Author Archives: Anthony

1970 April – 1970 October: Cabbage Tree Creek Sandgate. Pesticides detected: DDE, DDD, DDT

Cabbage Tree Creek, Sandgate (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.009, DDT 0.013

2/7/70

DDE 0.001

8/10/70

DDE 0.02, DDD 0.014

The Use of DDT in Australia - Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Cabbage Tree Creek, Sandgate (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.009, DDT 0.013

2/7/70

DDE 0.001

8/10/70

DDE 0.02, DDD 0.014

The Use of DDT in Australia – Australian Academy of Science February 1972

1970 April – 1970 October: Brisbane River Lytton. Pesticides: DDE, DDD, DDT

Brisbane River, Lyton (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.037, DDD 0.116, DDT 0.203

2/7/70

DDE 0.2, DDD 0.51, DDT 0.94

8/10/70

DDE 0.033, DDD 0.107, DDT 0.094

The Use of DDT in Australia - Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Brisbane River, Lyton (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.037, DDD 0.116, DDT 0.203

2/7/70

DDE 0.2, DDD 0.51, DDT 0.94

8/10/70

DDE 0.033, DDD 0.107, DDT 0.094

The Use of DDT in Australia – Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Tingalpa Creek, Lota (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.007, DDT 0.016

8/10/70

DDE 0.017, DDT 0.073

p71 The use of DDT in Australia - Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Tingalpa Creek, Lota (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.007, DDT 0.016

8/10/70

DDE 0.017, DDT 0.073

p71 The use of DDT in Australia – Australian Academy of Science February 1972

1970 April – 1970 October: Moogoorapum Creek Redland Bay. Pesticides: DDE, DDD, DDT

Moogoorapum Creek (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.022, DDD 0.02, DDT 0.029

2/7/70

DDE 0.035, DDT 0.11

8/10/70

DDE 0.035, DDD 0.01, DDT 0.26

p71 The use of DDT in Australia - Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Moogoorapum Creek (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.022, DDD 0.02, DDT 0.029

2/7/70

DDE 0.035, DDT 0.11

8/10/70

DDE 0.035, DDD 0.01, DDT 0.26

p71 The use of DDT in Australia – Australian Academy of Science February 1972

1970 April – 1970 October: DDT residues Logan River. Pesticides: DDE, DDT

Logan River (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.007

2/7/70

DDE 0.055

8/10/70

DDE 0.02, DDT 0.055

p71 The use of DDT in Australia - Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Logan River (Department of Primary Industries Brisbane)

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.007

2/7/70

DDE 0.055

8/10/70

DDE 0.02, DDT 0.055

p71 The use of DDT in Australia – Australian Academy of Science February 1972

1970 April – 1970 October: Coomera River – residues in Oysters. Pesticides: DDE, DDD, DDT

Coomera River

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.007, DDD 0.006, DDT 0.006

8/10/70

DDE 0.039, DDD 0.023, DDT 0.046

p71 The use of DDT in Australia - Australian Academy of Science February 1972

Coomera River

ug/g whole oyster meat

2/4/70

DDE 0.007, DDD 0.006, DDT 0.006

8/10/70

DDE 0.039, DDD 0.023, DDT 0.046

p71 The use of DDT in Australia – Australian Academy of Science February 1972

1972 February: Mareeba District reduction of birdlife. Pesticide: DDT

"... a reduction of bird life in the Mareeba district of Queensland where DDT is also used to protect tobacco..." p39 The use of DDT in Australia Feb 72. Australian Academy of Science

“… a reduction of bird life in the Mareeba district of Queensland where DDT is also used to protect tobacco…” p39 The use of DDT in Australia Feb 72. Australian Academy of Science

1938 June: Blackberry spraying starts: 2,4-D, Sodium Chlorate

MEANS TO STOP SPREAD OF BLACKBERRY PEST 1938 June

New Spray Proves Effective RESULTS AT FERNTREE GULLY

The first steps taken toward eradicating blackberries from the hill country have proved so effective that it is now hoped that means have been found of ridding thousands of acres of land, tourist tracks, and beauty spots of this creeping menace.

It has been demonstrated that a new type of weed killer will kill this destructive pest. It is now hoped that a concerted attack on blackberries will be made, with landholders, municipalities, and Government departments co-operating.

The extent to which blackberries ha\e| taken possession of the hill country and many other areas of the State has to be seen to be believed In the Dandenong Ranges thousands of acres of valuable and fertile land have been thrown out of production because of the spread of black- berries which in many cases have actually driven the owners out of possession Gullies fence Unes loads paddocks and whole farms are covered with the creeping menace which until now his stoutly defied any economic means to eradicate it

Tourist Spots Ruined

The most appalling aspect of the spread of this terrible weed is that it is .slowly but surely bringing min to our greatest tourist resorts in the near hills. With an insistence that will not be denied it is spreading over fern gullies, glades, glens and favourite tourist tracks, choking out the fern life, and making these once beautiful spots impassable. The curse it of spreading and increasing, taking possession of all.

Spraying, cutting, and burning, and the

Normal means of eradication have proved ineffective Landholders in the hill country have gone through heart breaklng experiences In efforts to keep the weed in check. Many have spent small fortunes, but still have not conquered the noxious menace.

Some time ago the agricultural experts and chemists of the technical services division of Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand Ltd determined to attack the blackberry eradication problem.  After long research they evolved a new type of weed killer called Atlacide. which is non-poisonous and does not involve risk of fire from chemicals.

New Spray Evolved

Because of the dangers of stock poisoning and fire by using sodium chlorate and other chemicals which wilI usually kill blackberries, research was undertaken to discover a solution or powder which was non poisonous and non inflammable. The i result was Atlacide which Is a combination of calcium and sodium chlorates and chlorides and Is applied either by spraying or dusting in the form of powder.

A practical test to determine the efficacy of this new weed killer was undertaken on March 7 last on blackberries of extremely dense growth on the Ferntree Gully-Upwey road In the presence of a large number of landholders and Government and municipal officials representatives of Imperial Chemlcal Industries demonstrated methods of using Atlacide by spraying and dusting as powder. The places treated were to be regarded as test plots which would be closelv studied to determine the efficacy of the spray It was also Intended tint the Initial spraying should be followed by others.

Proved Effective

Examination during the week end of the areas treated reveals that even with one spraying Atlacide appears to have achieved even more than was claimed for it.

  The dense and large blackberry canes have withered, and have received such a severe check that with another spraying they should be killed effectively. The chloride in Atlacide keeps the chemicals sprayed on to the leaf constantly moist, thus enabling them to be absorbed into the sap flow and taken right down to the roots. In this regard it appears to have done the job thoroughly'.

Some regrowth may be expected from seedlings which had not appeared above the ground before the first spraying or from roots not completely destroyed. These, however, may be treated during October or November. The one spraying has shown such definite results that it seems certain that if minor regrowths are sprayed before they become established the pest will be exterminated.

Similar good results with Atlacide are reported to have been achieved at various places in the Western district, Gippsland, and at Ballarat

MEANS TO STOP SPREAD OF BLACKBERRY PEST

New Spray Proves Effective RESULTS AT FERNTREE GULLY

The first steps taken toward eradicating blackberries from the hill country have proved so effective that it is now hoped that means have been found of ridding thousands of acres of land, tourist tracks, and beauty spots of this creeping menace.

It has been demonstrated that a new type of weed killer will kill this destructive pest. It is now hoped that a concerted attack on blackberries will be made, with landholders, municipalities, and Government departments co-operating.

The extent to which blackberries ha\e| taken possession of the hill country and many other areas of the State has to be seen to be believed In the Dandenong Ranges thousands of acres of valuable and fertile land have been thrown out of production because of the spread of black- berries which in many cases have actually driven the owners out of possession Gullies fence Unes loads paddocks and whole farms are covered with the creeping menace which until now his stoutly defied any economic means to eradicate it

Tourist Spots Ruined

The most appalling aspect of the spread of this terrible weed is that it is .slowly but surely bringing min to our greatest tourist resorts in the near hills. With an insistence that will not be denied it is spreading over fern gullies, glades, glens and favourite tourist tracks, choking out the fern life, and making these once beautiful spots impassable. The curse it of spreading and increasing, taking possession of all.

Spraying, cutting, and burning, and the

Normal means of eradication have proved ineffective Landholders in the hill country have gone through heart breaklng experiences In efforts to keep the weed in check. Many have spent small fortunes, but still have not conquered the noxious menace.

Some time ago the agricultural experts and chemists of the technical services division of Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand Ltd determined to attack the blackberry eradication problem.  After long research they evolved a new type of weed killer called Atlacide. which is non-poisonous and does not involve risk of fire from chemicals.

New Spray Evolved

Because of the dangers of stock poisoning and fire by using sodium chlorate and other chemicals which wilI usually kill blackberries, research was undertaken to discover a solution or powder which was non poisonous and non inflammable. The i result was Atlacide which Is a combination of calcium and sodium chlorates and chlorides and Is applied either by spraying or dusting in the form of powder.

A practical test to determine the efficacy of this new weed killer was undertaken on March 7 last on blackberries of extremely dense growth on the Ferntree Gully-Upwey road In the presence of a large number of landholders and Government and municipal officials representatives of Imperial Chemlcal Industries demonstrated methods of using Atlacide by spraying and dusting as powder. The places treated were to be regarded as test plots which would be closelv studied to determine the efficacy of the spray It was also Intended tint the Initial spraying should be followed by others.

Proved Effective

Examination during the week end of the areas treated reveals that even with one spraying Atlacide appears to have achieved even more than was claimed for it.

  The dense and large blackberry canes have withered, and have received such a severe check that with another spraying they should be killed effectively. The chloride in Atlacide keeps the chemicals sprayed on to the leaf constantly moist, thus enabling them to be absorbed into the sap flow and taken right down to the roots. In this regard it appears to have done the job thoroughly’.

Some regrowth may be expected from seedlings which had not appeared above the ground before the first spraying or from roots not completely destroyed. These, however, may be treated during October or November. The one spraying has shown such definite results that it seems certain that if minor regrowths are sprayed before they become established the pest will be exterminated.

Similar good results with Atlacide are reported to have been achieved at various places in the Western district, Gippsland, and at Ballarat

1976 November: Cancer Deaths Followed Sprays. Organochlorines

Cancer Deaths Followed Sprays. The Sun, 19 November 1976.

A Gembrook woman noted cancer deaths and illnesses in her diary for four years after aerial spraying of the Dandenong Ranges town in 1975. Among the entries are accounts of 24 cancer deaths within 1.6 kilometres of her home, five cases of cancer with the victims in remission, including her son; short and long term illnesses in her family and the townspeople including severe rashes, nausea, headaches, nerve and muscle disorders, weakness, irritability and dizziness.

The Pesticide Handbook put out by the International Organisation of Consumer Unions lists all the above symptoms as consistent with acute and chronic poisoning from organochlorine chemicals.

The woman recalls the spraying as a fog that hung in the air and smelt like a dead animal. "Those who got sprayed blamed all the symptoms on something else, but you couldn't escape the effects of the spray - it was in the air and water. In the end you weren't game to go to the doctor for fear of being thought of as a hypochondriac."

Her diary did not record incidents of suicide, heart failure, or death, aggravated asthma or marital breakdown, because she felt they may be unrelated. Now, she is not sure.

Cancer Deaths Followed Sprays. The Sun, 19 November 1976.

A Gembrook woman noted cancer deaths and illnesses in her diary for four years after aerial spraying of the Dandenong Ranges town in 1975. Among the entries are accounts of 24 cancer deaths within 1.6 kilometres of her home, five cases of cancer with the victims in remission, including her son; short and long term illnesses in her family and the townspeople including severe rashes, nausea, headaches, nerve and muscle disorders, weakness, irritability and dizziness.

The Pesticide Handbook put out by the International Organisation of Consumer Unions lists all the above symptoms as consistent with acute and chronic poisoning from organochlorine chemicals.

The woman recalls the spraying as a fog that hung in the air and smelt like a dead animal. “Those who got sprayed blamed all the symptoms on something else, but you couldn’t escape the effects of the spray – it was in the air and water. In the end you weren’t game to go to the doctor for fear of being thought of as a hypochondriac.”

Her diary did not record incidents of suicide, heart failure, or death, aggravated asthma or marital breakdown, because she felt they may be unrelated. Now, she is not sure.

1990: Clarence River NSW: OC residues in wildlife: Dieldrin, DDT

OC Residues in Wildlife of the Clarence River.

Source: Courtesy of Marianne Grinter - North Coast Environment Council, Stuarts Point NSW 1990.

Mullett: <0.1ppm Dieldrin, <0.01ppm DDT

Cormorant: <0.1ppm Dieldrin, ~0.8ppm DDT

Magpie: ~1.4ppm Dieldrin, 0.1ppm DDT

Kookaburra: 0.8ppm Dieldrin, 0.7ppm DDT

Bandicoot: 13ppm Dieldrin, 2.7ppm DDT

p114 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

OC Residues in Wildlife of the Clarence River.

Source: Courtesy of Marianne Grinter – North Coast Environment Council, Stuarts Point NSW 1990.

Mullett: <0.1ppm Dieldrin, <0.01ppm DDT

Cormorant: <0.1ppm Dieldrin, ~0.8ppm DDT

Magpie: ~1.4ppm Dieldrin, 0.1ppm DDT

Kookaburra: 0.8ppm Dieldrin, 0.7ppm DDT

Bandicoot: 13ppm Dieldrin, 2.7ppm DDT

p114 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1960’s – 1980’s: Sugarcane farmer health issues: Pesticides: 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, DDT, DDE, Dieldrin

I left school at 15 and worked on my father's farm for three years. I picked grapes for another two or three years after that and then in 1958 I began cutting cane by hand. In 1972 I bought a cane harvester and was employed as a contractor on a seasonal basis. I worked long hours, seven days a week.

Because I was healthy I could take the pace. Part of my job involved washing down the harvester with a high pressure spray. The water was taken from the cane drains and would hit the machine then bounce back, covering me. I had to spray underneath the machine too, so I was always wet. This process would go on for two hours every week. Often I would take mouthfuls of water and although it tasted poisonous I never thought twice about it. The farmers whom I contracted for knew that pesticides were in the water as they regularly sprayed the drains with 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T to keep them free of weeds. They could see I was covered from head to toe with the contaminated water but nothing was ever said. I began to feel sick during the '84 cane season and had to quit work at the end of the '85 season.

I've been to see lots of doctors. Many of my symptoms are recognised as being consistent with pesticide poisoning. They include eye irritation, bladder problems, excess saliva, bleeding from the nose and from the bowel. I also get tingling in the hands and around the mouth and in the feet and have regular sickness in the stomach. I also get muscles jumping in various parts of my body, have headaches, a fever-like sensation and nausea.

The doctors say that my major symptoms are constitutional. I can't concentrate well any more and get tired very easily. I get dizzy and irritable too. In 1988 I had blood taken by Dr Ryan and sent over to America. The results showed massive levels of DDE, a breakdown product of DDT. The average for the US population of DDE in blood is 5.6 ppb and I measured 62.6. My dieldrin and xylene levels were way over too. Some of the doctors I have seen concur with my view that I have been poisoned with pesticides. The government doctor doesn't think so though but when he took a blood sample, only a few pesticides were measured. They did DDT itself and got 17ppb but didn't measure the DDE though. The government doctor said that these measurements 'are not considered to indicate any significant degree of pesticide contamination. I'm going to continue with my compensation case though, as I am sure that I've been poisoned. p110/111 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

I left school at 15 and worked on my father’s farm for three years. I picked grapes for another two or three years after that and then in 1958 I began cutting cane by hand. In 1972 I bought a cane harvester and was employed as a contractor on a seasonal basis. I worked long hours, seven days a week.

Because I was healthy I could take the pace. Part of my job involved washing down the harvester with a high pressure spray. The water was taken from the cane drains and would hit the machine then bounce back, covering me. I had to spray underneath the machine too, so I was always wet. This process would go on for two hours every week. Often I would take mouthfuls of water and although it tasted poisonous I never thought twice about it. The farmers whom I contracted for knew that pesticides were in the water as they regularly sprayed the drains with 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T to keep them free of weeds. They could see I was covered from head to toe with the contaminated water but nothing was ever said. I began to feel sick during the ’84 cane season and had to quit work at the end of the ’85 season.

I’ve been to see lots of doctors. Many of my symptoms are recognised as being consistent with pesticide poisoning. They include eye irritation, bladder problems, excess saliva, bleeding from the nose and from the bowel. I also get tingling in the hands and around the mouth and in the feet and have regular sickness in the stomach. I also get muscles jumping in various parts of my body, have headaches, a fever-like sensation and nausea.

The doctors say that my major symptoms are constitutional. I can’t concentrate well any more and get tired very easily. I get dizzy and irritable too. In 1988 I had blood taken by Dr Ryan and sent over to America. The results showed massive levels of DDE, a breakdown product of DDT. The average for the US population of DDE in blood is 5.6 ppb and I measured 62.6. My dieldrin and xylene levels were way over too. Some of the doctors I have seen concur with my view that I have been poisoned with pesticides. The government doctor doesn’t think so though but when he took a blood sample, only a few pesticides were measured. They did DDT itself and got 17ppb but didn’t measure the DDE though. The government doctor said that these measurements ‘are not considered to indicate any significant degree of pesticide contamination. I’m going to continue with my compensation case though, as I am sure that I’ve been poisoned. p110/111 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980 – 1992: Mungindi NSW. Multiple pesticides + Parathion Methyl

All my life, the casual and careless use of poisons has worried me. With the commencement of aerial spraying in this area I became very worried, as the chemical seemed to go everywhere but where it was intended. In about 1980 my neighbour sprayed for weeds and the spray ended on my property. When I explained the problem he just laughed and said I must have got it all, because it didn't kill the weeds on his place.

In 1983, the spray on the property across the river killed cattle and literally thousands of birds, all species. The wild green budgies which were here in the thousands were completely wiped out.

Later that year, I discovered that my neighbour was going to grow cotton within 100 yards of my verandah. I was terribly worried because I knew he had nowehere to store his tailwater, he was so close to my home and I remembered the weed spraying incident about 1980. I rang all the government departments explaining my concerns about pesticide drift. I explained to Water Resources that the chemically polluted water would come back into the river and pollute my water supply. I got nowhere. They told me not to be a complaining old woman and when the irrigator's licence was granted, they did not even come near my place to see the impact it might have on me.

The cotton crop went ahead, with the tailwaters pouring directly into the river, which was my house supply. The aerial spraying was carried out in all wind conditions and just to add to my worries, the plane used to come straight at the house and pull out at the last minute. In February 1985, they sprayed before I could get the windows closed and I was savagely exposed to pesticides. It was early in the morning, but light enough to see, with a strong wind blowing directly at my house. There was no number on the plane, but I complained to the authorities just the same.

A month later the same thing happened again; early in the morning, my neighbour sprayed in a strong wind, and my house was full of chemicals again. I called the police and they followed the plane to the airport and confirmed that the plane had no number. The pesticide being used was the highly toxic methyl parathion. The police did make a report but there was no follow-up.

Problems with drift and water pollution continued, my health began to deteriorate badly and our Angora goats were suffering a lot of stress from the noise and chemicals. Four of the kids were born large and well-informed but dead. I sent tests away to Queensland University and they could find nothing amiss. They indicated that it could be chemical poisoning but that it was impossible to prove. We also had seven donkeys and five of them just died. An autopsy showed that it was a toxin that killed them but I was never informed exactly what it was. Four of our five horses just up and died together at the one time all with indications of poisoning.

In a few years the industry has just denuded this fertile area of trees, the river is dying, the water and bird life is diminishing at such a rate you can almost hear it happening. They are wiping out colonies of koalas without a second thought. The bees are nearly non-existent.

I have lived in this small town, about a thousand population, for 24 years. In early days there were a few cancer cases, a little asthma, viruses occasionally, stomach problems were rarely heard of and skin disorders not many. There was a bit of hay fever for those working around wheat in harvest time and that was how life went along. Then cotton came into the area with all the tonnes of chemicals. They get into the water, the air and on the people. Now we have a different situation. There have been 28 cases of cancer that I know of, also stillbirths, miscarriages and minor deformities. Asthma is rife and it is quite common for small children to have respiratory problems. Then there are the viruses that sweep town, but instead of recovering completely, people keep having relapses. Stomach complaints and skin disorders are commonplace now. What has caused this dramatic change in our community? It's the extensive use of chemicals and it's happening in other towns as well yet the authorities won't consider the evidence. Pat Jackson Mungindi, NSW. p109/110 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

All my life, the casual and careless use of poisons has worried me. With the commencement of aerial spraying in this area I became very worried, as the chemical seemed to go everywhere but where it was intended. In about 1980 my neighbour sprayed for weeds and the spray ended on my property. When I explained the problem he just laughed and said I must have got it all, because it didn’t kill the weeds on his place.

In 1983, the spray on the property across the river killed cattle and literally thousands of birds, all species. The wild green budgies which were here in the thousands were completely wiped out.

Later that year, I discovered that my neighbour was going to grow cotton within 100 yards of my verandah. I was terribly worried because I knew he had nowehere to store his tailwater, he was so close to my home and I remembered the weed spraying incident about 1980. I rang all the government departments explaining my concerns about pesticide drift. I explained to Water Resources that the chemically polluted water would come back into the river and pollute my water supply. I got nowhere. They told me not to be a complaining old woman and when the irrigator’s licence was granted, they did not even come near my place to see the impact it might have on me.

The cotton crop went ahead, with the tailwaters pouring directly into the river, which was my house supply. The aerial spraying was carried out in all wind conditions and just to add to my worries, the plane used to come straight at the house and pull out at the last minute. In February 1985, they sprayed before I could get the windows closed and I was savagely exposed to pesticides. It was early in the morning, but light enough to see, with a strong wind blowing directly at my house. There was no number on the plane, but I complained to the authorities just the same.

A month later the same thing happened again; early in the morning, my neighbour sprayed in a strong wind, and my house was full of chemicals again. I called the police and they followed the plane to the airport and confirmed that the plane had no number. The pesticide being used was the highly toxic methyl parathion. The police did make a report but there was no follow-up.

Problems with drift and water pollution continued, my health began to deteriorate badly and our Angora goats were suffering a lot of stress from the noise and chemicals. Four of the kids were born large and well-informed but dead. I sent tests away to Queensland University and they could find nothing amiss. They indicated that it could be chemical poisoning but that it was impossible to prove. We also had seven donkeys and five of them just died. An autopsy showed that it was a toxin that killed them but I was never informed exactly what it was. Four of our five horses just up and died together at the one time all with indications of poisoning.

In a few years the industry has just denuded this fertile area of trees, the river is dying, the water and bird life is diminishing at such a rate you can almost hear it happening. They are wiping out colonies of koalas without a second thought. The bees are nearly non-existent.

I have lived in this small town, about a thousand population, for 24 years. In early days there were a few cancer cases, a little asthma, viruses occasionally, stomach problems were rarely heard of and skin disorders not many. There was a bit of hay fever for those working around wheat in harvest time and that was how life went along. Then cotton came into the area with all the tonnes of chemicals. They get into the water, the air and on the people. Now we have a different situation. There have been 28 cases of cancer that I know of, also stillbirths, miscarriages and minor deformities. Asthma is rife and it is quite common for small children to have respiratory problems. Then there are the viruses that sweep town, but instead of recovering completely, people keep having relapses. Stomach complaints and skin disorders are commonplace now. What has caused this dramatic change in our community? It’s the extensive use of chemicals and it’s happening in other towns as well yet the authorities won’t consider the evidence. Pat Jackson Mungindi, NSW. p109/110 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

 

1991 May: Emerald Oval Pesticide Accident: Pesticide: 2,4-D

On May 19, 1991 a council worker accidently mixed a 2,4-D amine concentrate 50/50 with diesel and applied it to boundaries of the local oval. The label stipulated 2.8 litres per hectare, so over 100 times the recommended dose was applied. The mixture was applied at 11 am on the Saturday and was still detectable by smell on the Wednesday, after 2 days of rain. No samples were taken for analysis. An adult supervising children on the oval reported a rash on a boy's neck, a girl who became dizzy and an adult netball player who had an asthma attack. The council convened a meeting to discuss the incident and the health inspector said that there was no danger to anybody using the field. A Queensland Department of Primary Industry representative also reported a 'no-risk' finding after consultation with the NHMRC. He explained to Emerald residents that 2,4-D was not considered a serious hazard and that is not absorbed through the skin. This opinion is directly contradicted by information on another 2,4-D formulation, 2,4-D ester. The manufacturer's 1992 Material Safety Data Sheet explained that 'absorption through the skin is considered to be the major route whereby workers with 2,4-D ester are exposed. p103/4 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

On May 19, 1991 a council worker accidently mixed a 2,4-D amine concentrate 50/50 with diesel and applied it to boundaries of the local oval. The label stipulated 2.8 litres per hectare, so over 100 times the recommended dose was applied. The mixture was applied at 11 am on the Saturday and was still detectable by smell on the Wednesday, after 2 days of rain. No samples were taken for analysis. An adult supervising children on the oval reported a rash on a boy’s neck, a girl who became dizzy and an adult netball player who had an asthma attack. The council convened a meeting to discuss the incident and the health inspector said that there was no danger to anybody using the field. A Queensland Department of Primary Industry representative also reported a ‘no-risk’ finding after consultation with the NHMRC. He explained to Emerald residents that 2,4-D was not considered a serious hazard and that is not absorbed through the skin. This opinion is directly contradicted by information on another 2,4-D formulation, 2,4-D ester. The manufacturer’s 1992 Material Safety Data Sheet explained that ‘absorption through the skin is considered to be the major route whereby workers with 2,4-D ester are exposed. p103/4 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1980s: Perth. Death of Child. Pesticides Suspected: Atrazine, Amitrole

Many local councils use herbicides on parks, gardens and sports ovals where young people are likely to absorb them as they roll, run and play on grass and bare earth. One tragic case involved 6-year old Malcolm Sargent who went barefoot on his paper round in Perth. He absorbed the herbicides atrazine and amitrole through his skin on two seperate occasions, a week apart, and died of pneumonia four days after the second exposure. Although the link between exposure and death cannot be proved, Malcolm's prior excellent health suggests that he was a victim of pesticide poisoning. p103 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

Many local councils use herbicides on parks, gardens and sports ovals where young people are likely to absorb them as they roll, run and play on grass and bare earth. One tragic case involved 6-year old Malcolm Sargent who went barefoot on his paper round in Perth. He absorbed the herbicides atrazine and amitrole through his skin on two seperate occasions, a week apart, and died of pneumonia four days after the second exposure. Although the link between exposure and death cannot be proved, Malcolm’s prior excellent health suggests that he was a victim of pesticide poisoning. p103 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s – 1991: Yelgun Spray Drift and Health concerns: Pesticide: 2,4-D

*** from Yelgun has lived with the problem for 14 years, and is convinced that his family's health problems are directly related to pesticide spraying. Before they moved to the area, Stan and his wife were very healthy but now the family often suffers from watering eyes, sore throats and runny noses, vomiting. nausea and blinding headaches. Stan's wife had two stressful pregnancies and suffers from respiratory problems and Stan gets bad rashes on the face and arms. Their two sons were born with skeletal deformities in the feet and jaw and have problems with their concentration spans. The older boy suffered severe psychological trauma initiated when he was evacuated from his home, wrapped in plastic, during one particularly bad spray incident.

Stan has personally witnessed extensive spray drift onto his property, on many occasions under conditions of high wind when the risk of drift has been certain. In September 1991, pesticides were applied within 50 metres of his home and he recorded this and many other instances where careless application placed his and other families at risk. Stan has also written and made submissions to the NSW Government about pesticide mismanagement but his efforts have got him nowhere. Indeed, local government officials have sought to portray him as an unbalanced and emotionally driven person with little regard or knowledge of science, which, for them has shown that 2,4-D is harmless. p102/3 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

*** from Yelgun has lived with the problem for 14 years, and is convinced that his family’s health problems are directly related to pesticide spraying. Before they moved to the area, Stan and his wife were very healthy but now the family often suffers from watering eyes, sore throats and runny noses, vomiting. nausea and blinding headaches. Stan’s wife had two stressful pregnancies and suffers from respiratory problems and Stan gets bad rashes on the face and arms. Their two sons were born with skeletal deformities in the feet and jaw and have problems with their concentration spans. The older boy suffered severe psychological trauma initiated when he was evacuated from his home, wrapped in plastic, during one particularly bad spray incident.

Stan has personally witnessed extensive spray drift onto his property, on many occasions under conditions of high wind when the risk of drift has been certain. In September 1991, pesticides were applied within 50 metres of his home and he recorded this and many other instances where careless application placed his and other families at risk. Stan has also written and made submissions to the NSW Government about pesticide mismanagement but his efforts have got him nowhere. Indeed, local government officials have sought to portray him as an unbalanced and emotionally driven person with little regard or knowledge of science, which, for them has shown that 2,4-D is harmless. p102/3 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s: Bucca Qld. Health problems spray drift

My neighbours at Bucca, were determined to spray pesticides on their gum trees. No-one needs to spray gums and the couple of fruit trees  they did have could have been sprayed with products that would not have harmed me. They sprayed every 3 to 10 days in summer and the smell was in the air in our house and on our land. I knew that the sprays would affect me and my children badly so I arranged for several doctors to write to them and explain that I was extremely chemically sensitive. Even this would not change their minds and it became a pattern. 12 to 14 hours after they sprayed, my whole body function would just shut down with pain in every nerve and muscle. I was rushed to hospital by ambulance several times and on other occasions would lay in bed at home feeling that I was dying. The neighbours would not stop spraying and it was only after publicity that the Department of Agriculture finally did something to help. They got the neighbours to agree to temporarily stop spraying if we would agree to sell. The Health Department did nothing. My illness put so much stress on the family that we could not cope with a court case to fight for our rights. We sold our house for a song and moved. My husband had to give up work to care for me and for the children, who were emotionally damaged by their experience.

p102 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

My neighbours at Bucca, were determined to spray pesticides on their gum trees. No-one needs to spray gums and the couple of fruit trees  they did have could have been sprayed with products that would not have harmed me. They sprayed every 3 to 10 days in summer and the smell was in the air in our house and on our land. I knew that the sprays would affect me and my children badly so I arranged for several doctors to write to them and explain that I was extremely chemically sensitive. Even this would not change their minds and it became a pattern. 12 to 14 hours after they sprayed, my whole body function would just shut down with pain in every nerve and muscle. I was rushed to hospital by ambulance several times and on other occasions would lay in bed at home feeling that I was dying. The neighbours would not stop spraying and it was only after publicity that the Department of Agriculture finally did something to help. They got the neighbours to agree to temporarily stop spraying if we would agree to sell. The Health Department did nothing. My illness put so much stress on the family that we could not cope with a court case to fight for our rights. We sold our house for a song and moved. My husband had to give up work to care for me and for the children, who were emotionally damaged by their experience.

p102 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1983 August – Fixed Spray Installation Systems. Pesticide detected: Dichlorvos

Spraying with dichlorvos started in August 1983. It went on every day between 2 and 3 am til August 1984. The day before spraying commenced the Secretary/Manager of the club told us that there would be an automatic spray going off and not to get worried with the noise it made as it could not harm anybody. On the morning of the 19 November 1983, Manfred collapsed outside the Bistro. He managed to crawl downstairs to the auditorium where he was found slumped in a chair. He complained of chest pains, numbness in both legs and arms, blurred visions, sore and burning eyes. His tongue felt swollen, he had difficulty talking and was grey in the face with purplish coloured lips. We took him to Ryde Hospital immediately.

At that stage we didn't connect Dad's symptoms with his exposure to dichlorvos, and so we did not tell the Hospital that he had collapsed when his workplace. The doctor told us that he seemed to have suffered a heart attack and a specialist later remarked that he could not get over Manfred's remarkable recovery. Meanwhile the rest of us were working in the gas daily. *** was experiencing breathing difficulties and muscular aches and the doctor diagnosed bronchitis. She had chest pains as well, but was given an all clear by the heart specialist.

We cleaned in The Bistro every day. It was totally closed when the gas went off. The lights to this room were in the ladies toilet at the far end of the room, and to turn them on we just took a deep breath and ran through the gas with our breath held. When you looked back into the room you couldn't see anything but a heavy mist. The whole place was totally white with the mist and it fell on your skin when you went through. All of us were suffering from the same symptoms and rashes. We also had massive weight loss without being on diets and were all very moody, aggressive and extremely tired.

In March 1984 we started another contract cleaning job at another RSL Club. The spray went off when we were inside the club. Although it was only supposed to go off once a week, it went off on numerous occasions each week. Manfred started asking for details about the gas and both the assistant manager and the spokesperson for the company that hired out the gas cylinders told him it was not residual and would not harm humans. There were no warning signs except in the assistant manager's office. In late January 1986, the company changed over to another pesticide. We were sacked in March 1986 and always felt that it was our complaints about the gas that caused our dismissal.

Meanwhile *** and Manfred didn't get any better. They were referred to a toxicologist because their GP couldn't work out what was wrong with them. The specialist gave them tests and recommended a solicitor who could handle the compensation and damages suit. But *** and Dad were only trying to find out what was wrong with them, not take out a suit against the clubs. They wanted to stop it happening to anybody else.

The solictor handled the case for four and a half years but nothing was done. In mid 1990 we rang the Total Environment Centre and they recommended that we transfer our case to a lawyer who specialises in this sort of poisoning. Things have moved much quicker since then.

Dad died on the 14th of April, 1990, aged 57. He was reasonably healthy during his last six months except for experiencing a loss of hearing on his left side and a loss of hearing in his left ear. We are waiting for the coroner's results and would like an enquiry into Manfred's death. *** Gladesville NSW, July 1990.

p95/6 Quick Poison Slow Poison Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

Spraying with dichlorvos started in August 1983. It went on every day between 2 and 3 am til August 1984. The day before spraying commenced the Secretary/Manager of the club told us that there would be an automatic spray going off and not to get worried with the noise it made as it could not harm anybody. On the morning of the 19 November 1983, Manfred collapsed outside the Bistro. He managed to crawl downstairs to the auditorium where he was found slumped in a chair. He complained of chest pains, numbness in both legs and arms, blurred visions, sore and burning eyes. His tongue felt swollen, he had difficulty talking and was grey in the face with purplish coloured lips. We took him to Ryde Hospital immediately.

At that stage we didn’t connect Dad’s symptoms with his exposure to dichlorvos, and so we did not tell the Hospital that he had collapsed when his workplace. The doctor told us that he seemed to have suffered a heart attack and a specialist later remarked that he could not get over Manfred’s remarkable recovery. Meanwhile the rest of us were working in the gas daily. *** was experiencing breathing difficulties and muscular aches and the doctor diagnosed bronchitis. She had chest pains as well, but was given an all clear by the heart specialist.

We cleaned in The Bistro every day. It was totally closed when the gas went off. The lights to this room were in the ladies toilet at the far end of the room, and to turn them on we just took a deep breath and ran through the gas with our breath held. When you looked back into the room you couldn’t see anything but a heavy mist. The whole place was totally white with the mist and it fell on your skin when you went through. All of us were suffering from the same symptoms and rashes. We also had massive weight loss without being on diets and were all very moody, aggressive and extremely tired.

In March 1984 we started another contract cleaning job at another RSL Club. The spray went off when we were inside the club. Although it was only supposed to go off once a week, it went off on numerous occasions each week. Manfred started asking for details about the gas and both the assistant manager and the spokesperson for the company that hired out the gas cylinders told him it was not residual and would not harm humans. There were no warning signs except in the assistant manager’s office. In late January 1986, the company changed over to another pesticide. We were sacked in March 1986 and always felt that it was our complaints about the gas that caused our dismissal.

Meanwhile *** and Manfred didn’t get any better. They were referred to a toxicologist because their GP couldn’t work out what was wrong with them. The specialist gave them tests and recommended a solicitor who could handle the compensation and damages suit. But *** and Dad were only trying to find out what was wrong with them, not take out a suit against the clubs. They wanted to stop it happening to anybody else.

The solictor handled the case for four and a half years but nothing was done. In mid 1990 we rang the Total Environment Centre and they recommended that we transfer our case to a lawyer who specialises in this sort of poisoning. Things have moved much quicker since then.

Dad died on the 14th of April, 1990, aged 57. He was reasonably healthy during his last six months except for experiencing a loss of hearing on his left side and a loss of hearing in his left ear. We are waiting for the coroner’s results and would like an enquiry into Manfred’s death. *** Gladesville NSW, July 1990.

p95/6 Quick Poison Slow Poison Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1995 January: Footscray. Pesticides in Breast Milk. Pesticides detected: Heptachlor, DDT

Breast-milk Research Reveals Excessive Levels Of Pesticide

The Age

Wednesday January 18, 1995

STEVE DOW

Excessive levels of the pesticide heptachlor have been found in the breast milk of one-third of first-time mothers tested in a Melbourne study.

Heptachlor, from the group of organochlorides that includes DDT and dieldrin, is commonly used against termites in houses. Authorities have already acted on concerns about its longevity in the environment, with a ban to begin on 30 June.

The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology's Centre for Applied and Nutritional Toxicology studied 57 milk samples from 23 women from Cranbourne and Footscray.

Researchers Ms Diana Donohue and Ms Patricia Quinsey extracted fat from the milk samples and weighed babies to compare intakes of organochlorides.

One-third of the samples were positive to heptachlor, showing levels above the World Health Organisation's acceptable daily intake, which is 0.1 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. Half were between 0.1 and 0.225 micrograms, the other half were above 0.225.

The study also found that every milk sample had traces of DDT, which has been banned in Australia for several years.

However, the average level of DDT in mothers' milk fat is below the WHO's acceptable levels.

Ms Donohue said it was important to note that the WHO's levels were conservative and applied to lifetime exposure, rather than just the time a baby is breastfed.

Despite the chemical residues, she was convinced that the benefits of breastfeeding outweighed the doubts.

``It's the only balanced formula for babies," she said. ``It also contains antibodies against disease to give babies a head start."

The National Registration Authority will deregister the last two of the main organochlorides, heptachlor and chlordane, on 30 June.

The vice-president of the Australian Environmental Pest Managers Association, Mr Peter Meadows, said there was no evidence of long-term health effects in humans from the ``minute quantities" of heptachlor used to kill termites in houses.

``The Australian public is being denied a very safe and effective tool," he said. The alternative, a phosphate called chlorpyrifos, would add $3000 to the cost of a house, he said.

Breast-milk Research Reveals Excessive Levels Of Pesticide

The Age Wednesday January 18, 1995 STEVE DOW

Excessive levels of the pesticide heptachlor have been found in the breast milk of one-third of first-time mothers tested in a Melbourne study.

Heptachlor, from the group of organochlorides that includes DDT and dieldrin, is commonly used against termites in houses. Authorities have already acted on concerns about its longevity in the environment, with a ban to begin on 30 June.

The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology’s Centre for Applied and Nutritional Toxicology studied 57 milk samples from 23 women from Cranbourne and Footscray.

Researchers Ms Diana Donohue and Ms Patricia Quinsey extracted fat from the milk samples and weighed babies to compare intakes of organochlorides.

One-third of the samples were positive to heptachlor, showing levels above the World Health Organisation’s acceptable daily intake, which is 0.1 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. Half were between 0.1 and 0.225 micrograms, the other half were above 0.225.

The study also found that every milk sample had traces of DDT, which has been banned in Australia for several years.

However, the average level of DDT in mothers’ milk fat is below the WHO’s acceptable levels.

Ms Donohue said it was important to note that the WHO’s levels were conservative and applied to lifetime exposure, rather than just the time a baby is breastfed.

Despite the chemical residues, she was convinced that the benefits of breastfeeding outweighed the doubts.

“It’s the only balanced formula for babies,” she said. “It also contains antibodies against disease to give babies a head start.”

The National Registration Authority will deregister the last two of the main organochlorides, heptachlor and chlordane, on 30 June.

The vice-president of the Australian Environmental Pest Managers Association, Mr Peter Meadows, said there was no evidence of long-term health effects in humans from the “minute quantities” of heptachlor used to kill termites in houses.

“The Australian public is being denied a very safe and effective tool,” he said. The alternative, a phosphate called chlorpyrifos, would add $3000 to the cost of a house, he said.

1995: Cranbourne. Women’s Breast Milk. Pesticides detected: Heptachlor, DDT

Breast-milk Research Reveals Excessive Levels Of Pesticide

The Age

Wednesday January 18, 1995

STEVE DOW

Excessive levels of the pesticide heptachlor have been found in the breast milk of one-third of first-time mothers tested in a Melbourne study.

Heptachlor, from the group of organochlorides that includes DDT and dieldrin, is commonly used against termites in houses. Authorities have already acted on concerns about its longevity in the environment, with a ban to begin on 30 June.

The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology's Centre for Applied and Nutritional Toxicology studied 57 milk samples from 23 women from Cranbourne and Footscray.

Researchers Ms Diana Donohue and Ms Patricia Quinsey extracted fat from the milk samples and weighed babies to compare intakes of organochlorides.

One-third of the samples were positive to heptachlor, showing levels above the World Health Organisation's acceptable daily intake, which is 0.1 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. Half were between 0.1 and 0.225 micrograms, the other half were above 0.225.

The study also found that every milk sample had traces of DDT, which has been banned in Australia for several years.

However, the average level of DDT in mothers' milk fat is below the WHO's acceptable levels.

Ms Donohue said it was important to note that the WHO's levels were conservative and applied to lifetime exposure, rather than just the time a baby is breastfed.

Despite the chemical residues, she was convinced that the benefits of breastfeeding outweighed the doubts.

``It's the only balanced formula for babies," she said. ``It also contains antibodies against disease to give babies a head start."

The National Registration Authority will deregister the last two of the main organochlorides, heptachlor and chlordane, on 30 June.

The vice-president of the Australian Environmental Pest Managers Association, Mr Peter Meadows, said there was no evidence of long-term health effects in humans from the ``minute quantities" of heptachlor used to kill termites in houses.

``The Australian public is being denied a very safe and effective tool," he said. The alternative, a phosphate called chlorpyrifos, would add $3000 to the cost of a house, he said.

Breast-milk Research Reveals Excessive Levels Of Pesticide

The Age

Wednesday January 18, 1995

STEVE DOW

Excessive levels of the pesticide heptachlor have been found in the breast milk of one-third of first-time mothers tested in a Melbourne study.

Heptachlor, from the group of organochlorides that includes DDT and dieldrin, is commonly used against termites in houses. Authorities have already acted on concerns about its longevity in the environment, with a ban to begin on 30 June.

The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology’s Centre for Applied and Nutritional Toxicology studied 57 milk samples from 23 women from Cranbourne and Footscray.

Researchers Ms Diana Donohue and Ms Patricia Quinsey extracted fat from the milk samples and weighed babies to compare intakes of organochlorides.

One-third of the samples were positive to heptachlor, showing levels above the World Health Organisation’s acceptable daily intake, which is 0.1 micrograms per kilogram of body weight. Half were between 0.1 and 0.225 micrograms, the other half were above 0.225.

The study also found that every milk sample had traces of DDT, which has been banned in Australia for several years.

However, the average level of DDT in mothers’ milk fat is below the WHO’s acceptable levels.

Ms Donohue said it was important to note that the WHO’s levels were conservative and applied to lifetime exposure, rather than just the time a baby is breastfed.

Despite the chemical residues, she was convinced that the benefits of breastfeeding outweighed the doubts.

“It’s the only balanced formula for babies,” she said. “It also contains antibodies against disease to give babies a head start.”

The National Registration Authority will deregister the last two of the main organochlorides, heptachlor and chlordane, on 30 June.

The vice-president of the Australian Environmental Pest Managers Association, Mr Peter Meadows, said there was no evidence of long-term health effects in humans from the “minute quantities” of heptachlor used to kill termites in houses.

“The Australian public is being denied a very safe and effective tool,” he said. The alternative, a phosphate called chlorpyrifos, would add $3000 to the cost of a house, he said.

1996 January: Moree Cattle Contamination. Pesticide detected: Chlorflurazuron, Endosulfan

Beef's Image Takes A Hiding

Sydney Morning Herald Saturday January 20, 1996

DAVID PASSEY

Australia's beef exports took a double blow this week as the US claimed our meat testing was deficient, and pesticide residues were found in some beef. DAVID PASSEY reports.

NOT long after dark, on the evening of December 6, the phone rang at Bill Coote's cattle property, 20 kilometres west of Moree. He had been expecting the call from his stock agent, but not the bad news. "Mate, we could have a problem with those cattle you sent in. It looks like chemicals - again."

Coote said nothing. Just 14 months earlier, residues of a cotton chemical, Helix , had forced his herd into quarantine and cost him $80,000. The prospect that his cattle might again face chemical contamination seemed unbelievable.

But, as the fax began to whistle early the next morning, chemical analysis from the abattoir spelt out a new disaster: 25 of his cattle were to be condemned for exceeding the maximum residue limit of endosulphin , the active ingredient in an unrelated but widely used crop spray.

"It was an awful feeling," said Coote. "I kept thinking, 'once, maybe, but surely not twice'. What was so utterly frustrating was that I knew damn well we hadn't used that chemical and I knew another quarantine situation would crucify our cash flow."

Coote's revelation was a warning that things could again be about to go badly wrong for the cattle industry.

Helix contamination of Australian beef in October 1994 sent export markets into a panic after the United States, Japan, Canada, Taiwan and Korea impounded 60,000 tonnes of meat for testing.

Authorities in Australia were forced to quarantine more than a million cattle in NSW and Queensland after cotton trash, treated with Helix and thought to be safe fodder, was found to be the culprit. Japan took Australian produce off the supermarket shelves and our reputation as a clean and green producer was in jeopardy.

After the release of the beef and $3 million spent on promotion to shore up our image, the $3-billion annual export trade was again beginning to look secure. The last thing Australia needed was another chemical scare.

But now, 23 properties in NSW have been placed under quarantine for excessive levels of endosulphin sulphate. Tests have detected the chemical in 30 more herds and abattoirs have destroyed more than 100 contaminated carcasses.

NSW Agriculture is unsure how many could be affected.

No-one is certain where Coote's problem came from. Neighbouring farms were known to use the endosulphin sprays and NSW Agriculture said spray drift was a likely cause.

"I'm not going to say it was spray drift," Coote said. "But the fairies didn't bring it."

The environmental director of the Australian Cotton Foundation, Harvey Baker, put the industry on red alert and stepped up research programs into endosulphin's chemical effects. He is not taking responsibility, but neither is he denying it.

So far, the problem remains on-shore, with contaminated beef yet to escape the residue-testing net. NSW Agriculture says endosulphin will not be the crisis Helix became because the chemical clears cattle in six weeks, much faster than Helix.

But it is yet another signal that our now sensitised export markets did not need to hear. And it comes in the week that a new and potentially much more damaging problem has been uncovered in the Australian beef processing industry.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has put Australia on notice that, unless serious flaws in our meat inspections and chemical testing systems can be addressed by the February 8 deadline, the US will halt our $1 billion beef trade.

USDA inspections of 30 Australian abattoirs late last year found standards at six meatworks "unacceptable" and they were barred immediately from the right to export to the US, pending improvements. Another eight were deemed to be "marginally unacceptable".

A TERSE letter of notification, sent to the Australian Quarantine Inspection Service (AQIS) and obtained by the Herald, accused the industry of "large-scale non-compliance" with US requirements. It said the inspector found "significant deficiencies in residue-testing laboratories used by the Australian meat inspection system".

Crisis meetings between industry and the Government began last week, as experts scrambled to avert what the Cattle Council of Australia said would be the worst disaster to hit the Australian industry yet.

AQIS has moved fast to meet the four key demands set down by the US. These include an in-depth investigation into the causes and events leading to non-compliance, specific action at faulty plants, an action plan to avert future repetition, and the correction of deficiencies in all residue-testing laboratories.

"We are seriously concerned," the acting executive director, Brian McDonald, said in an interview with the Herald. "The report does indicate they have found serious difficulties and it is indicative of problems in laboratory systems in Australia.

"But there is no doubt we will satisfy the US requirements by deadline. This is not a crisis and we are confident our international markets will not react to what are specific problems at specific plants."

But McDonald did concede that the industry had "endemic problems" and that some of the faults had the potential to harm hygiene and product quality if they were not tackled.

While he would not divulge the specific nature of the problems, he stressed that all Australian beef was safe for consumption and said consumers here and overseas should not be alarmed. Four of the six unacceptable plants were already back up to standard, he said.

Out in the paddock, an air of disquiet has descended upon farmers, who believe they are producing the world's best and cheapest beef in the cleanest of environments, only to have their efforts compromised by issues over which they have no control.

They see the set of events as a trifecta that has the potential to undermine Australia's credibility and drive buyers to the cheaper, emerging beef suppliers of South America.

"Add together Helix, endosulphin and the abattoir problems and we have got a big image problem," said Errol Rush, a Boggabri cattle farmer who was badly burnt by Helix. "Put it this way, if I was an overseas buyer, I'd be looking elsewhere."

Farmers wincing under the pressures of drought and chemical contamination are beginning to point a legal finger at those they say are to blame. They have started a class action against Federal and State governments, and the ICI chemical company.

At stake is an estimated $125 million worth of damages. The solicitor undertaking the campaign on a no-win, no-pay basis, Peter Long of Gunnedah, says he is also preparing a case on endosulphin, which he expects to lodge in two months.

At the heart of the accusations is the alleged failure of the National Registration Authority for agricultural and veterinary chemicals (NRA) to label pesticides adequately. With both endosulphin and Helix, the NRA was forced to change labels and give stricter instructions.

But the NRA disputes any negligence. It argues that the knowledge of chemical effects is constantly changing and that its job is to respond to changes as new information becomes available.

Every time a new issue hits the headlines, the president of the Cattle Council of Australia, John Wyld, is forced off his cattle property in western Victoria and on to the phone. Farming, he says, is easier.

"The issues are all very serious, no doubt about it, but they are also manageable. The US threat to cut our trade is the most serious issue our industry has faced. But we will fix it - the consequences if we don't are just too catastrophic.

"The main thing is to keep all these issues in perspective and deal with them fast and efficiently. We have to be very conscious of our image, when reality and logic tend to go out the window. We can't have any more residue issues and we must fix the meatworks."

Wyld says the US is not picking on Australia, but reacting to internal political issues.

"Over the past 18 months the US has had a spate of food-poisoning deaths - nothing to do with product quality and everything to do with handling and cooking problems. But it has become a huge emotive issue over there, and that is the background to the tough tests they are imposing on exporters everywhere in the world."

But even in the face of adversity, Wyld does not give Australia's meatworks a clean bill of health. He says poor practice is entrenched in some areas and the "big stick" approach of AQIS and the USDA is doomed to fail.

"What we need is a massive culture shift, and that means labour market reform. Until workers get incentives to perform well, they will take short cuts. It's like the speeding motorist and the policeman. If the coppers are not around, the motorists will speed."

But while many growers are looking back over their shoulders, trying to divine blame for past events, some realise that future performance is the key to industry credibility.

Dominic Osborne, a cattle grower at Bungendore, near Canberra, is the chairman of a new Cattle-Care program, designed to drill quality assurance into every step of on-farm production.

"Look, these events have alarmed and horrified worried growers," Osborne said. "The signals being sent to all markets are bad news. But I am confident we can tidy our act.

"Even as these problems are upon us, we must secure the future. Australia has one of the toughest environments on earth and for us to win the trade battles we must produce the cleanest and best beef around. That will not happen without rigid strategies.

"Once we do that we can expect it of the entire beef production chain. It is crunch time; we must get smart with our management and marketing. Only that will secure the future."

Beef’s Image Takes A Hiding

Sydney Morning Herald Saturday January 20, 1996

DAVID PASSEY

Australia’s beef exports took a double blow this week as the US claimed our meat testing was deficient, and pesticide residues were found in some beef. DAVID PASSEY reports.

NOT long after dark, on the evening of December 6, the phone rang at Bill Coote’s cattle property, 20 kilometres west of Moree. He had been expecting the call from his stock agent, but not the bad news. “Mate, we could have a problem with those cattle you sent in. It looks like chemicals – again.”

Coote said nothing. Just 14 months earlier, residues of a cotton chemical, Helix , had forced his herd into quarantine and cost him $80,000. The prospect that his cattle might again face chemical contamination seemed unbelievable.

But, as the fax began to whistle early the next morning, chemical analysis from the abattoir spelt out a new disaster: 25 of his cattle were to be condemned for exceeding the maximum residue limit of endosulphin , the active ingredient in an unrelated but widely used crop spray.

“It was an awful feeling,” said Coote. “I kept thinking, ‘once, maybe, but surely not twice’. What was so utterly frustrating was that I knew damn well we hadn’t used that chemical and I knew another quarantine situation would crucify our cash flow.”

Coote’s revelation was a warning that things could again be about to go badly wrong for the cattle industry.

Helix contamination of Australian beef in October 1994 sent export markets into a panic after the United States, Japan, Canada, Taiwan and Korea impounded 60,000 tonnes of meat for testing.

Authorities in Australia were forced to quarantine more than a million cattle in NSW and Queensland after cotton trash, treated with Helix and thought to be safe fodder, was found to be the culprit. Japan took Australian produce off the supermarket shelves and our reputation as a clean and green producer was in jeopardy.

After the release of the beef and $3 million spent on promotion to shore up our image, the $3-billion annual export trade was again beginning to look secure. The last thing Australia needed was another chemical scare.

But now, 23 properties in NSW have been placed under quarantine for excessive levels of endosulphin sulphate. Tests have detected the chemical in 30 more herds and abattoirs have destroyed more than 100 contaminated carcasses.

NSW Agriculture is unsure how many could be affected.

No-one is certain where Coote’s problem came from. Neighbouring farms were known to use the endosulphin sprays and NSW Agriculture said spray drift was a likely cause.

“I’m not going to say it was spray drift,” Coote said. “But the fairies didn’t bring it.”

The environmental director of the Australian Cotton Foundation, Harvey Baker, put the industry on red alert and stepped up research programs into endosulphin’s chemical effects. He is not taking responsibility, but neither is he denying it.

So far, the problem remains on-shore, with contaminated beef yet to escape the residue-testing net. NSW Agriculture says endosulphin will not be the crisis Helix became because the chemical clears cattle in six weeks, much faster than Helix.

But it is yet another signal that our now sensitised export markets did not need to hear. And it comes in the week that a new and potentially much more damaging problem has been uncovered in the Australian beef processing industry.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has put Australia on notice that, unless serious flaws in our meat inspections and chemical testing systems can be addressed by the February 8 deadline, the US will halt our $1 billion beef trade.

USDA inspections of 30 Australian abattoirs late last year found standards at six meatworks “unacceptable” and they were barred immediately from the right to export to the US, pending improvements. Another eight were deemed to be “marginally unacceptable”.

A TERSE letter of notification, sent to the Australian Quarantine Inspection Service (AQIS) and obtained by the Herald, accused the industry of “large-scale non-compliance” with US requirements. It said the inspector found “significant deficiencies in residue-testing laboratories used by the Australian meat inspection system”.

Crisis meetings between industry and the Government began last week, as experts scrambled to avert what the Cattle Council of Australia said would be the worst disaster to hit the Australian industry yet.

AQIS has moved fast to meet the four key demands set down by the US. These include an in-depth investigation into the causes and events leading to non-compliance, specific action at faulty plants, an action plan to avert future repetition, and the correction of deficiencies in all residue-testing laboratories.

“We are seriously concerned,” the acting executive director, Brian McDonald, said in an interview with the Herald. “The report does indicate they have found serious difficulties and it is indicative of problems in laboratory systems in Australia.

“But there is no doubt we will satisfy the US requirements by deadline. This is not a crisis and we are confident our international markets will not react to what are specific problems at specific plants.”

But McDonald did concede that the industry had “endemic problems” and that some of the faults had the potential to harm hygiene and product quality if they were not tackled.

While he would not divulge the specific nature of the problems, he stressed that all Australian beef was safe for consumption and said consumers here and overseas should not be alarmed. Four of the six unacceptable plants were already back up to standard, he said.

Out in the paddock, an air of disquiet has descended upon farmers, who believe they are producing the world’s best and cheapest beef in the cleanest of environments, only to have their efforts compromised by issues over which they have no control.

They see the set of events as a trifecta that has the potential to undermine Australia’s credibility and drive buyers to the cheaper, emerging beef suppliers of South America.

“Add together Helix, endosulphin and the abattoir problems and we have got a big image problem,” said Errol Rush, a Boggabri cattle farmer who was badly burnt by Helix. “Put it this way, if I was an overseas buyer, I’d be looking elsewhere.”

Farmers wincing under the pressures of drought and chemical contamination are beginning to point a legal finger at those they say are to blame. They have started a class action against Federal and State governments, and the ICI chemical company.

At stake is an estimated $125 million worth of damages. The solicitor undertaking the campaign on a no-win, no-pay basis, Peter Long of Gunnedah, says he is also preparing a case on endosulphin, which he expects to lodge in two months.

At the heart of the accusations is the alleged failure of the National Registration Authority for agricultural and veterinary chemicals (NRA) to label pesticides adequately. With both endosulphin and Helix, the NRA was forced to change labels and give stricter instructions.

But the NRA disputes any negligence. It argues that the knowledge of chemical effects is constantly changing and that its job is to respond to changes as new information becomes available.

Every time a new issue hits the headlines, the president of the Cattle Council of Australia, John Wyld, is forced off his cattle property in western Victoria and on to the phone. Farming, he says, is easier.

“The issues are all very serious, no doubt about it, but they are also manageable. The US threat to cut our trade is the most serious issue our industry has faced. But we will fix it – the consequences if we don’t are just too catastrophic.

“The main thing is to keep all these issues in perspective and deal with them fast and efficiently. We have to be very conscious of our image, when reality and logic tend to go out the window. We can’t have any more residue issues and we must fix the meatworks.”

Wyld says the US is not picking on Australia, but reacting to internal political issues.

“Over the past 18 months the US has had a spate of food-poisoning deaths – nothing to do with product quality and everything to do with handling and cooking problems. But it has become a huge emotive issue over there, and that is the background to the tough tests they are imposing on exporters everywhere in the world.”

But even in the face of adversity, Wyld does not give Australia’s meatworks a clean bill of health. He says poor practice is entrenched in some areas and the “big stick” approach of AQIS and the USDA is doomed to fail.

“What we need is a massive culture shift, and that means labour market reform. Until workers get incentives to perform well, they will take short cuts. It’s like the speeding motorist and the policeman. If the coppers are not around, the motorists will speed.”

But while many growers are looking back over their shoulders, trying to divine blame for past events, some realise that future performance is the key to industry credibility.

Dominic Osborne, a cattle grower at Bungendore, near Canberra, is the chairman of a new Cattle-Care program, designed to drill quality assurance into every step of on-farm production.

“Look, these events have alarmed and horrified worried growers,” Osborne said. “The signals being sent to all markets are bad news. But I am confident we can tidy our act.

“Even as these problems are upon us, we must secure the future. Australia has one of the toughest environments on earth and for us to win the trade battles we must produce the cleanest and best beef around. That will not happen without rigid strategies.

“Once we do that we can expect it of the entire beef production chain. It is crunch time; we must get smart with our management and marketing. Only that will secure the future.”

1996 August: Macquarie Valley. Pesticide detected: Endosulfan

Alarm Over River Pesticide Levels

Sun Herald

Saturday August 10, 1996

By HEATH GILMORE Environment Reporter

CHEMICALS linked to liver disease and human hormone level changes have been found in growing concentrations in major NSW rivers.

The Central and North-West Water Quality program showed pesticide levels had increased in the Namoi River and remained stable in the Gwydir and Macquarie Valley.

All sites within the survey area during the November to March spraying season failed to meet Australia and New Zealand Environment Consultative Council ecosystem guidelines for the pesticide Endosulfan.

This chemical is possibly the most widely used in cotton, sunflower, soybean and oilseed crop production and has been linked to liver disease and changing human hormone levels.

The study also found fish kills in the rivers had been linked to insecticides and herbicides in the region. Cotton farmers had financially supported the scientific analysis of water pollutants since 1990.

Land and Water Conservation Minister Kim Yeadon said this year's results showed a continuing problem with water quality.

"The results of this study show we cannot be complacent about the way pesticides and nutrients are used," Mr Yeadon said.

"There has been no decrease in levels of pesticides in the rivers which are studied and it showed the enormous loss of valuable top soil that occurs in storms.

"Most farmers are aware of the challenge and how they can help by the wise use of agricultural chemicals and fertilisers, the erosion control measures they take and by adopting techniques which minimise the use of water."

National Parks Association president Anne Reeves said the latest survey findings were disturbing. She said the impact on the surrounding ecology was of great concern.

"Our rivers in these regions are already in strife and empty into important areas, such as the Macquarie Marshes," she said.

"This report shows that we have to lift our games further."

This report shows we have to lift our games further

Alarm Over River Pesticide Levels

Sun Herald Saturday August 10, 1996

By HEATH GILMORE Environment Reporter

CHEMICALS linked to liver disease and human hormone level changes have been found in growing concentrations in major NSW rivers.

The Central and North-West Water Quality program showed pesticide levels had increased in the Namoi River and remained stable in the Gwydir and Macquarie Valley.

All sites within the survey area during the November to March spraying season failed to meet Australia and New Zealand Environment Consultative Council ecosystem guidelines for the pesticide Endosulfan.

This chemical is possibly the most widely used in cotton, sunflower, soybean and oilseed crop production and has been linked to liver disease and changing human hormone levels.

The study also found fish kills in the rivers had been linked to insecticides and herbicides in the region. Cotton farmers had financially supported the scientific analysis of water pollutants since 1990.

Land and Water Conservation Minister Kim Yeadon said this year’s results showed a continuing problem with water quality.

“The results of this study show we cannot be complacent about the way pesticides and nutrients are used,” Mr Yeadon said.

“There has been no decrease in levels of pesticides in the rivers which are studied and it showed the enormous loss of valuable top soil that occurs in storms.

“Most farmers are aware of the challenge and how they can help by the wise use of agricultural chemicals and fertilisers, the erosion control measures they take and by adopting techniques which minimise the use of water.”

National Parks Association president Anne Reeves said the latest survey findings were disturbing. She said the impact on the surrounding ecology was of great concern.

“Our rivers in these regions are already in strife and empty into important areas, such as the Macquarie Marshes,” she said.

“This report shows that we have to lift our games further.”

This report shows we have to lift our games further

1997 March: OP Pesticide Spill Morwell

Tough New Controls On Way For Pesticide Used To Kill Pets

Sydney Morning Herald

Monday April 14, 1997

By BOB BEALE Science and Environment Editor

Tough new national controls are likely to be placed on a potentially deadly horticultural pesticide linked to the widespread deliberate poisoning of domestic animals and wildlife.

The controls, which Canberra sources say will be announced soon, follow an incident last month in which 100 litres of the pesticide spilled into a shopping centre when a drum fell from a truck in Morwell, Victoria.

A few drops taken orally can kill an adult human and it acts so quickly that veterinarians often cannot save animals poisoned by it. It is used legally in horticulture to kill insect pests. The Australian Veterinary Association's Sydney branch president, Dr Kersti Seksel, says the organophosphate insecticide is an acutely toxic member of the nerve gas family and was withdrawn from sale voluntarily in the United States in 1994.

In the AVA's newsletter, Dr Seksel warns that the pesticide is still available in Australia and appears to be commonly and illegally used to kill pets and wild birds, especially those that affect crops.

"It is sold in NSW without any record of its sale being kept," Dr Seksel says. "A 500 ml bottle, costing around $65, contains enough compound to kill 2,000 adult humans, the lethal oral dose being just 0.25 ml.

"It is clearly a quick and cost-effective way for pet-haters, for whatever reason, to take matters into their own hands and get rid of perceived animal 'problems'." Dr Seksel says vets have expressed concern over the continuing availability of the pesticide, after an investigation revealed a dog belonging to a Sydney veterinary couple died after taking a bait laced with it.

More baits containing the poison were later dropped in the garden of the home and on the footpath where they could have been picked up by dogs, cats, birds and even children.

One of the most extensive reviews undertaken in Australia on an agricultural or veterinary chemical is being finalised by the National Registration Authority after a year-long process of consultation and scientific reviews of more than 200 research papers.

The review is expected to recommend tighter controls on the sale, distribution, occupational handling and registration of users of the pesticide, but to stop short of recommending a national ban.

Tough New Controls On Way For Pesticide Used To Kill Pets

Sydney Morning Herald Monday April 14, 1997

By BOB BEALE Science and Environment Editor

Tough new national controls are likely to be placed on a potentially deadly horticultural pesticide linked to the widespread deliberate poisoning of domestic animals and wildlife.

The controls, which Canberra sources say will be announced soon, follow an incident last month in which 100 litres of the pesticide spilled into a shopping centre when a drum fell from a truck in Morwell, Victoria.

A few drops taken orally can kill an adult human and it acts so quickly that veterinarians often cannot save animals poisoned by it. It is used legally in horticulture to kill insect pests. The Australian Veterinary Association’s Sydney branch president, Dr Kersti Seksel, says the organophosphate insecticide is an acutely toxic member of the nerve gas family and was withdrawn from sale voluntarily in the United States in 1994.

In the AVA’s newsletter, Dr Seksel warns that the pesticide is still available in Australia and appears to be commonly and illegally used to kill pets and wild birds, especially those that affect crops.

“It is sold in NSW without any record of its sale being kept,” Dr Seksel says. “A 500 ml bottle, costing around $65, contains enough compound to kill 2,000 adult humans, the lethal oral dose being just 0.25 ml.

“It is clearly a quick and cost-effective way for pet-haters, for whatever reason, to take matters into their own hands and get rid of perceived animal ‘problems’.” Dr Seksel says vets have expressed concern over the continuing availability of the pesticide, after an investigation revealed a dog belonging to a Sydney veterinary couple died after taking a bait laced with it.

More baits containing the poison were later dropped in the garden of the home and on the footpath where they could have been picked up by dogs, cats, birds and even children.

One of the most extensive reviews undertaken in Australia on an agricultural or veterinary chemical is being finalised by the National Registration Authority after a year-long process of consultation and scientific reviews of more than 200 research papers.

The review is expected to recommend tighter controls on the sale, distribution, occupational handling and registration of users of the pesticide, but to stop short of recommending a national ban.

1997 May: 29 Legal Workers Hospitalised. Pesticide detected: Dimethoate,

City Shops Evacuated After Chemical Spill

Sydney Morning Herald

Monday May 26, 1997

By ANDREW CLENNELL

Twenty-nine workers from a city solicitor's office and a fireman were taken to hospital yesterday afternoon after they were overcome by fumes from a pesticide spill.

Fire brigade crews were called to the Skygarden Shopping Centre in Castlereagh Street about midday after workers at Malcolm Johns and Co, on the 12th floor, complained of sore throats, nausea and breathing problems.

Five hundred people were soon evacuated from the shopping centre and the street cordoned off between King and Market streets until 4 pm.

The officers donned breathing apparatus and found two pesticide containers in a cupboard, one holding the organo-phosphate Rogor , another containing Killval .

"There was a leak in one of the containers (Rogor) ," fire brigades hazardous material officer Mr John Tapper said last night.

"The container burst its seam for some unknown reason and its contents very slowly emptied into the cupboard in which it was stored."

The pesticides are understood to have been exhibits for a court case.

Business at shops came to a standstill as the street was cordoned off, with David Jones shutting its Castlereagh Street doors.

The affected workers were taken to Sydney and St Vincent's hospitals and later reported to be in a satisfactory condition. They were expected to be discharged last night.

Workers at the solicitors' firm would be able to go to work today although WorkCover had instructed that cleaners do some extra work, Mr Tapper said.

Fire brigade spokesman Mr Ian Krimmer said carpets and furnishings were hosed down in Castlereagh Street.

"Once again the fire brigade reminds the public to think carefully about where they store dangerous substances," he said.

PESTICIDE STOPS SHOPPERS

* Pesticide spill in 12th floor solicitors' office

* 30 hospitalised

* 500 evacuated

* Road blocks, noon - 4pm

City Shops Evacuated After Chemical Spill

Sydney Morning Herald Monday May 26, 1997

By ANDREW CLENNELL

Twenty-nine workers from a city solicitor’s office and a fireman were taken to hospital yesterday afternoon after they were overcome by fumes from a pesticide spill.

Fire brigade crews were called to the Skygarden Shopping Centre in Castlereagh Street about midday after workers at Malcolm Johns and Co, on the 12th floor, complained of sore throats, nausea and breathing problems.

Five hundred people were soon evacuated from the shopping centre and the street cordoned off between King and Market streets until 4 pm.

The officers donned breathing apparatus and found two pesticide containers in a cupboard, one holding the organo-phosphate Rogor , another containing Killval .

“There was a leak in one of the containers (Rogor) ,” fire brigades hazardous material officer Mr John Tapper said last night.

“The container burst its seam for some unknown reason and its contents very slowly emptied into the cupboard in which it was stored.”

The pesticides are understood to have been exhibits for a court case.

Business at shops came to a standstill as the street was cordoned off, with David Jones shutting its Castlereagh Street doors.

The affected workers were taken to Sydney and St Vincent’s hospitals and later reported to be in a satisfactory condition. They were expected to be discharged last night.

Workers at the solicitors’ firm would be able to go to work today although WorkCover had instructed that cleaners do some extra work, Mr Tapper said.

Fire brigade spokesman Mr Ian Krimmer said carpets and furnishings were hosed down in Castlereagh Street.

“Once again the fire brigade reminds the public to think carefully about where they store dangerous substances,” he said.

PESTICIDE STOPS SHOPPERS

* Pesticide spill in 12th floor solicitors’ office

* 30 hospitalised

* 500 evacuated

* Road blocks, noon – 4pm

1997 July: Sydney Tawny Frogmouths Poisoned: OC pesticides

Too Many Tawny Frogmouths Die

Sydney Morning Herald

Wednesday July 9, 1997

By COL ALLISON

A scientific study will attempt to monitor the dwindling numbers of one of Australia's most unusual birds, the tawny frogmouth - a victim of residual pesticide poisoning.

The Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services (SMWS), a newly formed non-profit organisation, was set up to concentrate on animal problems in the Sydney region, according to its spokeswoman, Mrs Jacqueline Corr, a former animal carer with WIRES (the Wildlife Information and Rescue Service) for 10 years.

Three years ago, Ms Corr - who held the WIRES Insect and Carnivorous Birds Register, which keeps track of sick animals under care - was instrumental in initiating toxicity tests by the Department of Agriculture in Queensland following the many deaths of "tawnies" in Sydney each spring.

The tests confirmed her suspicions after WIRES recorded the deaths of 53 tawnies within six days and 200 for the 1993-94 year. The owl-like birds had died of massive accumulation of chemicals stored in their fat. The main offenders were chemicals used to spray for termite control.

"It came to my attention that tawnies were dying of things we didn't quite understand. I'd noticed it for the previous six to eight years," Ms Corr said.

"Organochlorides are the main offenders. They are sprayed under houses and are picked up by stick insects and frogs, favourite foods of the tawnies.

"When food is in short supply, the birds draw on their fat deposits for survival, but in effect it kills them."

Still vitally concerned by frogmouth mortality, Mrs Corr and her fellow SMWS members are about to launch a fresh investigation and are seeking public support in their campaign.

The association would like to hear from any members of the public who have tawny frogmouths nesting in their gardens or environs.

Contact SMWS on 9413 4300 or at the services' head office, Jenkins Kitchen in the Lane Cove National Park, Lady Game Drive, West Chatswood.

Too Many Tawny Frogmouths Die

Sydney Morning Herald Wednesday July 9, 1997

By COL ALLISON

A scientific study will attempt to monitor the dwindling numbers of one of Australia’s most unusual birds, the tawny frogmouth – a victim of residual pesticide poisoning.

The Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services (SMWS), a newly formed non-profit organisation, was set up to concentrate on animal problems in the Sydney region, according to its spokeswoman, Mrs Jacqueline Corr, a former animal carer with WIRES (the Wildlife Information and Rescue Service) for 10 years.

Three years ago, Ms Corr – who held the WIRES Insect and Carnivorous Birds Register, which keeps track of sick animals under care – was instrumental in initiating toxicity tests by the Department of Agriculture in Queensland following the many deaths of “tawnies” in Sydney each spring.

The tests confirmed her suspicions after WIRES recorded the deaths of 53 tawnies within six days and 200 for the 1993-94 year. The owl-like birds had died of massive accumulation of chemicals stored in their fat. The main offenders were chemicals used to spray for termite control.

“It came to my attention that tawnies were dying of things we didn’t quite understand. I’d noticed it for the previous six to eight years,” Ms Corr said.

“Organochlorides are the main offenders. They are sprayed under houses and are picked up by stick insects and frogs, favourite foods of the tawnies.

“When food is in short supply, the birds draw on their fat deposits for survival, but in effect it kills them.”

Still vitally concerned by frogmouth mortality, Mrs Corr and her fellow SMWS members are about to launch a fresh investigation and are seeking public support in their campaign.

The association would like to hear from any members of the public who have tawny frogmouths nesting in their gardens or environs.

Contact SMWS on 9413 4300 or at the services’ head office, Jenkins Kitchen in the Lane Cove National Park, Lady Game Drive, West Chatswood.

1998 September: Bulahdelah Chemical Spill. Pesticide: Paraquat

Toxic Truck Spill Drama

Newcastle Herald

Wednesday September 23, 1998

By ELLEN CONNOLLY

MORE than 1000 litres of deadly pesticide spilled near Bulahdelah yesterday forcing the closure of the Pacific Highway for 17 hours.

The chemical spill occurred at 2am when a truck rolled down an embankment at Wootton and sparked one of the biggest clean-up operations in the State's history.

The Victorian truck driver's 11-year-old son, Cameron, who was asleep in the cabin, was trapped for a short time.

He was flown with his father, Jason Senior, to John Hunter Hospital and later released.

More than 50 firefighters were involved in recovering the 700 drums, which toppled over the embankment in the crash.

Wearing breathing apparatus and protective suits, officers spent the day mopping up the toxic pesticide

The semi-trailer was packed with drums of Gramoxone, a herbicide used widely in farming but if ingested it can kill.

Hazardous Material Units from Sydney and Newcastle were called with brigades from Taree, Bulahdelah and Forster.

`The pesticide is highly toxic and very dangerous,' a fire brigade spokesman said.

`A large number of the drums split open when they came off the truck.'

Officers from the Environment Protection Authority were at the scene, concerned at the threat to nearby waterways.

An authority spokesman said miraculously the spill did not cause major environmental damage.

`This is a big spill but in terms of environmental harm it will only be short-term to the soil,' he said.

Mr Senior said he was relieved his son was asleep in the cabin and not in the passenger seat, which copped the full brunt of the accident. Traffic was diverted around the Lakes Way and the highway was reopened at 6.30pm.

Toxic Truck Spill Drama

Newcastle Herald Wednesday September 23, 1998

By ELLEN CONNOLLY

MORE than 1000 litres of deadly pesticide spilled near Bulahdelah yesterday forcing the closure of the Pacific Highway for 17 hours.

The chemical spill occurred at 2am when a truck rolled down an embankment at Wootton and sparked one of the biggest clean-up operations in the State’s history.

The Victorian truck driver’s 11-year-old son, Cameron, who was asleep in the cabin, was trapped for a short time.

He was flown with his father, Jason Senior, to John Hunter Hospital and later released.

More than 50 firefighters were involved in recovering the 700 drums, which toppled over the embankment in the crash.

Wearing breathing apparatus and protective suits, officers spent the day mopping up the toxic pesticide.

The semi-trailer was packed with drums of Gramoxone, a herbicide used widely in farming but if ingested it can kill.

Hazardous Material Units from Sydney and Newcastle were called with brigades from Taree, Bulahdelah and Forster.

`The pesticide is highly toxic and very dangerous,’ a fire brigade spokesman said.

`A large number of the drums split open when they came off the truck.’

Officers from the Environment Protection Authority were at the scene, concerned at the threat to nearby waterways.

An authority spokesman said miraculously the spill did not cause major environmental damage.

`This is a big spill but in terms of environmental harm it will only be short-term to the soil,’ he said.

Mr Senior said he was relieved his son was asleep in the cabin and not in the passenger seat, which copped the full brunt of the accident. Traffic was diverted around the Lakes Way and the highway was reopened at 6.30pm.

2000 June: Gosford Council Fined. Pesticide: Diazinon

Record Fine For Council

Newcastle Herald Wednesday June 28, 2000

GOSFORD City Council was fined $16,000 for pesticide misuse in a record sentence handed down in the Land and Environment Court yesterday.

The council pleaded guilty to breaching the Pesticides Act and was ordered to pay a further $12,000 costs for disregarding a label instruction when using a registered pesticide.

The charges, brought against the council by the NSW Environmental Protection Authority, relate to incidents in March, 1999 where council employees mixed pesticide at up to 26 times the recommended concentration and sprayed it at the wrong rate.

EPA director-general Neil Shepherd said the court found that on March 30 last year, the council mixed the pesticide `pennside' at 26 times the recommended concentration and then applied 10 times the recommended amount to the Kincumber High School oval.

About 50 wood ducks were found dead near the school oval, sparking the EPA's investigation.

Record Fine For Council

Newcastle Herald Wednesday June 28, 2000

GOSFORD City Council was fined $16,000 for pesticide misuse in a record sentence handed down in the Land and Environment Court yesterday.

The council pleaded guilty to breaching the Pesticides Act and was ordered to pay a further $12,000 costs for disregarding a label instruction when using a registered pesticide.

The charges, brought against the council by the NSW Environmental Protection Authority, relate to incidents in March, 1999 where council employees mixed pesticide at up to 26 times the recommended concentration and sprayed it at the wrong rate.

EPA director-general Neil Shepherd said the court found that on March 30 last year, the council mixed the pesticide `pennside’ at 26 times the recommended concentration and then applied 10 times the recommended amount to the Kincumber High School oval.

About 50 wood ducks were found dead near the school oval, sparking the EPA’s investigation.

2000 October: Gippsland Lakes Mosquito Spray Plan: Pesticide of Concern: Temephos

Pesticide Spray Plan Draws Fire

The Age Wednesday October 18, 2000

CLAIRE MILLER, ENVIRONMENT REPORTER

East Gippsland Shire is planning aerial spraying of the Gippsland Lakes with a pesticide linked to wildlife deformities.

The council claims that spraying to control mosquitoes is necessary to reduce the risk of diseases such as Ross River virus and Barmah forest encephalitis and to protect tourism.

But the plan has alarmed residents, who say aerial spraying will endanger human health as well as frogs, fish and birds.

The lakes are listed under the Ramsar international treaty to protect migratory birds. The ecosystem is already severely degraded by farm pollutants and low river inflows due to high diversions for irrigation and the Thomson dam.

The council wants to spray an organophosphate pesticide called Abate. Chief executive Graeme Pearce said Abate had been hand-sprayed for many years, but aerial spraying was being considered to apply it ``more effectively".

The safety sheet for Abate warns that it should not be used where birds are foraging, particularly where there are large quantities of larvae or shallow depths where birds can feed easily. It says treated water may also affect molluscs and crustaceans.

Organophosphates damage nervous systems. The US Department of the Interior has linked Abate to deformities and reduced breeding in frogs, and lowered hatchings among birds. It is highly toxic to bees and low to moderately persistent in the environment.

Mr Pearce said the council generally accepted that spraying reduced mosquito numbers, although it had not studied whether numbers were linked with the incidence of mosquito-borne disease.

The council has sought Department of Natural Resources and Environment approval to start spraying as soon as possible. Mr Pearce said drift would be minimal due to low flying and targeting techniques.

The department's Gippsland manager, Tony Edgar, said all agencies involved, including Land Victoria and Parks Victoria, were still discussing the council's application.

Department of Human Services spokesman Bram Alexander said spraying did not eliminate mosquitoes or the risk of disease. ``Nine times out of 10, the mosquitoes are a nuisance rather than a real risk."

Jim Reside, from Friends of the Gippsland Lakes Wetlands, said mosquitoes were a problem every summer, regardless of treatment. ``Spraying them is very short-term, then they are back again," he said.

Tambo Environment Awareness Group spokeswoman Loris Duclos said the larvae were a major food source for fish and birds. ``It is just ridiculous to attempt to wipe out the bottom of the food chain in an area dependent on fishing."

She said aerial spraying would contaminate rainwater run-off for household tanks.

Pesticide Spray Plan Draws Fire

The Age Wednesday October 18, 2000

CLAIRE MILLER, ENVIRONMENT REPORTER

East Gippsland Shire is planning aerial spraying of the Gippsland Lakes with a pesticide linked to wildlife deformities.

The council claims that spraying to control mosquitoes is necessary to reduce the risk of diseases such as Ross River virus and Barmah forest encephalitis and to protect tourism.

But the plan has alarmed residents, who say aerial spraying will endanger human health as well as frogs, fish and birds.

The lakes are listed under the Ramsar international treaty to protect migratory birds. The ecosystem is already severely degraded by farm pollutants and low river inflows due to high diversions for irrigation and the Thomson dam.

The council wants to spray an organophosphate pesticide called Abate. Chief executive Graeme Pearce said Abate had been hand-sprayed for many years, but aerial spraying was being considered to apply it “more effectively”.

The safety sheet for Abate warns that it should not be used where birds are foraging, particularly where there are large quantities of larvae or shallow depths where birds can feed easily. It says treated water may also affect molluscs and crustaceans.

Organophosphates damage nervous systems. The US Department of the Interior has linked Abate to deformities and reduced breeding in frogs, and lowered hatchings among birds. It is highly toxic to bees and low to moderately persistent in the environment.

Mr Pearce said the council generally accepted that spraying reduced mosquito numbers, although it had not studied whether numbers were linked with the incidence of mosquito-borne disease.

The council has sought Department of Natural Resources and Environment approval to start spraying as soon as possible. Mr Pearce said drift would be minimal due to low flying and targeting techniques.

The department’s Gippsland manager, Tony Edgar, said all agencies involved, including Land Victoria and Parks Victoria, were still discussing the council’s application.

Department of Human Services spokesman Bram Alexander said spraying did not eliminate mosquitoes or the risk of disease. “Nine times out of 10, the mosquitoes are a nuisance rather than a real risk.”

Jim Reside, from Friends of the Gippsland Lakes Wetlands, said mosquitoes were a problem every summer, regardless of treatment. “Spraying them is very short-term, then they are back again,” he said.

Tambo Environment Awareness Group spokeswoman Loris Duclos said the larvae were a major food source for fish and birds. “It is just ridiculous to attempt to wipe out the bottom of the food chain in an area dependent on fishing.”

She said aerial spraying would contaminate rainwater run-off for household tanks.

2002 January: Pesticide Leak 9 Workers in Hospital: Pesticide: Fenitrothion

Pesticide Leak Puts 9 Workers In Hospital

The Age

Tuesday January 8, 2002

ANDRA JACKSON

Nine workers were taken to hospital yesterday afternoon after being exposed to chemical fumes following a pesticide accident in Melbourne's west.

The accident, at the Totalcare Transport Warehouse in Boundary Road, Derrimut, took place when a forklift driver accidentally ran over three large cans of pesticide that had been placed on the warehouse floor.

Fumes were released when the cans were punctured and a number of the warehouse employees were affected.

The warehouse had to be evacuated and the nine employees exposed to the chemical were taken to Sunshine Hospital by ambulance for treatment.

A Metropolitan Ambulance Service spokeswoman said they had stinging eyes, nausea and skin irritation.

Police cordoned off the area while the Metropolitan Fire Brigade began cleaning up.

Metropolitan Fire Brigade acting inspector Angelo Parsakis said it took nine firefighters four-and-a-half hours in full protective clothing and using breathing apparatus to decontaminate the warehouse.

He said the chemical involved, fenitrothion, works its way into the eyes, armpits and up the nose.

Pesticide Leak Puts 9 Workers In Hospital

The Age Tuesday January 8, 2002

ANDRA JACKSON

Nine workers were taken to hospital yesterday afternoon after being exposed to chemical fumes following a pesticide accident in Melbourne’s west.

The accident, at the Totalcare Transport Warehouse in Boundary Road, Derrimut, took place when a forklift driver accidentally ran over three large cans of pesticide that had been placed on the warehouse floor.

Fumes were released when the cans were punctured and a number of the warehouse employees were affected.

The warehouse had to be evacuated and the nine employees exposed to the chemical were taken to Sunshine Hospital by ambulance for treatment.

A Metropolitan Ambulance Service spokeswoman said they had stinging eyes, nausea and skin irritation.

Police cordoned off the area while the Metropolitan Fire Brigade began cleaning up.

Metropolitan Fire Brigade acting inspector Angelo Parsakis said it took nine firefighters four-and-a-half hours in full protective clothing and using breathing apparatus to decontaminate the warehouse.

He said the chemical involved, fenitrothion, works its way into the eyes, armpits and up the nose.

1999 April – 2002 November: Rentokill Fined $40,000

Pest Firm's Fine For Spray Leak

Illawarra Mercury

Saturday November 30, 2002

A PESTICIDE company has been fined $40,000 after a chemical spray to kill fleas in a storage area was sucked through an airconditioning vent into offices.

Among offices affected were those of the NSW workplace safety watchdog.

Rentokil was yesterday fined in the NSW Industrial Relations Commission for workplace safety breaches at a Shellharbour office complex in April 1999.

Commissioner Russell Peterson was told the company failed to ensure the health and safety of workers in three offices above the storage area, which included WorkCover NSW.

WorkCover took the case to the Industrial Commission saying Rentokil failed to shut down the airconditioning unit before spraying the flea treatment, and failed to warn the occupants of the office about the treatment.

``During the treatment and afterwards, occupants present in the office areas of the building began to experience eye, nose and throat irritations as well as headaches and nausea as a result of exposure to (the) insecticide," Commissioner Peterson said.

The maximum fine for the breach was $825,000.

Pest Firm’s Fine For Spray Leak

Illawarra Mercury Saturday November 30, 2002

A PESTICIDE company has been fined $40,000 after a chemical spray to kill fleas in a storage area was sucked through an airconditioning vent into offices.

Among offices affected were those of the NSW workplace safety watchdog.

Rentokil was yesterday fined in the NSW Industrial Relations Commission for workplace safety breaches at a Shellharbour office complex in April 1999.

Commissioner Russell Peterson was told the company failed to ensure the health and safety of workers in three offices above the storage area, which included WorkCover NSW.

WorkCover took the case to the Industrial Commission saying Rentokil failed to shut down the airconditioning unit before spraying the flea treatment, and failed to warn the occupants of the office about the treatment.

“During the treatment and afterwards, occupants present in the office areas of the building began to experience eye, nose and throat irritations as well as headaches and nausea as a result of exposure to (the) insecticide,” Commissioner Peterson said.

The maximum fine for the breach was $825,000.

2003 November: Pesticides in Cigarettes. Pesticides detected: DDT, Dichloran

Silence On Pesticide In Cigarettes

The Age

Monday November 3, 2003

An Australian cigarette company knew for more than 20 years that its tobacco contained high levels of DDT and other dangerous pesticides, industry documents reveal.

The Federal Government was also aware that pesticide levels far exceeded those in British and US samples, but disregarded a recommendation by its own agency to set limits for chemicals in tobacco.

Instead, it abandoned its only test on cigarettes for tar and nicotine levels and left the industry to regulate itself. The Government also rejected consumer calls for disclosure of all cigarette ingredients, similar to food label requirements.

Tobacco samples tested for Philip Morris Australia in 1978 showed DDT levels 40 times higher than German limits, its internal documents say. As late as the early 1990s, the company's testing found residue of DDT, dichloran and maleic hydrazide - all forms of pesticides - above German or US limits, according to Simon Chapman, of Sydney University's School of Public Health. But the company issued no health warnings or product recalls, he said.

Professor Chapman has been searching for Australian references in the 7 million tobacco industry documents posted on the internet after a 1998 US court case. His latest findings will appear in the Tobacco Control Journal.

Asked about the present use of pesticides, Philip Morris spokesman Colin Lippiatt said it had guidelines about the ``judicious use" of crop protection agents on imported tobacco.

 In 1981, a report by the National Health and Medical Research Council warned that pesticide residues exceeding those in overseas cigarettes were ``likely to increase the known adverse effects of inhaling tobacco smoke" and ordered an investigation. It never took place.

 In 1985, the Department of Primary Industry recommended that the government set upper limits for the agricultural chemical content of tobacco. But the government set no restrictions on cigarette ingredients, and they are not regulated.

Instead, the government and the industry agreed to voluntary disclosure of some of the ingredients in a cigarette, but not the residues in the tobacco and the chemicals in the smoke.

But European producers have had to disclose all ingredients, justify their use and explain their health impacts since January. Disclosure is also required in parts of Canada and in Thailand.

 A Health Department spokesman said it had extended the scheme until December next year, but was ``considering options for future disclosure requirements".

 A co-director of the VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Ron Borland, said many of the ingredients Australian consumers were not told of might be harmful.

 ``We now have cigarettes that taste better, are smoother and less harsh to smoke and would be described by the tobacco industry as higher quality. It is now easier to smoke something that kills half its long-term users," he said.

 But Dr Borland said the harmful effects of tobacco itself were of most

Silence On Pesticide In Cigarettes

The Age Monday November 3, 2003

Geesche Jacobsen

An Australian cigarette company knew for more than 20 years that its tobacco contained high levels of DDT and other dangerous pesticides, industry documents reveal.

The Federal Government was also aware that pesticide levels far exceeded those in British and US samples, but disregarded a recommendation by its own agency to set limits for chemicals in tobacco.

Instead, it abandoned its only test on cigarettes for tar and nicotine levels and left the industry to regulate itself. The Government also rejected consumer calls for disclosure of all cigarette ingredients, similar to food label requirements.

Tobacco samples tested for Philip Morris Australia in 1978 showed DDT levels 40 times higher than German limits, its internal documents say. As late as the early 1990s, the company’s testing found residue of DDT, dichloran and maleic hydrazide – all forms of pesticides – above German or US limits, according to Simon Chapman, of Sydney University’s School of Public Health. But the company issued no health warnings or product recalls, he said.

Professor Chapman has been searching for Australian references in the 7 million tobacco industry documents posted on the internet after a 1998 US court case. His latest findings will appear in the Tobacco Control Journal.

Asked about the present use of pesticides, Philip Morris spokesman Colin Lippiatt said it had guidelines about the “judicious use” of crop protection agents on imported tobacco.

In 1981, a report by the National Health and Medical Research Council warned that pesticide residues exceeding those in overseas cigarettes were “likely to increase the known adverse effects of inhaling tobacco smoke” and ordered an investigation. It never took place.

In 1985, the Department of Primary Industry recommended that the government set upper limits for the agricultural chemical content of tobacco. But the government set no restrictions on cigarette ingredients, and they are not regulated.

Instead, the government and the industry agreed to voluntary disclosure of some of the ingredients in a cigarette, but not the residues in the tobacco and the chemicals in the smoke.

But European producers have had to disclose all ingredients, justify their use and explain their health impacts since January. Disclosure is also required in parts of Canada and in Thailand.

A Health Department spokesman said it had extended the scheme until December next year, but was “considering options for future disclosure requirements”.

A co-director of the VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, Ron Borland, said many of the ingredients Australian consumers were not told of might be harmful.

“We now have cigarettes that taste better, are smoother and less harsh to smoke and would be described by the tobacco industry as higher quality. It is now easier to smoke something that kills half its long-term users,” he said.

But Dr Borland said the harmful effects of tobacco itself were of most

2004 September: Rotenone to be used to Kill Trout

State Looked At Poison Plan To Cut Trout Numbers

The Age

Thursday September 23, 2004

Richard Baker, State Political Reporter

 

The State Government has considered using a pesticide that causes Parkinson's disease symptoms in rats to eradicate trout from streams and rivers in Victoria.

Documents reveal that the Department of Sustainability and Environment's plan to boost the population of an endangered native fish, barred galaxias, includes use of the pesticide rotenone to kill trout.

Rotenone has been effective in removing trout overseas, but it could lead to the death of other species because it kills insects that form the basis of the food chain. Norwegian research published last year showed rotenone killed up to 99 per cent of invertebrates in trials.

"The poisoning of sections of streams below barred galaxias populations, where trout are the only populations present, will need to be undertaken," the plan said.

"These measures, not previously practised in Victoria to eradicate exotic species and rehabilitate stream sections for the use of threatened fauna, are necessary because of the urgent need to stabilise the dramatic decline of the barred galaxias."

A department spokesman last night said the Government had no plans to use rotenone to kill trout. It would need the approval of the Environment Protection Authority each time it wanted to use it, he said.

"When any animal is listed as threatened we've got to list an action statement, but not everything on that statement is necessarily used," he said. "We're not planning to do so."

Rivers where it would be most likely used to help boost barred galaxias numbers include the Goulburn, Howqua and Jamieson, as well as the streams feeding Lake Eildon.

Recent international scientific studies have linked rotenone, which is derived from the roots of tropical legumes, with symptoms resembling Parkinson's disease in studies on rats. Symptoms included uncontrollable muscle tremors and loss of balance.

Despite the Government's assurance that is has no plan to use rotenone, the State Opposition, the Murrindindi Shire Council and the Australian Trout Foundation have expressed concerns, and said there were senior people within the department who wanted to use rotenone.

Opposition environment spokesman Phil Honeywood said there needed to be an independent inquiry held before rotenone was used in Victoria.

State Looked At Poison Plan To Cut Trout Numbers

The Age Thursday September 23, 2004

Richard Baker, State Political Reporter

The State Government has considered using a pesticide that causes Parkinson’s disease symptoms in rats to eradicate trout from streams and rivers in Victoria.

Documents reveal that the Department of Sustainability and Environment’s plan to boost the population of an endangered native fish, barred galaxias, includes use of the pesticide rotenone to kill trout.

Rotenone has been effective in removing trout overseas, but it could lead to the death of other species because it kills insects that form the basis of the food chain. Norwegian research published last year showed rotenone killed up to 99 per cent of invertebrates in trials.

“The poisoning of sections of streams below barred galaxias populations, where trout are the only populations present, will need to be undertaken,” the plan said.

“These measures, not previously practised in Victoria to eradicate exotic species and rehabilitate stream sections for the use of threatened fauna, are necessary because of the urgent need to stabilise the dramatic decline of the barred galaxias.”

A department spokesman last night said the Government had no plans to use rotenone to kill trout. It would need the approval of the Environment Protection Authority each time it wanted to use it, he said.

“When any animal is listed as threatened we’ve got to list an action statement, but not everything on that statement is necessarily used,” he said. “We’re not planning to do so.”

Rivers where it would be most likely used to help boost barred galaxias numbers include the Goulburn, Howqua and Jamieson, as well as the streams feeding Lake Eildon.

Recent international scientific studies have linked rotenone, which is derived from the roots of tropical legumes, with symptoms resembling Parkinson’s disease in studies on rats. Symptoms included uncontrollable muscle tremors and loss of balance.

Despite the Government’s assurance that is has no plan to use rotenone, the State Opposition, the Murrindindi Shire Council and the Australian Trout Foundation have expressed concerns, and said there were senior people within the department who wanted to use rotenone.

Opposition environment spokesman Phil Honeywood said there needed to be an independent inquiry held before rotenone was used in Victoria.

2006 January: Bird Deaths Blackall’s Park

Warning Over Bird Slaughter

Newcastle Herald Friday January 20, 2006

PESTICIDE poisoning is behind the deaths of more than 70 native birds in Blackalls Park since last month.

The NSW Department of Environment and Conservation confirmed the poisonings and alerted Lake Macquarie residents yesterday in a letter drop.

The Herald reported that the department conducted autopsies after 63 corellas, four magpies and two wood ducks were found dead.

Blackalls Park resident Jo Wicks said that since those deaths were reported, neighbours had found about six sick or dead birds a day.

"That stopped about a week ago and just started again," Ms Wicks said.

She also said that another dead bird had been found yesterday at a neighbour's property.

Department Hunter regional manager Grahame Clarke said the dead birds found more recently were all corellas.

He could not say if the poisoning was continuing or deliberate because the investigation was still under way.

However, a department spokeswoman said the case will be pursued under the Pesticides Act, which made it an offence "to wilfully use a pesticide contrary to approved label directions".

She said the department would not reveal which pesticide had killed the birds, to avoid any copycat acts.

Mr Clarke said the department had interviewed some people but made the information public yesterday to urge people to come forward with any leads, and to issue a warning.

"Heavy fines can be imposed by the courts for offences committed under the Pesticides Act," the letter said. Mr Clarke also warned it was an offence under the National Parks and Wildlife Act to harm protected fauna.

People with any information are urged to contact department pesticide officer Brian Curtain on 4908 6804. Calls will remain confidential.

Warning Over Bird Slaughter

Newcastle Herald Friday January 20, 2006

PESTICIDE poisoning is behind the deaths of more than 70 native birds in Blackalls Park since last month.

The NSW Department of Environment and Conservation confirmed the poisonings and alerted Lake Macquarie residents yesterday in a letter drop.

The Herald reported that the department conducted autopsies after 63 corellas, four magpies and two wood ducks were found dead.

Blackalls Park resident Jo Wicks said that since those deaths were reported, neighbours had found about six sick or dead birds a day.

"That stopped about a week ago and just started again," Ms Wicks said.

She also said that another dead bird had been found yesterday at a neighbour's property.

Department Hunter regional manager Grahame Clarke said the dead birds found more recently were all corellas.

He could not say if the poisoning was continuing or deliberate because the investigation was still under way.

However, a department spokeswoman said the case will be pursued under the Pesticides Act, which made it an offence "to wilfully use a pesticide contrary to approved label directions".

She said the department would not reveal which pesticide had killed the birds, to avoid any copycat acts.

Mr Clarke said the department had interviewed some people but made the information public yesterday to urge people to come forward with any leads, and to issue a warning.

"Heavy fines can be imposed by the courts for offences committed under the Pesticides Act," the letter said. Mr Clarke also warned it was an offence under the National Parks and Wildlife Act to harm protected fauna.

People with any information are urged to contact department pesticide officer Brian Curtain on 4908 6804. Calls will remain confidential.

Warning Over Bird Slaughter

Newcastle Herald Friday January 20, 2006

PESTICIDE poisoning is behind the deaths of more than 70 native birds in Blackalls Park since last month.

The NSW Department of Environment and Conservation confirmed the poisonings and alerted Lake Macquarie residents yesterday in a letter drop.

The Herald reported that the department conducted autopsies after 63 corellas, four magpies and two wood ducks were found dead.

Blackalls Park resident Jo Wicks said that since those deaths were reported, neighbours had found about six sick or dead birds a day.

“That stopped about a week ago and just started again,” Ms Wicks said.

She also said that another dead bird had been found yesterday at a neighbour’s property.

Department Hunter regional manager Grahame Clarke said the dead birds found more recently were all corellas.

He could not say if the poisoning was continuing or deliberate because the investigation was still under way.

However, a department spokeswoman said the case will be pursued under the Pesticides Act, which made it an offence “to wilfully use a pesticide contrary to approved label directions”.

She said the department would not reveal which pesticide had killed the birds, to avoid any copycat acts.

Mr Clarke said the department had interviewed some people but made the information public yesterday to urge people to come forward with any leads, and to issue a warning.

“Heavy fines can be imposed by the courts for offences committed under the Pesticides Act,” the letter said. Mr Clarke also warned it was an offence under the National Parks and Wildlife Act to harm protected fauna.

People with any information are urged to contact department pesticide officer Brian Curtain on 4908 6804. Calls will remain confidential.

2006 May: India Rejects Wheat from Australia

India Rejects Wheat From Australia

The Age Tuesday May 2, 2006 ORIETTA GUERRERA, RURAL REPORTER

WHEAT exporter AWB has rushed a high-level delegation to India, after the country refused to unload 50,000 tonnes of Australian wheat that it claims contain unacceptable levels of pesticide.

In another blow to the embattled company, Indian authorities contacted AWB on the weekend with the quality concerns.

Customs officials at Chennai port, in southern India, are refusing to allow the cargo, which arrived from South Australia last week, to be unloaded unless it is cleared by further tests.

The 50,000-tonne shipment was the first consignment of half a million tonnes of Australian duty-free wheat due to be shipped to India in coming months. The contract is believed to be worth about $100 million.

AWB secured the tender with the Indian Government's State Trading Corporation in March, over companies from the US, Canada and Europe.

India, the world's second-biggest wheatgrower, is importing grain for the first time in seven years because local production can no longer keep up with the growing demand for wheat products by the country's ballooning population.

AWB spokesman Peter McBride said the delegation, which included the company's head of grain technology and quality assurance, was due to arrive in India today to meet authorities and perhaps even carry out their own tests.

Test results from samples taken before the wheat left Australia will also be reviewed.

"We take (India's) concerns seriously, and we'll obtain more information when they're over there," Mr McBride said.

"We're hopeful that we will be in a position to provide further details, later this week or early next week."

India's The Hindu newspaper reported that initial laboratory tests on samples taken from the cargo revealed more than the permissible pesticide content.

Further samples have been sent to the country's Central Food Technological Research Institute in Mysore. Sources told the newspaper that unless the tests cleared the wheat, there would be little option but to send it back.

The second shipment in the tender is expected to arrive in India later this week.

It has been a turbulent year for AWB, which is under investigation by the Cole inquiry for paying $300 million in kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq to secure wheat contracts.

Federal Agriculture Minister Peter McGauran yesterday said the Government was helping to address questions arising from the testing of the shipment. He supported AWB's handling of the issue.

"Every sale is significant for Australian wheatgrowers, but given its size, this one is particularly important," he said.

"I look forward to a quick resolution of these matters."

The Grains Council of Australia was briefed on the situation yesterday. A spokeswoman said the group welcomed the company's speedy delegation to India to address the issue.

India Rejects Wheat From Australia

The Age Tuesday May 2, 2006 ORIETTA GUERRERA, RURAL REPORTER

WHEAT exporter AWB has rushed a high-level delegation to India, after the country refused to unload 50,000 tonnes of Australian wheat that it claims contain unacceptable levels of pesticide.

In another blow to the embattled company, Indian authorities contacted AWB on the weekend with the quality concerns.

Customs officials at Chennai port, in southern India, are refusing to allow the cargo, which arrived from South Australia last week, to be unloaded unless it is cleared by further tests.

The 50,000-tonne shipment was the first consignment of half a million tonnes of Australian duty-free wheat due to be shipped to India in coming months. The contract is believed to be worth about $100 million.

AWB secured the tender with the Indian Government’s State Trading Corporation in March, over companies from the US, Canada and Europe.

India, the world’s second-biggest wheatgrower, is importing grain for the first time in seven years because local production can no longer keep up with the growing demand for wheat products by the country’s ballooning population.

AWB spokesman Peter McBride said the delegation, which included the company’s head of grain technology and quality assurance, was due to arrive in India today to meet authorities and perhaps even carry out their own tests.

Test results from samples taken before the wheat left Australia will also be reviewed.

“We take (India’s) concerns seriously, and we’ll obtain more information when they’re over there,” Mr McBride said.

“We’re hopeful that we will be in a position to provide further details, later this week or early next week.”

India’s The Hindu newspaper reported that initial laboratory tests on samples taken from the cargo revealed more than the permissible pesticide content.

Further samples have been sent to the country’s Central Food Technological Research Institute in Mysore. Sources told the newspaper that unless the tests cleared the wheat, there would be little option but to send it back.

The second shipment in the tender is expected to arrive in India later this week.

It has been a turbulent year for AWB, which is under investigation by the Cole inquiry for paying $300 million in kickbacks to Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq to secure wheat contracts.

Federal Agriculture Minister Peter McGauran yesterday said the Government was helping to address questions arising from the testing of the shipment. He supported AWB’s handling of the issue.

“Every sale is significant for Australian wheatgrowers, but given its size, this one is particularly important,” he said.

“I look forward to a quick resolution of these matters.”

The Grains Council of Australia was briefed on the situation yesterday. A spokeswoman said the group welcomed the company’s speedy delegation to India to address the issue.

1970’s?: Malabar Sewerage Outfall: Pesticide detected: Hexachlorobenzene

 
 

Science and the Control of Information: An Australian Case Study

 Sharon Beder, 'Science and the Control of Information: An Australian Case Study', The Ecologist, vol. 20, July/August 1990, pp136-140

 
 
Sydney-siders were shocked earlier this year when they were told by the media that fish caught near their coastline were massively contaminated with organochlorines. The impact on the fish markets was immediate. Fish sales declined dramatically costing the industry an estimated $500,000 each week. Many people blamed the media for this. It was assumed that scientific studies had been sensationalised and distorted in order to sell newspapers or improve ratings. The director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project who was visiting Sydney at the time advised government scientists and engineers:

The recent events in Sydney indicate a route of communication to the public from the scientists should be developed. This may reduce the "scare" from the press and shield the fishing industry from impacts produced by false or inaccurate media reporting.[1]

However the two studies that were the basis for media stories were reported accurately and did not overstate the results. The first study, which triggered the media attention, was the 1987 Malabar Bioaccumulation Study. The results of this study are shown in Table 1 & 2. The Sydney Morning Herald reported the results as follows:

FISH OFF SYDNEY BEACHES POLLUTED
Secret tests on fish caught near Sydney's main sewage outfall at Malabar have found dangerous levels of pesticides, up to 120 times above the recommended safety limits...
The red morwong had average concentrations of BHC of 1.22 parts per million, with the blue groper showing 0.20 parts per million. For HPTE, the red morwong showed average levels of 2.60 parts per million, with the blue groper 0.25 parts per million.
There were also traces of dieldrin in both fish, with the red morwong being slightly over the recommended maximum levels.[2]

https://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/sewage/ecologist.html

https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/42cf47eb-4ae5-47db-b983-ec1c3679ab74/files/connell.pdf

Science and the Control of Information: An Australian Case Study

 Sharon Beder, ‘Science and the Control of Information: An Australian Case Study’, The Ecologist, vol. 20, July/August 1990, pp136-140

Sydney-siders were shocked earlier this year when they were told by the media that fish caught near their coastline were massively contaminated with organochlorines. The impact on the fish markets was immediate. Fish sales declined dramatically costing the industry an estimated $500,000 each week. Many people blamed the media for this. It was assumed that scientific studies had been sensationalised and distorted in order to sell newspapers or improve ratings. The director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project who was visiting Sydney at the time advised government scientists and engineers:

The recent events in Sydney indicate a route of communication to the public from the scientists should be developed. This may reduce the “scare” from the press and shield the fishing industry from impacts produced by false or inaccurate media reporting.[1]

However the two studies that were the basis for media stories were reported accurately and did not overstate the results. The first study, which triggered the media attention, was the 1987 Malabar Bioaccumulation Study. The results of this study are shown in Table 1 & 2. The Sydney Morning Herald reported the results as follows:

FISH OFF SYDNEY BEACHES POLLUTED
Secret tests on fish caught near Sydney’s main sewage outfall at Malabar have found dangerous levels of pesticides, up to 120 times above the recommended safety limits…
The red morwong had average concentrations of BHC of 1.22 parts per million, with the blue groper showing 0.20 parts per million. For HPTE, the red morwong showed average levels of 2.60 parts per million, with the blue groper 0.25 parts per million.
There were also traces of dieldrin in both fish, with the red morwong being slightly over the recommended maximum levels.[2]

https://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/sewage/ecologist.html

1980’s: Bootwa Dam NSW. Pesticide detected: Aldrin

... Pacific Palms resident Ross Bowen was disturbed by at the Health Department's response to evidence of massive pollution in the nearby Bootawa Dam. Aldrin residues in dam sediment were recorded at 1500 times above the WHO Guidelines but the authorities saw no need to take any action. Nor, according to Ross, did the Department take enough care with testing of his community's water supply. He found that the Department's interpretation of its own test results left a lot to be desired. Indeed he considered its approach deliberately misleading.

If you look at the actual laboratory results, you can see what I mean about dubious report writing by the Division of Analytical Laboratories. One sample on the lab assistant's report shows dieldrin at '0.03.ND', whilst the lab's certificate shows the same sample as having no detectable dieldrin. This interpretation is tied up with their definition of 'not detectable'. If this is less than 0.05ppm it is classified as 'not detected' thereby allowing a nil return. Now the World Health Organisation maximum for dieldrin in drinking water is 0.03ppm, whilst the Australian standard is 1. The lesson from this is when people are getting water tested, they should insist on the actual lab report, as well as the official certificate. [Ross Bowen, Pacific Palms Water Survey Group, NSW]. p 92/3 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

… Pacific Palms resident Ross Bowen was disturbed by at the Health Department’s response to evidence of massive pollution in the nearby Bootawa Dam. Aldrin residues in dam sediment were recorded at 1500 times above the WHO Guidelines but the authorities saw no need to take any action. Nor, according to Ross, did the Department take enough care with testing of his community’s water supply. He found that the Department’s interpretation of its own test results left a lot to be desired. Indeed he considered its approach deliberately misleading.

If you look at the actual laboratory results, you can see what I mean about dubious report writing by the Division of Analytical Laboratories. One sample on the lab assistant’s report shows dieldrin at ‘0.03.ND’, whilst the lab’s certificate shows the same sample as having no detectable dieldrin. This interpretation is tied up with their definition of ‘not detectable’. If this is less than 0.05ppm it is classified as ‘not detected’ thereby allowing a nil return. Now the World Health Organisation maximum for dieldrin in drinking water is 0.03ppm, whilst the Australian standard is 1. The lesson from this is when people are getting water tested, they should insist on the actual lab report, as well as the official certificate. [Ross Bowen, Pacific Palms Water Survey Group, NSW]. p 92/3 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1988 – 1989: Dundurrabin Dam. Pesticides detected: Chlordane, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, Methoxychlor, Endosulfan, Aldrin, Lindane

People in the tiny village of Dundurrabin near Dorrigo in NSW became concerned after noticing a change in their water quality and an increase in gastric illness among residents. They were aware of widespread clearing of native forest, upstream of the Dundurrabin Dam, and of the cultivation of pastures immediately beside the creek. These activities caused the formerly clear waters of the dam, and that of an upstream creek to become full of suspended sediment. The residents decided to get both water and sediment tested.

In December 1989, the first three water samples were taken. They came from the Dundurrabin Dam, a smaller dam upstream and a small rivulet known as Cockatoo Creek. The results of the tests showed each sample to be contaminated with OC pesticides at levels considerably in excess of the drinking water criteria. The Dundurrabin dam sample was the most polluted with levels approximately 100 times the limit for chlordane and dieldrin and 650 times for heptachlor. Methoxychlor and endosulfan were not found to exceed the drinking water criteria but, as with the other OCs detected, did exceed criteria for the protection of aquatic ecosystems. In February of the next year a further seven samples were taken from other small streams in the area, this time after heavy rain had fallen. All samples were found to contain the OC pesticides dieldrin, aldrin, lindane and heptachlor and the metabolite oxychlordane, with levels generally being relatively similar throughout...What the results do show is that there are persistent low levels of a number of OCs in the waterways of the Dundurrabin area. [Dr Ian Irvine. Investigation of the Dundurrabin Water Supply]

Parents in Dundurrabin have good reason to be worried about the quality of their drinking water. Seven out of 40 children at the local school have unexplained learning difficulties and there has been ongoing concern in the area about birth defects.... p87 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

People in the tiny village of Dundurrabin near Dorrigo in NSW became concerned after noticing a change in their water quality and an increase in gastric illness among residents. They were aware of widespread clearing of native forest, upstream of the Dundurrabin Dam, and of the cultivation of pastures immediately beside the creek. These activities caused the formerly clear waters of the dam, and that of an upstream creek to become full of suspended sediment. The residents decided to get both water and sediment tested.

In December 1989, the first three water samples were taken. They came from the Dundurrabin Dam, a smaller dam upstream and a small rivulet known as Cockatoo Creek. The results of the tests showed each sample to be contaminated with OC pesticides at levels considerably in excess of the drinking water criteria. The Dundurrabin dam sample was the most polluted with levels approximately 100 times the limit for chlordane and dieldrin and 650 times for heptachlor. Methoxychlor and endosulfan were not found to exceed the drinking water criteria but, as with the other OCs detected, did exceed criteria for the protection of aquatic ecosystems. In February of the next year a further seven samples were taken from other small streams in the area, this time after heavy rain had fallen. All samples were found to contain the OC pesticides dieldrin, aldrin, lindane and heptachlor and the metabolite oxychlordane, with levels generally being relatively similar throughout…What the results do show is that there are persistent low levels of a number of OCs in the waterways of the Dundurrabin area. [Dr Ian Irvine. Investigation of the Dundurrabin Water Supply]

Parents in Dundurrabin have good reason to be worried about the quality of their drinking water. Seven out of 40 children at the local school have unexplained learning difficulties and there has been ongoing concern in the area about birth defects…. p87 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s: Moyhu Valley/Ovens Valley.

In the early 1980's my health was affected by both OC pesticides and dichlorvos. We moved out of our polluted home and our health improved. Then, in 1985, we moved to the Moyhu Valley near Wangaratta. It was then that my interest in pesticide pollution began. I developed multiple chemical allergies and my son came out in rashes when he took a shower.

I began to investigate my own water supply. Although the state laboratories told me that the supply was safe, I changed to tank water and my health improved until aerial spraying with 2,4-D contaminated it. Since then I have only drunk spring water and my health is all the better for it.

I kept on making enquiries and found that those drinking from Boggy Creek and the King River in most cases suffered disease and ill-health. Wangaratta's water supply is drawn from the King and Ovens Rivers, both of which have a catchment along kilometres of farms growing tobacco, hops, grapes and fruit. In many cases the crops are grown to the actual river itself and often steeply sloping to the water. There are also dairy and cattle farms to the north-east which have been quarantined because of high chemical residues. For many years, tests carried out by bodies such as the EPA, State Forests and Lands and the Rural Water Commission have shown fluctuating levels of cyclodienes in the Ovens and King Rivers but the all clear signal has been given time and time again. p87/88 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

In the early 1980’s my health was affected by both OC pesticides and dichlorvos. We moved out of our polluted home and our health improved. Then, in 1985, we moved to the Moyhu Valley near Wangaratta. It was then that my interest in pesticide pollution began. I developed multiple chemical allergies and my son came out in rashes when he took a shower.

I began to investigate my own water supply. Although the state laboratories told me that the supply was safe, I changed to tank water and my health improved until aerial spraying with 2,4-D contaminated it. Since then I have only drunk spring water and my health is all the better for it.

I kept on making enquiries and found that those drinking from Boggy Creek and the King River in most cases suffered disease and ill-health. Wangaratta’s water supply is drawn from the King and Ovens Rivers, both of which have a catchment along kilometres of farms growing tobacco, hops, grapes and fruit. In many cases the crops are grown to the actual river itself and often steeply sloping to the water. There are also dairy and cattle farms to the north-east which have been quarantined because of high chemical residues. For many years, tests carried out by bodies such as the EPA, State Forests and Lands and the Rural Water Commission have shown fluctuating levels of cyclodienes in the Ovens and King Rivers but the all clear signal has been given time and time again. p87/88 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1985: Picadilly Valley. Pesticides detected: DDT, Chlorpyrifos, Parathion, Endosulfan

In South Australia, studies found DDT residues in creek waters above the WHO guidelines, with other pesticides such as Chlorpyrifos, Parathion and Endosulfan also present in 'relatively high' concentrations. The residues originated in water run-off from a golf course and the intensively cultivated Picadilly Valley. At the reservoir itself, pesticide levels were measurable in parts per billion. p87 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

In South Australia, studies found DDT residues in creek waters above the WHO guidelines, with other pesticides such as Chlorpyrifos, Parathion and Endosulfan also present in ‘relatively high’ concentrations. The residues originated in water run-off from a golf course and the intensively cultivated Picadilly Valley. At the reservoir itself, pesticide levels were measurable in parts per billion. p87 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1990 – 1992: Tully. Banana Plantations. Pesticides of concern: Propiconazole, Chlorpyrifos, Dimethoate, Monocrotophos, Mancozeb

I live in the middle of a banana growing area where spraying takes place every four days. Once, I was trapped by flood waters and couldn't leave when my neighbour sprayed. I closed the house up tight and didn't go out for a couple of hours, but from Monday til Thursday my eyes were terribly sore. I heard that people from nearby Jumbun were also affected, with fiver members of one family with sore eyes. One had to go to hospital for drops. The children had actually been crying, their eyes were so sore. Later I tried to find out what the pilot had used to cause our eyes to hurt so much, but he wouldn't tell me what it was. Neither the farmer nor the pilot will ever tell me what spray they use. anon p80/81 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

We are writing to let you know about why consumers should be concerned about chemical residues in bananas. Our Association is aware of the aerial spraying of fungicides and insecticides on banana crops in North Queensland. Fungal disease, grubs and other insect pests have to be controlled with pesticides because they cause markings on the fruit and many consumers won't accept even slightly blemished fruits. A large number of pesticides are registered or approved for use, and the most commonly used are chlorpyrifos, dimethoate and monocrotophos, the last two of which are systematic poisons [ie absorbed into the flesh of fruit and vegetables; not able to be washed off]. They spray on weekends and pick the fruit during the week, which means that withholding periods are not scrupulously observed. Chlorpyrifos has a withholding period of 14 days, dimethoate 7 days and monocrotophos 10 days. The bananas are also sprayed with mancozeb and petroleum oil every fortnight in summer time and every three to four weeks in winter, using aircraft or misting machines. Between 200 and 300 tons of mancozeb is dumped on the 3755 hectares of banana crops in North Queensland each season. We believe it leaves residues in banana fruit and urge consumer groups to get them tested for ETU (ethylene thiourea), the metabolite of mancozeb, which is a potential carcinogen. In the United States, the EPA has withdrawn the use of this and similar fungicides on many crops and we are not aware of any monitoring of ETU by public authorities. Citizens Against Aerial Spraying Association, Tully Queensland.

Two years later, the Tully people had more information about food pesticide risk. Government tests on 15 Tully banana samples found mancozeb in 13, chlorpyrifos in four, monocrotophos in three and propiconozole in one...

p83/84 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

I live in the middle of a banana growing area where spraying takes place every four days. Once, I was trapped by flood waters and couldn’t leave when my neighbour sprayed. I closed the house up tight and didn’t go out for a couple of hours, but from Monday til Thursday my eyes were terribly sore. I heard that people from nearby Jumbun were also affected, with fiver members of one family with sore eyes. One had to go to hospital for drops. The children had actually been crying, their eyes were so sore. Later I tried to find out what the pilot had used to cause our eyes to hurt so much, but he wouldn’t tell me what it was. Neither the farmer nor the pilot will ever tell me what spray they use. anon p80/81 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

We are writing to let you know about why consumers should be concerned about chemical residues in bananas. Our Association is aware of the aerial spraying of fungicides and insecticides on banana crops in North Queensland. Fungal disease, grubs and other insect pests have to be controlled with pesticides because they cause markings on the fruit and many consumers won’t accept even slightly blemished fruits. A large number of pesticides are registered or approved for use, and the most commonly used are chlorpyrifos, dimethoate and monocrotophos, the last two of which are systematic poisons [ie absorbed into the flesh of fruit and vegetables; not able to be washed off]. They spray on weekends and pick the fruit during the week, which means that withholding periods are not scrupulously observed. Chlorpyrifos has a withholding period of 14 days, dimethoate 7 days and monocrotophos 10 days. The bananas are also sprayed with mancozeb and petroleum oil every fortnight in summer time and every three to four weeks in winter, using aircraft or misting machines. Between 200 and 300 tons of mancozeb is dumped on the 3755 hectares of banana crops in North Queensland each season. We believe it leaves residues in banana fruit and urge consumer groups to get them tested for ETU (ethylene thiourea), the metabolite of mancozeb, which is a potential carcinogen. In the United States, the EPA has withdrawn the use of this and similar fungicides on many crops and we are not aware of any monitoring of ETU by public authorities. Citizens Against Aerial Spraying Association, Tully Queensland.

Two years later, the Tully people had more information about food pesticide risk. Government tests on 15 Tully banana samples found mancozeb in 13, chlorpyrifos in four, monocrotophos in three and propiconozole in one…

p83/84 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

 

1983 August: Sydney. Pesticide: Heptachlor

In August, 1983, Sydney woman Marg Sambrook had her house treated for termites and spiders with the OC, heptachlor. Six days later, she became extremely ill after wiping the pesticide residue off her windows, where it had dripped from the eaves and gutters. The operator had told her that the poison was harmless once it had dried. Her symptoms included severe muscle aching and contraction, severe nausea, memory loss and poor coordination. She could only sleep for two and a half hours each night for the six months following the treatment. Her symptoms continued for well over a year and she eventually had to move away from her home. It took her three years to fully recover from heptachlor poisoning. p80 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

In August, 1983, Sydney woman Marg Sambrook had her house treated for termites and spiders with the OC, heptachlor. Six days later, she became extremely ill after wiping the pesticide residue off her windows, where it had dripped from the eaves and gutters. The operator had told her that the poison was harmless once it had dried. Her symptoms included severe muscle aching and contraction, severe nausea, memory loss and poor coordination. She could only sleep for two and a half hours each night for the six months following the treatment. Her symptoms continued for well over a year and she eventually had to move away from her home. It took her three years to fully recover from heptachlor poisoning. p80 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1950’s: Sydney (St George Hospital): Pesticide detected: Sodium Arsenite

In the early 1950's, a council in southern Sydney used the inorganic pesticide sodium arsenite to kill weeds in its parks and gardens. The weed killer was sprayed liberally around areas where children played and not long after, St George Hospital staff noticed an increase in admissions for child poisoning. The cause of the poisoning remained a mystery until urine samples proved positive for arsenic. The community reasoned that the children had absorbed the pesticide through their skin and eventually the council was forced to stop spraying. p80 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

In the early 1950’s, a council in southern Sydney used the inorganic pesticide sodium arsenite to kill weeds in its parks and gardens. The weed killer was sprayed liberally around areas where children played and not long after, St George Hospital staff noticed an increase in admissions for child poisoning. The cause of the poisoning remained a mystery until urine samples proved positive for arsenic. The community reasoned that the children had absorbed the pesticide through their skin and eventually the council was forced to stop spraying. p80 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1987: Newcastle. Pesticide of Concern: Aldrin

In 1987 Ray Campbell and Phil Jones were working as steel fixers in Newcastle. They were poisoned after kneeling in a puddle of a white milky liquid for several hours. The liquid was run-off Aldrin, the OC pesticide that had been sprayed some hours previously, and left to accumulate in puddles on the site. The two men became sick on the job with symptoms of acute exposure, including dry throat and tingling sensation in the legs. Six years after exposure both are still unwell. Symptoms include coughing up blood, blisters and red blotches on the roof of the mouth, rhinitis, loss of voice and constant burning sensations in the nose. p79 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

In 1987 *** and *** were working as steel fixers in Newcastle. They were poisoned after kneeling in a puddle of a white milky liquid for several hours. The liquid was run-off Aldrin, the OC pesticide that had been sprayed some hours previously, and left to accumulate in puddles on the site. The two men became sick on the job with symptoms of acute exposure, including dry throat and tingling sensation in the legs. Six years after exposure both are still unwell. Symptoms include coughing up blood, blisters and red blotches on the roof of the mouth, rhinitis, loss of voice and constant burning sensations in the nose. p79 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s: Bundaberg Tomato Industry

Teresa Weir worked in the Bundaberg tomato industry for nine years as both picker and packer. During the picking season, she was in constant contact with the bushes and on some occasions, directly with pesticides as they were applied. She constantly inhaled their fumes. After two years in the industry, Teresa developed asthma, and after four years, swellings and sores appeared on her hands and arms, and her body itched constantly all over. These symptoms continued during the season and gradually diminished during the six-month off-season. In February 1990, Teresa was diagnosed as suffering from allergic contact dermatitis. The doctor's report indicated that her symptoms were consistent with pesticide exposure and indicated that, at the age of 48, she was incapable of returning to work. p78 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

*** worked in the Bundaberg tomato industry for nine years as both picker and packer. During the picking season, she was in constant contact with the bushes and on some occasions, directly with pesticides as they were applied. She constantly inhaled their fumes. After two years in the industry, *** developed asthma, and after four years, swellings and sores appeared on her hands and arms, and her body itched constantly all over. These symptoms continued during the season and gradually diminished during the six-month off-season. In February 1990, *** was diagnosed as suffering from allergic contact dermatitis. The doctor’s report indicated that her symptoms were consistent with pesticide exposure and indicated that, at the age of 48, she was incapable of returning to work. p78 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1960’s – 1990’s: Northern Flinders Ranges: Dieldrin

Natalie and her husband Tom lives on a sheep station in the Northern Flinders Ranges for 30 years. Each year, like every other grazier in the district, they dipped their sheep in dieldrin to stop fly strike and scabies. The dieldrin was commonly mixed by hand by both she and her husband, and everybody else, were up to their armpits in it. Natalie has since left to live in the city but has noticed with concern the number of her grazier neighbours who have died of cancer. p77/78 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

Natalie and her husband Tom lives on a sheep station in the Northern Flinders Ranges for 30 years. Each year, like every other grazier in the district, they dipped their sheep in dieldrin to stop fly strike and scabies. The dieldrin was commonly mixed by hand by both she and her husband, and everybody else, were up to their armpits in it. Natalie has since left to live in the city but has noticed with concern the number of her grazier neighbours who have died of cancer. p77/78 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1950’s – 1980’s: Ovens Valley. Pesticides: DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, Chlordane

I am Maria, 26 years of age and the daughter of a first generation Italian tobacco farmer who worked in the industry for more than twenty years. As a teenager I learned to live with a word called 'cancer' and with the horrendous suffering it causes. I could never fathom the reality that so many people I knew could be affected by such a disease. 'The Poison' to which everybody so casually referred I later came to understand were pesticides. Some were known carcinogens and all of them were extensively used on tobacco where they polluted the environment we lived in. They included DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, heptachlor and chlordane. Dieldrin especially was a great worry because it was so widely used and could penetrate the skin so easily.

I cannot express my emotions... how I feel about the tobacco industry who must have been aware of the toxic residues these chemicals were leaving and yet allowed its people to be poisoned. Through my experience I have come to believe that there is an underlying tragedy to all this. For the migrants who left their homes more than thirty years ago to build better lives for themselves, their children and communities ... in the tobacco growing industry of north-eastern Victoria. Inevitably they have helped to poison themselves and others through ignorance.

There are so many memories vivid in my mind. Swimming in rivers contaminated with pesticide containers, rivers from which people would draw their water supply. And eating foods grown alongside tobacco crops, inevitably being sprayed with the same chemicals that were used on the tobacco. Seeing chemical containers potted with plants, accepting as normal the smoking and lack of protective clothing being worn by farmers when mixing and using chemicals. The inability of the farmers to read and understand labels, the non-existent 'compulsory' periodic blood testing of farmers and their families. I ask myself again and again, has it been, in fact in the best interests of the tobacco industry and chemical companies to keep us ignorant and uneducated? After all, there has never been any enforcement if education of the dangers of such practices.

I have observed the escalating cancer, birth abnormalities and asthma/allergies in the area and I have come to fear this technological age we live in. And I ask why should we be made the guinea pigs in such reckless experimentation with man-made insecticides and their long term legacy of death and suffering. The people of north-east Victoria are only one small group who have fallen to pesticide injustice. Ultimately we must all accept some responsibility in trying to change this destructive technology that poisons our bodies and the environment. Maria Mammlioti, Wakely, NSW, March 1989. p71/2 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

I am Maria, 26 years of age and the daughter of a first generation Italian tobacco farmer who worked in the industry for more than twenty years. As a teenager I learned to live with a word called ‘cancer’ and with the horrendous suffering it causes. I could never fathom the reality that so many people I knew could be affected by such a disease. ‘The Poison’ to which everybody so casually referred I later came to understand were pesticides. Some were known carcinogens and all of them were extensively used on tobacco where they polluted the environment we lived in. They included DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, heptachlor and chlordane. Dieldrin especially was a great worry because it was so widely used and could penetrate the skin so easily.

I cannot express my emotions… how I feel about the tobacco industry who must have been aware of the toxic residues these chemicals were leaving and yet allowed its people to be poisoned. Through my experience I have come to believe that there is an underlying tragedy to all this. For the migrants who left their homes more than thirty years ago to build better lives for themselves, their children and communities … in the tobacco growing industry of north-eastern Victoria. Inevitably they have helped to poison themselves and others through ignorance.

There are so many memories vivid in my mind. Swimming in rivers contaminated with pesticide containers, rivers from which people would draw their water supply. And eating foods grown alongside tobacco crops, inevitably being sprayed with the same chemicals that were used on the tobacco. Seeing chemical containers potted with plants, accepting as normal the smoking and lack of protective clothing being worn by farmers when mixing and using chemicals. The inability of the farmers to read and understand labels, the non-existent ‘compulsory’ periodic blood testing of farmers and their families. I ask myself again and again, has it been, in fact in the best interests of the tobacco industry and chemical companies to keep us ignorant and uneducated? After all, there has never been any enforcement if education of the dangers of such practices.

I have observed the escalating cancer, birth abnormalities and asthma/allergies in the area and I have come to fear this technological age we live in. And I ask why should we be made the guinea pigs in such reckless experimentation with man-made insecticides and their long term legacy of death and suffering. The people of north-east Victoria are only one small group who have fallen to pesticide injustice. Ultimately we must all accept some responsibility in trying to change this destructive technology that poisons our bodies and the environment. Maria Mammlioti, Wakely, NSW, March 1989. p71/2 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1990: Lake Popiltah: Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Heptachlor, DDT

Chlorpyrifos is also used extensively in agriculture and its residues can turn up in surprising places. Biodymanic farmer and standards officer David Williams found traces of it in cereals grown in the virgin soil of Lake Popiltah, south of Menindie on the Darling River. He also found heptachlor and DDT and surmised that flood waters must have deposited the poisons on the lake. Their source could only have been from cotton and other sprayed crops grown upstream. p68 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

Chlorpyrifos is also used extensively in agriculture and its residues can turn up in surprising places. Biodymanic farmer and standards officer David Williams found traces of it in cereals grown in the virgin soil of Lake Popiltah, south of Menindie on the Darling River. He also found heptachlor and DDT and surmised that flood waters must have deposited the poisons on the lake. Their source could only have been from cotton and other sprayed crops grown upstream. p68 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1956: Gulf of St Vincent. Mass Crayfish deaths

Some may remember the demise of South Australian crayfish in 1956 after huge floods washed the residues of pesticides used for plague locust spraying into the Gulf of St. Vincent. p65 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country Kate Short 1994

Some may remember the demise of South Australian crayfish in 1956 after huge floods washed the residues of pesticides used for plague locust spraying into the Gulf of St. Vincent. p65 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country Kate Short 1994

1990?: Cannery near Sheffield Tasmania. Birth deformites

The woman at the hospital started telling me about a friend who had just given birth to a baby without a covering over its brain. The child's father worked [at the cannery] and the thing that concerned her was that both she and the parents concerned were all aware of other babies with the same condition born to fathers working at the cannery...My level of concern went up a few months later when I was in the local hospital having my second baby. The lady next to me was distressed as she had just given birth to a baby with a serious birth defect and during our talk she told me that her husband worked at the cannery. Later on, I spoke with my mother who had been a receptionist at the hospital for 11 years. She told me that to her, the number of babies born with cleft palates and other deformities seemed inordinately high but she had nothing else to compare her observations with. She was responsible for typing patients' files so she had a fair idea of what was going on. Jo Eastern Sheffield Tasmania 1991.

The woman at the hospital started telling me about a friend who had just given birth to a baby without a covering over its brain. The child’s father worked [at the cannery] and the thing that concerned her was that both she and the parents concerned were all aware of other babies with the same condition born to fathers working at the cannery…My level of concern went up a few months later when I was in the local hospital having my second baby. The lady next to me was distressed as she had just given birth to a baby with a serious birth defect and during our talk she told me that her husband worked at the cannery. Later on, I spoke with my mother who had been a receptionist at the hospital for 11 years. She told me that to her, the number of babies born with cleft palates and other deformities seemed inordinately high but she had nothing else to compare her observations with. She was responsible for typing patients’ files so she had a fair idea of what was going on. *** Sheffield Tasmania 1991.

1980’s: Perth. Pesticide of concern: Heptachlor

My husband and I have five other healthy children. When I was six months pregnant with Gemma, the concrete foundation of our new extension was sprayed with heptachlor. I returned to the house two and a half hours after the spray and opened the front door. The odour of chemicals was very strong and I immediately retreated to the front verge without taking a step inside, thinking 'you can't go in there, you are six months pregnant and have two young children with you'. I had to feed the children and we went inside but stayed in the lounge room hoping that was the least affected. I wouldn't allow the children into the kitchen or their bedrooms that day and didn't feel happy putting them to bed that night. During that day, my eyes felt badly sunburnt and I became extremely tired and could hardly walk. The smell persisted for days. All three children vomited and the youngest had hideous nightmares, became noticeably aggressive and began to wet the bed. My four-year-old daughter completely lost her appetite and our nine-year-old son developed breathing problems and vocal chord congestion.

Then Gemma was born one month premature, blind and with a serious heart defect. She was delivered by emergency caesarian delivery. The doctor said that in another day she would have been a stillbirth. After a corneal graft Gemma was given a 50 per cent chance that she would gain even 3 per cent of her vision. The corneal graft was not successful but she can now see a little in the other eye.

When I contacted her opthalmologist and mentioned the heptachlor I was exposed to during pregancy, in case it had any bearing on Gemma's subsequent treatment. He was sceptical and asked if I had genetic counselling. At a much later date I told him about the research I had done. I had discovered that the heptachlor spray contained 50 per cent xylene, and that the chemical caused opaque corneas in rabbits, and also in men, who had been oversprayed. The specialist said that he had not known that, and was quite concerned. Marie Ryan, Perth October 1991.

Marie Ryan continued her investigations into the causes of birth defects and identified five other similarly exposed women whose children were also blind. She eventually compiled a list of at least 50 women who had suffered the trauma of miscarriage, stillbirth, neo-natal death or birth abnormality. All of these women had been exposed to OC and other pesticides either just prior to, or during pregnancy. p57/8 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

My husband and I have five other healthy children. When I was six months pregnant with Gemma, the concrete foundation of our new extension was sprayed with heptachlor. I returned to the house two and a half hours after the spray and opened the front door. The odour of chemicals was very strong and I immediately retreated to the front verge without taking a step inside, thinking ‘you can’t go in there, you are six months pregnant and have two young children with you’. I had to feed the children and we went inside but stayed in the lounge room hoping that was the least affected. I wouldn’t allow the children into the kitchen or their bedrooms that day and didn’t feel happy putting them to bed that night. During that day, my eyes felt badly sunburnt and I became extremely tired and could hardly walk. The smell persisted for days. All three children vomited and the youngest had hideous nightmares, became noticeably aggressive and began to wet the bed. My four-year-old daughter completely lost her appetite and our nine-year-old son developed breathing problems and vocal chord congestion.

Then Gemma was born one month premature, blind and with a serious heart defect. She was delivered by emergency caesarian delivery. The doctor said that in another day she would have been a stillbirth. After a corneal graft Gemma was given a 50 per cent chance that she would gain even 3 per cent of her vision. The corneal graft was not successful but she can now see a little in the other eye.

When I contacted her opthalmologist and mentioned the heptachlor I was exposed to during pregancy, in case it had any bearing on Gemma’s subsequent treatment. He was sceptical and asked if I had genetic counselling. At a much later date I told him about the research I had done. I had discovered that the heptachlor spray contained 50 per cent xylene, and that the chemical caused opaque corneas in rabbits, and also in men, who had been oversprayed. The specialist said that he had not known that, and was quite concerned. ***, Perth October 1991.

*** continued her investigations into the causes of birth defects and identified five other similarly exposed women whose children were also blind. She eventually compiled a list of at least 50 women who had suffered the trauma of miscarriage, stillbirth, neo-natal death or birth abnormality. All of these women had been exposed to OC and other pesticides either just prior to, or during pregnancy. p57/8 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1987 August – 1988 January: Yass Department of Agriculture: Organochlorines

Helen Alchin worked as a typist/receptionist with the NSW Department of Agriculture at Yass. Her duties included receiving, storing and recording the stocks of banned organochlorine pesticides that had been recalled during the 'beef-export' crisis of 1987.

'The men in the office were more often out in the field which meant I had to take delivery of the banned chemicals - some of the containers were very old - the smell of chemicals in the shed was very strong'.

Helen worked in the office from August 1987 to January 1988 when she left to have a baby. In April 1988, her daughter was delivered stillborn two weeks before she was due. Helen had previously delivered two healthy boys and has subsequently had a healthy son. p57 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

*** worked as a typist/receptionist with the NSW Department of Agriculture at Yass. Her duties included receiving, storing and recording the stocks of banned organochlorine pesticides that had been recalled during the ‘beef-export’ crisis of 1987.

‘The men in the office were more often out in the field which meant I had to take delivery of the banned chemicals – some of the containers were very old – the smell of chemicals in the shed was very strong’.

Helen worked in the office from August 1987 to January 1988 when she left to have a baby. In April 1988, her daughter was delivered stillborn two weeks before she was due. Helen had previously delivered two healthy boys and has subsequently had a healthy son. p57 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1980 – 1982: Coffs Harbour Banana Plantations

Our first child was born healthy in 1977 and the next year we moved to Coffs Harbour. Our house was on the roadside corner of a banana plantation and we asked the owners of the house and the real estate agent about the pesticides and were told only white oil and fertilisers were being used - nothing harmful. We bought the house and moved in.
 
One morning, while hanging out the washing a spray plane came over so low I could read the numbers on it and see the pilot. We were all covered with a fine wet rain of pesticide from the plane. It burnt my eyes and face and I felt like vomiting, doubled up and was sick. The plane came over again and again, and we got sprayed some more. We staggered inside and the showered. By this time I had bad stomach cramps and was really ill. I had blinding headaches, nose bleeds, and chronic diarrhoea with sores on my arms and legs the size of 50 cent pieces. I later found all but three of my chooks dead, they were bleeding from their beaks.
 
Soon after, I found that I was pregnant and the doctor told me that this was the reason for my illness. The remainder of my pregnancy I was very sick and in and out of hospital. My baby never slept. She thrashed about in rigid jerking movements rather than just shifting or rolling. Near the end of my pregnancy, they finally X-rayed me and found that the baby was not going to live. Jennifer was born on the 1st of June 1981 and died at birth. The autopsy revealed that she had no top on her head, a cleft lip and palate, spina bifida and her bones had hooks and barbs on them. There were no wrists or elbows. She could not be lain flat, half her heart was missing, and her organs were all shrivelled, her liver with cancerous lesions.
 
Two years later I had the same experience. I was not aware that I was pregnant and we were all outside. I was hanging out the washing and my husband and son were in the garden. The plane came over and on the third sweep I was drenched and crawled vomiting and bleeding towards the house. Our goats fell down and vomited, aborted and bled from the mouth and bowel and all but two of our 16 chooks died too. Our big ginger cat died two weeks later. The vet said he had been poisoned. Cattle in neighbouring paddocks also got sick.
 
My pregancy was confirmed nine days later after this second spray incident and the pattern was the same as the first. My baby thrashed about continually, I was sick the whole time and in and out of hospital. Nikita was born dead on April 13th 1982. She had a hare lip and palate and hydrocephalus and the autopsy revealed that she was deformed inside; cancerous lesions on the liver, completely cleft palate and a hare lip, heart defect, shrivelled fallopian tubes, ovaries and uterus and no actual spine except for a small amount at the base.
 
This time I was told I must have a genetic fault, either that, or both my husband and I did. I was told our chances of another live healthy child were nil. I asked for tests to show me the problem and I was then told that it was a genetic fault found only in females and passed from mother to daughter. A year later, living in a clean environment, I gave birth to a healthy daughter. Dianne Marshall. Gold Coast, Queensland 1991.  p 54/55 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994
Our first child was born healthy in 1977 and the next year we moved to Coffs Harbour. Our house was on the roadside corner of a banana plantation and we asked the owners of the house and the real estate agent about the pesticides and were told only white oil and fertilisers were being used – nothing harmful. We bought the house and moved in.
One morning, while hanging out the washing a spray plane came over so low I could read the numbers on it and see the pilot. We were all covered with a fine wet rain of pesticide from the plane. It burnt my eyes and face and I felt like vomiting, doubled up and was sick. The plane came over again and again, and we got sprayed some more. We staggered inside and the showered. By this time I had bad stomach cramps and was really ill. I had blinding headaches, nose bleeds, and chronic diarrhoea with sores on my arms and legs the size of 50 cent pieces. I later found all but three of my chooks dead, they were bleeding from their beaks.
Soon after, I found that I was pregnant and the doctor told me that this was the reason for my illness. The remainder of my pregnancy I was very sick and in and out of hospital. My baby never slept. She thrashed about in rigid jerking movements rather than just shifting or rolling. Near the end of my pregnancy, they finally X-rayed me and found that the baby was not going to live. Jennifer was born on the 1st of June 1981 and died at birth. The autopsy revealed that she had no top on her head, a cleft lip and palate, spina bifida and her bones had hooks and barbs on them. There were no wrists or elbows. She could not be lain flat, half her heart was missing, and her organs were all shrivelled, her liver with cancerous lesions.
Two years later I had the same experience. I was not aware that I was pregnant and we were all outside. I was hanging out the washing and my husband and son were in the garden. The plane came over and on the third sweep I was drenched and crawled vomiting and bleeding towards the house. Our goats fell down and vomited, aborted and bled from the mouth and bowel and all but two of our 16 chooks died too. Our big ginger cat died two weeks later. The vet said he had been poisoned. Cattle in neighbouring paddocks also got sick.
My pregnancy was confirmed nine days later after this second spray incident and the pattern was the same as the first. My baby thrashed about continually, I was sick the whole time and in and out of hospital. Nikita was born dead on April 13th 1982. She had a hare lip and palate and hydrocephalus and the autopsy revealed that she was deformed inside; cancerous lesions on the liver, completely cleft palate and a hare lip, heart defect, shrivelled fallopian tubes, ovaries and uterus and no actual spine except for a small amount at the base.
This time I was told I must have a genetic fault, either that, or both my husband and I did. I was told our chances of another live healthy child were nil. I asked for tests to show me the problem and I was then told that it was a genetic fault found only in females and passed from mother to daughter. A year later, living in a clean environment, I gave birth to a healthy daughter. ***. Gold Coast, Queensland 1991.  p 54/55 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1989 January – February: Lindenow

During January to February 1989 my husband Noel Conway and I were living and working near Lindenow in the Mitchell River area of East Gippsland. We were labouring on the broccoli, bean and gherkin crops. The shack we lived in had no running water so we drank from the river which flowed through a crop run-off area. We also had several experiences where crop dusting planes worked in very close proximity. This happened just near our dwelling and while we were working on the crops. On the 9th of January I became pregnant and we left Lindenow in early March.

My son Clancy is now 19 months old but has the development of a child about 11 to 12 months. He crawled at 15 months and is now able to stand with the support of a table. He will probably walk before he is two. In his first year he was partially deaf but now his hearing is normal. He wears glasses. A CAT scan revealed that his brain is abnormally structured. The neurologist at Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth says the damage to Clancy's body happened in the first trimester of pregnancy. The cause, they say, is either from external factors, such as poisoning, or it is genetic. My husband and I both feel that pesticides are the more likely cause.

The abnormality of Clancy's brain will never allow him to develop normally, according to the [hospital] neurologists. He will be mentally and physically handicapped for the rest of his life. Clancy is underweight, has low body tone, is partially deaf, very long sighted and developmentally delayed. Amazingly, he looks like a normal person and has a normal life expectancy. Genevieve Forrest, Fremantle, Western Australia May 1991. Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

During January to February 1989 my husband Noel Conway and I were living and working near Lindenow in the Mitchell River area of East Gippsland. We were labouring on the broccoli, bean and gherkin crops. The shack we lived in had no running water so we drank from the river which flowed through a crop run-off area. We also had several experiences where crop dusting planes worked in very close proximity. This happened just near our dwelling and while we were working on the crops. On the 9th of January I became pregnant and we left Lindenow in early March.

My son Clancy is now 19 months old but has the development of a child about 11 to 12 months. He crawled at 15 months and is now able to stand with the support of a table. He will probably walk before he is two. In his first year he was partially deaf but now his hearing is normal. He wears glasses. A CAT scan revealed that his brain is abnormally structured. The neurologist at Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth says the damage to Clancy’s body happened in the first trimester of pregnancy. The cause, they say, is either from external factors, such as poisoning, or it is genetic. My husband and I both feel that pesticides are the more likely cause.

The abnormality of Clancy’s brain will never allow him to develop normally, according to the [hospital] neurologists. He will be mentally and physically handicapped for the rest of his life. Clancy is underweight, has low body tone, is partially deaf, very long sighted and developmentally delayed. Amazingly, he looks like a normal person and has a normal life expectancy. ***, Fremantle, Western Australia May 1991. Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

2007 February: Child Care Centre on Pesticides Site

Child care centre 'on pesticides site'

February 16, 2007

Western Australia is conducting a review of all its child care centres after a centre was shut down after it was found to have been built on an old pesticides site.

WA's Department for Community Development (DCD) on Thursday suspended the licence of the Cuddles Child Care Centre in Carlisle, in Perth's east, after being advised the centre was built over an old pesticides facility owned by pharmaceuticals company Bayer.

The state Health Department said it learnt this on Tuesday and told DCD the site was possibly contaminated because pesticide containers had been inappropriately disposed of there, probably in the 1980s and early 1990s.

In an information sheet for parents on its website, the Health Department said the pesticide residue was later removed and soil monitoring in 1997 and 1998 showed pesticide levels met acceptable standards.

It is unlikely children have been affected because the contamination was located at the rear of the old property, not near the day care centre, the information sheet said.

DCD spokesman Mark Glasson said all the state's licensed child care centres will now be checked to make sure they are not on contaminated sites.

"The department ... will in future ensure that application forms for a childcare centre licence will incorporate questions seeking information about the history of the land on which they propose to operate," Mr Glasson said.

Mr Glasson said the Cuddles Child Care Centres company was given permission by the Town of Victoria Park to build the Carlisle centre in May 2005.

Under local planning requirements, childcare centres are regarded as commercial developments and require less stringent health checks than residential developments.

Town of Victoria Park spokeswoman Rochelle Lavery said the Council recently discovered that when Bayer conducted the clean-up of the site it failed to submit its final report to the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC).

This meant the clean-up never received the final tick-off and when the council alerted Bayer to this the company then submitted its final report to DEC, Ms Lavery said.

"I'm presuming that there's some concern that the processes that were in place in 1997 are not acceptable now," Ms Lavery said.

Bayer Australia and Cuddles child care centres have been contacted for comment.

Cuddles Management, which owns the Carlisle Cuddles centre, later released a statement saying it had no prior knowledge of the site being used by a chemical company or of any contamination.

"How did the town of Victoria Park allow for the approval of the site with the knowledge of the prior use and why were reports not audited at this stage?", Cuddles Management state manager Roberta Keown asked.

The Health Department will now test the site for pesticides and heavy metals and assess the risk to 70 or more children who were at the centre.

 

Child care centre ‘on pesticides site’

February 16, 2007

Western Australia is conducting a review of all its child care centres after a centre was shut down after it was found to have been built on an old pesticides site.

WA’s Department for Community Development (DCD) on Thursday suspended the licence of the Cuddles Child Care Centre in Carlisle, in Perth’s east, after being advised the centre was built over an old pesticides facility owned by pharmaceuticals company Bayer.

The state Health Department said it learnt this on Tuesday and told DCD the site was possibly contaminated because pesticide containers had been inappropriately disposed of there, probably in the 1980s and early 1990s.

In an information sheet for parents on its website, the Health Department said the pesticide residue was later removed and soil monitoring in 1997 and 1998 showed pesticide levels met acceptable standards.

It is unlikely children have been affected because the contamination was located at the rear of the old property, not near the day care centre, the information sheet said.

DCD spokesman Mark Glasson said all the state’s licensed child care centres will now be checked to make sure they are not on contaminated sites.

“The department … will in future ensure that application forms for a childcare centre licence will incorporate questions seeking information about the history of the land on which they propose to operate,” Mr Glasson said.

Mr Glasson said the Cuddles Child Care Centres company was given permission by the Town of Victoria Park to build the Carlisle centre in May 2005.

Under local planning requirements, childcare centres are regarded as commercial developments and require less stringent health checks than residential developments.

Town of Victoria Park spokeswoman Rochelle Lavery said the Council recently discovered that when Bayer conducted the clean-up of the site it failed to submit its final report to the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC).

This meant the clean-up never received the final tick-off and when the council alerted Bayer to this the company then submitted its final report to DEC, Ms Lavery said.

“I’m presuming that there’s some concern that the processes that were in place in 1997 are not acceptable now,” Ms Lavery said.

Bayer Australia and Cuddles child care centres have been contacted for comment.

Cuddles Management, which owns the Carlisle Cuddles centre, later released a statement saying it had no prior knowledge of the site being used by a chemical company or of any contamination.

“How did the town of Victoria Park allow for the approval of the site with the knowledge of the prior use and why were reports not audited at this stage?”, Cuddles Management state manager Roberta Keown asked.

The Health Department will now test the site for pesticides and heavy metals and assess the risk to 70 or more children who were at the centre.

 

 

1979-1981: Oatley NSW. Birth deformities. Pesticide: Dichlorvos

Peter was born on May 18, 1980 with only one hand. One arm stopped mid-way between the elbow and what would have been the wrist. The last menstrual period was August 18th 1979. During September that year I was exposed to close and frequent contact with a surface spray containing the organophosphate dichlorvos. At the same time, my flatmate was taken ill. Her symptoms were similar to a previous illness which her doctor had put down to dichlorvos exposure through her use of surface spray. During this previous illness, she had painful swollen limbs and was unable to walk.

My pregnancy was confirmed on the 2nd of October, after which time I have no clear memory of using dichlorvos but I may have done so. After my son was born, I attended the Limb Deficiency Clinic and several of the women there had recollections of using dichlorvos spray. One told me that she had used the spray according to instructions when pregnant, the other that the pesticides had been used during the cooking classes she had attended when pregnant. A fourth mother did not mention the actual product but her limb deficient child mentioned that his mother still used it as a spider spray. A fifth mother whose child has a hand but no fingers said she used the surface spray containing dichlorvos regularly and would have done so during her pregnancy.

I realise that all this information is just stories ... It's anecdotal and isn't the stuff which scientific research is made of. But it's a warning to other women to avoid using this pesticide in their homes, especially when they are pregnant. Kerrie Carr, Oatley NSW, October 1989. Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short. 1994

Peter was born on May 18, 1980 with only one hand. One arm stopped mid-way between the elbow and what would have been the wrist. The last menstrual period was August 18th 1979. During September that year I was exposed to close and frequent contact with a surface spray containing the organophosphate dichlorvos. At the same time, my flatmate was taken ill. Her symptoms were similar to a previous illness which her doctor had put down to dichlorvos exposure through her use of surface spray. During this previous illness, she had painful swollen limbs and was unable to walk.

My pregnancy was confirmed on the 2nd of October, after which time I have no clear memory of using dichlorvos but I may have done so. After my son was born, I attended the Limb Deficiency Clinic and several of the women there had recollections of using dichlorvos spray. One told me that she had used the spray according to instructions when pregnant, the other that the pesticides had been used during the cooking classes she had attended when pregnant. A fourth mother did not mention the actual product but her limb deficient child mentioned that his mother still used it as a spider spray. A fifth mother whose child has a hand but no fingers said she used the surface spray containing dichlorvos regularly and would have done so during her pregnancy.

I realise that all this information is just stories … It’s anecdotal and isn’t the stuff which scientific research is made of. But it’s a warning to other women to avoid using this pesticide in their homes, especially when they are pregnant. ***, Oatley NSW, October 1989. Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short. 1994

1980’s: Tamworth Crop Dusting Loading. Pesticides: Multiple

Sandra O'Connor lives in Tamworth, in northern NSW. Her husband's job in the crop dusting industry involved loading pesticides onto planes. These included endosulfan, dicamba, methomyl, benomyl, 2,4-D, chlorpyrifos, glyphosate and picloram. He wore no protective clothing when he worked with pesticides and when Sandra washed she could smell them on her husband's clothing. She did not for a moment think that this constituted exposure to them. She became pregnant but the baby was born nine weeks early and died one hour later from lack of blood. The autopsy revealed that the baby died from Anaemia Respiratory Distress Syndrome and that he had only five millilitres of blood in his body. After this experience, Sandra's husband changed his job but still experiences the restlessness, headaches and skin irritation that began when he first started working with pesticides. p53 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. 1994 Kate Short

*** lives in Tamworth, in northern NSW. Her husband’s job in the crop dusting industry involved loading pesticides onto planes. These included endosulfan, dicamba, methomyl, benomyl, 2,4-D, chlorpyrifos, glyphosate and picloram. He wore no protective clothing when he worked with pesticides and when Sandra washed she could smell them on her husband’s clothing. She did not for a moment think that this constituted exposure to them. She became pregnant but the baby was born nine weeks early and died one hour later from lack of blood. The autopsy revealed that the baby died from Anaemia Respiratory Distress Syndrome and that he had only five millilitres of blood in his body. After this experience, Sandra’s husband changed his job but still experiences the restlessness, headaches and skin irritation that began when he first started working with pesticides. p53 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. 1994 Kate Short

2010 January: Great Alpine Road

12/1/10: Great Alpine Road. Contractor (4 Site Australia Pty Ltd) was using triclopyr-based product for English Broom control in temperatures approaching 40 degrees and in strong wind (40kph?) on a Code Red day. Although effectiveness of herbicide in such conditions is questionable, there is potential for damage to orchard trees.

12/1/10: Great Alpine Road. Contractor (4 Site Australia Pty Ltd) was using triclopyr-based product for English Broom control in temperatures approaching 40 degrees and in strong wind (40kph?) on a Code Red day. Although effectiveness of herbicide in such conditions is questionable, there is potential for damage to orchard trees.

2009 September: Calder Highway Vicroads Incorrect Plant ID. Pesticide:

15/9/09: Calder Highway. Northern Weed Control staff were to be spraying 13km of bridal creeper on the Calder Highway each side of Wedderburn, but through incorrect identification methods, clematis microphylla (Old Man's Beard) was sprayed using "Brush Off"... This section of the Calder Highway is identified as an area of Significant Roadside Vegetation and because of their actions some off-target damage may have occurred, but due to the mode of herbicide action the effects may take 4 weeks to show...

15/9/09: Calder Highway. Northern Weed Control staff were to be spraying 13km of bridal creeper on the Calder Highway each side of Wedderburn, but through incorrect identification methods, clematis microphylla (Old Man’s Beard) was sprayed using “Brush Off”… This section of the Calder Highway is identified as an area of Significant Roadside Vegetation and because of their actions some off-target damage may have occurred, but due to the mode of herbicide action the effects may take 4 weeks to show…

2007 August: Vicroads spray drift Echuca Mitiamo Road

2/8/07: Herbicide Spraying - Echuca-Mitiamo Rd. An ETS was received at Vicroads on 9th August 2007 regarding herbicide drifting into a nearby paddock causing some damage to a barley crop following recent weed spraying around guideposts by City Wide. City Wide was notified and admitted that weed spraying had been undertaken at the above location in the week prior to the notification of the incident.

2/8/07: Herbicide Spraying – Echuca-Mitiamo Rd. An ETS was received at Vicroads on 9th August 2007 regarding herbicide drifting into a nearby paddock causing some damage to a barley crop following recent weed spraying around guideposts by City Wide. City Wide was notified and admitted that weed spraying had been undertaken at the above location in the week prior to the notification of the incident.

2007 June: Wimmera Highway Spray drift

18/6/07: Wimmera Highway. On 18/6/07 a Sub Contractor for VicRoads Road Services (Wilkin Environmental Services) undertook spraying of regrowth on the Wimmera High in which spray drift caused off target damage to native vegetation and a small part of an adjoining landowners crop (<50sqm). The spraying of regrowth within road reserves is part of VicRoads Road Services obligation under the 06/08 Routine Maintenance SLA.

On notification of the incident a meeting between VicRoads Road Services, Wilkin Environmental Services and VicRoads was convened on the 28/8/07. During the meeting VicRoads Roads Services presented a Non Conformance Report with Wilkin Environmental Services. Wilkin Environmental Services Chemical Spray Record indicates that the Roundup/Grazon mix was applied via a hand lance and ute mounted boom with wind speeds measured to be 15km/hr. It should be noted that application of spray in 15km/hr winds is within the 18km/hr maximum stated in Wilkin Environmental Services Operating Procedure, along with this spraying of regrowth on the 18/6/2007 was undertaken along numerous sections of the Wimmera Hwy and this is the only area known to have caused off target damage.

18/6/07: Wimmera Highway. On 18/6/07 a Sub Contractor for VicRoads Road Services (Wilkin Environmental Services) undertook spraying of regrowth on the Wimmera High in which spray drift caused off target damage to native vegetation and a small part of an adjoining landowners crop (<50sqm). The spraying of regrowth within road reserves is part of VicRoads Road Services obligation under the 06/08 Routine Maintenance SLA.

On notification of the incident a meeting between VicRoads Road Services, Wilkin Environmental Services and VicRoads was convened on the 28/8/07. During the meeting VicRoads Roads Services presented a Non Conformance Report with Wilkin Environmental Services. Wilkin Environmental Services Chemical Spray Record indicates that the Roundup/Grazon mix was applied via a hand lance and ute mounted boom with wind speeds measured to be 15km/hr. It should be noted that application of spray in 15km/hr winds is within the 18km/hr maximum stated in Wilkin Environmental Services Operating Procedure, along with this spraying of regrowth on the 18/6/2007 was undertaken along numerous sections of the Wimmera Hwy and this is the only area known to have caused off target damage.

2006 April: Yarra Blvd Melbourne. 15,000 plants killed by Vicroads

28/4/06: Yarra Blvd. Inappropriate Herbicide Spraying. Reported by Friends of Yarra Group via PITS. Extent of damage = 1.4km x 1.5m area sprayed and estimated no. of plants killed 15,000. This section of Yarra Blvd is closed to traffic. It appears Contractor has sprayed out section of old footpath.

28/4/06: Yarra Blvd. Inappropriate Herbicide Spraying. Reported by Friends of Yarra Group via PITS. Extent of damage = 1.4km x 1.5m area sprayed and estimated no. of plants killed 15,000. This section of Yarra Blvd is closed to traffic. It appears Contractor has sprayed out section of old footpath.

1980’s: Armidale NSW. Health impacts. Pesticides of concern: Aldrin, Heptachlor.

John Hunt, 28, of Armidale worked as a carpenter and was frequently exposed to the OC pesticides aldrin and heptachlor which were routinely used on building sites. He also cleaned out barley silos for four months over a two year period. The stored cereal was fumigated with pesticides and residues remained after treatment. John now suffers from giddiness, restlessness, fatigue, muscle twitching, sweating, breathing difficulties, hypoglycemia and allergies. These symptoms first became apparent when he was 21 and still persist eight years later. p43 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

***, 28, of Armidale worked as a carpenter and was frequently exposed to the OC pesticides aldrin and heptachlor which were routinely used on building sites. He also cleaned out barley silos for four months over a two year period. The stored cereal was fumigated with pesticides and residues remained after treatment. John now suffers from giddiness, restlessness, fatigue, muscle twitching, sweating, breathing difficulties, hypoglycemia and allergies. These symptoms first became apparent when he was 21 and still persist eight years later. p43 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1986: Gatton (Qld). Child illness

When the Coles family moved to Gatton in southern Queensland, their son was a normal healthy boy. Within months, he contracted a string of minor complaints ranging from sore throats, runny eyes and headaches and stomach pains. He was hospitalised with undiagnosed symptoms five times in five months and when he developed fever was given a spinal tap for meningitis. When this proved negative, allergies were suggested as a possible source of the complaint and he was sent to a specialist in Brisbane. Upon learning that the lad came from Gatton, the specialist commented to the parents that two-thirds of his patients were from that region and then proceeded to test for a variety of suspected allergic substances. Minor allergies to pollens from grass and local trees were found but the main culprit was pesticides used in crop spraying. At first the Coles believed their son's allergy to be an isolated event but later learnt from a teacher that most children at the school suffered similar symptoms in the spraying season, usually an hour or so after an application, when the wind conditions favoured their exposure. Gatton is the major fruit and vegetable growing region for Brisbane and has a long history of pesticide use. Adapted from Technology Report, Science Unit, ABC Radio, April 1986. p41/2 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

When the Coles family moved to Gatton in southern Queensland, their son was a normal healthy boy. Within months, he contracted a string of minor complaints ranging from sore throats, runny eyes and headaches and stomach pains. He was hospitalised with undiagnosed symptoms five times in five months and when he developed fever was given a spinal tap for meningitis. When this proved negative, allergies were suggested as a possible source of the complaint and he was sent to a specialist in Brisbane. Upon learning that the lad came from Gatton, the specialist commented to the parents that two-thirds of his patients were from that region and then proceeded to test for a variety of suspected allergic substances. Minor allergies to pollens from grass and local trees were found but the main culprit was pesticides used in crop spraying. At first the Coles believed their son’s allergy to be an isolated event but later learnt from a teacher that most children at the school suffered similar symptoms in the spraying season, usually an hour or so after an application, when the wind conditions favoured their exposure. Gatton is the major fruit and vegetable growing region for Brisbane and has a long history of pesticide use. Adapted from Technology Report, Science Unit, ABC Radio, April 1986. p41/2 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1950’s – 1960’s. Willowtree Road, Ferntree Gully.

The Street that Died Young

Robyn Williams: The classic book, Silent Spring, with its clarion call for the world to do something about the poisons devastating wildlife, was published in 1962. The author was Rachel Carson. So much we know and assume that the world has taken note and moved on; become more prudent about the blunderbuss treatment of crops with sprays so that nature and people can life more safely.

But now a book, published 35 years later, claims we are still reckless with our chemical weaponry, used not in the field of battle but where our crops and salads grow. Gloria Frydman has written The Street That Died Young and says it tells the story of Australia's own Silent Spring. It's a startling story, and one which we should perhaps take very seriously.

Gloria Frydman.

Gloria Frydman: The Australian postwar era of the 1950s saw the introduction of new and highly toxic chemicals imported from overseas. Pesticides such as DDT that had been trialled during the Second World War were now being unleashed on an unknowing, innocent and trusting population.

The new postwar immigrants to Australia were freely doused in DDT. The fruit of market garden apple orchards were liberally sprayed with DDT. Vegetable crops were sprayed with other chemicals from the family of organochlorines as dieldrin, now prohibited. They were also sprayed with Phosdrin, the trade name for the organophosphate mevinphos, one of the most deadly pesticides ever concocted. Blackberry bushes grew wild along the borders of unmade roads that were literally carved out of bush to become part of the new postwar housing boom, the new housing estates. Blackberries were sprayed with 245-T (Agent Orange was a mixture of 24-D and 245-T).

In 1952, John and Betty Brennan and their two children (six more followed) moved into their new home in Willowtree Road, Ferntree Gully, an outer Melbourne suburb at the foothills to the Dandenong Ranges. They were among the first residents of a street whose legacy to these newcomers would prove to be an ominous one. The street had only just been created out of a thicket of market gardens. The Brennans' home was one of nine new houses that had been recently constructed by Betty's brother, Bill Blundell, who also purchased one of these houses and moved in with his wife and four children.

Kathy Brennan, the second oldest daughter, and her cousin, Lesley Blundell, were of a similar age. The two cousins grew up as neighbours. Their backyard was the market gardens where they roamed freely as companions and playmates. In the years to come, both girls were to suffer a variety of strange medical conditions that have continued throughout their adult lives. Their siblings and their children have also been plagued by numerous health disorders. Each family lost a parent to cancer. Kathy's mother, Betty Brennan, was the first in the street to die, contracting breast cancer at age 34 and dying in her 30s.

The initial 1950s and '60s residents of Willowtree Road, Ferntree Gully, people such as the Brennans, their family and neighbours, may well have been the victims of pesticide poisoning. This is not something that can be irrefutably and scientifically proven. Three indisputable facts are: This was a large market garden and orchard area; The crops were sprayed with pesticides, some of which have since been banned for their carcinogenic properties; The residents were undeniably exposed to these substances.

In June 1996, Kathy Alexander (nee Brennan) was operated on for a suspected malignancy, her third brush with cancer. She was 45 years old. Since the age of 25, she has been diagnosed with a malignant melanoma, cervical cancer and now a neurilemmoma, a rare tumour that had twisted itself around the femoral nerve. Throughout her life she has suffered bouts of nausea, migraine, fainting spells, joint pains, severe allergies, eight separate bouts of pneumonia, mood swings, depression, panic attacks and agorophobia. She has been hospitalised several times for nervous breakdowns. During her 20s and 30s, Kathy experienced an ectopic pregnancy, cysts on the ovaries, a hysterectomy, the onset of arthritis, an immune deficiency disease described as a connective tissue disorder, dangerously high and low blood pressure problems, and a vitamin B12 deficiency that has led to chronic pernicious anaemia. Hers is no ordinary medical history. Why would a normal, healthy young woman experience a number of unrelated major health crises, many of them quite rare conditions? Kathy has had her suspicions.

She recalls playing in the cabbage patches as a child. The cabbages were covered with a fine white film. She remembers rubbing this white powder over her face and arms and pretending she was a fairy playing in the fields. She would often eat the cabbages or the brussels sprouts raw and unwashed, fresh from the gardens and covered in poison. As Kathy herself says, after such exposure, how could she possibly expect to have a good immune system?

At different periods of their lives, both Kathy and Lesley began to wonder what common link their families shared which might explain all their mysterious illnesses. What common link might explain all the other young deaths in this street? The only common link seemed to be that they had all lived in a market garden area, and because of this, had been heavily exposed to the new breed of chemical sprays.

Kathy and Lesley are not the only ones who lived in that street whose families have had a long history of fatal and chronic illnesses. Neighbour after neighbour died young. Some suicided. There were deaths from brain tumours, lung cancer, breast cancer, bowel cancer. There were ten cancer deaths that they knew of within a half-mile radius, and all occurring within a few short years. This is a street that died young, a street exposed to the effects of toxic chemical sprays.

There were also social repercussions on so many families, young families who had lost a young parent. This impacted on so many lives, in many cases causing lifelong emotional traumas. Local schoolteacher Pat Merry had several of the children from Willowtree Road in her class. She says, 'At one time I knew of 35 children from that street who had only one surviving parent. I taught many of these children. I knew many of the men and women who died young.' Merry and her family lived in an adjoining street to Willowtree Road. They too have suffered a strange medical history. Pat Merry has had no less than 15 surgical procedures in as many years. She has a history of liver problems, a hysterectomy, an ovarian cyst, a duodenal ulcer, a hiatus hernia, food allergies and severe chronic fatigue syndrome. Her three children were extremely hyperactive. One son suffers psoriasis, a daughter is a chronic asthmatic, another son suffers anklyosing spondylitis, a degenerative immune disorder.

It is a scientific fact that exposure to pesticides can and does cross the placenta barrier. Many of the offspring of those exposed to pesticides in the '50s and '60s seem to have inherited ongoing health problems that have continued into subsequent generations, who have become the innocent victims of a continuous toxic chemical onslaught, exposed to a barrage of substances that the human body cannot deal with, and was not designed to withstand.

The Street that Died Young

Robyn Williams: The classic book, Silent Spring, with its clarion call for the world to do something about the poisons devastating wildlife, was published in 1962. The author was Rachel Carson. So much we know and assume that the world has taken note and moved on; become more prudent about the blunderbuss treatment of crops with sprays so that nature and people can life more safely.

But now a book, published 35 years later, claims we are still reckless with our chemical weaponry, used not in the field of battle but where our crops and salads grow. Gloria Frydman has written The Street That Died Young and says it tells the story of Australia’s own Silent Spring. It’s a startling story, and one which we should perhaps take very seriously.

Gloria Frydman.

Gloria Frydman: The Australian postwar era of the 1950s saw the introduction of new and highly toxic chemicals imported from overseas. Pesticides such as DDT that had been trialled during the Second World War were now being unleashed on an unknowing, innocent and trusting population.

The new postwar immigrants to Australia were freely doused in DDT. The fruit of market garden apple orchards were liberally sprayed with DDT. Vegetable crops were sprayed with other chemicals from the family of organochlorines as dieldrin, now prohibited. They were also sprayed with Phosdrin, the trade name for the organophosphate mevinphos, one of the most deadly pesticides ever concocted. Blackberry bushes grew wild along the borders of unmade roads that were literally carved out of bush to become part of the new postwar housing boom, the new housing estates. Blackberries were sprayed with 245-T (Agent Orange was a mixture of 24-D and 245-T).

In 1952, John and Betty Brennan and their two children (six more followed) moved into their new home in Willowtree Road, Ferntree Gully, an outer Melbourne suburb at the foothills to the Dandenong Ranges. They were among the first residents of a street whose legacy to these newcomers would prove to be an ominous one. The street had only just been created out of a thicket of market gardens. The Brennans’ home was one of nine new houses that had been recently constructed by Betty’s brother, Bill Blundell, who also purchased one of these houses and moved in with his wife and four children.

Kathy Brennan, the second oldest daughter, and her cousin, Lesley Blundell, were of a similar age. The two cousins grew up as neighbours. Their backyard was the market gardens where they roamed freely as companions and playmates. In the years to come, both girls were to suffer a variety of strange medical conditions that have continued throughout their adult lives. Their siblings and their children have also been plagued by numerous health disorders. Each family lost a parent to cancer. Kathy’s mother, Betty Brennan, was the first in the street to die, contracting breast cancer at age 34 and dying in her 30s.

The initial 1950s and ’60s residents of Willowtree Road, Ferntree Gully, people such as the Brennans, their family and neighbours, may well have been the victims of pesticide poisoning. This is not something that can be irrefutably and scientifically proven. Three indisputable facts are: This was a large market garden and orchard area; The crops were sprayed with pesticides, some of which have since been banned for their carcinogenic properties; The residents were undeniably exposed to these substances.

In June 1996, Kathy Alexander (nee Brennan) was operated on for a suspected malignancy, her third brush with cancer. She was 45 years old. Since the age of 25, she has been diagnosed with a malignant melanoma, cervical cancer and now a neurilemmoma, a rare tumour that had twisted itself around the femoral nerve. Throughout her life she has suffered bouts of nausea, migraine, fainting spells, joint pains, severe allergies, eight separate bouts of pneumonia, mood swings, depression, panic attacks and agorophobia. She has been hospitalised several times for nervous breakdowns. During her 20s and 30s, Kathy experienced an ectopic pregnancy, cysts on the ovaries, a hysterectomy, the onset of arthritis, an immune deficiency disease described as a connective tissue disorder, dangerously high and low blood pressure problems, and a vitamin B12 deficiency that has led to chronic pernicious anaemia. Hers is no ordinary medical history. Why would a normal, healthy young woman experience a number of unrelated major health crises, many of them quite rare conditions? Kathy has had her suspicions.

She recalls playing in the cabbage patches as a child. The cabbages were covered with a fine white film. She remembers rubbing this white powder over her face and arms and pretending she was a fairy playing in the fields. She would often eat the cabbages or the brussels sprouts raw and unwashed, fresh from the gardens and covered in poison. As Kathy herself says, after such exposure, how could she possibly expect to have a good immune system?

At different periods of their lives, both Kathy and Lesley began to wonder what common link their families shared which might explain all their mysterious illnesses. What common link might explain all the other young deaths in this street? The only common link seemed to be that they had all lived in a market garden area, and because of this, had been heavily exposed to the new breed of chemical sprays.

Kathy and Lesley are not the only ones who lived in that street whose families have had a long history of fatal and chronic illnesses. Neighbour after neighbour died young. Some suicided. There were deaths from brain tumours, lung cancer, breast cancer, bowel cancer. There were ten cancer deaths that they knew of within a half-mile radius, and all occurring within a few short years. This is a street that died young, a street exposed to the effects of toxic chemical sprays.

There were also social repercussions on so many families, young families who had lost a young parent. This impacted on so many lives, in many cases causing lifelong emotional traumas. Local schoolteacher Pat Merry had several of the children from Willowtree Road in her class. She says, ‘At one time I knew of 35 children from that street who had only one surviving parent. I taught many of these children. I knew many of the men and women who died young.’ Merry and her family lived in an adjoining street to Willowtree Road. They too have suffered a strange medical history. Pat Merry has had no less than 15 surgical procedures in as many years. She has a history of liver problems, a hysterectomy, an ovarian cyst, a duodenal ulcer, a hiatus hernia, food allergies and severe chronic fatigue syndrome. Her three children were extremely hyperactive. One son suffers psoriasis, a daughter is a chronic asthmatic, another son suffers anklyosing spondylitis, a degenerative immune disorder.

It is a scientific fact that exposure to pesticides can and does cross the placenta barrier. Many of the offspring of those exposed to pesticides in the ’50s and ’60s seem to have inherited ongoing health problems that have continued into subsequent generations, who have become the innocent victims of a continuous toxic chemical onslaught, exposed to a barrage of substances that the human body cannot deal with, and was not designed to withstand.

Yvonne Dolman’s story reinforces the Willowtree Road experience. The death of her daughter Annette in 1976 from Hodgkin’s disease led Yvonne to discover that the area around their Melbourne bayside suburb of Beaumaris had been heavily sprayed during the ’60s and ’70s, for blackberries, weeds and termites. The local council sprayed, private contractors sprayed, private individuals sprayed, people with little to no knowledge of the dangers to which they and others were being exposed. The whole Dolman family were exposed to the sprays and all suffered health problems. Subsequent research later identified this as a cancer cluster area.

Shirley Barber’s story reveals another aspect: the health problems faced by the rural sector. Shirley’s severe allergic reactions to various chemicals sprayed on agricultural crops in the Wangaratta area and which invaded and contaminated the town’s water supply, encouraged her to do her own investigations. The results revealed ‘a frighteningly high incidence of allergic illnesses, diabetes, asthma and cancer.’ Her studies also revealed significant levels of dieldrin and DDT in use in the area.

In Mary Holland’s case, her rapid deterioration in health was medically proven by a liver biopsy to be ‘necrosis of the liver caused by exposure to the pesticide Paraquat, an extremely dangerous chemical.’ Although banned in most other countries, Paraquat is still used in Australia. Mary Holland was exposed to the pesticide while playing golf. At her request, her local golf club sent her a list of the chemicals they used on their lawns. The list contained 22 chemicals, including Atrazine, one of the most dangerous chemicals around and one which the World Health Organisation has declared a possible carcinogen. Her club also admitted spraying the ground some 23 times between October and April each year. Off the top of her head, Mary Holland can cite some 27 people from her golf club who either have cancer or have died from cancer in the last ten years, most of them young men and women in their 40s and 50s. Out of the 27, 14 have already died and the rest are either in remission or battling with the disease.’ She says that ‘of the five women with whom I played regularly, one has died of liver cancer, two of the others have breast cancer and I have permanent liver damage.

The dangers of banned pesticides such as dieldrin or DDT have merely given way to even more toxic chemicals that are used on our foodstuffs and spread into the environment. Dr Charles Castle, a consultant in rehabilitation medicine at Victoria’s Hampton Rehabilitation Hospital, admits to ‘some 6,000 chemicals in use throughout Australia for which we don’t have good epidemiological evidence.’ Dr John Pollak, Honorary Research Associate in Anatomy and Histology at the University of Sydney, estimates there are between 50,000 and 100,000 chemicals now in use world wide, with more than 250-million tonnes being produced each year. The Melbourne allergist, Dr Robert Allen, refers to this as ‘that massive uncontrolled experiment in which we are all innocently and unavoidably being obliged to participate.’ The real tragedy is that the chemical hazards to which the population is exposed today are even more prevalent and more toxic than they were in the 1950s.

How many other streets have died young, in suburban Melbourne, in rural Victoria, in Australia nationwide? How many other cancer clusters exist and have never been documented? And what will it take before doctors, scientists, politicians, governments try and ensure that our streets and our suburbs are safe to live in? History is notorious for repeating its mistakes, for not learning its lessons. Yvonne Dolman says that ‘the silence related to human pesticide contamination began with the release of the toxins and has remained until the present day.’ And as Dr John French, former chief research scientist for the CSIRO says, ‘science is not neutral. Everything boils down to who is paying for it, and that is usually a large chemical company.’

Only an ever alert and vigilant public can hope to prevent the power of such forces, as the giant chemical companies continue indiscriminate pesticide usage without providing sufficient safeguards and protection for those who lie in its path.

Robyn Williams: Are the effects described by Gloria Frydman a relic of misuse many years ago, or is the cavalier approach still with us? You can judge for yourself. Her book, The Street That Died Young is published in Melbourne by Five Mile Press.


Transmission Date 30/11/1997

1950 – 1967: Sandringham. Pesticide of concern: Heptachlor, Dieldrin

"Yvonne Dolman investigated the impact of heptachlor in the Melbourne suburb of Sandringham, where it was used to control Argentine ant infestations during the 1950's and 1960's. She found that in two streets where people had been living continuously from 1950 to 1963, half the families had at least one cancer and concluded this was significant in terms of community's long exposure to heptachlor. p34/5 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

3 March 1967

Re; Aerial Spraying with Pesticides.

With reference to your circular of 27th February I wish to advise that no aerial spraying with pesticides has been carried out in this municipality.

However 121 properties have been sprayed by council staff for the eradication of Argentine ants using the barrier spray technique recommended by the Department of Agriculture.

1200 Gallons of 0.5% dieldrin solution was used in this operation.

Town Clerk.

“Yvonne Dolman investigated the impact of heptachlor in the Melbourne suburb of Sandringham, where it was used to control Argentine ant infestations during the 1950’s and 1960’s. She found that in two streets where people had been living continuously from 1950 to 1963, half the families had at least one cancer and concluded this was significant in terms of community’s long exposure to heptachlor. p34/5 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

3 March 1967

Re; Aerial Spraying with Pesticides.

With reference to your circular of 27th February I wish to advise that no aerial spraying with pesticides has been carried out in this municipality.

However 121 properties have been sprayed by council staff for the eradication of Argentine ants using the barrier spray technique recommended by the Department of Agriculture.

1200 Gallons of 0.5% dieldrin solution was used in this operation.

Town Clerk – City of Sandringham

1991 April: Wagait and Daly River Reserves. Weed Control: Tebuthiuron

Just For Once, Nature Needs Chemicals

Sydney Morning Herald Tuesday April 30, 1991 CHIPS MACKINOLTY

WHILE conservationists around the world would be expected to oppose the use of herbicides, the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) is poised to support the use of chemical defoliants to rid Australia of an introduced weed that endangers tropical wetlands stretching from Bundaberg in Queensland to Broome in Western Australia.

It has not been an easy decision, according to the ACF's Mike Krockenberger, but one that is necessary in the face of Mimosa pigra - an exotic Central American shrub that has established itself as the major threat to native fauna and flora across millions of hectares of Australia's northern coastline. "We don't endorse the use of these chemicals elsewhere, but we feel that - with strict controls and monitoring - its use is justified."

But it is not just green sensibilities that are at stake. It is an issue that fundamentally affects thousands of Aboriginal people. Mimosa has forced the Aboriginal-controlled Northern Land Council to plead for urgent assistance to stem the tide of a biological enemy that poses a threat to the lifestyle of thousands of their own people, as well as tourism and other developments in the region.

Not only can mimosa wipe out world renowned heritage areas such as Kakadu National Park, it has the potential to choke virtually every river system in northern Australia. With some 800 square kilometres of the Northern Territory already covered, it is suggested that mimosa-affected land can potentially double in size every year.

At this stage, most infestations are on Aboriginal land, but, according to the director of the Northern Land Council, Mike Dodson, mimosa is a danger to the entire North.

An introduced plant, mimosa has no natural predators in Australia, and has proved a ruthless competitor as it has established a monoculture that has destroyed all native fauna and flora in its path. The strength of its conquests may be seen by the fact that it can produce up to 12,000 seeds per square metre compared with only 100 seeds per square metre in its native Mexico, where it normally faces hundreds of natural predators.

Mimosa was first introduced to northern Australia in the late 1800s as a stock feed, and caused little problem until it was first noticed in the Adelaide River region of the Top End in the '50s. Even now, infestations mostly affect only Aboriginal land in Arnhem Land, Wagait and Daly River reserves.

Mimosa forms dense, impenetrable thickets that choke out virtually all other plants and thereby in turn deprive native birds and animals of their food and natural environment. From only 100 hectares in the Oenpelli region on Aboriginal land east of Kakadu in the early '80s, the infestation had reached 7,000 hectares within six years.

The Northern Land Council, which has been involved with the Northern Territory and Commonwealth governments in small-scale mimosa eradication measures in the Oenpelli region since 1987, has proposed an extensive use of Tebuthiuron and other chemicals over a five-year program to limit the spread and, it hopes, limit the range of mimosa infestation until such time as biological agents can be introduced to control the weed.

The environmental projects officer for the Northern Land Council, Mr Andrew Jackson, says that chemical control is the only practicable method available in the short term. "Mechanical techniques don't work - bulldozers can't cope because of the way the plants grow: they just run over them without killing. Hand removal only works in small isolated pockets and large-scale removal such as the use of napalm is entirely inappropriate.

"To contain, let alone remove, Mimosa we are forced to propose chemical eradication methods. Biological methods are at least five years away, despite active research."

Tebuthiuron, marketed as Graslan, is the principal chemical proposed, and would be applied in a pellet form by fixed-wing aircraft as well as helicopters.

According to an environment report prepared for the council and released publicly a fortnight ago, it is highly unlikely to spread to watercourses, although it is expected that there will be some "sacrifices" among native trees, including eucalypts common across areas where the mimosa will be targeted.

The council says that such losses would be outweighed by environmental benefits derived from the eradication of the weed. The choice, according to Aboriginal interests, is the spending of money on chemical defoliants now rather than reaping the harvest of a biological disaster in years to come.

Just For Once, Nature Needs Chemicals

Sydney Morning Herald Tuesday April 30, 1991 CHIPS MACKINOLTY

WHILE conservationists around the world would be expected to oppose the use of herbicides, the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) is poised to support the use of chemical defoliants to rid Australia of an introduced weed that endangers tropical wetlands stretching from Bundaberg in Queensland to Broome in Western Australia.

It has not been an easy decision, according to the ACF’s Mike Krockenberger, but one that is necessary in the face of Mimosa pigra – an exotic Central American shrub that has established itself as the major threat to native fauna and flora across millions of hectares of Australia’s northern coastline. “We don’t endorse the use of these chemicals elsewhere, but we feel that – with strict controls and monitoring – its use is justified.”

But it is not just green sensibilities that are at stake. It is an issue that fundamentally affects thousands of Aboriginal people. Mimosa has forced the Aboriginal-controlled Northern Land Council to plead for urgent assistance to stem the tide of a biological enemy that poses a threat to the lifestyle of thousands of their own people, as well as tourism and other developments in the region.

Not only can mimosa wipe out world renowned heritage areas such as Kakadu National Park, it has the potential to choke virtually every river system in northern Australia. With some 800 square kilometres of the Northern Territory already covered, it is suggested that mimosa-affected land can potentially double in size every year.

At this stage, most infestations are on Aboriginal land, but, according to the director of the Northern Land Council, Mike Dodson, mimosa is a danger to the entire North.

An introduced plant, mimosa has no natural predators in Australia, and has proved a ruthless competitor as it has established a monoculture that has destroyed all native fauna and flora in its path. The strength of its conquests may be seen by the fact that it can produce up to 12,000 seeds per square metre compared with only 100 seeds per square metre in its native Mexico, where it normally faces hundreds of natural predators.

Mimosa was first introduced to northern Australia in the late 1800s as a stock feed, and caused little problem until it was first noticed in the Adelaide River region of the Top End in the ’50s. Even now, infestations mostly affect only Aboriginal land in Arnhem Land, Wagait and Daly River reserves.

Mimosa forms dense, impenetrable thickets that choke out virtually all other plants and thereby in turn deprive native birds and animals of their food and natural environment. From only 100 hectares in the Oenpelli region on Aboriginal land east of Kakadu in the early ’80s, the infestation had reached 7,000 hectares within six years.

The Northern Land Council, which has been involved with the Northern Territory and Commonwealth governments in small-scale mimosa eradication measures in the Oenpelli region since 1987, has proposed an extensive use of Tebuthiuron and other chemicals over a five-year program to limit the spread and, it hopes, limit the range of mimosa infestation until such time as biological agents can be introduced to control the weed.

The environmental projects officer for the Northern Land Council, Mr Andrew Jackson, says that chemical control is the only practicable method available in the short term. “Mechanical techniques don’t work – bulldozers can’t cope because of the way the plants grow: they just run over them without killing. Hand removal only works in small isolated pockets and large-scale removal such as the use of napalm is entirely inappropriate.

“To contain, let alone remove, Mimosa we are forced to propose chemical eradication methods. Biological methods are at least five years away, despite active research.”

Tebuthiuron, marketed as Graslan, is the principal chemical proposed, and would be applied in a pellet form by fixed-wing aircraft as well as helicopters.

According to an environment report prepared for the council and released publicly a fortnight ago, it is highly unlikely to spread to watercourses, although it is expected that there will be some “sacrifices” among native trees, including eucalypts common across areas where the mimosa will be targeted.

The council says that such losses would be outweighed by environmental benefits derived from the eradication of the weed. The choice, according to Aboriginal interests, is the spending of money on chemical defoliants now rather than reaping the harvest of a biological disaster in years to come.

1970’s – 1990’s. Lucas Heights. Pesticide dump

Poisonous Waste Lies Forgotten

Sydney Morning Herald Sunday May 31, 1992 By DANIELLE COOK

Some of the most toxic substances known have been dumped at Lucas Heights in the past 20 years and virtually ignored.

Lying in the ground with little to stop the chemicals leaching into groundwater supplies and eventually the Georges River system are herbicides and PCBs heavily contaminated with dioxins, courtesy of Union Carbide Australia Ltd.

More than 230 tonnes of highly toxic PCBs and herbicides from this company's operations found their way to the old IWC liquid waste depot at Lucas Heights in one year during the early 1970s.

Ironically, when the company cleaned up its old factory site at Rhodes in 1986, the State Government insisted that similar waste products could not be dumped in Australia but had to be shipped overseas.

Union Carbide was not the only company dumping hazardous waste: many companies and government bodies dumped domestic, commercial and industrial waste at Lucas Heights. This included solid industrial waste of unknown composition and untreated faecal waste dumped by Sutherland Shire Council.

Despite knowing of highly toxic chemicals at Lucas Heights since 1985, the State Government has ignored the potential dangers, according to a report for Sutherland Shire Council by a Sydney barrister, Mr Tim Robertson.

The report has been submitted to the commission of inquiry investigating the State Government's plans to expand the Lucas Heights landfill site.

Although complaints about pollution in nearby Mill Creek were aired publicly in 1970 and leaching of wastes into drains and the creek was observed by the Government in 1975, the report says that no regulatory action was taken until 1980, when the IWC liquid waste depot was ordered to take no more waste

Five years later, the State Pollution Control Commission (SPCC) became highly critical of "the vast quantities of free liquid" on the IWC site. Cleanaway - which succeeded IWC as operator of the depot - offered to install a leachate collection system but did not study groundwater movements.

Poisonous Waste Lies Forgotten

Sydney Morning Herald Sunday May 31, 1992 By DANIELLE COOK

Some of the most toxic substances known have been dumped at Lucas Heights in the past 20 years and virtually ignored.

Lying in the ground with little to stop the chemicals leaching into groundwater supplies and eventually the Georges River system are herbicides and PCBs heavily contaminated with dioxins, courtesy of Union Carbide Australia Ltd.

More than 230 tonnes of highly toxic PCBs and herbicides from this company’s operations found their way to the old IWC liquid waste depot at Lucas Heights in one year during the early 1970s.

Ironically, when the company cleaned up its old factory site at Rhodes in 1986, the State Government insisted that similar waste products could not be dumped in Australia but had to be shipped overseas.

Union Carbide was not the only company dumping hazardous waste: many companies and government bodies dumped domestic, commercial and industrial waste at Lucas Heights. This included solid industrial waste of unknown composition and untreated faecal waste dumped by Sutherland Shire Council.

Despite knowing of highly toxic chemicals at Lucas Heights since 1985, the State Government has ignored the potential dangers, according to a report for Sutherland Shire Council by a Sydney barrister, Mr Tim Robertson.

The report has been submitted to the commission of inquiry investigating the State Government’s plans to expand the Lucas Heights landfill site.

Although complaints about pollution in nearby Mill Creek were aired publicly in 1970 and leaching of wastes into drains and the creek was observed by the Government in 1975, the report says that no regulatory action was taken until 1980, when the IWC liquid waste depot was ordered to take no more waste

Five years later, the State Pollution Control Commission (SPCC) became highly critical of “the vast quantities of free liquid” on the IWC site. Cleanaway – which succeeded IWC as operator of the depot – offered to install a leachate collection system but did not study groundwater movements.

1993 April: Liverpool Golf Club (Lansvale). Herbicides kill 70 native ducks

Herbicides Killed 70 Ducks, Say Golfers

Sydney Morning Herald Sunday April 11, 1993 By GERALDINE O'BRIEN

Inspectors from the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the RSPCA are investigating the use of herbicides at the Liverpool Golf Club, Lansvale, which apparently led to the death of at least 70 native ducks.

The incident, which occurred on March 30, was reported by a number of golfers who saw the ducks die after two greens were sprayed by grounds staff.

One of them, Mr Erwin Huber, of Bondi, said yesterday that it had been"carnage; absolute slaughter".

He was playing a round of social golf when men began spraying the ninth and 18th greens, which are adjacent to large ponds that are home to ducks.

"As we came up the fairway a little time later, one of us spotted a dead duck on the ground. I looked around and there were another five or six. By the time we'd played the last two holes there were 20-odd dead and dying," he said.

"Those that weren't already dead were in total distress and frothing at the mouth."

When he asked at the pro-shop, Mr Huber was told the greens were being sprayed against weeds.

Later, from the clubhouse, Mr Huber and his friends saw a utility drive around the course picking up dead birds. He estimated it collected about 70 birds.

A spokesman for the RSPCA confirmed yesterday that the poisonings were being investigated. A spokesman for the golf club could not be contacted.

Herbicides Killed 70 Ducks, Say Golfers

Sydney Morning Herald Sunday April 11, 1993 By GERALDINE O’BRIEN

Inspectors from the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the RSPCA are investigating the use of herbicides at the Liverpool Golf Club, Lansvale, which apparently led to the death of at least 70 native ducks.

The incident, which occurred on March 30, was reported by a number of golfers who saw the ducks die after two greens were sprayed by grounds staff.

One of them, Mr Erwin Huber, of Bondi, said yesterday that it had been”carnage; absolute slaughter”.

He was playing a round of social golf when men began spraying the ninth and 18th greens, which are adjacent to large ponds that are home to ducks.

“As we came up the fairway a little time later, one of us spotted a dead duck on the ground. I looked around and there were another five or six. By the time we’d played the last two holes there were 20-odd dead and dying,” he said.

“Those that weren’t already dead were in total distress and frothing at the mouth.”

When he asked at the pro-shop, Mr Huber was told the greens were being sprayed against weeds.

Later, from the clubhouse, Mr Huber and his friends saw a utility drive around the course picking up dead birds. He estimated it collected about 70 birds.

A spokesman for the RSPCA confirmed yesterday that the poisonings were being investigated. A spokesman for the golf club could not be contacted.

2009 May – June. Gladstone Ports Dredging. Pesticides detected: Metalachlor, Chlorpyrifos

 
 

Metalachlor Water Quality Monitoring Results

24/6/09: Station WQ01 0.013ug/L

23/6/09: Station WQ02 0.009ug/L

24/6/09: Station WQ06 0.099ug/L

24/6/09: Station WQ07 0.03ug/L

23/6/09: Station WQ08 0.273ug/L

24/6/09: Station WQ09 0.027ug/L

23/6/09: Station WQ12 0.075ug/L

Chlorpyrifos Water Quality Monitoring Results

 

Metalachlor Water Quality Monitoring Results

24/6/09: Station WQ01 0.013ug/L

23/6/09: Station WQ02 0.009ug/L

24/6/09: Station WQ06 0.099ug/L

24/6/09: Station WQ07 0.03ug/L

23/6/09: Station WQ08 0.273ug/L

24/6/09: Station WQ09 0.027ug/L

23/6/09: Station WQ12 0.075ug/L

Chlorpyrifos Water Quality Monitoring Results

https://www.westernbasinportdevelopment.com.au/media/pdf/EIS%20Appendix%20K.pdf

1983 – 1985: Minlaton (SA). Childhood leukaemia

Between 1983 and 1985 Minlaton, a South Australian town of 850 people had three cases of leukaemia in children. All three lived in Eighth Street, directly adjacent to farmland. Helen Howatt, a farmer's daughter and resident of Eighth Street, became interested in the cancer rate after the death of three people who lived on three adjacent farms. One was her father.

During the eight to ten month period prior to the children's death I recall crop aerial spraying being conducted on a property west of us, often on extremely windy days, the winds being westerly. The residents complained of a strong smell and within a short period began to notice their rain water was tasting of chemical residue and their gardens were being affected. As well as the children, there have been another two cancer victims die within months and one other diagnosed at that time. They all lived on the same street as well, only doors away from each other. There are two, in the same locality, including myself, with cervical cancer. p 29 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

Between 1983 and 1985 Minlaton, a South Australian town of 850 people had three cases of leukaemia in children. All three lived in Eighth Street, directly adjacent to farmland. Helen Howatt, a farmer’s daughter and resident of Eighth Street, became interested in the cancer rate after the death of three people who lived on three adjacent farms. One was her father.

During the eight to ten month period prior to the children’s death I recall crop aerial spraying being conducted on a property west of us, often on extremely windy days, the winds being westerly. The residents complained of a strong smell and within a short period began to notice their rain water was tasting of chemical residue and their gardens were being affected. As well as the children, there have been another two cancer victims die within months and one other diagnosed at that time. They all lived on the same street as well, only doors away from each other. There are two, in the same locality, including myself, with cervical cancer. p 29 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s – 1990’s: Weddin (NSW). Leaukemia

"Other rural areas also appear to have more than their fair share of leukaemia. In the southern and central NSW towns of Temora and Weddin, a child leukaemia death rate of 13 and 10 times the expected rate respectively, has been established while the rate of death from all cancers in the 0-19 year age group was six times the state average. Pesticides are used in both these rural communities and the potential for air and water pollution is high. p29 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

“Other rural areas also appear to have more than their fair share of leukaemia. In the southern and central NSW towns of Temora and Weddin, a child leukaemia death rate of 13 and 10 times the expected rate respectively, has been established while the rate of death from all cancers in the 0-19 year age group was six times the state average. Pesticides are used in both these rural communities and the potential for air and water pollution is high. p29 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1980’s – 1990’s: Temora (NSW). Leukaemia

"Other rural areas also appear to have more than their fair share of leukaemia. In the southern and central NSW towns of Temora and Weddin, a child leukaemia death rate of 13 and 10 times the expected rate respectively, has been established while the rate of death from all cancers in the 0-19 year age group was six times the state average. Pesticides are used in both these rural communities and the potential for air and water pollution is high. p29 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

“Other rural areas also appear to have more than their fair share of leukaemia. In the southern and central NSW towns of Temora and Weddin, a child leukaemia death rate of 13 and 10 times the expected rate respectively, has been established while the rate of death from all cancers in the 0-19 year age group was six times the state average. Pesticides are used in both these rural communities and the potential for air and water pollution is high. p29 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1980 – 1984: Emu Plains (NSW). Pesticide of Concern: 2,4-D

"From Christmas 1980 to Christmas 1984, the Macic family lived in a house at Emu Plains, west of Sydney. Their home was adjacent to an electrical substation owned by Telecom. The site was regularly sprayed with herbicides, including 2,4-D and the odour of the chemicals would drift into the Macic's property and could be smelt inside the house. The backyard soon became defoliated - all trees and shrubs died. Then the family became ill with a mixture of symptoms ranging from gut and stomach problems to massive headaches, depression and fever. The worst affected were the younger children, particularly Bobby and Andy who were six and three years old when the poisoning began. These children failed to thrive; their bodies stayed small and they fell badly behind in school. The poison directly affected the function of many of their organs. No Australian doctor was able to help the Maccis and, desperate for medical assistance, they finally went back to their homeland. They were advised by Dr Vaskrsija Janjic from the University of Belgrade:

"Even though several years have passed since the poisoning of the Macic family, [it is still possible] to indicate the main consequences and disorders still present in their organisms as a result of the toxic effect of 2,4-D... All scientific and expert literature, all text-books and manuals, and all experimental reports [that] give descriptions of 2,4-D poisoning have established that it decreases thyroid function. Examinations of the Macic family have shown hypothyroidism.

The function of the thyroid in human organisms is very important and irreplaceable. Its hormones maintain the metabolism of the organism at normal levels [and this] is much more important in the period of growth than in later life, especially for the development of the central nervous system. In the youngest members of the family...the effect of 2,4-D was reflected on their growth, and their development and function of all their organs. In [the older children] sexual development was delayed. A deficiency of thyroid hormones slows down the growth of the brain...

Our examinations revealed that the mental capacities of all children in the Macic family border on the mentally retarded. In the adults, since their organs were fully developed at the time of the poisoning, the effect of 2,4-D was manifested differently. All their symptoms were characteristic of a lack of thyroid hormones." Adapted from the report of Dr V. Janic. Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, University of Belgrade. December 1988. p22 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

“From Christmas 1980 to Christmas 1984, the Macic family lived in a house at Emu Plains, west of Sydney. Their home was adjacent to an electrical substation owned by Telecom. The site was regularly sprayed with herbicides, including 2,4-D and the odour of the chemicals would drift into the Macic’s property and could be smelt inside the house. The backyard soon became defoliated – all trees and shrubs died. Then the family became ill with a mixture of symptoms ranging from gut and stomach problems to massive headaches, depression and fever. The worst affected were the younger children, particularly Bobby and Andy who were six and three years old when the poisoning began. These children failed to thrive; their bodies stayed small and they fell badly behind in school. The poison directly affected the function of many of their organs. No Australian doctor was able to help the Maccis and, desperate for medical assistance, they finally went back to their homeland. They were advised by Dr Vaskrsija Janjic from the University of Belgrade:

“Even though several years have passed since the poisoning of the Macic family, [it is still possible] to indicate the main consequences and disorders still present in their organisms as a result of the toxic effect of 2,4-D… All scientific and expert literature, all text-books and manuals, and all experimental reports [that] give descriptions of 2,4-D poisoning have established that it decreases thyroid function. Examinations of the Macic family have shown hypothyroidism.

The function of the thyroid in human organisms is very important and irreplaceable. Its hormones maintain the metabolism of the organism at normal levels [and this] is much more important in the period of growth than in later life, especially for the development of the central nervous system. In the youngest members of the family…the effect of 2,4-D was reflected on their growth, and their development and function of all their organs. In [the older children] sexual development was delayed. A deficiency of thyroid hormones slows down the growth of the brain…

Our examinations revealed that the mental capacities of all children in the Macic family border on the mentally retarded. In the adults, since their organs were fully developed at the time of the poisoning, the effect of 2,4-D was manifested differently. All their symptoms were characteristic of a lack of thyroid hormones.” Adapted from the report of Dr V. Janic. Institute of Pesticides and Environmental Protection, University of Belgrade. December 1988. p22 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s: Byrill Creek (NSW). Pesticide of concern: 2,4-D

"...Residents of Byrill Creek, a tiny community south of Murwillumbah, were trying to stop their local shire spraying groundsel with 2,4-D. There concern was both environmental and personal: spray drift and run-off threatened their water supply; rare plants and animals were at risk; and residents suffered diarrhoea, vomiting, headaches, lethargy, 'Flu-like' symptoms including twitching muscles, rashes, pneumonia, dizziness and mouth ulcers during spray sessions. Council rejected their offer to hand-clear the weed, and dumped 6,000 litres of 2,4-D from a helicopter in one blitz alone. Chemical Crisis. One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

“…Residents of Byrill Creek, a tiny community south of Murwillumbah, were trying to stop their local shire spraying groundsel with 2,4-D. There concern was both environmental and personal: spray drift and run-off threatened their water supply; rare plants and animals were at risk; and residents suffered diarrhoea, vomiting, headaches, lethargy, ‘Flu-like’ symptoms including twitching muscles, rashes, pneumonia, dizziness and mouth ulcers during spray sessions. Council rejected their offer to hand-clear the weed, and dumped 6,000 litres of 2,4-D from a helicopter in one blitz alone. Chemical Crisis. One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

1950’s – 2000’s: McBryde Street. Pesticide of concern: 2,4-D

"If they are not the result of chemical exposure, why do we have a chronic fatigue syndrome cluster coinciding with cotton spraying around Breeza, three cases of rare neuroblastoma cancer at Moree, another cotton-growing area; and widespread Illness at Kingston, Queensland, where a housing estate was built on  a toxic waste dump, and in McBride Street, Melbourne, close by a former 2,4-D factory?..." p149 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? 1994

“If they are not the result of chemical exposure, why do we have a chronic fatigue syndrome cluster coinciding with cotton spraying around Breeza, three cases of rare neuroblastoma cancer at Moree, another cotton-growing area; and widespread Illness at Kingston, Queensland, where a housing estate was built on  a toxic waste dump, and in McBryde Street, Melbourne, close by a former 2,4-D factory?…” p149 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? 1994

1990’s: Breeza (NSW). Chronic Fatigue

"If they are not the result of chemical exposure, why do we have a chronic fatigue syndrome cluster coinciding with cotton spraying around Breeza, three cases of rare neuroblastoma cancer at Moree, another cotton-growing area; and widespread Illness at Kingston, Queensland, where a housing estate was built on  a toxic waste dump, and in McBride Street, Melbourne, close by a former 2,4-D factory?..." p149 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? 1994

“If they are not the result of chemical exposure, why do we have a chronic fatigue syndrome cluster coinciding with cotton spraying around Breeza, three cases of rare neuroblastoma cancer at Moree, another cotton-growing area; and widespread Illness at Kingston, Queensland, where a housing estate was built on  a toxic waste dump, and in McBride Street, Melbourne, close by a former 2,4-D factory?…” p149 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? 1994

2005 – 2006: The Blue Lake + Mount Gambier. Pesticides detected: DEET, Atrazine, Simazine

 
 
 

https://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/waterforahealthycountry/2009/wfhc-protecting-blue-lake.pdf

 

2002 February: Prospect Creek Sydney. Pesticide spill, fish kill

Man fined $35,000 over pesticide spill

Posted 3 Jul 2003, 11:45am

A man has been fined $35,000 over a pesticide spill that polluted Prospect Creek, in Sydney's west, killing tonnes of aquatic life.

Richard John Hopley pleaded guilty to his role in the disaster.

More than three tonnes of fish, eels and aquatic life were killed after almost 1,000 litres of pesticide spilled into Prospect Creek in February last year.

The accident occurred when a container holding the pesticide fell off a forklift and split open, sending almost the entire contents onto the road and into the stormwater system.

The state's Environment Protection Authority took the matter to the Land and Environment Court where Richard Hopley pleaded guilty to employing a person to transport dangerous goods who did not have a licence to do so.

Justice Dennis Cowdroy today fined Hopley $35,000, saying he had reduced the penalty by $15,000 because of the guilty plea and the fact that he had co-operated with the authorities.

Man fined $35,000 over pesticide spill

Posted

A man has been fined $35,000 over a pesticide spill that polluted Prospect Creek, in Sydney’s west, killing tonnes of aquatic life.

Richard John Hopley pleaded guilty to his role in the disaster.

More than three tonnes of fish, eels and aquatic life were killed after almost 1,000 litres of pesticide spilled into Prospect Creek in February last year.

The accident occurred when a container holding the pesticide fell off a forklift and split open, sending almost the entire contents onto the road and into the stormwater system.

The state’s Environment Protection Authority took the matter to the Land and Environment Court where Richard Hopley pleaded guilty to employing a person to transport dangerous goods who did not have a licence to do so.

Justice Dennis Cowdroy today fined Hopley $35,000, saying he had reduced the penalty by $15,000 because of the guilty plea and the fact that he had co-operated with the authorities.

2008 July – 2009 December: SAT site Alice Springs. Pesticides detected: DEET, Dicamba, Mecoprop, MCPA, 2,4-D, Dalapon, Desisipropyl Atrazine, Diuron, 3,4 Dichloroanaline, Simazine

SAT Site Alice Springs: Alice Springs SAT Project Hydrological and Water Quality Monitoring Report 2008-2009

"The study site is located in Alice Springs (Northern Territory) in central part of Australia. Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) commenced here on 3rd June 2008 at the Arid Zone Research Institute using treated wastewater following dissolved air flotation (DAF) at Alice Springs sewage treatment plant. The project is led by Power and Water Corporation (PWC) and this report, prepared by CSIRO, and supported by PWC and National Water Commission, is to evaluate the performance of the project, in particular rates of infiltration and changes in groundwater quality to build a basis for understanding how to continue to improve the operation of the site."

2,4-D: 0.12ug/L

3,4 Dichloroanaline: 0.01ug/L - 0.05ug/L

Dalapon: 0.01ug/L - 0.04ug/L

DEET: 0.03ug/L - 0.07ug/L

Desisopropyl Atrazine: 0.02ug/L - 0.03ug/L

Dicamba: 0.03ug/L - 0.24ug/L

Diuron: 0.08ug/L - 0.32ug/L

MCPA: 0.02ug/L - 0.44ug/L

Mecoprop: 0.01ug/L - 0.02ug/L

Simazine: 0.05ug/L - 0.14ug/L

SAT Site Alice Springs: Alice Springs SAT Project Hydrological and Water Quality Monitoring Report 2008-2009

“The study site is located in Alice Springs (Northern Territory) in central part of Australia. Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) commenced here on 3rd June 2008 at the Arid Zone Research Institute using treated wastewater following dissolved air flotation (DAF) at Alice Springs sewage treatment plant. The project is led by Power and Water Corporation (PWC) and this report, prepared by CSIRO, and supported by PWC and National Water Commission, is to evaluate the performance of the project, in particular rates of infiltration and changes in groundwater quality to build a basis for understanding how to continue to improve the operation of the site.”

2,4-D: 0.12ug/L

3,4 Dichloroanaline: 0.01ug/L – 0.05ug/L

Dalapon: 0.01ug/L – 0.04ug/L

DEET: 0.03ug/L – 0.07ug/L

Desisopropyl Atrazine: 0.02ug/L – 0.03ug/L

Dicamba: 0.03ug/L – 0.24ug/L

Diuron: 0.08ug/L – 0.32ug/L

MCPA: 0.02ug/L – 0.44ug/L

Mecoprop: 0.01ug/L – 0.02ug/L

Simazine: 0.05ug/L – 0.14ug/L

https://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/waterforahealthycountry/2010/wfhc-Alice-Springs-SAT-monitoring.pdf

1987 February: Streaky Bay School Ceduna. Pesticide detected: Aldrin

"The Streaky Bay area school near Ceduna had to be closed in 1988 when pupils developed vomiting, diarrhoea, headaches, lethargy, and irritability after Aldrin spraying. The highly toxic organochlorine had been injected through holes drilled in the concrete floor - thereby contaminating carpets, flooring, and everything in the classrooms. Two months later, the Health Commission declared the school safe after a $300,000 community-funded clean-up.

p103-4 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

 

“The Streaky Bay area school near Ceduna had to be closed in 1988 when pupils developed vomiting, diarrhoea, headaches, lethargy, and irritability after Aldrin spraying. The highly toxic organochlorine had been injected through holes drilled in the concrete floor – thereby contaminating carpets, flooring, and everything in the classrooms. Two months later, the Health Commission declared the school safe after a $300,000 community-funded clean-up.

p103-4 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

1989 September: Wodonga High School. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

" Anti-termite and spider treatment of our schools is not uncommon. We often hear and read of pupils and teachers ill after spraying, including reports of nausea, headaches, and nose-bleeds at Nhill High School after it had been sprayed for termites; adverse reactions after Lilydale High School was treated during school holidays with Aldrin, and students ill after Wodonga High School was sprayed with chlorpyrifos. In the last case, authorities absolved themselves of responsibility with statements that the 'flu was going round, the chemical was administered according to normal procedures, and the children could not have been poisoned. These authorities did not seem to realise that 'flu-like symptoms are as much a manifestation of toxicity and chemical sensitivity as they are of a viral infection: all three states involve an immune and central nervous system response to a foreign substance"...  p103 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

” Anti-termite and spider treatment of our schools is not uncommon. We often hear and read of pupils and teachers ill after spraying, including reports of nausea, headaches, and nose-bleeds at Nhill High School after it had been sprayed for termites; adverse reactions after Lilydale High School was treated during school holidays with Aldrin, and students ill after Wodonga High School was sprayed with chlorpyrifos. In the last case, authorities absolved themselves of responsibility with statements that the ‘flu was going round, the chemical was administered according to normal procedures, and the children could not have been poisoned. These authorities did not seem to realise that ‘flu-like symptoms are as much a manifestation of toxicity and chemical sensitivity as they are of a viral infection: all three states involve an immune and central nervous system response to a foreign substance”…  p103 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

1989 December: Lilydale High School. Pesticide: Aldrin

" Anti-termite and spider treatment of our schools is not uncommon. We often hear and read of pupils and teachers ill after spraying, including reports of nausea, headaches, and nose-bleeds at Nhill High School after it had been sprayed for termites; adverse reactions after Lilydale High School was treated during school holidays with Aldrin, and students ill after Wodonga High School was sprayed with chlorpyrifos. In the last case, authorities absolved themselves of responsibility with statements that the 'flu was going round, the chemical was administered according to normal procedures, and the children could not have been poisoned. These authorities did not seem to realise that 'flu-like symptoms are as much a manifestation of toxicity and chemical sensitivity as they are of a viral infection: all three states involve an immune and central nervous system response to a foreign substance"...  p103 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

” Anti-termite and spider treatment of our schools is not uncommon. We often hear and read of pupils and teachers ill after spraying, including reports of nausea, headaches, and nose-bleeds at Nhill High School after it had been sprayed for termites; adverse reactions after Lilydale High School was treated during school holidays with Aldrin, and students ill after Wodonga High School was sprayed with chlorpyrifos. In the last case, authorities absolved themselves of responsibility with statements that the ‘flu was going round, the chemical was administered according to normal procedures, and the children could not have been poisoned. These authorities did not seem to realise that ‘flu-like symptoms are as much a manifestation of toxicity and chemical sensitivity as they are of a viral infection: all three states involve an immune and central nervous system response to a foreign substance”…  p103 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

1988-9: Nhill High School – Anti-Termite and Spider Treatment. Pesticides: Aldrin, Chlorpyrifos

" Anti-termite and spider treatment of our schools is not uncommon. We often hear and read of pupils and teachers ill after spraying, including reports of nausea, headaches, and nose-bleeds at Nhill High School after it had been sprayed for termites; adverse reactions after Lilydale High School was treated during school holidays with Aldrin, and students ill after Wodonga High School was sprayed with chlorpyrifos. In the last case, authorities absolved themselves of responsibility with statements that the 'flu was going round, the chemical was administered according to normal procedures, and the children could not have been poisoned. These authorities did not seem to realise that 'flu-like symptoms are as much a manifestation of toxicity and chemical sensitivity as they are of a viral infection: all three states involve an immune and central nervous system response to a foreign substance"...  p103 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

” Anti-termite and spider treatment of our schools is not uncommon. We often hear and read of pupils and teachers ill after spraying, including reports of nausea, headaches, and nose-bleeds at Nhill High School after it had been sprayed for termites; adverse reactions after Lilydale High School was treated during school holidays with Aldrin, and students ill after Wodonga High School was sprayed with chlorpyrifos. In the last case, authorities absolved themselves of responsibility with statements that the ‘flu was going round, the chemical was administered according to normal procedures, and the children could not have been poisoned. These authorities did not seem to realise that ‘flu-like symptoms are as much a manifestation of toxicity and chemical sensitivity as they are of a viral infection: all three states involve an immune and central nervous system response to a foreign substance”…  p103 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? Diana Crumpler 1994

1987 July: Kobyboyn Area (Vic). Pesticides detected: Paraquat, Diquat

Yea District

"...in the Yea district, drift from an illegal aerial application in 1988 of a product containing the pesticides paraquat and diquat damaged vegetation over an area of 100 square kilometres."
Source: 'Spray drift controversy: chemical not registered for aerial use.' Goulburn and Marray Valley Country News, 19 July 1988. As cited in 'Chemical Crisis, One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future?' Diana Crumpler, 1994. Scribe Publication Pty Ltd, Newham Victoria, Australia. ISBN 0 908011 25 3.

The Event

5. The drift occurred following the aerial spraying of a hilltop with Sprayseed and sowing down with pasture on the morning and early afternoon of 2 July 1987.

6. It has been recalled that 2 July was a frosty night followed by a sunny morning until it clouded over during the afternoon. It has been claimed that a temperature inversion was operating at the time aerial spraying was taking place...

9. The conditions of the day cannot be accurately reconstructed now as there is no synoptic weather station near the spray site. Hilly areas are associated with complex air and wind movements. It is possible to have wind movements at a hilltop with still air in the valley as well as having air currents moving across a valley floor up a ridge, across a plateau and up a further ridge distributing spray all the way. This in fact happened.

10. As a result of the spray application on 2 July, Sprayseed drifted across an area in excess of 25,000 acres and up to 17 km from the application site.

11. Spray drift produced an observable effect on pasture grass and native and non-indigenous plants. Effect was most severe on those eucalypts closest to the spray site and over the whole area plants with broad leaves were most severely affected...

12. The effect on trees was first noticed *** at Kobyboyn around 14 July when affected plants were delivered to the Seymour office for diagnosis of the problem...

27. ...In discussion with the people at Kobyboyn/Highlands Caveat, the issue of aerial spraying for the establishment of pine plantations in the Central Highlands was raised on many occasions. The encroachment of pine plantations in an area requiring extensive use of agricultural chemicals to ensure establishment of the plantations is clearly of concern to local residents. In the Broadford Shire, plantation owners have obtained Planning Appeals Board judgements granting permits that strictly limit the ways in which agricultural chemicals may be used; residents on the other hand do not believe that local municipalities have the appropriately trained personnel to ensure the permit conditions are abided with...

Yea District

“…in the Yea district, drift from an illegal aerial application in 1988 of a product containing the pesticides paraquat and diquat damaged vegetation over an area of 100 square kilometres.”
Source: ‘Spray drift controversy: chemical not registered for aerial use.’ Goulburn and Marray Valley Country News, 19 July 1988. As cited in ‘Chemical Crisis, One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future?’ Diana Crumpler, 1994. Scribe Publication Pty Ltd, Newham Victoria, Australia. ISBN 0 908011 25 3.

The Event

5. The drift occurred following the aerial spraying of a hilltop with Sprayseed and sowing down with pasture on the morning and early afternoon of 2 July 1987.

6. It has been recalled that 2 July was a frosty night followed by a sunny morning until it clouded over during the afternoon. It has been claimed that a temperature inversion was operating at the time aerial spraying was taking place…

9. The conditions of the day cannot be accurately reconstructed now as there is no synoptic weather station near the spray site. Hilly areas are associated with complex air and wind movements. It is possible to have wind movements at a hilltop with still air in the valley as well as having air currents moving across a valley floor up a ridge, across a plateau and up a further ridge distributing spray all the way. This in fact happened.

10. As a result of the spray application on 2 July, Sprayseed drifted across an area in excess of 25,000 acres and up to 17 km from the application site.

11. Spray drift produced an observable effect on pasture grass and native and non-indigenous plants. Effect was most severe on those eucalypts closest to the spray site and over the whole area plants with broad leaves were most severely affected…

12. The effect on trees was first noticed *** at Kobyboyn around 14 July when affected plants were delivered to the Seymour office for diagnosis of the problem…

27. …In discussion with the people at Kobyboyn/Highlands Caveat, the issue of aerial spraying for the establishment of pine plantations in the Central Highlands was raised on many occasions. The encroachment of pine plantations in an area requiring extensive use of agricultural chemicals to ensure establishment of the plantations is clearly of concern to local residents. In the Broadford Shire, plantation owners have obtained Planning Appeals Board judgements granting permits that strictly limit the ways in which agricultural chemicals may be used; residents on the other hand do not believe that local municipalities have the appropriately trained personnel to ensure the permit conditions are abided with…

1950’s – 2010’s: Nufarm Coogee Kwinana (WA). Contaminated Site

Nufarm Coogee

Location:       Mason Road, Kwinana. Western Australia

Status:           Inferred POP’s hotspot.

POP’s type:     Dioxin and furans

The Nufarm Coogee site is currently used for the manufacture of a range of agricultural chemicals. Liquid wastes from production are injected via a deep bore into the Cockleshell aquifer causing contamination of the aquifer with herbicides. However, POP’s contamination in soil and water beneath the site is believed to be due to the activities of a previous company that occupied the site - Chemical Industries Kwinana (CIK).

CIK manufactured 2,4,D and 2,4,5,T at the site for use in the Vietnam War as Agent Orange. The Cockburn Sound Management Plan[1] acknowledges that a plume of contamination of chlorinated phenol remains beneath the site and has migrated to other nearby industrial sites. Quality control in the production of 2,4,5 trichlorophenol and 2,4D by CIK was often poor and ‘bad batches’ were disposed of in pits on-site and from time to time were burned.

[1] CSIRO. Trefry and David et al., (2006) Status of Groundwater Quality in the Cockburn Sound Catchment. Final Report to the Cockburn Sound Management Council. p.54.

Source: National Toxics Network - Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009.

The poor quality material was believed to contain levels of dioxin above the regulatory controls of the day. Open burning of these chemicals is likely to have created dioxin contamination at the site even if the chemical waste was initially free of dioxin or contained low levels.

CIK had a sister company operating in Eagle Farm Queensland manufacturing a similar range of chemicals. Recent reports indicate that similar contamination may be present at that site.

The CIK site (pictured above in 1968) was also used to bury drums of unidentified chemicals and chemical mixtures and these are believed to have contributed to the groundwater contamination. When Nufarm took control of the site it inherited hundreds of drums of chemical waste including high strength OCP’s and many unidentified chemical wastes and mixtures which were eventually disposed of by in a manner acceptable to Western Australian environmental authorities.

Action Required:

  • Investigation of dioxin levels in soil, groundwater and in surrounding surface soils
  • Complete remediation of POP’s related waste at the site.

Source: National Toxics Network - Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009.

Nufarm Coogee

Location:       Mason Road, Kwinana. Western Australia

Status:           Inferred POP’s hotspot.

POP’s type:     Dioxin and furans

The Nufarm Coogee site is currently used for the manufacture of a range of agricultural chemicals. Liquid wastes from production are injected via a deep bore into the Cockleshell aquifer causing contamination of the aquifer with herbicides. However, POP’s contamination in soil and water beneath the site is believed to be due to the activities of a previous company that occupied the site – Chemical Industries Kwinana (CIK).

CIK manufactured 2,4,D and 2,4,5,T at the site for use in the Vietnam War as Agent Orange. The Cockburn Sound Management Plan[1] acknowledges that a plume of contamination of chlorinated phenol remains beneath the site and has migrated to other nearby industrial sites. Quality control in the production of 2,4,5 trichlorophenol and 2,4D by CIK was often poor and ‘bad batches’ were disposed of in pits on-site and from time to time were burned.

[1] CSIRO. Trefry and David et al., (2006) Status of Groundwater Quality in the Cockburn Sound Catchment. Final Report to the Cockburn Sound Management Council. p.54.

Source: National Toxics Network – Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009.

The poor quality material was believed to contain levels of dioxin above the regulatory controls of the day. Open burning of these chemicals is likely to have created dioxin contamination at the site even if the chemical waste was initially free of dioxin or contained low levels.

CIK had a sister company operating in Eagle Farm Queensland manufacturing a similar range of chemicals. Recent reports indicate that similar contamination may be present at that site.

The CIK site (pictured above in 1968) was also used to bury drums of unidentified chemicals and chemical mixtures and these are believed to have contributed to the groundwater contamination. When Nufarm took control of the site it inherited hundreds of drums of chemical waste including high strength OCP’s and many unidentified chemical wastes and mixtures which were eventually disposed of by in a manner acceptable to Western Australian environmental authorities.

Action Required:

  • Investigation of dioxin levels in soil, groundwater and in surrounding surface soils
  • Complete remediation of POP’s related waste at the site.

Source: National Toxics Network – Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009.

 

1970’s – 2010’s: Wedgefield (WA). Hazardous Waste Incinerator

Oil Energy Corporation Pty Ltd (ToxFree) Hazardous Waste Incinerator

Location:       20 Schillaman St. Wedgefield, Western Australia

Status:           Inferred POP’s hotspot.

POP’s type:   Dioxin and furans

The Oil Energy Corporation incinerator is situated 6.5km south-west of Port Hedland, a mining town in the north west of Western Australia. It is located within the Wedgefield Special Control Area- a mixed industrial residential area that houses nearly 200 caretaker properties. The incinerator is directly adjacent (200-300m) to a 600 person workforce accommodation village.

The incinerator has a history of controversy with the local community who have lodged numerous complaints about odours, emissions, ash fallout and unusual coloured smoke. There have also been large uncontrolled fires at the site over recent years where waste oil and other chemicals have burst into flames.

Some workers in the accommodation village a few hundred metres from the site have complained of health effects after breathing fumes and emissions that blow from the incinerator but no official investigation has occurred.

The incinerator is very basic consisting of a small inclined rotary kiln and stack. A large range of wastes are incinerated including:

  • waste oil, grease
  • hydrocarbon materials
  • sulfinol and ethylene glycol
  • pesticide wastes
  • halogenated wastes
  • photographic wastes
  • industrial washwaters
  • contaminated soils and drilling mud from oil and gas fields.

 

From 2001 to 2003 trials were conducted for incinerating perchlorethylene wastes, pesticides and halogenated wastes but the application to continue the practice was withdrawn before agreement could be reached with regulators. The incinerator can operate at temperatures of up to 1000oC. The gas scrubbing equipment is limited to a wet venturi scrubber and wet cyclone.

 

 

The Department of Environment and Conservation have concluded that odorous VOC emissions from the site and particulate matter are ‘high risk ‘. Acid gases are considered medium risk. No mention is made anywhere in licensing documents about dioxin control or levels in either emissions or ash.

 

The nature of the wastes burned and the temperatures at which they are burned indicate that dioxins and furans will be created – potentially at high levels.

 

Community complaints include:

  • emissions of ash, yellow and dark smoke
  • uncovered ash loads blowing into the environment as they leave the site.
  • Strong oil burning and sulfurous odours
  • Demands for health investigations for those living nearby.

 

Incinerator ash is currently recycled back through the incinerator to bulk up liquid wastes. This practice results in concentrations of PCDD/DF becoming very high as the ash continues to adsorb these compounds time after time. There has been some evidence of ash disposal/spills on-site. When the ash becomes too contaminated to feed back through the incinerator it is taken off site to an ‘approved’ landfill.

 

Most rural landfills in Western Australia are unlined allowing for contamination of groundwater to occur. Ash is not tested for dioxin. Therefore ash which would inevitably contain concentrated levels of dioxins and heavy metals are being disposed of to landfill somewhere near Port Hedland.

 

Action Required:

  • Immediate closure of the incinerator.
  • Assessment of on-site soil and groundwater for POP’s contamination.
  • Health investigations of nearby residents to assess impacts of emissions.
  • Off-site testing for dioxin contamination.
  • Assessment of dioxin levels in ash.
  • Investigation of fate of ash generated to date.

Oil Energy Corporation Pty Ltd (ToxFree) Hazardous Waste Incinerator

Location:       20 Schillaman St. Wedgefield, Western Australia

Status:           Inferred POP’s hotspot.

POP’s type:   Dioxin and furans

The Oil Energy Corporation incinerator is situated 6.5km south-west of Port Hedland, a mining town in the north west of Western Australia. It is located within the Wedgefield Special Control Area- a mixed industrial residential area that houses nearly 200 caretaker properties. The incinerator is directly adjacent (200-300m) to a 600 person workforce accommodation village.

The incinerator has a history of controversy with the local community who have lodged numerous complaints about odours, emissions, ash fallout and unusual coloured smoke. There have also been large uncontrolled fires at the site over recent years where waste oil and other chemicals have burst into flames.

Some workers in the accommodation village a few hundred metres from the site have complained of health effects after breathing fumes and emissions that blow from the incinerator but no official investigation has occurred.

The incinerator is very basic consisting of a small inclined rotary kiln and stack. A large range of wastes are incinerated including:

  • waste oil, grease
  • hydrocarbon materials
  • sulfinol and ethylene glycol
  • pesticide wastes
  • halogenated wastes
  • photographic wastes
  • industrial washwaters
  • contaminated soils and drilling mud from oil and gas fields.

From 2001 to 2003 trials were conducted for incinerating perchlorethylene wastes, pesticides and halogenated wastes but the application to continue the practice was withdrawn before agreement could be reached with regulators. The incinerator can operate at temperatures of up to 1000oC. The gas scrubbing equipment is limited to a wet venturi scrubber and wet cyclone.

The Department of Environment and Conservation have concluded that odorous VOC emissions from the site and particulate matter are ‘high risk ‘. Acid gases are considered medium risk. No mention is made anywhere in licensing documents about dioxin control or levels in either emissions or ash.

The nature of the wastes burned and the temperatures at which they are burned indicate that dioxins and furans will be created – potentially at high levels.

Community complaints include:

  • emissions of ash, yellow and dark smoke
  • uncovered ash loads blowing into the environment as they leave the site.
  • Strong oil burning and sulfurous odours
  • Demands for health investigations for those living nearby.

Incinerator ash is currently recycled back through the incinerator to bulk up liquid wastes. This practice results in concentrations of PCDD/DF becoming very high as the ash continues to adsorb these compounds time after time. There has been some evidence of ash disposal/spills on-site. When the ash becomes too contaminated to feed back through the incinerator it is taken off site to an ‘approved’ landfill.

Most rural landfills in Western Australia are unlined allowing for contamination of groundwater to occur. Ash is not tested for dioxin. Therefore ash which would inevitably contain concentrated levels of dioxins and heavy metals are being disposed of to landfill somewhere near Port Hedland.

Action Required:

  • Immediate closure of the incinerator.
  • Assessment of on-site soil and groundwater for POP’s contamination.
  • Health investigations of nearby residents to assess impacts of emissions.
  • Off-site testing for dioxin contamination.
  • Assessment of dioxin levels in ash.
  • Investigation of fate of ash generated to date.

Source: National Toxics Network – Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009.

1904 – 1994: Midland Railway Workshops (WA). Contaminated Site

Midland Railway Workshops

 Location:       Midland, Western Australia.

Status:           Confirmed POP’s contaminated site

POP’s type:   Unspecified OCP’s

 This site is located east of Western Australia’s capital Perth. The old Midland Railway Workshops were closed in the 1990’s and have been the subject of environmental investigations in recent years. The site was used for nearly a hundred years and involved large scale metal fabrication, casting and general engineering. A wide range of hazardous chemicals were used on site and most residues were buried in different areas around the

Contamination is widespread across the site with high concentrations in the former hydrocarbon dump on-site. Remediation to date has only involved the removal of soil from surface areas and significant contamination remains beneath this layer.

Recent government reports confirm that contamination of the site is still a problem.

There is a solvent plume in groundwater beneath the site. The extent of the plume is

unknown. There are hydrocarbon plumes at isolated locations across the site, including

phase separated hydrocarbons. Heavy metals are present in groundwater. Pesticides have

also been detected in the groundwater.

 There are waste fill deposits over a large portion of the site containing heavy metals,

asbestos, hydrocarbons, pesticides and solvents. A dedicated asbestos dump containing

buried asbestos material is located in the central part of the site[1].

 Action Required

  • Full remediation of site and treatment of OCP’s by environmentally acceptable technology.
  • Dioxin assessment of soil contamination.

[1] Department of Environment and Conservation (2009) Contaminated Sites Act 2003. Basic Summary of Records Search Response. Midland Railway Workshops

 Source: National Toxics Network - Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009

Midland Railway Workshops

Location:       Midland, Western Australia.

Status:           Confirmed POP’s contaminated site

POP’s type:   Unspecified OCP’s

This site is located east of Western Australia’s capital Perth. The old Midland Railway Workshops were closed in the 1990’s and have been the subject of environmental investigations in recent years. The site was used for nearly a hundred years and involved large scale metal fabrication, casting and general engineering. A wide range of hazardous chemicals were used on site and most residues were buried in different areas around the

Contamination is widespread across the site with high concentrations in the former hydrocarbon dump on-site. Remediation to date has only involved the removal of soil from surface areas and significant contamination remains beneath this layer.

Recent government reports confirm that contamination of the site is still a problem.

There is a solvent plume in groundwater beneath the site. The extent of the plume is

unknown. There are hydrocarbon plumes at isolated locations across the site, including

phase separated hydrocarbons. Heavy metals are present in groundwater. Pesticides have

also been detected in the groundwater.

 There are waste fill deposits over a large portion of the site containing heavy metals,

asbestos, hydrocarbons, pesticides and solvents. A dedicated asbestos dump containing

buried asbestos material is located in the central part of the site[1].

Action Required

  • Full remediation of site and treatment of OCP’s by environmentally acceptable technology.
  • Dioxin assessment of soil contamination.

[1] Department of Environment and Conservation (2009) Contaminated Sites Act 2003. Basic Summary of Records Search Response. Midland Railway Workshops

Source: National Toxics Network – Australian POPs Hotspots A briefing paper on facilities and sites with confirmed or inferred POP’s pollution. Author: Lee Bell March 2009

1997: Howard Springs (NT). Pesticides detected in Sediment: Dieldrin, Endosulfan

 
 

1995 November – 1997 April. Winnellie Drain (Darwin). Pesticides detected: DDT, Chlordane, Dieldrin, Heptachlor

 
 
 
 
 
https://www.lrm.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/13850/pesticide-study-appendices.pdf

1995 November – 1997 June. Moil Drain Darwin. Pesticides detected: Dieldrin, Triclopyr

 
 
 
 
 

1996 December: Elizabeth River (NT). Pesticide detected: Chlordane

 
 
 
 
 

1992 March – 1992 October: Darwin Rural Area. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Prometryn, Heptachlor, Carbaryl

 

1990: Darwin Naval Base (Larrakeyah). Pesticides detected in Sediment: Dieldrin, DDE, DDT, Methoxychlor

 
 
https://www.lrm.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/13850/pesticide-study-appendices.pdf

1981 September: Rapid Creek (NT). Pesticides detected: Aldrin, Dieldrin, Lindane

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
https://www.lrm.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/13850/pesticide-study-appendices.pdf

2015 January: Cox Peninsula Northern Territory

Decades-old Kenbi land claim held up by $32m clean-up bill for asbestos and pollutants hazard

Updated 12 Jan 2015, 7:49pm

The Kenbi land claim was lodged in 1979 and 36 years later has still not been fully resolved.

The claim covers the Cox Peninsula, west of Darwin, which had been used by the Commonwealth Government for over 70 years for communications and defence purposes during WWII, with a lighthouse and other government buildings spread over 4,750 hectares of land.

A report by the Department of Finance submitted last month stated that buildings and their surrounding areas on the land are harbouring dangerous levels of asbestos, pesticides, heavy metals and other toxic pollutants, which "pose a significant risk to human health" and represent a "liability for the Commonwealth".

The area has also been used as a dump for decades, with building debris from Cyclone Tracy in 1974 being offloaded there.

Indigenous elder Tibby Quall, who lives near the Cox Peninsula, said he had never been told by the government or the Northern Land Council (NLC) that the land was polluted.

Decades-old Kenbi land claim held up by $32m clean-up bill for asbestos and pollutants hazard

Updated

The Kenbi land claim was lodged in 1979 and 36 years later has still not been fully resolved.

The claim covers the Cox Peninsula, west of Darwin, which had been used by the Commonwealth Government for over 70 years for communications and defence purposes during WWII, with a lighthouse and other government buildings spread over 4,750 hectares of land.

A report by the Department of Finance submitted last month stated that buildings and their surrounding areas on the land are harbouring dangerous levels of asbestos, pesticides, heavy metals and other toxic pollutants, which “pose a significant risk to human health” and represent a “liability for the Commonwealth”.

The area has also been used as a dump for decades, with building debris from Cyclone Tracy in 1974 being offloaded there.

Indigenous elder Tibby Quall, who lives near the Cox Peninsula, said he had never been told by the government or the Northern Land Council (NLC) that the land was polluted.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-01-11/decades-old-land-claim-held-up-by-asbestos-hazard/6011096

2005 August: Narangba (Qld). Pesticide Chemical Fire

Explosions, fire rip through chemical factory

 26 Aug 2005,

A massive factory fire in Narangba north of Brisbane lit up the sky overnight, as drums full of chemicals exploded.

More than 100 fire officers, police and scientific officers were called to Binary Chemicals, a weed killer manufacturer, about 10:00pm AEST.

Large drums of herbicides and pesticides exploded and nearby residents were asked to stay in their homes and switch off any air conditioning units.

Two fire officers had to be treated for smoke inhalation.

The Queensland Fire and Rescue Service's Assistant Commissioner, Ian McKenzie, says the situation was dangerous.

"It involved two buildings, both over 70 metres in length and 40 metres wide, and completely involved in fire," he said.

"And those buildings have been full of 200-litre drums of various herbicides and pesticides that have periodically been exploding through the night.

"So quite spectacular fireballs and, at times, quite dangerous conditions."

Assistant Commissioner McKenzie says the situation has now been brought under control.

"We're trying to extinguish the fire finally and we're maintaining a watch on all the waterways for any chemical run-off and the cloud of smoke as well to make sure it's safe," he said.

Police Inspector Michael Brady says it is not yet known what caused the blaze.

"It's far too early for that," he said.

"They're going to make their investigations and that'll probably be going on all through the day."

A police spokeswoman says it is believed no-one was in the building at the time the fire started.

Residents

Narangba residents say the fire proves an industrial estate should never have been set-up in the area.

Fran Jell from the Narangba Community Action Group says the industrial area is bounded by one of the fastest growing communities in south-east Queensland.

"And new estates mean young people and young people mean children," she said.

"And you don't need these noxious, offensive and hazardous industries close handy to children."

Explosions, fire rip through chemical factory

 

A massive factory fire in Narangba north of Brisbane lit up the sky overnight, as drums full of chemicals exploded.

More than 100 fire officers, police and scientific officers were called to Binary Chemicals, a weed killer manufacturer, about 10:00pm AEST.

Large drums of herbicides and pesticides exploded and nearby residents were asked to stay in their homes and switch off any air conditioning units.

Two fire officers had to be treated for smoke inhalation.

The Queensland Fire and Rescue Service’s Assistant Commissioner, Ian McKenzie, says the situation was dangerous.

“It involved two buildings, both over 70 metres in length and 40 metres wide, and completely involved in fire,” he said.

“And those buildings have been full of 200-litre drums of various herbicides and pesticides that have periodically been exploding through the night.

“So quite spectacular fireballs and, at times, quite dangerous conditions.”

Assistant Commissioner McKenzie says the situation has now been brought under control.

“We’re trying to extinguish the fire finally and we’re maintaining a watch on all the waterways for any chemical run-off and the cloud of smoke as well to make sure it’s safe,” he said.

Police Inspector Michael Brady says it is not yet known what caused the blaze.

“It’s far too early for that,” he said.

“They’re going to make their investigations and that’ll probably be going on all through the day.”

A police spokeswoman says it is believed no-one was in the building at the time the fire started.

Residents

Narangba residents say the fire proves an industrial estate should never have been set-up in the area.

Fran Jell from the Narangba Community Action Group says the industrial area is bounded by one of the fastest growing communities in south-east Queensland.

“And new estates mean young people and young people mean children,” she said.

“And you don’t need these noxious, offensive and hazardous industries close handy to children.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-08-26/explosions-fire-rip-through-chemical-factory/2089366

2014 December: Federal, NSW. Pesticide Spill

Insecticide spill poisons creek at Federal

Echo Net Daily Dec 3 2014

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has warned an accidental spill of the pesticides Orthene and Spin on a macadamia farm at Federal could affect water in nearby Whian Creek and Coopers Creek..

People have been warned not to pump or drink the water until further testing is complete and Rous Water has switched off pumps in the Wilsons River downstream of the spill.

Byron Shire Council has informed affected residents adjoining Whian Creek and Coopers Creek.

An EPA spokesperson said a large quantity of the pesticide mix spilled into an unnamed creek following tractor accident on a private property on Monday afternoon.

Around 2pm, a tractor was towing a trailer carrying a tank of pesticide mix when the connector failed, causing it to break away from the tractor and career down an embankment, crashing onto the creek bank.

The spokesperson said much of the 2,000 litres of the pesticide and water mix, which was being sprayed on macadamias, gathered in a natural pool in the creek and was later pumped out by the pesticides contractor.

Both the EPA and NSW Fire and Rescue attended the incident and took samples of the water.

NSW Fire and Rescue also built a weir further downstream of the creek to contain the spill, which was also pumped out.

The EPA estimates around 40,000 litres of affected water has been pumped from the two pools.

Orthene is an organophosphate and is toxic to aquatic organisms, birds and mammals.

Fire and Rescue NSW officers said they observed sick and dead fish in the natural pool where the pesticide mix had collected.

Rous Water is conducting tests on water downstream and has isolated the pumps in Wilsons River, which it says will not be pumping water until analysis confirms that the water is free of pesticides.

EPA director north Gary Davey said the spill was quickly contained and the risk of significant contamination downstream is unlikely. But the EPA recommeds that residents suspend their use of the water in Byrangery Creek until the sampling results are known.

https://www.echo.net.au/2014/12/insecticide-spill-poisons-creek-federal/

Chemical spill on macadamia farm

 3 Dec 2014,

A large chemical spill west of Byron Bay has leaked into to a local waterway.

On Monday afternoon a large quantity of pesticide mix spilled into a creek after a tractor accident on a private property at Federal.

The Environment Protection Authority said much of the 2000 litres of the pesticide mix, which was being sprayed on macadamias, gathered in a natural pool in the creek.

The affected water was later pumped out by the pesticides contractor.

Fire and Rescue constructed a small weir further downstream to contain the spill.

The EPA estimates that approximately 40,000 litres of water has been pumped from the two pools.

Water supply authority, Rous Water, will conduct further water quality sampling to ensure that no pesticide has moved downstream into Byrangery Creek.

The EPA said while the spill was quickly contained and the risk of significant contamination downstream is unlikely, it is recommended that residents suspend their use of the water in Byrangery Creek until sampling results are known.

Insecticide spill poisons creek at Federal

Echo Net Daily Dec 3 2014

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has warned an accidental spill of the pesticides Orthene and Spin on a macadamia farm at Federal could affect water in nearby Whian Creek and Coopers Creek..

People have been warned not to pump or drink the water until further testing is complete and Rous Water has switched off pumps in the Wilsons River downstream of the spill.

Byron Shire Council has informed affected residents adjoining Whian Creek and Coopers Creek.

An EPA spokesperson said a large quantity of the pesticide mix spilled into an unnamed creek following tractor accident on a private property on Monday afternoon.

Around 2pm, a tractor was towing a trailer carrying a tank of pesticide mix when the connector failed, causing it to break away from the tractor and career down an embankment, crashing onto the creek bank.

The spokesperson said much of the 2,000 litres of the pesticide and water mix, which was being sprayed on macadamias, gathered in a natural pool in the creek and was later pumped out by the pesticides contractor.

Both the EPA and NSW Fire and Rescue attended the incident and took samples of the water.

NSW Fire and Rescue also built a weir further downstream of the creek to contain the spill, which was also pumped out.

The EPA estimates around 40,000 litres of affected water has been pumped from the two pools.

Orthene is an organophosphate and is toxic to aquatic organisms, birds and mammals.

Fire and Rescue NSW officers said they observed sick and dead fish in the natural pool where the pesticide mix had collected.

Rous Water is conducting tests on water downstream and has isolated the pumps in Wilsons River, which it says will not be pumping water until analysis confirms that the water is free of pesticides.

EPA director north Gary Davey said the spill was quickly contained and the risk of significant contamination downstream is unlikely. But the EPA recommeds that residents suspend their use of the water in Byrangery Creek until the sampling results are known.

https://www.echo.net.au/2014/12/insecticide-spill-poisons-creek-federal/

Chemical spill on macadamia farm

 

A large chemical spill west of Byron Bay has leaked into to a local waterway.

On Monday afternoon a large quantity of pesticide mix spilled into a creek after a tractor accident on a private property at Federal.

The Environment Protection Authority said much of the 2000 litres of the pesticide mix, which was being sprayed on macadamias, gathered in a natural pool in the creek.

The affected water was later pumped out by the pesticides contractor.

Fire and Rescue constructed a small weir further downstream to contain the spill.

The EPA estimates that approximately 40,000 litres of water has been pumped from the two pools.

Water supply authority, Rous Water, will conduct further water quality sampling to ensure that no pesticide has moved downstream into Byrangery Creek.

The EPA said while the spill was quickly contained and the risk of significant contamination downstream is unlikely, it is recommended that residents suspend their use of the water in Byrangery Creek until sampling results are known.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-03/chem-spill/5936858

2005 May: Wudinna (SA). Pesticide Spill

Experts to clean up pesticide spill

2 May 2005

Hazardous chemical experts from the South Australian Country Fire Service (CFS) are preparing to fly to Wudinna, on the Eyre Peninsula, to clean up a pesticide spill.

This morning a semitrailer driver discovered that a 20-litre drum of pesticide had ruptured while he was stopped overnight at a parking bay on the Eyre Highway, five kilometres from Wudinna.

CFS volunteers are directing traffic around the area as they wait for chemical experts to arrive from Adelaide.

Brenton Ragless from the CFS says the spill is not posing an immediate safety risk, but firefighters are being extra cautious.

"As with any chemical, we don't want to take any chances, so that's why we've called in specialist crews, specially trained in hazardous material response and they're going to be wearing gas-type space suits which protects them from the chemical," Mr Ragless said.

"They're wearing breathing apparatus inside.

"So we're taking every precaution necessary to make sure this area is declared safe."

Experts to clean up pesticide spill

Hazardous chemical experts from the South Australian Country Fire Service (CFS) are preparing to fly to Wudinna, on the Eyre Peninsula, to clean up a pesticide spill.

This morning a semitrailer driver discovered that a 20-litre drum of pesticide had ruptured while he was stopped overnight at a parking bay on the Eyre Highway, five kilometres from Wudinna.

CFS volunteers are directing traffic around the area as they wait for chemical experts to arrive from Adelaide.

Brenton Ragless from the CFS says the spill is not posing an immediate safety risk, but firefighters are being extra cautious.

“As with any chemical, we don’t want to take any chances, so that’s why we’ve called in specialist crews, specially trained in hazardous material response and they’re going to be wearing gas-type space suits which protects them from the chemical,” Mr Ragless said.

“They’re wearing breathing apparatus inside.

“So we’re taking every precaution necessary to make sure this area is declared safe.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-05-02/experts-to-clean-up-pesticide-spill/1561886

2013 July: Peregian Beach Qld. Pesticide of Concern: Gloricide (2,4-D + Metsulfuron Methyl)

Sunshine Coast council sprays dunes with 'Agent Orange' mix to control weeds The Courier-Mail July 13, 2013

COMMUNITY safety fears have been raised after it was revealed a Sunshine Coast council mixed up its own chemical brew from an ingredient used in Agent Orange and sprayed it at popular beaches to kill sand dune weeds.

The council is under fire for using the herbicide 2,4-D _ one half of the toxic defoliant blend Agent Orange from the Vietnam War _ that is under review by federal authorities.

For the past three years, the council has been experimenting with an off-label "tank mix" of 2,4-D and another herbicide, metsulfuron methyl, to rid sand dunes of the invasive glory lily (gloriosa superba) weed.

Fears have been raised over the safety of the brew _ dubbed Gloricide _ as federal agencies undertake a review of 2,4-D over concerns it can harm the environment and humans.

The federal environment department has recommended a ban on all "high volatile" 2,4-D products which can vapourish and travel kilometres, landing on other plants and aquatic organisms.

Human trials and real-life environmental tests are also under way on the "low volatile" 2,4-D products, with results expected at the end of the year.

In the United States, there is a push to have 2,4-D banned.

Glory lily is considered one of the most difficult weeds to control and has taken over sand dunes along much of Australia's east coast.

To tackle infestations, the Sunshine Coast council began broader scale trials of the Gloricide concoction.

Some contractors have been ordered to spray it twice yearly up and down the coast at locations including Marcus Beach, Mudjimba and Peregian Beach.

However local coast care groups which weed the dunes by hand have confirmed they knew nothing about the spray program.

The Sunshine Coast Environment Council (SCEC) lobby group was also unaware.

"It would be extremely unorthodox for the council to be using chemicals not proven to be safe, particularly in public areas," said SCEC's Narelle McCarthy.

Because neither herbicide was designed for glory lily, the council was issued a special federal permit to use the products "off-label".

Neither chemical should be sprayed near "aquatic environments" but whistleblower former contractor Adam Presnell claims he was told to spray the mix near a creek at Marcoola and by a drain.

Sunshine Coast campaigner Susan Guy, whose brother died after exposure to 2,4,5-T - the other half of Agent Orange - said she was appalled that the council was using a chemical from the "Dark Ages".

Ms Guy's brother sprayed 2,4,5-T while working in the Beerwah forestry in the 1970s and developed leukaemia.

It was considered the "dangerous" half of Agent Orange and is no longer in use.

"I'm just horrified that the general public is unaware," said Ms Guy.

"All spraying in public places should end. It's bizarre in this day and age. And they're mixing it to give it that extra punch on a little weed."

However the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority executive director of pesticides Raj Bhula said it was "highly unlikely" that mixing 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl would create a toxic brew like Agent Orange.

"It's very, very, very unlikely that would happen in a normal spray tank under normal pressure and normal spray conditions," she said.

When asked whether 2,4-D should be used while the review was still under way, she said: "Until we bring down a finding on the other forms of 2,4-D I probably can't answer that question."

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council has strongly vouched for the safety of its spray program, saying all the methodology had been reviewed and proven to be low risk to the environment.

"The outcome of these reviews and investigations from the Queensland Ombudsman, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Work Health and Safety Qld, Biosecurity Queensland and the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts has shown that council is undertaking and using these herbicides in line with current legislation," a statement said.

"The application of these herbicides, as with any weed control activities using herbicides, is undertaken via a developed work procedure and protocol.

"This is to ensure best practice is carried out when delivering these activities on the ground."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said there was no evidence 2,4-D was safe.

"It's a chemical that's been around a long time and some people use that as an argument for its safety," she said.

"I would say it means it hasn't been subjected to modern safety and testing. It was one of those old chemicals that were grandfathered into the national scheme."

Ms Immig said claims that the two active chemicals in Gloricide were "compatible" only meant they wouldn't react when mixed, not that they were safe to humans or the environment.

Sunshine Coast council sprays dunes with ‘Agent Orange’ mix to control weeds The Courier-Mail July 13, 2013

COMMUNITY safety fears have been raised after it was revealed a Sunshine Coast council mixed up its own chemical brew from an ingredient used in Agent Orange and sprayed it at popular beaches to kill sand dune weeds.

The council is under fire for using the herbicide 2,4-D _ one half of the toxic defoliant blend Agent Orange from the Vietnam War _ that is under review by federal authorities.

For the past three years, the council has been experimenting with an off-label “tank mix” of 2,4-D and another herbicide, metsulfuron methyl, to rid sand dunes of the invasive glory lily (gloriosa superba) weed.

Fears have been raised over the safety of the brew _ dubbed Gloricide _ as federal agencies undertake a review of 2,4-D over concerns it can harm the environment and humans.

The federal environment department has recommended a ban on all “high volatile” 2,4-D products which can vapourish and travel kilometres, landing on other plants and aquatic organisms.

Human trials and real-life environmental tests are also under way on the “low volatile” 2,4-D products, with results expected at the end of the year.

In the United States, there is a push to have 2,4-D banned.

Glory lily is considered one of the most difficult weeds to control and has taken over sand dunes along much of Australia’s east coast.

To tackle infestations, the Sunshine Coast council began broader scale trials of the Gloricide concoction.

Some contractors have been ordered to spray it twice yearly up and down the coast at locations including Marcus Beach, Mudjimba and Peregian Beach.

However local coast care groups which weed the dunes by hand have confirmed they knew nothing about the spray program.

The Sunshine Coast Environment Council (SCEC) lobby group was also unaware.

“It would be extremely unorthodox for the council to be using chemicals not proven to be safe, particularly in public areas,” said SCEC’s Narelle McCarthy.

Because neither herbicide was designed for glory lily, the council was issued a special federal permit to use the products “off-label”.

Neither chemical should be sprayed near “aquatic environments” but whistleblower former contractor Adam Presnell claims he was told to spray the mix near a creek at Marcoola and by a drain.

Sunshine Coast campaigner Susan Guy, whose brother died after exposure to 2,4,5-T – the other half of Agent Orange – said she was appalled that the council was using a chemical from the “Dark Ages”.

Ms Guy’s brother sprayed 2,4,5-T while working in the Beerwah forestry in the 1970s and developed leukaemia.

It was considered the “dangerous” half of Agent Orange and is no longer in use.

“I’m just horrified that the general public is unaware,” said Ms Guy.

“All spraying in public places should end. It’s bizarre in this day and age. And they’re mixing it to give it that extra punch on a little weed.”

However the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority executive director of pesticides Raj Bhula said it was “highly unlikely” that mixing 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl would create a toxic brew like Agent Orange.

“It’s very, very, very unlikely that would happen in a normal spray tank under normal pressure and normal spray conditions,” she said.

When asked whether 2,4-D should be used while the review was still under way, she said: “Until we bring down a finding on the other forms of 2,4-D I probably can’t answer that question.”

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council has strongly vouched for the safety of its spray program, saying all the methodology had been reviewed and proven to be low risk to the environment.

“The outcome of these reviews and investigations from the Queensland Ombudsman, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Work Health and Safety Qld, Biosecurity Queensland and the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts has shown that council is undertaking and using these herbicides in line with current legislation,” a statement said.

“The application of these herbicides, as with any weed control activities using herbicides, is undertaken via a developed work procedure and protocol.

“This is to ensure best practice is carried out when delivering these activities on the ground.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said there was no evidence 2,4-D was safe.

“It’s a chemical that’s been around a long time and some people use that as an argument for its safety,” she said.

“I would say it means it hasn’t been subjected to modern safety and testing. It was one of those old chemicals that were grandfathered into the national scheme.”

Ms Immig said claims that the two active chemicals in Gloricide were “compatible” only meant they wouldn’t react when mixed, not that they were safe to humans or the environment.

QUICK FACTS:

Agent Orange

* A 50-50 mix of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T used to clear jungles in Vietnam War

* 2,4,5-T considered the dangerous component and phased out

* 2,4-D still widely used on crops and gardens

Gloricide

* Developed in Qld to treat Glory Lily

* Mix of 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl

* Lab trials undertaken at Alan Fletcher Research Station (Qld State Govt)

* Broad-scale field trials on the Sunshine Coast

2,4-D

* Listed as a possible endocrine disrupter

* No proven cancer link

* There are two forms: high volatile (ester) and low volatile

* High volatile found to pose “unacceptable risk” to non-target vegetation, fish and aquatic invertebrates

* High and low volatile forms an “unacceptable” risk to aquatic plants and algae

* High volatile forms can evaporate days after spraying and travel several kilometres

* Detected in 9-27 per cent of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree rivers

* Found in trace amounts in 3 of 52 groundwater samples in Bundaberg

APVMA Review

* Instigated in 2003 over concerns about 2,4-D

* Federal Environment Department has recommended a ban on all high volatile 2,4-D

* Users have two weeks to respond before a final decision by the APVMA

* Review of low volatile 2,4-D (including human trials and environment testing) ongoing

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/sunshine-coast-council-sprays-dunes-with-8216agent-orange8217-mix-to-control-weeds/story-fnihsrf2-1226678653244

2013 July: Mudjimba Qld. Pesticide of Concern: Gloricide (2,4-D + Metsulfuron Methyl)

Sunshine Coast council sprays dunes with 'Agent Orange' mix to control weeds The Courier-Mail July 13, 2013

COMMUNITY safety fears have been raised after it was revealed a Sunshine Coast council mixed up its own chemical brew from an ingredient used in Agent Orange and sprayed it at popular beaches to kill sand dune weeds.

The council is under fire for using the herbicide 2,4-D _ one half of the toxic defoliant blend Agent Orange from the Vietnam War _ that is under review by federal authorities.

For the past three years, the council has been experimenting with an off-label "tank mix" of 2,4-D and another herbicide, metsulfuron methyl, to rid sand dunes of the invasive glory lily (gloriosa superba) weed.

Fears have been raised over the safety of the brew _ dubbed Gloricide _ as federal agencies undertake a review of 2,4-D over concerns it can harm the environment and humans.

The federal environment department has recommended a ban on all "high volatile" 2,4-D products which can vapourish and travel kilometres, landing on other plants and aquatic organisms.

Human trials and real-life environmental tests are also under way on the "low volatile" 2,4-D products, with results expected at the end of the year.

In the United States, there is a push to have 2,4-D banned.

Glory lily is considered one of the most difficult weeds to control and has taken over sand dunes along much of Australia's east coast.

To tackle infestations, the Sunshine Coast council began broader scale trials of the Gloricide concoction.

Some contractors have been ordered to spray it twice yearly up and down the coast at locations including Marcus Beach, Mudjimba and Peregian Beach.

However local coast care groups which weed the dunes by hand have confirmed they knew nothing about the spray program.

The Sunshine Coast Environment Council (SCEC) lobby group was also unaware.

"It would be extremely unorthodox for the council to be using chemicals not proven to be safe, particularly in public areas," said SCEC's Narelle McCarthy.

Because neither herbicide was designed for glory lily, the council was issued a special federal permit to use the products "off-label".

Neither chemical should be sprayed near "aquatic environments" but whistleblower former contractor Adam Presnell claims he was told to spray the mix near a creek at Marcoola and by a drain.

Sunshine Coast campaigner Susan Guy, whose brother died after exposure to 2,4,5-T - the other half of Agent Orange - said she was appalled that the council was using a chemical from the "Dark Ages".

Ms Guy's brother sprayed 2,4,5-T while working in the Beerwah forestry in the 1970s and developed leukaemia.

It was considered the "dangerous" half of Agent Orange and is no longer in use.

"I'm just horrified that the general public is unaware," said Ms Guy.

"All spraying in public places should end. It's bizarre in this day and age. And they're mixing it to give it that extra punch on a little weed."

However the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority executive director of pesticides Raj Bhula said it was "highly unlikely" that mixing 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl would create a toxic brew like Agent Orange.

"It's very, very, very unlikely that would happen in a normal spray tank under normal pressure and normal spray conditions," she said.

When asked whether 2,4-D should be used while the review was still under way, she said: "Until we bring down a finding on the other forms of 2,4-D I probably can't answer that question."

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council has strongly vouched for the safety of its spray program, saying all the methodology had been reviewed and proven to be low risk to the environment.

"The outcome of these reviews and investigations from the Queensland Ombudsman, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Work Health and Safety Qld, Biosecurity Queensland and the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts has shown that council is undertaking and using these herbicides in line with current legislation," a statement said.

"The application of these herbicides, as with any weed control activities using herbicides, is undertaken via a developed work procedure and protocol.

"This is to ensure best practice is carried out when delivering these activities on the ground."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said there was no evidence 2,4-D was safe.

"It's a chemical that's been around a long time and some people use that as an argument for its safety," she said.

"I would say it means it hasn't been subjected to modern safety and testing. It was one of those old chemicals that were grandfathered into the national scheme."

Ms Immig said claims that the two active chemicals in Gloricide were "compatible" only meant they wouldn't react when mixed, not that they were safe to humans or the environment.

QUICK FACTS:

Sunshine Coast council sprays dunes with ‘Agent Orange’ mix to control weeds The Courier-Mail July 13, 2013

COMMUNITY safety fears have been raised after it was revealed a Sunshine Coast council mixed up its own chemical brew from an ingredient used in Agent Orange and sprayed it at popular beaches to kill sand dune weeds.

The council is under fire for using the herbicide 2,4-D _ one half of the toxic defoliant blend Agent Orange from the Vietnam War _ that is under review by federal authorities.

For the past three years, the council has been experimenting with an off-label “tank mix” of 2,4-D and another herbicide, metsulfuron methyl, to rid sand dunes of the invasive glory lily (gloriosa superba) weed.

Fears have been raised over the safety of the brew _ dubbed Gloricide _ as federal agencies undertake a review of 2,4-D over concerns it can harm the environment and humans.

The federal environment department has recommended a ban on all “high volatile” 2,4-D products which can vapourish and travel kilometres, landing on other plants and aquatic organisms.

Human trials and real-life environmental tests are also under way on the “low volatile” 2,4-D products, with results expected at the end of the year.

In the United States, there is a push to have 2,4-D banned.

Glory lily is considered one of the most difficult weeds to control and has taken over sand dunes along much of Australia’s east coast.

To tackle infestations, the Sunshine Coast council began broader scale trials of the Gloricide concoction.

Some contractors have been ordered to spray it twice yearly up and down the coast at locations including Marcus Beach, Mudjimba and Peregian Beach.

However local coast care groups which weed the dunes by hand have confirmed they knew nothing about the spray program.

The Sunshine Coast Environment Council (SCEC) lobby group was also unaware.

“It would be extremely unorthodox for the council to be using chemicals not proven to be safe, particularly in public areas,” said SCEC’s Narelle McCarthy.

Because neither herbicide was designed for glory lily, the council was issued a special federal permit to use the products “off-label”.

Neither chemical should be sprayed near “aquatic environments” but whistleblower former contractor Adam Presnell claims he was told to spray the mix near a creek at Marcoola and by a drain.

Sunshine Coast campaigner Susan Guy, whose brother died after exposure to 2,4,5-T – the other half of Agent Orange – said she was appalled that the council was using a chemical from the “Dark Ages”.

Ms Guy’s brother sprayed 2,4,5-T while working in the Beerwah forestry in the 1970s and developed leukaemia.

It was considered the “dangerous” half of Agent Orange and is no longer in use.

“I’m just horrified that the general public is unaware,” said Ms Guy.

“All spraying in public places should end. It’s bizarre in this day and age. And they’re mixing it to give it that extra punch on a little weed.”

However the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority executive director of pesticides Raj Bhula said it was “highly unlikely” that mixing 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl would create a toxic brew like Agent Orange.

“It’s very, very, very unlikely that would happen in a normal spray tank under normal pressure and normal spray conditions,” she said.

When asked whether 2,4-D should be used while the review was still under way, she said: “Until we bring down a finding on the other forms of 2,4-D I probably can’t answer that question.”

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council has strongly vouched for the safety of its spray program, saying all the methodology had been reviewed and proven to be low risk to the environment.

“The outcome of these reviews and investigations from the Queensland Ombudsman, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Work Health and Safety Qld, Biosecurity Queensland and the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts has shown that council is undertaking and using these herbicides in line with current legislation,” a statement said.

“The application of these herbicides, as with any weed control activities using herbicides, is undertaken via a developed work procedure and protocol.

“This is to ensure best practice is carried out when delivering these activities on the ground.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said there was no evidence 2,4-D was safe.

“It’s a chemical that’s been around a long time and some people use that as an argument for its safety,” she said.

“I would say it means it hasn’t been subjected to modern safety and testing. It was one of those old chemicals that were grandfathered into the national scheme.”

Ms Immig said claims that the two active chemicals in Gloricide were “compatible” only meant they wouldn’t react when mixed, not that they were safe to humans or the environment.

QUICK FACTS:

Agent Orange

* A 50-50 mix of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T used to clear jungles in Vietnam War

* 2,4,5-T considered the dangerous component and phased out

* 2,4-D still widely used on crops and gardens

Gloricide

* Developed in Qld to treat Glory Lily

* Mix of 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl

* Lab trials undertaken at Alan Fletcher Research Station (Qld State Govt)

* Broad-scale field trials on the Sunshine Coast

2,4-D

* Listed as a possible endocrine disrupter

* No proven cancer link

* There are two forms: high volatile (ester) and low volatile

* High volatile found to pose “unacceptable risk” to non-target vegetation, fish and aquatic invertebrates

* High and low volatile forms an “unacceptable” risk to aquatic plants and algae

* High volatile forms can evaporate days after spraying and travel several kilometres

* Detected in 9-27 per cent of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree rivers

* Found in trace amounts in 3 of 52 groundwater samples in Bundaberg

APVMA Review

* Instigated in 2003 over concerns about 2,4-D

* Federal Environment Department has recommended a ban on all high volatile 2,4-D

* Users have two weeks to respond before a final decision by the APVMA

* Review of low volatile 2,4-D (including human trials and environment testing) ongoing

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/sunshine-coast-council-sprays-dunes-with-8216agent-orange8217-mix-to-control-weeds/story-fnihsrf2-1226678653244

2013 July: Marcus Beach Qld. Pesticides of Concern: Gloricide (2,4-D + Metsulfuron Methyl)

Sunshine Coast council sprays dunes with 'Agent Orange' mix to control weeds The Courier-Mail July 13, 2013

COMMUNITY safety fears have been raised after it was revealed a Sunshine Coast council mixed up its own chemical brew from an ingredient used in Agent Orange and sprayed it at popular beaches to kill sand dune weeds.

The council is under fire for using the herbicide 2,4-D _ one half of the toxic defoliant blend Agent Orange from the Vietnam War _ that is under review by federal authorities.

For the past three years, the council has been experimenting with an off-label "tank mix" of 2,4-D and another herbicide, metsulfuron methyl, to rid sand dunes of the invasive glory lily (gloriosa superba) weed.

Fears have been raised over the safety of the brew _ dubbed Gloricide _ as federal agencies undertake a review of 2,4-D over concerns it can harm the environment and humans.

The federal environment department has recommended a ban on all "high volatile" 2,4-D products which can vapourish and travel kilometres, landing on other plants and aquatic organisms.

Human trials and real-life environmental tests are also under way on the "low volatile" 2,4-D products, with results expected at the end of the year.

In the United States, there is a push to have 2,4-D banned.

Glory lily is considered one of the most difficult weeds to control and has taken over sand dunes along much of Australia's east coast.

To tackle infestations, the Sunshine Coast council began broader scale trials of the Gloricide concoction.

Some contractors have been ordered to spray it twice yearly up and down the coast at locations including Marcus Beach, Mudjimba and Peregian Beach.

However local coast care groups which weed the dunes by hand have confirmed they knew nothing about the spray program.

The Sunshine Coast Environment Council (SCEC) lobby group was also unaware.

"It would be extremely unorthodox for the council to be using chemicals not proven to be safe, particularly in public areas," said SCEC's Narelle McCarthy.

Because neither herbicide was designed for glory lily, the council was issued a special federal permit to use the products "off-label".

Neither chemical should be sprayed near "aquatic environments" but whistleblower former contractor Adam Presnell claims he was told to spray the mix near a creek at Marcoola and by a drain.

Sunshine Coast campaigner Susan Guy, whose brother died after exposure to 2,4,5-T - the other half of Agent Orange - said she was appalled that the council was using a chemical from the "Dark Ages".

Ms Guy's brother sprayed 2,4,5-T while working in the Beerwah forestry in the 1970s and developed leukaemia.

It was considered the "dangerous" half of Agent Orange and is no longer in use.

"I'm just horrified that the general public is unaware," said Ms Guy.

"All spraying in public places should end. It's bizarre in this day and age. And they're mixing it to give it that extra punch on a little weed."

However the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority executive director of pesticides Raj Bhula said it was "highly unlikely" that mixing 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl would create a toxic brew like Agent Orange.

"It's very, very, very unlikely that would happen in a normal spray tank under normal pressure and normal spray conditions," she said.

When asked whether 2,4-D should be used while the review was still under way, she said: "Until we bring down a finding on the other forms of 2,4-D I probably can't answer that question."

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council has strongly vouched for the safety of its spray program, saying all the methodology had been reviewed and proven to be low risk to the environment.

"The outcome of these reviews and investigations from the Queensland Ombudsman, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Work Health and Safety Qld, Biosecurity Queensland and the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts has shown that council is undertaking and using these herbicides in line with current legislation," a statement said.

"The application of these herbicides, as with any weed control activities using herbicides, is undertaken via a developed work procedure and protocol.

"This is to ensure best practice is carried out when delivering these activities on the ground."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said there was no evidence 2,4-D was safe.

"It's a chemical that's been around a long time and some people use that as an argument for its safety," she said.

"I would say it means it hasn't been subjected to modern safety and testing. It was one of those old chemicals that were grandfathered into the national scheme."

Ms Immig said claims that the two active chemicals in Gloricide were "compatible" only meant they wouldn't react when mixed, not that they were safe to humans or the environment.

Sunshine Coast council sprays dunes with ‘Agent Orange’ mix to control weeds The Courier-Mail July 13, 2013

COMMUNITY safety fears have been raised after it was revealed a Sunshine Coast council mixed up its own chemical brew from an ingredient used in Agent Orange and sprayed it at popular beaches to kill sand dune weeds.

The council is under fire for using the herbicide 2,4-D _ one half of the toxic defoliant blend Agent Orange from the Vietnam War _ that is under review by federal authorities.

For the past three years, the council has been experimenting with an off-label “tank mix” of 2,4-D and another herbicide, metsulfuron methyl, to rid sand dunes of the invasive glory lily (gloriosa superba) weed.

Fears have been raised over the safety of the brew _ dubbed Gloricide _ as federal agencies undertake a review of 2,4-D over concerns it can harm the environment and humans.

The federal environment department has recommended a ban on all “high volatile” 2,4-D products which can vapourish and travel kilometres, landing on other plants and aquatic organisms.

Human trials and real-life environmental tests are also under way on the “low volatile” 2,4-D products, with results expected at the end of the year.

In the United States, there is a push to have 2,4-D banned.

Glory lily is considered one of the most difficult weeds to control and has taken over sand dunes along much of Australia’s east coast.

To tackle infestations, the Sunshine Coast council began broader scale trials of the Gloricide concoction.

Some contractors have been ordered to spray it twice yearly up and down the coast at locations including Marcus Beach, Mudjimba and Peregian Beach.

However local coast care groups which weed the dunes by hand have confirmed they knew nothing about the spray program.

The Sunshine Coast Environment Council (SCEC) lobby group was also unaware.

“It would be extremely unorthodox for the council to be using chemicals not proven to be safe, particularly in public areas,” said SCEC’s Narelle McCarthy.

Because neither herbicide was designed for glory lily, the council was issued a special federal permit to use the products “off-label”.

Neither chemical should be sprayed near “aquatic environments” but whistleblower former contractor Adam Presnell claims he was told to spray the mix near a creek at Marcoola and by a drain.

Sunshine Coast campaigner Susan Guy, whose brother died after exposure to 2,4,5-T – the other half of Agent Orange – said she was appalled that the council was using a chemical from the “Dark Ages”.

Ms Guy’s brother sprayed 2,4,5-T while working in the Beerwah forestry in the 1970s and developed leukaemia.

It was considered the “dangerous” half of Agent Orange and is no longer in use.

“I’m just horrified that the general public is unaware,” said Ms Guy.

“All spraying in public places should end. It’s bizarre in this day and age. And they’re mixing it to give it that extra punch on a little weed.”

However the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority executive director of pesticides Raj Bhula said it was “highly unlikely” that mixing 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl would create a toxic brew like Agent Orange.

“It’s very, very, very unlikely that would happen in a normal spray tank under normal pressure and normal spray conditions,” she said.

When asked whether 2,4-D should be used while the review was still under way, she said: “Until we bring down a finding on the other forms of 2,4-D I probably can’t answer that question.”

The Sunshine Coast Regional Council has strongly vouched for the safety of its spray program, saying all the methodology had been reviewed and proven to be low risk to the environment.

“The outcome of these reviews and investigations from the Queensland Ombudsman, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Work Health and Safety Qld, Biosecurity Queensland and the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts has shown that council is undertaking and using these herbicides in line with current legislation,” a statement said.

“The application of these herbicides, as with any weed control activities using herbicides, is undertaken via a developed work procedure and protocol.

“This is to ensure best practice is carried out when delivering these activities on the ground.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said there was no evidence 2,4-D was safe.

“It’s a chemical that’s been around a long time and some people use that as an argument for its safety,” she said.

“I would say it means it hasn’t been subjected to modern safety and testing. It was one of those old chemicals that were grandfathered into the national scheme.”

Ms Immig said claims that the two active chemicals in Gloricide were “compatible” only meant they wouldn’t react when mixed, not that they were safe to humans or the environment.

QUICK FACTS:

Agent Orange

* A 50-50 mix of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T used to clear jungles in Vietnam War

* 2,4,5-T considered the dangerous component and phased out

* 2,4-D still widely used on crops and gardens

Gloricide

* Developed in Qld to treat Glory Lily

* Mix of 2,4-D and metsulfuron methyl

* Lab trials undertaken at Alan Fletcher Research Station (Qld State Govt)

* Broad-scale field trials on the Sunshine Coast

2,4-D

* Listed as a possible endocrine disrupter

* No proven cancer link

* There are two forms: high volatile (ester) and low volatile

* High volatile found to pose “unacceptable risk” to non-target vegetation, fish and aquatic invertebrates

* High and low volatile forms an “unacceptable” risk to aquatic plants and algae

* High volatile forms can evaporate days after spraying and travel several kilometres

* Detected in 9-27 per cent of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree rivers

* Found in trace amounts in 3 of 52 groundwater samples in Bundaberg

APVMA Review

* Instigated in 2003 over concerns about 2,4-D

* Federal Environment Department has recommended a ban on all high volatile 2,4-D

* Users have two weeks to respond before a final decision by the APVMA

* Review of low volatile 2,4-D (including human trials and environment testing) ongoing

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/sunshine-coast-council-sprays-dunes-with-8216agent-orange8217-mix-to-control-weeds/story-fnihsrf2-1226678653244

2001 June: Wau Avenue Gold Coast. Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin, DDE

 
 
https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/water/pdf/cont-oysters-runawaybay-jun2001.pdf

2001 June: Lae Drive Gold Coast. Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin, DDE, trans-Chlordane

2001 June: Columbus Drive Gold Coast. Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin, Dieldrin, DDE, trans Chlordane, cis Chlordane, trans nonachlor

2001 June: Paradise Point – Gold Coast (Qld). Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin, DDE

 
 
 

2011 May: Wadeville (NSW) – Gastroschisis. Pesticides of concern: Atrazine

Birth defect cluster sparks investigation

Health authorities are investigating a cluster of birth defects affecting an alarming number of babies born in a small northern New South Wales community.

Gastroschisis is a condition where a baby's intestines and organs grow outside the body through a hole in the abdominal wall.

The global incidence of gastroschisis is one in 5,000, but data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics puts the incidence for NSW's Northern Rivers region at one in 950 births.

In the past three years there have been at least seven babies born with the defect around the community of Wadeville.

NSW Health declined to be interviewed by ABC1's 7.30, but it is currently investigating a possible gastroschisis cluster in the Northern Rivers and an expert panel is expected to meet this month.

Wadeville resident Angela Summers is one mum who has first-hand knowledge of the condition. Her second child, Indi Black Summers, was born with Gastroschisis.

"I felt really alone being at a hospital no one knew nothing. It was hard," she said.

But a small article in the local newspaper about Indi set off a staggering chain of events.

Parents Jacqui McSkimming and her partner Matt Ostilla saw the article after their son Olive was also born with Gastroschisis.

The couple from Barkers Vale, just five minutes drive from Wadeville, discovered their son had the condition 36 hours before he was born.

"It was just a chaos, a mess having so much stuff hanging outside of him; actually I don't know how the surgeon held him up without it all falling on the ground," Mr Ostilla said.

Until Ms Summers and Ms McSkimming met they had no idea how similar their experiences were.

Nor did they realise there were many more families from the area whose babies had been born with the same birth defect in the past three years.

"Six other babies with gastroschisis all at once, all in the Mater Mothers," Ms Summers said.

Kellie Thomas and her partner Troy Rose from Goonellabah were one of the six families. Their third child Mia was born with an acute case of Gastroschisis.

"It was hard, it was really hard to sit there and watch Mia, it was hard to watch her vomiting every two hours," Ms Thomas said.

"Her bowel turned right around and pushed her appendix up on the other side. It was horrible just watching her and not being able to do anything to help her."

Risk factors

Ms Thomas says she did not have any of the known risk factors associated with having a baby born with Gastroschisis, such as amphetamine and cannabis use, drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, or being under the age of 20.

"I was wondering why. Why it was happening? Because we were told there was no reasons for this and then all of a sudden there's all these babies within a 35 kilometre range with the same problem," she said.

"And we really would like to know what has caused this and if someone's to blame, well we need to know."

Elowyn Paitson also had no risk factors. But her daughter Obelia, now two-years old, was born with an extreme case of Gastroschisis.

Up to 10 per cent of children born with the condition do not survive and Obelia's doctor feared the worst.

"He was really not optimistic about her chances of surviving the first surgery. The actual hole was only about two centimetres but all of her large intestine and most of her small intestine, part of her liver and all of her reproductive organs were on the outside," Ms Paitson said.

"It's definitely really concerning. We don't live in a highly populous area."

Brisbane paediatrician Dr Tim Donovan has also been monitoring the rising rate of gastroschisis in Queensland.

"It's essentially risen by a factor of 500 per cent over the last decade," he said.

"It is a large increase and that is why there is interest in this particular anomaly."

Pesticide link

In 2010, the Environmental Defenders Office and the National Toxins Network investigated which pesticides and herbicides were being sprayed by farmers in the Northern Rivers.

"On that list it's incredible to find that there are seven pesticides that are actually banned in the European Union," Jo Immig, an environmental scientist and spokesperson for the National Toxins Network said.

One of those chemicals is Atrazine, a herbicide widely used in Australia to control weeds in a variety of crops.

In 2010, researchers at the University of Washington released a landmark study analysing almost 20 years of medical and agricultural data for Eastern Washington.

It linked the rising rate of gastroschisis to exposure to Atrazine-contaminated waters, particularly for women who conceived in spring - the peak spraying time.

Another 2010 study from the University of California found one in 10 male frogs exposed to Atrazine turned into females, while 75 per cent were rendered sterile.

Studies done by the manufacturer of Atrazine did not come to the same conclusions.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is the regulator of pesticides.

"The APVMA has reviewed in detail scientific studies that suggest possible links between Atrazine and gastroschisis and Atrazine and Hermaphrodism in frogs. While the studies are interesting, they do not satisfy internationally accepted standards of scientific rigour relevance and reliability, which regulators rely upon to make decisions," the APVMA said in a statement.

Dr Donovan says there may be no link between gastroschisis and pesticides and herbicides used in the Northern Rivers

"In gastroschisis if there was a pesticide link then the link would probably include some difference between rural mothers with a rural postcode and rural addresses versus metropolitan mothers," he said.

"And there is no clear answer but the risk seems to be higher in metropolitan mothers in Europe particularly, in the United Kingdom particularly than it is in regional mothers.

"That doesn't mean that pesticides can't be part of multiple causes but it certainly makes it less likely that it's the only cause."

Birth defect cluster sparks investigation

Health authorities are investigating a cluster of birth defects affecting an alarming number of babies born in a small northern New South Wales community.

Gastroschisis is a condition where a baby’s intestines and organs grow outside the body through a hole in the abdominal wall.

The global incidence of gastroschisis is one in 5,000, but data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics puts the incidence for NSW’s Northern Rivers region at one in 950 births.

In the past three years there have been at least seven babies born with the defect around the community of Wadeville.

NSW Health declined to be interviewed by ABC1’s 7.30, but it is currently investigating a possible gastroschisis cluster in the Northern Rivers and an expert panel is expected to meet this month.

Wadeville resident Angela Summers is one mum who has first-hand knowledge of the condition. Her second child, Indi Black Summers, was born with Gastroschisis.

“I felt really alone being at a hospital no one knew nothing. It was hard,” she said.

But a small article in the local newspaper about Indi set off a staggering chain of events.

Parents Jacqui McSkimming and her partner Matt Ostilla saw the article after their son Olive was also born with Gastroschisis.

The couple from Barkers Vale, just five minutes drive from Wadeville, discovered their son had the condition 36 hours before he was born.

“It was just a chaos, a mess having so much stuff hanging outside of him; actually I don’t know how the surgeon held him up without it all falling on the ground,” Mr Ostilla said.

Until Ms Summers and Ms McSkimming met they had no idea how similar their experiences were.

Nor did they realise there were many more families from the area whose babies had been born with the same birth defect in the past three years.

“Six other babies with gastroschisis all at once, all in the Mater Mothers,” Ms Summers said.

Kellie Thomas and her partner Troy Rose from Goonellabah were one of the six families. Their third child Mia was born with an acute case of Gastroschisis.

“It was hard, it was really hard to sit there and watch Mia, it was hard to watch her vomiting every two hours,” Ms Thomas said.

“Her bowel turned right around and pushed her appendix up on the other side. It was horrible just watching her and not being able to do anything to help her.”

Risk factors

Ms Thomas says she did not have any of the known risk factors associated with having a baby born with Gastroschisis, such as amphetamine and cannabis use, drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, or being under the age of 20.

“I was wondering why. Why it was happening? Because we were told there was no reasons for this and then all of a sudden there’s all these babies within a 35 kilometre range with the same problem,” she said.

“And we really would like to know what has caused this and if someone’s to blame, well we need to know.”

Elowyn Paitson also had no risk factors. But her daughter Obelia, now two-years old, was born with an extreme case of Gastroschisis.

Up to 10 per cent of children born with the condition do not survive and Obelia’s doctor feared the worst.

“He was really not optimistic about her chances of surviving the first surgery. The actual hole was only about two centimetres but all of her large intestine and most of her small intestine, part of her liver and all of her reproductive organs were on the outside,” Ms Paitson said.

“It’s definitely really concerning. We don’t live in a highly populous area.”

Brisbane paediatrician Dr Tim Donovan has also been monitoring the rising rate of gastroschisis in Queensland.

“It’s essentially risen by a factor of 500 per cent over the last decade,” he said.

“It is a large increase and that is why there is interest in this particular anomaly.”

Pesticide link

In 2010, the Environmental Defenders Office and the National Toxins Network investigated which pesticides and herbicides were being sprayed by farmers in the Northern Rivers.

“On that list it’s incredible to find that there are seven pesticides that are actually banned in the European Union,” Jo Immig, an environmental scientist and spokesperson for the National Toxins Network said.

One of those chemicals is Atrazine, a herbicide widely used in Australia to control weeds in a variety of crops.

In 2010, researchers at the University of Washington released a landmark study analysing almost 20 years of medical and agricultural data for Eastern Washington.

It linked the rising rate of gastroschisis to exposure to Atrazine-contaminated waters, particularly for women who conceived in spring – the peak spraying time.

Another 2010 study from the University of California found one in 10 male frogs exposed to Atrazine turned into females, while 75 per cent were rendered sterile.

Studies done by the manufacturer of Atrazine did not come to the same conclusions.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is the regulator of pesticides.

“The APVMA has reviewed in detail scientific studies that suggest possible links between Atrazine and gastroschisis and Atrazine and Hermaphrodism in frogs. While the studies are interesting, they do not satisfy internationally accepted standards of scientific rigour relevance and reliability, which regulators rely upon to make decisions,” the APVMA said in a statement.

Dr Donovan says there may be no link between gastroschisis and pesticides and herbicides used in the Northern Rivers

“In gastroschisis if there was a pesticide link then the link would probably include some difference between rural mothers with a rural postcode and rural addresses versus metropolitan mothers,” he said.

“And there is no clear answer but the risk seems to be higher in metropolitan mothers in Europe particularly, in the United Kingdom particularly than it is in regional mothers.

“That doesn’t mean that pesticides can’t be part of multiple causes but it certainly makes it less likely that it’s the only cause.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-05-14/birth-defect-cluster-sparks-investigation/2715546

1949 – 1986: Union Carbide owned Rhodes (Homebush Bay). Pesticides included: 2,4,5-T, 2,4-D

Sydney Harbour’s toxic legacy shows value of green safety net (Dec 17 2012)

Chris McGrath Senior Lecturer at The University of Queensland

The story of dioxin contamination of Sydney Harbour shows us the great value of the green safety net of environmental law.

The laws that form this green safety net, particularly federal laws, have recently been under attack as “green tape”.

This term has become a negative political slogan that represents a sustained attempt to whittle away the protections that have been established, particularly over the past 20 years.

The federal government’s decision to shelve plans to devolve approval powers under its main environmental laws to state governments is sure to re-ignite this attack.

The irony of this sustained political attack on environmental law is that it is the very success of these laws in maintaining or restoring a healthy environment in Australia that has bred the complacency underpinning the attacks.

Many people have forgotten the problems that these laws were created to solve. The danger is that when such laws succeed in maintaining and restoring a healthy environment, they are taken for granted and, over time, holes in the safety net are allowed to grow.

The story of Sydney Harbour’s toxic legacy is timely to remember in this context.

Dioxin contamination of Sydney Harbour

Dioxins are a group of persistent environmental pollutants that accumulate in the food chain, mainly in the fatty tissue of animals. They are highly toxic and can cause reproductive and developmental problems; damage the immune system; interfere with hormones and also cause cancer.

The dioxin contamination of Sydney Harbour comes largely from a former industrial site at Rhodes adjacent to Homebush Bay.

A long history of bad site management

The history of bad management of the site is explained in detail in the technical reports for the remediation of Homebush Bay.

From 1928 until its closure in 1986, the site was used for the manufacture of a wide range of highly toxic chemicals, including timber preservatives, herbicides, pesticides and plastics.

For the latter half of its operating life, the site was owned by Union Carbide Australia Ltd, although the company changed its name following the Bhopal gas disaster at the Union Carbide India Ltd pesticide plant in 1984.

From 1949 until 1976, the site was used to manufacture the herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D, the ingredients for Agent Orange that was used as a defoliant in the Vietnam War.

As a result of both chemical manufacturing and the use of contaminated fill for reclamation, soil and groundwater on the site were highly contaminated by various chemicals, including dioxins.

Overflow during reclamation and uncontrolled release of stormwater and wastewater into Homebush Bay, as well as possible spills while loading and unloading ships, also contributed to heavy contamination of the bay by dioxins and other chemicals.

This occurred until about 1970, when site management was improved to comply with new environmental laws. Extensive remediation of the site has since been carried out.

The toxic legacy

While the heavily contaminated former Union Carbide site has been extensively remediated, dioxins from the site have spread throughout the sediments at the bottom of Sydney Harbour.

Dioxins formed as a by-product of the manufacture of timber preservatives and 2,4,5-T at the site have been linked by a characteristic chemical profile to the dioxin contamination in other parts of Sydney Harbour. The site appears to be the major source of these contaminants in the harbour.

It is impracticable to remediate the extensive area of the harbour that is contaminated.

Dioxins from the contaminated sediments enter the marine food chain and are accumulated in fish, prawns and other organisms. The only practicable means to ‘remove’ the contaminants from the marine food chain is to allow other, clean sediments to cover the contaminants. For much of the harbour, this process will take decades.

Fishing banned for decades to come

Fishing bans have been in place around Homebush Bay since 1989, and were extended to parts of the Parramatta River in 1990.

The extent of contamination from the site was not recognised until 2006, when all commercial fishing was banned in Sydney Harbour after tests revealed elevated levels of dioxin in fish and crustaceans in the harbour.

Recreational fishing in the Harbour has not been banned but, based on advice from an expert panel, the NSW government recommends that:

  • No fish or crustaceans caught west of the Sydney Harbour Bridge should be eaten.

  • For fish caught east of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, generally no more than 150 grams per month should be consumed, except for species for which specific higher consumption limits have been established (for example, 1,200 grams of sand whiting).

A NSW government study suggested that much of Sydney Harbour remains contaminated by dioxins at levels that will make eating fish from much of the harbour unsafe for decades.

Environmental regulation is difficult

Regulating a site such as the former Union Carbide factory is difficult. It requires government agencies with the technical and administrative capability as well as the legal powers to do the job.

It is easy to look back and think, “how could the government have missed this happening?” but it is important to recognise in this context that the Union Carbide factory was one of thousands of industrial sites spread across an enormous geographic area.

It is easy to forget that lax laws in the past led to serious environmental problems.

Certainly all environmental laws should be subject to regular review to make them as efficient, effective and equitable as is practicable. That approach is simply what standard texts on policy design recommend.

But attacking the green safety net of environmental laws as “green tape” fails to recognise the history of environmental problems.

It also fails to recognise that our current laws need to be strengthened in many areas, not weakened. A glaring example of this is the profound inadequacy of our response to the unrivalled threat of climate change.

So, next time you walk barefoot on a clean beach and go for a swim in the ocean, spare a thought for the value of the green safety net of environmental law that is working to maintain the health of these places.

Editorial note: This is an abridged version of an article published in the November/December 2012 issue of Precedent.

Made in Australia

Between 1961 and 1971 the US and its allies sprayed and dumped around 80 million litres of Agent Orange and related chemicals on Vietnam. Demand for this poison was high, and Australian chemical manufacturers helped meet the demand and got their share of the profits.

Union Carbide (now owned by Dow Chemical) produced Agent Orange at Homebush in Sydney, leaving a terrible legacy. The factory is gone now, but in June 1997 Greenpeace investigations revealed an orphaned stockpile of thirty-six 200-litre drums and fifteen 50-litre drums of waste highly contaminated with dioxin next to Homebush Bay and the site of the 2000 Olympic Games. Greenpeace sampling of fish from Homebush Bay found high levels of dioxin in the food chain. Two sea mullet were found to have levels of the most toxic form of dioxin, 2378 TCDD, 10-15 times higher than US and Canadian standards for concentrations in edible fish.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported on October 30, 2010, that carcinogenic chemicals from the former Union Carbide factory are spreading throughout Sydney Harbour. According to government authorities, the contamination covers an area too large to be remediated, and the only answer is to wait until sediments cover the contaminated layer, so the poison cannot be absorbed by fish and small invertebrates. The high levels of dioxins in areas where fish feed mean that the official warnings not to eat fish caught west of the Harbour Bridge, and to eat only 150 grams a month of fish caught east of the bridge, will likely remain for decades.

Agent Orange was also produced in the outer Perth suburb of  Kwinana by  Chemical Industries Kwinana. The National Toxics Network noted in 2009 that quality control at the Perth factory was often poor, and “bad batches” were disposed of in pits on site and from time to time were burned. The open burning of these chemicals would have added to dioxin contamination. State government agencies have identified a plume of dioxin contamination beneath the site that has migrated to other nearby industrial sites.

The Nine MSN website reported on December 12, 2008, that Queensland’s Environmental Protection Agency had revealed the presence of dioxin in soil at an industrial site at Pinkenba, on the banks of a drain leading into the Brisbane River. Again the site was once a chemical factory that made Agent Orange in the 1960s and ‘70s. Dow Chemical, a global producer of Agent Orange, is currently cleaning up dioxin contamination on some of its sites in Victoria.

https://directaction.org.au/issue34/australias_role_in_agent_orange_crime

Sydney Harbour’s toxic legacy shows value of green safety net (Dec 17 2012)

Chris McGrath Senior Lecturer at The University of Queensland

The story of dioxin contamination of Sydney Harbour shows us the great value of the green safety net of environmental law.

The laws that form this green safety net, particularly federal laws, have recently been under attack as “green tape”.

This term has become a negative political slogan that represents a sustained attempt to whittle away the protections that have been established, particularly over the past 20 years.

The federal government’s decision to shelve plans to devolve approval powers under its main environmental laws to state governments is sure to re-ignite this attack.

The irony of this sustained political attack on environmental law is that it is the very success of these laws in maintaining or restoring a healthy environment in Australia that has bred the complacency underpinning the attacks.

Many people have forgotten the problems that these laws were created to solve. The danger is that when such laws succeed in maintaining and restoring a healthy environment, they are taken for granted and, over time, holes in the safety net are allowed to grow.

The story of Sydney Harbour’s toxic legacy is timely to remember in this context.

Dioxin contamination of Sydney Harbour

Dioxins are a group of persistent environmental pollutants that accumulate in the food chain, mainly in the fatty tissue of animals. They are highly toxic and can cause reproductive and developmental problems; damage the immune system; interfere with hormones and also cause cancer.

The dioxin contamination of Sydney Harbour comes largely from a former industrial site at Rhodes adjacent to Homebush Bay.

A long history of bad site management

The history of bad management of the site is explained in detail in the technical reports for the remediation of Homebush Bay.

From 1928 until its closure in 1986, the site was used for the manufacture of a wide range of highly toxic chemicals, including timber preservatives, herbicides, pesticides and plastics.

For the latter half of its operating life, the site was owned by Union Carbide Australia Ltd, although the company changed its name following the Bhopal gas disaster at the Union Carbide India Ltd pesticide plant in 1984.

From 1949 until 1976, the site was used to manufacture the herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D, the ingredients for Agent Orange that was used as a defoliant in the Vietnam War.

As a result of both chemical manufacturing and the use of contaminated fill for reclamation, soil and groundwater on the site were highly contaminated by various chemicals, including dioxins.

Overflow during reclamation and uncontrolled release of stormwater and wastewater into Homebush Bay, as well as possible spills while loading and unloading ships, also contributed to heavy contamination of the bay by dioxins and other chemicals.

This occurred until about 1970, when site management was improved to comply with new environmental laws. Extensive remediation of the site has since been carried out.

The toxic legacy

While the heavily contaminated former Union Carbide site has been extensively remediated, dioxins from the site have spread throughout the sediments at the bottom of Sydney Harbour.

Dioxins formed as a by-product of the manufacture of timber preservatives and 2,4,5-T at the site have been linked by a characteristic chemical profile to the dioxin contamination in other parts of Sydney Harbour. The site appears to be the major source of these contaminants in the harbour.

It is impracticable to remediate the extensive area of the harbour that is contaminated.

Dioxins from the contaminated sediments enter the marine food chain and are accumulated in fish, prawns and other organisms. The only practicable means to ‘remove’ the contaminants from the marine food chain is to allow other, clean sediments to cover the contaminants. For much of the harbour, this process will take decades.

Fishing banned for decades to come

Fishing bans have been in place around Homebush Bay since 1989, and were extended to parts of the Parramatta River in 1990.

The extent of contamination from the site was not recognised until 2006, when all commercial fishing was banned in Sydney Harbour after tests revealed elevated levels of dioxin in fish and crustaceans in the harbour.

Recreational fishing in the Harbour has not been banned but, based on advice from an expert panel, the NSW government recommends that:

  • No fish or crustaceans caught west of the Sydney Harbour Bridge should be eaten.
  • For fish caught east of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, generally no more than 150 grams per month should be consumed, except for species for which specific higher consumption limits have been established (for example, 1,200 grams of sand whiting).

A NSW government study suggested that much of Sydney Harbour remains contaminated by dioxins at levels that will make eating fish from much of the harbour unsafe for decades.

Environmental regulation is difficult

Regulating a site such as the former Union Carbide factory is difficult. It requires government agencies with the technical and administrative capability as well as the legal powers to do the job.

It is easy to look back and think, “how could the government have missed this happening?” but it is important to recognise in this context that the Union Carbide factory was one of thousands of industrial sites spread across an enormous geographic area.

It is easy to forget that lax laws in the past led to serious environmental problems.

Certainly all environmental laws should be subject to regular review to make them as efficient, effective and equitable as is practicable. That approach is simply what standard texts on policy design recommend.

But attacking the green safety net of environmental laws as “green tape” fails to recognise the history of environmental problems.

It also fails to recognise that our current laws need to be strengthened in many areas, not weakened. A glaring example of this is the profound inadequacy of our response to the unrivalled threat of climate change.

So, next time you walk barefoot on a clean beach and go for a swim in the ocean, spare a thought for the value of the green safety net of environmental law that is working to maintain the health of these places.

Editorial note: This is an abridged version of an article published in the November/December 2012 issue of Precedent.

1996: Narrowmine NSW. Cotton Sprays, Cancer and Other Health Concerns

1996 Narrowmine, Cotton. Cancer and various other health concerns, Public meeting Adoption of Gunnedah Spray Guidelines. Investigation of suspected cancer cluster

https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded

1996 Narrowmine, Cotton. Cancer and various other health concerns, Public meeting Adoption of Gunnedah Spray Guidelines. Investigation of suspected cancer cluster

https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded

1995 -1997: Gunnedah Cotton. Various Health Problems

 
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded
 

Cotton Farmers Hit Back In Aerial Spraying Battle

Sydney Morning Herald

Monday June 16, 1997

By ANTHONY HOY Rural Editor

The State and Federal Governments are supporting calls for an independent scientific health study into the impact of aerial pesticide spraying on community health in an attempt to resolve a battle between the farm sector and residents, centred on the township of Gunnedah.

Some of the Upper Namoi's 160 farmer families claim they have received death threats and constant telephone and street harassment, and that their children have developed complexes from discrimination and vilification by peers and adults in schools and at sport.

They say that medical conditions are being attributed to the spraying, without scientific foundation.

The residents are being supported by the environmental movement, which has taken up the local cause to develop the aerial cotton chemical spraying into a State-wide issue.

This week the farming families hit back by launching a campaign against what they say is a climate of social prejudice and regulatory discrimination.

"It's a curious case of a community biting the hand that feeds it," sharefarmer Mr Peter Greentree said.

"Agricultural production in the Upper Namoi Valley, of which Gunnedah is the focal point, is worth $675 million annually to the region, according to Gunnedah Shire Council."

The cotton farmers also grow barley, wheat, sorghum, sunflowers and corn, and 70 per cent of them raise cattle.

"As mixed farmers, we are no longer prepared to be shackled with the spectre of the State's chemical human health problems, unfairly singled out from other intensive agricultural centres and victimised without any scientific foundation to the allegations levelled against us," said Mr Greentree.

Hope of an end to these deep divisions in the community came this week when a spokesman for the Minister for the Environment, Ms Allan, confirmed the State Government was "happy to discuss dollar-for-dollar funding" for the health study with the Federal Government.

And a spokesman for the Primary Industries Minister and deputy leader of the National Party, Mr Anderson, whose electorate includes Gunnedah, confirmed that Mr Anderson supported moves for an independent health study.

The farm families complain that 24 separate pieces of legislation and regulation are disrupting normal cropping programs, affecting yields and slashing profits.

Cotton Australia's executive director, Mr Gary Punch, said: "We are committed to the campaign for an independent study based on objective tests and sound methodologies as the only means of resolving the conflict over aerial application of pesticides.

"The environmental lobby - the Total Environment Centre and the Gunnedah Environment Group - has made huge milage out of the questionable findings of a 1966 preliminary report into the health impact of pesticides, which showed that 13 people had symptoms that may have been linked to either aerial application, pollens and other factors."

https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded

Minister In A Spin Over Cotton Pesticide War

Sydney Morning Herald

Friday May 9, 1997

By MURRAY HOGARTH Environment Writer

Conflict over a chemical crisis among Gunnedah farmers has forced the State Government to bring forward its overhaul of the aging and maligned pesticides law.

The battle pits the small Gunnedah Environment Group (GEG) against Australia’s $1 billion-a-year cotton industry, which has become a major force in the region’s economy over the past five years.

The Minister for the Environment, Ms Allan, was accused yesterday of bowing to cotton might after a backflip on her historic intervention this week to enforce a strict new regime on Gunnedah’s aerial spraying industry.

Her moves pre-empt next week’s release of a report of an investigation by the Total Environment Centre entitled “Gunnedah – A community in crisis over pesticides”. It will brand the area as a pesticide “hot spot” and includes case histories of people who claim spray drift from cotton crops is destroying their health and livelihoods.

“You can’t control the involuntary exposure to chemicals,” said a beef and grain producer, Mr Len Sanders. “It is this low-dose involuntary exposure that is gradually strangling life out of both the human and natural environments.”

But the executive director of Cotton Australia, Mr Gary Punch, has attacked the GEG members as “tabloid environmentalists” and called for the punishment of vexatious or frivolous complainants.

The Herald has found that the Gunnedah crisis includes:* Gunnedah lawyers leading class actions over the chemicals Helix – now voluntarily banned after an export meat contamination disaster – and Endosulfan, which is heavily used by cotton growers;

* Gunnedah Council recently closing its aerial spraying facility. More than two decades of activities led to high-level chemical contamination that could cost $1 million to clean up;* The cotton industry being blamed for everything from a falling water table to major dieback of trees and widespread health complaints, although the industry denies there is any scientific support for such claims;* A chemist, Mr Peter Dennis, saying he had observed a significant but unquantified increase in demand for medications for allergies and respiratory complaints and calling for an expert survey of Gunnedah health practitioners.

On Tuesday, Ms Allan promised to use an obscure provision in the Pesticides Act to take control of aerial spraying, including imposing a night ban. The NSW Farmers’ Association attacked her as a “Big Brother” using “jackboot tactics”.

Days later, Ms Allan changed tack after negotiations with Mr Punch, a former Federal Labor MP. She agreed to give the spraying industry a last chance to regulate itself because she feared its non co-operation could jeopardise her facilitation process.

Yesterday, Ms Allan released a new discussion paper on proposed changes to the Pesticides Act, two months early, saying it gave Gunnedah people options to resolve the conflict. The proposals include raising fines for pesticide offences from $40,000 to $125,000 and making negligence as well as wilful acts punishable. The GEG campaign, using the slogan “Gunna Die at Gunnedah”, wants aerial spraying banned and is led by farmers Ms Margaret Mercer and Ms Michelle Kelly.

Ms Mercer said the split was “between those who use a little bit of chemicals and those who use a lot”.

Cotton Farmers Hit Back In Aerial Spraying Battle

Sydney Morning Herald

Monday June 16, 1997

By ANTHONY HOY Rural Editor

The State and Federal Governments are supporting calls for an independent scientific health study into the impact of aerial pesticide spraying on community health in an attempt to resolve a battle between the farm sector and residents, centred on the township of Gunnedah.

Some of the Upper Namoi’s 160 farmer families claim they have received death threats and constant telephone and street harassment, and that their children have developed complexes from discrimination and vilification by peers and adults in schools and at sport.

They say that medical conditions are being attributed to the spraying, without scientific foundation.

The residents are being supported by the environmental movement, which has taken up the local cause to develop the aerial cotton chemical spraying into a State-wide issue.

This week the farming families hit back by launching a campaign against what they say is a climate of social prejudice and regulatory discrimination.

“It’s a curious case of a community biting the hand that feeds it,” sharefarmer Mr Peter Greentree said.

“Agricultural production in the Upper Namoi Valley, of which Gunnedah is the focal point, is worth $675 million annually to the region, according to Gunnedah Shire Council.”

The cotton farmers also grow barley, wheat, sorghum, sunflowers and corn, and 70 per cent of them raise cattle.

“As mixed farmers, we are no longer prepared to be shackled with the spectre of the State’s chemical human health problems, unfairly singled out from other intensive agricultural centres and victimised without any scientific foundation to the allegations levelled against us,” said Mr Greentree.

Hope of an end to these deep divisions in the community came this week when a spokesman for the Minister for the Environment, Ms Allan, confirmed the State Government was “happy to discuss dollar-for-dollar funding” for the health study with the Federal Government.

And a spokesman for the Primary Industries Minister and deputy leader of the National Party, Mr Anderson, whose electorate includes Gunnedah, confirmed that Mr Anderson supported moves for an independent health study.

The farm families complain that 24 separate pieces of legislation and regulation are disrupting normal cropping programs, affecting yields and slashing profits.

Cotton Australia’s executive director, Mr Gary Punch, said: “We are committed to the campaign for an independent study based on objective tests and sound methodologies as the only means of resolving the conflict over aerial application of pesticides.

“The environmental lobby – the Total Environment Centre and the Gunnedah Environment Group – has made huge milage out of the questionable findings of a 1966 preliminary report into the health impact of pesticides, which showed that 13 people had symptoms that may have been linked to either aerial application, pollens and other factors.”

1984 – 1993: Coffs Harbour, NSW. Bananas – Cluster of Cleft Palate, Spina Bifida, Heart and Brain Abnormalities

1992-3, Coffs Harbour NSW, Bananas, Cluster of Cleft Palate.

Community consultation 3x case control studies Air sampling
 
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded
 
"Coffs Harbour, the hub of our banana industry, reported birth defects six times the national average in 1984, including spina bifida, cleft palates and heart and brain abnormalities, as well as 331 children suffering from malabsorption, chronic diarrhoea, vomiting, weight loss, and growth retardation... At least twelve chemicals ... used in Coffs Harbour ... are banned, withdrawn or severely restricted in other parts of the world...
 
p142 Chemical Crisis - One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future?. Diana Crumpler 1994
 
... Further analysis revealed that 26 per cent of water samples contained dieldrin, with the highest rate, 40 per cent in Coffs Harbour.
 
The Health Department was nonplussed by these findings, but community member, Lorraine Wright, was particularly disturbed. A year before, Lorraine had arranged for a sample of tank water to be taken from a home located near a banana plantation. A woman living there had recently given birth to a deformed child and a friend living on the same property had requested the test on her behalf. The laboratory certificate showed propiconazole present at 60 micrograms per cubic litre. It also reported that there was 'no maximum residue limit set for this compound' in water, leaving the family to ponder the implications of its presence in their water supply. p87 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994
1992-3, Coffs Harbour NSW, Bananas, Cluster of Cleft Palate.

Community consultation 3x case control studies Air sampling
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded
“Coffs Harbour, the hub of our banana industry, reported birth defects six times the national average in 1984, including spina bifida, cleft palates and heart and brain abnormalities, as well as 331 children suffering from malabsorption, chronic diarrhoea, vomiting, weight loss, and growth retardation… At least twelve chemicals … used in Coffs Harbour … are banned, withdrawn or severely restricted in other parts of the world…
p142 Chemical Crisis – One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future?. Diana Crumpler 1994
… Further analysis revealed that 26 per cent of water samples contained dieldrin, with the highest rate, 40 per cent in Coffs Harbour.
The Health Department was nonplussed by these findings, but community member, Lorraine Wright, was particularly disturbed. A year before, Lorraine had arranged for a sample of tank water to be taken from a home located near a banana plantation. A woman living there had recently given birth to a deformed child and a friend living on the same property had requested the test on her behalf. The laboratory certificate showed propiconazole present at 60 micrograms per cubic litre. It also reported that there was ‘no maximum residue limit set for this compound’ in water, leaving the family to ponder the implications of its presence in their water supply. p87 Quick Poison Slow Poison. Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994

1980’s: Emerald Queensland. Cotton Spraying. Childhood leukemia

 
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded/Research%20Reports/health_safety_aus_farming_community_2000.pdf
 
"The Fairbairn Dam, built in 1972, brought new industry and new wealth to outback Queensland - and, it would seem, a new curse. Emerald, the centre of the region's cotton industry, now has a childhood leukaemia rate sixteen times the expected norm"... p 149 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? Diana Crumpler 1994.
 
"In southern Queensland there are five small country regions distinguished by their high child cancer rates and heavy use of pesticides. Between 1980 and 1987 each region had a far higher than expected rate of child leukaemia. Between 1980 and 1985 eight children in these regions died of leukaemia, seven of whom were living in the town of Emerald at the time of diagnosis. This was over eight times the expected rate for a town of that size. According to probability, only 0.86 cases of child leukaemia would be expected in a town the size of Emerald with similar probabilities in the other areas. The probability of the seven Emerald cases occurring in that same time span was 0.0000041 - a four in one million chance. p29 Quick Poison Slow Poison Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded/Research%20Reports/health_safety_aus_farming_community_2000.pdf
“The Fairbairn Dam, built in 1972, brought new industry and new wealth to outback Queensland – and, it would seem, a new curse. Emerald, the centre of the region’s cotton industry, now has a childhood leukaemia rate sixteen times the expected norm”… p 149 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? Diana Crumpler 1994.
“In southern Queensland there are five small country regions distinguished by their high child cancer rates and heavy use of pesticides. Between 1980 and 1987 each region had a far higher than expected rate of child leukaemia. Between 1980 and 1985 eight children in these regions died of leukaemia, seven of whom were living in the town of Emerald at the time of diagnosis. This was over eight times the expected rate for a town of that size. According to probability, only 0.86 cases of child leukaemia would be expected in a town the size of Emerald with similar probabilities in the other areas. The probability of the seven Emerald cases occurring in that same time span was 0.0000041 – a four in one million chance. p29 Quick Poison Slow Poison Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1980’s Moree NSW. General Cluster of Neuroblastoma, Cotton pesticides.

 
 
 
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded/Research%20Reports/health_safety_aus_farming_community_2000.pdf
 
"If they are not the result of chemical exposure, why do we have a chronic fatigue syndrome cluster coinciding with cotton spraying around Breeza, three cases of rare neuroblastoma cancer at Moree, another cotton-growing area; and widespread Illness at Kingston, Queensland, where a housing estate was built on  a toxic waste dump, and in McBride Street, Melbourne, close by a former 2,4-D factory?..." p149 Chemical Crisis One Woman's Story. Humanity's Future? 1994
 
In the cotton shire of Moree, four rare neuroblastomas and another similar rare cancer have been diagnosed in children within a few years. Quick Poison Slow Poison Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded/Research%20Reports/health_safety_aus_farming_community_2000.pdf
“If they are not the result of chemical exposure, why do we have a chronic fatigue syndrome cluster coinciding with cotton spraying around Breeza, three cases of rare neuroblastoma cancer at Moree, another cotton-growing area; and widespread Illness at Kingston, Queensland, where a housing estate was built on  a toxic waste dump, and in McBride Street, Melbourne, close by a former 2,4-D factory?…” p149 Chemical Crisis One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? 1994
In the cotton shire of Moree, four rare neuroblastomas and another similar rare cancer have been diagnosed in children within a few years. Quick Poison Slow Poison Pesticide Risk in the Lucky Country. Kate Short 1994.

1970’s Wee Waa NSW. Health Concerns Cotton Pesticides

 
 
 
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded/Research%20Reports/health_safety_aus_farming_community_2000.pdf
https://www.aghealth.org.au/tinymce_fm/uploaded/Research%20Reports/health_safety_aus_farming_community_2000.pdf

2005 August – 2006 April: Gunbower National Channel. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan

August 2005: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

September 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.016ug/L

October 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.022ug/L

November 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.032ug/L

December 2005: Atrazine 0.045ug/L

January 2006: Atrazine 0.038ug/L

February 2006: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

March 2006: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

August 2005: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

September 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.016ug/L

October 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.022ug/L

November 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.032ug/L

December 2005: Atrazine 0.045ug/L

January 2006: Atrazine 0.038ug/L

February 2006: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

March 2006: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2004 October – 2006 April: Kangaroo Lake Channel 7 (main channel to Swan Hill). Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Molinate, Chlorpyrifos

2004 October: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2004 November: Endosulfan (0.002ug/L) TRIMPS

2004 December: Endosulfan (0.0026ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 January: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 February: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 March: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 April: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005: August: Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.012ug/L

2005 October: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L), Molinate 0.0052ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine Trace

2005 November: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Chlorpyrifos Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2006 January: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2006 February: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine Trace

2006 March: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.029ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

2004 October: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2004 November: Endosulfan (0.002ug/L) TRIMPS

2004 December: Endosulfan (0.0026ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 January: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 February: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 March: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005 April: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2005: August: Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.012ug/L

2005 October: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L), Molinate 0.0052ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine Trace

2005 November: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Chlorpyrifos Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS

2006 January: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2006 February: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine Trace

2006 March: Endosulfan (0.0015ug/L) TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.029ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

2004 October – 2006 April: Appin Channel 8/2. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan

2004 October: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2004 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2004 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 February: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.012ug/L

2005 April: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 August: Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 October: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2006 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2006 February: Atrazine Trace

2006 March: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.032ug/L

2006 April: Endosulfan 0.0013ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.03ug/L

2004 October: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2004 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2004 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 February: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.012ug/L

2005 April: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 August: Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 October: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2006 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2006 February: Atrazine Trace

2006 March: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.032ug/L

2006 April: Endosulfan 0.0013ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.03ug/L

2004 October – 2006 April: West Boort (Waranga Western Channel). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan

2004 October: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2004 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2004 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 January: Endosulfan 0.0017ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 February: , Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.018ug/L

2005 April: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.016ug/L

2005 October: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

2005 November: Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.022ug/L, Atrazine Trace

2006 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2006 February: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2006 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.032ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.033ug/L

2004 October: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2004 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2004 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 January: Endosulfan 0.0017ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 February: , Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.018ug/L

2005 April: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.016ug/L

2005 October: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

2005 November: Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.022ug/L, Atrazine Trace

2006 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2006 February: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2006 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.032ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.033ug/L

2004 October – 2006 April: Corop Waranga Western Channel. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan

2004 October: Endosulfan 0.0017ug/L (TRIMPS)

2004 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2004 December: Endosulfan 0.0027ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 January: Endosulfan 0.002ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 February: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.011ug/L

2005 April: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 August: Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0024ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.017ug/L

2005 October: Atrazine 0.024ug/L

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.0023ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0017ug/L (TRIMPS)

2006 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Endosulfan 0.0081 (av), Atrazine Trace

2006 February: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.020ug/L

2006 March: Atrazine 0.039ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.036ug/L

2004 October: Endosulfan 0.0017ug/L (TRIMPS)

2004 November: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2004 December: Endosulfan 0.0027ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 January: Endosulfan 0.002ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 February: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS)

2005 March: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.011ug/L

2005 April: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 August: Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0024ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.017ug/L

2005 October: Atrazine 0.024ug/L

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.0023ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0017ug/L (TRIMPS)

2006 January: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Endosulfan 0.0081 (av), Atrazine Trace

2006 February: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.020ug/L

2006 March: Atrazine 0.039ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.036ug/L

2005 January – 2006 April: Tatura Channel 3/5 Town Supply. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan

2005 January: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 April: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 August: Trace

2005 October: Trace

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.002ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Atrazine 0.025ug/L

2006 January: Atrazine 0.04ug/L

2006 February: Atrazine 0.041ug/L

2006 March: Atrazine 0.04ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.042ug/L

2005 January: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 April: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005 August: Trace

2005 October: Trace

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.002ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: Atrazine 0.025ug/L

2006 January: Atrazine 0.04ug/L

2006 February: Atrazine 0.041ug/L

2006 March: Atrazine 0.04ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.042ug/L

2004 October – 2006 April: Kyabram Channel 8. Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine,

2004 October: 0.0025ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 November: 0.0018ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 December: 0.0087ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 January: 0.0033ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 February: 0.0121ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.01ugL Atrazine

2005 March: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 April: 0.01ugL Atrazine

2005 August: Trace Atrazine

2005 September: 0.0007ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.021ugL Atrazine

2005 October: 0.0046ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), Trace Atrazine

2005 November: 0.0032ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0081ug/L (av), Trace Atrazine

2005 December: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2006 January: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), Trace Atrazine

2006 February: 0.0007ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.021ug/L Atrazine

2006 March: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.032ug/L Atrazine

2006 April: 0.04ug/L Atrazine

2004 October: 0.0025ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 November: 0.0018ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 December: 0.0087ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 January: 0.0033ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 February: 0.0121ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.01ugL Atrazine

2005 March: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 April: 0.01ugL Atrazine

2005 August: Trace Atrazine

2005 September: 0.0007ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.021ugL Atrazine

2005 October: 0.0046ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), Trace Atrazine

2005 November: 0.0032ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0081ug/L (av), Trace Atrazine

2005 December: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2006 January: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), Trace Atrazine

2006 February: 0.0007ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.021ug/L Atrazine

2006 March: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.032ug/L Atrazine

2006 April: 0.04ug/L Atrazine

 

2004 October – 2006 April: Ardmona Channel 4. Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Chlorpyrifos, Parathion Methyl

2004 October: 0.0042ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 November: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 December: 0.0021ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 January: 0.01ug/L Atrazine

2005 March: 0.014ug/L Atrazine

2005 April: 0.02ug/L Atrazine

2005 August: 0.0114ug/L Chlorpyrifos (average), Atrazine Trace

2005 September: 0.0291ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0584ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.01305ug/L Endosulfan (av), 0.1418ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.9213ug/L Parathion Methyl (av)

2005 October: 0.0062ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0478ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.0645ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.2259ug/L Parathion Methyl (av), Atrazine Trace

2005 November: 0.0037ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.033ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.0081ug/L Endosulfan (av), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: 0.0041ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0061ug/L Endosulfan (av), 0.0061ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.026ug/L Atrazine

2005 January: 0.021ug/L Atrazine

2005 February: 0.038ug/L Atrazine

2006 March: 0.0019ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.03ug/L Atrazine

2006 April: 0.036ug/L Atrazine

2004 October: 0.0042ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 November: 0.0015ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2004 December: 0.0021ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS)

2005 January: 0.01ug/L Atrazine

2005 March: 0.014ug/L Atrazine

2005 April: 0.02ug/L Atrazine

2005 August: 0.0114ug/L Chlorpyrifos (average), Atrazine Trace

2005 September: 0.0291ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0584ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.01305ug/L Endosulfan (av), 0.1418ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.9213ug/L Parathion Methyl (av)

2005 October: 0.0062ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0478ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.0645ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.2259ug/L Parathion Methyl (av), Atrazine Trace

2005 November: 0.0037ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.033ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.0081ug/L Endosulfan (av), Atrazine Trace

2005 December: 0.0041ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.0061ug/L Endosulfan (av), 0.0061ug/L Chlorpyrifos (av), 0.026ug/L Atrazine

2005 January: 0.021ug/L Atrazine

2005 February: 0.038ug/L Atrazine

2006 March: 0.0019ug/L Endosulfan (TRIMPS), 0.03ug/L Atrazine

2006 April: 0.036ug/L Atrazine

2004 October – April 2006: Mooroopna (Vic) Channel 15/6/4. Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Chlorpyrifos

Oct 2004: Endosulfan 0.0260ug/L TRIMPS

November 2004: Endosulfan 0.0053ug/L TRIMPS

December 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.01ug/L

January 2005: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

February 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS

March 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.017ug/L

April 2005: Atrazine Trace

August 2005: Atrazine Trace

September 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.031ug/L

October 2005: Endosulfan 0.0046ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine Trace

November 2005: Endosulfan 0.0053ug/L TRIMPS, Chlorpyrifos 0.01ug/l TRIMPS,

December 2005: Atrazine 0.021ug/L

January 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.034ug/L

February 2006: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.047ug/L

March 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.034ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.035ug/L

Oct 2004: Endosulfan 0.0260ug/L TRIMPS

November 2004: Endosulfan 0.0053ug/L TRIMPS

December 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.01ug/L

January 2005: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

February 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS

March 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.017ug/L

April 2005: Atrazine Trace

August 2005: Atrazine Trace

September 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.031ug/L

October 2005: Endosulfan 0.0046ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine Trace

November 2005: Endosulfan 0.0053ug/L TRIMPS, Chlorpyrifos 0.01ug/l TRIMPS,

December 2005: Atrazine 0.021ug/L

January 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.034ug/L

February 2006: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.047ug/L

March 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L TRIMPS, Atrazine 0.034ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.035ug/L

2009 December – 2010 January: Starvation Creek Reservoir. Pesticides: Multiple

15 Starvation Creek Reservoir

10/12/09: Azinphos-Methyl 0.003ug/L, Dimethoate 0.002ug/L, Fenamiphos 0.002ug/L, Atrazine 0.005ug/L, Prometryn 0.3ug/L, Simazine 0.01ug/L, Desethylatrazine 0.007ug/L, Oxadixyl 0.005ug/L, Carbaryl 0.003ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.003ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Triadimenol 0.004ug/L, Tebufenozide 0.001ug/L, Fenoxycarb 0.004ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.003ug/L

21/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L, Pendimethalin 0.01ug/L

Melbourne Water and DPI agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

15 Starvation Creek Reservoir

10/12/09: Azinphos-Methyl 0.003ug/L, Dimethoate 0.002ug/L, Fenamiphos 0.002ug/L, Atrazine 0.005ug/L, Prometryn 0.3ug/L, Simazine 0.01ug/L, Desethylatrazine 0.007ug/L, Oxadixyl 0.005ug/L, Carbaryl 0.003ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.003ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Triadimenol 0.004ug/L, Tebufenozide 0.001ug/L, Fenoxycarb 0.004ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.003ug/L

21/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L, Pendimethalin 0.01ug/L

Melbourne Water and DPI agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

2009 September – January 2010: Little Yarra River. Pesticides detected: Multiple

Site13: Little Yarra River Corduroy Rd

7/9/09: Pirimicarb 0.01ug/L

22/10/09: Simazine 0.16ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.015ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.003ug/L

10/12/09: Prometryn 0.21ug/L, Simazine 0.06ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L, Trifloxystrobin 0.002ug/L

21/1/10: Atrazine 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.008ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.057ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.003ug/L

Site 13 Sediment: 7/9/09 Bifenthrin 8.7ug/kg, Simazine 3.6ug/kg, Pirimicarb 1ug/kg, Cyprodinil 1ug/kg. 22/10/09 Simazine 3.7ug/kg. 10/12/09 Simazine 2ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 6ug/kg, Myclobutanil 2ug/kg. 21/1/10 Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg, Myclobutanil 1ug/kg, Indoxacarb 1ug/kg

Melbourne Water and DPI agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

Little Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.007ug/L

Site13: Little Yarra River Corduroy Rd

7/9/09: Pirimicarb 0.01ug/L

22/10/09: Simazine 0.16ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.015ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.003ug/L

10/12/09: Prometryn 0.21ug/L, Simazine 0.06ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L, Trifloxystrobin 0.002ug/L

21/1/10: Atrazine 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.008ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.057ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.003ug/L

Site 13 Sediment: 7/9/09 Bifenthrin 8.7ug/kg, Simazine 3.6ug/kg, Pirimicarb 1ug/kg, Cyprodinil 1ug/kg. 22/10/09 Simazine 3.7ug/kg. 10/12/09 Simazine 2ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 6ug/kg, Myclobutanil 2ug/kg. 21/1/10 Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg, Myclobutanil 1ug/kg, Indoxacarb 1ug/kg

 

Melbourne Water and DPI agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

Little Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.007ug/L

2009 October – 2010 January: Donnellys Creek Weir. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Prometryn, Metalaxyl

Site 14: Donnellys Creek Weir

22/10/09: Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L

10/12/09: Atrazine 0.003ug/L, Prometryn 0.13ug/L

21/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L

Site 14: Sediment 7/9/09: Propiconazole 4ug/kg

Melbourne Water and DPI agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

Table 20: Maroondah Catchment samples

Sample No.4 Donnellys Creek @ Weir

Feb 2010: Metalaxyl 0.001ug/L

For instance, the fungicide propiconazole was detected in a sediment sample collected in September 2009 at 4 ug/kg, and metalaxyl was detected in water sample collected in October 2009 at 0.001 ug/L. Atrazine and prometryn triazine herbicides were also detected in the December 2009 water.

Site 14: Donnellys Creek Weir

22/10/09: Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L

10/12/09: Atrazine 0.003ug/L, Prometryn 0.13ug/L

21/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L

Site 14: Sediment 7/9/09: Propiconazole 4ug/kg

Melbourne Water and DPI agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

 

2009 September – 2010 January: Yarra River (Spadonis). Pesticides detected: Multiple

Site 1: Yarra River Spadonis

7/9/09: Simazine 0.14ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.008ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.008ug/L

22/10/09: Simazine 0.03ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.004ug/L

10/12/09: Dimethoate 0.061ug/L, Prometryn 0.35ug/L, Simazine 0.07ug/L, Methomyl 0.019ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.015ug/L, Carbaryl 0.007ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.003ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.063ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.038ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.001ug/L

21/1/10: Dimethoate 0.002ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.026ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.005ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.001ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.011ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.004ug/L, Fenoxycarb 0.001ug/L, Pendimethalin 0.01ug/L

 Site 1 Sediment: 7/9/09 Pyrimethanil 4.2ug/kg. 22/10/09 Simazine 2ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 9ug/kg, Cyprodinil 1ug/kg. 10/12/09 Simazine 1.2ug/kg, Imidacloprid 4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 8ug/kg, Myclobutanil 2ug/kg. 21/1/10 Pyrimethanil 3.3ug/L, Myclobutanil 1ug/kg

Melbourne Water and DPI  agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

Site 1: Yarra River Spadonis

7/9/09: Simazine 0.14ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.008ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.008ug/L

22/10/09: Simazine 0.03ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.004ug/L

10/12/09: Dimethoate 0.061ug/L, Prometryn 0.35ug/L, Simazine 0.07ug/L, Methomyl 0.019ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.015ug/L, Carbaryl 0.007ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.003ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.063ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.038ug/L, Pyraclostrobin 0.001ug/L

21/1/10: Dimethoate 0.002ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.026ug/L, Pirimicarb 0.002ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.005ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.001ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.011ug/L, Myclobutanil 0.004ug/L, Fenoxycarb 0.001ug/L, Pendimethalin 0.01ug/L

Site 1 Sediment: 7/9/09 Pyrimethanil 4.2ug/kg. 22/10/09 Simazine 2ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 9ug/kg, Cyprodinil 1ug/kg. 10/12/09 Simazine 1.2ug/kg, Imidacloprid 4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 8ug/kg, Myclobutanil 2ug/kg. 21/1/10 Pyrimethanil 3.3ug/L, Myclobutanil 1ug/kg

 

Melbourne Water and DPI  agrochemicals in Port Phillip Catchment project report 2009-10

2008?: Woori Yallock Creek (Yarra River Catchment). Pesticide detected: Multiple

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Atrazine 0.088 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Propargite 0.15 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 0.12ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.003 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Imidacloprid 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Myclobutanil 0.02 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 0.09 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.33 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.005 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.1 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.16 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyraclostrobin 0.1 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Fenoxycarb 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Prochloraz 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 0.004 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Penconazole 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tetraconzole 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 0.005 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pendimethalin 0.04 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Atrazine 0.088 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Propargite 0.15 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.004ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 0.12ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.003 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Imidacloprid 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Myclobutanil 0.02 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 0.09 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.33 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.005 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.1 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.16 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyraclostrobin 0.1 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Fenoxycarb 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Prochloraz 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 0.004 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Penconazole 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tetraconzole 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 0.005 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pendimethalin 0.04 ug/L [9b]

Woori Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L [9b]

2008? Watts River (approx location). Pesticides detected: Indoxacarb, Difenconazole, Dieldrin

Watts River Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.05 ug/L [9b]

Watts River Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.02 ug/L [9b]

Watts River Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Dieldrin 0.003 ug/L [9b]

Watts River Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.05 ug/L [9b]

Watts River Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.02 ug/L [9b]

Watts River Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Dieldrin 0.003 ug/L [9b]

2008? Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf (approx location). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Fenoxycarb, Pirimicarb

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 2 Simazine 0.023ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 12 Simazine 0.02ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 12 Fenoxycarb 0.002ug/L [9b]

Woady Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.11 ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L [9b] (

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 2 Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Metalaxyl 0.003ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Myclobutanil 0.009ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 2 Simazine 0.023ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 12 Simazine 0.02ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 12 Fenoxycarb 0.002ug/L [9b]

Woady Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.11 ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L [9b] (

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 2 Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Metalaxyl 0.003ug/L [9b]

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Myclobutanil 0.009ug/L [9b]

2008? Wandin Yallock Creek (Yarra Catchment). Pesticides detected: Imidacloprid, Mycobutanil, Tebuconazole, Simazine, Carbaryl

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Imidacloprid 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Mycobutanil 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.002 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.083 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Carbaryl 0.005 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Imidacloprid 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Mycobutanil 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.002 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.083 ug/L [9b]

Wandin Yallock Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Carbaryl 0.005 ug/L [9b]

2008?: Stringybark Creek (Yarra Catchment). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Myclobutanil, Pirimicarb

Stringybark Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.67 ug/L [9b]

Stringybark Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Myclobutanil 0.05 ug/L [9b]

Stringybark Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 0.006 ug/L [9b]

Stringybark Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.67 ug/L [9b]

Stringybark Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Myclobutanil 0.05 ug/L [9b]

Stringybark Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 0.006 ug/L [9b]

2008?: Shepherd Creek (Yarra Catchment). Pesticides detected: Indoxacarb, Metalaxyl, Difenconazole, Trifloxystrobin, Pyraclostrobin, Pendimethalin

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.04 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.002 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyraclostrobin 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pendimethalin 0.02 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.04 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.002 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.03 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyraclostrobin 0.01 ug/L [9b]

Shepherd Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pendimethalin 0.02 ug/L [9b]

2008?: Sheep Station Creek (Yarra Catchment). Pesticides detected: Multiple

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 1.4ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Iprodione 3ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.005ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.73ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Myclobutanil 2.1ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 70ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Cyproconazole 0.39ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008?Chlorpyrifos 0.04ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Carbaryl 0.03ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pirimicarb 1.4ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Iprodione 3ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Metalaxyl 0.005ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.73ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Myclobutanil 2.1ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyrimethanil 70ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Cyproconazole 0.39ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008?Chlorpyrifos 0.04ug/L [9b]

Sheep Station Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Carbaryl 0.03ug/L [9b]

2008? Olinda Creek (Yarra Catchment). Pesticides detected: Imidacloprid, Simazine

Olinda Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Imidacloprid 0.045ug/L [9b]

Olinda Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.012ug/L [9b]

Olinda Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Imidacloprid 0.045ug/L [9b]

Olinda Creek Yarra River Catchment Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.012ug/L [9b]

2010 July – 2017 April. Offtake Sugarloaf Reservoir. Pesticides: Several.

Major Offtake to Sugarloaf Reservoir in Yering Gorge

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Carbamazepine 0.02ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.08ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Triclopyr 0.01ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake MCPA 0.02ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Metolachlor 0.01ug/l

20/8/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Atrazine 0.023ug/l

20/8/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.013ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.01ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Metolachlor 0.017ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Atrazine 0.018ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.016ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake MCPA 0.03ug/l

7/1/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.04ug/L

7/1/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metolachlor 0.1ug/L

4/2/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

11/2/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.026ug/L

11/2/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metolachlor 0.273ug/L

21/3/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Glyphosate 0.5ug/L

21/3/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.05ug/L

7/4/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.05ug/L

4/5/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.016ug/L

18/5/11Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Atrazine 0.056ug/L

18/5/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.012ug/L

14/7/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.134ug/L

14/7/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Atrazine 0.173ug/L

14/7/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metolachlor 0.013ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Dicamba 0.03ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Atrazine 0.188ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.038ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake MCPA 0.07ug/L

23/7/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.01ug/L

8/10/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

12/10/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.01ug/L

12/10/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

11/2/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Diphenylamine 0.15ug/L 

11/2/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.14ug/L

6/3/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

8/5/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.01ug/L

8/5/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.21ug/L

12/10/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.73ug/L

14/10/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Imidacloprid 0.01ug/L

14/10/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

2/3/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

2/3/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.06ug/L

4/6/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.01ug/L

4/6/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Nonylphenol 0.05ug/L

4/6/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Triclopyr 0.4ug/L

6/8/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake MCPA 0.2ug/L

6/8/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

4/10/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.04ug/L

6/12/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

6/12/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake MCPA 0.1ug/L

9/2/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

9/2/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metsulfuron Methyl 0.02ug/L

12/4/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

12/4/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/l

Major Offtake to Sugarloaf Reservoir in Yering Gorge

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Carbamazepine 0.02ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.08ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Triclopyr 0.01ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake MCPA 0.02ug/l

23/7/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Metolachlor 0.01ug/l

20/8/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Atrazine 0.023ug/l

20/8/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.013ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.01ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Metolachlor 0.017ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Atrazine 0.018ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.016ug/l

10/9/10 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake MCPA 0.03ug/l

7/1/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.04ug/L

7/1/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metolachlor 0.1ug/L

4/2/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

11/2/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Simazine 0.026ug/L

11/2/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metolachlor 0.273ug/L

21/3/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake Glyphosate 0.5ug/L

21/3/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.05ug/L

7/4/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake DEET 0.05ug/L

4/5/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.016ug/L

18/5/11Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Atrazine 0.056ug/L

18/5/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.012ug/L

14/7/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.134ug/L

14/7/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Atrazine 0.173ug/L

14/7/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metolachlor 0.013ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Dicamba 0.03ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Atrazine 0.188ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.038ug/L

11/8/11 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake MCPA 0.07ug/L

23/7/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.01ug/L

8/10/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

12/10/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.01ug/L

12/10/14 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

11/2/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Diphenylamine 0.15ug/L

11/2/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.14ug/L

6/3/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

8/5/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.01ug/L

8/5/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.21ug/L

12/10/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.73ug/L

14/10/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Imidacloprid 0.01ug/L

14/10/15 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

2/3/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

2/3/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.06ug/L

4/6/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.01ug/L

4/6/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Nonylphenol 0.05ug/L

4/6/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Triclopyr 0.4ug/L

6/8/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake MCPA 0.2ug/L

6/8/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/L

4/10/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.04ug/L

6/12/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

6/12/16 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake MCPA 0.1ug/L

9/2/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

9/2/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Metsulfuron Methyl 0.02ug/L

12/4/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake DEET 0.02ug/L

12/4/17 Melbourne Water Yarra River Sugarloaf Offtake Simazine 0.02ug/l

 

2008?: Cockatoo Creek (Vic) Yarra Catchment. Pesticides: Multiple.

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Propargite 0.1 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.27ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.08ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.15ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyraclostrobin 0.08ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Fenoxycarb 0.016ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Prochloraz 0.02 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.006 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Azoxystrobin 0.003 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Penconazole 0.01 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Cyprodinil 0.01 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.01 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Dieldrin 0.002 ug/L [9b]

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pendimethalin 0.04ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Propargite 0.1 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Indoxacarb 0.27ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Difenconazole 0.08ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Trifloxystrobin 0.15ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pyraclostrobin 0.08ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Fenoxycarb 0.016ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Prochloraz 0.02 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.006 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Azoxystrobin 0.003 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Penconazole 0.01 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Cyprodinil 0.01 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Tebuconazole 0.01 ug/L

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Dieldrin 0.002 ug/L [9b]

Cockatoo Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Pendimethalin 0.04ug/L

2009-2010: Yarra River (approximate locations). Pesticides detected: Australian record?

Sugarloaf Reservoir supplies 1.5 million people in western and northern Melbourne with drinking water.

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Simazine 15ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Fipronil 0.22ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Methiocarb 1.2ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Atrazine 0.31ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Endosulfan 0.31ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Dimethoate 0.094ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Dieldrin 0.022ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir 4,4-DDD 0.022ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir 4,4-DDE 0.024ug/L

 Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Azoxystrobin 0.02ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Boscalid 0.02ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Cyproconazole 0.39ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  DIA 1.3ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Diflenoconazole 0.15ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Dimethomorph 0.01ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Fenoxycarb 0.034ug/L 

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Imidacloprid 0.59ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Indoxacarb 0.33ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Linuron 0.6ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Metalaxyl 0.012ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Myclobutanil 2.9ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Oxadixyl 0.39ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Penconazole 0.05ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Prochloraz 0.06ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Procymidone 0.91ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Prometryn 21ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Pyraclostrobin 0.1ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Pyrimethanil 70ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  Spinosad 0.03ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  Tebuconazole 0.04ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Tebufenozide 0.045ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Tetraconazole 0.059ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  Triadimenol 0.002ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Trifloxystrobin 0.73ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Triadimefon 0.012ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Pendimethalin 0.04ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Propiconazole 0.021ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Trichlorfon 0.006ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir 4,4-DDT 0.046ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Fenarimol 0.2ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Chlorpyrifos 0.04ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Hexazinone 0.96ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Carbaryl 0.039ug/L

Samples published January 2011 in Environment, Science & Technology, in article "Effects of Pesticides Monitored with Three Sampling Methods in 24 Sites on Macroinvertebrates and Microorganisms"

Sugarloaf Reservoir supplies 1.5 million people in western and northern Melbourne with drinking water.

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Simazine 15ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Fipronil 0.22ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Methiocarb 1.2ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Atrazine 0.31ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Endosulfan 0.31ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Dimethoate 0.094ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Dieldrin 0.022ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir 4,4-DDD 0.022ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir 4,4-DDE 0.024ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Azoxystrobin 0.02ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Boscalid 0.02ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Cyproconazole 0.39ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  DIA 1.3ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Diflenoconazole 0.15ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Dimethomorph 0.01ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Fenoxycarb 0.034ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Imidacloprid 0.59ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Indoxacarb 0.33ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Linuron 0.6ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Metalaxyl 0.012ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Myclobutanil 2.9ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Oxadixyl 0.39ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Penconazole 0.05ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Prochloraz 0.06ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Procymidone 0.91ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Prometryn 21ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Pyraclostrobin 0.1ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Pyrimethanil 70ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  Spinosad 0.03ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  Tebuconazole 0.04ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Tebufenozide 0.045ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Tetraconazole 0.059ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir  Triadimenol 0.002ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Trifloxystrobin 0.73ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Triadimefon 0.012ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Pendimethalin 0.04ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Propiconazole 0.021ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Trichlorfon 0.006ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir 4,4-DDT 0.046ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Fenarimol 0.2ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Chlorpyrifos 0.04ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Hexazinone 0.96ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir Carbaryl 0.039ug/L

Samples published January 2011 in Environment, Science & Technology, in article “Effects of Pesticides Monitored with Three Sampling Methods in 24 Sites on Macroinvertebrates and Microorganisms”

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 2 Simazine 0.023ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 12 Simazine 0.02ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 12 Fenoxycarb 0.002ug/L

Woady Yallock Creek Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Simazine 0.11 ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 2 Pirimicarb 0.004ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Metalaxyl 0.003ug/L

Yarra River Upstream Sugarloaf Reservoir? 2008? Site 1 Myclobutanil 0.009ug/L

2009 November – 2016 August: Balmoral (Vic). Pesticides detected: MCPA, Atrazine

4/11/09 Wannon Water Balmoral MCPA 0.01ug/L

8/11/11 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.03ug/L

26/2/13  Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.01ug/L

27/5/13 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.06ug/L

19/2/15 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.05ug/L

3/8/16 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.02ug/L

4/11/09 Wannon Water Balmoral MCPA 0.01ug/L

8/11/11 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.03ug/L

26/2/13  Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.01ug/L

27/5/13 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.06ug/L

19/2/15 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.05ug/L

3/8/16 Wannon Water Balmoral Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2009 August – 2014 April. Warrnambool Headworks. Pesticides detected: 2,4-D, MCPA

5/8/09 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

4/11/09 Wannon Water Warrambool Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.01ug/L

3/5/10 Wannon Water East Zone Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.03ug/L

3/5/10 Wannon Water East Zone Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.02ug/L

13/4/11Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.03ug/L

13/4/11 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

8/11/2011 East Zone Headworks & Storages Mecoprop 0.02ug/L

8/11/2011 East Zone Headworks & Storages Mecoprop 0.03ug/L

8/11/2011 East Zone Headworks & Storages Triclopyr 0.03ug/L

9/11/11 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.03ug/L

9/11/11 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

9/11/11Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages Atrazine 0.19ug/L

7/5/2012 East Zone Headworks & Storages Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

6/8/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

6/8/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages MCPA 0.02ug/L

13/11/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

13/11/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages Dicamba 0.02ug/L

9/4/14: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages Atrazine 0.02ug/L

5/8/09 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

4/11/09 Wannon Water Warrambool Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.01ug/L

3/5/10 Wannon Water East Zone Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.03ug/L

3/5/10 Wannon Water East Zone Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.02ug/L

13/4/11Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.03ug/L

13/4/11 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

8/11/2011 East Zone Headworks & Storages Mecoprop 0.02ug/L

8/11/2011 East Zone Headworks & Storages Mecoprop 0.03ug/L

8/11/2011 East Zone Headworks & Storages Triclopyr 0.03ug/L

9/11/11 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages MCPA 0.03ug/L

9/11/11 Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

9/11/11Wannon Water Warrnambool Headworks and Storages Atrazine 0.19ug/L

7/5/2012 East Zone Headworks & Storages Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

6/8/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

6/8/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages MCPA 0.02ug/L

13/11/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

13/11/13: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages Dicamba 0.02ug/L

9/4/14: Warrnambool Headworks & Storages Atrazine 0.02ug/L

 

2007-10: Pykes Creek Reservoir. Pesticide detected: 2,4-D

6/02/2007Western WaterPykes Creek Reservoir (Myniong)2,4-D0.06ug/L
11/02/2008Western WaterPykes Creek Reservoir (Myniong)2,4-D0.03ug/L
8/02/2010Western WaterPykes Creek Reservoir (Myniong)2,4-D0.04ug/L

 

6/02/2007 Western Water Pykes Creek Reservoir (Myniong) 2,4-D 0.06ug/L
11/02/2008 Western Water Pykes Creek Reservoir (Myniong) 2,4-D 0.03ug/L
8/02/2010 Western Water Pykes Creek Reservoir (Myniong) 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

2000 October/2011 Nov-Dec: Katamatite (Vic). Pesticides detected: Heptachlor, 2,4-D

18/10/00 Goulburn Valley Water Katamatite Heptachlor 0.02ug/L

23/02/2011Katamatite RAW 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.3 μg/L
23/11/2011Katamatite RAW 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.3 μg/L 

 

18/10/00 Goulburn Valley Water Katamatite Heptachlor 0.02ug/L

23/02/2011 Katamatite RAW 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.3 μg/L
23/11/2011 Katamatite RAW 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.3 μg/L

1996 October: Horsham Water Tank. Pesticide detected: Simazine

27/10/96 Blair Tank (Horsham) Simazine 0.24ug/L Investigation of Microbiological & Water Quality in Rainwater Tanks in Victoria. June 1977 Report No. 139/97, Water Ecoscience. R. Bannister

27/10/96 Blair Tank (Horsham) Simazine 0.24ug/L Investigation of Microbiological & Water Quality in Rainwater Tanks in Victoria. June 1977 Report No. 139/97, Water Ecoscience. R. Bannister

2007 March – 2010 September: Gellibrand (Vic). Pesticides detected: 2,4-D, 4 chlorphenoxy acetic acid, MCPA

14/3/07 Barwon Water Gellibrand Lardners Creek 2,4-D 0.2ug/L

9/12/09 Barwon Water Gellibrand WTP 4, chlorphenoxy acetic acid 0.05ug/L

13/9/10 Barwon Water Gellibrand MCPA 0.01ug/L

14/3/07 Barwon Water Gellibrand Lardners Creek 2,4-D 0.2ug/L

9/12/09 Barwon Water Gellibrand WTP 4, chlorphenoxy acetic acid 0.05ug/L

13/9/10 Barwon Water Gellibrand MCPA 0.01ug/L

14/3/07 Barwon Water Gellibrand Lardners Creek 2,4-D 0.2ug/L

9/12/09 Barwon Water Gellibrand WTP 4, chlorphenoxy acetic acid 0.05ug/L

13/9/10 Barwon Water Gellibrand MCPA 0.01ug/L

2009 September – 2015 December: Birregurra. Pesticides detected: MCPA, Molinate.

4/9/09 Barwon Water Birregurra WTP MCPA 0.02ug/L

7/6/12 Barwon Water Birregurra WTP Molinate 0.03ug/L

19/12/15: Barwon Water Birregurra Basin 2 MCPA 0.01ug/L

19/12/15: Barwon Water Birregurra Basin 1 MCPA 0.04ug/L

19/12/15: Barwon Water Birregurra Channel prior Basin Inlet MCPA 0.06ug/L

Source: FoI's  Barwon Water

4/9/09 Barwon Water Birregurra WTP MCPA 0.02ug/L

7/6/12 Barwon Water Birregurra WTP Molinate 0.03ug/L

19/12/15: Barwon Water Birregurra Basin 2 MCPA 0.01ug/L

19/12/15: Barwon Water Birregurra Basin 1 MCPA 0.04ug/L

19/12/15: Barwon Water Birregurra Channel prior Basin Inlet MCPA 0.06ug/L

Source: FoI’s  Barwon Water

1994 January: Olangolah Dam. Pesticide detected: DDT

“The only incident in which concentrations were found exceeding WHO guidelines (detection limits are generally less than 1/10th of the guideline values) was in the Colac Supply in January 1994. Samples from Olangolah Dam and the No 4 Service Basin were found to contain DDT at concentrations twice the WHO guideline of 2ug/L. Samples taken four days later showed negligible concentrations and none after treatment.” Physico-Chemical Quality Victorian Domestic Water Supplies (except Melbourne Metropolitan Areas) July 1995-June 1997. Australian Water Technologies.

“The only incident in which concentrations were found exceeding WHO guidelines (detection limits are generally less than 1/10th of the guideline values) was in the Colac Supply in January 1994. Samples from Olangolah Dam and the No 4 Service Basin were found to contain DDT at concentrations twice the WHO guideline of 2ug/L. Samples taken four days later showed negligible concentrations and none after treatment.” Physico-Chemical Quality Victorian Domestic Water Supplies (except Melbourne Metropolitan Areas) July 1995-June 1997. Australian Water Technologies.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm

1991: Boggy Creek/King River.

"I kept on making enquiries and found that those drinking water from Boggy Creek and the King River in most cases suffered disease and ill-health. Wangaratta's water supply is drawn from the King and Ovens Rivers, both of which have a catchment along kilometres of farms growing tobacco, hops, grapes and fruit. In many cases the crops are grown to the actual river itself and often steeply sloping to the water. There are also dairy and cattle farms to the north-east which have been quarantined because of high chemical residues. For many years, tests carried out by bodies such as the EPA, State Forests and Lands and the Rural Water Commission have shown fluctuating levels of cyclodienes in the Ovens and King Rivers but the all clear signal has been given time and time again (Shirley Barber, The Mohyu Valley, Victoria. May 1991. Quick Poison Slow Poison by Kate Short 1994

“I kept on making enquiries and found that those drinking water from Boggy Creek and the King River in most cases suffered disease and ill-health. Wangaratta’s water supply is drawn from the King and Ovens Rivers, both of which have a catchment along kilometres of farms growing tobacco, hops, grapes and fruit. In many cases the crops are grown to the actual river itself and often steeply sloping to the water. There are also dairy and cattle farms to the north-east which have been quarantined because of high chemical residues. For many years, tests carried out by bodies such as the EPA, State Forests and Lands and the Rural Water Commission have shown fluctuating levels of cyclodienes in the Ovens and King Rivers but the all clear signal has been given time and time again (Shirley Barber, The Mohyu Valley, Victoria. May 1991. Quick Poison Slow Poison by Kate Short 1994

1961 March: Tongala (Vic). Pesticides detected: Amitrole

According to the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission in a letter to the Pesticides Review Committee 1/12/66 ""(a) no pesticide analyses are required of our department by statute. (b) Most analyses will be required in connection with stream sampling. At present only amitrole is routinely sought, but there could be some interest in diuron and dalapon in the future... (c) Total analyses last year - 47 samples of water tested for amitrole..."

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission samples were taken at weekly intervals at Swan Hill in the Murray River, and at the outfall of the Deakin Main Drain at Echuca, the major outfall of the Tongala District, which has been the largest user of amino-triazole (amitrole). Samples have also been taken from other localities, in drains or streams depending on local usage of Weedazol... (Source 10/2/69 SRWSC to PRC)

1961: In the period 14/3/61 - 23/3/61 various formulations (Weedazol 50, Weedazole Total, Weedazol T1) were applied to water couch in 12 miles of drains at Tongala and 77 samples were taken from the drains to indicate the pattern and extent of contamination...Sampling at the outfall of this system gave a maximum of 0.70ppm but a more representative figure would be 0.30ppm.... Samples taken 100 yards of operating spray teams showed levels in the range of 0 - 19.5 ppm. The average contamination level was 0.25ppm representing 20% of applied material....

1963: Over the period 16/1/63 - 1/4/63, 17 samples were taken for analysis from the Tongala drain outfall, and 25 samples from the Murray at Swan Hill...Only the control samples gave positive results. These were within 10% of the anticipated value. These samples also indicated the stability of amitrole in water over, at least a 3 week period...

Positive detections 1964/5 Deakin Drain 0.1ppm, 1965/66 Bendigo Trust Channel 0.05ppm, 1966/7 Warren's Extension Bendigo Trust System 0.1 & 0.08ppm)

According to the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission in a letter to the Pesticides Review Committee 1/12/66 “”(a) no pesticide analyses are required of our department by statute. (b) Most analyses will be required in connection with stream sampling. At present only amitrole is routinely sought, but there could be some interest in diuron and dalapon in the future… (c) Total analyses last year – 47 samples of water tested for amitrole…”

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission samples were taken at weekly intervals at Swan Hill in the Murray River, and at the outfall of the Deakin Main Drain at Echuca, the major outfall of the Tongala District, which has been the largest user of amino-triazole (amitrole). Samples have also been taken from other localities, in drains or streams depending on local usage of Weedazol… (Source 10/2/69 SRWSC to PRC)

1961: In the period 14/3/61 – 23/3/61 various formulations (Weedazol 50, Weedazole Total, Weedazol T1) were applied to water couch in 12 miles of drains at Tongala and 77 samples were taken from the drains to indicate the pattern and extent of contamination…Sampling at the outfall of this system gave a maximum of 0.70ppm but a more representative figure would be 0.30ppm…. Samples taken 100 yards of operating spray teams showed levels in the range of 0 – 19.5 ppm. The average contamination level was 0.25ppm representing 20% of applied material….

1963: Over the period 16/1/63 – 1/4/63, 17 samples were taken for analysis from the Tongala drain outfall, and 25 samples from the Murray at Swan Hill…Only the control samples gave positive results. These were within 10% of the anticipated value. These samples also indicated the stability of amitrole in water over, at least a 3 week period…

Positive detections 1964/5 Deakin Drain 0.1ppm, 1965/66 Bendigo Trust Channel 0.05ppm, 1966/7 Warren’s Extension Bendigo Trust System 0.1 & 0.08ppm)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm

1973 November – 1975 January: Amitrole detections Broken Creek.

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 7.3ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 6.3ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 5.5ug/L

13/12/73 Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 3.7ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 3.7ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 3.7ug/L

29/11/73 Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 2ug/L

20/12/73 Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples - State Rivers & Water Supply Commission - Amitrole 2ug/L

Arrowhead Spraying Program

At a meeting of the Pesticides Review Committee on 4 September, approval was given to a proposal by the Commission to spray arrowhead in the Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with 2,4,-D during 1981-82. Although not stated in the resolution, I am confident it was intended that approval be subject to agreement between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a water sampling program to detect any residues of 2,4-D.

*** recently informed me that spraying has started but plans for analysing water samples, or in other ways estimating residue levels, are not complete. The Commission could therefore be criticized on the grounds that it is spraying in an unacceptable way. However, it is pointed out that this program has been undertaken each year since the late sixties and was approved by the Pesticides Review Committee on a number of occasions during the early part of this period.

If spraying is to continue, it is my view that agreement should be reached immediately between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a program for measuring herbicide residues in water; otherwise the spraying should be suspended until such a time as agreement is reached.

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission – Amitrole 7.3ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 6.3ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 5.5ug/L

13/12/73 Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 3.7ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 3.7ug/L

6/1/75 [report date] Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 3.7ug/L

29/11/73 Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 2ug/L

20/12/73 Broken Creek [Nathalia, Numurkah, Wunghnu Determination of Amitrole in Water Samples – State Rivers & Water Supply Commission Amitrole 2ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#all

Arrowhead Spraying Program

At a meeting of the Pesticides Review Committee on 4 September, approval was given to a proposal by the Commission to spray arrowhead in the Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with 2,4,-D during 1981-82. Although not stated in the resolution, I am confident it was intended that approval be subject to agreement between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a water sampling program to detect any residues of 2,4-D.

*** recently informed me that spraying has started but plans for analysing water samples, or in other ways estimating residue levels, are not complete. The Commission could therefore be criticized on the grounds that it is spraying in an unacceptable way. However, it is pointed out that this program has been undertaken each year since the late sixties and was approved by the Pesticides Review Committee on a number of occasions during the early part of this period.

If spraying is to continue, it is my view that agreement should be reached immediately between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a program for measuring herbicide residues in water; otherwise the spraying should be suspended until such a time as agreement is reached.

2007: Kerrie Reservoir Romsey. Pesticide detected: 2,4-D, Chlordane

Kerrie Reservoir (Water supply for Romsey) located in the Bolinda Creek Catchment ~6km south west of Romsey. This water supply had traces of the herbicide 2,4-D detected in it in February 2007. 2,4-D was also detected at the Glenfern Park Basin (just out of Romsey). Most of the Bolinda Creek catchment has native forest and pasture on it, meaning that a farmer had most likely been using 2,4-D and some of this was washed into the reservoir.

2007/8 WQR Western Water Kerrie Reservoir (Raw) Chlordane 0.01ug/L

5/02/2007Western WaterKerrie Reservoir (Romsey)2,4-D0.02ug/L
8/02/2010Western WaterKerrie Reservoir (Romsey)2,4-D0.04ug/L

Kerrie Reservoir (Water supply for Romsey) located in the Bolinda Creek Catchment ~6km south west of Romsey. This water supply had traces of the herbicide 2,4-D detected in it in February 2007. 2,4-D was also detected at the Glenfern Park Basin (just out of Romsey). Most of the Bolinda Creek catchment has native forest and pasture on it, meaning that a farmer had most likely been using 2,4-D and some of this was washed into the reservoir.

2007/8 WQR Western Water Kerrie Reservoir (Raw) Chlordane 0.01ug/L?

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Western

5/02/2007 Western Water Kerrie Reservoir (Romsey) 2,4-D 0.02ug/L
8/02/2010 Western Water Kerrie Reservoir (Romsey) 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

2007 December: Tarwin River. Pesticide detected: Prometryn.

Prometryn detected at 10 parts per billion (December 2007) in grab sample at the Tarwin River at Tarwin in 'Pilot Study of Agrochemicals in West Gippsland Waterways - 2007'. Unlikely that herbicide was detected above offtakes to Dumbalk and Meeniyan water supplies.

Prometryn detected at 10 parts per billion (December 2007) in grab sample at the Tarwin River at Tarwin in ‘Pilot Study of Agrochemicals in West Gippsland Waterways – 2007’. Unlikely that herbicide was detected above offtakes to Dumbalk and Meeniyan water supplies.

2006 – 2016: Dumbalk Water Treatment Plant. Pesticide detected: Methoxychlor, Triclopyr, 2,4-D.

Methoxychlor detected 0.2µg/L 7/3/06 Dumbalk WTP

Clear Water Storage Water28/03/2012Triclopyr0.02ug/L    
Clear Water Storage Water29/04/2013Triclopyr0.04ug/L    
Clear Water Storage Water18/03/2014Triclopyr0.04ug/L    
Untreated Source Water18/11/2014Triclopyr0.03ug/L    
Untreated Source Water21/04/2015Triclopyr0.06ug/L    
Untreated Source Water17/11/20152,4-D0.05ug/L    
Untreated Source Water17/11/2015Triclopyr0.04ug/L    
Untreated Source Water19/04/2016Triclopyr0.52ug/L    

Methoxychlor detected 0.2µg/L 7/3/06 Dumbalk WTP

Clear Water Storage Water 28/03/2012 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L Dumbalk
Clear Water Storage Water 29/04/2013 Triclopyr 0.04ug/L Dumbalk
Clear Water Storage Water 18/03/2014 Triclopyr 0.04ug/L Dumbalk
Untreated Source Water 18/11/2014 Triclopyr 0.03ug/L Dumbalk
Untreated Source Water 21/04/2015 Triclopyr 0.06ug/L Dumbalk
Untreated Source Water 17/11/2015 2,4-D 0.05ug/L Dumbalk
Untreated Source Water 17/11/2015 Triclopyr 0.04ug/L Dumbalk
Untreated Source Water 19/04/2016 Triclopyr 0.52ug/L Dumbalk

1974 April – 1981 November. Korumburra Golf Course Concerns. Pesticides: 2,4-D, Iprodione, MCPA, Dicamba, Benomyl, Thiram, 2,4,5-T

Korumburra Golf Club

February 25, 1974

...As requested in your letter dated 18/2/1974, we have investigated the matter further and list below the relevant information regarding sprays that have been used on the Golf Course.

General Weedkillers - Brand Names: New Farm, Killester, Weedone.

These are a 2-4D variety and are mixed to a strength of 2 1/2 - 3 pints per 65 gallons, with some 10 gallons collectively being the maximum usage during the year...

Blackberry Spray:

Brand Name: Killaberry. Mixture is 1 oz. to 5 gallons water, with total usage per annum only some 1/2 pint... [Note: Killaberry active was 2,4,5-T]

Latrobe Valley Water & Sewerage Board
22 April 1974

...regarding the use of fungicides and weedicides by the Golf Club which is in close proximity to your No.1 Reservoir.

Our comments regarding the two preparations to be used are as follows:-

1. Fungicide: 75% Thiram (TMTD). This compound has a low persistence level but is on record as depressing egg production in poultry. 3% mercuric Acetate. This compound has a very high persistence level and would be extremely toxic to fish and aquatic life.

2. Weedicide: Estan 80 (2,4-D)....

Korumburra Golf Club 13th May 1974

Re: Weed Sprays

...I have been directed to advise the Club not to use sprays Thimer Fungicide and Eston 80 on the Golf Club Area...

Korumburra Waterworks Trust 14th July 1975

Re: Fungicides being used on Korumburra Golf Club

"Du Pont Benlate Benomyle Fungicide active constituent Benomyl...

Water Pollution Control

Tuesday 26th September 1978

10:30am Telephone call from ***. A tractor and boomspray operating in Golf Course.

11:00am Interviewed Mr *** at the Course. Approximately 100 metres from water.

Mr *** admitted that the spray in use was Eston 80.

A sample was taken from tanker.

Chemical has distinctive small.... also agreed it was Eston 80

Rang *** from Latrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Board.

Advised to send sample.

Minutes Pesticide Review Meeting #141Committee Victorian Government 6/10/78: "(d) Letter from Korumburra Waterworks Trust. The letter from the Trust and a copy of the Latrobe Water Sewerage Board about the proposed use of Weedicide Estan 80 (2,4-D) on the Korumburra Golf Course in close proximity to the towns No.1 reservoir was tabled. Dr Parsons felt that an amine formulation would be preferable to estan and that care should be taken as to weather conditions existing at the time of spraying eg windless and rainless. Dr Christophers said that as the town's water supply could be involved the matter should be referred to the Health Department with certain recommendations from this committee for examination and advice."

Minutes Pesticide Review Committee Victorian Government 19/7/1979: "...Request from Korumburra Golf Club to use the Turf Fungicide 'Rovral' (Iprodione). The Korumburra Golf Course is in the direct catchment of the towns water storage reservoir and runoff reaches the reservoir very quickly due to the drainage of the greens and fairways".

March 1981 Letter from Korumburra Waterworks Trust

"... It has been brought to the attention of the Trust that a new selective herbicide called 'Embutox 40'is now on the market which may control the "White Daisy" problem on the Golf Course.

As you are aware the golf course is in the direct catchment of Korumburra's No.1 Reservoir. The land which would be sprayed is less than 30 metres from the waters edge. Run-off from the golf course goes directly into the town's water supply...

Letter from Korumburra Waterworks Trust to PRV August 18 1981: "Korumburra Golf Course catchment No.1 Reservoir is owned by the Trust and leased to the golf club. Water run-off from the golf course goes directly into the town's water supply reserve. Selective herbicide required to control English Daisy. Suggested that MCPA and Dicamba be used. "The reservoir has already given some trouble and has been the subject of a report by the Materials Science Division of the SRWSC on various algae and biological problems which have affected water, taste and colour..."

November 1981

Letter from Agriculture Victoria

"... As the trust has doubts on the use of the registered herbicide mixture of M.C.P.A and Dicamba the only other alternative is to use M.C.P.A. alone which is registered for use on flat weeds, but more than one application might be needed for control.

The recommendations for improving fairways are at a time when there is usually no water run off. I cannot give a written assurance that the applications recommended will not have a detrimental effect on the quality of the water supply in the reservoir nor is it my function..."

Korumburra Golf Club

February 25, 1974

…As requested in your letter dated 18/2/1974, we have investigated the matter further and list below the relevant information regarding sprays that have been used on the Golf Course.

General Weedkillers – Brand Names: New Farm, Killester, Weedone.

These are a 2-4D variety and are mixed to a strength of 2 1/2 – 3 pints per 65 gallons, with some 10 gallons collectively being the maximum usage during the year…

Blackberry Spray:

Brand Name: Killaberry. Mixture is 1 oz. to 5 gallons water, with total usage per annum only some 1/2 pint… [Note: Killaberry active was 2,4,5-T]

Latrobe Valley Water & Sewerage Board
22 April 1974

…regarding the use of fungicides and weedicides by the Golf Club which is in close proximity to your No.1 Reservoir.

Our comments regarding the two preparations to be used are as follows:-

1. Fungicide: 75% Thiram (TMTD). This compound has a low persistence level but is on record as depressing egg production in poultry. 3% mercuric Acetate. This compound has a very high persistence level and would be extremely toxic to fish and aquatic life.

2. Weedicide: Estan 80 (2,4-D)….

Korumburra Golf Club 13th May 1974

Re: Weed Sprays

…I have been directed to advise the Club not to use sprays Thimer Fungicide and Eston 80 on the Golf Club Area…

Korumburra Waterworks Trust 14th July 1975

Re: Fungicides being used on Korumburra Golf Club

“Du Pont Benlate Benomyle Fungicide active constituent Benomyl…

Water Pollution Control

Tuesday 26th September 1978

10:30am Telephone call from ***. A tractor and boomspray operating in Golf Course.

11:00am Interviewed Mr *** at the Course. Approximately 100 metres from water.

Mr *** admitted that the spray in use was Eston 80.

A sample was taken from tanker.

Chemical has distinctive small…. also agreed it was Eston 80

Rang *** from Latrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Board.

Advised to send sample.

Minutes Pesticide Review Meeting #141Committee Victorian Government 6/10/78: “(d) Letter from Korumburra Waterworks Trust. The letter from the Trust and a copy of the Latrobe Water Sewerage Board about the proposed use of Weedicide Estan 80 (2,4-D) on the Korumburra Golf Course in close proximity to the towns No.1 reservoir was tabled. Dr Parsons felt that an amine formulation would be preferable to estan and that care should be taken as to weather conditions existing at the time of spraying eg windless and rainless. Dr Christophers said that as the town’s water supply could be involved the matter should be referred to the Health Department with certain recommendations from this committee for examination and advice.”

Minutes Pesticide Review Committee Victorian Government 19/7/1979: “…Request from Korumburra Golf Club to use the Turf Fungicide ‘Rovral’ (Iprodione). The Korumburra Golf Course is in the direct catchment of the towns water storage reservoir and runoff reaches the reservoir very quickly due to the drainage of the greens and fairways”.

March 1981 Letter from Korumburra Waterworks Trust

“… It has been brought to the attention of the Trust that a new selective herbicide called ‘Embutox 40’is now on the market which may control the “White Daisy” problem on the Golf Course.

As you are aware the golf course is in the direct catchment of Korumburra’s No.1 Reservoir. The land which would be sprayed is less than 30 metres from the waters edge. Run-off from the golf course goes directly into the town’s water supply…

Letter from Korumburra Waterworks Trust to PRV August 18 1981: “Korumburra Golf Course catchment No.1 Reservoir is owned by the Trust and leased to the golf club. Water run-off from the golf course goes directly into the town’s water supply reserve. Selective herbicide required to control English Daisy. Suggested that MCPA and Dicamba be used. “The reservoir has already given some trouble and has been the subject of a report by the Materials Science Division of the SRWSC on various algae and biological problems which have affected water, taste and colour…”

November 1981

Letter from Agriculture Victoria

“… As the trust has doubts on the use of the registered herbicide mixture of M.C.P.A and Dicamba the only other alternative is to use M.C.P.A. alone which is registered for use on flat weeds, but more than one application might be needed for control.

The recommendations for improving fairways are at a time when there is usually no water run off. I cannot give a written assurance that the applications recommended will not have a detrimental effect on the quality of the water supply in the reservoir nor is it my function…”

1990: Edi King River. Pesticides detected: DDT, Dieldrin.

In “Biocide Contamination in the Aquatic Environment. A study of the Ovens and King Rivers Region. EPA Scientific Series SRS 90/004”, the highest reading for DDT in a storm event on the Ovens River was 3.8µg/L . Dieldrin was found on the King River during a storm event at 0.07µg/L", Aldrin at 0.01ug/L, Lindane at 0.01µg/L and Heptachlor at 0.08µg/L. Total DDT levels in sediment at a Myrtleford site were as high as 70ug/kg and at Edi on the King River at 85ug/kg. Total Dieldrin levels at Porkepunkah were found at 5ug/Kg and at 10ug/Kg at Edi. These levels are of concern.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

In “Biocide Contamination in the Aquatic Environment. A study of the Ovens and King Rivers Region. EPA Scientific Series SRS 90/004”, the highest reading for DDT in a storm event on the Ovens River was 3.8µg/L . Dieldrin was found on the King River during a storm event at 0.07µg/L”, Aldrin at 0.01ug/L, Lindane at 0.01µg/L and Heptachlor at 0.08µg/L. Total DDT levels in sediment at a Myrtleford site were as high as 70ug/kg and at Edi on the King River at 85ug/kg. Total Dieldrin levels at Porkepunkah were found at 5ug/Kg and at 10ug/Kg at Edi. These levels are of concern.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1990: Ovens River and King River. Pesticides detected: DDT, Diedrin, Aldrin, Lindane, Heptachlor

In “Biocide Contamination in the Aquatic Environment. A study of the Ovens and King Rivers Region. EPA Scientific Series SRS 90/004”, the highest reading for DDT in a storm event on the Ovens River was 3.8µg/L . Dieldrin was found on the King River during a storm event at 0.07µg/L", Aldrin at 0.01ug/L, Lindane at 0.01µg/L and Heptachlor at 0.08µg/L. Total DDT levels in sediment at a Myrtleford site were as high as 70ug/kg and at Edi on the King River at 85ug/kg. Total Dieldrin levels at Porkepunkah were found at 5ug/Kg and at 10ug/Kg at Edi. These levels are of concern.

In “Biocide Contamination in the Aquatic Environment. A study of the Ovens and King Rivers Region. EPA Scientific Series SRS 90/004”, the highest reading for DDT in a storm event on the Ovens River was 3.8µg/L . Dieldrin was found on the King River during a storm event at 0.07µg/L”, Aldrin at 0.01ug/L, Lindane at 0.01µg/L and Heptachlor at 0.08µg/L. Total DDT levels in sediment at a Myrtleford site were as high as 70ug/kg and at Edi on the King River at 85ug/kg. Total Dieldrin levels at Porkepunkah were found at 5ug/Kg and at 10ug/Kg at Edi. These levels are of concern.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1994: Myrtleford Ovens River. Pesticides detected: DDT, Dieldrin

In “Organochlorine Pesticide Residues in Water & Sediments from the Ovens and King Rivers, North East Victoria, Australia F. McKenzie-Smith, D. Tiller, D. Allen EPA Victoria, State Chemistry Laboratory Published in Arch. Environ Contam. Toxicol. 26, 483-490 (1994)” , the highest reading for DDT (and its metabolites) at a site just upstream from Myrtleford on the Ovens River was 0.34µg/L recorded during a storm event, with Dieldrin recorded at much lower levels. Downstream of Myrtleford DDT measured at ~0.051µg/L and Dieldrin 0.0026µg/L.

In “Organochlorine Pesticide Residues in Water & Sediments from the Ovens and King Rivers, North East Victoria, Australia F. McKenzie-Smith, D. Tiller, D. Allen EPA Victoria, State Chemistry Laboratory Published in Arch. Environ Contam. Toxicol. 26, 483-490 (1994)” , the highest reading for DDT (and its metabolites) at a site just upstream from Myrtleford on the Ovens River was 0.34µg/L recorded during a storm event, with Dieldrin recorded at much lower levels. Downstream of Myrtleford DDT measured at ~0.051µg/L and Dieldrin 0.0026µg/L.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1971 + 1988/89 + 2013/22: Wangaratta Drinking Water. Pesticides detected: Dieldrin, Heptachlor, Aldrin, Lindane, HCB, TDE, DDT, Triclopyr

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: Wangaratta Reservoir Pump Lindane 0.02ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Reservoir Pump HCB 0.02ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water HCB 0.006ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water TDE 0.012ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water TDE 0.012ug/L

6/1/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water Lindane 0.025ug/L

6/1/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water DDT 0.01ug/L

Agricultural & Domestic Chemicals Review Committee - Extraordinary Meeting 19 June 1989.

"In December 1988, water samples (Ovens & King Rivers) indicated no significant levels of DDT or Dieldrin. However samples collected in March 1989 during storm flows were found to contain detectable levels greater than the WHO Guidelines... Wangaratta City Council tests showed high readings of Heptachlor and Dieldrin in April."

29/9/88: Dieldrin Raw 0.005ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.004ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.028ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.017ug/L, Aldrin Raw 0.011ug/L, Aldrin Treated 0.006ug/L

26/10/88: Heptachlor Raw 0.007ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.008ug/L, Aldrin Raw 0.002ug/L, Aldrin Treated 0.002ug/L

10/11/88: Dieldrin Raw 0.002ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.003ug/L.

21/12/88: Dieldrin Raw 0.007ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.016ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.013ug/L, Aldrin Raw 0.007ug/L

1/12/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.015ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.018ug/L

7/3/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.001ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.003ug/L.

11/4/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.06ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.06ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.22ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.02ug/L,

26/5/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.007ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.002ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.009ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.004ug/L,

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

One one occasion in April, dieldrin and heptachlor had been detected in the Wangaratta water supply at concentrations above WHO guidelines as indicated in the following summary. The results are expressed parts per billion.

12/6/13: Ovens River at Wangaratta Offtake: Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Wangaratta Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Wangaratta Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Wangaratta: Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.02ug/L

2021/22: Wangaratta: Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.04ug/L

 

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: Wangaratta Reservoir Pump Lindane 0.02ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Reservoir Pump HCB 0.02ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water HCB 0.006ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water TDE 0.012ug/L

16/12/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water TDE 0.012ug/L

6/1/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water Lindane 0.025ug/L

6/1/71: Wangaratta Filtered Water DDT 0.01ug/L

Agricultural & Domestic Chemicals Review Committee – Extraordinary Meeting 19 June 1989.

“In December 1988, water samples (Ovens & King Rivers) indicated no significant levels of DDT or Dieldrin. However samples collected in March 1989 during storm flows were found to contain detectable levels greater than the WHO Guidelines… Wangaratta City Council tests showed high readings of Heptachlor and Dieldrin in April.”

29/9/88: Dieldrin Raw 0.005ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.004ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.028ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.017ug/L, Aldrin Raw 0.011ug/L, Aldrin Treated 0.006ug/L

26/10/88: Heptachlor Raw 0.007ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.008ug/L, Aldrin Raw 0.002ug/L, Aldrin Treated 0.002ug/L

10/11/88: Dieldrin Raw 0.002ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.003ug/L.

21/12/88: Dieldrin Raw 0.007ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.016ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.013ug/L, Aldrin Raw 0.007ug/L

1/12/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.015ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.018ug/L

7/3/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.001ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.003ug/L.

11/4/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.06ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.06ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.22ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.02ug/L,

26/5/89: Dieldrin Raw 0.007ug/L, Dieldrin Treated 0.002ug/L, Heptachlor Raw 0.009ug/L, Heptachlor Treated 0.004ug/L,

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

One one occasion in April, dieldrin and heptachlor had been detected in the Wangaratta water supply at concentrations above WHO guidelines as indicated in the following summary. The results are expressed parts per billion.

12/6/13: Ovens River at Wangaratta Offtake: Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Wangaratta Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Wangaratta Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Wangaratta: Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.02ug/L

2021/22: Wangaratta: Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.04ug/L

1971 December – 1972 March: King River. Pesticides detected: Lindane, DDE.

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: King River Above Ovens River Lindane 0.02ug/L

22/3/72: King River Above Ovens River DDE 0.04ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: King River Above Ovens River Lindane 0.02ug/L

22/3/72: King River Above Ovens River DDE 0.04ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1971 January – 1972 March: Buffalo River Above Ovens River. Pesticides detected: DDT, DDE, Dieldrin

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

6/1/71: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.01ug/L

6/1/71: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDE 0.01ug/L

19/1/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.01ug/L

19/1/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDE 0.005ug/L

9/2/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.02ug/L

9/2/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River Dieldrin 0.01ug/L

2/3/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.008ug/L

2/3/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

6/1/71: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.01ug/L

6/1/71: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDE 0.01ug/L

19/1/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.01ug/L

19/1/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDE 0.005ug/L

9/2/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.02ug/L

9/2/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River Dieldrin 0.01ug/L

2/3/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River DDT 0.008ug/L

2/3/72: Buffalo River Above Ovens River Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1972 February: Barwidgee River Bridge. Pesticide detected: DDT

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

9/2/72: Barwidgee River Bridge DDT 0.02ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

9/2/72: Barwidgee River Bridge DDT 0.02ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1971 January – 1972 March: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley. Pesticides detected: DDT, Dieldrin, DDE

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.02ug/L

6/1/71: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.007ug/L

2/3/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.008ug/L

19/1/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.025ug/L

19/1/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

2/3/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

19/1/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDE 0.005ug/L

9/2/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.01ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.02ug/L

6/1/71: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.007ug/L

2/3/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.008ug/L

19/1/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.025ug/L

19/1/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

2/3/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

19/1/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDE 0.005ug/L

9/2/72: Victoria Bridge Happy Valley DDT 0.01ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

 

1971 December: Clancy Lane Myrtleford. Pesticides detected: DDT, Lindane

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: Clancy Lane Well Myrtleford DDT 0.02ug/L

16/12/71: Clancy Lane Well Myrtleford Lindane 0.04ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

16/12/71: Clancy Lane Well Myrtleford DDT 0.02ug/L

16/12/71: Clancy Lane Well Myrtleford Lindane 0.04ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1971 January – 1972 March: Ovens River above Buffalo River. Pesticide detected: DDT

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

6/1/71: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.007ug/L

19/1/72: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.01ug/L

9/2/72: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.013ug/L

2/3/72: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.022ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

6/1/71: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.007ug/L

19/1/72: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.01ug/L

9/2/72: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.013ug/L

2/3/72: Ovens River Above Buffalo River DDT 0.022ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1972 February: Ovens River below Morses Creek. Pesticide detected. HCB

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

9/2/72: Ovens River Below Morses Creek: HCB 0.06ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

9/2/72: Ovens River Below Morses Creek: HCB 0.06ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1972 January: Ovens River East Branch. Pesticides detected: DDT

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

19/1/72: Ovens River East Branch: DDT 0.01ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

19/1/72: Ovens River East Branch: DDT 0.01ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1972 January: Harrietville. Pesticide detected: DDT

"In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area..." (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

19/1/72: Harrietville Caravan Park: DDT 0.01ug/L

“In 1971/2, this Department conducted a pesticide survey of the Ovens River catchment which was chosen because of reported heavy use of pesticides on the tobacco crops in that area…” (Commission of Public Health 6 February 1976).

19/1/72: Harrietville Caravan Park: DDT 0.01ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1966 – 1971: King River Fish Kills.

Commission of Enquiry Into Effects of Pesticides - February 1966

p61 "Evidence was received concerning the tobacco growing areas along the Ovens, King and Buffalo Rivers that weekly spraying with persistent insecticides and fungicides is a routine practice and that a proportion of the spraying is done by aircraft. Fish have been killed on occassions when pesticides have reached the river..."

Pesticides Review Committee Minutes 15th Meeting 1/3/68: Correspondance (k) Secretary Premiers Department - re a letter from A.V. Bradbury MLC with an enclosed letter from the King River Improvement Trust stating that the dumping of pesticides in streams is a problem that can only be overcome by education and publicity.

State Laboratories Memo for Director of Agriculture 5/12/68: "... information accumulated has shown residue status in ... specific pesticides in such water as the Ovens River..."

Pesticides Review Committee Minutes 48th Meeting 20/8/71: Item 31(b) Wangaratta Fly Fishing Club. Letter received on 23rd February concerning fish kills in the King River at Chestnut. It appeared that local tobacco growers were responsible due to the sprays used on their crops... Report on Fish Kills in North East Victoria..."Some 23 fish kills were investigated..."

Commission of Enquiry Into Effects of Pesticides – February 1966

p61 “Evidence was received concerning the tobacco growing areas along the Ovens, King and Buffalo Rivers that weekly spraying with persistent insecticides and fungicides is a routine practice and that a proportion of the spraying is done by aircraft. Fish have been killed on occasions when pesticides have reached the river…”

Pesticides Review Committee Minutes 15th Meeting 1/3/68: Correspondance (k) Secretary Premiers Department – re a letter from A.V. Bradbury MLC with an enclosed letter from the King River Improvement Trust stating that the dumping of pesticides in streams is a problem that can only be overcome by education and publicity.

State Laboratories Memo for Director of Agriculture 5/12/68: “… information accumulated has shown residue status in … specific pesticides in such water as the Ovens River…”

Pesticides Review Committee Minutes 48th Meeting 20/8/71: Item 31(b) Wangaratta Fly Fishing Club. Letter received on 23rd February concerning fish kills in the King River at Chestnut. It appeared that local tobacco growers were responsible due to the sprays used on their crops… Report on Fish Kills in North East Victoria…”Some 23 fish kills were investigated…”

1965 December: Yarrabula Creek Fish Kill.

Age Letter 20/12/65: Sir, There have been reports recently concerning the finding of hundreds of dead fish in the Morses and Yarraboola creeks, both tributaries of the Ovens River in Victoria. Apparently the destruction of these fish was due to the run-off of pesticides sprayed on surrounding farms which was carried to the streams during recent rains in the Ovens and Buffalo valleys...

Age Letter 20/12/65: Sir, There have been reports recently concerning the finding of hundreds of dead fish in the Morses and Yarraboola creeks, both tributaries of the Ovens River in Victoria. Apparently the destruction of these fish was due to the run-off of pesticides sprayed on surrounding farms which was carried to the streams during recent rains in the Ovens and Buffalo valleys…

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1965: Wandiligong fish Kill. Pesticides detected: Endrin, DDT

Committee of Enquiry Into The Effects Of Pesticides - Minutes of 25th Meeting 7/12/65

"(a) Mr ... reported on two incidents involving deaths of fish. The first referred to 1000 dead trout near Wandiligong; fish were found over a distance of six miles and it appears that Endrin and DDT were responsible. The second incident was in Morses Creek near Myrtleford where 1000 dead trout were found, & was also caused by Endrin..."

Committee of Enquiry Into The Effects Of Pesticides – Minutes of 25th Meeting 7/12/65

“(a) Mr … reported on two incidents involving deaths of fish. The first referred to 1000 dead trout near Wandiligong; fish were found over a distance of six miles and it appears that Endrin and DDT were responsible. The second incident was in Morses Creek near Myrtleford where 1000 dead trout were found, & was also caused by Endrin…”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#North

1982 – 1983: Wandin Yallock Creek. Pesticides detected: TDE, DDE, DDT, Dieldrin, 2,4,5-T.

In 1982 a further study into Macroinvertebrates of the Yarra River; stated in regards to Wandin Yallock Creek that "pesticides appear to be the most likely toxic influence at this site. TDE, DDE, DDT and Dieldrin have been detected in the sediments at a site 2km downstream of a major market gardening and horticultural area, and DDT and Dieldrin have been found in the sediments of a site in the middle of the market gardening area...TDE, DDE, DDT and Dieldrin have been detected in sediment samples 8km downstream of areas of intensive market gardening and potato growing..."  (Environmental Studies Program Ministry for Conservation. The Benthic Macroinvertebrates of the Yarra River and its Tributaries. By Ian C Campbell, Luisa A. Macmillan, A Jenny Smith, Maryanne E McKaige 1982. Environmental Studies Series Publication No 362)

Another study (31) published in 1983 looked at pesticide transport in three sub catchments of the Upper Yarra Catchment. The pesticides Diedrin, DDT, DDE, Linuron and 2,4,5-T were detected. Pesticides at one location were most frequently detected in flows during vegetable washing operations. Pesticide concentrations were also generally higher in storm flow samples. Pesticide loads transported from catchments were generally between 1.3 and 9.3 mg/ha and between 134 and 228mg/ha in relation to vegetable washing plants. The authors wrote; "The concentrations of Dieldrin and DDT do not appear to present problems for drinking water supply in the Yarra River itself although, on occasions the concentrations detected in flows from cultivated land during storms and operation of vegetable washing plants exceeded health criteria". (Pesticide Transport from Intensive Agricultural Catchments. C.R. Fitzpatrick and P.D.Sutherland. Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 1983, Hobart, 8-10 November. Institution of Engineers Australia 1983).

In 1982 a further study into Macroinvertebrates of the Yarra River; stated in regards to Wandin Yallock Creek that “pesticides appear to be the most likely toxic influence at this site. TDE, DDE, DDT and Dieldrin have been detected in the sediments at a site 2km downstream of a major market gardening and horticultural area, and DDT and Dieldrin have been found in the sediments of a site in the middle of the market gardening area…TDE, DDE, DDT and Dieldrin have been detected in sediment samples 8km downstream of areas of intensive market gardening and potato growing…”  (Environmental Studies Program Ministry for Conservation. The Benthic Macroinvertebrates of the Yarra River and its Tributaries. By Ian C Campbell, Luisa A. Macmillan, A Jenny Smith, Maryanne E McKaige 1982. Environmental Studies Series Publication No 362)

Another study (31) published in 1983 looked at pesticide transport in three sub catchments of the Upper Yarra Catchment. The pesticides Diedrin, DDT, DDE, Linuron and 2,4,5-T were detected. Pesticides at one location were most frequently detected in flows during vegetable washing operations. Pesticide concentrations were also generally higher in storm flow samples. Pesticide loads transported from catchments were generally between 1.3 and 9.3 mg/ha and between 134 and 228mg/ha in relation to vegetable washing plants. The authors wrote; “The concentrations of Dieldrin and DDT do not appear to present problems for drinking water supply in the Yarra River itself although, on occasions the concentrations detected in flows from cultivated land during storms and operation of vegetable washing plants exceeded health criteria”. (Pesticide Transport from Intensive Agricultural Catchments. C.R. Fitzpatrick and P.D.Sutherland. Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 1983, Hobart, 8-10 November. Institution of Engineers Australia 1983).

1996: Reefton (Yarra River). Pesticides detected: Heptachlor and Heptachlor Epoxide

Heptachlor and Heptachlor Epoxide were also found in sediment, downstream of Reefton in 1996 in the UWRAA study. - UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data for Yarra River 1996.

Heptachlor and Heptachlor Epoxide were also found in sediment, downstream of Reefton in 1996 in the UWRAA study. – UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data for Yarra River 1996.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Melbourne

2000 February: Johns Hill Plant Kallista. Pesticides detected: Aldrin, Lindane and Heptachlor

Johns Hill Plant 7/2/00 (Kallista) for; Aldrin 0.02 ug/L, Lindane 0.02ug/L Heptachlor 0.013 ug/L

Johns Hill Plant was supplied via closed pipeline from Silvan Reservoir, which raises the question was the source of the organochlorines Silvan and if so why were the pesticides detected at Johns Hill and not at Silvan?

Johns Hill Plant 7/2/00 (Kallista) for; Aldrin 0.02 ug/L, Lindane 0.02ug/L Heptachlor 0.013 ug/L

Johns Hill Plant was supplied via closed pipeline from Silvan Reservoir, which raises the question was the source of the organochlorines Silvan and if so why were the pesticides detected at Johns Hill and not at Silvan?

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Melbourne

1980: Healesville (Vic). Pesticide detected: Dieldrin

{Agricultural Chemicals Committee 15th Meeting 1980? Minutes: (J) Waters From Agricultural Areas For Human Consumption. Pollution Control Section - 10 samples taken by Healesville Water Works Trust... The only pesticide detected was Dieldrin in 6 of the samples of the range was 0.02 to 0.06 micrograms per litre).

{Agricultural Chemicals Committee 15th Meeting 1980? Minutes: (J) Waters From Agricultural Areas For Human Consumption. Pollution Control Section – 10 samples taken by Healesville Water Works Trust… The only pesticide detected was Dieldrin in 6 of the samples of the range was 0.02 to 0.06 micrograms per litre).

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Melbourne

2010 November – 2017 February: Murrabit (Vic). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine.

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

6/3/13: Murrabit Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/2/17: Murrabit Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/2/17: Murrabit Murray River Simazine 0.03ug/L

Source: FoI Application Lower Murray Water June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

6/3/13: Murrabit Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/2/17: Murrabit Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/2/17: Murrabit Murray River Simazine 0.03ug/L

Source: FoI Application Lower Murray Water June 2017

2010 November + 2017 February: Koondrook (Vic). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Atrazine

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

8/2/17: Koondrook Murray River at Pump Site Atrazine 0.01ug/L

8/2/17: Koondrook Murray River at Pump Site Simazine 0.02ug/L

Source: Lower Murray Water FoI Application June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

8/2/17: Koondrook Murray River at Pump Site Atrazine 0.01ug/L

8/2/17: Koondrook Murray River at Pump Site Simazine 0.02ug/L

Source: Lower Murray Water FoI Application June 2017

2010 November: Kerang. Pesticides detected: Atrazine

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine? [3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine? [3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Lower

2010 November – 2017 February: Piangil (Vic). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Atrazine

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

7/2/17: Piangil Murray River Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/2/17: Piangil Murray River Simazine 0.02ug/L

Source: Freedom of Information Request June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

7/2/17: Piangil Murray River Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/2/17: Piangil Murray River Simazine 0.02ug/L

Source: Freedom of Information Request June 2017

2010 November + 2017 February: Swan Hill Murray River. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

7/2/17: Swan Hill Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

7/2/17: Swan Hill Murray River Simazine 0.03ug/L

Source: FoI Application Lower Murray Water June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

7/2/17: Swan Hill Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

7/2/17: Swan Hill Murray River Simazine 0.03ug/L

Source: FoI Application Lower Murray Water June 2017

2010 November – March 2013: Robinvale (Vic). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

5/3/13: Robinvale Water Treatment Plant Atrazine 0.01ug/L

Source: FoI Application Lower Murray Water June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

5/3/13: Robinvale Water Treatment Plant Atrazine 0.01ug/L

Source: FoI Application Lower Murray Water June 2017

2010 November: Red Cliffs (Vic). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine.

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

5/3/13: Red Cliffs Murray River Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/2/17: Red Cliffs Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

7/2/17: Red Cliffs Murray River Simazine 0.04ug/L

Source: FoI Application June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

5/3/13: Red Cliffs Murray River Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/2/17: Red Cliffs Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

7/2/17: Red Cliffs Murray River Simazine 0.04ug/L

Source: FoI Application June 2017

2010 November: Mildura Murray River. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record 'low levels' of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

5/3/13: Mildura Murray River Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/2/17: Mildura Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

7/2/17: Mildura Murray River Simazine 0.03ug/L

Source: FoI Request Lower Murray Water June 2017

November 2010: Communities along the Murray River all record ‘low levels’ of simazine and atrazine over two days. Research in the United States shows Atrazine having impacts at levels as low as 0.1ug/L. Does this mean that the Murray River from Kerang to Mildura, a distance of ~300km was also contaminated with low levels of atrazine & simazine?

[3/11/10: Mildura Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Red Cliffs Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Robinvale Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Swan Hill Atrazine 0.03ug/L. Swan Hill Simazine 0.06ug/L. Piangil Simazine 0.06ug/L, Mildura Simazine 0.04ug/L, Red Cliffs Simazine 0.04ug/L, Robinvale Simazine 0.09ug/L. 4/11/10 Kerang Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Koondrook Simazine 0.07ug/L, Murrabit Simazine 0.03ug/L, Koondrook Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Murrabit Atrazine 0.04ug/L]

5/3/13: Mildura Murray River Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/2/17: Mildura Murray River Atrazine 0.02ug/L

7/2/17: Mildura Murray River Simazine 0.03ug/L

Source: FoI Request Lower Murray Water June 2017

1986 November: Rainbow (Vic). Pesticides: Fenvalerate.

Wimmera Mail Times October 27 1986: Dead Yabbies found in "two of the towns four water storgaes and also in dams near Nhill and Pimpinio"

10 November 1986: ADCRC Meeting - "Mr ... reported that the tissue tests on yabbies found dead and dying in three storages around Rainbow showed the insecticide Fenvalerate to be present at 10 parts per billion. However, the channel waters and sediments tested did not show positive results for either Fenvalerate or for the synthetic pyrethroids which were also sprayed, although Fenvalerate was detected in some puddle samples."

20 March 1987 DCFL Memorandum:In October 1986, aerial spraying of field peas for pea weevil and heliotis resulted in extensive yabby mortalities in water stored and farm dams in the Rainbow area. The RWC immediately closed the Rainbow urban storages and took samples of water, sediments and yabbies for chemical analysis. No chemicals were found in water or sediments, but fenvalerate ... was detected at a concentration of 10 parts per million in yabbies...

22 June 1987 Rural Water Corporation (RWC): In 1986 the Rainbow storage was contaminated with insecticide resulting in death of yabbies. The cause was identifed as the aerial spraying of pea crops. DCFL reported 9 other yabbie kills plus one of fish. Subsequent to the contamination of the Rainbow storage no further contamination of any waterway was reported...

21 July 1987: "The Water Commission continues to be concerned that off-target aerial spraying of insecticides or pea crops this year could contaminate water supplies..."

24 July 1987 RWC Memorandum: "... the issue of avoiding potential contamination of water supplies is vital... The urban storages should be highlighted on a plan and the contractors informed that the RWC opposes spraying near flowing channels, storages containing water and within 100m of urban storages..." [Aerial spraying of Wimmera Pea crops].

28 September 1987: RWC Memorandum: The Commission has had recent concerns with off-target spraying of insecticides in the Wimmera and Mallee where urban storages have been polluted. In the present act there is only provision for declaring horticultural areas as hazardous areas, but not waterways or storages...

Wimmera Mail Times October 27 1986: Dead Yabbies found in “two of the towns four water storgaes and also in dams near Nhill and Pimpinio”

10 November 1986: ADCRC Meeting “Mr … reported that the tissue tests on yabbies found dead and dying in three storages around Rainbow showed the insecticide Fenvalerate to be present at 10 parts per billion. However, the channel waters and sediments tested did not show positive results for either Fenvalerate or for the synthetic pyrethroids which were also sprayed, although Fenvalerate was detected in some puddle samples.”

20 March 1987 DCFL Memorandum:In October 1986, aerial spraying of field peas for pea weevil and heliotis resulted in extensive yabby mortalities in water stored and farm dams in the Rainbow area. The RWC immediately closed the Rainbow urban storages and took samples of water, sediments and yabbies for chemical analysis. No chemicals were found in water or sediments, but fenvalerate … was detected at a concentration of 10 parts per million in yabbies…

22 June 1987 Rural Water Corporation (RWC): In 1986 the Rainbow storage was contaminated with insecticide resulting in death of yabbies. The cause was identifed as the aerial spraying of pea crops. DCFL reported 9 other yabbie kills plus one of fish. Subsequent to the contamination of the Rainbow storage no further contamination of any waterway was reported…

21 July 1987: “The Water Commission continues to be concerned that off-target aerial spraying of insecticides or pea crops this year could contaminate water supplies…”

24 July 1987 RWC Memorandum: “… the issue of avoiding potential contamination of water supplies is vital… The urban storages should be highlighted on a plan and the contractors informed that the RWC opposes spraying near flowing channels, storages containing water and within 100m of urban storages…” [Aerial spraying of Wimmera Pea crops].

28 September 1987: RWC Memorandum: The Commission has had recent concerns with off-target spraying of insecticides in the Wimmera and Mallee where urban storages have been polluted. In the present act there is only provision for declaring horticultural areas as hazardous areas, but not waterways or storages…

29 September 1987 Rural Water Corporation

Re: Spray drift from spraying field pea crops adjacent to Rural Water Commission waterways.

“… The seriousness of water contamination was highlighted last year where there was a large yabbie kill in one of the Rainbow urban storages. Fortunately no-ill effects were passed onto the people of Rainbow. The contamination in this case was due to spray drift entering the storage from aerial spraying of a pea crop immediately adjacent to the storage…”

“Last year the urban storage of the RWC at Rainbow was polluted with insecticide from off-target aerial spraying of a field pea crop. There were also other fish and yabby kills in the Wimmera for the same reason…”

29 September 1987 RWC to ADCRC: “You asked to be kept informed of initiatives taken by the RWC to avoid repitition of insecticide contamination of urban storages in the Wimmera and Mallee by aerial spraying…”

October 2 1987: Spray forum Horsham – 200 people attended. In 1985/6 616,000ha of crops and 16,000ha of pasture were sprayed with herbicides. 45,000ha of crops and 8,000ha of pasture sprayed with insecticides.

Time covered in FoI request: 25/6/05 – 20/8/07:

Wimmera Mallee Pipeline being constructed. This will substantially reduce risk of runoff into channels.

Current Pesticide Testing Regimes:

NATA accredited laboratory working on behalf of GWMWater, scan checks for traces of; Lindane, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Heptachlor Epoxide, 4-4-DDD, 4-4-DDE, 4,4-DDT, Hexachlorobenzene (HCB). Testing appears to be based on annual checks however it appears that some supplies are not tested annually and some more than annually. Due to the information sourced from the FoI further explanations are impossible.

No positive results detected.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Grampians

1981: Hopetoun (Vic). Pesticides Endosulfan, DDT.

Chief Irrigation Officer January 1982: Fish kill Hopetoun No 1 Reservoir during October/November 1981 - probably DDT/Endosulfan. "The enquiries indicated a high probability of the fish deaths being caused by insecticides endosulphan and DDT. These chemicals were sprayed from the air by contractos during October to control grubs (Heliothus) in crops such as peas, lupins, sunflowers and tomatoes, and also to control pea weevil. As crops are sometimes as close as five metres to water supply channels, contamination of the water is very likely...There was more aerial spraying than usual in 1981..."

 

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

Irrigation Services Division

4 February 1982

Effect of Aerial Spraying on Water Quality

The recent fish deaths in Hopetoun No.1 reservoir have highlighted the possibility of aerial spraying resulting in contamination of water supplies. Further, in discussion with ***, it is apparent that there have been other instances in which aerial spraying is thought to have caused fish deaths.

These events are only part of the present aerial spraying scene. I am aware of a number of enquiries about the possible risks to human health from aerial spraying, and also objections raised by people who have suffered discomfort through contact with spray drift. Although these cases are considered by the Pesticide Review Committee, they are usually attended to by the Health Commission.

Two officers of the Department of Agriculture, both of whom have considerable experience with pesticides, have expressed some concern with the standard of aerial spraying. In addition, the Pesticides Review Committee is in the process of writing to the Director-General of Agriculture to determine what action is necessary to reduce the undesirable features of aerial spraying.

It seems appropriate, therefore, that an assessment be made of the effect of aerial spraying on water quality. What is required is consultation with departmental officers and others with some knowledge of aerial spraying, field observations of aerial spraying near water supplies, and details of fish deaths or other evidence of water contamination as a result of aerial spraying.

Chief Irrigation Officer January 1982: Fish kill Hopetoun No 1 Reservoir during October/November 1981 – probably DDT/Endosulfan. “The enquiries indicated a high probability of the fish deaths being caused by insecticides endosulphan and DDT. These chemicals were sprayed from the air by contractos during October to control grubs (Heliothus) in crops such as peas, lupins, sunflowers and tomatoes, and also to control pea weevil. As crops are sometimes as close as five metres to water supply channels, contamination of the water is very likely…There was more aerial spraying than usual in 1981…”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Grampians

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

Irrigation Services Division

4 February 1982

Effect of Aerial Spraying on Water Quality

The recent fish deaths in Hopetoun No.1 reservoir have highlighted the possibility of aerial spraying resulting in contamination of water supplies. Further, in discussion with ***, it is apparent that there have been other instances in which aerial spraying is thought to have caused fish deaths.

These events are only part of the present aerial spraying scene. I am aware of a number of enquiries about the possible risks to human health from aerial spraying, and also objections raised by people who have suffered discomfort through contact with spray drift. Although these cases are considered by the Pesticide Review Committee, they are usually attended to by the Health Commission.

Two officers of the Department of Agriculture, both of whom have considerable experience with pesticides, have expressed some concern with the standard of aerial spraying. In addition, the Pesticides Review Committee is in the process of writing to the Director-General of Agriculture to determine what action is necessary to reduce the undesirable features of aerial spraying.

It seems appropriate, therefore, that an assessment be made of the effect of aerial spraying on water quality. What is required is consultation with departmental officers and others with some knowledge of aerial spraying, field observations of aerial spraying near water supplies, and details of fish deaths or other evidence of water contamination as a result of aerial spraying.

1982 January: East Goulburn Channel 12 Fish Kill. Pesticide detected: Endosulfan

5 January 1982: Fish kill reported in Drain No. 4 Shepparton. Drain 4 is part of the irrigation system in that it discharges into the East Goulburn Channel 12 which is also a source of domestic supply...A large number of redfin and carp were dead in the Number 4 drain and along East Goulburn Channel 12...numbered well over 200 individuals over 2 to 3 kilometres of the watercourse... A tomato crop on CA34 ... was sprayed some 4 days prior to this investigation by Field Air (Benalla) Pty Ltd ... with Thiodan (Endosulfan) and Copper Cocide...the indications point to an overspray with Thiodan (Endosulfan) and Copper Cocide..."

5 January 1982: Fish kill reported in Drain No. 4 Shepparton. Drain 4 is part of the irrigation system in that it discharges into the East Goulburn Channel 12 which is also a source of domestic supply…A large number of redfin and carp were dead in the Number 4 drain and along East Goulburn Channel 12…numbered well over 200 individuals over 2 to 3 kilometres of the watercourse… A tomato crop on CA34 … was sprayed some 4 days prior to this investigation by Field Air (Benalla) Pty Ltd … with Thiodan (Endosulfan) and Copper Cocide…the indications point to an overspray with Thiodan (Endosulfan) and Copper Cocide…”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Valley

1981 December: Nine Mile Creek. Pesticides detected: 2,4-D

2 December 1981 SRWSC: Sampling of 2,4-D residues Arrowhead Weed Spray Program. "Inspection of Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with EPA representatives 26/11/81. "They did not express their original concern about the possibility that the figure of 0.004mg/L for continuous exposure of 2,4-D to aquatic organisms may be exceeded. Their main concern at this inspection was that some verification of our mathematical arguments was now necessary because the use of 2,4-D in a domestic water supply was an extremely contentious issue..."

2 December 1981 SRWSC: Sampling of 2,4-D residues Arrowhead Weed Spray Program. “Inspection of Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with EPA representatives 26/11/81. “They did not express their original concern about the possibility that the figure of 0.004mg/L for continuous exposure of 2,4-D to aquatic organisms may be exceeded. Their main concern at this inspection was that some verification of our mathematical arguments was now necessary because the use of 2,4-D in a domestic water supply was an extremely contentious issue…”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Valley

1980 – 1981 December: Broken Creek. Pesticides detected: Dieldrin, 2,4-D

Agricultural Chemicals Committee (15th meeting 1980?): (I) Waters of Broken Creek. Pollution Control Section of the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission requested analysis of 6 waters from various locations in the Broken Creek near 2 country towns. Trace residues of Dieldrin were detected in all samples 0.01micrograms per litre. A total of 0.16micrograms per litre was present in one sample.

2 December 1981 SRWSC: Sampling of 2,4-D residues Arrowhead Weed Spray Program. "Inspection of Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with EPA representatives 26/11/81. "They did not express their original concern about the possibility that the figure of 0.004mg/L for continuous exposure of 2,4-D to aquatic organisms may be exceeded. Their main concern at this inspection was that some verification of our mathematical arguments was now necessary because the use of 2,4-D in a domestic water supply was an extremely contentious issue..."

Agricultural Chemicals Committee (15th meeting 1980?): (I) Waters of Broken Creek. Pollution Control Section of the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission requested analysis of 6 waters from various locations in the Broken Creek near 2 country towns. Trace residues of Dieldrin were detected in all samples 0.01micrograms per litre. A total of 0.16micrograms per litre was present in one sample.

2 December 1981 SRWSC: Sampling of 2,4-D residues Arrowhead Weed Spray Program. “Inspection of Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with EPA representatives 26/11/81. “They did not express their original concern about the possibility that the figure of 0.004mg/L for continuous exposure of 2,4-D to aquatic organisms may be exceeded. Their main concern at this inspection was that some verification of our mathematical arguments was now necessary because the use of 2,4-D in a domestic water supply was an extremely contentious issue…”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Valley

1967 March: Snob’s Creek Fish Hatchery

Pesticides Review Committee Minutes 1/3/67 6th Meeting: (d) Mr... informed members of the Committee of a recent incident at Snob's Creek Fish Hatchery, where a pesticide was introduced into the creek 500 yards upstream from the hatchery, which nearly killed approximately 2,500,000 fish. The alternative water supply was introduced in sufficient time to save the fish, which were most stressed...

Pesticides Review Committee Minutes 1/3/67 6th Meeting: (d) Mr… informed members of the Committee of a recent incident at Snob’s Creek Fish Hatchery, where a pesticide was introduced into the creek 500 yards upstream from the hatchery, which nearly killed approximately 2,500,000 fish. The alternative water supply was introduced in sufficient time to save the fish, which were most stressed…

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/foewaterreport.htm#Valley

2007 June: Acrolein Southern Rural Water.

Gippsland Times June 1 2007: TESTS have confirmed the chemical acrolein has been detected in the Thomson River after being used as a weed killer by Southern Rural Water. The chemical is used to kill submerged weeds in SRW's main southern and main northern channels. Freedom of Information documents obtained by the Gippsland Times show levels of almost three parts per million were recorded at a site referred to by the test papers as "Heyfield Intermittent Town Supply". A reading of more than four parts per million was detected at the point referred to as "Swimming Pool Check". Both sites were tested as part of the main southern channel. In the main northern channel, readings of five parts per million were recorded at sites referred to as "Football Lane" and "Coloe's Road". The testing was carried out by SRW following use of the chemical. The SRW response to the FOI request also states SRW "does not routinely monitor chemicals within its water supply networks" as it is not required to by law. Victorian Agricultural Chemicals Advisory Committee representative Anthony Amis questioned what arrangement SRW had with regard to alerting water authorities of the chemical treatments and sought assurances the chemicals could not enter the water supply for Maffra via the Macalister River. While he admitted acrolein had a relatively short half life of around two days, he said the chemical had been the subject of a fish kill investigation in the Goulburn River - an irrigation district. "Fingers were pointed at use of acrolein which is highly toxic to fish," he said. "There was a report done by the EPA." SRW also uses roundup as a form of weed control. Tests for glyphosphate came in below the detection limit, according to the FOI document. An SRW spokesperson had not responded to request for an interview at the time of going to print.

Gippsland Times June 1 2007: TESTS have confirmed the chemical acrolein has been detected in the Thomson River after being used as a weed killer by Southern Rural Water. The chemical is used to kill submerged weeds in SRW’s main southern and main northern channels. Freedom of Information documents obtained by the Gippsland Times show levels of almost three parts per million were recorded at a site referred to by the test papers as “Heyfield Intermittent Town Supply”. A reading of more than four parts per million was detected at the point referred to as “Swimming Pool Check”. Both sites were tested as part of the main southern channel. In the main northern channel, readings of five parts per million were recorded at sites referred to as “Football Lane” and “Coloe’s Road”. The testing was carried out by SRW following use of the chemical. The SRW response to the FOI request also states SRW “does not routinely monitor chemicals within its water supply networks” as it is not required to by law. Victorian Agricultural Chemicals Advisory Committee representative Anthony Amis questioned what arrangement SRW had with regard to alerting water authorities of the chemical treatments and sought assurances the chemicals could not enter the water supply for Maffra via the Macalister River. While he admitted acrolein had a relatively short half life of around two days, he said the chemical had been the subject of a fish kill investigation in the Goulburn River – an irrigation district. “Fingers were pointed at use of acrolein which is highly toxic to fish,” he said. “There was a report done by the EPA.” SRW also uses roundup as a form of weed control. Tests for glyphosphate came in below the detection limit, according to the FOI document. An SRW spokesperson had not responded to request for an interview at the time of going to print.

2007 June: Moe Drain. Pesticides detected: Simazine, Ethion

Simazine detected at 0.03 parts per billion (28/29 November2007) in grab sample at the Latrobe River near Rosedale in 'Pilot Study of Agrochemicals in West Gippsland Waterways - 2007'. Simazine also detected at 0.16ug/l (over 21 day period) and Ethion (over 21 day period) June 2007 at Moe Drain. Hexazinone detected at 0.01ug/l (over 21 day period) and simazine 0.195ug/L (over 21 day period) December 2007 at Latrobe River Rosedale.

Simazine detected at 0.03 parts per billion (28/29 November2007) in grab sample at the Latrobe River near Rosedale in ‘Pilot Study of Agrochemicals in West Gippsland Waterways – 2007’. Simazine also detected at 0.16ug/l (over 21 day period) and Ethion (over 21 day period) June 2007 at Moe Drain. Hexazinone detected at 0.01ug/l (over 21 day period) and simazine 0.195ug/L (over 21 day period) December 2007 at Latrobe River Rosedale.

2007 November – December: Latrobe River near Rosedale. Pesticides detected: Simazine, Hexazinone.

Simazine detected at 0.03 parts per billion (28/29 November2007) in grab sample at the Latrobe River near Rosedale in 'Pilot Study of Agrochemicals in West Gippsland Waterways - 2007'. Simazine also detected at 0.16ug/l (over 21 day period) and Ethion (over 21 day period) June 2007 at Moe Drain. Hexazinone detected at 0.01ug/l (over 21 day period) and simazine 0.195ug/L (over 21 day period) December 2007 at Latrobe River Rosedale.

Simazine detected at 0.03 parts per billion (28/29 November2007) in grab sample at the Latrobe River near Rosedale in ‘Pilot Study of Agrochemicals in West Gippsland Waterways – 2007’. Simazine also detected at 0.16ug/l (over 21 day period) and Ethion (over 21 day period) June 2007 at Moe Drain. Hexazinone detected at 0.01ug/l (over 21 day period) and simazine 0.195ug/L (over 21 day period) December 2007 at Latrobe River Rosedale.

2012 March: Easterbrook Creek (Thorpdale Vic). Pesticides detected: Triclopyr, Azoxystrobin, Metolachlor

According to the EPA the following pesticides were detected in Easterbrook Creek in March 2012: Triclopyr 0.022ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L and Metolachlor 0.011ug/L.

https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/our-work/publications/publication/2013/april/1528

According to the EPA the following pesticides were detected in Easterbrook Creek in March 2012: Triclopyr 0.022ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L and Metolachlor 0.011ug/L.

https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/our-work/publications/publication/2013/april/1528

1969 May: Mitchell River Spray Regimes

2 May 1969 Letter to Bairnsdale Waterworks Trust from Agricultural Department: "... regarding aerial spraying on river flats adjacent to the Mitchell River and possible danger of pesticides contaminating the Bairnsdale water supply. As area of vegetables at Lindenow was sprayed last summer from the air at a point approximately 15 miles upstream from the Bairnsdale pumping station... These crops were sprayed four times from December to February with DDT at the rate of 1 pound of active ingredient per acre, one of the DDT sprays did include Maneb at the rate of 2 pounds per acre ... Ground crops were also sprayed by ground machines including - Insecticides: Disulfoton, Demeton-s-Methyl, DDT and Trichlorphon - Fungicides: Copper Oxychloride, Quintozene and Dichloran - Weedicides: Linuron, Prometryne, Chlorthal and Trifluralin... Many of the crops sprayed by ground machine run right through to the riverbank, but it is unlikely that the spraying operations, whether from the ground or air could be responsible for any contamination. However pesticides could be introduced into the stream by operators washing spraying equipment in the river, allowing washings to be returned to the river or by disposing of empty containers in the river..."

2 May 1969 Letter to Bairnsdale Waterworks Trust from Agricultural Department: “… regarding aerial spraying on river flats adjacent to the Mitchell River and possible danger of pesticides contaminating the Bairnsdale water supply. As area of vegetables at Lindenow was sprayed last summer from the air at a point approximately 15 miles upstream from the Bairnsdale pumping station… These crops were sprayed four times from December to February with DDT at the rate of 1 pound of active ingredient per acre, one of the DDT sprays did include Maneb at the rate of 2 pounds per acre … Ground crops were also sprayed by ground machines including – Insecticides: Disulfoton, Demeton-s-Methyl, DDT and Trichlorphon – Fungicides: Copper Oxychloride, Quintozene and Dichloran – Weedicides: Linuron, Prometryne, Chlorthal and Trifluralin… Many of the crops sprayed by ground machine run right through to the riverbank, but it is unlikely that the spraying operations, whether from the ground or air could be responsible for any contamination. However pesticides could be introduced into the stream by operators washing spraying equipment in the river, allowing washings to be returned to the river or by disposing of empty containers in the river…”

1980 + 2010 – 2014: Lal Lal Reservoir (Vic). Pesticides detected: DDT, 2,4-D, MCPA, Triclopyr, Atrazine, Simazine

Agricultural Chemicals Committee (15th meeting 1980?): The Soil Conservation Authority submitted 11 sediment samples from Lal Lal Reservoir which supplies water to the City of Ballarat... Reservoir residues ranged from 0.003 to 0.015mg/kg total DDT and input streams from 0.003 to 0.022mg/kg total DDT..."

30/9/2010: Lal Lal Reservoir  2,4-D 0.02ug/L

30/9/2010: Lal Lal Reservoir  MCPA 0.02ug/L

30/9/2010: Lal Lal Reservoir Triclopyr 0.03ug/L

13/11/2012: Lal Lal Reservoir Atrazine 0.02ug/L

13/11/2012: Lal Lal Reservoir Simazine 0.03ug/L

13/11/2012: Lal Lal Reservoir MCPA 0.01ug/L

12/11/2013: Lal Lal Reservoir Atrazine 0.02ug/L

12/11/2013: Lal Lal Reservoir Simazine 0.05ug/L

12/11/2013: Lal Lal Reservoir MCPA 0.01ug/L

11/11/2014: Lal Lal Reservoir Atrazine 0.02ug/L

11/11/2014: Lal Lal Reservoir Simazine 0.05ug/L

Source FoI Application September 2015

Agricultural Chemicals Committee (15th meeting 1980?): The Soil Conservation Authority submitted 11 sediment samples from Lal Lal Reservoir which supplies water to the City of Ballarat… Reservoir residues ranged from 0.003 to 0.015mg/kg total DDT and input streams from 0.003 to 0.022mg/kg total DDT…”

30/9/2010: Lal Lal Reservoir – 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

30/9/2010: Lal Lal Reservoir – MCPA 0.02ug/L

30/9/2010: Lal Lal Reservoir Triclopyr 0.03ug/L

13/11/2012: Lal Lal Reservoir Atrazine 0.02ug/L

13/11/2012: Lal Lal Reservoir Simazine 0.03ug/L

13/11/2012: Lal Lal Reservoir MCPA 0.01ug/L

12/11/2013: Lal Lal Reservoir Atrazine 0.02ug/L

12/11/2013: Lal Lal Reservoir Simazine 0.05ug/L

12/11/2013: Lal Lal Reservoir MCPA 0.01ug/L

11/11/2014: Lal Lal Reservoir Atrazine 0.02ug/L

11/11/2014: Lal Lal Reservoir Simazine 0.05ug/L

Source FoI Application September 2015

2012 – 2023: Tullaroop Reservoir – Maryborough Water Supply. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine, 2,4-D, Metalochlor, Benomyl, Fluometuron, Diuron

Tullaroop Reservoir (Maryborough drinking water supply)

19/11/2012: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, 19/11/2012: 2,4-D 0.03ug/L, 19/11/2012: Simazine 0.05ug/L

14/11/2013: Metolachlor 0.01ug/L, 14/11/2013: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, 14/11/2013: Simazine 0.05ug/L, 14/11/2013: 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

13/11/2014: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, 13/11/2014: Simazine 0.08ug/L

12/11/2015: Benomyl 0.01ug/L, 11/11/2015: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, 11/11/2015: Simazine 0.06ug/L

23/11/2016: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, 23/11/2016: Fluometuron 0.04ug/L, 23/11/2016: Diuron 0.08ug/L, 23/11/2016: Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, 23/11/2016: Benomyl 0.1ug/L

"Improvements in the level of detection capability by the lab analysis have resulted in low level detection of some pesticides" Central Highlands Water Annual Water Quality Report 2013/14

Water supply not specified. Could be Tullaroop or Centenary Reservoir

2017/18: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.12ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L, MCPA 0.03ug/L, 2,4-D 0.01ug/L, Clopyralid 0.34ug/L, Triclopyr 0.01ug/L, Benomyl 0.06ug/L, Fluometuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.08ug/L, 2,4-D 0.01ug/L, Benomyl 0.03ug/L

2019/20: Dimethoate 0.03ug/L, Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Simazine 0.23ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L, 2,4-D 0.03ug/L, MCPA 0.06ug/L, Triclopyr 0.07ug/L, Benomyl 0.03ug/L, Tebuconazole 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 1ug/L

2020/21: Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L, Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.17ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L,  Terbutryn 0.02ug/L, 2,4-D 0.02ug/L. Clopyralid 0.8ug/L, MCPA 0.03ug/L, Triclopyr 0.02ug/L, Benomyl 0.02ug/L

2021/22: Trichlorofon 0.38ug/L, Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Simazine 0.09ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.03ug/L, 2,4-D 0.34ug/L, Clopyralid 0.43ug/L, MCPA 0.03ug/L, Triclopyr 0.08ug/L, Benomyl 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2022/23: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Simazine 0.29ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.03ug/L, Prometryn 0.06ug/L, Terbutryn 0.01ug/L, 2,4-D 0.08ug/L, Clopyralid 0.15ug/L, MCPA 0.07ug/L, Triclopyr 0.03ug/L, Benomyl 0.26ug/L, Tebuconazole 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Thiamethoxam 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L

Tullaroop Reservoir (Maryborough drinking water supply)

19/11/2012: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, 19/11/2012: 2,4-D 0.03ug/L, 19/11/2012: Simazine 0.05ug/L

14/11/2013: Metolachlor 0.01ug/L, 14/11/2013: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, 14/11/2013: Simazine 0.05ug/L, 14/11/2013: 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

13/11/2014: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, 13/11/2014: Simazine 0.08ug/L

12/11/2015: Benomyl 0.01ug/L, 11/11/2015: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, 11/11/2015: Simazine 0.06ug/L

23/11/2016: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, 23/11/2016: Fluometuron 0.04ug/L, 23/11/2016: Diuron 0.08ug/L, 23/11/2016: Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, 23/11/2016: Benomyl 0.1ug/L

“Improvements in the level of detection capability by the lab analysis have resulted in low level detection of some pesticides” Central Highlands Water Annual Water Quality Report 2013/14

Water supply not specified. Could be Tullaroop or Centenary Reservoir

2017/18: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.12ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L, MCPA 0.03ug/L, 2,4-D 0.01ug/L, Clopyralid 0.34ug/L, Triclopyr 0.01ug/L, Benomyl 0.06ug/L, Fluometuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.08ug/L, 2,4-D 0.01ug/L, Benomyl 0.03ug/L

2019/20: Dimethoate 0.03ug/L, Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Simazine 0.23ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L, 2,4-D 0.03ug/L, MCPA 0.06ug/L, Triclopyr 0.07ug/L, Benomyl 0.03ug/L, Tebuconazole 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 1ug/L

2020/21: Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L, Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.17ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L,  Terbutryn 0.02ug/L, 2,4-D 0.02ug/L. Clopyralid 0.8ug/L, MCPA 0.03ug/L, Triclopyr 0.02ug/L, Benomyl 0.02ug/L

2021/22: Trichlorofon 0.38ug/L, Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Simazine 0.09ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.03ug/L, 2,4-D 0.34ug/L, Clopyralid 0.43ug/L, MCPA 0.03ug/L, Triclopyr 0.08ug/L, Benomyl 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2022/23: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Simazine 0.29ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.03ug/L, Prometryn 0.06ug/L, Terbutryn 0.01ug/L, 2,4-D 0.08ug/L, Clopyralid 0.15ug/L, MCPA 0.07ug/L, Triclopyr 0.03ug/L, Benomyl 0.26ug/L, Tebuconazole 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Thiamethoxam 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L

2012 – 2013 + 2021/22: Lexton Reservoir (Vic). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Simazine, 2,4-D, Propazine, Bromoxynil

Pesticides detected in Lexton Reservoir

7/11/2012: Lexton Reservoir Atrazine 1ug/L

7/11/2012: Lexton Reservoir Propazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/2012: Lexton Reservoir Simazine 0.11ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir Atrazine 0.15ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir Simazine 0.05ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir Bromoxynil 0.01ug/L

2021/22: Lexton 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

"Improvements in the level of detection capability by the lab analysis have resulted in low level detection of some pesticides" Central Highlands Water Annual Water Quality Report 2013/14.

ility by the lab analysis have resulted in low level detection of some pesticides" Central Highlands Water Annual Water Quality Report 2013/14.

Pesticides detected in Lexton Reservoir

7/11/2012: Lexton Reservoir Atrazine 1ug/L

7/11/2012: Lexton Reservoir Propazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/2012: Lexton Reservoir Simazine 0.11ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir Atrazine 0.15ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir Simazine 0.05ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir 2,4-D 0.02ug/L

4/11/2013: Lexton Reservoir Bromoxynil 0.01ug/L

2021/22: Lexton 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

“Improvements in the level of detection capability by the lab analysis have resulted in low level detection of some pesticides” Central Highlands Water Annual Water Quality Report 2013/14.

2005 January – 2006 April: Shepparton Irrigation Area. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Chlorpyrifos, Endosulfan, Parathion Methyl

Shepparton Irrigation Area - Channel 12 below Fingerboards

2005 January: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 March: Chlorpyrifos 0.0333ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005: April: Chlorpyrifos 0.0208ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005: August: Chlorpyrifos 0.0260ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Chlorpyrifos 0.0225ug/L (TRIMPS) + 0.0645ug/L (TRIMPS), Parathion Methyl 0.8358 (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 October: Chlorpyrifos 0.0142ug/L (TRIMPS), Parathion Methyl 0.5421 (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace, Chlorpyrifos 0.056ug/L

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.0052ug/L (TRIMPS), Chlorpyrifos 0.0167ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace, Atrazine 0.97ug/L

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.027ug/L

2005 January: Atrazine 0.024ug/L

2006 February: Chlorpyrifos 0.0153ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.041ug/L

2006 March: Chlorpyrifos 0.0075ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.035ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.036ug/L

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water's Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

Shepparton Irrigation Area – Channel 12 below Fingerboards

2005 January: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

2005 March: Chlorpyrifos 0.0333ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005: April: Chlorpyrifos 0.0208ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2005: August: Chlorpyrifos 0.0260ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 September: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Chlorpyrifos 0.0225ug/L (TRIMPS) + 0.0645ug/L (TRIMPS), Parathion Methyl 0.8358 (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace

2005 October: Chlorpyrifos 0.0142ug/L (TRIMPS), Parathion Methyl 0.5421 (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace, Chlorpyrifos 0.056ug/L

2005 November: Endosulfan 0.0052ug/L (TRIMPS), Chlorpyrifos 0.0167ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine Trace, Atrazine 0.97ug/L

2005 December: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.027ug/L

2005 January: Atrazine 0.024ug/L

2006 February: Chlorpyrifos 0.0153ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.041ug/L

2006 March: Chlorpyrifos 0.0075ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.035ug/L

2006 April: Atrazine 0.036ug/L

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water’s Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

2005 August – 2006 April: Katamatite (Vic) Channel Water Supply. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan, Chlorpyrifos.

Aug 2005: Atrazine Trace

Sep 2005: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (TRIMPS average), Atrazine 0.017ug/L

Oct 2005: Atrazine 0.0754ug/L (TRIMPS average), Atrazine 0.031ug/L

Nov 2005: Atrazine 0.030ug/L

Dec 2005: Atrazine 0.056ug/L

Jan 2006: Chlorpyrifos 0.0890ug/L (TRIMPS average), Atrazine 0.038ug/L

Feb 2006: Atrazine 0.045ug/L

Mar 2006: Atrazine 0.030ug/L

Apr 2006: Atrazine Trace

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water's Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

Aug 2005: Atrazine Trace

Sep 2005: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (TRIMPS average), Atrazine 0.017ug/L

Oct 2005: Atrazine 0.0754ug/L (TRIMPS average), Atrazine 0.031ug/L

Nov 2005: Atrazine 0.030ug/L

Dec 2005: Atrazine 0.056ug/L

Jan 2006: Chlorpyrifos 0.0890ug/L (TRIMPS average), Atrazine 0.038ug/L

Feb 2006: Atrazine 0.045ug/L

Mar 2006: Atrazine 0.030ug/L

Apr 2006: Atrazine Trace

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water’s Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

2005 August – 2006 April: Burramine region Yarrawonga Drain (Vic). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Endosulfan.

Aug 2005: Atrazine Trace

Sep 2005: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.014ug/L

Oct 2005: Atrazine 0.034ug/L

Nov 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.039ug/L

Dec 2005: Atrazine 0.062ug/L

Jan 2006: Atrazine 0.038ug/L

Feb 2006: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.048ug/L

Mar 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.027ug/L

Apr 2006: Atrazine Trace

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water's Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

Aug 2005: Atrazine Trace

Sep 2005: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.014ug/L

Oct 2005: Atrazine 0.034ug/L

Nov 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.039ug/L

Dec 2005: Atrazine 0.062ug/L

Jan 2006: Atrazine 0.038ug/L

Feb 2006: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.048ug/L

Mar 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (average), Atrazine 0.027ug/L

Apr 2006: Atrazine Trace

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water’s Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

2004 October – 2006 April: Torgannah Region (Vic): Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Parathion Methyl, Atrazine, Chlorpyrifos

Pesticides detected, Murray Valley Irrigation Area (MVIA) Torgannah region - Channel 1 (intensive orchard (stone and pome fruit) region.

Oct 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Nov 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Dec 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Jan 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Feb 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Apr 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Aug 2005: Atrazine Trace, Parathion Methyl 0.04ug/L

Sep 2005: Endosulfan 0.0024ug/L, Parathion Methyl 0.071ug/L, 0.3388ug/L (average), Atrazine Trace

Oct 2005: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L, Atrazine Trace

Nov 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L, Atrazine 0.033ug/L

Dec 2005: Atrazine 0.049ug/L

Jan 2006: Atrazine 0.048ug/L

Feb 2006: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L, Atrazine 0.048ug/L

Mar 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L, Atrazine 0.024ug/L

Apr 2006: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water's Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

Oct 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Nov 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Dec 2004: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Jan 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Feb 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Apr 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L

Aug 2005: Atrazine Trace, Parathion Methyl 0.04ug/L

Sep 2005: Endosulfan 0.0024ug/L, Parathion Methyl 0.071ug/L, 0.3388ug/L (average), Atrazine Trace

Oct 2005: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L, Atrazine Trace

Nov 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L, Atrazine 0.033ug/L

Dec 2005: Atrazine 0.049ug/L

Jan 2006: Atrazine 0.048ug/L

Feb 2006: Endosulfan 0.0007ug/L, Atrazine 0.048ug/L

Mar 2006: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L, Atrazine 0.024ug/L

Apr 2006: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water’s Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

 

2004 November – 2006 April: Stuart Murray Canal (Vic). Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine.

Stuart Murray Canal offtake at Goulburn Weir. Water is diverted at this point for northern and north western Victoria.

Pesticides detected by Goulburn Murray Water.

November 2004: Endosulfan Trace

January 2005: Atrazine 0.002ug/L

February 2005: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

March 2005: Atrazine 0.019ug/L

April 2005: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

August 2005: Atrazine Trace

October 2005: Endosulfan 0.0087ug/L, Atrazine Trace

November 2005: Endosulfan 0.0186ug/L, Atrazine Trace

December 2005: Endosulfan 0.0021ug/L, Atrazine 0.042ug/L

January 2006: Atrazine 0.044 ug/L

March 2006: Atrazine 0.0048ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.036ug/L

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water's Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

Stuart Murray Canal offtake at Goulburn Weir. Water is diverted at this point for northern and north western Victoria.

Pesticides detected by Goulburn Murray Water.

November 2004: Endosulfan Trace

January 2005: Atrazine 0.002ug/L

February 2005: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

March 2005: Atrazine 0.019ug/L

April 2005: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

August 2005: Atrazine Trace

October 2005: Endosulfan 0.0087ug/L, Atrazine Trace

November 2005: Endosulfan 0.0186ug/L, Atrazine Trace

December 2005: Endosulfan 0.0021ug/L, Atrazine 0.042ug/L

January 2006: Atrazine 0.044 ug/L

March 2006: Atrazine 0.0048ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.036ug/L

Source: Pesticide Monitoring in Goulburn Murray Water’s Irrigation Supply Channels Covering the Six Irrigation areas [2004-2006 Irrigation Season Study Report: Interim Report June 2006. Goulburn Murray Water

2007 April: Waranga Western Channel. Pesticide Detected: Glyphosate.

Gouburn Murray Water - Waranga Western Channel

April 2007: Glyphosate detected GMW WWC Sample 27 Glyphosate 120ug/L

April 2007: Glyphosate detected GMW WWC Glyphosate 73ug/L

April 2007: Glyphosate detected GMW WWC Glyphosate 50ug/L

Gouburn Murray Water – Waranga Western Channel

April 2007: Glyphosate detected GMW WWC Sample 27 Glyphosate 120ug/L

April 2007: Glyphosate detected GMW WWC Glyphosate 73ug/L

April 2007: Glyphosate detected GMW WWC Glyphosate 50ug/L

“Here in Northern Victoria, government spray gangs have for years routinely sprayed 2,4-D along the Waranga-Mallee irrigation channel, the domestic water source for every town for hundreds of miles…” p148 Chemical Crisis. One Woman’s Story. Humanity’s Future? By Diane Crumpler 1994

1995 April – 2006 May: Broken Creek (Vic). Pesticides detected: Glyphosate.

Goulburn Murray Water use Glyphosate to control Typa spp., Phragmites spp in irrigation channels and drains. Also in water couch in drains.

Normal rates 6-9L/ha for perennial weeds. 1-3L/ha for annual grasses. Residue limit is 0.1ppm. In natural waterways into which drains discharge the limit is 0.01ppm.

Glyphosate is sprayed directly into creeks and rivers to control aquatic weeds – Broken Creek and Nine Mile Creek.

Goulburn Murray Water - Detections of Glyphosate Broken Creek

8/5/06: GMW Broken Creek Glyphosate 160ug/L

8/5/06: GMW Broken Creek Glyphosate 85ug/L

6/4/95 Broken Creek downstream Devenish Glyphosate 170ug/L

6/4/95 Broken Creek downstream Devenish Glyphosate 20ug/L

6/4/95 Broken Creek downstream Devenish Glyphosate 18ug/L

Goulburn Murray Water use Glyphosate to control Typa spp., Phragmites spp in irrigation channels and drains. Also in water couch in drains.

Normal rates 6-9L/ha for perennial weeds. 1-3L/ha for annual grasses. Residue limit is 0.1ppm. In natural waterways into which drains discharge the limit is 0.01ppm.

Glyphosate is sprayed directly into creeks and rivers to control aquatic weeds – Broken Creek and Nine Mile Creek.

Goulburn Murray Water – Detections of Glyphosate Broken Creek

8/5/06: GMW Broken Creek Glyphosate 160ug/L

8/5/06: GMW Broken Creek Glyphosate 85ug/L

6/4/95 Broken Creek downstream Devenish Glyphosate 170ug/L

6/4/95 Broken Creek downstream Devenish Glyphosate 20ug/L

6/4/95 Broken Creek downstream Devenish Glyphosate 18ug/L

 

1996 November – 2007: Lake Nagambie (Vic). Pesticides detected: Glyphosate.

Lake Nagambie - Spraying for Aquatic Weeds

GMW started spraying in May-June 1996 when lake was dry. 210 litres sprayed. Samples late 1996 <30ug/L.

Nov96/Feb 97: 361L of Nufarm Weedmaster used.  Highest level recorded  38ug/L

1999/03 2193.5L Biactive 360 Weedmaster used. Highest level recorded  <30ug/L

2007 Glyphosate detected at  120ug/L post spray. No residues detected 19-51 days after spraying.

Goulburn Weir Backwater also has problems with aquatic weeds, including Mexican Water Lily (Nymphaea mexicana) and Cabomba (Cabomba caroliniana). Goulburn Murray Water started a weed control program in May - June 1996 when the lake was sprayed with Roundup biactive in dry conditions. About 210 litres of Glyphosate was used. Water lily clumps were targeted again in late November 1996 - March 1997 with Glyphosate rates of 6L/ha, meaning 577 litres of Glyphosate was used. Samples taken in late1996 showed Glyphosate levels of <0.03mg/L (<30ug/L).

Between November 1997 to March 1998, 361 litres of Nufarm Weedmaster 360 was applied. Glyphosate levels at one point in the lake increased to 38ug/L and then decreased to <30ug/L after two days. From 1999 to 2003 another 2193.5 litres of herbicide (either Roundup Biactive, Roundup 360 and Weedmaster 360) was used in the lake. During 2000/1 monitoring found Glyphosate residues of <30ug/L.

Monitoring of glyphosate post spraying in 2007 saw Glyphosate levels as high as 120ug/L post spray. No residues were detected 19-51 days after spraying.

Lake Nagambie – Spraying for Aquatic Weeds

GMW started spraying in May-June 1996 when lake was dry. 210 litres sprayed. Samples late 1996 <30ug/L.

Nov96/Feb 97: 361L of Nufarm Weedmaster used.  Highest level recorded  38ug/L

1999/03 2193.5L Biactive 360 Weedmaster used. Highest level recorded  <30ug/L

2007 Glyphosate detected at  120ug/L post spray. No residues detected 19-51 days after spraying.

Goulburn Weir Backwater also has problems with aquatic weeds, including Mexican Water Lily (Nymphaea mexicana) and Cabomba (Cabomba caroliniana). Goulburn Murray Water started a weed control program in May – June 1996 when the lake was sprayed with Roundup biactive in dry conditions. About 210 litres of Glyphosate was used. Water lily clumps were targeted again in late November 1996 – March 1997 with Glyphosate rates of 6L/ha, meaning 577 litres of Glyphosate was used. Samples taken in late1996 showed Glyphosate levels of <0.03mg/L (<30ug/L).

Between November 1997 to March 1998, 361 litres of Nufarm Weedmaster 360 was applied. Glyphosate levels at one point in the lake increased to 38ug/L and then decreased to <30ug/L after two days. From 1999 to 2003 another 2193.5 litres of herbicide (either Roundup Biactive, Roundup 360 and Weedmaster 360) was used in the lake. During 2000/1 monitoring found Glyphosate residues of <30ug/L.

Monitoring of glyphosate post spraying in 2007 saw Glyphosate levels as high as 120ug/L post spray. No residues were detected 19-51 days after spraying.

2003 August – 2004 May. Wilson River (NSW). Pesticides detected: Glyphosate, Dicamba.

21/08/2003 Wilson’s River WR02 Glyphosate 209 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR02 Dicamba 1.8 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR03 Dicamba 1.1 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR03 Glyphosate 41 ug/L

29/01/2004 Wilsons River WR03 Glyphosate 17.7 ug/L

2/10/03 Wilson’s River WR04 Glyphosate 50 ug/L

16/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR05 Glyphosate 98 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR05 Dicamba 1.5 ug/L

20/05/2004 Wilsons River WR05 Glyphosate 18.67 ug/L

Emigrant Creek Dam was constructed by Ballina Council in the late 1960’s and was the major water supply for Lennox Head and Ballina until 1988. In 1988 these areas were connected to the Rous Water water supply system. Emigrant Creek Dam remains a key component of the Rous Water regional water supply system and supplements the water supply from Rocky Creek Dam.

Record low levels at Rocky Creek Dam during 2002/03 resulted in Rous Water seeking an emergency water supply source to maintain a reliable supply to it’s customers. An emergency water source was subsequently identified at the Wilson’s River near Howard Grass, downstream of the Boat harbour. During the recent drought period, this source was the principal supply to the majority of Rous Water customers.

The Wilson’s River source is now set to become a key component of the Rous Water water supply strategy.

21/08/2003 Wilson’s River WR02 Glyphosate 209 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR02 Dicamba 1.8 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR03 Dicamba 1.1 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR03 Glyphosate 41 ug/L

29/01/2004 Wilsons River WR03 Glyphosate 17.7 ug/L

2/10/03 Wilson’s River WR04 Glyphosate 50 ug/L

16/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR05 Glyphosate 98 ug/L

25/09/2003 Wilson’s River WR05 Dicamba 1.5 ug/L

20/05/2004 Wilsons River WR05 Glyphosate 18.67 ug/L

Emigrant Creek Dam was constructed by Ballina Council in the late 1960’s and was the major water supply for Lennox Head and Ballina until 1988. In 1988 these areas were connected to the Rous Water water supply system. Emigrant Creek Dam remains a key component of the Rous Water regional water supply system and supplements the water supply from Rocky Creek Dam.

Record low levels at Rocky Creek Dam during 2002/03 resulted in Rous Water seeking an emergency water supply source to maintain a reliable supply to it’s customers. An emergency water source was subsequently identified at the Wilson’s River near Howard Grass, downstream of the Boat harbour. During the recent drought period, this source was the principal supply to the majority of Rous Water customers.

The Wilson’s River source is now set to become a key component of the Rous Water water supply strategy.

https://www.rouswater.nsw.gov.au/content/uploads/appendix_a_2003-04_pesticide_residue_water_sampling_and_analysis_program%5B1%5D.pdf

2003 August – 2004 February: Emigrant Creek (NSW). Pesticides detected: Glyphosate, Triclopyr, Endosulfan.

Review of Pesticide Residue Water Sampling Program Rous Water 2003/4 

7/08/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Glyphosate 18.9ug/L

16/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Glyphosate 32 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Total Endosulfan *0.06 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Triclopyr * 0.9 ug/L

30/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.08 ug/L

6/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.06 ug/L

20/11/2003 Emigrant Creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate *0.09 ug/L

27/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.07 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Total Endosulfan *0.4 ug/L

30/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.07 ug/L

6/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate *0.05 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Total Endosulfan * 0.08 ug/L

27/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.06 ug/L

4/12/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.08 ug/L

30/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC06 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.07 ug/L

28/08/2003 Emigrant creek EC09 Glyphosate 16 ug/L

25/02/2004 Emigrant creek EC10 Glyphosate 11.7 ug/L

Emigrant Creek Dam was constructed by Ballina Council in the late 1960’s and was the major water supply for Lennox Head and Ballina until 1988. In 1988 these areas were connected to the Rous Water water supply system. Emigrant Creek Dam remains a key component of the Rous Water regional water supply system and supplements the water supply from Rocky Creek Dam.

Record low levels at Rocky Creek Dam during 2002/03 resulted in Rous Water seeking an emergency water supply source to maintain a reliable supply to it’s customers. An emergency water source was subsequently identified at the Wilson’s River near Howard Grass, downstream of the Boat harbour. During the recent drought period, this source was the principal supply to the majority of Rous Water customers.

The Wilson’s River source is now set to become a key component of the Rous Water water supply strategy.

Review of Pesticide Residue Water Sampling Program Rous Water 2003/4 

7/08/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Glyphosate 18.9ug/L

16/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Glyphosate 32 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Total Endosulfan *0.06 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC02 Triclopyr * 0.9 ug/L

30/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.08 ug/L

6/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.06 ug/L

20/11/2003 Emigrant Creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate *0.09 ug/L

27/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.07 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC03 Total Endosulfan *0.4 ug/L

30/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.07 ug/L

6/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate *0.05 ug/L

13/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Total Endosulfan * 0.08 ug/L

27/11/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.06 ug/L

4/12/2003 Emigrant creek EC05 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.08 ug/L

30/10/2003 Emigrant creek EC06 Endosulfan Sulfate * 0.07 ug/L

28/08/2003 Emigrant creek EC09 Glyphosate 16 ug/L

25/02/2004 Emigrant creek EC10 Glyphosate 11.7 ug/L

Emigrant Creek Dam was constructed by Ballina Council in the late 1960’s and was the major water supply for Lennox Head and Ballina until 1988. In 1988 these areas were connected to the Rous Water water supply system. Emigrant Creek Dam remains a key component of the Rous Water regional water supply system and supplements the water supply from Rocky Creek Dam.

Record low levels at Rocky Creek Dam during 2002/03 resulted in Rous Water seeking an emergency water supply source to maintain a reliable supply to it’s customers. An emergency water source was subsequently identified at the Wilson’s River near Howard Grass, downstream of the Boat harbour. During the recent drought period, this source was the principal supply to the majority of Rous Water customers.

The Wilson’s River source is now set to become a key component of the Rous Water water supply strategy.

https://www.rouswater.nsw.gov.au/content/uploads/appendix_a_2003-04_pesticide_residue_water_sampling_and_analysis_program%5B1%5D.pdf

1997: Brisbane River. Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin.

As well as evidence of contamination by heavy metals, in some sites bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos were found in sediments around Brisbane waterways (Mortimer et al.,1997). Oysters in the Redcliffe area have tested positive for the presence of chlorpyrifos at every site tested, although the latest results were negative for bifenthrin (Keys et al., 2002

As well as evidence of contamination by heavy metals, in some sites bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos were found in sediments around Brisbane waterways (Mortimer et al.,1997). Oysters in the Redcliffe area have tested positive for the presence of chlorpyrifos at every site tested, although the latest results were negative for bifenthrin (Keys et al., 2002

https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ReviewOfTermitisidesInAustralia.pdf

2001-2002: Gold Coast. Pesticides detected: Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin.

2001–2002: Gold Coast – Complaints from residents about the taste and odour of tap water following termiticide treatment. Permeation through plastic water pipes by solvents is suspected as the cause. Analysis of water samples indicated the presence of volatile organics, C3and C4 substituted benzenes and aromatic hydrocarbons. The termiticides chlorpyrifos and bifenthrin were also identified, but were not quantified and so it is difficult to make health risk assessments regarding them. In cases where the polyethylene pipes were replaced with copper pipes the contamination ceased, suggesting that there was some permeation of solvents through the polyethylene pipes

2001–2002: Gold Coast – Complaints from residents about the taste and odour of tap water following termiticide treatment. Permeation through plastic water pipes by solvents is suspected as the cause. Analysis of water samples indicated the presence of volatile organics, C3and C4 substituted benzenes and aromatic hydrocarbons. The termiticides chlorpyrifos and bifenthrin were also identified, but were not quantified and so it is difficult to make health risk assessments regarding them. In cases where the polyethylene pipes were replaced with copper pipes the contamination ceased, suggesting that there was some permeation of solvents through the polyethylene pipes.

https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ReviewOfTermitisidesInAustralia.pdf

2001 March: Oxley Creek Brisbane. Multiple pesticides.

March 2001: Oxley Creek tributary, Brisbane – chemicals leaked through storm drains to the creek in runoff following a fire at Barmac Industries at Rocklea. Chemicals included insecticides and herbicides, requiring water to be pumped from the creek by the Queensland EPA, to prevent contaminated water reaching Oxley Creek.

March 2001: Oxley Creek tributary, Brisbane – chemicals leaked through storm drains to the creek in runoff following a fire at Barmac Industries at Rocklea. Chemicals included insecticides and herbicides, requiring water to be pumped from the creek by the Queensland EPA, to prevent contaminated water reaching Oxley Creek.

https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ReviewOfTermitisidesInAustralia.pdf

2001 February: Loders Creek Southport (Qld). Pesticide detected: Chlorpyrifos.

February 2001: Loders Creek, Southport – fish kill followed by tests revealing high concentrations of chlorpyrifos. The source of contamination is not known, but it is likely to be as a result of runoff from nearby canal estate building sites.

February 2001: Loders Creek, Southport – fish kill followed by tests revealing high concentrations of chlorpyrifos. The source of contamination is not known, but it is likely to be as a result of runoff from nearby canal estate building sites.

https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ReviewOfTermitisidesInAustralia.pdf

2001 February: Redcliffe (Qld). Pesticide detected: Bifenthrin.

February 2001: Bifenthrin (0.125 mg/kg) was found in oysters from Redcliffe waterways (Keys and Mortimer, 2001), at well above Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) food standards code for maximum residue levels (0.05 mg/kg). The source of this contamination is not known, but it is likely to be as a result of runoff from nearby canal estate building sites.

February 2001: Bifenthrin (0.125 mg/kg) was found in oysters from Redcliffe waterways (Keys and Mortimer, 2001), at well above Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) food standards code for maximum residue levels (0.05 mg/kg). The source of this contamination is not known, but it is likely to be as a result of runoff from nearby canal estate building sites.

https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ReviewOfTermitisidesInAustralia.pdf

2001 January: Fish Kill Gold Coast. Pesticide detected: Chlorpyrifos.

January 2001: Swan Lake canal estate, Gold Coast – pest control company driver washing spillage into a stormwater drain. Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) subsequently identified at 100 times the lethal dose for fish in the canal water. Over 1000 fish killed.

January 2001: Swan Lake canal estate, Gold Coast – pest control company driver

washing spillage into a stormwater drain. Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) subsequently

identified at 100 times the lethal dose for fish in the canal water. Over 1000 fish killed.

https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/ReviewOfTermitisidesInAustralia.pdf

1998 – 2000 + 2022: Barossa Water Treatment Plant. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Hexazinone, Diazinon, MCPA.

Barossa Water Treatment Plant Inlet - Pesticide Detections.

Atrazine: 3.41ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.7ug/L (10 Aug 98), 1.61ug/L (24 Aug 98), 1.48ug/L (14 Sep 98), 1.73ug/L (16 Sep 98), 1.85ug/L (21 Sep 98), 1.38ug/L (28 Sep 98), 1.19ug/L (7 Oct 98), 1.03ug/L (12 Oct 98), 1.48ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.48ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.34ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.26ug/L (5 Nov 98), 1.29ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.28ug/L (16 Nov 98), 1.47ug/L (17 Nov 98), 1.41ug/L (24 Nov 98), 1.36ug/L (1 Dec 98), 1.53ug/L (7 Dec 98), 1.66ug/L (14 Dec 98), 1.37ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.3ug/L (28 Dec 98), 1.52ug/L (1 Jan 99), 1.61ug/L (4 Jan 99), 1.59ug/L (11 Jan 99), 1.42ug/L (15 Jan 99), 1.41ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.42ug/L (25 Jan 99), 1.41ug/L (1 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (22 Feb 99), 2.3ug/L (1 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (15 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (29 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (5 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (12 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (19 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (26 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (3 May 99), 1.4ug/L (18 May 99), 1.6ug/L (19 May 99), 1.3ug/L (31 May 99), 0.9ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (15 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (21 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (5 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (27 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (16 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (19 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (23 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (30 Aug 99), 1.7ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1.3ug/L (17 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1.1ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1.1ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (18 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (25 Oct 99), 1ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1.2ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 1ug/L (29 Nov 99), 1ug/L (6 Dec 99), 1.1ug/L (13 Dec 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 1ug/L (27 Dec 99), 1.1ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (24 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (31 Jan 00), 1ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (1 May 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (12 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (24 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (31 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (7 Aug 00), 0.5ug/L (14 Aug 00), 0.5ug/L (28 Aug 00), 0.5ug/L (18 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (25 Sep 00).

Hexazinone: 1.34ug/L (14 Sep 98), 1.46ug/L (16 Sep 98), 1.49ug/L (21 Sep 98), 1.08ug/L (28 Sep 98), 1.21ug/L (7 Oct 98), 1.23ug/L (12 Sep 98), 1.36ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.53ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.42ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.28ug/L (5 Nov 98), 1.8ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.34ug/L (16 Nov 98), 0.93ug/L (17 Nov 98), 1.01ug/L (24 Nov 98), 2.07ug/L (1 Dec 98), 1.35ug/L (7 Dec 98), 1.3ug/L (14 Dec 98), 1.29ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.34ug/L (28 Dec 98), 1.46ug/L (1 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (4 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (11 Jan 99), 1.33ug/L (15 Jan 99), 1.33ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.24ug/L (25 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (1 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Feb 99), 1.4ug/L (1 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (15 Mar 99), 1.3ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (29 Mar 99), 1.4ug/L (5 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (12 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (19 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (26 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (3 May 99), 1.5ug/L (10 May 99), 1.4ug/L (18 May 99), 1.2ug/L (19 May 99), 1.2ug/L (31 May 99), 1.1ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (15 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (21 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (5 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.6ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.6ug/L (22 Jul 99), 1.7ug/L (27 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (16 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (19 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (23 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (30 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1.6ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (18 Oct 99), 1ug/L (25 Oct 99), 1.2ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1.3ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1.3ug/L (22 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (29 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (6 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (13 Nov 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 1ug/L (27 Dec 99), 1.2ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 1.2ug/L (24 Jan 00), 1ug/L (31 Jan 00), 1ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.9ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.9ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (1 May 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 May 00), 0.6ug/L (29 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.7ug/L (12 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.9ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.9ug/L (10 Jul 00), 1ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (31 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (7 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (14 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (21 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (28 Aug 00), 0.8ug/L (4 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (11 Sep 00), 0.7ug/L (18 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (25 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (2 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (9 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (22 Oct 00), 0.6ug/L (23 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (6 Nov 00), 0.5ug/L (13 Nov 00).

24/8/98: Diazinon: 0.6ug/L

7/11/22: Barossa WTP Inlet MCPA 0.06ug/L

Barossa Water Treatment Plant Before Storage

Atrazine: 1.9ug/L (16 Jun 98), 1.75ug/L (29 Jun 98), 2.33ug/L (10 Jul 98), 0.69ug/L (7 Sep 98), 0.68ug/L (16 Sep 98), 1.19ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.38ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.22ug/L (4 Nov 98), 0.62ug/L (5 Nov 98), 1.29ug/L (16 Nov 98), 0.5ug/L (15 Mar 99), 0.8ug/L (19 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (21 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (22 Jul 99), 0.5ug/L (27 Jul 99), 0.7ug/L (2 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (18 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (25 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (29 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (6 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Dec 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (27 Dec 99), 1ug/L (4 Jan 00), 1ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (24 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (31 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.7ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (1 May 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (12 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (7 Aug 00).

Hexazinone: 4.16ug/L (10 Jul 98), 0.98ug/L (7 Sep 98), 0.97ug/L (16 Sep 98), 0.63ug/L (21 Sep 98), 1.29ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.23ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.45ug/L (4 Nov 98), 0.92ug/L (5 Nov 98), 0.74ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.29ug/L (16 Nov 98), 0.77ug/L (1 Dec 98), 0.75ug/L (7 Dec 98), 1.44ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.86ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.44ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.52ug/L (6 Jan 99), 0.5ug/L (27 Jan 99), 0.55ug/L (15 Feb 99), 0.6ug/L (22 Feb 99), 0.7ug/L (8 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (15 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (20 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (22 Mar 99), 0.7ug/L (29 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (5 Apr 99), 0.6ug/L (12 Apr 99), 0.5ug/L (26 Apr 99), 0.6ug/L (3 May 99), 1.1ug/L (10 May 99), 0.8ug/L (24 May 99), 0.8ug/L (7 Jun 99), 0.6ug/L (15 Jun 99), 0.6ug/L (21 Jun 99), 0.8ug/L (28 Jun 99), 0.5ug/L (5 Jul 99), 0.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (22 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (27 Jul 99), 1ug/L (2 Aug 99), 0.5ug/L (16 Aug 99), 0.5ug/L (19 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1.3ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1.3ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1.2ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (18 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (25 Oct 99), 1.1ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 1ug/L (29 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (6 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Dec 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (27 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (4 Jan 00), 1.1ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 1ug/L (24 Jan 00), 1ug/L (31 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.9ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.7ug/L (15 May 00), 0.7ug/L (23 May 00), 0.6ug/L (29 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.7ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.9ug/L (10 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (31 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (7 Aug 00), 0.6ug/L (14 Aug 00), 0.6ug/L (21 Aug 00), 0.6ug/L (28 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (4 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (11 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (18 Sep 00), 0.5ug/L (25 Sep 00), 0.5ug/L (2 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (9 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (23 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (30 Oct 00), 0.6ug/L (13 Nov 00),

Barossa Water Treatment Plant Inlet – Pesticide Detections.

Atrazine: 3.41ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.7ug/L (10 Aug 98), 1.61ug/L (24 Aug 98), 1.48ug/L (14 Sep 98), 1.73ug/L (16 Sep 98), 1.85ug/L (21 Sep 98), 1.38ug/L (28 Sep 98), 1.19ug/L (7 Oct 98), 1.03ug/L (12 Oct 98), 1.48ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.48ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.34ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.26ug/L (5 Nov 98), 1.29ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.28ug/L (16 Nov 98), 1.47ug/L (17 Nov 98), 1.41ug/L (24 Nov 98), 1.36ug/L (1 Dec 98), 1.53ug/L (7 Dec 98), 1.66ug/L (14 Dec 98), 1.37ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.3ug/L (28 Dec 98), 1.52ug/L (1 Jan 99), 1.61ug/L (4 Jan 99), 1.59ug/L (11 Jan 99), 1.42ug/L (15 Jan 99), 1.41ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.42ug/L (25 Jan 99), 1.41ug/L (1 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (22 Feb 99), 2.3ug/L (1 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (15 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (29 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (5 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (12 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (19 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (26 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (3 May 99), 1.4ug/L (18 May 99), 1.6ug/L (19 May 99), 1.3ug/L (31 May 99), 0.9ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (15 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (21 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (5 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (27 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (16 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (19 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (23 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (30 Aug 99), 1.7ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1.3ug/L (17 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1.1ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1.1ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (18 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (25 Oct 99), 1ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1.2ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 1ug/L (29 Nov 99), 1ug/L (6 Dec 99), 1.1ug/L (13 Dec 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 1ug/L (27 Dec 99), 1.1ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (24 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (31 Jan 00), 1ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (1 May 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (12 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (24 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (31 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (7 Aug 00), 0.5ug/L (14 Aug 00), 0.5ug/L (28 Aug 00), 0.5ug/L (18 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (25 Sep 00).

Hexazinone: 1.34ug/L (14 Sep 98), 1.46ug/L (16 Sep 98), 1.49ug/L (21 Sep 98), 1.08ug/L (28 Sep 98), 1.21ug/L (7 Oct 98), 1.23ug/L (12 Sep 98), 1.36ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.53ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.42ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.28ug/L (5 Nov 98), 1.8ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.34ug/L (16 Nov 98), 0.93ug/L (17 Nov 98), 1.01ug/L (24 Nov 98), 2.07ug/L (1 Dec 98), 1.35ug/L (7 Dec 98), 1.3ug/L (14 Dec 98), 1.29ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.34ug/L (28 Dec 98), 1.46ug/L (1 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (4 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (11 Jan 99), 1.33ug/L (15 Jan 99), 1.33ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.24ug/L (25 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (1 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Feb 99), 1.4ug/L (1 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (15 Mar 99), 1.3ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (29 Mar 99), 1.4ug/L (5 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (12 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (19 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (26 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (3 May 99), 1.5ug/L (10 May 99), 1.4ug/L (18 May 99), 1.2ug/L (19 May 99), 1.2ug/L (31 May 99), 1.1ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (15 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (21 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (5 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.6ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.6ug/L (22 Jul 99), 1.7ug/L (27 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (16 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (19 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (23 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (30 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1.6ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (18 Oct 99), 1ug/L (25 Oct 99), 1.2ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1.3ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1.3ug/L (22 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (29 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (6 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (13 Nov 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 1ug/L (27 Dec 99), 1.2ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 1.2ug/L (24 Jan 00), 1ug/L (31 Jan 00), 1ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.9ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.9ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (1 May 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 May 00), 0.6ug/L (29 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.7ug/L (12 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.9ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.9ug/L (10 Jul 00), 1ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (31 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (7 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (14 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (21 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (28 Aug 00), 0.8ug/L (4 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (11 Sep 00), 0.7ug/L (18 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (25 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (2 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (9 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (22 Oct 00), 0.6ug/L (23 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (6 Nov 00), 0.5ug/L (13 Nov 00).

24/8/98: Diazinon: 0.6ug/L

7/11/22: Barossa WTP Inlet MCPA 0.06ug/L

Barossa Water Treatment Plant Before Storage

Atrazine: 1.9ug/L (16 Jun 98), 1.75ug/L (29 Jun 98), 2.33ug/L (10 Jul 98), 0.69ug/L (7 Sep 98), 0.68ug/L (16 Sep 98), 1.19ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.38ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.22ug/L (4 Nov 98), 0.62ug/L (5 Nov 98), 1.29ug/L (16 Nov 98), 0.5ug/L (15 Mar 99), 0.8ug/L (19 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (21 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (22 Jul 99), 0.5ug/L (27 Jul 99), 0.7ug/L (2 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (18 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (25 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (29 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (6 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Dec 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (27 Dec 99), 1ug/L (4 Jan 00), 1ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (24 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (31 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.7ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (1 May 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (12 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (10 Jul 00), 0.6ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (7 Aug 00).

Hexazinone: 4.16ug/L (10 Jul 98), 0.98ug/L (7 Sep 98), 0.97ug/L (16 Sep 98), 0.63ug/L (21 Sep 98), 1.29ug/L (19 Oct 98), 1.23ug/L (26 Oct 98), 1.45ug/L (4 Nov 98), 0.92ug/L (5 Nov 98), 0.74ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.29ug/L (16 Nov 98), 0.77ug/L (1 Dec 98), 0.75ug/L (7 Dec 98), 1.44ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.86ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.44ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.52ug/L (6 Jan 99), 0.5ug/L (27 Jan 99), 0.55ug/L (15 Feb 99), 0.6ug/L (22 Feb 99), 0.7ug/L (8 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (15 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (20 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (22 Mar 99), 0.7ug/L (29 Mar 99), 0.6ug/L (5 Apr 99), 0.6ug/L (12 Apr 99), 0.5ug/L (26 Apr 99), 0.6ug/L (3 May 99), 1.1ug/L (10 May 99), 0.8ug/L (24 May 99), 0.8ug/L (7 Jun 99), 0.6ug/L (15 Jun 99), 0.6ug/L (21 Jun 99), 0.8ug/L (28 Jun 99), 0.5ug/L (5 Jul 99), 0.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (22 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (27 Jul 99), 1ug/L (2 Aug 99), 0.5ug/L (16 Aug 99), 0.5ug/L (19 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (6 Sep 99), 1.3ug/L (13 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (20 Sep 99), 1.3ug/L (27 Sep 99), 1ug/L (5 Oct 99), 1.2ug/L (11 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (18 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (25 Oct 99), 1.1ug/L (1 Nov 99), 1ug/L (8 Nov 99), 1.1ug/L (15 Nov 99), 1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 1ug/L (29 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (6 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Dec 99), 1ug/L (20 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (27 Dec 99), 0.9ug/L (4 Jan 00), 1.1ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jan 00), 1ug/L (24 Jan 00), 1ug/L (31 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (7 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (6 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Mar 00), 0.9ug/L (20 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (27 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (3 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (10 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (17 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (26 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (8 May 00), 0.7ug/L (15 May 00), 0.7ug/L (23 May 00), 0.6ug/L (29 May 00), 0.8ug/L (5 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (19 Jun 00), 0.7ug/L (25 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (3 Jul 00), 0.9ug/L (10 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (31 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (7 Aug 00), 0.6ug/L (14 Aug 00), 0.6ug/L (21 Aug 00), 0.6ug/L (28 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (4 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (11 Sep 00), 0.6ug/L (18 Sep 00), 0.5ug/L (25 Sep 00), 0.5ug/L (2 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (9 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (23 Oct 00), 0.5ug/L (30 Oct 00), 0.6ug/L (13 Nov 00),

1998 – 2023: Torrens River Gorge Weir (SA). Pesticides Detected: Endosulfan, Simazine, Triclopyr, Picloram, MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl.

Torrens River - Torrens Gorge Weir - Pesticide Detections

1998 October 16 Endosulphan Sulphate 0.07ug/L

1998 December 9 Simazine 0.58ug/L

1999 September Simazine 0.6ug/L

2011 June 27 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

6/2/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

28/5/12: Picloram 0.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.6ug/L

25/6/12: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

17/9/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

15/10/12: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

12/11/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

7/1/13: MCPA 0.09ug/L

4/2/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

29/4/13: Picloram 0.2ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

23/9/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

2/6/14: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

4/8/14: MCPA 0.08ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

11/5/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

21/9/15: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

19/10/15: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

8/2/16: Picloram 0.3ug/L, Triclopyr 0.7ug/L

30/5/16: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

29/8/16: MCPA 0.11ug/L (sample pump)

24/10/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

21/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

19/12/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

16/1/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

18/9/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

16/10/17: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.16ug/L (sample pump)

11/12/17: MCPA 0.11ug/L (sample pump)

8/1/18: MCPA 0.11ug/L (sample pump)

2/7/18: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

1/7/19: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

13/1/20: Metsufuron Methyl 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

10/2/20: Metsufuron Methyl 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

4/5/20: Metsufuron Methyl 0.11ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L (sample pump)

1/6/20: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L (sample pump)

13/9/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

17/1/22: MCPA 0.06ug/L

6/6/22: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

7/11/22: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.07ug/L

16/1/23: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.06ug/L

1/5/23: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.06ug/L

1/5/23: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

Torrens River – Torrens Gorge Weir – Pesticide Detections

1998 October 16 Endosulphan Sulphate 0.07ug/L

1998 December 9 Simazine 0.58ug/L

1999 September Simazine 0.6ug/L

2011 June 27 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

6/2/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

28/5/12: Picloram 0.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.6ug/L

25/6/12: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

17/9/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

15/10/12: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

12/11/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

7/1/13: MCPA 0.09ug/L

4/2/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

29/4/13: Picloram 0.2ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

23/9/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

2/6/14: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

4/8/14: MCPA 0.08ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

11/5/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

21/9/15: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

19/10/15: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

8/2/16: Picloram 0.3ug/L, Triclopyr 0.7ug/L

30/5/16: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

29/8/16: MCPA 0.11ug/L (sample pump)

24/10/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

21/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

19/12/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

16/1/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

18/9/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

16/10/17: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.16ug/L (sample pump)

11/12/17: MCPA 0.11ug/L (sample pump)

8/1/18: MCPA 0.11ug/L (sample pump)

2/7/18: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

1/7/19: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

13/1/20: Metsufuron Methyl 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

10/2/20: Metsufuron Methyl 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

4/5/20: Metsufuron Methyl 0.11ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L (sample pump)

1/6/20: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L (sample pump)

13/9/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

17/1/22: MCPA 0.06ug/L

6/6/22: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

7/11/22: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.07ug/L

16/1/23: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.06ug/L

1/5/23: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.06ug/L

1/5/23: Torrens Gorge Weir Sample Pump Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

1999 May – 2015 March: Murray Bridge, Murray River. Pesticide detections: Hexazinone, Simazine, MCPA.

Murray Bridge – River Murray - Pesticide detections.

1999 May 19 Hexazinone 0.9ug/L

2002 January 16 Simazine 1.5ug/L

2010 November 17 Simazine 1.1ug/L

River Murray Murray Bridge Sample Pump

8/2/12: Simazine 1.5ug/L

2/5/12: Simazine 8.2ug/L

25/17/12: Simazine 1.5ug/L

10/3/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

Murray Bridge – River Murray – Pesticide detections.

1999 May 19 Hexazinone 0.9ug/L

2002 January 16 Simazine 1.5ug/L

2010 November 17 Simazine 1.1ug/L

River Murray Murray Bridge Sample Pump

8/2/12: Simazine 1.5ug/L

2/5/12: Simazine 8.2ug/L

25/7/12: Simazine 1.5ug/L

10/3/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

1998 January – 2012 December: Millbrook Reservoir. Pesticide detected: Atrazine, Triclopyr, MCPA.

Millbrook Reservoir - Pesticide detections.

1998 Jan 5 Atrazine 2.5ug/L

Millbrook Reservoir - Pesticide detections.

1998 Jan 5 Atrazine 2.5ug/L

Millbrook Reservoir Loc 1

23/8/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

21/8/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

18/9/12: MCPA 0.12ug/L

16/10/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

13/11/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

11/12/12: MCPA 0.08ug/L

Millbrook Reservoir – Pesticide detections.

1998 Jan 5 Atrazine 2.5ug/L

Millbrook Reservoir Loc 1

23/8/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

21/8/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

18/9/12: MCPA 0.12ug/L

16/10/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

13/11/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

11/12/12: MCPA 0.08ug/L

1999 – 2023: Little Para River Snake Gully Bridge (SA). Pesticides detected: Hexazinone, Simazine, Chlorthal-Dimethyl, MCPA, Triclopyr, Picloram, Metsulfuron Methyl.

Little Para River Snake Gully Bridge - Pesticide Detections.

1999 May 25 Hexazinone 5.9ug/L

1999 August 9 Simazine 1ug/L

1999 September 8 Simazine 1.1 (inlet wtp)

2001 July 6 Simazine 1ug/L

2009 October 13 Simazine 1.8ug/L

2010 May 30 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.37ug/L

2010 May 31 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.43ug/L

2010 June 30 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.19ug/L

22/8/11: MCPA 0.99ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L,

9/1/12: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

5/3/12: Picloram 0.2ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

2/4/12: Picloram 1.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.5ug/L,

30/4/12: Picloram 0.9ug/L, Triclopyr 0.9ug/L,

27/7/12: Simazine 0.8ug/L,

4/5/13: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

27/5/13: Picloram 0.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

24/6/13: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

8/4/15: Triclopyr 4.1ug/L,

17/4/15: MCPA 0.57ug/L, Triclopyr 2.1ug/L

1/6/15: Picloram 0.3ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

29/6/15: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

27/7/15: 2,4-D 1.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.9ug/L

24/8/16: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

26/5/16: Trifluralin 0.39ug/L

25/7/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L

19/9/16: 2,4-D 0.11ug/L

17/10/16: 2,4-D 0.05ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.19ug/L

12/12/16: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

9/1/17: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

20/1/17: Trifluralin 0.06ug/L

6/2/17: Triclopyr 0.4ug/L

16/8/17: Simazine 0.9ug/L

27/8/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

24/9/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.36ug/L (sample pump)

6/4/20: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

19/4/21: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.1ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/5/22: MCPA 0.09ug/L

6/6/22: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

15/8/22: Little Para River Snake Gully Sample Pump 2,4-D 0.28ug/L

6/3/23: Little Para River Snake Gully Sample Pump Triclopyr 0.5ug/L

Little Para River Snake Gully Bridge – Pesticide Detections.

1999 May 25 Hexazinone 5.9ug/L

1999 August 9 Simazine 1ug/L

1999 September 8 Simazine 1.1 (inlet wtp)

2001 July 6 Simazine 1ug/L

2009 October 13 Simazine 1.8ug/L

2010 May 30 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.37ug/L

2010 May 31 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.43ug/L

2010 June 30 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.19ug/L

22/8/11: MCPA 0.99ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L,

9/1/12: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

5/3/12: Picloram 0.2ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

2/4/12: Picloram 1.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.5ug/L,

30/4/12: Picloram 0.9ug/L, Triclopyr 0.9ug/L,

27/7/12: Simazine 0.8ug/L,

4/5/13: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

27/5/13: Picloram 0.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

24/6/13: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

8/4/15: Triclopyr 4.1ug/L,

17/4/15: MCPA 0.57ug/L, Triclopyr 2.1ug/L

1/6/15: Picloram 0.3ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L,

29/6/15: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

27/7/15: 2,4-D 1.4ug/L, Triclopyr 0.9ug/L

24/8/16: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L,

26/5/16: Trifluralin 0.39ug/L

25/7/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L

19/9/16: 2,4-D 0.11ug/L

17/10/16: 2,4-D 0.05ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.19ug/L

12/12/16: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

9/1/17: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

20/1/17: Trifluralin 0.06ug/L

6/2/17: Triclopyr 0.4ug/L

16/8/17: Simazine 0.9ug/L

27/8/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

24/9/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.36ug/L (sample pump)

6/4/20: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

19/4/21: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.1ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/5/22: MCPA 0.09ug/L

6/6/22: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

15/8/22: Little Para River Snake Gully Sample Pump 2,4-D 0.28ug/L

6/3/23: Little Para River Snake Gully Sample Pump Triclopyr 0.5ug/L

1998 – 2023: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir (SA). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Dieldrin, Triclopyr, MCPA, 2,4-D.

Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Pesticide detections

1998 October 26 Simazine 0.96ug/L

1998 November 3 Simazine 0.8ug/L

1998 November 10 Simazine 0.6ug/L

1998 December 1 Simazine 0.53ug/L

2002 April 17 Dieldrin 0.02ug/L

Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1

6/7/11: MCPA 0.05ug/L

31/8/11: MCPA 0.06ug/L

26/10/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

12/4/12: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

29/8/12: MCPA 0.11ug/L

19/12/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L

28/8/13: MCPA 0.17ug/L

23/10/13: MCPA 0.12ug/L

18/12/13: MCPA 0.09ug/L

12/2/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

2/4/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

28/5/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

3/9/14: MCPA 0.12ug/L

29/10/14: MCPA 0.1ug/L

20/1/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

20/1/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (10m)

3/2/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L (10m)

3/2/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

17/2/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (10m),

3/3/15: MCPA  0.05ug/L (10m), 3/3/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (30m), 3/3/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L (20m),

17/3/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (20m)

31/8/16: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

31/8/16: MCPA 0.24ug/L

1/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

21/12/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

30/8/17: MCPA 0.18ug/L

26/10/17: MCPA 0.16ug/L

18/12/17: MCPA 0.12ug/L

1/9/21: MCPA 0.1ug/L

27/10/21: MCPA 0.09ug/L

22/12/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

31/8/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.12ug/L

31/8/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

26/10/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.17ug/L

26/10/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

29/12/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.12ug/L

13/4/23: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.1ug/L

7/6/23: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.1ug/L

Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Pesticide detections

1998 October 26 Simazine 0.96ug/L

1998 November 3 Simazine 0.8ug/L

1998 November 10 Simazine 0.6ug/L

1998 December 1 Simazine 0.53ug/L

2002 April 17 Dieldrin 0.02ug/L

Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1

6/7/11: MCPA 0.05ug/L

31/8/11: MCPA 0.06ug/L

26/10/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

12/4/12: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

29/8/12: MCPA 0.11ug/L

19/12/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L

28/8/13: MCPA 0.17ug/L

23/10/13: MCPA 0.12ug/L

18/12/13: MCPA 0.09ug/L

12/2/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

2/4/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

28/5/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

3/9/14: MCPA 0.12ug/L

29/10/14: MCPA 0.1ug/L

20/1/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

20/1/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (10m)

3/2/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L (10m)

3/2/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

17/2/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (10m),

3/3/15: MCPA  0.05ug/L (10m), 3/3/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (30m), 3/3/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L (20m),

17/3/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (20m)

31/8/16: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

31/8/16: MCPA 0.24ug/L

1/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

21/12/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

30/8/17: MCPA 0.18ug/L

26/10/17: MCPA 0.16ug/L

18/12/17: MCPA 0.12ug/L

1/9/21: MCPA 0.1ug/L

27/10/21: MCPA 0.09ug/L

22/12/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

31/8/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.12ug/L

31/8/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

26/10/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.17ug/L

26/10/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

29/12/22: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.12ug/L

13/4/23: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.1ug/L

7/6/23: Kangaroo Creek Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.1ug/L

1986 March – 1998 September: Hougraves Weir (SA). Pesticides detected: Chlorthal-Dimethyl, Simazine, DDE

Houlgraves Weir Onkaparinga River - Pesticide detections.

1998 September 24 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.07ug/L

1998 September 24 Simazine 0.84ug/L

 

Pesticide Contamination of South Australian Waters

Appendix 4

Pesticides in Sediment - Concentration ug/kg - dry weight

Onkarparinga River - Houlgraves Weir

14/3/86: DDE 39, Sum DDT 39

Houlgraves Weir Onkaparinga River – Pesticide detections.

1998 September 24 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.07ug/L

1998 September 24 Simazine 0.84ug/L

Pesticide Contamination of South Australian Waters

Appendix 4

Pesticides in Sediment – Concentration ug/kg – dry weight

Onkarparinga River – Houlgraves Weir

14/3/86: DDE 39, Sum DDT 39

1998 May – 2022: Hope Valley Water Treatment Plant (SA). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Atrazine, Chlordane, Dieldrin, Aldrin, Triclopyr, MCPA.

Hope Valley Water Treatment Plant

1998 May 14 Simazine 1.89ug/L (loc 9)

1998 September 15 Simazine 0.76ug/L (inlet)

1998 September 17 Simazine 0.65ug/L (loc 9)

1998 October 13 Simazine 0.6ug/L (inlet)

1998 October 19 Simazine 0.7ug/L (inlet)

1998 October 26 Simazine 0.62ug/L (inlet)

1998 November 2 Simazine 0.54ug/L (inlet)

1998 November 9 Simazine 0.56ug/L wtp

1998 November 18 Simazine 1.24ug/L

1998 November 30 Simazine 0.99ug/L

1998 December 7 Simazine 0.58ug/L

1998 December 14 Simazine 0.93ug/L

1998 December 22 Simazine 0.62ug/L

1998 December 30 Simazine 0.68ug/L

1999: January 4 Simazine 0.64ug/L

1999: July Atrazine 0.5ug/L (after storage)

2002 March 4 Chlordane-g 0.04ug/L

2002 March 4 Dieldrin 0.03ug/L

2003 January 6: Aldrin 0.01ug/L

2011 June 27 Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

2011 June 28 Triclopyr 0.2 (Loc 9)

Hope Valley WTP Inlet 2011-18

8/7/11: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L (Product Before Storage)

11/7/11: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

25/7/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

22/8/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

3/12/12: MCPA 0.08ug/L

3/12/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

31/12/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

30/1/13: MCPA 0.07ug/L

25/2/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

9/9/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

1/12/14: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

16/10/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/11/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

11/12/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

22/1/18: MCPA 0.09ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

17/1/22: MCPA 0.05ug/L

Hope Valley Water Treatment Plant

1998 May 14 Simazine 1.89ug/L (loc 9)

1998 September 15 Simazine 0.76ug/L (inlet)

1998 September 17 Simazine 0.65ug/L (loc 9)

1998 October 13 Simazine 0.6ug/L (inlet)

1998 October 19 Simazine 0.7ug/L (inlet)

1998 October 26 Simazine 0.62ug/L (inlet)

1998 November 2 Simazine 0.54ug/L (inlet)

1998 November 9 Simazine 0.56ug/L wtp

1998 November 18 Simazine 1.24ug/L

1998 November 30 Simazine 0.99ug/L

1998 December 7 Simazine 0.58ug/L

1998 December 14 Simazine 0.93ug/L

1998 December 22 Simazine 0.62ug/L

1998 December 30 Simazine 0.68ug/L

1999: January 4 Simazine 0.64ug/L

1999: July Atrazine 0.5ug/L (after storage)

2002 March 4 Chlordane-g 0.04ug/L

2002 March 4 Dieldrin 0.03ug/L

2003 January 6: Aldrin 0.01ug/L

2011 June 27 Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

2011 June 28 Triclopyr 0.2 (Loc 9)

Hope Valley WTP Inlet 2011-18

8/7/11: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L (Product Before Storage)

11/7/11: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

25/7/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

22/8/11: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

3/12/12: MCPA 0.08ug/L

3/12/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

31/12/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

30/1/13: MCPA 0.07ug/L

25/2/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

9/9/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

1/12/14: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

16/10/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/11/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

11/12/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

22/1/18: MCPA 0.09ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

17/1/22: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2001 – 2022: Clarendon Weir (SA). Pesticide detected: Simazine, MCPA, Triclopyr, 2,4-D

Clarendon Weir Pesticide detections.

23/5/00: Simazine 0.9ug/L

31/8/05: Simazine 0.6ug/L

Clarendon Weir Sample Pump

25/6/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

20/8/12: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

17/9/12: MCPA 0.11ug/L

15/10/12: MCPA 0.11ug/L

12/11/12: MCPA 0.09ug/L

30/1/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

4/2/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

29/7/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

23/9/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

21/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

18/11/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

16/12/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

13/1/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

4/8/14: MCPA 0.8ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

22/9/14: MCPA 0.09ug/L

20/10/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

17/11/14: MCPA 0.09ug/L

15/12/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

22/8/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

19/9/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L

14/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

6/3/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L

21/8/17: MCPA 0.15ug/L

28/9/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

16/10/17: MCPA 0.09ug/L

13/11/17: MCPA 0.11ug/L

11/12/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

8/1/18: MCPA 0.08ug/L

5/2/18: MCPA 0.07ug/L

5/3/18: MCPA 0.05ug/L

1/7/19: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L, MCPA 1.32ug/L

26/8/19: MCPA 0.16ug/L

21/10/19: MCPA 0.06ug/L

13/7/20: MCPA 0.2ug/L

17/8/20: MCPA 0.1ug/L

14/9/20: MCPA 0.08ug/L

19/10/20: MCPA 0.05ug/L

16/8/21: MCPA 0.12ug/L

13/9/21: MCPA 0.11ug/L

11/10/21: MCPA 0.11ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L,

6/6/22: Triclopyr 0.4ug/L

12/9/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.09ug/L

10/10/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.08ug/L

9/11/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.09ug/L

5/12/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.06ug/L

The Clarendon Weir is a small weir on the Onkaparinga River near Adelaide in South Australia. Built in 1894–96 as part of the early Onkaparinga Water Scheme, the weir was designed to pool water from the Mount Bold Reservoir on the Onkaparinga, which is often boosted with water from the River Murray From the weir water is directed onwards to Happy Valley Reservoir in the Field River catchment through pipeline. The water is used to supply the majority of the Adelaide region's water needs. Source: Wikipedia.

urce: Wikipedia.

Clarendon Weir Pesticide detections.

23/5/00: Simazine 0.9ug/L

31/8/05: Simazine 0.6ug/L

Clarendon Weir Sample Pump

25/6/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

20/8/12: Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

17/9/12: MCPA 0.11ug/L

15/10/12: MCPA 0.11ug/L

12/11/12: MCPA 0.09ug/L

30/1/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

4/2/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

29/7/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

23/9/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

21/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

18/11/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

16/12/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

13/1/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

4/8/14: MCPA 0.8ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

22/9/14: MCPA 0.09ug/L

20/10/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

17/11/14: MCPA 0.09ug/L

15/12/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L

22/8/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

19/9/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L

14/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

6/3/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L

21/8/17: MCPA 0.15ug/L

28/9/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

16/10/17: MCPA 0.09ug/L

13/11/17: MCPA 0.11ug/L

11/12/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

8/1/18: MCPA 0.08ug/L

5/2/18: MCPA 0.07ug/L

5/3/18: MCPA 0.05ug/L

1/7/19: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L, MCPA 1.32ug/L

26/8/19: MCPA 0.16ug/L

21/10/19: MCPA 0.06ug/L

13/7/20: MCPA 0.2ug/L

17/8/20: MCPA 0.1ug/L

14/9/20: MCPA 0.08ug/L

19/10/20: MCPA 0.05ug/L

16/8/21: MCPA 0.12ug/L

13/9/21: MCPA 0.11ug/L

11/10/21: MCPA 0.11ug/L

8/11/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L,

6/6/22: Triclopyr 0.4ug/L

12/9/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.09ug/L

10/10/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.08ug/L

9/11/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.09ug/L

5/12/22: Clarendon Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.06ug/L

The Clarendon Weir is a small weir on the Onkaparinga River near Adelaide in South Australia. Built in 1894–96 as part of the early Onkaparinga Water Scheme, the weir was designed to pool water from the Mount Bold Reservoir on the Onkaparinga, which is often boosted with water from the River Murray From the weir water is directed onwards to Happy Valley Reservoir in the Field River catchment through pipeline. The water is used to supply the majority of the Adelaide region’s water needs. Source: Wikipedia.

2010 – 2022: Bundaleer Reservoir (SA). Pesticide Detected: Simazine, Dicamba, MCPA, Atrazine, 2,4-D

Bundaleer Reservoir- Pesticide Detections

2010 September 13 Simazine 0.6ug/L

Bundaleer Reservoir Location 1

27/2/12: Dicamba 0.5ug/L

15/10/12: Dicamba 0.3ug/L

30/9/13: Dicamba 0.4ug/L

21/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

29/9/14: Atrazine 1ug/L, Dicamba 0.3ug/L, MCPA 0.06ug/L, Simazine 1ug/L

31/3/15: Atrazine 0.9ug/L

14/9/15: Atrazine 0.8ug/L

5/9/16: Simazine 1ug/L

12/9/16: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L, MCPA 0.07ug/L

16/11/16: 2,4-D 0.07ug/L, Simazine 0.5ug/L

Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump

20/3/17: Atrazine 0.6ug/L, Simazine 0.6ug/L

10/4/17: Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Simazine 0.5ug/L

1/5/17: Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Simazine 0.5ug/L

5/6/17: Simazine 0.5ug/L

3/10/17: MCPA 0.21ug/L

12/9/22: Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump 2,4-D 2.14ug/L

12/9/22: Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump Clopyralid 0.8ug/L

12/9/22: Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump MCPA 3.03ug/L

Bundaleer Reservoir is located 58 kilometres south east of Port Pirie and was built between 1898 and 1903 to supplement supplies from the Beetaloo Reservoir.

The Bundaleer scheme was designed to provide water for the towns of Snowtown, Redhill, Brinkworth, Narridy, Blythe and Port Wakefield and surrounding districts.

 

Bundaleer Reservoir- Pesticide Detections

2010 September 13 Simazine 0.6ug/L

Bundaleer Reservoir Location 1

27/2/12: Dicamba 0.5ug/L

15/10/12: Dicamba 0.3ug/L

30/9/13: Dicamba 0.4ug/L

21/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

29/9/14: Atrazine 1ug/L, Dicamba 0.3ug/L, MCPA 0.06ug/L, Simazine 1ug/L

31/3/15: Atrazine 0.9ug/L

14/9/15: Atrazine 0.8ug/L

5/9/16: Simazine 1ug/L

12/9/16: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L, MCPA 0.07ug/L

16/11/16: 2,4-D 0.07ug/L, Simazine 0.5ug/L

Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump

20/3/17: Atrazine 0.6ug/L, Simazine 0.6ug/L

10/4/17: Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Simazine 0.5ug/L

1/5/17: Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Simazine 0.5ug/L

5/6/17: Simazine 0.5ug/L

3/10/17: MCPA 0.21ug/L

12/9/22: Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump 2,4-D 2.14ug/L

12/9/22: Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump Clopyralid 0.8ug/L

12/9/22: Bundaleer Reservoir Sample Pump MCPA 3.03ug/L

Bundaleer Reservoir is located 58 kilometres south east of Port Pirie and was built between 1898 and 1903 to supplement supplies from the Beetaloo Reservoir.

The Bundaleer scheme was designed to provide water for the towns of Snowtown, Redhill, Brinkworth, Narridy, Blythe and Port Wakefield and surrounding districts.

 

1998 – 2022: Barossa Weir. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Hexazinone, Diazinon, Simazine, MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl.

Barossa Weir: Contamination with Atrazine and Hexazinone for almost two years 1998-2000.

Barossa Weir

Atrazine: 1.47ug/L (9/7/98), 1.81ug/L (23/7/98), 1.73ug/L (6 Aug 98), 1.48ug/L (25 Sep 98), 1.46ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.5ug/L (3 Dec 98), 1.69ug/L (17 Dec 98), 1.61ug/L (7 Jan 99), 1.58ug/L (14 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (21 Jan 99), 1.52ug/L (28 Jan 99), 1.55ug/L (4 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (18 Mar 99), 1.9ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (13 May 99), 1.6ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (29 May 99), 1.3ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (13 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (9 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (9 Aug 99), 1.6ug/L (4 Sep 99), 1ug/L (29 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (3 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (10 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (10 Nov 99), 0.8ug/L (22 Nov 99), 0.8ug/L (3 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Feb 00), 0.7ug/L (9 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (23 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (14 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (20 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (30 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (13 May 00), 0.6ug/L (18 May 00), 0.5ug/L (27 May 00), 0.6ug/L (6 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (22 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (28 Jun 00).

Hexazinone: 1.27ug/L (25 Sep 98), 1.49ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.63ug/L (3 Dec 98), 1.59ug/L (17 Dec 98), 1.51ug/L (7 Jan 99), 1.34ug/L (14 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (21 Jan 99), 1.34ug/L (28 Jan 99), 1.36ug/L (4 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (18 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.1ug/L (13 May 99), 1.4ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (29 May 99), 1.2ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (13 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (4 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (29 Sep 99), 1ug/L (3 Oct 99), 1ug/L (10 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Oct 99), 1ug/L (10 Nov 99), 1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (3 Dec 99), 0.7ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (9 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (23 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (20 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (30 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (13 May 00), 0.7ug/L (18 May 00), 0.6ug/L (23 May 00), 0.7ug/L (22 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Jun 00), 0.7ug/L (20 Jul 00), 0.7ug/L (26 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (23 Aug 00).

1998 August 24 Diazinon 0.6ug/L

2004 June 23 Simazine 0.6ug/L

Source: SA Water 2011

Barossa Weir 2011-18

25/7/11: MCPA 0.05ug/L

20/8/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

17/9/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

15/10/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/1/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

24/6/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

26/8/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

23/9/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

21/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

18/11/13: MCPA 0.09ug/L

16/12/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

10/2/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

28/7/14: MCPA 0.33ug/L

28/7/14: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.06ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.21ug/L

8/9/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L (WTP Inlet)

22/9/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

8/10/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L (WTP Inlet)

11/3/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

8/4/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

4/5/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

27/7/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

24/8/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

21/9/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

19/10/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

16/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

14/12/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

25/7/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

22/8/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

19/9/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

17/10/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

14/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

21/8/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

18/9/17: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

16/10/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L (sample pump)

13/11/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

11/12/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

8/11/18: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

15/7/20: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

19/8/20: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

16/9/20: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

21/10/20: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

16/8/21: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

13/9/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L (sample pump)

11/10/21: Dieldrin 0.1ug/L, MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

8/11/21: MCPA 0.05ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/2/22: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/3/22: MCPA 0.05ug/L

8/6/22: MCPA 0.11ug/L

12/9/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump Dicamba 0.8ug/L

12/9/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump MCPA 2.03ug/L

10/10/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.07ug/L

14/11/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump Metsulfuron Methyl 0.06ug/L

Source SA Water

 

Barossa Weir: Contamination with Atrazine and Hexazinone for almost two years 1998-2000.

Barossa Weir

Atrazine: 1.47ug/L (9/7/98), 1.81ug/L (23/7/98), 1.73ug/L (6 Aug 98), 1.48ug/L (25 Sep 98), 1.46ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.5ug/L (3 Dec 98), 1.69ug/L (17 Dec 98), 1.61ug/L (7 Jan 99), 1.58ug/L (14 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (21 Jan 99), 1.52ug/L (28 Jan 99), 1.55ug/L (4 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (18 Mar 99), 1.9ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (13 May 99), 1.6ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (29 May 99), 1.3ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (13 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (9 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (9 Aug 99), 1.6ug/L (4 Sep 99), 1ug/L (29 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (3 Oct 99), 0.9ug/L (10 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (10 Nov 99), 0.8ug/L (22 Nov 99), 0.8ug/L (3 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Feb 00), 0.7ug/L (9 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (23 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (14 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (20 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (30 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (13 May 00), 0.6ug/L (18 May 00), 0.5ug/L (27 May 00), 0.6ug/L (6 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (22 Jun 00), 0.5ug/L (28 Jun 00).

Hexazinone: 1.27ug/L (25 Sep 98), 1.49ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.63ug/L (3 Dec 98), 1.59ug/L (17 Dec 98), 1.51ug/L (7 Jan 99), 1.34ug/L (14 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (21 Jan 99), 1.34ug/L (28 Jan 99), 1.36ug/L (4 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (18 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Mar 99), 1.1ug/L (13 May 99), 1.4ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (29 May 99), 1.2ug/L (7 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (13 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (19 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (4 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (29 Sep 99), 1ug/L (3 Oct 99), 1ug/L (10 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Oct 99), 1ug/L (10 Nov 99), 1ug/L (22 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (3 Dec 99), 0.7ug/L (21 Feb 00), 0.8ug/L (24 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (9 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (23 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (14 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (20 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (30 Apr 00), 0.8ug/L (13 May 00), 0.7ug/L (18 May 00), 0.6ug/L (23 May 00), 0.7ug/L (22 Jun 00), 0.8ug/L (28 Jun 00), 0.7ug/L (20 Jul 00), 0.7ug/L (26 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (23 Aug 00).

1998 August 24 Diazinon 0.6ug/L

2004 June 23 Simazine 0.6ug/L

Source: SA Water 2011

Barossa Weir 2011-18

25/7/11: MCPA 0.05ug/L

20/8/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

17/9/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

15/10/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/1/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

24/6/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

26/8/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

23/9/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

21/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

18/11/13: MCPA 0.09ug/L

16/12/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

10/2/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

28/7/14: MCPA 0.33ug/L

28/7/14: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.06ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.21ug/L

8/9/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L (WTP Inlet)

22/9/14: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

8/10/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L (WTP Inlet)

11/3/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

8/4/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

4/5/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

27/7/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

24/8/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

21/9/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

19/10/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

16/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

14/12/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

25/7/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

22/8/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

19/9/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

17/10/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

14/11/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

21/8/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

18/9/17: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

16/10/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L (sample pump)

13/11/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

11/12/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

8/11/18: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

15/7/20: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

19/8/20: MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

16/9/20: MCPA 0.06ug/L (sample pump)

21/10/20: MCPA 0.05ug/L (sample pump)

16/8/21: MCPA 0.09ug/L (sample pump)

13/9/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L (sample pump)

11/10/21: Dieldrin 0.1ug/L, MCPA 0.07ug/L (sample pump)

8/11/21: MCPA 0.05ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/2/22: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/3/22: MCPA 0.05ug/L

8/6/22: MCPA 0.11ug/L

12/9/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump Dicamba 0.8ug/L

12/9/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump MCPA 2.03ug/L

10/10/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump MCPA 0.07ug/L

14/11/22: Barossa Weir Sample Pump Metsulfuron Methyl 0.06ug/L

Source SA Water

2008 September: Munglinup (WA). Pesticide detected: Atrazine

Munglinup Western Australia - Pesticides in Water Supply.

2008 September 2: Atrazine 0.4ug/L

Munglinup - like Borden, the water source for Munglinup is a local dam surrounded by agricultural farming properties predominantly used for cropping. Cropping activities often involve the broad acre spraying of pesticides with the associated risk of spray drift of the chemicals used. This was identified as the most likely source of contamination from the sample taken on 2 September 2008. A subsequent sample on 16 September 2008 did not detect atrazine and it has not been detected in any samples since.

Source: Water Corporation August 2008.

Munglinup Western Australia – Pesticides in Water Supply.

2008 September 2: Atrazine 0.4ug/L

Munglinup – like Borden, the water source for Munglinup is a local dam surrounded by agricultural farming properties predominantly used for cropping. Cropping activities often involve the broad acre spraying of pesticides with the associated risk of spray drift of the chemicals used. This was identified as the most likely source of contamination from the sample taken on 2 September 2008. A subsequent sample on 16 September 2008 did not detect atrazine and it has not been detected in any samples since.

Source: Water Corporation August 2008.

2008 June: Borden (WA). Pesticide detected. Atrazine.

Pesticides detected in Borden water supply.

2008 June 23: Atrazine 0.4ug/L

Borden - the water source for Borden is a local dam surrounded by agricultural farming properties predominantly used for cropping. Cropping activities often involve the broad acre spraying of pesticides with the associated risk of spray drift of the chemicals used. This was identified as the most likely source of contamination from the sample taken on 23 June 2008. A subsequent sample on 8 July 2008 did not detect atrazine and it has not been detected in any samples since.

Source: Water Corporation August 2011.

Pesticides detected in Borden water supply.

2008 June 23: Atrazine 0.4ug/L

Borden – the water source for Borden is a local dam surrounded by agricultural farming properties predominantly used for cropping. Cropping activities often involve the broad acre spraying of pesticides with the associated risk of spray drift of the chemicals used. This was identified as the most likely source of contamination from the sample taken on 23 June 2008. A subsequent sample on 8 July 2008 did not detect atrazine and it has not been detected in any samples since.

Source: Water Corporation August 2011.

2006 August: Denham (WA) – Pesticides detected: Bifenthrin.

Pesticides detected: Denham (WA)

2006 August 23: Bifenthrin 0.08ug/L

Denham - the water source for Denham is two brackish artesian bores which are desalinated prior to distribution to customers. The bores draw water from a deep, protected aquifer so the risk of source contamination from pesticides is low. Bifenthrin is an insecticide and the source of the contamination from the sample taken on 23 August 2006 was not able to be identified. A subsequent sample on 6 September 2006 did not detect bifenthrin and it has not been detected in any samples since.

Source: Water Corporation August 2011

Pesticides detected: Denham (WA)

2006 August 23: Bifenthrin 0.08ug/L

Denham – the water source for Denham is two brackish artesian bores which are desalinated prior to distribution to customers. The bores draw water from a deep, protected aquifer so the risk of source contamination from pesticides is low. Bifenthrin is an insecticide and the source of the contamination from the sample taken on 23 August 2006 was not able to be identified. A subsequent sample on 6 September 2006 did not detect bifenthrin and it has not been detected in any samples since.

Source: Water Corporation August 2011

2005 February – 2009 February: Fitzroy Crossing (WA): Pesticide detected: Dieldrin.

Fitzroy Crossing Pesticide Detections.

2005 February 16 - Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.01ug/L

2005 May 18 - Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.01ug/L

2005 August 17 - Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.007ug/L

2005 November 16 - Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.009ug/L

2006 February 15: Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.014ug/L

2006 April 19: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2006 August 9: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.008ug/L

2006 November 1: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.008ug/L

2007 February 14: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2007 May 1: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.007ug/L

2007 August 8: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2007 November 13: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2008 February 6: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.01ug/L

2008 November 11: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

2009 February 17: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

Fitzroy Crossing - the water source for Fitzroy Crossing is a series of bores adjacent to the Fitzroy River. Similar to Yerecoin, dieldrin is likely to be present due to construction works in the area and the historic use of dieldrin to control termite infestations. The aquifer at Fitzroy Crossing is fractured rock so it is very difficult to determine the extent of the contamination and subsequently remove any contaminated soil. The Corporation has revised its bore operating strategy to ensure minimal impact.

Source: Water Corporation - August 2011.

Fitzroy Crossing Pesticide Detections.

2005 February 16 – Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.01ug/L

2005 May 18 – Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.01ug/L

2005 August 17 – Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.007ug/L

2005 November 16 – Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.009ug/L

2006 February 15: Fitzroy Crossing: Dieldrin 0.014ug/L

2006 April 19: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2006 August 9: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.008ug/L

2006 November 1: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.008ug/L

2007 February 14: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2007 May 1: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.007ug/L

2007 August 8: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2007 November 13: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.006ug/L

2008 February 6: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin: 0.01ug/L

2008 November 11: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

2009 February 17: Fitzroy Crossing Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

Fitzroy Crossing – the water source for Fitzroy Crossing is a series of bores adjacent to the Fitzroy River. Similar to Yerecoin, dieldrin is likely to be present due to construction works in the area and the historic use of dieldrin to control termite infestations. The aquifer at Fitzroy Crossing is fractured rock so it is very difficult to determine the extent of the contamination and subsequently remove any contaminated soil. The Corporation has revised its bore operating strategy to ensure minimal impact.

Source: Water Corporation – August 2011.

2005 – 2010: Yerecoin (WA). Pesticide detected: Dieldrin.

Yerecoin Western Australia

2005 February 1: Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

2006 January 3: Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

2010 October 20" Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

Yerecoin - the water source for Yerecoin is a series of shallow spears and wells surrounded by cereal crop farms. An investigation after the initial detection in 2005 identified a power pole bringing power to the treatment facilities adjacent to the spears and wells as the probable source of contamination. Past practice for termite protection of power poles involved spraying the base of the pole with dieldrin. The pole was replaced and contaminated soil surrounding the pole was removed. The most recent detection may indicate that some residual contamination may still exist as dieldrin is a very persistent chemical in soils and water and may continue to be leached from soils for some time....

Source: Water Corporation August 2011.

Yerecoin Western Australia

2005 February 1: Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

2006 January 3: Dieldrin 0.004ug/L

2010 October 20″ Dieldrin 0.005ug/L

Yerecoin – the water source for Yerecoin is a series of shallow spears and wells surrounded by cereal crop farms. An investigation after the initial detection in 2005 identified a power pole bringing power to the treatment facilities adjacent to the spears and wells as the probable source of contamination. Past practice for termite protection of power poles involved spraying the base of the pole with dieldrin. The pole was replaced and contaminated soil surrounding the pole was removed. The most recent detection may indicate that some residual contamination may still exist as dieldrin is a very persistent chemical in soils and water and may continue to be leached from soils for some time….

Source: Water Corporation August 2011.

 

2007 – 2020: Baroota Reservoir (SA). Pesticide detected: Simazine, 2,4-D, MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl, Dicamba.

Baroota Reservoir 2007-17

19/6/07: Simazine 1.6ug/L (Source of information FoI SA Water)

8/9/15: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.05ug/L

16/11/16: 2,4-D 0.16ug/L

16/11/16: MCPA 0.48ug/L

6/9/17: Dicamba 0.3ug/L

6/9/17: MCPA 0.06ug/L

23/3/20: 2,4-D 0.19ug/L

Additional water for Port Pirie and other northern parts of the Beetaloo distribution system was provided when the five-year project to build the Baroota Reservoir was completed in 1921.

Situated on a creek of the same name to the north-east of Port Germein, the dam also receives water from the Morgan-Whyalla Pipeline.

It took until 1932 before there was enough water in Baroota for the spillway to overflow. In the 1970s a new spillway was constructed.

The Baroota Reservoir lies between the Mount Remarkable National Park and the Telowie Gorge Conservation Park.

Baroota Reservoir 2007- 2020

19/6/07: Simazine 1.6ug/L (Source of information FoI SA Water)

8/9/15: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.05ug/L

16/11/16: 2,4-D 0.16ug/L

16/11/16: MCPA 0.48ug/L

6/9/17: Dicamba 0.3ug/L

6/9/17: MCPA 0.06ug/L

23/3/20: 2,4-D 0.19ug/L

Additional water for Port Pirie and other northern parts of the Beetaloo distribution system was provided when the five-year project to build the Baroota Reservoir was completed in 1921.

Situated on a creek of the same name to the north-east of Port Germein, the dam also receives water from the Morgan-Whyalla Pipeline.

It took until 1932 before there was enough water in Baroota for the spillway to overflow. In the 1970s a new spillway was constructed.

The Baroota Reservoir lies between the Mount Remarkable National Park and the Telowie Gorge Conservation Park.

1998 September – 2017 November: Anstey Hill Water Treatment Plant (SA). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Chlordane, Dieldrin, MCPA

Anstey Hill Water Treatment Plant Inlet - Pesticide detections 1998 - 2002.

Anstey Hill was the second of Adelaide’s water filtration plants to be commissioned and was completed in 1980. It treats water from the Mannum-Adelaide pipeline and the Millbrook Reservoir and supplies suburbs to the north-east of Adelaide.

1998 September 14 Simazine 0.67ug/L

1998 September 17 Simazine 0.74ug/L

1998 September 21 Simazine 0.77ug/L

1998 September 28 Simazine 0.6ug/L

1998 October 14 Simazine 0.5ug/L

1998 October 19 Simazine 0.55ug/L

1998 October 26 Simazine 0.53ug/L

2002 March 4 Chlordane-a 0.01ug/L

2002 March 4 Chlordane-a 0.03ug/L

2002 March 4 Dieldrin-a 0.02ug/L

Source: SA Water FoI 2011

Anstey Hill Water Treatment Plant Inlet 2012-17

3/12/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L

28/1/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/5/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/11/17: MCPA 0.09ug/L

11/12/17 MCPA 0.07ug/L

 

Source: SA Water FoI 2015

Anstey Hill Water Treatment Plant Inlet – Pesticide detections 1998 – 2002.

Anstey Hill was the second of Adelaide’s water filtration plants to be commissioned and was completed in 1980. It treats water from the Mannum-Adelaide pipeline and the Millbrook Reservoir and supplies suburbs to the north-east of Adelaide.

1998 September 14 Simazine 0.67ug/L

1998 September 17 Simazine 0.74ug/L

1998 September 21 Simazine 0.77ug/L

1998 September 28 Simazine 0.6ug/L

1998 October 14 Simazine 0.5ug/L

1998 October 19 Simazine 0.55ug/L

1998 October 26 Simazine 0.53ug/L

2002 March 4 Chlordane-a 0.01ug/L

2002 March 4 Chlordane-a 0.03ug/L

2002 March 4 Dieldrin-a 0.02ug/L

Source: SA Water FoI 2011

Anstey Hill Water Treatment Plant Inlet 2012-17

3/12/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L

28/1/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/5/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/11/17: MCPA 0.09ug/L

11/12/17 MCPA 0.07ug/L

Source: SA Water FoI’s 2015/18

2003 – 2013: South Esk River (West Tamar). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Glyphosate, 2,4-D, Metsulfuron Methyl, Atrazine, MCPA, Sulfometuron Methyl, Prometryn.

South Esk River/West Tamar System

21 May 2003 West Tamar Raw Simazine 0.29ug/L, Treated Simazine 0.1ug/L (Source Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

27 July 2004 West Tamar Raw Simazine 0.7ug/L (Source Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

11 August 2009 West Tamar System Simazine 0.05ug/L (Source Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

10 November 2009 West Tamar System Glyphosate 10ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System 2,4-D 0.38ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System Metsulfuron Methyl 0.14ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System Atrazine 0.05ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System MCPA 0.36ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System Sulfometuron Methyl 0.25ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System 2,4-D 1.03ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System Metsulfuron Methyl 0.45ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System Atrazine 0.05ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System MCPA 0.83ug/L

Source: Ben Lomond Water. Launceston Drinking Water.

15 August 2013 South Esk 2,4-D 0.17ug/L

15 August 2013 South Esk Simazine 0.12ug/L

15 August 2013 West Tamar Tap Simazine 0.09ug/L

Source Right to Information Act

South Esk River/West Tamar System

21 May 2003 West Tamar Raw Simazine 0.29ug/L, Treated Simazine 0.1ug/L (Source Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

27 July 2004 West Tamar Raw Simazine 0.7ug/L (Source Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

11 August 2009 West Tamar System Simazine 0.05ug/L (Source Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

10 November 2009 West Tamar System Glyphosate 10ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System 2,4-D 0.38ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System Metsulfuron Methyl 0.14ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System Atrazine 0.05ug/L

2 December 2010 West Tamar System MCPA 0.36ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System Sulfometuron Methyl 0.25ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System 2,4-D 1.03ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System Metsulfuron Methyl 0.45ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System Atrazine 0.05ug/L

2 December 2010 South Esk System MCPA 0.83ug/L

Source: Ben Lomond Water. Launceston Drinking Water.

15 August 2013 South Esk 2,4-D 0.17ug/L

15 August 2013 South Esk Simazine 0.12ug/L

15 August 2013 West Tamar Tap Simazine 0.09ug/L

Source Right to Information Act

2009 September: White Kangaroo Rivulet (Tas). Pesticide detected: Hexazinone.

WHITE KANGAROO RIVULET (#3209)

 16/9/09: Hexazinone 0.08ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

WHITE KANGAROO RIVULET (#3209)

 16/9/09: Hexazinone 0.08ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2012 July – 2014 July: Welcome River (Tas). Pesticides detected: 2,4-D, Dicamba, MCPA

WELCOME RIVER AT SANDTRACK BRIDGE (# 14230)

 3/7/12: 2,4-D 0.1ug/L, Dicamba 0.16ug/L, MCPA 0.91ug/L

 5/5/14: 2,4-D 0.3ug/L, MCPA 0.33ug/L

 7/7/14: 2,4-D 1.58ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

WELCOME RIVER AT SANDTRACK BRIDGE (# 14230)

 3/7/12: 2,4-D 0.1ug/L, Dicamba 0.16ug/L, MCPA 0.91ug/L

 5/5/14: 2,4-D 0.3ug/L, MCPA 0.33ug/L

 7/7/14: 2,4-D 1.58ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2011 September – 2014 July: Tuckers Creek (Tas). Pesticides detected: Metsulfuron Methyl, Prometryn, Simazine, Ethofumesate, Methabenzthiazuron, Boscalid, 2,4-D.

TUCKERS CREEK AT BARNBOUGLE ROAD (#3465)

 2/9/11: Metsulfuron Methyl Trace, Prometryn 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.7ug/L

Sample taken on 02/09/2011 contained approximately 1-2μg/L of Ethofumesate. This pesticide is not formally requested as part of general routine analysis.

 9/11/11: Prometryn 0.08ug/L, Simazine 0.17ug/L,

Sample taken on 09/11/2011 contained approximately 0.1μg/L of Ethofumesate and 0.2μg/L of Methabenzthiazuron. These pesticides are not formally requested as part of general analysis.

 19/1/12: Prometryn 0.19ug/L Sample taken on 19/01/2012 contained low levels of Ethofumesate and Methabenziazuron, both estimated between 0.05μg/L and 0.5μg/L. These pesticides are not formally requested as part of general analysis.

 16/3/12: Prometryn 0.16ug/L Sample taken on 16/03/2012 contained trace levels of Ethofumesate between the Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of 0.04μg/L and Minimum Reporting Limit (MRL) of 0.1μg/L. This pesticide is not formally requested as part of general routine analysis.

 8/5/12: Boscalid 0.23ug/L, Prometryn 0.07ug/L

 10/7/12: 2,4-D 2.72ug/L, Prometryn Trace

 10/9/12: Prometryn Trace

 12/11/12: Prometryn 0.09ug/L

 1/2/13: Prometryn 0.07ug/L

 6/3/13: Prometryn 0.07ug/L

 6/5/13: Prometryn 0.05ug/L

 3/7/13: Prometryn Trace

 29/1/14: Prometryn Trace

 13/3/14: Prometryn Trace

 9/5/14: Prometryn Trace 

 14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.19ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

TUCKERS CREEK AT BARNBOUGLE ROAD (#3465)

 2/9/11: Metsulfuron Methyl Trace, Prometryn 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.7ug/L

Sample taken on 02/09/2011 contained approximately 1-2μg/L of Ethofumesate. This pesticide is not formally requested as part of general routine analysis.

 9/11/11: Prometryn 0.08ug/L, Simazine 0.17ug/L,

Sample taken on 09/11/2011 contained approximately 0.1μg/L of Ethofumesate and 0.2μg/L of Methabenzthiazuron. These pesticides are not formally requested as part of general analysis.

 19/1/12: Prometryn 0.19ug/L Sample taken on 19/01/2012 contained low levels of Ethofumesate and Methabenziazuron, both estimated between 0.05μg/L and 0.5μg/L. These pesticides are not formally requested as part of general analysis.

 16/3/12: Prometryn 0.16ug/L Sample taken on 16/03/2012 contained trace levels of Ethofumesate between the Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of 0.04μg/L and Minimum Reporting Limit (MRL) of 0.1μg/L. This pesticide is not formally requested as part of general routine analysis.

 8/5/12: Boscalid 0.23ug/L, Prometryn 0.07ug/L

 10/7/12: 2,4-D 2.72ug/L, Prometryn Trace

 10/9/12: Prometryn Trace

 12/11/12: Prometryn 0.09ug/L

 1/2/13: Prometryn 0.07ug/L

 6/3/13: Prometryn 0.07ug/L

 6/5/13: Prometryn 0.05ug/L

 3/7/13: Prometryn Trace

 29/1/14: Prometryn Trace

 13/3/14: Prometryn Trace

 9/5/14: Prometryn Trace 

 14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.19ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2011 September – 2013 July: Sulphur Creek (Tas). Pesticides detected: MCPA, Prometryn, Metsulfuron Methyl, 2,4-D, Fenitrothion,

SULPHUR CREEK 1.5KM UPSTREAM MOUTH (#14206)

 5/9/11: MCPA 0.33ug/L

3/11/11: Prometryn 0.16ug/L

 31/1/12: Metsulfuron Methyl: Trace

 7/3/12: MCPA Trace, Prometryn Trace

 9/7/12: 2,4-D 0.17ug/L, Contains trace levels of Fenitrothion reported between the Minimum Detection Limit of 0.04μg/L and Minimum Reporting Limit of 0.10μg/L. This chemical is not requested as part of formal analysis for ASCHEM

 2/7/13: MCPA 0.23ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

SULPHUR CREEK 1.5KM UPSTREAM MOUTH (#14206)

 5/9/11: MCPA 0.33ug/L

3/11/11: Prometryn 0.16ug/L

 31/1/12: Metsulfuron Methyl: Trace

 7/3/12: MCPA Trace, Prometryn Trace

 9/7/12: 2,4-D 0.17ug/L, Contains trace levels of Fenitrothion reported between the Minimum Detection Limit of 0.04μg/L and Minimum Reporting Limit of 0.10μg/L. This chemical is not requested as part of formal analysis for ASCHEM

 2/7/13: MCPA 0.23ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2010 January – 2012 January: St. Pauls River (Tas). Pesticides detected: Metalaxyl, Metribuzin, Prometryn.

ST PAULS RIVER UPSTREAM OF SOUTH ESK RIVER (#18311)

 15/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.42ug/L, Sample 15/1/10 also contains metribuzin at 0.18 ug/L

 2/2/11: Metalaxyl Trace

 30/1/12: Prometryn 0.12ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

ST PAULS RIVER UPSTREAM OF SOUTH ESK RIVER (#18311)

 15/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.42ug/L, Sample 15/1/10 also contains metribuzin at 0.18 ug/L

 2/2/11: Metalaxyl Trace

 30/1/12: Prometryn 0.12ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2005 October: South Esk River (Perth Tas). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Terbacil.

SOUTH ESK RIVER AT PERTH (#181)

 26/10/05: Simazine 2.2ug/L, Terbacil 0.1ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

23/11/05: Simazine, 0.06ug/L, 0.07ug/L

29/11/05: Simazine 0.05ug/L, 6.30ug/L

2/12/05: Simazine 0.03ug/L, 0.04ug/L, 0.23ug/L

Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08 Exact location?

SOUTH ESK RIVER AT PERTH (#181)

 26/10/05: Simazine 2.2ug/L, Terbacil 0.1ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

23/11/05: Simazine, 0.06ug/L, 0.07ug/L

29/11/05: Simazine 0.05ug/L, 6.30ug/L

2/12/05: Simazine 0.03ug/L, 0.04ug/L, 0.23ug/L

Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08 Exact Location?

 

2005 July – 2014 July: Rubicon River (Tas). Australia’s highest reading for MCPA Jan 14 2014.

RUBICON RIVER AT TIDAL LIMIT (#17200)

 21/7/05: Atrazine 0.14ug/L

26/9/05: Atrazine (logging coupe) 0.08ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

28/9/05: Atrazine (logging coupe) 0.13ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

12/10/05: Atrazine 0.7ug/L, 6.50ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

24/7/06: Atrazine 0.14ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

 25/7/06: Simazine 0.18ug/L, 2,4-D 0.67ug/L

 15/7/08: 2,4-D 1.07ug/L, MCPA 0.1ug/L

25/8/06: Simazine 0.19ug/L, 0.22ug/L, 0.36ug/L, 1.13ug/L, 0.26ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

14/9/06: Simazine 0.09ug/L, 0.12ug/L, 0.29ug/L, 0.14ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

21/9/06: Simazine 0.06ug/L, 0.08ug/L, 0.05ug/L, 0.94ug/L, 0.66ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

28/9/06: Simazine 0.1ug/L, 0.22ug/L, 1.04ug/L, 0.26 ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

5/10/06: Simazine 0.19ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

19/10/06: Simazine 0.09, 0.14ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

 14/1/10: Atrazine Trace

 4/11/10: MCPA 0.31ug/L

 12/4/11: Hexazinone 0.09ug/L

 3/11/11: MCPA 0.98ug/L, Prometryn Trace

 7/11/12: MCPA Trace

 2/7/13: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

 14/1/14: MCPA 19.1ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.38ug/L, Contains Triclopyr @ 0.69ug/L

 6/5/14: 2,4-D 0.54ug/L

 8/7/14: 2,4-D 0.47ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

 
 

RUBICON RIVER AT TIDAL LIMIT (#17200)

 21/7/05: Atrazine 0.14ug/L

26/9/05: Atrazine (logging coupe) 0.08ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

28/9/05: Atrazine (logging coupe) 0.13ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

12/10/05: Atrazine 0.7ug/L, 6.50ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

24/7/06: Atrazine 0.14ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

 25/7/06: Simazine 0.18ug/L, 2,4-D 0.67ug/L

 15/7/08: 2,4-D 1.07ug/L, MCPA 0.1ug/L

25/8/06: Simazine 0.19ug/L, 0.22ug/L, 0.36ug/L, 1.13ug/L, 0.26ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

14/9/06: Simazine 0.09ug/L, 0.12ug/L, 0.29ug/L, 0.14ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

21/9/06: Simazine 0.06ug/L, 0.08ug/L, 0.05ug/L, 0.94ug/L, 0.66ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

28/9/06: Simazine 0.1ug/L, 0.22ug/L, 1.04ug/L, 0.26 ug/L. Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

5/10/06: Simazine 0.19ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

19/10/06: Simazine 0.09, 0.14ug/L Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. FoI Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

 14/1/10: Atrazine Trace

 4/11/10: MCPA 0.31ug/L

 12/4/11: Hexazinone 0.09ug/L

 3/11/11: MCPA 0.98ug/L, Prometryn Trace

 7/11/12: MCPA Trace

 2/7/13: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

 14/1/14: MCPA 19.1ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.38ug/L, Contains Triclopyr @ 0.69ug/L

 6/5/14: 2,4-D 0.54ug/L

 8/7/14: 2,4-D 0.47ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

 

2011 September – 2014 July Rubicon River Avenue Road (Tas). Pesticides Detected: MCPA, 2,4-D, Triclopyr.

RUBICON RIVER AT AVENUE ROAD (#29069)

 9/9/11: MCPA Trace

 3/11/11: MCPA 0.22ug/L

 9/7/12: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

 4/9/12: MCPA Trace

 31/1/13: MCPA 0.26ug/L

 1/5/13:   Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L) , This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 2/7/13: 2,4-D 0.17ug/L

 5/9/13: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

 6/5/14: 2,4-D 0.33ug/L

 8/7/14: 2,4-D 0.23ug/L Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

RUBICON RIVER AT AVENUE ROAD (#29069)

 9/9/11: MCPA Trace

 3/11/11: MCPA 0.22ug/L

 9/7/12: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

 4/9/12: MCPA Trace

 31/1/13: MCPA 0.26ug/L

 1/5/13:   Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L) , This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 2/7/13: 2,4-D 0.17ug/L

 5/9/13: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

 6/5/14: 2,4-D 0.33ug/L

 8/7/14: 2,4-D 0.23ug/L Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2012 July – 2014 July: Quamby Brook (Tas). Pesticides detected: MCPA, Triclopyr, 2,4-D.

QUAMBY BROOK AT “ROXFORD” (#3380)

 2/7/12: MCPA Trace,

 29/4/13: Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L) . This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 5/11/13: MCPA Trace

 9/7/14: 2.4-D 0.22ug/L Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

QUAMBY BROOK AT “ROXFORD” (#3380)

 2/7/12: MCPA Trace,

 29/4/13: Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L) . This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 5/11/13: MCPA Trace

 9/7/14: 2.4-D 0.22ug/L Contains Triclopyr at trace levels (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2005 April: Prosser River Tas. Pesticide Detected: Simazine.

PROSSER RIVER UPSTREAM OF LOWER DAM (#2202)

13/4/05: Simazine 0.09ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

PROSSER RIVER UPSTREAM OF LOWER DAM (#2202)

13/4/05: Simazine 0.09ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2011 September – 2014 July: Panatana Rivulet (Tas). Pesticides detected: Numerous

PANATANA RIVULET AT PARKERS FORD ROAD (# 17207)

9/9/11: Metsulfuron Methyl Trace

3/11/11: Cyanazine 0.21ug/L, MCPA Trace, Prometryn 0.23ug/L

31/1/12: Prometryn 0.05ug/L Contains Metalaxyl-M at 0.13μg/L. This Fungicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring

7/3/12: Cyanazine Trace, MCPA 0.34ug/L, Prometryn 0.07ug/L Contains Metalaxyl-M at TD (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L) , Pirimicarb at TD (>0.04μg/L<0.1μg/L) and low levels of Clomazome and Dimethenamid. These pesticides are not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 9/7/12: Contains Pirimicarb, Clomazome, Dimethenamid and Procymidone at trace levels recorded between the Minimum Detection Limit of 0.04μg/L and Minimum Reporting Limit of 0.1μg/L.. These pesticides are not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 7/11/12: Cyanazine Trace, MCPA 0.2ug/L Contains Ethofumesate at TD (>0.04μg/L<0.1μg/L). This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 31/1/13: Prometryn Trace

 1/5/13: Prometryn Trace, Simazine 0.61ug/L Contains Metalaxyl-M at TD (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

 2/7/13: MCPA Trace

 12/9/13: MCPA Trace

 6/11/13: Cyanazine Trace

 14/1/14: Cyanazine 0.9ug/L, Metribuzin 0.1ug/L, Prometryn 0.06ug/L Contains Ethofumesate at TD (>0.04μg/L<0.1μg/L and Contains Metalaxyl-M at TD (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

 4/3/14: Cyanazine 0.37ug/L,

 6/5/14: Cyanazine Trace, MCPA Trace, Metribuzin Trace

 6/7/14: Atrazine Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

PANATANA RIVULET AT PARKERS FORD ROAD (# 17207)

9/9/11: Metsulfuron Methyl Trace

3/11/11: Cyanazine 0.21ug/L, MCPA Trace, Prometryn 0.23ug/L

31/1/12: Prometryn 0.05ug/L Contains Metalaxyl-M at 0.13μg/L. This Fungicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring

7/3/12: Cyanazine Trace, MCPA 0.34ug/L, Prometryn 0.07ug/L Contains Metalaxyl-M at TD (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L) , Pirimicarb at TD (>0.04μg/L<0.1μg/L) and low levels of Clomazome and Dimethenamid. These pesticides are not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 9/7/12: Contains Pirimicarb, Clomazome, Dimethenamid and Procymidone at trace levels recorded between the Minimum Detection Limit of 0.04μg/L and Minimum Reporting Limit of 0.1μg/L.. These pesticides are not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 7/11/12: Cyanazine Trace, MCPA 0.2ug/L Contains Ethofumesate at TD (>0.04μg/L<0.1μg/L). This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

 31/1/13: Prometryn Trace

 1/5/13: Prometryn Trace, Simazine 0.61ug/L Contains Metalaxyl-M at TD (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

 2/7/13: MCPA Trace

 12/9/13: MCPA Trace

 6/11/13: Cyanazine Trace

 14/1/14: Cyanazine 0.9ug/L, Metribuzin 0.1ug/L, Prometryn 0.06ug/L Contains Ethofumesate at TD (>0.04μg/L<0.1μg/L and Contains Metalaxyl-M at TD (>0.08μg/L<0.2μg/L)

 4/3/14: Cyanazine 0.37ug/L,

 6/5/14: Cyanazine Trace, MCPA Trace, Metribuzin Trace

 6/7/14: Atrazine Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2006 April – 2014 March: Montagu River (Tas) at Stuarts Road. Pesticides detected: Simazine, MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl.

MONTAGU RIVER AT STUARTS ROAD (#14200)

26/4/06: Simazine 0.07ug/L

22/1/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

23/7/08: MCPA 0.45ug/L

24/1/09: MCPA 0.24ug/L

19/7/10: MCPA 0.69ug/L

4/11/10: MCPA 0.22ug/L

1/5/12: Simazine 0.35ug/L

3/7/12: MCPA 0.32ug/L

7/11/12: Simazine 1.23ug/L

2/7/13: MCPA Trace

4/3/14: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.11ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MONTAGU RIVER AT STUARTS ROAD (#14200)

26/4/06: Simazine 0.07ug/L

22/1/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

23/7/08: MCPA 0.45ug/L

24/1/09: MCPA 0.24ug/L

19/7/10: MCPA 0.69ug/L

4/11/10: MCPA 0.22ug/L

1/5/12: Simazine 0.35ug/L

3/7/12: MCPA 0.32ug/L

7/11/12: Simazine 1.23ug/L

2/7/13: MCPA Trace

4/3/14: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.11ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2012 May – 2014 March: Montagu River (Tas). Pesticides detected: MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl.

MONTAGU RIVER AT RENISON ROAD (#14252)

1/5/12: MCPA 0.29ug/L

7/11/12: MCPA Trace

1/5/13: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.21ug/L

2/7/13: MCPA 0.82ug/L

4/3/14: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.14ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MONTAGU RIVER AT RENISON ROAD (#14252)

1/5/12: MCPA 0.29ug/L

7/11/12: MCPA Trace

1/5/13: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.21ug/L

2/7/13: MCPA 0.82ug/L

4/3/14: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.14ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2008 July – 2011 April: Meander River (Tas) at Strathbridge. Pesticides detected: Simazine, MCPA.

MEANDER RIVER AT STRATHBRIDGE (#852)

16/7/08: Simazine 0.26ug/L, MCPA 0.1ug/L

12/4/11: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MEANDER RIVER AT STRATHBRIDGE (#852)

16/7/08: Simazine 0.26ug/L, MCPA 0.1ug/L

12/4/11: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2007 October: Macquarie River Tas (near Campbell Town). Pesticide detected: Simazine.

MACQUARIE RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF ELIZABETH RIVER JUNCTION (#18312)

18/10/07 Simazine 0.14ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MACQUARIE RIVER DOWNSTREAM OF ELIZABETH RIVER JUNCTION (#18312)

18/10/07 Simazine 0.14ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2013 September: Macquarie River (Tas) at Woolmers Bridge. Pesticide detected: 2,4-D.

MACQUARIE RIVER AT WOOLMERS BRIDGE (#231)

5/9/13: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MACQUARIE RIVER AT WOOLMERS BRIDGE (#231)

5/9/13: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2007 July – 2007 October: Macquarie River (Tas) at Trefusis. Pesticide detected: Simazine.

MACQUARIE RIVER AT TREFUSIS (#18217)

11/7/07: Simazine 1.27ug/L

31/7/07: Simazine 1.08ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

10/8/07: Simazine 1.16ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

4/9/07: Simazine 0.89ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

20/9/07: Simazine 1.18ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

3/10/07: Simazine 0.29ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

18/10/07: Simazine 0.23ug/L

23/10/07: Simazine 0.22ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

MACQUARIE RIVER AT TREFUSIS (#18217)

11/7/07: Simazine 1.27ug/L

31/7/07: Simazine 1.08ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

10/8/07: Simazine 1.16ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

4/9/07: Simazine 0.89ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

20/9/07: Simazine 1.18ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

3/10/07: Simazine 0.29ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

18/10/07: Simazine 0.23ug/L

23/10/07: Simazine 0.22ug/L FoI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways 28 February 2008 Tim Morris MP

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2012 July: Macquarie River Stewarton Bridge. Pesticide detected: MCPA

MACQUARIE RIVER AT STEWARTON BRIDGE (#1270)

13/7/12: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MACQUARIE RIVER AT STEWARTON BRIDGE (#1270)

13/7/12: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2007 July – 2014 July: Macquarie River (Tas) Campbell Town. Pesticides detected: Simazine, MCPA, Triclopyr.

MACQUARIE RIVER 1.25KM UPSTREAM OF ELIZABETH RIVER (#18313)

11/7/07: Simazine 0.16ug/L

18/10/07: Simazine 0.67ug/L

16/11/07: Simazine 0.73ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

23/11/07: Simazine 0.59ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

6/12/07: Simazine 0.66ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

16/1/08: Simazine 0.36ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

17/7/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

11/7/14: Contains triclopyr at trace levels

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

MACQUARIE RIVER 1.25KM UPSTREAM OF ELIZABETH RIVER (#18313)

11/7/07: Simazine 0.16ug/L

18/10/07: Simazine 0.67ug/L

16/11/07: Simazine 0.73ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

23/11/07: Simazine 0.59ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

6/12/07: Simazine 0.66ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

16/1/08: Simazine 0.36ug/L (Tim Morris FoI)

17/7/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

11/7/14: Contains triclopyr at trace levels

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2013 July – 2014 May: Little Forester River (Tas): Pesticides detected: 2,4-D, MCPA.

LITTLE FORESTER RIVER AT BRIDPORT ROAD (#29035)

3/7/13: 2,4-D 0.08ug/L

13/3/14: MCPA Trace

9/5/14: 2,4-D 0.14ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

LITTLE FORESTER RIVER AT BRIDPORT ROAD (#29035)

3/7/13: 2,4-D 0.08ug/L

13/3/14: MCPA Trace

9/5/14: 2,4-D 0.14ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2008 November – 2014 March: Liffey River (Tas) Carrick. Pesticides Detected: MCPA, Metalaxyl, Triclopyr.

LIFFEY RIVER AT CARRICK (#164)

5/11/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

19/9/09: MCPA 0.33ug/L

15/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.5ug/L

3/3/14: Includes Triclopyr @ 0.34 ppb

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

LIFFEY RIVER AT CARRICK (#164)

5/11/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

19/9/09: MCPA 0.33ug/L

15/1/10: Metalaxyl 0.5ug/L

3/3/14: Includes Triclopyr @ 0.34 ppb

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2006 July – 2013 November: Jordan River (Tas) Mauriceton. Pesticides Detected: Atrazine, MCPA, Diazinon, 2,4-D, Metalaxyl, Triclopyr

JORDAN RIVER AT MAURICETON (#4201)

24/7/06: Atrazine 0.14ug/L

18/4/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L

24/10/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L

24/7/08: Test results of 24/7/2008 show additional pesticide ,Diazinon at 0.10 ppb

10/9/09: 2,4-D Trace

3/2/11: Metalaxyl Trace

16/1/12: MCPA 0.56ug/L

23/1/13: Trace detection of Metalaxyl-M >0.02μg/L<0.05μg/L

10/9/13: 2,4-D 0.21ug/L

 8/11/13: Triclopyr @ 0.36 μg/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

JORDAN RIVER AT MAURICETON (#4201)

24/7/06: Atrazine 0.14ug/L

18/4/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L

24/10/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L

24/7/08: Test results of 24/7/2008 show additional pesticide ,Diazinon at 0.10 ppb

10/9/09: 2,4-D Trace

3/2/11: Metalaxyl Trace

16/1/12: MCPA 0.56ug/L

23/1/13: Trace detection of Metalaxyl-M >0.02μg/L<0.05μg/L

10/9/13: 2,4-D 0.21ug/L

 8/11/13: Triclopyr @ 0.36 μg/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2007 January: Inglis River (Tas). Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone.

INGLIS RIVER AT EMERALDVALE ROAD (#3689)

18/1/07: Hexazinone 0.05ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

INGLIS RIVER AT EMERALDVALE ROAD (#3689)

18/1/07: Hexazinone 0.05ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2014 May – 2014 July: Great Forester River (Tas). Pesticides detected: 2,4-D.

GREAT FORESTER RIVER AT FORESTER ROAD BRIDGE (#19207)

9/5/14: 2,4-D 0.05ug/L

14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.12ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

GREAT FORESTER RIVER AT FORESTER ROAD BRIDGE (#19207)

9/5/14: 2,4-D 0.05ug/L

14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.12ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2007 July: Great Forester River (Tas). Pesticides Detected: MCPA, 2,4-D.

GREAT FORESTER RIVER 2 KM UPSTREAM OF FORESTER RD BRIDGE (# 19201)

12/7/07: MCPA 0.29ug/L

17/8/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 0.18ug/L. 2,4-D 0.36ug/L (Tim Morris MP FoI)

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

GREAT FORESTER RIVER 2 KM UPSTREAM OF FORESTER RD BRIDGE (# 19201)

12/7/07: MCPA 0.29ug/L

17/8/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 0.18ug/L. 2,4-D 0.36ug/L (Tim Morris MP FoI)

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2010 July – July 2014: Great Forester River – Prosperity Road (Tas). Pesticides detected: MCPA, 2,4-D.

GREAT FORESTER RIVER AT PROSPERITY ROAD (19224)

21/7/10 MCPA Trace

28/10/10 MCPA Trace

11/7/14: 2,4-D 0.15ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

GREAT FORESTER RIVER AT PROSPERITY ROAD (19224)

21/7/10 MCPA Trace

28/10/10 MCPA Trace

11/7/14: 2,4-D 0.15ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2012 March – 2013 March: Gawler River (Ulverstone Tas): Pesticides detected: Metsulfuron Methyl, MCPA.

GAWLER RIVER AT WEST GAWLER ROAD (#14208)

7/3/12: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.11ug/L

12/3/13: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

GAWLER RIVER AT WEST GAWLER ROAD (#14208)

7/3/12: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.11ug/L

12/3/13: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2006 July – 2014 July: Duck River (Tas). Pesticides detected: MCPA, Atrazine, Triclopyr, 2,4-D, Metsulfuron Methyl.

DUCK RIVER UPSTREAM OF SCOTCHTOWN RD BRIDGE (#14214)

24/6/06: MCPA 0.44ug/L, 0.46ug/L, 0.36ug/L, 0.31ug/L, 0.17ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

25/6/06: MCPA 0.14ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

18/7/06: MCPA 0.10ug/L

18/1/07: Atrazine 0.05ug/L

18/1/07: MCPA 0.27ug/L

29/5/07: MCPA 1.68ug/L, 1.56ug/L, 2.36ug/L, 1.93ug/L, 1.30ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

30/5/07: MCPA 0.79ug/L, 0.76ug/L, 0.28ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

31/5/07: MCPA 0.25ug/L, 0.17ug/L, 0.30ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

18/7/07: MCPA 0.25ug/L, 0.35ug/L, 0.95ug/L, 1.24ug/L, 0.36ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

1/8/07: MCPA 0.88ug/L, 0.93ug/L, 0.87ug/L, 1.49ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

2/8/07: MCPA 1.35ug/L, 0.86ug/L, 1.36ug/L, 1.31ug/L, 0.65ug/L, 0.24ug/L (Copper Rd), 0.67ug/L Huetts Rd, 1.76ug/L Geals Crk, 2.02ug/L Weir.  DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

3/8/07: MCPA 0.54ug/L, 0.36ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

4/8/07: MCPA 0.27ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

8/8/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 0.18ug/L, 0.11ug/L, (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

16/8/07: MCPA 0.10ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

5/9/07: MCPA 0.10ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.24ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

19/9/07: MCPA 0.76ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

28/9/07: MCPA 0.56ug/L, 0.61ug/L, 0.68ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

29/9/07: MCPA 0.64ug/L, 0.56ug/L, 0.72ug/L, 0.5ug/L, 0.31ug/L, 0.28ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

30/9/07: MCPA 0.23ug/L, 0.16ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

1/10/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

14/11/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 0.12ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

28/11/07: MCPA 0.14ug/L, 0.13ug/L, 0.19ug/L. Atrazine 0.64ug/L, 0.72ug/L, (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

4/12/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 1.25ug/L, 1.24ug/L, 0.38ug/L, 0.1ug/L, 0.44ug/L, 0.72ug/L. Atrazine 0.33ug/L, 0.38ug/L, 0.15ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways - Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

23/1/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

23/7/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

28/10/08: MCPA 0.24ug/L

19/7/10: MCPA 0.67ug/L

1/2/11: MCPA Trace

3/11/11: MCPA 0.38ug/L

7/11/12: MCPA 0.73ug/L

1/5/13: Contains Triclopyr at 0.24μg/L . This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

2/7/13: 2,4-D 1.88ug/L, MCPA Trace

5/5/14: 2,4-D 0.18ug/L, MCPA 0.25ug/L

7/7/14: MCPA 0.22ug/L

Source (for bolded data only): Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

DUCK RIVER UPSTREAM OF SCOTCHTOWN RD BRIDGE (#14214)

24/6/06: MCPA 0.44ug/L, 0.46ug/L, 0.36ug/L, 0.31ug/L, 0.17ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

25/6/06: MCPA 0.14ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

18/7/06: MCPA 0.10ug/L

18/1/07: Atrazine 0.05ug/L

18/1/07: MCPA 0.27ug/L

29/5/07: MCPA 1.68ug/L, 1.56ug/L, 2.36ug/L, 1.93ug/L, 1.30ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

30/5/07: MCPA 0.79ug/L, 0.76ug/L, 0.28ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

31/5/07: MCPA 0.25ug/L, 0.17ug/L, 0.30ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

18/7/07: MCPA 0.25ug/L, 0.35ug/L, 0.95ug/L, 1.24ug/L, 0.36ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

1/8/07: MCPA 0.88ug/L, 0.93ug/L, 0.87ug/L, 1.49ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

2/8/07: MCPA 1.35ug/L, 0.86ug/L, 1.36ug/L, 1.31ug/L, 0.65ug/L, 0.24ug/L (Copper Rd), 0.67ug/L Huetts Rd, 1.76ug/L Geals Crk, 2.02ug/L Weir.  DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

3/8/07: MCPA 0.54ug/L, 0.36ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

4/8/07: MCPA 0.27ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

8/8/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 0.18ug/L, 0.11ug/L, (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

16/8/07: MCPA 0.10ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

5/9/07: MCPA 0.10ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.24ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

19/9/07: MCPA 0.76ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

28/9/07: MCPA 0.56ug/L, 0.61ug/L, 0.68ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

29/9/07: MCPA 0.64ug/L, 0.56ug/L, 0.72ug/L, 0.5ug/L, 0.31ug/L, 0.28ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

30/9/07: MCPA 0.23ug/L, 0.16ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

1/10/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L DPIW Flood Monitoring/FOI. (Source: Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

14/11/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 0.12ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

28/11/07: MCPA 0.14ug/L, 0.13ug/L, 0.19ug/L. Atrazine 0.64ug/L, 0.72ug/L, (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

4/12/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 1.25ug/L, 1.24ug/L, 0.38ug/L, 0.1ug/L, 0.44ug/L, 0.72ug/L. Atrazine 0.33ug/L, 0.38ug/L, 0.15ug/L (Source: FOI Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways – Tim Morris MP 28/2/08. Exact location on Duck River?)

23/1/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

23/7/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L

28/10/08: MCPA 0.24ug/L

19/7/10: MCPA 0.67ug/L

1/2/11: MCPA Trace

3/11/11: MCPA 0.38ug/L

7/11/12: MCPA 0.73ug/L

1/5/13: Contains Triclopyr at 0.24μg/L . This herbicide is not requested as part of routine monitoring.

2/7/13: 2,4-D 1.88ug/L, MCPA Trace

5/5/14: 2,4-D 0.18ug/L, MCPA 0.25ug/L

7/7/14: MCPA 0.22ug/L

Source (for bolded data only): Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2007 October – 2010 November: Don River (Tas) Old Bass Hwy. Pesticide Detected: MCPA.

DON RIVER UPSTREAM OLD BASS HIGHWAY (#16200)

4/10/07: MCPA 0.18ug/L

20/4/09: MCPA Trace

14/1/10: MCPA Trace

4/11/10: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

DON RIVER UPSTREAM OLD BASS HIGHWAY (#16200)

4/10/07: MCPA 0.18ug/L

20/4/09: MCPA Trace

14/1/10: MCPA Trace

4/11/10: MCPA Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2013 January – 2014 July: Don River (Tas) at Sheffield Rd. Pesticides detected: MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl.

DON RIVER AT SHEFFIELD ROAD (#15995)

30/1/13: MCPA 0.37ug/L

8/7/14: Metsulfuron Methyl Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

DON RIVER AT SHEFFIELD ROAD (#15995)

30/1/13: MCPA 0.37ug/L

8/7/14: Metsulfuron Methyl Trace

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2013 July: Deep Creek (Tas). Pesticide detected: 2,4-D.

DEEP CREEK UPSTREAM LAKE MIKANY (# 3527)

2/7/13: 2,4-D 0.19ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

DEEP CREEK UPSTREAM LAKE MIKANY (# 3527)

2/7/13: 2,4-D 0.19ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2008 April – 2014 July: Coal River Richmond (Tas). Pesticides Detected: Metalaxyl, MCPA, Boscalid, Pirimicarb.

4/4/08: Metalaxyl 0.1ug/L ***4/4/2008 Includes detection of an additional chemical, Pirimicarb at 0.08 ppb. (Health value 5 ppb)

10/7/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L ***10/7/08 Includes detection of an additional chemical, Pirimicarb at 0.054 ppb. (Health value 5 ppb

2/6/09: ***2/6/09 Includes detection of additional chemicals Boscalid at 0.46ppb and Pirimicarb at trace detection level

17/7/14: contains Propachlor @ 0.11 ppb and Propyzamide @ 0.06 ppb

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

COAL RIVER AT RICHMOND (#3208)

4/4/08: Metalaxyl 0.1ug/L ***4/4/2008 Includes detection of an additional chemical, Pirimicarb at 0.08 ppb. (Health value 5 ppb)

10/7/08: MCPA 0.1ug/L ***10/7/08 Includes detection of an additional chemical, Pirimicarb at 0.054 ppb. (Health value 5 ppb

2/6/09: ***2/6/09 Includes detection of additional chemicals Boscalid at 0.46ppb and Pirimicarb at trace detection level

17/7/14: contains Propachlor @ 0.11 ppb and Propyzamide @ 0.06 ppb

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2009 September: Coal River at Baden (Tas). Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone.

COAL RIVER AT BADEN (#3203)

10/9/09: Hexazinone 0.05ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

COAL RIVER AT BADEN (#3203)

10/9/09: Hexazinone 0.05ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2012 May – 2016 October: Clyde River at Bothwell (Tas): Pesticides detected: 2,4-D, MCPA, Clomazone, Propyzamide, Clopyralid.

 

CLYDE RIVER AT BOTHWELL (#54)

9/5/12: 2,4-D 0.15ug/L

9/5/12: MCPA 0.4ug/L

6/11/12: MCPA Trace

10/7/13: 2,4-D Trace

11/7/14: 2,4-D 11.2ug/L, Contains clomazone @ 0.10ppb and propyzamide @ 0.10 ppb

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

1/2/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

1/2/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.05ug/L

16/3/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.02ug/L

1/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.14ug/L

7/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.03ug/L

11/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.1ug/L

27/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.15ug/L

9/5/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.16ug/L

23/5/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw 2,4-D 0.12ug/L

23/5/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 3.0ug/L

6/6/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw 2,4-D 0.13ug/L

6/6/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw Clopyralid 0.5ug/L

6/6/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.39ug/L

Source: Right to Know Request

 

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

*TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

CLYDE RIVER AT BOTHWELL (#54)

9/5/12: 2,4-D 0.15ug/L

9/5/12: MCPA 0.4ug/L

6/11/12: MCPA Trace

10/7/13: 2,4-D Trace

11/7/14: 2,4-D 11.2ug/L, Contains clomazone @ 0.10ppb and propyzamide @ 0.10 ppb

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

1/2/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

1/2/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.05ug/L

16/3/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.02ug/L

1/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.14ug/L

7/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.03ug/L

11/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.1ug/L

27/4/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.15ug/L

9/5/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.16ug/L

23/5/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw 2,4-D 0.12ug/L

23/5/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 3.0ug/L

6/6/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw 2,4-D 0.13ug/L

6/6/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw Clopyralid 0.5ug/L

6/6/16: Clyde River (650043) Bothwell Raw MCPA 0.39ug/L

Source: Right to Know Request

2009 September – 2013 November: Carlton River (Tas). Pesticides Detected: MCPA, Metalaxyl.

CARLTON RIVER AT TIDAL LIMIT (#2209)

8/9/09: MCPA Trace

3/2/11: MCPA 0.50ug/L `** Sample of 3/2/11 contained a trace detection of cyanazine

20/11/13: Metalaxyl @ trace levels, ie >0.08 but <0.2μ/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

CARLTON RIVER AT TIDAL LIMIT (#2209)

8/9/09: MCPA Trace

3/2/11: MCPA 0.50ug/L `** Sample of 3/2/11 contained a trace detection of cyanazine

20/11/13: Metalaxyl @ trace levels, ie >0.08 but <0.2μ/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2006 July – 2014 July: Brid River (Tas). Pesticides Detected: Simazine, MCPA, Cyanazine, Metalaxyl, 2,4-D

BRID RIVER 2.6 KM UPSTREAM OF TIDAL LIMIT (#19200)

12/7/06: Simazine 0.13ug/L

15/7/08: MCPA 0.10ug/L

25/8/08: Simazine 0.08ug/L *** Contains cyanazine at trace levels

13/1/10: Metalaxyl Trace

3/7/13: 2,4-D Trace

14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

BRID RIVER 2.6 KM UPSTREAM OF TIDAL LIMIT (#19200)

12/7/06: Simazine 0.13ug/L

15/7/08: MCPA 0.10ug/L

25/8/08: Simazine 0.08ug/L *** Contains cyanazine at trace levels

13/1/10: Metalaxyl Trace

3/7/13: 2,4-D Trace

14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

2013 July – 2014 July: Boobyalla River (Tas). Pesticide detected: 2,4-D.

BOOBYALLA RIVER AT WATERHOUSE ROAD (#29005)

3/7/13: 2,4-D Trace

14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program - Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

BOOBYALLA RIVER AT WATERHOUSE ROAD (#29005)

3/7/13: 2,4-D Trace

14/7/14: 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

Source: Pesticide Water Monitoring Program – Routine Monitoring Results (Tas Govt)

https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/Baseline%20Monitoring%20Program.pdf

 

1965 – 1973: Nufarm Operations in Fawkner

NUFARM OPERATIONS IN FAWKNER

During Nufarm's time of operation at Fawkner, the council received what was later described by the Chief Health Officer as a "constant stream of complaints" by residents of foul odours and incessant noise at night preventing sleep. The EPA also received many complaints.

1965: Mr John Minette, of McBryde St., too up a petition amongst his neighbours to protest about the dreadful stench they had to endure coming from Nufarm and the death of flowers and shrubs in the street. (Herald 8/12/67)

Dec. 1967: Twenty families left their homes at four in the morning when fumes became "too much" for them. During the same incident, the milkman's horse bolted from the smell. The cause, according to "The Herald", was an overheated "furnace containing a weed-killer mixture". (Herald 8/12/67)

Feb. 1969: Nufarm was convicted of an offence against Section 40 of the Health Act, the "nuisance section". (Letter 27/7/73)

May 71: Nufarm was convicted on 6 counts of discharging fumes, vapours, gases and waste liquid. During the same court case, the firm's Managing Director was found guilty of three charges of impeding, opposing and obstructing the Broadmeadows Health Officer in his duty, and the Technical Manager was convicted of a similar charge. (Summary of Prosecutions, Broadmeadows City Council)

Feb. 72: The Broadmeadows Council brought an appeal to the Supreme Court on charges dismissed at the previous court case and won. Nufarm was convicted of using McBryde St. "for the purpose of an offensive industry". The local residents, some of whom had resorted to protest meetings and midnight demonstrations outside the factory, saw an end to an eight year battle with the firm in sight. Nufarm's lawyer made a promise that the factory would move as soon as possible. Almost two years later, production continued virtually 24 hours a day. (Supreme Court records. "Battling Sylvia wins the day" Article not identified.)

July 73: Solicitors acting for the City of Broadmeadows, wrote to the EPA to determine if Nufarm was operating with a licence. If so, they assumed that given the evidence of residents on their current activities, they must be breaching the terms of that licence. (Letter, 27/7/73)

Aug 73: The EPA replied that the company was "exempt from licencing by virtue of the number of employees and the date when the factory was first established." (EPA complaint form no. 996)

Aug 73: The Town Clerk asked the EPA for help again. (Letter, 21/8/73)

Aug 73: The Hon. J.M. Tripovich, MLC, complained to the EPA that Nufarm was not complying with government orders. (Letter, 23/8/73)

Sep 73: The Secretary to the Premier's Dept. wrote to the EPA and the Director of Conservation requesting urgent responses to the complaints by a McBryde St. resident. She had pointed out that despite visits by the EPA, nothing had been done. Further, she claimed that the "man who comes seems to treat us as though we don't know what we're talking about." (Letters, 10/9/73, 6/9/73 and resident's letter of complaint)

Sep 73: J.M. Tripovich lodged a complaint with the EPA on behalf of the residents of Broadmeadows. The description of the complaint reads as "Offences to residents of Broadmeadows from factory manufacturing noxious products - particularly at night." (EPA Complaint form, complaint No. 1233)

Nov 73: The Town Clerk wrote to the EPA again, pointing out that complaints were continuing about the "obnoxious odours." (Letter 13/11/73)

Nov 73: The Town Clerk lodged a complaint with the EPA, on behalf of residents who were still complaining about Nufarm to the council. (EPA Complaint No 1867)

Nov 73: Mr Tripovich wrote to the EPA again. He also lodged another complaint on behalf of the residents. (Letter, 26/11/73, EPA Complaint No. 1935)

Nov 73: For years, residents had complained that they could not keep plants alive in their gardens. Those who had resorted to plastic flowers found that they quickly lost their colour. A complaint of further plant damage was verified by an EPA inspector. A Nufarm employee surmised that the likely cause was the production of 2,4,5-T (EPA Inspection Report, 29/11/73, Complaint No. 1839)

Apr 74: The same resident who had resorted to the Premier's Dept., lodged a complaint with the EPA. She had a letter from the secretary of the department, promising the plant's closure by the 31st of March. The EPA officer who visited Nufarm in response, concluded that the company "at the most could only stop at the Fawkner premises for a few months. Because of this action by the EPA is not necessary." Inspection Report, Complaint No.3357)

The locals' and Shire's allegations of pollution to the environment were finally vindicated by the 1990 sample studies of soils which established the Fawkner plant as possibly one of the worst dioxin contaminated sites in the world (with levels of 2,3,7,8-TCDD found at 250ppb). To establish the full health consequences to residents would require a comprehensive study of all those who had lived in the area since 1963. The prohibitive nature of such a study means the government will probably never be done. (Health Dept. spokesperson, quoted in The Sun, 13/6/90)

NUFARM OPERATIONS IN FAWKNER

During Nufarm’s time of operation at Fawkner, the council received what was later described by the Chief Health Officer as a “constant stream of complaints” by residents of foul odours and incessant noise at night preventing sleep. The EPA also received many complaints.

1965: Mr John Minette, of McBryde St., too up a petition amongst his neighbours to protest about the dreadful stench they had to endure coming from Nufarm and the death of flowers and shrubs in the street. (Herald 8/12/67)

Dec. 1967: Twenty families left their homes at four in the morning when fumes became “too much” for them. During the same incident, the milkman’s horse bolted from the smell. The cause, according to “The Herald”, was an overheated “furnace containing a weed-killer mixture”. (Herald 8/12/67)

Feb. 1969: Nufarm was convicted of an offence against Section 40 of the Health Act, the “nuisance section”. (Letter 27/7/73)

May 71: Nufarm was convicted on 6 counts of discharging fumes, vapours, gases and waste liquid. During the same court case, the firm’s Managing Director was found guilty of three charges of impeding, opposing and obstructing the Broadmeadows Health Officer in his duty, and the Technical Manager was convicted of a similar charge. (Summary of Prosecutions, Broadmeadows City Council)

Feb. 72: The Broadmeadows Council brought an appeal to the Supreme Court on charges dismissed at the previous court case and won. Nufarm was convicted of using McBryde St. “for the purpose of an offensive industry”. The local residents, some of whom had resorted to protest meetings and midnight demonstrations outside the factory, saw an end to an eight year battle with the firm in sight. Nufarm’s lawyer made a promise that the factory would move as soon as possible. Almost two years later, production continued virtually 24 hours a day. (Supreme Court records. “Battling Sylvia wins the day” Article not identified.)

July 73: Solicitors acting for the City of Broadmeadows, wrote to the EPA to determine if Nufarm was operating with a licence. If so, they assumed that given the evidence of residents on their current activities, they must be breaching the terms of that licence. (Letter, 27/7/73)

Aug 73: The EPA replied that the company was “exempt from licencing by virtue of the number of employees and the date when the factory was first established.” (EPA complaint form no. 996)

Aug 73: The Town Clerk asked the EPA for help again. (Letter, 21/8/73)

Aug 73: The Hon. J.M. Tripovich, MLC, complained to the EPA that Nufarm was not complying with government orders. (Letter, 23/8/73)

Sep 73: The Secretary to the Premier’s Dept. wrote to the EPA and the Director of Conservation requesting urgent responses to the complaints by a McBryde St. resident. She had pointed out that despite visits by the EPA, nothing had been done. Further, she claimed that the “man who comes seems to treat us as though we don’t know what we’re talking about.” (Letters, 10/9/73, 6/9/73 and resident’s letter of complaint)

Sep 73: J.M. Tripovich lodged a complaint with the EPA on behalf of the residents of Broadmeadows. The description of the complaint reads as “Offences to residents of Broadmeadows from factory manufacturing noxious products – particularly at night.” (EPA Complaint form, complaint No. 1233)

Nov 73: The Town Clerk wrote to the EPA again, pointing out that complaints were continuing about the “obnoxious odours.” (Letter 13/11/73)

Nov 73: The Town Clerk lodged a complaint with the EPA, on behalf of residents who were still complaining about Nufarm to the council. (EPA Complaint No 1867)

Nov 73: Mr Tripovich wrote to the EPA again. He also lodged another complaint on behalf of the residents. (Letter, 26/11/73, EPA Complaint No. 1935)

Nov 73: For years, residents had complained that they could not keep plants alive in their gardens. Those who had resorted to plastic flowers found that they quickly lost their colour. A complaint of further plant damage was verified by an EPA inspector. A Nufarm employee surmised that the likely cause was the production of 2,4,5-T (EPA Inspection Report, 29/11/73, Complaint No. 1839)

Apr 74: The same resident who had resorted to the Premier’s Dept., lodged a complaint with the EPA. She had a letter from the secretary of the department, promising the plant’s closure by the 31st of March. The EPA officer who visited Nufarm in response, concluded that the company “at the most could only stop at the Fawkner premises for a few months. Because of this action by the EPA is not necessary.” Inspection Report, Complaint No.3357)

The locals’ and Shire’s allegations of pollution to the environment were finally vindicated by the 1990 sample studies of soils which established the Fawkner plant as possibly one of the worst dioxin contaminated sites in the world (with levels of 2,3,7,8-TCDD found at 250ppb). To establish the full health consequences to residents would require a comprehensive study of all those who had lived in the area since 1963. The prohibitive nature of such a study means the government will probably never be done. (Health Dept. spokesperson, quoted in The Sun, 13/6/90)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Nufarm.htm#Fawkner

1991 June: Nufarm North Laverton: 2,4-D Production and Dioxins

Nufarm A Greenpeace Report June 1991 Executive Summary

This document documents the operations of Nufarm and the regulatory authorities. Nufarm is a pesticide company in North Laverton. In May 1990, Greenpeace revealed that Nufarm was discharging illegal levels of chlorinated phenols and high levels of dioxins and furans into the sewerage system.

What Was Found in Nufarm's Effluent?

The Greenpeace action was taken following testing of samples of Nufarm's effluent. The discharge sample was tested by National Analytical Laboratories and found to contain 1.4 parts per billion of the furan 2,3,7,8-TCDF. This level of 2,3,7,8-TCDF is equivalent to 143 parts per trillion of the dioxin, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, the substance used as the world standard for comparisons of dioxin/furan toxicity. As a point of comparison, 0.038 parts per trillion of this highly toxic compound in water is enough to start killing fish. (Mehrle PM. et al. 1988)

Nufarm's effluent also contained chlorophenols, a group of chemicals that are the precursors for the manufacture of 2,4-D. Several different types of these chemicals were found, including dichlorophenol and trichlorophenol. The Greenpeace samples contained up to 5,000 parts per million of these substances, 100 times Nufarm's allowed limit as set in their old Trade Waste Agreement (NAL Report, Greenpeace, April 1990).

Nufarm A Greenpeace Report June 1991 Executive Summary

This document documents the operations of Nufarm and the regulatory authorities. Nufarm is a pesticide company in North Laverton. In May 1990, Greenpeace revealed that Nufarm was discharging illegal levels of chlorinated phenols and high levels of dioxins and furans into the sewerage system.

What Was Found in Nufarm’s Effluent?

The Greenpeace action was taken following testing of samples of Nufarm’s effluent. The discharge sample was tested by National Analytical Laboratories and found to contain 1.4 parts per billion of the furan 2,3,7,8-TCDF. This level of 2,3,7,8-TCDF is equivalent to 143 parts per trillion of the dioxin, 2,3,7,8-TCDD, the substance used as the world standard for comparisons of dioxin/furan toxicity. As a point of comparison, 0.038 parts per trillion of this highly toxic compound in water is enough to start killing fish. (Mehrle PM. et al. 1988)

Nufarm’s effluent also contained chlorophenols, a group of chemicals that are the precursors for the manufacture of 2,4-D. Several different types of these chemicals were found, including dichlorophenol and trichlorophenol. The Greenpeace samples contained up to 5,000 parts per million of these substances, 100 times Nufarm’s allowed limit as set in their old Trade Waste Agreement (NAL Report, Greenpeace, April 1990).

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Nufarm.htm

1960 – 2015: Gunnamatta Outfall Melbourne Water

Pollution Make Up

What's in the lethal brew that is dumped into the ocean and bay?

Nutrients: (eg Phosphates and Nitrogen)

These pollutants, emanating from sewage trade waste (food processing), detergents and agriculture (fertilisers, herbicides) can lead to toxic algal blooms, pollution of the reef and sea floor habitat, the degradation of fisheries and degraded water quaility.

Heavy Metals: (eg Mercury, Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic)

These are elementary toxins that emanate predominantly from industrial activity (car manufacturing, electroplating, plant manufacturers etc) and also road run-offs. Heavy metals settle and accumulate in sediment on the sea floor and estuaries and are absorbed in the marine eco-system, marine plants and animals (particularly shellfish). Some heavy metals are lethal if ingested by humans eating contaminated seafood. They bio-accumulate* in the flesh and vital organs of animal species.

Organic Toxicants: (eg Dioxin, Petroleum, PCB's, Dieldrin)

These contaminants are products of the modern industrial society, many like Dioxins and Dieldrin and DDT are designed specifically to destroy life. They cause genetic damage in plant and animal life forms and remain for long periods in the environment and bio-accumulate* in living beings.

*Bio-accumulate - When toxicants travel up the food chain (ie big fish eat little fish) and their toxicity increases.

Bacterial Contaminants: (eg E.Coli and Streptococci)

These are micro-organisms that emanate from the gut of mammals and can be transferred into our waterways through sewers. Bacteria can cause serious eye, ear, throat and intestinal infections. Certain strains of streptococci and ecoli can cause lethal diseases such as Meningitis.

Toxic waves at Gunnamatta

*Melbourne Water dump 1 Billion Litres a day of semi-treated sewage and industrial waste into the ocean and bay.

*Companies pay Melbourne Water to discharge industrial waste into the sewage system.

*In the year 1996/7 Melbourne Water had an operating profit of $173 million for their sewage activities.

*Industrial (trade) waste makes-up 16% of the total sewage load but constitutes 50% of all toxicants and nutrients.

*Dangerous lethal poisons such as heavy metals (Lead, Cadmium, Mercury and Arsenic), Organic toxicants (Dioxin, PCB’s, Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Petroleum) and nutrients (Phosphates and Nitrogen) are contained in effluent discharged into the sea by Melbourne Water.

*Land-based disposal of sewage would be made more viable if dangerous poisons were extracted.

*Melbourne Water do not envisage the seperation of industrial waste from the domestic sewage stream.

The Victorian EPA

*The EPA are the body given the job of regulating and monitoring the discharge of pollutants into the environment.

*The Victorian EPA had an operation budget in (1996/7) of $27.5 million compared with their NSW counterparts of $74 million.

*In the year 1996/7 the NSW EPA laid 134 charges against polluters with fines totalling over $700,000. In the same year the Victorian EPA laid 21 charges with fines totalling $83,000.

*Since the Kennett Government came to power in 1992, the EPA have been forced into a co-operative relationship with polluters.

*The EPA do not have the resources to even check the data from companies licensed to pollute.

*From 1990/91 to 1996/7 pollution abatement notices to industry fell from 228 to 90. Prosecutions for polluters fell from 42 to 21 and prosecutions for waste fell from 61 to 11.

*In the same period prosecutions to the public for littering rose from 400 to 2683.

Pollution Make Up

What’s in the lethal brew that is dumped into the ocean and bay?

Nutrients: (eg Phosphates and Nitrogen)

These pollutants, emanating from sewage trade waste (food processing), detergents and agriculture (fertilisers, herbicides) can lead to toxic algal blooms, pollution of the reef and sea floor habitat, the degradation of fisheries and degraded water quaility.

Heavy Metals: (eg Mercury, Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic)

These are elementary toxins that emanate predominantly from industrial activity (car manufacturing, electroplating, plant manufacturers etc) and also road run-offs. Heavy metals settle and accumulate in sediment on the sea floor and estuaries and are absorbed in the marine eco-system, marine plants and animals (particularly shellfish). Some heavy metals are lethal if ingested by humans eating contaminated seafood. They bio-accumulate* in the flesh and vital organs of animal species.

Organic Toxicants: (eg Dioxin, Petroleum, PCB’s, Dieldrin)

These contaminants are products of the modern industrial society, many like Dioxins and Dieldrin and DDT are designed specifically to destroy life. They cause genetic damage in plant and animal life forms and remain for long periods in the environment and bio-accumulate* in living beings.

*Bio-accumulate – When toxicants travel up the food chain (ie big fish eat little fish) and their toxicity increases.

Bacterial Contaminants: (eg E.Coli and Streptococci)

These are micro-organisms that emanate from the gut of mammals and can be transferred into our waterways through sewers. Bacteria can cause serious eye, ear, throat and intestinal infections. Certain strains of streptococci and ecoli can cause lethal diseases such as Meningitis.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/melbwater.htm

1996: Geelong Arm Port Phillip Bay – CSIRO Port Phillip Bay Environment Study 1996 – Pesticide: Dieldrin

C.S.I.R.O. Port Phillip Bay Environment Study 1996.

In 1997, with much fanfare and an associated public relations campaign, Melbourne Water released their '1992-1996 Port Phillip Bay Environment Study'. Images of clear bay waters, colourful fish and dolphins flashed across TV screens, full page newspaper advertisements and even the sides of city trams.

The study was conducted by the CSIRO at a cost of $12 million. The findings which according to the Minister for Conservation, Mrs Marie Tehan, gave the bay an 'environmental clean bill of health' were released to the public in the form of a 32 page "glossy" which lifted selected data interpretation from the studies thousands of pages of research data.

What follows are some selected quotes from the Bay Study's Technical Reports that were not released to the public:

*"Dieldrin and DDT wide spread in the liver and fillet of fish thoughout the bay."

*Dieldrin in fish liver was twice the health limit (in the Geelong Arm)."

C.S.I.R.O. Port Phillip Bay Environment Study 1996.

In 1997, with much fanfare and an associated public relations campaign, Melbourne Water released their ‘1992-1996 Port Phillip Bay Environment Study’. Images of clear bay waters, colourful fish and dolphins flashed across TV screens, full page newspaper advertisements and even the sides of city trams.

The study was conducted by the CSIRO at a cost of $12 million. The findings which according to the Minister for Conservation, Mrs Marie Tehan, gave the bay an ‘environmental clean bill of health’ were released to the public in the form of a 32 page “glossy” which lifted selected data interpretation from the studies thousands of pages of research data.

What follows are some selected quotes from the Bay Study’s Technical Reports that were not released to the public:

*”Dieldrin and DDT wide spread in the liver and fillet of fish thoughout the bay.”

*Dieldrin in fish liver was twice the health limit (in the Geelong Arm).”

*”Tests for organic toxicants detected Phthalate Esters, PCB’s, Phenol’s, Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Flathead and Mullet.”

*”Petroleum Hydrocarbons exceeded the threshold for taste-tainting in fish flesh at three separate sites”.

*”Port Phillip Bay is chronically contaminated with Petroleum and Chlorinated Hydrocarbons”.

*”It is estimated (heavy metals in sewage effluent from Werribee) in general represent an increase of between 20% and 50% compared to 1980-81 data.”

*Mussels from sites such as the Rippleside area still exceed the health limits (for lead contamination).”

*”Lesions, local haemorrhages and cutaneous erytherma were found on Spikey Globefish after a major fish kill.”

*”Sand Flathead had severe visceral haemosiderosis. The condition was accompanied by high tissue cadmium and lead.”

*”Industries holding current licences are self regulating, with reports of discharged concentrations being supplied to the EPA who do not have the resources to undertake checks of the data.”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/melbwater.htm

1996: CSIRO Port Phillip Bay Environment Study – Pesticides: Dieldrin, DDT.

C.S.I.R.O. Port Phillip Bay Environment Study 1996.

In 1997, with much fanfare and an associated public relations campaign, Melbourne Water released their '1992-1996 Port Phillip Bay Environment Study'. Images of clear bay waters, colourful fish and dolphins flashed across TV screens, full page newspaper advertisements and even the sides of city trams.

The study was conducted by the CSIRO at a cost of $12 million. The findings which according to the Minister for Conservation, Mrs Marie Tehan, gave the bay an 'environmental clean bill of health' were released to the public in the form of a 32 page "glossy" which lifted selected data interpretation from the studies thousands of pages of research data.

What follows are some selected quotes from the Bay Study's Technical Reports that were not released to the public:

*"Dieldrin and DDT wide spread in the liver and fillet of fish thoughout the bay."

C.S.I.R.O. Port Phillip Bay Environment Study 1996.

In 1997, with much fanfare and an associated public relations campaign, Melbourne Water released their ‘1992-1996 Port Phillip Bay Environment Study’. Images of clear bay waters, colourful fish and dolphins flashed across TV screens, full page newspaper advertisements and even the sides of city trams.

The study was conducted by the CSIRO at a cost of $12 million. The findings which according to the Minister for Conservation, Mrs Marie Tehan, gave the bay an ‘environmental clean bill of health’ were released to the public in the form of a 32 page “glossy” which lifted selected data interpretation from the studies thousands of pages of research data.

What follows are some selected quotes from the Bay Study’s Technical Reports that were not released to the public:

*”Dieldrin and DDT wide spread in the liver and fillet of fish thoughout the bay.”

*”Tests for organic toxicants detected Phthalate Esters, PCB’s, Phenol’s, Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Flathead and Mullet.”

*”Petroleum Hydrocarbons exceeded the threshold for taste-tainting in fish flesh at three separate sites”.

*”Port Phillip Bay is chronically contaminated with Petroleum and Chlorinated Hydrocarbons”.

*”It is estimated (heavy metals in sewage effluent from Werribee) in general represent an increase of between 20% and 50% compared to 1980-81 data.”

*Dieldrin in fish liver was twice the health limit (in the Geelong Arm).”

*Mussels from sites such as the Rippleside area still exceed the health limits (for lead contamination).”

*”Lesions, local haemorrhages and cutaneous erytherma were found on Spikey Globefish after a major fish kill.”

*”Sand Flathead had severe visceral haemosiderosis. The condition was accompanied by high tissue cadmium and lead.”

*”Industries holding current licences are self regulating, with reports of discharged concentrations being supplied to the EPA who do not have the resources to undertake checks of the data.”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/melbwater.htm

1974: Diggora (Vic). Pesticide: Acrolein, DDT, Mevinphos.

The water authorities targeted our drainage channel for special attention. They sprayed it with herbicides so that weeds would not impede the water flow. They blitzed the channel until its banks were sterile, denuded and crumbling, and dead fish floated belly up, shining like a silver-scaled carpet and clogging the siphon. I remember the jeeps trailing huge herbicide vats, spraying along the easement by our house, and how more than once I packed Guy and John into the car and went away to escape the sickening smell. Our bore had been sunk beside that drainage channel. We usually collected rainwater from our roof for drinking, but pumped from the bore when the tank ran low.

Another time, a herbicide was added directly to the water and allowed to wash downstream. Our neighbour, Lionel, was told by one of the government workers that they had to drop the chemical in the channel from a bridge on the main road, because it was too explosive to carry across country. And then Lionel collapsed when the fumes wafted up from the channel near where he was working. In later years, when we were discussing events with Lionel, we came to suspect that this particular herbicide was acrolein - because the warnings we received to remove stock from the channel, and our indirect discovery of the chemical's explosive nature and its extreme volatility, all match what we now know to be the properties of acrolein.

“In hindsight, we had not picked an ideal time to enter farming. In 1974, January, normally a droughty month, gave forewarning of what was to come with 132mm of rain. When rivers overflowed their banks, the locals surrounded their towns with sandbags in a desperate attempt to stem the rising waters. Our farm was hard hit: not by a river, but by the drainage channel which passed through a siphon at our boundary before tunnelling under the main irrigation channel. A large pipe that had been installed the previous year, at the insistence of the former owner, still could not handle a freak 529mm of rain during the cropping season, and the channel backed up to flood nearby farms.

The water authorities targeted our drainage channel for special attention. They sprayed it with herbicides so that weeds would not impede the water flow. They blitzed the channel until its banks were sterile, denuded and crumbling, and dead fish floated belly up, shining like a silver-scaled carpet and clogging the siphon. I remember the jeeps trailing huge herbicide vats, spraying along the easement by our house, and how more than once I packed Guy and John into the car and went away to escape the sickening smell. Our bore had been sunk beside that drainage channel. We usually collected rainwater from our roof for drinking, but pumped from the bore when the tank ran low.

Another time, a herbicide was added directly to the water and allowed to wash downstream. Our neighbour, Lionel, was told by one of the government workers that they had to drop the chemical in the channel from a bridge on the main road, because it was too explosive to carry across country. And then Lionel collapsed when the fumes wafted up from the channel near where he was working. In later years, when we were discussing events with Lionel, we came to suspect that this particular herbicide was acrolein – because the warnings we received to remove stock from the channel, and our indirect discovery of the chemical’s explosive nature and its extreme volatility, all match what we now know to be the properties of acrolein.

We used no chemicals in our own cropping routine, but simply relied on the traditional cycle of fallow and rotation to conserve moisture and destroy weeds. Most irrigation farmers did not even use herbicides in those days. They slashed the weeds in their drains, so much so that tractor-drawn drain cleaners were one of Bernie’s standard engineering lines. Now, everyone clears drains the quick-and-easy way, with herbicides. Mechanical drain cleaners are as obsolete as horse-drawn machinery.

The face of the tomato industry has changed even more rapidly. Sadly, the era of the small tomato grower has passed. Instead of signing with growers for five acres here and ten acres there, the canning factories now contract to farmers who plant hundreds of acres. Where our growers planted, hoed, and picked by hand, machines now plant and harvest, and herbicides control the weeds. Both methods, however, relied heavily on chemical pest control.

I remember how the spray plane would work down the paddock beside our house, zoom in low, spray a strip, lift, turn, and spray the next strip until the pilot covered the entire crop. Often he would turn above us, with his spray jets still operating, blasting our house and vegetable garden – even the babies’ nappies drying on the clothes line. We may have been unafraid of these routine spray-runs (hopelessly naive I would call it now), but we certainly had no desire to drink the stuff. I can remember Bernie perched on the roof, disconnecting the spouting, and scrubbing the spray off before the next rain washed it into our tanks.

We will probably never know what concoctions blitzed our channels – our every attempt to find out has been fobbed off – but we do know that DDT and mevinphos were sprayed on and around our house. Even then, DDT had been banned across North America whereas here in Australia its toxicity was recognised only by a thirty-day withholding period between spraying and picking. So we did feel uneasy seeing bins of tomatos stacked at our gate the day after the crop had been sprayed. Although DDT was the first line of defence in the grub war, pests were already developing resistance to it: Bernie can remember one of our growers re-calling the plane for a double-strength blast when the bugs survived the first dose. When that, too, was ineffective, they tried mevinphos.

Mevinphos was then nothing more than a name to us. Now we know it as a neurotoxic organophosphate, one of the most deadly pesticides ever concocted.” Source: Scribe Chemical Crisis – One Woman’s Story – Humanity’s Future. Diana Crumpler 1994.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

1971 June – 1971 December: State Rivers and Water Supply Commission Testing Results: Broken Creek Nathalia

Irrigation Services Division. SRWSC 2,4-D Residues in Stream Samples

2,4-D is used to control Arrowhead where traditionally it has been used in Broken Creek and some used in nearby channels and drains. Used in Victoria in waterways since the 1950's.

The 2011 Australian Drinking Water Guideline for 2,4-D is 30ug/L (parts per billion)

Waters From Nathalia (Broken Creek) 2,4-D residues (1971)

7/6/71 0.01ug/L, 8/6/71 0.09ug/L, 9/6/71 0.13ug/L, 10/6/71 0.12ug/L, 13/6/71 0.21ug/L, 14/6/71 0.37ug/L, 15/6/71 0.55ug/L, 16/6/71 1.13ug/L, 17/6/71 0.79ug/L, 18/6/71 0.67ug/L, 19/6/71 0.82ug/L, 20/6/71 1.46ug/L, 9/12/71 0.1ug/L, 11//12/71 0.1ug/L, 12/12/71 0.2ug/L, 13/12/71 0.2ug/L, 14/12/71 0.2ug/L, 15/12/71 0.5ug/L, 16/12/71 0.4ug/L, 17/12/71 0.5ug/L, 18/12/71 0.5ug/L, 19/12/71 0.4ug/L

Arrowhead Spraying Program

At a meeting of the Pesticides Review Committee on 4 September, approval was given to a proposal by the Commission to spray arrowhead in the Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with 2,4,-D during 1981-82. Although not stated in the resolution, I am confident it was intended that approval be subject to agreement between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a water sampling program to detect any residues of 2,4-D.

*** recently informed me that spraying has started but plans for analysing water samples, or in other ways estimating residue levels, are not complete. The Commission could therefore be criticized on the grounds that it is spraying in an unacceptable way. However, it is pointed out that this program has been undertaken each year since the late sixties and was approved by the Pesticides Review Committee on a number of occasions during the early part of this period.

If spraying is to continue, it is my view that agreement should be reached immediately between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a program for measuring herbicide residues in water; otherwise the spraying should be suspended until such a time as agreement is reached.

Irrigation Services Division. SRWSC 2,4-D Residues in Stream Samples

2,4-D is used to control Arrowhead where traditionally it has been used in Broken Creek and some used in nearby channels and drains. Used in Victoria in waterways since the 1950’s.

The 2011 Australian Drinking Water Guideline for 2,4-D is 30ug/L (parts per billion)

Waters From Nathalia (Broken Creek) 2,4-D residues (1971)

7/6/71 0.01ug/L, 8/6/71 0.09ug/L, 9/6/71 0.13ug/L, 10/6/71 0.12ug/L, 13/6/71 0.21ug/L, 14/6/71 0.37ug/L, 15/6/71 0.55ug/L, 16/6/71 1.13ug/L, 17/6/71 0.79ug/L, 18/6/71 0.67ug/L, 19/6/71 0.82ug/L, 20/6/71 1.46ug/L, 9/12/71 0.1ug/L, 11//12/71 0.1ug/L, 12/12/71 0.2ug/L, 13/12/71 0.2ug/L, 14/12/71 0.2ug/L, 15/12/71 0.5ug/L, 16/12/71 0.4ug/L, 17/12/71 0.5ug/L, 18/12/71 0.5ug/L, 19/12/71 0.4ug/L

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

18 November 1981

Arrowhead Spraying Program

At a meeting of the Pesticides Review Committee on 4 September, approval was given to a proposal by the Commission to spray arrowhead in the Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with 2,4,-D during 1981-82. Although not stated in the resolution, I am confident it was intended that approval be subject to agreement between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a water sampling program to detect any residues of 2,4-D.

*** recently informed me that spraying has started but plans for analysing water samples, or in other ways estimating residue levels, are not complete. The Commission could therefore be criticized on the grounds that it is spraying in an unacceptable way. However, it is pointed out that this program has been undertaken each year since the late sixties and was approved by the Pesticides Review Committee on a number of occasions during the early part of this period.

If spraying is to continue, it is my view that agreement should be reached immediately between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a program for measuring herbicide residues in water; otherwise the spraying should be suspended until such a time as agreement is reached.

1985 January: Harcourt Fish Kill. Pesticide: Xylaquat contaminated with Dioxins.

Xylaquat was used for many years by the Rural Water Commission, however during 1981-5 it was used when the Xylaquat was contaminated with Dioxins. Xylaquat use in the Commission's Eagle Channel at Harcourt, led to a fish kill at the nearby Ottwood Park Trout Farm in January 1985. An investigation led to the conclusion that the Xylaquat was contaminated.

Xylaquat was manufactured by the Shell Company. The contamination included the pesticides, Aldrin, Dieldrin, DDE, TDE and DDT. Contaminated Xylaquat was also used at Numurkah, Shepparton, Kyabram, Tongala, Numurkah, Rochester, Swan Hill, Lake Boga, Mildura, Merebin

18 April 1985

Contamination of Purchased Herbicides

The Minister was advised that the herbicide Xylaquat supplied by Shell Australia, and used by the (Rural Water) Commission in its channels for weed control purposes, has been found to be contaminated by Dieldrin and other pesticides. Remedial action is being taken to protect consumers by warnings and by disposal of contaminated sediment from a Rural Water Commission channel at Harcourt. Investigations are continuing on other possible sites and negotiations are proposed with the supplier with a view to recovering associated costs and any subsequent claims faced by the Commission.

Xylaquat was used for many years by the Rural Water Commission, however during 1981-5 it was used when the Xylaquat was contaminated with Dioxins. Xylaquat use in the Commission’s Eagle Channel at Harcourt, led to a fish kill at the nearby Ottwood Park Trout Farm in January 1985. An investigation led to the conclusion that the Xylaquat was contaminated.

Xylaquat was manufactured by the Shell Company. The contamination included the pesticides, Aldrin, Dieldrin, DDE, TDE and DDT. Contaminated Xylaquat was also used at Numurkah, Shepparton, Kyabram, Tongala, Numurkah, Rochester, Swan Hill, Lake Boga, Mildura, Merebin

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

18 April 1985

Contamination of Purchased Herbicides

The Minister was advised that the herbicide Xylaquat supplied by Shell Australia, and used by the (Rural Water) Commission in its channels for weed control purposes, has been found to be contaminated by Dieldrin and other pesticides. Remedial action is being taken to protect consumers by warnings and by disposal of contaminated sediment from a Rural Water Commission channel at Harcourt. Investigations are continuing on other possible sites and negotiations are proposed with the supplier with a view to recovering associated costs and any subsequent claims faced by the Commission.

1985 January: Fish Kills at Boort. Pesticides Suspected: Endosulfan.

Rural Water Corporation Memorandum February 27 1985

"...On January 14th I was notified of another fish kill in the 2/2 Channel at Boort. This fish kill occurred in the same channel and in the same area as a fish kill I documented last year...It appears that this recent incident was associated with a tomato grower pumping wastewater back into the channel during or following aerial spraying..." Endosulfan?

Pesticide Review Committee Minutes March 22 1985

Rural Water Commission uses 22,000 litres of acrolein for some 250 acrolein treatments to control submersed weed growth over a supply channel/drain length of 2200km. Fish kill reported on the Goulburn River December 1984.

Rural Water Corporation Memorandum November 11 1986

"... In particular we have had a reported fish kill at Boort as a result of spraying of a tomato crop"

Rural Water Commission - 17 January 1985

1. On 16 Jan 1985 I received a complaint from ***, Boort, that there were dead fish in two of our channels. The circumstances of the report seemed identical to those reported by me in Complaint Number 1/84, dated 13 Jan 84.

2a). ... There are 1,200 acres of irrigated tomatoes grown in the area, which have been aerial sprayed every 10/14 days since the end of October. The various farmers combine for the spraying, half of the properties being done every 5/7days.

b) There are a range of chemicals used, but two in particular, Endosulfan and synthetic pyrethrins (either simbush or sumicide) are toxic to fish in very low concentrations.

c) Fish deaths had occurred intermittently over two to three weeks, in channel No. 2/2, but only one dead fish was seen in channel No.2.

3. It is generally accepted that the pumping of drainage water back into channels is not acceptable. However ***, the owner of *** was, some time ago given permission, on a one off basis, to pump drainage water from irrigated tomatoes back into channel No. 2/2. Contrary to the original directive, the pump was left by the channel and unbeknown to the Baliff, pumping has continued intermittently ever since. In fact irrigation, drainage pumping, and aerial spraying are believed to have occurred simultaneously. No dead fish have been reported upstream of the pumping point on channel No 2.2...

Rural Water Corporation Memorandum February 27 1985

“…On January 14th I was notified of another fish kill in the 2/2 Channel at Boort. This fish kill occurred in the same channel and in the same area as a fish kill I documented last year…It appears that this recent incident was associated with a tomato grower pumping wastewater back into the channel during or following aerial spraying…” Endosulfan?

Pesticide Review Committee Minutes March 22 1985

Rural Water Commission uses 22,000 litres of acrolein for some 250 acrolein treatments to control submersed weed growth over a supply channel/drain length of 2200km. Fish kill reported on the Goulburn River December 1984.

Rural Water Corporation Memorandum November 11 1986

“… In particular we have had a reported fish kill at Boort as a result of spraying of a tomato crop”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

Rural Water Commission – 17 January 1985

1. On 16 Jan 1985 I received a complaint from ***, Boort, that there were dead fish in two of our channels. The circumstances of the report seemed identical to those reported by me in Complaint Number 1/84, dated 13 Jan 84.

2a). … There are 1,200 acres of irrigated tomatoes grown in the area, which have been aerial sprayed every 10/14 days since the end of October. The various farmers combine for the spraying, half of the properties being done every 5/7days.

b) There are a range of chemicals used, but two in particular, Endosulfan and synthetic pyrethrins (either simbush or sumicide) are toxic to fish in very low concentrations.

c) Fish deaths had occurred intermittently over two to three weeks, in channel No. 2/2, but only one dead fish was seen in channel No.2.

3. It is generally accepted that the pumping of drainage water back into channels is not acceptable. However ***, the owner of *** was, some time ago given permission, on a one off basis, to pump drainage water from irrigated tomatoes back into channel No. 2/2. Contrary to the original directive, the pump was left by the channel and unbeknown to the Baliff, pumping has continued intermittently ever since. In fact irrigation, drainage pumping, and aerial spraying are believed to have occurred simultaneously. No dead fish have been reported upstream of the pumping point on channel No 2.2…

1971 February: Loddon Weir. Fish Kill. Pesticide detected: Acrolein.

Herald - February 27 1971: MP Defends Killer of Weeds

"The Minister for Water Supply, Mr Dunstan, today defended the use of the weed killer Aqualin in irrigation channels...This month the Labor MLA for Kara Kara, Mr Curnow claimed that about 10,000 fish were killed when 24 gallons of Aqualin [were sprayed] into a 10 mile channel from Loddon Weir. Mr Dunstan agreed that Aqualin did kill some fish but it did not pollute the water...The weedicide is not used in rivers, but only in irrigation channels where any fish remaining in channels would die at the end of the season when the channels ran dry"

Herald – February 27 1971: MP Defends Killer of Weeds

“The Minister for Water Supply, Mr Dunstan, today defended the use of the weed killer Aqualin in irrigation channels…This month the Labor MLA for Kara Kara, Mr Curnow claimed that about 10,000 fish were killed when 24 gallons of Aqualin [were sprayed] into a 10 mile channel from Loddon Weir. Mr Dunstan agreed that Aqualin did kill some fish but it did not pollute the water…The weedicide is not used in rivers, but only in irrigation channels where any fish remaining in channels would die at the end of the season when the channels ran dry”

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

2005 October: Sunday Creek Reservoir. Pesticide detected: Pentachlorophenol.

Sunday Creek Reservoir supplies drinking water to the towns of Broadford, Kilmore and Kilmore East. Traces of Pentachlorophenol (PCP) at 2 µg/L (2 parts per billion) were detected in this reservoir in October 2005 by Goulburn Valley Water. The reading came in at 20% of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline.

Pentachlorophenol is a chlorinated phenol and is a carcinogen, a suspected endocrine disruptor and has a high acute toxicity. The World Health Organisation class Pentachlorophenol as 1b (Highly Hazardous). PCP is known as being a wood preservative, a microbiocide, an algaecide, a fungicide and a molluscicide. So what is it doing being detected in this reservoir which has a largely closed catchment.

Sunday Creek Reservoir supplies drinking water to the towns of Broadford, Kilmore and Kilmore East. Traces of Pentachlorophenol (PCP) at 2 µg/L (2 parts per billion) were detected in this reservoir in October 2005 by Goulburn Valley Water. The reading came in at 20% of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline.

Pentachlorophenol is a chlorinated phenol and is a carcinogen, a suspected endocrine disruptor and has a high acute toxicity. The World Health Organisation class Pentachlorophenol as 1b (Highly Hazardous). PCP is known as being a wood preservative, a microbiocide, an algaecide, a fungicide and a molluscicide. So what is it doing being detected in this reservoir which has a largely closed catchment.

Sunday Creek Reservoir in drought – November 2006.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

2005 June – 2012 October: Broken Creek Numurkah. Pesticides detected: PCP, Atrazine, Simazine and 2,4-D

Broken Creek Numurkah: Pollution of the town's water supply, Broken Creek, occurred twice in 2005 detected at the offtake to the town. Pentachlorophenol (PCP) was detected at 1 µg/L in December and 2,4-D was detected at 17 µg/L in June. The 2,4-D reading was alarming.

The PCP reading came in at 10% of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline value. Pentachlorophenol is a chlorinated phenol and is a carcinogen, a suspected endocrine disruptor and has a high acute toxicity. The World Health Organisation class Pentachlorophenol as 1b (Highly Hazardous). PCP is known as being a wood preservative, a microbiocide, an algaecide, a fungicide and a molluscicide.

2,4-D is a chlorophenoxy compound, a possible carcinogen and suspected endocrine disruptor. 17ug/L is about 57% of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline.

Source below: Goulburn Valley Water FoI November 2016

DateAtrazine2,4-DSimazine
19/08/20100.5  
9/09/20100.7  
9/09/2010  1
9/09/20100.3  
9/09/20100.6  
9/09/2010  0.9
16/09/20100.7  
16/09/2010  0.8
24/02/2011 1.7 
24/02/2011 1 
10/03/2011 0.5 
23/08/20120.7  
23/08/20120.3  
6/09/20120.5  
6/09/20120.5  
14/09/20120.1  
17/09/20120.1  
11/10/20120.1  
11/10/20120.7  
11/10/20120.6  
18/10/20120.2  
18/10/20120.2  
18/10/20120.1  

Arrowhead Spraying Program

At a meeting of the Pesticides Review Committee on 4 September, approval was given to a proposal by the Commission to spray arrowhead in the Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with 2,4,-D during 1981-82. Although not stated in the resolution, I am confident it was intended that approval be subject to agreement between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a water sampling program to detect any residues of 2,4-D.

*** recently informed me that spraying has started but plans for analysing water samples, or in other ways estimating residue levels, are not complete. The Commission could therefore be criticized on the grounds that it is spraying in an unacceptable way. However, it is pointed out that this program has been undertaken each year since the late sixties and was approved by the Pesticides Review Committee on a number of occasions during the early part of this period.

If spraying is to continue, it is my view that agreement should be reached immediately between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a program for measuring herbicide residues in water; otherwise the spraying should be suspended until such a time as agreement is reached.

Broken Creek Numurkah: Pollution of the town’s water supply, Broken Creek, occurred twice in 2005 detected at the offtake to the town. Pentachlorophenol (PCP) was detected at 1 µg/L in December and 2,4-D was detected at 17 µg/L in June. The 2,4-D reading was alarming.

The PCP reading came in at 10% of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline value. Pentachlorophenol is a chlorinated phenol and is a carcinogen, a suspected endocrine disruptor and has a high acute toxicity. The World Health Organisation class Pentachlorophenol as 1b (Highly Hazardous). PCP is known as being a wood preservative, a microbiocide, an algaecide, a fungicide and a molluscicide.

2,4-D is a chlorophenoxy compound, a possible carcinogen and suspected endocrine disruptor. 17ug/L is about 57% of the Australian Drinking Water Guideline.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

Source below: Goulburn Valley Water FoI November 2016

Date Atrazine 2,4-D Simazine
19/08/2010 0.5
9/09/2010 0.7
9/09/2010 1
9/09/2010 0.3
9/09/2010 0.6
9/09/2010 0.9
16/09/2010 0.7
16/09/2010 0.8
24/02/2011 1.7
24/02/2011 1
10/03/2011 0.5
23/08/2012 0.7
23/08/2012 0.3
6/09/2012 0.5
6/09/2012 0.5
14/09/2012 0.1
17/09/2012 0.1
11/10/2012 0.1
11/10/2012 0.7
11/10/2012 0.6
18/10/2012 0.2
18/10/2012 0.2
18/10/2012 0.1

Arrowhead Spraying Program

At a meeting of the Pesticides Review Committee on 4 September, approval was given to a proposal by the Commission to spray arrowhead in the Broken and Nine Mile Creeks with 2,4,-D during 1981-82. Although not stated in the resolution, I am confident it was intended that approval be subject to agreement between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a water sampling program to detect any residues of 2,4-D.

*** recently informed me that spraying has started but plans for analysing water samples, or in other ways estimating residue levels, are not complete. The Commission could therefore be criticized on the grounds that it is spraying in an unacceptable way. However, it is pointed out that this program has been undertaken each year since the late sixties and was approved by the Pesticides Review Committee on a number of occasions during the early part of this period.

If spraying is to continue, it is my view that agreement should be reached immediately between the Commission and Environment Protection Authority on a program for measuring herbicide residues in water; otherwise the spraying should be suspended until such a time as agreement is reached.

2006 May: Murray Valley CH13A 7/2: Australia’s highest levels of 2,4-D?

According to the EPA Victoria's 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River - Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas was estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb).

Between the 30th of March 2006 and 6th of May 2006, Amitrole was detected between 1 and 29ug/L in the Rodney Main Drain at Wyuna. The highest reading was detected on 30th of April 2006. Glyphosate was detected in the Rodney Main Drain, Wyuna at 80ug/L on April 11, 2006.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

According to the EPA Victoria’s 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River – Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas was estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb).

Between the 9th of May 2006 and 12th of May 2006, 2,4-D was detected at levels between 1920ug/L and 2960ug/L – likely to be the highest levels recorded in Australia. Since the 1950’s 2,4-D has been used throughout Victoria to control aquatic weeds.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

2006 March – 2006 May: Rodney Main Drain, Weller Rd, Wyuna.

According to the EPA Victoria's 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River - Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas was estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb).

Between the 30th of March 2006 and 6th of May 2006, Amitrole was detected between 1 and 29ug/L in the Rodney Main Drain at Wyuna. The highest reading was detected on 30th of April 2006. Glyphosate was detected in the Rodney Main Drain, Wyuna at 80ug/L.

According to the EPA Victoria’s 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River – Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas was estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb).

Between the 30th of March 2006 and 6th of May 2006, Amitrole was detected between 1 and 29ug/L in the Rodney Main Drain at Wyuna. The highest reading was detected on 30th of April 2006. Glyphosate was detected in the Rodney Main Drain, Wyuna at 80ug/L on April 11, 2006.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

2006 April: Drain 8 Ardmona. Australia’s highest level of Glyphosate and AMPA

According to the EPA Victoria's 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River - Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas was estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb).

The first test results were disturbing - It is unknown whether the testing has continued.

On the 12th of April 2006, the following levels of Glyphosate and AMPA were recorded in Drain 8, Ardmona, Midland Highway. Glyphosate 10,500ug/L, AMPA 830ug/L. These are likely to be the highest levels of either substance recorded in Australia. These levels are high due to Glyphosate being used against aquatic weeds.

According to the EPA Victoria’s 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River – Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas was estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb).

The first test results were disturbing – It is unknown whether the testing has continued.

On the 12th of April 2006, the following levels of Glyphosate and AMPA were recorded in Drain 8, Ardmona, Midland Highway. Glyphosate 10,500ug/L, AMPA 830ug/L. These are likely to be the highest levels of either substance recorded in Australia. These levels are high due to Glyphosate being used against aquatic weeds.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

2006 April: Community Surface Drain – Rodney Drainage System: Pesticides: Glyphosate, AMPA, Amitrole.

According to the EPA Victoria's 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River - Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas is estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb)

Goulburn Murray Water Test Results: 10/4/06

Community Surface Drain – Rodney Drainage System (not drinking water)

10/4/06: Glyphosate 940ug/L, AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid - Glyphosate Breakdown Product) 50ug/L, Amitrole 1060ug/L

According to the EPA Victoria’s 2006 Environmental Audit of the Goulburn River – Lake Eildon to The Murray River,  the mean annual concentration for Amitrole T in the Central Goulburn and Shepparton Irrigation Areas is estimated to be above the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines by over 250%. As a result of the EPA audit, Goulburn Murray Water had to test for Glyphosate, Amitrole, 2,4-D and AMPA over a 3 year period. (Guideline Heath limits for Amitrole are 10ppb, Glyphosate 1000ppb and 2,4-D 30ppb)

Goulburn Murray Water Test Results: 10/4/06

Community Surface Drain – Rodney Drainage System (not drinking water)

10/4/06: Glyphosate 940ug/L, AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid – Glyphosate Breakdown Product) 50ug/L, Amitrole 1060ug/L
https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/gmw.htm

2005 January – 2005 March. Hexazinone Pollution Bungal Creek

Hexazinone pollution for a couple of months in Bungal Creek, possibly as a result of pollution from a pine plantation at Korweinguboora.

31/1/05 Barwon Water Bungal Creek Hexazinone 0.082ug/L (0.0205%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bungal Creek Hexazinone 0.047ug/L (0.01175%adwgh)

Hexazinone pollution for a couple of months in Bungal Creek, possibly as a result of pollution from a pine plantation at Korweinguboora.

31/1/05 Barwon Water Bungal Creek Hexazinone 0.082ug/L (0.0205%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bungal Creek Hexazinone 0.047ug/L (0.01175%adwgh)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/BarwonWater.htm

2006 March: Hexazinone Pollution East Moorabool River

Hexazinone pollution in East Moorabool catchment, a result of pesticide pollution from Korweinguboora pine plantation in 2004.

7/3/06 Barwon Water East Moorabool River Hexazinone 0.086ug/L (0.0215%adwgh)

Hexazinone pollution in East Moorabool catchment, a result of pesticide pollution from Korweinguboora pine plantation in 2004.

7/3/06 Barwon Water East Moorabool River Hexazinone 0.086ug/L (0.0215%adwgh)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/BarwonWater.htm

2005 March: Hexazinone detected at Bannockburn Basin.

Hexazinone detected at Bannockburn Basin, most likely as a result of a pollution incident at Korweinguboora Reservoir in late 2004.

4/3/05 Barwon Water Bannockburn Basin Hexazinone 0.19ug/L (0.0475%adwgh)

Hexazinone detected at Bannockburn Basin, most likely as a result of a pollution incident at Korweinguboora Reservoir in late 2004.

4/3/05 Barwon Water Bannockburn Basin Hexazinone 0.19ug/L (0.0475%adwgh)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/BarwonWater.htm

2005 March – 2007 October: Hexazinone Pollution Bostok Reservoir

Hexazinone also appeared at the outlet to Bostok Reservoir between March and August 2007, possibly as a result of the pollution of Korweinguboora plantation by Hancock Victorian Plantations.

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.58ug/L (0.145%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.56ug/L (0.14%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.44ug/L (0.11%adwgh)

15/8/07 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.029ug/L (0.00725%adwgh)

17/10/07 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.036 ug/L (0.012%adwgh)

Hexazinone also appeared at the outlet to Bostok Reservoir between March and August 2007, possibly as a result of the pollution of Korweinguboora plantation by Hancock Victorian Plantations.

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.58ug/L (0.145%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.56ug/L (0.14%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.44ug/L (0.11%adwgh)

15/8/07 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.029ug/L (0.00725%adwgh)

17/10/07 Barwon Water Bostok Outlet Hexazinone 0.036 ug/L (0.012%adwgh)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/BarwonWater.htm

 

2005 January – 2007 October: Hexazinone Pollution Korweinguboora Outlet

31/1/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Inlet Hexazinone 0.37ug/L (0.0925%adwgh)

31/1/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 1.3ug/L (0.325%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.86ug/L (0.215%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.67ug/L (0.1675%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.051ug/L (0.01275%adwgh)

17/10/07 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.016ug/L (0.004%adwgh)

(0.1675%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.051ug/L (0.01275%adwgh)

17/10/07 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.016ug/L (0.004%adwgh)

Hexazinone levels recorded at the Outlet at Korweinguboora Reservoir during the 2004/8 pollution incident at the reservoir.

31/1/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Inlet Hexazinone 0.37ug/L (0.0925%adwgh)

31/1/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 1.3ug/L (0.325%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.86ug/L (0.215%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.67ug/L (0.1675%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.051ug/L (0.01275%adwgh)

17/10/07 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Outlet Hexazinone 0.016ug/L (0.004%adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

2005 March: Korweingboora Reservoir: Hexazinone highest level

 The highest level of Hexazinone recorded in the pollution incident at Korweinguboora which lasted almost 4 years was 9.4ug/L on the 4th of March 2005. The reservoir is surrounded by pine plantations, some of which had been sprayed post logging.

4/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Reservoir Hexazinone 9.4ug/L (2.35%adwgh)

 The highest level of Hexazinone recorded in the pollution incident at Korweinguboora which lasted almost 4 years was 9.4ug/L on the 4th of March 2005. The reservoir is surrounded by pine plantations, some of which had been sprayed post logging.

4/3/05 Barwon Water Korweinguboora Reservoir Hexazinone 9.4ug/L (2.35%adwgh)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/BarwonWater.htm

2006 January – 2011 June: Moorabool Treatment Plant Geelong Water Supply

Moorabool Treatment plant treats water sourced from the Moorabool River System. The water is then distributed through the Geelong region. Water at the plant was polluted between January 2006 and October 2008 with the forestry herbicide Hexazinone after a pollution event at Korweinguboora Plantation. The highest levels of Hexazinone reached the plant during November 2006. The 2,4-D incident in June 2008 remains Victoria's 5th highest detection of that herbicide in a water supply. Low levels of Atrazine were also recorded for 9 months between September 2011 and June 2012.

4/1/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.071ug/L (0.01775%adwgh)

7/3/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.058ug/L (0.0145%adwgh)

5/4/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.12ug/L (0.03%adwgh)

3/5/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.17ug/L (0.0425%adwgh)

7/6/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

8/8/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

5/10/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.082ug/L (0.0205%adwgh)

9/11/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

15/12/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.15ug/L (0.0375%adwgh)

15/12/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.032ug/L (0.009%adwgh)

7/2/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.13ug/L (0.0325%adwgh)

7/3/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

3/5/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

4/7/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.06ug/L (0.015%adwgh)

6/8/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.067ug/L (0.01675%adwgh)

5/9/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (0.005%adwgh)

3/10/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.074ug/L (0.0185%adwgh)

7/11/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.026ug/L (0.0065%adwgh)

5/12/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.019ug/L (0.00475%adwgh)

6/2/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.018ug/L (0.0045%adwgh)

4/6/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP 2,4-D 1.9ug/L (6.33%adwgh)

4/6/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (0.005%adwgh)

9/10/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Raw Water Hexazinone 0.014ug/L (0.0035%adwgh)

3/3/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP 2,4-D 0.01ug/L (0.0333%adwgh)

2/6/10 Barwon Water Moorobool WTP 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (0.067%adwgh)

8/9/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

7/12/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

24/12/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.2ug/L (1% adwgh)

4/2/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.2ug/L (1% adwgh)

4/3/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.2ug/L (1% adwgh)

7/6/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

22/6/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

Moorabool Treatment plant treats water sourced from the Moorabool River System. The water is then distributed through the Geelong region. Water at the plant was polluted between January 2006 and October 2008 with the forestry herbicide Hexazinone after a pollution event at Korweinguboora Plantation. The highest levels of Hexazinone reached the plant during November 2006. The 2,4-D incident in June 2008 remains Victoria’s 5th highest detection of that herbicide in a water supply. Low levels of Atrazine were also recorded for 9 months between September 2011 and June 2012.

4/1/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.071ug/L (0.01775%adwgh)

7/3/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.058ug/L (0.0145%adwgh)

5/4/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.12ug/L (0.03%adwgh)

3/5/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.17ug/L (0.0425%adwgh)

7/6/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

8/8/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

5/10/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.082ug/L (0.0205%adwgh)

9/11/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

15/12/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.15ug/L (0.0375%adwgh)

15/12/06 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.032ug/L (0.009%adwgh)

7/2/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.13ug/L (0.0325%adwgh)

7/3/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

3/5/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.11ug/L (0.0275%adwgh)

4/7/07 Barwon Water Moorabool Treatment Hexazinone 0.06ug/L (0.015%adwgh)

6/8/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.067ug/L (0.01675%adwgh)

5/9/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (0.005%adwgh)

3/10/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.074ug/L (0.0185%adwgh)

7/11/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.026ug/L (0.0065%adwgh)

5/12/07 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.019ug/L (0.00475%adwgh)

6/2/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.018ug/L (0.0045%adwgh)

4/6/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP 2,4-D 1.9ug/L (6.33%adwgh)

4/6/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (0.005%adwgh)

9/10/08 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Raw Water Hexazinone 0.014ug/L (0.0035%adwgh)

3/3/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP 2,4-D 0.01ug/L (0.0333%adwgh)

2/6/10 Barwon Water Moorobool WTP 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (0.067%adwgh)

8/9/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

7/12/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

24/12/10 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.2ug/L (1% adwgh)

4/2/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.2ug/L (1% adwgh)

4/3/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.2ug/L (1% adwgh)

7/6/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

22/6/11 Barwon Water Moorabool WTP Combined Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5% adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

2005 January – 2005 March: Hexazinone Pollution Stony Creek Reservoir 2 (Geelong Water Supply)

Hexazinone used on pine plantations was  detected in this reservoir for 6 weeks in 2005, due to a pollution incident at Korweinguboora Reservoir 30km upstream.

31/1/05 Barwon Water Upper Stony Creek Res #2 Hexazinone 0.18ug/L (0.045%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Upper Stony Creek Res #2 Hexazinone 0.15ug/L (0.0375%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Upper Stony Creek Res #2 Hexazinone 0.15ug/L (0.0375%adwgh)

Hexazinone used on pine plantations was  detected in this reservoir for 6 weeks in 2005, due to a pollution incident at Korweinguboora Reservoir 30km upstream.

31/1/05 Barwon Water Upper Stony Creek Res #2 Hexazinone 0.18ug/L (0.045%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Upper Stony Creek Res #2 Hexazinone 0.15ug/L (0.0375%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Upper Stony Creek Res #2 Hexazinone 0.15ug/L (0.0375%adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

2003 August – 2011 July: Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Pesticide Detections: 2,4-D, Hexazinone, Atrazine

Pesticide detections in Stony Creek Reservoir #3, which lies north of Geelong in the Moorabool River Catchment. The Hexazinone detections were due to an incident at Korweinguboora plantation owned by Hancock Victorian Plantations. This event polluted Stony Creek #3 Reservoir for 18 months between December 2004 and June 2006. Atrazine was detected in the reservoir between April and July 2011.

5/8/03 Barwon Water Stony Creek Res #3 2,4-D 20ug/l (66.67%adwgh) - Third highest detection of 2,4-D in a Victorian (and possibly Australian) water supply.

1/12/04 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.32ug/L (0.08%adwgh)

31/1/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.22ug/L (0.055%adwgh)

31/1/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.21ug/L (0.0525%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.22ug/L (0.055%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.24ug/L (0.06%adwg)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.16ug/L (0.04%adwgh)

4/1/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/2/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir#3 Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

5/4/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.18ug/L (0.045%adwgh)

7/6/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.084ug/L (0.021%adwgh)

17/4/11 Barwon Water M6/3 Stony Creek Reservoir 3 Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5%adwgh)

22/6/11 Barwon Water M6/3 Stony Creek Reservoir 3 Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5%adwgh)

19/7/11 Barwon Water M6/3 Stony Creek Reservoir 3 Atrazine 0.5ug/L (2.5%adwgh)

Pesticide detections in Stony Creek Reservoir #3, which lies north of Geelong in the Moorabool River Catchment. The Hexazinone detections were due to an incident at Korweinguboora plantation owned by Hancock Victorian Plantations. This event polluted Stony Creek #3 Reservoir for 18 months between December 2004 and June 2006. Atrazine was detected in the reservoir between April and July 2011.

5/8/03 Barwon Water Stony Creek Res #3 2,4-D 20ug/l (66.67%adwgh) – Third highest detection of 2,4-D in a Victorian (and possibly Australian) water supply.

1/12/04 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.32ug/L (0.08%adwgh)

31/1/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.22ug/L (0.055%adwgh)

31/1/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.21ug/L (0.0525%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.22ug/L (0.055%adwgh)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.24ug/L (0.06%adwg)

7/3/05 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.16ug/L (0.04%adwgh)

4/1/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

7/2/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir#3 Hexazinone 0.20ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

5/4/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.18ug/L (0.045%adwgh)

7/6/06 Barwon Water Stony Creek Reservoir #3 Hexazinone 0.084ug/L (0.021%adwgh)

17/4/11 Barwon Water M6/3 Stony Creek Reservoir 3 Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5%adwgh)

22/6/11 Barwon Water M6/3 Stony Creek Reservoir 3 Atrazine 0.1ug/L (0.5%adwgh)

19/7/11 Barwon Water M6/3 Stony Creek Reservoir 3 Atrazine 0.5ug/L (2.5%adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

1999 October: Dieldrin detected in drinking Water Supply at Highton Geelong

The highly residual organochlorine Dieldrin was detected at Highton at 10% of Australian Drinking Water Guideline levels in October 1999. This remains the highest level of this now banned insecticide detected in a Victorian water supply. Dieldrin accumulates in the fatty tissue of animals, including humans. A recall of Dieldrin occurred in Australia in 1987.

28/10/99 Barwon Water Highton PreDisinfection Dieldrin 0.03ug/l (10%adwgh)

The highly residual organochlorine Dieldrin was detected at Highton at 10% of Australian Drinking Water Guideline levels in October 1999. This remains the highest level of this now banned insecticide detected in a Victorian water supply. Dieldrin accumulates in the fatty tissue of animals, including humans. A recall of Dieldrin occurred in Australia in 1987.

28/10/99 Barwon Water Highton PreDisinfection Dieldrin 0.03ug/l (10%adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

2007 September – 2013 September: Pennyroyal Creek Geelong Water Supply

Water flowing from Pennyroyal Creek is diverted into the Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel about 2.5km south west of Deans Marsh. There have been 6 pesticide detections in this creek between 2007 and 2013.

18/9/07 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (0.067%adwgh)

20/9/11 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.12ug/L (0.3% adwgh)

17/9/13 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (0.067% adwgh)

17/9/13 Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.02ug/L (0.05% adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.h

Water flowing from Pennyroyal Creek is diverted into the Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel about 2.5km south west of Deans Marsh. There have been 6 pesticide detections in this creek between 2007 and 2013.

18/9/07 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (0.067%adwgh)

20/9/11 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.12ug/L (0.3% adwgh)

17/9/13 Barwon Water Pennyroyal Creek 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (0.067% adwgh)

17/9/13 Pennyroyal Creek MCPA 0.02ug/L (0.05% adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

2007 September – 2016 August. Matthews Creek Geelong Water Supply. Pesticides: MCPA, 2,4-D, Dicamba

Matthews Creek flow is diverted and channeled into Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel about 5-6km south west of Deans Marsh. Farmland occurs upstream of the offtake. This is the location of the highest levels of the herbicide MCPA in a domestic water supply in Victoria. These levels have occurred since 2011. No detections of MCPA have been recorded at Wurdee Boluc Reservoir, some 23 km away,

18/9/07 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.07ug/L (0.175%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Matthews Creek (Geelong) MCPA 0.07ug/L (0.175%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Matthews Creek 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (0.1667%adwgh)

10/9/10 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.48ug/L (1.2%adwgh)

17/8/10 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.26ug/L (0.65%adwgh)

21/9/10 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.02ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

19/7/11 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 2.4ug/L (6%adwgh). The second highest level of MCPA recorded in a domestic water supply in Victoria.

20/9/11 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.03ug/L (0.075%adwgh)

6/8/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 2.4ug/L (6%adwgh). The second highest level of MCPA recorded in a domestic water supply in Victoria.

6/8/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek 2,4-D 0.03ug/L (0.1% adwgh)

6/8/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.04ug/L (0.1%adwgh)

17/9/13 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 4.6ug/L (11.5% adwgh). The highest level of MCPA recorded in a domestic water supply in Victoria.

18/12/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.02ug/L (0.05% adwgh)

17/9/13 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Dicamba 0.35ug/L (0.35% adwgh)

17/12/13 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Triclopyr 0.02ug/L (0.1%adwgh)

15/7/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025% adwg)

11/10/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025% adwg)

16/12/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Triclopyr 0.21ug/L (1.05% adwg)

16/12/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.05ug/L (0.125% adwg)

14/7/15 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.1ug/L (0.25% adwg)

14/7/15 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.08ug/L (0.2% adwg)

27/8/16 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Triclopyr 0.01ug/L (0.05% adwg)

27/8/16 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.04ug/L (1% adwg)

Matthews Creek flow is diverted and channeled into Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel about 5-6km south west of Deans Marsh. Farmland occurs upstream of the offtake. This is the location of the highest levels of the herbicide MCPA in a domestic water supply in Victoria. These levels have occurred since 2011. No detections of MCPA have been recorded at Wurdee Boluc Reservoir, some 23 km away,

18/9/07 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.07ug/L (0.175%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Matthews Creek (Geelong) MCPA 0.07ug/L (0.175%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Matthews Creek 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (0.1667%adwgh)

10/9/10 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.48ug/L (1.2%adwgh)

17/8/10 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.26ug/L (0.65%adwgh)

21/9/10 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.02ug/L (0.05%adwgh)

19/7/11 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 2.4ug/L (6%adwgh). The second highest level of MCPA recorded in a domestic water supply in Victoria.

20/9/11 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.03ug/L (0.075%adwgh)

6/8/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 2.4ug/L (6%adwgh). The second highest level of MCPA recorded in a domestic water supply in Victoria.

6/8/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek 2,4-D 0.03ug/L (0.1% adwgh)

6/8/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.04ug/L (0.1%adwgh)

17/9/13 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 4.6ug/L (11.5% adwgh). The highest level of MCPA recorded in a domestic water supply in Victoria.

18/12/12 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.02ug/L (0.05% adwgh)

17/9/13 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Dicamba 0.35ug/L (0.35% adwgh)

17/12/13 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Triclopyr 0.02ug/L (0.1%adwgh)

15/7/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025% adwg)

11/10/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.01ug/L (0.025% adwg)

16/12/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Triclopyr 0.21ug/L (1.05% adwg)

16/12/14 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.05ug/L (0.125% adwg)

14/7/15 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.1ug/L (0.25% adwg)

14/7/15 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.08ug/L (0.2% adwg)

27/8/16 Barwon Water Matthews Creek Triclopyr 0.01ug/L (0.05% adwg)

27/8/16 Barwon Water Matthews Creek MCPA 0.04ug/L (1% adwg)

2007 July – 2016 August: Pesticides Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel – Salt Creek Lane. Pesticides: Glyphosate, 2,4-D, MCPA, 4, Chlorophenoxy Acid

Pesticides Detected in the Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel at Salt Creek Lane (2007-11). Wurdee Boluc Reservoir supplies drinking water to Geelong and surf coast towns.

17/7/07 Barwon Water Inlet Channel Salt Creek Lane Glyphosate 80ug/l  (8%adwgh). 4th highest Glyphosate level in a Victorian Water Supply System. Was not detected in Wurdee Boluc Reservoir).

18/9/07 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc @ Salt Creek Lane 4, chlorophenoxy acetic acid 0.04ug/L

18/9/07 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc @ Brickmakers Rd 4, chlorophenoxy acetic acid 0.01ug/L

15/12/09 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc @ Salt Creek Lane 4, chlorophenoxy acetic acid 0.01ug/L

20/9/11 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel @ Salt Creek Lane MCPA 0.1ug/L (0.25% adwgh)

27/8/16: Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel at Salt Creek Lane 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

Pesticides Detected in the Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel at Salt Creek Lane (2007-11). Wurdee Boluc Reservoir supplies drinking water to Geelong and surf coast towns.

17/7/07 Barwon Water Inlet Channel Salt Creek Lane Glyphosate 80ug/l  (8%adwgh). 4th highest Glyphosate level in a Victorian Water Supply System. Was not detected in Wurdee Boluc Reservoir).

18/9/07 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc @ Salt Creek Lane 4, chlorophenoxy acetic acid 0.04ug/L

18/9/07 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc @ Brickmakers Rd 4, chlorophenoxy acetic acid 0.01ug/L

15/12/09 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc @ Salt Creek Lane 4, chlorophenoxy acetic acid 0.01ug/L

20/9/11 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel @ Salt Creek Lane MCPA 0.1ug/L (0.25% adwgh)

27/8/16: Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel at Salt Creek Lane 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

2003 August – 2009 September. Pesticides detected in Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel.

Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel flows into Wurdee Boluc Reservoir which provides drinking water to western Geelong and some surf coast towns. 5 pesticide detections have occurred between August 2003 and September 2009.

19/8/03 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Chan 2,4-D 27ug/l (90%adwgh). This remains the second highest level of 2,4-D recorded in an Australian domestic water supply. The highest, 34ug/L was recorded in Wurdee Boluc Reservoir in May 2003, indicating that 2,4-D pollution may have been occurring for 3-4 months during 2003.

18/9/07 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel MCPA 0.04ug/L (0.1%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel 2,4-D 0.09ug/L (0.3%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel 2,4-D 0.03ug/L (0.1% adwgh)

20/9/11 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel MCPA 0.03ug/L (0.075%adwgh)

Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel flows into Wurdee Boluc Reservoir which provides drinking water to western Geelong and some surf coast towns. 5 pesticide detections have occurred between August 2003 and September 2009.

19/8/03 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Chan 2,4-D 27ug/l (90%adwgh). This remains the second highest level of 2,4-D recorded in an Australian domestic water supply. The highest, 34ug/L was recorded in Wurdee Boluc Reservoir in May 2003, indicating that 2,4-D pollution may have been occurring for 3-4 months during 2003.

18/9/07 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel MCPA 0.04ug/L (0.1%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel 2,4-D 0.09ug/L (0.3%adwgh)

15/12/09 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel 2,4-D 0.03ug/L (0.1% adwgh)

20/9/11 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Inlet Channel MCPA 0.03ug/L (0.075%adwgh)

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

1994 April: Pyrethrum Spill Tonganah (Tas).

1994 April: Spill of the insecticide pyrethum at Tonganah, near Scottsdale Tasmania. Killed massive numbers of fish, eels and freshwater crayfish. 3 years after the spill river health better but a lack of blackfish and freshwater crayfish a concern (Mercury 5/7/97).

1994 April: Spill of the insecticide pyrethum at Tonganah, near Scottsdale Tasmania. Killed massive numbers of fish, eels and freshwater crayfish. 3 years after the spill river health better but a lack of blackfish and freshwater crayfish a concern (Mercury 5/7/97).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/historylesson2.htm

1988: Warrenbayne Logging Committee Forms – Illness in Community.

STRATHBOGIE RANGES (VIC) Late 80's: Warrenbayne Logging Committee formed due to problems associated with pine plantations including associated long term health effects. Environmental Impact Study was supposed to be done, but never released by authorities. Health problems in community started emerging around 1987 with the local tennis club, which included a male and a female genetic mutation involving the gonads. The girl also had a bone cancer at 9 years of age and the removal of precancerous ovaries at 13 years. Two other girls and a boy develop late onset epilepsy. Another male member was born extremely premature. Girl developed myeloid leaukemia and passed away, age 24. Residents feel that these issues are the tip of the health iceberg. Apparently in the 1970's the Forestry Commission had also used ROGOR (Dimethoate) in establishing pine plantations.

STRATHBOGIE RANGES (VIC) Late 80’s: Warrenbayne Logging Committee formed due to problems associated with pine plantations including associated long term health effects. Environmental Impact Study was supposed to be done, but never released by authorities. Health problems in community started emerging around 1987 with the local tennis club, which included a male and a female genetic mutation involving the gonads. The girl also had a bone cancer at 9 years of age and the removal of precancerous ovaries at 13 years. Two other girls and a boy develop late onset epilepsy. Another male member was born extremely premature. Girl developed myeloid leaukemia and passed away, age 24. Residents feel that these issues are the tip of the health iceberg. Apparently in the 1970’s the Forestry Commission had also used ROGOR (Dimethoate) in establishing pine plantations.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/historylesson2.htm

1977 July: Scrubby Creek (Vic) – Forests Commission: 2,4,5-T

July 1977: 162 ha sprayed with mixture of 1.4 litre a.i. butyl ester of 2,4,5-T in 48.6 litres of distallate per hectare in a portion of the plantation that drains into Scrubby Creek by Forest Commission. 2,4,5-T concentrations were below detection limit (0.3ug/l) in water in Scrubby Creek and in water from storages on private property. 2,4,5-T concentrations of up to 4.2ug/l were detected in a culvert pipe draining the main gully of the spray area on the 3rd, 4th and 5th day following spraying. (see 2,4,5-T Concentrations in Scrubby Creek Following Aerial Spraying of a young pinus radiata plantation - RJ McKimm & P Hopmans. Research Branch Report No. 93 Forests Commission 1977)

July 1977: 162 ha sprayed with mixture of 1.4 litre a.i. butyl ester of 2,4,5-T in 48.6 litres of distallate per hectare in a portion of the plantation that drains into Scrubby Creek by Forest Commission. 2,4,5-T concentrations were below detection limit (0.3ug/l) in water in Scrubby Creek and in water from storages on private property. 2,4,5-T concentrations of up to 4.2ug/l were detected in a culvert pipe draining the main gully of the spray area on the 3rd, 4th and 5th day following spraying. (see 2,4,5-T Concentrations in Scrubby Creek Following Aerial Spraying of a young pinus radiata plantation – RJ McKimm & P Hopmans. Research Branch Report No. 93 Forests Commission 1977)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/ovens/LEGL93-150.html

1973 June: Forests Commission, Clear Creek: 2,4,5-T Experiment

"In June 1973 the F.C.V. (Forests Commission Victoria) carried out a larger study in 1 335 hectare section of a pine plantation in a catchment of Clear Creek near Myrtleford. Four stream sample points were established at varying distances from the spray area and a total of 1,000 samples were collected over a ten day period. Major peaks in 2,4,5-T concentration occurred after rain, and lesser, relatively insignificant, peaks also occurred during spraying (McKimm, 1974). McKimm stated that 2,4,5-T concentrations were in excess of the upper limit of 20 ug/litre set by the N.H. & M.R.C. but he did not list values. In fact, at the sampling point immediately below the spray zone values of 75 ug/l were obtained during spraying and peaks up to 690ug/l were obtained after rain. Three kilometres downstream values of 135 ug/l were obtained during spraying and peaks up to 500ug/l were obtained after rain. Worse, for the sampling point immediately below the spray zone, of 83 readings made during the seven days after spraying, 48% (40) exceeded 20 ug/l.; 14% (12) exceeded 50 ug/l.; and 7% (6) exceeded 100 ug/l. These measurements indicated that there was a significant threat to streams in aerially sprayed areas, but nothing was done. Rather, two new monitoring programs were organised, one at Carboor near Myrtleford and another at Narbethong in the Central Highlands." (Source: The Herbicide 2,4,5-T and its use in Forestry. By Peter Rawlinson Zoology Department, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, 3083. 1980?)

“In June 1973 the F.C.V. (Forests Commission Victoria) carried out a larger study in 1 335 hectare section of a pine plantation in a catchment of Clear Creek near Myrtleford. Four stream sample points were established at varying distances from the spray area and a total of 1,000 samples were collected over a ten day period. Major peaks in 2,4,5-T concentration occurred after rain, and lesser, relatively insignificant, peaks also occurred during spraying (McKimm, 1974). McKimm stated that 2,4,5-T concentrations were in excess of the upper limit of 20 ug/litre set by the N.H. & M.R.C. but he did not list values. In fact, at the sampling point immediately below the spray zone values of 75 ug/l were obtained during spraying and peaks up to 690ug/l were obtained after rain. Three kilometres downstream values of 135 ug/l were obtained during spraying and peaks up to 500ug/l were obtained after rain. Worse, for the sampling point immediately below the spray zone, of 83 readings made during the seven days after spraying, 48% (40) exceeded 20 ug/l.; 14% (12) exceeded 50 ug/l.; and 7% (6) exceeded 100 ug/l. These measurements indicated that there was a significant threat to streams in aerially sprayed areas, but nothing was done. Rather, two new monitoring programs were organised, one at Carboor near Myrtleford and another at Narbethong in the Central Highlands.” (Source: The Herbicide 2,4,5-T and its use in Forestry. By Peter Rawlinson Zoology Department, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, 3083. 1980?)

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/ovens/LEGL93-149.html

 

 

1977 July: Narbethong Plantation Spray Experiment – Pesticide 2,4,5-T

July 1977: 108 ha of Old Mill Stream catchment sprayed with 1.12kg a.i. butyl ester of 2,4,5-T in 48.6 litres of distillate (120kg used on the target area). Stream immediately below the sprayed area was sampled twice daily for 5 days before spraying and at 12 minute intervals for a period of 13 days during and following spraying. 2,4,5-T was detected in samples on 7th and 8th day following spraying, during a period of heavy rain. On the 7th day the maximal concentration was 10ug/l with all other values of 4.3ug/l or less. 8th day concentration was 1.0ug/l . . . 2,4,5-T could not be detected (ie less than 0.3 ug/l) in samples collected 2.5 km downstream of the spray area at any time during the period of study (see 2,4,5-T Residues in Stream Water Following Aerial Spraying for Woody Weed Control in the Narbethong Plantation by RJ McKimm & P Hopman Research Branch Report No 112. June 1978 Forest Commission).

July 1977: 108 ha of Old Mill Stream catchment sprayed with 1.12kg a.i. butyl ester of 2,4,5-T in 48.6 litres of distillate (120kg used on the target area). Stream immediately below the sprayed area was sampled twice daily for 5 days before spraying and at 12 minute intervals for a period of 13 days during and following spraying. 2,4,5-T was detected in samples on 7th and 8th day following spraying, during a period of heavy rain. On the 7th day the maximal concentration was 10ug/l with all other values of 4.3ug/l or less. 8th day concentration was 1.0ug/l . . . 2,4,5-T could not be detected (ie less than 0.3 ug/l) in samples collected 2.5 km downstream of the spray area at any time during the period of study (see 2,4,5-T Residues in Stream Water Following Aerial Spraying for Woody Weed Control in the Narbethong Plantation by RJ McKimm & P Hopman Research Branch Report No 112. June 1978 Forest Commission).

1983 April: Plantation near Archerton – Pesticide Detected: Clopyralid.

April 1983: 56 Hectares near Archeton (in Benalla's water supply) sprayed with 2.5kg ha-1 of Lontrel L. During and after spraying the streamwater was regularly sampled, just below the sprayed area and at a point 13km further downstream for a 19 day period, during which there were 7 substantial rainfall events totalling 143mm. Highest level of 0.015mgL-1 detected just below the sprayed area . . . At the downstream sampling point, the highest concentration was 0.001mgL-1. (see: Residues of 3,6-DCPA in Streamwater following aerial application to a radiata pine plantation in Ryan's Creek Catchment, N.E. Victoria. Forest Commission Research Report No 238. PC Fagg & CJ Leitch).

April 1983: 56 Hectares near Archeton (in Benalla’s water supply) sprayed with 2.5kg ha-1 of Lontrel L. During and after spraying the streamwater was regularly sampled, just below the sprayed area and at a point 13km further downstream for a 19 day period, during which there were 7 substantial rainfall events totalling 143mm. Highest level of 0.015mgL-1 detected just below the sprayed area . . . At the downstream sampling point, the highest concentration was 0.001mgL-1. (see: Residues of 3,6-DCPA in Streamwater following aerial application to a radiata pine plantation in Ryan’s Creek Catchment, N.E. Victoria. Forest Commission Research Report No 238. PC Fagg & CJ Leitch).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/benalla/LEGL93-66-1.html

1971-1974: Scarsdale Plantation – Pesticide Tested: Picloram.

The Forests Commission, Dow Chemicals and the Commonwealth Defence Standards Laboratory were involved with experimenting with application of Tordon (Picloram) herbicide in the early 1970's with rates between 4 pounds active ingredient per acre & 10 pounds active ingredient per hectare. Total Runoff per acre figures for the 12 month period 18/10/71 to 18/10/72: 5,928 gallons for catchment A and 20,874 gallons for catchment B. Highest rates observed in dams in the plantation were 47.67 parts per billion on 28/10/74.

The Forests Commission, Dow Chemicals and the Commonwealth Defence Standards Laboratory were involved with experimenting with application of Tordon (Picloram) herbicide in the early 1970’s with rates between 4 pounds active ingredient per acre & 10 pounds active ingredient per hectare. Total Runoff per acre figures for the 12 month period 18/10/71 to 18/10/72: 5,928 gallons for catchment A and 20,874 gallons for catchment B. Highest rates observed in dams in the plantation were 47.67 parts per billion on 28/10/74.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/ballarat/LEGL93-29.html

1998 May: Herbicide Spill Traralgon South (Vic). Pesticide: Simazine.

HERBICIDE SPILL ALONG RED HILL ROAD, TRARALGON SOUTH - 26 May 1998 - STRZELECKI RANGES.

A spill of Simazine herbicide occurred for about a kilometre along Red Hill Road, finishing near Middle Road. A company crew had been using the material the previous day and had mixed more than they were able to use. When they went to use it they found that the clay particles has settled and had set solidly. They could not clear it so they took the tank back to their workshops to get cleared. It appears that a valve had been left open which had become unblocked on the way down from Balook Road and had leaked.

The leak which was estimated to be about 100 litres and left a white line on the bitumen road surface.

The leak was not reported either to Australian Paper Plantations Pty Ltd or the EPA until several days after the event.

From the EPA Complaint Report:

"Investigated and found bright pink dye on the edge of the road, the slope leading to a waterhole and a pink tinge in the water. Obtained a sample of the waterhole and at the outlet from it."

On 27/5/98 APP was notified and were advised to pump the water out (to be used as make-up water) and to remove the contaminated soil.

Explanation from spray contractors " *** explained that his son *** had used the suction hose on the new spray unit to pump water into the spray tank after having put the chemicals and dye into the tank (21 litres simazine, 6 litres roundup, 200 ml pulse and 230 ml dye). When he had filled the 600 litre tank he stopped the pump and as he took the hose out of the water he saw the pink liquid running out of the end of the hose into the water. He quickly threw the hose onto the roadway and then onto the vehicle. He saw that the water had been coloured with the dye/chemical mix and that there were stains on the bank and the road edge. He did not notify anyone because he thought the spill was too insignificant but he did spread some sawdust on the spill on the road. It appears that the non-return valve in the hose inlet did not work when the pump was turned off. They have now installed another non-return valve in the inlet hose. "

HERBICIDE SPILL ALONG RED HILL ROAD, TRARALGON SOUTH – 26 May 1998 – STRZELECKI RANGES.

A spill of Simazine herbicide occurred for about a kilometre along Red Hill Road, finishing near Middle Road. A company crew had been using the material the previous day and had mixed more than they were able to use. When they went to use it they found that the clay particles has settled and had set solidly. They could not clear it so they took the tank back to their workshops to get cleared. It appears that a valve had been left open which had become unblocked on the way down from Balook Road and had leaked.

The leak which was estimated to be about 100 litres and left a white line on the bitumen road surface.

The leak was not reported either to Australian Paper Plantations Pty Ltd or the EPA until several days after the event.

From the EPA Complaint Report:

“Investigated and found bright pink dye on the edge of the road, the slope leading to a waterhole and a pink tinge in the water. Obtained a sample of the waterhole and at the outlet from it.”

On 27/5/98 APP was notified and were advised to pump the water out (to be used as make-up water) and to remove the contaminated soil.

Explanation from spray contractors ” *** explained that his son *** had used the suction hose on the new spray unit to pump water into the spray tank after having put the chemicals and dye into the tank (21 litres simazine, 6 litres roundup, 200 ml pulse and 230 ml dye). When he had filled the 600 litre tank he stopped the pump and as he took the hose out of the water he saw the pink liquid running out of the end of the hose into the water. He quickly threw the hose onto the roadway and then onto the vehicle. He saw that the water had been coloured with the dye/chemical mix and that there were stains on the bank and the road edge. He did not notify anyone because he thought the spill was too insignificant but he did spread some sawdust on the spill on the road. It appears that the non-return valve in the hose inlet did not work when the pump was turned off. They have now installed another non-return valve in the inlet hose. “

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/herbicidesUpdate0602.htm

2000-2002: Rosedale (Vic) Death of 100 old growth Red Gums. Pesticides: Atrazine and Hexazinone.

Atrazine and Hexazinone (Forest Mix WDH*) incident that killed 100 old growth redgum trees at Rosedale between 2000 and 2002.

Friends Block Background

1 The site

Friends Block (now owned by Grand Ridge Plantations (GRP) is located approximately 6km south of Rosedale. The district has a long grazing history. The site receives roughly 700mm of rain per year and is about 50m ASL. The landform is gently undulating to flat, with locally dissected drainage ways, or on flatter parts, shallow irregularly scattered depressions. The parent material is unconsolidated alluvial deposits of the late Pliocene age. The soils are a yellow duplex textured soil, with a loamy sand surface horizon over a yellow-brown mottled and generally dense clay. The block is about 450ha in size.

2 Past activities

In 2000, the Friends Block was site prepared and planted in Pinus radiata by Australian Paper Plantations. The site had in excess of 100 old Red Gum trees on site, which were deliberately protected and left intact at time of site preparation and planting. A different herbicide was used to that used normally, which was believed to have a lesser effect on native trees. No herbicide was sprayed around the native trees but this appears to have been inadequate protection. On this block we applied "Forest Mix WDH*" @ 7.2Kg/Ha. Apparently, following herbicide application a strong rain event occurred, resulting in water from the general establishment area pooling around the base of the native trees. The water was slow to get away due to the duplex nature of the soil.

Atrazine and Hexazinone (Forest Mix WDH*) incident that killed 100 old growth redgum trees at Rosedale between 2000 and 2002.

Friends Block Background

1 The site

Friends Block (now owned by Grand Ridge Plantations (GRP) is located approximately 6km south of Rosedale. The district has a long grazing history. The site receives roughly 700mm of rain per year and is about 50m ASL. The landform is gently undulating to flat, with locally dissected drainage ways, or on flatter parts, shallow irregularly scattered depressions. The parent material is unconsolidated alluvial deposits of the late Pliocene age. The soils are a yellow duplex textured soil, with a loamy sand surface horizon over a yellow-brown mottled and generally dense clay. The block is about 450ha in size.

2 Past activities

In 2000, the Friends Block was site prepared and planted in Pinus radiata by Australian Paper Plantations. The site had in excess of 100 old Red Gum trees on site, which were deliberately protected and left intact at time of site preparation and planting. A different herbicide was used to that used normally, which was believed to have a lesser effect on native trees. No herbicide was sprayed around the native trees but this appears to have been inadequate protection. On this block we applied “Forest Mix WDH*” @ 7.2Kg/Ha. Apparently, following herbicide application a strong rain event occurred, resulting in water from the general establishment area pooling around the base of the native trees. The water was slow to get away due to the duplex nature of the soil.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/herbicidesUpdate0602.htm#Rosedale

2009 March: Hobart – Derwent River. Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone and Atrazine

27/9/06: Derwent River Atrazine: 0.08ug/L (Tim Morris MP FoI)

March 2009 Hexazinone Hobart Water Supply

The State Government says there's no need to be alarmed but small amounts of a herbicide called hexazinone have been found in Hobart's drinking water supply and it's likely forestry operations are to blame. The Greens says it's a public health risk but the Government says the levels aren't high enough to cause harm.

ELIZABETH JACKSON: Herbicides have been found in Hobart's drinking water. The State Government says it's likely the chemicals have come from a pine plantation.

The Tasmanian Greens say public health has been put at risk. But the Government says level of the herbicides found in the water isn't high enough to be a health concern.

Felicity Ogilvie reports from Hobart.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Hobart's drinking water comes from the Derwent River. And the river contains more things than water; a herbicide called Hexazinone has been found at one of the city's water treatment plants.

Earlier this week the Primary Industries Minister, David Llewellyn, told State Parliament the herbicide has probably come from a pine plantation that's near the river.

DAVID LLEWELLYN: As such my department is working with forestry companies in the area to examine practices and identify any measures that can be implemented to mitigate the chance of contamination in the future.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Tim Morris from the Tasmanian Greens wants the herbicide banned.

TIM MORRIS: These chemicals can potentially impact on the reproductive system in humans, and that is the real worry here.

FELICITY OGILVIE: The Hexazinone was found in the river on the 26th of February. No public health warning was issued.

Mr Llewellyn says that's because the level of the chemical was too low to be a health risk.

DAVID LLEWELLYN: This detection is well below the guideline and health value and our colleagues in the Health Department advise that this detection presents no public health risk.

TIM MORRIS: What we have is evidence from the United States which suggests that these chemicals are potentially harmful for humans.

At much, much lower levels, in fact parts per trillion.

FELICITY OGILVIE: The State Government says there's no risk because the herbicide levels haven't exceeded Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.

Stuart Heggie is the state manager of environmental health.

STUART HEGGIE: The level at which this chemical does become a public health risk is if it is detected in drinking water at the level of 300 parts per billion.

The detection that was found earlier this year was at 1.02. So that is not at a level at which it becomes a public health risk.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Hexazinone isn't the only herbicide that's been found in Hobart's drinking water supply. Last September small amounts of Atrazine were found in the Derwent River.

Tim Morris says the source of the contamination needs to be found.

TIM MORRIS: The Government has not disclosed where these chemicals have come from. They say it's highly likely that the chemical detection found in Hobart's water was from a forestry pine plantation redevelopment operation.

But they were not willing to confirm it.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Hobart Water says it will continue testing the drinking water it gets from the Derwent River.

27/9/06: Derwent River Atrazine: 0.08ug/L (Tim Morris MP FoI)

March 2009 Hexazinone Hobart Water Supply

The State Government says there’s no need to be alarmed but small amounts of a herbicide called hexazinone have been found in Hobart’s drinking water supply and it’s likely forestry operations are to blame. The Greens says it’s a public health risk but the Government says the levels aren’t high enough to cause harm.

ELIZABETH JACKSON: Herbicides have been found in Hobart’s drinking water. The State Government says it’s likely the chemicals have come from a pine plantation.

The Tasmanian Greens say public health has been put at risk. But the Government says level of the herbicides found in the water isn’t high enough to be a health concern.

Felicity Ogilvie reports from Hobart.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Hobart’s drinking water comes from the Derwent River. And the river contains more things than water; a herbicide called Hexazinone has been found at one of the city’s water treatment plants.

Earlier this week the Primary Industries Minister, David Llewellyn, told State Parliament the herbicide has probably come from a pine plantation that’s near the river.

DAVID LLEWELLYN: As such my department is working with forestry companies in the area to examine practices and identify any measures that can be implemented to mitigate the chance of contamination in the future.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Tim Morris from the Tasmanian Greens wants the herbicide banned.

TIM MORRIS: These chemicals can potentially impact on the reproductive system in humans, and that is the real worry here.

FELICITY OGILVIE: The Hexazinone was found in the river on the 26th of February. No public health warning was issued.

Mr Llewellyn says that’s because the level of the chemical was too low to be a health risk.

DAVID LLEWELLYN: This detection is well below the guideline and health value and our colleagues in the Health Department advise that this detection presents no public health risk.

TIM MORRIS: What we have is evidence from the United States which suggests that these chemicals are potentially harmful for humans.

At much, much lower levels, in fact parts per trillion.

FELICITY OGILVIE: The State Government says there’s no risk because the herbicide levels haven’t exceeded Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.

Stuart Heggie is the state manager of environmental health.

STUART HEGGIE: The level at which this chemical does become a public health risk is if it is detected in drinking water at the level of 300 parts per billion.

The detection that was found earlier this year was at 1.02. So that is not at a level at which it becomes a public health risk.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Hexazinone isn’t the only herbicide that’s been found in Hobart’s drinking water supply. Last September small amounts of Atrazine were found in the Derwent River.

Tim Morris says the source of the contamination needs to be found.

TIM MORRIS: The Government has not disclosed where these chemicals have come from. They say it’s highly likely that the chemical detection found in Hobart’s water was from a forestry pine plantation redevelopment operation.

But they were not willing to confirm it.

FELICITY OGILVIE: Hobart Water says it will continue testing the drinking water it gets from the Derwent River.
https://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2008/s2558974.htm

2011 February: Dunoon (NSW) Spray Drift Fear

2011 February:

A GROUP of Dunoon residents are demanding a US agricultural company at least warn them the next time it sprays potentially cancer-causing chemicals in their area.

While spokesman Silas Long said the group was keen to maintain friendly relations with Hancock Agricultural Investment Group, they were yet to receive a written response about an incident involving a helicopter spraying close to neighbouring properties during windy conditions in November.

The Hancock group, which owns several macadamia farms near Dunoon, used choppers for aerial spraying on at least two occasions late last year causing serious concerns within parts of the local community.

Residents’ concerns led to a local meeting that demanded , in future, neighbours be notified of all sprayings and the names of the chemicals to be used.

But Mr Long blamed “weak planning”, that had allowed residential and farming properties to exist side by side, rather than the Hancock group, for the situation locals have found themselves in.

Since publicity about the incident, the organic banana and avocado grower has had a verbal discussion with Hancock’s managing director, Andrew Strahley.

A letter had gone to the agricultural company on January 18.

The Dunoon residents’ concerns come on the heels of a report by the Environmental Defenders Office NSW and the National Toxics Network, called Getting the Drift, that found many pesticides and herbicides commonly used on the Northern Rivers pose a threat to human health.

A GROUP of Dunoon residents are demanding a US agricultural company at least warn them the next time it sprays potentially cancer-causing chemicals in their area.

While spokesman Silas Long said the group was keen to maintain friendly relations with Hancock Agricultural Investment Group, they were yet to receive a written response about an incident involving a helicopter spraying close to neighbouring properties during windy conditions in November.

The Hancock group, which owns several macadamia farms near Dunoon, used choppers for aerial spraying on at least two occasions late last year causing serious concerns within parts of the local community.

Residents’ concerns led to a local meeting that demanded , in future, neighbours be notified of all sprayings and the names of the chemicals to be used.

But Mr Long blamed “weak planning”, that had allowed residential and farming properties to exist side by side, rather than the Hancock group, for the situation locals have found themselves in.

Since publicity about the incident, the organic banana and avocado grower has had a verbal discussion with Hancock’s managing director, Andrew Strahley.

A letter had gone to the agricultural company on January 18.

The Dunoon residents’ concerns come on the heels of a report by the Environmental Defenders Office NSW and the National Toxics Network, called Getting the Drift, that found many pesticides and herbicides commonly used on the Northern Rivers pose a threat to human health.

https://www.northernstar.com.au/news/residents-fear-over-toxic-chemicals-dunoon/769539/

2012 June: Pesticides Yarra River Sugarloaf Reservoir Offtake

Pesticide found near drinking water dam

Date June 17, 2012 The Age Newspaper

(31 positive samples 2008-2012: Simazine, Atrazine, Metolachlor, DEET and Glyphosate)

 PESTICIDES have been detected upstream of a reservoir that feeds Melbourne's drinking water supply, sparking calls by an environmental group for an urgent upgrade of the dam's filtration and treatment plant.

On eight occasions in 2010-11, the levels of pesticides, including simazine, atrazine and DEET, at Sugarloaf reservoir, north-east of Melbourne, were recorded above safe European Union drinking water standards, according to Melbourne Water data obtained by Friends of the Earth through freedom of information.

The pesticide levels were within Australian safety limits, but Friends of the Earth spokesman Anthony Amis said it highlighted problems with the Winneke treatment plant at Sugarloaf, which ''was never intended to filter out pesticides''.

''We'd argue that as a precautionary principle the treatment process at Winneke should be upgraded to filter out these pesticides. Elsewhere in Australia, activated carbon has been used to filter out pesticides.''

Sugarloaf is one of three Melbourne reservoirs where the water has to be fully treated and the only one fed by the Yarra River.

Before reaching Sugarloaf, the Yarra passes through some intensively farmed and sprayed properties, including several vineyards.

''It is clear to us that there is probably no other place in Victoria, other than near Werribee, where there'd be such a heavy use of agricultural chemicals,'' Mr Amis said.

Half the pesticides detected in the upper Yarra, including simazine and atrazine, were ''endocrine disrupters'' that could interfere with hormonal development, he said.

Atrazine can turn male frogs into female frogs, while in humans it has been associated with birth defects, low birth weights and menstrual problems.

Mr Amis said there was a strong case for Australia to adopt stricter standards, which are currently set at 20 parts per billion, compared with 0.1 parts per billion in Europe.

Melbourne Water's own risk assessment - published in the Friends of the Earth report, Issues regarding Melbourne drinking water and pesticides - stated that ''of any of the catchments, biocides are most likely to be found in Sugarloaf''.

Pesticide found near drinking water dam

Date June 17, 2012 The Age Newspaper

(31 positive samples 2008-2012: Simazine, Atrazine, Metolachlor, DEET and Glyphosate)

 PESTICIDES have been detected upstream of a reservoir that feeds Melbourne’s drinking water supply, sparking calls by an environmental group for an urgent upgrade of the dam’s filtration and treatment plant.

On eight occasions in 2010-11, the levels of pesticides, including simazine, atrazine and DEET, at Sugarloaf reservoir, north-east of Melbourne, were recorded above safe European Union drinking water standards, according to Melbourne Water data obtained by Friends of the Earth through freedom of information.

The pesticide levels were within Australian safety limits, but Friends of the Earth spokesman Anthony Amis said it highlighted problems with the Winneke treatment plant at Sugarloaf, which ”was never intended to filter out pesticides”.

”We’d argue that as a precautionary principle the treatment process at Winneke should be upgraded to filter out these pesticides. Elsewhere in Australia, activated carbon has been used to filter out pesticides.”

Sugarloaf is one of three Melbourne reservoirs where the water has to be fully treated and the only one fed by the Yarra River.

Before reaching Sugarloaf, the Yarra passes through some intensively farmed and sprayed properties, including several vineyards.

”It is clear to us that there is probably no other place in Victoria, other than near Werribee, where there’d be such a heavy use of agricultural chemicals,” Mr Amis said.

Half the pesticides detected in the upper Yarra, including simazine and atrazine, were ”endocrine disrupters” that could interfere with hormonal development, he said.

Atrazine can turn male frogs into female frogs, while in humans it has been associated with birth defects, low birth weights and menstrual problems.

Mr Amis said there was a strong case for Australia to adopt stricter standards, which are currently set at 20 parts per billion, compared with 0.1 parts per billion in Europe.

Melbourne Water’s own risk assessment – published in the Friends of the Earth report, Issues regarding Melbourne drinking water and pesticides – stated that ”of any of the catchments, biocides are most likely to be found in Sugarloaf”.

Melbourne Water also acknowledged that ”the health impacts of biocides are uncertain and generally of a chronic nature.

”It is possible that long-term exposure could cause cancer within a subset of the population resulting in shortened life expectancy in some people.” It also acknowledges that the impact of biocide contamination would be ”catastrophic”.

Since 2010, Friends of the Earth has resisted attempts by the Eastern Golf Club to open a new course at Yering, one kilometre upstream from Sugarloaf, over fears chemicals used to maintain the greens could be washed into the reservoir in the event of a flood.

Water quality scientist Dan Deere, an expert witness at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hearings on the golf course application, said treatment plants such as Winneke were not designed to remove pesticides although ”they will reduce pesticides to some extent”.

”Advanced treatment, such as ozone coupled with organic carbon, or reverse osmosis, would be required [to fully remove pesticides],” he said.

Dr Deere said the European Union guidelines were based ”on consumer expectations of no pesticides being present”.

If pesticide levels met Australian guidelines, ”they weren’t thought to present a public health risk”.

Dr Deere said if tougher guidelines were introduced for pesticides in water, they would have to be introduced for food as well.

”If you adopted a ‘zero detection’ approach to pesticides in water, you would need to consider what you’d do about foods,” he said. ”If pesticides are applied directly to foods you can see that the total amount of pesticide consumed by a person might be higher from those foods than from any trace levels that might end up highly diluted in the water.”

The general manager of asset planning at Melbourne Water, Paul Pretto, said he was ”very concerned at this alarmist interpretation of our own data” by Friends of the Earth.

”The simple fact is that all drinking water we supply has to meet very strict health guidelines. At no stage have pesticides been detected above the recommended health limits. They are many, many times below the health-based values in the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.”

■scauchi@theage.com.au

https://www.theage.com.au/victoria/pesticide-found-near-drinking-water-dam-20120616-20h3z.html

2008 May: Ross (Tas) & Macquarie River: Pesticide Detected: Atrazine.

Gunns hit with ban on use of herbicide Matthew Denholm May 17, 2008 The Australian

TASMANIA'S Director of Public Health has banned Gunns from using controversial herbicides in a town drinking-water catchment and suggested their use state-wide be reconsidered.

Roscoe Taylor revealed yesterday he had directed the timber company not to use the triazine herbicides - atrazine and simazine - to control weeds in its forest plantations in the Macquarie River catchment. This followed repeated detection of simazine in drinking water supplies for the town of Ross at levels more than double the national guideline.

Dr Taylor also told The Weekend Australian he believed the use of the chemicals in cooler states might need to be re-examined following evidence they were persisting longer in cool environments. "There have been two detections of simazine in drinking-water catchments in Tasmania in four years," Dr Taylor said.

"From my point of view (it's) three strikes and it's out." "If it can be demonstrated that these things are persisting (in the environment) despite good practice in their application, then maybe people need to look at whether or not their application in the Tasmanian setting is appropriate."

Also yesterday, Gunns confirmed it was reviewing the use of the herbicides, linked by some research to cancers and hormonal defects, on its plantations.

The developments follow The Australian's report earlier this week that American researchers had found that atrazine caused damaging changes to human cells at levels half those of Australia's drinking-water health value.

"I'm regarding this matter as under investigation," Dr Taylor said. "The issues include whether or not the triazine herbicides demonstrate greater persistence in the Tasmanian environment than they may, say, in a warmer climate."

He had observed persistence of the chemicals in the Prosser catchment at Orford, on Tasmania's east coast. "There was a fairly lengthy degree of persistence over many months - the chemical just stayed at very, very low concentrations," he said.

The State Department of Primary Industries and Water was developing ways to assess the risks of chemical use in water catchments. Dr Taylor would then pursue the issue via the national Agricultural, Silvicultural and Veterinary Chemicals Council.

"Until those pieces of information are provided to me, I feel it is best to ask operators to avoid using this long-acting herbicide in that particular catchment, where there is a public drinking-water supply that was contaminated," he said.

"My brief is to protect public health and I believe that the community should be reassured that in these cases, public health protection has occurred." He said atrazine levels in the Macquarie River, a source of drinking water for the Midlands town of Ross, had ranged as high as 1.35 parts per billion, far above the Australian Drinking Water Guideline of 0.5 > ppb.

The level was far below health value levels and Ross's water supply was already unfit for drinking because of algal contamination. "(However), it's an unnecessary chemical to have in our drinking-water supply and therefore measures should betaken to reduce it," Dr Taylor said.

Gunns had complied with his directive. "In fact, they indicated they would be seeking to review the application of chemicals on plantations," Dr Taylor said. "I will be interested to see what that review brings forward." Gunns confirmed that a review was under way.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#may1708

Gunns hit with ban on use of herbicide Matthew Denholm May 17, 2008 The Australian

TASMANIA’S Director of Public Health has banned Gunns from using controversial herbicides in a town drinking-water catchment and suggested their use state-wide be reconsidered.

Roscoe Taylor revealed yesterday he had directed the timber company not to use the triazine herbicides – atrazine and simazine – to control weeds in its forest plantations in the Macquarie River catchment. This followed repeated detection of simazine in drinking water supplies for the town of Ross at levels more than double the national guideline.

Dr Taylor also told The Weekend Australian he believed the use of the chemicals in cooler states might need to be re-examined following evidence they were persisting longer in cool environments. “There have been two detections of simazine in drinking-water catchments in Tasmania in four years,” Dr Taylor said.

“From my point of view (it’s) three strikes and it’s out.” “If it can be demonstrated that these things are persisting (in the environment) despite good practice in their application, then maybe people need to look at whether or not their application in the Tasmanian setting is appropriate.”

Also yesterday, Gunns confirmed it was reviewing the use of the herbicides, linked by some research to cancers and hormonal defects, on its plantations.

The developments follow The Australian’s report earlier this week that American researchers had found that atrazine caused damaging changes to human cells at levels half those of Australia’s drinking-water health value.

“I’m regarding this matter as under investigation,” Dr Taylor said. “The issues include whether or not the triazine herbicides demonstrate greater persistence in the Tasmanian environment than they may, say, in a warmer climate.”

He had observed persistence of the chemicals in the Prosser catchment at Orford, on Tasmania’s east coast. “There was a fairly lengthy degree of persistence over many months – the chemical just stayed at very, very low concentrations,” he said.

The State Department of Primary Industries and Water was developing ways to assess the risks of chemical use in water catchments. Dr Taylor would then pursue the issue via the national Agricultural, Silvicultural and Veterinary Chemicals Council.

“Until those pieces of information are provided to me, I feel it is best to ask operators to avoid using this long-acting herbicide in that particular catchment, where there is a public drinking-water supply that was contaminated,” he said.

“My brief is to protect public health and I believe that the community should be reassured that in these cases, public health protection has occurred.” He said atrazine levels in the Macquarie River, a source of drinking water for the Midlands town of Ross, had ranged as high as 1.35 parts per billion, far above the Australian Drinking Water Guideline of 0.5 > ppb.

The level was far below health value levels and Ross’s water supply was already unfit for drinking because of algal contamination. “(However), it’s an unnecessary chemical to have in our drinking-water supply and therefore measures should betaken to reduce it,” Dr Taylor said.

Gunns had complied with his directive. “In fact, they indicated they would be seeking to review the application of chemicals on plantations,” Dr Taylor said. “I will be interested to see what that review brings forward.” Gunns confirmed that a review was under way.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#may1708

2007 October: Plantation Pesticides Leach Off Site. Western Creek (Tas) – Pesticides: Glyphosate and Sulfometuron Methyl

Herbicide leak in water feared Matthew Denholm October 03, 2007 (The Australian)

A TASMANIAN farmer is demanding compensation, believed to be at least $150,000, after herbicides sprayed on a Gunns forest plantation site apparently washed on to adjoining pasture.

The state Government is investigating whether any of the herbicides, including one chemical linked to crop contamination in the US, has contaminated waterways.

Local residents and community groups last night called for independent tests to be conducted to show whether drinking water had been polluted.

The concerns centre on a cattle grazing property at Dairy Plains, Western Creek, in the state's rural north. Residents' groups say heavy rains in August washed herbicides applied to a Gunns plantation site in late June on to land owned by farmer Michael Terry.

Mr Terry is understood to have lost pasture. Samples have been taken from a large dam on the property that is feared to have been contaminated.

Local community groups - Western Rivers Preservation Trust and the Meander Valley Action Group - said they feared the Western Creek, Meander River and South Esk River had been contaminated.

Rod Hutchins, of the Meander Valley Action Group, said these waterways provided water for towns such as Deloraine and Westbury, and the West Tamar, as well as emergency supplies for Launceston.

Mr Terry would not comment yesterday, but confirmed to The Australian that he was negotiating a settlement with Gunns. "I'm in negotiation with Gunns at the moment and don't want to comment," Mr Terry said. It is understood he agists dairy and beef cattle on his land.

Gunns was also tight-lipped. "Gunns is continuing to comply with all relevant regulations," a spokesman said.

The state Department of Primary Industry and Water confirmed it was investigating possible contamination. "The DPIW spray unit is investigating whether there has been any contamination of a waterway in the Western Creek area," spokesman Simon de Salis said.

Mr Hutchins said it was one of about eight examples of herbicide spray from forestry plantations affecting neighbouring properties in the state's north and east in the past six months.

He believed two herbicides had been sprayed on the Western Plains plantation land by Gunns: Oust and Glyphosate. "There is meant to be a buffer zone but they sprayed right up to the fence and the wash-off after heavy rains went as far as 1.5km into the adjoining property and into a dam used for irrigation," Mr Hutchins said.

 

4/10/07: Western Creek Coupe: Simazine 0.24ug/L (Tim Morris MP FoI)

Herbicide leak in water feared Matthew Denholm October 03, 2007 (The Australian)

A TASMANIAN farmer is demanding compensation, believed to be at least $150,000, after herbicides sprayed on a Gunns forest plantation site apparently washed on to adjoining pasture.

The state Government is investigating whether any of the herbicides, including one chemical linked to crop contamination in the US, has contaminated waterways.

Local residents and community groups last night called for independent tests to be conducted to show whether drinking water had been polluted.

The concerns centre on a cattle grazing property at Dairy Plains, Western Creek, in the state’s rural north. Residents’ groups say heavy rains in August washed herbicides applied to a Gunns plantation site in late June on to land owned by farmer Michael Terry.

Mr Terry is understood to have lost pasture. Samples have been taken from a large dam on the property that is feared to have been contaminated.

Local community groups – Western Rivers Preservation Trust and the Meander Valley Action Group – said they feared the Western Creek, Meander River and South Esk River had been contaminated.

Rod Hutchins, of the Meander Valley Action Group, said these waterways provided water for towns such as Deloraine and Westbury, and the West Tamar, as well as emergency supplies for Launceston.

Mr Terry would not comment yesterday, but confirmed to The Australian that he was negotiating a settlement with Gunns. “I’m in negotiation with Gunns at the moment and don’t want to comment,” Mr Terry said. It is understood he agists dairy and beef cattle on his land.

Gunns was also tight-lipped. “Gunns is continuing to comply with all relevant regulations,” a spokesman said.

The state Department of Primary Industry and Water confirmed it was investigating possible contamination. “The DPIW spray unit is investigating whether there has been any contamination of a waterway in the Western Creek area,” spokesman Simon de Salis said.

Mr Hutchins said it was one of about eight examples of herbicide spray from forestry plantations affecting neighbouring properties in the state’s north and east in the past six months.

He believed two herbicides had been sprayed on the Western Plains plantation land by Gunns: Oust and Glyphosate. “There is meant to be a buffer zone but they sprayed right up to the fence and the wash-off after heavy rains went as far as 1.5km into the adjoining property and into a dam used for irrigation,” Mr Hutchins said.

While Mr Terry would not comment on the negotiations with Gunns, Mr Hutchins said he was aware that company director, and former Liberal premier, Robin Gray was among Gunns’ representatives talking to the farmer.

Neil Graham, president of the Western Rivers Preservation Trust, questioned Gunns’ environmental credentials. “How can Gunns hope to establish a pulp mill with environmental guidelines when they can’t even adhere to guidelines in respect to establishing simple plantations?” he said.

The incident has inflamed local opposition to forest plantations, which have expanded rapidly in recent years, fuelled by tax-friendly investment schemes, taking over farmland. “They are destroying our way of life,” Mr Hutchins said.

“Farmers get offers for their land that are too good to refuse and with them goes their families, and with them the services and community. There is also concern about whether the use of these chemicals is linked to the higher incidence of certain cancers in the north of Tasmania.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#leak

4/10/07: Western Creek Coupe: Simazine 0.24ug/L (Tim Morris MP FoI)

2007 June: Joondalup (WA) Groundwater Polluted. Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone.

WA Times Historic trees fall victim to spray program 16th June 2007,

A weed-spraying operation has backfired, killing historic trees around Perth and causing the death or decline of others in at least 74 locations, including some on private property.

The City of Stirling’s report into the incident said the council normally used Roundup every six months to control weeds in sumps. But a decision was taken in 2004 to spray once a year with a longer-lasting herbicide, partly because sumps in the neighbouring City of Joondalup presented well and were sprayed annually.

But problems occurred six months after Stirling’s herbicide was changed to the chemical hexazinone in May last year. “City officers and residents started noticing deterioration in the condition of established trees and shrubs in and adjoining the sumps,” the report said.

And the city’s contractor, Turfmaster, warned that Joondalup was experiencing a significant stressing and loss of established vegetation next to its sumps.

Stirling’s tree expert advised the effect was probably due to hexazinone, compounded by drought and a dropping watertable.

Stirling’s investigation found that trees and vegetation in sumps sprayed with hexazinone were dead or in severe decline. “Though replacement planting could be undertaken using native vegetation, a number of the dead and declining trees were of a significant age class that categorised them as historic,” the report said.

In all 136 sumps had been sprayed, 74 of which required tree lopping or removal of dead vegetation, including dead or dying material in private properties adjoining 10 of the sumps. The report recommended that herbicides such as hexazinone should not be used in sumps.

It said the council should negotiate with the spray contractor to recover the cost for removing and replacing trees.

Turfmaster director Kim Evans declined to comment. The Health Department said Water Corporation tests indicated hexazinone was not in groundwater drinking bores in Stirling and Joondalup.

The Department of Environment and Conservation is still examining whether the chemical entered groundwater supplies.

WA Times Historic trees fall victim to spray program 16th June 2007,

A weed-spraying operation has backfired, killing historic trees around Perth and causing the death or decline of others in at least 74 locations, including some on private property.

The City of Stirling’s report into the incident said the council normally used Roundup every six months to control weeds in sumps. But a decision was taken in 2004 to spray once a year with a longer-lasting herbicide, partly because sumps in the neighbouring City of Joondalup presented well and were sprayed annually.

But problems occurred six months after Stirling’s herbicide was changed to the chemical hexazinone in May last year. “City officers and residents started noticing deterioration in the condition of established trees and shrubs in and adjoining the sumps,” the report said.

And the city’s contractor, Turfmaster, warned that Joondalup was experiencing a significant stressing and loss of established vegetation next to its sumps.

Stirling’s tree expert advised the effect was probably due to hexazinone, compounded by drought and a dropping watertable.

Stirling’s investigation found that trees and vegetation in sumps sprayed with hexazinone were dead or in severe decline. “Though replacement planting could be undertaken using native vegetation, a number of the dead and declining trees were of a significant age class that categorised them as historic,” the report said.

In all 136 sumps had been sprayed, 74 of which required tree lopping or removal of dead vegetation, including dead or dying material in private properties adjoining 10 of the sumps. The report recommended that herbicides such as hexazinone should not be used in sumps.

It said the council should negotiate with the spray contractor to recover the cost for removing and replacing trees.

Turfmaster director Kim Evans declined to comment. The Health Department said Water Corporation tests indicated hexazinone was not in groundwater drinking bores in Stirling and Joondalup.

The Department of Environment and Conservation is still examining whether the chemical entered groundwater supplies.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#West

2007 March: Inglis River (Tas): Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone.

News of more rivers contaminated. This time in the North West of Tassie.

In yesterday’s Mercury (21st March 2007): “Traces of the herbicide MCPA at a level of 0.27 parts per billion and atrazine at 0.05 ppb were found in the Duck River near Smithton. In the Inglis River near Wynyard traces of the herbicide Hexazinone were measured at 0.06 ppb.”

In the Advocate it is reported that the Chemicals Registrar (Ian Parr) was “unsure whether farmers or foresters were spraying too close to the water systems.”

Councillor Hine from Circular Head said “many farmers were currently spraying against various weeds...Farmers just need to be a bit careful with that sort of thing.”

However, the contamination of our rivers, creeks and rainwater tanks is a GUARANTEED result of normal (and legal) practice in this State.

News of more rivers contaminated. This time in the North West of Tassie.

In yesterday’s Mercury (21st March 2007): “Traces of the herbicide MCPA at a level of 0.27 parts per billion and atrazine at 0.05 ppb were found in the Duck River near Smithton. In the Inglis River near Wynyard traces of the herbicide Hexazinone were measured at 0.06 ppb.”

In the Advocate it is reported that the Chemicals Registrar (Ian Parr) was “unsure whether farmers or foresters were spraying too close to the water systems.”

Councillor Hine from Circular Head said “many farmers were currently spraying against various weeds…Farmers just need to be a bit careful with that sort of thing.”

However, the contamination of our rivers, creeks and rainwater tanks is a GUARANTEED result of normal (and legal) practice in this State.

See: https://www.geocities.com/rosserbj/this_is_a_perversion.html

All pesticides are dangerous and it is my understanding that it is a violation of federal law to claim that they are safe as Minister Llewellyn is claiming in yesterday’s Advocate.

i. Australian Drinking Water Guidelines “Drinking water should be safe to use and aesthetically pleasing. Ideally, it should be clear, colourless, and well aerated, with no unpalatable taste or odour, and it should contain no suspended matter, harmful chemical substances or pathogenic micro-organisms…”

ii. State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 Clause 24 of the State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 which provides that a person responsible for activities with the potential to contaminate groundwater must take appropriate safeguards to minimise the risk of contamination. Regulatory authorities (such as councils) should use their powers to require compliance with this objective Action is required to PREVENT future Contamination. Yet the state government has done nothing but legally perpetuate practices known to ENSURE continued contamination.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#West

2007 March: Duck River North West Tasmania: Pesticides Detected: MCPA, Atrazine.

News of more rivers contaminated. This time in the North West of Tassie.

In yesterday’s Mercury (21st March 2007): “Traces of the herbicide MCPA at a level of 0.27 parts per billion and atrazine at 0.05 ppb were found in the Duck River near Smithton. In the Inglis River near Wynyard traces of the herbicide Hexazinone were measured at 0.06 ppb.”

In the Advocate it is reported that the Chemicals Registrar (Ian Parr) was “unsure whether farmers or foresters were spraying too close to the water systems.”

Councillor Hine from Circular Head said “many farmers were currently spraying against various weeds...Farmers just need to be a bit careful with that sort of thing.”

However, the contamination of our rivers, creeks and rainwater tanks is a GUARANTEED result of normal (and legal) practice in this State.

News of more rivers contaminated. This time in the North West of Tassie.

In yesterday’s Mercury (21st March 2007): “Traces of the herbicide MCPA at a level of 0.27 parts per billion and atrazine at 0.05 ppb were found in the Duck River near Smithton. In the Inglis River near Wynyard traces of the herbicide Hexazinone were measured at 0.06 ppb.”

In the Advocate it is reported that the Chemicals Registrar (Ian Parr) was “unsure whether farmers or foresters were spraying too close to the water systems.”

Councillor Hine from Circular Head said “many farmers were currently spraying against various weeds…Farmers just need to be a bit careful with that sort of thing.”

However, the contamination of our rivers, creeks and rainwater tanks is a GUARANTEED result of normal (and legal) practice in this State.

See: https://www.geocities.com/rosserbj/this_is_a_perversion.html

All pesticides are dangerous and it is my understanding that it is a violation of federal law to claim that they are safe as Minister Llewellyn is claiming in yesterday’s Advocate.

i. Australian Drinking Water Guidelines “Drinking water should be safe to use and aesthetically pleasing. Ideally, it should be clear, colourless, and well aerated, with no unpalatable taste or odour, and it should contain no suspended matter, harmful chemical substances or pathogenic micro-organisms…”

ii. State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 Clause 24 of the State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 which provides that a person responsible for activities with the potential to contaminate groundwater must take appropriate safeguards to minimise the risk of contamination. Regulatory authorities (such as councils) should use their powers to require compliance with this objective Action is required to PREVENT future Contamination. Yet the state government has done nothing but legally perpetuate practices known to ENSURE continued contamination.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#West

2007 March: Pesticides detected in George River: MCPA, Atrazine, 2,4-D, Metsulfuron Methyl.

Fury over water poison MICHELLE PAINE March 22, 2007 The Mercury

POISON detected in St Helens' drinking water has angered a local doctor, who has asked why residents were not told earlier.

Herbicides MCPA, atrazine and the restricted 2,4-D have been found in three Tasmanian rivers by government testing. Investigations have begun but authorities said finding the source was unlikely.

Agricultural chemicals MCPA and 2,4-D were found in the George River, near where suspicion was raised three years ago after a mass St Helens oyster kill.

Chemicals were also detected in the North-West Duck and Inglis rivers by tests which began two years ago after concern first triggered by the shellfish deaths.

"How can this happen? MCPA was found consistently on February 10 to 13 and still found at the end of testing," said St Helens GP Alison Bleaney.

"Why is the community put at such risk from this danger, which has been highlighted so many times before?

"There is no health value for this chemical in drinking water guidelines because guidelines have determined it should not be in drinking water," Dr Bleaney said.

She said chemicals applied in water catchments must have routine water testing afterwards. Dr Bleaney said she was angry that the Government press release was not accurate.

It said the MCPA detection was "transient", yet it was picked up in 10 tests on consecutive days.

Tasmanian Government registrar of chemical products Ian Parr said it was the first time the chemical had been found in the George River. Mr Parr said investigations were being done.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Fury

10/2/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 1.11ug/L, 2,4-D 0.53ug/L

11/2/07: MCPA 0.88ug/L, 0.36ug/L, 0.3ug/L, 0.25ug/L, 0.18ug/L, 2,4-D 0.2ug/L

12/2/07: MCPA 0.14ug/L, 0.12ug/L

13/2/07: MCPA 0.12ug/L

30/4/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.3ug/L, 0.24ug/L, 0.21ug/L,

1/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.16ug/L, 0.14ug/L

4/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.17ug/L, 0.12ug/L, 0.2ug/L, 0.19ug/L, 0.24ug/L

5/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.19ug/L, 0.13ug/L, 0.1ug/L

6/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.15ug/L, 0.1ug/L

10/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.1ug/L

Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

Fury over water poison MICHELLE PAINE March 22, 2007 The Mercury

POISON detected in St Helens’ drinking water has angered a local doctor, who has asked why residents were not told earlier.

Herbicides MCPA, atrazine and the restricted 2,4-D have been found in three Tasmanian rivers by government testing. Investigations have begun but authorities said finding the source was unlikely.

Agricultural chemicals MCPA and 2,4-D were found in the George River, near where suspicion was raised three years ago after a mass St Helens oyster kill.

Chemicals were also detected in the North-West Duck and Inglis rivers by tests which began two years ago after concern first triggered by the shellfish deaths.

“How can this happen? MCPA was found consistently on February 10 to 13 and still found at the end of testing,” said St Helens GP Alison Bleaney.

“Why is the community put at such risk from this danger, which has been highlighted so many times before?

“There is no health value for this chemical in drinking water guidelines because guidelines have determined it should not be in drinking water,” Dr Bleaney said.

She said chemicals applied in water catchments must have routine water testing afterwards. Dr Bleaney said she was angry that the Government press release was not accurate.

It said the MCPA detection was “transient”, yet it was picked up in 10 tests on consecutive days.

Tasmanian Government registrar of chemical products Ian Parr said it was the first time the chemical had been found in the George River. Mr Parr said investigations were being done.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Fury

10/2/07: MCPA 0.1ug/L, 1.11ug/L, 2,4-D 0.53ug/L

11/2/07: MCPA 0.88ug/L, 0.36ug/L, 0.3ug/L, 0.25ug/L, 0.18ug/L, 2,4-D 0.2ug/L

12/2/07: MCPA 0.14ug/L, 0.12ug/L

13/2/07: MCPA 0.12ug/L

30/4/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.3ug/L, 0.24ug/L, 0.21ug/L,

1/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.16ug/L, 0.14ug/L

4/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.17ug/L, 0.12ug/L, 0.2ug/L, 0.19ug/L, 0.24ug/L

5/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.19ug/L, 0.13ug/L, 0.1ug/L

6/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.15ug/L, 0.1ug/L

10/5/07: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.1ug/L

Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways. Tim Morris MP 28/2/08

2005 July: Gellibrand (Vic) Aerial Spraying

Families getting sick by Cassie Milner Echo News Paper Colac Thursday, July 14, 2005 p4

Gellibrand resident Helen Brettagh believes aerial spraying was to blame for her family suffering a bout of diarrhoea.

Mrs Brettagh, who lives adjacent to a timber plantation, is concerned spray drift from the chemical spaying is making residents sick. “My personal experience is that we all got diarrhoea after spraying including the cat who couldn’t make it to the litter box,” she said.

She also said that she was aware of four other families who had similar gastric complaints after a recent round of spraying. Ms Brettagh wants to hear from anyone in the region who believes the spray drift or contaminated water is making them ill.

“I think it is very important to identify those people who are. I want to start health mapping so we can see if people who are not sick before spraying are afterwards, ”she said. “I’m not against plantation timber, I’m just against getting sprayed with chemicals.”

Families getting sick by Cassie Milner Echo News Paper Colac Thursday, July 14, 2005 p4

Gellibrand resident Helen Brettagh believes aerial spraying was to blame for her family suffering a bout of diarrhoea.

Mrs Brettagh, who lives adjacent to a timber plantation, is concerned spray drift from the chemical spaying is making residents sick. “My personal experience is that we all got diarrhoea after spraying including the cat who couldn’t make it to the litter box,” she said.

She also said that she was aware of four other families who had similar gastric complaints after a recent round of spraying. Ms Brettagh wants to hear from anyone in the region who believes the spray drift or contaminated water is making them ill.

“I think it is very important to identify those people who are. I want to start health mapping so we can see if people who are not sick before spraying are afterwards, ”she said. “I’m not against plantation timber, I’m just against getting sprayed with chemicals.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Families

2004 July – 2005 June: Prosser River Tasmania – Pesticide Detected: Simazine

Orford water murky again The Mercury June 18

HERBICIDE simazine has again been detected in the Prosser River, which provides Orford's water supply.

The herbicide was found at a concentration of 0.09 micrograms a litre (mg/L) in the second round of monitoring of Tasmanian waterways pesticide chemicals.

Samples from 28 Tasmanian rivers and streams were taken in April and May and sent to Analytical Services Tasmania's laboratory for screening for pesticides. All other sites were free of the pesticides tested for.

Primary Industries and Water Minister Steve Kons said while the low level of contamination was barely above detection level, it remained contamination and was unacceptable.

28/7/04: Simazine 1.2ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

12/8/04: Simazine 0.4ug/L, 0.43ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

30/9/04: Simazine 0.31 (0.61?) partly obscured. Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

3/11/04: Simazine 0.12ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

18/1/05: Simazine 2.5ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

8/2/05; Simazine 0.12ug/L, 0.13ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

10/3/05: Simazine 0.16ug/L

Orford water murky again The Mercury June 18

HERBICIDE simazine has again been detected in the Prosser River, which provides Orford’s water supply.

The herbicide was found at a concentration of 0.09 micrograms a litre (mg/L) in the second round of monitoring of Tasmanian waterways pesticide chemicals.

Samples from 28 Tasmanian rivers and streams were taken in April and May and sent to Analytical Services Tasmania’s laboratory for screening for pesticides. All other sites were free of the pesticides tested for.

Primary Industries and Water Minister Steve Kons said while the low level of contamination was barely above detection level, it remained contamination and was unacceptable.

A sample taken from the Prosser River on January 18 found simazine, which was once linked to cancer, at more than double the level (2.5 mg/L) found in a sample taken on July 28 last year (0.0012 mg/L).

The Australian Drinking Water Guideline maximum is 0.5 mg/L. Director of Public Health Roscoe Taylor said latest level detected in the Prosser did not pose any risk to public health.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#murky

28/7/04: Simazine 1.2ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

12/8/04: Simazine 0.4ug/L, 0.43ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

30/9/04: Simazine 0.31 (0.61?) partly obscured. Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

3/11/04: Simazine 0.12ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

18/1/05: Simazine 2.5ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

8/2/05; Simazine 0.12ug/L, 0.13ug/L Source FoI:  (Agricultural Chemicals in Waterways: Tim Morris MP 28/2/08)

10/3/05: Simazine 0.16ug/L

2005 February: George River (Tas) Oyster Deaths: Suspected Pesticides: Atrazine, Alpha-Cypermethrin.

Chemical Scare River water tests add to disease concerns by Claire Miller The Sunday Age February 6, 2005. P10

Water from rivers on Tasmania’s north-east coast is toxic to sea urchin larvae, a species used in European research as a model for pre-cancerous changes in human cells. Larvae cells dies in surface water samples taken from rivers with suspected chemical contamination. Oyster larvae cells also died or failed to develop normally.

Sea urchin cells are recognised as models for cellular development in all living things. Dysfunctional development is a hallmark for tumour cells and human cancers, according to French studies cited in a report prepared for the Australian Medical Association.

Dr Alison Bleaney, a general practioner at St Helens on the state’s north-east coast, commissioned the tests from Ecotox Services Australasia, an independent private laboratory in Sydney.

Chemical Scare River water tests add to disease concerns by Claire Miller The Sunday Age February 6, 2005. P10

Water from rivers on Tasmania’s north-east coast is toxic to sea urchin larvae, a species used in European research as a model for pre-cancerous changes in human cells. Larvae cells dies in surface water samples taken from rivers with suspected chemical contamination. Oyster larvae cells also died or failed to develop normally.

Sea urchin cells are recognised as models for cellular development in all living things. Dysfunctional development is a hallmark for tumour cells and human cancers, according to French studies cited in a report prepared for the Australian Medical Association.

Dr Alison Bleaney, a general practioner at St Helens on the state’s north-east coast, commissioned the tests from Ecotox Services Australasia, an independent private laboratory in Sydney.

The AMA’s public health committee will consider the results at the end of the month, along with statistics from the Tasmanian AMA branch that suggest increased occurrence of neurological illnesses, intestinal tract tumours and reproductive cancers in northern Tasmania.

The Tasmanian AMA prepared its report following community concerns that health problems may be linked to chemicals used in forestry. The rise in illness coincides with the expansion of plantations, which have more than tripled in areas across northern and eastern Tasmania since 1996.

Timber plantations undergo chemical treatment in the first few years to remove competition from wildlife, plants and insects that might slow growth rates. Chemicals used include atrazine, a possible human carcinogen, and alpha-cypermethrin, which is toxic to oysters in trace quantities.

Tasmania’s public health director, Roscoe Taylor, said the tests using sea urchins and oyster larvae were not relevant to drinking water standards for humans. “No other regulatory or water authority in Australia has been in the practice of using these tests,” he said. The method could concentrate naturally occurring toxins, such as tannin, “so it is very premature to declare human health risks in relation to man-made toxins”.

He said the tests had been referred to the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. The department would try to reproduce the sampling and conduct similar tests at other sites. “It is interesting stuff, but premature to speculate publicly about the risk to public health,” Dr Taylor said.

St Helen’s oyster farmers first raised concerns about chemical contamination after 90 per cent of their oysters died in January last year following a record flood. The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment says fresh water killed the oysters.

A marine ecologist at Sydney Water, Dr Marcus Scammell, investigated on behalf of the farmers and said fresh water alone could not explain the death rates. Break O’Day Council has tested water in the George River, near St Helens, monthly since July last year. The results have been clear, but Dr Bleaney said the issue was the cumulative risk, not whether particular chemicals could be detected. She said many studies indicated chemicals acted in concert in the environment to harm human health.

Dr Scammell said European researchers used urchin cells as a predictor for tumour development in humans. He said Tasmanian authorities should suspend risky activities pending an investigation, and should test water to isolate what was harming the larvae. “Something is causing mortalities in oysters that are unnatural, and something is causing a significant effect on human health since mid-2001, he said. “We would put a halt to everything until we had worked out what the hell was going on.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Scare

2005 January: St. Helens (Tas) Childhood Cancers, Premature Births. Pesticides Suspected: Atrazine and Simazine.

Doctors fear chemical link to child disease by Claire Miller Sunday Age January 30, 2005. p3

A surge in cancer and neurological cases in north-eastern Tasmania since 2002 is consistent with chronic low-level chemical exposure, says a report to be submitted to the federal Australian Medical Association next month.

The Tasmanian AMA has charted the rise for the first time and wants expert opinion from the AMA’s public health committee. The report says Tasmania has health anomalies including a sudden jump in childhood cancers and higher-than-average premature births. Its says cases documented around St Helens, on the east coast, in particular are symptomatic of possible chemical exposure.

The report says a rise in neurological illnesses, reproductive and gastrointestinal cancers around St Helens is statistically significant over and above what might be expected through population increases alone. The rise coincides with the expansion of timber plantations in the catchment that supplies the drinking water.

Doctors fear chemical link to child disease by Claire Miller Sunday Age January 30, 2005. p3

A surge in cancer and neurological cases in north-eastern Tasmania since 2002 is consistent with chronic low-level chemical exposure, says a report to be submitted to the federal Australian Medical Association next month.

The Tasmanian AMA has charted the rise for the first time and wants expert opinion from the AMA’s public health committee. The report says Tasmania has health anomalies including a sudden jump in childhood cancers and higher-than-average premature births. Its says cases documented around St Helens, on the east coast, in particular are symptomatic of possible chemical exposure.

The report says a rise in neurological illnesses, reproductive and gastrointestinal cancers around St Helens is statistically significant over and above what might be expected through population increases alone. The rise coincides with the expansion of timber plantations in the catchment that supplies the drinking water.

Plantations are sprayed with chemicals during establishment to kill weeds and grasses. The local Break O’Day Council, helicopter operators, the Health Department and the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment have identified at least a dozen herbicides in use or detected around St Helens since 2002. Many are known as possible carcinogens or hormone disruptors.

Tasmania’s Director of Public Health, Dr Roscoe Taylor, said cancers and other health conditions around St Helens did not appear to depart significantly from the rates expected in a population with similar demographics. The department has sought independent toxicology advice on the neurological cases and expects a report in a fortnight.

The Tasmanian AMA president, Launceston-based Dr Michael Aizen, said the Government response in investigating chemical use and testing water was inadequate, and data available was limited. He wanted more robust, transparent water testing that correlated with when, where and what chemicals were applied.

Stan Siejka, northern Tasmania’s only neurologist, said that in the past year he had treated several patients with unexplained neurological symptoms and definite exposure to chemical spraying. In a typical case, a worker showed classic symptoms after a field nearby was sprayed, but his employer called Dr Siejka to claim the worker had not been exposed.

“I don’t like to see this complete denial where there is a clear possibility that he could have been exposed,” Dr Siejka said. “The frustration is we have little access to what precisely has been applied in the area, and it is very difficult to get independent assessments for the concentrations. A lot of the chemicals are known to have potential side effects.”

Chemicals identified in the St Helens catchment included atrazine and simazine, classified by the World Health Organisation as Type 2B carcinogens, meaning they are suspected of causing cancer.

Atrazine is readily absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, according to a draft review released in October last year by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority.

The review says atrazine, when properly used, is unlikely to pose an unacceptable risk to human health. However, it also noted the chemical was moderately toxic to creatures at the bottom of the food chain, including algae and tiny marine crustaceans. Overall, it said atrazine was slightly to moderately toxic to humans and other mammals.

Break O’Day Council began monthly water tests for chemical residues in July last year. The Health Department ordered tests following a community outcry over the failure to clean up chemical spilt in a helicopter crash in November 2003.

Two months later, more than 90 per cent of oysters downstream in Georges Bay died after a flood.

Break O’Day Mayor Stephen Salter said no chemicals had been detected so far and the water supply was safe. The council is sampling from the George River just above its entry into Georges Bay, where dilution is maximised. The St Helens town water intake is several kilometres upstream.

Alison Bleaney, the St Helens general practioner who alerted health authorities to apparent anomalies in illness rates, said the council and other agencies were using methods to detect individual chemicals and bacteria, rather than testing whether the water itself was toxic and then investigating possible cause.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#link

2004 December: Western Creek (Tas) Water Supply. Pesticides detected: Atrazine and Simazine.

Resident fear at trace of chemical By ROHAN WADE 14dec 04 Mercury

AT least eight households have stopped drawing drinking water from a creek after Government tests found it was contaminated with herbicides.

The township of Western Creek, near Deloraine, is reeling after testing found simazine and atrazine in Tusons Creek, which flows into Western Creek where residents pump their water.

It is hoping a State Government investigation will uncover the source of the chemicals, with timber giant Gunns Ltd, Forestry Tasmania and neighbouring properties all denying any part in the contamination.

Tusons Creek flows past a 110ha Gunns eucalypt plantation which was started about 18 months ago.

Resident fear at trace of chemical By ROHAN WADE 14dec 04 Mercury

AT least eight households have stopped drawing drinking water from a creek after Government tests found it was contaminated with herbicides.

The township of Western Creek, near Deloraine, is reeling after testing found simazine and atrazine in Tusons Creek, which flows into Western Creek where residents pump their water.

It is hoping a State Government investigation will uncover the source of the chemicals, with timber giant Gunns Ltd, Forestry Tasmania and neighbouring properties all denying any part in the contamination.

Tusons Creek flows past a 110ha Gunns eucalypt plantation which was started about 18 months ago.

Western Creek resident and Upper Meander Catchment Landcare Group leader Kevin Knowles said as part of Gunns’ good neighbour charter it had agreed not to use either simazine or atrazine on the plantation.

He said terbacil, which was also found at low levels in the creek, was used by Gunns when the plantation was being established.

Resident Debbie Lynch said she was not concerned with who was using the chemicals, only that it was stopped.

Mr Knowles said most of the properties along Western Creek drew water directly from the creek, with one house having an inlet just 10m from where the contaminated Tusons Creek entered Western Creek.

He said the State Government needed to investigate the source of the contamination and ban such chemicals outright.

Testing showed the water contained 0.61 micrograms a litre of simazine — above the specified guidelines of 0.5 micrograms, triggering an investigation.

The Primary Industries, Water and Environment Department yesterday confirmed it would investigate the matter and would conduct more testing.

Gunns brand manager Sarah Dent said Gunns had not used atrazine or simazine at the plantation.

Last week the small township clashed with Gunns over 1080 baiting at another plantation, with a 28-signature petition eventually convincing the $1 billion company to cease its baiting plans.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#fear

2004 October: Snowy River Pine Plantations. Suspected Pesticide: Atrazine.

Toxic chemical poisoning Snowy: farmer

By Rossylyn Beeby Research, Conservation and Science Reporter Wednesday, 6 October 2004.Canberra Times

The Snowy River catchment is likely to have been contaminated by high levels of toxic herbicides used to control weeds on pine plantations, according to a local farmer and Landcare committee chairman.

Addressing ANU Forestry students, Gippsland grazier Robert Belcher said atrazine and pyrethhoids had been used for more than 30 years to control weeds in pine plantations on the southern Monaro.

He said anecdotal evidence from local spraying contractors indicated herbicides were frequently used at high-strength levels that exceeded legally prescribed safety levels...

"Atrazine has contaminated most of the rivers and streams that flow into the Snowy. We have seen massive fish kills and in some cases, everything in the river has died," he said. "I’m not saying that you shouldn’t use chemicals but I think you should be starting to get a bit suspicious about how safe they are."

Studies in the United States and Europe claim the herbicide is linked to prostate cancer, reproductive problems and hormone imbalances. It has been proved to cause sexual abnormalities in frogs and also cited as a likely cause of an overall global decline in frog populations.

Mr Belcher told The Canberra Times urgent public meetings were being organised at Delegate and Bombala to discuss the health impacts of atrazine and other herbicides.

He said the rural settlement of Craigie had experienced a high number of cancer deaths in recent years and locals believed these deaths were linked to atrazine. "Eight people from Craigie have died from cancer in the last five to ten years, and that figure does not include people suffering from prostate or breast cancer.

 

Toxic chemical poisoning Snowy: farmer

By Rossylyn Beeby Research, Conservation and Science Reporter Wednesday, 6 October 2004.Canberra Times

The Snowy River catchment is likely to have been contaminated by high levels of toxic herbicides used to control weeds on pine plantations, according to a local farmer and Landcare committee chairman.

Addressing ANU Forestry students, Gippsland grazier Robert Belcher said atrazine and pyrethhoids had been used for more than 30 years to control weeds in pine plantations on the southern Monaro.

He said anecdotal evidence from local spraying contractors indicated herbicides were frequently used at high-strength levels that exceeded legally prescribed safety levels.

“Atrazine has contaminated most of the rivers and streams that flow into the Snowy. We have seen massive fish kills and in some cases, everything in the river has died,” he said. “I’m not saying that you shouldn’t use chemicals but I think you should be starting to get a bit suspicious about how safe they are.”

Studies in the United States and Europe claim the herbicide is linked to prostate cancer, reproductive problems and hormone imbalances. It has been proved to cause sexual abnormalities in frogs and also cited as a likely cause of an overall global decline in frog populations.

Mr Belcher told The Canberra Times urgent public meetings were being organised at Delegate and Bombala to discuss the health impacts of atrazine and other herbicides.

He said the rural settlement of Craigie had experienced a high number of cancer deaths in recent years and locals believed these deaths were linked to atrazine. “Eight people from Craigie have died from cancer in the last five to ten years, and that figure does not include people suffering from prostate or breast cancer.

“We know it is still being used by forestry operators in the area – it has a very distinctive smell,” he said.

Tasmanian farmer David Reid obtained documents under Freedom of Information on the extent of herbicide use in Tasmania’s forestry industry and recently gave copies of relevant documents to Mr Belcher and to the Canberra Times. One scientific report published in 1994 stated atrazine contamination from a single forestry operation persisted in streams at low levels for up to 16 months.

The report, by Tasmania’s Inland Fisheries Commission, also says rainfall causes significant increases in atrazine concentrations in creeks and streams, and concludes that contamination of Tasmania’s streams by herbicides is a “frequent occurrence wherever they are used”.

In August, Delegate residents travelled to Canberra to express concerns to federal politicians over tax relief investment in pine plantations.

The group met senior politicians, Cabinet ministers and one of the Prime Minister’s senior advisers to outline their opposition to the expansion of pine plantations in the region. They claim managed investment schemes are driving an expansion of private forestry plantations, with scant regard for preservation of native grasslands, bushfire management and water catchment protection.

South Melbourne based company Willmot forests manages 16,000ha of pine plantations in the Delegate and Bombala regions. The company could not be contacted last night but has previously stated that it was a major employer and injected $9.9 million directly into the region last year.

Mr Belcher, chair of the Snowy River Landcare committee for the past 14 years, believes forestry herbicide use should be a key political consideration for Eden-Monaro residents in this weekend’s election.

“I don’t know how you can talk about that sort of chemical use and expect to see this planet operating in another thousand years.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Snowy

2002 September: Orbost Water Supply. Pesticide Detected Simazine

10 September 2002 Simazine Testing Rocky River, Murrungower (Orbost Water Supply East Gippsland, Victoria)

Letter to Harris Daishowa from East Gippsland Water

"As discussed with you, the initial tests (4th June 2002 pre-spraying) returned a result of <0.02ug/L however, Simazine was detected at a level of 0.2ug/L in the post spraying sample taken on 7th August 2002... Given that the sampling program was limited to a single standard before and after spraying events and no further investigations had been undertaken upstream of your site or at sites inbetween Murrungower and our offtake, it can only be assumed that the source of contamination was the spraying activity..."

10 September 2002 Simazine Testing Rocky River, Murrungower (Orbost Water Supply East Gippsland, Victoria)

Letter to Harris Daishowa from East Gippsland Water

“As discussed with you, the initial tests (4th June 2002 pre-spraying) returned a result of <0.02ug/L however, Simazine was detected at a level of 0.2ug/L in the post spraying sample taken on 7th August 2002… Given that the sampling program was limited to a single standard before and after spraying events and no further investigations had been undertaken upstream of your site or at sites inbetween Murrungower and our offtake, it can only be assumed that the source of contamination was the spraying activity…”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Murrungower

2004 June: Campbell Town (Tas) Drinking Water. Pesticide Detected: Simazine

Town has herbicide in water by Danny Rose 18 June 2004

The Health Department says Campbell Town’s drinking water is safe, despite the discovery of a toxic herbicide. Tests done by the plantation division of forestry company Gunns Ltd have shown a minute level of simazine upstream from where the town draws its water.

Residents were alerted in a letter sent from Northern Midlands late last month, which also labelled the find as "insignificant".

The Greens raised the discovery in State Parliament yesterday, and called for further investigation by Health Minister David Llewellyn. Green MHA for Lyons Tim Morris said some residents still held concerns. It is understood simazine is used in the management of plantations in the Lake Leake catchment area, where the town’s water supply is drawn.

Town has herbicide in water by Danny Rose 18 June 2004

The Health Department says Campbell Town’s drinking water is safe, despite the discovery of a toxic herbicide. Tests done by the plantation division of forestry company Gunns Ltd have shown a minute level of simazine upstream from where the town draws its water.

Residents were alerted in a letter sent from Northern Midlands late last month, which also labelled the find as “insignificant”.

The Greens raised the discovery in State Parliament yesterday, and called for further investigation by Health Minister David Llewellyn. Green MHA for Lyons Tim Morris said some residents still held concerns. It is understood simazine is used in the management of plantations in the Lake Leake catchment area, where the town’s water supply is drawn.

Water quality is monitored by Gunns as part of a deal struck with council. “The contamination of drinking water with simazine and atrazine has been a controversial issue over the past decade in Tasmania,” Mr Morris said yesterday. “At one stage drinking water was trucked into Derby when it was found forestry spraying had contaminated the water supply. “Campbell Town residents need to know whether the Health Department was notified of this, and whether further testing has been undertaken to determine what levels of simazine were in the water supply.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#in

Director of Public Health Rosco Taylor said he was told of the discovery yesterday. He said there was no risk to residents according to council figures. “But I am seeking more details from the Northern Midlands Council to confirm this information,” he said.

1989 October: Loch Valley (Victoria). Noojee Water Supply. Pesticide detected: Hexazinone.

127.7ha sprayed with 510.8kg of Velpar ULW in October 1989. The application was made under an experimental chemical permit obtained from the Department of Agricultural and Rural Affairs. Herbicide was detected at 6.0ug/L, 1 hr after spraying was completed and 7.5ug/L, 6 days after spraying and after light rain had been falling. . . Monitoring was undertaken 2 to 3 km downstream of the treated areas detected trace residues of hexazinone in only three of the 24 samples analysed, the maximum concentration being 1.3ug/L. (See Weed Control in Radiata Pine plantation by aerial application of granulated hexazinone-Lands and Forests Technical Report No. 5. Conservation and Environment 1991).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/strzeleckis/LEGL93-118.html

127.7ha sprayed with 510.8kg of Velpar ULW in October 1989. The application was made under an experimental chemical permit obtained from the Department of Agricultural and Rural Affairs. Herbicide was detected at 6.0ug/L, 1 hr after spraying was completed and 7.5ug/L, 6 days after spraying and after light rain had been falling. . . Monitoring was undertaken 2 to 3 km downstream of the treated areas detected trace residues of hexazinone in only three of the 24 samples analysed, the maximum concentration being 1.3ug/L. (See Weed Control in Radiata Pine plantation by aerial application of granulated hexazinone-Lands and Forests Technical Report No. 5. Conservation and Environment 1991).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/strzeleckis/LEGL93-118.html

1989 October: Neerim East Plantations. Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone.

October 1989: 121.3 ha sprayed with 485.2kg of Velpar ULW. 'The highest levels of hexazinone detected in streamwater were at the Neerim East site, these being 18.0ug/l, five days after application and 17.5ug/l one month later following the largest rainfall measured . Monitoring was undertaken 2 to 3 km downstream of the treated areas detected trace residues of hexazinone in only three of the 24 samples analysed, the maximum concentration being 1.3ug/L.

Source: (Weed Control in Radiata Pine plantation by aerial application of granulated hexazinone - Lands and Forests Technical Report No. 5 Conservation and Environment 1991).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/strzeleckis/LEGL93-119.html

October 1989: 121.3 ha sprayed with 485.2kg of Velpar ULW. ‘The highest levels of hexazinone detected in streamwater were at the Neerim East site, these being 18.0ug/l, five days after application and 17.5ug/l one month later following the largest rainfall measured . Monitoring was undertaken 2 to 3 km downstream of the treated areas detected trace residues of hexazinone in only three of the 24 samples analysed, the maximum concentration being 1.3ug/L.

Source: (Weed Control in Radiata Pine plantation by aerial application of granulated hexazinone – Lands and Forests Technical Report No. 5 Conservation and Environment 1991).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/strzeleckis/LEGL93-119.html

2000 December: Plantation Giant Rejects Risk Claims. Pesticide: Dimethoate.

December 2000: The State Government has threatened to ban all aerial spraying of pesticides on bluegum plantations amid concerns that the chemicals could damage WA's beef, wine and aquaculture industries.

Use of one pesticide has been banned until at least February and Primary Industry Minister Monty House has warned that other chemicals will be blacklisted unless plantation owners change their habits.

But the timber industry has condemned the threat as a cheap vote-buying measure in Mr House's Great Southern electorate of Stirling. Plantation groups fear a ban could damage their own industry, which is worth close to a billion dollars.

And while environmentalists have welcomed a ban, they say it may come too late to prevent potential health problems.

Farmers, particularly in the Great Southern, have expressed fears that chemicals sprayed on plantations drifted on to other properties, collected on roofs and possibly threatened drinking water.

 

And while environmentalists have welcomed a ban, they say it may come too late to prevent potential health problems.

Spray fears – Plantation giant rejects risk claims

By Ruth Callaghan

Taken from West Australian page 1. 27/12/00.

The State Government has threatened to ban all aerial spraying of pesticides on bluegum plantations amid concerns that the chemicals could damage WA’s beef, wine and aquaculture industries.

Use of one pesticide has been banned until at least February and Primary Industry Minister Monty House has warned that other chemicals will be blacklisted unless plantation owners change their habits.

But the timber industry has condemned the threat as a cheap vote-buying measure in Mr House’s Great Southern electorate of Stirling. Plantation groups fear a ban could damage their own industry, which is worth close to a billion dollars.

And while environmentalists have welcomed a ban, they say it may come too late to prevent potential health problems.

Farmers, particularly in the Great Southern, have expressed fears that chemicals sprayed on plantations drifted on to other properties, collected on roofs and possibly threatened drinking water.

There are also concerns that aerial spraying has killed crustaceans in some dams and waterways.

Mr House said he shared the community’s concern that spraying had a potential impact on human health and agricultural industries.

Earlier this year, the Health Department banned aerial spraying of the toxic chemical dimethoate
– which can be fatal if ingested in very high concentrations – until at least February. Dimethoate is used against moths. Another four chemicals are commonly sprayed on bluegums.

Mr House said he had asked Attorney-General Peter Foss for information about legally proving that over-spraying of plantations was occuring in agricultural regions.

He also announced that Agriculture WA would meet beef producers to develop a way of monitoring pesticide residue to protect exports. Mr House said plantation managers would need to commit to a final code of practice for the use of agricultural chemicals, which was in draft stage.

But plantation investment giant Timbercorp denied that the bluegum industry was not doing enough to minimise risks from aerial spraying.

Timbercorp spokesman Tim Browning said that a code of practice had been in place since September. The industry had adopted the code fully. He said Mr House was biased against plantations and was putting his re-election ahead of the State’s best interests.

Mr Browning said the same chemicals used by the industry were used by canola growers, orchardists and on bowling greens.

If concerns about the safety of meat and wine were genuine, the same risks would have been presented by the massive locust eradication program run by Agriculture WA in recent months.

Conservationist Rob Versluis, a resident in Bow Bridge, between Denmark and Walpole, backed a ban on aerial spraying, but said the Government had taken too long to act. “We don’t know that the drinking water is safe, even though they say (the chemicals) break down in time,” Mr Versluis said.

“The yabbies are dying in the river, so I just don’t believe the spray is harmless. We need to know if it is dangerous before they start to use it, not ban it down the track.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#TAG10

2015 January: Feminsation of Male Fish Queensland – Herbert River

SCIENTISTS have discovered chemical pollution in Queensland’s two most high profile fish species — barramundi and coral trout.

The Great Barrier Reef discovery also marks the first time in Australia that scientists have identified feminisation of male fish.

It is not clear yet whether the contamination has human health impacts but it raises significant concerns about fisheries sustainability.

A team of 10 led by Australian Institute of Marine Science principal research scientist Frederieke Kroon found that the Reef is chronically exposed to agricultural run-off, mainly during the wet season.

Chemical scare in barramundi and coral trout

Brian Williams The Courier-Mail January 28, 2015

SCIENTISTS have discovered chemical pollution in Queensland’s two most high profile fish species — barramundi and coral trout.

The Great Barrier Reef discovery also marks the first time in Australia that scientists have identified feminisation of male fish.

It is not clear yet whether the contamination has human health impacts but it raises significant concerns about fisheries sustainability.

A team of 10 led by Australian Institute of Marine Science principal research scientist Frederieke Kroon found that the Reef is chronically exposed to agricultural run-off, mainly during the wet season.

“Pesticide contamination of GBR waters is … widespread and year-round,’’ the paper says.

The research is a blow to multi-million dollar programs introduced by the federal and state governments who are under pressure from UNESCO to cut Reef run-off and stem decades of damage.

Canegrowers senior environment manager Matt Kealley said there always was room to do more but the State Government’s latest report card showed that 1857 growers had improved management.

WWF spokesman Nick Heath said it was unacceptable that key species were being impacted by agricultural chemicals in a World Heritage area.

“This means the fish we eat are being exposed to chemicals in sufficient concentration that abnormalities are occurring in their genetic code,’’ Mr Heath said.

We need a far greater investment from both sides of politics in helping farmers change over to safer practices and to ensure minimum run-off and chemical contamination standards are adhered to.’’

Run-off had been regulated by the previous state government but had been replaced with a weak voluntary scheme.

Environment Minister Andrew Powell said the annual average pesticide load reaching the Reef has fallen by 28 per cent.

“We’re committed to protecting the Reef and are investing $35 million a year to improve water quality and help producers adopt Reef-friendly practices,’’ he said.

A spokesman for Federal Environment Minister Greg Hunt said 59 per cent of horticulture and 49 per cent of cane growers were improving practices.

Average pollutant loads entering the Reef had been reduced by 10 per cent for nitrogen and 11 per cent for sediment.

The scientists collected fish from nine river catchments and five reef environments, some of which had no agricultural use like the Ducie and Embley rivers on Cape York. Others — like the Haughton River on the east coast — has 98 per cent under agriculture.

Dr Kroon said the study found barramundi with abnormal levels of oestrogen compounds and exposure to run-off from cane farms was the likely pathway.

Among a long list of chemicals, the herbicides ametryn, diuron, hexazinone, simazine had been identified and the insecticide imidacloprid.

The pesticide pollution produces endocrine disrupters. These can have reproductive, neurological, immune and developmental impacts in humans and wildlife.

Most abnormal readings were found in areas where there was a high level of cane production, like the Tully, Haughton and Herbert rivers.

Dr Kroon said the next step would be to see if there would be any human health impacts.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/chemical-scare-in-barramundi-and-coral-trout/story-fnn8dlfs-1227198727764

2015 January: Feminisation of Male Fish Queensland – Haughton River

Jan 15:

SCIENTISTS have discovered chemical pollution in Queensland’s two most high profile fish species — barramundi and coral trout.

The Great Barrier Reef discovery also marks the first time in Australia that scientists have identified feminisation of male fish.

It is not clear yet whether the contamination has human health impacts but it raises significant concerns about fisheries sustainability.

A team of 10 led by Australian Institute of Marine Science principal research scientist Frederieke Kroon found that the Reef is chronically exposed to agricultural run-off, mainly during the wet season.

Chemical scare in barramundi and coral trout

Brian Williams The Courier-Mail January 28, 2015

SCIENTISTS have discovered chemical pollution in Queensland’s two most high profile fish species — barramundi and coral trout.

The Great Barrier Reef discovery also marks the first time in Australia that scientists have identified feminisation of male fish.

It is not clear yet whether the contamination has human health impacts but it raises significant concerns about fisheries sustainability.

A team of 10 led by Australian Institute of Marine Science principal research scientist Frederieke Kroon found that the Reef is chronically exposed to agricultural run-off, mainly during the wet season.

“Pesticide contamination of GBR waters is … widespread and year-round,’’ the paper says.

The research is a blow to multi-million dollar programs introduced by the federal and state governments who are under pressure from UNESCO to cut Reef run-off and stem decades of damage.

Canegrowers senior environment manager Matt Kealley said there always was room to do more but the State Government’s latest report card showed that 1857 growers had improved management.

WWF spokesman Nick Heath said it was unacceptable that key species were being impacted by agricultural chemicals in a World Heritage area.

“This means the fish we eat are being exposed to chemicals in sufficient concentration that abnormalities are occurring in their genetic code,’’ Mr Heath said.

We need a far greater investment from both sides of politics in helping farmers change over to safer practices and to ensure minimum run-off and chemical contamination standards are adhered to.’’

Run-off had been regulated by the previous state government but had been replaced with a weak voluntary scheme.

Environment Minister Andrew Powell said the annual average pesticide load reaching the Reef has fallen by 28 per cent.

“We’re committed to protecting the Reef and are investing $35 million a year to improve water quality and help producers adopt Reef-friendly practices,’’ he said.

A spokesman for Federal Environment Minister Greg Hunt said 59 per cent of horticulture and 49 per cent of cane growers were improving practices.

Average pollutant loads entering the Reef had been reduced by 10 per cent for nitrogen and 11 per cent for sediment.

The scientists collected fish from nine river catchments and five reef environments, some of which had no agricultural use like the Ducie and Embley rivers on Cape York. Others — like the Haughton River on the east coast — has 98 per cent under agriculture.

Dr Kroon said the study found barramundi with abnormal levels of oestrogen compounds and exposure to run-off from cane farms was the likely pathway.

Among a long list of chemicals, the herbicides ametryn, diuron, hexazinone, simazine had been identified and the insecticide imidacloprid.

The pesticide pollution produces endocrine disrupters. These can have reproductive, neurological, immune and developmental impacts in humans and wildlife.

Most abnormal readings were found in areas where there was a high level of cane production, like the Tully, Haughton and Herbert rivers.

Dr Kroon said the next step would be to see if there would be any human health impacts.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/chemical-scare-in-barramundi-and-coral-trout/story-fnn8dlfs-1227198727764

2015 January: Feminisation of Male Fish Queensland – Tully.

Chemical scare in barramundi and coral trout

Brian Williams The Courier-Mail January 28, 2015

SCIENTISTS have discovered chemical pollution in Queensland’s two most high profile fish species — barramundi and coral trout.

The Great Barrier Reef discovery also marks the first time in Australia that scientists have identified feminisation of male fish.

It is not clear yet whether the contamination has human health impacts but it raises significant concerns about fisheries sustainability.

A team of 10 led by Australian Institute of Marine Science principal research scientist Frederieke Kroon found that the Reef is chronically exposed to agricultural run-off, mainly during the wet season.

Chemical scare in barramundi and coral trout

Brian Williams The Courier-Mail January 28, 2015

SCIENTISTS have discovered chemical pollution in Queensland’s two most high profile fish species — barramundi and coral trout.

The Great Barrier Reef discovery also marks the first time in Australia that scientists have identified feminisation of male fish.

It is not clear yet whether the contamination has human health impacts but it raises significant concerns about fisheries sustainability.

A team of 10 led by Australian Institute of Marine Science principal research scientist Frederieke Kroon found that the Reef is chronically exposed to agricultural run-off, mainly during the wet season.

“Pesticide contamination of GBR waters is … widespread and year-round,’’ the paper says.

The research is a blow to multi-million dollar programs introduced by the federal and state governments who are under pressure from UNESCO to cut Reef run-off and stem decades of damage.

Canegrowers senior environment manager Matt Kealley said there always was room to do more but the State Government’s latest report card showed that 1857 growers had improved management.

WWF spokesman Nick Heath said it was unacceptable that key species were being impacted by agricultural chemicals in a World Heritage area.

“This means the fish we eat are being exposed to chemicals in sufficient concentration that abnormalities are occurring in their genetic code,’’ Mr Heath said.

We need a far greater investment from both sides of politics in helping farmers change over to safer practices and to ensure minimum run-off and chemical contamination standards are adhered to.’’

Run-off had been regulated by the previous state government but had been replaced with a weak voluntary scheme.

Environment Minister Andrew Powell said the annual average pesticide load reaching the Reef has fallen by 28 per cent.

“We’re committed to protecting the Reef and are investing $35 million a year to improve water quality and help producers adopt Reef-friendly practices,’’ he said.

A spokesman for Federal Environment Minister Greg Hunt said 59 per cent of horticulture and 49 per cent of cane growers were improving practices.

Average pollutant loads entering the Reef had been reduced by 10 per cent for nitrogen and 11 per cent for sediment.

The scientists collected fish from nine river catchments and five reef environments, some of which had no agricultural use like the Ducie and Embley rivers on Cape York. Others — like the Haughton River on the east coast — has 98 per cent under agriculture.

Dr Kroon said the study found barramundi with abnormal levels of oestrogen compounds and exposure to run-off from cane farms was the likely pathway.

Among a long list of chemicals, the herbicides ametryn, diuron, hexazinone, simazine had been identified and the insecticide imidacloprid.

The pesticide pollution produces endocrine disrupters. These can have reproductive, neurological, immune and developmental impacts in humans and wildlife.

Most abnormal readings were found in areas where there was a high level of cane production, like the Tully, Haughton and Herbert rivers.

Dr Kroon said the next step would be to see if there would be any human health impacts.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/chemical-scare-in-barramundi-and-coral-trout/story-fnn8dlfs-1227198727764

1994 June: Derby Water Supply Contaminated. Pesticide: Atrazine.

Atrazine: How We Won the (Media) War - Peter Coxhead

Native Forest News - Native Forest Network 1995

Atrazine: How We Won the (Media) War - Peter Coxhead

Forestry Spraying Atrazine - the world’s most widely-used herbicide - is currently under moratorium in Tasmania. Forestry spraying of Atrazine in plantations accounts for 85% of application while the remaining 15% is used by industry, private individuals and muncipal councils. Despite frequent incidents in the past, little or no coverage or waterway contamination occurred, until the community at Lorinna gained a great deal of publicity when their water supply was contaminated from forestry spraying. This event was to have a profound affect on public response to the following events in the Derby township in July 1994.

In June 1994 the newly-corporatised Forestry Tasmania (FT) sprayed 53 hectares of clearfell located 7km above Derby’s water storage at Cascade Dam. Prior to spraying FT notified local council of their intentions. The council, responsible for water quality, failed to notify residents, one of whom approached FT to substantiate what was still a rumour and to find out what results had shown up downstream of the spray site. FT confirmed spraying and refused to release the results. In the hope of forcing out the information, residents went to the media, since, subsequent to Lorinna, FT had promised to release all spray results to the public. During the three months that followed we had 63 newspaper articles and considerable radio and TV coverage...

In the end the NRA began a review of the health, environment and trade implications of the herbicide (Atrazine residues have become a convenient US trade barrier). In Tasmania a task force has been sent to monitor and test for all agricultural chemicals on monthly basis. Forestry Tasmania is spending $200,000 on investigating alternatives to chemical use in plantations. There is a moratorium on Atrazine and Simazine by FT until 1997.

 

 

Atrazine: How We Won the (Media) War – Peter Coxhead

Native Forest News – Native Forest Network 1995

Forestry Spraying Atrazine – the world’s most widely-used herbicide – is currently under moratorium in Tasmania. Forestry spraying of Atrazine in plantations accounts for 85% of application while the remaining 15% is used by industry, private individuals and muncipal councils. Despite frequent incidents in the past, little or no coverage or waterway contamination occurred, until the community at Lorinna gained a great deal of publicity when their water supply was contaminated from forestry spraying. This event was to have a profound affect on public response to the following events in the Derby township in July 1994.

Atrazine: How We Won the (Media) War – Peter Coxhead

In June 1994 the newly-corporatised Forestry Tasmania (FT) sprayed 53 hectares of clearfell located 7km above Derby’s water storage at Cascade Dam. Prior to spraying FT notified local council of their intentions. The council, responsible for water quality, failed to notify residents, one of whom approached FT to substantiate what was still a rumour and to find out what results had shown up downstream of the spray site. FT confirmed spraying and refused to release the results. In the hope of forcing out the information, residents went to the media, since, subsequent to Lorinna, FT had promised to release all spray results to the public. During the three months that followed we had 63 newspaper articles and considerable radio and TV coverage.

The initial FT response to the media campaign was to claim that the dilution factor and Derby’s distant storage site meant that our water would not show contamination. Twenty days later, atrazine appeared in the town’s taps. The next council meeting witnessed residents spilling out of the chamber, down the corridor and into the street – quite a change. The council wrote to FT requesting a moratorium. In reply FT sought a closed meeting with all councilors and from that day onward, at the mention of the word Atrazine they would all chant “council does not want Atrazine – or any othert chemical – in our water supplies, but we take our advice from the state Health and Environment Departments.” This may have eased their conscience, but didn’t do much for the residents.

The media campaign had Atrazine’s manufacturer Ciba Geigy desperately trying to explain that countries were mistaken in their banning of the herbicide, and that it couldn’t harm anyone. Especially not those people in Italy with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, nor those in Kansas with bowel – or was it uterine? – cancer. They seemed especially concerned to point out that the Atrazine rain in the US – and Atrazine fog in Europe – were only a result of naughty farmers who used the stuff incorrectly. Maybe the fact that 75% of US water bores are contaminated with this farmer’s friend was a clerical error.

Then we released information from the manufacturers that the metabolites of Atrazine – what it breaks down into – were more than twice as toxic as the compound itself. Ciba Geigy called a private meeting in Melbourne (off the island) with their PR lackeys along with FT, North Forest Products, the Health Department and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). FT agreed to send a list of the names of pests such as us – totaling hundreds – hoping we might be influenced by Ciba Geigy propaganda. Some government employees at the meeting agreed to lobby politicians to try and ease the pain for Ciba Geigy.

By then the Australian Medical Association had come out against the spraying of Atrazine. Dozens of us in Derby sent letters of liability to the company, forestry, council, departments of health and environment, telling them we held them legally responsible for the disaster. We held a public meeting with FT who offered a water tanker for us to drink from, which they retracted when it seemed we might accept. Then the National Registration Authority of Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (NRA) changed the rules, amending its use near water and banning its use by councils, industry and private individuals, but exempting forestry and agriculture. By now Ciba Geigy Australia was copping flack from the Switzerland head office, and requested that some of the bosses come out to Tasmania.

In the end the NRA began a review of the health, environment and trade implications of the herbicide (Atrazine residues have become a convenient US trade barrier). In Tasmania a task force has been sent to monitor and test for all agricultural chemicals on monthly basis. Forestry Tasmania is spending $200,000 on investigating alternatives to chemical use in plantations. There is a moratorium on Atrazine and Simazine by FT until 1997.

There has been a heightening of awareness across Tasmania regarding agricultural chemicals, particularly as they relate to water quality, and councils are looking at using super-heated steam weed control methods in urban areas. The fight against chemical use in our forests and farms and around waterways is not over – the cruel use of 1080 wildlife poison kills up to 400,000 wallabies annually on farms and in plantations – but a battle has been won for a while. Atrazine is now a dirty word.

Atrazine Pesticide Contamination of Tasmania’s Waterways (November 1994?)

Atrazine, a highly residual herbicide, is routinely used to suppress weed competition during plantation establishment. Atrazine is mutagenic and classed as a type 2B carcinogen by the World Health Organisation (WHO). It is the most widely used herbicide in the world and is coming under increasing scrutiny world-wide as a ubiquitous polluter of waterways.

HISTORY

Atrazine has been used for forestry weed control for 26 years. Twenty one spray-sites in the north-east were studied by J.L.Barton and Dr P.E. Davies (1990-91) and showed consistent and persistent contamination of streams, at concentrations as high as 2,000 times the level recommended for potable water.

In May 1993, despite repeated pleas and public protest from the local residents, the Forestry Commission arrested the protesters and sprayed a cocktail of Atrazine and Roundup in the Lorinna water-catchment. When the rains came in July, the domestic water-supply was found to be contaminated at levels many times the World Health Organisation standard. Nearly a year and a half later, atrazine is still detectable at unacceptable levels in the Lorinna water-supply.

The Forestry Commission called for public submissions to find alternative methods of weed control. Following this process, it was publicly declared (11th Aug, ’93) that cost-effective alternative methods existed and that the commission would not contaminate waterways after March 1994.

In June 1994, without consultation with the local residents, the Forestry Commission sprayed atrazine in the water-catchment at Derby. Consequently, the water for the entire town has become contaminated and residents have been obliged to find alternative supplies at their own expense.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#War

1993-1994: Lorrina Tas. Pesticide Detected Atrazine.

The Atrazine Campaign
From For the Forests

by Helen Gee
Annie Willock and Bart Wisse

In 1993, the people of Lorinna refused to accept the poisoning of domestic water with herbicides used in the establishment of a plantation in their water catchment. Atrazine was being sprayed in the Eucalyptus nitens plantation to kill the aggressive snowgrass weed. Atrazine is a teratogen and has been found to cause cancer of the ovaries, non-Hodgkins lymphoma and to suppress the immune system.

Lorinna residents persisted in claiming, 'For us there is no safe level, no acceptable level...we have to make a stand for other areas.' When forestry leaders claimed their pursuit of a chemical free environment was idealistic, the people of Lorinna argued that they were living an ideal.

Because of its isolation, in rugged north-west Tasmania, Lorinna has the potential to develop as Tasmania's organically-grown food capital. However, to be approved as a bio-dynamic farm, soil and water must be free of all synthetic chemicals. Three and a half months after the spraying in the catchment, the atrazine levels at Lorinna exceeded the World Health Organisation's safe level...

But because the atrazine was definitely there and there was a discrepancy, after the next rain a week or so later DELM authorised a dual sample. They took samples from a number of sites and sent one of each to Melbourne and Hobart laboratories. Forestry wanted to show how responsible t hey were and genuinely wanted to look at it and get it right. Paul Smith had used this 0.2 parts per billion benchmark and the next result was way over. It was 9.3 parts per billion; nearly five times the World Health Organisation allowable limit. Forestry now had to come up with some story to destroy the position they had created for us. So they said it's OK for short term exposure.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html

The Atrazine Campaign
From For the Forests

by Helen Gee
Annie Willock and Bart Wisse

In 1993, the people of Lorinna refused to accept the poisoning of domestic water with herbicides used in the establishment of a plantation in their water catchment. Atrazine was being sprayed in the Eucalyptus nitens plantation to kill the aggressive snowgrass weed. Atrazine is a teratogen and has been found to cause cancer of the ovaries, non-Hodgkins lymphoma and to suppress the immune system.

Lorinna residents persisted in claiming, ‘For us there is no safe level, no acceptable level…we have to make a stand for other areas.’ When forestry leaders claimed their pursuit of a chemical free environment was idealistic, the people of Lorinna argued that they were living an ideal.

Because of its isolation, in rugged north-west Tasmania, Lorinna has the potential to develop as Tasmania’s organically-grown food capital. However, to be approved as a bio-dynamic farm, soil and water must be free of all synthetic chemicals. Three and a half months after the spraying in the catchment, the atrazine levels at Lorinna exceeded the World Health Organisation’s safe level…

But because the atrazine was definitely there and there was a discrepancy, after the next rain a week or so later DELM authorised a dual sample. They took samples from a number of sites and sent one of each to Melbourne and Hobart laboratories. Forestry wanted to show how responsible t hey were and genuinely wanted to look at it and get it right. Paul Smith had used this 0.2 parts per billion benchmark and the next result was way over. It was 9.3 parts per billion; nearly five times the World Health Organisation allowable limit. Forestry now had to come up with some story to destroy the position they had created for us. So they said it’s OK for short term exposure.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html

 

1993 November: Shephards Flat Plantation Spraying leading to spray drift covering 500 sq km. Pesticide detected: Hexazinone.

22 October: Victorian Plantations Corporation (VPC) writes to Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) requesting approval for aerial spraying of Velpar L (hexazinone preparation) on pines in Creswick (LEGL 93-39/1) and Shepherds Flat (Ballarat) (LEGL 93-32) pine plantations in November/December in accordance with Code of Practice.

28 October: ADCRC approves spraying.

2 November: VPC distributes letter to residents between Creswick East and Springmount informing them amongst other things that;

". . . Aerial application will commence in early November, 1993 and should be completed in one day, depending on weather.

4 November: VPC sends almost identical letter (as above) to Shire of Creswick.

15 November: Field Air* (Ballarat) sprays 70 hectares of the Shepherds Flat pine plantation (located about 4km south east of the village of Durham Lead) with Velpar L (wind SE, 12 knots). Three/Four? spraying flights were necessary. Approximately 912 litres of Velpar (Hexazinone), 1520 litres of Ulvapron and 2128 litres of water were sprayed. (*Field Air act as agents for Air Tractor Australia - owned by Air Tractor (Olney, Texas)).

16 November: Field Air (Benalla) sprays 30 hectares in one aircraft trip at Creswick (plantation known as Sawpit Gully) with Velpar L (wind NE, 4 knots). VPC advises DCNR (Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) of aerial spraying near Creswick nursery that day. Nursery staff observe plane flying low over nursery. DCNR staff ask what is being sprayed. VPC advises it is Velpar L. - 12 litres of Velpar, 20 litres of Ulvapron (an anti-evaporant petroleum based compound) and 28 litres of water, total 60 litres per hectare. Droplet size was 250-300 microns (a relatively large droplet size which are normally 100 microns). Aircraft in question had an 1800 litre tank. Height of the aircraft was 1 to 2 metres above canopy - 3 metres above the ground.

End November/early December: DCNR Creswick nursery staff observe yellow blotching on nursery stock and amenity plants at nursery. Damaged tubestock thrown out.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#BALLARAT

22 October: Victorian Plantations Corporation (VPC) writes to Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) requesting approval for aerial spraying of Velpar L (hexazinone preparation) on pines in Creswick (LEGL 93-39/1) and Shepherds Flat (Ballarat) (LEGL 93-32) pine plantations in November/December in accordance with Code of Practice.

28 October: ADCRC approves spraying.

2 November: VPC distributes letter to residents between Creswick East and Springmount informing them amongst other things that;

“. . . Aerial application will commence in early November, 1993 and should be completed in one day, depending on weather.

4 November: VPC sends almost identical letter (as above) to Shire of Creswick.

15 November: Field Air* (Ballarat) sprays 70 hectares of the Shepherds Flat pine plantation (located about 4km south east of the village of Durham Lead) with Velpar L (wind SE, 12 knots). Three/Four? spraying flights were necessary. Approximately 912 litres of Velpar (Hexazinone), 1520 litres of Ulvapron and 2128 litres of water were sprayed. (*Field Air act as agents for Air Tractor Australia – owned by Air Tractor (Olney, Texas)).

16 November: Field Air (Benalla) sprays 30 hectares in one aircraft trip at Creswick (plantation known as Sawpit Gully) with Velpar L (wind NE, 4 knots). VPC advises DCNR (Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) of aerial spraying near Creswick nursery that day. Nursery staff observe plane flying low over nursery. DCNR staff ask what is being sprayed. VPC advises it is Velpar L. – 12 litres of Velpar, 20 litres of Ulvapron (an anti-evaporant petroleum based compound) and 28 litres of water, total 60 litres per hectare. Droplet size was 250-300 microns (a relatively large droplet size which are normally 100 microns). Aircraft in question had an 1800 litre tank. Height of the aircraft was 1 to 2 metres above canopy – 3 metres above the ground.

End November/early December: DCNR Creswick nursery staff observe yellow blotching on nursery stock and amenity plants at nursery. Damaged tubestock thrown out.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#BALLARAT

1993 November: Creswick Plantations Sprayed – eventually leading to spray drift covering 500 sq km. Pesticide: Hexazinone.

22 October: Victorian Plantations Corporation (VPC) writes to Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) requesting approval for aerial spraying of Velpar L (hexazinone preparation) on pines in Creswick (LEGL 93-39/1) and Shepherds Flat (Ballarat) (LEGL 93-32) pine plantations in November/December in accordance with Code of Practice.

28 October: ADCRC approves spraying.

2 November: VPC distributes letter to residents between Creswick East and Springmount informing them amongst other things that;

". . . Aerial application will commence in early November, 1993 and should be completed in one day, depending on weather.

4 November: VPC sends almost identical letter (as above) to Shire of Creswick.

15 November: Field Air* (Ballarat) sprays 70 hectares of the Shepherds Flat pine plantation (located about 4km south east of the village of Durham Lead) with Velpar L (wind SE, 12 knots). Three/Four? spraying flights were necessary. Approximately 912 litres of Velpar (Hexazinone), 1520 litres of Ulvapron and 2128 litres of water were sprayed. (*Field Air act as agents for Air Tractor Australia - owned by Air Tractor (Olney, Texas)).

16 November: Field Air (Benalla) sprays 30 hectares in one aircraft trip at Creswick (plantation known as Sawpit Gully) with Velpar L (wind NE, 4 knots). VPC advises DCNR (Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) of aerial spraying near Creswick nursery that day. Nursery staff observe plane flying low over nursery. DCNR staff ask what is being sprayed. VPC advises it is Velpar L. - 12 litres of Velpar, 20 litres of Ulvapron (an anti-evaporant petroleum based compound) and 28 litres of water, total 60 litres per hectare. Droplet size was 250-300 microns (a relatively large droplet size which are normally 100 microns). Aircraft in question had an 1800 litre tank. Height of the aircraft was 1 to 2 metres above canopy - 3 metres above the ground.

End November/early December: DCNR Creswick nursery staff observe yellow blotching on nursery stock and amenity plants at nursery. Damaged tubestock thrown out.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#BALLARAT

22 October: Victorian Plantations Corporation (VPC) writes to Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) requesting approval for aerial spraying of Velpar L (hexazinone preparation) on pines in Creswick (LEGL 93-39/1) and Shepherds Flat (Ballarat) (LEGL 93-32) pine plantations in November/December in accordance with Code of Practice.

28 October: ADCRC approves spraying.

2 November: VPC distributes letter to residents between Creswick East and Springmount informing them amongst other things that;

“. . . Aerial application will commence in early November, 1993 and should be completed in one day, depending on weather.

4 November: VPC sends almost identical letter (as above) to Shire of Creswick.

15 November: Field Air* (Ballarat) sprays 70 hectares of the Shepherds Flat pine plantation (located about 4km south east of the village of Durham Lead) with Velpar L (wind SE, 12 knots). Three/Four? spraying flights were necessary. Approximately 912 litres of Velpar (Hexazinone), 1520 litres of Ulvapron and 2128 litres of water were sprayed. (*Field Air act as agents for Air Tractor Australia – owned by Air Tractor (Olney, Texas)).

16 November: Field Air (Benalla) sprays 30 hectares in one aircraft trip at Creswick (plantation known as Sawpit Gully) with Velpar L (wind NE, 4 knots). VPC advises DCNR (Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) of aerial spraying near Creswick nursery that day. Nursery staff observe plane flying low over nursery. DCNR staff ask what is being sprayed. VPC advises it is Velpar L. – 12 litres of Velpar, 20 litres of Ulvapron (an anti-evaporant petroleum based compound) and 28 litres of water, total 60 litres per hectare. Droplet size was 250-300 microns (a relatively large droplet size which are normally 100 microns). Aircraft in question had an 1800 litre tank. Height of the aircraft was 1 to 2 metres above canopy – 3 metres above the ground.

End November/early December: DCNR Creswick nursery staff observe yellow blotching on nursery stock and amenity plants at nursery. Damaged tubestock thrown out.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#BALLARAT

1993 December – 1994 March: Ballarat and 500 sq km of central Victoria impacted by plantation spray drift: Pesticide: Hexazinone

Chemical damage alarms Ballarat citizens 25/3/94 Melbourne Age

The Environment Protection Authority may take legal action is it finds the law has been breached in an incident that left 500 square kilometers of central Victoria sprayed with farm chemical including most of the city of Ballarat.

The spraying of the herbicide Hexazinone has raised health and environmental concerns among Ballarat residents and damaged elm trees in Ballarat’s Avenue of Honour. A community health hotline was set up in late February, when the chemical’s presence was first detected.

Many trees have suffered from spotted leaves, and hundreds of elm trees have dropped their leaves early. But local health officers have advised that no trace of the chemical had been found in the city’s water supply and that homegrown fruit and vegetables were safe to eat.

The EPA is investigating the incident, which probably occurred late last year. The area affected runs south of Ballarat as far as Buninyong, and north to Clunes. There has been speculation that the chemical dump was caused by a drift from aerial spraying of pine forests.

Hexazinone is used to retard the growth of young eucalypts in pine plantations. An EPA spokesman said there was no confirmed link between aerial spraying and the chemical’s appearance, but that any breaches of the Environment Protection Act could lead to court action.

About 50 people have rung a hot line set up by the Department of Health and Community Services. The EPA has also set up a hot line for people to give information about the spraying.

The Chief Medical Officer, Dr Graham Rouch, said Ballarat’s residents were not at risk from hexazinone. Herbicides worked on plant systems but were not toxic to humans, he said. But Dr Rouch said hexazinone could irritate the eyes.

No traces of the chemical had been found in Ballarat’s water, he said. “We’re looking at very tiny drops in a diluted form (over Ballarat),” he said.

The City of Ballarat’s director of gardens and parks, Mr Phil Clingin, said yellow spots appeared on leaves of trees in the Avenue of Honour last November. Mr Clingin said about 25 per cent of the avenue’s 4000 trees had been affected, with many dropping all their leaves. He said it was too early to say whether the elms would recover.

The ALP candidate for Ballarat Province, Mrs Catherine Laffey, said there was widespread concern about the spraying, although it was important that people were not unduly alarmed. Mrs Laffey said an independent inquiry should be held. Ballarat Community Health Council’s executive officer, Mr Paul Niall, said no one had come in with health problems from the spray.

A spokesman for the Australian Medical Association in Ballarat said doctors had not reported patients being affected. A Ballarat Councillor, Ms Janet Dale, said she believed the incident was being properly investigated but that more stringent controls might be needed once the EPA released its results.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#BALLARAT

Chemical damage alarms Ballarat citizens 25/3/94 Melbourne Age

The Environment Protection Authority may take legal action is it finds the law has been breached in an incident that left 500 square kilometers of central Victoria sprayed with farm chemical including most of the city of Ballarat.

The spraying of the herbicide Hexazinone has raised health and environmental concerns among Ballarat residents and damaged elm trees in Ballarat’s Avenue of Honour. A community health hotline was set up in late February, when the chemical’s presence was first detected.

Many trees have suffered from spotted leaves, and hundreds of elm trees have dropped their leaves early. But local health officers have advised that no trace of the chemical had been found in the city’s water supply and that homegrown fruit and vegetables were safe to eat.

The EPA is investigating the incident, which probably occurred late last year. The area affected runs south of Ballarat as far as Buninyong, and north to Clunes. There has been speculation that the chemical dump was caused by a drift from aerial spraying of pine forests.

Hexazinone is used to retard the growth of young eucalypts in pine plantations. An EPA spokesman said there was no confirmed link between aerial spraying and the chemical’s appearance, but that any breaches of the Environment Protection Act could lead to court action.

About 50 people have rung a hot line set up by the Department of Health and Community Services. The EPA has also set up a hot line for people to give information about the spraying.

The Chief Medical Officer, Dr Graham Rouch, said Ballarat’s residents were not at risk from hexazinone. Herbicides worked on plant systems but were not toxic to humans, he said. But Dr Rouch said hexazinone could irritate the eyes.

No traces of the chemical had been found in Ballarat’s water, he said. “We’re looking at very tiny drops in a diluted form (over Ballarat),” he said.

The City of Ballarat’s director of gardens and parks, Mr Phil Clingin, said yellow spots appeared on leaves of trees in the Avenue of Honour last November. Mr Clingin said about 25 per cent of the avenue’s 4000 trees had been affected, with many dropping all their leaves. He said it was too early to say whether the elms would recover.

The ALP candidate for Ballarat Province, Mrs Catherine Laffey, said there was widespread concern about the spraying, although it was important that people were not unduly alarmed. Mrs Laffey said an independent inquiry should be held. Ballarat Community Health Council’s executive officer, Mr Paul Niall, said no one had come in with health problems from the spray.

A spokesman for the Australian Medical Association in Ballarat said doctors had not reported patients being affected. A Ballarat Councillor, Ms Janet Dale, said she believed the incident was being properly investigated but that more stringent controls might be needed once the EPA released its results.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#BALLARAT

1985 November – 1986 March: Stanley (Vic) Velpar (Hexazinone) Incident.

STANLEY VELPAR INCIDENT November 1985 - March 1986.

Spraying on the Stanley Plateau carried out by DCFL on pine plantations

Orchards were damaged in this incident by the Overdrift of Velpar. Chlorotic spotting was evident on some fruit trees with the trees suffering the worst possibly being those suffering moisture stress through lack of irrigation. By January at least 24 growers from the Stanley area were effected. The damage was first reported in 26 November. Between 2 and 31 December,1985, a total of 30 written complaints were received in Central Registry. All complainants reported the occurrence of leaf spotting on trees, mainly chestnuts, walnuts, cherries, apples (pears) and on a variety of ornamental species, following the aerial spraying of a nearby pine plantation by the Forest Commission.

Vowell Air Services (Helicopters) Pty Ltd of Stuart Road, Tyabb, apparently did the spraying. The application was Velpar (Hexazinone) applied at a rate of 2kg of active ingredient per hectare mixed with 20 litres of Ulvapron and 32 litres of water. Symptoms of Velpar damage were also observed on roadside reserves and in unsprayed forest areas. Possibly a cloud of minute particles of spray material was picked up during the aerial spraying and carried from the target area by a current of wind which then circulated in a generally south west direction depositing several amounts of spray material over and onto nearby properties.

December 10, 1985: The Ovens and Murray Advertiser ‘Premier called on to intervene on aerial spraying of pine trees’. Orchardists and Beechworth Shire Council wanted the ban in the Stanley area until studies had been completed into the spraying problems.

January 21, 1986: The Ovens and Murray Advertiser ‘Growers call for spraying to stop’. A meeting packed with orchardists at Stanley last Tuesday unanimously called on the CFL Minister, Ms Kirner, to stop aerial spraying in the vicinity of the Stanley Plateau. Orchardists were concerned to see whether there would be any short or long term effects on the production of fruit. Also concerns that sprays had fallen on roofs and then entered water supplies.

February 11, 1986: The Ovens and Murray Advertiser ‘Spraying at Stanley now Banned says Kirner’. ‘The Minister for CFL has introduced a ban on all aerial spraying of pine plantations in the Stanley area . . . The decision follows an urgent call by Stanley orchardists in the middle of January for a ban on the spraying. Ms Kirner said CFL had agreed to cease all spraying pending a investigation into the spotting of fruit and other tree foliage which appeared late in November.

STANLEY VELPAR INCIDENT November 1985 – March 1986.

Spraying on the Stanley Plateau carried out by DCFL on pine plantations.

Orchards were damaged in this incident by the Overdrift of Velpar. Chlorotic spotting was evident on some fruit trees with the trees suffering the worst possibly being those suffering moisture stress through lack of irrigation. By January at least 24 growers from the Stanley area were effected. The damage was first reported in 26 November. Between 2 and 31 December,1985, a total of 30 written complaints were received in Central Registry. All complainants reported the occurrence of leaf spotting on trees, mainly chestnuts, walnuts, cherries, apples (pears) and on a variety of ornamental species, following the aerial spraying of a nearby pine plantation by the Forest Commission.

Vowell Air Services (Helicopters) Pty Ltd of Stuart Road, Tyabb, apparently did the spraying. The application was Velpar (Hexazinone) applied at a rate of 2kg of active ingredient per hectare mixed with 20 litres of Ulvapron and 32 litres of water. Symptoms of Velpar damage were also observed on roadside reserves and in unsprayed forest areas. Possibly a cloud of minute particles of spray material was picked up during the aerial spraying and carried from the target area by a current of wind which then circulated in a generally south west direction depositing several amounts of spray material over and onto nearby properties.

December 10, 1985: The Ovens and Murray Advertiser ‘Premier called on to intervene on aerial spraying of pine trees’. Orchardists and Beechworth Shire Council wanted the ban in the Stanley area until studies had been completed into the spraying problems.

January 21, 1986: The Ovens and Murray Advertiser ‘Growers call for spraying to stop’. A meeting packed with orchardists at Stanley last Tuesday unanimously called on the CFL Minister, Ms Kirner, to stop aerial spraying in the vicinity of the Stanley Plateau. Orchardists were concerned to see whether there would be any short or long term effects on the production of fruit. Also concerns that sprays had fallen on roofs and then entered water supplies.

February 11, 1986: The Ovens and Murray Advertiser ‘Spraying at Stanley now Banned says Kirner’. ‘The Minister for CFL has introduced a ban on all aerial spraying of pine plantations in the Stanley area . . . The decision follows an urgent call by Stanley orchardists in the middle of January for a ban on the spraying. Ms Kirner said CFL had agreed to cease all spraying pending a investigation into the spotting of fruit and other tree foliage which appeared late in November.

1999-2000: Lock 9 Murray River (Vic). Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone.

1999-2000:

The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1999-2000:

The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1999 -2012 September: Mannum (SA). Pesticide Detected: Hexazinone, Simazine

1999-2000:

The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) [atrazine also detected at Mannum March 8 2001, 0.5ug/l] and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

River Murray Mannum Sample Pump

20/9/12: Simazine 1ug/L

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1999-2000:

The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) [atrazine also detected at Mannum March 8 2001, 0.5ug/l] and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

River Murray Mannum Sample Pump

20/9/12: Simazine 1ug/L

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1998 – 2023 : Mount Bold Reservoir. Pesticide Detected: Dieldrin, Chlorthal Dimethyl, MCPA, 2,4-D.

Mount Bold Reservoir - Pesticides Detected.

1998 December 23 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.06ug/L (loc 1)

Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1

20/8/12: MCPA 0.13ug/L

15/10/12: MCPA 0.13ug/L

10/12/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

4/2/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/9/13: MCPA 0.14ug/L

28/10/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

17/2/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.12ug/L

20/10/14: MCPA 0.1ug/L

15/12/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

22/8/16: MCPA 0.13ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

21/8/17: MCPA 0.2ug/L

16/10/17: MCPA 0.14ug/L

11/12/17: MCPA 0.1ug/L

5/2/18: MCPA 0.05ug/L

26/8/19: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L, MCPA 0.18ug/L

1/7/20: MCPA 0.12ug/L

24/8/20: MCPA 0.08ug/L

19/10/20: MCPA 0.12ug/L

23/8/21: MCPA 0.14ug/L

20/10/21: MCPA 0.11ug/L

7/2/22: MCPA 0.05ug/L

17/10/22: Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.13ug/L

12/12/22: Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.08ug/L

26/6/23: Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.14ug/L

1999-2000: The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

 

Mount Bold Reservoir – Pesticides Detected.

1998 December 23 Chlorthal-Dimethyl 0.06ug/L (loc 1)

Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1

20/8/12: MCPA 0.13ug/L

15/10/12: MCPA 0.13ug/L

10/12/12: MCPA 0.1ug/L

4/2/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/9/13: MCPA 0.14ug/L

28/10/13: MCPA 0.1ug/L

17/2/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

25/8/14: MCPA 0.12ug/L

20/10/14: MCPA 0.1ug/L

15/12/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

22/8/16: MCPA 0.13ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.09ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

21/8/17: MCPA 0.2ug/L

16/10/17: MCPA 0.14ug/L

11/12/17: MCPA 0.1ug/L

5/2/18: MCPA 0.05ug/L

26/8/19: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L, MCPA 0.18ug/L

1/7/20: MCPA 0.12ug/L

24/8/20: MCPA 0.08ug/L

19/10/20: MCPA 0.12ug/L

23/8/21: MCPA 0.14ug/L

20/10/21: MCPA 0.11ug/L

7/2/22: MCPA 0.05ug/L

17/10/22: Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.13ug/L

12/12/22: Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.08ug/L

26/6/23: Mount Bold Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.14ug/L

1999-2000: The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1999-2000: Hope Valley Reservoir: Pesticide Detected – Atrazine

1999-2000: The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

Australia

The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1998 – 2001 + 5/6/22: Gumeracha Weir (SA). Pesticides detected: Simazine, Endosulphan, Heptachlor..

Gumeracha Weir Pesticide Detections (SA Water)

1998 September 25 Simazine 1.25ug/L

2000 June 22 Endosulphan Sulphate 0.08ug/L

2000 June 28 Simazine 0.6ug/L

2000 July 3 Simazine 0.5ug/L

2000 July 19 Simazine 0.9ug/L

2001 May 18 Heptachlor 0.06ug/L

2022 June 5: Chlorpyrifos 0.05ug/L (forestry site) automated sampler

* simazine which was detected in four samples from Gumeracha Weir and in single samples from Little Para River and Reservoir, Torrens Gorge Weir and Tod Reservoir; and

*hexazinone which was detected in single samples from Little Para River and the River Murray at Murray Bridge, Mannum, Lock 9 and Loxton.

* Atrazine was detected in one samples of product water from the Hope Valley Water Treatment Plant, endosulfan sulfate in one sample from Gumeracha Weir and dieldrin which is no longer registered for use was detected in one sample from Mt Bold Reservoir.

Gumeracha Weir Pesticide Detections (SA Water)

1998 September 25 Simazine 1.25ug/L

2000 June 22 Endosulphan Sulphate 0.08ug/L

2000 June 28 Simazine 0.6ug/L

2000 July 3 Simazine 0.5ug/L

2000 July 19 Simazine 0.9ug/L

2001 May 18 Heptachlor 0.06ug/L

2022 June 5: Chlorpyrifos 0.05ug/L (forestry site) automated sampler

State Water Monitoring Coordinating Sub-committee Nov 2000

p11 Pesticides

Contamination of the Warren catchment and the Warren, South Para and Barossa Reservoirs by atrazine and hexazinone had been featured in media reports in 1998. Through 1999 and 2000 the concentrations of the two pesticides decreased gradually in the reservoirs. Although activated carbon was used at the Barossa Water Treatment Plant to remove the pesticides low concentrations were detected in some samples.

By September 1999 concentrations at the inlet to the Barossa Water Treatment Plant were consistently below 1.6ug/L and the use of activated carbon was discontinued. The health related guideline value for atrazine was 20ug/L and for hexazinone is 300ug/L. In the latest samples collected in mid August 2000 the concentrations were below detection limits at most most locations and including the inlet and outlet of the Barossa Water Treatment Plant.

There were occasional detections of pesticides throughout the period. The most common were of:

* simazine which was detected in four samples from Gumeracha Weir and in single samples from Little Para River and Reservoir, Torrens Gorge Weir and Tod Reservoir; and

*hexazinone which was detected in single samples from Little Para River and the River Murray at Murray Bridge, Mannum, Lock 9 and Loxton.

* Atrazine was detected in one samples of product water from the Hope Valley Water Treatment Plant, endosulfan sulfate in one sample from Gumeracha Weir and dieldrin which is no longer registered for use was detected in one sample from Mt Bold Reservoir.

The detection of atrazine and hexazinone in product water from the Barossa Treatment Plant, atrazine, in product water from the Hope Valley Treatment Plant (0.5ug/L), dieldrin in Mt Bold Reservoir (0.07ug/L) and the concentrations of hexazinone detected in the Little Para River (5.9ug/L) and the River Murray at Mannum (2.5ug/L) and Lock 9 (2.1ug/L) represented Type 1 incidents. However, the concentrations detected were well below the health related guideline values (atrazine 20ug/L; dieldrin 0.3ug/L; hexazinone 300ug/L) and DHS considered in each case that there was no risks to human health. Except for the results from the Barossa Treatment Plant the pesticide detections were gnerally isolated samples.

The remaining detections represented Type 2 incidents.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/adelaide.html#Monitoring

1998 July – 2017 October: Warren Reservoir (SA). Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Hexazinone, Simazine, MCPA, Clopyralid, Metsulfuron Methyl.

Warren Reservoir Location 1

Atrazine: 2.48ug/L (20 Jul 98), 4.78ug/L (3 Aug 98), 7.91ug/L (3 Aug 98), 4.58ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.22ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.6ug/L (17 Aug 98), 5.69ug/L (7 Sep 98), 5.06ug/L (21 Sep 98), 3.74ug/L (19 Oct 98), 3.67ug/L (27 Oct 98), 3.25ug/L (4 Nov 98), 3.33ug/L (9 Dec 98), 3.05ug/L (16 Dec 98), 2.74ug/L (23 Dec 98), 2.93ug/L (6 Jan 99), 2.57ug/L (20 Jan 99), 2.4ug/L (3 Feb 99), 2.41ug/L (17 Feb 99), 2.3ug/L (3 Mar 99), 2.5ug/L (15 Mar 99), 2.3ug/L (7 Apr 99), 2.1ug/L (22 Apr 99), 2.2ug/L (28 Apr 99), 1.8ug/L (5 May 99), 1.9ug/L (12 May 99), 1.9ug/L (19 May 99), 1.7ug/L (25 May 99), 1.8ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1ug/L (11 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (18 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (25 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Sep 99), 0.5ug/L (6 Oct 99).

Hexazinone: 3.44ug/L (20 Jul 98), 4.85ug/L (3 Aug 98), 6.73ug/L (3 Aug 98), 3.65ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.39ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.17ug/L (17 Aug 98), 5.78ug/L (7 Sep 98), 5.79ug/L (21 Sep 98), 4.97ug/L (19 Oct 98), 5.11ug/L (27 Oct 98), 4.86ug/L (4 Nov 98), 4.35ug/L (18 Nov 98), 4.37ug/L (6 Jan 99), 4.22ug/L (20 Jan 99), 4.14ug/L (3 Feb 99), 3.89ug/L (17 Feb 99), 3.8ug/L (3 Mar 99), 3.7ug/L (15 Mar 99), 3.5ug/L (7 Apr 99), 2.8ug/L (22 Apr 99), 3.1ug/L (28 Apr 99), 3.2ug/L (5 May 99), 2.1ug/L (12 May 99), 2.6ug/L (19 May 99), 2.7ug/L (25 May 99), 2.3ug/L (2 Jun 99), 2.6ug/L (9 Jun 99), 2.8ug/L (16 Jun 99), 2.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 2.5ug/L (30 Jun 99), 2.6ug/L (7 Jul 99), 2.4ug/L (14 Jul 99), 2.4ug/L (21 Jul 99), 2.3ug/L (28 Jul 99), 2.2ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.7ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1.6ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.8ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (6 Oct 99), 0.7ug/L (3 Nov 99), 0.7ug/L (9 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (6 Jan 00), 0.7ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.6ug/L (9 Mar 00), 0.5ug/L (6 Apr 00),

Simazine: 3.93ug/L (3 Aug 98), 0.69ug/L (7 Sep 98), 0.7ug/L (23 Jun 99).

Warren Reservoir Location 2

Atrazine: 0.8ug/L (1 Jul 99), 0.7ug/L (9 Jul 99), Hexazinone: 15.7ug/L (1 Jul 99), 16.4ug/L (9 Jul 99), 4.4ug/L (18 Jul 99), 2ug/L (9 Aug 99), 2.2ug/L (5 Sep 99).

Warren Reservoir Location 4A

Hexazinone: 1.6ug/L (1 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (9 Jul 99), 0.5ug/L (18 Jul 99)

Warren Reservoir Location 4B

Simazine: 3.1ug/L (6 Sep 99)

Warren Reservoir Location 5

Hexazinone: 3.7ug/L (1 Jul 99), 3.5ug/L (9 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Jul 99), 0.7ug/L (9 Aug 99), 0.6ug/L (5 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (7 Oct 99), 0.6ug/L (14 Oct 99), 1.4ug/L (11 Nov 99), 1.2ug/L (3 Dec 99).

Warren Reservoir Location 6

Hexazinone: 5ug/L (1 Jul 99), 4.1ug/L (9 Jul 99), 2.3ug/L (18 Jul 99), 0.6ug/L (9 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (5 Sep 99),

Warren Reservoir Location 11A

Atrazine: 0.5ug/L (9 Jul 99)

Hexazinone: 7.5ug/L (9 Jul 99), 5.9ug/L (9 Jul 99), 3.5ug/L (18 Jul 99), 2.9ug/L (9 Aug 99), 3.2ug/L (5 Sep 99)

Warren Reservoir Location 11B

Hexazinone: 1.4ug/L (1 Jul 99),

Warren Reservoir Loc 1

31/8/11: MCPA 0.1ug/L

26/10/11: MCPA 0.07ug/L

29/8/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

23/10/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

9/7/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

3/9/14: MCPA 0.09ug/L

29/10/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/11/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/7/16: Clopyralid 1.1ug/L

7/7/16: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.05ug/L

31/8/16: Clopyralid 0.7ug/L

26/10/16: 2,4-D 0.05ug/L

30/8/17: MCPA 0.16ug/L

26/10/17: MCPA 0.06ug/L

"... ATRAZINE ENTERING WATER FROM FORESTRY ACTIVITIES The Environment Protection Authority has recently been advised by the SA Water Corporation that the herbicide atrazine has been detected in the Barossa Reservoir continuously since September 1997 and that normal water filtration processes have not been able to remove atrazine from the water supply system. It is also understood that investigations conducted by SA Water since June 1998 have indicated that: water in South Para and Warren Reservoirs contains atrazine at similar concentrations to that found in the Barossa Reservoir...In accordance with the objects of the Environment Protection Act 1993, which provide for application of the precautionary principle, and the general environmental duty contained in Section 25 of the Act, the Authority directs Forestry SA to cease the use of Atrazine and other herbicides in all of the proclaimed water protection areas within the Mt Lofty Ranges until such time as a management plan is developed by Forestry SA to the satisfaction of the Authority which seeks to avoid herbicides entering water bodies from forestry areas..." Letter from Executive Director EPA to General Manager Forestry SA 3 August 1998

"... Atrazine was detected by SA Water at Barossa Reservoir last September [1997], but it was only made public through a press release issued after 11pm on Tuesday [15 Sep 1998]. The notification followed an EPA investigation which found the contamination had travelled down creek beds from the SA Forestry plantation to the Warren, South Para and Barossa Reservoirs..." The Advertiser Sep 17 1998

"In order to guarantee the safety of the water supply, SA Water has initaited powdered activated carbon treatment of the water produced by United Water at Barossa Water Treatment Plant. It is expected that this treatment will enable levels in the Barossa distribution system to be maintained below analytical limits. This will be verified by WTP product water analyses..." SA Water Briefing Note 55/98 16 July 1998.

"... Samples from streams draining through the plantation areas (which then drain into Warren Reservoir) show herbicide levels around 150ug/L, which are up to six times the level recommended for drinking water. These levels are also significant from an environmental viewpoint and the EPA is likely to take an active interest. Dosing of powder activated carbon has been instigated at Barossa Water Treatment Plant in order to prevent the herbicides passing into supply. At present, herbicide concentrations in the treated water leaving Barossa plant are below the limit of detection (currently 1.2ug/L) against the guideline (0.5ug/L) and health limits (20ug/L) set within the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Provided the herbicide concentrations in the raw water entering the Barossa treatment plant remain below around 2-3ug/L, existing powder activated carbon dosing at the plant is expected to remain effective in controlling herbicide levels in treated water. Dosing costs are currently $30,000 per month. Should herbicide concentrations increase significantly then further temporary dosing facilities will need to be installed at the plant and dosing costs will also increase significantly..." SA Water Briefing Paper - No. 69/98 29 July 1998.

"SA Water continues to dose powder activated carbon (20mg/L) into the raw water entering Barossa WTP in order to ansure that no herbicides reach customers. Product water analyses have demonstrated effective removal..." SA Water Briefing Paper - No. 113 10 September 1998

"Atrazine was regularly dropped by helicopter near most of the state reservoirs to control weeds in new forestry plantations. In late 1997, large quantities leached into Warren Reservoir after heavy rain dissolved clay pellets coated with the chemical..." The Advertiser Jan 24 2001

"Forestry SA has stopped using a herbicide linked overseas to cancer, says Government Minister Michael Armitage. The department ceased treating new pine plantations with Atrazine in May 1998...Since the early 1970's, Forestry SA has used to bomb new pine plantations around reservoirs with herbicides containing atrazine... SA Water spent an estimated $700,000 in 1998 treating contaminated water with an expensive chemical before it was released for drinking water supplies. The corporation wanted to sue Forestry SA to recover the cost ..." The Advertiser January 10 2001

A State Government department was ordered to stop using potentially carconogenic herbicides after its operations contaminated drinking water supplies. The Environment Protection Authority issued the edict to Forestry SA in August 1998 after herbicides were traced to new pine plantations near the Barossa Valley..." The Advertiser January 24 2001

 

Warren Reservoir Location 1

Atrazine: 2.48ug/L (20 Jul 98), 4.78ug/L (3 Aug 98), 7.91ug/L (3 Aug 98), 4.58ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.22ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.6ug/L (17 Aug 98), 5.69ug/L (7 Sep 98), 5.06ug/L (21 Sep 98), 3.74ug/L (19 Oct 98), 3.67ug/L (27 Oct 98), 3.25ug/L (4 Nov 98), 3.33ug/L (9 Dec 98), 3.05ug/L (16 Dec 98), 2.74ug/L (23 Dec 98), 2.93ug/L (6 Jan 99), 2.57ug/L (20 Jan 99), 2.4ug/L (3 Feb 99), 2.41ug/L (17 Feb 99), 2.3ug/L (3 Mar 99), 2.5ug/L (15 Mar 99), 2.3ug/L (7 Apr 99), 2.1ug/L (22 Apr 99), 2.2ug/L (28 Apr 99), 1.8ug/L (5 May 99), 1.9ug/L (12 May 99), 1.9ug/L (19 May 99), 1.7ug/L (25 May 99), 1.8ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1ug/L (11 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (18 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (25 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Sep 99), 0.5ug/L (6 Oct 99).

Hexazinone: 3.44ug/L (20 Jul 98), 4.85ug/L (3 Aug 98), 6.73ug/L (3 Aug 98), 3.65ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.39ug/L (3 Aug 98), 5.17ug/L (17 Aug 98), 5.78ug/L (7 Sep 98), 5.79ug/L (21 Sep 98), 4.97ug/L (19 Oct 98), 5.11ug/L (27 Oct 98), 4.86ug/L (4 Nov 98), 4.35ug/L (18 Nov 98), 4.37ug/L (6 Jan 99), 4.22ug/L (20 Jan 99), 4.14ug/L (3 Feb 99), 3.89ug/L (17 Feb 99), 3.8ug/L (3 Mar 99), 3.7ug/L (15 Mar 99), 3.5ug/L (7 Apr 99), 2.8ug/L (22 Apr 99), 3.1ug/L (28 Apr 99), 3.2ug/L (5 May 99), 2.1ug/L (12 May 99), 2.6ug/L (19 May 99), 2.7ug/L (25 May 99), 2.3ug/L (2 Jun 99), 2.6ug/L (9 Jun 99), 2.8ug/L (16 Jun 99), 2.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 2.5ug/L (30 Jun 99), 2.6ug/L (7 Jul 99), 2.4ug/L (14 Jul 99), 2.4ug/L (21 Jul 99), 2.3ug/L (28 Jul 99), 2.2ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.7ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1.6ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.8ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (6 Oct 99), 0.7ug/L (3 Nov 99), 0.7ug/L (9 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (6 Jan 00), 0.7ug/L (10 Jan 00), 0.6ug/L (9 Mar 00), 0.5ug/L (6 Apr 00),

Simazine: 3.93ug/L (3 Aug 98), 0.69ug/L (7 Sep 98), 0.7ug/L (23 Jun 99).

Warren Reservoir Location 2

Atrazine: 0.8ug/L (1 Jul 99), 0.7ug/L (9 Jul 99), Hexazinone: 15.7ug/L (1 Jul 99), 16.4ug/L (9 Jul 99), 4.4ug/L (18 Jul 99), 2ug/L (9 Aug 99), 2.2ug/L (5 Sep 99).

Warren Reservoir Location 4A

Hexazinone: 1.6ug/L (1 Jul 99), 0.8ug/L (9 Jul 99), 0.5ug/L (18 Jul 99)

Warren Reservoir Location 4B

Simazine: 3.1ug/L (6 Sep 99)

Warren Reservoir Location 5

Hexazinone: 3.7ug/L (1 Jul 99), 3.5ug/L (9 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Jul 99), 0.7ug/L (9 Aug 99), 0.6ug/L (5 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (7 Oct 99), 0.6ug/L (14 Oct 99), 1.4ug/L (11 Nov 99), 1.2ug/L (3 Dec 99).

Warren Reservoir Location 6

Hexazinone: 5ug/L (1 Jul 99), 4.1ug/L (9 Jul 99), 2.3ug/L (18 Jul 99), 0.6ug/L (9 Aug 99), 0.8ug/L (5 Sep 99),

Warren Reservoir Location 11A

Atrazine: 0.5ug/L (9 Jul 99)

Hexazinone: 7.5ug/L (9 Jul 99), 5.9ug/L (9 Jul 99), 3.5ug/L (18 Jul 99), 2.9ug/L (9 Aug 99), 3.2ug/L (5 Sep 99)

Warren Reservoir Location 11B

Hexazinone: 1.4ug/L (1 Jul 99),

Warren Reservoir Loc 1

31/8/11: MCPA 0.1ug/L

26/10/11: MCPA 0.07ug/L

29/8/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

23/10/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

9/7/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

3/9/14: MCPA 0.09ug/L

29/10/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/11/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

7/7/16: Clopyralid 1.1ug/L

7/7/16: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.05ug/L

31/8/16: Clopyralid 0.7ug/L

26/10/16: 2,4-D 0.05ug/L

30/8/17: MCPA 0.16ug/L

26/10/17: MCPA 0.06ug/L

“… ATRAZINE ENTERING WATER FROM FORESTRY ACTIVITIES The Environment Protection Authority has recently been advised by the SA Water Corporation that the herbicide atrazine has been detected in the Barossa Reservoir continuously since September 1997 and that normal water filtration processes have not been able to remove atrazine from the water supply system. It is also understood that investigations conducted by SA Water since June 1998 have indicated that: water in South Para and Warren Reservoirs contains atrazine at similar concentrations to that found in the Barossa Reservoir…In accordance with the objects of the Environment Protection Act 1993, which provide for application of the precautionary principle, and the general environmental duty contained in Section 25 of the Act, the Authority directs Forestry SA to cease the use of Atrazine and other herbicides in all of the proclaimed water protection areas within the Mt Lofty Ranges until such time as a management plan is developed by Forestry SA to the satisfaction of the Authority which seeks to avoid herbicides entering water bodies from forestry areas…” Letter from Executive Director EPA to General Manager Forestry SA 3 August 1998

“… Atrazine was detected by SA Water at Barossa Reservoir last September [1997], but it was only made public through a press release issued after 11pm on Tuesday [15 Sep 1998]. The notification followed an EPA investigation which found the contamination had travelled down creek beds from the SA Forestry plantation to the Warren, South Para and Barossa Reservoirs…” The Advertiser Sep 17 1998

“In order to guarantee the safety of the water supply, SA Water has initaited powdered activated carbon treatment of the water produced by United Water at Barossa Water Treatment Plant. It is expected that this treatment will enable levels in the Barossa distribution system to be maintained below analytical limits. This will be verified by WTP product water analyses…” SA Water Briefing Note 55/98 16 July 1998.

“… Samples from streams draining through the plantation areas (which then drain into Warren Reservoir) show herbicide levels around 150ug/L, which are up to six times the level recommended for drinking water. These levels are also significant from an environmental viewpoint and the EPA is likely to take an active interest. Dosing of powder activated carbon has been instigated at Barossa Water Treatment Plant in order to prevent the herbicides passing into supply. At present, herbicide concentrations in the treated water leaving Barossa plant are below the limit of detection (currently 1.2ug/L) against the guideline (0.5ug/L) and health limits (20ug/L) set within the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Provided the herbicide concentrations in the raw water entering the Barossa treatment plant remain below around 2-3ug/L, existing powder activated carbon dosing at the plant is expected to remain effective in controlling herbicide levels in treated water. Dosing costs are currently $30,000 per month. Should herbicide concentrations increase significantly then further temporary dosing facilities will need to be installed at the plant and dosing costs will also increase significantly…” SA Water Briefing Paper – No. 69/98 29 July 1998.

“SA Water continues to dose powder activated carbon (20mg/L) into the raw water entering Barossa WTP in order to ansure that no herbicides reach customers. Product water analyses have demonstrated effective removal…” SA Water Briefing Paper – No. 113 10 September 1998

“Atrazine was regularly dropped by helicopter near most of the state reservoirs to control weeds in new forestry plantations. In late 1997, large quantities leached into Warren Reservoir after heavy rain dissolved clay pellets coated with the chemical…” The Advertiser Jan 24 2001

“Forestry SA has stopped using a herbicide linked overseas to cancer, says Government Minister Michael Armitage. The department ceased treating new pine plantations with Atrazine in May 1998…Since the early 1970’s, Forestry SA has used to bomb new pine plantations around reservoirs with herbicides containing atrazine… SA Water spent an estimated $700,000 in 1998 treating contaminated water with an expensive chemical before it was released for drinking water supplies. The corporation wanted to sue Forestry SA to recover the cost …” The Advertiser January 10 2001

A State Government department was ordered to stop using potentially carconogenic herbicides after its operations contaminated drinking water supplies. The Environment Protection Authority issued the edict to Forestry SA in August 1998 after herbicides were traced to new pine plantations near the Barossa Valley…” The Advertiser January 24 2001

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/BadPlantations.htm#South

1998 – 2022: South Para Reservoir. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Hexazinone, MCPA, Triclopyr, Metsulfuron Methyl.

South Para Reservoir Location 1 - Pesticide detections.

Atrazine: 2.26ug/L (18 Jun 98), 1.74ug/L (16 Jul 98), 1.99ug/L (30 Jul 98), 43.6ug/L (30 Jul 98), 3.64ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.91ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.52ug/L (30 Jul 98), 1.85ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.85ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.85ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.95ug/L (13 Aug 98), 2.12ug/L (27 Aug 98), 1.85ug/L (10 Sep 98), 1.77ug/L (24 Sep 98), 1.4ug/L (8 Oct 98), 1.57ug/L (29 Oct 98), 1.75ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.56ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.98ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.98ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.33ug/L (2 Dec 98), 1.57ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.66ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.88ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.6ug/L (6 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.45ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.39ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (28 Apr 99), 1.3ug/L (12 May 99), 1.4ug/L (19 May 99), 1.3ug/L (26 May 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1ug/L (18 Aug 99), 0.9ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Sep 99), 0.7ug/L (15 Sep 99), 0.7ug/L (13 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.7ug/L (16 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.6ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (11 May 00), 0.5ug/L (15 Jun 00).

Hexazinone: 35.4ug/L (30/7/98), 3ug/L (30 Jul 98), 5.33ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.89ug/L (30 Jul 98), 5.12ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.8ug/L (27 Aug 98), 1.71ug/L (10 Sep 98), 1.68ug/L (24 Sep 98), 1.55ug/L (8 Oct 98), 1.62ug/L (29 Oct 98), 2.16ug/L (4 Nov 98), 2.03ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.7ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.17ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.41ug/L (2 Dec 98), 4.44ug/L (9 Dec 98), 4.13ug/L (16 Dec 98), 3.83ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.24ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.64ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.38ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.42ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.53ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.4ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Apr 99), 1.7ug/L (12 May 99), 1.2ug/L (19 May 99), 1.3ug/L (26 May 99), 1.3ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.1ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.1ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1ug/L (15 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (13 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.7ug/L (16 Dec 99), 1ug/L (13 Jan 00), 1.2ug/L (17 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (11 May 00), 0.7ug/L (15 Jun 00), Simazine: 2.66ug/L (30/7/98), 0.75ug/L (10 Sep 98), 0.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 0.6ug/L (30 Jun 99).

South Para Reservoir Loc 1

29/8/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/12/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

6/6/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L,

28/8/13: MCPA 0.11ug/L

23/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

18/12/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

12/2/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

9/7/14: MCPA 0.45ug/L

3/9/14: MCPA 0.21ug/L

29/10/14: MCPA 0.13ug/L

18/2/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

15/4/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

11/6/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

8/7/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/9/15: MCPA 0.08ug/L

28/10/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L.

7/7/16: MCPA 0.11ug/L

31/8/16: MCPA 0.08ug/L

30/8/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

26/10/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L

11/7/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.08ug/L

6/9/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

8/7/20: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/9/20: MCPA 0.06ug/L

27/10/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

31/8/22: South Para Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

26/10/22: South Para Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.09ug/L

26/10/22: South Para Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

South Para Reservoir Loc 2

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L, 9/11/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

South Para Reservoir Loc 3

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

South Para Reservoir Loc 4

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

"... ATRAZINE ENTERING WATER FROM FORESTRY ACTIVITIES The Environment Protection Authority has recently been advised by the SA Water Corporation that the herbicide atrazine has been detected in the Barossa Reservoir continuously since September 1997 and that normal water filtration processes have not been able to remove atrazine from the water supply system. It is also understood that investigations conducted by SA Water since June 1998 have indicated that: water in South Para and Warren Reservoirs contains atrazine at similar concentrations to that found in the Barossa Reservoir...In accordance with the objects of the Environment Protection Act 1993, which provide for application of the precautionary principle, and the general environmental duty contained in Section 25 of the Act, the Authority directs Forestry SA to cease the use of Atrazine and other herbicides in all of the proclaimed water protection areas within the Mt Lofty Ranges until such time as a management plan is developed by Forestry SA to the satisfaction of the Authority which seeks to avoid herbicides entering water bodies from forestry areas..." Letter from Executive Director EPA to General Manager Forestry SA 3 August 1998

"... Atrazine was detected by SA Water at Barossa Reservoir last September [1997], but it was only made public through a press release issued after 11pm on Tuesday [15 Sep 1998]. The notification followed an EPA investigation which found the contamination had travelled down creek beds from the SA Forestry plantation to the Warren, South Para and Barossa Reservoirs..." The Advertiser Sep 17 1998

"In order to guarantee the safety of the water supply, SA Water has initaited powdered activated carbon treatment of the water produced by United Water at Barossa Water Treatment Plant. It is expected that this treatment will enable levels in the Barossa distribution system to be maintained below analytical limits. This will be verified by WTP product water analyses..." SA Water Briefing Note 55/98 16 July 1998.

"... Samples from streams draining through the plantation areas (which then drain into Warren Reservoir) show herbicide levels around 150ug/L, which are up to six times the level recommended for drinking water. These levels are also significant from an environmental viewpoint and the EPA is likely to take an active interest. Dosing of powder activated carbon has been instigated at Barossa Water Treatment Plant in order to prevent the herbicides passing into supply. At present, herbicide concentrations in the treated water leaving Barossa plant are below the limit of detection (currently 1.2ug/L) against the guideline (0.5ug/L) and health limits (20ug/L) set within the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Provided the herbicide concentrations in the raw water entering the Barossa treatment plant remain below around 2-3ug/L, existing powder activated carbon dosing at the plant is expected to remain effective in controlling herbicide levels in treated water. Dosing costs are currently $30,000 per month. Should herbicide concentrations increase significantly then further temporary dosing facilities will need to be installed at the plant and dosing costs will also increase significantly..." SA Water Briefing Paper - No. 69/98 29 July 1998.

"SA Water continues to dose powder activated carbon (20mg/L) into the raw water entering Barossa WTP in order to ansure that no herbicides reach customers. Product water analyses have demonstrated effective removal..." SA Water Briefing Paper - No. 113 10 September 1998

"Atrazine was regularly dropped by helicopter near most of the state reservoirs to control weeds in new forestry plantations. In late 1997, large quantities leached into Warren Reservoir after heavy rain dissolved clay pellets coated with the chemical..." The Advertiser Jan 24 2001

"Forestry SA has stopped using a herbicide linked overseas to cancer, says Government Minister Michael Armitage. The department ceased treating new pine plantations with Atrazine in May 1998...Since the early 1970's, Forestry SA has used to bomb new pine plantations around reservoirs with herbicides containing atrazine... SA Water spent an estimated $700,000 in 1998 treating contaminated water with an expensive chemical before it was released for drinking water supplies. The corporation wanted to sue Forestry SA to recover the cost ..." The Advertiser January 10 2001

A State Government department was ordered to stop using potentially carconogenic herbicides after its operations contaminated drinking water supplies. The Environment Protection Authority issued the edict to Forestry SA in August 1998 after herbicides were traced to new pine plantations near the Barossa Valley..." The Advertiser January 24 2001

 

South Para Reservoir Location 1 – Pesticide detections.

Atrazine: 2.26ug/L (18 Jun 98), 1.74ug/L (16 Jul 98), 1.99ug/L (30 Jul 98), 43.6ug/L (30 Jul 98), 3.64ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.91ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.52ug/L (30 Jul 98), 1.85ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.85ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.85ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.95ug/L (13 Aug 98), 2.12ug/L (27 Aug 98), 1.85ug/L (10 Sep 98), 1.77ug/L (24 Sep 98), 1.4ug/L (8 Oct 98), 1.57ug/L (29 Oct 98), 1.75ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.56ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.98ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.98ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.33ug/L (2 Dec 98), 1.57ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.66ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.88ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.6ug/L (6 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.45ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.39ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (28 Apr 99), 1.3ug/L (12 May 99), 1.4ug/L (19 May 99), 1.3ug/L (26 May 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.2ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1ug/L (18 Aug 99), 0.9ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Sep 99), 0.7ug/L (15 Sep 99), 0.7ug/L (13 Oct 99), 0.8ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.7ug/L (16 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Jan 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.6ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.6ug/L (11 May 00), 0.5ug/L (15 Jun 00).

Hexazinone: 35.4ug/L (30/7/98), 3ug/L (30 Jul 98), 5.33ug/L (30 Jul 98), 4.89ug/L (30 Jul 98), 5.12ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.8ug/L (27 Aug 98), 1.71ug/L (10 Sep 98), 1.68ug/L (24 Sep 98), 1.55ug/L (8 Oct 98), 1.62ug/L (29 Oct 98), 2.16ug/L (4 Nov 98), 2.03ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.7ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.17ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.41ug/L (2 Dec 98), 4.44ug/L (9 Dec 98), 4.13ug/L (16 Dec 98), 3.83ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.24ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.64ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.31ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.38ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.42ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.53ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.5ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.4ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Apr 99), 1.7ug/L (12 May 99), 1.2ug/L (19 May 99), 1.3ug/L (26 May 99), 1.3ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.1ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.1ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.2ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.4ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.1ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.2ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1ug/L (15 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (13 Sep 99), 0.9ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.7ug/L (16 Dec 99), 1ug/L (13 Jan 00), 1.2ug/L (17 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (11 May 00), 0.7ug/L (15 Jun 00), Simazine: 2.66ug/L (30/7/98), 0.75ug/L (10 Sep 98), 0.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 0.6ug/L (30 Jun 99).

South Para Reservoir Loc 1

29/8/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/12/12: MCPA 0.05ug/L

6/6/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L,

28/8/13: MCPA 0.11ug/L

23/10/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

18/12/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

12/2/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

9/7/14: MCPA 0.45ug/L

3/9/14: MCPA 0.21ug/L

29/10/14: MCPA 0.13ug/L

18/2/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

15/4/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

11/6/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

8/7/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/9/15: MCPA 0.08ug/L

28/10/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L.

7/7/16: MCPA 0.11ug/L

31/8/16: MCPA 0.08ug/L

30/8/17: MCPA 0.08ug/L

26/10/17: MCPA 0.07ug/L

11/7/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.08ug/L

6/9/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

8/7/20: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/9/20: MCPA 0.06ug/L

27/10/21: MCPA 0.08ug/L

31/8/22: South Para Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

26/10/22: South Para Reservoir Loc 1 MCPA 0.09ug/L

26/10/22: South Para Reservoir Loc 1 Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

South Para Reservoir Loc 2

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L, 9/11/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

South Para Reservoir Loc 3

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

South Para Reservoir Loc 4

9/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

“… ATRAZINE ENTERING WATER FROM FORESTRY ACTIVITIES The Environment Protection Authority has recently been advised by the SA Water Corporation that the herbicide atrazine has been detected in the Barossa Reservoir continuously since September 1997 and that normal water filtration processes have not been able to remove atrazine from the water supply system. It is also understood that investigations conducted by SA Water since June 1998 have indicated that: water in South Para and Warren Reservoirs contains atrazine at similar concentrations to that found in the Barossa Reservoir…In accordance with the objects of the Environment Protection Act 1993, which provide for application of the precautionary principle, and the general environmental duty contained in Section 25 of the Act, the Authority directs Forestry SA to cease the use of Atrazine and other herbicides in all of the proclaimed water protection areas within the Mt Lofty Ranges until such time as a management plan is developed by Forestry SA to the satisfaction of the Authority which seeks to avoid herbicides entering water bodies from forestry areas…” Letter from Executive Director EPA to General Manager Forestry SA 3 August 1998

“… Atrazine was detected by SA Water at Barossa Reservoir last September [1997], but it was only made public through a press release issued after 11pm on Tuesday [15 Sep 1998]. The notification followed an EPA investigation which found the contamination had travelled down creek beds from the SA Forestry plantation to the Warren, South Para and Barossa Reservoirs…” The Advertiser Sep 17 1998

“In order to guarantee the safety of the water supply, SA Water has initaited powdered activated carbon treatment of the water produced by United Water at Barossa Water Treatment Plant. It is expected that this treatment will enable levels in the Barossa distribution system to be maintained below analytical limits. This will be verified by WTP product water analyses…” SA Water Briefing Note 55/98 16 July 1998.

“… Samples from streams draining through the plantation areas (which then drain into Warren Reservoir) show herbicide levels around 150ug/L, which are up to six times the level recommended for drinking water. These levels are also significant from an environmental viewpoint and the EPA is likely to take an active interest. Dosing of powder activated carbon has been instigated at Barossa Water Treatment Plant in order to prevent the herbicides passing into supply. At present, herbicide concentrations in the treated water leaving Barossa plant are below the limit of detection (currently 1.2ug/L) against the guideline (0.5ug/L) and health limits (20ug/L) set within the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Provided the herbicide concentrations in the raw water entering the Barossa treatment plant remain below around 2-3ug/L, existing powder activated carbon dosing at the plant is expected to remain effective in controlling herbicide levels in treated water. Dosing costs are currently $30,000 per month. Should herbicide concentrations increase significantly then further temporary dosing facilities will need to be installed at the plant and dosing costs will also increase significantly…” SA Water Briefing Paper – No. 69/98 29 July 1998.

“SA Water continues to dose powder activated carbon (20mg/L) into the raw water entering Barossa WTP in order to ansure that no herbicides reach customers. Product water analyses have demonstrated effective removal…” SA Water Briefing Paper – No. 113 10 September 1998

“Atrazine was regularly dropped by helicopter near most of the state reservoirs to control weeds in new forestry plantations. In late 1997, large quantities leached into Warren Reservoir after heavy rain dissolved clay pellets coated with the chemical…” The Advertiser Jan 24 2001

“Forestry SA has stopped using a herbicide linked overseas to cancer, says Government Minister Michael Armitage. The department ceased treating new pine plantations with Atrazine in May 1998…Since the early 1970’s, Forestry SA has used to bomb new pine plantations around reservoirs with herbicides containing atrazine… SA Water spent an estimated $700,000 in 1998 treating contaminated water with an expensive chemical before it was released for drinking water supplies. The corporation wanted to sue Forestry SA to recover the cost …” The Advertiser January 10 2001

A State Government department was ordered to stop using potentially carconogenic herbicides after its operations contaminated drinking water supplies. The Environment Protection Authority issued the edict to Forestry SA in August 1998 after herbicides were traced to new pine plantations near the Barossa Valley…” The Advertiser January 24 2001

 

1997 December – 2000 November: Barossa Reservoir. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, Hexazinone, Simazine.

Barossa Reservoir Location 1 - Pesticides Detected.

Atrazine: 2.1ug/L (11 Dec 97), 2ug/L (22/1/98), 2ug/L (19/2/98), 2ug/L (19/3/98), 2.38ug/L (16/4/98), 2.1ug/L (14/5/98), 1.54ug/L (11/6/98), 1.63ug/L (9/7/98), 1.92ug/L (23/7/98), 1.96ug/L (30/7/98), 1.69ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.63ug/L (6 Aug 98), 1.7ug/L (20 Aug 98), 1.87ug/L (3 Sep 98), 1.75ug/L (17 Sep 98), 1.25ug/L (1 Oct 98), 1.46ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.33ug/L (29 Oct 98), 1.4ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.34ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.58ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.39ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.24ug/L (2 Dec 98), 1.5ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.57ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.38ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.33ug/L (30 Dec 98), 1.6ug/L (6 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.46ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.29ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.38ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.53ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.47ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (12 May 99), 1.6ug/L (19 May 99), 1.4ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (14 Jul 99), 2.2ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.1ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1.1ug/L (15 Sep 99), 1ug/L (13 Oct 99), 1.1ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (16 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (17 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (11 May 00), 0.6ug/L (15 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (13 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (17 Aug 00),

Hexazinone: 1.5ug/L (11 Dec 97), 1.55ug/L (16 Apr 98), 1.67ug/L (3 Sep 98), 1.46ug/L (17 Sep 98), 1.12ug/L (1 Oct 98), 1.59ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.43ug/L (29 Oct 98), 1.55ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.96ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.73ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.15ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.41ug/L (2 Dec 98), 1.25ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.37ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.43ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.35ug/L (30 Dec 98), 1.43ug/L (6 Jan 99), 1.24ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.45ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.2ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.44ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.61ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.62ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.7ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (12 May 99), 1.3ug/L (19 May 99), 1.9ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (15 Sep 99), 1.1ug/L (13 Oct 99), 1.2ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (16 Dec 99), 1ug/L (13 Jan 00), 1ug/L (17 Feb 00), 1ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (11 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 Jun 00), 0.9ug/L (13 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (21 Sep 00).

Simazine: 0.5ug/L (23 Jun 99)

 

"... ATRAZINE ENTERING WATER FROM FORESTRY ACTIVITIES The Environment Protection Authority has recently been advised by the SA Water Corporation that the herbicide atrazine has been detected in the Barossa Reservoir continuously since September 1997 and that normal water filtration processes have not been able to remove atrazine from the water supply system. It is also understood that investigations conducted by SA Water since June 1998 have indicated that: water in South Para and Warren Reservoirs contains atrazine at similar concentrations to that found in the Barossa Reservoir...In accordance with the objects of the Environment Protection Act 1993, which provide for application of the precautionary principle, and the general environmental duty contained in Section 25 of the Act, the Authority directs Forestry SA to cease the use of Atrazine and other herbicides in all of the proclaimed water protection areas within the Mt Lofty Ranges until such time as a management plan is developed by Forestry SA to the satisfaction of the Authority which seeks to avoid herbicides entering water bodies from forestry areas..." Letter from Executive Director EPA to General Manager Forestry SA 3 August 1998

Barossa Reservoir Location 1 – Pesticides Detected.

Atrazine: 2.1ug/L (11 Dec 97), 2ug/L (22/1/98), 2ug/L (19/2/98), 2ug/L (19/3/98), 2.38ug/L (16/4/98), 2.1ug/L (14/5/98), 1.54ug/L (11/6/98), 1.63ug/L (9/7/98), 1.92ug/L (23/7/98), 1.96ug/L (30/7/98), 1.69ug/L (3 Aug 98), 1.63ug/L (6 Aug 98), 1.7ug/L (20 Aug 98), 1.87ug/L (3 Sep 98), 1.75ug/L (17 Sep 98), 1.25ug/L (1 Oct 98), 1.46ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.33ug/L (29 Oct 98), 1.4ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.34ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.58ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.39ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.24ug/L (2 Dec 98), 1.5ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.57ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.38ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.33ug/L (30 Dec 98), 1.6ug/L (6 Jan 99), 1.49ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.46ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.29ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.38ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.53ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.47ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.8ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.7ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.6ug/L (12 May 99), 1.6ug/L (19 May 99), 1.4ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (14 Jul 99), 2.2ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.3ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.2ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.1ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1.1ug/L (15 Sep 99), 1ug/L (13 Oct 99), 1.1ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (16 Dec 99), 0.8ug/L (13 Jan 00), 0.9ug/L (17 Feb 00), 0.9ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.7ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (11 May 00), 0.6ug/L (15 Jun 00), 0.6ug/L (13 Jul 00), 0.5ug/L (17 Aug 00),

Hexazinone: 1.5ug/L (11 Dec 97), 1.55ug/L (16 Apr 98), 1.67ug/L (3 Sep 98), 1.46ug/L (17 Sep 98), 1.12ug/L (1 Oct 98), 1.59ug/L (15 Oct 98), 1.43ug/L (29 Oct 98), 1.55ug/L (4 Nov 98), 1.96ug/L (11 Nov 98), 1.73ug/L (18 Nov 98), 1.15ug/L (25 Nov 98), 1.41ug/L (2 Dec 98), 1.25ug/L (9 Dec 98), 1.37ug/L (16 Dec 98), 1.43ug/L (23 Dec 98), 1.35ug/L (30 Dec 98), 1.43ug/L (6 Jan 99), 1.24ug/L (13 Jan 99), 1.45ug/L (20 Jan 99), 1.2ug/L (27 Jan 99), 1.44ug/L (3 Feb 99), 1.61ug/L (10 Feb 99), 1.62ug/L (17 Feb 99), 1.6ug/L (24 Feb 99), 1.7ug/L (3 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (10 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (17 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (24 Mar 99), 1.6ug/L (31 Mar 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (15 Apr 99), 1.4ug/L (22 Apr 99), 1.5ug/L (12 May 99), 1.3ug/L (19 May 99), 1.9ug/L (25 May 99), 1.4ug/L (2 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (9 Jun 99), 1.4ug/L (16 Jun 99), 1.6ug/L (23 Jun 99), 1.3ug/L (30 Jun 99), 1.5ug/L (7 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (14 Jul 99), 1.5ug/L (21 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (28 Jul 99), 1.4ug/L (4 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (11 Aug 99), 1.5ug/L (18 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (25 Aug 99), 1.3ug/L (1 Sep 99), 1.4ug/L (8 Sep 99), 1.6ug/L (15 Sep 99), 1.1ug/L (13 Oct 99), 1.2ug/L (11 Nov 99), 0.9ug/L (16 Dec 99), 1ug/L (13 Jan 00), 1ug/L (17 Feb 00), 1ug/L (16 Mar 00), 0.8ug/L (13 Apr 00), 0.7ug/L (11 May 00), 0.8ug/L (15 Jun 00), 0.9ug/L (13 Jul 00), 0.8ug/L (17 Aug 00), 0.7ug/L (21 Sep 00).

Simazine: 0.5ug/L (23 Jun 99)

“… ATRAZINE ENTERING WATER FROM FORESTRY ACTIVITIES The Environment Protection Authority has recently been advised by the SA Water Corporation that the herbicide atrazine has been detected in the Barossa Reservoir continuously since September 1997 and that normal water filtration processes have not been able to remove atrazine from the water supply system. It is also understood that investigations conducted by SA Water since June 1998 have indicated that: water in South Para and Warren Reservoirs contains atrazine at similar concentrations to that found in the Barossa Reservoir…In accordance with the objects of the Environment Protection Act 1993, which provide for application of the precautionary principle, and the general environmental duty contained in Section 25 of the Act, the Authority directs Forestry SA to cease the use of Atrazine and other herbicides in all of the proclaimed water protection areas within the Mt Lofty Ranges until such time as a management plan is developed by Forestry SA to the satisfaction of the Authority which seeks to avoid herbicides entering water bodies from forestry areas…” Letter from Executive Director EPA to General Manager Forestry SA 3 August 1998

“… Atrazine was detected by SA Water at Barossa Reservoir last September [1997], but it was only made public through a press release issued after 11pm on Tuesday [15 Sep 1998]. The notification followed an EPA investigation which found the contamination had travelled down creek beds from the SA Forestry plantation to the Warren, South Para and Barossa Reservoirs…” The Advertiser Sep 17 1998

“In order to guarantee the safety of the water supply, SA Water has initaited powdered activated carbon treatment of the water produced by United Water at Barossa Water Treatment Plant. It is expected that this treatment will enable levels in the Barossa distribution system to be maintained below analytical limits. This will be verified by WTP product water analyses…” SA Water Briefing Note 55/98 16 July 1998.

“… Samples from streams draining through the plantation areas (which then drain into Warren Reservoir) show herbicide levels around 150ug/L, which are up to six times the level recommended for drinking water. These levels are also significant from an environmental viewpoint and the EPA is likely to take an active interest. Dosing of powder activated carbon has been instigated at Barossa Water Treatment Plant in order to prevent the herbicides passing into supply. At present, herbicide concentrations in the treated water leaving Barossa plant are below the limit of detection (currently 1.2ug/L) against the guideline (0.5ug/L) and health limits (20ug/L) set within the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Provided the herbicide concentrations in the raw water entering the Barossa treatment plant remain below around 2-3ug/L, existing powder activated carbon dosing at the plant is expected to remain effective in controlling herbicide levels in treated water. Dosing costs are currently $30,000 per month. Should herbicide concentrations increase significantly then further temporary dosing facilities will need to be installed at the plant and dosing costs will also increase significantly…” SA Water Briefing Paper – No. 69/98 29 July 1998.

“SA Water continues to dose powder activated carbon (20mg/L) into the raw water entering Barossa WTP in order to ansure that no herbicides reach customers. Product water analyses have demonstrated effective removal…” SA Water Briefing Paper – No. 113 10 September 1998

“Atrazine was regularly dropped by helicopter near most of the state reservoirs to control weeds in new forestry plantations. In late 1997, large quantities leached into Warren Reservoir after heavy rain dissolved clay pellets coated with the chemical…” The Advertiser Jan 24 2001

“Forestry SA has stopped using a herbicide linked overseas to cancer, says Government Minister Michael Armitage. The department ceased treating new pine plantations with Atrazine in May 1998…Since the early 1970’s, Forestry SA has used to bomb new pine plantations around reservoirs with herbicides containing atrazine… SA Water spent an estimated $700,000 in 1998 treating contaminated water with an expensive chemical before it was released for drinking water supplies. The corporation wanted to sue Forestry SA to recover the cost …” The Advertiser January 10 2001

A State Government department was ordered to stop using potentially carconogenic herbicides after its operations contaminated drinking water supplies. The Environment Protection Authority issued the edict to Forestry SA in August 1998 after herbicides were traced to new pine plantations near the Barossa Valley…” The Advertiser January 24 2001

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/BadPlantations.htm#South

2004 December – 2008 October: Korweinguboora Plantation Pollution. Pesticide: Hexazinone

Poison in water supply (Geelong Advertiser 25 August 2006) By Peter Begg.

Barwon Water has taken action against a pine plantation operator in one of its catchments after a poisonous herbicide was detected in drinking water. The water authority confirmed yesterday it took action against a plantation operator in April 2005.

In a first since the relevant act came into force, Barwon Water issued Hancock Victorian Plantations with a notice of Contravention for Water Protection. The water authority has since reached agreement with Hancock plantations not to use certain herbicides in its catchment areas. This followed low-level detection of the herbicide hexazinone in raw water samples from the Korweinguboora Reservoir catchment, near Ballarat.

Barwon Health said the amount of the herbicide detected in tests was such a low level that it did not threaten public health. Hancock plantations confirmed yesterday that they have since agreed to use other herbicides that were less persistent.

But environment group Friends of the Earth said yesterday the herbicide hexazinone had been used for a number of years, and there was little known about its long-term effects. A spokesman for Friends of the Earth, Anthony Amis, said the group learned about the pollution from a Freedom of Information request to Barwon Water. Mr Amis said information gained from the FoI showed Barwon Water had detected hexazinone on 34 seperate occasions since December 2004. "It has shown up consistently now for 18 months," Mr Amis said. 'Ten samples during that time have been detected at the inlet to the Moorabool Water Treatment Plant near Meredith."

Barwon Water wrote to Hancock Victorian Plantations in April, 2005, informing the operator they were in 'Contravention of Water Supply Protection". Barwon Water executive manager water systems Carl Bicknell said yesterday that providing safe drinking water and protecting customers' health were Barwon Water's highest priorities.

Hexazinone was detected throughout the Moorobool Catchment for almost 4 years.

Poison in water supply (Geelong Advertiser 25 August 2006) By Peter Begg.

Barwon Water has taken action against a pine plantation operator in one of its catchments after a poisonous herbicide was detected in drinking water. The water authority confirmed yesterday it took action against a plantation operator in April 2005.

In a first since the relevant act came into force, Barwon Water issued Hancock Victorian Plantations with a notice of Contravention for Water Protection. The water authority has since reached agreement with Hancock plantations not to use certain herbicides in its catchment areas. This followed low-level detection of the herbicide hexazinone in raw water samples from the Korweinguboora Reservoir catchment, near Ballarat.

Barwon Health said the amount of the herbicide detected in tests was such a low level that it did not threaten public health. Hancock plantations confirmed yesterday that they have since agreed to use other herbicides that were less persistent.

But environment group Friends of the Earth said yesterday the herbicide hexazinone had been used for a number of years, and there was little known about its long-term effects. A spokesman for Friends of the Earth, Anthony Amis, said the group learned about the pollution from a Freedom of Information request to Barwon Water. Mr Amis said information gained from the FoI showed Barwon Water had detected hexazinone on 34 seperate occasions since December 2004. “It has shown up consistently now for 18 months,” Mr Amis said. ‘Ten samples during that time have been detected at the inlet to the Moorabool Water Treatment Plant near Meredith.”

Barwon Water wrote to Hancock Victorian Plantations in April, 2005, informing the operator they were in ‘Contravention of Water Supply Protection”. Barwon Water executive manager water systems Carl Bicknell said yesterday that providing safe drinking water and protecting customers’ health were Barwon Water’s highest priorities.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/BarwonWater.htm

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Lands Department Workers Meredith

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU ... calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Lands Department Workers Buninyong (Vic)

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Spray Workers Maryborough (Vic)

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Spray Workers Avoca (Vic)

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU ... calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014/15: Toxic Legacy Lands Department Workers Linton (Vic). Pesticide: 2,4,5-T (Dioxin TCDD)

Lands Department workers across Victoria exposed to dangerous chemicals

https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/3490374/cancer-link-to-chemicals/

Nov 13 2015

Lands Department workers in the region were exposed to more than double today’s standard tolerable intake of dangerous chemicals which a Victorian government independent inquiry found could be linked to cancer.

The findings from the inquiry were handed to the Minister for Environment Lisa Neville on Wednesday with the government now expected to respond to the findings. 

The report also found that despite a number of “excellent” research pieces and reviews into worker’s health and chemical safety which were completed, findings and recommendations were mostly not implemented.

The Ballarat Courier first revealed concerns surrounding the region's former Lands Department spray programs and practices back in September 2014, and has pushed strongly for further action by government ever since, with its Toxic Legacy campaign. 

Dozens of ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots in Ballarat, Maryborough, Daylesford, Linton and other central Victoria locations came forward with concerns.

In a statement, the inquiry’s chair Greg Tweedly said weed sprayers working for the department between 1965 and 1981 were exposed to double the tolerable monthly intake of a contaminant of 2,4,5-T called TCDD.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer  has classified TCDD as ‘carcinogenic to humans’ since 1997 and ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’ since 1982.

Mr Tweedly said a study of the department’s sprayers in the 1980s found no abnormal incidence of cancer.  

“However, we found consensus throughout academic papers, since then, regarding a link between exposure to TCDD and the incidence of soft tissue sarcomas and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.” 

Mr Tweedly said that through the time period examined safety messages were inconsistent and the availability and uptake of protective equipment was poor. 

“Formal training in the safe use of pesticides was introduced in the mid 1970s, but was not always compulsory or suited to employees’ training needs.”

More than 100,000 document pages were analysed as part of the process. Mr Tweedly said the inquiry had yielded unexpectedly large volumes of information.

“The community’s contributions … were vital to understanding the full picture of historic chemical use and storage practices within the former department and I thank them for their willingness to speak with us about this sensitive topic,” he said.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Lands Department workers across Victoria exposed to dangerous chemicals

https://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/3490374/cancer-link-to-chemicals/

Nov 13 2015

Lands Department workers in the region were exposed to more than double today’s standard tolerable intake of dangerous chemicals which a Victorian government independent inquiry found could be linked to cancer.

The findings from the inquiry were handed to the Minister for Environment Lisa Neville on Wednesday with the government now expected to respond to the findings.

The report also found that despite a number of “excellent” research pieces and reviews into worker’s health and chemical safety which were completed, findings and recommendations were mostly not implemented.

The Ballarat Courier first revealed concerns surrounding the region’s former Lands Department spray programs and practices back in September 2014, and has pushed strongly for further action by government ever since, with its Toxic Legacy campaign.

Dozens of ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots in Ballarat, Maryborough, Daylesford, Linton and other central Victoria locations came forward with concerns.

In a statement, the inquiry’s chair Greg Tweedly said weed sprayers working for the department between 1965 and 1981 were exposed to double the tolerable monthly intake of a contaminant of 2,4,5-T called TCDD.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer  has classified TCDD as ‘carcinogenic to humans’ since 1997 and ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’ since 1982.

Mr Tweedly said a study of the department’s sprayers in the 1980s found no abnormal incidence of cancer.

“However, we found consensus throughout academic papers, since then, regarding a link between exposure to TCDD and the incidence of soft tissue sarcomas and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.”

Mr Tweedly said that through the time period examined safety messages were inconsistent and the availability and uptake of protective equipment was poor.

“Formal training in the safe use of pesticides was introduced in the mid 1970s, but was not always compulsory or suited to employees’ training needs.”

More than 100,000 document pages were analysed as part of the process. Mr Tweedly said the inquiry had yielded unexpectedly large volumes of information.

“The community’s contributions … were vital to understanding the full picture of historic chemical use and storage practices within the former department and I thank them for their willingness to speak with us about this sensitive topic,” he said.

 

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Spray Workers Daylesford.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Spray Workers Clunes.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Toxic Legacy Spray Workers Beaufort.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014: Toxic Legacy Spray Workers Sebastopol (Vic)

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

2014 October: Victorian Lands Department Deceased Workers Ballarat

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing - October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

Toxic Legacy Support For Independent Inquiry Growing – October 3 2014 Ballarat Courier

A GROUNDSWELL of support is growing in the Ballarat region for an independent state government inquiry into the use of toxic chemicals by former Victorian Lands Department workers.

Over the past week, The Courier has heard dozens of stories from ex-workers and families of deceased workers from depots including Ballarat, Sebastopol, Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Linton, Avoca, Maryborough, Buninyong and Meredith.

Nearly a dozen people in the region have confirmed that if an independent state inquiry was established, they would readily make a submission.

State Opposition spokesperson for environment Lisa Neville said on Friday Labor would commit to a fully independent inquiry if elected in November.

The inquiry, which would be established under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act, would take submissions and have the power to call on witnesses.

The Courier has identified 17 former Victorian Lands Department weed eradicators in the region who have died, mostly from illness including various cancers.

There is currently no clear link between the deaths of the former workers and their exposure to toxic chemicals.

However, former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching believes his exposure to toxic chemicals led to several diseases and disorders. Former Linton depot spray hand Ewen Ching attributes most of his current illnesses to working with chemicals.

Mr Ching became sick two years after taking a redundancy package in 1998 when symptoms of peripheral neuropathy – a nerve disease – appeared. Mr Ching now battles Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnoea (a throat disorder that blocks the airways), diverticulitis (a bowel disease), a dysfunctional pancreas, a swollen prostate and cysts on his liver and kidney.

“These poisons caused a lot of what I’ve got,” Mr Ching said. “With all these sicknesses I’ve got, it’s gotta be caused by something.”

Australian Workers Union Victorian branch secretary Ben Davis said Labor’s commitment was a huge step forward.

“The AWU … calls upon the Napthine government to call an independent inquiry now so that the community can finally get some answers to some very troubling questions about the exposure of state government employees and others to these chemicals and the health effects of this.”

Earlier this week, the state government pledged to have the Department of Environment and Primary Industries – the successor to the Lands Department – conduct an internal investigation into the matter in collaboration with the Victorian WorkCover Authority. Environment and Climate Change Minister Ryan Smith could not be contacted before deadline.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

1966 November: Woorinen (Vic) Spray Drift.

Mid Murray Valley District Council ADFA Woorinen 29 November 1966

... This association desires to bring to your notice the widespread effects on vineyards and tomato plantations from what is thought to be aerial spraying of adjacent wheat crops. Although every vineyard reports distortion of leaves and failure of bunches to set their berries ... one factr that needs invesigation is the use of helicopters for this work. It is claimed that the drifts is much further with helicopters than with ordinary crop dusting planes. This may be because helicopters can operate in weather which would ground the ordinary plane, and that helicopter creates conditions which themselves cause drift...

Mid Murray Valley District Council ADFA Woorinen 29 November 1966

… This association desires to bring to your notice the widespread effects on vineyards and tomato plantations from what is thought to be aerial spraying of adjacent wheat crops. Although every vineyard reports distortion of leaves and failure of bunches to set their berries … one fact that needs investigation is the use of helicopters for this work. It is claimed that the drifts is much further with helicopters than with ordinary crop dusting planes. This may be because helicopters can operate in weather which would ground the ordinary plane, and that helicopter creates conditions which themselves cause drift…

 

1970’s: Agent Orange Drums Buried near Yarram Golf Course

Truth Buried - Agent Orange Drums Hidden Near Yarram - Yarram Standard May 2 2012

THE last remnants of a poison linked to cancer and birth defects are buried in dozens of drums near the Yarram Golf Club. Former Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) national vice-president Albert Littler this week revealed two drums of Agent Orange mysteriously disappeared and were buried at the site before the union could take samples from them during a 2003 investigation.

Mr Littler said the union was “trying to pin the Agent Orange link on to what was allegedly imported into Australia”. “They believed the surplus stock from Vietnam was bought up by the president of Singapore. It’s alleged a company in Western Australia imported the stuff and two drums were shipped to Victoria,” Mr Littler said.

Truth Buried – Agent Orange Drums Hidden Near Yarram – Yarram Standard May 2 2012

THE last remnants of a poison linked to cancer and birth defects are buried in dozens of drums near the Yarram Golf Club. Former Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) national vice-president Albert Littler this week revealed two drums of Agent Orange mysteriously disappeared and were buried at the site before the union could take samples from them during a 2003 investigation.

Mr Littler said the union was “trying to pin the Agent Orange link on to what was allegedly imported into Australia”. “They believed the surplus stock from Vietnam was bought up by the president of Singapore. It’s alleged a company in Western Australia imported the stuff and two drums were shipped to Victoria,” Mr Littler said.

Mr Littler could not say whether the two drums in question were the ones hastily buried at the site. “We’re not sure what’s in the drums, to be honest. But why were the drums dumped there?” he asked.

“We had monitoring devices down there – but don’t forget this is years and years later – where the depot was. The tests we conducted came back inconclusive. But some of the boys said: ‘We were suddenly asked to bury two drums in Yarram. Take them out of the depot and bury them in an isolated site.

“We then had a meeting under the ACTU (Australian Council of Trade Unions), with the Minister responsible at the time and said we wanted the drums dug up and removed and we wanted to test them. They wanted to know where they were but they didn’t want us to be there.” Mr Littler said the union wasn’t “game enough to dig them up ourselves”

“If they were as toxic as we suspected, the union would have been held liable if we’d disturbed them and they’d ruptured. There was a stream near these drums. So they’re still where they were left,” he said.

Slater and Gordon would eventually deem the potential cost of a class action on behalf of affected workers against the importer of the two drums too expensive. Mr Littler said many of the 30 or so workers examined by a Trades Hall Health Centre nurse had “various sorts of cancers and some rashes still persisting.”

He believes the lack of success of the investigation led to disappointment for the workers, “because it was inconclusive for them”. Talking to the Standard this week, Pat Read, a former Lands Department worker said up to 100 empty but uncleaned drums were also buried at the site during his time working for one of the two Yarram crews.

Mr Read was pensioned off in 1985 after suffering a heart attack. He does not blame his exposure to Agent Orange for his health problems, but said a lot of his colleagues were no longer alive.

“The CFMEU came out and I knew exactly where the drums would be. We probed down and found them. I asked them if they wanted them dug up and they said, ‘No, we’ll leave it at that.’” he said. Mr Read worked at the Lands Department from 1965, but said he was also there for a time about six years earlier.

He had heard no more about Agent Orange or its effects since the union left town all those years ago. “Someone was saying, ‘You’ll all get compensated on this.’ But it never came to anything,” he said.

“There’s not too many of us left, and only me and another bloke alive from the older workers. The bosses never said anything about the spray, but we knew it wasn’t right. When you’re mixing 2,4- D and 2,4,5-T and all those together, something had to give, didn’t it?”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

1964-66: Australian Army Tests Pesticides Innisfail Queensland

Australia's role in Agent Orange crime

Fifty years ago this month, the US began its spraying of Agent Orange and similar chemicals containing large amounts of deadly cancer-causing dioxin over southern Vietnam. This murderous campaign lasted 10 years, poisoning uncounted Vietnamese civilians and liberation fighters and members of the US military and its allies. Dioxin also attacks sperm or egg DNA, deforming victims’ children and grandchildren. Parts of southern Vietnam are still heavily contaminated with dioxin that continues to claim new victims. The US responsibility for devising and ordering this crime is well known. Less known is Australia’s role in testing, producing and spraying Agent Orange.

Tested in Australia

After 10 years of scouring the Australian War Memorial museum archives, one of the leading experts on the effects of chemicals on Australian veterans of the US war on Vietnam, Jean Williams, found reports of secret testing of Agent Orange. Williams discovered that Australian military scientists had sprayed Agent Orange on rainforest in the catchment area of the town of Innisfail in far north Queensland between 1964 and 1966.

On May 18, 2008, Williams told Fairfax media that one of the files on the testing was marked “considered sensitive” and showed that the chemicals 2,4-D, Diquat, Tordon and dimethylsulphoxide had been sprayed on the rainforest. “It was considered sensitive because they were mixing together all the bad chemicals, which just made them worse”, she said. “Those chemicals stay in the soil for years, and every time there is a storm they are stirred up and go into the water supply.”

Williams’ revelations were backed by former soldier Ted Bosworth, who drove the scientists to the site in the 1960s. “There was an English scientist and an Australian. I heard they both later died of cancer. They sprayed the trees by hand and then in the next couple of weeks I took them back up and they put ladders up against the trees and took photos of them as the foliage was dying”, he said. “They called it some other funny name - I hadn’t heard of Agent Orange then.”  Williams also said that a file that could indicate much wider testing in a project called Operation Desert had gone missing from the archives. It was marked “too disturbing to ever be released”.

To this day, the half-acre site at Gregory Falls remains deforested despite thick jungle surrounding it. Innisfail Returned and Services League president Reg Hamann told the Herald Sun on May 28, 2008, of the terrible effects he suffers from Agent Orange he was exposed to during the war. “A lot of my unit have died of cancer. I’ve got cancer of the oesophagus and stomach. I have to sleep on a special bed that raises me 17 degrees or everything in my stomach rises up. I’ve had a subdural haemorrhage, a heart attack and a quadruple bypass. It passes on to the next generation. My son was born with a deformed lung. My daughter has got the same skin problem I have from Agent Orange. Now my grandkids are going to get it.”

Unknown to Hamann at the time, while he was being poisoned in Vietnam, the army was poisoning what would become his hometown. “I believe it must have something to do with the high cancer rates in Innisfail. The amount of young people in this area who die of leukaemia and similar cancers to what I got from Agent Orange is scary. The authorities are scared of digging into it as there would be lots of lawsuits. The sad part is the number of kids who get cancer here. It’s been that way at least since I came here in 1970. That means it can’t be chemical spraying on the bananas as they only came here 15 years ago.”

Queensland Health claimed in 2008 that Innisfail did not have an above average cancer rate, based on figures from 1991 to 2005. Locals counter this saying that in 2007 about one person aged in their 40s was dying from cancer every month, a high number for a small town. The age of these cancer victims would also make them babies at the time of the testing. When the story of the testing hit the media in 2008, the Queensland and federal governments both promised investigations. To date no findings have been released.

https://directaction.org.au/issue34/australias_role_in_agent_orange_crime

 

Agent Orange Town

Matthew Benns and Frank Walker May 18, 2008 Sydney Morning Herald

THE Australian Army tested chemical weapons on a town which now has deaths from cancer 10 times the state average.

Military scientists sprayed the toxic defoliant Agent Orange in the jungle that is part of the water catchment area for Innisfail in Queensland's far north at the start of the Vietnam War.

The Sun-Herald last week found the site where military scientists tested Agent Orange in 1966. It is on a ridge little more 100 metres above the Johnstone River, which supplies the drinking water for Innisfail.

Forty years later the site - which abuts farmer Alan Wakeham's land - is still bare, covered only in tough Guinea grass, but surrounded by thick jungle. "It's strange how the jungle comes right up to this site and then just stops. It won't grow any further," Mr Wakeham said.

Australia’s role in Agent Orange crime

Fifty years ago this month, the US began its spraying of Agent Orange and similar chemicals containing large amounts of deadly cancer-causing dioxin over southern Vietnam. This murderous campaign lasted 10 years, poisoning uncounted Vietnamese civilians and liberation fighters and members of the US military and its allies. Dioxin also attacks sperm or egg DNA, deforming victims’ children and grandchildren. Parts of southern Vietnam are still heavily contaminated with dioxin that continues to claim new victims. The US responsibility for devising and ordering this crime is well known. Less known is Australia’s role in testing, producing and spraying Agent Orange.

Tested in Australia

After 10 years of scouring the Australian War Memorial museum archives, one of the leading experts on the effects of chemicals on Australian veterans of the US war on Vietnam, Jean Williams, found reports of secret testing of Agent Orange. Williams discovered that Australian military scientists had sprayed Agent Orange on rainforest in the catchment area of the town of Innisfail in far north Queensland between 1964 and 1966.

On May 18, 2008, Williams told Fairfax media that one of the files on the testing was marked “considered sensitive” and showed that the chemicals 2,4-D, Diquat, Tordon and dimethylsulphoxide had been sprayed on the rainforest. “It was considered sensitive because they were mixing together all the bad chemicals, which just made them worse”, she said. “Those chemicals stay in the soil for years, and every time there is a storm they are stirred up and go into the water supply.”

Williams’ revelations were backed by former soldier Ted Bosworth, who drove the scientists to the site in the 1960s. “There was an English scientist and an Australian. I heard they both later died of cancer. They sprayed the trees by hand and then in the next couple of weeks I took them back up and they put ladders up against the trees and took photos of them as the foliage was dying”, he said. “They called it some other funny name – I hadn’t heard of Agent Orange then.”  Williams also said that a file that could indicate much wider testing in a project called Operation Desert had gone missing from the archives. It was marked “too disturbing to ever be released”.

To this day, the half-acre site at Gregory Falls remains deforested despite thick jungle surrounding it. Innisfail Returned and Services League president Reg Hamann told the Herald Sun on May 28, 2008, of the terrible effects he suffers from Agent Orange he was exposed to during the war. “A lot of my unit have died of cancer. I’ve got cancer of the oesophagus and stomach. I have to sleep on a special bed that raises me 17 degrees or everything in my stomach rises up. I’ve had a subdural haemorrhage, a heart attack and a quadruple bypass. It passes on to the next generation. My son was born with a deformed lung. My daughter has got the same skin problem I have from Agent Orange. Now my grandkids are going to get it.”

Unknown to Hamann at the time, while he was being poisoned in Vietnam, the army was poisoning what would become his hometown. “I believe it must have something to do with the high cancer rates in Innisfail. The amount of young people in this area who die of leukaemia and similar cancers to what I got from Agent Orange is scary. The authorities are scared of digging into it as there would be lots of lawsuits. The sad part is the number of kids who get cancer here. It’s been that way at least since I came here in 1970. That means it can’t be chemical spraying on the bananas as they only came here 15 years ago.”

Queensland Health claimed in 2008 that Innisfail did not have an above average cancer rate, based on figures from 1991 to 2005. Locals counter this saying that in 2007 about one person aged in their 40s was dying from cancer every month, a high number for a small town. The age of these cancer victims would also make them babies at the time of the testing. When the story of the testing hit the media in 2008, the Queensland and federal governments both promised investigations. To date no findings have been released.

https://directaction.org.au/issue34/australias_role_in_agent_orange_crime

Agent Orange Town

Matthew Benns and Frank Walker May 18, 2008 Sydney Morning Herald

THE Australian Army tested chemical weapons on a town which now has deaths from cancer 10 times the state average.

Military scientists sprayed the toxic defoliant Agent Orange in the jungle that is part of the water catchment area for Innisfail in Queensland’s far north at the start of the Vietnam War.

The Sun-Herald last week found the site where military scientists tested Agent Orange in 1966. It is on a ridge little more 100 metres above the Johnstone River, which supplies the drinking water for Innisfail.

Forty years later the site – which abuts farmer Alan Wakeham’s land – is still bare, covered only in tough Guinea grass, but surrounded by thick jungle. “It’s strange how the jungle comes right up to this site and then just stops. It won’t grow any further,” Mr Wakeham said.

Agent Orange was sprayed extensively in Vietnam to defoliate the jungle and remove cover for North Vietnamese troops. It contains chemicals including the dioxin TCDD, which causes forms of cancer, birth defects and other health problems.

Researcher Jean Williams found details of the secret Innisfail tests in the Australian War Memorial archives. “These tests carried out between 1964 and 1966 were the first tests of Agent Orange and they were carried out at Gregory Falls near Innisfail,” said Ms Williams, who has been awarded the Order of Australia Medal for her work on the effects of chemicals on Vietnam veterans. “I was told there is a high rate of cancer there but no one can understand why. Perhaps now they will understand.”

Ms Williams unearthed three boxes of damning files. One file showed the chemicals 2,4-D, Diquat, Tordon and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) were sprayed on the rainforest in the Gregory Falls area in June 1966. The file carried the remarks: “Considered sensitive because report recommends use of 2,4-D with other agents in aerial spraying trials in Innisfail.” Ms Williams said: “It was considered sensitive because they were mixing together all the bad chemicals, which just made them worse. They cause all the cancers.”

Ms Williams claims a file which could indicate much wider testing in a project called Operation Desert had gone missing. The contents were marked “too disturbing to ever be released”. “Those chemicals stay in the soil for years and every time there is a storm they are stirred up and go into the water supply,” Ms Williams said. “The poor people of Innisfail have been kept in the dark about this. But these chemicals cause cancer and deformities that are passed on for generations. It is shocking. I am just an 83-year-old war-weary battler. I don’t want any more medals, I just want justice for the people of Innisfail.”

Queensland Health Department figures show Innisfail, which has a population of almost 12,000, had 76 people die from cancer in 2005. That is four times the national rate of death from cancer and 10 times the Queensland average. Australian War Memorial director Steve Gower confirmed the file on Operation Desert could not be found.

Australia and Britain opened a joint tropical research unit at Innisfail in 1962. In 1969 the Liberal defence minister Allen Fairhall flatly denied chemical warfare experiments had been associated with the unit at Innisfail. But last week The Sun-Herald found the site and an old digger, a decorated veteran of three wars, who had worked on the experiment.

Innisfail local Ted Bosworth, 86, fought in the New Guinea campaign in World War II, copped a bullet in the lungs in the Korean War for which he was awarded the Military Medal and was in the Army Reserve during the Vietnam War. In 1966 he drove scientists to the site where the spraying occurred. “There was an English scientist and an Australian. I heard they both later died of cancer. “They sprayed by hand. The forest started dying within days. By three weeks all the foliage was gone. The scientists always denied it was Agent Orange. They were pretty cagey.”

Mr Bosworth confirmed photos The Sun-Herald took were of the experiment site. “That is the area they sprayed. That is it. It was on top of the ridge next to grassland in the trees. It hasn’t changed much in all these years.”

Innisfail RSL president Reg Hamann suffers terrible effects from Agent Orange he was exposed to during the Vietnam War. “A lot of my unit have died of cancer. I’ve got cancer of the oesophagus and stomach. I have to sleep on a special bed that raises me 17 degrees or everything in my stomach rises up. I’ve had a subdural hemorrhage, a heart attack and a quadruple bypass. “It passes on to the next generation. My son was born with a deformed lung. My daughter has got the same skin problem I have from Agent Orange. Now my grandkids are going to get it.”

Mr Hamann is angry at the lies and deceit about the effects of Agent Orange on veterans and their families. Now he’s discovered that while he was fighting in Vietnam the Australian government was experimenting with Agent Orange upriver from his home town.

“We were sprayed regularly by Agent Orange as they cleared the river banks. We had no idea how dangerous the stuff was. They’d fly over us and give us a squirt just for fun and wiggle their wings. We took it as a joke. But the stuff turned out to be a curse.”

“I saw in Vietnam what Agent Orange did to an area and I am shocked to learn they used it here. It was kept secret. The army didn’t tell anyone. It was just some of the old army guys and local farmers who knew they were experimenting up there. “I believe it must have something to do with the high cancer rates in Innisfail. The amount of young people in this area who die of leukaemia and similar cancers to what I got from Agent Orange is scary. The authorities are scared of digging into it as there would be lots of law suits.

“The sad part is the number of kids who get cancer here. It’s been that way at least since I came here in 1970. That means it can’t be chemical spraying on the bananas as they only came here 15 years ago. “They’ve always used Innisfail as guinea pigs. They did it in World War II and they did it during Vietnam. It’s time to set it right.”

Val Robertson, 74, said a high number of local people aged in their 40s were dying from cancer, about one a month for the last 12 months. “That’s a lot for a small town like Innisfail. They would have been babies when they were spraying Agent Orange,” she said. Innisfail Mayor Bill Shannon said there was a high cancer rate in the area and there should be a full investigation. The Queensland Government and the Federal Government said they would look into the issue.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

There is another worrying Australian connection, reported by Australian Greens party senator Lee Rhiannon. Jean Williams, a researcher who received the Order of Australia medal for her research on the effects of chemicals on Australian war veterans, found that cancer rates in Innisfail, Queensland, were 10 times higher than the state average. This was linked to secret testing of Agent Orange by Australian military scientists during the Vietnam War. Williams based her allegations on Australian government reports found in the Australian War Memorial museum archives. A former soldier, Ted Bosworth, backed up the claims, saying that he had been involved in the secret testing. The Queensland health department claimed that cancer rates in Innisfail were not higher than those in other parts of the state. This denial is similar to that of the US and Australian governments when lobbied to take responsibility for the damage and deaths caused by Agent Orange (https://lee-rhiannon.greensmps.org.au/content/speeches/speech-agent-orange).

https://links.org.au/node/3636

1969-71: Rogue batch 2,4,5-T used at Beerwah Queensland

Toxic dumping more widespread

P 5 The Australian Jan 15 2002

Australian history of dumping dangerous chemicals underground is far more widespread and involves more toxic substances than has been revealed in the current Agent Orange scandal, a former Environmental Protection Agency chairman has warned.

Barry Carbon, who has headed the EPA in two states as well as the federal environment agency, told The Australian, there were a lot more chemicals dumped in the late 1970s and early 1980s and it could become an “acute issue”. . . .

West Australian authorities are searching for any remaining stockpiles of the Agent Orange chemical 245T, which was imported between 1969 and 1971 and was believed to have been used by government workers in the Kimberley region and in the southern towns of Dwellingup.

Research by Australian National University professors Ben Selinger and Peter Hall revealed 20 years ago that 300 tonnes of the chemical which is believed to have come from Vietnam, was imported into Western Australia and Queensland. The chemicals were imported under the guise of fire damaged KTCP, the starter chemical to make 245T.

A tip-off to the scientists and subsequent tests showed the chemicals contained no KTCP but were 245T with dioxin poison levels 200 times the recommended levels at the time.

The sister of a former Queensland Forestry worker who died of leukemia has revealed her brother had complained to his family about a “bad batch” of 245T he was using during the mid 1970s. Susan Porter says her brother Dallas Guy said the poison they were using in the Beerwah area was strong and smelly. “He complained about a bad batch . . . they were complaining about the stench . . . but some were rubbing on their skin to keep mozzies away,” she said.

Toxic dumping more widespread

P 5 The Australian Jan 15 2002

Australian history of dumping dangerous chemicals underground is far more widespread and involves more toxic substances than has been revealed in the current Agent Orange scandal, a former Environmental Protection Agency chairman has warned.

Barry Carbon, who has headed the EPA in two states as well as the federal environment agency, told The Australian, there were a lot more chemicals dumped in the late 1970s and early 1980s and it could become an “acute issue”. . . .

West Australian authorities are searching for any remaining stockpiles of the Agent Orange chemical 245T, which was imported between 1969 and 1971 and was believed to have been used by government workers in the Kimberley region and in the southern towns of Dwellingup.

Research by Australian National University professors Ben Selinger and Peter Hall revealed 20 years ago that 300 tonnes of the chemical which is believed to have come from Vietnam, was imported into Western Australia and Queensland. The chemicals were imported under the guise of fire damaged KTCP, the starter chemical to make 245T.

A tip-off to the scientists and subsequent tests showed the chemicals contained no KTCP but were 245T with dioxin poison levels 200 times the recommended levels at the time.

The sister of a former Queensland Forestry worker who died of leukemia has revealed her brother had complained to his family about a “bad batch” of 245T he was using during the mid 1970s. Susan Porter says her brother Dallas Guy said the poison they were using in the Beerwah area was strong and smelly. “He complained about a bad batch . . . they were complaining about the stench . . . but some were rubbing on their skin to keep mozzies away,” she said.

Former Kimberley weed sprayer Carl Drysdale has been lobbying for two decades for an investigation into the strange, sticky, black chemicals they were given to use between 1975 and 1985. Mr Drysdale and his workers believe the chemical has been responsible for a spate of premature deaths illnesses, miscarriages and birth defects.

A ministerial inquiry has been widened to investigate not only the health effects on the workers, but what chemicals were used and if any are still stockpiled in the state.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

1969-71: Rogue batch of 2,4,5-T Dwellingup WA

Toxic dumping more widespread

P 5 The Australian Jan 15 2002

Australian history of dumping dangerous chemicals underground is far more widespread and involves more toxic substances than has been revealed in the current Agent Orange scandal, a former Environmental Protection Agency chairman has warned.

Barry Carbon, who has headed the EPA in two states as well as the federal environment agency, told The Australian, there were a lot more chemicals dumped in the late 1970s and early 1980s and it could become an “acute issue”. . . .

West Australian authorities are searching for any remaining stockpiles of the Agent Orange chemical 245T, which was imported between 1969 and 1971 and was believed to have been used by government workers in the Kimberley region and in the southern towns of Dwellingup.

Toxic dumping more widespread

P 5 The Australian Jan 15 2002

Australian history of dumping dangerous chemicals underground is far more widespread and involves more toxic substances than has been revealed in the current Agent Orange scandal, a former Environmental Protection Agency chairman has warned.

Barry Carbon, who has headed the EPA in two states as well as the federal environment agency, told The Australian, there were a lot more chemicals dumped in the late 1970s and early 1980s and it could become an “acute issue”. . . .

West Australian authorities are searching for any remaining stockpiles of the Agent Orange chemical 245T, which was imported between 1969 and 1971 and was believed to have been used by government workers in the Kimberley region and in the southern towns of Dwellingup.

Research by Australian National University professors Ben Selinger and Peter Hall revealed 20 years ago that 300 tonnes of the chemical which is believed to have come from Vietnam, was imported into Western Australia and Queensland. The chemicals were imported under the guise of fire damaged KTCP, the starter chemical to make 245T.

A tip-off to the scientists and subsequent tests showed the chemicals contained no KTCP but were 245T with dioxin poison levels 200 times the recommended levels at the time.

The sister of a former Queensland Forestry worker who died of leukemia has revealed her brother had complained to his family about a “bad batch” of 245T he was using during the mid 1970s. Susan Porter says her brother Dallas Guy said the poison they were using in the Beerwah area was strong and smelly. “He complained about a bad batch . . . they were complaining about the stench . . . but some were rubbing on their skin to keep mozzies away,” she said.

Former Kimberley weed sprayer Carl Drysdale has been lobbying for two decades for an investigation into the strange, sticky, black chemicals they were given to use between 1975 and 1985. Mr Drysdale and his workers believe the chemical has been responsible for a spate of premature deaths illnesses, miscarriages and birth defects.

A ministerial inquiry has been widened to investigate not only the health effects on the workers, but what chemicals were used and if any are still stockpiled in the state.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Toxic

1969-71: Rogue batch of 2,4,5-T used near Derby (WA)

245-T linked to fatalities

p 1The Australian January 5, 2002

Natalie O’Brien

A rogue batch of highly toxic chemicals once probably earmarked to make the defoliant Agent Orange has been linked for the first time to a West Australian government herbicide program blamed for deaths, serious illnesses and birth deformities.

It is feared drums of the potentially deadly batch of 245-T might still be in warehouses around the country. Although suspicious shipments of the chemical from Singapore were uncovered 20 years ago, it has only now been revealed the same chemical is suspected of having been used in a controversial weed spraying program in the Kimberley region, that is now the subject of a West Australian parliamentary inquiry.

Concerns are held that some of the hundreds of drums of the fire damaged batches of 245-T remain unaccounted for and may be stored or dumped elsewhere around Australia. The chemical makes up 50 per cent of Agent Orange, a defoliant herbicide used in Vietnam, and its dioxin impurities have been linked to a range of health problems, including birth defects.

245-T linked to fatalities

p 1The Australian January 5, 2002

Natalie O’Brien

A rogue batch of highly toxic chemicals once probably earmarked to make the defoliant Agent Orange has been linked for the first time to a West Australian government herbicide program blamed for deaths, serious illnesses and birth deformities.

It is feared drums of the potentially deadly batch of 245-T might still be in warehouses around the country. Although suspicious shipments of the chemical from Singapore were uncovered 20 years ago, it has only now been revealed the same chemical is suspected of having been used in a controversial weed spraying program in the Kimberley region, that is now the subject of a West Australian parliamentary inquiry.

Concerns are held that some of the hundreds of drums of the fire damaged batches of 245-T remain unaccounted for and may be stored or dumped elsewhere around Australia. The chemical makes up 50 per cent of Agent Orange, a defoliant herbicide used in Vietnam, and its dioxin impurities have been linked to a range of health problems, including birth defects.

The rogue batches were discovered by Australian National University scientists Ben Selinger and Peter Hall, while investigating rumours that a load of Agent Orange had been dumped in Australia after the Vietnam War.

Professor Selinger said 245-T was rendered more toxic by heat exposure and the suspicious batches imported between 1969 and 1971 were listed as fire damaged and shipped in labeled as another chemical.

Professor Selinger said the black sticky substance reported by workers in the northwest town of Derby were disturbingly similar to the sample he and Professor Hall had tested 20 years ago and found to have dioxin levels 200 times the legal limit at that time. Professor Selinger said the rashes, blisters and burns described by the Derby men were similar to symptoms manifested by workers at the Singaporean factory where the rogue batches of 245-T suffered the damage before being dispatched to Perth and Brisbane. “But only an analysis will confirm their similarity,” he said.

The Perth based company that imported the chemical was a supplier of the state’s Agricultural Protection Board, which gave workers in Derby unmarked drums of chemicals – an illegal practice then and now – to use in a weed control program that ran from about 1975 to 1985. The workers complained about rashes and burns suffered when the chemical leaked. Some later developed serious illnesses and died.

Professors Selinger and Hall published their findings in the 1980s calling on Australian authorities to “make available full details of the exact nature of the suspicious imports”. But despite questions being raised in federal parliament in 1981 and evidence heard by a Senate inquiry that the batch was highly toxic, it appears the whereabouts and possible commercial use of the chemicals went unchecked.It is now believed some of those unmarked drums were dumped in Derby.

Professor Selinger, who has also chaired the National Registration Authority for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals said he believed the federal Health Department held documented information on the chemical that had not been released. “Governments don’t look for these things unless they are kicked and forced,” he said.

West Australian Agricultural Minister Kim Chance has established a parliamentary inquiry to document the chemical exposures of former Agricultural Protection Board workers who used the chemicals in the Kimberley region. Mr Chance said he also had been told that Agent Orange chemicals were imported into Australia and he fears they may have been used in some form in almost every state and territory. Mr Chance said using 245-T was dangerous even within legal dioxin limits “but if it was outside those speculations as the Senate inquiry evidence indicated, it was suicide’.

P2 The 245-T trail

1969-71: Large import from Singapore of fire damaged chemical listed as KTCP (the starting material used to make 245-T).

1972: Questions raised by competitor about labeling of imports for possible tariff avoidance.

1973: Samples for tariff inquiry believed to confirm fire damage but doesn’t measure dioxins.

1981: Same samples further tested and showed not to contain KTCP but found to be 245-T with illegally high levels of dioxins.

1981: Questions in federal parliament reveal samples did not contain KTCP but 245-T:

1981: Senate Standing Committee told the Department of Primary Industries first reported the chemical conformed to Australian standards but that further tests found it did not. It had dioxin levels 200 times the legal limit.

1982: Weed sprayers for the West Australian Agricultural Protection Board suffering rashes and unexplained illnesses question the safety of the chemical they are using. They are told by government employer it is not dangerous and ‘adverse publicity’ about it (245T) “is not a valid reason for discontinuing use”.

1985: Workers continue to use the unlabelled chemical.

1987: Workers told to dump remaining drums.

2002: State Parliamentary Enquiry called.

P2 Quest to find what killed Carl’s mates

Carl Drysdale kneels by a simple grave in the Derby cemetery and recalls how he lost one of his best mates to a sudden heart attack at the age of 33. The former Agriculture Protection Board worker watched his friend and dozens of others die or suffer unexplained illnesses after working together in a weed spraying program in the remote Kimberley during the 1970s and 80s.

The 56 year-old believes an unusual looking chemical they used is responsible. He’s been fighting 20 years to prove it. “I’m doing this for my mates and their families and kids,” Mr Drysdale said.

Mr Drysdale was a district officer with the board, leading a team of workers spraying weeds across the Kimberley. Many of his men were Aboriginies or itinerant white workers. They suffered side effects from using the chemicals 24-D and the now banned 245T, but it was a batch of unlabelled chemical that has really worried them. They were told it was the usual 245T – but it smelt stronger and looked darker and thicker than previous batches. And that is when their problems really started and people began dying, said Mr Drysdale.

“I asked them if it came from Vietnam” said Mr Drysdale. “I was being off-hand and I dismissed it as I thought noone would do that to people”. But there were other suspicious elements to the arrival of the drums. “There was 20 years supply which is not normal for government supply . . . They usually budget for one year and we got 20 years supply in one go.

And then people started to get sick.” At first, the men suffered rashes, blisters, burns, vomiting, diarrhoea and shocking headaches after using the new batch. Then came unexpected deaths and the workers wives and girlfriends were having multiple miscarriages and giving birth to deformed babies.

Mr Drysdale says he was ‘ as fit as a mallee bull’ before using the chemical, but he has since vomited up blood, lost weight, had his hair fall out in clumps and suffered fainting spells, angina, burns and rashes. One of his collegues was so strong he could throw a full 44 gallon drum on the back of a truck by himself, but he became so debilitated he could not even walk up a flight of stairs to collect his weeks’ pay.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#245-T

1969-71: Bad batch of 2,4,5-T used near Deception Bay Queensland

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail - January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail – January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

The families of at least five dead men believe exposure to a rogue 245-T batch, allegedly imported into Queensland between 1969 and 1971, caused their premature deaths from cancer and associated illnesses.

Fears about 300 tonnes of the fire-damaged batch, used to make the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange and imported into Queensland and Western Australia were first raised 20 years ago by Australian National University scientists. They were resurrected when new reports of early deaths and illnesses among herbicide users prompted the West Australian Government to launch a full inquiry last month.

Up to 120 tonnes of 245-T, laced with dioxin more than 200 times the then-legal level, is believed to have made its way into weed-spraying programs in Queensland.

Yeppoon resident Sid Armstrong said this week he remembered the arrival of a particularly heavy and “gluey” batch of 245-T which was to be used to spray undergrowth between trees at Byfield in Central Queensland. Mr Armstrong said the 245-T was usually mixed at the ratio of 11.3 litres to 200 litres of dieseline for spraying, but one batch had been “just gluey muck”.

When we first tried to mix it, it just floated around in big blobs . . . big clots and lumps like ambergris on top. It wouldn’t dissolve and mix,” Mr Armstrong said.

Maureen Fehihaber, of Yeppoon, whose husband George died from cancer at 49 after working with 245-T for about 17 years in the Byfield forests, said he often broke out in huge blisters after using sprays. Margaret Morris, of Redcliffe, said her husband Peter also dies at 49 from a heart attack attributed to an enlarged liver after sparking a campaign to stop Australian Paper Manufacturers using 245-T in aerial sprays on its pine plantations.

A former president of the Redcliffe and Deception Bay Farmers’ Association, Mr Morris had kept meticulous records of the anti-spray campaign until the State Government moved to have 245-T phased out in 1973.

A spokesman for Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk said this week the department was still trawling records for details of the rogue 245-T batch.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Forestry

1969-1971: Bad batch of 2,4,5-T used near Yarraman Queensland

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail - January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail – January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

The families of at least five dead men believe exposure to a rogue 245-T batch, allegedly imported into Queensland between 1969 and 1971, caused their premature deaths from cancer and associated illnesses.

Fears about 300 tonnes of the fire-damaged batch, used to make the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange and imported into Queensland and Western Australia were first raised 20 years ago by Australian National University scientists. They were resurrected when new reports of early deaths and illnesses among herbicide users prompted the West Australian Government to launch a full inquiry last month.

Up to 120 tonnes of 245-T, laced with dioxin more than 200 times the then-legal level, is believed to have made its way into weed-spraying programs in Queensland.

Yeppoon resident Sid Armstrong said this week he remembered the arrival of a particularly heavy and “gluey” batch of 245-T which was to be used to spray undergrowth between trees at Byfield in Central Queensland. Mr Armstrong said the 245-T was usually mixed at the ratio of 11.3 litres to 200 litres of dieseline for spraying, but one batch had been “just gluey muck”.

When we first tried to mix it, it just floated around in big blobs . . . big clots and lumps like ambergris on top. It wouldn’t dissolve and mix,” Mr Armstrong said.

Maureen Fehihaber, of Yeppoon, whose husband George died from cancer at 49 after working with 245-T for about 17 years in the Byfield forests, said he often broke out in huge blisters after using sprays. Margaret Morris, of Redcliffe, said her husband Peter also dies at 49 from a heart attack attributed to an enlarged liver after sparking a campaign to stop Australian Paper Manufacturers using 245-T in aerial sprays on its pine plantations.

A former president of the Redcliffe and Deception Bay Farmers’ Association, Mr Morris had kept meticulous records of the anti-spray campaign until the State Government moved to have 245-T phased out in 1973.

A spokesman for Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk said this week the department was still trawling records for details of the rogue 245-T batch.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Forestry

1969-71: Bad batch of 2,4,5-T Imbil Queensland

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail - January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail – January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

The families of at least five dead men believe exposure to a rogue 245-T batch, allegedly imported into Queensland between 1969 and 1971, caused their premature deaths from cancer and associated illnesses.

Fears about 300 tonnes of the fire-damaged batch, used to make the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange and imported into Queensland and Western Australia were first raised 20 years ago by Australian National University scientists. They were resurrected when new reports of early deaths and illnesses among herbicide users prompted the West Australian Government to launch a full inquiry last month.

Up to 120 tonnes of 245-T, laced with dioxin more than 200 times the then-legal level, is believed to have made its way into weed-spraying programs in Queensland.

Yeppoon resident Sid Armstrong said this week he remembered the arrival of a particularly heavy and “gluey” batch of 245-T which was to be used to spray undergrowth between trees at Byfield in Central Queensland. Mr Armstrong said the 245-T was usually mixed at the ratio of 11.3 litres to 200 litres of dieseline for spraying, but one batch had been “just gluey muck”.

When we first tried to mix it, it just floated around in big blobs . . . big clots and lumps like ambergris on top. It wouldn’t dissolve and mix,” Mr Armstrong said.

Maureen Fehihaber, of Yeppoon, whose husband George died from cancer at 49 after working with 245-T for about 17 years in the Byfield forests, said he often broke out in huge blisters after using sprays. Margaret Morris, of Redcliffe, said her husband Peter also dies at 49 from a heart attack attributed to an enlarged liver after sparking a campaign to stop Australian Paper Manufacturers using 245-T in aerial sprays on its pine plantations.

A former president of the Redcliffe and Deception Bay Farmers’ Association, Mr Morris had kept meticulous records of the anti-spray campaign until the State Government moved to have 245-T phased out in 1973.

A spokesman for Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk said this week the department was still trawling records for details of the rogue 245-T batch.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Forestry

1969-71: Beerburrum bad batch of pesticide: 2,4,5-T

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail - January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail – January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

The families of at least five dead men believe exposure to a rogue 245-T batch, allegedly imported into Queensland between 1969 and 1971, caused their premature deaths from cancer and associated illnesses.

Fears about 300 tonnes of the fire-damaged batch, used to make the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange and imported into Queensland and Western Australia were first raised 20 years ago by Australian National University scientists. They were resurrected when new reports of early deaths and illnesses among herbicide users prompted the West Australian Government to launch a full inquiry last month.

Up to 120 tonnes of 245-T, laced with dioxin more than 200 times the then-legal level, is believed to have made its way into weed-spraying programs in Queensland.

Yeppoon resident Sid Armstrong said this week he remembered the arrival of a particularly heavy and “gluey” batch of 245-T which was to be used to spray undergrowth between trees at Byfield in Central Queensland. Mr Armstrong said the 245-T was usually mixed at the ratio of 11.3 litres to 200 litres of dieseline for spraying, but one batch had been “just gluey muck”.

When we first tried to mix it, it just floated around in big blobs . . . big clots and lumps like ambergris on top. It wouldn’t dissolve and mix,” Mr Armstrong said.

Maureen Fehihaber, of Yeppoon, whose husband George died from cancer at 49 after working with 245-T for about 17 years in the Byfield forests, said he often broke out in huge blisters after using sprays. Margaret Morris, of Redcliffe, said her husband Peter also dies at 49 from a heart attack attributed to an enlarged liver after sparking a campaign to stop Australian Paper Manufacturers using 245-T in aerial sprays on its pine plantations.

A former president of the Redcliffe and Deception Bay Farmers’ Association, Mr Morris had kept meticulous records of the anti-spray campaign until the State Government moved to have 245-T phased out in 1973.

A spokesman for Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk said this week the department was still trawling records for details of the rogue 245-T batch.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Forestry

1969-1971: Atherton Tablelands Queensland Plantations: Pesticide 2,4,5-T

P17 Courier Mail - January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail – January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

The families of at least five dead men believe exposure to a rogue 245-T batch, allegedly imported into Queensland between 1969 and 1971, caused their premature deaths from cancer and associated illnesses.

Fears about 300 tonnes of the fire-damaged batch, used to make the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange and imported into Queensland and Western Australia were first raised 20 years ago by Australian National University scientists. They were resurrected when new reports of early deaths and illnesses among herbicide users prompted the West Australian Government to launch a full inquiry last month.

Up to 120 tonnes of 245-T, laced with dioxin more than 200 times the then-legal level, is believed to have made its way into weed-spraying programs in Queensland.

Yeppoon resident Sid Armstrong said this week he remembered the arrival of a particularly heavy and “gluey” batch of 245-T which was to be used to spray undergrowth between trees at Byfield in Central Queensland. Mr Armstrong said the 245-T was usually mixed at the ratio of 11.3 litres to 200 litres of dieseline for spraying, but one batch had been “just gluey muck”.

When we first tried to mix it, it just floated around in big blobs . . . big clots and lumps like ambergris on top. It wouldn’t dissolve and mix,” Mr Armstrong said.

Maureen Fehihaber, of Yeppoon, whose husband George died from cancer at 49 after working with 245-T for about 17 years in the Byfield forests, said he often broke out in huge blisters after using sprays. Margaret Morris, of Redcliffe, said her husband Peter also dies at 49 from a heart attack attributed to an enlarged liver after sparking a campaign to stop Australian Paper Manufacturers using 245-T in aerial sprays on its pine plantations.

A former president of the Redcliffe and Deception Bay Farmers’ Association, Mr Morris had kept meticulous records of the anti-spray campaign until the State Government moved to have 245-T phased out in 1973.

A spokesman for Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk said this week the department was still trawling records for details of the rogue 245-T batch.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Forestry

1969-1971: Rogue batch of pesticides Forest Plantations Queensland. Pesticide: 2,4,5-T

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail - January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

Forestry spraying linked to deaths

P17 Courier Mail – January 2, 2002 Glenis Green

Calls for a full inquiry into widespread health problems and deaths linked to the use of the now-banned herbicide 245-T mounted yesterday as more horror stories emerged across Queensland.

Stories of devastating crop damage in Brisbane’s bayside suburbs in the early 1970s have been added to the cases of birth defects, as well as seriously ill and dead workers who had been employed in forestry weed-spraying programs during the same years.

Information gathered by The Courier Mail points to toxic batches of 245-T being sprayed in forestry areas including Byfield, near Yeppoon, the Atherton Tablelands near Cairns; at Beerburrum on the Sunshine Coast; Imbil near Gympie; Yarraman near Kingaroy; and Deception Bay near Brisbane. It also may have been used in cactus eradication at Collinsville, west of Mackay.

The families of at least five dead men believe exposure to a rogue 245-T batch, allegedly imported into Queensland between 1969 and 1971, caused their premature deaths from cancer and associated illnesses.

Fears about 300 tonnes of the fire-damaged batch, used to make the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange and imported into Queensland and Western Australia were first raised 20 years ago by Australian National University scientists. They were resurrected when new reports of early deaths and illnesses among herbicide users prompted the West Australian Government to launch a full inquiry last month.

Up to 120 tonnes of 245-T, laced with dioxin more than 200 times the then-legal level, is believed to have made its way into weed-spraying programs in Queensland.

Yeppoon resident Sid Armstrong said this week he remembered the arrival of a particularly heavy and “gluey” batch of 245-T which was to be used to spray undergrowth between trees at Byfield in Central Queensland. Mr Armstrong said the 245-T was usually mixed at the ratio of 11.3 litres to 200 litres of dieseline for spraying, but one batch had been “just gluey muck”.

When we first tried to mix it, it just floated around in big blobs . . . big clots and lumps like ambergris on top. It wouldn’t dissolve and mix,” Mr Armstrong said.

Maureen Fehihaber, of Yeppoon, whose husband George died from cancer at 49 after working with 245-T for about 17 years in the Byfield forests, said he often broke out in huge blisters after using sprays. Margaret Morris, of Redcliffe, said her husband Peter also dies at 49 from a heart attack attributed to an enlarged liver after sparking a campaign to stop Australian Paper Manufacturers using 245-T in aerial sprays on its pine plantations.

A former president of the Redcliffe and Deception Bay Farmers’ Association, Mr Morris had kept meticulous records of the anti-spray campaign until the State Government moved to have 245-T phased out in 1973.

A spokesman for Primary Industries Minister Henry Palaszczuk said this week the department was still trawling records for details of the rogue 245-T batch.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Forestry

1985: Binginwarri Strzelecki Ranges (Vic). Pesticide: 2,4-D.

Sept, 1985 an accidental direct dumping of 2,4-D amine occurred, affecting a strip of quality pasture approximately 200m by 50m, when the Alpine Aviation pilot experienced difficulties in pulling out of a gully. The property affected belongs to ***** of Turton’s Track, Binginwarri, the target area was a neighbouring property. Regardless of what was below him, that pilot had to dump his entire load to avoid crashing . . .”

Sept, 1985 an accidental direct dumping of 2,4-D amine occurred, affecting a strip of quality pasture approximately 200m by 50m, when the Alpine Aviation pilot experienced difficulties in pulling out of a gully. The property affected belongs to ***** of Turton’s Track, Binginwarri, the target area was a neighbouring property. Regardless of what was below him, that pilot had to dump his entire load to avoid crashing . . .”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#southgippsland

1979 January: Leongatha Drive In Sprayed: Pesticide: Metiram

This occurred at the Leongatha Drive-In Theatre on the 15 Jan.’79. Two hundred patrons were sprayed with Polyram 2000 (Metiram) at 8:55pm. Once again there was no legal breach of the Aerial Spraying Control Act or Regulations.

“SUBMISSION PESTICIDES IN SOUTH GIPPSLAND 1 4 OCTOBER 1985

This occurred at the Leongatha Drive-In Theatre on the 15 Jan.’79. Two hundred patrons were sprayed with Polyram 2000 (Metiram) at 8:55pm. Once again there was no legal breach of the Aerial Spraying Control Act or Regulations.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#southgippsland

1974 October: Plantation Spraying Strzelecki Ranges: Pesticides: 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D.

1974 October: As I drove my children to school the spray plane emptied out a load of spray in the area along the Albert River and the road and there was a fine white mist all over my car and windscreen and I had to use washers and windscreen wipers so as to see where I was driving. Aerial contractors came into Hiawatha area on October 18, 1974 looking for aerial spraying contracts and on October 21st 1974 I wrote to them and told them that I strongly resented any aerial spraying of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T near our property but on October 28th 1974 at 4:30 pm they started aerial spraying on property lower down the Madalya Road approx. 2 or 3 miles away and sprayed for one a a half hours. Almost immediately we got the drift as there was a south-east breeze blowing directly from the sprayed area towards ours and Miss Woollard’s properties.

“SUBMISSION PESTICIDES IN SOUTH GIPPSLAND  4 OCTOBER 1985

P14 “ . . . The following is an extract from a submission by *** *** documenting her case history linked to spray drift.

As I drove my children to school the spray plane emptied out a load of spray in the area along the Albert River and the road and there was a fine white mist all over my car and windscreen and I had to use washers and windscreen wipers so as to see where I was driving. Aerial contractors came into Hiawatha area on October 18, 1974 looking for aerial spraying contracts and on October 21st 1974 I wrote to them and told them that I strongly resented any aerial spraying of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T near our property but on October 28th 1974 at 4:30 pm they started aerial spraying on property lower down the Madalya Road approx. 2 or 3 miles away and sprayed for one a a half hours. Almost immediately we got the drift as there was a south-east breeze blowing directly from the sprayed area towards ours and Miss Woollard’s properties.

Once again I’d replanted my garden and just got tomatoes etc. and spring flowers growing well. While the aerial spraying was being carried out I spent all the time in the garden watering down shrubs and plants hoping to save them. What I didn’t realize at the time was just what the spray could do to me.

Three days later I had to go to Dr. Martin in Yarram with a severe rash. My face burnt and stung like a severe sunburn and looked like a dried up paper bag with a rash. Twice now since that time I have had to have pre-cancerous cells burnt from my face and neck. This, I might add, means each time a month of most shocking pain and discmfort plus not being able to go out in public.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#southgippsland

1982 April: Hiawatha Valley Gippsland Health Problems. Pesticides: 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D.

Chemicals Killing Valley, Gippsland Women Say (The Age) April 26 1982

A welcoming sign at the gateway to Yarram, in the butter and cream belt of Gippsland, boasts of the district's unspoiled charm. But not far away, across the thick pine forests, lies the secluded Hiawatha Valley where other signs show that all is not well - dead trees, dying vegetation and an absence of bird life.

For more than 20 years the Lands Department has conducted a programme of herbicide spraying in Hiawatha Valley, using among other chemicals, 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D, components of the military defoliant Agent Orange. Either or both chemicals were also used in Agent White, Agent Pink, Agent Green and Agent Purple, the defoliants used in the Vietnam War.

As a result of the spraying residents claim a picture book setting in the Strzeleckis has suffered what took place in South Vietnam. The spraying has continued here, as in other parts of the State, in an attempt to control blackberries and weeds such as ragwort.

But the deaths of five workers engaged in spraying over the past three years has raised community concern about the possible health hazards associated with herbicides.

Around Yarram, which was at the centre of a birth deformity scare four years ago, the controversy has been renewed by a small group of women who say the drift from continued spraying is destroying their haven in the mountains.

Chemicals Killing Valley, Gippsland Women Say (The Age) April 26 1982

A welcoming sign at the gateway to Yarram, in the butter and cream belt of Gippsland, boasts of the district’s unspoiled charm. But not far away, across the thick pine forests, lies the secluded Hiawatha Valley where other signs show that all is not well – dead trees, dying vegetation and an absence of bird life.

For more than 20 years the Lands Department has conducted a programme of herbicide spraying in Hiawatha Valley, using among other chemicals, 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D, components of the military defoliant Agent Orange. Either or both chemicals were also used in Agent White, Agent Pink, Agent Green and Agent Purple, the defoliants used in the Vietnam War.

As a result of the spraying residents claim a picture book setting in the Strzeleckis has suffered what took place in South Vietnam. The spraying has continued here, as in other parts of the State, in an attempt to control blackberries and weeds such as ragwort.

But the deaths of five workers engaged in spraying over the past three years has raised community concern about the possible health hazards associated with herbicides.

Around Yarram, which was at the centre of a birth deformity scare four years ago, the controversy has been renewed by a small group of women who say the drift from continued spraying is destroying their haven in the mountains.

They claim the volume of chemicals poured on to Crown Land bordering their properties has defoliated and killed trees and taken its toll of stock.

Some of the cattle grazing in the area suffer deformities and owners say that abnormally high numbers of stock have had to be destroyed due to paralysis and unexplained sickness.

Those who came to live in the hill country near Hiawatha in the 1960’s remember when their bowl-shaped valley was filled with greenery.

Banksias and ferns lined the gravel tracks that climb up to the cottages of the valley’s inhabitants.

Sturdy blackwoods, wattles and gums stood in the paddocks and willows hung over the Little Albert river that tumbles through the valley.

From a white-painted “A” bridge over the river, children fished for gudgeon.

A former resident of the valley, Mrs Joan Osborne, speaks of the time when birds made a din in the trees outside ber bedroom window each morning.

“It was spectacular, just gorgeous,” she said: “To think we used to complain about the noise – now you can hardly hear a bird at all.”

Today, the two towering trees that shaded their old farmhouse are stark skeletons.

The statuesque gums are gaunt; the wattles bereft of their former glory.

And the willows are nowhere to be seen. Now they are no more than images in Mrs Osborne’s old snapshots.

Another resident in Hiawatha Valley, Miss Rene Woollard, is a fiercely independent and, to her detractors, somewhat eccentric spinster. She led the way to her tangled garden and pointed to the exaggerated growth of a mahogany gum.

Its branches were splayed and contorted.

Next to it, the top half of an English yew was dying.

Miss Wollard reached up and picked a handful of sickly leaves, crinkling at the edges. She indicated several brown spots: “That’s where it was hit by the drift. It is funnelled into this valley by the air currents – it’s completely uncontrollable,” she said.

Miss Woollard came to live in the valley at Stacey’s Bridge, 20 kilometres from Yarram, in 1966 with her late brother, Laurie. They planned to start a nursery and market garden on a 20-hectare property.

Soon after they took delivery of $8000 worth of plants, the Lands Department began spraying weeds and blackberry bushes. Now she has only 30 trees left.

In the early 1970s the department began spraying 2,4,5-T by air in the Hiawatha valley with devastating results for the locals.

Mrs Osborne recorded the date of the blitz, on Crown land about half a kilometre from the Osborne’s dairy farm: 16/12/71.

“My garden was as good as wiped right out,” said Mrs Osborne. “All the choice plants and shrubs were the worst affected; the delphiniums, dahlias and 24 new roses I’d bought the year before, plus all the vegetable garden…”

The valley’s trees started to die following aerial spraying, she said.

Mrs Osborne noticed that a koala colony, kangaroos, wallabies, wombats and lyrebirds disappeared from the area. Fish in the Little Albert River vanished, as did the bird life.

Then, two weeks after the spraying, Mrs Osborne replaced the water in the goldfish bowl with some taken from their drinking tanks. In the morning the fish were all dead. She believes their household water was poisoned when the spray drifted on to their roof and was washed into the tanks with the first rain.

The spraying continued throughout the early 1970s and on one occasion, Mrs Osborne said, a plane emptied its load over her car as she drove the children to school.

“There was a fine white mist all over the car and windscreen and I had to use the wipers to see where I was driving,” she said.

On 18 October, 1974, private contractors arrived in the Hiawatha area, looking for aerial spraying work.

Despite written protests from Mrs Osborne they went ahead – at 4.30pm on 21 October, she noted – and sprayed a property about two kilometres away for one and a half hours.

“Almost immediately we got the drift as there was a southeast breeze blowing direclty from the sprayed area towards ours and Miss Woollard’s property,” Mrs Osborne said.

Unknown to her at the time, she said, it was to be the beginning of years of agony and emotional trauma from which she feels she may never recover.

“While the aerial spraying was being carried out I spent all the time in the garden watering down shrubs and plants hoping to save them.”

Three days later her face developed a severe rash. “My face burned and stung like a severe sun burn and looked like a dried up paper bag with a rash,” she said.

Twice Mrs Osborne has had pre-cancerous cells burned from her face and neck, which caused her a month of pain and embarrassment.

A doctor’s certificate diagnosed what at the time appeared to be allergic contact dermatitis following aerial spraying.

Since being exposed to herbicide sprays Mrs Osborne says, her health has deteriorated. She is nervous, she gets depressed, her memory and concentration is bad and her bones ache. A doctor has also told her she has brain damage.

Mrs Osborne, her husband Dave and family moved to a smaller property near Traralgon in 1977 to escape the drift, a move she thought would also see an improvement in her health.

“After more than four years I am worse if anything. I know now that I will never be well again.”

Miss Woollard’s three-roomed home sits half-way up the slopes of the valley, obscured from the road by a tangle of blackberries.

She has been an indefatigable fighter for the abolition of herbicides for 15 years, a stand which she says has isolated her from much of the farming community.

“People refer to me at ‘that silly old duck up the mountains’ but I’m not afraid,” she said.

Miss Woollard, whose farm upbringing taught her to be cautious with all poisons, became concerned about chemical sprays when she saw the effect it was having on her sheep and cattle.

It’s all written down in an old ledger book: the spastic calves, the 15 cows she had shot by a neighbour because of calving paralysis, the deformities too distasteful to mention.

A stroll around her paddocks revealed further shocks.

A Friesian bull, which was sprayed with 2,4,5-T in 1967 while tethered by the roadside, developed a tumour-like growth on its back. “His daughter was born in 1980 with blisters,” Miss Woollard said.

Miss Woollard produced a steer’s skull with a grotesque bone deformity under its jaw. She claimed it was rapid bone cancer, which developed after the animal was exposed to herbicide.

She motioned to a pen where an emaciated cow, ribs protruding through its dull, matted coat, tottered about on shaky hindlegs: “I found her upside down in a gully in 1975. She’s never put on fat due to a breakdown in her metabolism.”

However, Dr Bill Parsons, a member of the Vermin and Noxious Weeds Destruction Board, who has visited the valley, said: “There’s no way the drift from those phenoxy herbicides would kill those trees.”

Dr Parsons said he had been told by the Agriculture Department that the deformed steer skull was “a classic case of lumpy jaw” and not bone cancer as Miss Woollard claimed.

Joan Osborne said that when her family first settled at Stacey’s Bridge, the Lands Department threatened to prosecute farmers if they did not spray with 2,4,5-T or 2,4-D.

But after using Lands Department equipment to spray grass on their property, the Osbornes became suspicious when their cows did not become pregnant.

In their last winter at the farm, they lost 100 of their dairy herd. The cows suddenly contracted an unknown illness.

Both Miss Woollard and Mrs Osborne said 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D were often mixed far stronger than recommended.

“It was left to unskilled people who just swished it around as if it was water,” Miss Woollard said.

Mrs Osborne added: “The Crown Land at the back of our home must have been sprayed as strongly as Vietnam to defoliate and kill the huge gums.”

The irony was that throughout the spraying campaigns, year in, year out, the ragwort continued to grow.

Between 1975 and 1976, a number of babies were born with major deformities soon after the Yarram district had been sprayed from the air with 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D. The babies died. Two doctors found that the frequency of neural tube disorders was 10 times the world rate. They found the Yarram abnormality rate among living children was at least twice the national average.

In March 1978, following a controversy over the deformities, the then Minister for Health, Mr Houghton, announced an inquiry which found no evidence linking the birth defects and herbicides spraying.

But scientists and doctors who took a close interest in the inquiry criticised it for a lack of thoroughness. The report said the malformations did not suggest a specific local cause. It also said that three abnormal babies among 93 deliveries at Yarram was a one in 500 probability which could happen by chance.

An ACTU-Trades Hall Council occupational health and safety unit report on the use of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D, released last year said:

“It is necessary to point out that the data analysed in the Yarram Report are mortality rather than incidence data. There is, as yet, no systematic collection of incidence data on such abnormalities throughout Australia.

“Further, as the majority of malformed foetuses are aborted, spontaneous abortions must be considered simultaneously with the numbers of live-born malformed children if credible judgements are to be made. The Yarram Report fails to recognise the importance of abortion information and consequently exempts it from analyses and conclusions.”

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Killing

1981 November: Tarra River Pollution. Pesticide Detected: 2,4,5-T.

Environmental Impacts of the Chlorophenoxy Herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D

State Pollution Control Commission recently did a study into all states regarding monitoring of chlorophenoxy herbicides and TCDD in Australia...

P60 "Keith Turnbull Research Institute of the Victorian Department of Crown Lands and Survey has investigated 2,4,5-T levels in the Tarra River following the spraying of dense stands of blackberries along one of its banks. (Vermin and Noxious Weeds Destruction Board, Dept Crown Lands and Survey pers comm). The blackberries were sprayed over a distance of 100m to a depth of 10-15m in from the bank, using approximately 600L of aqueous spray containing 370g of 2,4,5-T butyl ester and amitrole, equivalent to roughly 3.5 to 5 k/ha... 1/6th of spray went directly into river... 30m downstream 2,4,5-T peaked at 0.2mg/L after 1 hour (0.003mg/L after 4 hours). (1km downstream 0.05mg/L. 0.01mg/L after 3 hours...).

State Pollution Control Commission November 1981

Environmental Impacts of the Chlorophenoxy Herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D

State Pollution Control Commission recently did a study into all states regarding monitoring of chlorophenoxy herbicides and TCDD in Australia…

P60 “Keith Turnbull Research Institute of the Victorian Department of Crown Lands and Survey has investigated 2,4,5-T levels in the Tarra River following the spraying of dense stands of blackberries along one of its banks. (Vermin and Noxious Weeds Destruction Board, Dept Crown Lands and Survey pers comm). The blackberries were sprayed over a distance of 100m to a depth of 10-15m in from the bank, using approximately 600L of aqueous spray containing 370g of 2,4,5-T butyl ester and amitrole, equivalent to roughly 3.5 to 5 k/ha… 1/6th of spray went directly into river… 30m downstream 2,4,5-T peaked at 0.2mg/L after 1 hour (0.003mg/L after 4 hours). (1km downstream 0.05mg/L. 0.01mg/L after 3 hours…).

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm#Pollution

1978: October. Birth Deformities Cairns. Pesticides: 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D.

Herbicides Under Suspicion in Australia New Scientist 19 October 1978

The herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T remain suspected by the Australian public of causing birth defects despite being cleared by two government inquiries. The inquiries were set up after what seemed to be an abnormally high number of babies born with deformities at Cairns in Northern Queensland and at Yarram some 2000 km to the south in Victoria. The herbicide 2,4,5-T is used extensively for spraying fields of sugar cane near Cairns, and use of both this herbicide and 2,4-D were suspected of causing the deformities at Yarram.

The federal National Health and Medical Research Council reported in June this year that it could find no substantial scientific evidence of a causal link between the use of 2,4,5-T and human birth defects. It also stated that "the use of 2,4-D is not producing any risk to human health."

In its report, which was published late last month, the Victorian state government's investigation into the birth defects at Yarram also failed to establish a statistical link between the use of 2,4,5-T and birth defects. However, no sooner had that report been published than a further group of birth deformities came to light at the Victorian town of Sale. In this case, four deformed babies were born at the same hospital between September and December last year. One had no brain, another spina bifida, the third underdeveloped internal organs, and the fourth a cleft palate. The mothers of all these babies lived in houses that faced a playing field that had been sprayed with a strong formulation of 2,4-D to control weeds. State premier Dick Hamer announced last week that another inquiry will be held into these birth defects at Sale.

According to the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia uses about 2000 tonnes of 2,4-D and 250-300 tonnes of 2,4,5-T each year. Implicating or clearing these herbicides of causing the birth defects will be particularly difficult. At both Yarram and Cairns the basic statistics needed to determine whether the respective clusters of birth defects truly constitued epidemics were apparently just not available. At Yarram birth deformities were found in about 8 per cent of births, while at Cairns the figure was 6 per cent.

Submission to NSW Government Enquiry into the Herbicide 2,4,5-T. From Council on Environmental Hazards PO Box 238 North Quay 4000 Qld. Prepared by Paul Rogers

p8-10...Relevant Data from Queensland

Data from a survey of birth abnormalities in the Cairns region in 1978 is presented plus date from Queensland's Childhood Malignancy Register. Queensland does not have an adult cancer register.

Cairns Abnormalities.

In 1978 former director of Public Heath Dr. R.C. Rogers, conducted an investigation of a reported high incidence of birth abnormalities in the Cairns region. He surveyed two thousand births for twelve months prior to 1st June, 1978... The high figure is for neural tube abnormalities which were eleven out of two thousand. There were eleven perinatal deaths, cause undetermined. A percentage of these is likely to be for neural tube. The Queensland Health Department reported that no increase of significance was noted on the basis of a comparison with data from a Sydney study in 1976 by Field. It was reported that the rate of 5.5 per thousand in Cairns for neural tube was not statistically higher than 2.81 in the Sydney study. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to distort the statistics. The Sydney figure of 2.81 per thousand refers to central nervous system defects, i.e. anencephaly and spina bifida (neural tube) and hydrocephalus, which is not classified as a N.T. abnormality. No cases of hydrocephalus were reported from Cairns. In fact, the Health Minister at the time, Dr. L. Edwards had been reported in the press as saying that hydrocephalus was not associated with 2,4,5-T/TCDD.

Table 2

Abnormality     Rate/1,000 Births Cairns     Rate/1,000 Births Sydney

Neural Tube         5.5                                       1.71

Hydrocephalus     Not Reported                         1.09

Total C.N.S          5.5                                       2.81

The figures the Queensland Health Department should have used are 5.5 compared to 1.72. Also perinatal deaths were included in the Sydney figures but not in the Cairns figures. The statistical significance of the data has been confirmed by a statistician. The significance of this data is that neural tube abnormalities in the Cairns region in that period were three and possibly up to five times higher than what the national average can reasonably be estimated to be.

2,4,5-T is used heavily in the cane growing regions of North Queensland and is aerially sprayed. I should emphasize that the data above does not represent a statistically significant relationship with 2,4,5-T use. It does however, I believe, indicate a statistically significant excess of neural tube abnormalities over the national average. As 2,4,5-T/TCDD is an established animal teratogen every effort should be made to design studies to elucidate the relationship between the herbicide, or other teratogens, and birth abnormalities in the region. This is not being done to our knowledge.

Childhood Malignancy Register

The Register has presented two annual reports - 1979 and 1980. Although the Register is in its infancy, some trends have been detected.

An unusually high incidence of medulloblastoma, a brain tumour, retinoblastoma, an eye tumour, and Hodgkins disease have been detected in North Queensland and other crop growing areas that utilize phenoxy herbicides heavily, such as the Darling Downs.

The Chairman of the Register, Dr W.R. McWhirter recently told the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Environment and Conservation that "we strongly suspect that there is some form of environmental agent which is capable of inducing medulloblastoma. This tumour seems to have  a tendency to a higher incidence in children born in rural areas". This was included in a submission to the committee's enquiry into hazardous chemicals.

The high incidence of Hodgkins Disease in North Queensland may be significant. TCDD is a well established suppressor of cellular immune response in experimental animals due to thymus involution...

Herbicides Under Suspicion in Australia New Scientist 19 October 1978

The herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T remain suspected by the Australian public of causing birth defects despite being cleared by two government inquiries. The inquiries were set up after what seemed to be an abnormally high number of babies born with deformities at Cairns in Northern Queensland and at Yarram some 2000 km to the south in Victoria. The herbicide 2,4,5-T is used extensively for spraying fields of sugar cane near Cairns, and use of both this herbicide and 2,4-D were suspected of causing the deformities at Yarram.

The federal National Health and Medical Research Council reported in June this year that it could find no substantial scientific evidence of a causal link between the use of 2,4,5-T and human birth defects. It also stated that “the use of 2,4-D is not producing any risk to human health.”

In its report, which was published late last month, the Victorian state government’s investigation into the birth defects at Yarram also failed to establish a statistical link between the use of 2,4,5-T and birth defects. However, no sooner had that report been published than a further group of birth deformities came to light at the Victorian town of Sale. In this case, four deformed babies were born at the same hospital between September and December last year. One had no brain, another spina bifida, the third underdeveloped internal organs, and the fourth a cleft palate. The mothers of all these babies lived in houses that faced a playing field that had been sprayed with a strong formulation of 2,4-D to control weeds. State premier Dick Hamer announced last week that another inquiry will be held into these birth defects at Sale.

According to the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia uses about 2000 tonnes of 2,4-D and 250-300 tonnes of 2,4,5-T each year. Implicating or clearing these herbicides of causing the birth defects will be particularly difficult. At both Yarram and Cairns the basic statistics needed to determine whether the respective clusters of birth defects truly constitued epidemics were apparently just not available. At Yarram birth deformities were found in about 8 per cent of births, while at Cairns the figure was 6 per cent.

Submission to NSW Government Enquiry into the Herbicide 2,4,5-T. From Council on Environmental Hazards PO Box 238 North Quay 4000 Qld. Prepared by Paul Rogers

p8-10…Relevant Data from Queensland

Data from a survey of birth abnormalities in the Cairns region in 1978 is presented plus date from Queensland’s Childhood Malignancy Register. Queensland does not have an adult cancer register.

Cairns Abnormalities.

In 1978 former director of Public Heath Dr. R.C. Rogers, conducted an investigation of a reported high incidence of birth abnormalities in the Cairns region. He surveyed two thousand births for twelve months prior to 1st June, 1978… The high figure is for neural tube abnormalities which were eleven out of two thousand. There were eleven perinatal deaths, cause undetermined. A percentage of these is likely to be for neural tube. The Queensland Health Department reported that no increase of significance was noted on the basis of a comparison with data from a Sydney study in 1976 by Field. It was reported that the rate of 5.5 per thousand in Cairns for neural tube was not statistically higher than 2.81 in the Sydney study. This appears to be a deliberate attempt to distort the statistics. The Sydney figure of 2.81 per thousand refers to central nervous system defects, i.e. anencephaly and spina bifida (neural tube) and hydrocephalus, which is not classified as a N.T. abnormality. No cases of hydrocephalus were reported from Cairns. In fact, the Health Minister at the time, Dr. L. Edwards had been reported in the press as saying that hydrocephalus was not associated with 2,4,5-T/TCDD.

Table 2

Abnormality     Rate/1,000 Births Cairns     Rate/1,000 Births Sydney

Neural Tube         5.5                                       1.71

Hydrocephalus     Not Reported                     1.09

Total C.N.S            5.5                                       2.81

The figures the Queensland Health Department should have used are 5.5 compared to 1.72. Also perinatal deaths were included in the Sydney figures but not in the Cairns figures. The statistical significance of the data has been confirmed by a statistician. The significance of this data is that neural tube abnormalities in the Cairns region in that period were three and possibly up to five times higher than what the national average can reasonably be estimated to be.

2,4,5-T is used heavily in the cane growing regions of North Queensland and is aerially sprayed. I should emphasize that the data above does not represent a statistically significant relationship with 2,4,5-T use. It does however, I believe, indicate a statistically significant excess of neural tube abnormalities over the national average. As 2,4,5-T/TCDD is an established animal teratogen every effort should be made to design studies to elucidate the relationship between the herbicide, or other teratogens, and birth abnormalities in the region. This is not being done to our knowledge.

Childhood Malignancy Register

The Register has presented two annual reports – 1979 and 1980. Although the Register is in its infancy, some trends have been detected.

An unusually high incidence of medulloblastoma, a brain tumour, retinoblastoma, an eye tumour, and Hodgkins disease have been detected in North Queensland and other crop growing areas that utilize phenoxy herbicides heavily, such as the Darling Downs.

The Chairman of the Register, Dr W.R. McWhirter recently told the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Environment and Conservation that “we strongly suspect that there is some form of environmental agent which is capable of inducing medulloblastoma. This tumour seems to have  a tendency to a higher incidence in children born in rural areas”. This was included in a submission to the committee’s enquiry into hazardous chemicals.

The high incidence of Hodgkins Disease in North Queensland may be significant. TCDD is a well established suppressor of cellular immune response in experimental animals due to thymus involution…

1977: Spray Drift Seaview (Vic). Pesticide: 2,4-D.

Seaview Spray Incident - APM/Skyfarmers October 28, 1977

Minutes Of Pesticide Review Committee Meeting #132

Seaview Spray Incident (Ethylester of 2,4-D - Ciba Geigy Ester 80. South of Grand Ridge Road, Seaview Gippsland. "... several other people have complained of damage, including a National Park several hundred yards along the road...The EPA has expressed an interest in the area and delegated to the Latrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Trust who were looking at the possible prosecution of APM and Skyfarmers for damage to Nolan's property... Mr Pearce said about 1960, 2,4,5-T (ester) had been used to kill willows in State Rivers Channel and damage to a house garden about 200 yards downwind and the damage was quite severe."

 

11/10/78

Lawsuit over spray

A State Government authority will prosecute an aerial spraying firm over an incident in October last year involving the alleged spraying of the herbicide 2,4-D.

The LaTrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Authority will prosecute Skyfarmers Pty Ltd on behalf of the Environment Protection Authority.

Skyfarmers has been charged under Section 41 of the Environment Protection Act, which makes it an offence to make changes to the atmosphere to that it would be detrimental to human beings and noxious to plants.

The secretary of the LaTrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Authority, Mr John Maglen, today said the allegation was that there had been an accidental discharge on to a property at Seaview while tree plantations owned by Australian Paper Mills were being sprayed to get rid of noxious weeds.

The property at Seaview is named Brigadoon Park, in Grand Ridge Road.

The penalty under the Environment Protection Act is not more than $5000.

"It is being alleged that the substance used was 2,4-D" Mr Maglen said.

Seaview Spray Incident – APM/Skyfarmers October 28, 1977

Minutes Of Pesticide Review Committee Meeting #132

Seaview Spray Incident (Ethylester of 2,4-D – Ciba Geigy Ester 80. South of Grand Ridge Road, Seaview Gippsland. “… several other people have complained of damage, including a National Park several hundred yards along the road…The EPA has expressed an interest in the area and delegated to the Latrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Trust who were looking at the possible prosecution of APM and Skyfarmers for damage to Nolan’s property… Mr Pearce said about 1960, 2,4,5-T (ester) had been used to kill willows in State Rivers Channel and damage to a house garden about 200 yards downwind and the damage was quite severe.”

11/10/78

Lawsuit over spray

A State Government authority will prosecute an aerial spraying firm over an incident in October last year involving the alleged spraying of the herbicide 2,4-D.

The LaTrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Authority will prosecute Skyfarmers Pty Ltd on behalf of the Environment Protection Authority.

Skyfarmers has been charged under Section 41 of the Environment Protection Act, which makes it an offence to make changes to the atmosphere to that it would be detrimental to human beings and noxious to plants.

The secretary of the LaTrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Authority, Mr John Maglen, today said the allegation was that there had been an accidental discharge on to a property at Seaview while tree plantations owned by Australian Paper Mills were being sprayed to get rid of noxious weeds.

The property at Seaview is named Brigadoon Park, in Grand Ridge Road.

The penalty under the Environment Protection Act is not more than $5000.

“It is being alleged that the substance used was 2,4-D” Mr Maglen said.

1970: Milk Contamination, Witchcliffe WA). Pesticide: Dieldrin

Dieldrin Levels Western Australia 1966 & 1970

Dieldrin Residues Western Australian Study by E. Shewchuck February 1981 Government Chemical Laboratories Perth (milk levels included very high levels of Dieldrin found in milk farm - Wanneroo Dairy. June 1966 120-350ug/L 220ug/L mean 9 samples. July 1966 40-140ug/L 60 mean 12 samples. Area was sprayed for Argentine Ant control Feb/Mar 1966 and afterwards used for grazing of a dairy herd.

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 900ug/L

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 800ug/L

June 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L

June 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 170ug/L

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 81ug/L

July 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 49ug/L

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 32ug/L

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 24ug/L 

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 16ug/L 

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 14ug/L

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 12ug/L

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 10ug/L

Dieldrin Levels Western Australia 1966 & 1970

Dieldrin Residues Western Australian Study by E. Shewchuck February 1981 Government Chemical Laboratories Perth (milk levels included very high levels of Dieldrin found in milk farm – Wanneroo Dairy. June 1966 120-350ug/L 220ug/L mean 9 samples. July 1966 40-140ug/L 60 mean 12 samples. Area was sprayed for Argentine Ant control Feb/Mar 1966 and afterwards used for grazing of a dairy herd.

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 900ug/L

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 800ug/L

June 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L

June 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 170ug/L

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 81ug/L

July 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 49ug/L

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 32ug/L

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 24ug/L

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 16ug/L

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 14ug/L

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 12ug/L

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 10ug/L

1966 June-July: Wanneroo (WA) Milk Contamination: Pesticide: Dieldrin.

Dieldrin Levels Western Australia 1966 & 1970

Dieldrin Residues Western Australian Study by E. Shewchuck February 1981 Government Chemical Laboratories Perth (milk levels included very high levels of Dieldrin found in milk farm - Wanneroo Dairy. June 1966 120-350ug/L 220ug/L mean 9 samples. July 1966 40-140ug/L 60 mean 12 samples. Area was sprayed for Argentine Ant control Feb/Mar 1966 and afterwards used for grazing of a dairy herd.

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 900ug/L (3000xADWGH)

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 800ug/L (2666.667xADWGH)

June 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L (733.333xADWGH)

June 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 170ug/L (566.667xADWGH)

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 81ug/L (270xADWGH)

July 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L (733.333xADWGH)

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 49ug/L (163.333xADWGH)

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 32ug/L (106.667xADWGH)

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 24ug/L (80xADWGH)

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 16ug/L (53.333xADWGH)

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 14ug/L (46.667xADWGH)

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 12ug/L (40xADWGH

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 10ug/L (33.333xADWGH)

Dieldrin Levels Western Australia 1966 & 1970

Dieldrin Residues Western Australian Study by E. Shewchuck February 1981 Government Chemical Laboratories Perth (milk levels included very high levels of Dieldrin found in milk farm – Wanneroo Dairy. June 1966 120-350ug/L 220ug/L mean 9 samples. July 1966 40-140ug/L 60 mean 12 samples. Area was sprayed for Argentine Ant control Feb/Mar 1966 and afterwards used for grazing of a dairy herd.

May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 900ug/L (May 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 800ug/L

June 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L

June 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 170ug/L

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin Milk 81ug/L

July 1966 Mean Western Australia Wanneroo Dairy Dieldrin Milk 220ug/L

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 49ug/L

July 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 32ug/L

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 24ug/L

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd A) Dieldrin 16ug/L

August 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 14ug/L

November 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 12ug/L

December 1970 Western Australia Witchcliffe Area (Herd B) Dieldrin 10ug/L

1988 March: King Lake Farms Quaratined. Pesticide: Dieldrin.

Wednesday, 30th March 1988 The Age p18

Farmers Decide On Legal Action Over Land Contamination (Gayle Austen)

Forty-nine of the Victorian farmers whose properties are contaminated with the pesticide dieldrin will proceed with legal action against the State Government.

The farmers, beef producers from the Bellarine, Kinglake and Gembrook areas, decided this week that they could not wait any longer for the Minister for Agriculture, Mr Walker, to offer satisfactory compensation.

The State Government has consistently refused to provide compensation, despite recent evidence that the Department of Agriculture, which was recommending dieldrin for agricultural use until last year, had known about the contamination dangers of the pesticide since 1971.

Mr Walker has offered to buy contaminated cattle for 80 per cent of their value, but producers, facing long-term soil contamination, are dissatisfied and say they will press ahead with legal action.

"Generally, farmers are still very unhappy with what the minister has offered,"said a spokesman for the farmers, Mr Julian Dyer. "He can come up with as many short-term palliatives as he likes, but nobody at this stage knows what effect this will have on the value of property in the long-term...

 

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Agricultural%20Pesticides.htm#Dieldrin

Wednesday, 30th March 1988 The Age p18

Farmers Decide On Legal Action Over Land Contamination (Gayle Austen)

Forty-nine of the Victorian farmers whose properties are contaminated with the pesticide dieldrin will proceed with legal action against the State Government.

The farmers, beef producers from the Bellarine, Kinglake and Gembrook areas, decided this week that they could not wait any longer for the Minister for Agriculture, Mr Walker, to offer satisfactory compensation.

The State Government has consistently refused to provide compensation, despite recent evidence that the Department of Agriculture, which was recommending dieldrin for agricultural use until last year, had known about the contamination dangers of the pesticide since 1971.

Mr Walker has offered to buy contaminated cattle for 80 per cent of their value, but producers, facing long-term soil contamination, are dissatisfied and say they will press ahead with legal action.

“Generally, farmers are still very unhappy with what the minister has offered,”said a spokesman for the farmers, Mr Julian Dyer. “He can come up with as many short-term palliatives as he likes, but nobody at this stage knows what effect this will have on the value of property in the long-term…

“The whole thing’s a disaster. It’s terribly unfortunate that things like this have to go as far as they have.” Mr Dyer said there woule be no turning back from the action now, even if Mr Walker came up with a more acceptable offer.

He said he believed the dieldrin problem would continue to get worse as departmental officers turned their attention to the many hobby farms in Gembrook and on the Bellarine Peninsula. About 220 Victorian farms are under quarantine or scrutiny, and the figure would probably blow out to about 500, Mr Dyer said.

The president of the Victorian Farmers Federation’s pastoral group, Mr Bill Bodman, agreed yesterday that farmers had to be concerned about the long-term impact of pesticide contamination, beyond the immediate problem of affected cattle.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Agricultural%20Pesticides.htm#Dieldrin

1988 March: Bellarine Peninsula Farms Quarantined. Pesticide: Dieldrin.

Wednesday, 30th March 1988 The Age p18

Farmers Decide On Legal Action Over Land Contamination (Gayle Austen)

Forty-nine of the Victorian farmers whose properties are contaminated with the pesticide dieldrin will proceed with legal action against the State Government.

The farmers, beef producers from the Bellarine, Kinglake and Gembrook areas, decided this week that they could not wait any longer for the Minister for Agriculture, Mr Walker, to offer satisfactory compensation.

 

The State Government has consistently refused to provide compensation, despite recent evidence that the Department of Agriculture, which was recommending dieldrin for agricultural use until last year, had known about the contamination dangers of the pesticide since 1971.

Mr Walker has offered to buy contaminated cattle for 80 per cent of their value, but producers, facing long-term soil contamination, are dissatisfied and say they will press ahead with legal action.

 

Wednesday, 30th March 1988 The Age p18

Farmers Decide On Legal Action Over Land Contamination (Gayle Austen)

Forty-nine of the Victorian farmers whose properties are contaminated with the pesticide dieldrin will proceed with legal action against the State Government.

The farmers, beef producers from the Bellarine, Kinglake and Gembrook areas, decided this week that they could not wait any longer for the Minister for Agriculture, Mr Walker, to offer satisfactory compensation.

The State Government has consistently refused to provide compensation, despite recent evidence that the Department of Agriculture, which was recommending dieldrin for agricultural use until last year, had known about the contamination dangers of the pesticide since 1971.

Mr Walker has offered to buy contaminated cattle for 80 per cent of their value, but producers, facing long-term soil contamination, are dissatisfied and say they will press ahead with legal action.

“Generally, farmers are still very unhappy with what the minister has offered,”said a spokesman for the farmers, Mr Julian Dyer. “He can come up with as many short-term palliatives as he likes, but nobody at this stage knows what effect this will have on the value of property in the long-term…

“The whole thing’s a disaster. It’s terribly unfortunate that things like this have to go as far as they have.” Mr Dyer said there woule be no turning back from the action now, even if Mr Walker came up with a more acceptable offer.

He said he believed the dieldrin problem would continue to get worse as departmental officers turned their attention to the many hobby farms in Gembrook and on the Bellarine Peninsula. About 220 Victorian farms are under quarantine or scrutiny, and the figure would probably blow out to about 500, Mr Dyer said.

The president of the Victorian Farmers Federation’s pastoral group, Mr Bill Bodman, agreed yesterday that farmers had to be concerned about the long-term impact of pesticide contamination, beyond the immediate problem of affected cattle.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Agricultural%20Pesticides.htm#Dieldrin

1988 March: Dieldrin contamination at MMBW farm Werribee.

Friday 11th March 1988 (The Age Newspaper)

Board Sells Its Cattle Despite Quarantine

Victoria's biggest cattle farm, the Board of Works farm at Werribee, has been quarantined because of pesticide contamination, but is still selling cattle through Melbourne Markets.

Nearly half the 10,000-hectare farm, which makes $3 million annual profit on cattle raised on sewage-irrigated pasture, has shown excessive levels of dieldrin, the pesticide at the centre of the Victorian meat industry's contamination crisis.

However, the board is still selling cattle from the property, with Department of Agriculture approval. The animals, including 68 heifers sold yesterday, through Dandenong Market, are guaranteed to be below acceptable residue levels but are not identified as from a quarantined property.

The Werribee farm carries 15,000 cattle and has already sold 2000 animals this year, a board spokesman said. Dieldrin contamination was first discovered last September.

The board agreed to voluntary quaratine. Tests showed that the dieldrin was present in sewage effluent. The spokesman said the farm's cattle had lost weight and value dramatically since their removal from the irrigated land.

He said the dieldrin could have been building up in the farm's pasture for decades, and that there was no obvious solution. The board had carried out a big testing program. However, he was surprised to hear cattle were sold yesterday.

 

Friday 11th March 1988 (The Age Newspaper)

Board Sells Its Cattle Despite Quarantine

Victoria’s biggest cattle farm, the Board of Works farm at Werribee, has been quarantined because of pesticide contamination, but is still selling cattle through Melbourne Markets.

Nearly half the 10,000-hectare farm, which makes $3 million annual profit on cattle raised on sewage-irrigated pasture, has shown excessive levels of dieldrin, the pesticide at the centre of the Victorian meat industry’s contamination crisis.

However, the board is still selling cattle from the property, with Department of Agriculture approval. The animals, including 68 heifers sold yesterday, through Dandenong Market, are guaranteed to be below acceptable residue levels but are not identified as from a quarantined property.

The Werribee farm carries 15,000 cattle and has already sold 2000 animals this year, a board spokesman said. Dieldrin contamination was first discovered last September.

The board agreed to voluntary quaratine. Tests showed that the dieldrin was present in sewage effluent. The spokesman said the farm’s cattle had lost weight and value dramatically since their removal from the irrigated land.

He said the dieldrin could have been building up in the farm’s pasture for decades, and that there was no obvious solution. The board had carried out a big testing program. However, he was surprised to hear cattle were sold yesterday.

The Opposition yesterday raised the farm’s quarantine in State Parliament. Farmers whose properties are among 222 Victorian farms under quarantine made it plain yesterday that they felt the board was receiving special treatment.

But a spokesman for the Agriculture Minister, Mr Walker, said last night that the Werribee farm would not get special consideration. He said the approvals for sale were tightly controlled, and there was nothing wrong with the board not revealing its quarantine status when selling cattle.

1987-1988: The Dieldrin Contamination Issue: Gembrook (Vic)

The Dieldrin Contamination Issue

"...Until 1987, the organochlorine, dieldrin was used by potato farmers in several areas of southern Victoria to control insect pests such as wire worm (Gonocephalum pterohelaeus) and white fringed weevil (Graphognathus leucoloma). The traditional management system for these farmers is to rotate paddocks between potato cropping and sown grass/clover pasture. The sown pasture is usually used for grazing beef cattle over a period of. several years, before returning to potato cropping. When the dieldrin sampling at abattoirs intensified after the 1987 "dieldrin crisis", many cattle from these farms were found to have fat dieldrin levels exceeding the Maximum Residue Level (MRL) of 0.2 parts per million (ppm). Further investigation found that the soil from many of the paddocks which these cattle grazed, was contaminated with measurable amounts of dieldrin..." (Source: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL DIELDRIN LEVELS WITHIN DIELDRIN CONTAMINATED PADDOCKS IN SOUTHERN VICTORIA K.L. BUTLER*, H. SIMPFENDORER*, J. STEWART* and G. ROBERTS* Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 18). Farms across Victoria were quarantined, many in the Yarra River catchment.

 

Dieldrin:
 
Dieldrins use was prohibited in Victoria when it was found in a range of agricultural industries in 1987.
 
It was used in potatoes and bulbs for the control of the native click beetle. Since its identification, a national plan was devised for managing contaminated
areas (National Organo-chlorine Residue Management Plan).
 
Dieldrin is known to remains stable in soils by attaching itself to soil particles, and is reported to have a presence in soils for 30 to 50 years. Residue retesting in the area, indicates that contamination levels have not changed since 1987.
 
Dieldrin is an unresolvable issue for the area, there are no options, and so the area is stuck with the problem. During this period, growers and the community have learnt to live with it.
In Gembrook, 97 properties are reported to be effected by dieldrin (25% of the area), with a total of 228 properties having cattle on them (DPI, 2004).
 
Average levels found in agricultural soils in the area are approximately 3.5 ppm (EPA consider this to be a low level). This level is satisfactory for everything other than agriculture.
 
The main concern with dieldrin is with cattle, as they readily take up the chemical and store it in body fatty tissue. This is an important problem for potato growers, because part of their rota tional cycle is to rest paddocks as pasture, and to run cattle on them. To reduce the dieldrin build up problem in their cattle, they must agist their cattle on clean country for 6 to 7 mo nths to decontamination them. This practise means that farmers loose money on their cattle because they can’t be sold in prime market condition.
 
Other animals such as sheep metabolises dieldrin much more quickly and are not as likely to find their wayonto residue sensitive export markets.
 
Unpublished research undertaken by DPI, suggests that dieldrin is not taken up by the vascular tissue of plants, but can be assimilated into leaf tissue of plants grown close to the soil through a volatilisation process eg. green tea or mint.
 
Dieldrin represents a problem for hobby farmers who run cattle on small properties because they are generally not in a position to agist cattle off site.
 
Tracing cattle from hobby farms is also a problem for regulatory authorities. Problems with cattle on small hobby farms became a problem in the in Stanley area (similar red soils to Gembrook).
 
Crops and livestock that are less prone to contamination are: vines and tree crops, regularly cut lucerne, horses and sheep. Enterprises susceptible to contamination are: cattle, ground foraging birds (emus, ostriches, ducks, free range chickens).
 
https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GembrookRuralReview_TheFutureOfTheGembrookPotatoIndustryAndOtherLandUseImplications_2004-03.pdf
 
2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
 
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
 
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.
 
At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.
 
Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010
https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf
 
 
 
 

The Dieldrin Contamination Issue

“…Until 1987, the organochlorine, dieldrin was used by potato farmers in several areas of southern Victoria to control insect pests such as wire worm (Gonocephalum pterohelaeus) and white fringed weevil (Graphognathus leucoloma). The traditional management system for these farmers is to rotate paddocks between potato cropping and sown grass/clover pasture. The sown pasture is usually used for grazing beef cattle over a period of. several years, before returning to potato cropping. When the dieldrin sampling at abattoirs intensified after the 1987 “dieldrin crisis”, many cattle from these farms were found to have fat dieldrin levels exceeding the Maximum Residue Level (MRL) of 0.2 parts per million (ppm). Further investigation found that the soil from many of the paddocks which these cattle grazed, was contaminated with measurable amounts of dieldrin…” (Source: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL DIELDRIN LEVELS WITHIN DIELDRIN CONTAMINATED PADDOCKS IN SOUTHERN VICTORIA K.L. BUTLER*, H. SIMPFENDORER*, J. STEWART* and G. ROBERTS* Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 18). Farms across Victoria were quarantined, many in the Yarra River catchment.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Agricultural%20Pesticides.htm#Dieldrin

Dieldrin:
Dieldrin’s use was prohibited in Victoria when it was found in a range of agricultural industries in 1987.
It was used in potatoes and bulbs for the control of the native click beetle. Since its identification, a national plan was devised for managing contaminated
areas (National Organo-chlorine Residue Management Plan).
Dieldrin is known to remains stable in soils by attaching itself to soil particles, and is reported to have a presence in soils for 30 to 50 years. Residue retesting in the area, indicates that contamination levels have not changed since 1987.
Dieldrin is an unresolvable issue for the area, there are no options, and so the area is stuck with the problem. During this period, growers and the community have learnt to live with it.
In Gembrook, 97 properties are reported to be effected by dieldrin (25% of the area), with a total of 228 properties having cattle on them (DPI, 2004).
Average levels found in agricultural soils in the area are approximately 3.5 ppm (EPA consider this to be a low level). This level is satisfactory for everything other than agriculture.
The main concern with dieldrin is with cattle, as they readily take up the chemical and store it in body fatty tissue. This is an important problem for potato growers, because part of their rota tional cycle is to rest paddocks as pasture, and to run cattle on them. To reduce the dieldrin build up problem in their cattle, they must agist their cattle on clean country for 6 to 7 mo nths to decontamination them. This practise means that farmers loose money on their cattle because they can’t be sold in prime market condition.
Other animals such as sheep metabolises dieldrin much more quickly and are not as likely to find their wayonto residue sensitive export markets.
Unpublished research undertaken by DPI, suggests that dieldrin is not taken up by the vascular tissue of plants, but can be assimilated into leaf tissue of plants grown close to the soil through a volatilisation process eg. green tea or mint.
Dieldrin represents a problem for hobby farmers who run cattle on small properties because they are generally not in a position to agist cattle off site.
Tracing cattle from hobby farms is also a problem for regulatory authorities. Problems with cattle on small hobby farms became a problem in the in Stanley area (similar red soils to Gembrook).
Crops and livestock that are less prone to contamination are: vines and tree crops, regularly cut lucerne, horses and sheep. Enterprises susceptible to contamination are: cattle, ground foraging birds (emus, ostriches, ducks, free range chickens).
Source: https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GembrookRuralReview_TheFutureOfTheGembrookPotatoIndustryAndOtherLandUseImplications_2004-03.pdf
2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

1968: Loch Valley (Vic). Aerial Spraying of 2,4,5-T begins in Victoria.

Aerial application of 2,4,5-T begins in Victoria - 1968

In 1968 aerial application of 2,4,5-T approximately three years after planting was introduced to control silver wattle, followed by basal bark spraying or stem injection of the eucalypts with mixtures of 2,4,5-T and picloram (Flinn and Minko 1980. Advances in Control of Woody Weeds in Radiata Pine Plantations in Victoria). Application rate usually 1.1 kg 2,4,5-T in 50 litres of dieseline/ha.

p17 "Aerial spraying of 670 acres of wattle regrowth at Warrenbayne and Loch Valley Plantation with 1 pound active of technical 2,4,5-T Butyl Ester in 5 gallons of distillate (diesel) effectively killed off competing wattle growth . . . p35 Test aerial spraying with 2,4,5-T has been carried out in the Loch Valley Plantation..." Forests Commission 1968-69 Annual Report.

Aerial application of 2,4,5-T begins in Victoria – 1968

In 1968 aerial application of 2,4,5-T approximately three years after planting was introduced to control silver wattle, followed by basal bark spraying or stem injection of the eucalypts with mixtures of 2,4,5-T and picloram (Flinn and Minko 1980. Advances in Control of Woody Weeds in Radiata Pine Plantations in Victoria). Application rate usually 1.1 kg 2,4,5-T in 50 litres of dieseline/ha.

p17 “Aerial spraying of 670 acres of wattle regrowth at Warrenbayne and Loch Valley Plantation with 1 pound active of technical 2,4,5-T Butyl Ester in 5 gallons of distillate (diesel) effectively killed off competing wattle growth . . . p35 Test aerial spraying with 2,4,5-T has been carried out in the Loch Valley Plantation…” Forests Commission 1968-69 Annual Report.

 

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/strzeleckis/LEGL93-118.html

1968: Loch Valley and Strathbogie Ranges (Vic). Aerial Spraying of 2,4,5-T begins.

Aerial application of 2,4,5-T begins in Victoria - 1968

In 1968 aerial application of 2,4,5-T approximately three years after planting was introduced to control silver wattle, followed by basal bark spraying or stem injection of the eucalypts with mixtures of 2,4,5-T and picloram (Flinn and Minko 1980. Advances in Control of Woody Weeds in Radiata Pine Plantations in Victoria). Application rate usually 1.1 kg 2,4,5-T in 50 litres of dieseline/ha.

p17 "Aerial spraying of 670 acres of wattle regrowth at Warrenbayne and Loch Valley Plantation with 1 pound active of technical 2,4,5-T Butyl Ester in 5 gallons of distillate (diesel) effectively killed off competing wattle growth . . . p35 Test aerial spraying with 2,4,5-T has been carried out in the Loch Valley Plantation..." Forests Commission 1968-69 Annual Report.

l

Aerial application of 2,4,5-T begins in Victoria – 1968

In 1968 aerial application of 2,4,5-T approximately three years after planting was introduced to control silver wattle, followed by basal bark spraying or stem injection of the eucalypts with mixtures of 2,4,5-T and picloram (Flinn and Minko 1980. Advances in Control of Woody Weeds in Radiata Pine Plantations in Victoria). Application rate usually 1.1 kg 2,4,5-T in 50 litres of dieseline/ha.

p17 “Aerial spraying of 670 acres of wattle regrowth at Warrenbayne and Loch Valley Plantation with 1 pound active of technical 2,4,5-T Butyl Ester in 5 gallons of distillate (diesel) effectively killed off competing wattle growth . . . p35 Test aerial spraying with 2,4,5-T has been carried out in the Loch Valley Plantation…” Forests Commission 1968-69 Annual Report.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/directory/benalla/LEGL93-62.html

1975-1978: Yarram Birth Deformities. Pesticide: 2,4,5-T.

During the 1970's large areas near Yarram in southern Victoria were sprayed with the herbicide 2,4,5-T, on both timber plantations and farmland. A cluster of birth deformities occurred in the town and was reported by local doctors. A subsequent health enquiry suggested that the pesticides were not to blame, but this study was found to be statistically erroneous two years later. A large amount of information has been collated on this event and can be found at this link.

New Scientist 19 October 1978

Herbicides Under Suspicion in Australia – Brian Lee, Canberra

The herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T remain suspected by the Australian public of causing birth defects despite being cleared by two government inquiries. The inquiries were set up after what seemed like abnormally high numbers of babies born with deformities at Cairns in Northern Queensland and at Yarram some 2000 km to the south in Victoria. The herbicide 2,4,5-T is used extensively for spraying fields of sugar cane near Cairns, and use of both this herbicide and 2,4-D were suspected of causing the deformities at Yarram.

The federal National Health and Medical Research Council reported in June this year that it could find no substantial scientific evidence of a causal link between the use of 2,4,5-T and human birth defects. It also stated that “the use of 2,4-D is not producing any risk to human health”.

In its report, which was published late last month, the Victorian state government’s investigation into the birth defects at Yarram also failed to establish a statistical link between the use of 2,4,5-T and birth defects. However, no sooner had that report been published than a further group of birth deformities came to light at the Victorian town of Sale. In this case, four deformed babies were born at the same hospital between September and December last year. One had no brain, another spina bifida, the third underdeveloped internal organs, and the fourth a cleft palate. The mothers of all these babies lived in houses that faced a playing field that had been sprayed the previous January with a strong formulation of 2,4-D to control weeds. State Premier Dick Hamer announced last week that another inquiry will be held into these birth defects at Sale.

According to the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia uses almost 2000 tonnes of 2,4-D and 250-300 tonnes of 2,4,5-T each year. Implicating or clearing these herbicides of causing the birth defects will be particularly difficult. At both Yarram and Cairns the basic statistics needed to determine whether the respective clusters of birth defects truly constituted epidemics were apparently just not available. At Yarram birth deformities were found in about 8 per cent of births, while at Cairns the figure was 6 per cent.

During the 1970’s large areas near Yarram in southern Victoria were sprayed with the herbicide 2,4,5-T, on both timber plantations and farmland. A cluster of birth deformities occurred in the town and was reported by local doctors. A subsequent health enquiry suggested that the pesticides were not to blame, but this study was found to be statistically erroneous two years later. A large amount of information has been collated on this event and can be found at this link.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/yarramabnormalities.htm

New Scientist 19 October 1978

Herbicides Under Suspicion in Australia – Brian Lee, Canberra

The herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T remain suspected by the Australian public of causing birth defects despite being cleared by two government inquiries. The inquiries were set up after what seemed like abnormally high numbers of babies born with deformities at Cairns in Northern Queensland and at Yarram some 2000 km to the south in Victoria. The herbicide 2,4,5-T is used extensively for spraying fields of sugar cane near Cairns, and use of both this herbicide and 2,4-D were suspected of causing the deformities at Yarram.

The federal National Health and Medical Research Council reported in June this year that it could find no substantial scientific evidence of a causal link between the use of 2,4,5-T and human birth defects. It also stated that “the use of 2,4-D is not producing any risk to human health”.

In its report, which was published late last month, the Victorian state government’s investigation into the birth defects at Yarram also failed to establish a statistical link between the use of 2,4,5-T and birth defects. However, no sooner had that report been published than a further group of birth deformities came to light at the Victorian town of Sale. In this case, four deformed babies were born at the same hospital between September and December last year. One had no brain, another spina bifida, the third underdeveloped internal organs, and the fourth a cleft palate. The mothers of all these babies lived in houses that faced a playing field that had been sprayed the previous January with a strong formulation of 2,4-D to control weeds. State Premier Dick Hamer announced last week that another inquiry will be held into these birth defects at Sale.

According to the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia uses almost 2000 tonnes of 2,4-D and 250-300 tonnes of 2,4,5-T each year. Implicating or clearing these herbicides of causing the birth defects will be particularly difficult. At both Yarram and Cairns the basic statistics needed to determine whether the respective clusters of birth defects truly constituted epidemics were apparently just not available. At Yarram birth deformities were found in about 8 per cent of births, while at Cairns the figure was 6 per cent.

2007 May: Insecticide and cattle antibiotics Macalister Irrigation District. Pesticide: DEET.

29 May 2007 Chemical cocktail Leslie White Gippsland Times

WATER from the Latrobe River has registered what is believed to be one of the highest levels of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories detected in any river system in the world.

Private testing conducted at 15 sites in rivers and drains around the Macalister Irrigation District has discovered a cocktail of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories used in dairyfarming.

The tests found large amounts of oxytetracycline, a propellant used in the application of anti-inflammatories. The anti-parasitic agent DEET, which is also used to wash down dairy sheds, was found at all 15 sites tested.

No testing was conducted in the Macalister River, which is also part of the MID and from which Maffra draws its urban water supply. Gippsland Water has confirmed previously it does not test Maffra's water for chemicals or pharmaceuticals.

Dr Peter Fisher, a lecturer in water management at the University of Central Queensland, will detail the results of his study in a report to the international publication Journal of Cleaner Production.

Dr Fisher told the Gippsland Times he was "stunned" by the levels found in the Latrobe. "Of reported cases I know of, it's the highest," he said. "We did take one sample out of the Latrobe River about 15 kilometres from ... Lake Wellington, we were stunned by the figure. "It was an extraordinary level given the vast quantity of water in the river at that stage." The testing was carried out during calving season and was funded by philanthropic body the Sidney Myer Foundation...

The testing targeted pharmaceuticals used in dairying and did not include any tests for pesticides and herbicides used in timber plantations or in crop farming.

Dr Fisher called for an agreed "safe level" for pharmaceuticals in waterways. "They're unregulated contaminants," he said.

Maffra's water supply, on the other side of the MID, remains untested for chemicals, antibiotics and anti-inflammatories. The DHS spokesperson said each local water authority decided which tests should be undertaken to ensure water quality standards are met. These tests are detailed in a risk management plan based on local conditions, he added.

 

29 May 2007 Chemical cocktail Leslie White Gippsland Times

WATER from the Latrobe River has registered what is believed to be one of the highest levels of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories detected in any river system in the world.

Private testing conducted at 15 sites in rivers and drains around the Macalister Irrigation District has discovered a cocktail of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories used in dairyfarming.

The tests found large amounts of oxytetracycline, a propellant used in the application of anti-inflammatories. The anti-parasitic agent DEET, which is also used to wash down dairy sheds, was found at all 15 sites tested.

No testing was conducted in the Macalister River, which is also part of the MID and from which Maffra draws its urban water supply. Gippsland Water has confirmed previously it does not test Maffra’s water for chemicals or pharmaceuticals.

Dr Peter Fisher, a lecturer in water management at the University of Central Queensland, will detail the results of his study in a report to the international publication Journal of Cleaner Production.

Dr Fisher told the Gippsland Times he was “stunned” by the levels found in the Latrobe. “Of reported cases I know of, it’s the highest,” he said. “We did take one sample out of the Latrobe River about 15 kilometres from … Lake Wellington, we were stunned by the figure. “It was an extraordinary level given the vast quantity of water in the river at that stage.” The testing was carried out during calving season and was funded by philanthropic body the Sidney Myer Foundation.

Dr Fisher said it was difficult to tell what effects the antibiotics would have on river health, on humans or animals which consumed the water or on aquatic life in the Gippsland Lakes. “Recent work has established some contaminants at low concentrations have no impact, but when mixed with others a synergy effect occurs and they may well have an impact,” Dr Fisher said. “These chemicals are not acting independently, in some way they may combine not only with dairy industry chemicals and herbicides used in forestry but also pesticides used in places like Mirboo North on potato farms.”

The testing targeted pharmaceuticals used in dairying and did not include any tests for pesticides and herbicides used in timber plantations or in crop farming.

Dr Fisher called for an agreed “safe level” for pharmaceuticals in waterways. “They’re unregulated contaminants,” he said.

“We need a targeted program, we need to test for them (pharmaceuticals and chemicals) in rivers, establish some benchmarks. “We’re in the early days in understanding their impact on the environment and human health. “Traditionally the focus is on nutrients, not microcontaminants, as a whole they’ve never really been given much thought. “All that stuff is in the river system in the sediment, it doesn’t follow that if something biodegrades it’s necessarily less toxic.”

Dr Fisher said the industry could reduce the risk of impact by implementing better systems of management for chemical use on farms.

Human Services stresses test samples not drinking water

A spokesperson for the Department of Human Services says the organisation is keen to see the results of local testing which found large amounts of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories in the Latrobe River.

The substances targeted in the private testing were those in use in dairying in the Macalister Irrigation District. “We will be looking to see these results when they are published and will follow up on the information contained in the report,” the spokesperson said. “It is hard for the DHS to comment on a report it has not yet seen. “These test results are not from a drinking water supply … people are not drinking the water which was tested as part of this study.”

Maffra’s water supply, on the other side of the MID, remains untested for chemicals, antibiotics and anti-inflammatories. The DHS spokesperson said each local water authority decided which tests should be undertaken to ensure water quality standards are met. These tests are detailed in a risk management plan based on local conditions, he added.

“Local water authorities know the local conditions,” the spokesperson told the Gippsland Times.

Gippsland Water awaits full test results

GIPPSLAND Water submitted a written statement regarding the detection of antibiotics and anti-inflammatories in the Macalister Irrigation District. The testing did not include the Macalister River, from which Maffra takes its drinking water. The Gippsland Water statement is reproduced in full below: “Gippsland Water is concerned about any activities that occur in our catchment areas that have the potential to impact water quality.

We look forward to seeing the outcomes of the report, or any peer reviewed research that is conducted on water quality in our catchments. We encourage any researcher who is genuinely concerned about the outcomes of any investigation into water quality in our catchments to contact Gippsland Water, the Environment Protection Authority, the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority or Southern Rural Water.

Gippsland Water needs to better understand the location of the sampling points relative to our offtakes for drinking water supplies before drawing any conclusions.”

1965: Spray Drift in the Swan Hill District. Pesticide: 2,4-D.

Department of Agriculture - Seasonal Horticultural Conditions for December 1965.

Vines: ... Hormone damage has affected growth yields on Swan Hill vineyards...

1966 Herbicide Damage to Crops Swan Hill District: Dmagae reported at South Woorinen, Woorinen, vinifera, Wood Wood, Goodnight, Koraleigh...

"Extensive damage, presumable due to 2,4-D has occurrred this year to horticultural crops, particularly sultanas, in the Swan Hill district, including substantial loss of yield in some places... There is little doubt that the bulk of the damage can be attributed to aerial spraying of cereals within a few miles of the affected vines... The conclusions drawn suggest that aerial spraying should be discouraged within four miles of sultanas and currents during their growing period and that the Murray River is not necessarily an adequate buffer... NSW Department of Sprays.

Department of Agriculture – Seasonal Horticultural Conditions for December 1965.

Vines: … Hormone damage has affected growth yields on Swan Hill vineyards…

1966 Herbicide Damage to Crops Swan Hill District: Damage reported at South Woorinen, Woorinen, vinifera, Wood Wood, Goodnight, Koraleigh…

“Extensive damage, presumable due to 2,4-D has occurred this year to horticultural crops, particularly sultanas, in the Swan Hill district, including substantial loss of yield in some places… There is little doubt that the bulk of the damage can be attributed to aerial spraying of cereals within a few miles of the affected vines… The conclusions drawn suggest that aerial spraying should be discouraged within four miles of sultanas and currents during their growing period and that the Murray River is not necessarily an adequate buffer… NSW Department of Sprays.

1963: Heytsbury (Vic) Pollution Incident – Telodrin

Source: Conservation of Australian Amphibian and Reptile Communities by P.A. Rawlinson Proceedings of the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium Zoological Board of Victoria; July 1981.

In the early 1960s extensive areas around Heytesbury were cleared of natural vegetation and sown with introduced grasses for conversion to dairy pasture. Insect pests, especially underground grass caterpillars and Oxycanus grubs, invaded the pastures and by early 1963 were causing considerable damage. A ready solution seemed at hand, however, for in autumn 1962 the Victorian Agricultural Department had experimented with a new persistent organo-chlorine pesticide 'Telodrin' (isobenzan) in the Yanakie district of Gippsland and successfully controlled outbreaks of underground caterpillars in pasture. Even better, Telodrin proved so persistent at Yanakie that in treated areas no new infestations were reported and additional spraying was not necessary. Unfortunately for the Heytesbury area, the Agriculture Department's experiments did not extend to the pesticide's effects on non-target species or the environment. After the successful Yanakie experiments Telodrin was registered for use in Victoria on pastures to control underground pests.

In February 1963 pastures on a large number of farms in the Heytesbury areas were treated with Telodrin to control heavy infestations of underground grass caterpillars and Oxycanus grubs. Pastures in the area not sprayed in February were sprayed in late March and early April. It soon became apparent that the human ecosystem had become contaminated as a few weeks after spraying nervous symptoms developed in dairy cattle feeding from the pastures and a number of calves died. Rabbits feeding from the pastures died in numbers and deaths occurred amont dogs and cats in the area, apparently after eating Telodrin-poisoned rabbits. Finally nervous symptoms appeared in adults and babies after consumption of local milk, and the Departments of Agriculture and Health launched an investigation into the human health aspects. Substantial contamination of animal tissues with Telodrin was confirmed by electron capture gas chromatography on 28th May and extensive sampling revealed wide-spread contamination of pastures, animals and farm produce. As reports of nervous symptoms continued to surface in June, all milk from the area was withheld from sale for human use in July. The contaminated milk was sold for use in caesin and soap manufacture.

From July 1963 onwards 90 Heytesbury farms were monitored at fortnightly or monthly intervals for Telodrin levels in milk. As soon as they fell below an arbitary level of 0.02 parts per million, the milk was allowed to re-enter the market for human consumption, and the farm was declared free. On this basis all farms were declared free by April 1964 and regular monitoring for Telodrin was restricted to milk..."

Source: Conservation of Australian Amphibian and Reptile Communities by P.A. Rawlinson Proceedings of the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium Zoological Board of Victoria; July 1981.

“… For example, Littlejohn, Watson and Loftus-Hills (1971) reported a previously unsuspected zone of contact hybridization between Geocrinia Laevis and G. Victoriana in the Heytesbury area of south-western Victoria. Unknown to the authors (and to the Victorian public at large), this area was involved in an extensive, but little publicized, ‘pesticide incident’ in 1963. Although the ‘incident’ was not well documented publicly, a brief account was published in the ‘Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Effects of Pesticides in Victoria’ (1966) and additional information was provided by Belcher (1980).

In the early 1960s extensive areas around Heytesbury were cleared of natural vegetation and sown with introduced grasses for conversion to dairy pasture. Insect pests, especially underground grass caterpillars and Oxycanus grubs, invaded the pastures and by early 1963 were causing considerable damage. A ready solution seemed at hand, however, for in autumn 1962 the Victorian Agricultural Department had experimented with a new persistent organo-chlorine pesticide ‘Telodrin’ (isobenzan) in the Yanakie district of Gippsland and successfully controlled outbreaks of underground caterpillars in pasture. Even better, Telodrin proved so persistent at Yanakie that in treated areas no new infestations were reported and additional spraying was not necessary. Unfortunately for the Heytesbury area, the Agriculture Department’s experiments did not extend to the pesticide’s effects on non-target species or the environment. After the successful Yanakie experiments Telodrin was registered for use in Victoria on pastures to control underground pests. This is puzzling as Telodrin, a close relative of Dieldrin, Endrin and Aldrin, was not registered for use in most countries after it proved to be highly persistent and up to ten times more toxic than Dieldrin in experimental animals (Jager, 1970). In fact Dieldrin and Aldrin were under fire by 1962 because of their high toxicity and persistence, and in the United States their registrations for most uses were cancelled in 1971 (Caswell, 1980).

In February 1963 pastures on a large number of farms in the Heytesbury areas were treated with Telodrin to control heavy infestations of underground grass caterpillars and Oxycanus grubs. Pastures in the area not sprayed in February were sprayed in late March and early April. It soon became apparent that the human ecosystem had become contaminated as a few weeks after spraying nervous symptoms developed in dairy cattle feeding from the pastures and a number of calves died. Rabbits feeding from the pastures died in numbers and deaths occurred amont dogs and cats in the area, apparently after eating Telodrin-poisoned rabbits. Finally nervous symptoms appeared in adults and babies after consumption of local milk, and the Departments of Agriculture and Health launched an investigation into the human health aspects. Substantial contamination of animal tissues with Telodrin was confirmed by electron capture gas chromatography on 28th May and extensive sampling revealed wide-spread contamination of pastures, animals and farm produce. As reports of nervous symptoms continued to surface in June, all milk from the area was withheld from sale for human use in July. The contaminated milk was sold for use in caesin and soap manufacture.

From July 1963 onwards 90 Heytesbury farms were monitored at fortnightly or monthly intervals for Telodrin levels in milk. As soon as they fell below an arbitary level of 0.02 parts per million, the milk was allowed to re-enter the market for human consumption, and the farm was declared free. On this basis all farms were declared free by April 1964 and regular monitoring for Telodrin was restricted to milk; no monitoring was carried out on animal fat or meat in spite of the fact that carcasses were sold for human consumption. More importantly no continual monitoring of soil was carried out and it is probable that substantial amounts persisted in the soil for at least a decade. Tragically the effects on wildlife were not documented in spite of the fact that many species were known to have been killed including magpies, quail and ravens…”

2007: December – Spray Drift Wrattonbully South Australia.

Losses as chemical drift hits vineyards Advertiser 3/12/07

MORE than 50 hectares of Limestone Coast vines have been damaged by a land-owner allegedly spraying chemicals.

At least five properties in the Wrattonbully wine region have been affected by the vapour drift, which is being investigated by Department of Primary Industry

Resources SA in conjunction with the Limestone Coast ChemCare Committee. Committee chairman Andrew Kennedy said it was believed Phenoxy Herbicide, which may have been applied to a property in the first week of November, was responsible for the wide-spread damage.

"Vapour drift has thee potential to travel up to 20km and it appears that a chemical user has disregarded the need to be aware of the key roles played by wind speed, wind direction, humidity and temperature," he said.

Naradin Vineyard manager Rex Hutchison estimated up to 14ha of his vines had been affected, with the Sauvignon Blanc and Riesling vine leaves showing deformities.

The Wrattonbully Wine Industry Association has also condemned the damage, describing it as a major setback for the local industry.Chairman Neil Ottoson estimated one affected vineyard could face losses of more than $200,000.

The Limestone Coast ChemCare Committee has inspected the damaged vines and has con-firmed that crop losses are likely."We also believe that the problem is more widespread than we are able to confirm, as many grapegrowers may be yet to discover the damage to their crops," Mr kennedy said.

Losses as chemical drift hits vineyards Advertiser 3/12/07

MORE than 50 hectares of Limestone Coast vines have been damaged by a land-owner allegedly spraying chemicals.

At least five properties in the Wrattonbully wine region have been affected by the vapour drift, which is being investigated by Department of Primary Industry

Resources SA in conjunction with the Limestone Coast ChemCare Committee. Committee chairman Andrew Kennedy said it was believed Phenoxy Herbicide, which may have been applied to a property in the first week of November, was responsible for the wide-spread damage.

“Vapour drift has thee potential to travel up to 20km and it appears that a chemical user has disregarded the need to be aware of the key roles played by wind speed, wind direction, humidity and temperature,” he said.

Naradin Vineyard manager Rex Hutchison estimated up to 14ha of his vines had been affected, with the Sauvignon Blanc and Riesling vine leaves showing deformities.

“We’re still not clear about the degree of damage but it’s definitely going to affect trade,” he said.

The Wrattonbully Wine Industry Association has also condemned the damage, describing it as a major setback for the local industry.Chairman Neil Ottoson estimated one affected vineyard could face losses of more than $200,000.

The Limestone Coast ChemCare Committee has inspected the damaged vines and has con-firmed that crop losses are likely.”We also believe that the problem is more widespread than we are able to confirm, as many grapegrowers may be yet to discover the damage to their crops,” Mr kennedy said.

1988-1995: Perth Groundwater Pollution.

1988-95: Gerritse (1998) finds Perth groundwater polluted with DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane, heptachlor, lindane, chlorpyrifos. Appleyard (1995) finds groundwater polluted with Atrazine and Fenamiphos.

1988-95: Gerritse (1998) finds Perth groundwater polluted with DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane, heptachlor, lindane, chlorpyrifos. Appleyard (1995) finds groundwater polluted with Atrazine and Fenamiphos.

1997-8: Moreton Bay Queensland. Pesticides detected: Atrazine and Diuron.

In the analyses of sediment and intertidal seagrass samples from along the Queensland coast in 1997 and 1998, Haynes et al (2000a) found atrazine between 0.1 and 0.3ug/kg, and diuron from 0.2 to 10.1ug/kg (up to 1.7ug/kg in seagrass). The highest levels were mainly in samples collected along the high rainfall, tropical coast between Townsville and Port Douglas and in Moreton Bay.

Source: p145/6 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

 

In the analyses of sediment and intertidal seagrass samples from along the Queensland coast in 1997 and 1998, Haynes et al (2000a) found atrazine between 0.1 and 0.3ug/kg, and diuron from 0.2 to 10.1ug/kg (up to 1.7ug/kg in seagrass). The highest levels were mainly in samples collected along the high rainfall, tropical coast between Townsville and Port Douglas and in Moreton Bay.

Source: p145/6 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

 

2000: Herbert River region Queensland. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Atrazine, Diuron, 2,4-D.

"With increasing land area being converted to agricultural production, particularly sugarcane, inputs of pesticides into the Great Barrier Reef area have increased with time… The quantities of the insecticide chlorpyrifos, and herbicides atrazine, diuron and 2,4-D applied in the Herbert catchment have increased in the last 15 years…The fate of these pesticides in river and Reef ecosystems is largely unknown (Johnson & Ebert 2000).

Source: p145/6 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

 

“With increasing land area being converted to agricultural production, particularly sugarcane, inputs of pesticides into the Great Barrier Reef area have increased with time… The quantities of the insecticide chlorpyrifos, and herbicides atrazine, diuron and 2,4-D applied in the Herbert catchment have increased in the last 15 years…The fate of these pesticides in river and Reef ecosystems is largely unknown (Johnson & Ebert 2000).

Source: p145/6 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1991-2001: Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area. Numerous Pesticides.

"Thomas et al(1998) tested the acute toxicity of ten pesticides used in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (MIA), NSW to the Australian cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia. The pesticides atrazine, bensulfuron-methyl, bromacil. Chlorpyrifos, diuron, malathion, metolachlor, molinate, simazine and thiobencarb had been detected at elevated levels in drainage channels in previous irrigation seasons (Korth et al. 1995). With the exceptions of molinate and diuron, the acute toxicity decreased when tests were performed in irrigation supply water, in comparison to laboratory water…"

Source: p141 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

Diuron recorded at 9.5ug/L in main drain 1991-3, and 20ug/L in main drain 1997-2001

apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/15386-diuron-environment.pdf

“Thomas et al(1998) tested the acute toxicity of ten pesticides used in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (MIA), NSW to the Australian cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia. The pesticides atrazine, bensulfuron-methyl, bromacil. Chlorpyrifos, diuron, malathion, metolachlor, molinate, simazine and thiobencarb had been detected at elevated levels in drainage channels in previous irrigation seasons (Korth et al. 1995). With the exceptions of molinate and diuron, the acute toxicity decreased when tests were performed in irrigation supply water, in comparison to laboratory water…”

Source: p141 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

Diuron recorded at 9.5ug/L in main drain 1991-3, and 20ug/L in main drain 1997-2001

apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/15386-diuron-environment.pdf

 

1996: Bundaberg Region Groundwater. Pesticides detected: Chlorfenvinphos and 2,4-D.

"…Keating et al. (1996) reported traces of atrazine and hexazinone in the Callide Valley, and chlorfenvinphos and 2,4-D in 3 of 52 samples from the Bundaberg region…

Source: p134/5 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

“…Keating et al. (1996) reported traces of atrazine and hexazinone in the Callide Valley, and chlorfenvinphos and 2,4-D in 3 of 52 samples from the Bundaberg region…

Source: p134/5 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1996: Callide Valley Queensland Groundwater. Pesticides detected: Atrazine and Hexazinone.

"…Keating et al. (1996) reported traces of atrazine and hexazinone in the Callide Valley, and chlorfenvinphos and 2,4-D in 3 of 52 samples from the Bundaberg region…

Source: p134/5 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

 

“…Keating et al. (1996) reported traces of atrazine and hexazinone in the Callide Valley, and chlorfenvinphos and 2,4-D in 3 of 52 samples from the Bundaberg region…

Source: p134/5 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

 

1994: Shepparton East (Vic). Pesticides detected: Atrazine and Simazine.

"…Bauld (1996) reported that almost half of the 51 groundwater samples (49%) from the Shepparton East area of Victoria contained detectable pesticide residues and 43% contained triazines (atrazine and simazine). In contrast, there were very few pesticides found in groundwater in 1994 from a predominantly dryland agriculture region, the Goulburn River Catchment in the Nagambie-Mangalore area of Victoria (Watkins et al 1999a). They detected simazine and atrazine in only one ground (5%) and one surface water at concentrations between 0.06-0.96ug/L, and only in waters less than 25 years old…Ivkovic et al (2001) found atrazine (0.02 & 0.04ug/L), simazine (up to 0.45ug/L in 10 bores) and bromacil (2.5ug/L, 1 bore) in the Cobram area of northern Victoria. P134/5

Source: p134/5 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

“…Bauld (1996) reported that almost half of the 51 groundwater samples (49%) from the Shepparton East area of Victoria contained detectable pesticide residues and 43% contained triazines (atrazine and simazine). In contrast, there were very few pesticides found in groundwater in 1994 from a predominantly dryland agriculture region, the Goulburn River Catchment in the Nagambie-Mangalore area of Victoria (Watkins et al 1999a). They detected simazine and atrazine in only one ground (5%) and one surface water at concentrations between 0.06-0.96ug/L, and only in waters less than 25 years old…Ivkovic et al (2001) found atrazine (0.02 & 0.04ug/L), simazine (up to 0.45ug/L in 10 bores) and bromacil (2.5ug/L, 1 bore) in the Cobram area of northern Victoria. P134/5

Source: p134/5 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1993: Lower Namoi River, New South Wales. Pesticides detected: Atrazine.

"Jiwan and Riley (1993) detected atrazine in around 6% of groundwater samples at five sites in alluvial aquifers under the Liverpool Plains in the north-west of NSW. In the lower Namoi Valley, atrazine concentrations from less than 0.1 to 5.8ug/L were found in groundwater (Boey & Cooper 1996). The most vulnerable sites for ground water contamination by atrazine are often in floodplain areas where shallow perched water tables exist (Boey & Cooper 1996)".

Source: p134 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

“Jiwan and Riley (1993) detected atrazine in around 6% of groundwater samples at five sites in alluvial aquifers under the Liverpool Plains in the north-west of NSW. In the lower Namoi Valley, atrazine concentrations from less than 0.1 to 5.8ug/L were found in groundwater (Boey & Cooper 1996). The most vulnerable sites for ground water contamination by atrazine are often in floodplain areas where shallow perched water tables exist (Boey & Cooper 1996)”.

Source: p134 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1995: Wakool Cadell Groundwater. Pesticides Detected: Atrazine, Terbutryn and 2,4,5-T

"Groundwater surveys of irrigation areas in the Wakool-Cadell (sampled in 1995) and Denimein-Berriquin (sampled in 1996) districts of NSW detected atrazine, desethylatrazine (DEA; a metabolite of atrazine), terbutryn and 2,4,5-T, at concentrations of up to 0.3ug/L, although most concentrations were much lower (Watkins et al. 1998)"

“Groundwater surveys of irrigation areas in the Wakool-Cadell (sampled in 1995) and Denimein-Berriquin (sampled in 1996) districts of NSW detected atrazine, desethylatrazine (DEA; a metabolite of atrazine), terbutryn and 2,4,5-T, at concentrations of up to 0.3ug/L, although most concentrations were much lower (Watkins et al. 1998)”

Source: Page 134 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Sciences and Engineering.

1996: Johnstone River Queensland

1996: In North Queensland, Russell et al. (1996) reported that diedrin, DDE, 2,4-D and atrazine were detected in between 9 and 27% of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree Rivers.

p132 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

In North Queensland, Russell et al. (1996) reported that diedrin, DDE, 2,4-D and atrazine were detected in between 9 and 27% of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree Rivers.

p132 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1996: Daintree River Queensland

1996: In North Queensland, Russell et al. (1996) reported that diedrin, DDE, 2,4-D and atrazine were detected in between 9 and 27% of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree Rivers.

p132 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. 

In North Queensland, Russell et al. (1996) reported that diedrin, DDE, 2,4-D and atrazine were detected in between 9 and 27% of samples from the Johnstone and Daintree Rivers…Some herbicide residues were found in only 13% of aquatic fauna samples from Northern Queensland rivers between 1990 and 1993 (Hunter et al. 1996); atrazine and low levels of 2,4,5-T were found in a few samples from the Johnstone River, and 2,4-D was found in both Johnstone and Daintree Rivers (Hunter et al 1996)

p132 +145/6 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1996: Condamine-Balonne River Atrazine

Turner (1996) reported that Atrazine has been frequently detected in the Condamine-Balonne River system in Queensland, from trace levels up to 2.4mg/L.

Turner (1996) reported that Atrazine has been frequently detected in the Condamine-Balonne River system in Queensland, from trace levels up to 2.4mg/L.

Source: p 132 Pesticide Use in Australia A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1989-1992: Triazine Pollution of Tasmanian Streams

1989-92: Concentrations of the triazine herbicides atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, metribuzin and propazine were determined in streams draining forestry and agricultural catchments in Tasmania, Australia, between 1989 and 1992. Atrazine and simazine were used extensively by the forestry industry in a winter spraying programme, and applications of the other herbicides occurred in cropped agricultural catchments during spring and summer. Of 29 streams sampled intensively for triazines, 20 contained detectable residues. Median contaminations over all samples were 2.85, 1.05, <0.05, <0.05 and <0.05 µg L-1 for atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, metribuzin and propazine, respectively. All herbicide concentrations ranged over several orders of magnitude up to 53 mg L-1, with atrazine and simazine having significantly higher concentrations than the others. Atrazine concentrations were examined in streams draining forestry plantations for periods of up to two years. A decline in concentration was observed with time, but this was strongly influenced by rainfall events. Atrazine contamination from single spraying events persisted at a low level for up to 16 months. Contamination of Big Creek with atrazine to 22µg L-1 after aerial spraying led to an increase in stream invertebrate drift only on the day of spraying and to a short-term increase in movement of brown trout.

(Highest levels recorded: Cyanazine 5.2ug/L, Metribuzin 1.3ug/L, Propazine 3.3ug/L, Simazine 478.5ug/L)

1989-92: Concentrations of the triazine herbicides atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, metribuzin and propazine were determined in streams draining forestry and agricultural catchments in Tasmania, Australia, between 1989 and 1992. Atrazine and simazine were used extensively by the forestry industry in a winter spraying programme, and applications of the other herbicides occurred in cropped agricultural catchments during spring and summer. Of 29 streams sampled intensively for triazines, 20 contained detectable residues. Median contaminations over all samples were 2.85, 1.05, <0.05, <0.05 and <0.05 µg L-1 for atrazine, simazine, cyanazine, metribuzin and propazine, respectively. All herbicide concentrations ranged over several orders of magnitude up to 53 mg L-1, with atrazine and simazine having significantly higher concentrations than the others. Atrazine concentrations were examined in streams draining forestry plantations for periods of up to two years. A decline in concentration was observed with time, but this was strongly influenced by rainfall events. Atrazine contamination from single spraying events persisted at a low level for up to 16 months. Contamination of Big Creek with atrazine to 22µg L-1 after aerial spraying led to an increase in stream invertebrate drift only on the day of spraying and to a short-term increase in movement of brown trout. On examination of biological effects of triazines in surface waters reported in the literature, it was concluded that the observed frequent contamination of Tasmanian streams with triazines may cause occasional minor short-term disturbance to stream communities.

(Highest levels recorded: Cyanazine 5.2ug/L, Metribuzin 1.3ug/L, Propazine 3.3ug/L, Simazine 478.5ug/L)

https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/MF9940209.htm

1995: Willbriggie Irrigation Area NSW

Bowmer et al. (1995) reviewed and reported on the pesticide monitoring that has been carried out in these irrigation areas. Supply water from the rivers was of high quality and generally few pesticides were detected. Just a few channels contained low levels of atrazine (0.08ug/L & 0.2 ug/L); endosulfan sulphate (0.02ug/L); molinate (7.2 ug/L & 0.5 ug/L); and 2,4-D (0.5 ug/L). Water supplying farms in the Willbriggie district, which had been mixed with MIA drainage water, contained higher concentrations of some pesticides and more frequent detections. Molinate was detected in 90% of samples over 55-days in spring and early summer, up to a maximum concentration of 3.6ug/L and atrazine in 20% of samples, up to 0.35ug/L.

Bowmer et al. (1995) reviewed and reported on the pesticide monitoring that has been carried out in these irrigation areas. Supply water from the rivers was of high quality and generally few pesticides were detected. Just a few channels contained low levels of atrazine (0.08ug/L & 0.2 ug/L); endosulfan sulphate (0.02ug/L); molinate (7.2 ug/L & 0.5 ug/L); and 2,4-D (0.5 ug/L). Water supplying farms in the Willbriggie district, which had been mixed with MIA drainage water, contained higher concentrations of some pesticides and more frequent detections. Molinate was detected in 90% of samples over 55-days in spring and early summer, up to a maximum concentration of 3.6ug/L and atrazine in 20% of samples, up to 0.35ug/L.

Source: P129 Pesticide Use in Australia. A Review Undertaken by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

1978: Dichlorvos Poisoning Boronia Victoria

1978: Woman was poisoned at home by a pesticide. Her husband used a surface spray containing dichlorvos inside crockery cupboards... woman rinsed the cups and plates before use. She became ill with nausea, giddiness, headaches and sweating. She was restless and could not breathe properly, her muscles switched, she developed skin problems, allergic reactions. Her nervous system deteriorated.

Source: Quick Poison Slow Poison. Kate Short 1994

1978: Woman was poisoned at home by a pesticide. Her husband used a surface spray containing dichlorvos inside crockery cupboards… woman rinsed the cups and plates before use. She became ill with nausea, giddiness, headaches and sweating. She was restless and could not breathe properly, her muscles switched, she developed skin problems, allergic reactions. Her nervous system deteriorated.

Source: Quick Poison Slow Poison. Kate Short 1994

1991-2: Goulburn Valley Victoria Parathion

1991-2: Goulburn Valley Victoria. "Parathion for example, can cause death if a little under one teaspoon (four millilitres) is spilled on the skin, almost the same amount can kill someone if it is swallowed. Many orchardists spray parathion at least once every two to three weeks and those with large properties often use the substance on a daily basis during the spray season, Investigations by the Australian Workers Union in 1991 and 1992 revealed that Parathion use was still widespread in fruit growing areas. Union officer Dr Jossi Berger described its use in the Goulburn Valley as 'appalling' and called for a ban.

Source p17 Quick Poison, Slow Poison, Kate Short 1994.

1991-2: Goulburn Valley Victoria. “Parathion for example, can cause death if a little under one teaspoon (four millilitres) is spilled on the skin, almost the same amount can kill someone if it is swallowed. Many orchardists spray parathion at least once every two to three weeks and those with large properties often use the substance on a daily basis during the spray season, Investigations by the Australian Workers Union in 1991 and 1992 revealed that Parathion use was still widespread in fruit growing areas. Union officer Dr Jossi Berger described its use in the Goulburn Valley as ‘appalling’ and called for a ban.

Source p17 Quick Poison, Slow Poison, Kate Short 1994.

1988 March – Esk Region Southern Queensland

1988 March - Farm worker making a tomato spray mixture using the insecticide Methomyl, Accidently spilled some on himself and may have swallowed a couple of drops when it splashed on his face. He was found by his car, unconscious, twitching and frothing from the mouth. Half an hour later he was dead on arrival at Esk Hospital.

Source: Quick Poison Slow Poison. Kate Short 1994

1988 March – Farm worker making a tomato spray mixture using the insecticide Methomyl, Accidently spilled some on himself and may have swallowed a couple of drops when it splashed on his face. He was found by his car, unconscious, twitching and frothing from the mouth. Half an hour later he was dead on arrival at Esk Hospital.

Source: Quick Poison Slow Poison. Kate Short 1994

2008 February: Woori Yallock Spray Drift

2008: February - Source The Age: In the midst of Victoria's water crisis, a neighbourhood dispute over water supplies and the use of pesticides has turned ugly, with allegations of standover tactics and intimidation. A clash between small landowners and two of Australia's largest strawberry growers over the use of pesticides along Woori Yallock Creek has grown to embroil six government departments, the Shire of Yarra Ranges and the police.

Water from Woori Yallock Creek drains into the Yarra River, which supplies the Sugarloaf Reservoir and Melbourne's northern and western suburbs. But residents in this picturesque valley in Melbourne's east claim their drinking water and local creek are being contaminated with pesticides, dust and earthworks run-off from neighbouring strawberry farms.

2008: February – Source The Age: In the midst of Victoria’s water crisis, a neighbourhood dispute over water supplies and the use of pesticides has turned ugly, with allegations of standover tactics and intimidation. A clash between small landowners and two of Australia’s largest strawberry growers over the use of pesticides along Woori Yallock Creek has grown to embroil six government departments, the Shire of Yarra Ranges and the police.

Water from Woori Yallock Creek drains into the Yarra River, which supplies the Sugarloaf Reservoir and Melbourne’s northern and western suburbs. But residents in this picturesque valley in Melbourne’s east claim their drinking water and local creek are being contaminated with pesticides, dust and earthworks run-off from neighbouring strawberry farms.

They say the dust plumes and pesticide drifts are so bad that they cannot leave their windows open at night. They have started buying drinking water and no longer eat home-grown fruit and vegetables. The residents also claim they have felt intimidated by one of Australia’s leading strawberry marketing and distribution companies for raising their concerns about water and air pollution.

“There are plenty of residents, including smaller strawberry growers around here, who are intimidated by these people and are too scared to talk about it,” said local resident Rob Baines. “There has been a lot of intimidation going on around here, perceived and actual.”

Mr Baines is leading a campaign to change the farming practices of Oz Fresh Pty Ltd and a Perth-based managed investment scheme, Rewards Group. Mr Baines’ property sits alongside the Rewards Group land and is across the creek from Oz Fresh. Tensions increased last week when a confrontation between Mr Baines and his neighbour, Rocco Pignataro, led to complaints to police.

“They have been spraying two to three times a week for eight months using turbo sprays that can send the pesticide drifts up to 10 kilometres away, and this is part of the Melbourne water catchment,” Mr Baines said. The owners of Oz Fresh — the leading strawberry supplier to Coles and Safeway supermarkets — dispute the residents’ claims, citing national food safety awards, regular auditing of farming methods and compliance with laws governing water use in Melbourne’s catchment area.

But the Labor MP for Gembrook and a member of the Environment and Natural Resources Committee, Tammy Lobato, has asked Melbourne Water to conduct tests in Woori Yallock Creek and the EPA to test drinking water tanks for pesticide contamination.

Woori Yallock Creek rises from springs near the base of Mount Donna Buang east of Melbourne and is an important tributary for the Yarra River and the Melbourne water catchment.

Rights to pump from the creek or collect surface run-off in the catchment require a licence from Melbourne Water.

The long-established Oz Fresh farm, recently expanded to cover 97 hectares, has entitlements to pump from the creek and store water for irrigation.

But the Rewards Group, which started to acquire properties in the valley 10 months ago and has contracts and lease arrangements with Oz Fresh, has not been granted a water licence.

Despite this, Rewards’ strawberry and blueberry farm is being promoted to investors as having access to millions of litres of Melbourne’s drinking water from “river diversion licences” and a 200-megalitre storage dam to be constructed within six months.

“What they say on their website is one thing; we do not have an application (for the dam),” said Melbourne Water spokesman Ben Pratt.

“Oz Fresh have a 138-megalitre entitlement that is surface and water allocations (creek pumping), but bans on pumping are current.”

Mr Pratt said Melbourne Water had been working with Oz Fresh and Rewards Group to develop a farm management plan that would include revegetating the banks and public reserves along their shared creek frontage.

He said no new water rights would be approved until Melbourne Water was satisfied the environmental and water management plan had been fulfilled.

“We are closely monitoring the activity of Oz Fresh to ensure they comply,” Mr Pratt said.

But Joe Pignataro, a director of the private, family-run company, said the Woori Yallock property had award-winning farm practices. He denied any suggestion the neighbours were intimidated by his family and said “my door is always open”.

“I have no idea why they would be saying these things,” Mr Pignataro said.

He also denied pesticides were sprayed on his property with booms raised, a practice known to contribute to spray drift. “There is no issue with pesticides,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/news/national/surface-tensions-shatter-valley-calm/2008/02/23/1203467459965.html

1982: Yass River Polluted with 2,4,5-T

1982: In July 1982 it was disclosed that council workers had been using a mixture of diesel oil and 245T to spray stumps along the banks of the Yass River, and that an estimated two gallons had found its way into the river. The ecological impact of this herbicide was not great; tests carried out by the NSW Health Department indicated insignificant levels of pesticide in the water. Nevertheless, the resulting oil slick further offended the sensibilities of residents already uneasy about water quality; the Secretary of the Yass Acclimitisation Society expressed his concern to state government authorities (Yass Post 7 July 1982, P. 1).

1982: In July 1982 it was disclosed that council workers had been using a mixture of diesel oil and 245T to spray stumps along the banks of the Yass River, and that an estimated two gallons had found its way into the river. The ecological impact of this herbicide was not great; tests carried out by the NSW Health Department indicated insignificant levels of pesticide in the water. Nevertheless, the resulting oil slick further offended the sensibilities of residents already uneasy about water quality; the Secretary of the Yass Acclimitisation Society expressed his concern to state government authorities (Yass Post 7 July 1982, P. 1).

https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/previous%20series/lcj/1-20/wayward/ch15.html

1984: Spray Drift Merridan Western Australia

1984: Herbicides reported to be causing damage to crops in the Merridan region of Western Australia. Spray Seed and Roundup were seen to be contributing to the problem.

1984: Herbicides reported to be causing damage to crops in the Merridan region of Western Australia. Spray Seed and Roundup were seen to be contributing to the problem.

https://caws.nzpps.org/awc/1984/awc198410961.pdf

1988: Water Pollution Mount Lofty Ranges

1988: Pesticide residues were detected in 83% of water samples and in 100% of sediment samples from streams draining a horticultural catchment in the Mt Lofty‐Ranges of South Australia. Highest concentrations were detected during the first half of the summer growing season extending from October to December and particularly during runoff events occurring during this period. The organochlorlne insecticides DDT, lindane and endosulfan and the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos were detected in sufficiently high concentrations to adversely affect aquatic environments.

1988: Pesticide residues were detected in 83% of water samples and in 100% of sediment samples from streams draining a horticultural catchment in the Mt Lofty‐Ranges of South Australia. Highest concentrations were detected during the first half of the summer growing season extending from October to December and particularly during runoff events occurring during this period. The organochlorlne insecticides DDT, lindane and endosulfan and the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos were detected in sufficiently high concentrations to adversely affect aquatic environments. However, only low concentrations of the insecticide lindane and the herbicide chlorthal‐dimethyl could be detected at the reservoir outlet and did not adversely affect water quality for human consumers according to maximum Residue limit recommendations from the National Health and Medical Research Council.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09593338909384725?journalCode=tent19&#.VJdh8c6AhA

1992: Cox’s Creek South Australia. DDT and Chironomid Deformities

1992: Chironomid larvae (Chironomus spp.,Dicrotendipes conjunctus andProcladius paludicola) collected from Cox Creek and Aldgate Creek, South Australia, showed morphological abnormalities similar to those reported in other studies elsewhere in the world. The sediment of Cox Creek contained high concentrations of pesticides and there was a significant correlation between the occurrence of mouthpart and antennal deformities in larvae and the concentration of DDT and the herbicide, Dacthal®.

1992: Chironomid larvae (Chironomus spp.,Dicrotendipes conjunctus andProcladius paludicola) collected from Cox Creek and Aldgate Creek, South Australia, showed morphological abnormalities similar to those reported in other studies elsewhere in the world. The sediment of Cox Creek contained high concentrations of pesticides and there was a significant correlation between the occurrence of mouthpart and antennal deformities in larvae and the concentration of DDT and the herbicide, Dacthal®.

Laboratory experiments were conducted using a culture ofChironomus sp. to determine whether or not a causal relationship existed between exposure to pesticides and the occurrence of deformities in larvae. Results showed a positive relationship between the concentration of DDT and the percentage of deformed mouthparts (menta). The results for the effect of DDT on antennae and those for the effect of Dachthal® were less clear, but generally showed a higher incidence of deformity for treatments compared with controls.

To compare these results to a natural population (i.e. from an unpolluted area) the incidence of deformities was measured for larvae collected from Deep Creek Conservation Park, an area virtually free of pollution. The significance of this work is discussed with regard to its wider application as a useful environmental monitoring technique for freshwater systems.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02255289#page-1

 

1994 Feb: Port Phillip Bay Flathead contaminated with pesticides

Feb 1994: Petroleum hydrocarbons, the chlorinated pesticides dieldrin, DDT, DDE and DDD, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) present as aroclors 1254 and 1260, were widespread contaminants in the axial muscle tissue and liver of sand flathead (Platycephalus bassensis Cuvier & Valenciennes) from Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. The pesticides lindane and heptachlor were found patchily throughout the Bay.

Feb 1994: Petroleum hydrocarbons, the chlorinated pesticides dieldrin, DDT, DDE and DDD, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) present as aroclors 1254 and 1260, were widespread contaminants in the axial muscle tissue and liver of sand flathead (Platycephalus bassensis Cuvier & Valenciennes) from Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. The pesticides lindane and heptachlor were found patchily throughout the Bay. Fillet and liver samples contained very low or undetectable levels of selected polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) metabolites. There appeared to be a trend where sand flathead from the deeper sites had slightly higher levels of contamination.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0025326X94905487

1995 December: Qld Fruit Fly Treatment Poisoning Workers

Dec 1995: Cunningham told Green Left Weekly that workers in the quarantined area were being hospitalised for possible pesticide poisoning after vomiting blood. Forty workers have walked off the job in protest at the lack of protective clothing, ventilation and showers when working with the pesticides.

Dec 1995: Yvonne Cunningham, an Innisfail resident, is very critical of the DPI and questions its claim that the chemicals used in dips to kill fruit flies have “low toxicity” and a “short residual life”. Accusing the DPI of “acting like cowboys” in the use and storage of these toxins, Cunningham told Green Left Weekly that workers in the quarantined area were being hospitalised for possible pesticide poisoning after vomiting blood. Forty workers have walked off the job in protest at the lack of protective clothing, ventilation and showers when working with the pesticides. The workers are also worried about applying pesticides with solvents such as xylene which can damage the eyes and lungs, she said. Cunningham also told Green Left that some unemployed workers have been recruited onto the fruit fly program having been told that they would lose their dole if they didn’t work in pesticide treatment.

https://www.greenleft.org.au/node/10116

1995-96: Perth Metropolitan Area

1995-6: Persistent organochlorine pesticides such as dieldrin, which have not been used for many years, are still being detected in groundwater. The most widely detected pesticide in groundwater was diazinon. This pesticide is not normally considered to have a high mobility in water, but its mobility is being enhanced by washdown water being discarded to infiltration basins and soakwells.

Additional investigations were carried out by the Water and Rivers Commission to determine whether the Dianella contamination problem was an isolated occurrence or a more widespread contamination problem. Investigations were carried out around five pest control depots in the Perth metropolitan area in 1995 and 1996 (Appleyard et al., 1997). A number of pesticides were detected in groundwater near washdown areas, with concentration of some pesticides exceeding ANZECC criteria for drinking water and the protection of aquatic ecosystems. Persistent organochlorine pesticides such as dieldrin, which have not been used for many years, are still being detected in groundwater. The most widely detected pesticide in groundwater was diazinon. This pesticide is not normally considered to have a high mobility in water, but its mobility is being enhanced by washdown water being discarded to infiltration basins and soakwells.

https://www.agcsa.com.au/static/atm_articles/html/1_4d.html

1997 November: Pesticide spill Perth Belmont Race Course

November 1997: The importance of correct management cannot be understated. In November 1997, a spill of 600 litres of insecticide occurred at Belmont Park racecourse, situated on the banks of the Swan River. The spill was not immediately reported and was only discovered after over 4000 black bream fish were killed, representing approximately 30% of the rivers fish stock.

November 1997: The importance of correct management cannot be understated. In November 1997, a spill of 600 litres of insecticide occurred at Belmont Park racecourse, situated on the banks of the Swan River. The spill was not immediately reported and was only discovered after over 4000 black bream fish were killed, representing approximately 30% of the rivers fish stock. This repeatable tragedy was due to the lack of preparedness or emergency response of racecourse staff who could have prevented the spill or at least reduced its effects. The lever to prevent the valve leaking on the 600 litre mobile tank was inadvertently left open and slowly drained into a stormwater drain near where the tank was parked. No emergency authorities were alerted and the insecticide was transported straight to the river via the drain. Similar events happen every day, fortunately of a smaller scale

https://www.agcsa.com.au/static/atm_articles/html/1_4d.html

1992: Dianella (Perth) Groundwater contaminated with Atrazine and Fenamiphos

1993: However, the discovery in February 1993 of high levels of Fenamiphos (up to 1000ug/L) and atrazine (up to 2000 ug/L) in Dianella Perth, Western Australia, indicated that the storage and handling of chemicals by pest control operators may cause severe groundwater contamination and could pose a health risk to nearby residents with private wells.

1992-1993: However, the discovery in February 1993 of high levels of Fenamiphos (up to 1000ug/L) and atrazine (up to 2000 ug/L) in Dianella Perth, Western Australia, indicated that the storage and handling of chemicals by pest control operators may cause severe groundwater contamination and could pose a health risk to nearby residents with private wells.

https://info.ngwa.org/GWOL/pdf/952464163.PDF

1971-2012: Fiskville Country Fire Authority Training Facility

 
https://www.cfa.vic.gov.au/fm_files/attachments/Publications/fiskville-investigation/final-report/Report-of-the-Independent-Fiskville-Investigation.pdf
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/enrc/Fiskville_training_college/subs/Submission_446_-_MICHAEL_TISBURY.pdf

1998: Darling River

1998: Pesticides Detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor & Prometryn. Source of contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize.
Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

1998: Pesticides Detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor & Prometryn. Source of contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize.
Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1996 Namoi River Basin

1996: Pesticides: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Prometryn, Diuron & Chlorpyrifos. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Cooper 1996.

1996: Pesticides: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Prometryn, Diuron & Chlorpyrifos. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Cooper 1996.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1998: Namoi River Basin

1998: Pesticides Detected Endosulfan, Atrazine, Chlorpyrifos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor, Pendimethalin & Prometryn. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference Muschal 1998.

1998: Pesticides Detected Endosulfan, Atrazine, Chlorpyrifos, Dimethoate, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor, Pendimethalin & Prometryn. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference Muschal 1998.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1996: Border Rivers Basin

1996: Pesticides Detected - Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron & Prometryne. Source of contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Cooper 1996.

1996: Pesticides Detected – Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron & Prometryne. Source of contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Cooper 1996.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1998: Border River Basin

1998: Pesticides: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor & Prometryn. Source of contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize  Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

1998: Pesticides: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor & Prometryn. Source of contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize  Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1998: Gwydir River Basin

1998: Gwydir River Basin: Pesticides Detected - Endosulfan, Atrazine, Amitraz, Chlorpyrifos, Profenofos, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor, Pendimethalin, Prometryn, Simazine & Trifluralin. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

 

1998: Gwydir River Basin: Pesticides Detected - Endosulfan, Atrazine, Amitraz, Chlorpyrifos, Profenofos, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor, Pendimethalin, Prometryn, Simazine & Trifluralin. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize
Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

Detections are less frequent in riverine environments than in irrigation drainage,particularly in areas such as northern NSW where tailwater returns to the river are tightly controlled. The Central and North West Regions Water Quality Program finds chlorpyrifos in a very small number of samples (well below 1%) at concentrations generally between 0.1 and 1μg/L. However, chlorpyrifos accumulated to quite high levels in passive samplers deployed during 1998. This could reflect accumulation from background levels, or from occasional high pulses entering the river, with the latter
appearing more likely given that such pulses are detected from time to time. Such detections, generally below 10μg/L but reaching as high as 26μg/L in one sample from the Gwydir, may reflect non-agricultural uses such as termite protection of bridges. However, predicted concentrations of this magnitude may also occur in shallow water contaminated through excessive spray drift from higher rate uses, such as for cotton. It seems likely that higher concentrations would occur in minor tributaries where pesticide residues first enter the riverine system.
 
https://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/14756-chlorpyrifos-irr-environment.pdf
 
January 29 1998 Diuron 24ug/L
January 30 1998 Fluometuron 9ug/L
January 1998 Prometryn 9ug/L
 
*Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Cotton Production. Proceeding of the Cropping Systems Forum 2 & 3 December 1998 Narrabri NSW

1998: Gwydir River Basin: Pesticides Detected – Endosulfan, Atrazine, Amitraz, Chlorpyrifos, Profenofos, Diuron, Fluometuron, Metolachlor, Pendimethalin, Prometryn, Simazine & Trifluralin. Source of Contamination: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize
Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference: Muschal 1998.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

Detections are less frequent in riverine environments than in irrigation drainage,
particularly in areas such as northern NSW where tailwater returns to the river are
tightly controlled. The Central and North West Regions Water Quality Program finds
chlorpyrifos in a very small number of samples (well below 1%) at concentrations
generally between 0.1 and 1μg/L. However, chlorpyrifos accumulated to quite
highlevels in passive samplers deployed during 1998. This could reflect accumulation from
background levels, or from occasional high pulses entering the river, with the latter
appearing more likely given that such pulses are detected from time to time. Such
detections, generally below 10μg/L but reaching as high as 26μg/L in one sample
from the Gwydir, may reflect non-agricultural uses such as termite protection of
bridges. However, predicted concentrations of this magnitude may also occur in
shallow water contaminated through excessive spray drift from higher rate uses, such
as for cotton. It seems likely that higher concentrations would occur in minor
tributaries where pesticide residues first enter the riverine system.
https://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/14756-chlorpyrifos-irr-environment.pdf
January 29 1998 Diuron 24ug/L
January 30 1998 Fluometuron 9ug/L
January 1998 Prometryn 9ug/L
*Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Cotton Production. Proceeding of the Cropping Systems Forum 2 & 3 December 1998 Narrabri NSW

1996: Gwydir River Basin

1996: Gwydir River Basin: Pesticides Detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Prometryne & Chlorpyriphos - Source: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference Cooper 1996.

 

Highest level of diuron recorded in Gwydir Namoi River catchment, 1990's, 23ug/L

apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/15386-diuron-environment.pdf

1996: Gwydir River Basin: Pesticides Detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Prometryne & Chlorpyriphos – Source: Crops : Irrigated cotton, sorghum, maize. Where found: Rivers & streams. Reference Cooper 1996.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

Highest level of diuron recorded in Gwydir Namoi River catchment, 1990’s, 23ug/L

apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/15386-diuron-environment.pdf

1994-5: Murray Irrigation Area

1994-5: Murray Irrigation Area: Pesticides detected - Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Simazine, Diazinon, Bromacil, MCPA, 2, 4-D, Malathion,Thiobencarb & Molinate, Where Found: Where found: Drainage water, supply water, lakes, streams & rivers. Source: Bowmer et al. 1998

1994-5: Murray Irrigation Area: Pesticides detected – Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Simazine, Diazinon, Bromacil, MCPA, 2, 4-D, Malathion,Thiobencarb & Molinate, Where Found: Where found: Drainage water, supply water, lakes, streams & rivers. Source: Bowmer et al. 1998

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1990’s: Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area

1990's: Pesticides: Molinate, Malathion, Chlorpyrifos & Atrazine. Source of Contamination: Crops: Rice & maize. Where found: Drainage water. Bowmer et al. 1998

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1990’s: Pesticides: Molinate, Malathion, Chlorpyrifos & Atrazine. Source of Contamination: Crops: Rice & maize. Where found: Drainage water. Bowmer et al. 1998

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1994-5: Coleambally Irrigation Area

1994-5: Coleambally Irrigation Area; Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Simazine, MCPA, 2, 4-D, Thiobencarb & Molinate. Where found: Drainage & supply water. Bowmer et al. 1998

1994-5: Coleambally Irrigation Area; Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Simazine, MCPA, 2, 4-D, Thiobencarb & Molinate. Where found: Drainage & supply water. Bowmer et al. 1998

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

1991-3: Coleambally Irrigation Area Pesticides

1991-3: Coleambally Irrigation Area. Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Simazine, Diazinon, Malathion, Thiobencarb & Molinate. Where found: Drainage Water. Source: Buchan 1994.

1991-3: Coleambally Irrigation Area. Pesticides detected: Endosulfan, Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Simazine, Diazinon, Malathion, Thiobencarb & Molinate. Where found: Drainage Water. Source: Buchan 1994.

https://www.environment.gov.au/node/21899#pesticidesininlandwaters

2003 January: Endosulfan in rainwater tank 360 times higher than safe guideline

Jan 2003: One Darling Downs farmer says tests of water samples from his rain tank last year revealed levels of the organochlorine pesticide endosulfan of 18ug/L. The maximum recommended level in drinking water in Australia is .05ug/L. [That's 360 times above the Australian Safe Drinking Water Guideline!!!]

jan 2003:

One Darling Downs farmer says tests of water samples from his rain tank last year revealed levels of the organochlorine pesticide endosulfan of 18ug/L. The maximum recommended level in drinking water in Australia is .05ug/L. [That’s 360 times above the Australian Safe Drinking Water Guideline!!!]

https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/17/1042520777478.html

2001 November + 2014/17: Dalby Water Treatment Plant (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Metolachlor

 

Nov 2001: Dalby is the main town on the Darling Downs. Sampling by the Queensland Natural Resources Department turned up residues of a triazine, atrazine, of 12ug/L (micrograms per litre) in November 2001 in Dalby's main weir, which supplies drinking water. The "eco-trigger" recommended internationally for this chemical - the maximum level to avoid adverse environmental effects - is 2ug/L.

The draft report of a recent review of atrazine by the federal chemical monitoring agency, the National Registration Authority (NRA), says atrazine "should not be detected in drinking water". Studies in the United States suggest that even at low levels, atrazine hinders the reproductive ability of frogs.

https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/17/1042520777478.html

Dalby Water Treatment Plant

13/10/14: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L [Total 0.2ug/L 3 pesticides

7/10/15: Nothing

16/11/16: Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L

9/10/17: Nothing

9/10/18: Nothing

 

Nov 2001: Dalby is the main town on the Darling Downs. Sampling by the Queensland Natural Resources Department turned up residues of a triazine, atrazine, of 12ug/L (micrograms per litre) in November 2001 in Dalby’s main weir, which supplies drinking water. The “eco-trigger” recommended internationally for this chemical – the maximum level to avoid adverse environmental effects – is 2ug/L.

The draft report of a recent review of atrazine by the federal chemical monitoring agency, the National Registration Authority (NRA), says atrazine “should not be detected in drinking water”. Studies in the United States suggest that even at low levels, atrazine hinders the reproductive ability of frogs.

https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/17/1042520777478.html

Dalby Water Treatment Plant

13/10/14: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L [Total 0.2ug/L 3 pesticides

7/10/15: Nothing

16/11/16: Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L

9/10/17: Nothing

9/10/18: Nothing

 

2003 January: St George Cattle Quarantine. Pesticide: Endosulfan.

Cooper, a grazier from St George, had his property quarantined in 1998 when high levels of the cotton pesticide endosulfan were found in his cattle. "There were cowboys in the industry who didn't care how they went about spraying," he says.

Cooper, a grazier from St George, had his property quarantined in 1998 when high levels of the cotton pesticide endosulfan were found in his cattle. “There were cowboys in the industry who didn’t care how they went about spraying,” he says.

https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/17/1042520777478.html

2003 January: Darling Downs Health Problems

Jan 2003: However, further questioning of health officials in Brisbane reveals that 25 people were admitted to Darling Downs hospitals in the two years to June 2001 because of "accidental poisoning by or [from] exposure to pesticides" - a rate of admission three times the average for hospitals statewide.

And the cases just keep on mounting: Louise Skidmore, a Darling Downs farmer, lost $3000 when her organically grown lucerne was contaminated by chemicals sprayed by her local council, which has admitted liability. "It's bloody annoying that you put in so much effort and this happens," says Skidmore.

However, further questioning of health officials in Brisbane reveals that 25 people were admitted to Darling Downs hospitals in the two years to June 2001 because of “accidental poisoning by or [from] exposure to pesticides” – a rate of admission three times the average for hospitals statewide.

And the cases just keep on mounting: Louise Skidmore, a Darling Downs farmer, lost $3000 when her organically grown lucerne was contaminated by chemicals sprayed by her local council, which has admitted liability. “It’s bloody annoying that you put in so much effort and this happens,” says Skidmore.

https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/17/1042520777478.html

 

2003 January: Dalby (Qld) Health Concerns

Despite mounting evidence that agricultural chemicals are poisoning farmers, health authorities refuse to take the problem seriously, writes Greg Roberts.

Aimee Mackay can no longer visit her grandmother on her property on Queensland's Darling Downs when the pesticide spraying of cotton is under way. "I go into convulsions, I get bad headaches, sometimes I vomit. I just can't cope with it. If they're spraying, I lock myself inside. I dare not go outdoors," says Mackay, 23.

Don and Lynette Lucht are hoping no one plants cotton this summer near their pony stud outside Dalby. "The smell of the chemicals - it chokes you. You have to have a handkerchief around your mouth," Lynette Lucht says. "One of our pony foals just collapsed. But you don't get anywhere when you complain. They accuse you of stirring. There's big dollars in cotton; they don't want to rock the boat."

Despite mounting evidence that agricultural chemicals are poisoning farmers, health authorities refuse to take the problem seriously, writes Greg Roberts.

Aimee Mackay can no longer visit her grandmother on her property on Queensland’s Darling Downs when the pesticide spraying of cotton is under way. “I go into convulsions, I get bad headaches, sometimes I vomit. I just can’t cope with it. If they’re spraying, I lock myself inside. I dare not go outdoors,” says Mackay, 23.

Don and Lynette Lucht are hoping no one plants cotton this summer near their pony stud outside Dalby. “The smell of the chemicals – it chokes you. You have to have a handkerchief around your mouth,” Lynette Lucht says. “One of our pony foals just collapsed. But you don’t get anywhere when you complain. They accuse you of stirring. There’s big dollars in cotton; they don’t want to rock the boat.”

https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/17/1042520777478.html

2001: Warringah Golf Course 10,000 Dead Fish (Chemical: Azinphos Methyl)

2001: ... It was a catastrophic spill at Warringah Golf Club in 2001 that led to direct action from the golfing industry... The club was found guilty of criminal negligence in the Land and Environment Court after a pesticide spill killed more than 10,000 fish in Brookvale Creek and Manly Lagoon. Poisonous chemicals, including the pesticide Gusathion, were frequently handled and mixed on a concrete slab in the greenkeepers’ workshop area adjacent to stormwater pits that led to the creek. The slab was not surrounded by a bund or any other protective devices. The court found that the leak and the harm caused were foreseeable, labelling it an “accident waiting to happen”. The club was fined a NSW record of $250,000, ordered to pay Manly and Warringah Council’s clean-up costs and carry out preventative works.

Pesticide Spill To Cost Sydney Golf Club $600,000

Illawarra Mercury

Wednesday October 1, 2003

By MELISSA JENKINS

A SYDNEY golf club was yesterday ordered to pay $600,000 for its role in an environmental disaster that killed more than 10,000 fish, as well as numerous ducks and other wildlife.

Justice Robert Talbot imposed a $250,000 fine on Warringah Golf Club, at North Manly, over a pesticide spill that poisoned the fauna in the Manly Lagoon in February 2001.

It is the equal highest fine for environmental damage ever ordered in NSW.

On top of the fine, Justice Talbot ordered the club to pay the Environment Protection Authority's legal bill and clean-up costs, lifting the total penalty to around $600,000.

A greenkeeper was fined and sentenced to 250 hours community service earlier this year on charges stemming from the incident.

He hosed the toxic pesticide onto concrete, which spilt into a stormwater drain and into the lagoon, killing the fish, ducks and other inhabitants of the waterway.

Justice Talbot said it was important to send a powerful message to organisations to clean up their acts.

``Non-profit entities should not think they can escape significant penalties if they fail to maintain the environmental standards set by legislation solely because they provide a service to the general public," Justice Talbot said in his judgment in the Land and Environment Court in Sydney.

He said the golf club's actions were ``heinous" and it was highly culpable for the environmental disaster.

``It was emphatically and utterly foreseeable that the conditions were totally inadequate to deal with even sporadic handling of dangerous toxic compounds in close proximity to a sensitive waterway," Justice Talbot said.

Department of Environment and Conservation spokesman John Dengate said the punishment showed the courts and the community wanted to see the environment protected.

``It is important to understand that simple precautions could have prevented this whole incident," Mr Dengate said.

``We think it (the penalty) sends a very strong message that if you are going to deal with chemicals, you have to have your environmental controls absolutely in place." The maximum penalty for the offence is $1 million.

Pesticide Spill To Cost Sydney Golf Club $600,000

Illawarra Mercury Wednesday October 1, 2003

By MELISSA JENKINS

A SYDNEY golf club was yesterday ordered to pay $600,000 for its role in an environmental disaster that killed more than 10,000 fish, as well as numerous ducks and other wildlife.

Justice Robert Talbot imposed a $250,000 fine on Warringah Golf Club, at North Manly, over a pesticide spill that poisoned the fauna in the Manly Lagoon in February 2001.

It is the equal highest fine for environmental damage ever ordered in NSW.

On top of the fine, Justice Talbot ordered the club to pay the Environment Protection Authority’s legal bill and clean-up costs, lifting the total penalty to around $600,000.

A greenkeeper was fined and sentenced to 250 hours community service earlier this year on charges stemming from the incident.

He hosed the toxic pesticide onto concrete, which spilt into a stormwater drain and into the lagoon, killing the fish, ducks and other inhabitants of the waterway.

Justice Talbot said it was important to send a powerful message to organisations to clean up their acts.

“Non-profit entities should not think they can escape significant penalties if they fail to maintain the environmental standards set by legislation solely because they provide a service to the general public,” Justice Talbot said in his judgment in the Land and Environment Court in Sydney.

He said the golf club’s actions were “heinous” and it was highly culpable for the environmental disaster.

“It was emphatically and utterly foreseeable that the conditions were totally inadequate to deal with even sporadic handling of dangerous toxic compounds in close proximity to a sensitive waterway,” Justice Talbot said.

Department of Environment and Conservation spokesman John Dengate said the punishment showed the courts and the community wanted to see the environment protected.

“It is important to understand that simple precautions could have prevented this whole incident,” Mr Dengate said.

“We think it (the penalty) sends a very strong message that if you are going to deal with chemicals, you have to have your environmental controls absolutely in place.” The maximum penalty for the offence is $1 million.

2001: … It was a catastrophic spill at Warringah Golf Club in 2001 that led to direct action from the golfing industry… The club was found guilty of criminal negligence in the Land and Environment Court after a pesticide spill killed more than 10,000 fish in Brookvale Creek and Manly Lagoon. Poisonous chemicals, including the pesticide Gusathion, were frequently handled and mixed on a concrete slab in the greenkeepers’ workshop area adjacent to stormwater pits that led to the creek. The slab was not surrounded by a bund or any other protective devices. The court found that the leak and the harm caused were foreseeable, labelling it an “accident waiting to happen”. The club was fined a NSW record of $250,000, ordered to pay Manly and Warringah Council’s clean-up costs and carry out preventative works.

2004 September: Timber Spraying Contaminated Drinking Water. Pesticide: Atrazine.

Sep 2004: While intense political debate over yet unseen Coalition and Labor forestry policies continues, the Tasmanian Government and Gunns Limited have been reluctant to inform the community about the incident last month at Wyena, in the north-east. Today in Parliament, 20 minutes after Opposition parties began questioning the Premier about it – who said he knew nothing – his Primary Industries and Water Minister, Steve Kons, admitted he was aware of the problem. STEVE KONS: The Spray Information and Referral Unit collected three water samples on the 20th of August. These samples were collected from a temporary stream flowing from the coop (phonetic) and onto the Carpenters' property, a dam at the bottom of the property and one from a depression in a target area. All three tests gave positive readings which exceeded the Australian drinking water guideline.

Sunday Age February 6 2005

"...Six week after the spraying on August 18, the herbicide atrazine was detected at a level of 0.72 parts per billion in the bore supplying their drinking water

Sep 2004: ANNIE GUEST: While intense political debate over yet unseen Coalition and Labor forestry policies continues, the Tasmanian Government and Gunns Limited have been reluctant to inform the community about the incident last month at Wyena, in the north-east. Today in Parliament, 20 minutes after Opposition parties began questioning the Premier about it – who said he knew nothing – his Primary Industries and Water Minister, Steve Kons, admitted he was aware of the problem. STEVE KONS: The Spray Information and Referral Unit collected three water samples on the 20th of August. These samples were collected from a temporary stream flowing from the coop (phonetic) and onto the Carpenters’ property, a dam at the bottom of the property and one from a depression in a target area. All three tests gave positive readings which exceeded the Australian drinking water guideline.

https://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2004/s1209049.htm

Sunday Age February 6 2005

“…Six week after the spraying on August 18, the herbicide atrazine was detected at a level of 0.72 parts per billion in the bore supplying their drinking water

2005 January: Pesticides Linked to Breast Cancer in Victoria

Monash University PhD student Dr Narges Khanjani has revealed a possible link between the use of organochlorine pesticides and breast cancer in Victoria's north-east. Her study shows up to 48,000 women in the Ovens and Murray Shire could have been exposed to the chemicals which were mainly used in the production of tobacco crops. "Because this is the only region in Victoria to grow tobacco, the number of women possibly exposed is much higher here than anywhere else in the state," Dr Khanjani said. "Although women traditionally don't work in the fields, they have been exposed to the chemicals which have contaminated the food chain and have been unknowingly consumed in produce such as meat, milk and eggs. "Once organochlorines are absorbed into the body they are not easily secreted or broken down and are stored in fat tissue such as breast fat."

https://www.labonline.com.au/news/7704-Pesticides-linked-to-breast-cancer-in-Victoria

Monash University PhD student Dr Narges Khanjani has revealed a possible link between the use of organochlorine pesticides and breast cancer in Victoria’s north-east. Her study shows up to 48,000 women in the Ovens and Murray Shire could have been exposed to the chemicals which were mainly used in the production of tobacco crops. “Because this is the only region in Victoria to grow tobacco, the number of women possibly exposed is much higher here than anywhere else in the state,” Dr Khanjani said. “Although women traditionally don’t work in the fields, they have been exposed to the chemicals which have contaminated the food chain and have been unknowingly consumed in produce such as meat, milk and eggs. “Once organochlorines are absorbed into the body they are not easily secreted or broken down and are stored in fat tissue such as breast fat.”

https://www.labonline.com.au/news/7704-Pesticides-linked-to-breast-cancer-in-Victoria

2006: Worst Groundwater Pollution in Southern Hemisphere

2006: A paper presenting information on the worst groundwater pollution ever documented in the Southern Hemisphere. Orica's Botany Industrial Park. The site was previously owned by British multinational ICI. As a result of decades of manufacturing activities and poor environmental practices on the site, chlorinated hydrocarbons leaked into the ground for a period from as early as 1940s to late 1980s. The carcinogenic chemicals mix with groundwater and eventually form a toxic plume that has spread 2 square kilometres covering the area under the houses of about 1000 residents. The plume is now gradually moving towards Botany Bay and is only a few hundred met res from the bay. If unchecked, the toxic plume will bring disaster to marine life and cause healthproblems to human and animalsin contact with the contaminated water in the bay.

2006: A paper presenting information on the worst groundwater pollution ever documented in the Southern Hemisphere. Orica’s Botany Industrial Park. The site was previously owned by British multinational ICI. As a result of decades of manufacturing activities and poor environmental practices on the site, chlorinated hydrocarbons leaked into the ground for a period from as early as 1940s to late 1980s. The carcinogenic chemicals mix with groundwater and eventually form a toxic plume that has spread 2 square kilometres covering the area under the houses of about 1000 residents. The plume is now gradually moving towards Botany Bay and is only a few hundred met res from the bay. If unchecked, the toxic plume will bring disaster to marine life and cause healthproblems to human and animalsin contact with the contaminated water in the bay.

https://www.prres.net/papers/Chan_Groundwater_Contamination_Case_Study.pdf

2007: Pesticides Galathea Creek, New South Wales

2008: Study published, Dissipation of Cotton Pesticides from Runoff Water in Glasshouse Columns in or nearby Galathera Creek (between Narrabri and Wee Waa NSW). Pesticides included Endosulfan, Chlorpyrifos, Aldicarb, Diuron, Prometryn.

2008: Study published, Dissipation of Cotton Pesticides from Runoff Water in Glasshouse Columns in or nearby Galathera Creek (between Narrabri and Wee Waa NSW). Pesticides included Endosulfan, Chlorpyrifos, Aldicarb, Diuron, Prometryn.

https://www.bashanfoundation.org/ivan/ivancotton.pdf

2009 January: Spray Drift Mackenzie River Queensland

Jan 2009: Herbicide spray drift damage to a number of Central Queensland cotton crops has been reported this summer as broadacre farmers battle prolific weed growth...Herbicide spray drift damage to cotton has again been reported on the Central Highlands, Dawson Valley and on the Mackenzie River...Biosecurity Queensland district inspector Tim Fischer said spray applicators had a moral and legal obligation to ensure spray applications did not impact on neighbouring situations or landholders...

Jan 2009: Herbicide spray drift damage to a number of Central Queensland cotton crops has been reported this summer as broadacre farmers battle prolific weed growth…Herbicide spray drift damage to cotton has again been reported on the Central Highlands, Dawson Valley and on the Mackenzie River…Biosecurity Queensland district inspector Tim Fischer said spray applicators had a moral and legal obligation to ensure spray applications did not impact on neighbouring situations or landholders…

2009 January: Spray Drift Warning Dawson Valley Qld

Jan 2009: Herbicide spray drift damage to a number of Central Queensland cotton crops has been reported this summer as broadacre farmers battle prolific weed growth...Herbicide spray drift damage to cotton has again been reported on the Central Highlands, Dawson Valley and on the Mackenzie River...Biosecurity Queensland district inspector Tim Fischer said spray applicators had a moral and legal obligation to ensure spray applications did not impact on neighbouring situations or landholders...

Jan 2009: Herbicide spray drift damage to a number of Central Queensland cotton crops has been reported this summer as broadacre farmers battle prolific weed growth…Herbicide spray drift damage to cotton has again been reported on the Central Highlands, Dawson Valley and on the Mackenzie River…Biosecurity Queensland district inspector Tim Fischer said spray applicators had a moral and legal obligation to ensure spray applications did not impact on neighbouring situations or landholders…

2009 January: Spray Drift Central Highlands Region Queensland

Jan 2009: Herbicide spray drift damage to a number of Central Queensland cotton crops has been reported this summer as broadacre farmers battle prolific weed growth...Herbicide spray drift damage to cotton has again been reported on the Central Highlands, Dawson Valley and on the Mackenzie River...Biosecurity Queensland district inspector Tim Fischer said spray applicators had a moral and legal obligation to ensure spray applications did not impact on neighbouring situations or landholders...

Jan 2009: Herbicide spray drift damage to a number of Central Queensland cotton crops has been reported this summer as broadacre farmers battle prolific weed growth…Herbicide spray drift damage to cotton has again been reported on the Central Highlands, Dawson Valley and on the Mackenzie River…Biosecurity Queensland district inspector Tim Fischer said spray applicators had a moral and legal obligation to ensure spray applications did not impact on neighbouring situations or landholders…

2009 May: EPA Lower Yarra Fish Study. Pesticide: DDT.

May 2009: EPA Victoria publishes, Lower Yarra Fish Study: Investigation of Contaminants in Fish. Levels of organochlorines (DDT and metabolites) lower than in 2006, when pp-DDD and pp-DDE were detected.

May 2009: EPA Victoria publishes, Lower Yarra Fish Study: Investigation of Contaminants in Fish. Levels of organochlorines (DDT and metabolites) lower than in 2006, when pp-DDD and pp-DDE were detected.

https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/~/media/Publications/1283.pdf

2009 May: High Risk Pesticides Ord Irrigation Region

May 2009: Study shows strategies to minimise pesticide runoff. High Risk Pesticides include: Atrazine, Ametyrn, Diuron, Thiodicarb, Pendimethalin, Endosulfan.

May 2009: Study shows strategies to minimise pesticide runoff. High Risk Pesticides include: Atrazine, Ametyrn, Diuron, Thiodicarb, Pendimethalin, Endosulfan.

https://lwa.gov.au/files/products/innovation/pn30176/minimising-site-transport-pesticides-ord-river-irr.pdf

2009 June: Gordonvale Qld Spray Drift

June 2009: CHEMICAL spray drift complaints in the Gordonvale area have prompted a warning to canegrowers to ensure the correct use of spray nozzles and spray pressure.Biosecurity Queensland senior inspector Aaron Russell said the complaints were associated with the use of boom jets or moonless spray nozzles to apply selective herbicides to sugarcane.

June 2009: CHEMICAL spray drift complaints in the Gordonvale area have prompted a warning to canegrowers to ensure the correct use of spray nozzles and spray pressure.Biosecurity Queensland senior inspector Aaron Russell said the complaints were associated with the use of boom jets or moonless spray nozzles to apply selective herbicides to sugarcane.

2009 November: $9000 Spray Drift Fine to Emerald Farmer

Nov 2009: Biosecurity Queensland officer Dr Sandra Baxendell said an Emerald property owner was recently fined $9000 for damage caused to a neighbouring crop from chemical spray drift. “Direct chemical drift from a spray boom used by the property owner caused partial crop loss on a neighbouring property,” she said. “The owner plead guilty to carrying out distribution of a chemical in a hazardous area and in conditions reasonably intended to do damage to a crop. “This is only a small fine in relation to what offenders could face but we hope this serves as an example to other property owners spraying their crops this season - we are monitoring and we will prosecute.”

Nov 2009: Biosecurity Queensland officer Dr Sandra Baxendell said an Emerald property owner was recently fined $9000 for damage caused to a neighbouring crop from chemical spray drift. “Direct chemical drift from a spray boom used by the property owner caused partial crop loss on a neighbouring property,” she said. “The owner plead guilty to carrying out distribution of a chemical in a hazardous area and in conditions reasonably intended to do damage to a crop. “This is only a small fine in relation to what offenders could face but we hope this serves as an example to other property owners spraying their crops this season – we are monitoring and we will prosecute.”

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/news/agriculture/cropping/general-news/9000-spray-drift-fine-for-emerald-farmer/1678669.aspx

2009 November: Bunbury Dolphin Deaths

Nov 2009: DAYS after authorities revealed the deaths of six dolphins in Perth's Swan River within four months, scientists said up to eight had died near Bunbury in the past two years...But he said the recent deaths within the Swan River pod, which have occurred since June this year, had happened in a similar environment and could provide some clues.
At least three of the dead Swan River dolphins were confirmed to have high levels of the highly toxic pesticide dieldrin, which was banned in 1988.

Nov 2009: DAYS after authorities revealed the deaths of six dolphins in Perth’s Swan River within four months, scientists said up to eight had died near Bunbury in the past two years…But he said the recent deaths within the Swan River pod, which have occurred since June this year, had happened in a similar environment and could provide some clues.
At least three of the dead Swan River dolphins were confirmed to have high levels of the highly toxic pesticide dieldrin, which was banned in 1988.

2009 November: Pesticides Suspected in Dolphin Deaths. Pesticide: Dieldrin.

Nov 2009: DAYS after authorities revealed the deaths of six dolphins in Perth's Swan River within four months, scientists said up to eight had died near Bunbury in the past two years...But he said the recent deaths within the Swan River pod, which have occurred since June this year, had happened in a similar environment and could provide some clues.
At least three of the dead Swan River dolphins were confirmed to have high levels of the highly toxic pesticide dieldrin, which was banned in 1988.

Nov 2009: DAYS after authorities revealed the deaths of six dolphins in Perth’s Swan River within four months, scientists said up to eight had died near Bunbury in the past two years…But he said the recent deaths within the Swan River pod, which have occurred since June this year, had happened in a similar environment and could provide some clues.
At least three of the dead Swan River dolphins were confirmed to have high levels of the highly toxic pesticide dieldrin, which was banned in 1988.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/pesticide-suspected-in-dolphin-deaths/story-e6frf7kf-1225799861802

2010 January: Spray Drift Clouds Kingaroy

Jan 2010: KINGAROY district producers are up in arms over an alleged spray drift incident from an aerial applicator. It's an issue that continues to surface at this time of the year in the aftermath of rains which trigger instant weed growth, requiring treatment by chemicals like 2,4D. However, spray drift from commercial operators, be it from ground rigs or aerial applications, can spread across many kilometres if carried out in unsuitable conditions.

Jan 2010: KINGAROY district producers are up in arms over an alleged spray drift incident from an aerial applicator. It’s an issue that continues to surface at this time of the year in the aftermath of rains which trigger instant weed growth, requiring treatment by chemicals like 2,4D. However, spray drift from commercial operators, be it from ground rigs or aerial applications, can spread across many kilometres if carried out in unsuitable conditions.

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/spray-drift-clouds-kingaroy/1725225.aspx

2010 February: Wowan Spray Drift Issue Unresolved

Feb 2010: CENTRAL Queensland producer Robert Eastcott says he is “frustrated” that officialdom is unable to help him resolve a long-standing spray drift complaint. The alleged incident at his Kaylee Park property, Wowan, has caused him to generate a swag of correspondence over the issue which, he says, stands to place him in danger of financial ruin. Since purchasing the property in 2001, Mr Eastcott says he has suffered numerous spray drift incidents, forcing him to reconsider further investment in forage sorghum and other pasture crops, also irrigation technology. He estimates crop losses arising from the alleged incident to be in the order of $60,000.

Feb 2010: CENTRAL Queensland producer Robert Eastcott says he is “frustrated” that officialdom is unable to help him resolve a long-standing spray drift complaint. The alleged incident at his Kaylee Park property, Wowan, has caused him to generate a swag of correspondence over the issue which, he says, stands to place him in danger of financial ruin. Since purchasing the property in 2001, Mr Eastcott says he has suffered numerous spray drift incidents, forcing him to reconsider further investment in forage sorghum and other pasture crops, also irrigation technology. He estimates crop losses arising from the alleged incident to be in the order of $60,000.

 

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/wowan-in-spray-drift-limelight/1741637.aspx

1999 May – 2015 May: Tod Reservoir South Australia. Pesticides detected: Simazine, Chlorpyrifos

Tod Reservoir Pesticide Detections.

1999 May 18 Simazine 0.6ug/L

1999 October 5 Simazine 0.7ug/L (loc 1)

2000 December 5 Simazine 0.6ug/L

2007 June 8 Simazine 0.7ug/L

2007 July 12 Simazine 0.6ug/L

2010 April 14 Simazine 0.55ug/L Middle Lake

2010 April 14 Simazine 0.65ug/L Loc 1

Tod Reservoir

8/5/14: Chlorpyrifos 2.68ug/L (Middle Lake)

8/5/14: Chlorpyrifos 1.39 (Loc 1)

20/6/14: Simazine 1.2ug/L, Trifluralin 0.11ug/L

21/5/15: Simazine 0.7ug/L

21/5/15: Simazine 0.6ug/L (Middle Lake)

21/5/15: Simazine 0.8ug/L (Middle Lake)

 

December 2009: Port Lincoln mayor Peter Davis has questioned whether a toxic chemical is the reason why the area's main reservoir is not being used. The 11,000-megalitre Tod Reservoir has been decommissioned because SA Water says salinity is high. But Mr Davis says he has been told the real reason is agricultural run-off of the farm chemical Simazine. He says whatever the reason, SA Water is wasting a valuable resource and the reservoir should be restored. "Given that there may be this toxic chemical Simazine in there which has come off farmers' paddocks for the last 50 years or whatever it is I don't know, ergo you can't use the water," he said.

Tod Reservoir – Pesticide detections.

1999 May 18 Simazine 0.6ug/L

1999 October 5 Simazine 0.7ug/L (loc 1)

2000 December 5 Simazine 0.6ug/L

2007 June 8 Simazine 0.7ug/L

2007 July 12 Simazine 0.6ug/L

2010 April 14 Simazine 0.55ug/L Middle Lake

2010 April 14 Simazine 0.65ug/L Loc 1

Tod Reservoir

8/5/14: Chlorpyrifos 2.68ug/L (Middle Lake)

8/5/14: Chlorpyrifos 1.39 (Loc 1)

20/6/14: Simazine 1.2ug/L, Trifluralin 0.11ug/L

21/5/15: Simazine 0.7ug/L

21/5/15: Simazine 0.6ug/L (Middle Lake)

21/5/15: Simazine 0.8ug/L (Middle Lake)

December 2009: Port Lincoln mayor Peter Davis has questioned whether a toxic chemical is the reason why the area’s main reservoir is not being used. The 11,000-megalitre Tod Reservoir has been decommissioned because SA Water says salinity is high. But Mr Davis says he has been told the real reason is agricultural run-off of the farm chemical Simazine. He says whatever the reason, SA Water is wasting a valuable resource and the reservoir should be restored. “Given that there may be this toxic chemical Simazine in there which has come off farmers’ paddocks for the last 50 years or whatever it is I don’t know, ergo you can’t use the water,” he said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/18/2775394.htm?site=eyre

2010 April: Gympie Farmer Dudded Spray Drift Compo

The couple's chief complaint is not so much against Ergon Energy but the contractors Mossman Port Douglas Tree Lopping Service which Ergon employed to spray weedicide under its power lines and around power poles...Throughout the whole drama, the Mossman Port Douglas company has refused to accept any responsibility for crop contamination as well as refusing to release any results from crop damage tests....All went well until Ergon Energy put in a spur line to supply power to the newer section of the farm located on a higher frost free ridge. Soon after that spraying contractors Mossman Port Douglas Tree Lopping sprayed weedicide on the already cleared lane under the line and in the process the chemical drifted over squash plants, causing withering and distortion of the plants.

The couple’s chief complaint is not so much against Ergon Energy but the contractors Mossman Port Douglas Tree Lopping Service which Ergon employed to spray weedicide under its power lines and around power poles…Throughout the whole drama, the Mossman Port Douglas company has refused to accept any responsibility for crop contamination as well as refusing to release any results from crop damage tests….All went well until Ergon Energy put in a spur line to supply power to the newer section of the farm located on a higher frost free ridge. Soon after that spraying contractors Mossman Port Douglas Tree Lopping sprayed weedicide on the already cleared lane under the line and in the process the chemical drifted over squash plants, causing withering and distortion of the plants.

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/news/agriculture/cropping/general-news/spray-drift-compo-gympie-farmer-dudded/1797930.aspx?storypage=1

2008: Noosa Two Headed Fish Controversy and Carbendazim

By 2005 Gwen’s fish farm was flanked by Macadamia plantations on three sides. In 2006 she experienced a total fish kill after spray drift from her new neighbours. She was paid compensation by the farmer with no admission of liability. In 2007 with a change of management of the adjacent farm, co-operation was lost and compensation payments ended — but the fish kills continued... . He identified three main chemicals used on Macadamia farms that were likely to have affected these fish — Carbendazim, Endosulfan and Methidathione — provided a case report and samples to QDPI&F.

By 2005 Gwen’s fish farm was flanked by Macadamia plantations on three sides. In 2006 she experienced a total fish kill after spray drift from her new neighbours. She was paid compensation by the farmer with no admission of liability. In 2007 with a change of management of the adjacent farm, co-operation was lost and compensation payments ended — but the fish kills continued...Gwen took photos of dying fish larvae through her microscope, some spinning uncontrollably and others hatching with two heads…Gwen wrote an article seeking help that was published in the aquaculture magazine Hatchery International and an aquaculture veterinarian, Dr Matt Landos, visited her farm in October 2008. He confirmed Gwen’s observations with separate trials and was at the fish farm to see the full effects of the spay drift from the Macadamia plantation. He identified three main chemicals used on Macadamia farms that were likely to have affected these fish — Carbendazim, Endosulfan and Methidathione — provided a case report and samples to QDPI&F.

Noosa’s two-headed fish: farm spraying goes nuts

2010 July: Bowen Tomato Crop Wiped Out

A BOWEN family’s greenhouse tomato crop has been wiped out by an act of horticultural vandalism. What’s more, there could be health implications due to the poisoned water being part of the household supply.

Wayne and Valerie Donnelly are hydroponic tomato growers next door to Supa Seedlings which lost more than 7 million vegetable seedlings when somebody poisoned the irrigation system late last week. The Donnellys have lost all of their 16,000 truss tomato plants which has put them out of action for the entire growing season.

A BOWEN family’s greenhouse tomato crop has been wiped out by an act of horticultural vandalism. What’s more, there could be health implications due to the poisoned water being part of the household supply.

Wayne and Valerie Donnelly are hydroponic tomato growers next door to Supa Seedlings which lost more than 7 million vegetable seedlings when somebody poisoned the irrigation system late last week. The Donnellys have lost all of their 16,000 truss tomato plants which has put them out of action for the entire growing season.

https://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/horticulture/general-news/protected-tomato-crop-wiped-out/1878821.aspx

2010 October: Esperance Council may reverse summer 2,4-D decision

ESPERANCE Shire Council looks set to reverse last month’s decision not to grant licences to farmers for the use of 2,4-D High Volatile Ester (HVE) use during the summer. (HVE is authorised by Esperance Council for farmers to use during winter months, but has been seen as being too volatile during summer as it burns off into the atmosphere in extreme heat.)

ESPERANCE Shire Council looks set to reverse last month’s decision not to grant licences to farmers for the use of 2,4-D High Volatile Ester (HVE) use during the summer. (HVE is authorised by Esperance Council for farmers to use during winter months, but has been seen as being too volatile during summer as it burns off into the atmosphere in extreme heat.)

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/news/agriculture/cropping/general-news/esperance-may-reverse-summer-24d-decision/1978050.aspx

2011: Belyando River Pesticide Detections Queensland

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 3 pesticides detected in Belyando River: Atrazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 3 pesticides detected in Belyando River: Atrazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor.

2011 + 2017/2023: Burnett River Bundaberg (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Burnett River at Quay Street Bridge

874 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Mar 2023

Diuron: 87 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Mar 2022. 0.39ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.0488ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 60 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.0665ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 116 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.54ug/L (max 17/10/18). 0.0817ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 6 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.04ug/L (max 5/1/18). 0.0317ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 3 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2017 and May 2020.

Fluroxypur: 25 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.27ug/L (max 24/2/18). 0.096ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 5 detections of Haloxyfop between Mar 2022 and Oct 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 156 detections of Hexazinone between Sep 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 27/10/17). 0.0335ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 25 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.0176ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 26 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.0408ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 27 detections of MCPA between Jan 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.22ug/L (max 23/1/18). 0.0296ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 150 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.1128ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 11 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and May 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 18/10/17). 0.0509ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.1ug/L (max 14/10/18). 0.042ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 149 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2021 and Apr 2022. 1.2ug/L (10/4/22). 0.1623ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 13 detections of Terbuthylazine between Oct 2017 and Mar 2018. 0.02ug/L (max 31/10/17). 0.0108ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 5 detections of Triclopyr between Oct 2018 and Oct 2022. 0.31ug/L (max). 0.136ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 4 pesticides and one metabolites detected in Burnett River: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Hexazinone, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor.

Burnett River at Quay Street Bridge

874 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Mar 2023

Diuron: 87 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Mar 2022. 0.39ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.0488ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 60 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.0665ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 116 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.54ug/L (max 17/10/18). 0.0817ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 6 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.04ug/L (max 5/1/18). 0.0317ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 3 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2017 and May 2020.

Fluroxypur: 25 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.27ug/L (max 24/2/18). 0.096ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 5 detections of Haloxyfop between Mar 2022 and Oct 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 156 detections of Hexazinone between Sep 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 27/10/17). 0.0335ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 25 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.0176ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 26 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.0408ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 27 detections of MCPA between Jan 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.22ug/L (max 23/1/18). 0.0296ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 150 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.1128ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 11 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and May 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 18/10/17). 0.0509ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.1ug/L (max 14/10/18). 0.042ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 149 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2021 and Apr 2022. 1.2ug/L (10/4/22). 0.1623ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 13 detections of Terbuthylazine between Oct 2017 and Mar 2018. 0.02ug/L (max 31/10/17). 0.0108ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 5 detections of Triclopyr between Oct 2018 and Oct 2022. 0.31ug/L (max). 0.136ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 4 pesticides and one metabolites detected in Burnett River: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Hexazinone, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor.

2011/2023: Multiple Pesticides Detected in Comet Weir Queensland

Comet River at Comet Weir

1627 pesticide detections between Oct 2011 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 55 detections of Diuron between Oct 2011 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 31/10/11). 0.0859ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 142 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2013 and Jan 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.1314ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 9 detections of Ametryn between Jun 2016 and Jun 2017. 0.0003ug/L (max 17/6/16). 0.0013ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 208 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2011 and Feb 2023. 24ug/L (max 17/1/22). 0.6097ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jul 2017 and May 2019

Diazinon: 6 detections of Diazinon between Dec 2016 and May 2022. 0.0001ug/L (max 7/12/16). 0.00002ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 145 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 5.6ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.2776ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 67 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 0.26ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.0442ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 73 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2011 and Dec 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 19/8/16). 0.0275ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 71 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.67ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.0665ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 13 detections of Imidacloprid between Jun 2016 to Jan 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 15/5/22). 0.0212ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 35 detections of Isoxaflutole between Feb 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.89ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.1227ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 31 detections of MCPA between Jun 2015 and Dec 2022. 0.54ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.0641ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 215 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2011 and Feb 2023. 11ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.5466ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 31 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.08ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.0239ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 5 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2022 and Jan 2023. 0.04ug/L (max 17/1/23). 0.032ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 8 detections of Prometryn between Jan 2015 and Mar 2017. 0.12ug/L (max 29/1/15). 0.0307ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 134 detections of Simazine between Dec 2011 and Dec 2022. 7.3ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.1632ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 251 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2011 and Feb 2023. 4.7ug/L (max 14/11/21). 0.5789ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 109 detections of Terbuthylazine between Jul 2015 and Jan 2023. 28ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.4231ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 17 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 1.1ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.1889ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2012-2013

Comet River at Comet Weir

Total Atrazine 41kg, Tebuthiuron 1.9kg

Source: Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Total Suspended Solids, Nutrients & Pesticide Loads (2012-2013) for Rivers that Discharge to the Great Barrier Reef - Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2012-2013

https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/measuring-success/paddock-to-reef/assets/2012-2013-gbr-catchment-loads-technical-report.pdf

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides and two metabolites detected in Comet River: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Hexazinone, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor, DEET.

Comet River at Comet Weir

1627 pesticide detections between Oct 2011 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 55 detections of Diuron between Oct 2011 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 31/10/11). 0.0859ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 142 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2013 and Jan 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.1314ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 9 detections of Ametryn between Jun 2016 and Jun 2017. 0.0003ug/L (max 17/6/16). 0.0013ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 208 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2011 and Feb 2023. 24ug/L (max 17/1/22). 0.6097ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jul 2017 and May 2019

Diazinon: 6 detections of Diazinon between Dec 2016 and May 2022. 0.0001ug/L (max 7/12/16). 0.00002ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 145 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 5.6ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.2776ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 67 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 0.26ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.0442ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 73 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2011 and Dec 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 19/8/16). 0.0275ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 71 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.67ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.0665ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 13 detections of Imidacloprid between Jun 2016 to Jan 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 15/5/22). 0.0212ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 35 detections of Isoxaflutole between Feb 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.89ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.1227ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 31 detections of MCPA between Jun 2015 and Dec 2022. 0.54ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.0641ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 215 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2011 and Feb 2023. 11ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.5466ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 31 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.08ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.0239ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 5 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2022 and Jan 2023. 0.04ug/L (max 17/1/23). 0.032ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 8 detections of Prometryn between Jan 2015 and Mar 2017. 0.12ug/L (max 29/1/15). 0.0307ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 134 detections of Simazine between Dec 2011 and Dec 2022. 7.3ug/L (max 17/7/16). 0.1632ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 251 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2011 and Feb 2023. 4.7ug/L (max 14/11/21). 0.5789ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 109 detections of Terbuthylazine between Jul 2015 and Jan 2023. 28ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.4231ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 17 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 1.1ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.1889ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2012-2013

Comet River at Comet Weir

Total Atrazine 41kg, Tebuthiuron 1.9kg

Source: Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Total Suspended Solids, Nutrients & Pesticide Loads (2012-2013) for Rivers that Discharge to the Great Barrier Reef – Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2012-2013

https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/measuring-success/paddock-to-reef/assets/2012-2013-gbr-catchment-loads-technical-report.pdf

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides and two metabolites detected in Comet River: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Hexazinone, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor, DEET.

2011: Pesticide detections Pioneer River Queensland

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides and two metabolites detected in Pioneer River: Ametryn, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Imidacloprid.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides and two metabolites detected in Pioneer River: Ametryn, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Imidacloprid.

2011: Pesticide Detections Sandy Creek (Mackay) Queensland

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 11 pesticides and two metabolites detected in Sandy Creek: Ametryn, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Bromacil, Metolachlor, Imidacloprid, 2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, MCPA.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 11 pesticides and two metabolites detected in Sandy Creek: Ametryn, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Bromacil, Metolachlor, Imidacloprid, 2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, MCPA.

2011: Pesticide Monitoring South Johnstone River Queensland

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 3 pesticides detected in South Johnstone River: Atrazine, Diuron, Imidacloprid.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 3 pesticides detected in South Johnstone River: Atrazine, Diuron, Imidacloprid.

2011: Suttor River/Burdekin River pesticide detections

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides (and one metabolite) detected in Suttor River: Atrazine, Ametryn, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Imidacloprid.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides (and one metabolite) detected in Suttor River: Atrazine, Ametryn, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Imidacloprid.

2008/9: Pesticides detected in Murray River Queensland

2008/9: Detected pesticides included diuron, atrazine, hexazinone, simazine and tebuthiuron. Concentrations of detected pesticides were typically higher during the wet season, and the maximum water concentrations of individual herbicides ranged from 2 to 15 nanograms per litre.

Australia

2008/9: A range of pesticides were detected in time-integrated passive samplers deployed in inshore marine waters in the Wet Tropics region over the 12-month monitoring period. Detected pesticides included diuron, atrazine, hexazinone, simazine and tebuthiuron. Concentrations of detected pesticides were typically higher during the wet season, and the maximum water concentrations of individual herbicides ranged from 2 to 15 nanograms per litre.
In high river flow conditions, a similar range of pesticides were detected off the Tully and Murray Rivers in 2008 but not above Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Water Quality Guidelines. However, concentrations of diuron did exceed 100 nanograms per litre (Lewis et al., 2009), which is above the effects level for photosynthesis inhibition in a number of marine plants.

2011: Tully River Queensland pesticide detections.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments - Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides (and one metabolite) detected in Tully River: Atrazine, Ametryn, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Imidacloprid.

2011: Large Scale Pesticide Monitoring Across Great Barrier Reef Catchments – Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, 6 pesticides (and one metabolite) detected in Tully River: Atrazine, Ametryn, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Simazine, Imidacloprid.

1990’s: Endosulfan detected in the MacIntrye River NSW

1998 (Report Published) - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides.  Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops and detected in MacIntyre River.

1998 (Report Published) – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides.  Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops and detected in MacIntyre River.

1990’s Endosulfan detected in Macquarie River NSW

1998 (Report Published) - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides.  Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops and detected in Macquarie River.

1998 (Report Published) – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides.  Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops and detected in Macquarie River.

1989 January: Endosulfan detected 0.3ug/L Jabiru Lagoon NSW

7/1/89 - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides.  Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops and detected in Jabiru Lagoon (near Wee Waa (NSW) 0.3ug/L.

1991 – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides.  Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops and detected in Jabiru Lagoon (near Wee Waa (NSW).

1991: Endosulfan detected in Millie Creek

1991 - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops.

1991 – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in Barwon River at Mungindi at 0.3ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998.

1991/2: Fish Kills due to Endosulfan – Gwydir River

1991/2 - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in the Gwydir River at Bragreen at 3ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998.

1991/2 – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in the Gwydir River at Bragreen at 3ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998.

https://ojs.library.unsw.edu.au/index.php/wetlands/article/viewFile/192/198

1984 – 1992: Fish Kills due to Endosulfan Gil Gil Creek, Galloway

1991/2 - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in Gil Gil Creek at Galloway at 0.8ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998.

In1984, sampling by the NSW State Pollution Control Commission in response to a major fish kill, identified endosulfan residues in Gil Gil Creek, north west of Moree at levels of (0.9-1.5ug/L) well above the LC50 for trout (0.3ug/L). Follow up sampling of Boobera Lagoon in the MacIntyre Valley during 1983-1984 confirmed the presence of endosulfan and a report on pesticide monitoring from the central and north west regions in 1995, acknowledged that the detection of high levels of endosulfan residues in the environment was a consequence of its use in agriculture. In the 1989-99 sampling in the Murray Darling Basin, endosulfan was detected in 53% if water samples with the median levels ranging from 0.02ug/L to 0.04ug/L.

https://ntn.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/polluterpaysmythlegend.pdf

1991/2 – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in Gil Gil Creek at Galloway at 0.8ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998.

https://ojs.library.unsw.edu.au/index.php/wetlands/article/viewFile/192/198

In1984, sampling by the NSW State Pollution Control Commission in response to a major fish kill, identified endosulfan residues in Gil Gil Creek, north west of Moree at levels of (0.9-1.5ug/L) well above the LC50 for trout (0.3ug/L). Follow up sampling of Boobera Lagoon in the MacIntyre Valley during 1983-1984 confirmed the presence of endosulfan and a report on pesticide monitoring from the central and north west regions in 1995, acknowledged that the detection of high levels of endosulfan residues in the environment was a consequence of its use in agriculture. In the 1989-99 sampling in the Murray Darling Basin, endosulfan was detected in 53% if water samples with the median levels ranging from 0.02ug/L to 0.04ug/L.

https://ntn.org.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/polluterpaysmythlegend.pdf

1991/2: Endosulfan and Fish Kills Barwon River Mungindi

1991/2 - Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in Barwon River at Mungindi at 0.3ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998.

1991/2 – Records of Fish Kills in Inland Waters of NSW and Qld in Relation to Cotton Pesticides. Fish kills associated with insecticide Endosulfan used primarily on cotton crops. Endosulfan recorded in Barwon River at Mungindi at 0.3ug/L. Source: Wetlands Australia 1998. A farmer was also prosecuted in 1989 for polluting the Barwon River at Mungindi with Endosulfan.

https://ojs.library.unsw.edu.au/index.php/wetlands/article/viewFile/192/198

2012 March: Pesticides in Groundwater Lower Burdekin River Floodplain

March 2012: A study by the Department of Environment and Resource Management, Pesticides in Groundwater of the Lower Burdekin Floodplain. "Pesticides were present at detectable levels in 38% of groundwater samples taken from bores in the Burdekin Riverdelta and Burdekin River Irrigation Areas. Four herbicides (atrazine, diuron, hexazinone and metolachlor) and two breakdown products of the herbicide atrazine (desethyl atrazine, desisopropyl atrazine) were detected in at least one of the 53 groundwater samples. The organophosphate insecticide, chlorpyrifos was detected in two of the groundwater bores sampled."

March 2012: A study by the Department of Environment and Resource Management, Pesticides in Groundwater of the Lower Burdekin Floodplain. “Pesticides were present at detectable levels in 38% of groundwater samples taken from bores in the Burdekin Riverdelta and Burdekin River Irrigation Areas. Four herbicides (atrazine, diuron, hexazinone and metolachlor) and two breakdown products of the herbicide atrazine (desethyl atrazine, desisopropyl atrazine) were detected in at least one of the 53 groundwater samples. The organophosphate insecticide, chlorpyrifos was detected in two of the groundwater bores sampled.”

https://www.qld.gov.au/dsitia/assets/documents/rti-13045-pesticides-in-groundwater.pdf

Shaw MS, Silburn DS, Lenahan M & Harris M. 2012.
Pesticides in groundwater in the Lower Burdekin floodplain. Brisbane:
Department of Environment and Resource Management, Queensland Government.
ISBN: 978-1-7423-0953.

Results Lower Burdekin Groundwater Pesticide Analysis August 2011

Atrazine 0.031ug/L(max), 0.019 ug/L (mean)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.254 ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.044ug/L (max), 0.021ug/L (mean)

Diuron 0.125ug/L (max), 0.072ug/L (mean)

Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (max), 0.019ug/L (mean)

Metolachlor 0.009ug/L (max), 0.009ug/L (mean)

Chlorpyrifos 0.4ug/L (max), 0.3ug/L (mean)

 

 

2012 March: 20 hectares of Kosciuszko National Park sprayed by Trans Grid

March 2012: Transgrid caught out spraying 20 hectares of Kosciuszko National Park killing thousands of alpine plants. The spraying occurred along a 17km stretch of power line between Khancoban and Guthega Ski Fields.

March 2012: Transgrid caught out spraying 20 hectares of Kosciuszko National Park killing thousands of alpine plants. The spraying occurred along a 17km stretch of power line between Khancoban and Guthega Ski Fields.

https://www.theage.com.au/environment/electricity-agency-admits-using-herbicide-in-national-park-20120329-1w15k.html

2012 April: Clare Valley attracts spray drift. Pesticide: Glyphosate.

Apr 2012: Clare Valley Vines at Risk Through ongoing research, it has been discovered the Clare Valley tends to be the end location for chemical drift (particlarly Glyphosate) in the summer spraying period, from October to April each year. Spray drift problems occurred between 2006-12. With the right atmospheric conditions, the vapour travels along a phenomenon called an “inversion layer” and through gravity and wind patterns, most of the chemical drift eventually centres on the Clare Valley. “It can come from up to 100kms away.

Apr 2012: Clare Valley Vines at Risk

FARMERS could face a ban of the widely-used weed control chemical, Glyphosate, if newly introduced summer spraying regulations are not acknowledged by growers… through ongoing research, it was discovered the Clare Valley tends to be the end location for chemical drift in the summer spraying period, from October to April each year.
This forms a residue on the fruit and also affects its early development.
It is a pivotal time for the wine industry, with vintage during that period.
“The Clare Valley has been hit in each of the last six years,” Mr Faulkner said.
With the right atmospheric conditions, the vapour travels along a phenomenon called an “inversion layer” and through gravity and wind patterns, most of the chemical drift eventually centres on the Clare Valley. “It can come from up to 100kms away, although we can’t tell exactly how far,” Mr Faulkner said.

https://www.plainsproducer.com.au/?p=6476

2010 April: Glyphosate more toxic to Eucalypts after bushfires

April 2010: AN AERIAL spray contractor has been fined $10,000 for allowing herbicide to cause damage in the Kinglake National Park and Black Ranges State Forest. The spray drift incident occurred over 10 days in April 2010 while Forest Air Helicopters, of Albury, was spraying a mixture of glyphosate and metsulfuron-methyl to control weeds in a forestry pine plantation that was re- covering from the Black Saturday bushfires. It resulted in damage to more than 200 hectares of bushland near a number of forestry coupes at Kinglake West, Buxton and Narbethong. (Sep 2012)

April 2010 (Weekly Times): AN AERIAL spray con- tractor has been fined $10,000 for allowing herbicide to cause damage in the Kinglake National Park and Black Ranges State Forest. The spray drift incident occurred over 10 days in April 2010 while Forest Air Helicopters, of Albury, was spraying a mixture of glyphosate and metsulfuron-methyl to control weeds in a forestry pine plantation that was recovering from the Black Saturday bushfires. It resulted in damage to more than 200 hectares of bushland near a number of forestry coupes at Kinglake West, Buxton and Narbethong. A Forest Air Helicopters spokesman said the company ran the usual computer modelling and risk assessments beforehand and had boundary riders in radio contact with the pilot and buffer zones in place. Forest Air Helicopters pleaded guilty in the Wodonga Magistrates’ Court earlier this month and was fined on three charges; another seven were struck out. As well as the fine, the company was ordered to pay court and other costs totalling $27,024.61. No conviction was recorded. Department of Primary Industries chemical standards officer Jane Rhodes said the matter was a timely reminder for all spray contractors.

2010 July: Western Downs Spray Drift

July 2010: The Queensland Supreme Court has ruled that in 2005 Meandarra Aerial and the owners of two cattle properties were negligent for spraying chemicals in windy conditions. The chemicals destroyed cotton crop 20 kilometres away.

July 2010: The Queensland Supreme Court has ruled that in 2005 Meandarra Aerial and the owners of two cattle properties were negligent for spraying chemicals in windy conditions. The chemicals destroyed Ash Geldard’s cotton crop 20 kilometres away.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-07-06/farmer-awarded-470k-after-chemical-damage-to-crop/893264

2012 November: Katherine River Trial Pesticide Monitoring

Nov 2012: Report published by the Northern Territory's Department of Land Resource Management, Trial Monitoring for Pesticides and PAH's in the Katherine River using Passive Samplers, finds traces of 5 pesticides (and metabolites) and 2 insecticides. Atrazine, Atrazine Desethyl (0.001ug/L), Hexazinone, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, DEET (0.189ug/L) and Chlorpyrifos were detected.

Nov 2012: Report published by the Northern Territory’s Department of Land Resource Management, Trial Monitoring for Pesticides and PAH’s in the Katherine River using Passive Samplers, finds traces of 5 pesticides (and metabolites) and 2 insecticides. Atrazine, Atrazine Desethyl (0.001ug/L), Hexazinone, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, DEET (0.189ug/L) and Chlorpyrifos were detected.

https://www.lrm.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/146765/Kath_pesticides_Final_Nov_2012_DLRM.pdf

2012 November: Farmer killed in Paraquat accident

Nov 2012:  Lynford farmer in the Darling Downs, was spraying weeds on his property on Monday when the 8L pressure pump unit filled with paraquat released, spraying the poisonous chemical into his mouth and coating his face and chest. He later died in a Brisbane Hospital.

Nov 2012:  Lynford farmer in the Darling Downs, was spraying weeds on his property on Monday when the 8L pressure pump unit filled with paraquat released, spraying the poisonous chemical into his mouth and coating his face and chest. He later died in a Brisbane Hospital.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/lifelong-farmer-dies-from-toxic-weedkiller/story-e6frg6n6-1226517724826?nk=495c9ff013754ab4d0348e4505e96145

2013 February: Great Barrier Reef Pesticide Fact Sheet

Feb 2013: Overview of pesticides running off farms into the Great Barrier Reef produced by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre (Cairns). Main pesticides include: Atrazine, Diuron, Ametryn, Hexazinone and Tebuthiuron.

Feb 2013: Overview of pesticides running off farms into the Great Barrier Reef produced by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre (Cairns). Main pesticides include: Atrazine, Diuron, Ametryn, Hexazinone and Tebuthiuron.

https://reefcatchments.com.au/files/2013/02/RRRC-Water-Quality-Pesticide-Factsheet-1.pdf

2013 March: Coonawarra Spray Drift Concerns. Pesticide: 2,4-D.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is "Damage from off-target spray drift continues...to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons." The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is “Damage from off-target spray drift continues…to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons.” The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

2013 March: Spray Drift Concerns Riverland Vineyards. Pesticide: 2,4-D.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is "Damage from off-target spray drift continues...to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons." The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is “Damage from off-target spray drift continues…to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons.” The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

2013 March: Spray Drift Concerns Barossa Valley. Pesticide: 2,4-D.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is "Damage from off-target spray drift continues...to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons." The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is “Damage from off-target spray drift continues…to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons.” The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

https://wgcsa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Spray-Drift-Submission-to-Biosecurity-SA-27-Feb-2013.pdf

2013 March: Spray Drift Affecting South Australian Vineyards. Pesticide: 2,4-D.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is "Damage from off-target spray drift continues...to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons." The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

March 2013: South Australian Wine Industry and Wine Grape Council SA publish Reducing Spray Drift. A Discussion Paper on Reducing Off-Target Drift of Group I Herbicides. A key quote is “Damage from off-target spray drift continues…to occur in South Australian vineyards. Every region is at risk, with more significant incidents occurring in the Clare Valley, Barossa Valley, Riverland and Coonawarra. It is believed that damage to vines can persist for a number of seasons.” The main problem appears to the 2,4-D spray drift.

https://wgcsa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Spray-Drift-Submission-to-Biosecurity-SA-27-Feb-2013.pdf

2013 May: Yarra River Lower Section Pesticides. Pesticide: DDT

May 2013: EPA Publishes The Origin Fate and Dispersion of Toxicants in the Lower Sections of the Yarra River. The DDT levels remain high, even on a global level. According to the Report,  "This comparison indicates that concentrations of DDT in sediments in the Yarra River may be very high on global scales, with the maximum concentration from the port area significantly higher than most comparable estuaries and bays globally."

May 2013: EPA Publishes The Origin Fate and Dispersion of Toxicants in the Lower Sections of the Yarra River. The DDT levels remain high, even on a global level.

According to the Report,

“This comparison indicates that concentrations of DDT in sediments in the Yarra River may be very high on global scales, with the maximum concentration from the port area significantly higher than most comparable estuaries and bays globally.”

https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/~/media/Publications/1529.pdf

2013 April: Narracan Creek (Vic) Pesticides and Potatoes

April 2013: Victorian EPA publishes Impacts of Intensive Agriculture and Plantation Forestry on Water Quality in the Latrobe Catchment Victoria. Narracan Creek is dominated by potato cropping. It also supplies thousands of people with drinking water. 10 different pesticides were detected including: Water supplies for Narracan Creek (Moe, Newborough, Trafalgar, Yallourn North and Yarragon) and Easterbrook Creek (Thorpdale). According to the EPA 2013 the following pesticides were detected in Narracan Creek in December 2011 (Diazinon 0.008ug/L, Simazine 0.012ug/L, Metolachlor 0.005ug/L, 2,4-D 0.005ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Diazinon 0.002ug/L, Metribuzin 0.072ug/L, 2,4-D 0.023ug/L, MCPA 0.076ug/L, Triclopyr 0.217ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Diazinon 0.002ug/L, Atrazine 0.003ug/L, Metribuzin 0.069ug/L, 2,4-D 0.028ug/L, MCPA 0.072ug/L, Triclopyr 0.0261ug/L, Atrazine 0.003ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L) and March 2012 (2,4-D 0.018ug/L, Triclopyr 0.022ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Metolachlor 0.011ug/L)

April 2013: Victorian EPA publishes Impacts of Intensive Agriculture and Plantation Forestry on Water Quality in the Latrobe Catchment Victoria. Narracan Creek is dominated by potato cropping. It also supplies thousands of people with drinking water. 10 different pesticides were detected including: Water supplies for Narracan Creek (Moe, Newborough, Trafalgar, Yallourn North and Yarragon) and Easterbrook Creek (Thorpdale). According to the EPA 2013 the following pesticides were detected in Narracan Creek in December 2011 (Diazinon 0.008ug/L, Simazine 0.012ug/L, Metolachlor 0.005ug/L, 2,4-D 0.005ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Diazinon 0.002ug/L, Metribuzin 0.072ug/L, 2,4-D 0.023ug/L, MCPA 0.076ug/L, Triclopyr 0.217ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Diazinon 0.002ug/L, Atrazine 0.003ug/L, Metribuzin 0.069ug/L, 2,4-D 0.028ug/L, MCPA 0.072ug/L, Triclopyr 0.0261ug/L, Atrazine 0.003ug/L, Metalaxyl 0.002ug/L) and March 2012 (2,4-D 0.018ug/L, Triclopyr 0.022ug/L, Azoxystrobin 0.002ug/L, Metolachlor 0.011ug/L)

2013 April: Middle Creek Strzelecki Ranges Pesticide Residues

April 2013: Victorian EPA publishes Impacts of Intensive Agriculture and Plantation Forestry on Water Quality in the Latrobe Catchment Victoria.Pesticides detected in Middle Creek (Strzelecki Ranges) include, Diazinon, Oxychlordane, Simazine, Metalaxyl, Pirimicarb. Plantation Forestry was the source of simazine and oxychlordane. Simazine had not been used in the catchment for 10 years, Chlordane for 30 years. The other pesticides are the result of 30km spray drift from vegetable crops.

April 2013. Victorian EPA publishes Impacts of Intensive Agriculture and Plantation Forestry on Water Quality in the Latrobe Catchment Victoria. Numerous pesticides found in Middle Creek and Narracan Creek in the Strzelecki Ranges. Plantation Forestry was the source of simazine and oxychlordane. Simazine had not been used in the catchment for 10 years, Chlordane for 30 years.

https://hancockwatch.nfshost.com/docs/13may.htm

2012 July: Bifenthrin pollution Wentworth Falls NSW. Thousands of dead crayfish.

July 2012: Bifenthrin from poor termite control practices leaches into Jamison Creek, upstream of world famous Wentworth Falls (within the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area) and kills over 1000 dead Giant Spiny Crayfish (Euastacus spinifer)

July 2012: Bifenthrin from poor termite control practices leaches into Jamison Creek, upstream of world famous Wentworth Falls (within the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area) and kills over 1000 dead Giant Spiny Crayfish (Euastacus spinifer)

 

https://www.aabio.com.au/bifenthrin-pesticide-causes-catastrophic-crayfish-mass-mortality-event-in-blue-mountains-nsw/

2007-2009: Pesticides in Water Mount Lofty Ranges. Pesticides: Fenarimol, Chlorpyrifos.

2013: Study looking at water contamination from Cherry and Apple Orchards in the Mount Lofty Ranges in 2007-9. Fenarimol was detected at levels that exceeded Australian Drinking Water Guidlines. Chlorpyrfos detections breached ANZECC Guidelines.

In summary the pesticides detected to date in the water samples have been:
• carbaryl, fenarimol and chlorpyrifos from the apples site.
 
very low concentrations of penconazole, cyprodinil, myclobutanil,
and fludioxonil from the grapes site;
 
and
• procymidone, propiconazole and pirimicarb from the cherries site
 

https://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/projects/MtLoftyMonitoring.pdf

Oliver, Danni; Kookana, Rai; Cox, Jim; Anderson, Jenny

2010-11-12

Conference Material

Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and Emerging TMDLs IV, Baltimore Maryland USA, 14-17 November 2010

10-11

Local runoff from the catchments in the Mount Lofty Ranges watershed provides a major source (up to 60%) of drinking water for the city of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. In this study two major land uses (apples and cherries) in the Mount Lofty Ranges were monitored for off-site transport of pesticides over approximately 30 months. The pathways of off-site transport (soluble or colloidal) of pesticides were also monitored. There were several pesticides detected in surface drainage water from the apples site but two pesticides (chlorpyrifos and fenarimol) were of particular concern. The average chlorpyrifos concentrations were 0.12 and 0.15 μg/L in 2007 and 2009, respectively, which are more than ten times the Australian environmental guideline value, suggesting potential deleterious effects on aquatic organisms downstream of the apple site. The form in which chlorpyrifos was transported off-site varied throughout the season but over time a greater proportion moved in the soluble (<1.2 µm) phase. The highest fenarimol concentration (~10 μg/L) was detected in the first main runoff event in April 2007 and the average concentration for the duration that it was detected during April to early June 2007 was 4.3 μg/L, which are 10 and 4.3 times, respectively, the Australian drinking water guideline (DWG) (1 μg/L). Fenarimol was detected in 19 water samples collected from early April to early June 2007 and in 95% of these cases the total concentration exceeded the DWG. In all seasons monitored fenarimol moved predominantly in a soluble (<1.2 µm) phase. The results from this study indicate that pesticides are of concern in this catchment and strategies for minimising off-site transport need to be developed and evaluated. Data about the mode of transport will have implications for the choice and efficacy of mitigation strategies.

https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?list=ASE&pid=csiro:EP101960&expert=false&sb=RECENT&n=6&rpp=10&page=259&tr=3111&dr=all&csiro.affiliation=B3800

2013: Study looking at water contamination from Cherry and Apple Orchards in the Mount Lofty Ranges in 2007-9. Fenarimol was detected at levels that exceeded Australian Drinking Water Guidlines. Chlorpyrfos detections breached ANZECC Guidelines.

In summary the pesticides detected to date in the water samples have been:
• carbaryl, fenarimol and chlorpyrifos from the apples site.
very low concentrations of penconazole, cyprodinil, myclobutanil,
and fludioxonil from the grapes site;
and
• procymidone, propiconazole and pirimicarb from the cherries site

https://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/projects/MtLoftyMonitoring.pdf

Oliver, Danni; Kookana, Rai; Cox, Jim; Anderson, Jenny

2010-11-12

Conference Material

Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and Emerging TMDLs IV, Baltimore Maryland USA, 14-17 November 2010

10-11

Local runoff from the catchments in the Mount Lofty Ranges watershed provides a major source (up to 60%) of drinking water for the city of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. In this study two major land uses (apples and cherries) in the Mount Lofty Ranges were monitored for off-site transport of pesticides over approximately 30 months. The pathways of off-site transport (soluble or colloidal) of pesticides were also monitored. There were several pesticides detected in surface drainage water from the apples site but two pesticides (chlorpyrifos and fenarimol) were of particular concern. The average chlorpyrifos concentrations were 0.12 and 0.15 μg/L in 2007 and 2009, respectively, which are more than ten times the Australian environmental guideline value, suggesting potential deleterious effects on aquatic organisms downstream of the apple site. The form in which chlorpyrifos was transported off-site varied throughout the season but over time a greater proportion moved in the soluble (<1.2 µm) phase. The highest fenarimol concentration (~10 μg/L) was detected in the first main runoff event in April 2007 and the average concentration for the duration that it was detected during April to early June 2007 was 4.3 μg/L, which are 10 and 4.3 times, respectively, the Australian drinking water guideline (DWG) (1 μg/L). Fenarimol was detected in 19 water samples collected from early April to early June 2007 and in 95% of these cases the total concentration exceeded the DWG. In all seasons monitored fenarimol moved predominantly in a soluble (<1.2 µm) phase. The results from this study indicate that pesticides are of concern in this catchment and strategies for minimising off-site transport need to be developed and evaluated. Data about the mode of transport will have implications for the choice and efficacy of mitigation strategies.

https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?list=ASE&pid=csiro:EP101960&expert=false&sb=RECENT&n=6&rpp=10&page=259&tr=3111&dr=all&csiro.affiliation=B3800

 

2014 May: Pesticide Limits Breached by WA Fruit Growers

May 2014: Fruit sold across a number of markets and retail outlets in Perth breached Maximum Residues Limits (MRL's) for unspecified pesticides.

May 2014: Fruit sold across a number of markets and retail outlets in Perth breached Maximum Residues Limits (MRL’s).

 

https://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/pesticide-limits-breached-by-rogue-wa-fruit-growers-20140507-zr5sy.html

2013: Mount Barker Spray Drift Case Settled out of court

2013: 5 year spray drift court case resolved with plaintiff paying the defendents costs. Marron death apparently caused by bacterial septicaemia, not pesticides.

June 2013: 5 year landmark court case between marron farmer and neighbour settled out of court. $1.9 million dollars worth of marron were allegedly killed due to spray drift from vineyard. Plaintiff paid $425,000 toward the defendents costs…”Reports that had been carried out by Fisheries officials at the time showed the marron had bacterial septicaemia and that was the cause of the marron’s death.”

It was alleged an initial spray drift incident took place between December 12, 2002 and February 26, 2003 which contaminated 36 of the Moore’s marron ponds and caused business losses totalling $3.1m.

Those alleged losses were said to consist of $1.6m for the lost marron stock, $500,000 for the cost of pond rehabilitation and $1m from loss of future sales for a period of seven years.

Since that time it was again alleged more vineyard spraying between October 13, 2004 and March 2, 2005 caused further losses amounting to $4.8m.

The alleged losses are said to consist of $300,000 for lost marron stock, $500,000 for the cost of pond rehabilitation and $4m from loss of future sales for a period of five to seven years.

There were 46 hearings involved in the case.

2013 August: Moama vine growers concerned about spray drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D.

August 2013: Moama vineyard operators anxious about grape yields ahead of  growing season call for greater awareness of the impacts of spray drift damage from the herbicide 2,4-D. Extensive vine damage predominantly in local vineyard’s chardonnay crop last year.

August 2013: Moama vineyard operators anxious about grape yields ahead of  growing season call for greater awareness of the impacts of spray drift damage from the herbicide 2,4-D. Extensive vine damage predominantly in local vineyard’s chardonnay crop last year.

2013 May: Aboriginal community impacted by cotton sprays

May 2013: Aboriginal communities in the cotton-growing region of north-western New South Wales are calling for a review of pesticides used by the industry and their potential impacts on health.

Locals in Boggabilla are reporting a rise in cancer-related deaths and disorders.

May 2013: Communities in the cotton-growing region of north-western New South Wales are calling for a review of pesticides used by the industry and their potential impacts on health.

Locals in Boggabilla are reporting a rise in cancer-related deaths and disorders.

Families like the Munro family are calling for a government task-force into chemicals and pesticides used in the region.

“We have possibly over 20 Aboriginal families here in Moree with Spina Bifida children. We have I would suggest the same amount in numbers with Cerebral Palsy children – the autistic rate I think there’s 9-10 Aboriginal families with autistic children,” said local Lyall Munro.

No one really knows what’s causing the rising number of complications connected with cancer including breast removals.

Lyall Munro claims around 60 deaths a year in the Aboriginal community of Moree alone are cancer-related.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2013/05/17/cotton-pesticide-impacting-peoples-health

 

2010 – 2012: Childers Tomato crop suffers spray drift. SP Exports Collapses.

2012: Farmer and helicopter pilot were fined more than $20,000 for damaging a neighbour's tomato crop near Childers in Queensland.

 

SP Exports Collapses 21 February 2012

WET weather and overspraying have been blamed for the failure of the country's largest tomato grower, Bundaberg-based SP Exports.

SP Exports was placed into voluntary administration on Friday, reportedly owing creditors about $12.5 million, with insolvency firm Korda Mentha taking over the company's operations at Childers, near the Queensland city of Bundaberg, and in Victoria.

At least 60 staff were terminated at Childers on Friday, while a skeleton staff have been retained to continue some harvesting.

Korda Mentha partner Ginette Muller said it is too early to say definitively what had gone wrong at SP Exports but the company's directors had blamed wet weather and overspraying, which was the subject of an insurance claim.

"Plants were ruined by dusting and, they were contaminated and killed," Ms Muller said. "We've had one offer (to settle the insurance claim) already".

Ms Muller said the company's directors were expected to propose a deed of company administration. There were still significant tomato crops in the ground which would require further investment to harvest, she said.

A creditors meeting will be held later this month.

Hopes

The agriculture industry, meanwhile, hopes the company will be able to trade its way out of trouble.

Growcom, the peak representative body for Queensland horticulture, said it was tragic to see such a large operation in trouble.

Growcom chief executive Alex Livingstone was hopeful the company could survive.

‘‘We’re hoping that SP can trade its way out, sooner rather than later,’’ he said.

‘‘Just a couple of weeks ago there was a major glut of produce on the market.

‘‘Growing conditions along the east coast have been pretty good and that’s led to an abundance of product, and as the supply increases the price goes down.’’

Mr Livingstone said the fruit and vegetable industry has been erratic this year.

‘‘It’s up and down, it depends on the commodity, and it depends on the week and it depends on supply not only from your own area but other areas as well.

‘‘I couldn’t say it’s abnormal but in some areas people are not getting a decent return for their product,’’ he said.

SP Exports put more than 1160 hectares of farm land and four homes at Childers on the market last December as the company’s owners battled to keep it running.

In March 2011 more than a million dollars damage was caused to a crop of SP Exports’ cherry tomatoes in Childers after an alleged chemical spray drift from a nearby property.

https://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/sp-exports-collapses/2462597.aspx

2012: Farmer and helicopter pilot were fined more than $20,000 for damaging a neighbour’s tomato crop near Childers in Queensland.

SP Exports Collapses 21 February 2012

WET weather and overspraying have been blamed for the failure of the country’s largest tomato grower, Bundaberg-based SP Exports.

SP Exports was placed into voluntary administration on Friday, reportedly owing creditors about $12.5 million, with insolvency firm Korda Mentha taking over the company’s operations at Childers, near the Queensland city of Bundaberg, and in Victoria.

At least 60 staff were terminated at Childers on Friday, while a skeleton staff have been retained to continue some harvesting.

Korda Mentha partner Ginette Muller said it is too early to say definitively what had gone wrong at SP Exports but the company’s directors had blamed wet weather and overspraying, which was the subject of an insurance claim.

“Plants were ruined by dusting and, they were contaminated and killed,” Ms Muller said. “We’ve had one offer (to settle the insurance claim) already”.

Ms Muller said the company’s directors were expected to propose a deed of company administration. There were still significant tomato crops in the ground which would require further investment to harvest, she said.

A creditors meeting will be held later this month.

Hopes

The agriculture industry, meanwhile, hopes the company will be able to trade its way out of trouble.

Growcom, the peak representative body for Queensland horticulture, said it was tragic to see such a large operation in trouble.

Growcom chief executive Alex Livingstone was hopeful the company could survive.

‘‘We’re hoping that SP can trade its way out, sooner rather than later,’’ he said.

‘‘Just a couple of weeks ago there was a major glut of produce on the market.

‘‘Growing conditions along the east coast have been pretty good and that’s led to an abundance of product, and as the supply increases the price goes down.’’

Mr Livingstone said the fruit and vegetable industry has been erratic this year.

‘‘It’s up and down, it depends on the commodity, and it depends on the week and it depends on supply not only from your own area but other areas as well.

‘‘I couldn’t say it’s abnormal but in some areas people are not getting a decent return for their product,’’ he said.

SP Exports put more than 1160 hectares of farm land and four homes at Childers on the market last December as the company’s owners battled to keep it running.

In March 2011 more than a million dollars damage was caused to a crop of SP Exports’ cherry tomatoes in Childers after an alleged chemical spray drift from a nearby property.

https://www.theland.com.au/news/agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/sp-exports-collapses/2462597.aspx

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *

 

2013: DDT deforms Chironomid mouthparts

2013: Study conducted in the Ovens Valley region, which had been polluted with pesticides from 150 years of tobacco farming, find that chironomid mouthparts can be deformed by use of pesticides, particularly DDT.Australia

2013: Study conducted in the Ovens Valley region, which had been polluted with pesticides from 150 years of tobacco farming, find that chironomid mouthparts can be deformed by use of pesticides, particularly DDT.

 

2013: Cotton Spray Drift Concerns

2013: Phenoxy 2,4-D likely to have caused spray drift over 12,000 hectares of cotton crops - Over $8.8 million of crops impacted in 2012.

2013: Phenoxy 2,4-D likely to have caused spray drift over 12,000 hectares of cotton crops – Over $8.8 million of crops impacted in 2012.

2014 March: 700 birds killed near Dubbo Wildlife Reserve. Pesticide: Fenthion.

March 2014: As many as 700 birds have been found dead in a wildlife reserve in New South Wales, Australia. Preliminary tests reveal that the pesticide, fenthion, was the cause of death for many little correlas, galahs and sulphur-crested cockatoos found over the past two weeks.

March 2014: As many as 700 birds have been found dead in a wildlife reserve in New South Wales, Australia. Preliminary tests reveal that the pesticide, fenthion, was the cause of death for many little correlas, galahs and sulphur-crested cockatoos found over the past two weeks.

2012 April: Market Gardener (WA) fined $15,000 for pesticide pollution. Chemical: Metham Sodium.

April 25 2012: Market gardener causes spray drift with the fumigant Metham Sodium. Neighbours reported having eye and nose problems after being exposed.

April 25 2012: Market gardener causes spray drift with the fumigant Metham Sodium. Neighbours reported having eye and nose problems after being exposed.

 

https://www.der.wa.gov.au/about-us/media-statements/207-market-gardener-fined-15-000-for-pesticide-pollution

2013: $1 million Tenterfield Tomatoes damaged by spray drift.

2013: A Tenterfield tomato farmer sustains damage to a $1 million crop as a result of herbicide spray drift from a neighbouring farm.EPA suggest that the spray used could have been 2,4-D. No legal action taken.

December 2012: Million Dollar Crop Loss Warning

2013: A Tenterfield tomato farmer sustains damage to a $1 million crop as a result of herbicide spray drift from a neighbouring farm says his experience should serve as a warning to others. EPA suggest that the spray used could have been 2,4-D. No legal action taken.

December 2012: Million Dollar Crop Loss Warning

2008 September: Bee Deaths Yarra Valley. Pesticide: Clothiandin.

September 2008, several apiarists in the Yarra Valley, particularly in the Wandin-Seville area, reported on the death of their bees.  The deaths were linked to the use of Clothiandin, supplied in Australia by the multinational company Sumitomo.

September 2008, several apiarists in the Yarra Valley, particularly in the Wandin-Seville area, reported on the death of their bees.  The deaths were linked to the use of Clothiandin, supplied in Australia by the multinational company Sumitomo.

1972 August: Nathalia (Broken Creek catchment). Pesticide detected: Amitrole 430ug/L.

August 23 1972 Nathalia (Broken Creek Catchment). Amitrole 0.430mg/L (430 ug/L) or almost 480 times over current (2011) Australian drinking water guideline. Broken Creek heavily sprayed for weed control, with Amitrole, 2,4-D and Glyphosate. This could be Australia's highest pesticide reading in a domestic water supply.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission 1972 August (document).

Contamination limits

At a meeting of the Victorian Interdepartmental Committee on Pesticides on 24th September, 1962, approval was given for the Commission to use amitrole provided the level in domestic drinking water did not exceed 0.3ppm. The only exception was in Gippsland where contamination of drinking water was not permitted as it is a goitre area.

After completion of experiments on the toxicity of amitrole to crops and pastures, the Commission in June, 1963, adopted a maximum contamination level of amitrole in streams of 0.002 ppm. This level was 1/500 th of the concentration which in one irrigation, damaged the most sensitive crop tested.

On the basis of experience the Commission has had with amitrole over the the past ten years, it is considered that the maximum concentration of amitrole in streams could be safely determined at 0.01ppm or higher if necessary. This concentration is slightly higher than the sensitivity of the amitrole analytical method but considerably below the level of 0.3 ppm originally approved.

Although water containing amitrole residues may be pumped from drains for irrigation, this is closely controlled under license to the Commission. Also drainage water is always diluted in streams before use for domestic purposes. Establishment of a separate limit for drainage effluent is therefore unnecessary.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

Memo 31 August 1983

On 29 July I drew your attention to the expected withdrawal from sale of the herbicide amitrole by a major supplier. It was understood that the basis for the withdrawal was the alleged carcinogenic (cancer producing) nature of amitrole. A confirmatory letter from ICI Australia was tabled at a meeting of the Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) on 26 August.

You will be aware that amitrole has been used extensively by the Commission for about twenty years, mainly to control the growth of water couchgrass in drains. The withdrawal of amitrole from sale would necessitate the use of an alternative herbicide, At present, glyphosate is the only satisfactory alternative, the additional cost being about $40,000 annually.

The main decision arising from discussion at the meeting was that the Premier be notified of the cation taken by ICI, and that ADCRC considers that State Departments and instrumentalities should cease using amitrole.

However, at a meeting of several members of ADCRC on 30 August, convened when further information had been obtained, it was agreed that no recommendation should be made at present to terminate the use of amitrole. Instead, the Premier would be advised that ADCRC was taking immediate steps to consult ICI on the company's action, and to obtain a review by the National Health and Medical research Council in toxicological data on amitrole.

It is evident that, for the time being at least, the Commission should plan to continue using amitrole for control of water couchgrass in drains in the usual way. Nevertheless contingency plans should be made so that a change from amitrole to glyphosate can be made as smoothly as possible if such as change becomes necessary.

August 23 1972 Nathalia (Broken Creek Catchment). Amitrole 0.430mg/L (430 ug/L) or almost 480 times over current Australian drinking water guideline. Broken Creek heavily sprayed for weed control, with Amitrole, 2,4-D and Glyphosate. This could be Australia’s highest pesticide reading in a domestic water supply.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission 1972 August (document).

Contamination limits

At a meeting of the Victorian Interdepartmental Committee on Pesticides on 24th September, 1962, approval was given for the Commission to use amitrole provided the level in domestic drinking water did not exceed 0.3ppm. The only exception was in Gippsland where contamination of drinking water was not permitted as it is a goitre area.

After completion of experiments on the toxicity of amitrole to crops and pastures, the Commission in June, 1963, adopted a maximum contamination level of amitrole in streams of 0.002 ppm. This level was 1/500 th of the concentration which in one irrigation, damaged the most sensitive crop tested.

On the basis of experience the Commission has had with amitrole over the the past ten years, it is considered that the maximum concentration of amitrole in streams could be safely determined at 0.01ppm or higher if necessary. This concentration is slightly higher than the sensitivity of the amitrole analytical method but considerably below the level of 0.3 ppm originally approved.

Although water containing amitrole residues may be pumped from drains for irrigation, this is closely controlled under license to the Commission. Also drainage water is always diluted in streams before use for domestic purposes. Establishment of a separate limit for drainage effluent is therefore unnecessary.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

Memo 31 August 1983

On 29 July I drew your attention to the expected withdrawal from sale of the herbicide amitrole by a major supplier. It was understood that the basis for the withdrawal was the alleged carcinogenic (cancer producing) nature of amitrole. A confirmatory letter from ICI Australia was tabled at a meeting of the Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) on 26 August.

You will be aware that amitrole has been used extensively by the Commission for about twenty years, mainly to control the growth of water couchgrass in drains. The withdrawal of amitrole from sale would necessitate the use of an alternative herbicide, At present, glyphosate is the only satisfactory alternative, the additional cost being about $40,000 annually.

The main decision arising from discussion at the meeting was that the Premier be notified of the cation taken by ICI, and that ADCRC considers that State Departments and instrumentalities should cease using amitrole.

However, at a meeting of several members of ADCRC on 30 August, convened when further information had been obtained, it was agreed that no recommendation should be made at present to terminate the use of amitrole. Instead, the Premier would be advised that ADCRC was taking immediate steps to consult ICI on the company’s action, and to obtain a review by the National Health and Medical research Council in toxicological data on amitrole.

It is evident that, for the time being at least, the Commission should plan to continue using amitrole for control of water couchgrass in drains in the usual way. Nevertheless contingency plans should be made so that a change from amitrole to glyphosate can be made as smoothly as possible if such as change becomes necessary.

 

 

1972 August: Swan Hill (Vic). Pesticide: Amitrole 320ug/L

Swan Hill August 23 1972. Murray River Amitrole 320ug/L - Almost 350 times higher than current (2011) Australian Drinking Water Guideline.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission 1972 August (document).

Contamination limits

At a meeting of the Victorian Interdepartmental Committee on Pesticides on 24th September, 1962, approval was given for the Commission to use amitrole provided the level in domestic drinking water did not exceed 0.3ppm. The only exception was in Gippsland where contamination of drinking water was not permitted as it is a goitre area.

After completion of experiments on the toxicity of amitrole to crops and pastures, the Commission in June, 1963, adopted a maximum contamination level of amitrole in streams of 0.002 ppm. This level was 1/500 th of the concentration which in one irrigation, damaged the most sensitive crop tested.

On the basis of experience the Commission has had with amitrole over the the past ten years, it is considered that the maximum concentration of amitrole in streams could be safely determined at 0.01ppm or higher if necessary. This concentration is slightly higher than the sensitivity of the amitrole analytical method but considerably below the level of 0.3 ppm originally approved.

Although water containing amitrole residues may be pumped from drains for irrigation, this is closely controlled under license to the Commission. Also drainage water is always diluted in streams before use for domestic purposes. Establishment of a separate limit for drainage effluent is therefore unnecessary.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

Memo 31 August 1983

On 29 July I drew your attention to the expected withdrawal from sale of the herbicide amitrole by a major supplier. It was understood that the basis for the withdrawal was the alleged carcinogenic (cancer producing) nature of amitrole. A confirmatory letter from ICI Australia was tabled at a meeting of the Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) on 26 August.

You will be aware that amitrole has been used extensively by the Commission for about twenty years, mainly to control the growth of water couchgrass in drains. The withdrawal of amitrole from sale would necessitate the use of an alternative herbicide, At present, glyphosate is the only satisfactory alternative, the additional cost being about $40,000 annually.

The main decision arising from discussion at the meeting was that the Premier be notified of the cation taken by ICI, and that ADCRC considers that State Departments and instrumentalities should cease using amitrole.

However, at a meeting of several members of ADCRC on 30 August, convened when further information had been obtained, it was agreed that no recommendation should be made at present to terminate the use of amitrole. Instead, the Premier would be advised that ADCRC was taking immediate steps to consult ICI on the company's action, and to obtain a review by the National Health and Medical research Council in toxicological data on amitrole.

It is evident that, for the time being at least, the Commission should plan to continue using amitrole for control of water couchgrass in drains in the usual way. Nevertheless contingency plans should be made so that a change from amitrole to glyphosate can be made as smoothly as possible if such as change becomes necessary.

Swan Hill August 23 1972. Murray River Amitrole 320ug/L – Almost 350 times higher than current (2011) Australian Drinking Water Guideline.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission 1972 August (document).

Contamination limits

At a meeting of the Victorian Interdepartmental Committee on Pesticides on 24th September, 1962, approval was given for the Commission to use amitrole provided the level in domestic drinking water did not exceed 0.3ppm. The only exception was in Gippsland where contamination of drinking water was not permitted as it is a goitre area.

After completion of experiments on the toxicity of amitrole to crops and pastures, the Commission in June, 1963, adopted a maximum contamination level of amitrole in streams of 0.002 ppm. This level was 1/500 th of the concentration which in one irrigation, damaged the most sensitive crop tested.

On the basis of experience the Commission has had with amitrole over the the past ten years, it is considered that the maximum concentration of amitrole in streams could be safely determined at 0.01ppm or higher if necessary. This concentration is slightly higher than the sensitivity of the amitrole analytical method but considerably below the level of 0.3 ppm originally approved.

Although water containing amitrole residues may be pumped from drains for irrigation, this is closely controlled under license to the Commission. Also drainage water is always diluted in streams before use for domestic purposes. Establishment of a separate limit for drainage effluent is therefore unnecessary.

State Rivers and Water Supply Commission

Memo 31 August 1983

On 29 July I drew your attention to the expected withdrawal from sale of the herbicide amitrole by a major supplier. It was understood that the basis for the withdrawal was the alleged carcinogenic (cancer producing) nature of amitrole. A confirmatory letter from ICI Australia was tabled at a meeting of the Agricultural and Domestic Chemicals Review Committee (ADCRC) on 26 August.

You will be aware that amitrole has been used extensively by the Commission for about twenty years, mainly to control the growth of water couchgrass in drains. The withdrawal of amitrole from sale would necessitate the use of an alternative herbicide, At present, glyphosate is the only satisfactory alternative, the additional cost being about $40,000 annually.

The main decision arising from discussion at the meeting was that the Premier be notified of the cation taken by ICI, and that ADCRC considers that State Departments and instrumentalities should cease using amitrole.

However, at a meeting of several members of ADCRC on 30 August, convened when further information had been obtained, it was agreed that no recommendation should be made at present to terminate the use of amitrole. Instead, the Premier would be advised that ADCRC was taking immediate steps to consult ICI on the company’s action, and to obtain a review by the National Health and Medical research Council in toxicological data on amitrole.

It is evident that, for the time being at least, the Commission should plan to continue using amitrole for control of water couchgrass in drains in the usual way. Nevertheless contingency plans should be made so that a change from amitrole to glyphosate can be made as smoothly as possible if such as change becomes necessary.

2010 August: Kilmore East (Vic). Pesticide: Simazine

2010: Victoria's highest reading for Simazine 20ug/L located in a farm dam located East of Kilmore East, draining a recently clearfelled pine plantation owned by Midway Plantations Pty Ltd. Thousands of tonnes of silt also washed into dam which wasn't cleaned up until 2015.

2010: Victoria’s highest reading for Simazine 20ug/L located in a farm dam located East of Kilmore East, draining a recently clearfelled pine plantation owned by Midway Plantations Pty Ltd. Thousands of tonnes of silt also washed into dam.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/Midway3Wandong.htm

Mr Speechley told The Age he was concerned about the impact on his property and health, and was concerned it may impede his ability to sell cattle that drank from the creek.

https://www.theage.com.au/victoria/chemical-find-in-creek-prompts-drinking-water-tests-20100929-15xgy.html

2003 May – 2013 Dec: Wurdee Boluc Reservoir (Geelong). Pesticide: 2,4-D.

Australia's highest 2,4-D reading in a domestic water supply 34ug/L, May 12 2003. Wurdee Boluc supplies drinking water to suburbs in western Geelong region and surf coast towns.

In the decade 2003-13, three detections of pesticides have occurred at Wurdee Boluc, with many more occurring upstream.

12/5/03 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Raw Water 2,4-D 34ug/l (1.13xADWGHealth)

5/12/11 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc WTP Raw Water Pirimicarb 1.1ug/L (15.71% adwgh). Second highest level of Pirimicarb detected in Victorian Water Supply.

4/12/13 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Propachlor 1.8ug/L (2.57%adwhg). Highest level of Propachlor detected in a Victorian Water Supply.

Australia’s highest 2,4-D reading in a domestic water supply 34ug/L, May 12 2003. Wurdee Boluc supplies drinking water to suburbs in western Geelong region and surf coast towns.

In the decade 2003-13, three detections of pesticides have occurred at Wurdee Boluc, with many more occurring upstream.

12/5/03 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Raw Water 2,4-D 34ug/l (1.13xADWGHealth)

5/12/11 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc WTP Raw Water Pirimicarb 1.1ug/L (15.71% adwgh). Second highest level of Pirimicarb detected in Victorian Water Supply.

4/12/13 Barwon Water Wurdee Boluc Propachlor 1.8ug/L (2.57%adwhg). Highest level of Propachlor detected in a Victorian Water Supply.

https://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/GeelongWaterSupply.htm

2004 December – 2006 April: Kerang (Vic) Channel 14/2. Pesticide: Esfenvalerate, Bifenthrin, Taufluvalinate, Endosulfan, Atrazine, Simazine.

Channel 14/2 provides drinking water to Kerang. The Esfenvalerate, Bifenthrin and Taufluvalinate levels are likely to be the highest level of these pesticides detected in Australia. There are no guideline levels for Bifenthrin and Taufluvalinate in Australia.

December 2004: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

August 2005: Atrazine Trace

September 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.035ug/L

October 2005: Goulburn Murray Water Kerang Channel 14/2 Esfenvalerate 65ug/L ) (2.167 x Australian Drinking Water Guideline), Bifenthrin 100ug/L, Taufluvalinate 75ug/L, Atrazine Trace.

November 2005: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

December 2005: Atrazine Trace

January 2006: Atrazine 0.038ug/L

February 2006: Atrazine 0.031ug/L

March 2006: Atrazine 0.05ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.028ug/L

The following information sourced from F.o.I. to Lower Murray Water June 2017

4/2/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L

8/2/17: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/2/17: Simazine 0.04ug/L

Channel 14/2 provides drinking water to Kerang. The Esfenvalerate, Bifenthrin and Taufluvalinate levels are likely to be the highest level of these pesticides detected in Australia. There are no guideline levels for Bifenthrin and Taufluvalinate in Australia.

December 2004: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

August 2005: Atrazine Trace

September 2005: Endosulfan 0.0015ug/L (TRIMPS), Atrazine 0.035ug/L

October 2005: Goulburn Murray Water Kerang Channel 14/2 Esfenvalerate 65ug/L ) (2.167 x Australian Drinking Water Guideline), Bifenthrin 100ug/L, Taufluvalinate 75ug/L, Atrazine Trace.

November 2005: Atrazine 0.022ug/L

December 2005: Atrazine Trace

January 2006: Atrazine 0.038ug/L

February 2006: Atrazine 0.031ug/L

March 2006: Atrazine 0.05ug/L

April 2006: Atrazine 0.028ug/L

The following information sourced from F.o.I. to Lower Murray Water June 2017

4/2/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L

8/2/17: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/2/17: Simazine 0.04ug/L