Author Archives: Anthony

4/3/24: Individual fined over Hazelbrook Creek Crayfish Kill. Pesticide: Bifenthrin

Individual fined over Hazelbrook Creek crayfish kill

04 March 2024

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has fined an individual $8,250 for allegedly causing the death of a large number of crayfish in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek in the Blue Mountains last August.

The EPA has issued two penalty notices after its investigation found nearly 40 litres of the diluted pesticide Bifenthrin accidentally spilt on the driveway of a private property which eventually flowed into the stormwater system, causing a major crayfish kill along 600 metres of the creek.

The pesticide was detected in water, sediment, and crayfish samples collected from the impacted creek. Bifenthrin is commonly used for general pest control, such as termites, spiders, ants, and cockroaches and is highly toxic to crayfish and other aquatic organisms.

EPA Executive Director of Regulatory Operations, Jason Gordon said the pollution incident was preventable and had major consequences.

“The individual had the opportunity to clean up the spill to prevent further harm but failed to do so,” Mr Gordon said.

“While we are pleased the person responsible came forward on their own accord, we are committed to holding individuals accountable for actions that endanger our precious ecosystems.

“The misuse and mishandling of pesticides can have devastating impacts on our waterways, which are home to animals like the Giant Spiny Crayfish.

“This unfortunate incident serves as an important reminder of responsible pesticide use and handling practices to safeguard our waterways and ecosystems.

“All individuals and businesses are urged to handle chemicals carefully and to ensure that all measures are taken to prevent spills and contamination.”

The two fines relate to breaching the Pesticides Act 1999 and the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 for harming a non-target animal and polluting waters.

Individual fined over Hazelbrook Creek crayfish kill

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has fined an individual $8,250 for allegedly causing the death of a large number of crayfish in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek in the Blue Mountains last August.

The EPA has issued two penalty notices after its investigation found nearly 40 litres of the diluted pesticide Bifenthrin accidentally spilt on the driveway of a private property which eventually flowed into the stormwater system, causing a major crayfish kill along 600 metres of the creek.

The pesticide was detected in water, sediment, and crayfish samples collected from the impacted creek. Bifenthrin is commonly used for general pest control, such as termites, spiders, ants, and cockroaches and is highly toxic to crayfish and other aquatic organisms.

EPA Executive Director of Regulatory Operations, Jason Gordon said the pollution incident was preventable and had major consequences.

“The individual had the opportunity to clean up the spill to prevent further harm but failed to do so,” Mr Gordon said.

“While we are pleased the person responsible came forward on their own accord, we are committed to holding individuals accountable for actions that endanger our precious ecosystems.

“The misuse and mishandling of pesticides can have devastating impacts on our waterways, which are home to animals like the Giant Spiny Crayfish.

“This unfortunate incident serves as an important reminder of responsible pesticide use and handling practices to safeguard our waterways and ecosystems.

“All individuals and businesses are urged to handle chemicals carefully and to ensure that all measures are taken to prevent spills and contamination.”

The two fines relate to breaching the Pesticides Act 1999 and the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 for harming a non-target animal and polluting waters.

12/2/24: Scientist Warns Pesticides Harming Native Wildlife

Scientist warns pesticides harming native wildlife

Feb 12 2024 by Alec Smart. https://manlyobserver.com.au/scientist-warns-pesticides-often-help-invasive-species-while-harming-wildlife/

A distinguished scientist is among numerous animal welfare specialists warning that native fauna on the Northern Beaches, including possums, bandicoots, lizards and birds, are being indiscriminately killed by second generation pesticides.

Furthermore, far from reducing invasive pests, toxic baits and sprays may actually be enabling them to proliferate.

Toxicology expert Edwina Laginestra is a wildlife carer with Sydney Wildlife Rescue. She is also renowned for her considerable knowledge on a range of wildlife-related subjects. These include her detailed research papers on toxicology and sustainable land use; a scientific assessment on the impact of the Harbour Tunnel Beaches Link on groundwater and the endangered bat colony at Burnt Creek, Balgowlah; and sensible animal welfare advice, such as what to do when you find a baby bird on the ground.

Edwina explained to Manly Observer how relying on pesticides, instead of modifying human behaviour, is what enables ‘pest’ species like introduced rats to proliferate.

“We provide perfect habitat for unwanted black and brown rats by removing native vegetation, having loads of food sources and providing lots of hiding spots in our junk. Yet we don’t provide food for natives to compete. We don’t really think about how a system works.

“The best way to manage rodents would be allow the raptors to do that – the kookaburras, the owls, even magpies. But we remove the trees they nest in, and of course we are now killing them too, by baiting the rats [they feed on].”

Pesticides don’t decide what dies

Pesticides consist of herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and rodenticides. These poisoned baits, pellets and sprays are used to target ‘vermin’ (mice, rats, rabbits, foxes, etc.) and weeds. However, they filter into the natural environment and through the food chain to kill non-target species.

When sick animals come into your care, and you have diagnosed they’ve been poisoned, is it relatively easy to identify whether the toxicity is caused by pesticides?

“It’s not always easily determined,” Edwina revealed, “as some internal bleeding from major impact (e.g. a car) will also have white extremities and bleeding out from orifices. But usually with cars there are other signs of impact – pain, head injury, concussion.

“When you get in an animal with very white paws and nose and gums, then that’s very likely rat bait. They are also easy to handle, with their flight-and-fight response [resistance to capture] gone. They may also have swelling in face and gasping for breath. They can also have spotting (bleeding from capillaries)…”

She continued, “That’s the rodenticides… There are different types of rodenticides; the anticoagulant ones like warfarin (1st generation) and brodifacoum (2nd generation) both prevent blood clotting, so the victim bleeds to death. There are also non-coagulant rodenticides including strychnine and zinc phosphide, but they are not approved for general public use.

“For herbicides, the symptoms are very different. They usually have foaming at the mouth and often paroxysm [seizures]…”

FGARs and SGARs

Rodenticides are usually formulated as baits with attractive flavours – such as fish oil or peanut butter, or meats, grains and fruits, depending on the target creatures – to more effectively lure the species that eat them.

Rodenticides come in a number of different forms; some, such as the anticoagulants (that are popular with the public and favoured by councils), prevent the blood from clotting, causing a slow death through internal haemorrhaging.

Anticoagulant rodenticides are divided into two main groups: FGARs and SGARs.

According to the Federal Government-run Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA): “First-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (FGARs) are referred to as ‘multi-dose anticoagulants’, meaning that rodents must consume these baits for several consecutive feedings to consume a lethal dose.

“FGARs break down in rodents quicker than second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides [SGARs], so there is less chance of secondary poisoning occurring in non-target animals if they eat rodents poisoned with an FGAR.

“There are 3 FGAR active constituents currently registered for use in Australia: warfarin, coumatetralyl and diphacinone…”

Edwina summarised how FGARs work. “First generation rodenticides may take multiple doses to kill a rodent – so if only a nibble was taken once, it is possible the animal could recover, but they’d be slower and sicker and for any prey species that isn’t a good thing. Also if they do suffer impact, then they may well bleed out as the blood can’t clot quick enough.

“For the SGARs I doubt they’d survive without intervention.”

According to APVMA, SGARs are significantly more dangerous in the natural environment.

“Second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) are referred to as ‘single-dose anticoagulants’. A lethal dose can be ingested in a single feeding, making SGARs substantially more potent than FGARs. SGARs are slower to break down than FGARs and pose a higher risk of secondary poisoning to non-target animals.

“There are 5 SGAR active constituents currently registered for use in Australia: brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone, difenacoum and flocoumafen…”

Possum rescue

Recently, Edwina took custody of a newly-born possum whose mother had died in unknown circumstances. Two days after coming into care spots appeared on his belly – a sure sign of rodenticide poisoning – which then identified what killed his mum.

“We had reports someone had been baiting possums intentionally when this one was found, his mum already dying…”

The young male was given massive doses of vitamin K, which enables the blood to clot and can reverse the effects of anticoagulants.

Edwina revealed, “We also had to treat him for pneumonia. He was 3 months in care as I also needed to give him physiotherapy and climbing room to get his muscle tone back before he was eventually released.”

She added, “A lot of rescues I do have been homeowners spraying for ticks, but poisoning their resident ringtail possum instead.”

Lobbying Council

At an Ordinary Council Meeting held on Tuesday 18 October 2022, Edwina addressed Northern Beaches councillors on the hazards of using SGARs to control vermin.

The following month, on 2 November, Council’s Parks and Recreation department sent her a written confirmation that “SGARs are used by Council to control rat infestations in a number of locations around the Northern Beaches,” adding that they will consider “how we may be able to phase out use of SGARs by staff, contractors and tenants on land owned by the Council.”

Can councils, including Northern Beaches, effectively reduce their spraying of herbicides to replace them with ‘environmentally friendly’ alternatives, without harming wildlife?

“A while back Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was a thing where you had to consider what you were spraying, and when,” Edwina replied. “But it takes brains and patience and actually looking at what you have. That isn’t popular for anything large-scale. They work on timetables, and if that includes removing all the new tips on food trees [that sustain wildlife] and cutting down branches in spring, that’s what we get.”

She continued, “I’m sure they do spray ‘environmentally friendly’ chemicals like pyrethrin, but at the same time they don’t provide alternative foods for native birds and animals, because they never actually think about it…”

Sydney Wildlife Rescuehttp://www.sydneywildlife.org.au

Scientist warns pesticides harming native wildlife

Feb 12 2024 by Alec Smart. https://manlyobserver.com.au/scientist-warns-pesticides-often-help-invasive-species-while-harming-wildlife/

A distinguished scientist is among numerous animal welfare specialists warning that native fauna on the Northern Beaches, including possums, bandicoots, lizards and birds, are being indiscriminately killed by second generation pesticides.

Furthermore, far from reducing invasive pests, toxic baits and sprays may actually be enabling them to proliferate.

Toxicology expert Edwina Laginestra is a wildlife carer with Sydney Wildlife Rescue. She is also renowned for her considerable knowledge on a range of wildlife-related subjects. These include her detailed research papers on toxicology and sustainable land use; a scientific assessment on the impact of the Harbour Tunnel Beaches Link on groundwater and the endangered bat colony at Burnt Creek, Balgowlah; and sensible animal welfare advice, such as what to do when you find a baby bird on the ground.

Edwina explained to Manly Observer how relying on pesticides, instead of modifying human behaviour, is what enables ‘pest’ species like introduced rats to proliferate.

“We provide perfect habitat for unwanted black and brown rats by removing native vegetation, having loads of food sources and providing lots of hiding spots in our junk. Yet we don’t provide food for natives to compete. We don’t really think about how a system works.

“The best way to manage rodents would be allow the raptors to do that – the kookaburras, the owls, even magpies. But we remove the trees they nest in, and of course we are now killing them too, by baiting the rats [they feed on].”

Pesticides don’t decide what dies

Pesticides consist of herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and rodenticides. These poisoned baits, pellets and sprays are used to target ‘vermin’ (mice, rats, rabbits, foxes, etc.) and weeds. However, they filter into the natural environment and through the food chain to kill non-target species.

When sick animals come into your care, and you have diagnosed they’ve been poisoned, is it relatively easy to identify whether the toxicity is caused by pesticides?

“It’s not always easily determined,” Edwina revealed, “as some internal bleeding from major impact (e.g. a car) will also have white extremities and bleeding out from orifices. But usually with cars there are other signs of impact – pain, head injury, concussion.

“When you get in an animal with very white paws and nose and gums, then that’s very likely rat bait. They are also easy to handle, with their flight-and-fight response [resistance to capture] gone. They may also have swelling in face and gasping for breath. They can also have spotting (bleeding from capillaries)…”

She continued, “That’s the rodenticides… There are different types of rodenticides; the anticoagulant ones like warfarin (1st generation) and brodifacoum (2nd generation) both prevent blood clotting, so the victim bleeds to death. There are also non-coagulant rodenticides including strychnine and zinc phosphide, but they are not approved for general public use.

“For herbicides, the symptoms are very different. They usually have foaming at the mouth and often paroxysm [seizures]…”

FGARs and SGARs

Rodenticides are usually formulated as baits with attractive flavours – such as fish oil or peanut butter, or meats, grains and fruits, depending on the target creatures – to more effectively lure the species that eat them.

Rodenticides come in a number of different forms; some, such as the anticoagulants (that are popular with the public and favoured by councils), prevent the blood from clotting, causing a slow death through internal haemorrhaging.

Anticoagulant rodenticides are divided into two main groups: FGARs and SGARs.

According to the Federal Government-run Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA): “First-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (FGARs) are referred to as ‘multi-dose anticoagulants’, meaning that rodents must consume these baits for several consecutive feedings to consume a lethal dose.

“FGARs break down in rodents quicker than second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides [SGARs], so there is less chance of secondary poisoning occurring in non-target animals if they eat rodents poisoned with an FGAR.

“There are 3 FGAR active constituents currently registered for use in Australia: warfarin, coumatetralyl and diphacinone…”

Edwina summarised how FGARs work. “First generation rodenticides may take multiple doses to kill a rodent – so if only a nibble was taken once, it is possible the animal could recover, but they’d be slower and sicker and for any prey species that isn’t a good thing. Also if they do suffer impact, then they may well bleed out as the blood can’t clot quick enough.

“For the SGARs I doubt they’d survive without intervention.”

According to APVMA, SGARs are significantly more dangerous in the natural environment.

“Second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) are referred to as ‘single-dose anticoagulants’. A lethal dose can be ingested in a single feeding, making SGARs substantially more potent than FGARs. SGARs are slower to break down than FGARs and pose a higher risk of secondary poisoning to non-target animals.

“There are 5 SGAR active constituents currently registered for use in Australia: brodifacoum, bromadiolone, difethialone, difenacoum and flocoumafen…”

Possum rescue

Recently, Edwina took custody of a newly-born possum whose mother had died in unknown circumstances. Two days after coming into care spots appeared on his belly – a sure sign of rodenticide poisoning – which then identified what killed his mum.

“We had reports someone had been baiting possums intentionally when this one was found, his mum already dying…”

The young male was given massive doses of vitamin K, which enables the blood to clot and can reverse the effects of anticoagulants.

Edwina revealed, “We also had to treat him for pneumonia. He was 3 months in care as I also needed to give him physiotherapy and climbing room to get his muscle tone back before he was eventually released.”

She added, “A lot of rescues I do have been homeowners spraying for ticks, but poisoning their resident ringtail possum instead.”

Lobbying Council

At an Ordinary Council Meeting held on Tuesday 18 October 2022, Edwina addressed Northern Beaches councillors on the hazards of using SGARs to control vermin.

The following month, on 2 November, Council’s Parks and Recreation department sent her a written confirmation that “SGARs are used by Council to control rat infestations in a number of locations around the Northern Beaches,” adding that they will consider “how we may be able to phase out use of SGARs by staff, contractors and tenants on land owned by the Council.”

Can councils, including Northern Beaches, effectively reduce their spraying of herbicides to replace them with ‘environmentally friendly’ alternatives, without harming wildlife?

“A while back Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was a thing where you had to consider what you were spraying, and when,” Edwina replied. “But it takes brains and patience and actually looking at what you have. That isn’t popular for anything large-scale. They work on timetables, and if that includes removing all the new tips on food trees [that sustain wildlife] and cutting down branches in spring, that’s what we get.”

She continued, “I’m sure they do spray ‘environmentally friendly’ chemicals like pyrethrin, but at the same time they don’t provide alternative foods for native birds and animals, because they never actually think about it…”

Sydney Wildlife Rescuehttp://www.sydneywildlife.org.au

7/7/23: Are Queenslanders Microdosing on Weedkillers in their Drinking Water?

https://www.foe.org.au/are_queenslanders_microdosing_on_weedkillers_in_their_drinking_water

Are Queenslanders “Microdosing” on Weedkillers in their drinking water?

The answer to this question, is probably yes depending on where you live.

Pesticides in waterways are a common occurrence. Pesticides can wash off land particularly during rainfall events. If a community’s drinking water supply is located on a waterway downstream of where these chemicals are applied, there is a risk that the water could contain pesticide residues. Pesticides can also pollute groundwater. Some communities rely on bore water for drinking water. Pesticides can also move on air currents through a phenomenon called spray drift and end up in water supplies.

If the water supply offtake is connected to a water treatment plant then it is likely that pesticides in the source water, if present, will be significantly reduced or even eliminated by the treatment process employed. Powder Activated Carbon (PAC) is a relatively common method of reducing (but not entirely eliminating) pesticides in water, but not every water treatment plant will use PAC and standard water treatment facilities are not successful in removing pesticides. Once the treated water leaves the water treatment plant it is transported in the reticulation network to customer taps.

Original photo taken 8 Jan 2006 by Nick J

The number one concern of water authorities however are the dangers of micro-biological contaminants in the raw water which if found in the reticulated system can cause very serious health problems.

A number of other chemicals and substances can also be present in the raw, treated and reticulated water. Some chemicals are added at water treatment plants, such as chlorine, which in turn can create disinfection by-products. Pipes and plumbing can also have residues of heavy metals such as lead. Pesticides are generally regarded lower down the list of concerns for water authorities.

Another complicating factor is pesticide testing. This is costly with some samples costing hundreds of dollars each. To regularly test for the suite of possibly hundreds of pesticides used within a catchment around the year is an extremely costly exercise. As a result, some water authorities restrict their pesticide testing to once year or in some cases not at all. To add to the problem, in Queensland, local councils (often cash-strapped) are generally responsible for guaranteeing (and testing) safe drinking water to residents. Pesticide testing may be a low priority.

Users of pesticides are also under no obligation to inform the local council exactly what they are spraying. The more agriculture in a catchment, the higher the chances of pesticide runoff. Many of the catchments in coastal northern Queensland have large amounts of land devoted to crops such as sugarcane and bananas. Pesticides such as Atrazine can be used up to 3.3kg/ha in sugarcane, which may not sound like a lot, however pesticides can impact on water supplies less than parts per billion*, so it does not take alot of chemical to tarnish a water supply. (*One part per billion is equivalent to one drop in an Olympic size swimming pool). Many farms have also been established in high risk/runoff locations making relocation or retirement of farms unlikely.

Pesticide Reporting Portal

That being said, some of the most thorough pesticide testing in Australia has been conducted by the Queensland Government over the past decade. The Pesticide Reporting Portal provides a wealth of information on pesticide detections in a number of Queensland waterways, with a particular focus on waterways that flow into the Great Barrier Reef.

By accessing information from the Portal, over 72,000 pesticide detections from 39 current locations have been sighted by FoE. The amount of data in some cases stretches back to 2011. From these 39 locations, FoE determined that only 7[***] of the current testing locations were located in domestic water supplies.

These included: The Haughton River at Giru (just downstream from the towns offtake), the Pioneer River at Dumbleton Weir Mackay (the offtake to Mackay’s drinking water), the Fitzroy River at Rockhampton (near Rockhampton’s offtake) and Comet Weir (near the small town of Comet’s drinking water supply). The portal gives a unique insight into pesticide contamination of Australian waterways.

The timing of testing varied between these locations ranging back to 2011 for the Pioneer River (5647 positive samples) and Comet River (1628 positive samples), 2017 for the Haughton River (871 positive samples) and 2014 for the Fitzroy River (1976 positive samples). The testing also found 874 positive samples in the Burnett River (Bundaberg) from August 2017.

(*The city of Bundaberg sources drinking water from the Burnett River and bores. The location where the Queensland Government testing is conducted takes place 5km downstream of Branyan Water Treatment Plant offtake. The Government also have a testing location on Spliters Creek which flows into the Burnett River about 1km downstream of the Branyan WTP offtake. Nevertheless, testing of 6 water reservoirs at Bundaberg by the local council has revealed the presence of pesticides. Reservoirs fed by bore water have tested positive for the herbicide Bromacil.  A number of other Reservoirs are supplied water from Sun Water (eg The Gooburrum Main Channel sourced from Burnett River feeds into the Vecillios Road Reservior) and pesticides have also been found in these reservoirs. Sunwater also use the herbicide Acrolein to control weeds in their channels).

(*The town of Ingham relies primarily on bore water, however the town can draw from the Herbert River as an alternative. Queensland Government testing has recorded almost 2400 pesticide detections in the Herbert River since August 2011. The testing location appears to be in close proximity to the Water Treatment Plant. 23 pesticides have been detected with the most frequently detected being Diuron, Imidacloprid, Atrazine and 2,4-D. Of the 12 bores at Ingham, local council testing has found traces of Atrazine in 5 bores and Imidacloprid in 9. Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid insecticide with no Australian Drinking Water Guideline).

(*The town of Innisfail relies on drinking water from the Johnstone River. Queensland Government testing has recorded over 760  pesticide detections in the North Johnstone River since February 2012. The current Queensland testing location at Goondi is a couple of kilometres downstream from the Innisfail offtake. 16 pesticides have been detected with the most frequently detected being Imidacloprid, Diuron and 2,4-D. Local Government testing has found traces of 6 pesticides in the Innisfail raw water supply with the most frequently detected being Imidacloprid. The highest detection being 0.23µg/L).

Bundaberg: Approximate location of the Branyan WTP marked with wavy lines. Queensland Government testing points marked with blue pins. WTP samples therefore would not be ‘influenced’ by Spliters Creek. Spliters Creek flows into the Burnett River upstream of the Qld Govt Bundaberg/Burnett River testing site. The Burnett River site is also well downstream of the WTP offtake but will be influenced by whatever is washing down Spliters Creek and Bundaberg itself. Spliters creek pesticide samples were dominated by Metolachlor, Atrazine and 2,4-D. Branyan WTP over the past few years has recorded detections of: Atrazine, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, 2,4-D, Dalapon and Tebuthiuron at levels averaging 0.07% of Australian Drinking Water Guideline levels.

Four different water supplies

To standardise the test results the following graph looks at pesticide detections from four water supplies (excluding Bundaberg, Ingham and Innisfail) since October 2017. The graph shows that in terms of total pesticide amounts detected by the Queensland Government tests, Diuron and Atrazine were the biggest problem chemical for the Pioneer River at Dumbleton Weir Mackay, with Tebuthiuron being most problematic for the Fitzroy River Rockhampton and Comet River at Comet Weir. Atrazine and Tebuthiuron were the most frequently detected pesticides at Giru over the 5 ½ year period.

The graph below shows that the largest pesticide detection volumes of the Haughton, Pioneer, Fitzroy and Comet Rivers over 5 ½ years were detected in the Pioneer River at Mackay, followed by the Comet River, Fitzroy River and Haughton River. This shows that in terms of drinking water and risks associated with pesticides, Mackay would appear to be the standout.

The graph does not provide insight into what chemical loads have been coming down the Pioneer River for many years. Out of 16,500 tests carried out by the Queensland Government at Dumbleton Weir on the Pioneer River between 2011 and 2023, 34% were positive for pesticides. Of these tests 92.7% of samples tested positive for Diuron and 87% were positive for Atrazine. What this means is that almost every sample of water taken from Dumbleton Weir will contain Atrazine and Diuron. The average level of detection of both was around 0.5µg/L, well under the Australian Drinking water guideline for both herbicides (20µg/L), but 5 times higher than the European Guideline and for Atrazine 5 times higher than the level required to cause issues with hormones.

Of the 39 waterways tested for pesticides over the past decade average levels in the Pioneer River came in at 11th in the waterways tested for across catchments flowing into the Great Barrier Reef.

Atrazine has been found to cause hormonal changes in amphibians at 0.1µg/L. It is banned in Europe.  There are no Australian drinking water guidelines for Fluroxypur, Imidacloprid and Tebuthiuron. In fact FoE found in 2016 that 41% of pesticides detected in Australian waterways do not have Australian Drinking Water guidelines.

Atrazine Diversion

Non-legally enforceable guidelines for many agricultural chemicals and other substances in drinking water are set by the National Health and Medical Research Council. Safe is debatable term. To determine safe levels of pesticides, human testing is not allowed, so testing is conducted on animals. For Atrazine the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was based on a 2 year study of rats. This amount was then divided by 100 which incorporates a factor of 10 for interspecies extrapolation and 10 for intraspecies variation. An estimation of body weight of a 70kg male drinking 2L of water a day is also included in the calculation to determine ‘safe’ dose.

Are impacts on the endocrine system and other issues concerning long term low level exposure to pesticide included in these estimations? The guidelines also do not take into account impacts from mixtures of low levels of chemicals, where synergistic effects may occur. Are these effects included in the 100 ‘safety factor’? If so how?  It’s also interesting to note that the Australian drinking water guideline for Atrazine (set 12 years ago) is 20µg/L. In Europe, pesticides have a drinking water guideline of 0.1µg/L. In the United States the drinking water guideline for Atrazine is set at 3µg/L and long term exposure above this level is linked to cardiovascular system or reproductive problems. The Australian guideline prior to 2011 was 40µg/L.

Australian scientists have recently called for Atrazine to be withdrawn in Australia for its effect on male fertility.

Other studies have stated: “Current regulatory levels for chronic exposure are based on no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) of these LH alterations in rodent studies. Atrazine has also been studied for its effects on the central nervous system and neurotransmission. The European Union (EU) recognized the health risks of atrazine exposure as a public health concern with no way to contain contamination of drinking water. As such, the EU banned atrazine use in 2003. The United States recently reapproved atrazine’s use in the fall of 2020. Research has shown that there is a wide array of adverse health effects that are seen across multiple models, exposure times, and exposure periods leading to dysfunction in many different systems in the body with most pointing to a neuroendocrine target of toxicity.”

The following graphic reveals some of the complexities grappling researchers studying impacts of Atrazine and its metabolites.

Source of this graphical representation

Local Government to the Rescue?

In terms of impacts to drinking water, the Queensland Government test data can only surmise what is potentially ending up in consumer taps. It is highly unlikely that local Government authorities were testing their water treatment plants at the time that the Queensland Government was doing their monitoring. Some councils monitor for pesticides on an annual basis. Others test every few months using grab samples which really only give a chemical amount for an instant in time. Generally speaking if the grab tests show a level of pesticide at a level above the drinking water guidelines, further testing and management protocols should apply.

To try and ascertain what is being detected by Queensland local government, some of the information is published in various council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans which in some cases are published annually. After wading through a number of these plans it was determined that 12 shires published pesticide test results at some time over the past decade. There are however 77 local government areas in Queensland, so the scale of the issue is probably much larger than acknowledged.

Looking at the regional council data, FoE found over 1000 pesticide detections with a maximum detection average of 0.98µg/L. The 1000 test results however included samples taken in raw water, treatment plant water and reticulated water. Once the reticulated water samples were isolated a total of 204 positive detections in reticulated water supplies were found. The maximum detection average level in reticulated supplies was 3.9µg/L. It should be highlighted that there was a general lack of consistency in what defined treated as opposed to reticulated water. The numbers were also skewed by the Mackay incident of Feb & March 2013 where both Diuron and Atrazine were detected at the Nebo Road treatment plan at almost 20 times higher than the Australian Drinking Water Guideline (or 3900 and 3500 times higher than the European Guideline). It is unclear what amounts of Atrazine and Diuron ended up being consumed in Mackay as a result of this incident, but if this incident is removed from the spreadsheet the maximum pesticide detection average in reticulated water drops to 0.265µg/L.

Average detection levels in comparison to the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines for pesticides with guideline levels was 39.68%, once again including the 2013 spike of Atrazine and Diuron at Mackay. If the 2013 Nebo Road WTP incident is removed, the average pesticide detection level is 1.97% of current Australian Drinking Water Guideline Levels. 1.97% of guideline levels does probably not warrant much attention from water authorities, as there will be other chemicals found at much higher levels in water supplies which will take priority.

Friends of the Earth produced a report in 2017 looking at pesticide detections in Victorian water supplies for the years 2007-16. That report found that the average pesticide detection in mostly raw water was 0.46µg/L, with the average pesticide level in comparison to Australian Drinking Water Guidelines was 0.98%.

Source: Mackay Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013/14. How was the community notified about this incident. What amounts of Diuron and Atrazine ended up in reticulation? What areas of Mackay had the highest levels and for how long? Were there health impacts eg pregnant women?

The most positive test results according to various Drinking Water Quality Management Plans, from raw, treated and reticulated local council samples came from Western Downs Shire (274), followed by Bundaberg Shire (177), Mackay Shire (164), Banana Shire (149), Central Highlands Shire (127), Burdekin Shire (99), Flinders Shire (36), Hinchinbook Shire (33), Issac Shire (20), Cassowary Shire (14), Maranoa Shire (14) and Tablelands Shire (13). There was little consistency across these shires in terms of reporting data with some conducting testing one year, but then not following up the year after. Some of the test results were published, with others not.

19 separate pesticides were detected by local government testing, with Atrazine and its metabolites making up 49.5% of all detections, followed by Metolachlor 13.2% and Tebuthiuron 11.3%.

Interestingly there was no positive samples for Rockhampton. Whilst the Fitzroy River doesn’t seem to have the same pesticide loads as the Pioneer River at Mackay, the lack of positive detections is possibly explained by a lack of testing for pesticides used within the Fitzroy catchment by Rockhampton Shire. It is unclear whether the council actually test for the main pesticides found in the Fitzroy River by the Queensland Government namely, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor, Atrazine, Terbuthylazine, 2,4-D, Simazine, Fluroxypur etc.

From FoE’s assessment approximately 300,000 people in Queensland in approximately 12 shires have been exposed to pesticides in the drinking water over the past decade. The main concern areas being Mackay, Marian, Bundaberg, Ayr, Home Hill, Giru/Cungulla, Ingham, Biloela, Capella, Comet, Prairie, Baralaba and Jandowae.

It is likely that similar results would occur in many other regions of Australia.

The Queensland situation appears to be quite serious, particularly if one also factors in ecological impacts of application of pesticides. European guidelines suggest that any pesticide detection >0.1µg/L in a water supply need to be investigated by authorities to understand the source of the pollution and to try and stop the pollution occurring. Queensland Government testing suggest that the 0.1µg/L level was breached over 27,000 times over the past decade. Investigators would be hard pressed to find the source of the pesticides, considering their widespread use throughout Queensland.

Top ten detections of pesticides in Queensland domestic water supplies according to Council water quality management plans.

Location Pesticide Council Supply Amount (max) Australian Drinking Water Guidelines =1
Nebo Road WTP Feb 2013 Diuron Mackay Treatment Plant 390µg/L 19.5x
Nebo Road WTP Feb 2013 Atrazine Mackay Treatment Plant 350µg/L 17.5x
Prairie 2017/18 Heptachlor Flinders Raw 0.371µg/L 1.237x
Tinnaroo Park 2016/17 Thiometon Tablelands Raw 4.3µg/L 1.075x
Biloela Bore 2017/18 Dicofol Banana Raw 3.2µg/L 0.8x
Biloela 2017/18 Dicofol Banana Potable? 3.2µg/L 0.8x
River Park Res. 2019/20 Fipronil Bundaberg Raw 0.55µg/L 0.785x
Baralaba Jan/Mar 2015 Dicofol Banana Treatment Plant 2.9µg/L 0.725x
Jandowae Bore 2 27/9/16 Dieldrin Western Downs Raw 0.2µg/L 0.667x
Jandowae Bore 2 28/1/15 Dieldrin Western Downs Raw 0.2µg/L 0.667x
Jandowae Bore 2 29/7/15 Dieldrin Western Downs Raw 0.2µg/L 0.667x
Jandowae Bore 2 4/11/15 Dieldrin Western Downs Raw 0.2µg/L 0.667x

8/11/23: An Impossible Dream. Sustainable Pesticide Management in Great Barrier Reef Catchments

https://www.foe.org.au/why_pesticide_regulation_in_queensland_continues_to_fail_its_waterways

An Impossible Dream. Sustainable Pesticide Management in Great Barrier Reef Catchments?

In July 2023 FoE published a blog on pesticides in Queensland water supplies based on over 70,000 pesticide detections listed on the Queensland Government’s Pesticide Reporting Portal between late 2011 (in some locations) to March 2023. That blog attracted some media interest, including newspaper and radio, as well as hundreds of visits to the Friends of the Earth Australia website.

This blog is a follow up and looks at the potential ecological impact of pesticides flowing down rivers and creeks into the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). The blog will not discuss impacts of pesticides on the GBR but rather hopes to facilitate a better understanding of what is flowing into the GBR.

FoE argues that rather than tolerating Moderately Disturbed 95% ecological default guidelines (DGV’s) “previously known as trigger levels”, the Queensland Government, should be pushing for Slightly Disturbed/High Ecological 99% DGV’s in all waterways flowing into the GBR World Heritage Area. Unfortunately though, for many waterways flowing into the GBR they have historically been treated as little more than agricultural drains. It appears that in many locations this sad reality will continue into the indefinite future.

Whilst ecological guidelines can be useful indicators to the health of waterways, it could be argued that the guidelines themselves allow a “green light” for polluters to keep polluting waterways at supposedly “safe” levels. It also means that obvious failures in regards to pesticide labels, which supposedly don’t allow for water pollution, but actually do, are pushed aside and are rarely addressed.

The other glaringly obvious problem is that DGV’s exist for only a small fraction of pesticides used in Australia and that reviews for existing DGV’s occur rarely or not at all. For example in relation to  Atrazine, which represents the highest by quantity pesticide detected in GBR catchments, it has not had its DGV reviewed for almost a quarter of a century!!!

A major hindrance is that what may seem like the “greenest” course of action, is an entirely different proposition in the “real world”. This is especially the case if historical aspects of farm locations are taking into account and if one ignores the major economic contribution that agriculture makes to the Queensland and national economy. Eg Sugar is Australia’s second largest commodity crop after wheat, worth about $2bn/year. How many sugar users are aware of the ecological problems associated with the sugar cane industry? How is an equitable balance achieved?

FoE has determined that 22,492 breaches to Slightly Disturbed/High Ecological 99% DGV’s and 7,288 breaches to Moderately Disturbed 95% DGV’s occurred between late 2011* to March 2023 in testing across 39 locations. (*the actual amount is probably much higher as testing did not occur in many locations under several years after 2011).

Key ecological issues in relation to the health and Queensland rivers and waterways relate most significantly to the ongoing mismanagement of: Metolachlor, Diuron, Imidacloprid, Diazinon, Chlorpyrifos, Metsulfuron Methyl, Tebuthiuron, Imazapic and Atrazine.

87.2% of the 39 waterways sampled, breached 99% DGV’s for at least one pesticide, across the time period when all testing (including negative results) occurred. In some locations these breaches would have occurred relatively continously over a 11-12 year period and may have included up to eight pesticides.

33.3% of waterways sampled, regularly breached 95% DGV’s over the same period of time.

The most pesticide detections occurred at Barratta Creek at Northcote north of Ayr.

The highest volume of pesticides detected occurred at Sandy Creek at Homebush (south of Mackay), followed by Barratta Creek.

The highest average pesticide detection was at Coochin Creek, south of Beerwah.

Coochin Creek also recorded three* pesticides breaching the 95% DGV averaged out over the decade of pesticide testing at that location. (*including ‘sporadic and very high’ detections of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos).

The Proserpine River at Glen Isla, Sandy Creek at Homebush and Coochin Creek all had 8 pesticides regularly breaching 99% DGV’s.

Arguably the waterway suffering the worst peaks in pesticide pollution was the Welcome Creek at Gooburrum, mainly because of excessively high detections of the insecticide diazinon.

This ongoing pollution represents a continuing failure of existing pesticide labels and farm management practices to stop toxic pollutants entering waterways and the GBR and an embarrassing failure of pesticide regulation in highly sensitive catchments that flow into a World Heritage Area.

 

Quick Overview

*Note that pesticides refer in this blog to herbicides, insecticides and fungicides


The graph represents a summary of all of the 72,000 pesticide detections, sourced from the Pesticide Portal based on type of chemical. (Please note that most locations did not have testing results going back to 2011). The ten pesticides most frequently detected were: Diuron, Atrazine, Hexazinone, Imidacloprid, 2,4-D, Metolachlor, Imazapic, Fluroxypur, MCPA and Tebuthiuron. The ecological guideline levels of these pesticides however varies considerably. For instance the 95% DGV for 2,4-D is set at just over 1200 times higher than Diuron. The 99% DGV for 2,4-D is 4.6 million times higher than the guideline level for Diazinon, meaning that although 2,4-D was detected many times more frequently than Diazinon, the potential impacts of Diazinon can be far more serious.


This graph highlights detection averages across all 39 locations. This is the cumulation of all detections as a whole, not catchment by catchment. Catchment totals vary significantly.  The highest average detection levels across the 39 locations were for Atrazine, Bromacil, Diuron, 2,4-D, Fluroxypur, Metribuzin, Metolachlor and Tebuthiuron.


In terms of pesticide loads entering waterways that flow into the GBR, Atrazine dominates, followed by Diuron and 2,4-D. However, Atrazine detections at locations such as Barratta Creek (north of Ayr) and Sandy Creek (south of Mackay) contributed over 50% of Atrazine and Diuron loads.

With regards to the Queensland data that FoE has accessed, 24 pesticides were tested for over 39 locations. The detections of the pesticides varied on where the samples were taken and were determined by what crops were grown in the various catchments. For instance, sugarcane will use different pesticides than bananas and vegetable crops may use a variety of different pesticides. In fact horticulture appears to pose the most risks (eg Coochin Creek, Welcome Creek, Don River etc) through use of insecticides such as Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos. Detections also varied on how far away samples were taken from the agricultural practice. Samples taken closer to agricultural areas will generally have higher levels of pesticides detected than sites kilometres downstream where significant dilution of pesticide load will occur.

Image above: The Don River at Bowen has seen very high levels of the insecticides Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon. The area is the largest producer of winter vegetable crops in Queensland. The industry is worth about $650million/yr. Tomatoes, capsicum, mangoes, cucurbits, beans and corn are the main commodities. Since testing began in 2017, 400 pesticide incidents have been recorded in the Don River with an average detection level almost 166 times higher than the 99% ecological trigger level. This high level is largely due to numerous detections of the insecticides Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon. DGV’s for both insecticides are exceedingly small, 0.00003µg/L and 0.00004µg/L (parts per billion). What restrictions or label changes have been implemented to stop this pollution occurring? Both Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon can also be used as insecticides in commercial and industrial areas as well as commercial turf, however in the Don River situation, it is apparent that the main residential and industrial areas are well east of the sampling location.

Ecological guideline levels for pesticides

Guideline levels for some pesticides and other contaminants are listed in the ANZECC Guidelines. The Draft Guideline Values (DGV’s) are an attempt to set levels for contaminants in a way that protects the majority of species in freshwater and marine waters. In very simplistic terms if a waterway is already degraded (eg an urban waterway) it is assumed that some species loss has already occurred.  The guidelines therefore allow for higher levels of contaminants in more degraded waterways than those that are pristine and where species loss has not been impacted. The highest DGV/trigger level afforded by the ANZECC guidelines are 99%, followed by 95%, 90% and 80% for the most impacted waterways. The guidelines also reflect the fact that some contaminants are more toxic than others to a range of aquatic organisms. The more toxic the substance to aquatic life, the lower the guideline level. Generally, these guidelines are not legally enforceable and they are regarded as being a generic starting point for assessing water quality.

The ANZECC default guidelines for Metsulfuron Methyl (below) for example were not established until 2021, with Queensland proposing guideline levels as early as 2017. Prior to this, few would have “batted an eyelid” if Metsulfuron Methyl was detected in waterways at any level. (Note that µg/L refers to parts per billion). The Queensland proposed guideline is also higher than the ANZECC DGV.

ANZECC Toxicant Default Guideline Value for Aquatic Ecosystem Protection – Metsulfuron Methyl
99% 95% 90% 80%
0.0037µg/L
0.018µg/L 0.048µg/L 0.18µg/L
0.0047µg/L (Qld)
0.025µg/L (Qld)
0.069µg/L (Qld)
0.28µg/L (Qld)

The problem becomes even more concerning when one realises that:

Approximately 12% of pesticides detected in Australian waterways have DGV’s with 43 pesticides having DGV’s. 88% of these pesticides had guidelines in 2000 with only 5 pesticides receiving default guideline levels since 2000 and all of these occurred after 2020. Meaning no updates or new chemicals listed between 2000-2020!!!

State Governments can also set their own guideline levels and in terms of Queensland this is the case, as 11 of the 24 pesticides tested in the GBR catchments for are not listed under the ANZECC guidelines. These are covered in: “Proposed aquatic ecosystem protection guideline values for pesticides commonly used in the Great Barrier Reef catchment area: Part 1 (amended)”.

Queensland also has guideline levels for four pesticides also listed under ANZECC guidelines, namely Metolachlor, Metsulfuron Methyl, Simazine and Tebuthiuron. It was difficult to determine which guidelines the Queensland Government uses in relation to these four herbicides. The Pesticide Reporting Portal uses ANZECC Guidelines with the provision that “Low Reliability Default Guideline Value. Subject to Revision. King et al (2017a) provides higher values the will form the basis of revised draft guidelines to be submitted to the National Water Reform Committee (NWRC) for endorsement as Australian and New Zealand water quality guidelines).” In terms of this blog, guidelines used for these four herbicides have been the ANZECC guidelines.

Graph represents differing 99% trigger/DGV levels for Slightly Disturbed/High Ecological Value waterways. The scale is in parts per billion and is on a scale from Diazinon 0.00003µg/L (lowest) to 590µg/L for Haloxyfop (highest). Glyphosate is not included in the Pesticide Portal testing regimes in Queensland, but has been added here to show its relatively high ecological trigger level (180µg/L) which incidently is 6 million times higher than the 99% trigger level for the insecticide Diazinon. Glyphosate has also been included in the graph due to it being the most frequently used herbicide in Australia and the pesticide that is receiving the most media attention. It figures then that the lower the guideline level the more risk that if that chemical enters a waterway, the more potential problems occurring.

You definately don’t want Diazinon entering any waterway. But it regularly does, with 479 detections across numerous GBR catchments! Note that Diazinon has the lowest DGV and is closely followed by Chlorpyrifos with a guideline level of 0.00004µg/L. Both of these organophospate insecticides are lethal to many aquatic species. The lowest guideline level for a herbicide is 0.0037µg/L for Metsulfuron Methyl. As mentioned previously, Metsulfuron Methyl did not obtain an DGV until 2021. Were Metsulfuron Methyl labels updated, by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) to incorporate the new guideline levels, by either reducing the amount of herbicide allowed to be used or restricting the use of Metsulfuron Methyl in high risk areas?


Graph shows differing 95% DGV’s for Moderately disturbed/agricultural ecosystems which is how the Queensland Government defines a large expanse of Queensland (including waterways that flow into the World Heritage Listed, Great Barrier Reef). As explained previously, these levels are set higher than 99% DGV/trigger levels. eg for Diazinon the 95% DGV level is at 0.01µg/L or 333 times higher than the 99% DGV level. Glyphosate’s 95% DGV is set at 320µg/L (77.8% higher) than its 99% DGV. 95% DGV’s then allow for higher levels of pollution than what would be expected for 99% DGV’s.

It telling that pesticides with higher DGV levels, (eg Haloxyfop, Glyphosate, 2,4-D) will rarely be exceed the guideline level. This controversially includes Atrazine which has a 95% DGV of 13µg/L. It seems odd that Atrazine has such a high DGV, but not surprising when one realises that many pesticides were granted these guideline levels almost a quarter of a century ago and have not been changed since then, despite a huge body of research implying alot of ecological problems associated with Atrazine, including this 20 year report published a year after the ANZECC guideline was granted.

From assessing pesticide data up to March 2023 from the Pesticide Reporting Portal, it is possible to calculate however many breaches there have been the ANZECC DGV’s, both by location and type of chemical.

It’s clear that the largest number of breaches are associated with the following pesticides. In the 39 catchments, Metolachlor breached the 99% ANZECC DGV 5610 times, Diuron 4907 times, Imidacloprid 4147 times, Imazapic 2173 times, Atrazine 1603 times, Isoxaflutole 1109 times, Metsulfuron Methyl 941 times, Hexazinone 862 times and Ametryn 430 times.

In terms of the 95% DGV, the most exceedances were for Diuron 2750 times, Imidacloprid 2161 times, Metsulfuron Methyl 596 times and Metolachlor 559 times. It should be understood that a breach of the DGV may only last for a short period of time, particularly after periods of heavy rain. These rainfall events will produce a flush of contaminants which will become more diluted the further away from the source of the pollution. However, the data also suggests chronic ongoing issues of pesticides in waterways.

If label rates are working, why are these pesticides ending up in waterways and frequently exceeding ecological guideline levels? Could it be that if further restrictions were placed on the rates that these chemicals could be applied, many would not be viable?

The labels themselves can present contradictory information, Eg the label for Metolachor states: “DO NOT apply to waterlogged soils DO NOT apply if heavy rains or storms that are likely to cause run-off are forecast within 2 days of application DO NOT irrigate to the point of run-off for at least 2 days after application… In Northern Queensland, application must be made to moist soil and rainfall or irrigation should occur within 24 hours of application.” How is rain and heavy rain defined? At what rate of rainfall does Metolachlor not enter waterways?


In terms of what percentage of pesticide detections breached 95% ecological guidelines, it is clear that Metsulfuron Methyl is a major problem (see graph above). Also note that although Metsulfuron Methyl did not have as many detections (<1000), it is the highest in terms of percentage of detections that breached the ecological guidelines due to its very low DGV.  Other key problem chemicals, in terms of 95% DGV’s include: Fipronil, Diazinon, Chlorpyrifos, Imidacloprid and Diuron. As a regulator how do you address stopping widespread water pollution without reducing label rates or cancelling pesticide registration entirely?


Clearly the most problematic pesticides in terms of 99% DGV’s are Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos. The above graph reveals that the average Diazinon detection was a whopping 762 times higher than the 99% trigger level, with Chlorpyrifos at 727 times the 99% trigger level. 11 pesticides had average detection levels equal to or above the 99% DGV. Metsulfuron Methyl 27.2 times,  Metolachlor 22.8 times, Tebuthiuron 10.9 times, Diuron 4.9 times, Imidacloprid 3.2 times, Imazapic 2.8 times, Isoxaflutole 2.3 times, Fipronil 1.5 times and Atrazine 1 time. (Ametryn came in at 12th at 96% of the 99% DGV). Is this the major reason why the Queensland Government will not tolerate 99% DGV Slightly Disturbed/High Ecological Values across swathes of farmland draining into the GBR? Current pesticide mis-management across most GBR catchments makes attaining the 99% DGV an ‘impossible dream’.

Pesticide use is essentially a licence to pollute areas off-site of application, sometimes at levels that are exceedingly high. Tracking the source of the pollution is not easy, particularly if a number of users have applied the same chemical near the same time as each other. Yet what efforts are really underway to resolve the problem?

Could it be that for the pesticide to remain effective they need to be applied at levels which will knowingly pollute waterways. Waterways therefore become ecological ‘sacrifice zones’ which ‘magically’ will be diluted downstream. Any reduction in usage rates, could render the viability of the pesticide ineffective. If this is the case, then unique waterways providing habitat for a myriad of species are still being regarded as being little more than agricultural drains, that pesticide users are allowed to pollute with impunity. Flooding and poor location of farms, where farms were originally located in high risk and inappropriate locations only increases the problems and makes the issue more difficult to solve.

With the lower (and less ‘rigid’) 95% ecological DGV/trigger level used for moderately disturbed ecosystems, Metsulfuron Methyl (5.6 times) higher than 95% DGV) is the pesticide with the highest average detection level above the ANZECC guidelines. Chlorpyrifos 2.9 times, Diazinon 2.3 times, Diuron 1.7 times,  Imidacloprid 1.4 times and Fipronil 1.1 times also had average detection levels above the 95% DGV. These pesticides appear to be of key concern in moderately disturbed ecosystems, with four being insecticides. It is obvious then that users of these agricultural chemicals in a third of GBR catchments struggle to even meet the 95% guideline level.

Welcome Creek at Gooburrum (above) located north of Bundaberg recorded levels of Diazinon 36,000 times over the ANZECC 99% DGV in March 2021. At the same time, Chlorpyrifos was detected at 500 times the 99% DGV, Imidacloprid at 67 times the DGV and Fipronil at 10 times. 8 different pesticides were detected at the same time.  Average levels of Diazinon over March to April 2021 were almost 16,000 times over the 99% DGV. Welcome Creek probably comes in at the worst performing of all the waterways draining into the GBR. How can this ever be regarded as sustainable and ‘responsible agricultural’ management? No investigation into the source of the pollution was apparently followed up. Why?

Coochin Creek (above) just south east of Beerwah. Cocktails of chemicals including synergistic effects are ignored by regulators. Eg taking a random date such as 2.15pm the 8th of May 2022, Diazinon was recorded at 4600 times over the ANZECC 99% DGV in Coochin Creek. If this wasn’t bad enough Chlorpyrifos was detected at 3500 times the DGV at the same time, with Metolachlor at almost 18 times the DGV, Diuron at over 11 times the DGV and Atrazine at three times the DGV. 10 pesticides were detected at the same time! These chemical cocktails are not isolated and appear to be the norm. How are the synergistic impacts of a cocktail of chemicals factored into ecological guidelines?

Sugarcane country: Barratta Creek (above), north of Ayr in centre of image, with Burdekin river on left and Haughton River on the right. The highest levels of Metolachlor detected in Queensland occurred in the Barratta Creek at almost 1200 times the ANZECC DGV in June 2015. Baratta Creek has recorded over 7000 pesticide detections since 2011, including high levels of Atrazine and Diuron. Nine separate pesticides were recorded in Barratta Creek at the same time in early 2023.

Locations


A map of Queensland showing the 39 locations of pesticide sampling locations that FoE sourced from the Pesticide Portal. Average distance from the coast (excluding two locations near Comet) is ~10km, meaning greater potential impacts on the GBR. White pins indicate a location where pesticides were detected, but the average level detected over varying time periods did not exceed 99% or 95% DGV’s. Yellow indicates sites where pesticides breached the 99% DGV and red pins indicate sites where both the 99% and 95% DGV’s were exceeded.


In terms of 99% DGV ecological impacts over the entire length of time when testing occurred (inlcuding zero detection samples),  the key problem in some catchments appears to be application of Metolachlor, Diuron, Imidacloprid, Diazinon, Chlorpyrifos, Metsulfuron Methyl, Tebuthiuron, Imazapic and Atrazine.

Imidacloprid, Diuron, Metsulfuron Methyl, Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos appear to be most problematic in terms of 95% DGV’s.

FoE had accessed ~307,000 pesticide tests via the Pesticide Portal. Almost 72,000 of these tests were positive for pesticides, meaning that around 23% of all samples were positive across 39 locations. Positive detections in comparison to all samples were highest at Barratta Creek at Northcote 49.4% and lowest at the Normanby River 0.8% positive.

The following table helps explain why it is important to understand the issue based on catchment by catchment data, as pesticide use can vary significantly depending on the location and the crops grown.

Top Ten Locations  Positive Detections as % of all Detections Most Frequently Detected Pesticides
1. Barratta Creek at Northcote 49.4% Atrazine, Diuron, 2,4-D
2. Sandy Creek at Homebush 47.1% Diuron, Hexazinone, Atrazine
3. Proserpine River at Glen Isla 39% Hexazinone, Imazapic, Diuron
4. East Baratta Creek at Jerona Road 38.7% Atrazine, Diuron, Imazapic
5. Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road 34.8% Diuron, Bromacil, Ametryn
6. Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump 34.1% Diuron, Atrazine, Hexazinone
7. Mackenzie River at Rileys Crossing 30.7% Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor, Atrazine
8. Murray River at Bilyamo 28.8% Hexazinone, Atrazine, Diuron
9. Moore Park Drainage at Moore Park 28.7% Atrazine, Diuron, 2,4-D
10. Comet River at Comet Weir 28.4% Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor, Atrazine

 

Top Ten Locations Average pesticide detection level (µg/L)
Positive Detections as % of all Detections
1. Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road 0.6 34.8
2. Fairydale Drainage at Norton Road 0.59 22.9
3. Barratta Creek at Northcote 0.59 49.4
4. Sandy Creek at Homebush 0.55 47.1
5. Proserpine River at Glen Isla 0.45 39
6. Moore Park Drainage at Moore Park 0.39 28.7
7. Comet River at Comet Weir 0.33 28.4
8. Welcome Creek Gooburrum Road 0.28 24.3
9. Yellow Waterholes Creek 0.26 25.1
10. Mackenzie River at Rileys Crossing 0.24 30.7

The following table sheds some useful information based on locational data. What it shows is that 87.2% of waterways flowing into the Great Barrier Reef where pesticide testing occurred breached 99% DGV’s over the time period that those pesticides were tested for. 33.3% of waterways regularly breached 95% ecological trigger levels over the same time period. These averages included negative detections.

Note that although the insecticides Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos are listed at some locations with very high average detections, these averages are ‘skewed’ due to the incredibly low 99% trigger levels for both chemicals. These averages may in some instances be due to a handful of detections only a very short time period, meaning that the impact of the chemicals would be short lived (but intense). It should also be noted that although the dates listed showed that when pesticide data was sourced from the Pesticide Reporting Portal, some of the 24 pesticides may not have been tested for at that particular date, with a variance in frequency at some locations between pesticide test regimes.

99% and 95% ANZECC Draft Guideline Values (DGV’s) for specific pesticides based on all detections and locations. Highest levels detected.

Location (Red indicates major problems)
Date of Testing
 Average detection in comparison to 99% guideline Average detection in comparison to 95% guideline
Normanby River at Kalpowar Crossing January 2021 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 17% of DGV over time period.
Daintree River at Lower Daintree October 2017 – March 2023 Diuron detected at 12%, Imidacloprid 10.8% and Metolachlor at 10.1% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 4.8% and Diuron at 4.2% of DGV over time period
Mossman River at Bonnie Doon October 2017 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 2 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 84.9% and Imidacloprid at 69% of DGV over time period. Imidicloprid detected at 31% and Diuron at 30% of DGV over time period.
Mulgrave River at Deeral November 2013 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 2.2 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 76.6% and Imidacloprid at 33% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 26.6% and Imidacloprid at 14.7% of DGV over time period.
Russell River at East Russell January 2014 – March 2023 Diuron detected at 1.2 times DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 65.9% and Atrazine at 55.9% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 42.7% and Imidacloprid at 27.9% of DGV over time period.
North Johnstone River at Goondi February 2012 – March 2023 Imidacloprid detected at 1.1 times DGV over time period. Diazinon detected at 57.6% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 48.5% of DGV over time period.
Johnstone River at Coquette Point December 2015 – March 2023 Imidacloprid detected at 98.9%, Diazinon 79.7%, Diuron 69% and Metolachlor 54.3% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 44% and Diuron at 24% of DGV over time period.
Tully River at Euramo February 2011 – March 2023 Diazinon detected at 16.6, Diuron 1.6 and Imidacloprid 1.5 times DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 84.7% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 68.5% and Diuron at 56.6% of DGV over time period.
Herbert River at Ingham October 2011 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 1.3 times DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 88.63% and Diuron 70.9% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 39.4% and Diuron at 24.7% of DGV over time period.
Murray River at Bilyana November 2018 – March 2023 Diuron detected at 4.4, Imidacloprid 3.2, Metolachlor 3.2 and Imazapic 1.2 times DGV over time period. Hexazinone detected at 67.3%, Atrazine 48.5% and Isoxaflutole 37.8% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 1.5 and Imidacloprid 1.4 times DGV over time period. Hexazinone detected at 18.9% of DGV over time period.
Black River at Bruce Highway February 2018 – March 2023 Tebuthiuron detected at 23.7% and Metsulfuron Methyl 13.1%  of DGV over time period.
Ross River at Aplins Weir Headwaters February 2018 – March 2023 Tebuthiuron detected at 16.4% of DGV over time period.
Haughton River at Giru Tailwater August 2018 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 10, and Tebuthiuron 6.5 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 57.2% and Imazapic 45.5% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 19.9% and Metolachlor 18.3% of DGV over time period.
East Baratta Creek at Jerona Road August 2017 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 6.5, Diuron 2.7, Isoxaflutole 2.1, Tebuthiuron 1.7, Atrazine 1.2 and Imazapic 1.1 times DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl 52.9% and Ametryn 52.7% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 93.1% and Isoxaflutole 31.2% of DGV over time period.
Baratta Creek at Northcote August 2011 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 19.5, Diuron 8.7, Atrazine 4.4, Isoxaflutole 2.9, Diazinon 1.8 and Metsulfuron Methyl 1.5 times DGV over time period. Imazapic 88.6% and Ametryn 65.1% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 3.02 times DGV over time period. Isoxaflutole detected at 42.4%, Metolachlor 35.6% and Metsulfuron Methyl 31.5% of DGV over time period.
Burdekin River at Home Hill October 2011 – March 2023 Tebuthiuron detected at 3.4 and Metolachlor 1.2 times DGV over time period.
Don River at Bowen March 2017 – March 2023 Chlorpyrifos detected at 175, Diazinon 121.3, Metolachlor 12.3, Metsulfuron Methyl 3.8 and Tebuthiuron 1.7 times DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 78.1%, Chlorpyrifos 70%, Diazinon 36.4% and Metolachlor 22.7% of DGV over time period.
Proserpine River at Glen Isla December 2016 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 23, Diuron 9.5, Imidacloprid 8.5, Imazapic 6.5, Hexazinone 2.6, Chlorpyrifos 1.5, Atrazine 1.3 and Diazinon 1.1 times DGV over time period. Isoxaflutole deteted at 58.2% of DGV level over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 3.8, and Diuron 3.3 times DGV over time period. Hexazinone 72.2%, Imazapic 56.9% and Metolachlor 42.1% of DGV over time period.
O’Connell River at Caravan Park January 2014 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 2.2, Imidacloprid 2.2, Diuron 1.8 and Imazapic 1.4 times DGV over time period. Atrazine detected at 45.1% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid 97.3% and Diuron 63.5% of DGV over time period.
O’Connell River at Staffords Crossing September 2016 – March 2023 Diuron detected at 3.2, Metolachlor 2.5, Imidacloprid 2.4 and Imazapic 1.3 times DGV over time period. Tebuthiuron detected at 85.4%, Metsulfuron Methyl 62.6%, Hexazinone 46.3%, Atrazine 35.4% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 1.1 and Imidacloprid 1.06 times DGV over time period.
Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump Station September 2011 – March 2023 Diuron detected at 5.8, Metolachlor 2.9,  Imidacloprid 2.1 and Imazapic 1.3 times DGV over time period. Atrazine detected at 65.3%, Hexazinone 38.7% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 2.04 times DGV  over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 91.6% of DGV over time period.
Sandy Creek at Homebush September 2011 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 42.3, Diuron 16.7,  Imazapic 8.8, Imidacloprid 6.4, Isoxaflutole 2.4, Atrazine 1.9, Hexazinone 1.5 and Metsulfuron Methyl 1 time(s) DGV over time period. Ametryn detected at 57.1% of DGL over time period. Diuron detected at 5.8 and Imidacloprid 2.9 times DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 77.2%, Imazapic 76.9%, Hexazinone 42.7% and Isoxaflutole 34.8% DGV over time period
Plane Creek at Sucrogen Weir November 2017 – March 2023 Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 3.4  times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 85.4%, Imazapic 47.7% and Metolachlor at 35.5% of DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 69.4% and Diuron 29.7% of DGV over time period.
Fitzroy River at Fitzroy River
October 2017 – March 2013 Tebuthiuron detected at 30.3, Metolachlor 14.7 and Chlorpyrifos 2.7 times DGV over time period.  Tebuthiuron detected at 27.5% and Metolachlor 26.8% of DGV over time period.
Mackenzie River at Rileys Crossing December 2016 – March 2013 Metolachlor detected at 55.8, and Tebuthiuron 34.2 times DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 88.9%, Diuron 60.3% and Terbuthylazine 39.6% of DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 1.02  times DGV over time period. Tebuthiuron detected at 31.1%, Diuron 20.9% and Metsulfuron Methyl 18.3% of DGV over time period.
Comet River at Comet Weir October 2011 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 53.8, and Tebuthiuron 27.9 times DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 82.8%, Atrazine 69.7%, Imazapic 56.1%, Terbuthylazine 44.3% and Simazine 42.1% of DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 98.3% and Tebuthiuron 25.4% of DGV over time period.
Kolan River at Booyan Boat Ramp October 2017 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 2.7 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 61.4% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 21.3% of DGV over time period.
Kolan River at Barrage January 2020 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 3.8 and Diuron 1.1 times DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at  43.7% and Imazapic 27.6% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 39.3% and Imidacloprid 19.4% of DGV over time period.
Fairydale Drainage at Norton Road November 2019 – March 2023 Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 31.6, Metolachlor 3.2, Imidacloprid 2.7, Diuron 1.96 and Atrazine 1.3 times DGV over time period. Ametryn detected at 41.3% of DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 6.5 and Imidacloprid 1.2 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 68.3% of DGV over time period.
Moore Park at Moore Park Road November 2019 – March 2023 Diazinon detected at 83.3, Metsulfuron Methyl 77.9, Chlorpyrifos 43.3, Metolachlor 4.4, Imidacloprid 3.7 and Diuron 2 times DGV over time period. Atrazine detected at 97.4% of DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 16 and Imidacloprid 1.7 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 70.7% of DGV over time period.
Welcome Creek at Gooburrum Road December 2020 – March 2023 Diazinon detected at 1647.9, Chlorpyrifos 28.1, Metolachlor 23.7, and Imidacloprid 15.9 times DGV over time period. Fipronil detected at 77.8%, Imazapic 54.3% and Diuron 41.9% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 7.1 and Diazinon 4.9 times DGV over time period. Fipronil detected at 56.2% of DGV over time period.
Spliters Creek at Henkers Road November 2019 – March 2023 Diazinon detected at 34.6, Metolachlor 6.5, Metsulfuron Methyl 5.4, and Imidacloprid 1.01 times DGV over time period. Imazapic detected at 68.5% of DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 1.1 times DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 45.1% of DGV over time period.
Burnett River at Quay Street Bridge River
September 2017 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 9.3 and Tebuthiuron 5.6 times DGV over time period. Tebuthiuron detected at 55.7% and Diuron 22.5% of DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 16.9% of DGV over time period.
Yellow Waterholes Creek at Dahls Road November 2019 – March 2023 Chlorpyrifos detected at 47.2, Metolachlor 33.3, Metsulfuron Methyl 9.7 and Imidacloprid 4.8 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 70.1% of DGV over time period. Imidacloprid detected at 2.1 and Metsulfuron Methyl 2 times DGV over time period. Metolachlor detected at 60.8% of DGV over time period.
Elliott River at Dr Mays Crossing November 2019 – March 2023 Chlorpyrifos detected at 27.9 and Metolachlor 9.6 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 91.2% and Tebuthiuron 58.2% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 31.7% of DGV over time period.
Stockyard Creek at Wallerawang January 2020 – March 2023 Diazinon detected at 27.1 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 83.7% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 29.1% of DGV over time period.
Gregory River at Jarrets Road October 2017 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 7.6 and Diazinon 1.2 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at  70.3% and Metsulfuron Methyl 36.3% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 24.5% of DGV over time period.
Mary River at Churchill Street October 2017 – March 2023 Metolachlor detected at 5.8 times DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 61.7% and Metsulfuron Methyl 35.8% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 21.5% of DGV over time period.
Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road January 2013 – March 2023 Chlorpyrifos detected at 551.4, Diazinon 543.6, Metolachlor 25.2, Diuron 9, Ametryn 1.7, Bromacil 1.5, Simazine 1.5 and Atrazine 1.1 times DGV over time period. Metsulfuron Methyl detected at 41.4% of DGV over time period. Diuron detected at 3.1, Chlorpyrifos 2.2 and Diazinon 1.6 times DGV over time period. Bromacil detected at 67.7%, Metolachlor 46% and Ametryn 37.8% of DGV over time period.

Summary of above table. Although Prosperine River, Sandy Creek and Coochin Creek all had the most individual chemicals breaching the long term 99% DGV, Welcome Creek possibly takes the ‘award’ of the most polluted agricultural waterway, in terms of DGV exceedences relating to the misuse of Diazinon. Coochin Creek appears to be the biggest problem area in terms of long term breaches to 95% DGV’s, although Coochin Creek was impacted by short term spikes in detections of Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon.

 Waterways with highest pesticide levels in comparison with 99 and 95% DGV’s
Location Date of Testing
Breaches to 99% DGV
Breaches to 95% DGV
Proserpine River at Glen Isla December 2016 – March 2023 8 2
Sandy Creek at Homebush September 2011 – March 2023 8 2
Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road January 2013 – March 2023 8 3
East Baratta Creek at Jerona Road August 2017 – March 2023 6
Baratta Creek at Northcote August 2011 – March 2023 6 1
Moore Park Drainage at Moore Park Road November 2019 – March 2023 6 2
Don River at Bowen March 2017 – March 2023 5
Fairydale Drainage at Norton Road November 2019 – March 2023 5 2
Murray River at Bilyamo November 2018 – March 2023 4 2
Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump September 2011 – March 2023 4 1
Welcome Creek at Gooburrum Road December 2020 – March 2023 4 2
Spliters Creek at Henkers Road November 2019 – March 2023 4 1
Yellow Waterholes Creek November 2019 – March 2023 4 2
O’Connell River at Caravan Park January 2014 – March 2023 4
O’Connell River at Staffords Crossing September 2016 – March 2023 3 2
Fitzroy River at Fitzroy River October 2017 – March 2013 3
Tully River at Euramo February 2011 – March 2023 3
MacKenzie River at Rileys Crossing December 2016 – March 2013 2 1

 

Screenshot from Australian Pesticide Map showing pesticide detections throughout Queensland, are concentrated along the coast with highest amounts of detections in and around Brisbane region.

For more information regarding this blog contact anthony.amis@foe.org.au

16/10/23: Tasmanian Government Downplays Pesticide Monitoring

https://www.foe.org.au/tasmanian_government_now_flying_blind_on_pesticide_monitoring

Tasmanian Government “Downplays” Pesticide Monitoring?

A recent Right to Information request with TasWater, has raised concerns regarding pesticide monitoring in domestic water supplies in Tasmania. TasWater was punctual in responding to the request, with the process only taking 32 days, however the information provided leaves more questions than answers.

Trevallyn Dam, located 5km west of Launceston’s CBD. What was the source of the Atrazine that was detected in the Dam on August 8 2018 and were the public informed? Why was there no investigation to identify the source of the pollution?  Was the entire dam contaminated? If so for how long?

Information requested from TasWater included results of all pesticide monitoring in Tasmanian water supplies between 2016 to 2023. TasWater provided 149 positive results, between Feb 2016 and August 2018 only. No information was provided for the past 5 years, which is odd considering that between 2013-2018, pesticide detections averaged 29 per year. It seems implausible that detections immediately ceased in August 2018, just 22 days after Tasmania’s most serious pesticide in a domestic water supply incident (ever?). That occurred in Launceston’s Trevallyn Dam on August 8 2018, when the herbicide Atrazine was detected at 27µg/L (27 parts per billion), 35% higher than the Australian drinking water guideline. The last TasWater positive detection occurred on August 30 2018 at the Macquarie River at Longford. Since then there apparently have been no pesticide detections in Tasmanian water supplies. Really? What’s going on?

To put the Trevallyn Dam incident into some context, pesticide breaches to the ADWG’s (Australian Drinking Water Guidelines) are relatively rare events. FoE has recorded only 27 such incidents throughout Australia. The Trevallyn Dam incident is the 22nd most “serious” in relation to Australian drinking water guidelines. In terms of the infamous herbicide Atrazine, levels detected at Trevallyn Dam were the 6th highest recorded in an Australian water supply. Interestingly, the levels were 270 times higher than European Guidelines (any pesticide detection >0.1µg/L is regarded as a breach and is supposed to be investigated to determine the source) and 9 times higher than equivalent Atrazine guidelines in the United States.

The drop off in TasWater detections can partly be explained by TasWater themselves. According to the RTI letter from TasWater dated 4/10/23, “TasWater now test for 21 pesticides on a quarterly* basis. The pesticides are: 2,4 D, Alpha-cypermethrin, Atrazine, Dimethoate, Boscalid, Chlorpyrifos, Chlorothalonil, Clopyralid, Cyanazine, Glyphosate, Dicamba, Haloxyfop, Hexazinone, MCPA, Metribuzin, Metsulfuron methyl, Pendimethalin, Prometryn, Simazine, Sulfometuron-methyl, Terbacil. “For the period 1 January 2016 – 1 September 2023, TasWater carried out over 53,000 tests for pesticides. In 149 cases, pesticides were detected”.

(* Note quarterly means once every three months or only 1.12% of days per year).

This could imply a 0.28% chance of detecting a pesticide, with a 0.002% chance of detecting a pesticide above Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Perhaps the cost of testing outweighed the information gained from such testing? Perhaps funding for the tests has gone elsewhere? Perhaps TasWater have actually substantially reduced or eliminated pesticide testing in most catchments entirely? It appears to FoE that they have indeed decreased testing by at least 50%+ from what had occurred prior to September 1 2018.

According to TasWater on August 14 2018 (6 days after the Trevallyn dam incident!!!): “Historically, we have had few detections of pesticides and therefore the only time we would test for pesticides within the distribution network as if we are undertaking a specific investigation or whether we have had pesticide detections in the source water (raw water) above historical levels (i.e. if we notice a change)…We have a comprehensive water quality monitoring program that is routinely reviewed and to date we have not identified pesticides in our systems above (or approaching) the health limits in the ADWG.”

The RTI data also reveals that at some locations in 2016 (eg Bothwell, Bridport, Tunbridge) TasWater appear to have tested fortnightly at some times of the year. It is also entirely plausible that many locations were not tested at all.

TasWater can’t be entirely be blamed for not wanting to embark on more strenuous and frequent pesticide testing.  Nine years ago the Tasmanian Government raised eyebrows by axing their decade-long pesticide testing program conducted by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE). The program was axed just when results started revealing the highest amounts of pesticides. Up until that time, it was the most comprehensive pesticide testing regime in Australia. TasWater are mainly concerned about monitoring domestic water supplies. It would appear that the bulk of Tasmanian waterways, similar to the rest of Australia (outside of GBR catchments in Queensland), remain untested for. Why?

Pesticide detections were dominated by the herbicide MCPA, almost all of which occurred in 2016. 2018 detections however were dominated by the herbicides Sulfometuron Methyl and Metsulfuron Methyl.

Apart from the incident at Trevallyn Dam, the most serious raw water incidents, at 30% of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, occurred in 2018 in raw water at Pats River Weir Whitemark (Atrazine at 6µg/L), Cornwall in an unnamed stream (Metsulfuron Methyl 12µg/L) and Lake Barron Creek Weir, just upstream of National Park east of Mount Field National Park where Simazine was detected at 6µg/L. The small community of Lake Barron, on Lake Barron island recorded an MCPA detection of 11µg/L in 2016 (27.5% of ADWG), Cannes Hill Reservoir near the community of Whitemark recorded Atrazine at 3µg/L (15% of ADWG) and MCPA at 5.3µg/L (13.25% of ADWG) in 2018 and 2016. Also of interest was the contamination of all 5 bores at Lady Barron with the herbicide Clopyralid with levels in one bore at 180µg/L.

In terms of supplied water (coming through customers taps), an MCPA detection of 2.7µg/L in March 2016 (7% of ADWG) occurred at Whitemark Depot, and two detections of Metsulfuron Methyl of 2µg/L (5% of ADWG) at Herrick Reservoir in May 2018 and another of 1µg/L (2.5% of ADWG) in June 2018. Other water supply detections at Bridport, Lady Barron Police Station, Prospect Vale, Launceston, Bothwell and Longford were below 1% of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.

Whilst the most frequently pesticide detected was MCPA, 20 detections of Sulfometuron Methyl occurred over a 43 day period between April 30 and June 11 2018. According to FoE records, the only detections of Sulfometuron Methyl in domestic water supplies in Australia occurred in Tasmania during this period, with the highest levels 75µg/L recorded at Adventure Bay on Bruny Island on 25/5/18. Sulfometuron Methyl is registered for use in commercial and industrial areas and rights of way such as roads, powerlines and telephone lines). How did this herbicide impact so many water supplies over a 6 week period? There are no drinking water guidelines for Sulfometuron Methyl.

Tasmanian pesticide detections recorded mainly over the past 30 years from a number of sources according to the Australian Pesticide Map. ~89% of all detections are located in the northern half of the state.

31 different locations recorded pesticide detections between 2016-2018, with the most occurring at Bothwell (16), Tunbridge (11), Whitemark (11), Bridport 10, Gladstone 10, Lady Barron 10, Cornwall 8, Yolla 8, Herrick 7 and Trevallyn Dam 7.

Although communities such as Bothwell and Tunbridge may have recorded the most detections of pesticides, many of their detections were low in comparison to drinking water guideline levels. By accumulating all detections as a percentage of ADWG’s, it becomes apparent that the highest risk location for breaches to ADWG’s was Trevallyn Dam, due mainly to the Atrazine incident of August 2018. These events are however sporadic and to be a major concern for water authorities, events would have to be ongoing and above ADWG’s.

Potential Environmental Impacts

Drinking water is the main focus of TasWater’s testing regimes. However there is another aspect that has to be considered, and that is the ecological impact to species within the waterways themselves. Ecological guideline levels are generally much lower than drinking water guideline levels. Ecological impacts of toxicants in waterways are explained in the ANZECC Guidelines, which specify guideline/trigger levels for a number of pesticides. The ANZECC guidelines do not cover all pesticides. In fact FoE found in 2017 that ~11% of pesticides detected in Australian waterways, had ANZECC Guidelines and that only 3.5% of pesticides registered for use in Australia had ANZECC guidelines. Most of these guidelines date back to 2000, although a handful of pesticides have been granted guideline levels since 2020, the most notable, in terms of Tasmanian waterways being Metsulfuron Methyl.

In simple terms, toxicants have 4 trigger levels specified under the ANZECC Guidelines. High quality environmental streams, eg those with little environmental degradation warrant the highest protection level of 99%. This means that a toxicant entering such a waterway has a guideline level that supposedly will protect 99% of the species within that waterway. The more degraded the waterway, the less species protection. In many degraded urban streams for example the ecological trigger level will be 80%. Guideline levels are therefore are much “stricter” the more pristine the waterway. For example for Metsulfuron Methyl the 99% trigger level is 0.0037µg/L. The 95% trigger level is 0.018µg/L, the 90% trigger level is 0.048µg/L and the 80% trigger level is 0.18µg/l, 48 times higher than the guideline in pristine waterways.

State’s then define what level of protection is warranted for waterways throughout their areas of jurisdiction. National Parks and high conservation value areas would warrant the highest level of protection, whereas slightly to moderately disturbed waterways (eg agricultural areas) generally warrant a 95% trigger level. Deriving ecological guideline levels can be an extremely complicated undertaking. Generally speaking pollution events may also occur over a short duration, during flood events, where “pulses” of contaminants may enter waterways for a limited time period.

In terms of 99% and 95% trigger levels, by the far the most breaches to ecological guideline trigger levels relate to detections of Metsulfuron Methyl. All detections of Metsulfuron Methyl breached both the 99% and 95% trigger levels implying that this particular herbicide is of most concern regarding the ecological impacts upon waterways in Tasmania. Although MCPA was the most frequently detected herbicide by TasWater testing, only 8% of MCPA samples breached ecological guidelines. Metsulfuron Methyl is used on pastures, rights of way, commercial and industrial areas and forest plantations.

95% trigger level pesticide breaches 2016-2018, based on TasWater pesticide test regimes. 90% of breaches occur in the north of the state, with the majority in the north east of the state, including Launceston.

Curries Dam, drinking water supply for George Town and popular fishing location near centre of image. Tamar River and George Town/Bell Bay on the left of image.

TasWater recorded a detection of the organophosphate insecticide Chlorpyrifos at the Curries River offtake of 1µg/L in August 2017. Chlorpyrifos has an exceedingly low 99% guideline level of 0.00004µg/L. This means that the detection of this insecticide at the Currie River was 25,000 times above the 99% ecological trigger level and ten times the 95% ecological trigger level. The same location also recorded Metsulfuron Methyl in May 2018 at 67 times the 99% trigger level and almost 14 times the 95% trigger level. What was the source of the Chlorpyrifos and Metsulfuron Methyl? Why was an investigation not carried out? TasWater’s main role is to provide safe drinking water to consumers, the ecological impacts of toxicants in water supplies is not apparently the agencies priority. Was the EPA informed?

Average levels of the 18 Metsulfuron Methyl detections across Tasmania were 65 times higher than the 99% trigger level and 12 times higher than the 95% trigger level. The most detections occurred in the states north west at Yolla (Dowling Creek). Metsulfuron Methyl was detected over a two month period in 2016 at an average of nine times the 99% trigger level and almost two times the 95% trigger level at Dowling Creek.

Metsulfuron Methyl only “gained” an ecological guideline level in 2021, meaning that when the herbicide was detected by TasWater in 2016 and 2018 barely anyone would have “batted an eyelid“. It also appears that the recent guideline levels have not led to any restrictions of the Metsulfuron Methyl label, despite the exceedingly small ecological guideline level. Pesticide labels specify what amounts of the particular chemical can be sprayed on specific crops and land uses.

Any heavy rainfall events that occur after recent spraying can lead to offsite pollution events. This is particularly the case when many hectares of land in logged plantations for example are left exposed with limited vegetation to lessen soil and pesticide movement off site. If TasWater testing picked up many breaches to ANZECC guidelines in their limited testing regimes in 2016 and 2018 what is going on in terms of Metsulfuron Methyl pollution in other waterways throughout the state since then? No data No Problem?

In terms of the Tasmanian detections in an Australian context, based on FoE pesticide records.

Atrazine: Lake Trevallyn 8/8/18 27µg/L. Australia’s 6th highest detection of Atrazine in a domestic water supply and 22nd highest detection of any pesticide in a domestic water supply. (Atrazine Australian Drinking Water Guideline 20µg/L. ANZECC trigger levels 99% 0.7µg/L, 95% 13µg/L).

Chlorpyrifos: Curries River 10/8/17 1µg/L: Australia’s 2nd highest detection of Chlorpyrifos in a domestic water supply. (Chlorpyrifos Australian Drinking Water Guideline 10µg/L. ANZECC trigger levels 99% 0.00004µg/L, 95% 0.01µg/L).

Clopyralid: Lady Barron Bores 14/12/16 22-180µg/L: Australia’s 5 highest detections of Clopyralid in a domestic water supply and in any water source. (Clopyralid Australian Drinking Water Guideline 2000µg/L. No ANZECC trigger levels).

Dicamba: Lady Barron 7/5/18, Whitemark 7/5/18, Cornwall 8/5/18 0.6µg/L – 0.7µg/L: Australia’s 3rd, 4th and 5th highest detections of Dicamba in a domestic water supply. (Dicamba Australian Drinking Water Guideline 100µg/L. No ANZECC trigger levels).

Hexazinone: Ringarooma WTP 3/7/18 9.5µg/L. Australia’s 4th highest detection of Hexazinone in a domestic water supply. (Hexazinone Australian Drinking Water Guideline 400µg/L. ANZECC trigger levels 99% 0.31µg/L, 95% 1.1µg/L).

MCPA: Lady Barron 2/3/16 5.3µg/L. Australia’s 2nd highest detection of MCPA in a domestic water supply and 4th highest detection in any water source. 11µg/L. Whitemark 2/3/16. (MCPA Australian Drinking Water Guideline 40µg/L. ANZECC trigger levels 99% 1.4µg/L, 95% 1.4µg/L).

Metsulfuron Methyl: Australia’s 9 highest detections of Metsulfuron Methyl in domestic water supplies. 8/5/18 Cornwall 12µg/L (max) highest detection in any Australian waterway. (Metsulfuron Methyl Australian Drinking Water Guideline 40µg/L. ANZECC trigger levels 99% 0.0037µg/L, 95% 0.18µg/L).

Simazine: Lady Barron Creek Weir 26/7/18 6µg/L. Australia’s 5th highest detection of Simazine in a domestic water supply. (Simazine Australian Drinking Water Guideline 20µg/L. ANZECC trigger levels 99% 0.2µg/L, 95% 3.2µg/L).

Sulfometuron-methyl: Australia’s 10 highest detections of Sulfometuron Methyl in Australian domestic water supplies and Australian waterway. 25/5/18 Adventure Bay 75µg/L (max). (Sulfometurn Methyl has no Australian Drinking Water Guideline and no ANZECC trigger levels).

For more information or to make a tax deductible donation contact anthony.amis@foe.org.au

2021: Central West NSW (Narromine region) Vegetation testing. Pesticides: Multiple

September 2022: Meeting - Nature Conservation Council (NCC) and EPA

Pesticide tests in Narromine region

Overspray - Specific Questions:
Will the EPA share the data already collected under the pilot chemical monitoring program being conducted in the Central West?

The EPA has prepared the attached Fact Sheet (Tab 5) that is being finalised for uploading onto the EPA website.
What compounds does the EPA test for when taking a vegetation sample?
Samples were collected on 71 occasions between February and June 2021 and were tested for approximately 600 pesticides, including a wide range of herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides.
Pesticides detected in the bulk deposition samples were atrazine (detected on nine occasions), carbendazim (detected once), ethephon (detected twice) and simazine (detected once). Pesticides detected in vegetation samples were atrazine (detected twice), diuron (detected twice), ethephon (detected once) and glyphosate (detected once). Most of the detections were for widely used pesticides. Ethephon is the only one of the chemicals detected which is primarily used on cotton. Ethephon was only detected on two sampling occasions.

September 2022: Meeting – Nature Conservation Council (NCC) and EPA

Pesticide tests in Narromine region

Overspray – Specific Questions:
Will the EPA share the data already collected under the pilot chemical monitoring program being conducted in the Central West?

The EPA has prepared the attached Fact Sheet (Tab 5) that is being finalised for uploading onto the EPA website.
What compounds does the EPA test for when taking a vegetation sample?
Samples were collected on 71 occasions between February and June 2021 and were tested for
approximately 600 pesticides, including a wide range of herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides.
Pesticides detected in the bulk deposition samples were atrazine (detected on nine occasions),
carbendazim (detected once), ethephon (detected twice) and simazine (detected once). Pesticides detected in vegetation samples were atrazine (detected twice), diuron (detected twice), ethephon (detected once) and glyphosate (detected once). Most of the detections were for widely used pesticides. Ethephon is the only one of the chemicals detected which is primarily used on cotton. Ethephon was only detected on two sampling occasions.

January 27 2024: Menindee Fish Kills. Pesticides: Several

Menindee fish kills: inconsistent pesticide levels sparks calls for review of water testing methods

Experts call for review after two sets of water samples from the Darling-Baaka River reported by the state’s top scientific bodies contained different results

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/jan/27/menindee-fish-kills-pesticide-levels-testing-darling-baaka-river

Experts are calling for more sensitive water-quality testing in the Darling-Baaka River amid concerns that pesticides could be contributing to poor conditions, blue-green algae blooms and fish deaths.

It follows two of the state’s top scientific bodies publishing test results from water samples taken near Menindee in far western New South Wales which contained inconsistent results.

 

Testing conducted on behalf of the NSW chief scientist, on samples collected in August 2023 as part of an independent review into the deadly fish kill event in March in which 30m fish died, found low levels of some pesticides. Separate testing led by the NSW Environment Protection Authority did not detect any pesticides, despite collecting samples at similar locations and during the same month as the chief scientist’s testing.

The testing for the chief scientist was conducted by Charles Sturt University. It detected several herbicides including atrazine, simazine, terbuthylazine, tebuthiuron, metolachlor, clopyralid and fluroxypyr.

Atrazine, simazine, tebuthiuron and metolachlor are no longer approved for use in the European Union and have been classified by the European Chemicals Agency as being “very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”, but they are still approved for use in Australia.

The NSW deputy chief scientist and engineer, Dr Darren Saunders, said the CSU testing was commissioned due to requests from the community and the independent review’s need for further data.

The CSU report said the herbicide levels were “consistent with agricultural land-use in the area” and recommended ongoing monitoring. Two pesticides, tebuthiuron and metolachlor, were found to have exceeded the 99% species protection level in Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, which signifies a concentration estimated to be toxic to 1% of organisms in that aquatic environment. Both were below the 95% value, which the EPA tests for.

In contrast, the NSW EPA said it had not detected any pesticides of a reportable level in any routine testing of the river which had been conducted since the fish kill in March. This included its results from August, when the CSU samples were also collected.

‘A cocktail of pesticides’

Dr Matt Landos, an adjunct associate professor at the University of Queensland and director of Future Fisheries Veterinary Service, said the results showed “seriously concerning” levels of herbicides, which could produce “an elevated risk of ecological harm occurring”.

Landos said the guidelines did not consider the cumulative impact of “a cocktail of multiple pesticides” on the aquatic ecosystem.

He said that while the mass fish deaths at Menindee were attributed to low oxygen levels, the potential contribution of pesticides should also be investigated, alongside other issues like excessive nutrients from agricultural run-off.

“Pesticides were likely one of several contributors harming the ecosystem, particularly upstream, making the water that flowed to Menindee vulnerable to produce near-zero oxygen conditions,” he said.

Landos said pesticides, even at low levels, could modify the aquatic food web by “selectively harming sensitive organisms” such as algae and allowing more tolerant species to predominate.

“This is what’s happening in the Murray-Darling,” Landos said. “And the most tolerant organisms, as it turns out, are cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae.”

He said blue-green algae blooms could impair the ecological function of the river by creating volatile dissolved oxygen conditions, where oxygen levels rapidly rise during the day “due to extreme photosynthetic activity” and then plummet overnight.

“The bigger the biomass of algae, the more oxygen they’re going to require in that water body to keep everything alive,” he said. “If the bloom is too dense, it will suck the oxygen level down far too low and it can in fact cause mortality even to the algae.”

Landos said it was concerning that the EPA testing and CSU testing had produced such different results, and called for a review into the “sensitivity” of the testing methods.

The EPA told Guardian Australia its results were valid and its testing did not show any concentrations which exceeded the reporting limits. It said those limits were “well below the 95% guideline values” and consistent with best practice under the laboratory standard used by the Department of Climate Change, Environment, Energy and Water.

In April, the EPA announced its testing had “ruled out a pesticide pollution event” after the results came back negative for more than 600 pesticides. It has since reduced the frequency of pesticide sampling “following consistent zero results” from multiple testing rounds, including its results from August.

A spokesperson for NSW EPA said the organisation’s testing methods “are sensitive enough to detect concentrations of ecological significance”. They added that results below that limit “have a high uncertainty, are not meaningful and reporting them is not appropriate nor consistent with analytical best practice”. They also suggested the CSU results were inconsistent, as the published report was amended in December.

“The reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably measured,” the EPA said.

They also said that exceeding the 99% or 95% default guideline values “does not indicate an actual impact, rather that further investigations are warranted”.

Vincent Pettigrove, a professor of aquatic pollution at RMIT, said while the guideline values provided an indication of whether the chemicals of interest were at concentrations which may cause environmental harm, there were no national guidelines for “the majority of pesticides registered for use in Australia”.

He added that the ecotoxicological tests used to derive the guideline values for pesticides “are often short-term acute tests and do not account well for chronic long-term exposures”.

“I believe that the impact of pesticides on fish is more likely to be more subtle from chronic exposure that may reduce the viability of populations.”

Pettigrove said the guideline values were for one chemical and therefore “unable to consider the total effects of a mixture of chemicals”. For example, the triazine herbicides detected in the CSU study had a similar mode of toxicity, “so their combined effect should be considered”, he said.

 

Menindee fish kills: inconsistent pesticide levels sparks calls for review of water testing methods

Experts call for review after two sets of water samples from the Darling-Baaka River reported by the state’s top scientific bodies contained different results

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/jan/27/menindee-fish-kills-pesticide-levels-testing-darling-baaka-river

Experts are calling for more sensitive water-quality testing in the Darling-Baaka River amid concerns that pesticides could be contributing to poor conditions, blue-green algae blooms and fish deaths.

It follows two of the state’s top scientific bodies publishing test results from water samples taken near Menindee in far western New South Wales which contained inconsistent results.

Testing conducted on behalf of the NSW chief scientist, on samples collected in August 2023 as part of an independent review into the deadly fish kill event in March in which 30m fish died, found low levels of some pesticides. Separate testing led by the NSW Environment Protection Authority did not detect any pesticides, despite collecting samples at similar locations and during the same month as the chief scientist’s testing.

The testing for the chief scientist was conducted by Charles Sturt University. It detected several herbicides including atrazine, simazine, terbuthylazine, tebuthiuron, metolachlor, clopyralid and fluroxypyr.

Atrazine, simazine, tebuthiuron and metolachlor are no longer approved for use in the European Union and have been classified by the European Chemicals Agency as being “very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”, but they are still approved for use in Australia.

The NSW deputy chief scientist and engineer, Dr Darren Saunders, said the CSU testing was commissioned due to requests from the community and the independent review’s need for further data.

The CSU report said the herbicide levels were “consistent with agricultural land-use in the area” and recommended ongoing monitoring. Two pesticides, tebuthiuron and metolachlor, were found to have exceeded the 99% species protection level in Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, which signifies a concentration estimated to be toxic to 1% of organisms in that aquatic environment. Both were below the 95% value, which the EPA tests for.

In contrast, the NSW EPA said it had not detected any pesticides of a reportable level in any routine testing of the river which had been conducted since the fish kill in March. This included its results from August, when the CSU samples were also collected.

‘A cocktail of pesticides’

Dr Matt Landos, an adjunct associate professor at the University of Queensland and director of Future Fisheries Veterinary Service, said the results showed “seriously concerning” levels of herbicides, which could produce “an elevated risk of ecological harm occurring”.

Landos said the guidelines did not consider the cumulative impact of “a cocktail of multiple pesticides” on the aquatic ecosystem.

He said that while the mass fish deaths at Menindee were attributed to low oxygen levels, the potential contribution of pesticides should also be investigated, alongside other issues like excessive nutrients from agricultural run-off.

“Pesticides were likely one of several contributors harming the ecosystem, particularly upstream, making the water that flowed to Menindee vulnerable to produce near-zero oxygen conditions,” he said.

Landos said pesticides, even at low levels, could modify the aquatic food web by “selectively harming sensitive organisms” such as algae and allowing more tolerant species to predominate.

“This is what’s happening in the Murray-Darling,” Landos said. “And the most tolerant organisms, as it turns out, are cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae.”

He said blue-green algae blooms could impair the ecological function of the river by creating volatile dissolved oxygen conditions, where oxygen levels rapidly rise during the day “due to extreme photosynthetic activity” and then plummet overnight.

“The bigger the biomass of algae, the more oxygen they’re going to require in that water body to keep everything alive,” he said. “If the bloom is too dense, it will suck the oxygen level down far too low and it can in fact cause mortality even to the algae.”

Landos said it was concerning that the EPA testing and CSU testing had produced such different results, and called for a review into the “sensitivity” of the testing methods.

The EPA told Guardian Australia its results were valid and its testing did not show any concentrations which exceeded the reporting limits. It said those limits were “well below the 95% guideline values” and consistent with best practice under the laboratory standard used by the Department of Climate Change, Environment, Energy and Water.

In April, the EPA announced its testing had “ruled out a pesticide pollution event” after the results came back negative for more than 600 pesticides. It has since reduced the frequency of pesticide sampling “following consistent zero results” from multiple testing rounds, including its results from August.

A spokesperson for NSW EPA said the organisation’s testing methods “are sensitive enough to detect concentrations of ecological significance”. They added that results below that limit “have a high uncertainty, are not meaningful and reporting them is not appropriate nor consistent with analytical best practice”. They also suggested the CSU results were inconsistent, as the published report was amended in December.

“The reporting limit is the lowest concentration that can be reliably measured,” the EPA said.

They also said that exceeding the 99% or 95% default guideline values “does not indicate an actual impact, rather that further investigations are warranted”.

Vincent Pettigrove, a professor of aquatic pollution at RMIT, said while the guideline values provided an indication of whether the chemicals of interest were at concentrations which may cause environmental harm, there were no national guidelines for “the majority of pesticides registered for use in Australia”.

He added that the ecotoxicological tests used to derive the guideline values for pesticides “are often short-term acute tests and do not account well for chronic long-term exposures”.

“I believe that the impact of pesticides on fish is more likely to be more subtle from chronic exposure that may reduce the viability of populations.”

Pettigrove said the guideline values were for one chemical and therefore “unable to consider the total effects of a mixture of chemicals”. For example, the triazine herbicides detected in the CSU study had a similar mode of toxicity, “so their combined effect should be considered”, he said.

 

7/1/24: Insect apocalypse: Call to restrict pesticide ‘more toxic than DDT’

Insect apocalypse: Call to restrict pesticide ‘more toxic than DDT’

Tim Baylars 7/1/24. https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/insect-apocalypse-call-to-restrict-pesticide-more-toxic-than-ddt-20230630-p5dknk.html

Noticed fewer moths fluttering around outside lights in the evening or that butterflies seem less frequent visitors? Or that your car’s windscreen remains clearer of the haze of dead flies after a long journey than it used to? Part of the problem appears to point towards the use of a range of pesticides called neonicotinoids which Australian authorities are accused of being slow to regulate.

Ecologist Francisco Sanchez-Bayo from environmental sciences at Sydney University pulled together 100 long-term studies of the global fortunes of insects. He concluded that worldwide an average 37 per cent of species were declining, while populations of 18 per cent were increasing – those were agricultural herbivores and nuisance pests. Aquatic insect communities like mayflies, midges and sedges were even worse off: 42 per cent of species were declining and 29 per cent increasing.

The review threw up some interesting highlights. In northern NSW (Murwillumbah, north of Byron Bay), sampled for butterflies over 23 years, the overall abundance of 21 species declined by 57 per cent due to human disturbance.

Changes among 46 butterfly species in a peripheral urban landscape near Melbourne studied since 1941 found 36 to 48 per cent of species declined since 1981.

In Denmark, a small farmland area was sampled using the “windscreen splash” method between 1997 and 2017. Overall abundance of flying insects that crashed car windscreens declined 97 per cent along a 25 -kilometre road.

Sanchez-Bayo said: “In the 1990s, when I used to go to the Macquarie Marshes [north of Dubbo] to do research, as anyone who drove for a few hours to the countryside at that time would know, you had to stop to clean the windscreen. You don’t have to do that any more.

“In the case of Melbourne, the number of butterflies declined due to urbanisation, they were common years ago, but now they are just disappearing. We are talking about global declines, in Finland, Indonesia and the Amazon, everywhere. There is massive abuse with pesticides and other chemicals, fertilisers and so on which have contaminated the environment affecting mainly aquatic insects.”

One particular branch of pesticides, the neonicotinoids (also known as neonics) are used to treat seeds before planting and are claimed to increase crop yields. Scientists are now comparing neonicotinoids with DDT, of which the devastating effects on wildlife were revealed in the 1960s.

Roger Kitching, on the conservation committee of the Australian Entomological Society, says DDT affected vertebrates, particularly birds, but now, equally, insects deserve to be a major cause for concern due to their part in the food chain.

“The substitution of the range of earlier pesticides for the current generation of neonics and others is particularly bad for insect fauna,” he said. “These pesticides are systemic, that is they act from within plants, they are persistent, water-soluble and are very general in the species they target.

“When insects decline in ecosystems there are knock-on effects because of their roles as bird food, pollination vectors, plant munchers and so on – even though neonics do not impact vertebrates directly they have measurable impacts through these food-chain effects.”

In June, US ecologist Mike Miller, who works for Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources, told a fly-fishing podcast that he had found neonics in randomly selected waterways throughout the state. He said a lethal dose of neonics the size of a sugar grain was enough to kill 125,000 honey bees.

“One of those little paper sachets holds between 3 -4 grams of sugar and the comparable amount of neonics is enough to kill 600 million honey bees,” he said. “Neonics are thought to be 7000 times more toxic than DDT.”

The podcast host, fly-fishing guru Tom Rosenbauer, said: “It seems like in the past 10 years or so you hear so many fly-fishers complaining that the hatches [of insects] aren’t what they used to be. There seems to have been a dramatic decline in insects since neonics became popular.”

Miller’s comments were based on a scientific paper by ecologist Dave Goulson published a decade ago, called An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticide. Goulson, now at Sussex University, said 5 grams was enough to kill half of 1.25 billion bees and leave the other half just alive [known as an LD50 dose].

“While that figure is accurate, the levels of neonics found in the environment are pretty low and a bee would have to consume several CCs [cubic centimetres] of nectar to get a lethal dose, which it might do in its lifetime, but not in a morning,” he said. “The evidence we have is that bees are probably consuming less than a lethal dose, but that doesn’t mean that we can all breathe a sigh of relief that all is well.

“There is evidence that sub-lethal doses can seriously mess up the bees in a whole bunch of different ways – reduce their fertility, their ability to navigate and their resistance to disease. If their disease-resistance is knocked out by exposure to a pesticide, and then they are exposed to a virus transmitted by the Varroa mite, then there are many people who believe it does explain why bee colonies are collapsing.

“For an aquatic insect, you are not drinking the pesticide, you are bathing in it. The evidence is that anything over about 1 part per billion in a stream, which is the level which is commonly exceeded, it is enough to be impacting on aquatic insects when they are exposed to it 24/7.”

Asked if he felt Australia was behind other countries in regulating neonics, he added: “That would seem to be the case, the European regulators are pretty slow to act, but they thought the evidence was sufficiently compelling five years ago to act, and lots of other countries have followed suit in various ways. Within the developed world, Australia would appear to be at the tail end of the queue to do something about neonics. To ignore the evidence, I think, is probably foolish.

“There is a perception that we banned the really nasty pesticides years ago, we got rid of DDT and modern pesticides are better, but in some senses modern pesticides are much more dangerous because we have invented compounds that are far, far more poisonous to insect life, it means less of them has to go astray, into rivers or whatever, to do harm.

Australian scientists have also found imidacloprid (a neonicotinoid) in the catchment area of the Great Barrier Reef and the reef lagoon. Professor Michael Warne at the School of the Environment, University of Queensland in a research study of 6500 samples from 14 Great Barrier Reef catchment areas found the average concentration of imidacloprid was 0.051 µg/L (micrograms/litre) between July 2009 and June 2017. That concentration is 2.5 times higher than that found in a study of Dutch rivers, which led to an annual decrease in insectivorous bird populations of 3.5 per cent.

In a paper published a year ago, Warne wrote that within the Great Barrier Reef catchment area that imidacloprid was used to control canegrubs in sugarcane and the banana weevil borer in banana crops. He said that in a not yet published work by UQ and Department of Environment and Science suggests the risks from imidacloprid since 2017 may have stabilised or decreased, in part through education programs conducted in collaboration with some industry groups.

But he said: “There are many water samples where the concentration exceeds the proposed Australian and New Zealand water quality guideline for ecosystem protection from imidacloprid.”

Imidacloprids were restricted by the EU in 2018. In June last year, New York State moved to pass the Birds and Bees Protection Act, a first-in-the-nation bill to rein in the use of neonicotinoid pesticides. The Natural Resources Defence Council said in a statement: “Neonics are linked to massive bee and bird losses that impact food production, contaminate New York water and soil, and create human health concerns, especially with recent testing showing rising levels of neonics in 95+ per cent of pregnant women from New York and four other states.”

Pesticides use here is governed by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). It updated its website page on neonicotinoids in May and lists six neonics approved for agricultural use in Australia. It published a report in 2014 and then announced a review in 2019. It states three of the six neonic pesticides used here were restricted in April 2018 in the European Union to greenhouse use only.

A spokesperson for the APVMA said in a statement: “The APVMA commenced its review of neonicotinoids in 2019 to allow for the consideration of new scientific information about risks to the environment, and to ensure safety instructions on products meet contemporary standards.

“Based on the statutory timeframes, the review is due to be completed in August 2023. The APVMA anticipates publication of proposed regulatory decisions during 2024 and has assigned additional resources to chemical review activities, including the use of external scientific reviewers to progress reviews as rapidly as possible.” However, there has been no update to the statement last May.

The authority was subject of a damning independent report in July which said it was “concerning that a number of chemical reviews have been ongoing for over 20 years”. It said the APVMA appeared reluctant to take compliance and enforcement action against industry.

Recent changes to the APVMA’s staff profile following the relocation of its offices from Canberra to Armidale in 2019, “has most likely impacted corporate knowledge, workload, and work capacity. Only a small proportion of previous APVMA staff relocated”.

Sanchez-Bayo said the APVMA was way behind schedule. “We are behind in many ways and how long it will take them to come up with a final decision we don’t know,” he said. “It is under-resourced and behind the times.

“My understanding is that the APVMA does not have enough staff, they are not properly trained in these issues, there has been a lot of turnover in the last few years. They are not producing the results they are expected to produce.”

Eddie Tsyrlin, a freshwater ecologist and waterbug taxonomist, estimates that as many as to 2000 species of freshwater invertebrates could have already been lost.

“The Ecological Safety section of Safety Data Sheet [for neonics] states that ‘these chemicals are very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects to the aquatic environment’.
“For the adequate protection of Australian fish and invertebrates, testing needs to be done on pollution-sensitive and common species of freshwater invertebrates occurring in streams as well as in still waters. These could be mayfly and stonefly nymphs and sensitive species of midges.”

Insect apocalypse: Call to restrict pesticide ‘more toxic than DDT’

Tim Baylars 7/1/24. https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/insect-apocalypse-call-to-restrict-pesticide-more-toxic-than-ddt-20230630-p5dknk.html

Noticed fewer moths fluttering around outside lights in the evening or that butterflies seem less frequent visitors? Or that your car’s windscreen remains clearer of the haze of dead flies after a long journey than it used to? Part of the problem appears to point towards the use of a range of pesticides called neonicotinoids which Australian authorities are accused of being slow to regulate.

Ecologist Francisco Sanchez-Bayo from environmental sciences at Sydney University pulled together 100 long-term studies of the global fortunes of insects. He concluded that worldwide an average 37 per cent of species were declining, while populations of 18 per cent were increasing – those were agricultural herbivores and nuisance pests. Aquatic insect communities like mayflies, midges and sedges were even worse off: 42 per cent of species were declining and 29 per cent increasing.

The review threw up some interesting highlights. In northern NSW (Murwillumbah, north of Byron Bay), sampled for butterflies over 23 years, the overall abundance of 21 species declined by 57 per cent due to human disturbance.

Changes among 46 butterfly species in a peripheral urban landscape near Melbourne studied since 1941 found 36 to 48 per cent of species declined since 1981.

In Denmark, a small farmland area was sampled using the “windscreen splash” method between 1997 and 2017. Overall abundance of flying insects that crashed car windscreens declined 97 per cent along a 25 -kilometre road.

Sanchez-Bayo said: “In the 1990s, when I used to go to the Macquarie Marshes [north of Dubbo] to do research, as anyone who drove for a few hours to the countryside at that time would know, you had to stop to clean the windscreen. You don’t have to do that any more.

“In the case of Melbourne, the number of butterflies declined due to urbanisation, they were common years ago, but now they are just disappearing. We are talking about global declines, in Finland, Indonesia and the Amazon, everywhere. There is massive abuse with pesticides and other chemicals, fertilisers and so on which have contaminated the environment affecting mainly aquatic insects.”

One particular branch of pesticides, the neonicotinoids (also known as neonics) are used to treat seeds before planting and are claimed to increase crop yields. Scientists are now comparing neonicotinoids with DDT, of which the devastating effects on wildlife were revealed in the 1960s.

Roger Kitching, on the conservation committee of the Australian Entomological Society, says DDT affected vertebrates, particularly birds, but now, equally, insects deserve to be a major cause for concern due to their part in the food chain.

“The substitution of the range of earlier pesticides for the current generation of neonics and others is particularly bad for insect fauna,” he said. “These pesticides are systemic, that is they act from within plants, they are persistent, water-soluble and are very general in the species they target.

“When insects decline in ecosystems there are knock-on effects because of their roles as bird food, pollination vectors, plant munchers and so on – even though neonics do not impact vertebrates directly they have measurable impacts through these food-chain effects.”

In June, US ecologist Mike Miller, who works for Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources, told a fly-fishing podcast that he had found neonics in randomly selected waterways throughout the state. He said a lethal dose of neonics the size of a sugar grain was enough to kill 125,000 honey bees.

“One of those little paper sachets holds between 3 -4 grams of sugar and the comparable amount of neonics is enough to kill 600 million honey bees,” he said. “Neonics are thought to be 7000 times more toxic than DDT.”

The podcast host, fly-fishing guru Tom Rosenbauer, said: “It seems like in the past 10 years or so you hear so many fly-fishers complaining that the hatches [of insects] aren’t what they used to be. There seems to have been a dramatic decline in insects since neonics became popular.”

Miller’s comments were based on a scientific paper by ecologist Dave Goulson published a decade ago, called An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticide. Goulson, now at Sussex University, said 5 grams was enough to kill half of 1.25 billion bees and leave the other half just alive [known as an LD50 dose].

“While that figure is accurate, the levels of neonics found in the environment are pretty low and a bee would have to consume several CCs [cubic centimetres] of nectar to get a lethal dose, which it might do in its lifetime, but not in a morning,” he said. “The evidence we have is that bees are probably consuming less than a lethal dose, but that doesn’t mean that we can all breathe a sigh of relief that all is well.

“There is evidence that sub-lethal doses can seriously mess up the bees in a whole bunch of different ways – reduce their fertility, their ability to navigate and their resistance to disease. If their disease-resistance is knocked out by exposure to a pesticide, and then they are exposed to a virus transmitted by the Varroa mite, then there are many people who believe it does explain why bee colonies are collapsing.

“For an aquatic insect, you are not drinking the pesticide, you are bathing in it. The evidence is that anything over about 1 part per billion in a stream, which is the level which is commonly exceeded, it is enough to be impacting on aquatic insects when they are exposed to it 24/7.”

Asked if he felt Australia was behind other countries in regulating neonics, he added: “That would seem to be the case, the European regulators are pretty slow to act, but they thought the evidence was sufficiently compelling five years ago to act, and lots of other countries have followed suit in various ways. Within the developed world, Australia would appear to be at the tail end of the queue to do something about neonics. To ignore the evidence, I think, is probably foolish.

“There is a perception that we banned the really nasty pesticides years ago, we got rid of DDT and modern pesticides are better, but in some senses modern pesticides are much more dangerous because we have invented compounds that are far, far more poisonous to insect life, it means less of them has to go astray, into rivers or whatever, to do harm.

Australian scientists have also found imidacloprid (a neonicotinoid) in the catchment area of the Great Barrier Reef and the reef lagoon. Professor Michael Warne at the School of the Environment, University of Queensland in a research study of 6500 samples from 14 Great Barrier Reef catchment areas found the average concentration of imidacloprid was 0.051 µg/L (micrograms/litre) between July 2009 and June 2017. That concentration is 2.5 times higher than that found in a study of Dutch rivers, which led to an annual decrease in insectivorous bird populations of 3.5 per cent.

In a paper published a year ago, Warne wrote that within the Great Barrier Reef catchment area that imidacloprid was used to control canegrubs in sugarcane and the banana weevil borer in banana crops. He said that in a not yet published work by UQ and Department of Environment and Science suggests the risks from imidacloprid since 2017 may have stabilised or decreased, in part through education programs conducted in collaboration with some industry groups.

But he said: “There are many water samples where the concentration exceeds the proposed Australian and New Zealand water quality guideline for ecosystem protection from imidacloprid.”

Imidacloprids were restricted by the EU in 2018. In June last year, New York State moved to pass the Birds and Bees Protection Act, a first-in-the-nation bill to rein in the use of neonicotinoid pesticides. The Natural Resources Defence Council said in a statement: “Neonics are linked to massive bee and bird losses that impact food production, contaminate New York water and soil, and create human health concerns, especially with recent testing showing rising levels of neonics in 95+ per cent of pregnant women from New York and four other states.”

Pesticides use here is governed by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). It updated its website page on neonicotinoids in May and lists six neonics approved for agricultural use in Australia. It published a report in 2014 and then announced a review in 2019. It states three of the six neonic pesticides used here were restricted in April 2018 in the European Union to greenhouse use only.

A spokesperson for the APVMA said in a statement: “The APVMA commenced its review of neonicotinoids in 2019 to allow for the consideration of new scientific information about risks to the environment, and to ensure safety instructions on products meet contemporary standards.

“Based on the statutory timeframes, the review is due to be completed in August 2023. The APVMA anticipates publication of proposed regulatory decisions during 2024 and has assigned additional resources to chemical review activities, including the use of external scientific reviewers to progress reviews as rapidly as possible.” However, there has been no update to the statement last May.

The authority was subject of a damning independent report in July which said it was “concerning that a number of chemical reviews have been ongoing for over 20 years”. It said the APVMA appeared reluctant to take compliance and enforcement action against industry.

Recent changes to the APVMA’s staff profile following the relocation of its offices from Canberra to Armidale in 2019, “has most likely impacted corporate knowledge, workload, and work capacity. Only a small proportion of previous APVMA staff relocated”.

Sanchez-Bayo said the APVMA was way behind schedule. “We are behind in many ways and how long it will take them to come up with a final decision we don’t know,” he said. “It is under-resourced and behind the times.

“My understanding is that the APVMA does not have enough staff, they are not properly trained in these issues, there has been a lot of turnover in the last few years. They are not producing the results they are expected to produce.”

Eddie Tsyrlin, a freshwater ecologist and waterbug taxonomist, estimates that as many as to 2000 species of freshwater invertebrates could have already been lost.

“The Ecological Safety section of Safety Data Sheet [for neonics] states that ‘these chemicals are very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects to the aquatic environment’.
“For the adequate protection of Australian fish and invertebrates, testing needs to be done on pollution-sensitive and common species of freshwater invertebrates occurring in streams as well as in still waters. These could be mayfly and stonefly nymphs and sensitive species of midges.”

2022/23: One of worst years for spray drift (New South Wales).

Ag bodies act to minimise spray drift this summer

Grain Central Dec 4 2023

COTTON Australia, Grain Producers Australia and GrainGrowers are urging growers to take appropriate action to avoid a repeat of last year’s devastating spray-drift incidents.

The 2022-23 season saw one of the worst years on record for spray drift with some farmers suffering millions of dollars’ worth of lost production.

Last year in the Macintyre and Balonne regions alone, producers lost considerable amounts to spray drift.

Cotton Australia CEO Adam Kay said last year’s impact was widespread, with farmers reporting moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, in St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett and the Macquarie Valley.

“We need a whole-of agriculture response to minimise the impact of off-target drift,” Mr Kay said.

“It’s not just cotton growers who are suffering extreme hardship when drift from others impacts their crops, but grain growers and other farmers are being hit hard during spray season and there is no one-fix solution.”

The potential for another major spray drift season depends on numerous factors including the practices of growers and contractors applying chemicals and the conditions prevalent of the time of application.

There is the potential for greater damage if spraying occurs under “hazardous inversion” conditions, most commonly occurring at night, when cold air is trapped near the ground and spray droplets can remain suspended in the air for hours and can travel many kilometres beyond the intended target.

Past spray drift events have indicated that some people are not applying in accordance with approved label instructions, or that the label instructions for some products may need review.

Mr Kay said last year Cotton Australia joined forces with other agricultural groups, the Australian Government registration authority and supply regulator of agricultural chemical products, the APVMA and enforcement agencies to highlight best practice and warn about the implications of non-compliance.

“We also called for more boots on the ground, so all stakeholders could see action was being taken to crack down on those doing the wrong thing and support those impacted. I’m pleased to say that the regulators appear to be listening.”

NSW EPA’s executive director regulatory practice and services Steve Beaman said the EPA would not t hesitate to take action against anyone spraying pesticides irresponsibly or deliberately causing harm.

“We’ve got around 15 investigations under way in Griffith, Narromine, Carrathool, Moree, Forbes, Warren and Yallaroi – we’re looking at people who may be operating without a license and others who are spraying in the kind of weather where pesticides are likely to drift and cause damage,” Mr Beaman said.

“The harm is really serious – we’ve seen farmers lose more than a year’s income just from someone spraying recklessly.

“It’s devastating and it’s got to stop.”

Mr Beaman said the EPA was hopeful that with increased education and compliance, this season will be a better one.

“We’re reminding all pesticide users to carefully follow the label instructions for each chemical, store their chemicals safely and keep accurate and up-to-date records of spraying activity for three years.

“There’s so much technology available to tell you what the weather’s doing and when it’s safe to spray. The message is simple – if you’re in any doubt, don’t put it out.”

Grain bodies take action

With summer weed-spraying coming into focus, GPA and GrainGrowers have urged members to brush up on best practice and make use of available resources.

To assist this, GrainGrowers will soon launch a grower-focussed online hub, which seeks to provide growers with up-to-date resources on spray-drift management, including a new video training series.

GrainGrowers CEO Shona Gawel said the grains industry was committed to meeting the challenge and minimising issues by ensuring best practice is always followed.

“The majority of growers take their land-stewardship responsibilities very seriously and follow procedures that allow them to spray weeds effectively and efficiently and in a way that protects the surrounding environment,” Ms Gawel said.

“Knowing what to do, checking your conditions, and considering your neighbours by notifying them of your spray plan are three simple steps to follow.”

Given the spray drift damage earlier this year, both bodies have thrown their support behind a proactive, national approach to stop it from happening again.

GPA southern grower director and RD&E spokesperson Andrew Weidemann said it was critical to manage spray drift properly and be vigilant with application to ensure growers can maintain access to critical on-farm tools that help drive productivity and sustainability.

Mr Weidemann is also the independent chair of the National Working Party on Pesticide Application, established in 2010 to conduct targeted research relating to spray drift and inform the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority’s policy on spray drift.

He said most growers did the right thing most of the time and followed product labels, but complacency on application was not an option.

“Spray drift is an ongoing challenge for industry, and there have been substantive investments in practice improvement, training and education opportunities and technology to reduce off-target incidents from spray application and improve stewardship, but there are no excuses,” Mr Weidemann said.

GPA northern director Matthew Madden said growers and their representative groups recognised a strong and effective regulatory system was needed to protect the majority of growers who were compliant and did the right thing, but offenders needed to be “weeded out” with penalties.

“We need a system that protects those operating within the rules and penalises those putting other growers at risk, with non-compliant activities.”

GrainGrowers’ online spray drift resource hub will soon be released, and will feature a commissioned video series and links to resources available from GPA, GRDC, and others.

Source: Cotton Australia, NSW EPA, GPA, GrainGrowers

Ag bodies act to minimise spray drift this summer

Grain Central Dec 4 2023

COTTON Australia, Grain Producers Australia and GrainGrowers are urging growers to take appropriate action to avoid a repeat of last year’s devastating spray-drift incidents.

The 2022-23 season saw one of the worst years on record for spray drift with some farmers suffering millions of dollars’ worth of lost production.

Last year in the Macintyre and Balonne regions alone, producers lost considerable amounts to spray drift.

Cotton Australia CEO Adam Kay said last year’s impact was widespread, with farmers reporting moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, in St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett and the Macquarie Valley.

“We need a whole-of agriculture response to minimise the impact of off-target drift,” Mr Kay said.

“It’s not just cotton growers who are suffering extreme hardship when drift from others impacts their crops, but grain growers and other farmers are being hit hard during spray season and there is no one-fix solution.”

The potential for another major spray drift season depends on numerous factors including the practices of growers and contractors applying chemicals and the conditions prevalent of the time of application.

There is the potential for greater damage if spraying occurs under “hazardous inversion” conditions, most commonly occurring at night, when cold air is trapped near the ground and spray droplets can remain suspended in the air for hours and can travel many kilometres beyond the intended target.

Past spray drift events have indicated that some people are not applying in accordance with approved label instructions, or that the label instructions for some products may need review.

Mr Kay said last year Cotton Australia joined forces with other agricultural groups, the Australian Government registration authority and supply regulator of agricultural chemical products, the APVMA and enforcement agencies to highlight best practice and warn about the implications of non-compliance.

“We also called for more boots on the ground, so all stakeholders could see action was being taken to crack down on those doing the wrong thing and support those impacted. I’m pleased to say that the regulators appear to be listening.”

NSW EPA’s executive director regulatory practice and services Steve Beaman said the EPA would not t hesitate to take action against anyone spraying pesticides irresponsibly or deliberately causing harm.

“We’ve got around 15 investigations under way in Griffith, Narromine, Carrathool, Moree, Forbes, Warren and Yallaroi – we’re looking at people who may be operating without a license and others who are spraying in the kind of weather where pesticides are likely to drift and cause damage,” Mr Beaman said.

“The harm is really serious – we’ve seen farmers lose more than a year’s income just from someone spraying recklessly.

“It’s devastating and it’s got to stop.”

Mr Beaman said the EPA was hopeful that with increased education and compliance, this season will be a better one.

“We’re reminding all pesticide users to carefully follow the label instructions for each chemical, store their chemicals safely and keep accurate and up-to-date records of spraying activity for three years.

“There’s so much technology available to tell you what the weather’s doing and when it’s safe to spray. The message is simple – if you’re in any doubt, don’t put it out.”

Grain bodies take action

With summer weed-spraying coming into focus, GPA and GrainGrowers have urged members to brush up on best practice and make use of available resources.

To assist this, GrainGrowers will soon launch a grower-focussed online hub, which seeks to provide growers with up-to-date resources on spray-drift management, including a new video training series.

GrainGrowers CEO Shona Gawel said the grains industry was committed to meeting the challenge and minimising issues by ensuring best practice is always followed.

“The majority of growers take their land-stewardship responsibilities very seriously and follow procedures that allow them to spray weeds effectively and efficiently and in a way that protects the surrounding environment,” Ms Gawel said.

“Knowing what to do, checking your conditions, and considering your neighbours by notifying them of your spray plan are three simple steps to follow.”

Given the spray drift damage earlier this year, both bodies have thrown their support behind a proactive, national approach to stop it from happening again.

GPA southern grower director and RD&E spokesperson Andrew Weidemann said it was critical to manage spray drift properly and be vigilant with application to ensure growers can maintain access to critical on-farm tools that help drive productivity and sustainability.

Mr Weidemann is also the independent chair of the National Working Party on Pesticide Application, established in 2010 to conduct targeted research relating to spray drift and inform the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority’s policy on spray drift.

He said most growers did the right thing most of the time and followed product labels, but complacency on application was not an option.

“Spray drift is an ongoing challenge for industry, and there have been substantive investments in practice improvement, training and education opportunities and technology to reduce off-target incidents from spray application and improve stewardship, but there are no excuses,” Mr Weidemann said.

GPA northern director Matthew Madden said growers and their representative groups recognised a strong and effective regulatory system was needed to protect the majority of growers who were compliant and did the right thing, but offenders needed to be “weeded out” with penalties.

“We need a system that protects those operating within the rules and penalises those putting other growers at risk, with non-compliant activities.”

GrainGrowers’ online spray drift resource hub will soon be released, and will feature a commissioned video series and links to resources available from GPA, GRDC, and others.

Source: Cotton Australia, NSW EPA, GPA, GrainGrowers

6/12/23: Woolgoolga (New South Wales) Water Pollution, Pesticide Offences

EPA inspects North Coast farms for pesticide practices

06 December 2023
 
https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2023/epamedia231206-epa-inspects-north-coast-farms-for-pesticide-practices
 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is undertaking a series of pesticide compliance campaigns in the North Coast region throughout summer to ensure farmers are complying with environmental laws.

EPA Director of Operations Steve Orr said EPA officers will be inspecting intensive horticultural farms in the Woolgoolga region near Coffs Harbour and further north near Ballina to check for appropriate pesticide use, storage, record-keeping and wastewater management.

“Our inspections coincide with the summer growing season to ensure that crop-growers are always using pesticides responsibly to protect the environment and local waterways,” Mr Orr said.

“This campaign is building on previous work done with the intensive horticulture industry to reduce the potential impacts of pesticides from these activities.

“Since 2021, we have carried out more than 40 inspections of horticultural farms in the Woolgoolga region, resulting in 15 penalty notices, 7 official cautions, 8 formal warnings and 14 advisory letters issued for a range of water pollution and pesticide offences.

“We are following up with some of those farms we had previously visited to ensure that operators have taken adequate steps to improve their practices.

“This includes requirements for some growers to upgrade their wastewater capture and irrigation systems as well as their pesticide storage areas.

“We are also using intelligence to identify farms that we have not previously visited, so that a wider range of growers are reminded of their obligations under the Pesticides Act.

“We will continue to work closely with councils, industry and grower associations to increase awareness of pesticide regulations and how to spray safely this summer.”

EPA officers will provide resources and hear from local farmers about their pesticide use, as well as checking pesticide storage areas, water management and record-keeping practices.

For more information about preventing pesticide misuse in horticultural farms, see: https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse/campaigns-investigations/intensive-horticulture-and-protected-cropping

To find out more about the EPA’s compliance campaigns in the Woolgoolga region, see: https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse/campaigns-investigations/woolgoolga-compliance-inspections

EPA inspects North Coast farms for pesticide practices

https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2023/epamedia231206-epa-inspects-north-coast-farms-for-pesticide-practices

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is undertaking a series of pesticide compliance campaigns in the North Coast region throughout summer to ensure farmers are complying with environmental laws.

EPA Director of Operations Steve Orr said EPA officers will be inspecting intensive horticultural farms in the Woolgoolga region near Coffs Harbour and further north near Ballina to check for appropriate pesticide use, storage, record-keeping and wastewater management.

“Our inspections coincide with the summer growing season to ensure that crop-growers are always using pesticides responsibly to protect the environment and local waterways,” Mr Orr said.

“This campaign is building on previous work done with the intensive horticulture industry to reduce the potential impacts of pesticides from these activities.

“Since 2021, we have carried out more than 40 inspections of horticultural farms in the Woolgoolga region, resulting in 15 penalty notices, 7 official cautions, 8 formal warnings and 14 advisory letters issued for a range of water pollution and pesticide offences.

“We are following up with some of those farms we had previously visited to ensure that operators have taken adequate steps to improve their practices.

“This includes requirements for some growers to upgrade their wastewater capture and irrigation systems as well as their pesticide storage areas.

“We are also using intelligence to identify farms that we have not previously visited, so that a wider range of growers are reminded of their obligations under the Pesticides Act.

“We will continue to work closely with councils, industry and grower associations to increase awareness of pesticide regulations and how to spray safely this summer.”

EPA officers will provide resources and hear from local farmers about their pesticide use, as well as checking pesticide storage areas, water management and record-keeping practices.

For more information about preventing pesticide misuse in horticultural farms, see: https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse/campaigns-investigations/intensive-horticulture-and-protected-cropping

To find out more about the EPA’s compliance campaigns in the Woolgoolga region, see: https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse/campaigns-investigations/woolgoolga-compliance-inspections

11/12/23: Spray Drift Investigations New South Wales

“It’s got to stop”: Spray drift hits NSW cotton farms

By Christopher Kelly | 11 December 2023

https://www.ragtrader.com.au/news/it-s-got-to-stop-spray-drift-hits-nsw-cotton-farms

Over 1000 hectares of cotton crops have already been impacted by spray drift in New South Wales, pushing growers, agronomists and industry leaders to call for vigilance.

Summit Ag agronomist Emma Ayliffe has visited three farms between Lake Cargelligo and Condobolin in Central West NSW, reviewing three separate incidents ranging from minor damage to severe.

“Some of the crops have been hit hard, but the positive is that it’s only early days and they may recover, avoiding a total loss,” Ayliffe said. “We were hit hard last season, and we are all sick of it. It’s got to stop. 

“We can’t afford a repeat of the damage and if everyone uses the tools and resources available, this can all be avoided.”

There have also been reports from Griffith and near Moree with Cotton Australia (CA) regional managers concerned that conditions may lead to an escalation of damage and further incidents. 

The reports, combined with the recent rains boosting weed growth, indicate spraying activity is about to ramp up significantly.

CA policy officer for stewardship Doug McCollum said there is a perfect storm brewing.

“With hot conditions, growers might be tempted to delay spraying during the day to avoid evaporation and instead spray at night. 

“Unfortunately for growers, the inversion conditions are mostly prevalent during nighttime and that could lead to unintended drift over a large area.”

In New South Wales the EPA has signalled they won’t hesitate to take action against anyone spraying pesticides irresponsibly or deliberately causing harm. 

They have stepped up site visits with recent pesticide campaigns in Moree, Narrabri and Walgett, and are undertaking active investigations in Carrathool, Forbes, Griffith, Narromine, Moree, Warren and Yallaroi.

McCollum urged all those spraying their crops to fully utilise preventative tools to help prevent millions of dollars’ worth of lost production, including Weather and Networked Data (WAND) towers and SataCrop.

In March this year, both the Grains and Cotton Research and Development Corporations in conjunction with Goanna Ag, confirmed all 100 Weather and Networked Data (WAND) spray hazard identification towers were up and running stretching from Emerald in Queensland to the Victorian border.

Over 2,000 cotton and grain growers and spray operators have registered to use WAND towers to identify whether a hazardous inversion is present. 

Meanwhile, SataCrop can map all crop types, including cotton, grains and tree crops. Growers log in and plot the location of fields they have planted with different crops each season, allowing others to review the site when planning spray applications to see the location of potentially sensitive neighbouring crops.

“It’s fantastic having these tools and this year if people use them, remain vigilant around spray and wind conditions, and strictly adhere to the instructions on the label then we can avoid tens of millions worth of damage,” McCollum said.

“The vast majority are doing the right thing and those who flagrantly break the rules can expect to be caught.”

“It’s got to stop”: Spray drift hits NSW cotton farms

By Christopher Kelly | 11 December 2023

https://www.ragtrader.com.au/news/it-s-got-to-stop-spray-drift-hits-nsw-cotton-farms

Over 1000 hectares of cotton crops have already been impacted by spray drift in New South Wales, pushing growers, agronomists and industry leaders to call for vigilance.

Summit Ag agronomist Emma Ayliffe has visited three farms between Lake Cargelligo and Condobolin in Central West NSW, reviewing three separate incidents ranging from minor damage to severe.

“Some of the crops have been hit hard, but the positive is that it’s only early days and they may recover, avoiding a total loss,” Ayliffe said. “We were hit hard last season, and we are all sick of it. It’s got to stop.

“We can’t afford a repeat of the damage and if everyone uses the tools and resources available, this can all be avoided.”

There have also been reports from Griffith and near Moree with Cotton Australia (CA) regional managers concerned that conditions may lead to an escalation of damage and further incidents.

The reports, combined with the recent rains boosting weed growth, indicate spraying activity is about to ramp up significantly.

CA policy officer for stewardship Doug McCollum said there is a perfect storm brewing.

“With hot conditions, growers might be tempted to delay spraying during the day to avoid evaporation and instead spray at night.

“Unfortunately for growers, the inversion conditions are mostly prevalent during nighttime and that could lead to unintended drift over a large area.”

In New South Wales the EPA has signalled they won’t hesitate to take action against anyone spraying pesticides irresponsibly or deliberately causing harm.

They have stepped up site visits with recent pesticide campaigns in Moree, Narrabri and Walgett, and are undertaking active investigations in Carrathool, Forbes, Griffith, Narromine, Moree, Warren and Yallaroi.

McCollum urged all those spraying their crops to fully utilise preventative tools to help prevent millions of dollars’ worth of lost production, including Weather and Networked Data (WAND) towers and SataCrop.

In March this year, both the Grains and Cotton Research and Development Corporations in conjunction with Goanna Ag, confirmed all 100 Weather and Networked Data (WAND) spray hazard identification towers were up and running stretching from Emerald in Queensland to the Victorian border.

Over 2,000 cotton and grain growers and spray operators have registered to use WAND towers to identify whether a hazardous inversion is present.

Meanwhile, SataCrop can map all crop types, including cotton, grains and tree crops. Growers log in and plot the location of fields they have planted with different crops each season, allowing others to review the site when planning spray applications to see the location of potentially sensitive neighbouring crops.

“It’s fantastic having these tools and this year if people use them, remain vigilant around spray and wind conditions, and strictly adhere to the instructions on the label then we can avoid tens of millions worth of damage,” McCollum said.

“The vast majority are doing the right thing and those who flagrantly break the rules can expect to be caught.”

2023 December: Spray drift Griffith & Carrathool

'Spray drift an issue': EPA visiting farms in Griffith, Carrathool

Dec 13 2023: https://www.therural.com.au/story/8457509/epa-increases-farm-visits-in-wake-of-spray-drift-reports/

Following reports of spray drift in the area, the EPA is increasing farm visits around Griffith and Carrathool.

‘Spray drift an issue’: EPA visiting farms in Griffith, Carrathool

Dec 13 2023: https://www.therural.com.au/story/8457509/epa-increases-farm-visits-in-wake-of-spray-drift-reports/

Following reports of spray drift in the area, the EPA is increasing farm visits around Griffith and Carrathool.

2020: South Ballina (NSW). Pesticides in water and oysters

South Ballina Richmond River (NSW) Jan - March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Diuron 0.51ug/L, Hexazinone 0.51ug/L, Metolachlor 0.33ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.13 ng/g/w, Diuron 6 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 2.3 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Aluminium 14 ng/g/w, Hexazinone 1.16 ng/g/w, Iprodione 0.74 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.18ng/g/w, Pebulate 8.5 ng/g/w, Propargite 15.9 ng/g/w, Prothiofos 1 ng/g/w, Vernolate 1.4 ng/g/w

South Ballina Richmond River (NSW) Jan – March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Diuron 0.51ug/L, Hexazinone 0.51ug/L, Metolachlor 0.33ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.13 ng/g/w, Diuron 6 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 2.3 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Aluminium 14 ng/g/w, Hexazinone 1.16 ng/g/w, Iprodione 0.74 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.18ng/g/w, Pebulate 8.5 ng/g/w, Propargite 15.9 ng/g/w, Prothiofos 1 ng/g/w, Vernolate 1.4 ng/g/w

2020: Empire Vale 2/Richmond River (NSW). Pesticides in water and oysters

Empire Vale 2/Richmond River (NSW) Jan - March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 1.73ug/L, Diuron 2.98ug/L, Hexazinone 1.34ug/L, Metolachlor 1.31ug/L, Propazine 0.03ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.52 ng/g/w, Benomyl 0.12 ng/g/w, Chlorpyrifos 0.37 ng/g/w, Diuron 0.49 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 9.3 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Aluminium 15 ng/g/w, Iprodione 1.2 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.38ng/g/w, Pebulate 11 ng/g/w, Propargite 15.8 ng/g/w

Empire Vale 2/Richmond River (NSW) Jan – March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 1.73ug/L, Diuron 2.98ug/L, Hexazinone 1.34ug/L, Metolachlor 1.31ug/L, Propazine 0.03ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.52 ng/g/w, Benomyl 0.12 ng/g/w, Chlorpyrifos 0.37 ng/g/w, Diuron 0.49 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 9.3 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Aluminium 15 ng/g/w, Iprodione 1.2 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.38ng/g/w, Pebulate 11 ng/g/w, Propargite 15.8 ng/g/w

2020: Empire Vale 1/Richmond River (NSW). Pesticides in water and oysters

Empire Vale 1/Richmond River (NSW) Jan - March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.48ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.55ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.14 ng/g/w, Chlorpyrifos 0.27 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 4.8 ng/g/w, Iprodione 1.35 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.21 ng/g/w, Pebulate 14.2 ng/g/w, Propargite 7.9 ng/g/w

Empire Vale 1/Richmond River (NSW) Jan – March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.48ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.55ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.14 ng/g/w, Chlorpyrifos 0.27 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 4.8 ng/g/w, Iprodione 1.35 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.21 ng/g/w, Pebulate 14.2 ng/g/w, Propargite 7.9 ng/g/w

2020: North Creek/Richmond River (NSW). Pesticides in water and oysters

North Creek/Richmond River (NSW) Jan - March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.13 ng/g/w, Benomyl 0.13ng/g/w, Chlorpyrifos 0.37 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 9 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Aluminium 12 ng/g/w, Iprodione 1.07 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.14 ng/g/w, Pebulate 8.3 ng/g/w, Propargite 13.6 ng/g/w,  Vernolate 1.1 ng/g/w

North Creek/Richmond River (NSW) Jan – March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.13 ng/g/w, Benomyl 0.13ng/g/w, Chlorpyrifos 0.37 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 9 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Aluminium 12 ng/g/w, Iprodione 1.07 ng/g/w, Metolachlor 0.14 ng/g/w, Pebulate 8.3 ng/g/w, Propargite 13.6 ng/g/w,  Vernolate 1.1 ng/g/w

2020: Fishery Creek/Richmond River (NSW). Pesticides in water and oysters

Ballina NSW 2478, Australia

Fishery Creek/Richmond River (NSW) Jan - March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.11 ng/g/w, Diuron 0.28 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 4.5 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Auminium 20 ng/g/w, Iprodione 0.59 ng/g/w, Pebulate 11.1 ng/g/w,  Vernolate 1.1 ng/g/w

Fishery Creek/Richmond River (NSW) Jan – March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.11 ng/g/w, Diuron 0.28 ng/g/w, Fluproponate 4.5 ng/g/w, Fosetyl Auminium 20 ng/g/w, Iprodione 0.59 ng/g/w, Pebulate 11.1 ng/g/w,  Vernolate 1.1 ng/g/w

 

2020: Emigrant Creek/Richmond River (NSW). Pesticide in water and oysters

Emigrant Creek/Richmond River (NSW) Jan - March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Benomyl 0.02ug/L, Diuron 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.23 ng/g/w, Diuron 0.37 ng/g/w, Flupropinate 1.7 ng/g/w, Iprodione 0.6 ng/g/w, Pebulate 13 ng/g/w, Propargite 1.1 ng/g/w, Vernolate 0.16 ng/g/w

 

Emigrant Creek/Richmond River (NSW) Jan – March 2020

Pesticide occurrence in a subtropical estuary, Australia: Complementary sampling method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123084

Pesticide Concentrations in Water

Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Benomyl 0.02ug/L, Diuron 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L

Pesticide Concentrations in Oysters

Atrazine 0.23 ng/g/w, Diuron 0.37 ng/g/w, Flupropinate 1.7 ng/g/w, Iprodione 0.6 ng/g/w, Pebulate 13 ng/g/w, Propargite 1.1 ng/g/w, Vernolate 0.16 ng/g/w

 

14/12/23: Cocktail of pesticides found in Richmond River, including chemical banned in 2006

'Cocktail of pesticides' found in Richmond River, including chemical banned in 2006

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-14/illegal-chemical-among-pesticides-detected-in-richmond-river/103222592

Tests have revealed the presence of a "cocktail of pesticides" – including traces of a chemical that was banned almost 20 years ago – in a major New South Wales waterway and the wild oysters that inhabit it.

The data was collected in 2020-21 and the results of the Richmond River study were published in the Journal of Environmental Pollution this week.

Southern Cross University marine science professor Kirsten Benkendorff said 21 different pesticides were detected in the river near Ballina.

The researchers found more pesticides in the wild oysters than in the water.

There was an average of nine different pesticides detected in individual oyster samples.

Dr Benkendorff said the concentration of several pesticides exceeded safe environmental guidelines.

"There was a whole cocktail of pesticides in oysters and the water," she said.

"It's a serious concern of the health of the environment and potential consumer safety."

The fungicide benomyl, which has been illegal to use since 2006, was also detected.

"It is a really big concern to have found a banned pesticide in our water here — we don't know who is using it or why," she said.

"It's a pesticide with a pretty short half-life, so it's not something that has been hanging around in the environment for a long time."

Some of the pesticides identified in the report are used for roadside weed spraying and for maintenance of playing fields.

Most of the chemicals detected in the study are registered for use in the production of sugarcane.

"It demonstrates there is a range of different sources of pesticides, even when we consider agriculture as the main focus," Dr Benkendorff said.

Cane industry blindsided

The testing revealed high levels of the herbicides atrazine and diuron were detected in March 2020 at a testing site near a cane drain at Empire Vale, south of Ballina.

NSW Canegrowers chairman Ross Farlow said it was difficult to work out the exact source so long after the event.

"It's almost four years now since that data was collected and you would have to wonder why the data has been sat on and held and not flagged at the time," he said.

"If there was an issue of alarm, why wasn't it raised with the agricultural industries across the floodplain and something could have been investigated immediately?"

Australian Macadamia Society chief executive officer Clare Hamilton-Bate said two of the 21 chemicals were registered for macadamias.

One is the fungicide tebuconazole, the other is iprodione; which she says isn't used due to residue limits in key export markets.

"We have flagged our disappointment that there was no consultation and, it would appear, little agronomic knowledge of what is used in the macadamia industry," she said.

Water quality in the Richmond River has been a matter of concern for many years.

A 2015 University of New England study gave the river a D-plus health rating.

Aquatic veterinarian Matt Landos said he was not surprised by the results.

"We haven't reformed our regulation of pesticides to make them safe," he said.

"The detection of benomyl shows the product is still in use and someone is using that product illegally."

Oysters 'should be safe'

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is responsible for reviewing and approving pesticides up to the point of sale.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) regulates the use of pesticides.

An EPA spokesperson was not available for an interview, but said in a statement that the agency welcomed the work done by Southern Cross University and took the misuse of pesticides and their potential impacts seriously.

The EPA has commenced a compliance campaign targeting horticultural farms near Emigrant Creek.

The report authors are calling for further pesticide contamination research higher in the Richmond catchment, as well as in other estuaries.

Co-author Amanda Reichelt-Brushett said she did not want to put people off eating their oysters.

"They should be safe if you have bought them from a good farm," she said.

Richmond River oyster grower Geoff Lawler said he was concerned but not surprised that pesticides were found in the estuaries.

He said his commercial oysters were tested in 2020, the same year as when this research was carried out, and found to be pesticide-free.

"We're controlled by the NSW Food Authority, they apply the Food Standards Act," he said.

"If there was any problem they would have simply prevented us from harvesting."

‘Cocktail of pesticides’ found in Richmond River, including chemical banned in 2006

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-14/illegal-chemical-among-pesticides-detected-in-richmond-river/103222592

Tests have revealed the presence of a “cocktail of pesticides” – including traces of a chemical that was banned almost 20 years ago – in a major New South Wales waterway and the wild oysters that inhabit it.

The data was collected in 2020-21 and the results of the Richmond River study were published in the Journal of Environmental Pollution this week.

Southern Cross University marine science professor Kirsten Benkendorff said 21 different pesticides were detected in the river near Ballina.

The researchers found more pesticides in the wild oysters than in the water.

There was an average of nine different pesticides detected in individual oyster samples.

Dr Benkendorff said the concentration of several pesticides exceeded safe environmental guidelines.

“There was a whole cocktail of pesticides in oysters and the water,” she said.

“It’s a serious concern of the health of the environment and potential consumer safety.”

The fungicide benomyl, which has been illegal to use since 2006, was also detected.

“It is a really big concern to have found a banned pesticide in our water here — we don’t know who is using it or why,” she said.

“It’s a pesticide with a pretty short half-life, so it’s not something that has been hanging around in the environment for a long time.”

Some of the pesticides identified in the report are used for roadside weed spraying and for maintenance of playing fields.

Most of the chemicals detected in the study are registered for use in the production of sugarcane.

“It demonstrates there is a range of different sources of pesticides, even when we consider agriculture as the main focus,” Dr Benkendorff said.

Cane industry blindsided

The testing revealed high levels of the herbicides atrazine and diuron were detected in March 2020 at a testing site near a cane drain at Empire Vale, south of Ballina.

NSW Canegrowers chairman Ross Farlow said it was difficult to work out the exact source so long after the event.

“It’s almost four years now since that data was collected and you would have to wonder why the data has been sat on and held and not flagged at the time,” he said.

“If there was an issue of alarm, why wasn’t it raised with the agricultural industries across the floodplain and something could have been investigated immediately?”

Australian Macadamia Society chief executive officer Clare Hamilton-Bate said two of the 21 chemicals were registered for macadamias.

One is the fungicide tebuconazole, the other is iprodione; which she says isn’t used due to residue limits in key export markets.

“We have flagged our disappointment that there was no consultation and, it would appear, little agronomic knowledge of what is used in the macadamia industry,” she said.

Water quality in the Richmond River has been a matter of concern for many years.

A 2015 University of New England study gave the river a D-plus health rating.

Aquatic veterinarian Matt Landos said he was not surprised by the results.

“We haven’t reformed our regulation of pesticides to make them safe,” he said.

“The detection of benomyl shows the product is still in use and someone is using that product illegally.”

Oysters ‘should be safe’

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is responsible for reviewing and approving pesticides up to the point of sale.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) regulates the use of pesticides.

An EPA spokesperson was not available for an interview, but said in a statement that the agency welcomed the work done by Southern Cross University and took the misuse of pesticides and their potential impacts seriously.

The EPA has commenced a compliance campaign targeting horticultural farms near Emigrant Creek.

The report authors are calling for further pesticide contamination research higher in the Richmond catchment, as well as in other estuaries.

Co-author Amanda Reichelt-Brushett said she did not want to put people off eating their oysters.

“They should be safe if you have bought them from a good farm,” she said.

Richmond River oyster grower Geoff Lawler said he was concerned but not surprised that pesticides were found in the estuaries.

He said his commercial oysters were tested in 2020, the same year as when this research was carried out, and found to be pesticide-free.

“We’re controlled by the NSW Food Authority, they apply the Food Standards Act,” he said.

“If there was any problem they would have simply prevented us from harvesting.”

 

8/12/23: Over 1000ha of Cotton Crops in NSW hit by Spray Drift

Over 1K hectares of cotton crops in NSW, Australia hit by spray drift

8 Dec 2023

https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/cotton-news/over-1k-hectares-of-cotton-crops-in-nsw-australia-hit-by-spray-drift-291774-newsdetails.htm

More than 1,000 hectares of cotton crops have already been impacted by spray drift in Australia’s New South Wales (NSW) with growers, agronomists, and industry leaders fearful that a perfect storm may result in significant damage unless all sprayers do the right thing.

Agronomist Emma Ayliffe, from Summit Ag in Griffith visited three farms between Lake Cargelligo and Condobolin in Centra West NSW, reviewing three separate incidents ranging from minor damage to severe, Cotton Australia said in a press release.

“Some of the crops have been hit hard but the positive is that it’s only early days and they may recover, avoiding a total loss. We were hit hard last season, and we are all sick of it. It’s got to stop. We can’t afford a repeat of the damage and if everyone uses the tools and resources available, this can all be avoided,” Ayliffe said.

There have also been reports from Griffith and near Moree with Cotton Australia (CA) regional managers concerned that conditions may lead to an escalation of damage and reports. The reports, combined with the recent rains boosting weed growth, indicate spraying activity is about to ramp up significantly.

CA policy officer for stewardship Doug McCollum said there is a perfect storm brewing, and everyone needs to take extra precautions given the extreme conditions. “With hot conditions, growers might be tempted to delay spraying during the day to avoid evaporation and instead spray at night. Unfortunately for growers the inversion conditions are mostly prevalent during nighttime and that could lead to unintended drift over a large area.”

In New South Wales the EPA has signalled they will not hesitate to take action against anyone spraying pesticides irresponsibly or deliberately causing harm. They have stepped up site visits with recent pesticides campaigns in Moree, Narrabri and Walgett, and are undertaking active investigations in Carrathool, Forbes, Griffith, Narromine, Moree, Warren and Yallaroi.

McCollum urged all those spraying their crops to fully utilise the full complement of tools, including Weather and Networked Data (WAND) towers and SataCrop this season to avoid spray drift, enabling the rapid detection of hazardous conditions and inversions, potentially preventing millions of dollars’ worth of lost production.

In March this year both the Grains and Cotton Research and Development Corporations in conjunction with Goanna Ag, confirmed all 100 WAND spray hazard identification towers were up and running stretching from Emerald in Queensland to the Victorian border.

Over 2,000 cotton and grain growers and spray operators have registered to use WAND towers to identify, in real time, whether a hazardous inversion is present helping their decision to spray, or more importantly when not to spray.

WAND is a spray drift hazardous weather warning system that provides real-time weather data for growers and spray operators. Utilising remote sensing capability and new proprietary software, the towers provide growers and spray contractors with a two-hour forecast of weather data that is updated every 10 minutes.

SataCrop can map all crop types, including cotton, grains and tree crops. Growers log in and plot the location of fields they have planted with different crops each season allowing others to review the site when planning spray applications to see the location of potentially sensitive neighbouring crops, the release added.

“It’s fantastic having these tools and this year if people use them, remain vigilant around spray and wind conditions, and strictly adhere to the instructions on the label then we can avoid tens of millions worth of damage,” McCollum said. “The vast majority are doing the right thing and those who flagrantly break the rules can expect to be caught.”

Over 1K hectares of cotton crops in NSW, Australia hit by spray drift

8 Dec 2023

https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/cotton-news/over-1k-hectares-of-cotton-crops-in-nsw-australia-hit-by-spray-drift-291774-newsdetails.htm

More than 1,000 hectares of cotton crops have already been impacted by spray drift in Australia’s New South Wales (NSW) with growers, agronomists, and industry leaders fearful that a perfect storm may result in significant damage unless all sprayers do the right thing.

Agronomist Emma Ayliffe, from Summit Ag in Griffith visited three farms between Lake Cargelligo and Condobolin in Centra West NSW, reviewing three separate incidents ranging from minor damage to severe, Cotton Australia said in a press release.

“Some of the crops have been hit hard but the positive is that it’s only early days and they may recover, avoiding a total loss. We were hit hard last season, and we are all sick of it. It’s got to stop. We can’t afford a repeat of the damage and if everyone uses the tools and resources available, this can all be avoided,” Ayliffe said.

There have also been reports from Griffith and near Moree with Cotton Australia (CA) regional managers concerned that conditions may lead to an escalation of damage and reports. The reports, combined with the recent rains boosting weed growth, indicate spraying activity is about to ramp up significantly.

CA policy officer for stewardship Doug McCollum said there is a perfect storm brewing, and everyone needs to take extra precautions given the extreme conditions. “With hot conditions, growers might be tempted to delay spraying during the day to avoid evaporation and instead spray at night. Unfortunately for growers the inversion conditions are mostly prevalent during nighttime and that could lead to unintended drift over a large area.”

In New South Wales the EPA has signalled they will not hesitate to take action against anyone spraying pesticides irresponsibly or deliberately causing harm. They have stepped up site visits with recent pesticides campaigns in Moree, Narrabri and Walgett, and are undertaking active investigations in Carrathool, Forbes, Griffith, Narromine, Moree, Warren and Yallaroi.

McCollum urged all those spraying their crops to fully utilise the full complement of tools, including Weather and Networked Data (WAND) towers and SataCrop this season to avoid spray drift, enabling the rapid detection of hazardous conditions and inversions, potentially preventing millions of dollars’ worth of lost production.

In March this year both the Grains and Cotton Research and Development Corporations in conjunction with Goanna Ag, confirmed all 100 WAND spray hazard identification towers were up and running stretching from Emerald in Queensland to the Victorian border.

Over 2,000 cotton and grain growers and spray operators have registered to use WAND towers to identify, in real time, whether a hazardous inversion is present helping their decision to spray, or more importantly when not to spray.

WAND is a spray drift hazardous weather warning system that provides real-time weather data for growers and spray operators. Utilising remote sensing capability and new proprietary software, the towers provide growers and spray contractors with a two-hour forecast of weather data that is updated every 10 minutes.

SataCrop can map all crop types, including cotton, grains and tree crops. Growers log in and plot the location of fields they have planted with different crops each season allowing others to review the site when planning spray applications to see the location of potentially sensitive neighbouring crops, the release added.

“It’s fantastic having these tools and this year if people use them, remain vigilant around spray and wind conditions, and strictly adhere to the instructions on the label then we can avoid tens of millions worth of damage,” McCollum said. “The vast majority are doing the right thing and those who flagrantly break the rules can expect to be caught.”

21/11/23: Yorke Peninsula (South Australia) 26 reports of spray drift. Pesticide: Overwatch (Bixlozone)

Spray drift: not on our watch

Yorke Peninsula Country Times 21/11/23

Prompted by its investigation into 26 reports of off-target impacts of the herbicide Overwatch on Yorke Peninsula, Primary Industries and Regions South Australia says it will crackdown on non-compliant use of agricultural chemicals.

PIRSA biosecurity executive director Nathan Rhodes said the reports had come from throughout YP, including Alford, Balgowan, Edithburgh, Kulpara, Moonta and surrounds, Maitland, Minlaton, Port Vincent, Point Turton, Tiddy Widdy Beach, Wallaroo, Warooka and Wool Bay.

Overwatch damage has also been reported in the Mid North at Snowtown, Balaklava, Hart and Manoora.

No complaints or reports have been received from outside these two regions.

PIRSA has referred the reports to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority but has not yet received feedback.

Manufactured by FMC Australia, Overwatch is a pre-emergent herbicide which is applied during seeding time in April/May to control annual ryegrass and some broadleaf weeds in broadacre crops.

Mr Rhodes said PIRSA has a renewed focus on preventing drift of any agricultural chemicals by ensuring chemical users comply with mandatory instructions.

“Users identified to not be following mandatory label instructions can expect PIRSA to use the strongest possible regulatory enforcement options, which include prosecution,” he said.

Most of the reported damage was to garden plants in townships, often some distance from cropping paddocks.

“Damage is considered likely to have resulted from a combination of use during hazardous inversion weather conditions and/or application practices resulting in unacceptable production of fine droplets with a higher potential to drift,” Mr Rhodes said.

“Spray drift damage is highly visible for Overwatch — with some plant species being particularly susceptible to very low amounts of Overwatch drift — as the bleaching symptoms are easily observable.”

PIRSA contacted crop producers across YP believed to have used Overwatch in 2023, largely based on their location near reported damage, but this did not imply they were the source of the damage, he said.

No evidence was found by PIRSA to indicate the users checked during the investigation had contravened mandatory label instructions.

“All producers interviewed by PIRSA were aware of the potential of Overwatch to produce visible symptoms on non-target vegetation and were concerned about it, with one farmer choosing not to use the herbicide again due to this off-target damage risk,” Mr Rhodes said.

More training to stop spray drift

“Overwatch is a relatively new herbicide product and has a unique mode of action that enables it to control some weeds that are not well controlled by other herbicides,” PIRSA biosecurity executive director Nathan Rhodes said.

“This makes it useful where weed resistance to other herbicide groups has developed.”

It is expected Overwatch will be used again in 2024, and PIRSA is working with Grain Producers SA to improve awareness and training for chemical users.

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said the company had shared information with PIRSA during the investigation.

He said many factors — such as soil, nutrition, environmental conditions and use of other agricultural chemicals — can also cause plant symptoms which may be mistaken as signs of contact with Overwatch.

FMC has provided chemical-user training over the past three seasons and will run another series of workshops in 2024, Mr Robertson said.

These will be held at Crystal Brook on February 27, at Paskeville on February 28 and at Minlaton on February 29.

Mr Robertson said Overwatch does not pose any threat to human health when applied in accordance with label instructions.

“APVMA and the Department of Health determined that Overwatch has a very low toxicity profile,” he said.

“If any small amount of spray drift was to contact drinking water collection areas or fruit in nearby fields, the risk would be extremely low due to its very low toxicity to humans.”

Spray drift: not on our watch

Yorke Peninsula Country Times 21/11/23

Prompted by its investigation into 26 reports of off-target impacts of the herbicide Overwatch on Yorke Peninsula, Primary Industries and Regions South Australia says it will crackdown on non-compliant use of agricultural chemicals.

PIRSA biosecurity executive director Nathan Rhodes said the reports had come from throughout YP, including Alford, Balgowan, Edithburgh, Kulpara, Moonta and surrounds, Maitland, Minlaton, Port Vincent, Point Turton, Tiddy Widdy Beach, Wallaroo, Warooka and Wool Bay.

Overwatch damage has also been reported in the Mid North at Snowtown, Balaklava, Hart and Manoora.

No complaints or reports have been received from outside these two regions.

PIRSA has referred the reports to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority but has not yet received feedback.

Manufactured by FMC Australia, Overwatch is a pre-emergent herbicide which is applied during seeding time in April/May to control annual ryegrass and some broadleaf weeds in broadacre crops.

Mr Rhodes said PIRSA has a renewed focus on preventing drift of any agricultural chemicals by ensuring chemical users comply with mandatory instructions.

“Users identified to not be following mandatory label instructions can expect PIRSA to use the strongest possible regulatory enforcement options, which include prosecution,” he said.

Most of the reported damage was to garden plants in townships, often some distance from cropping paddocks.

“Damage is considered likely to have resulted from a combination of use during hazardous inversion weather conditions and/or application practices resulting in unacceptable production of fine droplets with a higher potential to drift,” Mr Rhodes said.

“Spray drift damage is highly visible for Overwatch — with some plant species being particularly susceptible to very low amounts of Overwatch drift — as the bleaching symptoms are easily observable.”

PIRSA contacted crop producers across YP believed to have used Overwatch in 2023, largely based on their location near reported damage, but this did not imply they were the source of the damage, he said.

No evidence was found by PIRSA to indicate the users checked during the investigation had contravened mandatory label instructions.

“All producers interviewed by PIRSA were aware of the potential of Overwatch to produce visible symptoms on non-target vegetation and were concerned about it, with one farmer choosing not to use the herbicide again due to this off-target damage risk,” Mr Rhodes said.

More training to stop spray drift

“Overwatch is a relatively new herbicide product and has a unique mode of action that enables it to control some weeds that are not well controlled by other herbicides,” PIRSA biosecurity executive director Nathan Rhodes said.

“This makes it useful where weed resistance to other herbicide groups has developed.”

It is expected Overwatch will be used again in 2024, and PIRSA is working with Grain Producers SA to improve awareness and training for chemical users.

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said the company had shared information with PIRSA during the investigation.

He said many factors — such as soil, nutrition, environmental conditions and use of other agricultural chemicals — can also cause plant symptoms which may be mistaken as signs of contact with Overwatch.

FMC has provided chemical-user training over the past three seasons and will run another series of workshops in 2024, Mr Robertson said.

These will be held at Crystal Brook on February 27, at Paskeville on February 28 and at Minlaton on February 29.

Mr Robertson said Overwatch does not pose any threat to human health when applied in accordance with label instructions.

“APVMA and the Department of Health determined that Overwatch has a very low toxicity profile,” he said.

“If any small amount of spray drift was to contact drinking water collection areas or fruit in nearby fields, the risk would be extremely low due to its very low toxicity to humans.”

2016/20: Whitfield drinking water supply. Pesticide: MCPA

Whitfield Drinking Water Supply

25/10/16: Whitfield Raw Water Tank MCPA 0.03ug/L

2018/19: Whitfield Triazine and triazineone herbicides 0.01ug/L

2019/20: Whitfield Organophosphate pesticides 0.04ug/L

 

Whitfield Drinking Water Supply

25/10/16: Whitfield Raw Water Tank MCPA 0.03ug/L

2018/19: Whitfield Triazine and triazineone herbicides 0.01ug/L

2019/20: Whitfield Organophosphate pesticides 0.04ug/L

2012/22: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga. Pesticides: Atrazine, MCPA, Simazine

Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga Drinking Water Supply

15/11/12: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.01ug/L

13/6/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.03ug/L

13/6/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP MCPA 0.04ug/L

13/6/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Simazine 0.04ug/L

25/7/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.01ug/L

30/7/15: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.04ug/L

30/7/15: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Simazine 0.03ug/L

28/7/16: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.05ug/L

28/7/16: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Simazine 0.04ug/L

2019/20: Yarrawonga Phenoxy herbicides 0.04ug/L

2020/21: Yarrawonga Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.15ug/L

2021/22: Yarrawonga Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.07ug/L

bicides 0.07ug/L

Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga Drinking Water Supply

15/11/12: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.01ug/L

13/6/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.03ug/L

13/6/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP MCPA 0.04ug/L

13/6/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Simazine 0.04ug/L

25/7/13: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.01ug/L

30/7/15: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.04ug/L

30/7/15: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Simazine 0.03ug/L

28/7/16: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Atrazine 0.05ug/L

28/7/16: Lake Mulwala, Yarrawonga WTP Simazine 0.04ug/L

2019/20: Yarrawonga Phenoxy herbicides 0.04ug/L

2020/21: Yarrawonga Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.15ug/L

2021/22: Yarrawonga Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.07ug/L

2012/22: Wodonga Creek, Wodonga. Pesticides: Multiple

Wodonga Creek, Wodonga Drinking Water Supply

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Diazinon 0.01ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Malathion 0.02ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap MCPA 0.01ug/L

5/6/13: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap 2,4-D 0.03ug/L

5/6/13: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

23/10/13: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Simazine 0.04ug/L

26/10/16: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Simazine 0.04ug/L

26/10/16: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

26/10/16: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap MCPA 0.01ug/L

2018/19: Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.01ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy herbicides 0.01ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.01ug/L

2021/22: Wodonga Carbamtates 0.01ug/L, Organophosphate Pesticides 0.21ug/L, Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.04ug/L

Wodonga Creek, Wodonga Drinking Water Supply

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Atrazine 0.02ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Diazinon 0.01ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Malathion 0.02ug/L

8/11/12: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap MCPA 0.01ug/L

5/6/13: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap 2,4-D 0.03ug/L

5/6/13: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

23/10/13: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Simazine 0.04ug/L

26/10/16: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap Simazine 0.04ug/L

26/10/16: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

26/10/16: Wodonga Creek P.S. at tap MCPA 0.01ug/L

2018/19: Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.01ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy herbicides 0.01ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.01ug/L

2021/22: Wodonga Carbamtates 0.01ug/L, Organophosphate Pesticides 0.21ug/L, Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.04ug/L

2012/22: Wahgunyah (Murray River, Victoria). Pesticides Atrazine, Terbutryn, MCPA, Simazine

Wahgunyah: Murray River at tap at inlet to treatment plant

8/11/12: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

25/7/13: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

25/7/13: Terbutryn 0.01ug/L

24/10/13: MCPA 0.01ug/L

30/10/14: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

27/10/16: Simazine 0.04ug/L

2020/21 (Wahgunyah): Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22 (Wahgunyah): Organophospate Pesticide 0.43ug/L, Phenoxy herbicides 0.05ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.1ug/L

05ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.1ug/L

Wahgunyah: Murray River at tap at inlet to treatment plant

8/11/12: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

25/7/13: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

25/7/13: Terbutryn 0.01ug/L

24/10/13: MCPA 0.01ug/L

30/10/14: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

27/10/16: Simazine 0.04ug/L

2020/21 (Wahgunyah): Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22 (Wahgunyah): Organophospate Pesticide 0.43ug/L, Phenoxy herbicides 0.05ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.1ug/L

2013/22: Oxley (Victoria). King River Offtake. Pesticides: MCPA, 2,6-D, Triclopyr

King River at Oxley Offtake

12/6/13: MCPA 0.07ug/L

23/4/14: 2,6-D 0.01ug/L

28/4/15: Triclopyr 0.04ug/L

27/1/16: Triclopyr 0.03

2021/22: Phenoxy Herbicides 0.49ug/L, Triazine or Triazineone Herbicides 0.07ug/L

King River at Oxley Offtake

12/6/13: MCPA 0.07ug/L

23/4/14: 2,6-D 0.01ug/L

28/4/15: Triclopyr 0.04ug/L

27/1/16: Triclopyr 0.03

2021/22: Phenoxy Herbicides 0.49ug/L, Triazine or Triazineone Herbicides 0.07ug/L

2018/22: Moyhu Drinking Water Supply (Victoria)

Moyhu (Victoria) Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine & Triazineone Herbicides 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.04ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.02ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy Herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine & Triazineone Herbicides 0.06ug/L

2021/22: Carbamate Pesticides 0.06ug/L, Phenoxy Herbicides 0.01ug/L, Triazine & Triazineone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

 

Moyhu (Victoria) Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine & Triazineone Herbicides 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.04ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.02ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy Herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine & Triazineone Herbicides 0.06ug/L

2021/22: Carbamate Pesticides 0.06ug/L, Phenoxy Herbicides 0.01ug/L, Triazine & Triazineone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2018/22: Dartmouth drinking water supply – Carbamate + Triazine Pesticides

Dartmouth Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy herbicides 0.11ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Carbamate Pesticides 0.01ug/L

Dartmouth Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy herbicides 0.11ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Carbamate Pesticides 0.01ug/L

2016/22: Corryong Drinking Water. Pesticides: Benomyl, Terbufos

Corryong WTP raw water tap

24/10/16: Corryong WTP raw water tap Benomyl 0.01ug/L

24/10/16: Corryong WTP raw water tap Terbufos 0.02ug/L

2021/22 Corryong Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.02ug/L

Corryong WTP raw water tap

24/10/16: Corryong WTP raw water tap Benomyl 0.01ug/L

24/10/16: Corryong WTP raw water tap Terbufos 0.02ug/L

2021/22 Corryong Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.02ug/L

2012/22: Lake Hume at Bethanga Bridge, Bellbridge. Pesticides: MCPA, Simazine, Atrazine

Lake Hume at Bethanga Bridge, Bellibridge

8/11/12: MCPA 0.01ug/L

14/10/15: MCPA 0.01ug/L

12/10/16: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

12/10/16: Simazine 0.05ug/L

12/10/16: Terbufos 0.01ug/L

2018/19: Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.01ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.02ug/L, Sulfonylurea Herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.01ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.02ug/L, Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.06ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.04ug/L, Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.05ug/L

 

Lake Hume at Bethanga Bridge, Bellibridge

8/11/12: MCPA 0.01ug/L

14/10/15: MCPA 0.01ug/L

12/10/16: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

12/10/16: Simazine 0.05ug/L

12/10/16: Terbufos 0.01ug/L

2018/19: Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.01ug/L

2019/20: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.02ug/L, Sulfonylurea Herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.01ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.02ug/L, Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.06ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.04ug/L, Triazine & Triazinone Herbicides 0.05ug/L

2012-22: Reserve Basin at Inlet to Beechworth. Pesticides: Benomyl, 2,6-D, Terbufos

Beechworth Drinking Water Supply

Reserve Basin at Inlet to Beechworth

25/9/12: Benomyl 0.03ug/L

23/4/14: 2,6-D 0.01ug/L

25/10/16: Terbufos 0.01ug/L

2018/19: (Beechworth): Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.04ug/L

2019/20: (Beechworth): Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: (Beechworth): Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Phenoxy Herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22 (Beechworth): Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Phenoxy Herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.01ug/L

 

Beechworth Drinking Water Supply

Reserve Basin at Inlet to Beechworth

25/9/12: Benomyl 0.03ug/L

23/4/14: 2,6-D 0.01ug/L

25/10/16: Terbufos 0.01ug/L

2018/19: (Beechworth): Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.04ug/L

2019/20: (Beechworth): Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: (Beechworth): Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Phenoxy Herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22 (Beechworth): Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Phenoxy Herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazinone Herbicides 0.01ug/L

2018/23: Myrtleford (Victoria) Water Supply. Pesticides: MCPA?, 2,4-D?

Myrtleford (Victoria) Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenoxy Herbicides (probably 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.04ug/L

2019/20: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenoxy Herbicides (probably 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.48ug/L

2021/22: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenoxy Herbicides (probably 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.03ug/L

2022/23: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenolic Compounds  0.14ug/L

 

Myrtleford (Victoria) Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenoxy Herbicides (probably 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.04ug/L

2019/20: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenoxy Herbicides (probably 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.48ug/L

2021/22: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenoxy Herbicides (probably 2,4-D or MCPA) 0.03ug/L

2022/23: Myrtleford Drinking Water Supply. Phenolic Compounds  0.14ug/L

 

2012/23: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah. Hexazinone, 2,4-D?, MCPA?

2012/16 Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah

7/11/12: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

4/6/13: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

30/7/13: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

21/1/14: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

29/7/14: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

28/1/15: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

29/7/15: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

26/1/16: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

29/7/16: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2019/20: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.04ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Phenoxy herbicides 0.17ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2022/23: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Phenolic Compounds 0.03ug/L

 

2012/16 Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah

7/11/12: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

4/6/13: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

30/7/13: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

21/1/14: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

29/7/14: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

28/1/15: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

29/7/15: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

26/1/16: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

29/7/16: Nine Mile Creek, Yackandandah, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2019/20: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.04ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Phenoxy herbicides 0.17ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Phenoxy herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone herbicides 0.03ug/L

2022/23: Yackandandah, Drinking Water Supply Phenolic Compounds 0.03ug/L

2013-2019/23: Walwa (Victoria) Murray River. 2,4-D, Atrazine, MCPA, Triclopyr

Walwa Drinking Water Supply (Murray River)

3/6/13: 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

3/6/13: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

3/6/13: MCPA 0.02ug/L

3/6/13: Triclopyr 0.03ug/L

North East Water FoI

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy herbicides 0.13ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.04ug/L

2022/23: Phenolic compounds 0.12ug/L

 

h East Water Drinking Water Quality Report 2022/23

Walwa Drinking Water Supply (Murray River)

3/6/13: 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

3/6/13: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

3/6/13: MCPA 0.02ug/L

3/6/13: Triclopyr 0.03ug/L

North East Water FoI

2019/20: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy herbicides 0.13ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone Herbicides 0.04ug/L

2022/23: Phenolic compounds 0.12ug/L

 

2013 + 2019/23: Tallangatta Drinking Water Supply. Pesticides: MCPA + 2,4-D

Tallangatta Drinking Water Supply

11/6/13: 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

11/6/13: MCPA 0.01ug/L

24/7/13: MCPA 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Sulonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone (most likely Atrazine, Simazine or Hexazinone) 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone (most likely Atrazine, Simazine or Hexazinone) 0.02ug/L

2022/23: Phenolic compounds 0.14ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone (most likely Atrazine, Simazine or Hexazinone) 0.1ug/L

 

 

Tallangatta Drinking Water Supply

11/6/13: 2,4-D 0.01ug/L

11/6/13: MCPA 0.01ug/L

24/7/13: MCPA 0.02ug/L

2019/20: Sulonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy herbicides 0.02ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone (most likely Atrazine, Simazine or Hexazinone) 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy herbicides 0.06ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone (most likely Atrazine, Simazine or Hexazinone) 0.02ug/L

2022/23: Phenolic compounds 0.14ug/L, Triazine and Triazineone (most likely Atrazine, Simazine or Hexazinone) 0.1ug/L

 

2018/23: Bright Drinking Water Supply. MCPA or 2,4-D

Bright Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely MCPA or 2,4-D) 0.52ug/L

2019/20: Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Phenoxy herbicides 0.7ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazines & Triazineones 0.01ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely MCPA or 2,4-D) 0.24ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely MCPA or 2,4-D) 0.06ug/L

2022/23: Phenolic compounds 0.12ug/L

North East Water Drinking Water Quality Reports

/23

Bright Drinking Water Supply

2018/19: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely MCPA or 2,4-D) 0.52ug/L

2019/20: Carbamates 0.01ug/L, Phenoxy herbicides 0.7ug/L, Sulfonylurea herbicides 0.03ug/L, Triazines & Triazineones 0.01ug/L

2020/21: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely MCPA or 2,4-D) 0.24ug/L

2021/22: Phenoxy Herbicides (most likely MCPA or 2,4-D) 0.06ug/L

2022/23: Phenolic compounds 0.12ug/L

North East Water Drinking Water Quality Reports

2018: Herrick (Tasmania). Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl

Herrick Reservoir (Tasmania)

29/5/18: Herrick Reservoir - Supply. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

29/5/18: Herrick Reservoir - Supply. Sulfometuron Methyl 4ug/L

11/6/18: Herrick Reservoir - Supply. Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

11/6/18: Herrick Reservoir- Supply. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

11/6/18: 11 Gladstone Road, Herrick - Supply. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

RTI Application

 

11/6/18: Herrick Reservoir. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

Herrick Reservoir (Tasmania)

29/5/18: Herrick Reservoir – Supply. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

29/5/18: Herrick Reservoir – Supply. Sulfometuron Methyl 4ug/L

11/6/18: Herrick Reservoir – Supply. Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

11/6/18: Herrick Reservoir- Supply. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

11/6/18: 11 Gladstone Road, Herrick – Supply. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

RTI Application

29/5/18: Herrick – river offtake (Tasmania). 2,4-D, Sulfometuron Methyl

Herrick (Tasmania)

29/5/18: Raw Water Offtake Tasman Highway Herrick. 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

29/5/18: Raw Water Offtake Tasman Highway Herrick. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

RTI Application

Herrick (Tasmania)

29/5/18: Raw Water Offtake Tasman Highway Herrick. 2,4-D 0.09ug/L

29/5/18: Raw Water Offtake Tasman Highway Herrick. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

RTI Application

2018: Mathinna (Tasmania). Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl

Mathinna (Tasmania)

8/5/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Sulfometuron Methyl 3ug/L

5/6/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

5/6/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Sulfometuron Methyl 32ug/L

Mathinna (Tasmania)

8/5/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Sulfometuron Methyl 3ug/L

5/6/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

5/6/18: Intake, South Esk River, Mathinna. Sulfometuron Methyl 32ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander (Tasmania). Dicamba, MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl

Scamander (Tasmania)

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. Dicamba 0.3ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. Metsulfuron Methyl 5ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

RTI Information

Scamander (Tasmania)

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. Dicamba 0.3ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. Metsulfuron Methyl 5ug/L

8/5/18: Scamander River Raw Intake. Sulfometuron Methyl 2ug/L

RTI Information

2018: Cornwall (Tasmania). Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl, Dicamba, MCPA

Cornwall (Tasmania)

8/5/18: Unnamed watercourse. Metsulfuron Methyl 12ug/L

8/5/18: Unnamed watercourse. Sulfomethuron Methyl 19ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Dicamba 0.6ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. MCPA 0.05ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Sulfometuron Methyl  11ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Sulfometuron Methyl  9ug/L

RTI Application

Cornwall (Tasmania)

8/5/18: Unnamed watercourse. Metsulfuron Methyl 12ug/L

8/5/18: Unnamed watercourse. Sulfomethuron Methyl 19ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Dicamba 0.6ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. MCPA 0.05ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Sulfometuron Methyl  11ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/5/18: Intake, Cornwall Fanshaft. Sulfometuron Methyl  9ug/L

RTI Application

2018: Wayatinah (Tasmania). 2,4-D, Dicamba, Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl

Wayatinah (Tasmania)

30/4/18: Wayatinah (Tasmania) 2,4-D 0.12ug/L

30/4/18: Wayatinah (Tasmania) Dicamba 0.2ug/L

30/4/18 Wayatinah (Tasmania) Metsulfuron Methyl 5ug/L

30/4/18 Wayatinah (Tasmania) Sulfometuron Methyl 6ug/L

RTI application

Wayatinah (Tasmania)

30/4/18: Wayatinah (Tasmania) 2,4-D 0.12ug/L

30/4/18: Wayatinah (Tasmania) Dicamba 0.2ug/L

30/4/18 Wayatinah (Tasmania) Metsulfuron Methyl 5ug/L

30/4/18 Wayatinah (Tasmania) Sulfometuron Methyl 6ug/L

RTI application

2017: Curries River Tasmania. Chlorpyrifos, Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl

Curries River  - Tasmania

10/8/17: Curries River Raw Sample Point Chlorpyrifos 1ug/L

8/5/18: Curries River Raw Sample Point Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

8/5/18: Curries River Raw Sample Point Sulfometuron Methyl 3ug/L

Curries River – Tasmania

10/8/17: Curries River Raw Sample Point Chlorpyrifos 1ug/L

8/5/18: Curries River Raw Sample Point Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

8/5/18: Curries River Raw Sample Point Sulfometuron Methyl 3ug/L

2016: Yolla (Tasmania). MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl

Yolla (Tasmania) - Dowling Creek

15/3/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) MCPA 0.12ug/L

15/3/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.07ug/L

5/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) MCPA 0.03ug/L

5/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.12ug/L

19/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) MCPA 0.03ug/L

19/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.09ug/L

4/5/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.04ug/L

31/5/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.02ug/L

Yolla (Tasmania) – Dowling Creek

15/3/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) MCPA 0.12ug/L

15/3/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.07ug/L

5/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) MCPA 0.03ug/L

5/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.12ug/L

19/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) MCPA 0.03ug/L

19/4/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.09ug/L

4/5/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.04ug/L

31/5/16: Yolla (Dowling Creek) Metsulfuron Methyl 0.02ug/L

2016: Lady Barron (Tasmania). MCPA, Clopyralid, Dicamba, Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl, Simazine

Lady Barron (Tasmania)

2/3/16: Police Station (supply) MCPA 0.22ug/L

2/3/16: Bore Pump Station (raw) MCPA 11ug/L

7/5/18: Bore Pump Station (raw) Dicamba 0.7ug/L

7/5/18: Bore Pump Station (raw) Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

7/5/18: Bore Pump Station (raw) Sulfometuron Methyl 4ug/L

Lady Barron (Bores)

14/12/16: Bore 1 Clopyralid 180ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 2 Clopyralid 74ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 3 Clopyralid 35ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 4 Clopyralid 55ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 5 Clopyralid 22ug/L

Lady Barron (Tasmania)

2/3/16: Police Station (supply) MCPA 0.22ug/L

2/3/16: Bore Pump Station (raw) MCPA 11ug/L

7/5/18: Bore Pump Station (raw) Dicamba 0.7ug/L

7/5/18: Bore Pump Station (raw) Metsulfuron Methyl 2ug/L

7/5/18: Bore Pump Station (raw) Sulfometuron Methyl 4ug/L

Lady Barron (Bores)

14/12/16: Bore 1 Clopyralid 180ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 2 Clopyralid 74ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 3 Clopyralid 35ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 4 Clopyralid 55ug/L

14/12/16: Bore 5 Clopyralid 22ug/L

2023 September: Crayfish Kill at Hazelbrook (NSW)

EPA Identifies Pollutant Behind Major Crayfish Kill

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has identified the pollutant which caused a major crayfish kill in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek in the Blue Mountains last month. 

According to the EPA media statement, released today, initial lab testing has found the insecticide Bifenthrin in water, sediment, and crayfish samples collected from the impacted creek.

"Bifenthrin is commonly used for general pest control, such as for termites, spiders, ants, and cockroaches and is highly toxic to crayfish and other aquatic organisms," the EPA statement said.

"The EPA investigation into the source of the Bifenthrin pollution is being finalised.

"Herbicides used by Blue Mountains City Council to control weeds, such as Glyphosate, have been ruled out as the cause of the crayfish kill and Council is not a subject of the ongoing investigation."

Blue Mountains City Council Mayor Cr Mark Greenhill said "I know many of our staff and volunteers were really hurt by fake claims on social media suggesting our people may have somehow been responsible.

"The opposite is true. Apart from assisting the regulator in the current case, our people dedicate themselves to keeping our waterways clean and protecting the wildlife within.

"To those who think it is a source of personal aggrandisement to suggest possible blame without any evidence, this should be both an embarrassment and a salient warning.

"I await the outcome of the EPA's investigation."

After hundreds of dead Giant Spiny Crayfish were discovered in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek by a tour guide in August, Council worked closely with the EPA on an investigation into the incident.

The Giant Spiny Crayfish, a local native species, face many dangers from runoff, pesticides, habitat destruction and illegal use of traps in Blue Mountains swamps and waterways.

Council will continue to monitor the recovery of freshwater crayfish and other aquatic macroinvertebrates at Hazelbrook Creek, as part of ongoing waterway health sampling programs.

EPA investigating insecticide as possible cause of crayfish kill at Hazelbrook

September 12 2023: https://www.bluemountainsgazette.com.au/story/8337913/epa-investigates-insecticide-as-possible-cause-of-crayfish-kill/

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) believes insecticide pollution may be the cause of a crayfish kill at Hazelbrook.

"The EPA has narrowed its investigation to the immediate vicinity of the Horseshoe Falls catchment and believe the impact on crayfish may have been caused by insecticide pollution," they said in a statement on September 4, adding that test results are still being finalised.

Blue Mountains mayor Mark Greenhill has ruled out any actions by council staff or bushcare volunteers contributing to the incident following uninformed speculation on social media.

 

"I can confirm that no actions by BMCC (Blue Mountains City Council) staff, or our dedicated bushcare volunteers, contributed to the water pollution event that precipitated the crayfish deaths in the Horseshoe Falls catchment," he said on September 6.

"Council and its people had absolutely nothing to do with this event and some recent commentary to the contrary on social media is false, irresponsible and unfair.

"Council staff were devastated by the discovery, and have been working to improve catchment health and water quality for over two decades across the city."

The EPA is continuing its investigation into the crayfish kill in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek on Wednesday, August 23.

A tour guide discovered the dead Giant Spiny Crayfish. A later inspection by council staff found up to 1000 of the crayfish either dead or dying, extending at least 600m downstream from Oaklands Road/Hall Parade at Hazelbrook.

 

EPA Identifies Pollutant Behind Major Crayfish Kill

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has identified the pollutant which caused a major crayfish kill in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek in the Blue Mountains last month.

According to the EPA media statement, released today, initial lab testing has found the insecticide Bifenthrin in water, sediment, and crayfish samples collected from the impacted creek.

“Bifenthrin is commonly used for general pest control, such as for termites, spiders, ants, and cockroaches and is highly toxic to crayfish and other aquatic organisms,” the EPA statement said.

“The EPA investigation into the source of the Bifenthrin pollution is being finalised.

“Herbicides used by Blue Mountains City Council to control weeds, such as Glyphosate, have been ruled out as the cause of the crayfish kill and Council is not a subject of the ongoing investigation.”

Blue Mountains City Council Mayor Cr Mark Greenhill said “I know many of our staff and volunteers were really hurt by fake claims on social media suggesting our people may have somehow been responsible.

“The opposite is true. Apart from assisting the regulator in the current case, our people dedicate themselves to keeping our waterways clean and protecting the wildlife within.

“To those who think it is a source of personal aggrandisement to suggest possible blame without any evidence, this should be both an embarrassment and a salient warning.

“I await the outcome of the EPA’s investigation.”

After hundreds of dead Giant Spiny Crayfish were discovered in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek by a tour guide in August, Council worked closely with the EPA on an investigation into the incident.

The Giant Spiny Crayfish, a local native species, face many dangers from runoff, pesticides, habitat destruction and illegal use of traps in Blue Mountains swamps and waterways.

Council will continue to monitor the recovery of freshwater crayfish and other aquatic macroinvertebrates at Hazelbrook Creek, as part of ongoing waterway health sampling programs.

EPA investigating insecticide as possible cause of crayfish kill at Hazelbrook

September 12 2023: https://www.bluemountainsgazette.com.au/story/8337913/epa-investigates-insecticide-as-possible-cause-of-crayfish-kill/

The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) believes insecticide pollution may be the cause of a crayfish kill at Hazelbrook.

“The EPA has narrowed its investigation to the immediate vicinity of the Horseshoe Falls catchment and believe the impact on crayfish may have been caused by insecticide pollution,” they said in a statement on September 4, adding that test results are still being finalised.

Blue Mountains mayor Mark Greenhill has ruled out any actions by council staff or bushcare volunteers contributing to the incident following uninformed speculation on social media.

“I can confirm that no actions by BMCC (Blue Mountains City Council) staff, or our dedicated bushcare volunteers, contributed to the water pollution event that precipitated the crayfish deaths in the Horseshoe Falls catchment,” he said on September 6.

“Council and its people had absolutely nothing to do with this event and some recent commentary to the contrary on social media is false, irresponsible and unfair.

“Council staff were devastated by the discovery, and have been working to improve catchment health and water quality for over two decades across the city.”

The EPA is continuing its investigation into the crayfish kill in a tributary of Hazelbrook Creek on Wednesday, August 23.

A tour guide discovered the dead Giant Spiny Crayfish. A later inspection by council staff found up to 1000 of the crayfish either dead or dying, extending at least 600m downstream from Oaklands Road/Hall Parade at Hazelbrook.

Blue Mountains City Council later won an award in 2019 for its efforts to protect Wentworth Falls Lake and Jamison Creek from stormwater pollution and other threats posed by urban runoff.

2019: Double Crossing Creek, site 6, Coffs Harbour NSW. Pesticides: Multiple

2019: Double Crossing Creek - Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 6

Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Dimethoate 0.02ug/L, Methomyl 0.02ug/L, Terbutyrn 0.1ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek – Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 6

Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Dimethoate 0.02ug/L, Methomyl 0.02ug/L, Terbutyrn 0.1ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek site 5, Coffs Harbour (NSW). Pesticides: Multiple

2019: Double Crossing Creek - Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 5

Imidacloprid 0.06ug/L, Dimethoate 0.02ug/L, Methomyl 0.02ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L, Terbutyrn 0.19ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek – Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 5

Imidacloprid 0.06ug/L, Dimethoate 0.02ug/L, Methomyl 0.02ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L, Terbutyrn 0.19ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek Site 4, Coffs Harbour (NSW). Pesticides: Dimethoate, Methomyl

2019: Double Crossing Creek - Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 4

Dimethoate 0.02ug/L, Methomyl 0.02ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek – Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 4

Dimethoate 0.02ug/L, Methomyl 0.02ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek Site 3, Coffs Harbour (NSW). Pesticides: Imidacloprid, Methomyl, Terbuthylazine

2019: Double Crossing Creek - Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 3

Imidacloprid 0.24ug/L, Methomyl 0.08ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek – Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 3

Imidacloprid 0.24ug/L, Methomyl 0.08ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019 Double Crossing Creek Site 2 , Coffs Harbour (NSW). Pesticides: Imidacloprid, Terbuthylazine

2019: Double Crossing Creek - Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 2

Imidacloprid 0.05ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.03ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek – Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 2

Imidacloprid 0.05ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.03ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019 Double Crossing Creek, Coffs Harbour. Pesticides: Multiple

2019: Double Crossing Creek - Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 1

Imidacloprid 294ug/L, Dimethoate 12.8ug/L, Methomyl 5.6ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.09ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L, Terbutyrn 0.46ug/L, Triadimenol 1.5ug/L, Malathion 0.47ug/L.

Wet Season: Omethoate 0.12ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2019: Double Crossing Creek – Coffs Harbour (NSW)

2019 Summer Autumn Site 1

Imidacloprid 294ug/L, Dimethoate 12.8ug/L, Methomyl 5.6ug/L, Pyrimethanil 0.09ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L, Terbutyrn 0.46ug/L, Triadimenol 1.5ug/L, Malathion 0.47ug/L.

Wet Season: Omethoate 0.12ug/L

Investigating pesticide and heavy metal distribution from water and sediments near expanding horticultural activities in the Coffs Harbour NSW Region.

Melanie Taylor, Dylan Laicher-Edwards, Shane A. White, Rebecca Woodrow, Tiago Passos, Christian J. Sanders 2022. Final Report Coffs Harbour City Council Environmental Levy Program. Southern Cross University National Marine Science Centre

2016/18: Lake Trevallyn, Tasmania. Atrazine, MCPA, Prometryn

Trevallyn Dam/Lake Trevallyn

17 May 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.02ug/L*

11 August 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.26ug/L

11 August 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam Prometryn 0.03ug/L

30 August 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.11ug/L

8 September 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.09ug/L

17 November 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.09ug/L

TasWater Pesticide Data by system v4 2016/17

8/8/18: There was a detection of a pesticide (atrazine – 27 ug/L) above the ADWG health limit on 8 August  2018. This was the first detection of atrazine in Lake Trevallyn since sampling for pesticides began in  2015.
An error occurred with the laboratory notification process which resulted in this exceedance not  being highlighted, and therefore there was no immediate resample. However, there have been no  detections of atrazine in any samples since August 2018.

TasWater Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2018-2019 Section A Summary

*RTI application

ater Quality Report 2018-2019 Section A Summary

eport 2018-2019 Section A Summary

Trevallyn Dam/Lake Trevallyn

17 May 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.02ug/L*

11 August 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.26ug/L

11 August 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam Prometryn 0.03ug/L

30 August 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.11ug/L

8 September 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.09ug/L

17 November 2016: South Esk Trevallyn Dam MCPA 0.09ug/L

TasWater Pesticide Data by system v4 2016/17

8/8/18: There was a detection of a pesticide (atrazine – 27 ug/L) above the ADWG health limit on 8 August  2018. This was the first detection of atrazine in Lake Trevallyn since sampling for pesticides began in  2015.
An error occurred with the laboratory notification process which resulted in this exceedance not  being highlighted, and therefore there was no immediate resample. However, there have been no  detections of atrazine in any samples since August 2018.

TasWater Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2018-2019 Section A Summary

*RTI application

July 17 2023: No sign of Gouldian Finches in Ord Valley

Three years with no sign of endangered Gouldian finches in Ord Valley prompts environmentalists' concern

July 17 2023: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-17/gouldian-finches-disappear-in-ord-valley-but-thrive-elsewhere/102602092

When nearly 10,000 hectares of land was approved for clearing on the fertile soil of the Kimberley's Ord Valley, protecting an endangered population of tiny birds was a key government stipulation. 

Now, a little more than a decade on, there's no trace of any Gouldian finches in the habitat that was carved out as a refuge for them.

Western Australia's Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development's 2022–23 monitoring report shows no breeding activity recorded in any of the 137 artificial nest boxes installed to replace the finches' natural hollows lost to the clearing.

It marks the third consecutive year without a sign of the small, seed-eating birds in the 11,000-hectare Weaber Plain environmental buffer.

Jaru man and environmentalist Donny Imberlong hadn't seen the environmental buffer site for years. When he returned, he was disappointed.

"This habitat is slowly becoming sterile," he said.

He pointed to the range of introduced vines and shrubs that were dominating the native ground cover and the old trees that were losing their leaves, an indication of spray drift.

"It's evident that the country around here is becoming sick," Mr Imberlong said.

According to Gary Fitt, chief executive of Save the Gouldians, the story is different 100 kilometres north-west of Kununurra's Ord Valley, around Wyndham, where the volunteer group surveys the endangered species each year.

"Last year, we saw the biggest numbers of Gouldians that we'd seen since 2008," Dr Fitt said.

"So it's surprising that there don't appear to be any in that area now. That's disappointing to see."

Up and gone?

Dr Fitt said that the birds likely migrated to a new home where they could find more suitable conditions.

"Gouldians are a highly mobile finch," he said.

"They're likely responding to a combination of environmental factors."

Those factors could be poor fire management, overgrazing or a weak wet season, although the last two were unlikely given the region's recent strong summer rainfall and the lack of cattle within the protected area.

Head east about 200 kilometres to Bullo River Station, where wildlife photographer Col Roberts assured ABC Radio Darwin that Gouldian Finches could be found in the thousands.

"I did a count of about 10 waterholes there and counted over 2,000 Gouldians," Mr Roberts said.

He questioned the current nature of their decades-old endangered listing under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

"They did suffer a decline [in numbers], but they are well and truly on the way back," he said.

Reworking attitudes towards conservation

The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development said they would continue to monitor the nest boxes, including those that they moved in late 2022 to more desirable locations, flagging this as a potential explanation for the lack of nesting.

"Routine, ongoing buffer management measures include removal of any cattle that find their way into the buffer area, maintenance of fencing and firebreaks, weed control, and restriction of access to the buffer area," DPIRD said in a statement.

But for Donny Imberlong, this effort is treating the symptom, not the cause.

"It does seem like a lot of these conservation buffers are islands in the middle of exposed farmland which, if I was a tiny little finch, I wouldn't be game to fly across to," he said.

"All the farmland here is fragmenting the habitat corridors that allow the animals to move freely between the hill ranges and the connecting plains country."

Mr Imberlong believes the process of allocating land to environmental buffers, then later managing that land, needs to be reviewed.

"It's a very colonial way of looking at these conservation areas, that idea that you just lock up an area of land and let nature look after itself," he said.

"Removing humans altogether from the equation isn't right, especially here where humans have been part of the environment for such a long time."

Three years with no sign of endangered Gouldian finches in Ord Valley prompts environmentalists’ concern

July 17 2023: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-17/gouldian-finches-disappear-in-ord-valley-but-thrive-elsewhere/102602092

When nearly 10,000 hectares of land was approved for clearing on the fertile soil of the Kimberley’s Ord Valley, protecting an endangered population of tiny birds was a key government stipulation.

Now, a little more than a decade on, there’s no trace of any Gouldian finches in the habitat that was carved out as a refuge for them.

Western Australia’s Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development’s 2022–23 monitoring report shows no breeding activity recorded in any of the 137 artificial nest boxes installed to replace the finches’ natural hollows lost to the clearing.

It marks the third consecutive year without a sign of the small, seed-eating birds in the 11,000-hectare Weaber Plain environmental buffer.

Jaru man and environmentalist Donny Imberlong hadn’t seen the environmental buffer site for years. When he returned, he was disappointed.

“This habitat is slowly becoming sterile,” he said.

He pointed to the range of introduced vines and shrubs that were dominating the native ground cover and the old trees that were losing their leaves, an indication of spray drift.

“It’s evident that the country around here is becoming sick,” Mr Imberlong said.

According to Gary Fitt, chief executive of Save the Gouldians, the story is different 100 kilometres north-west of Kununurra’s Ord Valley, around Wyndham, where the volunteer group surveys the endangered species each year.

“Last year, we saw the biggest numbers of Gouldians that we’d seen since 2008,” Dr Fitt said.

“So it’s surprising that there don’t appear to be any in that area now. That’s disappointing to see.”

Up and gone?

Dr Fitt said that the birds likely migrated to a new home where they could find more suitable conditions.

“Gouldians are a highly mobile finch,” he said.

“They’re likely responding to a combination of environmental factors.”

Those factors could be poor fire management, overgrazing or a weak wet season, although the last two were unlikely given the region’s recent strong summer rainfall and the lack of cattle within the protected area.

Head east about 200 kilometres to Bullo River Station, where wildlife photographer Col Roberts assured ABC Radio Darwin that Gouldian Finches could be found in the thousands.

“I did a count of about 10 waterholes there and counted over 2,000 Gouldians,” Mr Roberts said.

He questioned the current nature of their decades-old endangered listing under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

“They did suffer a decline [in numbers], but they are well and truly on the way back,” he said.

Reworking attitudes towards conservation

The Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development said they would continue to monitor the nest boxes, including those that they moved in late 2022 to more desirable locations, flagging this as a potential explanation for the lack of nesting.

“Routine, ongoing buffer management measures include removal of any cattle that find their way into the buffer area, maintenance of fencing and firebreaks, weed control, and restriction of access to the buffer area,” DPIRD said in a statement.

But for Donny Imberlong, this effort is treating the symptom, not the cause.

“It does seem like a lot of these conservation buffers are islands in the middle of exposed farmland which, if I was a tiny little finch, I wouldn’t be game to fly across to,” he said.

“All the farmland here is fragmenting the habitat corridors that allow the animals to move freely between the hill ranges and the connecting plains country.”

Mr Imberlong believes the process of allocating land to environmental buffers, then later managing that land, needs to be reviewed.

“It’s a very colonial way of looking at these conservation areas, that idea that you just lock up an area of land and let nature look after itself,” he said.

“Removing humans altogether from the equation isn’t right, especially here where humans have been part of the environment for such a long time.”

2013/2023: Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road

2956 pesticide detections between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 367 detections of Diuron between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 6.6ug/L (max 18/3/19). 0.7222ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 38 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2014 and Feb 2022. 0.24ug/L (max 2/2/18). 0.0611ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 357 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 2.2ug/L (max 9/10/18). 0.1283ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 350 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 12ug/L (max 19/2/21). 0.7794ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 367 detections of Bromacil between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 12ug/L (max 18/1/20). 2.4389ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 175 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jun 2016 and Oct 2022. 0.83ug/L (max 6/5/22). 0.0313ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 153 detections of Diazinon between Jun 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.42ug/L (max 9/10/18). 0.0306ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 1 detection of Fluroxypur 1/1/22 0.05ug/L

Haloxyfop: 319 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 3.9ug/L (max 16/3/19). 0.2139ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 315 detections of Hexazinone between Apr 2013 and Feb 2022. 1.2ug/L (max 19/11/19). 0.098ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 12 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2015 and Oct 2021. 0.14ug/L (max 4/8/16). 0.0294ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 99 detections of MCPA between Jan 2013 and Oct 2022. 0.62ug/L (max 10/3/20). 0.0443ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 230 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 9.9ug/L (max 6/5/22). 0.3382ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 8 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Feb 2020. 0.15ug/L (max 19/1/20). 0.07125ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 17 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between May 2013 and Oct 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 28/10/15). 0.0311ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 1 detections of Prometryn 31/5/23 0.01ug/L

Simazine: 134 detections of Simazine between Apr 2014 and May 2022. 34ug/L (max 28/2/20). 0.8095ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 4 detections of Tebuthiuron between May 2015 and Feb 2022. 0.02ug/L (max 4/2/22). 0.01325ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 10 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2013 and Jan 2021. 0.26ug/L (max 3/5/16). 0.101ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Coochin Creek at Mawsons Road

2956 pesticide detections between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 367 detections of Diuron between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 6.6ug/L (max 18/3/19). 0.7222ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 38 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2014 and Feb 2022. 0.24ug/L (max 2/2/18). 0.0611ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 357 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 2.2ug/L (max 9/10/18). 0.1283ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 350 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 12ug/L (max 19/2/21). 0.7794ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 367 detections of Bromacil between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 12ug/L (max 18/1/20). 2.4389ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 175 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jun 2016 and Oct 2022. 0.83ug/L (max 6/5/22). 0.0313ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 153 detections of Diazinon between Jun 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.42ug/L (max 9/10/18). 0.0306ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 1 detection of Fluroxypur 1/1/22 0.05ug/L

Haloxyfop: 319 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2013 and Feb 2023. 3.9ug/L (max 16/3/19). 0.2139ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 315 detections of Hexazinone between Apr 2013 and Feb 2022. 1.2ug/L (max 19/11/19). 0.098ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 12 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2015 and Oct 2021. 0.14ug/L (max 4/8/16). 0.0294ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 99 detections of MCPA between Jan 2013 and Oct 2022. 0.62ug/L (max 10/3/20). 0.0443ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 230 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 9.9ug/L (max 6/5/22). 0.3382ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 8 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Feb 2020. 0.15ug/L (max 19/1/20). 0.07125ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 17 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between May 2013 and Oct 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 28/10/15). 0.0311ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 1 detections of Prometryn 31/5/23 0.01ug/L

Simazine: 134 detections of Simazine between Apr 2014 and May 2022. 34ug/L (max 28/2/20). 0.8095ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 4 detections of Tebuthiuron between May 2015 and Feb 2022. 0.02ug/L (max 4/2/22). 0.01325ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 10 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2013 and Jan 2021. 0.26ug/L (max 3/5/16). 0.101ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: Mary River at Churchill Street, Maryborough (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Mary River at Churchill Street, Maryborough

855 pesticide detections between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 146 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.39ug/L (max 20/12/18). 0.069ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 67 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.24ug/L (max 5/2/10). 0.0566ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 5 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.04ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 101 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.47ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.1007ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 29 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.2ug/L (max 18/3/19). 0.0645ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 5 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021.

Fluroxypur: 13 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.15ug/L (max 7/2/20). 0.0877ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 89 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.13ug/L (max 23/2/18). 0.0281ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 59 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.12ug/L (max 17/10/17). 0.0271ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 7 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Nov 2019. 0.06ug/L (max 4/11/20). 0.0329ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 7 detections of Isoxaflutole between Oct 2017 and Mar 2019. 0.07ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.0514ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 23 detections of MCPA between Oct 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.1ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 153 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.82ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.0654ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 11 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2018 and Nov 2021. 0.03ug/L (max 15/11/21). 0.245ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 2 detections of Metribuzin 16/10/17. 0.05ug/L (max and av.)

Simazine: 53 detections of Simazine between Oct 2017 and Dec 2021. 0.2ug/L (max 26/4/19). 0.0259ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 36 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0236ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 48 detections of Triclopyr between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 8/2/20). 0.1027ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Mary River at Churchill Street, Maryborough

855 pesticide detections between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 146 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.39ug/L (max 20/12/18). 0.069ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 67 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.24ug/L (max 5/2/10). 0.0566ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 5 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.04ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 101 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.47ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.1007ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 29 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.2ug/L (max 18/3/19). 0.0645ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 5 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021.

Fluroxypur: 13 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.15ug/L (max 7/2/20). 0.0877ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 89 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.13ug/L (max 23/2/18). 0.0281ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 59 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.12ug/L (max 17/10/17). 0.0271ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 7 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Nov 2019. 0.06ug/L (max 4/11/20). 0.0329ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 7 detections of Isoxaflutole between Oct 2017 and Mar 2019. 0.07ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.0514ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 23 detections of MCPA between Oct 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.1ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 153 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.82ug/L (max 17/12/18). 0.0654ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 11 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2018 and Nov 2021. 0.03ug/L (max 15/11/21). 0.245ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 2 detections of Metribuzin 16/10/17. 0.05ug/L (max and av.)

Simazine: 53 detections of Simazine between Oct 2017 and Dec 2021. 0.2ug/L (max 26/4/19). 0.0259ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 36 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0236ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 48 detections of Triclopyr between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 8/2/20). 0.1027ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: Gregory River, Jarrets Road (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Gregory River at Jarrets Road

959 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 143 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.53ug/L (max 7/2/18). 0.106ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 79 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.1819ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 60 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 16/10/17). 0.0188ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 138 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 4/10/17). 0.1742ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 73 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.38ug/L (max 24/11/21). 0.0555ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2019 and Oct 2022.

Diazinon: 14 detections (13 trace detections) of Diazinon between Dec 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.01ug/L (max 8/1/22).

Fluroxypur: 39 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.46ug/L (max 22/11/17). 0.1203ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 24 detections of Haloxyfop between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.4ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.0508ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 31 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.09ug/L (max 14/10/18). 0.0177ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 50 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.0216ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 69 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.33ug/L (max 22/11/17). 0.0526ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 7 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and May 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 151 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.9ug/L (max 22/10/22). 0.1134ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 3 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2018 and Apr 2018. 0.28ug/L (max 30/4/18). 0.12ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 22 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 0.07ug/L (max 11/3/18). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 30 detections of Simazine between Oct 2018 and Feb 2013. 1.5ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.1003ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 15 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2018 and Dec 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0253ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 8 detections of Triclopyr between Oct 2017 and Dec 2021. 0.35ug/L (max 3/10/17). 0.11ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Gregory River at Jarrets Road

959 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 143 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.53ug/L (max 7/2/18). 0.106ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 79 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.1819ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 60 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 16/10/17). 0.0188ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 138 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 4/10/17). 0.1742ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 73 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.38ug/L (max 24/11/21). 0.0555ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2019 and Oct 2022.

Diazinon: 14 detections (13 trace detections) of Diazinon between Dec 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.01ug/L (max 8/1/22).

Fluroxypur: 39 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.46ug/L (max 22/11/17). 0.1203ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 24 detections of Haloxyfop between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.4ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.0508ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 31 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.09ug/L (max 14/10/18). 0.0177ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 50 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.0216ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 69 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.33ug/L (max 22/11/17). 0.0526ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 7 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and May 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 151 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.9ug/L (max 22/10/22). 0.1134ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 3 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2018 and Apr 2018. 0.28ug/L (max 30/4/18). 0.12ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 22 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 0.07ug/L (max 11/3/18). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 30 detections of Simazine between Oct 2018 and Feb 2013. 1.5ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.1003ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 15 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2018 and Dec 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0253ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 8 detections of Triclopyr between Oct 2017 and Dec 2021. 0.35ug/L (max 3/10/17). 0.11ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Stockyard Creek at Wallerawang (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Stockyard Creek at Wallerawang

465 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Mar 2023

Diuron: 68 detections of Diuron between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.43ug/L (max 2/3/20). 0.1212ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 31 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.59ug/L (max 2/12/20). 0.1035ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 45 detections of Ametryn between Nov 2021 and Jan 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 11/3/22). 0.0522ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 48 detections of Atrazine between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.56ug/L (max 17/11/21). 0.1508ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 61 detections of Bromacil between Feb 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.73ug/L (max 4/12/21). 0.2138ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 1 trace detection of Chlorpyrifos 24/5/22.

Diazinon: 13 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2021 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 23/7/22). 0.0077ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 13 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.41ug/L (max 3/12/22). 0.1231ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 8 detections of Haloxyfop between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 20/10/22). 0.025ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 14 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 0.02ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0114ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 39 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 2/3/20). 0.0254ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 43 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 8/3/22). 0.0319ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 9 detections of MCPA between Nov 2021 and Oct 2020. 0.06ug/L (max 22/5/22). 0.0256ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 45 detections of Metoloachlor between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.25ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.0462ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 1 detection of Metsulfuron Methyl 22/10/22. 0.04ug/L

Pendimethalin: 2 detections of Pendimethalin between Jan 2022 and Jul 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 22/7/22). 0.03ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 14 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2021 and Feb 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 31/1/22). 0.0129ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 10 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.34ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.138ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Stockyard Creek at Wallerawang

465 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Mar 2023

Diuron: 68 detections of Diuron between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.43ug/L (max 2/3/20). 0.1212ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 31 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.59ug/L (max 2/12/20). 0.1035ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 45 detections of Ametryn between Nov 2021 and Jan 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 11/3/22). 0.0522ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 48 detections of Atrazine between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.56ug/L (max 17/11/21). 0.1508ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 61 detections of Bromacil between Feb 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.73ug/L (max 4/12/21). 0.2138ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 1 trace detection of Chlorpyrifos 24/5/22.

Diazinon: 13 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2021 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 23/7/22). 0.0077ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 13 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.41ug/L (max 3/12/22). 0.1231ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 8 detections of Haloxyfop between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 20/10/22). 0.025ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 14 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 0.02ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0114ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 39 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 2/3/20). 0.0254ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 43 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 8/3/22). 0.0319ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 9 detections of MCPA between Nov 2021 and Oct 2020. 0.06ug/L (max 22/5/22). 0.0256ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 45 detections of Metoloachlor between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.25ug/L (max 21/10/22). 0.0462ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 1 detection of Metsulfuron Methyl 22/10/22. 0.04ug/L

Pendimethalin: 2 detections of Pendimethalin between Jan 2022 and Jul 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 22/7/22). 0.03ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 14 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2021 and Feb 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 31/1/22). 0.0129ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 10 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.34ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.138ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Elliott River at Dr Mays Crossing (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Elliott River at Dr Mays Crossing

991 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 110 detections of Diuron between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.54ug/L (max 11/1/22). 0.1127ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 68 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.36ug/L (max 25/22/21). 0.0626ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 44 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.0222ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 101 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 0.98ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.2809ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 16 detections of Bromacil between Feb 2020 and May 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 26/5/22). 0.0281ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 8 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Oct 2021 and Jan 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 24/11/21). 0.0271ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 3 trace detections of Diazinon between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022.

Fluroxypur: 59 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 22/10/22). 0.1544ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 41 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.08ug/L (max 4/12/22). 0.0471ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 75 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2019 and Nov 2021. 0.05ug/L (max 19/11/19). 0.0224ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 81 detections of Imazapic between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 28/10/22). 0.0229ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 63 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.11ug/L (max 24/7/22). 0.0387ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 3 detections of MCPA between Nov 2021 and May 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 26/5/22). 0.06ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 107 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 11/1/22). 0.1279ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 94 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 22/10/22). 0.1161ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 38 detections of Simazine between Mar 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.95ug/L (max 30/11/21). 0.1971ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 56 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2019 and Feb 2022. 0.13ug/L (max 15/6/20). 0.0354ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 25 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.31ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.1596ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Elliott River at Dr Mays Crossing

991 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 110 detections of Diuron between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.54ug/L (max 11/1/22). 0.1127ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 68 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.36ug/L (max 25/22/21). 0.0626ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 44 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.0222ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 101 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 0.98ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.2809ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 16 detections of Bromacil between Feb 2020 and May 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 26/5/22). 0.0281ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 8 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Oct 2021 and Jan 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 24/11/21). 0.0271ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 3 trace detections of Diazinon between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022.

Fluroxypur: 59 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 22/10/22). 0.1544ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 41 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.08ug/L (max 4/12/22). 0.0471ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 75 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2019 and Nov 2021. 0.05ug/L (max 19/11/19). 0.0224ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 81 detections of Imazapic between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 28/10/22). 0.0229ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 63 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.11ug/L (max 24/7/22). 0.0387ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 3 detections of MCPA between Nov 2021 and May 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 26/5/22). 0.06ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 107 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 11/1/22). 0.1279ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 94 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 22/10/22). 0.1161ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 38 detections of Simazine between Mar 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.95ug/L (max 30/11/21). 0.1971ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 56 detections of Tebuthiuron between Nov 2019 and Feb 2022. 0.13ug/L (max 15/6/20). 0.0354ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 25 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.31ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.1596ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Yellow Waterholes Creek (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Yellow Waterholes Creek

839 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 87 detections of Diuron between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.54ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.0922ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 72 detections of 2,4-D between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 2.2ug/L (max 5/12/21). 0.1701ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 8 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2021 and Dec 2022. 0.29ug/L (max). 0.06ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 55 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 1.9ug/L (max). 0.2813ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 12 detections of Bromacil between Jan 2020 and Mar 2020. 0.07ug/L (max). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 7 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Nov 2021 and Dec 2022. 0.24ug/L (max). 0.0386ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 3 trace detections of Diazinon in Dec 2021.

Fipronil: 4 detections of Fipronil between Nov 2021 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.0075ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 49 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 25/11/21). 0.1129ug/l (av.)

Haloxyfop: 71 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 1.6ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.118ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 13 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.45ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.0838ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 38 detections of Imazapic between Jan 2020 and May 2022. 0.14ug/L (max 21/2/20). 0.0311ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 118 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 2.7ug/L (max 13/5/22). 0.2847ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 55 detections of MCPA between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 1.1ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.1182ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 105 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 3.2ug/L (max 21/1/20). 0.381ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 40 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 4.4ug/L (max 21/1/20). 0.669ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 31 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Feb 2020 and Dec 2021. 0.65ug/L (max 18/2/20). 0.1658ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Jan 2020 and Feb 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 20/1/20). 0.121ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 25 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 23/1/23). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 46 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2020 and Jan 2022. 6.2ug/L (max 25/2/20). 1.0809ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Yellow Waterholes Creek

839 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 87 detections of Diuron between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.54ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.0922ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 72 detections of 2,4-D between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 2.2ug/L (max 5/12/21). 0.1701ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 8 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2021 and Dec 2022. 0.29ug/L (max). 0.06ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 55 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 1.9ug/L (max). 0.2813ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 12 detections of Bromacil between Jan 2020 and Mar 2020. 0.07ug/L (max). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 7 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Nov 2021 and Dec 2022. 0.24ug/L (max). 0.0386ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 3 trace detections of Diazinon in Dec 2021.

Fipronil: 4 detections of Fipronil between Nov 2021 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.0075ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 49 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 25/11/21). 0.1129ug/l (av.)

Haloxyfop: 71 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 1.6ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.118ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 13 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.45ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.0838ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 38 detections of Imazapic between Jan 2020 and May 2022. 0.14ug/L (max 21/2/20). 0.0311ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 118 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 2.7ug/L (max 13/5/22). 0.2847ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 55 detections of MCPA between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 1.1ug/L (max 23/11/21). 0.1182ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 105 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 3.2ug/L (max 21/1/20). 0.381ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 40 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 4.4ug/L (max 21/1/20). 0.669ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 31 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Feb 2020 and Dec 2021. 0.65ug/L (max 18/2/20). 0.1658ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Jan 2020 and Feb 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 20/1/20). 0.121ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 25 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 23/1/23). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 46 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2020 and Jan 2022. 6.2ug/L (max 25/2/20). 1.0809ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Spliters Creek at Henkers Road (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Spliters Creek at Henkers Road

777 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Mar 2023

Diuron: 19 detections of Diuron between Feb 2020 and Sep 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 14/2/20). 0.0368ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 58 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 9/2/20). 0.2221ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 2 detections of Ametryn in Feb 2020. 0.01ug/L (max 11/2/20). 0.01ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 73 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2019 and Mar 2023. 0.99ug/L (max 12/2/20). 0.2208ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 8 detections of Bromacil between Mar 2020 and Jun 2020. 0.03ug/L (max 3/5/20). 0.2063ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2020 and Aug 2022.

Diazinon: 11 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2021 and May 2022. 0.13ug/L (max 5/4/22). 0.0218ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 43 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.42ug/L (max 27/2/22). 0.1491ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 48 detections of Haloxyfop between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.39ug/L (max 12/6/22). 0.0948ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 85 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2019 and May 2022. 0.38ug/L (max 19/11/19). 0.0776ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 87 detections of Imazapic between Nov 2019 and Mar 2023. 0.21ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0655ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 83 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.67ug/L (max 5/4/22). 0.1379ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 9 detections of MCPA between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.02ug/L (max 7/2/22). 0.0156ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 87 detections of Metolachlor between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.1447ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 47 detections of Metribuzin between Feb 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.52ug.L (max 10/2/20). 0.1196ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 20 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Apr 2021 to Feb 2022. 0.5ug/L (max 26/6/21). 0.23ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 55 detections of Simazine between Feb 2020 and Apr 2021. 1.9ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.1389ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 27 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2019 and Mar 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0111ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 11 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021. 0.13ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0745ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

 

Spliters Creek at Henkers Road

777 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Mar 2023

Diuron: 19 detections of Diuron between Feb 2020 and Sep 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 14/2/20). 0.0368ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 58 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 9/2/20). 0.2221ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 2 detections of Ametryn in Feb 2020. 0.01ug/L (max 11/2/20). 0.01ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 73 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2019 and Mar 2023. 0.99ug/L (max 12/2/20). 0.2208ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 8 detections of Bromacil between Mar 2020 and Jun 2020. 0.03ug/L (max 3/5/20). 0.2063ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2020 and Aug 2022.

Diazinon: 11 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2021 and May 2022. 0.13ug/L (max 5/4/22). 0.0218ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 43 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.42ug/L (max 27/2/22). 0.1491ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 48 detections of Haloxyfop between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.39ug/L (max 12/6/22). 0.0948ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 85 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2019 and May 2022. 0.38ug/L (max 19/11/19). 0.0776ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 87 detections of Imazapic between Nov 2019 and Mar 2023. 0.21ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0655ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 83 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.67ug/L (max 5/4/22). 0.1379ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 9 detections of MCPA between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.02ug/L (max 7/2/22). 0.0156ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 87 detections of Metolachlor between Feb 2020 and Mar 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.1447ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 47 detections of Metribuzin between Feb 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.52ug.L (max 10/2/20). 0.1196ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 20 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Apr 2021 to Feb 2022. 0.5ug/L (max 26/6/21). 0.23ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 55 detections of Simazine between Feb 2020 and Apr 2021. 1.9ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.1389ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 27 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2019 and Mar 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0111ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 11 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021. 0.13ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0745ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

 

2019/2023: Welcome Creek at Gooburrum Road (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Welcome Creek at Gooburrum Road at Moore Park

1073 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 45 detections of Diuron between Dec 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.36ug/L (max 31/12/20). 0.0664ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 24 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 12/11/21). 0.0977ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 45 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2021 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 27/1/22). 0.2282ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 14 detections of Bromacil between Mar 2021 and Jun 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 6/4/21). 0.055ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2021 and Jun 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.033ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 24 detections of Diazinon between Mar 2021 and Jan 2022. 1.1ug/L (max 16/3/21). 0.1833ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 16 detections of Fipronil between Mar 2021 and Nov 2021. 0.13ug/L (max 16/3/21). 0.0563ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 46 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 9/3/22). 0.3958ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 61 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 12/11/21). 0.1482ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 9 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.03ug/L (max 18/4/22). 0.0144ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 35 detections of Imazapic between Nov 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 9/3/22). 0.0497ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 80 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 4.3ug/L (max 12/11/21). 0.8651ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 21 detections of MCPA between Dec 2020 and June 2022. 0.36ug/L (max 30/12/20). 0.0995ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 77 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 5.2ug/L (max 13/5/22). 0.2297ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 15 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2020 and Jun 2022. 1.7ug/L (max 9/3/22). 0.4633ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 1 detection of Pendimethalin 15/11/21 0.02ug/L

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 27/1/22 0.01ug/L

Triclopyr: 1 detection of Triclopyr 31/12/20. 0.06ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Welcome Creek at Gooburrum Road at Moore Park

1073 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 45 detections of Diuron between Dec 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.36ug/L (max 31/12/20). 0.0664ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 24 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 12/11/21). 0.0977ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 45 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2021 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 27/1/22). 0.2282ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 14 detections of Bromacil between Mar 2021 and Jun 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 6/4/21). 0.055ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2021 and Jun 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.033ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 24 detections of Diazinon between Mar 2021 and Jan 2022. 1.1ug/L (max 16/3/21). 0.1833ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 16 detections of Fipronil between Mar 2021 and Nov 2021. 0.13ug/L (max 16/3/21). 0.0563ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 46 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 9/3/22). 0.3958ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 61 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 12/11/21). 0.1482ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 9 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.03ug/L (max 18/4/22). 0.0144ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 35 detections of Imazapic between Nov 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 9/3/22). 0.0497ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 80 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 4.3ug/L (max 12/11/21). 0.8651ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 21 detections of MCPA between Dec 2020 and June 2022. 0.36ug/L (max 30/12/20). 0.0995ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 77 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 5.2ug/L (max 13/5/22). 0.2297ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 15 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2020 and Jun 2022. 1.7ug/L (max 9/3/22). 0.4633ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 1 detection of Pendimethalin 15/11/21 0.02ug/L

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 27/1/22 0.01ug/L

Triclopyr: 1 detection of Triclopyr 31/12/20. 0.06ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Moore Park Drainage (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Moore Park Drainage at Moore Park

1073 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 86 detections of Diuron between Nov 2019 and Apr 2021. 5.4ug/L (max 25/10/20). 0.2952ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 139 detections of 2,4-D between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 11ug/L (max 5/2/20). 1.0549ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 26 detections of Ametryn between Apr 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.74ug/L (max 13/4/20). 0.0992ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 144 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 5.8ug/L (max 10/1/22). 0.7337ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 63 detections of Bromacil between Apr 2020 and Feb 2023. 2ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.2283ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 14 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jan 2020 and Jun 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 6/1/20). 0.0193ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 10 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2021 and May 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.039ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 79 detections of Fluroxypur between Nov 2019 and Jan 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.3015ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 29 detections of Haloxyfop between Feb 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.55ug/L (max 31/1/21). 0.0789ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 28 detections of Hexazinone between Mar 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 13/11/21). 0.0514ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 24 detections of Imazapic between Mar 2021 and Dec 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 13/11/21). 0.0437ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 128 detections of Imidacloprid between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 16ug/L (max 20/2/22). 0.2225ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 9 detections of Isoxaflutole between Nov 2021 and Jan 2022. 0.14ug/L (max 13/11/21). 0.0733ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 19 detections of MCPA between Feb 2020 and Nov 2022. 4.1ug/L (max 20/6/22). 0.2584ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 97 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2019 and Jan 2023. 0.39ug/L (max 1/12/21). 0.0589ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 54 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 9.8ug/L (max 4/11/19). 0.8322ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 1 detection of Metribuzin 9/2/20 0.03ug/L

Pendimethalin: 9 detections of Pendimethalin between Nov 2021 and Apr 2022. 0.46ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.1089 ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 8 detections of Simazine between Dec 2019 and Jan 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.0325ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 88 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.91ug/L (max 4/2/21). 0.0876ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 17 detections of Terbuthylazine between Nov 2021 and Mar 2022. 0.77ug/L (max 12/11/21) (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Moore Park Drainage at Moore Park

1073 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 86 detections of Diuron between Nov 2019 and Apr 2021. 5.4ug/L (max 25/10/20). 0.2952ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 139 detections of 2,4-D between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 11ug/L (max 5/2/20). 1.0549ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 26 detections of Ametryn between Apr 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.74ug/L (max 13/4/20). 0.0992ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 144 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 5.8ug/L (max 10/1/22). 0.7337ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 63 detections of Bromacil between Apr 2020 and Feb 2023. 2ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.2283ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 14 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jan 2020 and Jun 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 6/1/20). 0.0193ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 10 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2021 and May 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.039ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 79 detections of Fluroxypur between Nov 2019 and Jan 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.3015ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 29 detections of Haloxyfop between Feb 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.55ug/L (max 31/1/21). 0.0789ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 28 detections of Hexazinone between Mar 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 13/11/21). 0.0514ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 24 detections of Imazapic between Mar 2021 and Dec 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 13/11/21). 0.0437ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 128 detections of Imidacloprid between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 16ug/L (max 20/2/22). 0.2225ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 9 detections of Isoxaflutole between Nov 2021 and Jan 2022. 0.14ug/L (max 13/11/21). 0.0733ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 19 detections of MCPA between Feb 2020 and Nov 2022. 4.1ug/L (max 20/6/22). 0.2584ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 97 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2019 and Jan 2023. 0.39ug/L (max 1/12/21). 0.0589ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 54 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 9.8ug/L (max 4/11/19). 0.8322ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 1 detection of Metribuzin 9/2/20 0.03ug/L

Pendimethalin: 9 detections of Pendimethalin between Nov 2021 and Apr 2022. 0.46ug/L (max 8/1/22). 0.1089 ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 8 detections of Simazine between Dec 2019 and Jan 2022. 0.09ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.0325ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 88 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.91ug/L (max 4/2/21). 0.0876ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 17 detections of Terbuthylazine between Nov 2021 and Mar 2022. 0.77ug/L (max 12/11/21) (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Fairydale Drainage at Norton Road, Moore Park Beach. Pesticides: Multiple

Fairydale Drainage at Norton Road

877 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 149 detections of Diuron between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 7.1ug/L (max 4/5/20). 0.1677ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 137 detections of 2,4-D between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 66ug/L (max 3/2/21). 1.9342ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 65 detections of Ametryn between Nov 2019 and Nov 2022. 0.9ug/L (max 25/10/20). 0.0749ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 140 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 7.3ug/L (max 24/1/21). 1.0362ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 9 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2021 and Dec 2021. 0.09ug/L (max 25/11/21). 0.0433ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021.

Diazinon: 2 detections of Diazinon between Mar 2020 and May 2022.

Fluroxypur: 38 detections of Fluroxypur between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 21/11/21). 0.3216ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 76 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.9ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.2116ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 3 detections of Hexazinone between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021. 0.62ug/L (max 21/11/21). 0.2267ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 2 detections of Imazapic between Nov 2021 and Sep 2022. 0.24ug/L (max 21/11/21). 0.14ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 57 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 15ug/L (max 20/2/22). 0.3744 ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 1 detection of Isoxaflutole 21/11/21 0.4ug/L

MCPA: 7 detections of MCPA between April 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0257ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 97 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.45ug/L (max 31/12/20). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 60 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 2.7ug/L (max 27/4/20). 0.3102ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 6 detections of Metribuzin between Feb 2020 and Mar 2021. 0.12ug/L (max 9/2/20). 0.055ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 8 detections of Pendimethalin between Feb 2020 and May 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 7/3/22). 0.095ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 14 detections of Simazine between Jan 2020 and Feb 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 5/2/20). 0.0193ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 1 detection of Terbuthylazine 21/11/21 1.8ug/L

Triclopyr: 2 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021. 0.28ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.19ug/L (av).

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Fairydale Drainage at Norton Road

877 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 149 detections of Diuron between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 7.1ug/L (max 4/5/20). 0.1677ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 137 detections of 2,4-D between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 66ug/L (max 3/2/21). 1.9342ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 65 detections of Ametryn between Nov 2019 and Nov 2022. 0.9ug/L (max 25/10/20). 0.0749ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 140 detections of Atrazine between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 7.3ug/L (max 24/1/21). 1.0362ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 9 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2021 and Dec 2021. 0.09ug/L (max 25/11/21). 0.0433ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021.

Diazinon: 2 detections of Diazinon between Mar 2020 and May 2022.

Fluroxypur: 38 detections of Fluroxypur between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 21/11/21). 0.3216ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 76 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 1.9ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.2116ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 3 detections of Hexazinone between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021. 0.62ug/L (max 21/11/21). 0.2267ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 2 detections of Imazapic between Nov 2021 and Sep 2022. 0.24ug/L (max 21/11/21). 0.14ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 57 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 15ug/L (max 20/2/22). 0.3744 ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 1 detection of Isoxaflutole 21/11/21 0.4ug/L

MCPA: 7 detections of MCPA between April 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0257ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 97 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.45ug/L (max 31/12/20). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 60 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Nov 2019 and Dec 2022. 2.7ug/L (max 27/4/20). 0.3102ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 6 detections of Metribuzin between Feb 2020 and Mar 2021. 0.12ug/L (max 9/2/20). 0.055ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 8 detections of Pendimethalin between Feb 2020 and May 2022. 0.3ug/L (max 7/3/22). 0.095ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 14 detections of Simazine between Jan 2020 and Feb 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 5/2/20). 0.0193ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 1 detection of Terbuthylazine 21/11/21 1.8ug/L

Triclopyr: 2 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021. 0.28ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.19ug/L (av).

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2019/2023: Kolan River at Barrage, Avondale (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Kolan River at Barrage

425 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 59 detections of Diuron between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 0.96ug/L (max 19/11/21). 0.1947ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 46 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.4ug/L (max 19/11/21). 0.1015ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 63 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.74ug/L (max 26/2/23). 0.072ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 13 detections of Bromacil between Feb 2020 and Mar 2020. 0.27ug/L (max 25/2/20). 0.1323ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 12 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021.

Diazinon: 4 trace detections of Diazinon in Nov 2021.

Fluroxypur: 6 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 28/11/21). 0.105ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 16 detections of Haloxyfop between Nov 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.0456ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 25 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 12/12/22). 0.0164ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 44 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.1ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0286ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 45 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and May 2022. 0.19ug/L (max 14/11/21). 0.0604ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 6 detections of MCPA between Nov 2021 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 30/10/22). 0.0283ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 74 detections of Metolachlor between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.31ug/L (max 25/2/20). 0.0558ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 1 detection of Metsulfuron Methyl 9/3/22 0.02ug/L

Metribuzin: 5 detections of Metribuzin between May 2022 and Dec 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 30/6/22). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 5 detections of Tebuthiuron in Dec 2021. 0.03ug/L (max 11/12/21). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 1 detection of Triclopyr  25/10/22 0.1ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Kolan River at Barrage

425 pesticide detections between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 59 detections of Diuron between Nov 2019 and Feb 2023. 0.96ug/L (max 19/11/21). 0.1947ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 46 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.4ug/L (max 19/11/21). 0.1015ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 63 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.74ug/L (max 26/2/23). 0.072ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 13 detections of Bromacil between Feb 2020 and Mar 2020. 0.27ug/L (max 25/2/20). 0.1323ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 12 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2020 and Nov 2021.

Diazinon: 4 trace detections of Diazinon in Nov 2021.

Fluroxypur: 6 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 28/11/21). 0.105ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 16 detections of Haloxyfop between Nov 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 9/1/22). 0.0456ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 25 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.17ug/L (max 12/12/22). 0.0164ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 44 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.1ug/L (max 10/2/20). 0.0286ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 45 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2020 and May 2022. 0.19ug/L (max 14/11/21). 0.0604ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 6 detections of MCPA between Nov 2021 and Oct 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 30/10/22). 0.0283ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 74 detections of Metolachlor between Feb 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.31ug/L (max 25/2/20). 0.0558ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 1 detection of Metsulfuron Methyl 9/3/22 0.02ug/L

Metribuzin: 5 detections of Metribuzin between May 2022 and Dec 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 30/6/22). 0.04ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 5 detections of Tebuthiuron in Dec 2021. 0.03ug/L (max 11/12/21). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 1 detection of Triclopyr  25/10/22 0.1ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2020: Kolan River at Booyan Boat Shed (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Kolan River at Kolan Booyan Boat Shed

332 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Jun 2020

Diuron: 39 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.71ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.1574ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 22 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.23ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.0782ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 8 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2017 and Oct 2018. 0.16ug/L (max 28/11/17). 0.0437ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 58 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and May 2020. 0.75ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.0896ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 19 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.23ug/L (max 17/10/17). 0.0684ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos in Feb 2020

Diazinon: 4 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2017 and Apr 2020.

Fluroxypur: 12 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.19ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.1ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 36 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.3ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.0369ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 28 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.13ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.0304ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 18 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.17ug/L (max 13/2/20). 0.0539ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 4 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Feb 2020. 0.06ug/L (max 28/1/20). 0.0275ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 47 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Jun 2020. 0.47ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.06ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 14 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.2ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.0507ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Oct 2018 and Dec 2018. 1.1ug/L (max 14/10/18). 0.181ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 8 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2017 and Nov 2018. 0.02ug/L (max 13/11/18). 0.125ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 1 detection of Triclopyr 3/1/18 0.05ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Kolan River at Kolan Booyan Boat Shed

332 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Jun 2020

Diuron: 39 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.71ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.1574ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 22 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.23ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.0782ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 8 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2017 and Oct 2018. 0.16ug/L (max 28/11/17). 0.0437ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 58 detections of Atrazine between Oct 2017 and May 2020. 0.75ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.0896ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 19 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.23ug/L (max 17/10/17). 0.0684ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos in Feb 2020

Diazinon: 4 detections of Diazinon between Nov 2017 and Apr 2020.

Fluroxypur: 12 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.19ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.1ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 36 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.3ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.0369ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 28 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.13ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.0304ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 18 detections of Imidacloprid between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.17ug/L (max 13/2/20). 0.0539ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 4 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Feb 2020. 0.06ug/L (max 28/1/20). 0.0275ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 47 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Jun 2020. 0.47ug/L (max 2/1/18). 0.06ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 14 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Mar 2020. 0.2ug/L (max 22/2/18). 0.0507ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Oct 2018 and Dec 2018. 1.1ug/L (max 14/10/18). 0.181ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 8 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2017 and Nov 2018. 0.02ug/L (max 13/11/18). 0.125ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 1 detection of Triclopyr 3/1/18 0.05ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2016/2023: MacKenzie River at Rileys Crossing. Pesticides: Multiple

MacKenzie River at Rileys Crossing

1606 pesticide detections between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 95 detections of Diuron between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 1.6ug/L (max 8/12/17). 0.1113ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 110 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.62ug/L (max 31/3/17). 0.0833ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 6 detections of Ametryn between Dec 2016 and Mar 2017. 0.0006ug/L (max 30/3/17). 0.0004ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 188 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 3.2ug/L (max 17/10/17). 0.2152ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 1 detection of Bromacil 23/8/22. 0.03ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Oct 2017 and Jul 2022.

Diazinon: 4 trace detections of Diazinon between Mar 2017 and Dec 2018.

Fipronil: 3 detections of Fipronil between Dec 2022 and Feb 2023. 0.02ug/L (max 1/2/23). 0.0167ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 135 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.2109ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 76 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 0.62ug/L (max 6/12/17). 0.0541ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 50 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 0.12ug/L (max 7/11/17). 0.0198ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 63 detections of Imazapic between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.21ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0322ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 19 detections of Imidacloprid between Mar 2017 and May 2022. 0.43ug/L (max 11/2/20). 0.0426ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 36 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.64ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.0788ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 34 detections of MCPA between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 13/5/22). 0.0674ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 191 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 5.4ug/L (max 17/1/22). 0.5376ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 32 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 0.09ug/L  (max 16/3/19). 0.0225ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 7 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.46ug/L (max 19/10/22). 0.1014ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 4 detections of Pendimethalin between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 20/10/22). 0.0425ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 22 detections of Prometryn between Dec 2016 and Dec 2022. 0.22ug/L (max 15/10/17). 0.0311ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 123 detections of Simazine between Dec 2016 and Jun 2022. 1.6ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.0903ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 219 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 4.2ug/L (max 14/2/22). 0.6849ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 158 detections of Terbuthylazine between Dec 2016 and Dec 2023. 8.3ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.2363ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 26 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.67ug/L (max 16/3/19). 0.1153ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

MacKenzie River at Rileys Crossing

1606 pesticide detections between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 95 detections of Diuron between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 1.6ug/L (max 8/12/17). 0.1113ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 110 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.62ug/L (max 31/3/17). 0.0833ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 6 detections of Ametryn between Dec 2016 and Mar 2017. 0.0006ug/L (max 30/3/17). 0.0004ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 188 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 3.2ug/L (max 17/10/17). 0.2152ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 1 detection of Bromacil 23/8/22. 0.03ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Oct 2017 and Jul 2022.

Diazinon: 4 trace detections of Diazinon between Mar 2017 and Dec 2018.

Fipronil: 3 detections of Fipronil between Dec 2022 and Feb 2023. 0.02ug/L (max 1/2/23). 0.0167ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 135 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.2109ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 76 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 0.62ug/L (max 6/12/17). 0.0541ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 50 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 0.12ug/L (max 7/11/17). 0.0198ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 63 detections of Imazapic between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.21ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.0322ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 19 detections of Imidacloprid between Mar 2017 and May 2022. 0.43ug/L (max 11/2/20). 0.0426ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 36 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.64ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.0788ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 34 detections of MCPA between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 13/5/22). 0.0674ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 191 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 5.4ug/L (max 17/1/22). 0.5376ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 32 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 0.09ug/L  (max 16/3/19). 0.0225ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 7 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.46ug/L (max 19/10/22). 0.1014ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 4 detections of Pendimethalin between Feb 2020 and Oct 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 20/10/22). 0.0425ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 22 detections of Prometryn between Dec 2016 and Dec 2022. 0.22ug/L (max 15/10/17). 0.0311ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 123 detections of Simazine between Dec 2016 and Jun 2022. 1.6ug/L (max 14/5/22). 0.0903ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 219 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2016 and Feb 2023. 4.2ug/L (max 14/2/22). 0.6849ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 158 detections of Terbuthylazine between Dec 2016 and Dec 2023. 8.3ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.2363ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 26 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.67ug/L (max 16/3/19). 0.1153ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: Plane Creek at Sucrogen Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Plane Creek at Sucrogen Weir

1072 pesticide detections between Jan 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 103 detections of Diuron between Nov 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.1778ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 136 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.1882ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 6 detections of Ametryn between Feb 2018 and Jan 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 31/12/10). 0.0267ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 101 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2017 and Feb 2023. 5.3ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.3901ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 72 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Mar 2021. 1.5ug/L (max 9/12/18). 0.1385ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between May 2022 and Dec 2022.

Diazinon: 10 trace detections of Diazinon between Jan 2019 and Jul 2022.

Fluroxypur: 69 detections of Fluoroxypur between Jan 2018 and Jan 2023. 1.1ug/L (max 28/2/22). 0.2093ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 147 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.6ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.1486ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 96 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.46ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.0479ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 43 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.62ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.0909ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 28 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.17ug/L (max 30/12/20). 0.0554ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 61 detections of MCPA between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.78ug/L (max 30/1/17). 0.0803ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 25 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 6/12/17). 0.032ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 82 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.18ug/L (max 17/2/20). 0.0408ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 4 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Feb 2020. 0.21ug/L (max 15/2/20). 0.08ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 8/1/19 0.02ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 11 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 73 detections of Triclopyr between Nov 2017 and Jan 2023. 2.3ug/L (max 17/2/20). 0.2309ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Plane Creek at Sucrogen Weir

1072 pesticide detections between Jan 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 103 detections of Diuron between Nov 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.1778ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 136 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.1882ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 6 detections of Ametryn between Feb 2018 and Jan 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 31/12/10). 0.0267ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 101 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2017 and Feb 2023. 5.3ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.3901ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 72 detections of Bromacil between Oct 2017 and Mar 2021. 1.5ug/L (max 9/12/18). 0.1385ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between May 2022 and Dec 2022.

Diazinon: 10 trace detections of Diazinon between Jan 2019 and Jul 2022.

Fluroxypur: 69 detections of Fluoroxypur between Jan 2018 and Jan 2023. 1.1ug/L (max 28/2/22). 0.2093ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 147 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.6ug/L (max 8/1/19). 0.1486ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 96 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.46ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.0479ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 43 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.62ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.0909ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 28 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.17ug/L (max 30/12/20). 0.0554ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 61 detections of MCPA between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.78ug/L (max 30/1/17). 0.0803ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 25 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 6/12/17). 0.032ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 82 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.18ug/L (max 17/2/20). 0.0408ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 4 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2020 and Feb 2020. 0.21ug/L (max 15/2/20). 0.08ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 8/1/19 0.02ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 11 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.07ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 73 detections of Triclopyr between Nov 2017 and Jan 2023. 2.3ug/L (max 17/2/20). 0.2309ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2016/2023: O’Connell River at Staffords Crossing (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

O’Connell River at Staffords Crossing (Qld)

1740 pesticide detections between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 209 detections of Diuron between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 10ug/L (max 29/12/19). 0.3703ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 170 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2016 and Mar 2020. 6.4ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.4534ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 3 detections of Ametryn between Mar 2017 and Jan 2019. 0.02ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0074ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 203 detections of Atrazine between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 6.9ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.3677ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 40 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2017 and May 2020. 2.6ug/L (max 24/4/19). 0.4222ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 6 detections of Diazinon between Dec 2016 and Feb 2019. 0.0018ug/L (max 22/3/27). 0.0004ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 3 detections of Fipronil in May 2017. 0.0013ug/L (max). 0.0008ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 65 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2016 and Jan 2020. 1.3ug/L (max 25/3/18). 0.1909ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 28 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2017 and Feb 2018. 0.14ug/L (max 30/1/17). 0.0191ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 244 detections of Hexazinone between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 3.8ug/L (max 29/12/19). 0.1771ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 215 detections of Imazapic between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0655ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 207 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 2ug/L (17/12/16). 0.1711ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 12 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2017 and Jan 2019. 0.26ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0327ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 93 detections of MCPA between Sep 2016 and Feb 2020. 1.2ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.0841ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 69 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 and May 2020. 0.8ug/L (max 29/12/19). 0.0929ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 37 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2017 and Mar 2019. 0.11ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.0183ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 25 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2016 and Jan 2019. 0.47ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0508ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Jan 2017 and Nov 2017. 0.03ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.0087ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 58 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2016 and Apr 2019. 1.2ug/L (max 4/12/17). 0.0886ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 42 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2016 and Feb 2020. 2.4ug/L (max 29/11/17). 0.2076ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

O’Connell River at Staffords Crossing (Qld)

1740 pesticide detections between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 209 detections of Diuron between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 10ug/L (max 29/12/19). 0.3703ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 170 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2016 and Mar 2020. 6.4ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.4534ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 3 detections of Ametryn between Mar 2017 and Jan 2019. 0.02ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0074ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 203 detections of Atrazine between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 6.9ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.3677ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 40 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2017 and May 2020. 2.6ug/L (max 24/4/19). 0.4222ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 6 detections of Diazinon between Dec 2016 and Feb 2019. 0.0018ug/L (max 22/3/27). 0.0004ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 3 detections of Fipronil in May 2017. 0.0013ug/L (max). 0.0008ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 65 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2016 and Jan 2020. 1.3ug/L (max 25/3/18). 0.1909ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 28 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2017 and Feb 2018. 0.14ug/L (max 30/1/17). 0.0191ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 244 detections of Hexazinone between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 3.8ug/L (max 29/12/19). 0.1771ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 215 detections of Imazapic between Sep 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0655ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 207 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 2ug/L (17/12/16). 0.1711ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 12 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2017 and Jan 2019. 0.26ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0327ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 93 detections of MCPA between Sep 2016 and Feb 2020. 1.2ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.0841ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 69 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 and May 2020. 0.8ug/L (max 29/12/19). 0.0929ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 37 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2017 and Mar 2019. 0.11ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.0183ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 25 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2016 and Jan 2019. 0.47ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0508ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Jan 2017 and Nov 2017. 0.03ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.0087ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 58 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2016 and Apr 2019. 1.2ug/L (max 4/12/17). 0.0886ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 42 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2016 and Feb 2020. 2.4ug/L (max 29/11/17). 0.2076ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2014/2023: O’Connell River at Caravan Park (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

O’Connell River at Caravan Park

2917 pesticide detections between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 329 detections of Diuron between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 3ug/L (max 26/12/10). 0.2056ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 280 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 6.3ug/L (max 13/1/23). 0.2186ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 10 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2014 and Feb 2017. 0.01ug/L (max 10/1/14). 0.0017ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 339 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 12ug/L (max 13/11/20). 0.4317ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 52 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2017 and Dec 2021. 1ug/L (max 11/2/21). 0.2023ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 5 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Aug 2019 and Jan 2023.

Diazinon: 7 trace detections of Diazinon between Dec 2017 and Jul 2022.

Fipronil: 1 detection of Fipronil 2/7/18 0.15ug/L

Fluroxypur: 138 detections of Fluroxypur between Mar 2014 and Jan 2023. 1.2ug/L (max 19/3/21). 0.1194ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 15 detections of Haloxyfop between Jun 2016 and Feb 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 17/2/22). 0.0231ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 397 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 16/7/16). 0.1354ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 291 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.51ug/L (max 30/12/21). 0.0689ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 319 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 15/1/23). 0.1555ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 103 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.69ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.0859ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 118 detections of MCPA between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023 1.3ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.0783ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 121 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.78ug/L (max 19/6/16). 0.0717ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 16 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jun 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.04ug/L (max 11/2/21). 0.0141ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 80 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2014 and Dec 2022. 1.1ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.1568ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 2 detections of Pendimethalin between May 2022 and Jan 2023. 0.02ug/L (max 25/5/22). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 18 Simazine detections between Jun 2016 and May 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0162ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 234 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2014 and Dec 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 10/1/14). 0.0365ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 16 detections of Terbuthylazine between Jun 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.25ug/L (max 30/11/22). 0.0657ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 26 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.32ug/L (max 12/12/21). 0.0729ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

O’Connell River at Caravan Park

2917 pesticide detections between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 329 detections of Diuron between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 3ug/L (max 26/12/10). 0.2056ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 280 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 6.3ug/L (max 13/1/23). 0.2186ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 10 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2014 and Feb 2017. 0.01ug/L (max 10/1/14). 0.0017ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 339 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 12ug/L (max 13/11/20). 0.4317ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 52 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2017 and Dec 2021. 1ug/L (max 11/2/21). 0.2023ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 5 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Aug 2019 and Jan 2023.

Diazinon: 7 trace detections of Diazinon between Dec 2017 and Jul 2022.

Fipronil: 1 detection of Fipronil 2/7/18 0.15ug/L

Fluroxypur: 138 detections of Fluroxypur between Mar 2014 and Jan 2023. 1.2ug/L (max 19/3/21). 0.1194ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 15 detections of Haloxyfop between Jun 2016 and Feb 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 17/2/22). 0.0231ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 397 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 16/7/16). 0.1354ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 291 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.51ug/L (max 30/12/21). 0.0689ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 319 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 15/1/23). 0.1555ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 103 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.69ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.0859ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 118 detections of MCPA between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023 1.3ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.0783ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 121 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.78ug/L (max 19/6/16). 0.0717ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 16 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jun 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.04ug/L (max 11/2/21). 0.0141ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 80 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2014 and Dec 2022. 1.1ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.1568ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 2 detections of Pendimethalin between May 2022 and Jan 2023. 0.02ug/L (max 25/5/22). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 18 Simazine detections between Jun 2016 and May 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.0162ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 234 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2014 and Dec 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 10/1/14). 0.0365ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 16 detections of Terbuthylazine between Jun 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.25ug/L (max 30/11/22). 0.0657ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 26 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.32ug/L (max 12/12/21). 0.0729ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2016/2023: Proserpine River at Glen Isla (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Prosperpine River at Glen Isla

3206 pesticide detections between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 310 detections of Diuron between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 8.3ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.8453ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 263 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 4.9ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.4705ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 34 detections of Ametryn between Dec 2016 and Dec 2021. 0.3ug/L (max 1/2/17). 0.0106ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 299 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2016 and Dec 2021. 17ug/L (max 28/1/19). 1.0152ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 196 detections of Bromacil between Dec 2017 and Dec 2021. 3.7ug/L (max 28/2/21). 0.2972ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.02ug/L (max 24/11/22). 0.005ug.L (av.)

Diazinon: 11 detections of Diazinon between Jan 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.01ug/L (max 3/4/17). 0.001ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 2 detections of Fipronil in Jan 2017. 0.0012ug/L (max 13/1/17). 0.0009ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 204 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.2784ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 52 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 23/3/17). 0.0517ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 341 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 6.6ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.801ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 330 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.2436ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 288 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 2.5ug/L (max 31/12/19). 0.4983ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 146 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.52ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.0932ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 226 detections of MCPA between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.2166ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 282 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 3.1ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.2361ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 42 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Dec 2016 and Mar 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 10/1/19). 0.0274ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 37 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2016 and Feb 2022. 0.42ug/L (max 4/12/17). 0.0689ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 33 detections of Simazine between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.69ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.051ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 41 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2016 and Apr 2022. 0.19ug/L (max 1/2/17). 0.0282ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 47 detections of Terbuthylazine between Jan 2019 and Jan 2023. 0.57ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.0917ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 17 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.35ug/L (max 18/5/17). 0.052ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Prosperpine River at Glen Isla

3206 pesticide detections between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 310 detections of Diuron between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 8.3ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.8453ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 263 detections of 2,4-D between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 4.9ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.4705ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 34 detections of Ametryn between Dec 2016 and Dec 2021. 0.3ug/L (max 1/2/17). 0.0106ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 299 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2016 and Dec 2021. 17ug/L (max 28/1/19). 1.0152ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 196 detections of Bromacil between Dec 2017 and Dec 2021. 3.7ug/L (max 28/2/21). 0.2972ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 detections of Chlorpyrifos between Jan 2020 and Dec 2022. 0.02ug/L (max 24/11/22). 0.005ug.L (av.)

Diazinon: 11 detections of Diazinon between Jan 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.01ug/L (max 3/4/17). 0.001ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 2 detections of Fipronil in Jan 2017. 0.0012ug/L (max 13/1/17). 0.0009ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 204 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 30/11/17). 0.2784ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 52 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 23/3/17). 0.0517ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 341 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 6.6ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.801ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 330 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 2/12/22). 0.2436ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 288 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 2.5ug/L (max 31/12/19). 0.4983ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 146 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.52ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.0932ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 226 detections of MCPA between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.2166ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 282 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 3.1ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.2361ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 42 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Dec 2016 and Mar 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 10/1/19). 0.0274ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 37 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2016 and Feb 2022. 0.42ug/L (max 4/12/17). 0.0689ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 33 detections of Simazine between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.69ug/L (max 1/12/22). 0.051ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 41 detections of Tebuthiuron between Dec 2016 and Apr 2022. 0.19ug/L (max 1/2/17). 0.0282ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 47 detections of Terbuthylazine between Jan 2019 and Jan 2023. 0.57ug/L (max 26/11/21). 0.0917ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 17 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.35ug/L (max 18/5/17). 0.052ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: Don River, Bowen (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Don River at Bowen Queensland

381 pesticide detections between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 5 detections of Diuron between Mar 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.18ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.0417ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 16 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 7/1/19). 0.0325ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 13 detections of Atrazine between Mar 2017 and Dec 2022. 3.3ug/L (max 12/5/22). 0.3478ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 1 detection of Chlorpyrifos 17/5/18 1.4ug/L

Diazinon: 22 detections of Diazinon between Apr 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.71ug/L (max 12/5/22). 0.0364ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 6 detections of Fipronil between Mar 2017 and May 2017. 0.024ug/L (max 28/3/17). 0.0061ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 10 detections of Fluroxypur between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.14ug/L (max 28/2/21). 0.0666ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 38 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.14ug/L (max 27/1/22). 0.0197ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 13 detections of Imidacloprid between Mar 2017 and May 2017. 0.013ug/L (max 18/5/17). 0.0043ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 1 detection of MCPA 23/2/20 0.04ug/L

Metolachlor: 74 detections of Metolachlor detected between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 12ug/L (max 17/5/18). 0.3109ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 30 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.59ug/L (max 31/1/22). 0.1032ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 7 detections of Metribuzin between Mar 2017 and May 2017. 0.063ug/L (max 18/5/17). 0.0203ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 119 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.72ug/L (max 6/1/21). 0.0647ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 26 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.72ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.1252ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Don River at Bowen

381 pesticide detections between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 5 detections of Diuron between Mar 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.18ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.0417ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 16 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 7/1/19). 0.0325ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 13 detections of Atrazine between Mar 2017 and Dec 2022. 3.3ug/L (max 12/5/22). 0.3478ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 1 detection of Chlorpyrifos 17/5/18 1.4ug/L

Diazinon: 22 detections of Diazinon between Apr 2017 and Oct 2022. 0.71ug/L (max 12/5/22). 0.0364ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 6 detections of Fipronil between Mar 2017 and May 2017. 0.024ug/L (max 28/3/17). 0.0061ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 10 detections of Fluroxypur between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.14ug/L (max 28/2/21). 0.0666ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 38 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2017 and Dec 2022. 0.14ug/L (max 27/1/22). 0.0197ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 13 detections of Imidacloprid between Mar 2017 and May 2017. 0.013ug/L (max 18/5/17). 0.0043ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 1 detection of MCPA 23/2/20 0.04ug/L

Metolachlor: 74 detections of Metolachlor detected between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 12ug/L (max 17/5/18). 0.3109ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 30 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.59ug/L (max 31/1/22). 0.1032ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 7 detections of Metribuzin between Mar 2017 and May 2017. 0.063ug/L (max 18/5/17). 0.0203ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 119 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.72ug/L (max 6/1/21). 0.0647ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 26 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.72ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.1252ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: East Barratta Creek at Jerona Road (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

East Barratta Creek at Jerona Road

2839 pesticide detections Aug 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 283 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.232ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 173 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 8/3/19). 0.155ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 220 detections of Ametryn between Aug 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 12/12/17). 0.054ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 306 detections of Atrazine between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023. Every sample positive. 4.9ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.813ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 110 detections of Bromacil between Feb 18 and Jul 2022. 0.96ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.123ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2018 and Oct 2021.

Diazinon: 10 trace detections of Diazinon between Nov 2017 and Jul 2020.

Fipronil: 1 detection of Fipronil 1/2/20 0.03ug/L

Fluroxypur: 178 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2.2ug/L (max 3/2/23). 0.324ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 71 detections of Haloxyfop between Nov 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 3/2/23). 0.048ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 70 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Nov 2022. 0.17ug/L (max 27/1/20). 0.0378ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 281 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.22ug/L (max 29/11/21). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 14 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2018 and Jan 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 28/1/22). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 208 detections of Isoxaflutole between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.2111ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 158 detections of MCPA between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.71ug/L (max 1/3/21). 0.075ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 218 detections of Metolachlor between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023. 1ug/L (max 27/4/22). 0.075ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 16 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Feb 2018 and Feb 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 2/4/19). 0.078ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 182 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.419ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 7 detections of Pendimethalin between May 2019 and May 2022. 0.26ug/L (max 26/4/22). 0.141ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 6 detections of Simazine between Dec 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 26/4/22). 0.094ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 218 detections of Tebuthiuron between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.37ug/L (max 7/1/21). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 90 detections of Terbuthylazine between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.96ug/L (max 11/11/21). 0.156ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 12 detections of Triclopyr between Nov 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 18/12/18). 0.079ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

East Barratta Creek at Jerona Road

2839 pesticide detections Aug 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 283 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.232ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 173 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 8/3/19). 0.155ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 220 detections of Ametryn between Aug 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 12/12/17). 0.054ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 306 detections of Atrazine between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023. Every sample positive. 4.9ug/L (max 11/1/19). 0.813ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 110 detections of Bromacil between Feb 18 and Jul 2022. 0.96ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.123ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Feb 2018 and Oct 2021.

Diazinon: 10 trace detections of Diazinon between Nov 2017 and Jul 2020.

Fipronil: 1 detection of Fipronil 1/2/20 0.03ug/L

Fluroxypur: 178 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2.2ug/L (max 3/2/23). 0.324ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 71 detections of Haloxyfop between Nov 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 3/2/23). 0.048ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 70 detections of Hexazinone between Oct 2017 and Nov 2022. 0.17ug/L (max 27/1/20). 0.0378ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 281 detections of Imazapic between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.22ug/L (max 29/11/21). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 14 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2018 and Jan 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 28/1/22). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 208 detections of Isoxaflutole between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.3ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.2111ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 158 detections of MCPA between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.71ug/L (max 1/3/21). 0.075ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 218 detections of Metolachlor between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023. 1ug/L (max 27/4/22). 0.075ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 16 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Feb 2018 and Feb 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 2/4/19). 0.078ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 182 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.419ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 7 detections of Pendimethalin between May 2019 and May 2022. 0.26ug/L (max 26/4/22). 0.141ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 6 detections of Simazine between Dec 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 26/4/22). 0.094ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 218 detections of Tebuthiuron between Aug 2017 and Feb 2023. 0.37ug/L (max 7/1/21). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 90 detections of Terbuthylazine between Dec 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.96ug/L (max 11/11/21). 0.156ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 12 detections of Triclopyr between Nov 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 18/12/18). 0.079ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: Haughton River at Giru Tailwater. Pesticides: Multiple

Haughton River at Giru Tailwater

871 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 78 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.74ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.137ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 59 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.45ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.109ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 12 detections of Ametryn between Jul 2019 and Dec 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 11/5/22). 0.031ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 152 detections of Atrazine between Aug 2017 and Jan 2023. 3.1ug/L (max 14/1/19). 0.316ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 1 detection of Bromacil 14/1/19 0.02ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Nov 2021 and May 2022

Diazinon: 8 trace detections of Diazinon between Aug 2018 and Apr 2022.

Fipronil: 4 detections of Fipronil between Feb 2018 and Jan 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.0325ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 40 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.66ug/L (max 1/9/21). 0.1457ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 8 detections of Haloxyfop between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.11ug/L (max 28/10/17). 0.05ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 5 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2018 and Jan 2020. 0.01ug/L (max 22/1/18). 0.01ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 59 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.31ug/L (max 1/2/22). 0.056ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 16 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2018 and Dec 2022. 0.1ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.039ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 5 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2018 and Jan 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.032ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 41 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.25ug/L (max 1/9/21). 0.0424ug/L (av).

Metolachlor: 136 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.9ug/L (max 27/1/22). 0.14ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 1 detection of Metsulfuron Methyl on 11/5/22. 0.06ug/L

Metribuzin: 17 detections of Metribuzin between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.68ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.139ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 1 detection of Pendimethalin 11/5/22. 0.07ug/L

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 14/1/19. 0.01ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 197 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.154ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 14 detections of Terbuthylazine between Nov 2021 and Jan 2023. 0.25ug/L (max 29/11/21). 0.061ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 8 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2018 and Dec 2021. 0.11ug/L (max 24/12/18). 0.075ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Haughton River at Giru Tailwater

871 pesticide detections between Aug 2017 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 78 detections of Diuron between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.74ug/L (max 27/11/21). 0.137ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 59 detections of 2,4-D between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.45ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.109ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 12 detections of Ametryn between Jul 2019 and Dec 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 11/5/22). 0.031ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 152 detections of Atrazine between Aug 2017 and Jan 2023. 3.1ug/L (max 14/1/19). 0.316ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 1 detection of Bromacil 14/1/19 0.02ug/L

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Nov 2021 and May 2022

Diazinon: 8 trace detections of Diazinon between Aug 2018 and Apr 2022.

Fipronil: 4 detections of Fipronil between Feb 2018 and Jan 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.0325ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 40 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2017 and Feb 2022. 0.66ug/L (max 1/9/21). 0.1457ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 8 detections of Haloxyfop between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020. 0.11ug/L (max 28/10/17). 0.05ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 5 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2018 and Jan 2020. 0.01ug/L (max 22/1/18). 0.01ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 59 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.31ug/L (max 1/2/22). 0.056ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 16 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2018 and Dec 2022. 0.1ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.039ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 5 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2018 and Jan 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.032ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 41 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.25ug/L (max 1/9/21). 0.0424ug/L (av).

Metolachlor: 136 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 1.9ug/L (max 27/1/22). 0.14ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 1 detection of Metsulfuron Methyl on 11/5/22. 0.06ug/L

Metribuzin: 17 detections of Metribuzin between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.68ug/L (max 16/12/18). 0.139ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 1 detection of Pendimethalin 11/5/22. 0.07ug/L

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 14/1/19. 0.01ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 197 detections of Tebuthiuron between Oct 2017 and Feb 2023. 2.8ug/L (max 28/1/19). 0.154ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 14 detections of Terbuthylazine between Nov 2021 and Jan 2023. 0.25ug/L (max 29/11/21). 0.061ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 8 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2018 and Dec 2021. 0.11ug/L (max 24/12/18). 0.075ug/L

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023. Ross River at Aplins Weir Townsville (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Ross River at Aplins Weir (Townsville Queensland)

139 pesticide detections Nov 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 3 detections of Diuron between Feb and Mar 2020. 0.02ug/L (max 26/2/20). 0.02ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 19 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 14/2/20). 0.0289ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 4 detections of Atrazine in Jan 2019. 0.03ug/L (max 27/1/19). 0.0275ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 5 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2019 to Feb 2023.

Diazinon: 1 trace detection of Diazinon in Nov 2018.

Fipronil:  3 detections of Fipronil in Jan 2023. 0.01ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.01ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 20 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2021 to Jan 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 2/2/22). 0.1105ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 2 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2021 to Feb 2021. 0.06ug/L (max 28/2/21). 0.045ug/L av.

MCPA: 56 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.05ug/L (max 28/11/22). 0.0196ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 24/3/21. 0.01ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 23 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.11ug/L (max 5/2/23). 0.03ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 2 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.08ug/L (max 5/2/23). 0.065ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Ross River at Aplins Weir (Townsville Queensland)

139 pesticide detections Nov 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 3 detections of Diuron between Feb and Mar 2020. 0.02ug/L (max 26/2/20). 0.02ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 19 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2018 and Apr 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 14/2/20). 0.0289ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 4 detections of Atrazine in Jan 2019. 0.03ug/L (max 27/1/19). 0.0275ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 5 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2019 to Feb 2023.

Diazinon: 1 trace detection of Diazinon in Nov 2018.

Fipronil:  3 detections of Fipronil in Jan 2023. 0.01ug/L (max 14/1/23). 0.01ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 20 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2021 to Jan 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 2/2/22). 0.1105ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 2 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2021 to Feb 2021. 0.06ug/L (max 28/2/21). 0.045ug/L av.

MCPA: 56 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.05ug/L (max 28/11/22). 0.0196ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 1 detection of Simazine 24/3/21. 0.01ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 23 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2020 and Feb 2023. 0.11ug/L (max 5/2/23). 0.03ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 2 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2021 and Feb 2023. 0.08ug/L (max 5/2/23). 0.065ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017/2023: Black River at Bruce Highway (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Black River at Bruce Highway

72 pesticide detections Aug 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 1 detection of Diuron 14/1/23. 0.04ug/L

2,4-D: 6 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.16ug/L (max 22/4/21). 0.063ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2019 and Feb 2023.

Diazinon: 6 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2018 and Nov 2021.

Fipronil: 2 detections of Fipronil between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.03ug/L (max 16/1/23). 0.025ug/L av.)

MCPA: 12 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 28/11/22). 0.0592ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 3 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2021 and Jan 2023. 0.04ug/L  (max 22/3/21) 0.0333ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 25 detections of Tebuthiuron between Feb 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.1ug/L (max 6/1/23). 0.0392ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 13 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2019 and Jan 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 26/4/22). 0.078ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Black River at Bruce Highway

72 pesticide detections Aug 2017 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 1 detection of Diuron 14/1/23. 0.04ug/L

2,4-D: 6 detections of 2,4-D between Feb 2018 and Jan 2023. 0.16ug/L (max 22/4/21). 0.063ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 4 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Mar 2019 and Feb 2023.

Diazinon: 6 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2018 and Nov 2021.

Fipronil: 2 detections of Fipronil between Jan 2020 and Jan 2023. 0.03ug/L (max 16/1/23). 0.025ug/L av.)

MCPA: 12 detections of MCPA between Feb 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 28/11/22). 0.0592ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 3 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2021 and Jan 2023. 0.04ug/L  (max 22/3/21) 0.0333ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 25 detections of Tebuthiuron between Feb 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.1ug/L (max 6/1/23). 0.0392ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 13 detections of Triclopyr between Feb 2019 and Jan 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 26/4/22). 0.078ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2018/2023: Murray River at Bilyana (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Murray River at Bilyana (Qld)

1700 pesticide detections Sep 2018 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 219 detections of Diuron between Sep 2018 and Feb 2023. 2.5ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.398ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 190 detections of 2,4-D between Sep 20-18 and Feb 2023. 2.2ug/L (max 1/9/21). 0.23ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 9 detections of Ametryn between Nov 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.04ug/L (max 30/1/23). 0.0189ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 204 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 5.1ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.41ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 15 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2018 and Feb 2020. 0.24ug/L (max 26/1/20). 0.0607ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos in April 2022

Diazinon: 7 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2018 and Apr 2022

Fluroxypur: 43 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 20/12/22). 0.0915ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 49 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.0579ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 228 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2018 and Feb 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 24/2/20). 0.2252ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 187 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.34ug/L (max 20/12/22). 0.0549ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 206 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 1.1ug/L (max 11/12/18). 0.1898ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 84 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2018 and Dec 2022. 0.37ug/L (max 24/2/20). 0.0773ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 8 detections of MCPA between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 24/2/20). 0.0613ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 145 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 10/12/18). 0.0452ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 4 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2020 to Feb 2020. 0.08ug/L (max 14/2/20). 0.0375ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 58 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.82ug/L (max 28/1/20). 0.124ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 1 detection of Pendimethalin 28/4/22. 0.03ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 15 detections of Simazine between Apr 2020 and Jan 2022. 0.46ug/L (max 19/4/20). 0.121ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 3 detections of Terbuthylazine in Jan 2020. 0.05ug/L (max 2/1/21). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 25 detections of Triclopyr between April 2019 and Jan 2022. 0.43ug/L (max 20/4/21). 0.1304ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Murray River at Bilyana

1700 pesticide detections Sep 2018 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 219 detections of Diuron between Sep 2018 and Feb 2023. 2.5ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.398ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 190 detections of 2,4-D between Sep 20-18 and Feb 2023. 2.2ug/L (max 1/9/21). 0.23ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 9 detections of Ametryn between Nov 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.04ug/L (max 30/1/23). 0.0189ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 204 detections of Atrazine between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 5.1ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.41ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 15 detections of Bromacil between Nov 2018 and Feb 2020. 0.24ug/L (max 26/1/20). 0.0607ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 3 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos in April 2022

Diazinon: 7 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2018 and Apr 2022

Fluroxypur: 43 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 20/12/22). 0.0915ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 49 detections of Haloxyfop between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.28ug/L (max 12/1/22). 0.0579ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 228 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2018 and Feb 2023. 1.5ug/L (max 24/2/20). 0.2252ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 187 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.34ug/L (max 20/12/22). 0.0549ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 206 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 1.1ug/L (max 11/12/18). 0.1898ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 84 detections of Isoxaflutole between Dec 2018 and Dec 2022. 0.37ug/L (max 24/2/20). 0.0773ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 8 detections of MCPA between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.2ug/L (max 24/2/20). 0.0613ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 145 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 10/12/18). 0.0452ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 4 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2020 to Feb 2020. 0.08ug/L (max 14/2/20). 0.0375ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 58 detections of Metribuzin between Dec 2018 and Feb 2023. 0.82ug/L (max 28/1/20). 0.124ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 1 detection of Pendimethalin 28/4/22. 0.03ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 15 detections of Simazine between Apr 2020 and Jan 2022. 0.46ug/L (max 19/4/20). 0.121ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 3 detections of Terbuthylazine in Jan 2020. 0.05ug/L (max 2/1/21). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 25 detections of Triclopyr between April 2019 and Jan 2022. 0.43ug/L (max 20/4/21). 0.1304ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2021: Forrest Beach (Qld). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Hexazinone

Scheme 3 Forrest Beach Water Supply

Pesticide Residue Analysis
Pesticide residue analysis occurs every 12 months for both untreated and treated samples. Herbicides including, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine and Hexazinone, have been recorded to have greater values than <0.1 μg/L, but have not exceeded the ADWG.

Scheme 3 Forrest Beach Water Supply

Pesticide Residue Analysis
Pesticide residue analysis occurs every 12 months for both untreated and treated samples. Herbicides including, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine and Hexazinone, have been recorded to have greater values than <0.1 μg/L, but have not exceeded the ADWG.

2021: Macknade (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Hexazinone

Scheme 2 Lower Herbert Water Supply

Macknade bores

Pesticide Residue Analysis
Pesticide residue analysis occurs every 12 months for both untreated and treated samples. Herbicides including, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine and Hexazinone, have been recorded to have greater values than <0.1 μg/L, but have not exceeded the ADWG.

Note that PFAS has been detected at Macknade

Scheme 2 Lower Herbert Water Supply

Macknade bores

Pesticide Residue Analysis
Pesticide residue analysis occurs every 12 months for both untreated and treated samples. Herbicides including, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine and Hexazinone, have been recorded to have greater values than <0.1 μg/L, but have not exceeded the ADWG.

Note that PFAS has been detected at Macknade

2015/2022: Johnstone River at Coquette Point. Pesticides: Multiple

Johnstone River at Coquette Point

1668 pesticide detections Oct 2015 and Dec 2022

Diuron: 344 detections of Diuron between Dec 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 17/1/18). 0.082ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 143 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.65ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.056ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 198 detections of Atrazine between Mar 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.47ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.053ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 2 detections of Bromacil between Apr 2020 and May 2020. 0.02ug/L (max 1/4/20). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 1 trace detection of Chlorpyrifos. 22/4/21

Diazinon: 3 detections of Diazinon between Jan 2018 and Feb 2018. 0.01ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.003ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 9 detections of Fluroxypur between May 2016 and Apr 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 19/4/21). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 48 detections of Haloxyfop between Mar 2016 and Mar 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 17/2/17). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 303 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.14ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 42 detections of Imazapic between Jul 2016 and Dec 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.015ug/L av.

Imidacloprid: 369 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.35ug/L (max 17/1/18). 0.067ug/L (av).

Isoxaflutole: 1 detection of Isoxaflutole 19/8/16. 0.001ug/L

MCPA: 47 detections of MCPA between March 2016 and May 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 6/3/18). 0.013ug/L (av).

Metolachlor: 75 detections of Metolachlor between May 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.5ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.031ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 21 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between May 2016 and Dec 2019. 0.1ug/L (max 9/12/19). 0.008ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 3 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Feb 2018. 0.06ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.037ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 32 detections of Simazine between Dec 2015 and Jan 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 3/1/21). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 8 detections of Tebuthiuron between Mar 2017 and Apr 2020. 0.04ug/L (max 12/12/18). 0.015ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 28 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2016 and Jun 2021. 0.12ug/L (max 25/12/18). 0.0423ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Johnstone River at Coquette Point

1668 pesticide detections Oct 2015 and Dec 2022

Diuron: 344 detections of Diuron between Dec 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.49ug/L (max 17/1/18). 0.082ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 143 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.65ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.056ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 198 detections of Atrazine between Mar 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.47ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.053ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 2 detections of Bromacil between Apr 2020 and May 2020. 0.02ug/L (max 1/4/20). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 1 trace detection of Chlorpyrifos. 22/4/21

Diazinon: 3 detections of Diazinon between Jan 2018 and Feb 2018. 0.01ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.003ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 9 detections of Fluroxypur between May 2016 and Apr 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 19/4/21). 0.02ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 48 detections of Haloxyfop between Mar 2016 and Mar 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 17/2/17). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 303 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.14ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 42 detections of Imazapic between Jul 2016 and Dec 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.015ug/L av.

Imidacloprid: 369 detections of Imidacloprid between Dec 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.35ug/L (max 17/1/18). 0.067ug/L (av).

Isoxaflutole: 1 detection of Isoxaflutole 19/8/16. 0.001ug/L

MCPA: 47 detections of MCPA between March 2016 and May 2022. 0.03ug/L (max 6/3/18). 0.013ug/L (av).

Metolachlor: 75 detections of Metolachlor between May 2016 and Jan 2023. 0.5ug/L (max 19/10/17). 0.031ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 21 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between May 2016 and Dec 2019. 0.1ug/L (max 9/12/19). 0.008ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 3 detections of Metribuzin between Oct 2017 and Feb 2018. 0.06ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.037ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 32 detections of Simazine between Dec 2015 and Jan 2022. 0.12ug/L (max 3/1/21). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 8 detections of Tebuthiuron between Mar 2017 and Apr 2020. 0.04ug/L (max 12/12/18). 0.015ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 28 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2016 and Jun 2021. 0.12ug/L (max 25/12/18). 0.0423ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2012/2023: North Johnstone River at Goondi (Innisfail Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

North Johnstone River at Goondi, Innisfail

766 pesticide detections Feb 2012 and Dec 2022

Diuron: 93 detections of Diuron between Feb 2012 and Dec 2022. 0.21ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.035ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 67 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2013 and Feb 2021. 0.46ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.041ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 41 detections of Atrazine between Mar 2012 to April 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 10 detections of Diazinon between Jan 2017 to Oct 2022. 0.0018ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.0004ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 10 detections of Fipronil between Jan 2017 to Dec 2018. 0.0013ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.0026ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 11 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2015 to Apr 2020. 0.007ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 33 detections of Haloxyfop between Mar 2015 to May 2020. 0.11ug/L (max 16/2/17). 0.013ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 66 detections of Hexazinone between Jul 2013 to April 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 11/1/22). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 16 detections of Imazapic between Jul 2016 to Feb 2017. 0.04ug/L (max 19/7/16). 0.009ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 327 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2012 to Jan 2023. 0.35ug/L (max 20/5/20). 0.067ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 6 detections of MCPA between Mar 2016 to Jan 2022. 0.01ug/L (max 3/3/16). 0.0095ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 12 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 to Jan 2022. 0.017ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.005ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 13 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Feb 2015 to Feb 2017. 0.01ug/L (max 7/2/15). 0.0023ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 13 detections of Simazine between May 2012 to Dec 2018. 0.016ug/L (max 5/1/17). 0.0066ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 15 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jun 2012 to May 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 17/4/20). 0.0075ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 30 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2015 to Apr 2020. 0.1ug/L (max 17/4/20). 0.0128ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

 

North Johnstone River at Goondi, Innisfail

766 pesticide detections Feb 2012 and Dec 2022

Diuron: 93 detections of Diuron between Feb 2012 and Dec 2022. 0.21ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.035ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 67 detections of 2,4-D between Mar 2013 and Feb 2021. 0.46ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.041ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 41 detections of Atrazine between Mar 2012 to April 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: 10 detections of Diazinon between Jan 2017 to Oct 2022. 0.0018ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.0004ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 10 detections of Fipronil between Jan 2017 to Dec 2018. 0.0013ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.0026ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 11 detections of Fluroxypur between Dec 2015 to Apr 2020. 0.007ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 33 detections of Haloxyfop between Mar 2015 to May 2020. 0.11ug/L (max 16/2/17). 0.013ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 66 detections of Hexazinone between Jul 2013 to April 2022. 0.06ug/L (max 11/1/22). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 16 detections of Imazapic between Jul 2016 to Feb 2017. 0.04ug/L (max 19/7/16). 0.009ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 327 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2012 to Jan 2023. 0.35ug/L (max 20/5/20). 0.067ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 6 detections of MCPA between Mar 2016 to Jan 2022. 0.01ug/L (max 3/3/16). 0.0095ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 12 detections of Metolachlor between Dec 2016 to Jan 2022. 0.017ug/L (max 8/1/17). 0.005ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 13 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Feb 2015 to Feb 2017. 0.01ug/L (max 7/2/15). 0.0023ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 13 detections of Simazine between May 2012 to Dec 2018. 0.016ug/L (max 5/1/17). 0.0066ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 15 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jun 2012 to May 2022. 0.04ug/L (max 17/4/20). 0.0075ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 30 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2015 to Apr 2020. 0.1ug/L (max 17/4/20). 0.0128ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

 

2014/23: Russell River at East Russell (Qld). Pestides: Multiple

Russell River at East Russell

3188 pesticide detections Jan 2014 and March 2023

Diuron: 646 detections of Diuron between Jan 2014 and Mar 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.12ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 331 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2014 and Mar 2023. 0.7ug/L (max 17/2/17). 0.05ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 9 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2015 and Oct 2017. 0.03ug/L (max 16/4/16). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 367 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.084ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 3 detections of Bromacil between May 2016 and July 2017. 0.02ug/L (max 5/4/17). 0.007ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between May 2022 and February 2023.

Diazinon: 4 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2018 and Mar 2021.

Fluroxypur: 109 detections of Fluroxypur between Mar 2014 and Feb 2020. 0.12ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.038ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 36 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.07ug/L (max 10/2/21). 0.019ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 590 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 22/1/22). 0.046ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 260 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.12ug/L (max 20/9/17). 0.026ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 549 Imidacloprid detections between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 0.31ug/L (max 8/5/20). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 43 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.029ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 61 detections of MCPA between Jan 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.028ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 78 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2014 to Dec 2022. 0.63ug/L (max 20/9/17). 0.056ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 47 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 16/4/20). 0.014ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 32 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2014 and Feb 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 20/9/17). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Mar 2020 and Jan 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 22/1/22). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 3 detections of Tebuthiuron in Dec 2018. 0.02ug/L (max 25/12/18). 0.013ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 8 detections of Triclopyr between Apr 2016 and Dec 2018. 0.08ug/L (max 25/12/18). 0.015ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Russell River at East Russell

3188 pesticide detections Jan 2014 and March 2023

Diuron: 646 detections of Diuron between Jan 2014 and Mar 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.12ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 331 detections of 2,4-D between Jan 2014 and Mar 2023. 0.7ug/L (max 17/2/17). 0.05ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 9 detections of Ametryn between Jan 2015 and Oct 2017. 0.03ug/L (max 16/4/16). 0.018ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 367 detections of Atrazine between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 1.7ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.084ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 3 detections of Bromacil between May 2016 and July 2017. 0.02ug/L (max 5/4/17). 0.007ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between May 2022 and February 2023.

Diazinon: 4 trace detections of Diazinon between Oct 2018 and Mar 2021.

Fluroxypur: 109 detections of Fluroxypur between Mar 2014 and Feb 2020. 0.12ug/L (max 5/2/18). 0.038ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 36 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.07ug/L (max 10/2/21). 0.019ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 590 detections of Hexazinone between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 0.27ug/L (max 22/1/22). 0.046ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 260 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.12ug/L (max 20/9/17). 0.026ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 549 Imidacloprid detections between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 0.31ug/L (max 8/5/20). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 43 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.029ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 61 detections of MCPA between Jan 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 29/1/14). 0.028ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 78 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2014 to Dec 2022. 0.63ug/L (max 20/9/17). 0.056ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 47 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.08ug/L (max 16/4/20). 0.014ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 32 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2014 and Feb 2022. 0.16ug/L (max 20/9/17). 0.029ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 10 detections of Simazine between Mar 2020 and Jan 2022. 0.15ug/L (max 22/1/22). 0.044ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 3 detections of Tebuthiuron in Dec 2018. 0.02ug/L (max 25/12/18). 0.013ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 8 detections of Triclopyr between Apr 2016 and Dec 2018. 0.08ug/L (max 25/12/18). 0.015ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2013/23: Mulgrave River at Deerel (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple (2515 detections)

Mulgrave River at Deeral: 2515 pesticide detections between 2013 and 2023

Diuron: 420 Diuron detections between Nov 2013 to March 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 3/2/14), 0.105ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 260 2,4-D detections between Nov 2013 to March 2023. 1ug/L (max 22/2/17), 0.087ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 10 Ametryn detections between Feb 2014 to Feb 2021. 0.03ug/L (max 3/2/14), 0.0137ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 345 Atrazine detections between Nov 2013 to March 2023.  1.4ug/L (max 20/9/17), 0.123ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 17 Bromacil detections between May 2016 to June 2017. 0.067ug/L (max 17/2/17), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: Trace level 1/11/21.

Diazinon: Trace level 24/12/18.

Fipronil: 1 Fipronil detection. 16/2/23 0.01ug/L

Fluroxypur: 162 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2014 to Feb 2023. 0.75ug/L (max 22/2/17), 0.089ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 36 detections of Haloxyfop Acid between Jan 2015 to Jul 2017. 0.04ug/L (max 14/2/15), 0.012ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 327 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2013 to Mar 2023. 0.41ug/L (max 8/1/17), 0.048ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 85 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.07ug/L (max 13/4/20), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 295 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.56ug/L (max 3/2/14), 0.039ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 73 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.18ug/L (max 19/9/17), 0.04ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 133 detections of MCPA between Jan 2014 and May 2022. 1.4ug/L (max 22/2/17), 0.067ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 218 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 0.79ug/L (max 2/9/21), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 15 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2015 and Nov 2018. 0.17ug/L (max 12/3/15). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 77 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2014 and Feb 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 9/2/16), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 5 detections of Prometryn between Jan 2014 and Dec 2020. 0.13ug/L (max 24/12/18), 0.052ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 13 detections of Simazine between Jun 2016 and Feb 2019. 0.08ug/L (max 8/1/17), 0.015ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 20 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2014 and Feb 2017. 0.09ug/L (max 20/2/14), 0.037ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Mulgrave River at Deeral (Queensland): 2515 pesticide detections between 2013 and 2013

Diuron: 420 Diuron detections between Nov 2013 to March 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 3/2/14), 0.105ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 260 2,4-D detections between Nov 2013 to March 2023. 1ug/L (max 22/2/17), 0.087ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 10 Ametryn detections between Feb 2014 to Feb 2021. 0.03ug/L (max 3/2/14), 0.0137ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 345 Atrazine detections between Nov 2013 to March 2023.  1.4ug/L (max 20/9/17), 0.123ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 17 Bromacil detections between May 2016 to June 2017. 0.067ug/L (max 17/2/17), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: Trace level 1/11/21.

Diazinon: Trace level 24/12/18.

Fipronil: 1 Fipronil detection. 16/2/23 0.01ug/L

Fluroxypur: 162 detections of Fluroxypur between Jan 2014 to Feb 2023. 0.75ug/L (max 22/2/17), 0.089ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 36 detections of Haloxyfop Acid between Jan 2015 to Jul 2017. 0.04ug/L (max 14/2/15), 0.012ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 327 detections of Hexazinone between Nov 2013 to Mar 2023. 0.41ug/L (max 8/1/17), 0.048ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 85 detections of Imazapic between Dec 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.07ug/L (max 13/4/20), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 295 detections of Imidacloprid between Jan 2014 and Jan 2023. 0.56ug/L (max 3/2/14), 0.039ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 73 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jan 2014 and Jan 2022. 0.18ug/L (max 19/9/17), 0.04ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 133 detections of MCPA between Jan 2014 and May 2022. 1.4ug/L (max 22/2/17), 0.067ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 218 detections of Metolachlor between Jan 2014 and Feb 2023. 0.79ug/L (max 2/9/21), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 15 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Mar 2015 and Nov 2018. 0.17ug/L (max 12/3/15). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 77 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2014 and Feb 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 9/2/16), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 5 detections of Prometryn between Jan 2014 and Dec 2020. 0.13ug/L (max 24/12/18), 0.052ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 13 detections of Simazine between Jun 2016 and Feb 2019. 0.08ug/L (max 8/1/17), 0.015ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 20 detections of Triclopyr between Mar 2014 and Feb 2017. 0.09ug/L (max 20/2/14), 0.037ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017-2023: Mossman River at Bonnie Doon. Pesticides: Multiple

Mossman River at Bonnie Doon

Diuron: 48 Diuron detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023. 2.6ug/L (max. 19/10/17), 0.212ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 25 2,4-D detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023.  1.4ug/L (max 3/1/23), 0.156ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 38 Atrazine detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023. 5ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.322ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: Trace levels Aug 18 – Dec 18. 3 detections.

Fluroxypur: 28 Fluroxypur detections between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 0.52ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.175ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 3 Haloxyfop detections between Dec 2021 to April 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 22/4/22), 0.043ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 44 Hexazinone detections between Oct 2017 to Jan 2023. 0.33ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.055ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 14 Imazapic detections between Dec 2018 to Jan 2023. 0.05ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.019ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 49 Imidacloprid detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023. 0.59ug/L (max 3/1/23), 0.103ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 32 MCPA detections between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 0.23ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.056ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 18 Metolachlor detections between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 1.2ug/L (max 19/10/17), 0.3ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Mossman River at Bonnie Doon

Diuron: 48 Diuron detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023. 2.6ug/L (max. 19/10/17), 0.212ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 25 2,4-D detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023.  1.4ug/L (max 3/1/23), 0.156ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 38 Atrazine detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023. 5ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.322ug/L (av.)

Diazinon: Trace levels Aug 18 – Dec 18. 3 detections.

Fluroxypur: 28 Fluroxypur detections between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 0.52ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.175ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 3 Haloxyfop detections between Dec 2021 to April 2022. 0.05ug/L (max 22/4/22), 0.043ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 44 Hexazinone detections between Oct 2017 to Jan 2023. 0.33ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.055ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 14 Imazapic detections between Dec 2018 to Jan 2023. 0.05ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.019ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 49 Imidacloprid detections between Oct 2017 to March 2023. 0.59ug/L (max 3/1/23), 0.103ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 32 MCPA detections between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 0.23ug/L (max 10/12/18), 0.056ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 18 Metolachlor detections between Oct 2017 to Feb 2023. 1.2ug/L (max 19/10/17), 0.3ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2017-2023: Daintree River at Lower Daintree. Pesticides: Multiple

Daintree River at Lower Daintree

Diuron: 39 Diuron detections between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.57ug/L (max 11/12/18), 0.089ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 16 2,4-D detections between Jan 2018 and Dec 2021. 0.09ug/L (max 31/12/21), 0.032ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 3 Atrazine detections between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 12/2/21), 0.057ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: Trace levels Aug 17. 1 detection

Diazinon: Trace levels Nov 18 – Jan 19. 3 detections.

Fluroxypur: 5 Fluroxypur detections between Jan 2018 and March 2021. 0.09mg/L (max 1/3/21), 0.07ugL (av.)

Hexazinone: 31 Hexazinone detections between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.21ug/L (max 21/4/22), 0.03ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 14 Imazapic detections between Jan 2018 and Nov 2022. 0.04ug/L (max. 11/12/18), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 23 Imidacloprid detections between Dec 2018 and Nov 2022. 0.92ug/L (max. 11/12/18), 0.08ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 1 Isoxaflutole detection. 0.13ug/L 1/7/2021

MCPA: 29 MCPA detections between Jan 2018 and Nov 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 26/11/22), 0.025ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 1 Metolachlor detection 0.3ug/L 12/2/21

Metribuzin: 3 Metribuzin detections between Jan and Dec 2018. 0.05ug/L (max 20/1/18), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 3 Triclopyr detections between Jan 2018 and March 2019. 0.12ug/L (max 26/2/18), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Daintree River at Lower Daintree

Diuron: 39 Diuron detections between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.57ug/L (max 11/12/18), 0.089ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 16 2,4-D detections between Jan 2018 and Dec 2021. 0.09ug/L (max 31/12/21), 0.032ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 3 Atrazine detections between Oct 2017 and Nov 2021. 0.07ug/L (max 12/2/21), 0.057ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: Trace levels Aug 17. 1 detection

Diazinon: Trace levels Nov 18 – Jan 19. 3 detections.

Fluroxypur: 5 Fluroxypur detections between Jan 2018 and March 2021. 0.09mg/L (max 1/3/21), 0.07ugL (av.)

Hexazinone: 31 Hexazinone detections between Oct 2017 and Jan 2023. 0.21ug/L (max 21/4/22), 0.03ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 14 Imazapic detections between Jan 2018 and Nov 2022. 0.04ug/L (max. 11/12/18), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 23 Imidacloprid detections between Dec 2018 and Nov 2022. 0.92ug/L (max. 11/12/18), 0.08ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 1 Isoxaflutole detection. 0.13ug/L 1/7/2021

MCPA: 29 MCPA detections between Jan 2018 and Nov 2022. 0.11ug/L (max 26/11/22), 0.025ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 1 Metolachlor detection 0.3ug/L 12/2/21

Metribuzin: 3 Metribuzin detections between Jan and Dec 2018. 0.05ug/L (max 20/1/18), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 3 Triclopyr detections between Jan 2018 and March 2019. 0.12ug/L (max 26/2/18), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

2021/22: Normanby River at Kalpower Crossing. Pesticides: 2,4-D, Chlorpyrifos, Diazinon, Fluroxypur, Imidacloprid, Metolachlor, Terbuthylazine

Normanby River at Kalpower Crossing

2,4-D: 3 detections February/March 2022. March 1 2022 0.07ug/L (max) 0.04ug/L av. detection

Chlorpyrifos: Trace levels February/March 2022

Diazinon: Trace levels January 2022

Fluroxypur: March 4 2022 0.09ug/L

Imidacloprid: March 4 2021 0.04ug/L

Metolachlor: 4 detections February/March 2021. 0.05ug/L (max), 0.0325ug/L (av. detection)

Terbuthylazine: 3 detections January 2021. 0.02ug/L (max), 0.017ug/L (av. detection)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government

Normanby River at Kalpower Crossing

2,4-D: 3 detections February/March 2022. March 1 2022 0.07ug/L (max) 0.04ug/L av. detection

Chlorpyrifos: Trace levels February/March 2022

Diazinon: Trace levels January 2022

Fluroxypur: March 4 2022 0.09ug/L

Imidacloprid: March 4 2021 0.04ug/L

Metolachlor: 4 detections February/March 2021. 0.05ug/L (max), 0.0325ug/L (av. detection)

Terbuthylazine: 3 detections January 2021. 0.02ug/L (max), 0.017ug/L (av. detection)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government

2017/18: Yallock Cut (Victoria). Pesticides: Multiple

2017/18 Yallock Cut (Grab Samples):

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.031µg/L, Iprodione 0.041µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.092µg/L (max), Metribuzin 0.03µg/L, Diuron 0.032µg/L (max), Simazine 0.041µg/L (max)

Spring: Malathion 0.1µg/L, Pirimicarb 0.52µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.11µg/L, Diuron 0.22µg/L (max), Simazine 0.14 µg/L (max)

Summer: Pirimicarb 0.11µg/L, Diuron 0.4µg/L, Simazine 0.63µg/L

Autumn: Pirimicarb 0.086µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.05µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.13µg/L, Diuron 0.11µg/L

2017/18 Yallock Cut (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.047µg/L, Iprodione 0.22µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.17µg/L, Atrazine 0.01µg/L, Diuron 0.027µg/L, Simazine 0.049µg/L

Spring: Malathion 0.015µg/L, Pyrimethanil 0.056µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.19µg/L, Iprodione 0.03µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.033µg/L, Diuron 0.069µg/L, Simazine 0.14µg/L

Summer: Pirimicarb 0.28µg/L, Procymidone 0.011µg/L, Pyrimethanil 0.04µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.089µg/L, Iprodione 0.075µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.23µg/L, Atrazine 0.041µg/L, Diuron 0.33µg/L, Simazine 0.38µg/L

Autumn: Pirimicarb 0.15µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.11µg/L, Iprodione 0.05µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.11µg/L, Atrazine 0.056µg/L, Diuron 0.051µg/L, Simazine 0.049µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Yallock Cut (Grab Samples):

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.031µg/L, Iprodione 0.041µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.092µg/L (max), Metribuzin 0.03µg/L, Diuron 0.032µg/L (max), Simazine 0.041µg/L (max)

Spring: Malathion 0.1µg/L, Pirimicarb 0.52µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.11µg/L, Diuron 0.22µg/L (max), Simazine 0.14 µg/L (max)

Summer: Pirimicarb 0.11µg/L, Diuron 0.4µg/L, Simazine 0.63µg/L

Autumn: Pirimicarb 0.086µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.05µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.13µg/L, Diuron 0.11µg/L

2017/18 Yallock Cut (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.047µg/L, Iprodione 0.22µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.17µg/L, Atrazine 0.01µg/L, Diuron 0.027µg/L, Simazine 0.049µg/L

Spring: Malathion 0.015µg/L, Pyrimethanil 0.056µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.19µg/L, Iprodione 0.03µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.033µg/L, Diuron 0.069µg/L, Simazine 0.14µg/L

Summer: Pirimicarb 0.28µg/L, Procymidone 0.011µg/L, Pyrimethanil 0.04µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.089µg/L, Iprodione 0.075µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.23µg/L, Atrazine 0.041µg/L, Diuron 0.33µg/L, Simazine 0.38µg/L

Autumn: Pirimicarb 0.15µg/L, Metalaxyl 0.11µg/L, Iprodione 0.05µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.11µg/L, Atrazine 0.056µg/L, Diuron 0.051µg/L, Simazine 0.049µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18: Cardinia Creek. Pesticides: Multiple

2017/18 Cardinia Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Tebuconazole 0.015µg/L, Atrazine 0.014µg/L, Metribuzin 0.032µg/L, Simazine 0.038µg/L

2017/18 Cardinia Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Iprodione 0.09µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.017µg/L, Metribuzin 0.044µg/L, Atrazine 0.018µg/L, Diuron 0.012µg/L, Simazine 0.055µg/L

Spring: Simazine 0.011µg/L

Summer: Metolachlor 0.015µg/L

Autumn: Metolachlor 0.044µg/L, Simazine 0.024µg/L

2017/18 Cardinia Reference (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Autumn: Tebuconazole 0.011µg/L, Simazine 0.019µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Cardinia Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Tebuconazole 0.015µg/L, Atrazine 0.014µg/L, Metribuzin 0.032µg/L, Simazine 0.038µg/L

2017/18 Cardinia Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Iprodione 0.09µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.017µg/L, Metribuzin 0.044µg/L, Atrazine 0.018µg/L, Diuron 0.012µg/L, Simazine 0.055µg/L

Spring: Simazine 0.011µg/L

Summer: Metolachlor 0.015µg/L

Autumn: Metolachlor 0.044µg/L, Simazine 0.024µg/L

2017/18 Cardinia Reference (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Autumn: Tebuconazole 0.011µg/L, Simazine 0.019µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18: Lower Gum Scrub Creek (Victoria). Pesticides: Multiple

2017/18 Lower Gum Scrub Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.12µg/L (max), Boscalid 0.023µg/L (max), Iprodione 2.4µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.016µg/L, Atrazine 0.017µg/L, Metribuzin 0.16µg/L (max), Diuron 0.61µg/L (max), Simazine 0.022µg/L (max)

Spring: Pirimicarb 0.016µg/L (max), Iprodione 0.087µg/L (max), Diuron 0.067µg/L (max)

2017/18 Lower Gum Scrub Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.055µg/L, Boscalid 0.028µg/L, Iprodione 4.5µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.014µg/L, Metribuzin 0.018µg/L, Atrazine 0.022µg/L, Diuron 0.093µg/L, Simazine 0.032µg/L

Spring: Pirimicarb 0.055µg/L (max), Iprodione 0.042µg/L, Diuron 0.028µg/L, Simazine 0.013µg/L (max)

Summer: Diuron 0.013µg/L, Simazine 0.021µg/L

Autumn: Boscalid 0.011µg/L, Iprodione 0.029µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.021µg/L, Diuron 0.015µg/L, Simazine 0.044µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Lower Gum Scrub Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.12µg/L (max), Boscalid 0.023µg/L (max), Iprodione 2.4µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.016µg/L, Atrazine 0.017µg/L, Metribuzin 0.16µg/L (max), Diuron 0.61µg/L (max), Simazine 0.022µg/L (max)

Spring: Pirimicarb 0.016µg/L (max), Iprodione 0.087µg/L (max), Diuron 0.067µg/L (max)

2017/18 Lower Gum Scrub Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Pirimicarb 0.055µg/L, Boscalid 0.028µg/L, Iprodione 4.5µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.014µg/L, Metribuzin 0.018µg/L, Atrazine 0.022µg/L, Diuron 0.093µg/L, Simazine 0.032µg/L

Spring: Pirimicarb 0.055µg/L (max), Iprodione 0.042µg/L, Diuron 0.028µg/L, Simazine 0.013µg/L (max)

Summer: Diuron 0.013µg/L, Simazine 0.021µg/L

Autumn: Boscalid 0.011µg/L, Iprodione 0.029µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.021µg/L, Diuron 0.015µg/L, Simazine 0.044µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18: Toomuc Creek (Victoria). Pesticides: Multiple

2017/18 Toomuc Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Tebuconazole 0.0138µg/L, Metribuzin 0.046µg/L, Simazine 0.07µg/L

2017/18 Toomuc Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Iprodione 0.01µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.012µg/L, Metribuzin 0.058µg/L, Atrazine 0.02µg/L, Simazine 0.12µg/L

Spring: Simazine 0.029µg/L

Autumn: Tebuconazole 0.012µg/L, Simazine 0.12µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Toomuc Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Tebuconazole 0.0138µg/L, Metribuzin 0.046µg/L, Simazine 0.07µg/L

2017/18 Toomuc Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Iprodione 0.01µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.012µg/L, Metribuzin 0.058µg/L, Atrazine 0.02µg/L, Simazine 0.12µg/L

Spring: Simazine 0.029µg/L

Autumn: Tebuconazole 0.012µg/L, Simazine 0.12µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18: Deep Creek (Westernport). Pesticides Multiple

2017/18 Deep Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Tebuconazole 0.016µg/L, Atrazine 0.022µg/L, Metribuzin 0.064µg/L (max), Simazine 0.068 µg/L (max)

Spring: Iprodione 0.096µg/L, Metolachlor 0.012µg/L, Diuron 0.034µg/L, Simazine 0.075µg/L (max)

Summer: Simazine 0.27µg/L

2017/18 Deep Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Propiconazole II 0.015µg/L, Propiconazole I 0.014µg/L, Iprodione 0.02µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.024µg/L, Metribuzin 0.086µg/L, Atrazine 0.042µg/L, Diuron 0.024µg/L, Simazine 0.18µg/L

Spring: DEET 0.12µg/L, Propiconazole I 0.023µg/L, Iprodione 0.05µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.025µg/L, Metolachlor 0.031µg/L, Atrazine 0.07µg/L, Diuron 0.036µg/L, Simazine 0.12µg/L

Autumn: Iprodione 0.037µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.047µg/L (max), Metolachlor 0.014µg/L (max), Diuron 0.035µg/L (max), Simazine 0.13µg/L (max)

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Deep Creek (Grab Samples):

Winter: Tebuconazole 0.016µg/L, Atrazine 0.022µg/L, Metribuzin 0.064µg/L (max), Simazine 0.068 µg/L (max)

Spring: Iprodione 0.096µg/L, Metolachlor 0.012µg/L, Diuron 0.034µg/L, Simazine 0.075µg/L (max)

Summer: Simazine 0.27µg/L

2017/18 Deep Creek (Chemcatcher Sampler)

Winter: Propiconazole II 0.015µg/L, Propiconazole I 0.014µg/L, Iprodione 0.02µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.024µg/L, Metribuzin 0.086µg/L, Atrazine 0.042µg/L, Diuron 0.024µg/L, Simazine 0.18µg/L

Spring: DEET 0.12µg/L, Propiconazole I 0.023µg/L, Iprodione 0.05µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.025µg/L, Metolachlor 0.031µg/L, Atrazine 0.07µg/L, Diuron 0.036µg/L, Simazine 0.12µg/L

Autumn: Iprodione 0.037µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.047µg/L (max), Metolachlor 0.014µg/L (max), Diuron 0.035µg/L (max), Simazine 0.13µg/L (max)

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18: Drain One Westernport (Victoria). Multiple

2017/18 Drain One (Grab Samples):

Winter: p,p,DDE 0.016µg/L (max), p,p,DDD 0.021µg/L (max), p,p,DDT 0.038µg/L (max), Metalaxyl 0.13µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.083µg/L (max), Metribuzin 0.014µg/L (max), Diuron 0.34µg/L (max), Simazine 0.098µg/L (max).

Spring: Metalaxyl 0.15µg/L (max), Diuron 3.6µg/L (max), Simazine 0.29µg/L (max).

Summer: Diuron 0.53µg/L (max), Simazine 0.22µg/L (max).

Autumn: Diuron 0.22µg/L

2017/18 Drain One (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Winter: Iprodione 0.045µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.075µg/L (max), Metribuzin 0.15µg/L (max), Atrazine 0.016µg/L (max), Diuron 0.18µg/L (max), Simazine 0.12µg/L (max)

Spring: Metalaxyl 0.19µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.047µg/L, Diuron 0.079µg/L, Simazine 0.35µg/L

Summer: Metalaxyl 0.012µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.012µg/L, Diuron 0.14µg/L (max), Simazine 0.14µg/L (max)

Autumn: Metalaxyl 0.014µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.041µg/L, Diuron 0.22µg/L, Simazine 0.096µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Drain One (Grab Samples):

Winter: p,p,DDE 0.016µg/L (max), p,p,DDD 0.021µg/L (max), p,p,DDT 0.038µg/L (max), Metalaxyl 0.13µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.083µg/L (max), Metribuzin 0.014µg/L (max), Diuron 0.34µg/L (max), Simazine 0.098µg/L (max).

Spring: Metalaxyl 0.15µg/L (max), Diuron 3.6µg/L (max), Simazine 0.29µg/L (max).

Summer: Diuron 0.53µg/L (max), Simazine 0.22µg/L (max).

Autumn: Diuron 0.22µg/L

2017/18 Drain One (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Winter: Iprodione 0.045µg/L (max), Tebuconazole 0.075µg/L (max), Metribuzin 0.15µg/L (max), Atrazine 0.016µg/L (max), Diuron 0.18µg/L (max), Simazine 0.12µg/L (max)

Spring: Metalaxyl 0.19µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.047µg/L, Diuron 0.079µg/L, Simazine 0.35µg/L

Summer: Metalaxyl 0.012µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.012µg/L, Diuron 0.14µg/L (max), Simazine 0.14µg/L (max)

Autumn: Metalaxyl 0.014µg/L, Tebuconazole 0.041µg/L, Diuron 0.22µg/L, Simazine 0.096µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18: Bunyip River (Victoria). Pesticides: Simazine, Metolachlor, Prometryn

2017/18 Bunyip River (Grab Samples):

Winter: Simazine 0.029µg/L

Autumn: Metolachlor 0.057µg/L

2017/18 Bunyip River (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Winter: Simazine 0.015µg/L

Spring: Prometryn 0.016µg/L, Metolachlor 0.029µg/L

Summer: Metolachlor 0.011µg/L

Autumn: Metolachlor 0.073µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

2017/18 Bunyip River (Grab Samples):

Winter: Simazine 0.029µg/L

Autumn: Metolachlor 0.057µg/L

2017/18 Bunyip River (Chemcatcher Sampler):

Winter: Simazine 0.015µg/L

Spring: Prometryn 0.016µg/L, Metolachlor 0.029µg/L

Summer: Metolachlor 0.011µg/L

Autumn: Metolachlor 0.073µg/L

Myers, JH., Sharp, S., Long, S., Kellar, C., and Pettigrove, V. (2018), Final Report Western Port Toxicant Study Stage 4: Assessment of pesticide risks in catchments of north-eastern Western Port, Aquatic Pollution Prevention Partnership, Technical Report No. 2, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia

12 March 2023: Spray Drift Cowboys: Fighting Spray Drift in the Cotton Industry

VIDEO: Spray Drift Cowboys: Fighting spray drift in the cotton industry

12 March 2023

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/programs/landline/2023-03-12/spray-drift-cowboys:-fighting-spray-drift-in-the/102086288

VIDEO: Spray Drift Cowboys: Fighting spray drift in the cotton industry

12 March 2023

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/programs/landline/2023-03-12/spray-drift-cowboys:-fighting-spray-drift-in-the/102086288

Feb 28 2028: Farm chemical spray drift causing widespread tree deaths, claims community group

Farm chemical spray drift causing widespread tree deaths, claims community group

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-28/spraydrift-ag-chemicals-prompts-calls-for-epa-investigation/102017874

Below: A tree said to be affected by spray drift in Gulgong, NSW.(Supplied)

Farmers, scientists and other community members across NSW have criticised the state’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for ignoring reports of damage to crops and vegetation from agricultural chemicals drifting on the wind.

Spray drift is the spread of agricultural chemicals like pesticides and herbicides from farms to neighbouring areas through the air.

It's a widely recognised phenomenon but this season has been described as one of the worst because unprecedented flooding, humidity and atmospheric inversion have all contributed to more incidents.

Members of Community Overspray Groups (COGs) met in Sydney recently to highlight their concerns.

They say the NSW EPA has not been properly investigating their reports of widespread impacts.

The group's secretary Beatrice Ludwig said members from across the state have reported the impact on their crops as well as the vegetation on their land and in public areas.

"We have gardens and orchards being defoliated. We have beekeepers, and entire bee hives dying," Ms Ludwig said.

The group said the EPA was giving them very little attention.

"The response is usually, 'you go and prove it'," rather than EPA taking it upon itself to investigate, she said.

“Spray drift is causing devastation and unintended consequences across thousands of hectares of farming and grazing land,” Pennie Scott, Convenor of the Passive Chemical Exposure Taskforce, said.

“They are doing nothing about protecting our environment … they are sitting on their hands, I don’t know whether its indifference, ignorance or just plain negligence, but they are not fulfilling their role," she said.

A group of scientists chaired by ANU adjunct professor Richard Thackway visited parts of the central west last year and determined that there was enough evidence to warrant investigation into the links between large-scale vegetation stress and agricultural chemicals.

"The group [of scientists] has widely observed symptoms of chemical drift on non-target vegetation over the past few decades and the degradation of vegetation does not appear to be occurring from natural causes," the statement said.

"The current run of wet seasons has resulted in vegetation recovery in many areas, but this is not evident in areas of intensive agronomic production where chemical use can be intense," it said.

'NSW waterways contaminated'

Aside from the possible effects on vegetation, pesticide runoff from agricultural production could also be in the state's waterways. 

Matt Landos is Director of Future Fisheries Veterinary Services and an honorary lecturer at Sydney University.

"What we know from monitoring [in Queensland] is that pretty much all waters that drain from agricultural land in Australia are contaminated with residues of products applied as pesticides," Dr Landos said.

Dr Landos said while New South Wales did not have an extensive monitoring system like other states, it was "almost certain" the state’s waterways were contaminated given NSW's volume of pesticide use in agriculture.

"From the fishery point of view, their productivity can be impacted by very low exposures to chemicals, impacting the viability of the food web, and the recruitment of new juveniles into fisheries," he said.

Bad conditions for drift

The NSW EPA acknowledged the season's conditions have come together to exacerbate spray drift.

"With the way the weather patterns have been this year, it's culminated in many farmers needing to spray at the same time," executive director of regulatory operations at the EPA Carmen Dwyer said.

She said farmers were desperate for their crops to succeed this season after some difficult years due to fires, floods and the mouse plague, and some were possibly spraying in ways they should not.

"We're seeing allegations of quite broad impact from particular chemicals"

Ms Dwyer encouraged people to report incidents of spray drift as soon as they suspected it.

"If we're told quickly about an incident we can get vegetation samples and confirm what type of pesticide has been applied, but unfortunately a lot of the time we're not notified of the incident in a timely way so that restricts our ability to investigate."

The EPA said it looked into all pollution notifications and reports, and had only received 12 this season.

The Community Overspray Groups worried that growers were now disillusioned with the investigation process, after making reports to the EPA for many years.

Farm chemical spray drift causing widespread tree deaths, claims community group

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-28/spraydrift-ag-chemicals-prompts-calls-for-epa-investigation/102017874

Below: A tree said to be affected by spray drift in Gulgong, NSW.(Supplied)

Farmers, scientists and other community members across NSW have criticised the state’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for ignoring reports of damage to crops and vegetation from agricultural chemicals drifting on the wind.

Spray drift is the spread of agricultural chemicals like pesticides and herbicides from farms to neighbouring areas through the air.

It’s a widely recognised phenomenon but this season has been described as one of the worst because unprecedented flooding, humidity and atmospheric inversion have all contributed to more incidents.

Members of Community Overspray Groups (COGs) met in Sydney recently to highlight their concerns.

They say the NSW EPA has not been properly investigating their reports of widespread impacts.

The group’s secretary Beatrice Ludwig said members from across the state have reported the impact on their crops as well as the vegetation on their land and in public areas.

“We have gardens and orchards being defoliated. We have beekeepers, and entire bee hives dying,” Ms Ludwig said.

The group said the EPA was giving them very little attention.

“The response is usually, ‘you go and prove it’,” rather than EPA taking it upon itself to investigate, she said.

“Spray drift is causing devastation and unintended consequences across thousands of hectares of farming and grazing land,” Pennie Scott, Convenor of the Passive Chemical Exposure Taskforce, said.

“They are doing nothing about protecting our environment … they are sitting on their hands, I don’t know whether its indifference, ignorance or just plain negligence, but they are not fulfilling their role,” she said.

A group of scientists chaired by ANU adjunct professor Richard Thackway visited parts of the central west last year and determined that there was enough evidence to warrant investigation into the links between large-scale vegetation stress and agricultural chemicals.

“The group [of scientists] has widely observed symptoms of chemical drift on non-target vegetation over the past few decades and the degradation of vegetation does not appear to be occurring from natural causes,” the statement said.

“The current run of wet seasons has resulted in vegetation recovery in many areas, but this is not evident in areas of intensive agronomic production where chemical use can be intense,” it said.

‘NSW waterways contaminated’

Aside from the possible effects on vegetation, pesticide runoff from agricultural production could also be in the state’s waterways.

Matt Landos is Director of Future Fisheries Veterinary Services and an honorary lecturer at Sydney University.

“What we know from monitoring [in Queensland] is that pretty much all waters that drain from agricultural land in Australia are contaminated with residues of products applied as pesticides,” Dr Landos said.

Dr Landos said while New South Wales did not have an extensive monitoring system like other states, it was “almost certainthe state’s waterways were contaminated given NSW’s volume of pesticide use in agriculture.

“From the fishery point of view, their productivity can be impacted by very low exposures to chemicals, impacting the viability of the food web, and the recruitment of new juveniles into fisheries,” he said.

Bad conditions for drift

The NSW EPA acknowledged the season’s conditions have come together to exacerbate spray drift.

“With the way the weather patterns have been this year, it’s culminated in many farmers needing to spray at the same time,” executive director of regulatory operations at the EPA Carmen Dwyer said.

She said farmers were desperate for their crops to succeed this season after some difficult years due to fires, floods and the mouse plague, and some were possibly spraying in ways they should not.

“We’re seeing allegations of quite broad impact from particular chemicals”

Ms Dwyer encouraged people to report incidents of spray drift as soon as they suspected it.

“If we’re told quickly about an incident we can get vegetation samples and confirm what type of pesticide has been applied, but unfortunately a lot of the time we’re not notified of the incident in a timely way so that restricts our ability to investigate.”

The EPA said it looked into all pollution notifications and reports, and had only received 12 this season.

The Community Overspray Groups worried that growers were now disillusioned with the investigation process, after making reports to the EPA for many years.

Jan 23 2023: Mudgee/Macquarie Valley. Spray Drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D?

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

2023 January: Lower Namoi (NSW) Spray Drift. 2,4-D?

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Jan 23 2023: Gwydir (NSW). Spray Drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D?

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Jan 23 2023: Mungindi (Qld). Spray Drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D?

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Jan 23 2023: Dirranbandi (NSW) Spray Drift

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Jan 23 2023: Spray Drift St George District. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Cotton Australia & others discuss action on spray drift incidents

Jan 23 2023: https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/cotton-australia-others-discuss-action-on-spray-drift-incidents-285336-newsdetails.htm

Australia’s top agricultural peak bodies including Cotton Australia, government regulators, and enforcement agencies, are discussing the latest incidents of spray drift which SOS NSW has described as at crisis point. Pesticide spray drift occurs when pesticide dust or droplets move through the air at the time of application or soon after, to unintended areas.

Farmers have reported moderate to severe spray drift incidents on the Darling Downs, St George district, Dirranbandi, Mungindi, Gwydir, Lower Namoi, Walgett, and the Macquarie Valley, according to a press release by Cotton Australia.

Cotton Australia’s general manager Michael Murray said: “Media reports have suggested 2,4-D spray drift is responsible in some locations and while the damage is consistent with phenoxy herbicides, there is currently no available evidence in the form of residue analysis to confirm that.

“That being said, unfortunately the industry has a long history of experience with spray drift, and if experienced farmers and agronomists identify the damages as being caused by 2-4D drift, then that is the most likely cause.”

Murray added that cotton crops had been impacted but so too have other crops and it is unclear in each location exactly what chemicals are responsible.

Cotton Australia reminds all growers and spray operators that they must apply chemicals in accordance with the label conditions which can include factors such as nozzle selections, wind speeds, and inversion conditions, added the release.

Cotton Australia is actively urging the relevant authorities to run compliance activities to ensure adherence to label conditions.

“There is no doubt, this year is the worst year in recent years, most likely reflecting the seasonal conditions which have generally been conducive for weed growth, and the weather induced delays to winter harvest means that in some instances weed control is occurring later than usual,” said Murray.

Jan 6 2023: Spray Drift impacts on 30,000ha Eastern Darling Downs. Pesticides: 2,4-D

Spray drift damages up to $100 million in cotton, prompting calls for more herbicide controls

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2023-01-06/spray-drift-damages-100-million-dollars-of-cotton-darling-downs/101816638

Anyone can buy the herbicide 2,4-D from a shop, but its misuse may have caused millions of dollars worth of damage to cotton crops, prompting calls for more controls.

The large-scale spray drift event hit up to 30,000 hectares of cotton on the eastern Darling Downs late last year.

But Crop Consultants Australia confirmed there had been spray drift detected across every cotton valley planted in Australia so far this season.

Spray drift is the airborne movement of agricultural chemicals outside a target area.

In this instance the chemical was 2,4-D, which kills plants by changing the way certain cells grow and is commonly used to control weeds.

Agronomist Matthew Holding said it was a shock to discover the affected cotton and he had never seen anything like it.

"To be able to say that pretty much every paddock we look in has some kind of symptom is just unbelievable," he said.

"These would range from low to moderate, and the moderate would be ones where we're starting to actually get concerned."

He said the true extent of the damage was still to be determined.

"It's happened just prior to Christmas I would say, so it's … still starting to rear its ugly head," he said.

Mr Holding said a lot of people were growing cotton at the moment due to strong prices, but sunflowers and small crops were also at risk.

Stuart Armitage, a former president of the Queensland Farmers Federation and former board member of Cotton Australia, said on top of high input costs, such as diesel, fertiliser and labour, the losses would be a huge blow.

"They [spray drift incidents] cause a lot of damage and a lot of grief and even depression and heartache for a lot of people," he said.

"You spend a lot of money getting a crop going, and then someone who we can't name or find or anything … through inconsideration, damages people's crops."

Agronomist Matthew Holding said $500 worth of chemical could have caused the damage, which may total up to $100 million.

"It's almost beyond belief to think that a few hundred dollars' worth of product done incorrectly and illegally could cause tens of millions of dollars … of damage in 2022," he said.

Both Mr Holding and Mr Armitage want more controls put in place around the chemical's use to create transparency.

They want 2,4-D listed as a controlled chemical that people would require certification to use.

"I would have thought that if you buy it from a shop, you've actually got to go onto a registered list and I think from that registered list, you've got to have the ability to keep good records and to be audited at any time," Mr Holding said.

Mr Armitage said the situation would not require a government review.

"All that does is need a tick from the government," he said.

In a statement, Biosecurity Queensland told the ABC it was investigating the use of herbicides associated with a reported spray drift incident on the Darling Downs affecting a 160-hectare site.

A spokesperson said further public comment was not possible while a complaint was being assessed.

Weeds become resistant due to wet season

Weeds have exploded across much of Australia due to wet weather last year.

Senior agronomist at Nutrien Dalby Ross Pomeroy said a huge amount of weed control in the areas concerned was ongoing, due to wet paddocks last winter and spring.

"We just couldn't work the paddock, it was too wet. So the situation was that we use a lot of herbicides," he said.

"Fleabane has been our biggest issue I'd say this season, and to a point where we've got fleabane varieties that are very tolerant or very, very resistant of our normal herbicides.

"Queensland, New South Wales, Northern Victoria [are affected and] I've seen it in my travels all the way up through the Queensland coast, around the Cape and it's just about everywhere, all the way through inland."

He said 30 years ago very light rates of glyphosate were used, but now he was having to go across paddocks three times.

"This might be the end of the herbicide era when it comes down to knockdown," he said.

Spray drift damages up to $100 million in cotton, prompting calls for more herbicide controls

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2023-01-06/spray-drift-damages-100-million-dollars-of-cotton-darling-downs/101816638

Anyone can buy the herbicide 2,4-D from a shop, but its misuse may have caused millions of dollars worth of damage to cotton crops, prompting calls for more controls.

The large-scale spray drift event hit up to 30,000 hectares of cotton on the eastern Darling Downs late last year.

But Crop Consultants Australia confirmed there had been spray drift detected across every cotton valley planted in Australia so far this season.

Spray drift is the airborne movement of agricultural chemicals outside a target area.

In this instance the chemical was 2,4-D, which kills plants by changing the way certain cells grow and is commonly used to control weeds.

Agronomist Matthew Holding said it was a shock to discover the affected cotton and he had never seen anything like it.

“To be able to say that pretty much every paddock we look in has some kind of symptom is just unbelievable,” he said.

“These would range from low to moderate, and the moderate would be ones where we’re starting to actually get concerned.”

He said the true extent of the damage was still to be determined.

“It’s happened just prior to Christmas I would say, so it’s … still starting to rear its ugly head,” he said.

Mr Holding said a lot of people were growing cotton at the moment due to strong prices, but sunflowers and small crops were also at risk.

Stuart Armitage, a former president of the Queensland Farmers Federation and former board member of Cotton Australia, said on top of high input costs, such as diesel, fertiliser and labour, the losses would be a huge blow.

“They [spray drift incidents] cause a lot of damage and a lot of grief and even depression and heartache for a lot of people,” he said.

“You spend a lot of money getting a crop going, and then someone who we can’t name or find or anything … through inconsideration, damages people’s crops.”

Agronomist Matthew Holding said $500 worth of chemical could have caused the damage, which may total up to $100 million.

“It’s almost beyond belief to think that a few hundred dollars’ worth of product done incorrectly and illegally could cause tens of millions of dollars … of damage in 2022,” he said.

Both Mr Holding and Mr Armitage want more controls put in place around the chemical’s use to create transparency.

They want 2,4-D listed as a controlled chemical that people would require certification to use.

“I would have thought that if you buy it from a shop, you’ve actually got to go onto a registered list and I think from that registered list, you’ve got to have the ability to keep good records and to be audited at any time,” Mr Holding said.

Mr Armitage said the situation would not require a government review.

“All that does is need a tick from the government,” he said.

In a statement, Biosecurity Queensland told the ABC it was investigating the use of herbicides associated with a reported spray drift incident on the Darling Downs affecting a 160-hectare site.

A spokesperson said further public comment was not possible while a complaint was being assessed.

Weeds become resistant due to wet season

Weeds have exploded across much of Australia due to wet weather last year.

Senior agronomist at Nutrien Dalby Ross Pomeroy said a huge amount of weed control in the areas concerned was ongoing, due to wet paddocks last winter and spring.

“We just couldn’t work the paddock, it was too wet. So the situation was that we use a lot of herbicides,” he said.

“Fleabane has been our biggest issue I’d say this season, and to a point where we’ve got fleabane varieties that are very tolerant or very, very resistant of our normal herbicides.

“Queensland, New South Wales, Northern Victoria [are affected and] I’ve seen it in my travels all the way up through the Queensland coast, around the Cape and it’s just about everywhere, all the way through inland.”

He said 30 years ago very light rates of glyphosate were used, but now he was having to go across paddocks three times.

“This might be the end of the herbicide era when it comes down to knockdown,” he said.

Sep 19 2022: Pilot dies in crop duster plane crash near Toowoomba

Pilot dies in crop duster plane crash near Toowoomba

Sep 19 2022: A pilot has died in a light aircraft crash north-west of Toowoomba.

The pilot, the sole occupant, died at the crash site on private property off Chinchilla Wondai Road at Canaga, near Chinchilla in the Western Downs, about 12.20pm on Monday.

Police said the pilot, a man aged in his 30s, was behind the controls of his crop duster aircraft when it lost altitude and crash-landed in a paddock.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau has been notified and will investigate the incident with the police service’s Forensic Crash Unit.

It comes after a pilot was killed in a plane crash in Ayr in the state’s north on Sunday, September 11.

The pilot, a 67-year-old Townsville man who was the only occupant of the aircraft, was found dead at the scene.

Last month, an experienced pilot, a millionaire businessman and his son died in an aircraft crash in the Fernvale area near Lake Wivenhoe in the Somerset Region, 40 kilometres west of Brisbane.

Bird carcass found in Qld plane's cockpit (Shep News Dec 16 2022)

The carcass of a large bird that can weigh as much as eight kilos was found in the cockpit of a crop duster involved in a fatal crash in rural Queensland.

A pilot was killed and his aircraft destroyed when it crashed into the ground at a property near Chinchilla, west of Brisbane, on September 19.

The aircraft hit the ground with the fuselage "in a near vertical attitude" and its "propeller and engine buried in the soft earth", the Australian Transport Safety Bureau's Stuart Godley said.

 

"A large bird carcass was found in the cockpit and the bird's wings were located about 300 metres north of the wreckage, in-line with the aircraft's track."

The engine appeared to be delivering power at the time of impact, a preliminary report says.

Examination have shown the bird was an Australian bustard or Plains turkey, which weighs up to eight kilograms and can be as tall as 1.2 metres.

They are mostly ground dwellers, but are capable of flight.

Farmers began their search for the plane at about midday after concerns were raised when the pilot failed to respond to a call about whether they needed more fuel.

One of the local farmers found the aircraft in a paddock where the pilot had been spraying pesticide shortly after.

The field where the accident occurred would generally be sprayed at a height of two metres above the ground, just above the weeds, the aircraft's operator advised.

While birdstrikes causing fatal aircraft accidents are very rare, the ATSB is separately investigating an incident involving a wedge-tailed eagle carcass located near the accident site of a helicopter that experienced an "in-flight break-up" in NSW in July. 

The ongoing investigation of the Chinchilla accident will include further examination of electronic components, operational documents and maintenance records.

A final report will be published at a later date.

Bird carcass found in Qld plane’s cockpit

Pilot dies in crop duster plane crash near Toowoomba

Sep 19 2022: A pilot has died in a light aircraft crash north-west of Toowoomba.

The pilot, the sole occupant, died at the crash site on private property off Chinchilla Wondai Road at Canaga, near Chinchilla in the Western Downs, about 12.20pm on Monday.

Police said the pilot, a man aged in his 30s, was behind the controls of his crop duster aircraft when it lost altitude and crash-landed in a paddock.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau has been notified and will investigate the incident with the police service’s Forensic Crash Unit.

It comes after a pilot was killed in a plane crash in Ayr in the state’s north on Sunday, September 11.

The pilot, a 67-year-old Townsville man who was the only occupant of the aircraft, was found dead at the scene.

Last month, an experienced pilot, a millionaire businessman and his son died in an aircraft crash in the Fernvale area near Lake Wivenhoe in the Somerset Region, 40 kilometres west of Brisbane.

Bird carcass found in Qld plane’s cockpit (Shep News Dec 16 2022)

The carcass of a large bird that can weigh as much as eight kilos was found in the cockpit of a crop duster involved in a fatal crash in rural Queensland.

A pilot was killed and his aircraft destroyed when it crashed into the ground at a property near Chinchilla, west of Brisbane, on September 19.

The aircraft hit the ground with the fuselage “in a near vertical attitude” and its “propeller and engine buried in the soft earth”, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau’s Stuart Godley said.

“A large bird carcass was found in the cockpit and the bird’s wings were located about 300 metres north of the wreckage, in-line with the aircraft’s track.”

The engine appeared to be delivering power at the time of impact, a preliminary report says.

Examination have shown the bird was an Australian bustard or Plains turkey, which weighs up to eight kilograms and can be as tall as 1.2 metres.

They are mostly ground dwellers, but are capable of flight.

Farmers began their search for the plane at about midday after concerns were raised when the pilot failed to respond to a call about whether they needed more fuel.

One of the local farmers found the aircraft in a paddock where the pilot had been spraying pesticide shortly after.

The field where the accident occurred would generally be sprayed at a height of two metres above the ground, just above the weeds, the aircraft’s operator advised.

While birdstrikes causing fatal aircraft accidents are very rare, the ATSB is separately investigating an incident involving a wedge-tailed eagle carcass located near the accident site of a helicopter that experienced an “in-flight break-up” in NSW in July.

The ongoing investigation of the Chinchilla accident will include further examination of electronic components, operational documents and maintenance records.

A final report will be published at a later date.

Bird carcass found in Qld plane’s cockpit

Jan 1 2023: Chemical Romance or Toxic Relationship: what you need to know about EDC’s

Chemical romance or toxic relationship: what you need to know about EDCs

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/7972744/two-heads-on-one-body-the-disturbing-chemicals-our-regulations-havent-caught-up-to/

John Hanscombe (Canberra Times) Jan 1 2023

Matt Landos knew something was seriously wrong when he saw the two-headed fish larvae.

It was 13 years ago when the veterinarian, who specialises in fish, was called to a small hatchery to investigate sudden, unexplained anomalies interfering with the embryos.

“They were having problems getting their fish to survive and they’d noticed some strange development in the eggs and the larvae of those fish in their hatchery,” he says.

“They had had some problems over the preceding couple of years which they suspected may have been related to the practices of their neighbour operating a commercial macadamia farm and utilising registered agricultural sprays on their crop.”

The hatchery operator had taken her concerns to the Queensland government, suspecting pesticide spray drift had introduced chemicals into the water in which the fish were bred. An initial investigation found the neighbour had complied with the necessary regulations.

“They essentially advised her that the operator was in compliance with regulations around application of spraying and therefore there may be other reasons why her fish were having problems. She rang me up and asked me as a veterinarian to come and investigate what was going on with her fish, to try and understand if there were other problems.”

Landos was particularly troubled by a group of bass, which had spawned in the springtime.

‘Two heads on the one body’

“Those larvae began developing their bodies and started bifurcating, so that they had two heads on the one body in a large number of the larvae that were developing.”

They died after 48 hours.

“It was a clear sign that the signalling that cells have early on was becoming deranged due to something,” Landos says.

The vet raised his concerns with then Queensland minister for primary industries and fisheries, the late Tim Mulherin. A task force was set up to try to establish what had caused the problems at the hatchery and whether it had anything to do with reported declining native fish stocks in the local catchment.

“That ran for about 12 months before putting together a final report. However there was really at no stage a consensus reached within the group about causation,” says Landos. “In the final report – the government-authored report – concluded that there was no definitive involvement of chemicals.”

ll these years later, he still takes issue with the report’s findings, saying it was trying to provide a definitive answer, which he says science is unable to do. And given most of the report’s recommendations related to the use of chemicals, it was clear from his perspective that chemicals were the culprit but the government just didn’t want to say so.

“The tension within the task force committee was such that they in fact stopped operating a proper committee process with minutes and actually broke it into meetings with individuals, which was very unusual for a committee.” Landos says there was disagreement over whether there was in fact any spray drift onto the hatchery. But his investigation found there was.

“We metered a swimming pool some 800 metres away from the macadamia farm, which was right next door to the fish farm and found the chemicals that were being sprayed. We hung filter paper in the air inside the closed hatchery building and we measured levels of the chemical being sprayed in the neighbour’s property on the filter paper. It was clearly moving its way into the shed and ended up on the filter paper and we detected it so we demonstrated that exposure was happening.”

Animals abortions and stillbirths

Critically, he says, that exposure occurred at the same time the fish were developing. “It was happening at the specific time that these cells were trying to divide in these embryos. This is a critical timing of exposure.”

Landos concluded that the embryos were being deformed through their exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in the pesticide. And it wasn’t just the fish.

“Over time, we also identified frogs on the property that were developing deformed legs. There were horses that had abortions, there were horses showing clinical signs as in muscle tremors and a loss of ability to walk properly that responded to an antidote specific for treating organophosphate pesticide poisoning.

“We had a dog on the property that had pups and many of the pups were stillborn. That same dog had pups a couple of years later that had no eyes during their development. They were born without eyes. These things may all be aberrations however when you dig into the peer reviewed literature you see that some of the ways the chemicals involved affect in laboratory studies is the development of eyes.”

Landos says his investigation triggered a lightbulb moment.

“Could these low doses in fact be enough to disturb these body systems and alter the way that animals both develop as embryos but also their ultimate health as they get older?”

He began immersing himself in the growing body of scientific research which suggests there is a link between exposure to even tiny doses of endocrine disrupting chemicals and developmental problems and health issues later in life.

“There had been a decade or more of hormone disrupting research but it wasn’t taught in my undergraduate degree at university. So I hadn’t run across it. It was sitting in a separate science silo that I hadn’t found my way to. Since finding that silo and cracking the lid on the thing it’s a treasure trove of knowledge.”

Lifting the lid on ‘disturbing’ knowledge

That knowledge is disturbing. Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are everywhere. They’re applied to food and the packaging it comes in. They make their way into the water supply. They’re on the clothes we wear, in the cars we drive and the furniture on which we sit. The research into their effects, Landos says, should raise alarm bells about human exposure to toxic chemicals and the regulations governing their use, which he maintains, fall way too short.

The endocrine system, common to all vertebrates, regulates hormones, which are critical to development and health.

“Hormones are incredibly powerful at tiny doses,” he says. “Tiny exposure levels of hormones can mediate huge effects on development. So small amounts of thyroid hormone are involved in helping the brain develop normally. As animals develop, we see small amounts of testosterone having tremendous effects on the development of different tissues in the animal and of course ultimately in the reproductive capacity of those animals.”

The pesticide being sprayed next to the fish hatchery, he says, might have been applied legally as far as the regulation was concerned. “But what the investigation highlighted was that there were problems with our regulation in that it was not safe and that exposures at levels below those which were permitted were causing harm.”

Landos says the system of regulating chemicals hasn’t been able to keep up with the growing body of research which identifies harms associated with exposure to even tiny amounts of EDCs. Its benchmarks, such as the exposure required for a chemical to become lethal, miss other effects which may be more subtle but still have lasting consequences.

“The issue is one of which part of the testing – which of the end points, as we call them – are considered in the regulatory process. The coarsest end point might be considered to be death of the animal. So at a certain level of exposure the animal’s systems might not be able to sustain themselves, the animal may perish. And this would establish a lethal end point for a study.

Problems in our regulations

“A more subtle end point might be loss of body weight or an impact on liver function or an inability to breed or a change in organ size.

The signal to regulate further is very clear and that is the decline in human health. The signal is one in six Australian couples need fertility treatment to have a child.

– Matt Landos

“So there are many different end points that can be selected to study the effects of exposure to chemicals. In the last couple of decades there has been a growing understanding that there are a group of end points that are extremely sensitive and these are called the endocrine end points. Or end points which are affecting the function of hormones in the body.”

Landos has campaigned vigorously for the past decade for a more robust regulatory system, both through his membership of the Australian Veterinary Association and as a member of the International Pollutants Elimination Network, an international advocacy group. Landos speaks at conferences, including SoilCare’s Australian Biological Farming Conference in Lismore in December, and contributes papers focused on chemical exposure and ocean pollution.

“The signal to regulate further is very clear and that is the decline in human health. The signal is one in six Australian couples need fertility treatment to have a child. The signal is that we are heading towards a quarter of Australians being pre-diabetic before 2025. The signal is that obesity is expanding in our population. The signal is that rates of depression are climbing in our population. The signal is that children with learning difficulties are at their highest rates that they’ve ever been in schools. There are some very strong public health signals out there.”

While exposure to EDCs might not be the sole cause of these problems, it could well be contributing.

A very clear signal over one of the most pervasive classes of EDC, perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances – commonly known as PFAS – emerged this year in the US. A University of California study found high exposure to PFAS can increase a person’s risk of non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma – a common liver cancer – by up to 4.5 times. PFAS are most commonly used in non-stick cookware but are also present in tap water, waterproof clothing and cleaning products.

The toxic legacy of PFAS has been an invisible torment for a number of Australian communities near defence bases – including Newcastle and Jervis Bay in NSW and Katherine in the Northern Territory – where firefighting foam containing the substance leached into surrounding waterways and the soil.

In June, the US Environmental Protection Agency cut the allowable use of PFAS in household products by 99 per cent.

More than 500 scientists from 28 countries gathered recently in Adelaide to hear about the scale of chemical use worldwide and how it’s affecting human and environmental health. Of particular concern was the ubiquity of PFAS. The Australian government recently released the third draft of its plan to manage PFAS but whether it will satisfy the scientific community which warns of a tsunami of chemicals remains to be seen.

Australia lags behind global standards

“PFAS have now been nominated to be listed, the entire class of those chemicals, on the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants,” says Landos. “But Australia has not sought to remove those at this stage. Australia still has relatively high levels of tolerance in terms of it permitting – as a water safety guideline relatively high levels in water compared to the EU, for example, which in order of magnitude are lower than Australia in their tolerance.”

He says Australia, while a signatory to the Stockholm Convention, drags its feet when it comes to ratifying the ban on troublesome chemicals.

“It doesn’t automatically ratify new listed chemicals to say that Australia will immediately remove them. Australia takes an approach where it says we will decide in our own time when we’ll remove them. So initially when we signed there were a dozen or so dangerous chemicals. We ratified those but since then Australia has been a complete laggard globally in ratifying the subsequent ones.”

Jo Immig, coordinator of the National Toxics Network, a non-profit which raises awareness about chemical pollutants, describes the regulatory system for chemicals in Australia as “a bit of a spaghetti junction”.

Pesticides are regulated by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, industrial chemicals are overseen by the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme and food ingredients and packaging come under the purview of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards.

Australia still uses many pesticides long banned in other countries and still has no effective mechanism to get them off the market.

– Jo Immig, National Toxics Network

In August, Immig wrote on behalf of the National Toxics Network to the new federal Agriculture Minister Murray Watt, urging tighter regulation of agricultural and veterinary (AGVET) chemicals.

“The previous government did untold damage to the regulation of AGVET chemicals,” she said. “They repealed critical legislation introduced under the Gillard government which established a systematic re-registration scheme for AGVET chemicals to ensure they met contemporary regulatory and scientific standards, as well as provided an effective mechanism to remove dangerous pesticides from the market. Given the extensive consultation that was undertaken to develop and implement that legislation perhaps this is something that could be easily achieved … Re-registration schemes have been part of regulatory regimes in Canada, the US and the EU for years.”

Ms Immig was particularly critical of the restructure of the APVMA, which she said had been gutted by the Morrison government which controversially and at great cost moved its operations to Armidale, in the electorate held by former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce. The restructure, argued then agriculture minister David Littleproud, would “mean the APVMA runs more efficiently, will reduce some costs, and mean that farmers can access safe and effective chemicals quickly”. This was diametrically opposed to the tougher regulatory approach being urged by scientists concerned about chemical exposure.

“The lengthy and costly reform process they recently undertook was marred by conflict of interest and culminated in legislation which further deregulated AGVET chemicals, while blatantly ignoring the science and evidence given by numerous stakeholders,” Immig wrote.

It was “shameful and dangerous Australia still uses many pesticides long banned in other countries and still has no effective mechanism to get them off the market or to incentivise farmers to move away from their use. We are a dumping ground for pesticides long banned by other more cautious countries, which is ultimately not to our competitive advantage and nor is it protective of public health or the environment.”

Australia, she says, should move to the precautionary approach to regulation adopted by the European Union, where chemicals need to be demonstrated to be safe before they are allowed on the market. The National Toxics Network has had notable success.

“We’ve been successful at having some dangerous pesticides removed from the market such as endosulfan,” says Immig. “We were largely responsible for the Gillard government introducing the re-registration scheme for pesticides which would have been great but the Abbott government dumped it.”

This year it brought to public attention concerns about the waste-to-energy incinerators being rolled out across NSW.

While Landos pushes for stronger regulation, he is taking his own small steps to keep himself and his family safe. You won’t find plastic in his home, nor non-stick cookware. “I have a cast iron frypan and no one ever complains about my eggs,” he says. Out too are fragranced cleaning products and personal care products. He buys his fruit and vegetables from organic farms.

But not everyone is in the position to make such choices.

Dr Shanna Swan, author of Count Down: How Our Modern World Is Threatening Sperm Counts, Altering Male and Female Reproductive Development, and Imperiling the Future of the Human Race, says poorer people face greater challenges avoiding chemical exposure.

“It’s much harder to learn about it if you don’t have the resources to access the information and you can’t buy your way out of it,” she says. “Maybe you’re in a food desert and there’s no organic food nearby, there’s no farmers market. You can’t take the steps necessary to decrease your exposure.”

Swan, a professor from New York’s Mount Sinai School of Medicine, says exposure to EDCs is a likely culprit not only in declining fertility and fecundity rates but also genital disorders.

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs): Common Sources

Clothing, furniture and electronics

Brominated flame retardants used in electronics, clothing and furniture, such as sofas and mattresses, to reduce flammability have been linked to abnormal hormone function in the thyroid. Adding to the risk of exposure, they often migrate out of their products over time and contaminate household dust and food. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications due to their non-flammability, as well as chemical stability and insulating properties. Although now banned, PCBs are still present in insulation, electrical equipment, caulking, oil-based paint and more, and do not break down readily. They have the strongest and longest-known associations with neurological disorders.

Food contact materials

Phthalates interfere with the production of androgen (testosterone), a hormone critical in male development and relevant to females as well. They are used in many food and beverage containers and plastic wraps and leach into foods when containers are microwaved. Many companies have voluntarily removed phthalates from their products and advertise them as “phthalate-free”. Other plastic containers, which contain phthalates, have the number “3” and “V” or “PVC” in the recycling symbol.

Pesticides and herbicides

Chlorpyrifos, an insecticide used in commercial agriculture, is a potent neurotoxicant that causes developmental delays, attention problems, and ADHD in children. It accumulates in soil, water, food and air, as well as in buildings. DDT, one of the best-known pesticide EDCs, was used extensively worldwide until it was banned in the 1970s by several countries, including Australia. It remains in use in India and Africa to fight insect-borne disease. Evidence suggests exposure to this neurotoxin might be associated with breast cancer, preterm birth, early pregnancy loss, reduced semen quality, disrupted menstruation and problems with lactation. Atrazine, a widely-used herbicide, has been shown to affect the hypothalamus and pituitary glands. Some studies have also proposed causal relationships between glyphosate, used to kill weeds on lawns and farms, and obesity, behavioral and cognitive disorders.

PFAS

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are man-made chemicals used as oil and water repellents and coatings for common products including cookware, carpets and textiles. They were also used extensively in firefighting foam until the manufacturer withdrew the product from sale because of fears it was unsafe. These EDCs do not break down when they are released into the environment, and they continue to accumulate over time.

Source: US Endocrine Society

 

4 Dec 2022: Court Verdict Spray Drift Holey Plains State Forest. Pesticides: Glyphosate, AMPA, Metsulfuron Methyl, Hexazinone

Slap on the Wrist” for company that killed forest in State Park by Herbicide Spray Drift

For more information see here

4 December 2022

In June 2020, Friends of the Earth found a potential spray drift incident which impacted on a two kilometre native forest boundary of a pine plantation located in Holey Plains State Park. The impacted site is ~14km south east of the Gippsland town of Rosedale and is owned by Hancock Victorian Plantations.

In September 2022 FoE was advised that the investigation and associated legal proceedings against the spray contracting firm by the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (Agriculture Victoria) had concluded. We were advised that information regarding the incident was confidential but that information pertaining to the incident and subsequent investigation might be accessible via Freedom of Information.

Our heavily redacted Freedom of Information request came through in the last week of November. The name of the company involved in the incident has not been included in the FoI, but they were contracted to Hancock Victorian Plantations. The investigation carried out by Agriculture Victoria was impressive and thorough.

Many trees have appeared to have survived the incident, but unbelievably these are now threatened by logging. Species listed on the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas that have been found in Holey Plains State Park near this location include: Powerful Owl (vulnerable), Australian Owlet-nightjar, White throated nightjar, Jacky Winter, Koala, Lace Monitor (Endangered), Southern Bullfrog, Common froglet, Martins Toadlet (critically endangered), Broom Spurge, Golden Grevillia (vulnerable), Sandhill sword-sedge, Narrow Comb Fern, Wellington Mint Bush (endangered), Sticky Boronia and Coral Lichen.

The FoI revealed that there was not just one spray drift incident, but several that took place over three days in late March 2020. 13 charges, including injuriously impacting native plants, breaching herbicide label instructions, using herbicides in excess of label rates and lack of appropriate record keeping were laid against a contract spraying company in March 2022, with the case ending in August 2022. Maximum fines for the offences could have amounted to more than $66,000, but for some reason weren't applied by the Magistrate.

There were a number of herbicides detected in leaves of vegetation adjoining the plantation, with impacted vegetation as far as 150m inside the Holey Plains State Park. The herbicides included Glyphosate (Wipe-Out 450 Herbicide), AMPA (a Glyphosate metabolite), Metsulfuron Methyl (Kenso Agcare Ken-Met 600 WG) and Hexazinone (Nufarm Grunt 750 WDG Herbicide).

Glyphosate drift was recorded in vegetation at 17 locations including in 2 locations in the tree canopy 15m-20m off the ground.  AMPA was recorded at one location offsite, Metsulfuron Methyl at 5 locations and Hexazinone at 4 locations. Clopyralid was not detected off site.

All 4 herbicides can be applied aerially, although hexazinone is only allowed to be used in a tree plantation as a water dispersible granule. So how did it end up in vegetation 100m from where it was applied? It is likely that the hexazinone moved offsite during rainfall. Hexazinone is extremely mobile in water and remains in soils for years after application. The Victorian Government banned aerial spraying of non-pellitised Hexazinone in the 1990’s after a series of serious spray drift incidents.

One glaring problem with pesticide regulation in Victoria is that it can avoid taking into account affected vegetation that does not have an economic value. It is actually a defence to Section 40 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Control of Use) Act 1992 to prove that affected vegetation has no economic value. Agriculture Victoria had to provide an expert report showing that the impacted vegetation in Holey Plains State Park did indeed have an economic value including: Amenity values for recreational users of the park, values to the apiary industry, carbon storage and sequestration values and biodiversity values, including existence values arising from the presence of koalas and species listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act.

In terms of an legal outcome to the event, the company that caused the spray drift was only granted a Diversion Notice, lasting 12 months, which means they must obtain Aerial Improvement Management System (AIMS) accreditation through the Aerial Application Association of Australia and also pay $1000 to the Yarram Yarram Landcare Network. This could be the first time that such a Diversion Notice has been granted in a spray drift incident and it is unclear why the Magistrate took this option. It is also unclear why the company involved was employed to carry out the spraying without AIMS accreditation and why Hancock would employ such a company when they have Forest Stewardship Council certification.

"Magistrates’ Remarks:

Accept that general deterrence relevant. Donation amount significantly reduced due to the time/money required to achieve compliance with the AIMS conditions. Also take into account the community support that the company provides. Sentence: Diversion for a period of 12 months: - The accused obtain AIMS accreditation through the AAAA and provide proof to Agriculture Victoria and the Court by 15 August 2023."

To rub salt into the wounds, it would appear that DELWP is proposing that 17.8 hectares of impacted vegetation in the State Park be removed, lopped or destroyed through a Detailed Assessment Pathway process. Some of the area may include Wellington Mint-bush (Prostanthera galbraithiae). It is unclear how DELWP define large and small trees none of which appear on their application to have been impacted by spray drift. It is also unclear why DELWP has proposed a plan to potentially knock over vegetation was may have survived the spraying incident and to destroy native vegetation which is now regenerating post spraying.

The case has profound implications for areas surrounding pine plantations elsewhere in the State. For instance the State Government is now planning to massively expand pine plantation establishment throughout the Strzelecki Ranges and Central Gippsland. The Strzelecki Ranges is already suffering through destruction of key Koala Feed Preference Trees due to plantation logging and associated roading safety issues. Spray drift impacting on key forest adjoining plantations, including koala habitat over a wide area in the region is a major concern as is the potential health impacts for people living near plantations, where spray drift can and does occur.

“Slap on the Wrist” for company that killed forest in State Park by Herbicide Spray Drift

For more information see here

4 December 2022

In June 2020, Friends of the Earth found a potential spray drift incident which impacted on a two kilometre native forest boundary of a pine plantation located in Holey Plains State Park. The impacted site is ~14km south east of the Gippsland town of Rosedale and is owned by Hancock Victorian Plantations.

In September 2022 FoE was advised that the investigation and associated legal proceedings against the spray contracting firm by the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (Agriculture Victoria) had concluded. We were advised that information regarding the incident was confidential but that information pertaining to the incident and subsequent investigation might be accessible via Freedom of Information.

Our heavily redacted Freedom of Information request came through in the last week of November. The name of the company involved in the incident has not been included in the FoI, but they were contracted to Hancock Victorian Plantations. The investigation carried out by Agriculture Victoria was impressive and thorough.

Many trees have appeared to have survived the incident, but unbelievably these are now threatened by logging. Species listed on the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas that have been found in Holey Plains State Park near this location include: Powerful Owl (vulnerable), Australian Owlet-nightjar, White throated nightjar, Jacky Winter, Koala, Lace Monitor (Endangered), Southern Bullfrog, Common froglet, Martins Toadlet (critically endangered), Broom Spurge, Golden Grevillia (vulnerable), Sandhill sword-sedge, Narrow Comb Fern, Wellington Mint Bush (endangered), Sticky Boronia and Coral Lichen.

The FoI revealed that there was not just one spray drift incident, but several that took place over three days in late March 2020. 13 charges, including injuriously impacting native plants, breaching herbicide label instructions, using herbicides in excess of label rates and lack of appropriate record keeping were laid against a contract spraying company in March 2022, with the case ending in August 2022. Maximum fines for the offences could have amounted to more than $66,000, but for some reason weren’t applied by the Magistrate.

There were a number of herbicides detected in leaves of vegetation adjoining the plantation, with impacted vegetation as far as 150m inside the Holey Plains State Park. The herbicides included Glyphosate (Wipe-Out 450 Herbicide), AMPA (a Glyphosate metabolite), Metsulfuron Methyl (Kenso Agcare Ken-Met 600 WG) and Hexazinone (Nufarm Grunt 750 WDG Herbicide).

Glyphosate drift was recorded in vegetation at 17 locations including in 2 locations in the tree canopy 15m-20m off the ground.  AMPA was recorded at one location offsite, Metsulfuron Methyl at 5 locations and Hexazinone at 4 locations. Clopyralid was not detected off site.

All 4 herbicides can be applied aerially, although hexazinone is only allowed to be used in a tree plantation as a water dispersible granule. So how did it end up in vegetation 100m from where it was applied? It is likely that the hexazinone moved offsite during rainfall. Hexazinone is extremely mobile in water and remains in soils for years after application. The Victorian Government banned aerial spraying of non-pellitised Hexazinone in the 1990’s after a series of serious spray drift incidents.

One glaring problem with pesticide regulation in Victoria is that it can avoid taking into account affected vegetation that does not have an economic value. It is actually a defence to Section 40 of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Control of Use) Act 1992 to prove that affected vegetation has no economic value. Agriculture Victoria had to provide an expert report showing that the impacted vegetation in Holey Plains State Park did indeed have an economic value including: Amenity values for recreational users of the park, values to the apiary industry, carbon storage and sequestration values and biodiversity values, including existence values arising from the presence of koalas and species listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act.

In terms of an legal outcome to the event, the company that caused the spray drift was only granted a Diversion Notice, lasting 12 months, which means they must obtain Aerial Improvement Management System (AIMS) accreditation through the Aerial Application Association of Australia and also pay $1000 to the Yarram Yarram Landcare Network. This could be the first time that such a Diversion Notice has been granted in a spray drift incident and it is unclear why the Magistrate took this option. It is also unclear why the company involved was employed to carry out the spraying without AIMS accreditation and why Hancock would employ such a company when they have Forest Stewardship Council certification.

“Magistrates’ Remarks:

Accept that general deterrence relevant. Donation amount significantly reduced due to the time/money required to achieve compliance with the AIMS conditions. Also take into account the community support that the company provides. Sentence: Diversion for a period of 12 months: – The accused obtain AIMS accreditation through the AAAA and provide proof to Agriculture Victoria and the Court by 15 August 2023.”

To rub salt into the wounds, it would appear that DELWP is proposing that 17.8 hectares of impacted vegetation in the State Park be removed, lopped or destroyed through a Detailed Assessment Pathway process. Some of the area may include Wellington Mint-bush (Prostanthera galbraithiae). It is unclear how DELWP define large and small trees none of which appear on their application to have been impacted by spray drift. It is also unclear why DELWP has proposed a plan to potentially knock over vegetation was may have survived the spraying incident and to destroy native vegetation which is now regenerating post spraying.

The case has profound implications for areas surrounding pine plantations elsewhere in the State. For instance the State Government is now planning to massively expand pine plantation establishment throughout the Strzelecki Ranges and Central Gippsland. The Strzelecki Ranges is already suffering through destruction of key Koala Feed Preference Trees due to plantation logging and associated roading safety issues. Spray drift impacting on key forest adjoining plantations, including koala habitat over a wide area in the region is a major concern as is the potential health impacts for people living near plantations, where spray drift can and does occur.

27/12/22: Dead fish found in Channel in Sale.

Dead fish found in channel in Sale

Dead fish found in channel in Sale

Eyewitnesses have spotted dead fish on the surface of irrigation channels on Gibsons Road in Sale after Southern Rural Water (SRW) recently completed its annual weed control program of channels in the Macalister Irrigation District.

SRW said the weed control takes place in spring and early summer, when weeds are at their most vigorous, and is done to ensure the irrigation channels are operating at maximum capacity.

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) said in a pollution report that the annual weed control program involves the “injection of herbicide into irrigation channels to kill submerged vegetation that restricts water flow”. This occurred on Monday, December 5 in the channel on Gibsons Rd where the dead fish were found by multiple people.

One witness said they first observed the dead fish and other animals on the surface last Thursday (December 8), with other observers taking photos. The witness said they also saw dead frogs and turtles, and believed most of the dead animals may have sunk to the bottom. This individual provided photos, expressing their concern about the environment.

Another witness, who has for years walked their dogs along the channel, told the Gippsland Times that last week they just saw all these “belly-up fish”.

“It was on Gibsons Rd, between Bengworden and Cobain Rds, almost smack down the middle,” they said.

“I thought maybe someone was fishing there … I saw half a dozen, maybe 10 (fish) carcasses on the trail.

“No smell or anything. I wouldn’t have even noticed if not for the dead fish on the trail

“My dogs are not eating them, thankfully. They sniff it and walk away.”

The witness said they had not seen anything like it in 10 years.

“Some of the (fish) were on the grass. I guess if the water is not good, they’ll thrash and jump out,” they said.

“Generally it’s a pleasant place to walk.”

SRW manager environment and climate adaptation, Kate Berg, told the Gippsland Times that an investigation of the channels found European carp.

“The purpose of irrigation channels is to deliver irrigation water to Southern Rural Water customers, who produce food and fibre,” Ms Berg said.

“They are not natural waterways, or intended for use as habitat for aquatic life.

“Our investigations found that European carp, a noxious invasive fish species, were in the channels, and these have been removed and sent to an authorised waste facility in Bairnsdale. No other animals were found by us.

“The Environment Protection Authority has been notified, and decided not to inspect the irrigation channels because our monitoring data shows that there was unlikely to be any impact to natural waterways.

“When we undertake weed control treatment, we notify affected customers directly, and we undertake advertising in local media to notify the community.”

A pollution report from the EPA, seen by the Gippsland Times, goes into more detail about the herbicide used and how it affects structures like the channel on Gibsons Rd.

“The herbicide is approved for channel maintenance, and many water authorities in Australia use it for this purpose,” it reads.

“It breaks down within two-to-three days and works by removing oxygen from the water, which inadvertently causes the death of any fish or other gilled animals that may have entered the channel. The channel is an artificial structure managed solely for distribution of irrigation water and is not intended to provide habitat for aquatic wildlife.

“EPA has reviewed Southern Rural Water’s operating procedures and monitoring program, and is satisfied that it has appropriate controls in place to prevent the herbicide from leaving the channels and impacting upon any natural waterways, including the ocean.”

Dead fish found in channel in Sale

Dead fish found in channel in Sale

Eyewitnesses have spotted dead fish on the surface of irrigation channels on Gibsons Road in Sale after Southern Rural Water (SRW) recently completed its annual weed control program of channels in the Macalister Irrigation District.

SRW said the weed control takes place in spring and early summer, when weeds are at their most vigorous, and is done to ensure the irrigation channels are operating at maximum capacity.

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) said in a pollution report that the annual weed control program involves the “injection of herbicide into irrigation channels to kill submerged vegetation that restricts water flow”. This occurred on Monday, December 5 in the channel on Gibsons Rd where the dead fish were found by multiple people.

One witness said they first observed the dead fish and other animals on the surface last Thursday (December 8), with other observers taking photos. The witness said they also saw dead frogs and turtles, and believed most of the dead animals may have sunk to the bottom. This individual provided photos, expressing their concern about the environment.

Another witness, who has for years walked their dogs along the channel, told the Gippsland Times that last week they just saw all these “belly-up fish”.

“It was on Gibsons Rd, between Bengworden and Cobain Rds, almost smack down the middle,” they said.

“I thought maybe someone was fishing there … I saw half a dozen, maybe 10 (fish) carcasses on the trail.

“No smell or anything. I wouldn’t have even noticed if not for the dead fish on the trail

“My dogs are not eating them, thankfully. They sniff it and walk away.”

The witness said they had not seen anything like it in 10 years.

“Some of the (fish) were on the grass. I guess if the water is not good, they’ll thrash and jump out,” they said.

“Generally it’s a pleasant place to walk.”

SRW manager environment and climate adaptation, Kate Berg, told the Gippsland Times that an investigation of the channels found European carp.

“The purpose of irrigation channels is to deliver irrigation water to Southern Rural Water customers, who produce food and fibre,” Ms Berg said.

“They are not natural waterways, or intended for use as habitat for aquatic life.

“Our investigations found that European carp, a noxious invasive fish species, were in the channels, and these have been removed and sent to an authorised waste facility in Bairnsdale. No other animals were found by us.

“The Environment Protection Authority has been notified, and decided not to inspect the irrigation channels because our monitoring data shows that there was unlikely to be any impact to natural waterways.

“When we undertake weed control treatment, we notify affected customers directly, and we undertake advertising in local media to notify the community.”

A pollution report from the EPA, seen by the Gippsland Times, goes into more detail about the herbicide used and how it affects structures like the channel on Gibsons Rd.

“The herbicide is approved for channel maintenance, and many water authorities in Australia use it for this purpose,” it reads.

“It breaks down within two-to-three days and works by removing oxygen from the water, which inadvertently causes the death of any fish or other gilled animals that may have entered the channel. The channel is an artificial structure managed solely for distribution of irrigation water and is not intended to provide habitat for aquatic wildlife.

“EPA has reviewed Southern Rural Water’s operating procedures and monitoring program, and is satisfied that it has appropriate controls in place to prevent the herbicide from leaving the channels and impacting upon any natural waterways, including the ocean.”

15/12/22: Suspected spray drift incident. Kuitpo (South Australia)

Farmer calls for spray drift to be investigated after thousands of marron die at his property

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-15/sa-pirsa-investigates-bee-and-marron-deaths/101767092

South Australia's primary industries department is investigating the deaths of thousands of bees and freshwater crayfish at a farm south of Adelaide.

It is the second time thousands of animals have died at the site, but the Department of Primary Industries and Regions in SA (PIRSA) says there are several potential causes.

Farmer John Luckens first contacted PIRSA on December 2, when he noticed thousands of bees seemed to be dropping dead on his property near Kuitpo, south of Adelaide.

"Literally bees were falling out of the sky and the driveway was covered in dead and dying bees," he said.

"I did a quick calculation and worked out there's probably at least a thousand bees on that driveway and then in the grass beside there was probably 8,000 or 10,000 bees and I thought that was pretty unusual."

He feared that if insects were dying, his marron — a type of freshwater crayfish — would be next.

"I also then thought that then – because we had a [suspected] poisoning event from farm chemicals here a few years ago, that there might be an impact on the marron, and there was," he said.

Mr Luckens believes his marron were poisoned by aerial spraying in 2019, but neither he nor the department were able to confirm the cause.

He said in this latest incident the crayfish in two of his 30 ponds — the most elevated on his block — were affected.

"We've probably got upwards of half a ton of marron dead. That's relatively significant for us," he said.

Primary industries officers have taken water, bee and marron samples for testing and have also notified the Environment Protection Authority.

"The department … is aware of a mortality event involving marron on a farm in Kuitpo area and is currently investigating the cause including testing for infectious disease, harmful algae and chemical contaminants," a spokesperson said in a statement to the ABC.

"The results of the chemical contaminant testing might also be relevant with PIRSA's investigations into bee mortalities occurring on the same property."

'Concerned' neighbours

Mr Luckens wants the government to investigate whether chemicals from spraying of nearby vineyards may have drifted into his ponds.

The neighbouring properties have sprayed the fungicide combination Top Wettable Sulphur and Tri-Base Blue and the surfactant Viti-Wet recently, but farm managers told the ABC they used advanced equipment that limited spray drift and had not sprayed insecticides.

"We're disappointed to hear what's happened and we want to work closely with John to find out what's happened and find a solution," Mark Vella, who manages the neighbouring Hersey Wines vineyard said.

Other properties were waiting to hear more about PIRSA's investigation.

"We were concerned to hear from PIRSA today about the marron deaths on our neighbour's property," the owners of Top Note winery, Cate and Nick Foskett told the ABC via email.

"Environmental safety is something we take very seriously … however we no longer operate the vineyard and have leased it out since May 2021.

"We understand that PIRSA is conducting an investigation, so we will not be commenting further."

'May just be a coincidence'

University of Adelaide pharmacology lecturer Ian Musgrave said authorities may not be able to determine what killed the bees and the marron, especially given there were several days between nearby spraying and the testing of samples from Mr Luckens's farm.

"It's going to be quite difficult," he said.

"One of the problems is the chemicals involved will degrade in the environment.

"For example, if we're talking about lakes or ponds, the materials will be absorbed into the water, then can quite often be absorbed into the sediments in the water, drop out into the sediment, then not be detectable in the water itself."

Dr Musgrave said the culprit may also be something occurring naturally in the surrounding environment.

"The environment is pretty nasty and it kills lots of things normally. So it may just be a coincidence that we see this bee die-off at the same time as you're seeing a marron die-off," he said.

PIRSA's Rural Chemicals Operations section investigated 39 "chemical trespass" incidents in the past financial year and issued formal warnings for five.

It found more than 60 per cent of the complaints received in 2021/22 were considered to be low risks of various types, or not chemical trespass.

Mr Luckens said the state government needed to do more to protect new industries like marron farming and ensure chemical use did not affect other types of farming.

"I think most people want to do best practice and have good regulation," he said.

"Some of the processes for managing these events are not appropriate.

"We need to have new industries, particularly food industries for the future … sometimes things happen beyond the farmer's control. The government needs to have a process in place to protect their back."

Farmer calls for spray drift to be investigated after thousands of marron die at his property

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-15/sa-pirsa-investigates-bee-and-marron-deaths/101767092

South Australia’s primary industries department is investigating the deaths of thousands of bees and freshwater crayfish at a farm south of Adelaide.

It is the second time thousands of animals have died at the site, but the Department of Primary Industries and Regions in SA (PIRSA) says there are several potential causes.

Farmer John Luckens first contacted PIRSA on December 2, when he noticed thousands of bees seemed to be dropping dead on his property near Kuitpo, south of Adelaide.

“Literally bees were falling out of the sky and the driveway was covered in dead and dying bees,” he said.

“I did a quick calculation and worked out there’s probably at least a thousand bees on that driveway and then in the grass beside there was probably 8,000 or 10,000 bees and I thought that was pretty unusual.”

He feared that if insects were dying, his marron — a type of freshwater crayfish — would be next.

“I also then thought that then – because we had a [suspected] poisoning event from farm chemicals here a few years ago, that there might be an impact on the marron, and there was,” he said.

Mr Luckens believes his marron were poisoned by aerial spraying in 2019, but neither he nor the department were able to confirm the cause.

He said in this latest incident the crayfish in two of his 30 ponds — the most elevated on his block — were affected.

“We’ve probably got upwards of half a ton of marron dead. That’s relatively significant for us,” he said.

Primary industries officers have taken water, bee and marron samples for testing and have also notified the Environment Protection Authority.

“The department … is aware of a mortality event involving marron on a farm in Kuitpo area and is currently investigating the cause including testing for infectious disease, harmful algae and chemical contaminants,” a spokesperson said in a statement to the ABC.

“The results of the chemical contaminant testing might also be relevant with PIRSA’s investigations into bee mortalities occurring on the same property.”

‘Concerned’ neighbours

Mr Luckens wants the government to investigate whether chemicals from spraying of nearby vineyards may have drifted into his ponds.

The neighbouring properties have sprayed the fungicide combination Top Wettable Sulphur and Tri-Base Blue and the surfactant Viti-Wet recently, but farm managers told the ABC they used advanced equipment that limited spray drift and had not sprayed insecticides.

“We’re disappointed to hear what’s happened and we want to work closely with John to find out what’s happened and find a solution,” Mark Vella, who manages the neighbouring Hersey Wines vineyard said.

Other properties were waiting to hear more about PIRSA’s investigation.

“We were concerned to hear from PIRSA today about the marron deaths on our neighbour’s property,” the owners of Top Note winery, Cate and Nick Foskett told the ABC via email.

“Environmental safety is something we take very seriously … however we no longer operate the vineyard and have leased it out since May 2021.

“We understand that PIRSA is conducting an investigation, so we will not be commenting further.”

‘May just be a coincidence’

University of Adelaide pharmacology lecturer Ian Musgrave said authorities may not be able to determine what killed the bees and the marron, especially given there were several days between nearby spraying and the testing of samples from Mr Luckens’s farm.

“It’s going to be quite difficult,” he said.

“One of the problems is the chemicals involved will degrade in the environment.

“For example, if we’re talking about lakes or ponds, the materials will be absorbed into the water, then can quite often be absorbed into the sediments in the water, drop out into the sediment, then not be detectable in the water itself.”

Dr Musgrave said the culprit may also be something occurring naturally in the surrounding environment.

“The environment is pretty nasty and it kills lots of things normally. So it may just be a coincidence that we see this bee die-off at the same time as you’re seeing a marron die-off,” he said.

PIRSA’s Rural Chemicals Operations section investigated 39 “chemical trespass” incidents in the past financial year and issued formal warnings for five.

It found more than 60 per cent of the complaints received in 2021/22 were considered to be low risks of various types, or not chemical trespass.

Mr Luckens said the state government needed to do more to protect new industries like marron farming and ensure chemical use did not affect other types of farming.

“I think most people want to do best practice and have good regulation,” he said.

“Some of the processes for managing these events are not appropriate.

“We need to have new industries, particularly food industries for the future … sometimes things happen beyond the farmer’s control. The government needs to have a process in place to protect their back.”

 

Oct/Nov 2022: Snowy River at Marlo. Pesticides: Hexazinone, Simazine, Captan

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Snowy River at Marlo

31/10/22: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

31/10/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Captan 0.3ug/L

PFAS chemicals also detected

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Snowy River at Marlo

31/10/22: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

31/10/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Captan 0.3ug/L

 

2022 November: Murray River at Swan Hill. Pesticides: Simazine, Atrazine

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Murray River at Swan Hill

3/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

PFAS chemicals  also detected.

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Murray River at Swan Hill

3/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

PFAS chemicals  also detected.

October 2022: Murray River at Echuca. Pesticides: Atrazine, MGK-264, Simazine

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Murray River at Echuca

31/10/22: Atrazine 0.0122ug/L

31/10/22: MGK-264 0.0111ug/L

31/10/22: Simazine 0.0140ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons  also detected.

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Murray River at Echuca

31/10/22: Atrazine 0.0122ug/L

31/10/22: MGK-264 0.0111ug/L

31/10/22: Simazine 0.0140ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons  also detected.

November 2022: Loddon River, Kerang. Pesticides: Atrazine, Simazine

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Loddon River at Kerang

1/11/22: Atrazine 0.0265ug/L

7/11/22: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

1/11/22: Simazine 0.0211ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons  also detected.

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Loddon River at Kerang

1/11/22: Atrazine 0.0265ug/L

7/11/22: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

1/11/22: Simazine 0.0211ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons  also detected.

November 2022: Little Murray River at Swan Hill. Pesticides: Atrazine, Simazine

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Little Murray River at Swan Hill

3/11/22: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

3/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

PFAS chemicals  also detected.

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Little Murray River at Swan Hill

3/11/22: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Atrazine 0.01ug/L

3/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

7/11/22: Simazine 0.01ug/L

PFAS chemicals  also detected.

Oct/Nov 2022: Campaspe River at Kyneton. Hexazinone detected

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Campaspe River at Kyneton

31/10/22: Hexazinone 0.0362ug/L

7/11/22: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons also detected.

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Campaspe River at Kyneton

31/10/22: Hexazinone 0.0362ug/L

7/11/22: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons also detected.

Oct 2022: Broken River Benalla. Pesticides: Atrazine, Simazine

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Broken River at Benalla

31/10/22: Atrazine 0.0155ug/L

31/10/22: Simazine 0.016ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons also detected.

EPA Victoria – Regional Flood Water Testing Program

Oct 31-Nov 9 2022

Broken River at Benalla

31/10/22: Atrazine 0.0155ug/L

31/10/22: Simazine 0.016ug/L

PFAS chemicals, Phthalates and Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons also detected.

November 2021/23: Armidale (NSW) Senior staff member of APVMA urinates on Staff

Pesticides authority boss and chair resign, after inquiry triggered by APVMA worker who allegedly urinated on colleagues

July 14 2023: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/apvma-pesticides-urination-review-delivered/

The board chair and CEO of Australia's chemical regulator have resigned, as a damning report finds the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) was "captured" by industry interests and subject to regular complaints of misconduct.

The APVMA review was commissioned by Agriculture Minister Murray Watt following allegations raised in a Senate inquiry that an employee had urinated on his colleagues following a staff Christmas party.

The reviewer, law firm Clayton UTZ, found complaints of misconduct covered the "entire organisation" and were made by and about employees at all levels of the pesticides authority.

"There were clearly cultural issues with the organisation given that on average there was a formal complaint about once every 4-6 weeks for 5 years," Clayton UTZ said.

"There are also a significant number of complaints that refer to serious impacts for the persons involved, including numerous instances of employees having to take periods of stress leave or feeling unable to attend work due to mental health concerns," the reviewer found.

The reviewer found despite the seriousness of some complaints, there appeared to be a lack of response to these concerns, a lack of record keeping and a lack of capacity to respond to complaints.

APVMA chair Carmel Hillyard and chief executive Lisa Croft tendered their resignations in recent days.

Ms Croft has been on leave since an interim review was handed to government.

Responding to Friday's report, the agriculture minister said the review had identified systemic problems.

"The number and range of issues at the APVMA have turned out to be far wider than I think any of us expected," Senator Watt said.

"Concerningly, the review found serious allegations of chemical industry capture of the APVMA, which appears to have played a key role in the organisation not performing its full regulatory responsibilities."

The alleged urination incident was referred to police and the public service commissioner in February.

String of controversies after forced relocation by Barnaby Joyce

The APVMA was also found to have "embedded" industry interests into its regulatory priorities and culture.

The agency was slammed for relying on education as an enforcement measure, even when criminal or civil prosecution was recommended.

Clayton UTZ recommended an urgent "re-evaluation of the APVMA's engagement with industry", which Senator Watt agreed to.

The review determined none of the material examined indicated any chemical products had been registered inappropriately.

But they found the authority, which approves products like weed-killer glyphosate, was taking decades to review chemicals.

"Of the 10 ongoing chemical reviews, eight have been in progress for over 15 years or more, with seven ongoing for nearly 20 years," they wrote.

Senator Watt has issued a ministerial directive for those reviews to be finalised "as soon as possible" and commissioned a fresh inquiry into the APVMA's governance and culture to be carried out by former public servant Ken Matthews. 

"There is enough in this report to make me concerned that if we don’t take action then there is a risk of issues concerning food safety in the future," he said.

"That’s not the case at the moment and I don’t want it to ever be the case."

The APVMA has been mired in controversy since 2016 when former agriculture minister Barnaby Joyce forced the agency to relocate from Canberra to Armidale, in his New South Wales electorate of New England.

The reviewer found that forced move "fundamentally changed the APVMA — if for no other reason than the APVMA had a very significant turnover of staff, including a change in CEO, associated with the relocation".

"This turnover of staff would have inevitably resulted in a loss of corporate knowledge, a loss of corporate culture and a loss of experience and knowledge of what it is to work within the Australian Public Service (APS). This may include practical awareness of foundational public service principles, such as the need to adhere to the APS values."

Senator Watt said the review had pointed to the relocation being one of the key factors behind the "demise of good governance" at the agency and he has not ruled out moving the APVMA back to Canberra. 

That issue, the minister said, would be investigated by the Matthews inquiry which is due to report back by the end of September. 

Greens senator Peter Whish-Wilson, who has previously raised concerns about the "embattled agency ... not being fit for purpose", welcomed the inquiries scrutinising its actions. 

"The government must now take a different approach to the regulation of Australia’s agricultural chemicals, and now this critical review has been finalised the Greens will be scrutinising the inevitable changes that should lie ahead," Senator Whish-Wilson tweeted.

Mr Joyce has been contacted for comment.

Executive at Australia’s pesticides authority allegedly urinated on staff at function, Senate hears

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/nov/08/executive-at-australias-pesticides-authority-allegedly-urinated-on-staff-at-function-senate-hears

Agriculture minister Murray Watt says he is seeking an ‘urgent briefing’ over the alleged 2021 incident

A senior staff member at the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is alleged to have urinated on staff members at a function in Armidale in late 2021, Senate estimates has heard.

 

He has now resigned, according to the APVMA’s chief executive officer, Lisa Croft, who was questioned about the incident at Tuesday’s hearing.

Croft confirmed that she was “aware of an incident” but denied it had happened at the APVMA’s Christmas party, as Green’s senator Peter Whish-Wilson had suggested in his question.

She said it had occurred “in a private capacity not at a work function”.

Croft admitted other staff had raised it with her, but it had not been the subject of a formal complaint.

“I understand that the people directly involved wanted me to be aware of the matter. There was no official complaint made,” Croft said.

She confirmed there had been discussions with HR and that the staff member – a member of the executive team – resigned soon after the event.

Whish-Wilson asked Croft whether there had been complaints of sexual harassment or bullying. Croft said she was not aware of any formal complaints or of three female staff making sexual harassment complaints.

The agriculture minister, Murray Watt, said he would be “seeking an urgent briefing”.

“These are obviously very concerning questions. It is certainly the first time I have heard about it,” he said.

The APVMA is the federal government agency responsible for approving registration of pesticides and other agricultural and veterinary chemicals.

 

Pesticides authority boss and chair resign, after inquiry triggered by APVMA worker who allegedly urinated on colleagues

July 14 2023: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/apvma-pesticides-urination-review-delivered/

The board chair and CEO of Australia’s chemical regulator have resigned, as a damning report finds the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) was “captured” by industry interests and subject to regular complaints of misconduct.

The APVMA review was commissioned by Agriculture Minister Murray Watt following allegations raised in a Senate inquiry that an employee had urinated on his colleagues following a staff Christmas party.

The reviewer, law firm Clayton UTZ, found complaints of misconduct covered the “entire organisation” and were made by and about employees at all levels of the pesticides authority.

“There were clearly cultural issues with the organisation given that on average there was a formal complaint about once every 4-6 weeks for 5 years,” Clayton UTZ said.

“There are also a significant number of complaints that refer to serious impacts for the persons involved, including numerous instances of employees having to take periods of stress leave or feeling unable to attend work due to mental health concerns,” the reviewer found.

The reviewer found despite the seriousness of some complaints, there appeared to be a lack of response to these concerns, a lack of record keeping and a lack of capacity to respond to complaints.

APVMA chair Carmel Hillyard and chief executive Lisa Croft tendered their resignations in recent days.

Ms Croft has been on leave since an interim review was handed to government.

Responding to Friday’s report, the agriculture minister said the review had identified systemic problems.

“The number and range of issues at the APVMA have turned out to be far wider than I think any of us expected,” Senator Watt said.

“Concerningly, the review found serious allegations of chemical industry capture of the APVMA, which appears to have played a key role in the organisation not performing its full regulatory responsibilities.”

The alleged urination incident was referred to police and the public service commissioner in February.

String of controversies after forced relocation by Barnaby Joyce

The APVMA was also found to have “embedded” industry interests into its regulatory priorities and culture.

The agency was slammed for relying on education as an enforcement measure, even when criminal or civil prosecution was recommended.

Clayton UTZ recommended an urgent “re-evaluation of the APVMA’s engagement with industry”, which Senator Watt agreed to.

The review determined none of the material examined indicated any chemical products had been registered inappropriately.

But they found the authority, which approves products like weed-killer glyphosate, was taking decades to review chemicals.

“Of the 10 ongoing chemical reviews, eight have been in progress for over 15 years or more, with seven ongoing for nearly 20 years,” they wrote.

Senator Watt has issued a ministerial directive for those reviews to be finalised “as soon as possible” and commissioned a fresh inquiry into the APVMA’s governance and culture to be carried out by former public servant Ken Matthews.

“There is enough in this report to make me concerned that if we don’t take action then there is a risk of issues concerning food safety in the future,” he said.

“That’s not the case at the moment and I don’t want it to ever be the case.”

The APVMA has been mired in controversy since 2016 when former agriculture minister Barnaby Joyce forced the agency to relocate from Canberra to Armidale, in his New South Wales electorate of New England.

The reviewer found that forced move “fundamentally changed the APVMA — if for no other reason than the APVMA had a very significant turnover of staff, including a change in CEO, associated with the relocation”.

“This turnover of staff would have inevitably resulted in a loss of corporate knowledge, a loss of corporate culture and a loss of experience and knowledge of what it is to work within the Australian Public Service (APS). This may include practical awareness of foundational public service principles, such as the need to adhere to the APS values.”

Senator Watt said the review had pointed to the relocation being one of the key factors behind the “demise of good governance” at the agency and he has not ruled out moving the APVMA back to Canberra.

That issue, the minister said, would be investigated by the Matthews inquiry which is due to report back by the end of September.

Greens senator Peter Whish-Wilson, who has previously raised concerns about the “embattled agency … not being fit for purpose”, welcomed the inquiries scrutinising its actions.

“The government must now take a different approach to the regulation of Australia’s agricultural chemicals, and now this critical review has been finalised the Greens will be scrutinising the inevitable changes that should lie ahead,” Senator Whish-Wilson tweeted.

Mr Joyce has been contacted for comment.

Executive at Australia’s pesticides authority allegedly urinated on staff at function, Senate hears

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/nov/08/executive-at-australias-pesticides-authority-allegedly-urinated-on-staff-at-function-senate-hears

Agriculture minister Murray Watt says he is seeking an ‘urgent briefing’ over the alleged 2021 incident

A senior staff member at the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) is alleged to have urinated on staff members at a function in Armidale in late 2021, Senate estimates has heard.

He has now resigned, according to the APVMA’s chief executive officer, Lisa Croft, who was questioned about the incident at Tuesday’s hearing.

Croft confirmed that she was “aware of an incident” but denied it had happened at the APVMA’s Christmas party, as Green’s senator Peter Whish-Wilson had suggested in his question.

She said it had occurred “in a private capacity not at a work function”.

Croft admitted other staff had raised it with her, but it had not been the subject of a formal complaint.

“I understand that the people directly involved wanted me to be aware of the matter. There was no official complaint made,” Croft said.

She confirmed there had been discussions with HR and that the staff member – a member of the executive team – resigned soon after the event.

Whish-Wilson asked Croft whether there had been complaints of sexual harassment or bullying. Croft said she was not aware of any formal complaints or of three female staff making sexual harassment complaints.

The agriculture minister, Murray Watt, said he would be “seeking an urgent briefing”.

“These are obviously very concerning questions. It is certainly the first time I have heard about it,” he said.

The APVMA is the federal government agency responsible for approving registration of pesticides and other agricultural and veterinary chemicals.

 

October 20 2022: Secret Files linked with Paraquat and Parkinsons Disease

Secret files suggest chemical giant feared weedkiller’s link to Parkinson’s disease

Documents seen by Guardian detail effort to refute scientific research into paraquat and derail nomination of key EPA adviser

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/20/syngenta-weedkiller-pesticide-parkinsons-disease-paraquat-documents

For decades, Swiss chemical giant Syngenta has manufactured and marketed a widely used weed-killing chemical called paraquat, and for much of that time the company has been dealing with external concerns that long-term exposure to the chemical may be a cause of the incurable brain ailment known as Parkinson’s disease.

Syngenta has repeatedly told customers and regulators that scientific research does not prove a connection between its weedkiller and the disease, insisting that the chemical does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, and does not affect brain cells in ways that cause Parkinson’s.

But a cache of internal corporate documents dating back to the 1950s reviewed by the Guardian suggests that the public narrative put forward by Syngenta and the corporate entities that preceded it has at times contradicted the company’s own research and knowledge.

And though the documents reviewed do not show that Syngenta’s scientists and executives accepted and believed that paraquat can cause Parkinson’s, they do show a corporate focus on strategies to protect product sales, refute external scientific research and influence regulators.

In one defensive tactic, the documents indicate that the company worked behind the scenes to try to keep a highly regarded scientist from sitting on an advisory panel for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The agency is the chief US regulator for paraquat and other pesticides. Company officials wanted to make sure the efforts could not be traced back to Syngenta, the documents show.

And the documents show that insiders feared they could face legal liability for long-term, chronic effects of paraquat as long ago as 1975. One company scientist called the situation “a quite terrible problem” for which “some plan could be made … ”

That prediction of legal consequences has come to pass. Thousands of people who allege they developed Parkinson’s because of long-term chronic effects of paraquat exposure are now suing Syngenta. Along with Syngenta, they are also suing Chevron USA, the successor to a company that distributed paraquat in the US until 1986. Both companies deny any liability and maintain that scientific evidence does not support a causal link between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease.

“Recent thorough reviews performed by the most advanced and science-based regulatory authorities, including the United States and Australia, continue to support the view that paraquat is safe,” Syngenta said in a statement to the Guardian.

During the years Chevron USA’s predecessor sold paraquat, “it regularly reviewed and considered scientific studies regarding the safety of its products, including paraquat,” Chevron USA said in a statement to the Guardian, adding that none of the studies reviewed “showed a causal link between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease”.

Chevron USA said the company “does not believe that [its former subsidiary that sold paraquat] had any role in causing the plaintiffs’ illnesses and will vigorously defend against the allegations in the lawsuits”.

As part of a court-ordered disclosure in the litigation, the companies provided plaintiffs’ lawyers with decades of internal records, including hand-written and typed memos, internal presentations, and emails to and from scientists, lawyers and company officials around the world. And though the files have not yet been made public through the court system, the Guardian has reviewed hundreds of pages of these documents in a reporting collaboration with the New Lede.

Among the revelations from the documents: scientists with Syngenta predecessor Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) and Chevron Chemical were aware in the 1960s and 70s of mounting evidence showing paraquat could accumulate in the human brain.

When Syngenta’s own internal research showed adverse effects of paraquat on brain tissue, the company withheld that information from regulators while downplaying the validity of similar findings being reported by independent scientists.

In addition, the records show company scientists were aware of evidence that exposure to paraquat could impair the central nervous system (CNS), triggering tremors and other symptoms in experimental animals similar to those suffered by people with Parkinson’s. A 1975 Chevron communication speaks of concerns about allegations of “permanent CNS effects from paraquat”.

And as independent researchers continued to find more and more evidence that paraquat may cause Parkinson’s, the documents describe what Syngenta called an “influencing” strategy “that proactively diffuses [sic] the potential threats that we face” and seeks to “maintain and safeguard paraquat registrations”, referring to their regulatory approvals. The strategy “must consider how best to influence academia, and regulatory and NGO environments”.

A Syngenta “regulatory strategy” document from 2003 refers to paraquat as a “‘blockbuster’ product” that must be “vigorously” defended to protect more than $400m in projected annual global sales. Ensuring what Syngenta called its “freedom to sell” paraquat was a top priority, the internal records show.

Syngenta also created a website the company used to publicly dismiss concerns about links between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease and provide positive product messaging. On that website, the company asserted that paraquat did not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, even when the company had evidence from animal and human data that paraquat accumulated in brain tissue. The company no longer uses that language on its website.

“It is highly unethical for a company not to reveal data they have that could indicate that their product is more toxic than had been believed,” said Bruce Blumberg, professor of developmental and cell biology at the University of California, Irvine, speaking generally about corporate conduct. “[These companies are] trying to maximize profits and they jeopardize public health, and it shouldn’t be allowed. That is the scandal.”

‘A unique herbicide’

Paraquat is one of the most widely used weed killing chemicals in the world, competing with herbicides such as glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup brand for use in agriculture. Farmers use it to control weeds before planting their crops and to dry out crops for harvest. In the United States, the chemical is used in orchards, wheat fields, pastures where livestock graze, cotton fields and elsewhere. As weeds have become more resistant to glyphosate, paraquat popularity has surged.

It is used on approximately 15m acres of US farmland. US government data shows that the amount of paraquat used in the United States has more than tripled between 1992 and 2018.

On the Syngenta-run Paraquat Information Center website, the chemical is described as “a unique herbicide” that “can deliver safe, effective weed control, generating social and economic benefits, while protecting the land for future generations”.

Paraquat has been the subject of more than 1,200 safety studies submitted to, and reviewed by, regulatory authorities around the world, according to Syngenta.

Though it is widely used, paraquat has long been known to be dangerous to ingest – a tiny swallow of the chemical can kill a person within days. Scores of people around the world have died from ingesting paraquat either intentionally or accidentally. The EPA restricts use only to people certified to apply it. It is not sold to consumers, and paraquat warning labels carry the symbol of death – a skull and crossbones.

Syngenta maintains on its website that if users follow directions and wear proper protective clothing, including gloves and boots, “there is no risk to human safety”. Paraquat is “not a neurotoxicity hazard,” and “does not cause Parkinson’s disease”, the company states.

Despite the company’s claims, dozens of countries have banned paraquat, both because of the acute dangers and mounting evidence of links to health risks such as Parkinson’s from chronic, long-term exposure. Syngenta currently sells paraquat products in more than two dozen countries, from Australia to Uruguay.

Paraquat was banned in the European Union in 2007 after a court found that regulators did not thoroughly assess safety concerns, including scientific evidence connecting Parkinson’s to paraquat. It is also banned in the UK, although it is manufactured there. The chemical was banned in Switzerland, Syngenta’s home country, in 1989. And it is banned in China, the home base for ChemChina, which purchased Syngenta five years ago.

In the US, the EPA has largely agreed with Syngenta and other chemical companies that say paraquat can be safely used. Last year, the EPA said it would continue to allow farmers to use paraquat, including spraying it across fields from small airplanes.

A ‘Parkinson’s pandemic’

Concerns about possible ties between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease have grown as the spread of Parkinson’s has accelerated; the disease is now considered one of the world’s fastest-growing neurological disorders. Prevalence of Parkinson’s more than doubled from 1990 to 2015 and is expected to continue to expand rapidly, impacting millions of people around the world. Along with paraquat, toxins in air pollution and other pesticides, and to a smaller extent genetic factors, also are considered by many researchers as risk factors for the disease.

Roughly 60,000 Americans are diagnosed each year with Parkinson’s, and in recent years it has been ranked among the top 15 causes of death in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Moreover, the death rate from Parkinson’s has climbed more than 60% in the United States over the past two decades, according to research published last year. It is considered the fastest-growing neurological disease in the world.

As a disease of the central nervous system, common Parkinson’s symptoms include tremors, or a rhythmic shaking in arms and legs, stiffness and rigidity of the muscles, a loss of balance and coordination, and difficulty speaking. Parkinson’s symptoms develop when dopamine-producing neurons in a specific area of the brain called the substantia nigra are lost or otherwise degenerate. Without sufficient dopamine production, the brain is not capable of transmitting signals between cells to control movement and balance

“The Parkinson’s pandemic has exacted an enormous toll on tens of millions of individuals who bear the brunt of the disease,” Ray Dorsey, a neurologist at the University of Rochester Center for Health + Technology in New York, wrote in a 2020 book about the rise of the disease.

Dorsey is one of a number of leading scientists from around the world who say research clearly shows paraquat exposure can cause Parkinson’s disease.

“Paraquat is considered the most toxic herbicide ever created,” Dorsey said in an interview.

Syngenta said the weight of evidence actually shows that paraquat does not cause Parkinson’s and said a 2021 study co-authored by its chief medical office backs that position. The company also pointed to a 2020 update to the US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) as supporting its position. (The 2020 AHS looked at a much larger group of people than prior AHS research has linked paraquat to Parkinson’s, however.)

“There is no properly designed epidemiological study that shows a link between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease,” the company said in a statement.

“To this day, and despite hundreds of studies being conducted in the past 20 or so years, a causal link between Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease has not been established,” Chevron USA said in a statement to the Guardian.

Toxic timeline

Syngenta predecessor ICI first recognized paraquat’s value as a herbicide in 1955, launching its paraquat brand Gramoxone in the UK in 1962 and then in the United States shortly after.

Even as the company was bringing paraquat to the market, its scientists were starting to see early signs of possible problems with the product. Internal records show that in 1958, an ICI researcher reported to a colleague that company tests on laboratory animals found exposure to a chemical compound related to paraquat appeared to affect the central nervous system.

A 1964 ICI study on rabbits noted dermal exposure to paraquat caused symptoms such as “weakness and incoordination” in some of the animals receiving very high doses. In 1966, ICI scientists studying paraquat exposure effects on a variety of animals noted that large doses given to rats and mice showed effects on the central nervous system, with various impacts, including some animals displaying “hyper-excitability”, a stiff gait or tremors.

In 1968, paraquat poisoning deaths were starting to mount around the world, as many people intentionally used the herbicide as a tool for suicide. With the deaths, according to the documents, came multiple autopsies and analyses revealing that paraquat was accumulating in brain tissue in people who had ingested small amounts of paraquat.

In the early 1970s, animal studies by ICI researchers found more evidence of the chemical’s ability to move into the brain, as well as the lungs, and spinal cord. Field workers exposed to the chemical were complaining of health problems, and the documents indicate that by 1974 some state regulators were expressing concerns about the potential long-term, chronic effects on workers who might inadvertently lick small quantities of paraquat residue off lips, or inhale paraquat mist. Company officials were also warned of rumors that some people inside the EPA were in favor of banning paraquat.

In response, Chevron executives decided the labeling on Gramoxone needed stronger warning language, including advising users to wear goggles and a respirator when spraying. Notes from a February 1974 meeting referred to the “paraquat toxicological problems in the USA” and “increasing numbers of reports of toxicological effects of paraquat to applicators in the field”.

ICI expressed concern about market “repercussions” outside the US from added warnings, but agreed to the changes, according to the meeting notes.

Notes from a follow-up meeting a month later quoted a Chevron lawyer as saying “to a lawyer there is evidence now that paraquat could cause industrial injury and it should be recognized that Chevron could face suits totalling millions of dollars”.

A year later, Chevron fears were growing. In a July 1975 letter to ICI, a Chevron toxicologist noted “problems of nosebleed and sore throat in our own plant workers”, as well as studies indicating the potential for central nervous system effects from paraquat. The Chevron scientist asked ICI for information, saying “anything you have on the question of permanent injury from paraquat, or any follow-up evaluations several years after spraying would be of benefit to us.”

Notes from an October 1975 meeting between Chevron and ICI recorded that “Chevron are concerned on the chronic effects of paraquat sprays … The syndrome is reported as injury to the CNS … ”

The notes state that there may be a need for long-term toxicity studies or an epidemiology study because “Chevron would like more positive data to use in litigation cases”. In the same meeting, it was noted that an autopsy of a recent paraquat poisoning victim had found lesions on the motor neurons “sufficient to cause debilitation” but the notes said it was not clear what might have induced this effect. (Motor neurons are cells in the brain and spinal cord that send commands from the brain to the rest of the body.)

In a December 1975 letter to the Chevron toxicologist, an ICI scientist wrote: “We discussed last week the point you raised about possible chronic effects, which you see causing legal problems. This is a quite terrible problem and, frankly, I do not believe a satisfactory investigation can be made. However, I think some plan could be made, and to be as definitive as possible, any study must be as free from doubt as possible.”

Bad news builds

As the companies fretted, the bad news continued to build: a 1976 autopsy of a farmworker reviewed by ICI showed “degenerative changes” in the “cells of the substantia nigra” of the brain. Such changes are a hallmark of Parkinson’s, but the autopsy said they were probably because of lung damage. A Chevron memo that year noted “gaps in our knowledge of the chronic effects of paraquat exposure”.

By 1985 the science on paraquat health effects had become the subject of vigorous research by independent scientists, and the findings were ringing alarm bells within Chevron’s highest ranks.

In October 1985, an internal memorandum circulated to Chevron officials noted that a study by a Canadian researcher had found “an extraordinarily high correlation” between Parkinson’s and the use of pesticides, including paraquat. The memo also noted that paraquat was “chemically very similar” to the byproduct of synthetic heroin called MTPT, “which produces almost instant Parkinson’s, by killing dopaminergic neurons in the brain”.

The author of the Canadian study had warned that an increase in Parkinson’s disease would be seen as a consequence of the relatively recent introduction of paraquat-like pesticides.

The memo then warned that paraquat could turn out to be a huge legal liability, similar to the fate that befell an asbestos company when the common building material was found to cause cancer.

The asbestos situation “highlighted the especially severe financial risks involved in selling a product which contributes to a chronic disease”, the memo states. “Parkinson’s can go on for decades.”

R Gwin Follis, the retired chairman of Standard Oil – which became known as Chevron in 1984 – wrote to GM Keller, the chairman of Chevron: “I cannot think of anything more horrible for us to bequeath to our successors than an asbestos problem.” Chevron stopped selling paraquat a year later, in 1986.

The “decision to exit the paraquat distribution business was made solely for commercial reasons due to increased competition and did not relate to any health concerns regarding paraquat,” Chevron USA said in a statement to the Guardian.

The company added that during the years a former Chevron subsidiary sold paraquat, it “met or exceeded all federal and state requirements for product-safety testing before and after release on the market”.

A ‘defensive position’

Through the 1990s and into the 2000s, the research on paraquat and Parkinson’s expanded, inside and outside Syngenta. Several US researchers did studies that found unsettling impacts of paraquat on mice, adding more evidence the chemical could cause Parkinson’s.

Syngenta noted these “external pressures on paraquat” and decided its own scientists should repeat studies done by the outside scientists to see if they came up with the same results. There was a caveat: the Syngenta science team “avoided measuring PQ [paraquat] levels in the brain, since the detection of any PQ in the brain (no matter how small) will not be perceived externally in a positive light”, according to an internal Syngenta presentation.

“Data generated will be used to build a scientifically robust, defensive position for paraquat in response to the issues already in the scientific literature, and to questions raised by the media, customers and regulatory authorities,” another Syngenta document stated.

“The issue around the claims that paraquat exposure and Parkinson’s disease are linked needs to be addressed if the future Syngenta aspirations for the product are to be realised.”

Along with making a plan to generate data for its defense, Syngenta began honing a broader “influencing” strategy and “freedom to sell” strategy. A 2003 eight-page document made the objectives clear: the goal was not just to protect paraquat, but to expand its use.

At the time, the chemical was under regulatory review in Australia and the European Union. The company worried about evolving regulatory policies posing “a threat”, including that regulators may start to replace “higher hazard products with lower hazard products”, and apply a “precautionary principle”.

Under that type of regulatory approach, companies seeking to sell a chemical have a burden of proving product safety. In contrast, the US regulatory system largely takes the opposite approach – a chemical must be proven unsafe to be kept off the market.

In response to the growing regulatory threats, Syngenta said it would take several steps, including leading “national, regional and global industry initiatives to influence regulatory policy”.

The company also set as an objective “targeted collaborations with key influencers to improve product image … ”

Internal communications show the company discussed consultations with several senior European scientists, and plans to “contribute substantively [sic] to the literature”, including for studies being done for submission to the UK’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and the Agricultural Health Study in the US, a decades-long collaborative research project involving multiple US government agencies.

As Syngenta honed its defenses, the data from its internal studies started to come in. The first internal study done in 2003 was designed to dose mice with paraquat as outside scientists had done, and then measure any loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra of the animals’ brains. Syngenta’s tests did find losses but used a manual counting technique for analyzing those losses that was different from the automated technique used by independent scientists. Under the Syngenta analysis, the impacts of paraquat on the animal’s brains were deemed not statistically significant, a finding Syngenta made public.

What the company did not publicize at the time, however, was the fact that Syngenta scientist Louise Marks, who led the animal studies in question, repeated those studies using the more accurate, automated technique used by independent scientists.

he found that when using an automated analysis technique, paraquat actually did result in a statistically significant loss of the relevant brain cells – just as the outside scientists had found. Marks did another study, and the results were the same. Marks could not be reached for comment.

Deposition testimony given in the current litigation by longtime Syngenta scientist Phillip Botham, which has not previously been made public and during which a judge was not present, indicates that company officials would not tell the EPA of Marks’ research findings until roughly 15 years later, in 2019. The company only told the EPA about the Marks’ data after lawyer Steve Tillery, who in 2019 was suing Syngenta on behalf of people with Parkinson’s, threatened to send the evidence to the EPA himself, according to a transcript of Botham’s testimony.

When asked about the Marks tests, Sygnenta said: “The Marks studies involved a model in which a particular breed of mouse was injected with near-lethal doses of paraquat. Such models are of limited relevance to evaluating the safety of those using paraquat occupationally.”

The deposition also revealed that when Syngenta said on its website that paraquat did not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, and did not reach the specific area of the brain necessary to produce Parkinson’s symptoms, the company knew those statements were not accurate.

When asked in the deposition if that information was true at the time it was posted on the website, Botham admitted it “certainly had some inaccuracies”. “It appears that this communication had not had a chance, for reasons which I can’t fully explain, to catch up with the science that was still emerging,” he said. Part of the reason the company never reported Marks’ findings on its website, he said, was because subsequent research produced different results.

A secret plan

Part of the strategy to influence regulators involved trying to lobby for and against who the EPA looked to for independent scientific advice. In 2005, the EPA was considering appointing Dr Deborah Cory-Slechta to an open position on an important agency scientific advisory panel (SAP) on pesticides. Cory-Slechta was an influential US scientist whose work at the time was establishing ever stronger evidence that paraquat could cause Parkinson’s disease.

“This is important. We do not want to have Cory-Slechta on the SAP core panel,” Syngenta senior research scientist Charles Breckenridge wrote to colleagues in a June 2005 email.

Company emails show Syngenta decided to ask Ray McAllister, a regulatory policy expert at the industry lobbying group CropLife America (CLA), to disparage Cory-Slechta’s work in communications to the EPA. Syngenta officials wrote what they wanted McAllister to tell the EPA, and delivered it to McAllister.

“Ray has a tough job to do in providing comments that don’t come back to haunt CLA and be used against us,” one Syngenta executive wrote to colleagues.

Another Syngenta executive wrote to colleagues that it was “going to be very difficult to pin something really specific on D C-S … ”

The company decided secrecy would be key. The company did not want the public or the EPA to know Syngenta was behind the effort.

“I would ask that you handle our comments with care and in such a way that they cannot be attributed to Syngenta,” Greg Watson, a Syngenta regulatory affairs executive, wrote to McAllister. He then suggested that the communications to the EPA about Cory-Slechta “should be submitted informally & NOT placed in the public docket”.

In a separate email, Watson wrote that “for many, many of our projects it would be a real disaster to have her on the SAP!”

Watson suggested, among other things, that McAllister tell the EPA that Cory-Slechta used an “over-interpretation of data” to present scientific conclusions that were “in reality, speculation,” and was someone who made “overly dogmatic” statements.

McAllister communicated the concerns about Cory-Slechta to the EPA without mentioning they came from Syngenta. The agency chose someone else for the advisory panel.

The documents show similar efforts to influence the roster of scientists selected by the EPA for a 2010-11 pesticide advisory panel. At that time, Syngenta advised CropLife to tell the EPA that Cory-Slechta was using her research program for “anti-pesticide advocacy” and was identifying effects “without quality data”.

Cory-Slechta was not selected for the panel in question, while a scientist supported by CropLife was.

When asked to comment about the company’s actions against her, Cory-Slechta said she was not surprised. She said Syngenta representatives had tried various tactics over the years to intimidate her, and also at least once to woo her with an invitation to help fund and collaborate on research.

“They would follow me around,” she said in an interview. “It was clear they were not happy with me. Consistently our research showed that when you administer paraquat in rodent models you would see a loss of dopamine cells … in the substantia nigra. That is the hallmark, or the gold standard, of Parkinson’s disease.”

She said: “They didn’t like the data. They saw a threat to a huge market.”

Cory-Slechta said she is not anti-pesticide, nor pro-pesticide. “I want to stay in the middle,” she said. “I pride myself and I go overboard to stay in the middle. I let myself be led by the data.”

When asked about the Cory-Slechta correspondence, Syngenta said: “We disagree and take exception to this mischaracterization.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyer Steve Tillery was poised to present many of these internal documents and other evidence at a June 2021 trial in Illinois that would have been the first major court challenge to Syngenta and Chevron over the Parkinson’s connection to paraquat.

Just as the trial was set to begin, however, Syngenta agreed to pay $187.5m to settle with the plaintiffs in that case and several others, according to a disclosure in the company’s 2021 financial statement. The company did not admit liability as part of the settlement. It is not clear how much, if any, Chevron might have paid.

Other lawyers are now pressing claims for more than 2,000 other plaintiffs with Parkinson’s disease, including filing lawsuits on behalf of people with Parkinson’s in Canada.

The EPA’s agreement to reconsider its assessment of paraquat was welcomed by the farmworker groups, Parkinson’s scientists and others who brought the court challenge. The agency has said it will take another look at the health risks and costs that come with the widespread use of paraquat, and will have a revised report out in a year.

“Our research partners have studied the ample and compelling evidence showing paraquat’s association with neurological degradation and symptoms related to PD,” Ted Thompson, senior vice president of public policy at the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, said in an email.

“We believe the federal government and the EPA should use every tool at their disposal to eliminate its risk.”

It is not clear however, if the EPA’s extended review of paraquat will change the agency’s position. EPA scientists said in its 2019 draft human health risk assessment that its review of research about the potential association between paraquat and Parkinson’s had found only 71 studies out of 489 to be relevant to the agency’s analysis.

The agency “has not found a clear link between paraquat exposure from labeled uses and adverse health outcomes such as Parkinson’s disease … ” the agency states on its website.

While the agency conducts its reassessment, paraquat use continues.

This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group. Carey Gillam is managing editor of the New Lede and the author of two books addressing glyphosate: Whitewash (2017); and The Monsanto Papers (2021)

20/10/22: Propyzamide linked to Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IFD)

Cosmos Magazine

https://cosmosmagazine.com/science/herbicide-propyzamide-promotes-ibd/

Scientists identify a readily available herbicide which might lead to IBD

The herbicide propyzamide has been found to interfere with the suppression of pro-inflammatory pathway in the gut.

A new study in Nature has identified an environmental chemical agent that might promote gastrointestinal inflammation or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Herbicides with the active ingredient propyzamide, which is the subject of the research, are available in Australia.

The report says propyzamide may boost inflammation in the small and large intestine by disrupting an anti-inflammatory pathway.

Inflammatory bowel disease is a term for two conditions – Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis – which are complex chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract.

Research has shown that there are about 200 genetic loci associated with the disease, but less is known about the specific environmental factors that influence the risk and severity of IBD.

Now, the Nature study has systematically identified environmental chemical agents that promote gastrointestinal inflammation, and specifically identified a common herbicide called propyzamide, that may boost inflammation in the small and large intestine by disrupting an anti-inflammatory pathway.

Senior author Francisco Quintana, a neurology professor at the Centre for Neurologic Diseases at Harvard Medical School’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital in the US, says environmental factors are known to be important in influencing autoimmune and inflammatory disease.

Propyzamide is widely used to control certain grasses and broad-leaf weeds in sports fields, crops and pastures. It’s used in Australia under various brand names.

And research has shown that about 60% of the chemical remains unmetabolised by the plant 50 days after its application.

With a series of cell-culture, zebrafish, and mouse experiments, they were able to show that propyzamide interferes with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a protein that’s involved in immune regulation.

In the study, researchers found that AHR maintains gut homeostasis by suppressing a second, pro-inflammatory pathway that had previously been shown to be genetically linked with IBD.

“Our methodology allowed us to identify a chemical that disrupts one of the body’s natural ‘brakes’ on inflammation,” Quintana says.

The team is now working to target this inflammatory pathway by engineering nanoparticles and probiotics to activate AHR.

“The anti-inflammatory AHR pathway we identified could be strengthened to ameliorate disease, and, further down the road, we could also investigate additional ways to deactivate the pro-inflammatory response,” says Quintana. “As we learn more about the environmental

factors that might contribute to disease, we can develop strategies to limit exposures.

“Some chemicals don’t seem to be toxic when tested under basic conditions, but we do not yet know about the effect of chronic, low-level exposures over decades, or early-on in development.”

Cosmos has not yet contacted any distributors of propyzamide-based products for comment.

26/5/22: Torrens River (South Australia). Gumeracha. Pesticide: Triclopyr

Torrens River - Gumeracha (South Australia)

Rain event - Torrens River u/s Gumeracha township 26/5/22: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

Rain event - Torrens River u/s Gumeracha township 26/5/22: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

ug/L

Torrens River – Gumeracha (South Australia)

Rain event – Torrens River u/s Gumeracha township 26/5/22: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

Rain event – Torrens River u/s Gumeracha township 26/5/22: Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

2013-2020: Home Hill Emergency Bores. Pesticides: Atrazine and metabolites

Home Hill Emergency Bores Raw Water 2013-2020

PFAS also detected

Atrazine 0.8ug/L (max) 0.178ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.8ug/L (max) 0.178ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av.)

Home Hill Emergency Bores Raw Water 2013-2020

PFAS also detected

Atrazine 0.8ug/L (max) 0.178ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.8ug/L (max) 0.178ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av.)

2013-2020: Home Hill Bores Raw Water. Pesticides: Multiple

Home Hill Bores Raw Water 2013-2020

PFAS also detected

Atrazine 0.63ug/L (max) 0.031ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 6ug/L (max) 0.128ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.034ug/L (av.)

Bromacil 0.1ug/L (max), 0.026ug/L (av.)

DCPMU 0.03ug/L (max), 0.023ug/L (av.)

Diuron 0.16ug/L (max), 0.028ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor 0.1ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av.)

Home Hill Bores Raw Water 2013-2020

PFAS also detected

Atrazine 0.63ug/L (max) 0.031ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 6ug/L (max) 0.128ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.034ug/L (av.)

Bromacil 0.1ug/L (max), 0.026ug/L (av.)

DCPMU 0.03ug/L (max), 0.023ug/L (av.)

Diuron 0.16ug/L (max), 0.028ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor 0.1ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av.)

2010-2020: Chambers Bores, Ayr. Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Imazapic

Chambers Bores Raw Water Quality 2010-2020

PFAS above guideline levels also detected

Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.01ug/L (max)

Imazapic 0.01ug/L (max)

Chambers Bores Raw Water Quality 2010-2020

PFAS above guideline levels also detected

Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.01ug/L (max)

Imazapic 0.01ug/L (max)

2010-2020: Nelsons Borefield, Ayr. Pesticides: Desethyl Atrazine, Bromacil, Dimethoate, Flusilazole

Nelsons Borefield Raw Water Quality 2010-2020

Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L (max)

Bromacil 0.26ug/L (max)

Dimethoate 0.4ug/L (max)

Flusilazole 0.05ug/L

PFAS above guideline levels also detected.

Nelsons Borefield Raw Water Quality 2010-2020

Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L (max)

Bromacil 0.26ug/L (max)

Dimethoate 0.4ug/L (max)

Flusilazole 0.05ug/L

PFAS above guideline levels also detected.

2015-2020: Conlan Street Bores, Ayr. Pesticides: Multiple

Conlan Street Bores Raw Water Quality 2015-2020

Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Bromacil 0.03ug/L (max), 0.028ug/L (av.)

DEET 0.4ug/L (max), 0.194ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop 0.17ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Imazapic 0.02ug/L (max), 0.013ug/L (av.)

PFAS also detected

Conlan Street Bores Raw Water Quality 2015-2020

Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Bromacil 0.03ug/L (max), 0.028ug/L (av.)

DEET 0.4ug/L (max), 0.194ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop 0.17ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Imazapic 0.02ug/L (max), 0.013ug/L (av.)

PFAS also detected

2010-2020: South Ayr Raw Water Quality. Pesticides: Multiple

South Ayr Raw Water Quality 2010-2020

Ametryn 0.04ug/L (max)

Atrazine 0.72ug/L (max)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.15ug/L (max)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max)

Diuron 0.1ug/L (max)

Haloxyfop 0.07ug/L (max)

Imazapic 0.03ug/L (max)

Imidacloprid 0.18ug/L (max)

Metolachlor 0.35ug/L (max)

PFAS also detected

South Ayr Raw Water Quality 2010-2020

Ametryn 0.04ug/L (max)

Atrazine 0.72ug/L (max)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.15ug/L (max)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max)

Diuron 0.1ug/L (max)

Haloxyfop 0.07ug/L (max)

Imazapic 0.03ug/L (max)

Imidacloprid 0.18ug/L (max)

Metolachlor 0.35ug/L (max)

PFAS also detected

Oct 3 2022: Glyphosate found inside Australian’s urine

The age group most at risk of having weedkiller in their system

Oct 3 2022.

One-in-12 Australians have a common weedkiller in their system, research has discovered, but who is most at risk is not evenly spread across the population.

Researchers from the University of Queensland tested urine samples from more than 1800 Australians, finding 8 per cent had low levels of glyphosate in their system.

Dr Sarit Kaserzon from UQ’s Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences said the result was good news, relatively speaking, when compared with the rates of the chemical found in other countries.

“In the United States, for example, according to the CDC report recently 80 to 90 per cent of samples came back positive,” she said.

“In France they recorded even higher numbers, so we’re very relieved to see that levels are much lower in Australia, but there’s still things to examine about how people are being exposed here.”

Kaserzon stressed that the levels at which the chemical was found in people’s systems were below the recommended safe guidelines, meaning that even the people who had it in their system were probably not at risk.

However much work was being done on the effect of glyphosate on humans, and what was a “safe” level was yet to be determined sufficiently, she said.

The question is the subject of legal action, including an Australian class action against chemical giant Monsanto, scheduled for hearing in 2023.

The urine samples were sourced from pathology samples which had been de-identified except for demographic information such as age and sex.

The research discovered people in the 45-60 age group were much more likely to have glyphosate in their system.

Kaserzon said they did not have any direct evidence, but the levels involved and the age group suggested it was household gardeners who were directly using products containing glyphosate.

The UQ researchers partnered with New Zealand’s Massey University to compare the Australian levels with 27 farmers who work with glyphosate in that country.

They found the farmers’ levels were much higher than the samples from Australia, which gave them an indication that people who directly used the product were most at risk, rather than people acquiring it through food and drink.

Lead research author, UQ PhD candidate Garth Campbell, said the finding suggested extra precautions should be taken by anyone using glyphosate products, even casually.

“Farmers or anyone else who regularly use chemicals containing glyphosate should wear goggles, protective gloves and avoid inhalation of dust and mist,” he said.

“I also highly recommend additional measures including protective clothing, mask wearing and hand washing after handling a product with glyphosate, and ensure it is stored safely.”

Kaserzon said more monitoring was needed to get more accurate figures about its prevalence in the population.

“More research is also needed into whether adults excrete it from their urine at the same rate,” she said.

“We assume that 20 per cent of [glyphosate] you ingest is excreted, but recent studies suggest it could be as low as 1 per cent, which means we’re under-estimating how much people are exposed.

“For the general population it might not make much difference but it would have a huge impact on farmers, which means more work is needed.”

2022 October: Peregrine Falcon Resurgence coming back from near Extinction

The peregrine falcon's 'remarkable' resurgence coming back from near extinction

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-03/sa-peregrine-falcons-resurgence/101494554

The peregrine falcon looks set to hit another milestone in its unlikely comeback from the brink of extinction.

The bird of prey is the fastest animal on the planet and its 'rare' conservation status is currently under review in South Australia.

Experts predict that status will be changed, making it the last state in the country to list the species population as 'secure'.

After decades of pesticide poisoning and persecution, the resurgence of the native bird has been described as "nothing short of remarkable".

Field ornithologist, Ian Falkenberg — who has been documenting peregrines for 40 years — said research on the peregrine's population helped Australia avert a "major environmental crisis".

Chemical destruction

Mr Falkenberg said pesticides widely used by farmers between the 1960s and 1980s almost wiped out the apex predator.

"Those chemicals started to accumulate in the food that they eat," he said.

"They consume small amounts over time which means that they get a very large dose over a long time."

Mr Falkenberg said chemicals like DDT, which was a commonly used in agriculture, caused the falcons to lay thinner eggs leading to a dramatic drop in the number of chicks being hatched.

"It caused a 28 per cent decrease in eggshell thinning and basically an egg won't hatch if it's at 25 per cent," he said.

"If we kept using these chemicals for another decade essentially we would have been in the situation that America and parts of Europe were in, with the falcon being wiped out in some areas."

The decline in population sparked bans across the country on the use of certain deadly pesticides in the late 1980s.

"We have a lot to be indebted to for the peregrine falcon alerting various countries on the devastation that these chemicals can actually cause," Mr Falkenberg said.

"It is a great story and one in which by looking at wildlife populations we can determine the health of the environment."

The falcon feud

The peregrine's diet consists mostly of other birds, and it's one of the most efficient apex-predators in the world.

But its particular love for eating pigeons has also made it the subject of persecution.

"Peregrine falcons have been blamed for killing racing pigeons over the years," Mr Falkenberg said.

"I know this, because a lot of the birds that I've been banding over the years, the band returns were sent back to me by pigeon racing clubs."

While peregrine hunting is mostly a thing of the past, the falcon remains a heated topic among pigeon racers.

Tom Tirrell has been racing pigeons for 60 years and said he loses at least 40 per cent of his flock a season to the falcon.

"I can remember a time when you would take your birds as a junior, we flew 13 pigeons and we lost 1 pigeon on either line," he said.

"Now if you start with 50 or a 100 pigeons you would struggle to get 20 or 30 at the end of the season."

The veteran racer said his beloved pigeons do not stand a chance against a bird capable of flying up to 300 kilometres per hour. 

"They create havoc and just put them down to ground or put them through trees," Mr Tirrell said.

"It's not like a warm fluffy pigeon that to me doesn't do anything."

"They're out and out killers."

But Mr Falkenberg said that peregrines play an important role in reducing the number of pest species like pigeons.

"They were trying to portray these Falcons as just simply ruthless killers of their pets, which simply wasn't the case," he said.

"The domestic pigeon is actually a feral animal, and causes significant environmental problems in some areas."

"They take over nesting sites of native birds and spread disease."

"We also found that 25 per cent of feral pigeons around buildings have pigeon racing rings on them."

The feud between pigeon racers and peregrines was so serious that racing groups in the 1970s called for the hawk to be killed and for their heads to be sent to the clubs in containers.

City life 'a perfect alternative'

After almost being extinct, experts believe there may be more peregrines now than ever before.

It means nesting sites have become more common, even among urban environments like the ABC Adelaide office in Collinswood.

Ecologist Stuart Collard said that is because peregrines have adapted better than any other native animal to city-life.

"They've been able to adapt to that environment, so typically they would nest on a cliff so they might find a ledge on a cliff but a high-rise building is also a perfect alternative," he said.

"So they've got a high vantage point that's nice and protected and they have access to prey."

"It's terrific and it's unusual that species actually go the other way. Oftentimes in an urban environment we're watching species decline" 

Dr Collard, who is also an operations manager for Green Adelaide, said the organisation is looking to set-up a peregrine nest live camera, like the one on Collins Street in Melbourne.

"We'd love to have a similar sort of story which engages thousands of people like it does in Victoria," Dr Collard said.

The peregrine falcon’s ‘remarkable’ resurgence coming back from near extinction

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-03/sa-peregrine-falcons-resurgence/101494554

The peregrine falcon looks set to hit another milestone in its unlikely comeback from the brink of extinction.

The bird of prey is the fastest animal on the planet and its ‘rare’ conservation status is currently under review in South Australia.

Experts predict that status will be changed, making it the last state in the country to list the species population as ‘secure’.

After decades of pesticide poisoning and persecution, the resurgence of the native bird has been described as “nothing short of remarkable”.

Field ornithologist, Ian Falkenberg — who has been documenting peregrines for 40 years — said research on the peregrine’s population helped Australia avert a “major environmental crisis”.

Chemical destruction

Mr Falkenberg said pesticides widely used by farmers between the 1960s and 1980s almost wiped out the apex predator.

“Those chemicals started to accumulate in the food that they eat,” he said.

“They consume small amounts over time which means that they get a very large dose over a long time.”

Mr Falkenberg said chemicals like DDT, which was a commonly used in agriculture, caused the falcons to lay thinner eggs leading to a dramatic drop in the number of chicks being hatched.

“It caused a 28 per cent decrease in eggshell thinning and basically an egg won’t hatch if it’s at 25 per cent,” he said.

“If we kept using these chemicals for another decade essentially we would have been in the situation that America and parts of Europe were in, with the falcon being wiped out in some areas.”

The decline in population sparked bans across the country on the use of certain deadly pesticides in the late 1980s.

“We have a lot to be indebted to for the peregrine falcon alerting various countries on the devastation that these chemicals can actually cause,” Mr Falkenberg said.

“It is a great story and one in which by looking at wildlife populations we can determine the health of the environment.”

The falcon feud

The peregrine’s diet consists mostly of other birds, and it’s one of the most efficient apex-predators in the world.

But its particular love for eating pigeons has also made it the subject of persecution.

“Peregrine falcons have been blamed for killing racing pigeons over the years,” Mr Falkenberg said.

“I know this, because a lot of the birds that I’ve been banding over the years, the band returns were sent back to me by pigeon racing clubs.”

While peregrine hunting is mostly a thing of the past, the falcon remains a heated topic among pigeon racers.

Tom Tirrell has been racing pigeons for 60 years and said he loses at least 40 per cent of his flock a season to the falcon.

“I can remember a time when you would take your birds as a junior, we flew 13 pigeons and we lost 1 pigeon on either line,” he said.

“Now if you start with 50 or a 100 pigeons you would struggle to get 20 or 30 at the end of the season.”

The veteran racer said his beloved pigeons do not stand a chance against a bird capable of flying up to 300 kilometres per hour.

“They create havoc and just put them down to ground or put them through trees,” Mr Tirrell said.

“It’s not like a warm fluffy pigeon that to me doesn’t do anything.”

“They’re out and out killers.”

But Mr Falkenberg said that peregrines play an important role in reducing the number of pest species like pigeons.

“They were trying to portray these Falcons as just simply ruthless killers of their pets, which simply wasn’t the case,” he said.

“The domestic pigeon is actually a feral animal, and causes significant environmental problems in some areas.”

“They take over nesting sites of native birds and spread disease.”

“We also found that 25 per cent of feral pigeons around buildings have pigeon racing rings on them.”

The feud between pigeon racers and peregrines was so serious that racing groups in the 1970s called for the hawk to be killed and for their heads to be sent to the clubs in containers.

City life ‘a perfect alternative’

After almost being extinct, experts believe there may be more peregrines now than ever before.

It means nesting sites have become more common, even among urban environments like the ABC Adelaide office in Collinswood.

Ecologist Stuart Collard said that is because peregrines have adapted better than any other native animal to city-life.

“They’ve been able to adapt to that environment, so typically they would nest on a cliff so they might find a ledge on a cliff but a high-rise building is also a perfect alternative,” he said.

“So they’ve got a high vantage point that’s nice and protected and they have access to prey.”

“It’s terrific and it’s unusual that species actually go the other way. Oftentimes in an urban environment we’re watching species decline”

Dr Collard, who is also an operations manager for Green Adelaide, said the organisation is looking to set-up a peregrine nest live camera, like the one on Collins Street in Melbourne.

“We’d love to have a similar sort of story which engages thousands of people like it does in Victoria,” Dr Collard said.

28/9/22: Blueberry Blues – Coffs Harbour

Blueberry blues: how the cash crop is causing a contamination crisis in Coffs Harbour

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/sep/28/blueberry-blues-how-the-cash-crop-is-causing-a-contamination-crisis-in-coffs-harbour

High levels of chemicals used to grow the berries are ending up in the water – and it’s community groups, rather than regulators, who are blowing the whistle.

In a region once famous for its Big Banana, blueberries are now the dominant crop. The berries account for $200m of the $250m agriculture industry in the Coffs Harbour district.

But with the change of use came concerns in this idyllic community on the New South Wales mid north coast about the environmental impact of pesticides and fertiliser runoff from these intensive farms. It may now be reaching a crisis, according to some scientists.

 

During heavy rain, water can be seen coursing down hills into creeks and rivers carrying sediment, high levels of fertiliser and other chemicals that are used to grow and protect blueberries.

It ultimately ends up in lakes and the sea, and scientists warn it is now threatening the north coast’s other major industries: fishing and prawn trawling.

The Coffs Harbour city council has been increasingly intervening to demand development applications when farms are set up or expanded in order to manage the problem.

The story of blueberries in the Coffs Harbour region is a salutary lesson in how pesticides and other agricultural chemicals are regulated.

Who monitors pesticides in the environment?

In theory, pesticide use and environmental monitoring fall to state environment protection authorities. But in practice it’s often left to community groups, academics and activist councillors to blow the whistle.

Policing proper use of pesticides is split between the state environment and agriculture agencies.

There are few resources devoted to the issue, yet pesticides are by their nature some of our most toxic poisons, so their escape into waterways or other parts of the environment can have serious unintended consequences.

While regulators acknowledged and responded to the dangers of DDT and other organochlorines, it is now known that seemingly safer new-generation pesticides, such as the neonicotinoids, can have an impact on bees and aquatic life even at very small doses.

Only the most dramatic events seem to gain official attention.

In 2020 the Victorian Environment Protection Authority took action against a commercial flower grower in the coastal town of Torquay after nearby residents suffered vision impairment, sore throats, breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea and vomiting.

Investigators found the chemical was being used to prepare ground for a new crop, but had been incorrectly applied and reacted with moist soil to produce methyl isothiocyanate, which is a hazardous gas.

Three people were taken to hospital by ambulance and a fourth transported himself. The grower was fined $70,000 without conviction.

The Victorian EPA said it did not have any statistics on other pesticide incidents and directed the Guardian to the agriculture department.

In NSW, the state’s EPA is responsible for policing both chemical use and pollution in the environment, including spray drift incidents.

It said it takes “a risk-based approach to pesticides and works with other agencies, industry, academic institutions and public interest groups”.

Over the past three years, there have been only two successful prosecutions of Pesticides Act offences in NSW. The EPA has also issued 30 advisory letters, 27 formal warnings, 30 official cautions, three clean-up actions and one prevention notice.

‘Hearnes Lake isn’t dead but it’s nearly dead’

It took more than 130 incident reports from the community and research by Southern Cross University in association with the Coffs Harbour council in 2017-18 to get official action over the impacts of the rapid expansion of blueberry farms and other intensive horticulture in the region.

Researchers found that nitrogen oxide levels in creeks feeding into the Hearnes Lake catchment were up to 695 times higher during high rainfall events than in dry weather and levels were as high as the worst rivers in China. This was attributed to fertiliser runoff.

Hearnes Lake is particularly important because it serves as a nursery for the nearby Solitary Islands marine park, which in turn nurtures the abundant seafood of the region.

Finally the Natural Resources Access Regulator stepped in on water use issues and the EPA undertook inspections and testing around Hearnes Lake, focusing on the impact of pesticides and fertilisers.

In October 2021 it issued a $7,500 fine and a caution to a blueberry farmer at Woolgoolga over pesticide pollution and storage. It has also put out guidance notes in an effort to raise standards of pesticide use among blueberry growers.

Nine inspections in late 2021 detected low levels of the insecticide imidacloprid – a neonicotinoid – and two cucumber growers were issued with cleanup notices over pesticide containers left near waterways.

Even tiny amounts of imidacloprid can be highly toxic to aquatic life.

Southern Cross University marine science professor Kirsten Benkendorff said her research has found residues of neonicotinoids above the safe residue limits in prawn flesh and in water in Hearnes Lake.

Pesticides had also been found in oysters and while it is causing stress, they seem to be more resistant, she said.

“Hearnes Lake isn’t dead but it’s nearly dead,” she said.

Further up the coast in the Richmond River, Benkendorff has detected high levels of atrazine, a potent endocrine disrupter that affects sexual development and has been linked to cancer. It is banned in Europe but still used on sugar cane and other crops in Australia.

The EPA announced in May it is targeting pesticide use in the Hearnes Lake catchment.

Spray drift and the burden of proof

One of the biggest problems for the regulation of pesticides in the environment is that the burden of proof falls on academics and the community.

Benkendorff said it cost more than $300 for each of her samples to be tested for pesticides, putting it beyond the reach of many communities. Separate tests were needed to detect glyphosate (sold as Roundup or Zero), one of the most common herbicides in use in Australia.

Matt Landos, a veterinarian and honorary lecturer in aquatic health at the University of Sydney, said the environment protection authorities are often reluctant to follow up on allegations of spray drift or concerns about environmental pollution because of the difficulty in getting a successful prosecution.

Spray drift incidents need to be investigated quickly and people reporting them often faced an almost insurmountable burden of establishing who was spraying and where the drift came from, Landos said

Blueberry blues: how the cash crop is causing a contamination crisis in Coffs Harbour

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/sep/28/blueberry-blues-how-the-cash-crop-is-causing-a-contamination-crisis-in-coffs-harbour

High levels of chemicals used to grow the berries are ending up in the water – and it’s community groups, rather than regulators, who are blowing the whistle.

In a region once famous for its Big Banana, blueberries are now the dominant crop. The berries account for $200m of the $250m agriculture industry in the Coffs Harbour district.

But with the change of use came concerns in this idyllic community on the New South Wales mid north coast about the environmental impact of pesticides and fertiliser runoff from these intensive farms. It may now be reaching a crisis, according to some scientists.

During heavy rain, water can be seen coursing down hills into creeks and rivers carrying sediment, high levels of fertiliser and other chemicals that are used to grow and protect blueberries.

It ultimately ends up in lakes and the sea, and scientists warn it is now threatening the north coast’s other major industries: fishing and prawn trawling.

The Coffs Harbour city council has been increasingly intervening to demand development applications when farms are set up or expanded in order to manage the problem.

The story of blueberries in the Coffs Harbour region is a salutary lesson in how pesticides and other agricultural chemicals are regulated.

Who monitors pesticides in the environment?

In theory, pesticide use and environmental monitoring fall to state environment protection authorities. But in practice it’s often left to community groups, academics and activist councillors to blow the whistle.

Policing proper use of pesticides is split between the state environment and agriculture agencies.

There are few resources devoted to the issue, yet pesticides are by their nature some of our most toxic poisons, so their escape into waterways or other parts of the environment can have serious unintended consequences.

While regulators acknowledged and responded to the dangers of DDT and other organochlorines, it is now known that seemingly safer new-generation pesticides, such as the neonicotinoids, can have an impact on bees and aquatic life even at very small doses.

Only the most dramatic events seem to gain official attention.

In 2020 the Victorian Environment Protection Authority took action against a commercial flower grower in the coastal town of Torquay after nearby residents suffered vision impairment, sore throats, breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea and vomiting.

Investigators found the chemical was being used to prepare ground for a new crop, but had been incorrectly applied and reacted with moist soil to produce methyl isothiocyanate, which is a hazardous gas.

Three people were taken to hospital by ambulance and a fourth transported himself. The grower was fined $70,000 without conviction.

The Victorian EPA said it did not have any statistics on other pesticide incidents and directed the Guardian to the agriculture department.

In NSW, the state’s EPA is responsible for policing both chemical use and pollution in the environment, including spray drift incidents.

It said it takes “a risk-based approach to pesticides and works with other agencies, industry, academic institutions and public interest groups”.

Over the past three years, there have been only two successful prosecutions of Pesticides Act offences in NSW. The EPA has also issued 30 advisory letters, 27 formal warnings, 30 official cautions, three clean-up actions and one prevention notice.

‘Hearnes Lake isn’t dead but it’s nearly dead’

It took more than 130 incident reports from the community and research by Southern Cross University in association with the Coffs Harbour council in 2017-18 to get official action over the impacts of the rapid expansion of blueberry farms and other intensive horticulture in the region.

Researchers found that nitrogen oxide levels in creeks feeding into the Hearnes Lake catchment were up to 695 times higher during high rainfall events than in dry weather and levels were as high as the worst rivers in China. This was attributed to fertiliser runoff.

Hearnes Lake is particularly important because it serves as a nursery for the nearby Solitary Islands marine park, which in turn nurtures the abundant seafood of the region.

Finally the Natural Resources Access Regulator stepped in on water use issues and the EPA undertook inspections and testing around Hearnes Lake, focusing on the impact of pesticides and fertilisers.

In October 2021 it issued a $7,500 fine and a caution to a blueberry farmer at Woolgoolga over pesticide pollution and storage. It has also put out guidance notes in an effort to raise standards of pesticide use among blueberry growers.

Nine inspections in late 2021 detected low levels of the insecticide imidacloprid – a neonicotinoid – and two cucumber growers were issued with cleanup notices over pesticide containers left near waterways.

Even tiny amounts of imidacloprid can be highly toxic to aquatic life.

Southern Cross University marine science professor Kirsten Benkendorff said her research has found residues of neonicotinoids above the safe residue limits in prawn flesh and in water in Hearnes Lake.

Pesticides had also been found in oysters and while it is causing stress, they seem to be more resistant, she said.

“Hearnes Lake isn’t dead but it’s nearly dead,” she said.

Further up the coast in the Richmond River, Benkendorff has detected high levels of atrazine, a potent endocrine disrupter that affects sexual development and has been linked to cancer. It is banned in Europe but still used on sugar cane and other crops in Australia.

The EPA announced in May it is targeting pesticide use in the Hearnes Lake catchment.

Spray drift and the burden of proof

One of the biggest problems for the regulation of pesticides in the environment is that the burden of proof falls on academics and the community.

Benkendorff said it cost more than $300 for each of her samples to be tested for pesticides, putting it beyond the reach of many communities. Separate tests were needed to detect glyphosate (sold as Roundup or Zero), one of the most common herbicides in use in Australia.

Matt Landos, a veterinarian and honorary lecturer in aquatic health at the University of Sydney, said the environment protection authorities are often reluctant to follow up on allegations of spray drift or concerns about environmental pollution because of the difficulty in getting a successful prosecution.

Spray drift incidents need to be investigated quickly and people reporting them often faced an almost insurmountable burden of establishing who was spraying and where the drift came from, Landos said

23/9/21: Hing Lee Hong Enterprise Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Hing Lee Hong Enterprise Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

23/9/21: Dried Longan - Hing Lee Hong Enterprise Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg. Not permitted in this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Hing Lee Hong Enterprise Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

23/9/21: Dried Longan – Hing Lee Hong Enterprise Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg. Not permitted in this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

17/9/21: Progressive Mango Growers Multan. Breaching Australian MRL: Tebuconazole

Progressive Mango Growers Multan (Pakistan) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Tebuconazole

17/9/21: Mangos Fresh - Progressive Mango Growers Multan (Pakistan): Tebuconazole 0.13mg/kg. Detected in excess of MRL

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Progressive Mango Growers Multan (Pakistan) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Tebuconazole

17/9/21: Mangos Fresh – Progressive Mango Growers Multan (Pakistan): Tebuconazole 0.13mg/kg. Detected in excess of MRL

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

17/9/21: Manahel Group (Egypt). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Manahel Group (Egypt) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

17/9/21: Okra - Manahel Group (Egypt): Chlorpyrifos  0.02mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Manahel Group (Egypt) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

17/9/21: Okra – Manahel Group (Egypt): Chlorpyrifos  0.02mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

15/9/21: Song Tran Import and Export (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Song Tran Import and Export Co Ltd (Vietnam) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

15/9/21: Frozen whole durian - Song Tran Import and Export Co Ltd (Vietnam): Carbendazim  0.13mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Song Tran Import and Export Co Ltd (Vietnam) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

15/9/21: Frozen whole durian – Song Tran Import and Export Co Ltd (Vietnam): Carbendazim  0.13mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

24/8/21: Rgn Exports (India). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Rgn Exports (India) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

24/8/21: Fresh kolkata betel leaves - Rgn Exports (India): Chlorpyrifos 0.03mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Rgn Exports (India) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

24/8/21: Fresh kolkata betel leaves – Rgn Exports (India): Chlorpyrifos 0.03mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

28/7/21: Anatolia (Iran). Breached Australian MRL. Pesticide: Propargite

Anatolia (Iran) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Propargite

28/7/21: Pitted Dates - Anatolia  (Iran): Propargite 0.11mg/kg Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Anatolia (Iran) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Propargite

28/7/21: Pitted Dates – Anatolia  (Iran): Propargite 0.11mg/kg Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

26/8/21: Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China). Breaching Australian MRL’s: Pesticides: Myclobutanil, Pyraclostrobin

Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Myclobutanil, Pyraclostrobin

26/8/21: Dried Lemon Slices - Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China): Myclobutanil 0.1mg/kg

26/8/21: Dried Lemon Slices - Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China): Pyraclostrobin 0.54mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Myclobutanil, Pyraclostrobin

26/8/21: Dried Lemon Slices – Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China): Myclobutanil 0.1mg/kg

26/8/21: Dried Lemon Slices – Xiangyang Tianma Zhonge Trading Co Ltd  (China): Pyraclostrobin 0.54mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2/8/21: Hunan Duoying Agricultural Science Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Flusilazole

Hunan Duoying Agricultural Science Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Flusilazole

2/8/21: Fresh sugar snap pea - Hunan Duoying Agricultural Science and Technology Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Flusilazole 0.1mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Hunan Duoying Agricultural Science Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Flusilazole

2/8/21: Fresh sugar snap pea – Hunan Duoying Agricultural Science and Technology Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Flusilazole 0.1mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

23/7/21: Tropical Green Co Ltd (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL for Chlorpyrifos

Tropical Green Co Ltd (Thailand) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

23/7/21: Fresh mangosteens - Tropical Green Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.36mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Tropical Green Co Ltd (Thailand) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

23/7/21: Fresh mangosteens – Tropical Green Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.36mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021: Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Permethrin

Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Permethrin

22/7/21: Edamame soybeans in pod - Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia) - Pesticide: Permethrin 0.08mg/kg

21/9/21: Soybeans in pod - Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia) - Pesticide: Permethrin 0.08mg/kg. Detected in excess of MRL

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Permethrin

22/7/21: Edamame soybeans in pod – Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia) – Pesticide: Permethrin 0.08mg/kg

21/9/21: Soybeans in pod – Pt Mitratani Dua Tujuh (Indonesia) – Pesticide: Permethrin 0.08mg/kg. Detected in excess of MRL

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

12/7/21: Red Dragon Co Ltd (Vietnam). Pesticide: Cypermethrin

Red Dragon Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cypermethrin

12/7/21: Fresh Lychee - Red Dragon Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.132mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Red Dragon Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cypermethrin

12/7/21: Fresh Lychee – Red Dragon Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.132mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2/7/21: Shanghai Dongmei Import and Export Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Shanghai Dongmei Import and Export Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

2/7/21: Frozen Spinach - Shanghai Dongmei Import and Export Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin detected - not permitted in this food. 0.011mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Shanghai Dongmei Import and Export Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

2/7/21: Frozen Spinach – Shanghai Dongmei Import and Export Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin detected – not permitted in this food. 0.011mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

August 25 2022: 70 Flying Foxes Poisoned. Pesticide: Dieldrin

Suspected poisoning of Shoalhaven flying-foxes

25 Aug 2022

https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/news/suspected-poisoning-of-shoalhaven-flying-foxes

Up to 70 grey-headed flying-foxes found dead in the Shoalhaven area earlier this year may have been poisoned, prompting authorities to remind people to properly dispose of chemicals and pesticides.

Mike Saxon from the Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) said tragically a banned organochlorine pesticide, Dieldrin, was confirmed in one flying-fox and there are signs that others had also ingested a poison.

"At this stage we have not been able to identify any person responsible and we do not know if this was a deliberate or accidental poisoning," Mr Saxon said.

"We are continuing enquiries but regardless, this tragic incident highlights the horrible impact banned pesticides have on our native wildlife.

"Grey-headed flying-foxes play a vital role in our environment pollinating our forests and dispersing our rainforest seeds. They also feed on fruit, including backyard fruit trees.

"We know this can frustrate gardeners but remind people that grey-headed flying-foxes are listed as a threatened species in New South Wales. They are protected under the Biodiversity Conservation Act and it is an offence to harm them," Mr Saxon said.

The department is partnering with the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) to inform the community about risks associated with improper storage and use of pesticides. Director of Regulatory Operations Cate Woods said the use of Dieldrin has been banned in Australia since 1987, noting that it can accumulate in native animals and livestock and contaminate soil for decades.

"This is a good reminder to check areas of your property where old pesticide or chemical stocks may be forgotten and dispose of them lawfully," Ms Wood said.

"Any old stocks of organochlorine pesticides like Dieldrin should be stored securely and properly labelled until they can be safely disposed of at a Household Chemical CleanOut event.

"These events accept household quantities up to a maximum of 20 litres or 20 kilograms of a single chemical or item. They are free services held across New South Wales.

"The next Household Chemical Clean Out Event in the Shoalhaven is this Sunday, 28 August, 9 am–3 pm at the Woollamia Council Works Depot, 3 Erina Road Woollamia.

"We much prefer that people come forward and dispose of these chemicals or poisons correctly, rather than try to dispose of them another way that may end up harming our environment and wildlife," Ms Wood said.

The department would like to thank the team at Wildlife Rescue South Coast, North Nowra Veterinary Hospital, Taronga Zoo and volunteers who helped recover and identify the cause of death for these flying-foxes

Suspected poisoning of Shoalhaven flying-foxes

25 Aug 2022

https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/news/suspected-poisoning-of-shoalhaven-flying-foxes

Up to 70 grey-headed flying-foxes found dead in the Shoalhaven area earlier this year may have been poisoned, prompting authorities to remind people to properly dispose of chemicals and pesticides.

Mike Saxon from the Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) said tragically a banned organochlorine pesticide, Dieldrin, was confirmed in one flying-fox and there are signs that others had also ingested a poison.

“At this stage we have not been able to identify any person responsible and we do not know if this was a deliberate or accidental poisoning,” Mr Saxon said.

“We are continuing enquiries but regardless, this tragic incident highlights the horrible impact banned pesticides have on our native wildlife.

“Grey-headed flying-foxes play a vital role in our environment pollinating our forests and dispersing our rainforest seeds. They also feed on fruit, including backyard fruit trees.

“We know this can frustrate gardeners but remind people that grey-headed flying-foxes are listed as a threatened species in New South Wales. They are protected under the Biodiversity Conservation Act and it is an offence to harm them,” Mr Saxon said.

The department is partnering with the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) to inform the community about risks associated with improper storage and use of pesticides. Director of Regulatory Operations Cate Woods said the use of Dieldrin has been banned in Australia since 1987, noting that it can accumulate in native animals and livestock and contaminate soil for decades.

“This is a good reminder to check areas of your property where old pesticide or chemical stocks may be forgotten and dispose of them lawfully,” Ms Wood said.

“Any old stocks of organochlorine pesticides like Dieldrin should be stored securely and properly labelled until they can be safely disposed of at a Household Chemical CleanOut event.

“These events accept household quantities up to a maximum of 20 litres or 20 kilograms of a single chemical or item. They are free services held across New South Wales.

“The next Household Chemical Clean Out Event in the Shoalhaven is this Sunday, 28 August, 9 am–3 pm at the Woollamia Council Works Depot, 3 Erina Road Woollamia.

“We much prefer that people come forward and dispose of these chemicals or poisons correctly, rather than try to dispose of them another way that may end up harming our environment and wildlife,” Ms Wood said.

The department would like to thank the team at Wildlife Rescue South Coast, North Nowra Veterinary Hospital, Taronga Zoo and volunteers who helped recover and identify the cause of death for these flying-foxes

June 2021: Malar Exports (India). Breaching Australian MRL’s: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Metalaxyl

Malar Exports (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Metalaxyl

28/6/21: Betel leaves - Malar Exports (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim Detected - not permitted in this food

28/6/21: Betel leaves - Malar Exports (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.18mg/kg

28/6/21: Betel leaves - Malar Exports (India) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.05mg/kg

28/6/21: Betel leaves - Malar Exports (India) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.49mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Malar Exports (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Metalaxyl

28/6/21: Betel leaves – Malar Exports (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim Detected – not permitted in this food

28/6/21: Betel leaves – Malar Exports (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.18mg/kg

28/6/21: Betel leaves – Malar Exports (India) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.05mg/kg

28/6/21: Betel leaves – Malar Exports (India) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.49mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/6/21: Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Difenconazole, Metalaxyl, Cyhalothrin

Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole, Metalaxyl, Cyhalothrin

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.1mg/kg 

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.1mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.16mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.15mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen mixed chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.14mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen mixed chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.07mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen green chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.06mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen green chilli - Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin Detected, not permitted in this food

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole, Metalaxyl, Cyhalothrin

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.1mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.1mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.16mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen red chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.15mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen mixed chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.14mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen mixed chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.07mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen green chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.06mg/kg

1/6/21: Frozen green chilli – Nguyen Thanh lep Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin Detected, not permitted in this food

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

18/5/21: Shenzhen J.F.Li Fruit Co Ltd (China), breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Shenzhen J.F.Li Fruit Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

18/5/21: Pear - Shenzhen J.F.Li Fruit Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin Detected - not permitted in this food

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Shenzhen J.F.Li Fruit Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

18/5/21: Pear – Shenzhen J.F.Li Fruit Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin Detected – not permitted in this food

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

21/5/21: D & T Green Foods (Vietnam), breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Difenconazole

D & T Green Foods Ltd (Vietnam) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole

21/5/21: Frozen Red Chilli - D & T Green Foods Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.055mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

D & T Green Foods Ltd (Vietnam) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole

21/5/21: Frozen Red Chilli – D & T Green Foods Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.055mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021: Benz Exports (India). Breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Profenofos, Cypermethrin

Benz Exports  (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Profenfos

14/5/21: Spinach - Benz Exports (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos. 0.074mg/kg

14/5/21: Broad bean pods - Benz Exports (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos. 0.072mg/kg

2/9/21: Whole broad beans - Benz Exports (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin. 0.07mg/kg

2/9/21: Whole broad beans - Benz Exports (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos. 0.17mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Benz Exports  (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Profenfos, Cypermethrin

14/5/21: Spinach – Benz Exports (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos. 0.074mg/kg

14/5/21: Broad bean pods – Benz Exports (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos. 0.072mg/kg

2/9/21: Whole broad beans – Benz Exports (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin. 0.07mg/kg

2/9/21: Whole broad beans – Benz Exports (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos. 0.17mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

10/5/21: M. Mandoor and Co Pak, breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Propargite

M. Mandoor and Co Pak Ltd  (Pakistan) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Propargite

10/5/21: Raisins - M. Mandoor & Co Pak Ltd (Pakistan) - Pesticide: Propargite. Not permitted in this food.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

M. Mandoor and Co Pak Ltd  (Pakistan) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Propargite

10/5/21: Raisins – M. Mandoor & Co Pak Ltd (Pakistan) – Pesticide: Propargite. Not permitted in this food.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

14/4/21: Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China), breaching Australian MRL’s for Thiamethoxam, Difenconazole

Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiamethoxam, Difenconazole

14/4/21: Snow Peas - Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.02mg/kg.

14/4/21: Snow Peas - Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.08mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiamethoxam, Difenconazole

14/4/21: Snow Peas – Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.02mg/kg.

14/4/21: Snow Peas – Yongzhou Huiyou Agriculture Development Limited Company (China) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.08mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021: Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd. Breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Thiamethoxam, Carbendazim

Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiamethoxam

1/4/21: Raisins Sultana - Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.25mg/kg.

20/4/21: Raisins - Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.5mg/kg.

28/6/21: Raisin sultana - Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.19mg/kg.

28/6/21: Raisin sultana - Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.28mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiamethoxam, Carbendazim

1/4/21: Raisins Sultana – Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.25mg/kg.

20/4/21: Raisins – Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.5mg/kg.

28/6/21: Raisin sultana – Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.19mg/kg.

28/6/21: Raisin sultana – Patidar Exports Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.28mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

16/3/21: Dakahlia (Egypt). Breaching Australian MRL for Mandarins. Pesticide: Pendimethalin

Dakahlia Group (Egypt) - Food breaching Australian MRL for: Pendimethalin

16/3/21: Mandarins - Dakahlia (Egypt) - Pesticide: Pendimethalin 0.08mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Dakahlia (Egypt) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Pendimethalin

16/3/21: Mandarins – Dakahlia (Egypt) – Pesticide: Pendimethalin 0.08mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

16/2/21: Eastern Condiments (India). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol

Eastern Condiments (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: 2-Phenylphenol

16/2/21: Cambodge tamarind fruit - Eastern Condiments Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol. 0.37mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Eastern Condiments (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: 2-Phenylphenol

16/2/21: Cambodge tamarind fruit – Eastern Condiments Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol. 0.37mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021 February: JM Exports Tonga, breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Acephate

JM Exports (Tonga) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate

9/2/21: Frozen Yam - JM Exports (Tonga) - Pesticide: Acephate. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

JM Exports (Tonga) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate

9/2/21: Frozen Yam – JM Exports (Tonga) – Pesticide: Acephate. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021: Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol

Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: 2-Phenylphenol

8/2/21: Goraka Fruit - Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka) - Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol. Detected. 0.37mg/kg

4/6/21: Goraka Fruit - Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka) - Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol. Detected. 0.22mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: 2-Phenylphenol

8/2/21: Goraka Fruit – Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka) – Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol. Detected. 0.37mg/kg

4/6/21: Goraka Fruit – Jayalanka Supplier (Sri Lanka) – Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol. Detected. 0.22mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

8/2/21: Guangzhou Meixiang Yang Catering Management Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Guangzhou Meixiang Yang Catering Management Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

8/2/21: Dried Longan - Guangzhou Meixiang Yang Catering Management Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim. Detected. Not permitted in this product

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Guangzhou Meixiang Yang Catering Management Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

8/2/21: Dried Longan – Guangzhou Meixiang Yang Catering Management Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim. Detected. Not permitted in this product

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

February 2021: PDS FZE (United Arab Emirates). Breaching Australian MRL for Cypermethrin

PDS FZE (United Arab Emirates) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL for: Cypermethrin

1/2/21: Dried Fig - PDS (FZE) (United Arab Emirates): Cypermethrin 0.27mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

PDS FZE (United Arab Emirates) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL for: Cypermethrin

1/2/21: Dried Fig – PDS (FZE) (United Arab Emirates): Cypermethrin 0.27mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2021 January: Nolka Limited (Papua New Guinea). Breaching Australian MRL for Cyhalothrin

Nolka Limited (Papua New Guinea) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL for: Cyhalothrin

25/1/21: Chilli - Nolka Limited (Papua New Guinea): Cyhalothrin Detected. Not permitted in this food.

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Nolka Limited (Papua New Guinea) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL for: Cyhalothrin

25/1/21: Chilli – Nolka Limited (Papua New Guinea): Cyhalothrin Detected. Not permitted in this food.

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2021 January: SPN Exports (India). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Carbendazim, Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos, Fipronil, Metalaxyl

SPN Exports (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Indoxacarb

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1a - SPN Exports (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1a - SPN Exports (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 5.5225 mg/kg.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1b - SPN Exports (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1b - SPN Exports (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1b - SPN Exports (India) - Pesticide: Fipronil Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1a - SPN Exports (India) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.4039 mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

SPN Exports (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Indoxacarb

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1a – SPN Exports (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1a – SPN Exports (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 5.5225 mg/kg.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1b – SPN Exports (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1b – SPN Exports (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1b – SPN Exports (India) – Pesticide: Fipronil Detected not permitted in this food.

18/1/21: Fresh betel leaves line 1a – SPN Exports (India) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.4039 mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021 January: Orange for Agricultural Crops (Egypt) breaching Australian MRL for Indoxacarb

Orange for Agricultural Crops (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Indoxacarb

15/1/21: Fresh Lemons (Egypt) - Orange for  Agricultural Crops (Egypt) - Pesticide: Indoxacarb 1.16mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Orange for Agricultural Crops (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Indoxacarb

15/1/21: Fresh Lemons (Egypt) – Orange for  Agricultural Crops (Egypt) – Pesticide: Indoxacarb 1.16mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

202January 2021: Qingdao Oea Foods Co Ltd, breaching Australian MRL for Procymidone

Qingdao Oea Foods Co Ltd. breaching Australian MRL for Procymidone

15/1/21: Frozen Brocolli (China) Qingdao Oea Foods Co Ltd Procymidone Detected not permitted in this food

Qingdao Oea Foods Co Ltd. breaching Australian MRL for Procymidone

15/1/21: Frozen Brocolli (China) Qingdao Oea Foods Co Ltd Procymidone Detected not permitted in this food

January 2021: Goodlife Company Ltd (Vietnam), breaching Australian MRL’s for Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Iprodione, Permethrin

Goodlife Company Ltd. (Vietnam) breaching Australian MRL for Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Iprodione, Permethrin

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Carbendazim Detected. Not permitted in this food.

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Cypermethrin 0.069mg/kg.

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Iprodione 0.16mg/kg.

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Permethrin 0.39mg/kg.

Goodlife Company Ltd. (Vietnam) breaching Australian MRL for Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Iprodione, Permethrin

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Carbendazim Detected. Not permitted in this food.

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Cypermethrin 0.069mg/kg.

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Iprodione 0.16mg/kg.

5/1/21: Dragon Fruit (Vietnam) Goodlife Company Ltd. Permethrin 0.39mg/kg.

December 2020: Anqiu Artisan Agricultural Products Co Ltd. (China) Breaching Australian MRL for Thiabendazole

Anqiu Artisan Agricultural Products Co Ltd. breaching Australian MRL for Thiabendazole

15/12/20: Garlic Shoots (China) Anqiu Artisan Agricultural Products Co Ltd. Thiabendazole 0.28mg/kg

Anqiu Artisan Agricultural Products Co Ltd. breaching Australian MRL for Thiabendazole

15/12/20: Garlic Shoots (China) Anqiu Artisan Agricultural Products Co Ltd. Thiabendazole 0.28mg/kg

26/11/20: Patel Chaturbhai Ranchholdbhai Pulses breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Patel Chaturbhai Ranchhodbhai Pulses Llp breaching Australian MRL for Chlorpyrifos

November 2020: Patel Chaturbhai Ranchhodbhai Pulses Llp breaching Australian MRL for Chlorpyrifos

26/11/20: Toor dal (pea) - Patel Chaturbhai Ranchhodbhai Pulses Llp (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.017mg/kg

Patel Chaturbhai Ranchhodbhai Pulses Llp breaching Australian MRL for Chlorpyrifos

26/11/20: Toor dal (pea) – Patel Chaturbhai Ranchhodbhai Pulses Llp (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.017mg/kg

November 2020: BJ & T Stock Company (Vietnam), breaching MRL’s for Carbendazim, Iprodione

BJ & T Joint Stock Company breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

20/11/20: Frozen Whole Jurian- BJ & T Joint Stock Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.18mg/kg

20/11/20: Frozen Whole Jurian- BJ & T Joint Stock Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Iprodione 0.39mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

BJ & T Joint Stock Company breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

20/11/20: Frozen Whole Jurian- BJ & T Joint Stock Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.18mg/kg

20/11/20: Frozen Whole Jurian- BJ & T Joint Stock Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Iprodione 0.39mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

October 2020: Jay Keshav Exports breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Jay Keshav Exports Pvt Ltd breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

7/10/20: Manuka Sultana Currant - Jay Keshav Exports Pvt Ltd  (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.66mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Jay Keshav Exports Pvt Ltd breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

7/10/20: Manuka Sultana Currant – Jay Keshav Exports Pvt Ltd  (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.66mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

October 2020: Micson Food Processing (China). Breaching Australian MRL’s

Micson Food Processing breaching Australian MRL's for: Cypermethrin, Propargite

7/10/20: Pitted Red Dates - Micson Food Processing (China) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.15mg/kg

7/10/20: Pitted Red Dates - Micson Food Processing (China) - Pesticide: Propargite 0.073mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Micson Food Processing breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cypermethrin, Propargite

7/10/20: Pitted Red Dates – Micson Food Processing (China) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.15mg/kg

7/10/20: Pitted Red Dates – Micson Food Processing (China) – Pesticide: Propargite 0.073mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

13/3/19: Bool Lagoon South Australia. Helicopter Spraying Accident

13/3/19: Bool Lagoon South Australia

Wirestrike involving a Robinson R44, VH-ZWK, 20 km from Naracoorte, South Australia, on 13 March 2019

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2019/aair/ao-2019-011/

What happened

On 13 March 2019, a Robinson R44 helicopter, registered VH-ZWK and operated by Helifarm, was conducting aerial spraying operations at Bool Lagoon, around 20 km south of Naracoorte, South Australia.

While spraying along a drainage channel, the helicopter pilot momentarily forgot about the location of a powerline spanning the channel, as he manoeuvred the helicopter over a bridge. The helicopter collided with the powerline, then crashed into the ground. The helicopter was destroyed and the pilot sustained minor injuries.

What the ATSB found

The helicopter pilot momentarily lost awareness of the powerline as he manoeuvred over the bridge. Nearby vegetation, which reduced the pilot’s ability to see the power poles and visually identify the powerline, probably reduced the pilot’s ability to maintain this awareness. The operator had a number of policies and procedures to support pilots’ powerline awareness, and it may not be possible to completely mitigate the risk of wirestrike during repeated low-level flying near powerlines.

As a result of this momentary loss of awareness, the helicopter collided with the powerline, which led to a collision with terrain. The bladder-type fuel tank installed in the accident helicopter, as compared to an all-aluminium fuel tank, probably reduced the risk of a post-accident fire.

What's been done as a result

The operator has implemented new policies and procedures to increase pilots’ awareness of powerlines during spraying operations, particularly spraying of drains. These include improved maps and other planning documents for drain spraying operations involving flying near powerlines, and increased training of helicopter pilots engaged in these operations.

Safety message

This accident provides another reminder of the dangers posed by powerlines during low-level spraying operations.

The ATSB has released, in association with the Aerial Application Association of Australia (AAAA), an educational booklet, Wirestrikes involving known wires: A manageable aerial agriculture hazard (AR-2011-028). This booklet contains numerous wirestrike accidents and lessons learned from them. The AAAA has now launched its Powerline Safety Program that aims to encourage and facilitate power companies to improve aviation safety. The program includes marking of powerlines by powerline network operators (with a marker in accordance with Australian Standard AS 3891-2) wherever it is requested by a pilot, aviation company or landholder.

As this accident highlights, there may be limits to the extent to which operators can mitigate the risk of wirestrike during repeated low-level operations near powerlines. Helicopter wirestrike protection (WSPS) can provide a last line of defence in the event of a wirestrike. Some aircraft selected for aerial agriculture operations can be configured to include WSPS. However, this technology is not currently available on smaller helicopters such as the R44.

Pilots and operators involved in low-level spraying are also reminded that flight helmets can reduce the risk of serious injury in the event of an accident.

13/3/19: Bool Lagoon South Australia

Wirestrike involving a Robinson R44, VH-ZWK, 20 km from Naracoorte, South Australia, on 13 March 2019

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2019/aair/ao-2019-011/

What happened

On 13 March 2019, a Robinson R44 helicopter, registered VH-ZWK and operated by Helifarm, was conducting aerial spraying operations at Bool Lagoon, around 20 km south of Naracoorte, South Australia.

While spraying along a drainage channel, the helicopter pilot momentarily forgot about the location of a powerline spanning the channel, as he manoeuvred the helicopter over a bridge. The helicopter collided with the powerline, then crashed into the ground. The helicopter was destroyed and the pilot sustained minor injuries.

What the ATSB found

The helicopter pilot momentarily lost awareness of the powerline as he manoeuvred over the bridge. Nearby vegetation, which reduced the pilot’s ability to see the power poles and visually identify the powerline, probably reduced the pilot’s ability to maintain this awareness. The operator had a number of policies and procedures to support pilots’ powerline awareness, and it may not be possible to completely mitigate the risk of wirestrike during repeated low-level flying near powerlines.

As a result of this momentary loss of awareness, the helicopter collided with the powerline, which led to a collision with terrain. The bladder-type fuel tank installed in the accident helicopter, as compared to an all-aluminium fuel tank, probably reduced the risk of a post-accident fire.

What’s been done as a result

The operator has implemented new policies and procedures to increase pilots’ awareness of powerlines during spraying operations, particularly spraying of drains. These include improved maps and other planning documents for drain spraying operations involving flying near powerlines, and increased training of helicopter pilots engaged in these operations.

Safety message

This accident provides another reminder of the dangers posed by powerlines during low-level spraying operations.

The ATSB has released, in association with the Aerial Application Association of Australia (AAAA), an educational booklet, Wirestrikes involving known wires: A manageable aerial agriculture hazard (AR-2011-028). This booklet contains numerous wirestrike accidents and lessons learned from them. The AAAA has now launched its Powerline Safety Program that aims to encourage and facilitate power companies to improve aviation safety. The program includes marking of powerlines by powerline network operators (with a marker in accordance with Australian Standard AS 3891-2) wherever it is requested by a pilot, aviation company or landholder.

As this accident highlights, there may be limits to the extent to which operators can mitigate the risk of wirestrike during repeated low-level operations near powerlines. Helicopter wirestrike protection (WSPS) can provide a last line of defence in the event of a wirestrike. Some aircraft selected for aerial agriculture operations can be configured to include WSPS. However, this technology is not currently available on smaller helicopters such as the R44.

Pilots and operators involved in low-level spraying are also reminded that flight helmets can reduce the risk of serious injury in the event of an accident.

 

31/7/20: Steam Plains (NSW) Helicopter Accident

31/7/20: Crop Duster Accident near Hay (NSW)

ATSB issues helmet warning in final report on Riverina helicopter crash that killed Dan Slennett

March 14 2022: https://www.areanews.com.au/story/7648207/atsb-issues-safety-warning-in-final-report-on-fatal-helicopter-crash/

Investigators have handed down their final report into the death of a Griffith-based helicopter pilot in a crash near Hay and have called for checks on safety equipment and procedures.

Dan Slennett, aged 34 and originally from Condobolin, suffered fatal injuries on July 31, 2020 when the Robinson R44 Raven helicopter he was piloting sustained significant damage in a crash.

Mr Slennett died three days later at Royal Melbourne Hospital.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) released its report on Friday, which found the helicopter hit a single wire power line and then the ground while Mr Slennett was spraying for weeds at a Steam Plains property, between Conargo and Hay.

"The pilot knew the wire existed and overflew a small section of the target area earlier that morning, but did not conduct an aerial inspection to identify hazards and verify the location of the powerline on the accident flight," the report stated.

"Without the aerial hazard check, the pilot was reliant on seeing the wire during the flight, but was unable to do so in time to avoid the wirestrike."

As a result of the investigation, the ATSB has issued a safety advisory notice to strongly encourage pilots that work at a low altitude to wear a flight helmet and ensure it is properly maintained, fitted and secured with a chin strap.

Mr Slennett was wearing a helmet during the crash but it was not effective in preventing fatal injuries.

"Either the impact forces exceeded the helmet design specifications, or the helmet was not fitted, worn or maintained correctly," the ATSB report stated.

The ATSB found that Mr Slennett's was likely wearing the same helmet when he suffered facial injuries during a crash in 2018 but there was no evidence it had subsequently been inspected or had maintenance.

Mr Slennett was working for Riverina Helicopters at the time of his death, a company that operates out of Griffith Airport.

Riverina Helicopters said it had changed ownership since the crash and was unable to comment.

Investigators were also unable to conclude whether Mr Slennett slipped out of his three-point restraint or was not wearing it, which led to flail injuries during the crash.

The ATSB also found that Mr Slennett had been diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnoea in January 2020 but had not adhered to using a CPAP machine most nights to improve his breathing during sleep.

"The pilot was not effectively managing severe obstructive sleep apnoea, which has been shown can cause impairments in cognitive functions including attention and short-term memory, and increased the risk of the pilot suffering the effects of fatigue," the ATSB report stated.

"It could not be determined whether the pilot was experiencing any impairments associated with the condition.

"The condition had also not been disclosed to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, which prevented oversight of any ongoing safety risk associated with the condition."

31/7/20: Crop Duster Accident near Hay (NSW)

ATSB issues helmet warning in final report on Riverina helicopter crash that killed Dan Slennett

March 14 2022: https://www.areanews.com.au/story/7648207/atsb-issues-safety-warning-in-final-report-on-fatal-helicopter-crash/

Investigators have handed down their final report into the death of a Griffith-based helicopter pilot in a crash near Hay and have called for checks on safety equipment and procedures.

Dan Slennett, aged 34 and originally from Condobolin, suffered fatal injuries on July 31, 2020 when the Robinson R44 Raven helicopter he was piloting sustained significant damage in a crash.

Mr Slennett died three days later at Royal Melbourne Hospital.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) released its report on Friday, which found the helicopter hit a single wire power line and then the ground while Mr Slennett was spraying for weeds at a Steam Plains property, between Conargo and Hay.

“The pilot knew the wire existed and overflew a small section of the target area earlier that morning, but did not conduct an aerial inspection to identify hazards and verify the location of the powerline on the accident flight,” the report stated.

“Without the aerial hazard check, the pilot was reliant on seeing the wire during the flight, but was unable to do so in time to avoid the wirestrike.”

As a result of the investigation, the ATSB has issued a safety advisory notice to strongly encourage pilots that work at a low altitude to wear a flight helmet and ensure it is properly maintained, fitted and secured with a chin strap.

Mr Slennett was wearing a helmet during the crash but it was not effective in preventing fatal injuries.

“Either the impact forces exceeded the helmet design specifications, or the helmet was not fitted, worn or maintained correctly,” the ATSB report stated.

The ATSB found that Mr Slennett’s was likely wearing the same helmet when he suffered facial injuries during a crash in 2018 but there was no evidence it had subsequently been inspected or had maintenance.

Mr Slennett was working for Riverina Helicopters at the time of his death, a company that operates out of Griffith Airport.

Riverina Helicopters said it had changed ownership since the crash and was unable to comment.

Investigators were also unable to conclude whether Mr Slennett slipped out of his three-point restraint or was not wearing it, which led to flail injuries during the crash.

The ATSB also found that Mr Slennett had been diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnoea in January 2020 but had not adhered to using a CPAP machine most nights to improve his breathing during sleep.

“The pilot was not effectively managing severe obstructive sleep apnoea, which has been shown can cause impairments in cognitive functions including attention and short-term memory, and increased the risk of the pilot suffering the effects of fatigue,” the ATSB report stated.

“It could not be determined whether the pilot was experiencing any impairments associated with the condition.

“The condition had also not been disclosed to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, which prevented oversight of any ongoing safety risk associated with the condition.”

15/7/22: Fungicide spill – Western Ring Road, Melbourne

Residents warned after chemical spill on major Melbourne road

(according to other media reports 40 tonnes of a fungicide was spilt)

July 15 2022: https://www.9news.com.au/national/truck-crash-chemical-spill-in-tullamarine-melbourne/0be16f28-2a13-40e4-a035-6098170359a2

Local residents have been warned to stay indoors following a chemical spill in Tullamarine, Melbourne.
 
A truck carrying hazardous pesticides crashed over a freeway embankment and was left hanging, with the driver trapped, at about 2am on Western Ring Road.
The driver has been rescued and taken to hospital, after he was trapped in the mangled cabin for hours.
 
But the operation is still underway, with pesticide spilled across the road.
An exclusion zone is in place, with people in Tullamarine warned to avoid the area and also to stay indoors.
 
It's expected the mop-up operation could take most of the morning.
 
The truck has still not been removed and the road is closed, with police, fire, ambulance and Rescue Victoria crews on the scene.
Police have said it is an "incredibly delicate" operation.
Drivers this morning are advised to avoid the area, including Caterpillar Road and parts of Melrose Drive.
 
However, the airport should still be accessible through other routes.
Police were unsure as to the causes of the crash, but an investigation is underway.
 

Residents warned after chemical spill on major Melbourne road

(according to other media reports 40 tonnes of a fungicide was spilt)

July 15 2022: https://www.9news.com.au/national/truck-crash-chemical-spill-in-tullamarine-melbourne/0be16f28-2a13-40e4-a035-6098170359a2

Local residents have been warned to stay indoors following a chemical spill in Tullamarine, Melbourne.
A truck carrying hazardous pesticides crashed over a freeway embankment and was left hanging, with the driver trapped, at about 2am on Western Ring Road.
The driver has been rescued and taken to hospital, after he was trapped in the mangled cabin for hours.
But the operation is still underway, with pesticide spilled across the road.
An exclusion zone is in place, with people in Tullamarine warned to avoid the area and also to stay indoors.
It’s expected the mop-up operation could take most of the morning.
The truck has still not been removed and the road is closed, with police, fire, ambulance and Rescue Victoria crews on the scene.
Police have said it is an “incredibly delicate” operation.
Drivers this morning are advised to avoid the area, including Caterpillar Road and parts of Melrose Drive.
However, the airport should still be accessible through other routes.
Police were unsure as to the causes of the crash, but an investigation is underway.

2022 July: Why are pesticides banned overseas still used in Australia…?

Why are pesticides banned overseas still used in Australia and what does it mean for the environment?

British campaigners say Australia uses toxic pesticides prohibited in the UK on health and environmental grounds. Here’s how the countries differ

July 11 2022: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/11/why-are-pesticides-banned-overseas-still-used-in-australia-and-what-does-it-mean-for-the-environment

Environmental campaigners in the UK have expressed concern that a trade deal could result in the importation of Australian food that is produced with pesticides banned there.

The Australia-UK free trade agreement, which was signed last December, has been criticised in the UK as being too liberalised on pesticides. A bill to implement the trade deal has not yet been passed by the UK parliament.

Josie Cohen of Pesticide Action UK told the Guardian last week that Australia uses toxic pesticides that are banned in the UK on health and environmental grounds. “They also permit residue levels many times more than in the UK,” she said.

According to the organisation, Australia authorises the use of 144 highly hazardous pesticides, compared with 73 permitted in the UK.

How do Australia’s pesticide regulations differ from the UK, what pesticides are used in Australia but banned overseas, and what health and environmental impacts do they have?

Banned overseas, permitted in Australia

All pesticides approved for use in Australia are regulated by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). Certain pesticides that are available in Australia are no longer in use overseas.

For example, paraquat, a herbicide used since the 1950s, has been banned in more than 50 countries including the UK. Research has linked it to negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems and it is highly toxic to humans. But in Australia paraquat has been under review by the APVMA since the 1990s and is still used commercially.

A class of substances called neonicotinoids have been used on Australian crops – including cotton, canola and fruit and vegetables – since 1994. Common neonicotinoid substances have been banned in the EU and UK, and restricted in the US and Canada, out of concern for negative impacts on insects – specifically European honeybee populations.

Fipronil, an insect nerve agent, is also banned in the EU and UK to protect honeybees but is approved for use in Australia.

“The scientific information available indicates that managed and wild honeybee populations are not in decline in Australia,” the APVMA stated in 2019, when it began a review into neonicotinoids. But honeybee populations may now be at risk if the deadly varroa mite, detected in the past fortnight in New South Wales, establishes itself in Australia.

Different regulatory approaches

“The risks and benefits of the same pesticide can differ markedly between countries, and this may lead to different regulations,” says Nicholas Buckley, a professor of clinical pharmacology at the University of Sydney. “Various things drive stricter regulation – there’s environmental concerns, chronic effects on human health, from use or food residues, and acute poisoning risks.”

“For some of the pesticides, the concerns relate to the environment and not humans. People are worried about bee toxicity, for example with neonicotinoids and fipronil, which are not very dangerous substances for humans, but kill bees with tiny, tiny exposures,” Buckley says.

“The reason they’re called neonicotinoids is because they act like nicotine, but they’re selective for insects over humans, so they’re less toxic than nicotine [to humans].”

Dr Tanzim Afroz, a lecturer at Edith Cowan University, says Australia’s approach to pesticide regulation is “incautious” compared with UK legislation, which has been influenced by EU policy. “The EU approach is to adopt the ‘precautionary principle’ – where there is scientific uncertainty, take precaution,” she says.

“Australia doesn’t implement the precautionary principle when we’re talking about pesticide management, at the legislative nor at executive level,” Afroz says. Instead, Australia has taken a regulatory approach, which Afroz says stemmed from a belief that “pesticides improve competitiveness and [productivity] of farm businesses”.

“The central purpose of Australian pesticide policy is usually to make pesticides available to those who wish to use them,” Afroz says, noting that approval takes into account specific criteria such as environmental impacts, residues, toxicology and occupational health and safety.

In contrast, a briefing published by the UK parliamentary office of science and technology last September says: “Although pesticides have not yet been established as a definite cause for any chronic health effects, regulatory authorities may withdraw pesticides for use if there is evidence of correlation with health or environmental concerns or significant scientific uncertainty about potential impacts, without the need to prove causality.”

Different environmental factors

Experts have pointed out that pesticide use has benefits in Australia. “Agricultural pesticides have undoubtedly reduced food loss and helped farmers provide the unblemished produce we have grown so used to,” researchers previously wrote in The Conversation.

​​Nigel Andrew, a professor of entomology at the University of New England, describes pesticide use as a “conundrum”, particularly in light of extreme weather events due to climate change.

“If you don’t use pesticides, you do actually have to have a reduction in the quality of food. But also, if you’re using pesticides which are very generalised, they will have unexpected impacts,” he says.

Warming temperatures may result in pest species spreading in Australia from tropical areas, Andrew says. “We will find more species that will become more problematic because their populations might not be pushed back over winter.”

Farming practices differ between the UK and Australia as the result of different environmental factors, he says. “We can have a bigger issue with pest species in terms of taking out major crops … It’s a bigger landscape with more diverse environments.”

 

Why are pesticides banned overseas still used in Australia and what does it mean for the environment?

British campaigners say Australia uses toxic pesticides prohibited in the UK on health and environmental grounds. Here’s how the countries differ

July 11 2022: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/11/why-are-pesticides-banned-overseas-still-used-in-australia-and-what-does-it-mean-for-the-environment

Environmental campaigners in the UK have expressed concern that a trade deal could result in the importation of Australian food that is produced with pesticides banned there.

The Australia-UK free trade agreement, which was signed last December, has been criticised in the UK as being too liberalised on pesticides. A bill to implement the trade deal has not yet been passed by the UK parliament.

Josie Cohen of Pesticide Action UK told the Guardian last week that Australia uses toxic pesticides that are banned in the UK on health and environmental grounds. “They also permit residue levels many times more than in the UK,” she said.

According to the organisation, Australia authorises the use of 144 highly hazardous pesticides, compared with 73 permitted in the UK.

How do Australia’s pesticide regulations differ from the UK, what pesticides are used in Australia but banned overseas, and what health and environmental impacts do they have?

Banned overseas, permitted in Australia

All pesticides approved for use in Australia are regulated by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA). Certain pesticides that are available in Australia are no longer in use overseas.

For example, paraquat, a herbicide used since the 1950s, has been banned in more than 50 countries including the UK. Research has linked it to negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems and it is highly toxic to humans. But in Australia paraquat has been under review by the APVMA since the 1990s and is still used commercially.

A class of substances called neonicotinoids have been used on Australian crops – including cotton, canola and fruit and vegetables – since 1994. Common neonicotinoid substances have been banned in the EU and UK, and restricted in the US and Canada, out of concern for negative impacts on insects – specifically European honeybee populations.

Fipronil, an insect nerve agent, is also banned in the EU and UK to protect honeybees but is approved for use in Australia.

“The scientific information available indicates that managed and wild honeybee populations are not in decline in Australia,” the APVMA stated in 2019, when it began a review into neonicotinoids. But honeybee populations may now be at risk if the deadly varroa mite, detected in the past fortnight in New South Wales, establishes itself in Australia.

Different regulatory approaches

“The risks and benefits of the same pesticide can differ markedly between countries, and this may lead to different regulations,” says Nicholas Buckley, a professor of clinical pharmacology at the University of Sydney. “Various things drive stricter regulation – there’s environmental concerns, chronic effects on human health, from use or food residues, and acute poisoning risks.”

“For some of the pesticides, the concerns relate to the environment and not humans. People are worried about bee toxicity, for example with neonicotinoids and fipronil, which are not very dangerous substances for humans, but kill bees with tiny, tiny exposures,” Buckley says.

“The reason they’re called neonicotinoids is because they act like nicotine, but they’re selective for insects over humans, so they’re less toxic than nicotine [to humans].”

Dr Tanzim Afroz, a lecturer at Edith Cowan University, says Australia’s approach to pesticide regulation is “incautious” compared with UK legislation, which has been influenced by EU policy. “The EU approach is to adopt the ‘precautionary principle’ – where there is scientific uncertainty, take precaution,” she says.

“Australia doesn’t implement the precautionary principle when we’re talking about pesticide management, at the legislative nor at executive level,” Afroz says. Instead, Australia has taken a regulatory approach, which Afroz says stemmed from a belief that “pesticides improve competitiveness and [productivity] of farm businesses”.

“The central purpose of Australian pesticide policy is usually to make pesticides available to those who wish to use them,” Afroz says, noting that approval takes into account specific criteria such as environmental impacts, residues, toxicology and occupational health and safety.

In contrast, a briefing published by the UK parliamentary office of science and technology last September says: “Although pesticides have not yet been established as a definite cause for any chronic health effects, regulatory authorities may withdraw pesticides for use if there is evidence of correlation with health or environmental concerns or significant scientific uncertainty about potential impacts, without the need to prove causality.”

Different environmental factors

Experts have pointed out that pesticide use has benefits in Australia. “Agricultural pesticides have undoubtedly reduced food loss and helped farmers provide the unblemished produce we have grown so used to,” researchers previously wrote in The Conversation.

​​Nigel Andrew, a professor of entomology at the University of New England, describes pesticide use as a “conundrum”, particularly in light of extreme weather events due to climate change.

“If you don’t use pesticides, you do actually have to have a reduction in the quality of food. But also, if you’re using pesticides which are very generalised, they will have unexpected impacts,” he says.

Warming temperatures may result in pest species spreading in Australia from tropical areas, Andrew says. “We will find more species that will become more problematic because their populations might not be pushed back over winter.”

Farming practices differ between the UK and Australia as the result of different environmental factors, he says. “We can have a bigger issue with pest species in terms of taking out major crops … It’s a bigger landscape with more diverse environments.”

 

4/7/2022: NSW Central West Spray Drift

Slow-burning problem’: residual ill will about chemical spray drift

4/7/2022: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/04/slow-burning-problem-residual-ill-will-about-chemical-spray-drift

Farmers in NSW’s central west fear chemical exposure is becoming a threat to food production and authorities are slow to respond.

A tourist barrelling along the highways of the central west might not notice anything wrong with the trees, but grazier Bruce Maynard, who has lived his whole life on the same farm between Trangie and Narromine, believes the land is sick.

The canaries in the coalmine are the bare peppercorn trees at the local golf course. Maynard says they were so dense with foliage in his youth that you couldn’t see through them.

 

He lays out the leaves of native trees – kurrajong, red river gum, bimble box – on his kitchen table, as well as introduced varieties such as yucca; all growing in the New South Wales Orana region, all dotted with the same black necrotic spots.

According to Maynard, the problem has been increasing in severity and rapidity, affecting all vegetation in the area since 2018.

He is a spokesperson for the community overspray groups who believe the passive chemical exposure from cotton farms – which exist in a mosaic among grazing and cropping farms – is a threat to all activities within the affected regions.

Food producers have to certify that their produce has not been exposed to chemicals in ways that would leave residues or cause food risk, Maynard says.

However, producers like him are “trapped” because the vegetation around them indicates chemical exposure is likely to have occurred, yet the responsible authorities are not responding to locals’ reports.

Because the food they produce feeds the nation, and the effect of chemicals on the environment is increasingly recognised as a worldwide public health threat, Maynard says the issue should transcend local concern.

“It’s everybody’s story, not just a bush one any more.”

‘Causal agent’

Last month, Peter Ampt, an adjunct professor in regenerative agriculture at Southern Cross University and an independent consultant, was engaged by the Macquarie Valley Landcare Group to address gatherings in Warren, Trangie and Narromine about conservation.

Ampt says that his observations while in the area on 16 and 17 June were that multiple vegetation species – which should have been growing very strongly after two years of good rainfall – were under stress.

Trees planted only 10 or 15 years ago as carbon sequestration plantings have died in the last five years, “with symptoms of low-level herbicide damage over a period of time leading to that death”, he says.

A report commissioned by the Department of Industry in 2018, obtained via Freedom of Information laws in 2020, states that defoliation in the area was “most likely a result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemical longer distance than would be expected compared to physical droplet spray drift”.

Farmers in NSW’s central west fear chemical exposure is becoming a threat to food production and authorities are slow to respond

A tourist barrelling along the highways of the central west might not notice anything wrong with the trees, but grazier Bruce Maynard, who has lived his whole life on the same farm between Trangie and Narromine, believes the land is sick.

The canaries in the coalmine are the bare peppercorn trees at the local golf course. Maynard says they were so dense with foliage in his youth that you couldn’t see through them.

 

He lays out the leaves of native trees – kurrajong, red river gum, bimble box – on his kitchen table, as well as introduced varieties such as yucca; all growing in the New South Wales Orana region, all dotted with the same black necrotic spots.

According to Maynard, the problem has been increasing in severity and rapidity, affecting all vegetation in the area since 2018.

He is a spokesperson for the community overspray groups who believe the passive chemical exposure from cotton farms – which exist in a mosaic among grazing and cropping farms – is a threat to all activities within the affected regions.

Food producers have to certify that their produce has not been exposed to chemicals in ways that would leave residues or cause food risk, Maynard says.

However, producers like him are “trapped” because the vegetation around them indicates chemical exposure is likely to have occurred, yet the responsible authorities are not responding to locals’ reports.

Because the food they produce feeds the nation, and the effect of chemicals on the environment is increasingly recognised as a worldwide public health threat, Maynard says the issue should transcend local concern.

“It’s everybody’s story, not just a bush one any more.”

‘Causal agent’

Last month, Peter Ampt, an adjunct professor in regenerative agriculture at Southern Cross University and an independent consultant, was engaged by the Macquarie Valley Landcare Group to address gatherings in Warren, Trangie and Narromine about conservation.

Ampt says that his observations while in the area on 16 and 17 June were that multiple vegetation species – which should have been growing very strongly after two years of good rainfall – were under stress.

Trees planted only 10 or 15 years ago as carbon sequestration plantings have died in the last five years, “with symptoms of low-level herbicide damage over a period of time leading to that death”, he says.

A report commissioned by the Department of Industry in 2018, obtained via Freedom of Information laws in 2020, states that defoliation in the area was “most likely a result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemical longer distance than would be expected compared to physical droplet spray drift”.

The latest report commissioned by Macquarie Valley Landcare Group, which Maynard is affiliated with, was published in 2021 by the ecologist David Goldney, an adjunct professor at Charles Sturt University in Bathurst.

Goldney said in his opinion, “there is a prima facie case that herbicide drift, particularly in the Autumn period prior to cotton harvesting, is very likely the causal agent in initiating the widespread dieback of native and non-native vegetation in the Narromine–Trangie area”.

A spokesperson for Cotton Australia told the Guardian that their organisation “works closely with relevant government departments in educating, training, and promoting best practice to all farmers in relation to the effective and safe application of chemicals”.

They also highlighted that over 20 different crops are grown in the Narromine/Trangie area, “most of which use agricultural chemicals under strict protocols and regulations”.

Sal Ceeney, a cereal and cotton farmer in Warren, who also works in stewardship for Cotton Australia, said cotton growers ensure chemical application is conducted to “a really high standard”.

“We live in this community, we live in the environment, as well as everybody else here. So we’re all trying to do the best to make sure that the chemicals that are used are done so responsibly.”

Ceeney says unintended spray drift is a concern for all agricultural industries which use the chemical sprays common in modern agriculture.

According to Ampt, the increased number of weeds due to the rain this season leads to an increased frequency and a range of herbicides used to control them, and consequently an increased risk of drift onto neighbouring areas.

‘Evidenced-based response’

Maynard says stakeholders have been trying for over four years to engage with the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) about the issue, but the response has consistently been inadequate.

Steve Fuller of the Crop Pollination Association said that honey contamination due to spray drift from cotton was a problem.

“When we do report a spraying … to the EPA, we get told it’s not their issue, it’s to go to another area,” he says.

“When we go to another area, we keep on getting told it’s an EPA issue.”

On 3 May 2021 Narromine free range, pastured and chemical-free egg farmer Colin Hamilton noticed burn spots on leaves and a quarter of his grass die where his hens run, and reported the event to the EPA.

“They didn’t follow up on that at all,” he said.

“Because I couldn’t accurately say who was spraying and where it came from, they wouldn’t do any more work on it.”

Ampt says that while “people that know the landscape well are better able to understand what the impact is, what I suspect is happening is that people are not seeing the problem because it’s a slow-burning problem”.

An EPA spokesperson told the Guardian that “the EPA has actively investigated the potential link between spray drift and alleged defoliation of peppercorn trees in the Narromine and Trangie (Macquarie Valley) area”.

“The EPA investigates all reports made to the environment line, but to date has not found enough evidence to link pesticide overspray or drift with defoliation.”

 

In 2020, the EPA commenced a broad-scale pilot pesticide monitoring campaign within the Gilgandra, Narromine and Warren local government areas in response to concerns being raised regarding pesticide drift.

The EPA spokesperson told the Guardian that the results to date show that ethephon, the only pesticide detected that is primarily used for cotton defoliation, was detected on two of 71 occasions when samples were collected.

The spokesperson said that the program was disrupted by Covid, but will continue in the Macquarie Valley for the 2022-23 season and be extended to the Narrabri cotton area (Namoi Valley), to examine the scope of the spray drift problem and develop an evidence-based response.

Connecting dots

On December 16 2021, Maynard and other stakeholders, including Landcare and the Nature Conservation Council, held an online meeting with several senior representatives of the EPA, including the then CEO Tracy Mackey.

Jo Immig, the coordinator of the National Toxics Network, expressed her disappointment with the EPA’s lack of action at the meeting.

At the time, Immig said, “the reality is that spray drift is occurring every day. It’s contaminating parts of the environment. It’s getting everywhere. But on your watch, nothing’s happening about it.”

“The implications, I think, if they actually joined dots together, are enormous,” she told the Guardian.

“It fundamentally means we have to rethink the way that so much agriculture is done.

“It’s as confronting as having to think about not using fossil fuels any more. As a result, it ends up in grey area all the time, which is the too hard basket.”

The EPA was approached for comment on the content of the meeting.

Slow-burning problem’: residual ill will about chemical spray drift

4/7/2022: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/jul/04/slow-burning-problem-residual-ill-will-about-chemical-spray-drift

Farmers in NSW’s central west fear chemical exposure is becoming a threat to food production and authorities are slow to respond.

A tourist barrelling along the highways of the central west might not notice anything wrong with the trees, but grazier Bruce Maynard, who has lived his whole life on the same farm between Trangie and Narromine, believes the land is sick.

The canaries in the coalmine are the bare peppercorn trees at the local golf course. Maynard says they were so dense with foliage in his youth that you couldn’t see through them.

He lays out the leaves of native trees – kurrajong, red river gum, bimble box – on his kitchen table, as well as introduced varieties such as yucca; all growing in the New South Wales Orana region, all dotted with the same black necrotic spots.

According to Maynard, the problem has been increasing in severity and rapidity, affecting all vegetation in the area since 2018.

He is a spokesperson for the community overspray groups who believe the passive chemical exposure from cotton farms – which exist in a mosaic among grazing and cropping farms – is a threat to all activities within the affected regions.

Food producers have to certify that their produce has not been exposed to chemicals in ways that would leave residues or cause food risk, Maynard says.

However, producers like him are “trapped” because the vegetation around them indicates chemical exposure is likely to have occurred, yet the responsible authorities are not responding to locals’ reports.

Because the food they produce feeds the nation, and the effect of chemicals on the environment is increasingly recognised as a worldwide public health threat, Maynard says the issue should transcend local concern.

“It’s everybody’s story, not just a bush one any more.”

‘Causal agent’

Last month, Peter Ampt, an adjunct professor in regenerative agriculture at Southern Cross University and an independent consultant, was engaged by the Macquarie Valley Landcare Group to address gatherings in Warren, Trangie and Narromine about conservation.

Ampt says that his observations while in the area on 16 and 17 June were that multiple vegetation species – which should have been growing very strongly after two years of good rainfall – were under stress.

Trees planted only 10 or 15 years ago as carbon sequestration plantings have died in the last five years, “with symptoms of low-level herbicide damage over a period of time leading to that death”, he says.

A report commissioned by the Department of Industry in 2018, obtained via Freedom of Information laws in 2020, states that defoliation in the area was “most likely a result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemical longer distance than would be expected compared to physical droplet spray drift”.

Farmers in NSW’s central west fear chemical exposure is becoming a threat to food production and authorities are slow to respond

A tourist barrelling along the highways of the central west might not notice anything wrong with the trees, but grazier Bruce Maynard, who has lived his whole life on the same farm between Trangie and Narromine, believes the land is sick.

The canaries in the coalmine are the bare peppercorn trees at the local golf course. Maynard says they were so dense with foliage in his youth that you couldn’t see through them.

He lays out the leaves of native trees – kurrajong, red river gum, bimble box – on his kitchen table, as well as introduced varieties such as yucca; all growing in the New South Wales Orana region, all dotted with the same black necrotic spots.

According to Maynard, the problem has been increasing in severity and rapidity, affecting all vegetation in the area since 2018.

He is a spokesperson for the community overspray groups who believe the passive chemical exposure from cotton farms – which exist in a mosaic among grazing and cropping farms – is a threat to all activities within the affected regions.

Food producers have to certify that their produce has not been exposed to chemicals in ways that would leave residues or cause food risk, Maynard says.

However, producers like him are “trapped” because the vegetation around them indicates chemical exposure is likely to have occurred, yet the responsible authorities are not responding to locals’ reports.

Because the food they produce feeds the nation, and the effect of chemicals on the environment is increasingly recognised as a worldwide public health threat, Maynard says the issue should transcend local concern.

“It’s everybody’s story, not just a bush one any more.”

‘Causal agent’

Last month, Peter Ampt, an adjunct professor in regenerative agriculture at Southern Cross University and an independent consultant, was engaged by the Macquarie Valley Landcare Group to address gatherings in Warren, Trangie and Narromine about conservation.

Ampt says that his observations while in the area on 16 and 17 June were that multiple vegetation species – which should have been growing very strongly after two years of good rainfall – were under stress.

Trees planted only 10 or 15 years ago as carbon sequestration plantings have died in the last five years, “with symptoms of low-level herbicide damage over a period of time leading to that death”, he says.

A report commissioned by the Department of Industry in 2018, obtained via Freedom of Information laws in 2020, states that defoliation in the area was “most likely a result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemical longer distance than would be expected compared to physical droplet spray drift”.

The latest report commissioned by Macquarie Valley Landcare Group, which Maynard is affiliated with, was published in 2021 by the ecologist David Goldney, an adjunct professor at Charles Sturt University in Bathurst.

Goldney said in his opinion, “there is a prima facie case that herbicide drift, particularly in the Autumn period prior to cotton harvesting, is very likely the causal agent in initiating the widespread dieback of native and non-native vegetation in the Narromine–Trangie area”.

A spokesperson for Cotton Australia told the Guardian that their organisation “works closely with relevant government departments in educating, training, and promoting best practice to all farmers in relation to the effective and safe application of chemicals”.

They also highlighted that over 20 different crops are grown in the Narromine/Trangie area, “most of which use agricultural chemicals under strict protocols and regulations”.

Sal Ceeney, a cereal and cotton farmer in Warren, who also works in stewardship for Cotton Australia, said cotton growers ensure chemical application is conducted to “a really high standard”.

“We live in this community, we live in the environment, as well as everybody else here. So we’re all trying to do the best to make sure that the chemicals that are used are done so responsibly.”

Ceeney says unintended spray drift is a concern for all agricultural industries which use the chemical sprays common in modern agriculture.

According to Ampt, the increased number of weeds due to the rain this season leads to an increased frequency and a range of herbicides used to control them, and consequently an increased risk of drift onto neighbouring areas.

‘Evidenced-based response’

Maynard says stakeholders have been trying for over four years to engage with the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) about the issue, but the response has consistently been inadequate.

Steve Fuller of the Crop Pollination Association said that honey contamination due to spray drift from cotton was a problem.

“When we do report a spraying … to the EPA, we get told it’s not their issue, it’s to go to another area,” he says.

“When we go to another area, we keep on getting told it’s an EPA issue.”

On 3 May 2021 Narromine free range, pastured and chemical-free egg farmer Colin Hamilton noticed burn spots on leaves and a quarter of his grass die where his hens run, and reported the event to the EPA.

“They didn’t follow up on that at all,” he said.

“Because I couldn’t accurately say who was spraying and where it came from, they wouldn’t do any more work on it.”

Ampt says that while “people that know the landscape well are better able to understand what the impact is, what I suspect is happening is that people are not seeing the problem because it’s a slow-burning problem”.

An EPA spokesperson told the Guardian that “the EPA has actively investigated the potential link between spray drift and alleged defoliation of peppercorn trees in the Narromine and Trangie (Macquarie Valley) area”.

“The EPA investigates all reports made to the environment line, but to date has not found enough evidence to link pesticide overspray or drift with defoliation.”

In 2020, the EPA commenced a broad-scale pilot pesticide monitoring campaign within the Gilgandra, Narromine and Warren local government areas in response to concerns being raised regarding pesticide drift.

The EPA spokesperson told the Guardian that the results to date show that ethephon, the only pesticide detected that is primarily used for cotton defoliation, was detected on two of 71 occasions when samples were collected.

The spokesperson said that the program was disrupted by Covid, but will continue in the Macquarie Valley for the 2022-23 season and be extended to the Narrabri cotton area (Namoi Valley), to examine the scope of the spray drift problem and develop an evidence-based response.

Connecting dots

On December 16 2021, Maynard and other stakeholders, including Landcare and the Nature Conservation Council, held an online meeting with several senior representatives of the EPA, including the then CEO Tracy Mackey.

Jo Immig, the coordinator of the National Toxics Network, expressed her disappointment with the EPA’s lack of action at the meeting.

At the time, Immig said, “the reality is that spray drift is occurring every day. It’s contaminating parts of the environment. It’s getting everywhere. But on your watch, nothing’s happening about it.”

“The implications, I think, if they actually joined dots together, are enormous,” she told the Guardian.

“It fundamentally means we have to rethink the way that so much agriculture is done.

“It’s as confronting as having to think about not using fossil fuels any more. As a result, it ends up in grey area all the time, which is the too hard basket.”

The EPA was approached for comment on the content of the meeting.

2015/20: Ingham (Qld) Drinking Water Bore Water. Pesticides: Atrazine, 2,4-D, Dalapon, Imidacloprid, Desethylatrazine, Hexazinone

Ingham (Qld) Water Supply. Groundwater Bores

Pesticide Residue Analysis
Pesticide residue analysis occurs every 12 months for both untreated and treated samples. Herbicides including, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine and Hexazinone, have been recorded to have greater values than <0.1 μg/L, but have not exceeded the ADWG.

Hinchinbrook Shire Council

Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2021

HIN 995 Groundwater

14/1/15: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

HIN 996 Groundwater

14/1/15: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

HIN 1327 Groundwater

20/3/19: 2,4-D 0.15ug/L, Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 0.4ug//L

HIN 1328 Groundwater

20/3/19: Imadacloprid 0.12ug/L, Atrazine 0.03ug/L, DesethylAtrazine 0.01ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

HIN 1330 Groundwater

20/3/19: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 0.2ug//L, Hexazinone 0.01ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L

HIN 1331 Groundwater

20/3/19: Imidacloprid 0.1ug/L, Atrazine 0.03ug/L, DesethylAtrazine 0.01ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

HIN 1378 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.08ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

HIN 1379 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

HIN 1380 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.08ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

HIN 1381 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.17ug/L, Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.05ug/L

HIN 1212 Groundwater

11/1/18: Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L

HIN 1213 Groundwater

11/1/18: Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L

Ingham (Qld) Water Supply. Groundwater Bores

Pesticide Residue Analysis
Pesticide residue analysis occurs every 12 months for both untreated and treated samples. Herbicides including, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine and Hexazinone, have been recorded to have greater values than <0.1 μg/L, but have not exceeded the ADWG.

Hinchinbrook Shire Council

Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2021

HIN 995 Groundwater

14/1/15: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

HIN 996 Groundwater

14/1/15: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

HIN 1327 Groundwater

20/3/19: 2,4-D 0.15ug/L, Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 0.4ug//L

HIN 1328 Groundwater

20/3/19: Imadacloprid 0.12ug/L, Atrazine 0.03ug/L, DesethylAtrazine 0.01ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

HIN 1330 Groundwater

20/3/19: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 0.2ug//L, Hexazinone 0.01ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L

HIN 1331 Groundwater

20/3/19: Imidacloprid 0.1ug/L, Atrazine 0.03ug/L, DesethylAtrazine 0.01ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

HIN 1378 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.08ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L

HIN 1379 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

HIN 1380 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.08ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L

HIN 1381 Groundwater

25/3/20: Imidacloprid 0.17ug/L, Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.05ug/L

HIN 1212 Groundwater

11/1/18: Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L

HIN 1213 Groundwater

11/1/18: Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L

February 22 2022: Spray Drift Clare (South Australia)

GPSA issues spray-drift warning to growers

Feb 22 2022 (Grain Central)

GRAIN Producers South Australia (GPSA) has warned growers that deliberately ignoring spraying laws could result in fines of up to $35,000 per offence following reports of damage to vineyards in Clare and the Riverland.

GPSA chair Adrian McCabe said the vast majority of grain growers did the right thing and followed the rules as outlined in GPSA’s Hit Your Target campaign.

“Most grain growers in South Australia implement a spraying program safely with consideration of weather conditions, other landholders, households in rural areas and crop types to minimise the risk of off-target spray damage,” Mr McCabe said.

“Grain growers who are deliberately ignoring the considerations of other crops when spraying could receive a maximum penalty of $35,000 per offence, reflecting the seriousness of not following mandatory label instructions.

“It makes good agronomic sense to stay on top of summer weeds through summer spraying to preserve moisture and nitrogen for the 2022 growing season and to prevent seed set for future years.”

Mr McCabe said with rising cost of inputs, particularly herbicides, growers would want to make sure they were getting the best results from their spray applications and not wasting any chemicals.

“However, in doing so, growers must adopt best-practice strategies and equipment to ensure spray drift doesn’t occur that results in damage to other people’s livelihoods.

“Grain growers need to make sure they are spraying safely and following the directions on the product label at all times, otherwise we risk losing access to important, cost-effective products.”

Mr McCabe said many growers have private on-farm weather stations, and a number of publicly platforms such as the Mid North, Riverland and Mallee Mesonet networks provided growers with information as to whether it was safe to spray.

“It would be prudent to subscribe to the Mesonet network to continue the ongoing maintenance of the multi-million system that provides valuable inversion-layer data to grain growers.”

A Riverland farmer was previously fined $7000 for failing to follow mandatory chemical label instructions as an example of what can happen to a grower not doing the right thing when it came to spraying.

GPSA issues spray-drift warning to growers

Feb 22 2022 (Grain Central)

GRAIN Producers South Australia (GPSA) has warned growers that deliberately ignoring spraying laws could result in fines of up to $35,000 per offence following reports of damage to vineyards in Clare and the Riverland.

GPSA chair Adrian McCabe said the vast majority of grain growers did the right thing and followed the rules as outlined in GPSA’s Hit Your Target campaign.

“Most grain growers in South Australia implement a spraying program safely with consideration of weather conditions, other landholders, households in rural areas and crop types to minimise the risk of off-target spray damage,” Mr McCabe said.

“Grain growers who are deliberately ignoring the considerations of other crops when spraying could receive a maximum penalty of $35,000 per offence, reflecting the seriousness of not following mandatory label instructions.

“It makes good agronomic sense to stay on top of summer weeds through summer spraying to preserve moisture and nitrogen for the 2022 growing season and to prevent seed set for future years.”

Mr McCabe said with rising cost of inputs, particularly herbicides, growers would want to make sure they were getting the best results from their spray applications and not wasting any chemicals.

“However, in doing so, growers must adopt best-practice strategies and equipment to ensure spray drift doesn’t occur that results in damage to other people’s livelihoods.

“Grain growers need to make sure they are spraying safely and following the directions on the product label at all times, otherwise we risk losing access to important, cost-effective products.”

Mr McCabe said many growers have private on-farm weather stations, and a number of publicly platforms such as the Mid North, Riverland and Mallee Mesonet networks provided growers with information as to whether it was safe to spray.

“It would be prudent to subscribe to the Mesonet network to continue the ongoing maintenance of the multi-million system that provides valuable inversion-layer data to grain growers.”

A Riverland farmer was previously fined $7000 for failing to follow mandatory chemical label instructions as an example of what can happen to a grower not doing the right thing when it came to spraying.

 

March 2022: Rockingham (Western Australia). Poisoned Corellas. Pesticide: Fenthion

Corellas poisoned in Perth with banned substance has authorities worried

March 17 2022

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-17/corellas-poisoned-perth-banned-substance/100915922

Nearly 40 corellas have been mysteriously poisoned with a harmful insecticide that has been banned since 2015.

In the past month, 37 birds have been admitted to the WA Wildlife Hospital after being found at Beeliar Oval in Cockburn, south of Perth, with signs of fenthion toxicity.

But according to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), all fenthion-containing products were phased out of the market by late 2015 because they were deemed to pose "undue risks to the environment and to human health" and are no longer available on the Australian market.

Corellas are considered a pest in many parts of WA and, despite many councils and shires imposing control methods on the corella population, WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan labelled the poisoning "abhorrent".

"The department doesn't support ad hoc poisoning on a localised level.

"So even though we might be frustrated, we might be angry that corellas are perhaps waking us up in the morning or chewing on our TV antennas, when we lay poison out other animals can consume that poison and they can succumb to that poison as well."

WA Wildlife's director of operations Dean Huxley said the centre received daily calls or emails from community members who had found dead birds that were showing signs of poisoning.

"When we get these cluster events, that's when we're really concerned," he said.

"In addition to these ones that we're seeing at Beeliar Oval, we have had reports of some birds in Rockingham that have just been found dead [with] very similar signs."

Mr Huxley said it was often difficult to prove animals had been poisoned once they had decomposed in the environment.

"Unfortunately, if the animal does die, we can't always send them off for testing because there are costs involved with that," he said.

"But what we do when we get a cluster event, which is what happened here, we work with the authorities to send animals off for testing and try and get some results and definitive answers."

Mr Huxley said one-third of the corellas with signs of poisoning had survived and recovered.

Authorities stress 'humane' population control

According to the WA Department of Parks and Wildlife, corellas are considered a "low conservation value species" and are not endangered in Western Australia.

"That means you don't actually need a licence to undertake control of corellas in the Perth metropolitan area, subject to local government area [regulations]," WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan said.

"But that's prescribed, and it must be done by firearm.

Mr Swan said the department engaged the WA Local Government Association (WALGA) several years ago to involve local governments in corella population control.

"That's done in a much more organised, controlled fashion where corellas are trapped en masse and euthanased humanely by professional contractors," he said.

Community encouraged to report suspicious behaviour

Mr Swan said the department was interested if the community had any information about "mass mortality events".

"We are probably less concerned about a dead corella here or there — it's those mass mortality events that we're very interested in.

"And we are trying to understand where these poisonings might be taking place because these birds are highly mobile, they can fly many kilometres.

"Just because they've been found at a particular oval, doesn't mean that they're being poisoned or impacted on at that particular site."

The City of Cockburn and the WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development are also investigating the poisoning.

Corellas poisoned in Perth with banned substance has authorities worried

March 17 2022

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-17/corellas-poisoned-perth-banned-substance/100915922

Nearly 40 corellas have been mysteriously poisoned with a harmful insecticide that has been banned since 2015.

In the past month, 37 birds have been admitted to the WA Wildlife Hospital after being found at Beeliar Oval in Cockburn, south of Perth, with signs of fenthion toxicity.

But according to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), all fenthion-containing products were phased out of the market by late 2015 because they were deemed to pose “undue risks to the environment and to human health” and are no longer available on the Australian market.

Corellas are considered a pest in many parts of WA and, despite many councils and shires imposing control methods on the corella population, WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan labelled the poisoning “abhorrent”.

“The department doesn’t support ad hoc poisoning on a localised level.

“So even though we might be frustrated, we might be angry that corellas are perhaps waking us up in the morning or chewing on our TV antennas, when we lay poison out other animals can consume that poison and they can succumb to that poison as well.”

WA Wildlife’s director of operations Dean Huxley said the centre received daily calls or emails from community members who had found dead birds that were showing signs of poisoning.

“When we get these cluster events, that’s when we’re really concerned,” he said.

“In addition to these ones that we’re seeing at Beeliar Oval, we have had reports of some birds in Rockingham that have just been found dead [with] very similar signs.”

Mr Huxley said it was often difficult to prove animals had been poisoned once they had decomposed in the environment.

“Unfortunately, if the animal does die, we can’t always send them off for testing because there are costs involved with that,” he said.

“But what we do when we get a cluster event, which is what happened here, we work with the authorities to send animals off for testing and try and get some results and definitive answers.”

Mr Huxley said one-third of the corellas with signs of poisoning had survived and recovered.

Authorities stress ‘humane’ population control

According to the WA Department of Parks and Wildlife, corellas are considered a “low conservation value species” and are not endangered in Western Australia.

“That means you don’t actually need a licence to undertake control of corellas in the Perth metropolitan area, subject to local government area [regulations],” WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan said.

“But that’s prescribed, and it must be done by firearm.

Mr Swan said the department engaged the WA Local Government Association (WALGA) several years ago to involve local governments in corella population control.

“That’s done in a much more organised, controlled fashion where corellas are trapped en masse and euthanased humanely by professional contractors,” he said.

Community encouraged to report suspicious behaviour

Mr Swan said the department was interested if the community had any information about “mass mortality events”.

“We are probably less concerned about a dead corella here or there — it’s those mass mortality events that we’re very interested in.

“And we are trying to understand where these poisonings might be taking place because these birds are highly mobile, they can fly many kilometres.

“Just because they’ve been found at a particular oval, doesn’t mean that they’re being poisoned or impacted on at that particular site.”

The City of Cockburn and the WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development are also investigating the poisoning.

March 17 2022: Poisoned Corellas, Beeliar Oval, Perth WA. Pesticide: Fenthion

Corellas poisoned in Perth with banned substance has authorities worried

March 17 2022

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-17/corellas-poisoned-perth-banned-substance/100915922

Nearly 40 corellas have been mysteriously poisoned with a harmful insecticide that has been banned since 2015.

In the past month, 37 birds have been admitted to the WA Wildlife Hospital after being found at Beeliar Oval in Cockburn, south of Perth, with signs of fenthion toxicity.

But according to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), all fenthion-containing products were phased out of the market by late 2015 because they were deemed to pose "undue risks to the environment and to human health" and are no longer available on the Australian market.

Corellas are considered a pest in many parts of WA and, despite many councils and shires imposing control methods on the corella population, WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan labelled the poisoning "abhorrent".

"The department doesn't support ad hoc poisoning on a localised level.

"So even though we might be frustrated, we might be angry that corellas are perhaps waking us up in the morning or chewing on our TV antennas, when we lay poison out other animals can consume that poison and they can succumb to that poison as well."

WA Wildlife's director of operations Dean Huxley said the centre received daily calls or emails from community members who had found dead birds that were showing signs of poisoning.

"When we get these cluster events, that's when we're really concerned," he said.

"In addition to these ones that we're seeing at Beeliar Oval, we have had reports of some birds in Rockingham that have just been found dead [with] very similar signs."

Mr Huxley said it was often difficult to prove animals had been poisoned once they had decomposed in the environment.

"Unfortunately, if the animal does die, we can't always send them off for testing because there are costs involved with that," he said.

"But what we do when we get a cluster event, which is what happened here, we work with the authorities to send animals off for testing and try and get some results and definitive answers."

Mr Huxley said one-third of the corellas with signs of poisoning had survived and recovered.

Authorities stress 'humane' population control

According to the WA Department of Parks and Wildlife, corellas are considered a "low conservation value species" and are not endangered in Western Australia.

"That means you don't actually need a licence to undertake control of corellas in the Perth metropolitan area, subject to local government area [regulations]," WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan said.

"But that's prescribed, and it must be done by firearm.

Mr Swan said the department engaged the WA Local Government Association (WALGA) several years ago to involve local governments in corella population control.

"That's done in a much more organised, controlled fashion where corellas are trapped en masse and euthanased humanely by professional contractors," he said.

Community encouraged to report suspicious behaviour

Mr Swan said the department was interested if the community had any information about "mass mortality events".

"We are probably less concerned about a dead corella here or there — it's those mass mortality events that we're very interested in.

"And we are trying to understand where these poisonings might be taking place because these birds are highly mobile, they can fly many kilometres.

"Just because they've been found at a particular oval, doesn't mean that they're being poisoned or impacted on at that particular site."

The City of Cockburn and the WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development are also investigating the poisoning.

Corellas poisoned in Perth with banned substance has authorities worried

March 17 2022

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-17/corellas-poisoned-perth-banned-substance/100915922

Nearly 40 corellas have been mysteriously poisoned with a harmful insecticide that has been banned since 2015.

In the past month, 37 birds have been admitted to the WA Wildlife Hospital after being found at Beeliar Oval in Cockburn, south of Perth, with signs of fenthion toxicity.

But according to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), all fenthion-containing products were phased out of the market by late 2015 because they were deemed to pose “undue risks to the environment and to human health” and are no longer available on the Australian market.

Corellas are considered a pest in many parts of WA and, despite many councils and shires imposing control methods on the corella population, WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan labelled the poisoning “abhorrent”.

“The department doesn’t support ad hoc poisoning on a localised level.

“So even though we might be frustrated, we might be angry that corellas are perhaps waking us up in the morning or chewing on our TV antennas, when we lay poison out other animals can consume that poison and they can succumb to that poison as well.”

WA Wildlife’s director of operations Dean Huxley said the centre received daily calls or emails from community members who had found dead birds that were showing signs of poisoning.

“When we get these cluster events, that’s when we’re really concerned,” he said.

“In addition to these ones that we’re seeing at Beeliar Oval, we have had reports of some birds in Rockingham that have just been found dead [with] very similar signs.”

Mr Huxley said it was often difficult to prove animals had been poisoned once they had decomposed in the environment.

“Unfortunately, if the animal does die, we can’t always send them off for testing because there are costs involved with that,” he said.

“But what we do when we get a cluster event, which is what happened here, we work with the authorities to send animals off for testing and try and get some results and definitive answers.”

Mr Huxley said one-third of the corellas with signs of poisoning had survived and recovered.

Authorities stress ‘humane’ population control

According to the WA Department of Parks and Wildlife, corellas are considered a “low conservation value species” and are not endangered in Western Australia.

“That means you don’t actually need a licence to undertake control of corellas in the Perth metropolitan area, subject to local government area [regulations],” WA Parks and Wildlife Officer Matt Swan said.

“But that’s prescribed, and it must be done by firearm.

Mr Swan said the department engaged the WA Local Government Association (WALGA) several years ago to involve local governments in corella population control.

“That’s done in a much more organised, controlled fashion where corellas are trapped en masse and euthanased humanely by professional contractors,” he said.

Community encouraged to report suspicious behaviour

Mr Swan said the department was interested if the community had any information about “mass mortality events”.

“We are probably less concerned about a dead corella here or there — it’s those mass mortality events that we’re very interested in.

“And we are trying to understand where these poisonings might be taking place because these birds are highly mobile, they can fly many kilometres.

“Just because they’ve been found at a particular oval, doesn’t mean that they’re being poisoned or impacted on at that particular site.”

The City of Cockburn and the WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development are also investigating the poisoning.

January 2022: Chemical concerns over mass bee kill (Sunraysia region, Victoria)

Chemical concerns after mass bee kill

Jan 2 2022

https://www.smh.com.au/national/victoria/chemical-concerns-after-mass-bee-kill-20211206-p59f84.html

Geelong beekeeper John Edmonds used to take his bee hives up to the Sunraysia region on the Murray River every winter to help pollinate the almond farms.

It’s a well-travelled route for beekeepers, with over 277,000 hives placed on almond orchards across Australia during blossom season from August to September each year.

However, Mr Edmonds has kept his bees at home for the past five years, deterred by the low prices paid by almond farmers to beekeepers and by the impact of the pesticides and fungicides used on the almond farms on his bees.

“When we first used to go up 25 years [ago], the bees would go in and they’d come out quite strong,” he said. “But in recent years they have been using more and more chemicals that are detrimental to the bees. I’d come home and for three months after your bees aren’t very good and I like to produce honey that is clean and green and no chemicals so I decided it wasn’t worth it.”

The use of chemicals may have resulted in a mass bee kill on two almond farms in the Sunraysia region this blossom season where millions of bees died.

One beekeeper, who did not want to be identified because he has been threatened with legal proceedings by an almond farmer, said he arrived at one of the farms to pick up his bees in September and found most of them were dead.

“There were piles of dead bees when I arrived, I’m not the only one, there are 30 or 40 beekeepers, which means thousands of hives,” he said. “In a world where insects are some of the most important little creatures in pollinating and providing our food, this sort of damage on this monoculture is just not acceptable.”

Agriculture Victoria has collected samples of dead bees found near a hive at an almond orchard in the Sunraysia region which are being tested for a range of pesticides.

A spokeswoman for Agriculture Victoria said an estimated 277,000 beehives were moved to the Sunraysia region for the 2021 almond pollination season and having such high hive density comes with some biosecurity disease risk.

“As the matter is currently under investigation it is inappropriate to make further comment,” the spokeswoman said. “All complaints received by the department are taken seriously and investigated as appropriate and in accordance with departmental procedures.”

Maximum penalties for chemical misuse offences can be more than $72,000 for a corporation, or $36,000 in any other case

What’s happened in Sunraysia is a familiar story around the world.

In the United States, beekeepers who send their hives to the almond farms have seen their bees die in record numbers with The Guardian reporting 50 billion bees – more than seven times the world’s human population – wiped out in a few months during winter 2018-19.

Beekeepers attribute the high mortality rate to pesticide exposure, diseases from parasites and habitat loss, but environmentalists and organic beekeepers are concerned about the almond industry’s mechanisation of one of nature’s most delicate natural processes.

Australia’s $1.8 billion almond industry is booming driven by our thirst for almond milk and the growth in plant-based eating and non-dairy alternatives.

Almonds have grown from a harvest of 10,000 tonnes in 2003 to one of 120,000 tonnes last year, and Australia is the second biggest producer of the nuts in the world.

It’s increasingly much more lucrative for beekeepers to hire their hives out to pollinate almond orchards than it is to produce honey, with beekeepers receiving just under $150 a hive to put their bees on an almond farm.

However, beekeepers describe working with almond farms as a “David and Goliath” situation where the small beekeepers are powerless.

“These almond growers have multimillion dollars behind them and we are just the little guys trucking our bees, working 18 and 20-hour days during spring and summer just to ensure we’ve got healthy bees,” one

beekeeper says.

Another commercial beekeeper who lost an estimated $600,000 worth of bees in the bee kill, and also wants to remain anonymous because of the threat of legal repercussions, said he has no doubt the bees were killed by fungicide spraying.

However, the beekeeper says the risk of death is one that beekeepers who put their hives on almond farms have signed up for.

It’s like playing with fire,” he says. “If you’re a beekeeper and you hire your bees out basically we’re just gigolos that put the bees out there as if we employed hookers.”

The beekeeper says while it’s devastating for beekeepers to lose their bees, they know the risk.

“Our bees get put in there and the risk is death by insecticide and fungicide,” he said. “That’s just what we get paid for. When you sign up for a pollination contract like that, you’re not going into an organic farm right? So, we know there is risk involved and so you’re basically going to have to wear that.”

He wants people to think more carefully about the impact of almond farming on the bee population.

“I mean cow’s milk is bad because ‘hey you’ve got to kill a calf every year’ and that’s not fashionable anymore,” he says. “It’s one calf, or it’s millions of bees. What would you rather do? What life is worth more?”

 

The Almond Board of Australia is aware of the bee kill and of the beekeepers’ concerns, but chief executive Tim Jackson says it was a one-off.

“It’s an isolated incident,” he says. “If these incidents occur we encourage the beekeepers to report them because we want to make sure that everyone’s compliant and doing the right thing.”

Mr Jackson says it is still unclear whether the kill was a result of the actions of almond farmers or neighbouring farmers.

“There was something like 40 different beekeepers involved in supplying bees to this one particular farm, so it’s really important that those bees are protected because beehive health is important to the almond industry as it is to the beekeeper,” he says.

The Almond Board this year began a partnership with Bee Friendly Farming Australia establishing bee-friendly certification and bee-friendly practices such as planting native flora around orchards to increase biodiversity and recommending only spraying pesticides and fungicides at night when bees are in their hives.

Mr Jackson says he is not sure what the legal consequences are for the beekeepers or almond farmers if an adverse finding is made over the bee kill.

“The long-term ramifications if someone’s doing the wrong thing and the beekeepers aren’t confident, then he’s going to struggle to get bees, so there is a mutual benefit in people behaving correctly,” he says.

He’s also unsure whether any financial compensation is available to the beekeepers.

“The almond industry is pretty lucrative at pollination time for their industry, but at the same time, we understand the importance of making sure those bees go in and go out as healthy as they were,” he says.

Chemical concerns after mass bee kill

Jan 2 2022

https://www.smh.com.au/national/victoria/chemical-concerns-after-mass-bee-kill-20211206-p59f84.html

Geelong beekeeper John Edmonds used to take his bee hives up to the Sunraysia region on the Murray River every winter to help pollinate the almond farms.

It’s a well-travelled route for beekeepers, with over 277,000 hives placed on almond orchards across Australia during blossom season from August to September each year.

However, Mr Edmonds has kept his bees at home for the past five years, deterred by the low prices paid by almond farmers to beekeepers and by the impact of the pesticides and fungicides used on the almond farms on his bees.

“When we first used to go up 25 years [ago], the bees would go in and they’d come out quite strong,” he said. “But in recent years they have been using more and more chemicals that are detrimental to the bees. I’d come home and for three months after your bees aren’t very good and I like to produce honey that is clean and green and no chemicals so I decided it wasn’t worth it.”

The use of chemicals may have resulted in a mass bee kill on two almond farms in the Sunraysia region this blossom season where millions of bees died.

One beekeeper, who did not want to be identified because he has been threatened with legal proceedings by an almond farmer, said he arrived at one of the farms to pick up his bees in September and found most of them were dead.

“There were piles of dead bees when I arrived, I’m not the only one, there are 30 or 40 beekeepers, which means thousands of hives,” he said. “In a world where insects are some of the most important little creatures in pollinating and providing our food, this sort of damage on this monoculture is just not acceptable.”

Agriculture Victoria has collected samples of dead bees found near a hive at an almond orchard in the Sunraysia region which are being tested for a range of pesticides.

A spokeswoman for Agriculture Victoria said an estimated 277,000 beehives were moved to the Sunraysia region for the 2021 almond pollination season and having such high hive density comes with some biosecurity disease risk.

“As the matter is currently under investigation it is inappropriate to make further comment,” the spokeswoman said. “All complaints received by the department are taken seriously and investigated as appropriate and in accordance with departmental procedures.”

Maximum penalties for chemical misuse offences can be more than $72,000 for a corporation, or $36,000 in any other case

What’s happened in Sunraysia is a familiar story around the world.

In the United States, beekeepers who send their hives to the almond farms have seen their bees die in record numbers with The Guardian reporting 50 billion bees – more than seven times the world’s human population – wiped out in a few months during winter 2018-19.

Beekeepers attribute the high mortality rate to pesticide exposure, diseases from parasites and habitat loss, but environmentalists and organic beekeepers are concerned about the almond industry’s mechanisation of one of nature’s most delicate natural processes.

Australia’s $1.8 billion almond industry is booming driven by our thirst for almond milk and the growth in plant-based eating and non-dairy alternatives.

Almonds have grown from a harvest of 10,000 tonnes in 2003 to one of 120,000 tonnes last year, and Australia is the second biggest producer of the nuts in the world.

It’s increasingly much more lucrative for beekeepers to hire their hives out to pollinate almond orchards than it is to produce honey, with beekeepers receiving just under $150 a hive to put their bees on an almond farm.

However, beekeepers describe working with almond farms as a “David and Goliath” situation where the small beekeepers are powerless.

“These almond growers have multimillion dollars behind them and we are just the little guys trucking our bees, working 18 and 20-hour days during spring and summer just to ensure we’ve got healthy bees,” one

beekeeper says.

Another commercial beekeeper who lost an estimated $600,000 worth of bees in the bee kill, and also wants to remain anonymous because of the threat of legal repercussions, said he has no doubt the bees were killed by fungicide spraying.

However, the beekeeper says the risk of death is one that beekeepers who put their hives on almond farms have signed up for.

It’s like playing with fire,” he says. “If you’re a beekeeper and you hire your bees out basically we’re just gigolos that put the bees out there as if we employed hookers.”

The beekeeper says while it’s devastating for beekeepers to lose their bees, they know the risk.

“Our bees get put in there and the risk is death by insecticide and fungicide,” he said. “That’s just what we get paid for. When you sign up for a pollination contract like that, you’re not going into an organic farm right? So, we know there is risk involved and so you’re basically going to have to wear that.”

He wants people to think more carefully about the impact of almond farming on the bee population.

“I mean cow’s milk is bad because ‘hey you’ve got to kill a calf every year’ and that’s not fashionable anymore,” he says. “It’s one calf, or it’s millions of bees. What would you rather do? What life is worth more?”

The Almond Board of Australia is aware of the bee kill and of the beekeepers’ concerns, but chief executive Tim Jackson says it was a one-off.

“It’s an isolated incident,” he says. “If these incidents occur we encourage the beekeepers to report them because we want to make sure that everyone’s compliant and doing the right thing.”

Mr Jackson says it is still unclear whether the kill was a result of the actions of almond farmers or neighbouring farmers.

“There was something like 40 different beekeepers involved in supplying bees to this one particular farm, so it’s really important that those bees are protected because beehive health is important to the almond industry as it is to the beekeeper,” he says.

The Almond Board this year began a partnership with Bee Friendly Farming Australia establishing bee-friendly certification and bee-friendly practices such as planting native flora around orchards to increase biodiversity and recommending only spraying pesticides and fungicides at night when bees are in their hives.

Mr Jackson says he is not sure what the legal consequences are for the beekeepers or almond farmers if an adverse finding is made over the bee kill.

“The long-term ramifications if someone’s doing the wrong thing and the beekeepers aren’t confident, then he’s going to struggle to get bees, so there is a mutual benefit in people behaving correctly,” he says.

He’s also unsure whether any financial compensation is available to the beekeepers.

“The almond industry is pretty lucrative at pollination time for their industry, but at the same time, we understand the importance of making sure those bees go in and go out as healthy as they were,” he says.

22 December 2021: Macadamia farmer convicted and fined. Spray Drift

Macadamia farmer convicted and fined for pesticide misuse

https://www.miragenews.com/macadamia-farmer-convicted-and-fined-for-699303/

22 Dec 2021

The NSW Land and Environment Court has upheld the conviction and sentence imposed on the owner and operator of a macadamia farm in Brooklet in northern NSW, Mr William Moore, for using a pesticide in a manner that caused injury, following a prosecution by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA).

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Steve Orr said, the EPA had commenced the prosecution after a person driving a car on a public road was exposed to pesticide spray drift being used at Wingvale Farm.

“This person suffered injuries including headaches, nausea and restricted breathing,” Mr Orr said.

On appeal from an earlier decision of the Byron Bay Local Court, the Land and Environment Court found Mr Moore guilty of one charge of using the pesticide Diazinon in a manner that caused injury to a person.

Justice Pain found that as the spraying occurred as part of a commercial operation that a high standard of care was necessary. Justice Pain also found that there were reasonable precautions that should have been taken at Wingvale Farm, which included notifying neighbours prior to spraying and only spraying in suitable weather conditions.

The Land and Environment Court upheld the sentence imposed against Mr Moore in the earlier Local Court proceedings, requiring him to pay a fine and the EPA’s legal and investigation costs totalling almost $15,000. Mr Moore was also ordered to pay the EPA’s legal costs of the appeal itself.

Mr Orr said the Court’s decision sent a strong message to all pesticide users to consider the safety of the local community and the environment.

“It is important that anyone who uses pesticides, particularly in or near residential areas, uses them correctly and safely.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users spraying in appropriate weather conditions, following the label instructions and considering the health impacts when applying pesticide.”

Macadamia farmer convicted and fined for pesticide misuse

https://www.miragenews.com/macadamia-farmer-convicted-and-fined-for-699303/

22 Dec 2021

The NSW Land and Environment Court has upheld the conviction and sentence imposed on the owner and operator of a macadamia farm in Brooklet in northern NSW, Mr William Moore, for using a pesticide in a manner that caused injury, following a prosecution by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA).

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Steve Orr said, the EPA had commenced the prosecution after a person driving a car on a public road was exposed to pesticide spray drift being used at Wingvale Farm.

“This person suffered injuries including headaches, nausea and restricted breathing,” Mr Orr said.

On appeal from an earlier decision of the Byron Bay Local Court, the Land and Environment Court found Mr Moore guilty of one charge of using the pesticide Diazinon in a manner that caused injury to a person.

Justice Pain found that as the spraying occurred as part of a commercial operation that a high standard of care was necessary. Justice Pain also found that there were reasonable precautions that should have been taken at Wingvale Farm, which included notifying neighbours prior to spraying and only spraying in suitable weather conditions.

The Land and Environment Court upheld the sentence imposed against Mr Moore in the earlier Local Court proceedings, requiring him to pay a fine and the EPA’s legal and investigation costs totalling almost $15,000. Mr Moore was also ordered to pay the EPA’s legal costs of the appeal itself.

Mr Orr said the Court’s decision sent a strong message to all pesticide users to consider the safety of the local community and the environment.

“It is important that anyone who uses pesticides, particularly in or near residential areas, uses them correctly and safely.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users spraying in appropriate weather conditions, following the label instructions and considering the health impacts when applying pesticide.”

2018/19: Reedy Lake (Victoria). Pesticides: Simazine, Atrazine, pp-DDE

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Reedy Lake

Water - June 2019: Simazine 0.12ug/L

Water - June 2018: Atrazine (trace)

Sediment - June 2018: pp-DDE (trace)

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Reedy Lake

Water – June 2019: Simazine 0.12ug/L

Water – June 2018: Atrazine (trace)

Sediment – June 2018: pp-DDE (trace)

2019 June: Lower Barwon River (Victoria). Pesticide: Simazine

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Lower Barwon River

Water - June 2019: Simazine 0.22ug/L

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Lower Barwon River

Water – June 2019: Simazine 0.22ug/L

2018 April. Cowies Creek (Geelong). Pesticide: Simazine

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Cowies Creek

Water - April 2018: Simazine 0.11ug/L

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Cowies Creek

Water – April 2018: Simazine 0.11ug/L

June 2019: Barwon Water. Pesticides: Atrazine, Simazine, Dieldrin, pp-DDE

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Upper Barwon River

Water - June 2019: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Simazine 0.41ug/L

Sediment - June 2019: Dieldrin 0.072mg/kg (60ug/kgOC), pp-DDE 0.024mg/kg (20ug/kgOC)

Soil - June 2019: Dieldrin 0.04mg/kg

Bellarine Peninsula: Legacy and emergency contaminant sampling and analysis (2018-2019)

EPA Victoria Publication 1870 May 2020

Site: Upper Barwon River

Water – June 2019: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Simazine 0.41ug/L

Sediment – June 2019: Dieldrin 0.072mg/kg (60ug/kgOC), pp-DDE 0.024mg/kg (20ug/kgOC)

Soil – June 2019: Dieldrin 0.04mg/kg

 

18/9/20: Tianjin Jinghai Huixan Industry and Trade. Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Propargite

Tianjin Jinghai Huixan Industry and Trade (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin, Difenconazole

18/9/20: Dried red dates - Linhai Monhong (China) - Pesticide: Propargite 0.06mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Tianjin Jinghai Huixan Industry and Trade (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin, Difenconazole

18/9/20: Dried red dates – Linhai Monhong (China) – Pesticide: Propargite 0.06mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

14/8/20: Linhai Monhong (China). Breaching Australian MRLs. Pesticides: Cyhalothrin, Difenconazole

Linhai Monhong (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin, Difenconazole

14/8/20: Chinese Donghui bayberry (Myrica rubra) - Linhai Monhong (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.12mg/kg

14/8/20: Chinese Donghui bayberry (Myrica rubra) - Linhai Monhong (China) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.08mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Linhai Monhong (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin, Difenconazole

14/8/20: Chinese Donghui bayberry (Myrica rubra) – Linhai Monhong (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.12mg/kg

14/8/20: Chinese Donghui bayberry (Myrica rubra) – Linhai Monhong (China) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.08mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

7/8/20: Hong Kong Top Gold International Trading Co Ltd. Breached Australian MRL; Pesticide: Carbendazim

Hong Kong Top Gold International Trading Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

7/8/20: Hawthorn (dried) - Hong Kong Top Gold International Trading Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Hong Kong Top Gold International Trading Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

7/8/20: Hawthorn (dried) – Hong Kong Top Gold International Trading Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

31/7/20: T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRLs. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Permethrin

T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Permethrin

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh - T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh - T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.055mg/kg

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh - T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.08mg/kg

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh - T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Permethrin 0.7mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Permethrin

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh – T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh – T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.055mg/kg

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh – T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.08mg/kg

31/7/20: Lychee Fruit Fresh – T&A VN Import Export Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Permethrin 0.7mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

31/7/20: Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India). Breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Acephate, Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate, Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

31/7/20: Chopped spinach, palak - Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.07mg/kg

31/7/20: Chopped spinach, palak - Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.47mg/kg

31/7/20: Chopped spinach, palak - Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.24mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate, Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

31/7/20: Chopped spinach, palak – Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.07mg/kg

31/7/20: Chopped spinach, palak – Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.47mg/kg

31/7/20: Chopped spinach, palak – Rutu Agro Food Cold Storage (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.24mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

24/7/20: Dujardin Food (Belgium). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Dujardin Food (Belgium) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

24/7/20: Herb, mint - Dujardin Food (Belgium) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Dujardin Food (Belgium) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

24/7/20: Herb, mint – Dujardin Food (Belgium) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

17/7/20: Consolidated Business Systems (Sri Lanka). Breached Australian MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Consolidated Business Systems (Sri Lanka) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

17/7/20: Dambala (wing beans) frozen - Consolidated Business Systems (Sri Lanka) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.52mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Consolidated Business Systems (Sri Lanka) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

17/7/20: Dambala (wing beans) frozen – Consolidated Business Systems (Sri Lanka) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.52mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

9/7/20: Dohler Neuenkirche N Gmbh (Germany). Breaching Australian MRL: Paclobutrazol

Dohler Neuenkirche N Gmbh (Germany) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Paclobutrazol

9/7/20: Blackberry juice concentrate organic- Dohler Neuenkirche N Gmbh (Germany) - Pesticide: Paclobutrazol 0.017mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Dohler Neuenkirche N Gmbh (Germany) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Paclobutrazol

9/7/20: Blackberry juice concentrate organic- Dohler Neuenkirche N Gmbh (Germany) – Pesticide: Paclobutrazol 0.017mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/7/20: Parayil Food Products (India). Breaching Australian MRL’s: Pesticides: Acephate, Monocrotophos

Parayil Food Products (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate, Monocrotophos

1/7/20: Frozen vegetable tindora- Parayil Food Products (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.174mg/kg

1/7/20: Frozen vegetable tindora- Parayil Food Products (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.21mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Parayil Food Products (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate, Monocrotophos

1/7/20: Frozen vegetable tindora- Parayil Food Products (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.174mg/kg

1/7/20: Frozen vegetable tindora- Parayil Food Products (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.21mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2020/21: Batra Enterprises (India). Breaches to Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Batra Enterprises (India) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

1/7/20: Door dal peas - Batra Enterprises (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.013mg/kg

1/7/20: Moong dhuli (lentils) - Batra Enterprises (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.121mg/kg

24/2/21: Green lentil - Batra Enterprises (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.016mg/kg

5/3/21: Yellow lentils - Batra Enterprises (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos - Lines 17a, 17c and 17d. Detected. Not permitted in this food

7/6/21: Green gram split - Batra Enterprises (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos - 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Batra Enterprises (India) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

1/7/20: Door dal peas – Batra Enterprises (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.013mg/kg

1/7/20: Moong dhuli (lentils) – Batra Enterprises (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.121mg/kg

24/2/21: Green lentil – Batra Enterprises (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.016mg/kg

5/3/21: Yellow lentils – Batra Enterprises (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos – Lines 17a, 17c and 17d. Detected. Not permitted in this food

7/6/21: Green gram split – Batra Enterprises (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos – 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2020/21: Jining New Silk Road Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Jining New Silk Road Food Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

15/6/20: Fresh Garlic Roots - Jining New Silk Road Food Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.1mg/kg

15/1/21: Fresh Garlic Roots - Jining New Silk Road Food Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Jining New Silk Road Food Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

15/6/20: Fresh Garlic Roots – Jining New Silk Road Food Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.1mg/kg

15/1/21: Fresh Garlic Roots – Jining New Silk Road Food Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2020: Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Hexaconazole, Difenconazole

Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Hexaconazole

11/6/20: Frozen small red chillies - Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.051mg/kg

23/6/20: Frozen grated small red chillies - Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.09mg/kg

14/8/20: Red chilli (frozen) - Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Hexaconazole

11/6/20: Frozen small red chillies – Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.051mg/kg

23/6/20: Frozen grated small red chillies – Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.09mg/kg

14/8/20: Red chilli (frozen) – Nam Hai Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

13/5/20: Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL’s

Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyfluthrin, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Cyhalothrin (approximate location only)

13/5/20: Chinese Dates - Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyfluthrin 0.22mg/kg

13/5/20: Chinese Dates - Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.107mg/kg

13/5/20: Chinese Dates - Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.313mg/kg

13/5/20: Chinese Dates - Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.027mg/kg

13/5/20: Jujube Dates - Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.313mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyfluthrin, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Cyhalothrin

13/5/20: Chinese Dates – Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyfluthrin 0.22mg/kg

13/5/20: Chinese Dates – Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.107mg/kg

13/5/20: Chinese Dates – Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.313mg/kg

13/5/20: Chinese Dates – Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.027mg/kg

13/5/20: Jujube Dates – Botou Huayang Jujube Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.313mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

13/5/20: Hong Kong Sing Hung Food Co (China). Breach to Australian MRL: Pesticide Carbendazim

Hong Kong Sing Hung Food Co (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

13/5/20: Dried Longan Pulp - Hong Kong Sing Hung Food Co (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.062mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Hong Kong Sing Hung Food Co (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

13/5/20: Dried Longan Pulp – Hong Kong Sing Hung Food Co (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.062mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2021 August: Overwatch problems in South Australia. Pesticide: Bixlozone

Overwatch moves outside boundary: trial

3 Aug 2021

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/7359646/overwatch-moves-outside-boundary-trial/

AGRONOMISTS in South Australia have joined those in Western Australia who are dealing with frustrations from alleged off-target damage from new mode-of-action herbicide Overwatch, from FMC.

Earlier this month, Farm Weekly reported on claims from WA agronomists Wayne Smith and Frank Boetels that stated in most cases, there was no off-target damage from the product when it was dry, but after it rained, they started seeing off-target damage in all directions.

Those claims have now been backed up by independent agronomist Craig Davis, based in South Australia's Mid North and Yorke Peninsula, who said he had seen movement outside paddock boundaries that didn't match up with the direction of spray.

"We've got the predominant prevailing wind direction taking the original spray drift one way, but now we've got multiple cases where it's moved in other directions outside of paddocks and accumulated on roadsides," Mr Davis said.

"We have weather records and spray application data to rule out drift or inversion and while you can notice the majority of the product went where you would expect, it's gone far further and caused much larger areas of off-target movement than we ever anticipated.

"Both WA and South Australia have very professional operators with very good set-ups and weather monitoring - they are aware of the risk of off-target damage and have quickly become embarrassed by the fact that Overwatch is moving outside their paddock boundaries."

With that in mind, Mr Davis went about conducting a canary pot trial to try to ascertain if Overwatch was volatile and had been moving in ways it shouldn't.

He took lupins from an undamaged paddock, dug holes to clear out any chemical that might be in the ground and embedded pots to within an inch of the soil surface in a paddock both one day and three weeks after spraying with Overwatch.

"That meant any gas, if it was a gas, could potentially come into contact with those lupins and if there were symptoms that would give a strong indication that we have a product moving after application," Mr Davis said.

"I monitored those plants and found that after one week there was no damage, but after two weeks both paddocks showed damage, meaning we picked up damage well after the application of the spray.

"It was certainly activated following rainfall, but it wasn't a lot of rain - the soil was already quite wet, but it didn't become waterlogged and in that trial it was only off a 10 millimetre rainfall event."

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said the company understood that different people had been undertaking their own research.

"We have not been involved with the methods they have been using, but we are aware that some potted lupins have demonstrated transient bleaching and some potted lupins have shown no transient bleaching," Mr Robertson said.

"FMC has been involved with scientific trials that were reviewed by the APVMA (Australian Pesticides And Veterinary Medicines Authority) - our results demonstrated that low-level volatility from treated soil is possible and it is therefore plausible that a sensitive plant such as lupins placed within an Overwatch treated paddock may show symptoms of transient bleaching.

"However, the available data indicates the amount of volatilisation causing such bleaching is very low and would be confined to a relatively short distance away from the application site."

In June, Farm Weekly reported that a farmer from Bolgart had a lupin paddock which had suffered from alleged off-target drift and the bleaching effect had been undeniable.

FMC had always maintained that crops would recover from the bleaching and that has been exactly what the farmer from Bolgart has seen happen.

"The lupins are now all starting to flower and you can't see any real difference to the ones that weren't affected," the farmer said.

"We checked all our records on spray dates for this paddock and we are thinking that the damage was caused by movement of droplets from the top of the hill down to the lower part of the paddock.

"That was likely due to spraying the paddock next door late in the afternoon with very low wind speed, warm temperatures and possible spray inversion."

Mr Robertson said FMC appreciated the before and after comparison by the grower of the transient bleaching of the lupin crop and had been in contact with him.

"The recovery from spray drift is consistent with what has been seen in the recovery of many other cases where spray drift has occurred," he said.

"Of the approximately 1.2 million hectares to which Overwatch was applied this year in Australia, we are aware of less than one per cent that are showing signs of off-target crop bleaching.

"As is the case with this grower, ongoing monitoring by FMC is observing strong recovery from transient bleaching in the overwhelming majority of cases."

However it's not just the off-target damage that is causing concern, with excessive levels of bleaching on crops that were sprayed with Overwatch as per the label instructions.

Mr Davis said he had recorded more than 60 paddocks, predominantly barley, with heightened levels of crop damage, above what was seen in trials.

While those crops, along with crops hit by off-target damage, are recovering, he said there were areas within them that were still severely affected with reduced growth, leaf area and tillering.

In some cases, paddocks in lighter soils had to be sown again.

"I'm hypothesising that lighter and loamier soils that contain more lime or bicarbonates are more prone to this occurring, whereas in other jurisdictions and States where their soil types are heavier with more organic matter, that is it not happening as readily," Mr Davis said.

"If we do find that Overwatch is volatile, my concern is that the volatility is also part of the contributor to barley being so sensitive.

"If it is volatility that is causing off-target movement - and I do maintain we still need to prove how that is happening - and barley is sensitive to it being applied to the leaf, then that volatility could be a major factor for why we're seeing such large scale damage to barley crops."

Mr Roberts said some key cropping regions of WA had experienced an exceptional, historically wet season characterised by waterlogging and prolonged wet, overcast conditions, while in South Australia the majority of crops went in dry followed by large rain events and strong winds in some areas.

"Under these circumstances not only Overwatch, but also other commonly used pre-emergent products, exhibited more crop effects than what had been encountered in the preceding seasons," he said.

"We could not have anticipated that based on the meteorological data and forecasts that were available to us.

"FMC will take the data that this experience has given us into account in our future research and development program."

Like most growers around the country, Mr Davis wants to keep using Overwatch and knows how important it is for rotational purposes, however he does want answers as to why the product is allegedly moving so drastically off-target.

"I do accept that this product has very good merits - it's a great active ingredient, it controls target weeds quite well and it is relatively safe on a number of crops including wheat and canola," Mr Davis said.

"There are farmers and advisers out there, like myself who love this product and want to keep it as we need it for resistance management, but that cannot happen at all cost.

"As long as we can work out how to use it safely and minimise its potential for crop damage and off-target movement, I'd be happy to maintain using it."

Overwatch moves outside boundary: trial

3 Aug 2021

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/7359646/overwatch-moves-outside-boundary-trial/

AGRONOMISTS in South Australia have joined those in Western Australia who are dealing with frustrations from alleged off-target damage from new mode-of-action herbicide Overwatch, from FMC.

Earlier this month, Farm Weekly reported on claims from WA agronomists Wayne Smith and Frank Boetels that stated in most cases, there was no off-target damage from the product when it was dry, but after it rained, they started seeing off-target damage in all directions.

Those claims have now been backed up by independent agronomist Craig Davis, based in South Australia’s Mid North and Yorke Peninsula, who said he had seen movement outside paddock boundaries that didn’t match up with the direction of spray.

“We’ve got the predominant prevailing wind direction taking the original spray drift one way, but now we’ve got multiple cases where it’s moved in other directions outside of paddocks and accumulated on roadsides,” Mr Davis said.

“We have weather records and spray application data to rule out drift or inversion and while you can notice the majority of the product went where you would expect, it’s gone far further and caused much larger areas of off-target movement than we ever anticipated.

“Both WA and South Australia have very professional operators with very good set-ups and weather monitoring – they are aware of the risk of off-target damage and have quickly become embarrassed by the fact that Overwatch is moving outside their paddock boundaries.”

With that in mind, Mr Davis went about conducting a canary pot trial to try to ascertain if Overwatch was volatile and had been moving in ways it shouldn’t.

He took lupins from an undamaged paddock, dug holes to clear out any chemical that might be in the ground and embedded pots to within an inch of the soil surface in a paddock both one day and three weeks after spraying with Overwatch.

“That meant any gas, if it was a gas, could potentially come into contact with those lupins and if there were symptoms that would give a strong indication that we have a product moving after application,” Mr Davis said.

“I monitored those plants and found that after one week there was no damage, but after two weeks both paddocks showed damage, meaning we picked up damage well after the application of the spray.

“It was certainly activated following rainfall, but it wasn’t a lot of rain – the soil was already quite wet, but it didn’t become waterlogged and in that trial it was only off a 10 millimetre rainfall event.”

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said the company understood that different people had been undertaking their own research.

“We have not been involved with the methods they have been using, but we are aware that some potted lupins have demonstrated transient bleaching and some potted lupins have shown no transient bleaching,” Mr Robertson said.

“FMC has been involved with scientific trials that were reviewed by the APVMA (Australian Pesticides And Veterinary Medicines Authority) – our results demonstrated that low-level volatility from treated soil is possible and it is therefore plausible that a sensitive plant such as lupins placed within an Overwatch treated paddock may show symptoms of transient bleaching.

“However, the available data indicates the amount of volatilisation causing such bleaching is very low and would be confined to a relatively short distance away from the application site.”

In June, Farm Weekly reported that a farmer from Bolgart had a lupin paddock which had suffered from alleged off-target drift and the bleaching effect had been undeniable.

FMC had always maintained that crops would recover from the bleaching and that has been exactly what the farmer from Bolgart has seen happen.

“The lupins are now all starting to flower and you can’t see any real difference to the ones that weren’t affected,” the farmer said.

“We checked all our records on spray dates for this paddock and we are thinking that the damage was caused by movement of droplets from the top of the hill down to the lower part of the paddock.

“That was likely due to spraying the paddock next door late in the afternoon with very low wind speed, warm temperatures and possible spray inversion.”

Mr Robertson said FMC appreciated the before and after comparison by the grower of the transient bleaching of the lupin crop and had been in contact with him.

“The recovery from spray drift is consistent with what has been seen in the recovery of many other cases where spray drift has occurred,” he said.

“Of the approximately 1.2 million hectares to which Overwatch was applied this year in Australia, we are aware of less than one per cent that are showing signs of off-target crop bleaching.

“As is the case with this grower, ongoing monitoring by FMC is observing strong recovery from transient bleaching in the overwhelming majority of cases.”

However it’s not just the off-target damage that is causing concern, with excessive levels of bleaching on crops that were sprayed with Overwatch as per the label instructions.

Mr Davis said he had recorded more than 60 paddocks, predominantly barley, with heightened levels of crop damage, above what was seen in trials.

While those crops, along with crops hit by off-target damage, are recovering, he said there were areas within them that were still severely affected with reduced growth, leaf area and tillering.

In some cases, paddocks in lighter soils had to be sown again.

“I’m hypothesising that lighter and loamier soils that contain more lime or bicarbonates are more prone to this occurring, whereas in other jurisdictions and States where their soil types are heavier with more organic matter, that is it not happening as readily,” Mr Davis said.

“If we do find that Overwatch is volatile, my concern is that the volatility is also part of the contributor to barley being so sensitive.

“If it is volatility that is causing off-target movement – and I do maintain we still need to prove how that is happening – and barley is sensitive to it being applied to the leaf, then that volatility could be a major factor for why we’re seeing such large scale damage to barley crops.”

Mr Roberts said some key cropping regions of WA had experienced an exceptional, historically wet season characterised by waterlogging and prolonged wet, overcast conditions, while in South Australia the majority of crops went in dry followed by large rain events and strong winds in some areas.

“Under these circumstances not only Overwatch, but also other commonly used pre-emergent products, exhibited more crop effects than what had been encountered in the preceding seasons,” he said.

“We could not have anticipated that based on the meteorological data and forecasts that were available to us.

“FMC will take the data that this experience has given us into account in our future research and development program.”

Like most growers around the country, Mr Davis wants to keep using Overwatch and knows how important it is for rotational purposes, however he does want answers as to why the product is allegedly moving so drastically off-target.

“I do accept that this product has very good merits – it’s a great active ingredient, it controls target weeds quite well and it is relatively safe on a number of crops including wheat and canola,” Mr Davis said.

“There are farmers and advisers out there, like myself who love this product and want to keep it as we need it for resistance management, but that cannot happen at all cost.

“As long as we can work out how to use it safely and minimise its potential for crop damage and off-target movement, I’d be happy to maintain using it.”

2021 August/September: Overwatch moves outside boundary: Pesticide: Bixlozone

‘Critical mass’ of farmers sought for Overwatch class action

6 September 2021 (graincentral.com)

GROWERS who allege they have suffered barley yield losses through unintended consequences caused by the use of the herbicide Overwatch are being invited to take part in a class action.

Proposed by Sydney-based law firm Levitt Robertson, the action seeks to represent affected growers in Western Australian, Victorian and South Australia and possibly New South Wales.

Through the Class PR website, the firm alleges Overwatch has bleached some barley crops, some of which will not recover their full yield potential.

Manufactured by chemical company FMC, Overwatch is a pre-emergent herbicide marketed as being suitable to control weeds including annual ryegrass in southern Australia’s three biggest winter crops: barley, canola and wheat.

“Although Overwatch worked brilliantly with some crops, it was FMC’s failure to steward the administration of the product and have farmers adjust their sowing systems by using a deeper planting method, which led to crop damage,” the website alleges.

The website states that FMC recommended the same application rate for barley as for wheat and canola, and agronomists advising growers were not provided with “crucial product information by FMC” which could have prevented the alleged damage.

Levitt Robinson is putting out the feelers to see if a “critical mass” of farming participants can be found in order to make the running of a class action feasible.

It is holding a series of webinars over coming weeks to inform growers about the process involved so they can decide whether or not to join the action.

It said interested growers needed to register as soon as possible.

Levitt Robinson successes in class actions include one on behalf of Storm Financial investors and franchisees of 7-Eleven.

Levitt Robinson special counsel Brett Imlay said the firm was looking into a class action on behalf of growers following an approach several weeks ago from  a party in the Victorian Wimmera.

FMC response

FMC has issued the following holding statement in response to the proposed legal action:

FMC confirms that it is aware that a law firm has called on growers who are concerned about lingering crop effects following the use of Overwatch Herbicide in barley to work with the firm, though no action has been filed.

FMC is currently investigating reports relating to enhanced bleaching in crops where Overwatch Herbicide has been used on a case-by-case basis, as much as COVID-19 travel guidelines allow. The incidence of enhanced bleaching is currently estimated at one percent or less of the total crop area treated with Overwatch Herbicide in Australia this year.

FMC takes its stewardship role very seriously and has a long-standing reputation for working closely with growers to ensure safe and responsible use of its products. FMC will continue to monitor the situation and work with concerned growers and industry partners to support Overwatch® users as required for each case.

Maiden year

Overwatch was released to the Australian market this year following approval by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

FMC’s Overwatch Herbicide website states its active ingredient Bixlozone, trademarked Isoflex active, is a Group Q molecule, which makes it a unique weed control option in the Australian broadacre market.

FMC Corporation is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and develops and produces herbicides, fungicides and pesticides for the global agricultural and horticultural chemical market.

Sources: Class PR, FMC, Levitt Robinson

 

Overwatch moves outside boundary: trial

3 Aug 2021

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/7359646/overwatch-moves-outside-boundary-trial/

AGRONOMISTS in South Australia have joined those in Western Australia who are dealing with frustrations from alleged off-target damage from new mode-of-action herbicide Overwatch, from FMC.

Earlier this month, Farm Weekly reported on claims from WA agronomists Wayne Smith and Frank Boetels that stated in most cases, there was no off-target damage from the product when it was dry, but after it rained, they started seeing off-target damage in all directions.

Those claims have now been backed up by independent agronomist Craig Davis, based in South Australia's Mid North and Yorke Peninsula, who said he had seen movement outside paddock boundaries that didn't match up with the direction of spray.

"We've got the predominant prevailing wind direction taking the original spray drift one way, but now we've got multiple cases where it's moved in other directions outside of paddocks and accumulated on roadsides," Mr Davis said.

"We have weather records and spray application data to rule out drift or inversion and while you can notice the majority of the product went where you would expect, it's gone far further and caused much larger areas of off-target movement than we ever anticipated.

"Both WA and South Australia have very professional operators with very good set-ups and weather monitoring - they are aware of the risk of off-target damage and have quickly become embarrassed by the fact that Overwatch is moving outside their paddock boundaries."

With that in mind, Mr Davis went about conducting a canary pot trial to try to ascertain if Overwatch was volatile and had been moving in ways it shouldn't.

He took lupins from an undamaged paddock, dug holes to clear out any chemical that might be in the ground and embedded pots to within an inch of the soil surface in a paddock both one day and three weeks after spraying with Overwatch.

"That meant any gas, if it was a gas, could potentially come into contact with those lupins and if there were symptoms that would give a strong indication that we have a product moving after application," Mr Davis said.

"I monitored those plants and found that after one week there was no damage, but after two weeks both paddocks showed damage, meaning we picked up damage well after the application of the spray.

"It was certainly activated following rainfall, but it wasn't a lot of rain - the soil was already quite wet, but it didn't become waterlogged and in that trial it was only off a 10 millimetre rainfall event."

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said the company understood that different people had been undertaking their own research.

"We have not been involved with the methods they have been using, but we are aware that some potted lupins have demonstrated transient bleaching and some potted lupins have shown no transient bleaching," Mr Robertson said.

"FMC has been involved with scientific trials that were reviewed by the APVMA (Australian Pesticides And Veterinary Medicines Authority) - our results demonstrated that low-level volatility from treated soil is possible and it is therefore plausible that a sensitive plant such as lupins placed within an Overwatch treated paddock may show symptoms of transient bleaching.

"However, the available data indicates the amount of volatilisation causing such bleaching is very low and would be confined to a relatively short distance away from the application site."

In June, Farm Weekly reported that a farmer from Bolgart had a lupin paddock which had suffered from alleged off-target drift and the bleaching effect had been undeniable.

FMC had always maintained that crops would recover from the bleaching and that has been exactly what the farmer from Bolgart has seen happen.

"The lupins are now all starting to flower and you can't see any real difference to the ones that weren't affected," the farmer said.

"We checked all our records on spray dates for this paddock and we are thinking that the damage was caused by movement of droplets from the top of the hill down to the lower part of the paddock.

"That was likely due to spraying the paddock next door late in the afternoon with very low wind speed, warm temperatures and possible spray inversion."

Mr Robertson said FMC appreciated the before and after comparison by the grower of the transient bleaching of the lupin crop and had been in contact with him.

"The recovery from spray drift is consistent with what has been seen in the recovery of many other cases where spray drift has occurred," he said.

"Of the approximately 1.2 million hectares to which Overwatch was applied this year in Australia, we are aware of less than one per cent that are showing signs of off-target crop bleaching.

"As is the case with this grower, ongoing monitoring by FMC is observing strong recovery from transient bleaching in the overwhelming majority of cases."

However it's not just the off-target damage that is causing concern, with excessive levels of bleaching on crops that were sprayed with Overwatch as per the label instructions.

Mr Davis said he had recorded more than 60 paddocks, predominantly barley, with heightened levels of crop damage, above what was seen in trials.

While those crops, along with crops hit by off-target damage, are recovering, he said there were areas within them that were still severely affected with reduced growth, leaf area and tillering.

In some cases, paddocks in lighter soils had to be sown again.

"I'm hypothesising that lighter and loamier soils that contain more lime or bicarbonates are more prone to this occurring, whereas in other jurisdictions and States where their soil types are heavier with more organic matter, that is it not happening as readily," Mr Davis said.

"If we do find that Overwatch is volatile, my concern is that the volatility is also part of the contributor to barley being so sensitive.

"If it is volatility that is causing off-target movement - and I do maintain we still need to prove how that is happening - and barley is sensitive to it being applied to the leaf, then that volatility could be a major factor for why we're seeing such large scale damage to barley crops."

Mr Roberts said some key cropping regions of WA had experienced an exceptional, historically wet season characterised by waterlogging and prolonged wet, overcast conditions, while in South Australia the majority of crops went in dry followed by large rain events and strong winds in some areas.

"Under these circumstances not only Overwatch, but also other commonly used pre-emergent products, exhibited more crop effects than what had been encountered in the preceding seasons," he said.

"We could not have anticipated that based on the meteorological data and forecasts that were available to us.

"FMC will take the data that this experience has given us into account in our future research and development program."

Like most growers around the country, Mr Davis wants to keep using Overwatch and knows how important it is for rotational purposes, however he does want answers as to why the product is allegedly moving so drastically off-target.

"I do accept that this product has very good merits - it's a great active ingredient, it controls target weeds quite well and it is relatively safe on a number of crops including wheat and canola," Mr Davis said.

"There are farmers and advisers out there, like myself who love this product and want to keep it as we need it for resistance management, but that cannot happen at all cost.

"As long as we can work out how to use it safely and minimise its potential for crop damage and off-target movement, I'd be happy to maintain using it."

‘Critical mass’ of farmers sought for Overwatch class action

6 September 2021 (graincentral.com)

GROWERS who allege they have suffered barley yield losses through unintended consequences caused by the use of the herbicide Overwatch are being invited to take part in a class action.

Proposed by Sydney-based law firm Levitt Robertson, the action seeks to represent affected growers in Western Australian, Victorian and South Australia and possibly New South Wales.

Through the Class PR website, the firm alleges Overwatch has bleached some barley crops, some of which will not recover their full yield potential.

Manufactured by chemical company FMC, Overwatch is a pre-emergent herbicide marketed as being suitable to control weeds including annual ryegrass in southern Australia’s three biggest winter crops: barley, canola and wheat.

“Although Overwatch worked brilliantly with some crops, it was FMC’s failure to steward the administration of the product and have farmers adjust their sowing systems by using a deeper planting method, which led to crop damage,” the website alleges.

The website states that FMC recommended the same application rate for barley as for wheat and canola, and agronomists advising growers were not provided with “crucial product information by FMC” which could have prevented the alleged damage.

Levitt Robinson is putting out the feelers to see if a “critical mass” of farming participants can be found in order to make the running of a class action feasible.

It is holding a series of webinars over coming weeks to inform growers about the process involved so they can decide whether or not to join the action.

It said interested growers needed to register as soon as possible.

Levitt Robinson successes in class actions include one on behalf of Storm Financial investors and franchisees of 7-Eleven.

Levitt Robinson special counsel Brett Imlay said the firm was looking into a class action on behalf of growers following an approach several weeks ago from  a party in the Victorian Wimmera.

FMC response

FMC has issued the following holding statement in response to the proposed legal action:

FMC confirms that it is aware that a law firm has called on growers who are concerned about lingering crop effects following the use of Overwatch Herbicide in barley to work with the firm, though no action has been filed.

FMC is currently investigating reports relating to enhanced bleaching in crops where Overwatch Herbicide has been used on a case-by-case basis, as much as COVID-19 travel guidelines allow. The incidence of enhanced bleaching is currently estimated at one percent or less of the total crop area treated with Overwatch Herbicide in Australia this year.

FMC takes its stewardship role very seriously and has a long-standing reputation for working closely with growers to ensure safe and responsible use of its products. FMC will continue to monitor the situation and work with concerned growers and industry partners to support Overwatch® users as required for each case.

Maiden year

Overwatch was released to the Australian market this year following approval by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

FMC’s Overwatch Herbicide website states its active ingredient Bixlozone, trademarked Isoflex active, is a Group Q molecule, which makes it a unique weed control option in the Australian broadacre market.

FMC Corporation is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and develops and produces herbicides, fungicides and pesticides for the global agricultural and horticultural chemical market.

Sources: Class PR, FMC, Levitt Robinson

 

Overwatch moves outside boundary: trial

3 Aug 2021

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/7359646/overwatch-moves-outside-boundary-trial/

AGRONOMISTS in South Australia have joined those in Western Australia who are dealing with frustrations from alleged off-target damage from new mode-of-action herbicide Overwatch, from FMC.

Earlier this month, Farm Weekly reported on claims from WA agronomists Wayne Smith and Frank Boetels that stated in most cases, there was no off-target damage from the product when it was dry, but after it rained, they started seeing off-target damage in all directions.

Those claims have now been backed up by independent agronomist Craig Davis, based in South Australia’s Mid North and Yorke Peninsula, who said he had seen movement outside paddock boundaries that didn’t match up with the direction of spray.

“We’ve got the predominant prevailing wind direction taking the original spray drift one way, but now we’ve got multiple cases where it’s moved in other directions outside of paddocks and accumulated on roadsides,” Mr Davis said.

“We have weather records and spray application data to rule out drift or inversion and while you can notice the majority of the product went where you would expect, it’s gone far further and caused much larger areas of off-target movement than we ever anticipated.

“Both WA and South Australia have very professional operators with very good set-ups and weather monitoring – they are aware of the risk of off-target damage and have quickly become embarrassed by the fact that Overwatch is moving outside their paddock boundaries.”

With that in mind, Mr Davis went about conducting a canary pot trial to try to ascertain if Overwatch was volatile and had been moving in ways it shouldn’t.

He took lupins from an undamaged paddock, dug holes to clear out any chemical that might be in the ground and embedded pots to within an inch of the soil surface in a paddock both one day and three weeks after spraying with Overwatch.

“That meant any gas, if it was a gas, could potentially come into contact with those lupins and if there were symptoms that would give a strong indication that we have a product moving after application,” Mr Davis said.

“I monitored those plants and found that after one week there was no damage, but after two weeks both paddocks showed damage, meaning we picked up damage well after the application of the spray.

“It was certainly activated following rainfall, but it wasn’t a lot of rain – the soil was already quite wet, but it didn’t become waterlogged and in that trial it was only off a 10 millimetre rainfall event.”

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said the company understood that different people had been undertaking their own research.

“We have not been involved with the methods they have been using, but we are aware that some potted lupins have demonstrated transient bleaching and some potted lupins have shown no transient bleaching,” Mr Robertson said.

“FMC has been involved with scientific trials that were reviewed by the APVMA (Australian Pesticides And Veterinary Medicines Authority) – our results demonstrated that low-level volatility from treated soil is possible and it is therefore plausible that a sensitive plant such as lupins placed within an Overwatch treated paddock may show symptoms of transient bleaching.

“However, the available data indicates the amount of volatilisation causing such bleaching is very low and would be confined to a relatively short distance away from the application site.”

In June, Farm Weekly reported that a farmer from Bolgart had a lupin paddock which had suffered from alleged off-target drift and the bleaching effect had been undeniable.

FMC had always maintained that crops would recover from the bleaching and that has been exactly what the farmer from Bolgart has seen happen.

“The lupins are now all starting to flower and you can’t see any real difference to the ones that weren’t affected,” the farmer said.

“We checked all our records on spray dates for this paddock and we are thinking that the damage was caused by movement of droplets from the top of the hill down to the lower part of the paddock.

“That was likely due to spraying the paddock next door late in the afternoon with very low wind speed, warm temperatures and possible spray inversion.”

Mr Robertson said FMC appreciated the before and after comparison by the grower of the transient bleaching of the lupin crop and had been in contact with him.

“The recovery from spray drift is consistent with what has been seen in the recovery of many other cases where spray drift has occurred,” he said.

“Of the approximately 1.2 million hectares to which Overwatch was applied this year in Australia, we are aware of less than one per cent that are showing signs of off-target crop bleaching.

“As is the case with this grower, ongoing monitoring by FMC is observing strong recovery from transient bleaching in the overwhelming majority of cases.”

However it’s not just the off-target damage that is causing concern, with excessive levels of bleaching on crops that were sprayed with Overwatch as per the label instructions.

Mr Davis said he had recorded more than 60 paddocks, predominantly barley, with heightened levels of crop damage, above what was seen in trials.

While those crops, along with crops hit by off-target damage, are recovering, he said there were areas within them that were still severely affected with reduced growth, leaf area and tillering.

In some cases, paddocks in lighter soils had to be sown again.

“I’m hypothesising that lighter and loamier soils that contain more lime or bicarbonates are more prone to this occurring, whereas in other jurisdictions and States where their soil types are heavier with more organic matter, that is it not happening as readily,” Mr Davis said.

“If we do find that Overwatch is volatile, my concern is that the volatility is also part of the contributor to barley being so sensitive.

“If it is volatility that is causing off-target movement – and I do maintain we still need to prove how that is happening – and barley is sensitive to it being applied to the leaf, then that volatility could be a major factor for why we’re seeing such large scale damage to barley crops.”

Mr Roberts said some key cropping regions of WA had experienced an exceptional, historically wet season characterised by waterlogging and prolonged wet, overcast conditions, while in South Australia the majority of crops went in dry followed by large rain events and strong winds in some areas.

“Under these circumstances not only Overwatch, but also other commonly used pre-emergent products, exhibited more crop effects than what had been encountered in the preceding seasons,” he said.

“We could not have anticipated that based on the meteorological data and forecasts that were available to us.

“FMC will take the data that this experience has given us into account in our future research and development program.”

Like most growers around the country, Mr Davis wants to keep using Overwatch and knows how important it is for rotational purposes, however he does want answers as to why the product is allegedly moving so drastically off-target.

“I do accept that this product has very good merits – it’s a great active ingredient, it controls target weeds quite well and it is relatively safe on a number of crops including wheat and canola,” Mr Davis said.

“There are farmers and advisers out there, like myself who love this product and want to keep it as we need it for resistance management, but that cannot happen at all cost.

“As long as we can work out how to use it safely and minimise its potential for crop damage and off-target movement, I’d be happy to maintain using it.”

9/7/21: Moisture blamed on Overwatch volatility. Pesticide: Bixlozone

Moisture blamed for Overwatch volatility

9 July 2021

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/7328460/moisture-blamed-for-overwatch-volatility/

AGRONOMISTS around Western Australia are claiming that FMC's new herbicide Overwatch is made volatile by moisture, which is what they allege has been causing excessive levels of bleaching in crops treated with the product and off-target damage in nearby paddocks.

From the outset, FMC noted there was likely to be some level of crop bleaching with the Group Q product, which was released to much hype as a new mode-of-action to combat ryegrass, but farmers and agronomists are worried the affects have been more severe than they anticipated.

Agronomic Acumen agronomist Wayne Smith, based in Albany, said he had seen that Overwatch could sit in dry soil for a month or two and nothing happened, but when it rained, that change.

"As soon as it rains, the product starts rising through the soil, moving in all different directions and causing bleaching to off-target plants," Mr Smith said.

"It's definitely the rain that activates it - in most cases, there is no off-target damage when it is dry, but a week after it rains, we start seeing off-target damage in all directions.

"If you spray a crop and see no effect for two months, then it rains and all of a sudden you start getting damage, you can't attribute that to spray drift, spraying from inversion, or mixing chemicals with it, as FMC has claimed."

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said volatilisation referred to the movement of herbicide vapours through the air following a herbicide application.

"The potential volatilisation of bixlozone, the active ingredient, applied to soil has been tested by FMC under both field conditions and controlled conditions in a wind tunnel and these investigations demonstrated that the amount of volatilisation was very low," Mr Robertson said.

"Bixlozone is expected to degrade rapidly in air, with a half-life of about six hours and this data indicates that volatility is unlikely to be a significant source of off-target movement of bixlozone.

"Based on available information and data, any off-target movement of Overwatch, which may be incorrectly perceived as volatility, is most likely related to spray drift which is supported by the many other instances where Overwatch has been applied alongside sensitive crops with no off-target bleaching recorded."

According to Mr Smith, it appears the vapour from the product is coming up through the soil, which could happen on the same day, a week later, or even a month later.

"I have a client on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, who sprayed dry in mid-March and then got a phone call in mid-May, after rain, telling him that he had damaged plants all down the highway," Mr Smith said.

"He hadn't sprayed for two months and is the only cropping guy around, so he sprayed dry, seeded and covered it up with soil, then it rained two months later and the damage began.

"That's all the evidence you need that it simply can't be spray drift - Overwatch is volatile and is moving later on when it's wet."

Mr Smith said there was no other product he had ever seen in farming that acted the way Overwatch appeared to.

"With it only happening with moisture, to me that indicates that there has been a chemical reaction and that is what is releasing, rather than the chemical itself," he said.

"This is the worst product we've ever seen for vapourising and we're seeing vapourising still happening six weeks from when the rain or wet soil activated the product."

Independent agronomist Frank Boetel, based in Katanning, said the worst bleaching was in paddocks that had been directly sprayed, with barley more susceptible than wheat and canola.

"We're getting unacceptable damage to barley crops," Mr Boetels said.

"Wheat is more tolerant to it, which is what we had already seen in trials, but as soon as it gets wet, that's when it really takes off and we're seeing substantial damage in barley crops that have been sprayed.

"The others hardest hit seem to be oats, lupins and serradella which are all more vulnerable to the off-target drift."

Both Mr Smith and Mr Boetel, along with hundreds of agronomists and farmers around the country, have made reports on the damage caused by Overwatch both to FMC and to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

According to FMC, the number of reports of off-target crop bleaching remains relatively low considering the area treated with Overwatch this year.

FMC has now received between 65 and 70 reported cases in WA and a total of nine reports in the Eastern States.

Mr Robertson said ongoing monitoring was showing promising recovery of lupin crops from transient bleaching effects.

"Many of the earlier sown crops have already recovered from in-crop transient bleaching," Mr Robertson said.

"There are still a few areas where FMC are yet to observe crop recovery from transient bleaching, especially in areas where it has been excessively wet or when a combination of factors have led to elevated in-crop crop bleaching.

"Those areas continue to be monitored but, importantly, it is still some weeks before FMC would expect that the transient bleaching effects would have entirely resolved in all crops."

An APVMA spokeswoman said they were aware of reports of crop damage in WA and Victoria and they were working with FMC to understand the nature of these incidents.

"The APVMA is working with the registrant to determine the nature and number of adverse experiences related to the use of Overwatch Herbicide and will assess any adverse experience reports it receives in relation to this matter," the spokeswoman said.

"The product label describes how Overwatch herbicide should be used, including how and under what conditions it should be applied and specifies mandatory downwind buffer zones to minimise the risks associated with spray drift.

"The APVMA encourages users to report adverse experiences associated with agvet chemicals."

Mr Boetels said the product seemed to be "doing more harm than good" in very wet conditions.

"That's clearly evident in the amount of damage that has been reported not just in WA but over east as well, as they're are more cases coming up over there," Mr Boetels said.

"Looking at the damage to one of my clients in east Katanning, we think yield wise about 50 per cent of the lupins and 35pc of the barley have been impacted based on the water use efficiency model.

"He paid $70,000 for the chemical, but we think there will be a loss of about $500,000 to $700,000 in revenue from damage to crops."

While the side-effects of using Overwatch are not ideal, Mr Smith said most farmers and agronomists don't want to stop using the product as it was such a valuable tool, but they will be more cautious and want to know what is making it volatile.

"The weed control is just fantastic, so we'll just use a lower rate going forward," he said.

"Wheat and canola are fine, they get a bit white for sure, but they seem pretty tolerant to it, however we probably won't use it too much on barley for a while and we've got to be careful if lupins or anything else susceptible is around, particularly down slope.

"It doesn't mean we stop using it altogether - you don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water as it's a great product, but it's just behaving in a way we're not used to and we'd like to know what's causing it."

Mr Robertson said FMC's ongoing monitoring was showing promising recovery of crops from off-target transient bleaching effects.

"Our team remains committed to answering any questions our customers may have and provide technical support via our qualified agronomy team," he said.

Moisture blamed for Overwatch volatility

9 July 2021

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/story/7328460/moisture-blamed-for-overwatch-volatility/

AGRONOMISTS around Western Australia are claiming that FMC’s new herbicide Overwatch is made volatile by moisture, which is what they allege has been causing excessive levels of bleaching in crops treated with the product and off-target damage in nearby paddocks.

From the outset, FMC noted there was likely to be some level of crop bleaching with the Group Q product, which was released to much hype as a new mode-of-action to combat ryegrass, but farmers and agronomists are worried the affects have been more severe than they anticipated.

Agronomic Acumen agronomist Wayne Smith, based in Albany, said he had seen that Overwatch could sit in dry soil for a month or two and nothing happened, but when it rained, that change.

“As soon as it rains, the product starts rising through the soil, moving in all different directions and causing bleaching to off-target plants,” Mr Smith said.

“It’s definitely the rain that activates it – in most cases, there is no off-target damage when it is dry, but a week after it rains, we start seeing off-target damage in all directions.

“If you spray a crop and see no effect for two months, then it rains and all of a sudden you start getting damage, you can’t attribute that to spray drift, spraying from inversion, or mixing chemicals with it, as FMC has claimed.”

FMC head of development Geoff Robertson said volatilisation referred to the movement of herbicide vapours through the air following a herbicide application.

“The potential volatilisation of bixlozone, the active ingredient, applied to soil has been tested by FMC under both field conditions and controlled conditions in a wind tunnel and these investigations demonstrated that the amount of volatilisation was very low,” Mr Robertson said.

“Bixlozone is expected to degrade rapidly in air, with a half-life of about six hours and this data indicates that volatility is unlikely to be a significant source of off-target movement of bixlozone.

“Based on available information and data, any off-target movement of Overwatch, which may be incorrectly perceived as volatility, is most likely related to spray drift which is supported by the many other instances where Overwatch has been applied alongside sensitive crops with no off-target bleaching recorded.”

According to Mr Smith, it appears the vapour from the product is coming up through the soil, which could happen on the same day, a week later, or even a month later.

“I have a client on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, who sprayed dry in mid-March and then got a phone call in mid-May, after rain, telling him that he had damaged plants all down the highway,” Mr Smith said.

“He hadn’t sprayed for two months and is the only cropping guy around, so he sprayed dry, seeded and covered it up with soil, then it rained two months later and the damage began.

“That’s all the evidence you need that it simply can’t be spray drift – Overwatch is volatile and is moving later on when it’s wet.”

Mr Smith said there was no other product he had ever seen in farming that acted the way Overwatch appeared to.

“With it only happening with moisture, to me that indicates that there has been a chemical reaction and that is what is releasing, rather than the chemical itself,” he said.

“This is the worst product we’ve ever seen for vapourising and we’re seeing vapourising still happening six weeks from when the rain or wet soil activated the product.”

Independent agronomist Frank Boetel, based in Katanning, said the worst bleaching was in paddocks that had been directly sprayed, with barley more susceptible than wheat and canola.

“We’re getting unacceptable damage to barley crops,” Mr Boetels said.

“Wheat is more tolerant to it, which is what we had already seen in trials, but as soon as it gets wet, that’s when it really takes off and we’re seeing substantial damage in barley crops that have been sprayed.

“The others hardest hit seem to be oats, lupins and serradella which are all more vulnerable to the off-target drift.”

Both Mr Smith and Mr Boetel, along with hundreds of agronomists and farmers around the country, have made reports on the damage caused by Overwatch both to FMC and to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

According to FMC, the number of reports of off-target crop bleaching remains relatively low considering the area treated with Overwatch this year.

FMC has now received between 65 and 70 reported cases in WA and a total of nine reports in the Eastern States.

Mr Robertson said ongoing monitoring was showing promising recovery of lupin crops from transient bleaching effects.

“Many of the earlier sown crops have already recovered from in-crop transient bleaching,” Mr Robertson said.

“There are still a few areas where FMC are yet to observe crop recovery from transient bleaching, especially in areas where it has been excessively wet or when a combination of factors have led to elevated in-crop crop bleaching.

“Those areas continue to be monitored but, importantly, it is still some weeks before FMC would expect that the transient bleaching effects would have entirely resolved in all crops.”

An APVMA spokeswoman said they were aware of reports of crop damage in WA and Victoria and they were working with FMC to understand the nature of these incidents.

“The APVMA is working with the registrant to determine the nature and number of adverse experiences related to the use of Overwatch Herbicide and will assess any adverse experience reports it receives in relation to this matter,” the spokeswoman said.

“The product label describes how Overwatch herbicide should be used, including how and under what conditions it should be applied and specifies mandatory downwind buffer zones to minimise the risks associated with spray drift.

“The APVMA encourages users to report adverse experiences associated with agvet chemicals.”

Mr Boetels said the product seemed to be “doing more harm than good” in very wet conditions.

“That’s clearly evident in the amount of damage that has been reported not just in WA but over east as well, as they’re are more cases coming up over there,” Mr Boetels said.

“Looking at the damage to one of my clients in east Katanning, we think yield wise about 50 per cent of the lupins and 35pc of the barley have been impacted based on the water use efficiency model.

“He paid $70,000 for the chemical, but we think there will be a loss of about $500,000 to $700,000 in revenue from damage to crops.”

While the side-effects of using Overwatch are not ideal, Mr Smith said most farmers and agronomists don’t want to stop using the product as it was such a valuable tool, but they will be more cautious and want to know what is making it volatile.

“The weed control is just fantastic, so we’ll just use a lower rate going forward,” he said.

“Wheat and canola are fine, they get a bit white for sure, but they seem pretty tolerant to it, however we probably won’t use it too much on barley for a while and we’ve got to be careful if lupins or anything else susceptible is around, particularly down slope.

“It doesn’t mean we stop using it altogether – you don’t want to throw the baby out with the bath water as it’s a great product, but it’s just behaving in a way we’re not used to and we’d like to know what’s causing it.”

Mr Robertson said FMC’s ongoing monitoring was showing promising recovery of crops from off-target transient bleaching effects.

“Our team remains committed to answering any questions our customers may have and provide technical support via our qualified agronomy team,” he said.

11/5/20: Wonderful Citrus (United States). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Tebuconazole

Wonderful Citrus (United States)  - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Tebuconazole

11/5/20: Frozen oranges - Wonderful Citrus (United States) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.24mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Wonderful Citrus (United States)  – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Tebuconazole

11/5/20: Frozen oranges – Wonderful Citrus (United States) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.24mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2020: Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australias MRL’s. Pesticides: Procymidone, Thiamethoxam, Cyhalothrin

Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

5/5/20: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Procymidone 0.026mg/kg

5/5/20: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.015mg/kg

24/6/20: Fresh Onion Flowers - Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.1mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

5/5/20: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Procymidone 0.026mg/kg

5/5/20: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.015mg/kg

24/6/20: Fresh Onion Flowers – Guangzhou Linqi Trading Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.1mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/5/20: Khajanchi Exports (Mumbai India). Food breaching Australian MRL for Carbendazim

Khajanchi Exports (Mumbai India)  - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

1/5/20: Brown Sultanas - Khajanchi Exports (Mumbai India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.94mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Khajanchi Exports (Mumbai India)  – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

1/5/20: Brown Sultanas – Khajanchi Exports (Mumbai India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.94mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2020: Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada). Breaching Australian MRLs for Carbendazim, Fipronil

Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Fipronil

30/4/20: Strawberry Puree Concentrate - Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.29mg/kg

14/12/20: Raspberry Juice Concentrate - Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada) - Pesticide: Fipronil 0.1mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Fipronil

30/4/20: Strawberry Puree Concentrate – Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.29mg/kg

14/12/20: Raspberry Juice Concentrate – Pacific Coast Fruit Products (Canada) – Pesticide: Fipronil 0.1mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

24/4/20: Svt International. Breaching Australian MRL’s: Pesticide: Carbendazim

Svt International - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

24/4/20: Frozen Strawberries - Svt International  (Poland) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.1mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Svt International – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

24/4/20: Frozen Strawberries – Svt International  (Poland) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.1mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

3/4/20: Colombia Bean and Produce Co Inc – Breaching Australian MRL’s: Pesticides: Acephate, Methamidophos

Colombia Bean and Produce Co Inc* - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate, Methamidophos [*AQIS state that this product was from Colombia, which appears to be incorrect. Country of origin appears to be United States]

3/4/20: Black Eyed Beans - Colombian Bean and Produce Co Inc  (Colombia) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.26mg/kg

3/4/20: Black Eyed Beans - Colombian Bean and Produce Co Inc  (Colombia) - Pesticide: Methamidophos 0.079mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Colombia Bean and Produce Co Inc* – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate, Methamidophos [*AQIS state that this product was from Colombia, which appears to be incorrect. Country of origin appears to be United States]

3/4/20: Black Eyed Beans – Colombian Bean and Produce Co Inc  (Colombia) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.26mg/kg

3/4/20: Black Eyed Beans – Colombian Bean and Produce Co Inc  (Colombia) – Pesticide: Methamidophos 0.079mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/4/20: D & T Green Food Co Ltd (Vietnam). Frozen Red Chillies Breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Difenconazole, Hexaconazole

D & T Green Food Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole, Hexaconazole

1/4/20: Frozen Red Chillies - D & T Green Food Co Ltd  (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.09mg/kg, Hexaconazole 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

D & T Green Food Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole, Hexaconazole

1/4/20: Frozen Red Chillies – D & T Green Food Co Ltd  (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.09mg/kg, Hexaconazole 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

30/3/20: Nature’s Touch Frozen Food Inc, Food Breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Taufluvalinate

Nature's Touch Frozen Foods Inc - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Taufluvalinate

30/3/20: Frozen Mixed Fruit - Nature's Touch Frozen Foods Inc  (Canada) - Pesticide: Taufluvalinate 0.11mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Nature’s Touch Frozen Foods Inc – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Taufluvalinate

30/3/20: Frozen Mixed Fruit – Nature’s Touch Frozen Foods Inc  (Canada) – Pesticide: Taufluvalinate 0.11mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

17/3/20: Colombo Commodities (Sri Lanka). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Chana Dahl. Pesticide: Pirimiphos Methyl

Colombo Commodities - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Pirimiphos Methyl

17/3/20: Chana Dahl - Colombo Commodities  (Sri Lanka) - Pesticide: Pirimiphos Methyl 0.16mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Colombo Commodities – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Pirimiphos Methyl

17/3/20: Chana Dahl – Colombo Commodities  (Sri Lanka) – Pesticide: Pirimiphos Methyl 0.16mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

6/3/20: Reanthong Agro Product Limited Partnership (Thailand) Australian MRL Breach. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Reanthong Agro Product Limited Partnership Exported - Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

6/3/20: Dried Longan Meat - Reanthong Agro Product Partnership (Thailand) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.13mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Reanthong Agro Product Limited Partnership Exported – Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

6/3/20: Dried Longan Meat – Reanthong Agro Product Partnership (Thailand) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.13mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2020/21: Ratin Khosh Co (Iran). Breached Australian MRL for Dried Strawberries and Raisans. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Ratin Khosh Co (Iran) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

4/3/20: Dried Strawberries - Ratin Khosh Co (Iran) - Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

16/3/21: Raisans - Ratin Khosh Co (Iran) - Carbendazim 0.78mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Ratin Khosh Co (Iran) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

4/3/20: Dried Strawberries – Ratin Khosh Co (Iran) – Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

16/3/21: Raisans – Ratin Khosh Co (Iran) – Carbendazim 0.78mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

28/4/21: Two Wells (South Australia). Spray Drift

Fears for kids’ health as chemical overspray hits homes

28/4/21: The Advertiser

Residents in the rural belt north of Adelaide (Two Wells) fear for their children’s health as chemicals from commercial farming outfits waft into residential properties.

Fears for kids’ health as chemical overspray hits homes

28/4/21: The Advertiser

Residents in the rural belt north of Adelaide (Two Wells) fear for their children’s health as chemicals from commercial farming outfits waft into residential properties.

25/3/20: United Co. For Food Industry (Sae). Breaching Australian MRL for Frozen Okra. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

United Co. For Food Industry (Sae) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

25/3/20: Frozen Okra - United Co. For Food Industry (Egypt) - Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

United Co. For Food Industry (Sae) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

25/3/20: Frozen Okra – United Co. For Food Industry (Egypt) – Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2/3/20: Ceres Fruit Juices Ltd (South Africa). Breaching Australian MRLs. Pesticide: Thiabendazole

Ceres Fruit Juices Ltd (South Africa) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiabendazole

2/3/20: Dried Alberta peaches halves - Ceres Fruit Juices Ltd (South Africa) - Thiabendazole 0.046mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Ceres Fruit Juices Ltd (South Africa) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiabendazole

2/3/20: Dried Alberta peaches halves – Ceres Fruit Juices Ltd (South Africa) – Thiabendazole 0.046mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2020: Kirsten Company Llc. Export Breaches Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Acephate, Chlorpyrifos

Kirsten Company Llc -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate

17/2/20: Black Eye Bean Seeds - Kirsten Company Llc - Acephate 0.39mg/kg

27/4/20: Black Eye Bean Seeds - Kirsten Company Llc - Chlorpyrifos 0.05mg/kg

10/7/20: Black Eye Bean Seeds - Kirsten Company Llc - Chlorpyrifos 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Kirsten Company Llc –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate

17/2/20: Black Eye Bean Seeds – Kirsten Company Llc – Acephate 0.39mg/kg

27/4/20: Black Eye Bean Seeds – Kirsten Company Llc – Chlorpyrifos 0.05mg/kg

10/7/20: Black Eye Bean Seeds – Kirsten Company Llc – Chlorpyrifos 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

31/1/20: Doehler Juice Solutions (USA). Breach to Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Captan

Doehler Juice Solutions -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Metalaxyl

31/1/20: Raspberry Juice Concentrate - Doehler Juice Solutions - Captan 33.7mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Doehler Juice Solutions –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Metalaxyl

31/1/20: Raspberry Juice Concentrate – Doehler Juice Solutions – Captan 33.7mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2020/21: Thangapandi International (India). Pesticide MRL breaches: Carbendazim, Metalaxyl, Chlorpyrifos, Fipronil, Cypermethrin, Profenofos

Thangapandi International -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Metalaxyl

15/1/20: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Carbendazim 0.065mg/kg

15/1/20: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Metalaxyl 0.92mg/kg

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Carbendazim. Detected, not permitted in this food.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Chlorpyrifos. Detected, not permitted in this food.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Fipronil. Detected, not permitted in this food.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Cypermethrin. 0.2891mg/kg.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves - Thanganpandi International - Profenofos. 0.4844mg/kg.

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Thangapandi International –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Metalaxyl

15/1/20: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Carbendazim 0.065mg/kg

15/1/20: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Metalaxyl 0.92mg/kg

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Carbendazim. Detected, not permitted in this food.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Chlorpyrifos. Detected, not permitted in this food.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Fipronil. Detected, not permitted in this food.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Cypermethrin. 0.2891mg/kg.

17/2/21: Fresh Betel Leaves – Thanganpandi International – Profenofos. 0.4844mg/kg.

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2021 August: Spray Drift Investigations. Julia Creek (Queensland)

Biosecurity Queensland investigating two spray drift complaints in new outback cropping area

25 August 2021

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-25/biosecurity-queensland-investigating-north-west-qld-spray-drift/100402442

Biosecurity Queensland has confirmed it has launched criminal investigations into two chemical spray drift complaints in one of the state's newest cropping areas.

The Flinders River catchment in the north-west has been touted as one of the country's new frontiers for cotton growing, with New South Wales-based irrigators making significant investments in the past two years.

But some recent incidents of chemical spray drift have put the area's already established cattle industry on edge.

Third-generation Julia Creek cattle-producer Ryan Hacon said he had not been directly impacted by the problem, but it had been going on in the district for the past two years.

"It's something we haven't had to deal with before and it is a fairly large concern," he said.

"We've got a really good area — everyone knows each other, everyone's friendly.

Mr Hacon said he had flown over areas where trees and pasture had been damaged by herbicides drifting across boundary fences.

"[It has damaged] mainly white woods and cork woods and trees like that," he said.

"It also damages pastures, especially all the broad-leaf herbages we get after the wet that really put the weight on our cattle."

'Criminal investigation'

Two separate incidents relating to one property in the area are now being investigated by Biosecurity Queensland.

Spray drift specialist Mary O'Brien said investigations like this could be "long and involved".

"The biosecurity investigations are actually a criminal investigation," Ms O'Brien said.

"They'll be looking for records, they'll be looking for weather conditions, the equipment that was used and if the product was used at the right rate."

Ms O'Brien said while there were legal implications with spray drift, it could be mitigated using other methods.

"I believe education and information is a much better path to go down," she said.

"But they are certainly within their rights to contact Biosecurity Queensland, and the faster they do that the more evidence they can collect in their investigation."

Development on the horizon

Mr Hacon said many landholders in the area were determined to fix the spray drift issues before the industry develops more.

"There's definitely a few people that are quite negative about [cropping] now," he said.

More cropping development has been forecast in north-west Queensland, with the state government announcing a 145,000-megalitre release of water from the Flinders River and at least two dam projects hoping to attract government funding.

Mr Hacon said he would like to see more enforcement of regulations if the industry is going to develop further.

"There needs to be some sort of policing or structure if there are issues with drift," he said.

Biosecurity Queensland investigating two spray drift complaints in new outback cropping area

25 August 2021

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-25/biosecurity-queensland-investigating-north-west-qld-spray-drift/100402442

Biosecurity Queensland has confirmed it has launched criminal investigations into two chemical spray drift complaints in one of the state’s newest cropping areas.

The Flinders River catchment in the north-west has been touted as one of the country’s new frontiers for cotton growing, with New South Wales-based irrigators making significant investments in the past two years.

But some recent incidents of chemical spray drift have put the area’s already established cattle industry on edge.

Third-generation Julia Creek cattle-producer Ryan Hacon said he had not been directly impacted by the problem, but it had been going on in the district for the past two years.

“It’s something we haven’t had to deal with before and it is a fairly large concern,” he said.

“We’ve got a really good area — everyone knows each other, everyone’s friendly.

Mr Hacon said he had flown over areas where trees and pasture had been damaged by herbicides drifting across boundary fences.

“[It has damaged] mainly white woods and cork woods and trees like that,” he said.

“It also damages pastures, especially all the broad-leaf herbages we get after the wet that really put the weight on our cattle.”

‘Criminal investigation’

Two separate incidents relating to one property in the area are now being investigated by Biosecurity Queensland.

Spray drift specialist Mary O’Brien said investigations like this could be “long and involved”.

“The biosecurity investigations are actually a criminal investigation,” Ms O’Brien said.

“They’ll be looking for records, they’ll be looking for weather conditions, the equipment that was used and if the product was used at the right rate.”

Ms O’Brien said while there were legal implications with spray drift, it could be mitigated using other methods.

“I believe education and information is a much better path to go down,” she said.

“But they are certainly within their rights to contact Biosecurity Queensland, and the faster they do that the more evidence they can collect in their investigation.”

Development on the horizon

Mr Hacon said many landholders in the area were determined to fix the spray drift issues before the industry develops more.

“There’s definitely a few people that are quite negative about [cropping] now,” he said.

More cropping development has been forecast in north-west Queensland, with the state government announcing a 145,000-megalitre release of water from the Flinders River and at least two dam projects hoping to attract government funding.

Mr Hacon said he would like to see more enforcement of regulations if the industry is going to develop further.

“There needs to be some sort of policing or structure if there are issues with drift,” he said.

2020/22: Court penalty over Torquay pesticide incident. Chemical: Metham Sodium

Court penalty over Torquay pesticide incident

April 12 2022

https://www.miragenews.com/court-penalty-over-torquay-pesticide-incident-762824/

Torquay commercial flower grower I, C & J Santospirito Pty Ltd has been fined $70,000 without conviction over a 2020 pesticide incident that left nearby residents suffering vision impairment, sore throats, breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea and vomiting.

Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA) laid two pollution charges against the company after the incident on 17 June 2020, which involved a chemical called Metham Sodium being used on agricultural land at 200 Coombes Road, Torquay.

EPA investigators working with Surf Coast Shire Council and other agencies found the chemical was being used to prepare ground for a new crop, but had been incorrectly applied and reacted with moist soil to produce methyl isothiocyanate (MITC), which is a hazardous gas.

Wind drift took the gas into the nearby Ocean Acres and Frog Hollow residential estates, three people were taken to hospital by ambulance and a fourth transported himself to hospital.

Volunteer crews of the Torquay CFA Brigade and a CFA HAZMAT unit from Lara responded to the incident, and the council received 53 reports of a chemical gas odour from residents over two days.

Metham Sodium is listed as a Schedule 6 poison, with a dangerous goods classification DG 8, corrosive. The official Metham Sodium safety datasheet says MITC is volatile and causes severe skin burns and eye damage.

The company pleaded guilty to two EPA charges under the Environment Protection Act 1970:

• Polluting the atmosphere so that the condition of the atmosphere is so changed as to make or be reasonably expected to make the atmosphere, noxious or poisonous or offensive to the senses of human beings, and

• Polluting the atmosphere so that the condition of the atmosphere is so changed as to make or be reasonably expected to make the atmosphere, harmful or potentially harmful to the health, welfare, safety or property of human beings.

Magistrate Simon Guthrie said the penalty took into account the company’s early plea of guilty, its cooperation with the investigation at all times, its prior good record, and what appeared to be genuine remorse and attention to the impact on the community.

The court also ordered the company to pay EPA’s legal costs of $7,582.40 and publicise the offending in local newspapers.

EPA lays charges over Torquay chemical incident

28 July 2021

Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA) has laid a total of three charges against Torquay company I, C & J Santospirito Pty Ltd. (Santospirito) under the Environment Protection Act 1970.

The charges follow a multi-agency investigation, which included assistance from Surfcoast Shire Council, into an alleged chemical incident at 200 Coombes Rd, Torquay.

EPA alleges that Santospirito improperly used a fumigant resulting in the production of methyl isothiocyanate (MITC). MITC affects the eyes and respiratory tract. Several nearby residents reported breathing difficulties as well as stinging and watering eyes. 

As the matter is now before the courts EPA will be making no further comment.

 

Court penalty over Torquay pesticide incident

April 12 2022

https://www.miragenews.com/court-penalty-over-torquay-pesticide-incident-762824/

Torquay commercial flower grower I, C & J Santospirito Pty Ltd has been fined $70,000 without conviction over a 2020 pesticide incident that left nearby residents suffering vision impairment, sore throats, breathing difficulties, headaches, nausea and vomiting.

Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA) laid two pollution charges against the company after the incident on 17 June 2020, which involved a chemical called Metham Sodium being used on agricultural land at 200 Coombes Road, Torquay.

EPA investigators working with Surf Coast Shire Council and other agencies found the chemical was being used to prepare ground for a new crop, but had been incorrectly applied and reacted with moist soil to produce methyl isothiocyanate (MITC), which is a hazardous gas.

Wind drift took the gas into the nearby Ocean Acres and Frog Hollow residential estates, three people were taken to hospital by ambulance and a fourth transported himself to hospital.

Volunteer crews of the Torquay CFA Brigade and a CFA HAZMAT unit from Lara responded to the incident, and the council received 53 reports of a chemical gas odour from residents over two days.

Metham Sodium is listed as a Schedule 6 poison, with a dangerous goods classification DG 8, corrosive. The official Metham Sodium safety datasheet says MITC is volatile and causes severe skin burns and eye damage.

The company pleaded guilty to two EPA charges under the Environment Protection Act 1970:

• Polluting the atmosphere so that the condition of the atmosphere is so changed as to make or be reasonably expected to make the atmosphere, noxious or poisonous or offensive to the senses of human beings, and

• Polluting the atmosphere so that the condition of the atmosphere is so changed as to make or be reasonably expected to make the atmosphere, harmful or potentially harmful to the health, welfare, safety or property of human beings.

Magistrate Simon Guthrie said the penalty took into account the company’s early plea of guilty, its cooperation with the investigation at all times, its prior good record, and what appeared to be genuine remorse and attention to the impact on the community.

The court also ordered the company to pay EPA’s legal costs of $7,582.40 and publicise the offending in local newspapers.

EPA lays charges over Torquay chemical incident

Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA) has laid a total of three charges against Torquay company I, C & J Santospirito Pty Ltd. (Santospirito) under the Environment Protection Act 1970.

The charges follow a multi-agency investigation, which included assistance from Surfcoast Shire Council, into an alleged chemical incident at 200 Coombes Rd, Torquay.

EPA alleges that Santospirito improperly used a fumigant resulting in the production of methyl isothiocyanate (MITC). MITC affects the eyes and respiratory tract. Several nearby residents reported breathing difficulties as well as stinging and watering eyes.

As the matter is now before the courts EPA will be making no further comment.

 

2015 November: Helicopter crash, Whyanbeel Road, Whyanbeel, Qld

Pilot injured but group make lucky escape in Mossman chopper crash

Emergency services crews near the site of a helicopter crash near Mossman. PICTURE: SHANE

Emergency services crews near the site of a helicopter crash near Mossman. PICTURE: SHANE NICHOLS

FOUR men are lucky to be alive after a helicopter surveying weeds near Mossman “fell out of the sky” and crashed into a creek bed yesterday.

The pilot of the GBR Helicopters chopper was being assessed for spinal injuries last night while the other three occupants walked away virtually unharmed.

The crash happened on a 50ha property on Whyanbeel Rd, near the location of a similar helicopter crash just over four years ago.

Four escape FNQ chopper crash

The wreck of a helicopter that crashed near Mossman. PICTURE: SUPPLIED

Emergency services were forced to trek to the scene through dense bushland to reach the site, before the 41-year-old male pilot was flown by rescue chopper to Cairns Hospital in a stable condition.

A Queensland Ambulance Service spokeswoman said the pilot had complained of lower back pain but all four occupants had been able to get out of the helicopter before help arrived.

It is believed the group were Biosecurity Queensland officers surveying the invasive miconia weed, which is a declared pest plant.

Project co-ordinator Mick Jeffery said last week they would be looking for the weed in “dense rainforest areas”.

“Once weeds have been identified, they will be marked using GPS technology,” he said.

High Falls Farm owner Andrew Le Carpentier was visited by State Government employees several days ago, who notified him they would be conducting weed surveys via helicopter in the Whyanbeel Valley this week.

Mr Le Carpentier said he had warned them about a helicopter crash involving crew conducting weed surveys in the valley four years ago.

Four people including government employees, a Cairns Regional Council officer and a pilot were injured after their GBR Bell Ranger 206 helicopter went down near Whyanbeel Rd after striking powerlines on June 1, 2011.

The pilot and one passenger sustained serious injuries, and the other two passengers sustained minor injuries.

Mr Le Carpentier said the powerlines were a hidden danger for low-flying aircraft in the area.

“There’s a big red ball on it to warn the helicopters, but unfortunately what happens is it goes mouldy,’’ he said.

Another resident said the helicopter “fell out of the sky” yesterday, and it appeared there was no contact with powerlines this time.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau will investigate the incident.

Pilot injured but group make lucky escape in Mossman chopper crash

Emergency services crews near the site of a helicopter crash near Mossman. PICTURE: SHANE

Emergency services crews near the site of a helicopter crash near Mossman. PICTURE: SHANE NICHOLS

FOUR men are lucky to be alive after a helicopter surveying weeds near Mossman “fell out of the sky” and crashed into a creek bed yesterday.

The pilot of the GBR Helicopters chopper was being assessed for spinal injuries last night while the other three occupants walked away virtually unharmed.

The crash happened on a 50ha property on Whyanbeel Rd, near the location of a similar helicopter crash just over four years ago.

Four escape FNQ chopper crash

The wreck of a helicopter that crashed near Mossman. PICTURE: SUPPLIED

Emergency services were forced to trek to the scene through dense bushland to reach the site, before the 41-year-old male pilot was flown by rescue chopper to Cairns Hospital in a stable condition.

A Queensland Ambulance Service spokeswoman said the pilot had complained of lower back pain but all four occupants had been able to get out of the helicopter before help arrived.

It is believed the group were Biosecurity Queensland officers surveying the invasive miconia weed, which is a declared pest plant.

Project co-ordinator Mick Jeffery said last week they would be looking for the weed in “dense rainforest areas”.

“Once weeds have been identified, they will be marked using GPS technology,” he said.

High Falls Farm owner Andrew Le Carpentier was visited by State Government employees several days ago, who notified him they would be conducting weed surveys via helicopter in the Whyanbeel Valley this week.

Mr Le Carpentier said he had warned them about a helicopter crash involving crew conducting weed surveys in the valley four years ago.

Four people including government employees, a Cairns Regional Council officer and a pilot were injured after their GBR Bell Ranger 206 helicopter went down near Whyanbeel Rd after striking powerlines on June 1, 2011.

The pilot and one passenger sustained serious injuries, and the other two passengers sustained minor injuries.

Mr Le Carpentier said the powerlines were a hidden danger for low-flying aircraft in the area.

“There’s a big red ball on it to warn the helicopters, but unfortunately what happens is it goes mouldy,’’ he said.

Another resident said the helicopter “fell out of the sky” yesterday, and it appeared there was no contact with powerlines this time.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau will investigate the incident.

2012 March: Porongurup Vineyards Spraydrift. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Porongurup wine grapes damaged by herbicide spray drift

Posted 21 Mar 2012, 2:43pm

Some Porongurup wine producers in WA's Great Southern are concerned about grapevine damage, seemingly from spray drift of herbicides being used in summer weed control.

Some growers have reported damage to the Department of Agriculture and Food and it appears that it's consistent with the effects of phenoxy herbicides such as 2,4-D drifting on to vines.

Angelo Diletti, from Castle Rock winery, is one grower affected.

"It's widespread within our vineyard. The growing tips of the vines have a typically mis-shapen leaves, almost certain hormone damage," he said.

"At this stage it's growing tips, so it probably hasn't affected this year. What it will do in the future I don't know."

The Department of Agriculture agrees that it is phenoxy damage and urges growers spraying summer weeds to be very careful in monitoring spraying conditions to avoid sprays drifting into susceptible crops such as grapes.

Porongurup wine grapes damaged by herbicide spray drift

Posted

Some Porongurup wine producers in WA’s Great Southern are concerned about grapevine damage, seemingly from spray drift of herbicides being used in summer weed control.

Some growers have reported damage to the Department of Agriculture and Food and it appears that it’s consistent with the effects of phenoxy herbicides such as 2,4-D drifting on to vines.

Angelo Diletti, from Castle Rock winery, is one grower affected.

“It’s widespread within our vineyard. The growing tips of the vines have a typically mis-shapen leaves, almost certain hormone damage,” he said.

“At this stage it’s growing tips, so it probably hasn’t affected this year. What it will do in the future I don’t know.”

The Department of Agriculture agrees that it is phenoxy damage and urges growers spraying summer weeds to be very careful in monitoring spraying conditions to avoid sprays drifting into susceptible crops such as grapes.

June 2021: Bird Deaths – Galahs (Parkes, New South Wales). Pesticide: Bromadiolone

Mouse plague impacts widen to native birds as EPA confirms galahs killed by bait

4 June 2021

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-04/bird-victims-of-suspected-mice-baiting/100187904

An investigation by the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has confirmed numerous bird deaths in western New South Wales were caused by the consumption of mouse bait.

The finding follows reports of native birds suspected to have been poisoned in the Central West.

Toxicology results found some native and introduced species around Forbes, Parkes, Dubbo, Narromine, Condobolin and the Riverina were poisoned.

Kelly Lacey, the WIRES bird coordinator from Parkes, found up to 100 dead galahs at the town's cemetery.

"Seeing the dead bodies and picking them up was just truly heartbreaking," Ms Lacey said.

Ms Lacey said when she arrived there were only two left alive — barely.

She said one had blood in its faeces, which made her suspect their deaths were a result of internal bleeding from eating bait.

"I feel stronger poisons are going to have a great impact on our wildlife," Ms Lacey said.

Follow guidelines, reduce impacts

The NSW government has announced a $50 million mouse control package that will include the distribution of 10,000 litres of bromadiolone, if it is approved by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

The second-generation anti-coagulant has been widely described as "napalm" for mice and is banned because of its strength.

EPA executive director of regulatory operations Carmen Dwyer said safe baiting was important. 

"There's always the possibility of a non-target animal taking the bait," she said.

Ms Dwyer urged people to use the bait in the amount recommended on the label. 

"We'll minimise any offsite impacts to our families, our communities, the environment and wildlife," she said.

Question of strength

Charles Sturt University ornithologist Maggie Watson said the widespread use of second-generation rodenticides could decimate native wildlife populations.

"Some just kill anything that comes into contact with them," she said.

Dr Watson said there had already been reports of large numbers of animals being killed by treated grain.

"If we bring bromadiolone into the system, we're just going to wave bye-bye to a whole suite of native animals in the landscape," she said.

Mouse plague impacts widen to native birds as EPA confirms galahs killed by bait

4 June 2021

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-04/bird-victims-of-suspected-mice-baiting/100187904

An investigation by the New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has confirmed numerous bird deaths in western New South Wales were caused by the consumption of mouse bait.

The finding follows reports of native birds suspected to have been poisoned in the Central West.

Toxicology results found some native and introduced species around Forbes, Parkes, Dubbo, Narromine, Condobolin and the Riverina were poisoned.

Kelly Lacey, the WIRES bird coordinator from Parkes, found up to 100 dead galahs at the town’s cemetery.

“Seeing the dead bodies and picking them up was just truly heartbreaking,” Ms Lacey said.

Ms Lacey said when she arrived there were only two left alive — barely.

She said one had blood in its faeces, which made her suspect their deaths were a result of internal bleeding from eating bait.

“I feel stronger poisons are going to have a great impact on our wildlife,” Ms Lacey said.

Follow guidelines, reduce impacts

The NSW government has announced a $50 million mouse control package that will include the distribution of 10,000 litres of bromadiolone, if it is approved by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

The second-generation anti-coagulant has been widely described as “napalm” for mice and is banned because of its strength.

EPA executive director of regulatory operations Carmen Dwyer said safe baiting was important.

“There’s always the possibility of a non-target animal taking the bait,” she said.

Ms Dwyer urged people to use the bait in the amount recommended on the label.

“We’ll minimise any offsite impacts to our families, our communities, the environment and wildlife,” she said.

Question of strength

Charles Sturt University ornithologist Maggie Watson said the widespread use of second-generation rodenticides could decimate native wildlife populations.

“Some just kill anything that comes into contact with them,” she said.

Dr Watson said there had already been reports of large numbers of animals being killed by treated grain.

“If we bring bromadiolone into the system, we’re just going to wave bye-bye to a whole suite of native animals in the landscape,” she said.

2021 Feb: Robinvale (Victoria) bird killing most likely deliberate. Pesticide: Methomyl

Mass killing of birds was most likely deliberate

Feb 25 2021 (Canberra Times)

Investigators have all but ruled out the deaths were caused by accident such as spray drift, which had been suggested.

"It is unlikely the cause of death in this instance was from nearby crops being sprayed with insecticide," Victorian government authorities said.

About 100 corellas fell dead from trees at Robinvale, in northern Victoria, on December 1 last year.

The Robinvale region has many horticulture crops, including table and wine grapes, citrus and almonds.

While corellas have a reputation as a nuisance and destructive to crops and gardens when they gather in large numbers, it is against the law to poison them.

No-one has yet been blamed for the deaths, despite an appeal for public help and the involvement of police and government authorities.

A dog which was seen to have one of the dead birds in its mouth later became sick, it has been disclosed.

Acting senior forest and wildlife officer Patrick Vincenzini said the investigation was ongoing.

"A necropsy of several deceased birds found no signs of infectious disease," Mr Vincenzini said.

"High concentrations of methomyl - an active ingredient found in various insecticides - was, however, identified in toxicology tests performed on the carcasses."

Methomyl is considered highly important for pest management in some horticulture crops and is widely used against fruit fly.

"We are appealing to anyone who may have information about this case to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or the DELWP Customer Contact Centre on 136 186," Mr Vincenzini said.

Corellas are a common species in the Robinvale area and the number killed would not have an impact on the species.

Authorities warn there were risks to vulnerable and endangered bird species such as the Regent Parrot in the Robinvale area.

Killing wildlife by poison is an offence under the Wildlife Act 1975. A person found guilty can receive penalties of up to $16,522 and/or six months jail.

The government is reviewing those laws with the likelihood more severe penalties will be available in future.

Mass killing of birds was most likely deliberate

Feb 25 2021 (Canberra Times)

Investigators have all but ruled out the deaths were caused by accident such as spray drift, which had been suggested.

“It is unlikely the cause of death in this instance was from nearby crops being sprayed with insecticide,” Victorian government authorities said.

About 100 corellas fell dead from trees at Robinvale, in northern Victoria, on December 1 last year.

The Robinvale region has many horticulture crops, including table and wine grapes, citrus and almonds.

While corellas have a reputation as a nuisance and destructive to crops and gardens when they gather in large numbers, it is against the law to poison them.

No-one has yet been blamed for the deaths, despite an appeal for public help and the involvement of police and government authorities.

A dog which was seen to have one of the dead birds in its mouth later became sick, it has been disclosed.

Acting senior forest and wildlife officer Patrick Vincenzini said the investigation was ongoing.

“A necropsy of several deceased birds found no signs of infectious disease,” Mr Vincenzini said.

“High concentrations of methomyl – an active ingredient found in various insecticides – was, however, identified in toxicology tests performed on the carcasses.”

Methomyl is considered highly important for pest management in some horticulture crops and is widely used against fruit fly.

“We are appealing to anyone who may have information about this case to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or the DELWP Customer Contact Centre on 136 186,” Mr Vincenzini said.

Corellas are a common species in the Robinvale area and the number killed would not have an impact on the species.

Authorities warn there were risks to vulnerable and endangered bird species such as the Regent Parrot in the Robinvale area.

Killing wildlife by poison is an offence under the Wildlife Act 1975. A person found guilty can receive penalties of up to $16,522 and/or six months jail.

The government is reviewing those laws with the likelihood more severe penalties will be available in future.

2021 Feb: Recycler Suez says herbicides in contaminated compost came from Melbourne council water. Pesticides: Dicamba, 2,4-D, MCPA, Triclopyr, Picloram

Recycler Suez says herbicides in contaminated compost came from Melbourne council waste

21/2/21

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-21/suez-herbicides-contaminated-compost-melbourne-council/13175200

Recycling giant Suez says the powerful herbicides that contaminated a batch of compost produced at its Melbourne facility late last year, killing hundreds of home vegetable gardens, came from council green waste.

"Feedstock obtained from municipal sources contained traces of the agricultural herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D, MCPA, triclopyr and picloram," a Suez spokesperson told the ABC.

"These are herbicides that would not normally be expected to be found and are therefore not ones for which testing is required.

"We continue to work at determining their source."

Chris Williams, who lectures in Urban Horticulture at Melbourne University, said he was shocked to find out the herbicides came from a council.

"I really thought this is the worst-case scenario," Dr Williams said.

"I was hoping we were dealing with manure. That would have been relatively easy to regulate.

"But if we're getting residual herbicide in municipal green waste, that's a lot more complex.

Recycler Suez says herbicides in contaminated compost came from Melbourne council waste

21/2/21

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-21/suez-herbicides-contaminated-compost-melbourne-council/13175200

Recycling giant Suez says the powerful herbicides that contaminated a batch of compost produced at its Melbourne facility late last year, killing hundreds of home vegetable gardens, came from council green waste.

“Feedstock obtained from municipal sources contained traces of the agricultural herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D, MCPA, triclopyr and picloram,” a Suez spokesperson told the ABC.

“These are herbicides that would not normally be expected to be found and are therefore not ones for which testing is required.

“We continue to work at determining their source.”

Chris Williams, who lectures in Urban Horticulture at Melbourne University, said he was shocked to find out the herbicides came from a council.

“I really thought this is the worst-case scenario,” Dr Williams said.

“I was hoping we were dealing with manure. That would have been relatively easy to regulate.

“But if we’re getting residual herbicide in municipal green waste, that’s a lot more complex.

2021 February: Bee Deaths, Dalby (Queensland). Pesticide: Fipronil

Bee deaths spark investigation after traces of chemical Fipronil found in hives

19/2/21

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-18/dalby-bee-deaths-spark-fipronil-investigation/13162662

A southern Queensland beekeeper is desperate for answers after losing up to 600,000 honeybees to suspected poisoning by a controversial agricultural chemical.

Peter Donohoe, from Dalby, first contacted biosecurity officials after finding hundreds of dying bees on his property on Christmas morning.

"I went out and there are dead bees in front of every hive and bees dying at the same time," he said.

"I tried to see what bees I could save and we started moving them and splitting [the hives].

"Exactly four weeks later the leftover bees that were there got hit again."

Mr Donohoe shifted the survivors, mostly Italian bees, to a new location near the Dalby township but the deaths have continued up to this week.

He estimated 15 hives had been destroyed, while the remaining hives were weakened.

"It's gut-wrenching. I can't really cope with it," he said.

"You're left with an absolute mess of dead bees and empty boxes.

Bee deaths spark investigation after traces of chemical Fipronil found in hives

19/2/21

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-18/dalby-bee-deaths-spark-fipronil-investigation/13162662

A southern Queensland beekeeper is desperate for answers after losing up to 600,000 honeybees to suspected poisoning by a controversial agricultural chemical.

Peter Donohoe, from Dalby, first contacted biosecurity officials after finding hundreds of dying bees on his property on Christmas morning.

“I went out and there are dead bees in front of every hive and bees dying at the same time,” he said.

“I tried to see what bees I could save and we started moving them and splitting [the hives].

“Exactly four weeks later the leftover bees that were there got hit again.”

Mr Donohoe shifted the survivors, mostly Italian bees, to a new location near the Dalby township but the deaths have continued up to this week.

He estimated 15 hives had been destroyed, while the remaining hives were weakened.

“It’s gut-wrenching. I can’t really cope with it,” he said.

“You’re left with an absolute mess of dead bees and empty boxes.

2021 February: Toxic Compost (Reservoir, Victoria). Pesticides?

Hundreds of Victorian home gardeners angry and out of pocket after using toxic compost from major recycler Suez

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-14/toxic-garden-compost-kills-vegetables-victorian-gardeners-angry/13152164

Feb 14 2021

Some time in October last year, a batch of commercial compost left a Suez recycling facility in Melbourne, bound for garden centres in central Victoria and Melbourne.

Within days, it had been combined into soil mixes, and sold to backyard gardeners planting their summer veggie crops.

Within weeks, many of those crops were dying.

"Nothing survived," said Kelly West, who lives in the northern Melbourne suburb of Reservoir.

In her front yard are two barren tubs that were supposed to be a thriving vegetable patch for her neighbours to harvest and enjoy.

"We were pretty excited about these beds. We had zucchini, squash, tomato, eggplant, and radishes around the edges ... it's really disappointing," she said.

Her backyard patch died too. But when Kelly mentioned it to a friend, she soon discovered she wasn't the only one who had lost their summer crop of veggies.

She's now one of more than 240 members of a Facebook group started just a few months ago in central Victoria by local gardeners who have experienced exactly the same thing.

Low concentrations of herbicides can have devastating results

The garden damage has prompted an Environment Protection Authority probe, and tests from Suez.

Experts believe the Suez compost was contaminated with a powerful herbicide that somehow wasn't removed in the composting process.

It wasn't picked up in testing, but even at low concentration it can have a devastating impact on gardens.

Clare — who's been a gardener for 40 years in central Victoria — was one of the first to raise the alarm in September after buying a load of soil from a local garden centre.

"After a couple of weeks, the leaves on my broad beans were curling — then the whole plant just became very twisted," she said.

"I had never ever seen anything like that before. They didn't flower or produce any beans. And then they just yellowed and died."

So did her tomatoes, capsicum, and eggplants.

To make it even more perplexing, some plants — like sweet corn, and brassicas like broccoli and cabbage — were not affected at all.

When Kelly and Clare went back to their garden centres for answers, they didn't get far.

Kelly's supplier in Melbourne told her to take it up with Suez.

Clare's attempts to reach her central Victorian garden centre by phone and email were ignored.

"Initially, my thing was to alert them to a problem," she said.

But many have. Some say they've have lost thousands of dollars in soil and seedling costs, to say nothing of the lost produce, and the simple enjoyment of growing their own food.

'This pops up all the time'

The toxic substance is probably a powerful broadleaf herbicide, according to Chris Williams, a lecturer in Urban Horticulture at Melbourne University.

"Anecdotally, this pops up all the time," he said.

Dr Williams has seen it firsthand, when plants at the University's Burnley campus died the same way three years ago.

He says he is often sent emails from former students asking him about why certain vegetables aren't growing, and says the symptoms are exactly the same.

He believes the contamination at Burnley came from pea straw treated with horse manure.

"Livestock are eating pasture that's been treated with these chemicals, which goes straight through them to the manure, and doesn't break down," he said.

Phenoxy acid herbicides are sold in variations like aminopyralid, clopyralid, picloram, and triclopyr. They are restricted to agricultural and commercial use, but can find their way into green waste used to make compost.

"Then people are unwittingly putting them onto their home gardens, and they're getting deformed crops as a result," said Dr Williams.

Both Suez and the Victorian Environment Protection Authority have been investigating the cluster of complaints, and have commissioned soil tests by the independent lab SESL.

Some samples have found traces of the herbicide, while others have not.

Clare's garden centre in central Victoria has written to its customers saying soil samples have come back clear. Suez also says testing shows its organic compounds are in line with EPA standards.

But it's not that simple.

SESL's senior soil scientist in Victoria Declan McDonald said the herbicide can cause problems in concentrations as low as a few parts per billion, which is too low for some labs to detect.

"We haven't been able to identify the smoking gun yet — but there's been lots of sound of gunfire," he said.

The EPA said: "There could have been an issue with product control either from the original supplier or during mixing at the shop, though it is not possible to conclusively prove that."

Clare is no doubt. She set up a series of test pots in her greenhouse containing samples from the four batches of soil she'd bought, and one with soil from her own backyard. It was the only one that survived.

And it's now apparent this contaminated batch is not a one-off event. Kelly said her problems began with a load of soil bought in March last year, also sourced from Suez.

For gardeners like Clare and Kelly — and many more like them — it's not clear who to complain to for a refund, or what to do with the toxic soil in their gardens.

"Do we cover it all in plastic? Do we get it removed? Maybe it's leaking into the rest of our soil. We really don't know," Kelly said.

Clare spread the soil in two rows at the back of her property. In the four months since, nothing has grown in them — not even weeds.

If your plants aren't growing, it might not be your fault

The EPA has passed the matter on to Consumer Affairs Victoria, which says it is aware of the complaints and is looking into the matter.

Suez told the ABC it has "ceased the sale of its composts until new batches are deemed clear of any unnecessary additives," but did not answer questions on how it plans to deal with requests for compensation or soil removal.

Even when — or if — gardeners get refunds, the scale of this contamination incident means the issue is unlikely to go away.

In the UK, and parts of the US, public campaigns in the 2000s led to restrictions on the use of phenoxy acid herbicides in agriculture.

But in Australia, the issue is almost unknown outside the industry.

Dr Williams says that may be because gardeners — especially novices — may have no idea what is causing the problem.

"They'll think, 'I haven't used enough mulch, I've haven't used enough compost'. But in this case, it's very clear you have these deformities caused by residual herbicide."

Kelly says she simply hopes it doesn't put people off gardening, or using organic materials like compost.

"I really feel for COVID gardeners who have picked it up during the lockdown and really got into their gardening. Because it's such a fantastic thing to do, mentally and physically," she said.

"They may not realise that it's not their fault that their plants aren't growing, and that might then make them give up on gardening. So I think it's really important for people to know that there's more to this."

Hundreds of Victorian home gardeners angry and out of pocket after using toxic compost from major recycler Suez

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-14/toxic-garden-compost-kills-vegetables-victorian-gardeners-angry/13152164

Feb 14 2021

Some time in October last year, a batch of commercial compost left a Suez recycling facility in Melbourne, bound for garden centres in central Victoria and Melbourne.

Within days, it had been combined into soil mixes, and sold to backyard gardeners planting their summer veggie crops.

Within weeks, many of those crops were dying.

“Nothing survived,” said Kelly West, who lives in the northern Melbourne suburb of Reservoir.

In her front yard are two barren tubs that were supposed to be a thriving vegetable patch for her neighbours to harvest and enjoy.

“We were pretty excited about these beds. We had zucchini, squash, tomato, eggplant, and radishes around the edges … it’s really disappointing,” she said.

Her backyard patch died too. But when Kelly mentioned it to a friend, she soon discovered she wasn’t the only one who had lost their summer crop of veggies.

She’s now one of more than 240 members of a Facebook group started just a few months ago in central Victoria by local gardeners who have experienced exactly the same thing.

Low concentrations of herbicides can have devastating results

The garden damage has prompted an Environment Protection Authority probe, and tests from Suez.

Experts believe the Suez compost was contaminated with a powerful herbicide that somehow wasn’t removed in the composting process.

It wasn’t picked up in testing, but even at low concentration it can have a devastating impact on gardens.

Clare — who’s been a gardener for 40 years in central Victoria — was one of the first to raise the alarm in September after buying a load of soil from a local garden centre.

“After a couple of weeks, the leaves on my broad beans were curling — then the whole plant just became very twisted,” she said.

“I had never ever seen anything like that before. They didn’t flower or produce any beans. And then they just yellowed and died.”

So did her tomatoes, capsicum, and eggplants.

To make it even more perplexing, some plants — like sweet corn, and brassicas like broccoli and cabbage — were not affected at all.

When Kelly and Clare went back to their garden centres for answers, they didn’t get far.

Kelly’s supplier in Melbourne told her to take it up with Suez.

Clare’s attempts to reach her central Victorian garden centre by phone and email were ignored.

“Initially, my thing was to alert them to a problem,” she said.

But many have. Some say they’ve have lost thousands of dollars in soil and seedling costs, to say nothing of the lost produce, and the simple enjoyment of growing their own food.

‘This pops up all the time’

The toxic substance is probably a powerful broadleaf herbicide, according to Chris Williams, a lecturer in Urban Horticulture at Melbourne University.

“Anecdotally, this pops up all the time,” he said.

Dr Williams has seen it firsthand, when plants at the University’s Burnley campus died the same way three years ago.

He says he is often sent emails from former students asking him about why certain vegetables aren’t growing, and says the symptoms are exactly the same.

He believes the contamination at Burnley came from pea straw treated with horse manure.

“Livestock are eating pasture that’s been treated with these chemicals, which goes straight through them to the manure, and doesn’t break down,” he said.

Phenoxy acid herbicides are sold in variations like aminopyralid, clopyralid, picloram, and triclopyr. They are restricted to agricultural and commercial use, but can find their way into green waste used to make compost.

“Then people are unwittingly putting them onto their home gardens, and they’re getting deformed crops as a result,” said Dr Williams.

Both Suez and the Victorian Environment Protection Authority have been investigating the cluster of complaints, and have commissioned soil tests by the independent lab SESL.

Some samples have found traces of the herbicide, while others have not.

Clare’s garden centre in central Victoria has written to its customers saying soil samples have come back clear. Suez also says testing shows its organic compounds are in line with EPA standards.

But it’s not that simple.

SESL’s senior soil scientist in Victoria Declan McDonald said the herbicide can cause problems in concentrations as low as a few parts per billion, which is too low for some labs to detect.

“We haven’t been able to identify the smoking gun yet — but there’s been lots of sound of gunfire,” he said.

The EPA said: “There could have been an issue with product control either from the original supplier or during mixing at the shop, though it is not possible to conclusively prove that.”

Clare is no doubt. She set up a series of test pots in her greenhouse containing samples from the four batches of soil she’d bought, and one with soil from her own backyard. It was the only one that survived.

And it’s now apparent this contaminated batch is not a one-off event. Kelly said her problems began with a load of soil bought in March last year, also sourced from Suez.

For gardeners like Clare and Kelly — and many more like them — it’s not clear who to complain to for a refund, or what to do with the toxic soil in their gardens.

“Do we cover it all in plastic? Do we get it removed? Maybe it’s leaking into the rest of our soil. We really don’t know,” Kelly said.

Clare spread the soil in two rows at the back of her property. In the four months since, nothing has grown in them — not even weeds.

If your plants aren’t growing, it might not be your fault

The EPA has passed the matter on to Consumer Affairs Victoria, which says it is aware of the complaints and is looking into the matter.

Suez told the ABC it has “ceased the sale of its composts until new batches are deemed clear of any unnecessary additives,” but did not answer questions on how it plans to deal with requests for compensation or soil removal.

Even when — or if — gardeners get refunds, the scale of this contamination incident means the issue is unlikely to go away.

In the UK, and parts of the US, public campaigns in the 2000s led to restrictions on the use of phenoxy acid herbicides in agriculture.

But in Australia, the issue is almost unknown outside the industry.

Dr Williams says that may be because gardeners — especially novices — may have no idea what is causing the problem.

“They’ll think, ‘I haven’t used enough mulch, I’ve haven’t used enough compost’. But in this case, it’s very clear you have these deformities caused by residual herbicide.”

Kelly says she simply hopes it doesn’t put people off gardening, or using organic materials like compost.

“I really feel for COVID gardeners who have picked it up during the lockdown and really got into their gardening. Because it’s such a fantastic thing to do, mentally and physically,” she said.

“They may not realise that it’s not their fault that their plants aren’t growing, and that might then make them give up on gardening. So I think it’s really important for people to know that there’s more to this.”

2020 October: Poisoned Eagles, Willurah Road, Conargo (NSW). Pesticide: ?

Wedge-tailed eagle deaths near Deniliquin linked to pesticide poisoning

27 January 2021
 
https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2021/epamedia210127-wedge-tailed-eagle-deaths-near-deniliquin-linked-to-pesticide-poisoning
 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has confirmed that several wedge-tailed eagle deaths near Deniliquin last year were the result of pesticide poisoning and is calling on the public to help identify the source.

On October 29, 2020 a report from a member of the public led NSW Police to find eight dead eagles off Willurah Rd outside of Conargo in southern NSW.

EPA officers collected two of the birds and sent them for analysis at the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment’s environmental forensic laboratory.

The toxicology results showed the eagles died as a result of pesticide poisoning.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Gary Whytcross said the EPA and NSW Police suspect the birds were specifically targeted.

“To find that many birds dead less than forty metres apart is highly suspicious and now with confirmation of pesticide poisoning it certainly looks like this was a targeted attack,” Mr Whytcross said.

“Wedge-tailed eagles, like all native Australian birds, are a protected species and it is illegal to harm one.

“Killing eight eagles with poison is a horrible crime and we want to find whoever did it.

“We’re calling on the public to come forward with any information that might help.

“If you’ve seen any unusual behaviour, or know anything that could assist us, please contact the EPA’s Environment Line on 131 555, the Deniliquin Police Station on 03 5881 9299 or CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000.”

The EPA and NSW Police are continuing their investigation into the matter.

Wedge-tailed eagle deaths near Deniliquin linked to pesticide poisoning

https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2021/epamedia210127-wedge-tailed-eagle-deaths-near-deniliquin-linked-to-pesticide-poisoning

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has confirmed that several wedge-tailed eagle deaths near Deniliquin last year were the result of pesticide poisoning and is calling on the public to help identify the source.

On October 29, 2020 a report from a member of the public led NSW Police to find eight dead eagles off Willurah Rd outside of Conargo in southern NSW.

EPA officers collected two of the birds and sent them for analysis at the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment’s environmental forensic laboratory.

The toxicology results showed the eagles died as a result of pesticide poisoning.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Gary Whytcross said the EPA and NSW Police suspect the birds were specifically targeted.

“To find that many birds dead less than forty metres apart is highly suspicious and now with confirmation of pesticide poisoning it certainly looks like this was a targeted attack,” Mr Whytcross said.

“Wedge-tailed eagles, like all native Australian birds, are a protected species and it is illegal to harm one.

“Killing eight eagles with poison is a horrible crime and we want to find whoever did it.

“We’re calling on the public to come forward with any information that might help.

“If you’ve seen any unusual behaviour, or know anything that could assist us, please contact the EPA’s Environment Line on 131 555, the Deniliquin Police Station on 03 5881 9299 or CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000.”

The EPA and NSW Police are continuing their investigation into the matter.

2021 January: Dead fish, yabbies, aquatic life (Cohuna, Vic). Pesticide: Acrolein

Fish, yabbies and aquatic life dead after 'toxic' herbicide treatment in irrigation channel

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-23/dead-fish-after-herbicide-acrolein-used-in-irrigation-channel/13084030

Mal Johnson isn't happy. The Cohuna farmer has spent the past few days cleaning up dead fish and plants from an irrigation channel on his property near Cohuna in northern Victoria.

"I walked up onto the channel bank, looked into the water and there was just a foot-wide stream of fish, all dead," Mr Johnson said.

The Torrumbarry Irrigation Channel was injected this week with the toxic herbicide Acrolein to get rid of weeds that are blocking up the system that provides water to more than 100 farming properties in the region.

"I've walked up here several times in the last few days, and I go home and say why? Why does this keep on happening to our environment? It's just not fair," Mr Johnson said.

Murray Goulburn Water (MGW) notified irrigators about the herbicide treatment and told them not to use water from the channels for 72 hours afterwards.

Water full of dead fish is meant to be safe

But three days later, Mr Johnson is still removing dead fish from the water.

"This channel is meant to be safe to use today," he said.  

But he's concerned that the dead fish and plants in the water may cause botulism in cattle.

GMW assistant manager Tim Nitschke said the water was safe for use.

"I'm extremely confident that it is safe," he said.

"There have been many, many studies done on this product. We've also done multiple and extensive water quality testing programs to demonstrate that," he said.

Mr Nitschke said fish kills were to be expected during the herbicide treatment, but there was no alternative.

Outdated herbicide kills endangered species, ecologist says

"Acroelin is our last resort," he said.

"We don't use it as our 'go-to' product, but it's something we use when we have no other options."

But ecologist Damien Cook said Acrolein is an outdated herbicide from the 1960s and is killing endangered species like the growling grass frog.

"It was once described as the most common species of frog — now there's only one population that we know of in the area," Mr Cook said.

"One of the reasons it's declined is herbicide use, and chemicals in the environment. 

"The frog has gone from being one of the most common species to now being endangered."

Mr Cook said although the Torrumbarry Channel was an artificially constructed irrigation network, the channels remained an important habitat for aquatic life along the Murray-Darling Basin.

Weeds blocking irrigation channel

But Kerang farmer Geoff Kendell said the weeds are causing headaches along the channels and need to be removed.

"Goulburn Murray Water will ring us up and say 'What's wrong? You're supposed to be having 20 megalitres coming out of the channel, and you're only getting three out,'" he said.

"It's the weed that's causing the problem."

But Mr Kendell said Goulburn Murray Water should have taken a proactive approach, rather than a reactive one.

"They should have dried the channels and the creeks out in winter and allowed the frost to kill most of the weeds," he said.

Mr Nitschke said that idea was under consideration.

"GMW is definitely looking at de-watering our network more regularly," he said.

"There are losses associated with that, but we're trying to find that right balance — making sure we still provide irrigation water to our farmers so that they can produce food and fibre."

Fish, yabbies and aquatic life dead after ‘toxic’ herbicide treatment in irrigation channel

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-23/dead-fish-after-herbicide-acrolein-used-in-irrigation-channel/13084030

Mal Johnson isn’t happy. The Cohuna farmer has spent the past few days cleaning up dead fish and plants from an irrigation channel on his property near Cohuna in northern Victoria.

“I walked up onto the channel bank, looked into the water and there was just a foot-wide stream of fish, all dead,” Mr Johnson said.

The Torrumbarry Irrigation Channel was injected this week with the toxic herbicide Acrolein to get rid of weeds that are blocking up the system that provides water to more than 100 farming properties in the region.

“I’ve walked up here several times in the last few days, and I go home and say why? Why does this keep on happening to our environment? It’s just not fair,” Mr Johnson said.

Murray Goulburn Water (MGW) notified irrigators about the herbicide treatment and told them not to use water from the channels for 72 hours afterwards.

Water full of dead fish is meant to be safe

But three days later, Mr Johnson is still removing dead fish from the water.

“This channel is meant to be safe to use today,” he said.

But he’s concerned that the dead fish and plants in the water may cause botulism in cattle.

GMW assistant manager Tim Nitschke said the water was safe for use.

“I’m extremely confident that it is safe,” he said.

“There have been many, many studies done on this product. We’ve also done multiple and extensive water quality testing programs to demonstrate that,” he said.

Mr Nitschke said fish kills were to be expected during the herbicide treatment, but there was no alternative.

Outdated herbicide kills endangered species, ecologist says

“Acroelin is our last resort,” he said.

“We don’t use it as our ‘go-to’ product, but it’s something we use when we have no other options.”

But ecologist Damien Cook said Acrolein is an outdated herbicide from the 1960s and is killing endangered species like the growling grass frog.

“It was once described as the most common species of frog — now there’s only one population that we know of in the area,” Mr Cook said.

“One of the reasons it’s declined is herbicide use, and chemicals in the environment.

“The frog has gone from being one of the most common species to now being endangered.”

Mr Cook said although the Torrumbarry Channel was an artificially constructed irrigation network, the channels remained an important habitat for aquatic life along the Murray-Darling Basin.

Weeds blocking irrigation channel

But Kerang farmer Geoff Kendell said the weeds are causing headaches along the channels and need to be removed.

“Goulburn Murray Water will ring us up and say ‘What’s wrong? You’re supposed to be having 20 megalitres coming out of the channel, and you’re only getting three out,'” he said.

“It’s the weed that’s causing the problem.”

But Mr Kendell said Goulburn Murray Water should have taken a proactive approach, rather than a reactive one.

“They should have dried the channels and the creeks out in winter and allowed the frost to kill most of the weeds,” he said.

Mr Nitschke said that idea was under consideration.

“GMW is definitely looking at de-watering our network more regularly,” he said.

“There are losses associated with that, but we’re trying to find that right balance — making sure we still provide irrigation water to our farmers so that they can produce food and fibre.”

2017/19: Prairie (Qld). Pesticide: Heptachlor, 2,4-DP (Dichlorprop), Asulam

2017/18: Prarie Raw

2017/18: Prairie (Queensland) Total Heptachlor <0.04ug/L (max), 0.371ug/L (mean), <0.02ug/L

“For the organochlorine pesticides, they have been banned for a number of decades and we do not often see any such residues in the environment. If any such residues were detected we would confirm their presence and quantification via an alternative detection method. Whilst we are reporting a value of < 0.4 ug/L for Total Aldrin & Dieldrin and for Total Heptachlor, the individual components are reported at a lower level, and we can detect their presence well below the guideline values. If any residues were detected we can confirm down to 0.06 ug/L for each of these total values.”

2017/18 Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Flinders Shire Council

2018/19: Prairie Raw

2,4-DP (Dichlorprop) 0.05ug/L (max), 0.05ugL(av.), 0.05ug/L(min)

Asulam: 0.075ug/L (max), <0.1ug/L (av.), 0.05ug/L (min)

Source: Flinders Shire Council 2018/19 Drinking Water Quality Management Plan

2017/18: Prarie Raw

2017/18: Prairie (Queensland) Total Heptachlor <0.04ug/L (max), 0.371ug/L (mean), <0.02ug/L

“For the organochlorine pesticides, they have been banned for a number of decades and we do not often see any such residues in the environment. If any such residues were detected we would confirm their presence and quantification via an alternative detection method. Whilst we are reporting a value of < 0.4 ug/L for Total Aldrin & Dieldrin and for Total Heptachlor, the individual components are reported at a lower level, and we can detect their presence well below the guideline values. If any residues were detected we can confirm down to 0.06 ug/L for each of these total values.”

2017/18 Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Flinders Shire Council

2018/19: Prairie Raw

2,4-DP (Dichlorprop) 0.05ug/L (max), 0.05ugL(av.), 0.05ug/L(min)

Asulam: 0.075ug/L (max), <0.1ug/L (av.), 0.05ug/L (min)

Source: Flinders Shire Council 2018/19 Drinking Water Quality Management Plan

2018/19: Torrens Creek (Queensland) – Metsulfuron Methyl

Torrens Creek (Queensland) - Metsulfuron Methyl

2018/19: Torrens Creek (Queensland). Metsulfuron Methyl 0.06ug/L (max), <0.01ug/L (av.), <0.02ug/L (av.)

Flinders Shire Council 2018/19 Drinking Water Quality Management Plan

Torrens Creek (Queensland) – Metsulfuron Methyl

2018/19: Torrens Creek (Queensland). Metsulfuron Methyl 0.06ug/L (max), <0.01ug/L (av.), <0.02ug/L (av.)

Flinders Shire Council 2018/19 Drinking Water Quality Management Plan

2019/20: Bundaberg WSA (Queensland). Hexazinone, 2,4-D

Bundaberg WSA  (Queensland) 

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.). 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/20

Bundaberg WSA  (Queensland) 

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.). 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/20

2019/21: Gin Gin Reservoir (Queensland). Pesticides: Hexazinone, 2,4-D, Dalapon, N-Buthylbenzenesulfonamide

Gin Gin Reservoir (Queensland) Gin GIn WSA

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.). 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max)

2021/22: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 1.9ug/L (max), 1ug/L (min)

2019/22 Bundaberg Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2019/22

Gin Gin Reservoir (Queensland) Gin GIn WSA

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.). 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max)

2021/22: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 1.9ug/L (max), 1ug/L (min)

2019/22 Bundaberg Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2019/22

2019/22: Gooburrum Reservoir (Queensland). Pesticide: Hexazinone, Dalapon, Tebuthiuron

Gooburrum Reservoir (Queensland) Gooburrum WSA

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max)

2021/22: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 0.2ug/L (max). Tebuthiuron 0.1ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2019/22

Gooburrum Reservoir (Queensland) Gooburrum WSA

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max)

2021/22: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 0.2ug/L (max). Tebuthiuron 0.1ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2019/22

2019/22: Lake Monduran Reservoir (Queensland). Pesticides: Hexazinone, 2,4-D, Dalapon

Lake Monduran Reservoir (Queensland)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), 2,4-D 0.08ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: 2,4-D 0.18ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (min)

2021/22: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 4ug/L (max), 2.4ug/L (min). 2,4-D 0.11ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (min)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2019/22

Lake Monduran Reservoir (Queensland)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), 2,4-D 0.08ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: 2,4-D 0.18ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (min)

2021/22: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 4ug/L (max), 2.4ug/L (min). 2,4-D 0.11ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (min)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2019/22

2020: Myponga Tiers Monitoring Station (South Australia). Pesticides: 2,4-D, Chlorpyrifos, Dimethoate, Glyphosate, MCPA, Metsulfuron Methyl

Myponga Tiers Monitoring Station W5020003 (South Australia)

8/8/19: MCPA

4/2/20: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

27/4/20: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.05ug/L

9/5/20: Glyphosate 6ug/L, MCPA 0.38ug/L

16/6/20: Chlorpyrifos 0.02ug/L, Dimethoate 0.09ug/L, MCPA 6.93ug/L

Myponga Tiers Monitoring Station W5020003 (South Australia)

8/8/19: MCPA

4/2/20: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

27/4/20: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.05ug/L

9/5/20: Glyphosate 6ug/L, MCPA 0.38ug/L

16/6/20: Chlorpyrifos 0.02ug/L, Dimethoate 0.09ug/L, MCPA 6.93ug/L

2020 September: Bird Deaths Hampden Road Reserve, Lakemba (NSW)

EPA seeking information after deliberate bird baiting

11 September 2020
 
 
https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2020/epamedia200911-epa-seeking-information-after-deliberate-bird-baiting
 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is appealing for information about the apparent poisoning of a large number of birds at a suburban Sydney park.

The EPA received reports of 24 and possibly more deceased and sick birds at Hampden Road Reserve, Lakemba, with 10 found in a single day on Saturday 29 August.

The affected species include native Corellas, Ibis, Cockatoos and pigeons. A Sydney Wildlife volunteer came across suspected poison rodenticide scattered with rice on the ground in the Reserve.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Giselle Howard said the killing of birds, whether through intentional or reckless misuse of pesticide, was a serious offence.

“On the evidence we’ve received, this is deplorable behaviour. The EPA will certainly take legal action against anyone found guilty of unlawfully using pesticides to poison native animals.

“Under the Pesticides Act it is illegal to use pesticides to kill or harm non-target animals such as native birds.

“No suspects have been identified, but the EPA would be happy to receive any information from the public about who may have baited these birds,” Ms Howard.

Canterbury-Bankstown Council are conducting daily inspections of the reserve and clearing any suspected baits. Council officers have been asked to report any suspicious behaviour to the EPA. 

Along with Council, the EPA is also working in collaboration with WIRES, Sydney Wildlife and Taronga Zoo to find those responsible for the apparent bird baiting. Each of these organisations has a vital role in protecting wildlife from harm.

EPA seeking information after deliberate bird baiting

https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2020/epamedia200911-epa-seeking-information-after-deliberate-bird-baiting

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is appealing for information about the apparent poisoning of a large number of birds at a suburban Sydney park.

The EPA received reports of 24 and possibly more deceased and sick birds at Hampden Road Reserve, Lakemba, with 10 found in a single day on Saturday 29 August.

The affected species include native Corellas, Ibis, Cockatoos and pigeons. A Sydney Wildlife volunteer came across suspected poison rodenticide scattered with rice on the ground in the Reserve.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Giselle Howard said the killing of birds, whether through intentional or reckless misuse of pesticide, was a serious offence.

“On the evidence we’ve received, this is deplorable behaviour. The EPA will certainly take legal action against anyone found guilty of unlawfully using pesticides to poison native animals.

“Under the Pesticides Act it is illegal to use pesticides to kill or harm non-target animals such as native birds.

“No suspects have been identified, but the EPA would be happy to receive any information from the public about who may have baited these birds,” Ms Howard.

Canterbury-Bankstown Council are conducting daily inspections of the reserve and clearing any suspected baits. Council officers have been asked to report any suspicious behaviour to the EPA.

Along with Council, the EPA is also working in collaboration with WIRES, Sydney Wildlife and Taronga Zoo to find those responsible for the apparent bird baiting. Each of these organisations has a vital role in protecting wildlife from harm.

2019 July: Rosebank (NSW). Spray Drift Fine

Spray drift complaint might have been avoided if wind speed records were kept

1 July 2019

https://www.theland.com.au/story/6249880/epa-fines-highlight-importance-of-on-farm-data/

A Northern Rivers macadamia farm and its contractor were punished by the Environment Protection Authority last week over a case involving a neighbour's complaint about chemical drift.

No one could actually verify the fact that a contractor on a Rosebank farm near Lismore had sprayed pesticide while it was blowing a gale - up to 52 kilometres an hour as was claimed - exceeding chemical manufacturers' guidelines.

Bureau of Meteorology wind data for the district comes either from Cape Byron, 23 metres above the ocean, or Lismore airport, which at 11m and on the Wilsons River floodplain typically receives less than half that breeze.

While there was no evidence to suggest the claim was true or not, there should have been, and that's why the EPA slapped Seabreeze Macadamias with a $1000 fine for incomplete records of farm activity on the day.

"We recommend producers buy an anemometer and log wind speed during spraying activities," said Australian Macadamia Society chief executive officer Jolyon Burnett.

"It is important to log data. The only reason this grower was fined was because of incomplete records."

The EPA issued an official caution to the spray contractor for not holding a licence to undertake ground applicator work, a requirement now one year old. The contractor said he didn't know that.

Neither did the AMS, which was unable to inform its member growers. However, everyone is now being made aware of the need for contractor licencing at grower meetings taking place this week.

Beyond compliance Mr Burnett said the logging of on-farm data was the hallmark of modern best practice, but to get all growers on board required a big cultural shift.

"Best standard business practice should be about measuring pesticide rates and fertiliser applications and we will see an increase in the area," he said.

As well, the AMA welcomed new initiatives like the $500,000 now available to rehabilitate priority coastal catchments through Local Land Services and Queensland's brand new reef protection legislation which will help guide farmers when it comes to best practice.

Meanwhile, the production of macadamias globally continues to grow at about seven per cent with demand exceeding that and leading to stable prices above $5/kg for nut in shell at 10 per cent moisture.

Dry summer conditions will lower forecasted harvest tonnage by 5500 tonnes to 48,000t. Last year's record production was 52,000t.

Queensland now supplies 53 per cent of product with Bundaberg district contributing 40pc and the Northern Rivers 35pc. South-east Queensland and isolated plantations on the mid North Coast make up the remainder.

Spray drift complaint might have been avoided if wind speed records were kept

1 July 2019

https://www.theland.com.au/story/6249880/epa-fines-highlight-importance-of-on-farm-data/

A Northern Rivers macadamia farm and its contractor were punished by the Environment Protection Authority last week over a case involving a neighbour’s complaint about chemical drift.

No one could actually verify the fact that a contractor on a Rosebank farm near Lismore had sprayed pesticide while it was blowing a gale – up to 52 kilometres an hour as was claimed – exceeding chemical manufacturers’ guidelines.

Bureau of Meteorology wind data for the district comes either from Cape Byron, 23 metres above the ocean, or Lismore airport, which at 11m and on the Wilsons River floodplain typically receives less than half that breeze.

While there was no evidence to suggest the claim was true or not, there should have been, and that’s why the EPA slapped Seabreeze Macadamias with a $1000 fine for incomplete records of farm activity on the day.

“We recommend producers buy an anemometer and log wind speed during spraying activities,” said Australian Macadamia Society chief executive officer Jolyon Burnett.

“It is important to log data. The only reason this grower was fined was because of incomplete records.”

The EPA issued an official caution to the spray contractor for not holding a licence to undertake ground applicator work, a requirement now one year old. The contractor said he didn’t know that.

Neither did the AMS, which was unable to inform its member growers. However, everyone is now being made aware of the need for contractor licencing at grower meetings taking place this week.

Beyond compliance Mr Burnett said the logging of on-farm data was the hallmark of modern best practice, but to get all growers on board required a big cultural shift.

“Best standard business practice should be about measuring pesticide rates and fertiliser applications and we will see an increase in the area,” he said.

As well, the AMA welcomed new initiatives like the $500,000 now available to rehabilitate priority coastal catchments through Local Land Services and Queensland’s brand new reef protection legislation which will help guide farmers when it comes to best practice.

Meanwhile, the production of macadamias globally continues to grow at about seven per cent with demand exceeding that and leading to stable prices above $5/kg for nut in shell at 10 per cent moisture.

Dry summer conditions will lower forecasted harvest tonnage by 5500 tonnes to 48,000t. Last year’s record production was 52,000t.

Queensland now supplies 53 per cent of product with Bundaberg district contributing 40pc and the Northern Rivers 35pc. South-east Queensland and isolated plantations on the mid North Coast make up the remainder.

2019 February: Jerilderie (NSW). Spray Drift

EPA investigating possible spray drift near Jerilderie

08 February 2019

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is investigating an alleged incident of potential spray drift that impacted a local cotton crop at Jerilderie in the state’s Riverina region.

 EPA Manager Regional Operations Riverina Far West Craig Bretherton said an investigation commenced after a complaint was made to the EPA’s Environment Line in December.

“Disappointingly, this is the second consecutive year this has occurred to summer crops in the area,” Mr Bretherton said.

The EPA has taken samples from the farm and these are currently being tested as part of the investigation.

Mr Bretherton said this is a timely reminder to landholders and contractors to use herbicides responsibly this summer to avoid spray drift that may impact surrounding areas.

EPA investigating possible spray drift near Jerilderie

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is investigating an alleged incident of potential spray drift that impacted a local cotton crop at Jerilderie in the state’s Riverina region.

 EPA Manager Regional Operations Riverina Far West Craig Bretherton said an investigation commenced after a complaint was made to the EPA’s Environment Line in December.

“Disappointingly, this is the second consecutive year this has occurred to summer crops in the area,” Mr Bretherton said.

The EPA has taken samples from the farm and these are currently being tested as part of the investigation.

Mr Bretherton said this is a timely reminder to landholders and contractors to use herbicides responsibly this summer to avoid spray drift that may impact surrounding areas.

2019/20: Dookie (Victoria) – Atrazine

2019/20: Dookie (Victoria) - Atrazine detected

p35 "All the pesticides tested in the source water were reported by the NATA laboratory at values below the level of reporting with the exception of a single detection of Atrazine at Euroa and Dookie, both at 10ug/L and in the raw water, well under the health limit of 20ug/L."

Goulburn Valley Water - Water Quality Annual Report 2019-20

2019/20: Dookie (Victoria) – Atrazine detected

p35 “All the pesticides tested in the source water were reported by the NATA laboratory at values below the level of reporting with the exception of a single detection of Atrazine at Euroa and Dookie, both at 10ug/L and in the raw water, well under the health limit of 20ug/L.”

Goulburn Valley Water – Water Quality Annual Report 2019-20

2019-20: Euroa (Victoria) – Atrazine

2019/20: Euroa (Victoria) - Atrazine detected

p35 "All the pesticides tested in the source water were reported by the NATA laboratory at values below the level of reporting with the exception of a single detection of Atrazine at Euroa and Dookie, both at 10ug/L and in the raw water, well under the health limit of 20ug/L."

Goulburn Valley Water - Water Quality Annual Report 2019-20

2019/20: Euroa (Victoria) – Atrazine detected

p35 “All the pesticides tested in the source water were reported by the NATA laboratory at values below the level of reporting with the exception of a single detection of Atrazine at Euroa and Dookie, both at 10ug/L and in the raw water, well under the health limit of 20ug/L.”

Goulburn Valley Water – Water Quality Annual Report 2019-20

2020 October: Contaminated Gibberellic Acid – Sunraysia Region (Victoria) – Clopyralid

The Weekly Times October 14 2020

P1 Killer Chemicals Table-grape producers to sue Chinese company over contaminated spray.

A group of Australian table grape growers are preparing to go up against a Chinese state-owned chemical giant in a legal battle for millions of dollars in compensation after a contaminated chemical destroyed their vines.

And The Weekly Times can reveal it took chemical company ADAMA more than three months to recall the product after being alerted to issues associated with it – a decision the industry fears could have jeopardised Australian access to lucrative export markets, worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

An investigation by The Weekly Times can also reveal:

As LEAST 11 growers are seeking more than $7 million in compensation from ADAMA after its Gibberellic Acid, used to promote fruit growth, was found to contain Clopyralid, a weed killer toxic to table grapes and not registered for use on fruit.

Damage from the contaminated Gibberellic Acid was brought to ADAMA’s attention in October 2018. However, the company did not recall the product until February 13, 2019 – about two weeks after growers started harvesting their table grapes.

The Federal Government body responsible for policing chemical companies, Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, which is funded by the companies it regulates, is yet to complete its investigation into the incident, more than 20 months after the recall.

New table-grape varieties that were grown as part of a trial by Australia’s leading science agency, CSIRO, were damaged by the contaminated chemical, but it is understood CSIRO is not taking legal action.

One table grape grower, who did not want to be named, said the contaminated Gibberellic Acid had “crippled” his family’s business…

Most of the 11 growers who sprayed the contaminated chemical have or are in the process of pulling out their vines because they were so badly damaged.

Eight growers, mostly located in the Sunraysia district where most of the country’s table grapes are grown, have begun legal action in the Victorian County Court against ADAMA and the retailer they bought the Gibberellic Acid from National Agricultural Services.

Court documents show these growers were seeking about $3.8 million in loss and damages but it is now understood ongoing losses now mean they are now seeking more than $7 million.

Solicitor Tyler Wolff, who is representing most of the growers, said they had lost three to four years worth of income.

It has hit the smaller growers really hard and put emotional strain on their business and family life. Some have had to sell permanent water while they wait for money to come in,” he said. “It has hit the bigger growers hard as they haven’t been able to pursue opportunities such as expanding their operations….

Victorian Farmers Federation vice-president Emma Germano said there should not be a “culture of secrecy” and there were “clearly deficiencies in the system” around recalling contaminated chemicals that needed to be addressed for the sake of Australia’s “clean green image.”…

Ms Germano raised concerns about the agriculture chemical industry’s regulator APVMA, being majority funded by the companies it regulates.

“Is it truly an independent regulator? If it’s not we have to ask the Government to resource this differently. Clearly we need something that is a bit more rigorous,” she said.

ADAMA which is owned by ADAMA Agricultural Solutions, a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned ChemChina, did not answer questions from The Weekly Times.

Neither did National Agricultural Services.

At the time of the recall, ADAMA claimed a labelling issue occurred to the tail end of the batch of Gibberellic Acid, during the manufacturing process conducted by a third party.

The Weekly Times understands the third party was Autopak, an agriculture chemical manufacturer in NSW. Autopak did not respond to questions.

The APVMA said it was unable to comment “on matters currently under investigation”.

In 2019-20 the APVMA received 280 allegations against the companies it regulates and from these referred two for prosecution and provided nine with formal warnings.

The Weekly Times October 14 2020

P1 Killer Chemicals Table-grape producers to sue Chinese company over contaminated spray.

A group of Australian table grape growers are preparing to go up against a Chinese state-owned chemical giant in a legal battle for millions of dollars in compensation after a contaminated chemical destroyed their vines.

And The Weekly Times can reveal it took chemical company ADAMA more than three months to recall the product after being alerted to issues associated with it – a decision the industry fears could have jeopardised Australian access to lucrative export markets, worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

An investigation by The Weekly Times can also reveal:

As LEAST 11 growers are seeking more than $7 million in compensation from ADAMA after its Gibberellic Acid, used to promote fruit growth, was found to contain Clopyralid, a weed killer toxic to table grapes and not registered for use on fruit.

Damage from the contaminated Gibberellic Acid was brought to ADAMA’s attention in October 2018. However, the company did not recall the product until February 13, 2019 – about two weeks after growers started harvesting their table grapes.

The Federal Government body responsible for policing chemical companies, Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, which is funded by the companies it regulates, is yet to complete its investigation into the incident, more than 20 months after the recall.

New table-grape varieties that were grown as part of a trial by Australia’s leading science agency, CSIRO, were damaged by the contaminated chemical, but it is understood CSIRO is not taking legal action.

One table grape grower, who did not want to be named, said the contaminated Gibberellic Acid had “crippled” his family’s business…

Most of the 11 growers who sprayed the contaminated chemical have or are in the process of pulling out their vines because they were so badly damaged.

Eight growers, mostly located in the Sunraysia district where most of the country’s table grapes are grown, have begun legal action in the Victorian County Court against ADAMA and the retailer they bought the Gibberellic Acid from National Agricultural Services.

Court documents show these growers were seeking about $3.8 million in loss and damages but it is now understood ongoing losses now mean they are now seeking more than $7 million.

Solicitor Tyler Wolff, who is representing most of the growers, said they had lost three to four years worth of income.

It has hit the smaller growers really hard and put emotional strain on their business and family life. Some have had to sell permanent water while they wait for money to come in,” he said. “It has hit the bigger growers hard as they haven’t been able to pursue opportunities such as expanding their operations….

Victorian Farmers Federation vice-president Emma Germano said there should not be a “culture of secrecy” and there were “clearly deficiencies in the system” around recalling contaminated chemicals that needed to be addressed for the sake of Australia’s “clean green image.”…

Ms Germano raised concerns about the agriculture chemical industry’s regulator APVMA, being majority funded by the companies it regulates.

“Is it truly an independent regulator? If it’s not we have to ask the Government to resource this differently. Clearly we need something that is a bit more rigorous,” she said.

ADAMA which is owned by ADAMA Agricultural Solutions, a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned ChemChina, did not answer questions from The Weekly Times.

Neither did National Agricultural Services.

At the time of the recall, ADAMA claimed a labelling issue occurred to the tail end of the batch of Gibberellic Acid, during the manufacturing process conducted by a third party.

The Weekly Times understands the third party was Autopak, an agriculture chemical manufacturer in NSW. Autopak did not respond to questions.

The APVMA said it was unable to comment “on matters currently under investigation”.

In 2019-20 the APVMA received 280 allegations against the companies it regulates and from these referred two for prosecution and provided nine with formal warnings.

2020 August: Geraldton (Western Australia). Pesticide: Ratsak/Brodifacoum

Native owls, lizards dying after eating mice and rats poisoned with Ratsak

26/8/20

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-26/wildlife-carers-say-owls-lizards-are-dying-eating-poisoned-mice/

A Western Australian wildlife carer is urging people to stop using a well-known brand of rodenticide because it is killing native owls and lizards who eat poisoned mice and rats.

Michelle Jones of GG Wildlife Rescue in Geraldton takes in sick and injured native animals to recover and then release back to the wild.

In the past month, she has seen five native owl species that were poisoned by Ratsak and only one survived.

"The ones that come in are the lucky ones," she said.

The one that survived is still in care and when it has returned to a healthy weight it will be released in the same location it was found.

Alternatives to poison

Ms Jones said at this time of the year it can be common to see more vermin, meaning an increase in the use of poisonings.

Not only can rodenticides be fatal to native owls, but also to native lizard species.

"I don't think they realise that the second degree poison is actually killing and making a lot of native species really sick," she said.

Ms Jones said there are other options that can be used to get rid of mice and rats, like traps, or simply ensuring that you clean up anything that could be a food supply like bird seed.

Nature's pest control

Some of the most common species Ms Jones has seen poisoned have been the southern boobook owl, the barn owl and black-shouldered kites.

Ms Jones said the best way to get rid of mice and rats is to look after their predators.

"What we are killing, if you've got them on your property … these guys are natural predators for rats and mice," she said.

"You're really doing something that inadvertently is going to affect the ecology and the ecosystem on your property for future generations."

Native owls, lizards dying after eating mice and rats poisoned with Ratsak

26/8/20

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-26/wildlife-carers-say-owls-lizards-are-dying-eating-poisoned-mice/

A Western Australian wildlife carer is urging people to stop using a well-known brand of rodenticide because it is killing native owls and lizards who eat poisoned mice and rats.

Michelle Jones of GG Wildlife Rescue in Geraldton takes in sick and injured native animals to recover and then release back to the wild.

In the past month, she has seen five native owl species that were poisoned by Ratsak and only one survived.

“The ones that come in are the lucky ones,” she said.

The one that survived is still in care and when it has returned to a healthy weight it will be released in the same location it was found.

Alternatives to poison

Ms Jones said at this time of the year it can be common to see more vermin, meaning an increase in the use of poisonings.

Not only can rodenticides be fatal to native owls, but also to native lizard species.

“I don’t think they realise that the second degree poison is actually killing and making a lot of native species really sick,” she said.

Ms Jones said there are other options that can be used to get rid of mice and rats, like traps, or simply ensuring that you clean up anything that could be a food supply like bird seed.

Nature’s pest control

Some of the most common species Ms Jones has seen poisoned have been the southern boobook owl, the barn owl and black-shouldered kites.

Ms Jones said the best way to get rid of mice and rats is to look after their predators.

“What we are killing, if you’ve got them on your property … these guys are natural predators for rats and mice,” she said.

“You’re really doing something that inadvertently is going to affect the ecology and the ecosystem on your property for future generations.”

2020 June: Canola Crop Damage. Glenorchy (Victoria). Pesticide: Triasulfuron?

Suspicious canola crop damage under investigation

Aug 19 2020

https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/6886786/suspicious-canola-crop-damage-under-investigation/?cs=4751

POLICE are investigating a failed crop in Victoria's southern Wimmera region to see whether it has been deliberately poisoned.

A canola crop in the Glenorchy district has been killed by herbicide and Ararat Police's criminal investigation unit is investigating the cause.

"Potential deliberate damage is one of the avenues we are examining," said senior constable Jackson Seres.

While spray drift is responsible for significant crop damage across the country at this stage it is not believed it is the culprit in this instance.

S/C Seres said all avenues, such as potential accidental contamination of spray equipment were also being looked at but added the farmer did not believe there had been a spraying error to cause the damage.

He said that the poisoning angle did not centre around someone taking a boom spray and applying chemical directly to the paddock, but rather contaminating a water tank used to prepare tank mixes for spraying.

The farmer with the poisoned crop may not have even been the target of the alleged contamination as the water tank is shared by several neighbours.

Police have been given an estimated loss from the damage of $100,000.

Laboratory investigations are ongoing as to what the active ingredient that caused the damage was, with triasulfuron, widely used in common herbicides, nominated as one potential culprit given the way the damage presented.

It is believed the herbicide was applied to the crop at a post-emergent stage, likely to be some time in June.

Grains industry leaders were scratching their heads to think of a precedent.

While spray drift and accidental application of the wrong chemical by the farmer has torched crops in the past, no one could remember an example in broadacre cropping where spray equipment had been deliberately tampered with in order to sabotage a crop.

 

The story Suspicious canola crop damage under investigation first appeared on Farm Online.

Suspicious canola crop damage under investigation

Aug 19 2020

https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/6886786/suspicious-canola-crop-damage-under-investigation/?cs=4751

POLICE are investigating a failed crop in Victoria’s southern Wimmera region to see whether it has been deliberately poisoned.

A canola crop in the Glenorchy district has been killed by herbicide and Ararat Police’s criminal investigation unit is investigating the cause.

“Potential deliberate damage is one of the avenues we are examining,” said senior constable Jackson Seres.

While spray drift is responsible for significant crop damage across the country at this stage it is not believed it is the culprit in this instance.

S/C Seres said all avenues, such as potential accidental contamination of spray equipment were also being looked at but added the farmer did not believe there had been a spraying error to cause the damage.

He said that the poisoning angle did not centre around someone taking a boom spray and applying chemical directly to the paddock, but rather contaminating a water tank used to prepare tank mixes for spraying.

The farmer with the poisoned crop may not have even been the target of the alleged contamination as the water tank is shared by several neighbours.

Police have been given an estimated loss from the damage of $100,000.

Laboratory investigations are ongoing as to what the active ingredient that caused the damage was, with triasulfuron, widely used in common herbicides, nominated as one potential culprit given the way the damage presented.

It is believed the herbicide was applied to the crop at a post-emergent stage, likely to be some time in June.

Grains industry leaders were scratching their heads to think of a precedent.

While spray drift and accidental application of the wrong chemical by the farmer has torched crops in the past, no one could remember an example in broadacre cropping where spray equipment had been deliberately tampered with in order to sabotage a crop.

The story Suspicious canola crop damage under investigation first appeared on Farm Online.

 

2020: Gwydir Wetlands (New South Wales). Spray Drift

Spray operators urged to apply pesticides carefully to prevent spray drift

https://www.miragenews.com/spray-operators-urged-to-apply-pesticides-carefully-to-prevent-spray-drift/

13 August 2020

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is reminding spray operators to follow safety protocols and use herbicides and pesticides responsibly to avoid impacting non-target crops and the environment.

The reminder comes after separate incidents in February this year where wetlands and trees in Moree were allegedly damaged by aerial spraying and trees allegedly damaged at Deepwater 40 km north of Glen Innes.

The EPA was alerted to the alleged aerial overspray at Moree by a resident who reported dead and dying leaves on his trees, on roadside trees and trees along the nearby travelling stock route.

Several trees two kilometres away in the Gwydir Wetlands were also found to have recent pesticide spray damage, with foliage dead or burnt off, along with patches of burnt grass.

The company has been fined $1,500 by the EPA for misuse of pesticides.

A Northern Tablelands landowner was also fined $1,500 and received an official caution for allegedly damaging a neighbour’s trees and using a pesticide contrary to an approved label.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Gary Whytcross said it was positive that both parties had since undertaken to introduce measures to improve spray drift risk assessment and management.

“The proper use of pesticides is critical to ensure the operators are safe when applying pesticides and so is the community and the environment,” Mr Whytcross said.

“Pesticides can harm the environment so all care must be taken to ensure pesticides are not used in unsuitable weather conditions that can result in the pesticides leaving the intended application site.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users following the label, applying pesticides during the appropriate weather conditions and notifying neighbours of the spraying.”

The EPA regulates the use of herbicides and pesticides in NSW, including those used in agriculture and on public land, through the Pesticides Act 1999.

The community plays an important role in helping to monitor pesticide activities. Anyone with concern or knowledge of a spray drift incident or pesticide misuse in their local area should contact the EPA’s Environment Line on 131 555.

Spray operators urged to apply pesticides carefully to prevent spray drift

https://www.miragenews.com/spray-operators-urged-to-apply-pesticides-carefully-to-prevent-spray-drift/

13 August 2020

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is reminding spray operators to follow safety protocols and use herbicides and pesticides responsibly to avoid impacting non-target crops and the environment.

The reminder comes after separate incidents in February this year where wetlands and trees in Moree were allegedly damaged by aerial spraying and trees allegedly damaged at Deepwater 40 km north of Glen Innes.

The EPA was alerted to the alleged aerial overspray at Moree by a resident who reported dead and dying leaves on his trees, on roadside trees and trees along the nearby travelling stock route.

Several trees two kilometres away in the Gwydir Wetlands were also found to have recent pesticide spray damage, with foliage dead or burnt off, along with patches of burnt grass.

The company has been fined $1,500 by the EPA for misuse of pesticides.

A Northern Tablelands landowner was also fined $1,500 and received an official caution for allegedly damaging a neighbour’s trees and using a pesticide contrary to an approved label.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Gary Whytcross said it was positive that both parties had since undertaken to introduce measures to improve spray drift risk assessment and management.

“The proper use of pesticides is critical to ensure the operators are safe when applying pesticides and so is the community and the environment,” Mr Whytcross said.

“Pesticides can harm the environment so all care must be taken to ensure pesticides are not used in unsuitable weather conditions that can result in the pesticides leaving the intended application site.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users following the label, applying pesticides during the appropriate weather conditions and notifying neighbours of the spraying.”

The EPA regulates the use of herbicides and pesticides in NSW, including those used in agriculture and on public land, through the Pesticides Act 1999.

The community plays an important role in helping to monitor pesticide activities. Anyone with concern or knowledge of a spray drift incident or pesticide misuse in their local area should contact the EPA’s Environment Line on 131 555.

2020: Deepwater (New South Wales). Spraydrift

Spray operators urged to apply pesticides carefully to prevent spray drift

https://www.miragenews.com/spray-operators-urged-to-apply-pesticides-carefully-to-prevent-spray-drift/

13 August 2020

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is reminding spray operators to follow safety protocols and use herbicides and pesticides responsibly to avoid impacting non-target crops and the environment.

The reminder comes after separate incidents in February this year where wetlands and trees in Moree were allegedly damaged by aerial spraying and trees allegedly damaged at Deepwater 40 km north of Glen Innes.

The EPA was alerted to the alleged aerial overspray at Moree by a resident who reported dead and dying leaves on his trees, on roadside trees and trees along the nearby travelling stock route.

Several trees two kilometres away in the Gwydir Wetlands were also found to have recent pesticide spray damage, with foliage dead or burnt off, along with patches of burnt grass.

The company has been fined $1,500 by the EPA for misuse of pesticides.

A Northern Tablelands landowner was also fined $1,500 and received an official caution for allegedly damaging a neighbour’s trees and using a pesticide contrary to an approved label.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Gary Whytcross said it was positive that both parties had since undertaken to introduce measures to improve spray drift risk assessment and management.

“The proper use of pesticides is critical to ensure the operators are safe when applying pesticides and so is the community and the environment,” Mr Whytcross said.

“Pesticides can harm the environment so all care must be taken to ensure pesticides are not used in unsuitable weather conditions that can result in the pesticides leaving the intended application site.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users following the label, applying pesticides during the appropriate weather conditions and notifying neighbours of the spraying.”

The EPA regulates the use of herbicides and pesticides in NSW, including those used in agriculture and on public land, through the Pesticides Act 1999.

The community plays an important role in helping to monitor pesticide activities. Anyone with concern or knowledge of a spray drift incident or pesticide misuse in their local area should contact the EPA’s Environment Line on 131 555.

Spray operators urged to apply pesticides carefully to prevent spray drift

https://www.miragenews.com/spray-operators-urged-to-apply-pesticides-carefully-to-prevent-spray-drift/

13 August 2020

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is reminding spray operators to follow safety protocols and use herbicides and pesticides responsibly to avoid impacting non-target crops and the environment.

The reminder comes after separate incidents in February this year where wetlands and trees in Moree were allegedly damaged by aerial spraying and trees allegedly damaged at Deepwater 40 km north of Glen Innes.

The EPA was alerted to the alleged aerial overspray at Moree by a resident who reported dead and dying leaves on his trees, on roadside trees and trees along the nearby travelling stock route.

Several trees two kilometres away in the Gwydir Wetlands were also found to have recent pesticide spray damage, with foliage dead or burnt off, along with patches of burnt grass.

The company has been fined $1,500 by the EPA for misuse of pesticides.

A Northern Tablelands landowner was also fined $1,500 and received an official caution for allegedly damaging a neighbour’s trees and using a pesticide contrary to an approved label.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Gary Whytcross said it was positive that both parties had since undertaken to introduce measures to improve spray drift risk assessment and management.

“The proper use of pesticides is critical to ensure the operators are safe when applying pesticides and so is the community and the environment,” Mr Whytcross said.

“Pesticides can harm the environment so all care must be taken to ensure pesticides are not used in unsuitable weather conditions that can result in the pesticides leaving the intended application site.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users following the label, applying pesticides during the appropriate weather conditions and notifying neighbours of the spraying.”

The EPA regulates the use of herbicides and pesticides in NSW, including those used in agriculture and on public land, through the Pesticides Act 1999.

The community plays an important role in helping to monitor pesticide activities. Anyone with concern or knowledge of a spray drift incident or pesticide misuse in their local area should contact the EPA’s Environment Line on 131 555.

2017/18? Southern Boobok Deaths – Perth environs (Western Australia). Pesticides: Warfarin, Difenacoum, Brodifacoum, Bromadiolone, Difethialone, Flocoumafen

Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in an Australian predatory bird increases with proximity to developed habitat
Michael T. Lohr
Science of the Total Environment 643 (2018) 134–144

Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are commonly used worldwide to control commensal rodents. Second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) are highly persistent and have the potential to cause secondary poisoning in wildlife. To date no comprehensive assessment has been conducted on AR residues in Australian wildlife.
My aim was to measure AR exposure in a common widespread owl species, the Southern Boobook (Ninox boobook) using boobooks found dead or moribund in order to assess the spatial distribution of this potential threat. A high percentage of boobooks were exposed (72.6%) and many showed potentially dangerous levels of AR residue (N0.1 mg/kg) in liver tissue (50.7%). Multiple rodenticides were detected in the livers of 38.4% of boobooks tested. Total liver concentration of ARs correlated positively with the proportions of developed areas
around points where dead boobooks were recovered and negatively with proportions of agricultural and native land covers. Total AR concentration in livers correlated more closely with land use type at the spatial scale of a boobook's home range than at smaller or larger spatial scales. Two rodenticides not used by the public (difethialone and flocoumafen) were detected in boobooks indicating that professional use of ARs contributed to secondary exposure. Multiple ARs were also detected in recent fledglings, indicating probable exposure prior to fledging. Taken together, these results suggest that AR exposure poses a serious threat to native predators in Australia, particularly in species using urban and peri-urban areas and species with large home ranges.

Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in an Australian predatory bird increases with proximity to developed habitat
Michael T. Lohr
Science of the Total Environment 643 (2018) 134–144

Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) are commonly used worldwide to control commensal rodents. Second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) are highly persistent and have the potential to cause secondary poisoning in wildlife. To date no comprehensive assessment has been conducted on AR residues in Australian wildlife.
My aim was to measure AR exposure in a common widespread owl species, the Southern Boobook (Ninox boobook) using boobooks found dead or moribund in order to assess the spatial distribution of this potential threat. A high percentage of boobooks were exposed (72.6%) and many showed potentially dangerous levels of AR residue (N0.1 mg/kg) in liver tissue (50.7%). Multiple rodenticides were detected in the livers of 38.4% of boobooks tested. Total liver concentration of ARs correlated positively with the proportions of developed areas
around points where dead boobooks were recovered and negatively with proportions of agricultural and native land covers. Total AR concentration in livers correlated more closely with land use type at the spatial scale of a boobook’s home range than at smaller or larger spatial scales. Two rodenticides not used by the public (difethialone and flocoumafen) were detected in boobooks indicating that professional use of ARs contributed to secondary exposure. Multiple ARs were also detected in recent fledglings, indicating probable exposure prior to fledging. Taken together, these results suggest that AR exposure poses a serious threat to native predators in Australia, particularly in species using urban and peri-urban areas and species with large home ranges.

2020 August: Boobook Owl Poisoning – Melbourne (Victoria). Pesticide: Brodifacoum

Walking time bombs': bird lovers call for ban on poisons

https://www.theage.com.au/environment/conservation/walking-time-bombs-bird-lovers-call-for-ban-on-poisons-20200812-p55kyl.html

August 12 2020

When word got around the office a boobook owl had been spotted in a nearby inner-city street, everyone in the BirdLife office grabbed their binoculars and headed for the door.

Unsurprisingly, when staff at Australia’s largest bird conservation organisation hear an unusual bird has visited Melbourne’s CBD, they rush to see it (and have binoculars at work).

But there was something wrong with this owl. It sat perched only three metres off the ground, on a tree with no foliage.

“It was completely exposed and close to the ground – you wouldn’t usually see a nocturnal bird displaying that kind of behaviour,” says Birdlife campaigns advisor Andrew Hunter.

Later that day a passerby found it dead under a tree in a nearby park. Hunter, who is also a wildlife rescuer, wanted to get the owl's body checked for poisoning from anticoagulant rodenticides, or rodent poisons.

So he took it back to the office freezer – used for keeping bird carcasses that will be taxidermied for educational purposes – and arranged for veterinary students at Melbourne University to do a pro bono dissection.

This found large haemorrhages under the skin and in the muscle of the owl’s keel, extending down the length of the left wing and around the carpus (wrist) of the right wing.

The tissues also had very high levels of of the anti-coagulant brodifacoum, enough to cause toxicity and account for the haemorrhages, the dissection report showed.

 

For Hunter and the other Birdlife staff, it was a first-hand experience of an issue their organisation has been campaigning on for years: the lethal effect of anticoagulant rodenticides, also called second-generation rat poisons, on birds like owls, kites and other birds of prey.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority is currently examining these rodenticides on the basis of concerns for worker exposure, public health and environmental safety.

Birds like boobook owls and black-winged kites can devour multiple rats and mice that have taken bait, says BirdLife Australia’s Sean Dooley. And because the poison takes some time to work, the poisoned rats are like "walking time-bombs”.

It’s a long and painful death for the birds, Dooley says. “These second-generation poisons don’t break down quickly – some can stay in tissues and organs for months, even years.” They can also cause birds to become disorientated, meaning they are more likely to crash into structures and vehicles.

 

These household products have been banned in some jurisdictions in the US and Europe, but are available from Australian supermarkets and hardware stores. They work by inhibiting Vitamin K in the body and disrupting the normal coagulation process. Poisoned animals suffer from uncontrolled hemorrhaging.

Professional pesticide users would prefer anticoagulant rodenticides were taken off retail shelves and made less accessible to the public, says Eris Hess, associate director of the Australian Environmental Pest Managers Association.

“The real question is why the bird is able to access the rodent. The general public is buying off supermarket shelves and using it incorrectly,” Mr Hess said. Professional users know they should collect the carcasses afterwards, he said.

The association would like a licence required for use, perhaps the safe chemical users licence, which most farmers already have.

All second-generation rodenticides should also be used in bait boxes to contain pests that have ingested poison, so they are not a risk to other animals or children, Mr Hess said.

Walking time bombs’: bird lovers call for ban on poisons

https://www.theage.com.au/environment/conservation/walking-time-bombs-bird-lovers-call-for-ban-on-poisons-20200812-p55kyl.html

August 12 2020

When word got around the office a boobook owl had been spotted in a nearby inner-city street, everyone in the BirdLife office grabbed their binoculars and headed for the door.

Unsurprisingly, when staff at Australia’s largest bird conservation organisation hear an unusual bird has visited Melbourne’s CBD, they rush to see it (and have binoculars at work).

But there was something wrong with this owl. It sat perched only three metres off the ground, on a tree with no foliage.

“It was completely exposed and close to the ground – you wouldn’t usually see a nocturnal bird displaying that kind of behaviour,” says Birdlife campaigns advisor Andrew Hunter.

Later that day a passerby found it dead under a tree in a nearby park. Hunter, who is also a wildlife rescuer, wanted to get the owl’s body checked for poisoning from anticoagulant rodenticides, or rodent poisons.

So he took it back to the office freezer – used for keeping bird carcasses that will be taxidermied for educational purposes – and arranged for veterinary students at Melbourne University to do a pro bono dissection.

This found large haemorrhages under the skin and in the muscle of the owl’s keel, extending down the length of the left wing and around the carpus (wrist) of the right wing.

The tissues also had very high levels of of the anti-coagulant brodifacoum, enough to cause toxicity and account for the haemorrhages, the dissection report showed.

For Hunter and the other Birdlife staff, it was a first-hand experience of an issue their organisation has been campaigning on for years: the lethal effect of anticoagulant rodenticides, also called second-generation rat poisons, on birds like owls, kites and other birds of prey.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority is currently examining these rodenticides on the basis of concerns for worker exposure, public health and environmental safety.

Birds like boobook owls and black-winged kites can devour multiple rats and mice that have taken bait, says BirdLife Australia’s Sean Dooley. And because the poison takes some time to work, the poisoned rats are like “walking time-bombs”.

It’s a long and painful death for the birds, Dooley says. “These second-generation poisons don’t break down quickly – some can stay in tissues and organs for months, even years.” They can also cause birds to become disorientated, meaning they are more likely to crash into structures and vehicles.

These household products have been banned in some jurisdictions in the US and Europe, but are available from Australian supermarkets and hardware stores. They work by inhibiting Vitamin K in the body and disrupting the normal coagulation process. Poisoned animals suffer from uncontrolled hemorrhaging.

Professional pesticide users would prefer anticoagulant rodenticides were taken off retail shelves and made less accessible to the public, says Eris Hess, associate director of the Australian Environmental Pest Managers Association.

“The real question is why the bird is able to access the rodent. The general public is buying off supermarket shelves and using it incorrectly,” Mr Hess said. Professional users know they should collect the carcasses afterwards, he said.

The association would like a licence required for use, perhaps the safe chemical users licence, which most farmers already have.

All second-generation rodenticides should also be used in bait boxes to contain pests that have ingested poison, so they are not a risk to other animals or children, Mr Hess said.

2003: Middle River (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Middle River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 9 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Middle River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 9 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Cygnet River Estuary Sediment (South Australia). Pesticides: Aldrin, DDD, DDE, Dieldrin

2003: Cygnet River Estuary (South Australia) Sediment

Aldrin 9 μg/kg, DDD 1.1 μg/kg, DDE 2.3 μg/kg, Dieldrin 3.3 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Cygnet River Estuary (South Australia) Sediment

Aldrin 9 μg/kg, DDD 1.1 μg/kg, DDE 2.3 μg/kg, Dieldrin 3.3 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Hill River Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Hill River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 3.1 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Hill River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 3.1 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Broughton River Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Broughton River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.8 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Broughton River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.8 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Finniss River Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

2003: Finniss River (South Australia) Sediment

Chlorpyrifos 20 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Finniss River (South Australia) Sediment

Chlorpyrifos 20 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Lake Albert Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Lake Albert (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 0.6 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Lake Albert (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 0.6 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Coorong Sediment (South Australia). Pesticides: Aldrin, Dieldrin, Delta HCH

2003: Coorong (South Australia) Sediment

Aldrin 2.4μg/kg, Dieldrin 3.6 μg/kg, Delta HCH 2.2 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Coorong (South Australia) Sediment

Aldrin 2.4μg/kg, Dieldrin 3.6 μg/kg, Delta HCH 2.2 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Drain C Sediment Coonawarra (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Drain C Coonawarra (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 1.9 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Drain C Coonawarra (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 1.9 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Cuppa Cup Swamp Sediment, Tatiara Creek (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Cuppa Cup Swamp, Tatiara Creek (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 9.8 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Cuppa Cup Swamp, Tatiara Creek (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 9.8 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Patawalonga Weir Sediment (South Australia). Pesticides: Aldrin, Chlordane, DDD, DDE, Total DDT, Chlorpyrifos

2003: Patawalonga Weir (South Australia) Sediment

Aldrin 5.5μg/kg, Chlordane 4.6μg/kg, DDD 16.6μg/kg, DDE 4.6μg/kg, Total DDT 27.6μg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 61μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Patawalonga Weir (South Australia) Sediment

Aldrin 5.5μg/kg, Chlordane 4.6μg/kg, DDD 16.6μg/kg, DDE 4.6μg/kg, Total DDT 27.6μg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 61μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Virginia Drainage Lines Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: Simazine

2003: Virginia Drainage Lines (South Australia) Sediment

Simazine 15μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Virginia Drainage Lines (South Australia) Sediment

Simazine 15μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003/09: Cox Creek Sediment (South Australia). Pesticides: Chlordane, DDE, Dieldrin, Simazine, DDD, DDT

2003/09: Cox Creek (South Australia) Sediment

2003: Chlordane 2.8μg/kg, DDE 35μg/kg, Dieldrin 4.1μg/kg, Simazine 40μg/kg

2009: DDD 6.8μg/kg, DDE 61μg/kg, DDT 15 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003/09: Cox Creek (South Australia) Sediment

2003: Chlordane 2.8μg/kg, DDE 35μg/kg, Dieldrin 4.1μg/kg, Simazine 40μg/kg

2009: DDD 6.8μg/kg, DDE 61μg/kg, DDT 15 μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Lenswood Creek Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Lenswood Creek (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.1μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Lenswood Creek (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.1μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Onkarparinga River Sediment (South Australia). Pesticides: DDE, Chlorpyrifos, Diazinon

2003: Onkarparinga River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 1.5μg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 23μg/kg, Diazinon 18μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Onkarparinga River (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 1.5μg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 23μg/kg, Diazinon 18μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Barker Inlet Wetland Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: Simazine

2003: Barker Inlet Wetland (South Australia) Sediment

Simazine 45μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Barker Inlet Wetland (South Australia) Sediment

Simazine 45μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Greenfields Wetland Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: Greenfields Wetland (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 2.7μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: Greenfields Wetland (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 2.7μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: River Torrens, Holbrooks Weir Sediment (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: River Torrens, Holbrooks Weir (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.7μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: River Torrens, Holbrooks Weir (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.7μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: River Torrens Outfall Sediment (South Australia). Pesticides: DDE, Simazine

2003: River Torrens Outfall (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.4mg/kg, Simazine 15μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: River Torrens Outfall (South Australia) Sediment

DDE 4.4mg/kg, Simazine 15μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: River Torrens Lake Weir (South Australia). Pesticide: DDE

2003: River Torrens (South Australia) - Lake Weir

DDE 6.6μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2003: River Torrens (South Australia) – Lake Weir

DDE 6.6μg/kg

EPA South Australia. A snapshot of pesticides in South Australian aquatic sediments. Clive Jenkins March 2013. https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/files/8537_aquatic_pesticides.pdf

2000-2003 Merah North Farm Soil (New South Wales). Pesticides: Endrin, DDE, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulphate

2000-2003 Merah North - Soils

Pesticides detected in soil to a depth of 1.2m: Endrin, DDE, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

Organochlorine pesticides in soil under irrigated cotton farming systems in Vertisols of the Namoi Valley, north-western New South Wales,Australia

Author: Weaver, Timothy B, Ghadiri, Hossein, Hulugalle, Nilantha R, Harden, Stephen

https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/48782/82240_1.pdf?sequence=1

2000-2003 Merah North – Soils

Pesticides detected in soil to a depth of 1.2m: Endrin, DDE, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

Organochlorine pesticides in soil under irrigated cotton farming systems in Vertisols of the Namoi Valley, north-western New South Wales,Australia

Author: Weaver, Timothy B, Ghadiri, Hossein, Hulugalle, Nilantha R, Harden, Stephen

https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/48782/82240_1.pdf?sequence=1

2000-2003 Wee Waa Farm (New South Wales). Pesticides: Endrin, DDT, DDE, DDD, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

2000-2003 Wee Waa - Soils

Pesticides detected in soil to a depth of 1.2m: Endrin, DDT, DDE, DDD, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

Organochlorine pesticides in soil under irrigated cotton farming systems in Vertisols of the Namoi Valley, north-western New South Wales,Australia

Author: Weaver, Timothy B, Ghadiri, Hossein, Hulugalle, Nilantha R, Harden, Stephen

https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/48782/82240_1.pdf?sequence=1

2000-2003 Wee Waa – Soils

Pesticides detected in soil to a depth of 1.2m: Endrin, DDT, DDE, DDD, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

Organochlorine pesticides in soil under irrigated cotton farming systems in Vertisols of the Namoi Valley, north-western New South Wales,Australia

Author: Weaver, Timothy B, Ghadiri, Hossein, Hulugalle, Nilantha R, Harden, Stephen

https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/48782/82240_1.pdf?sequence=1

2000-03: Australian Cotton Research Institute Soils (NSW). Pesticides: Endrin, DDT, DDE, DDD, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

2000-2003 Australian Cotton Research Institute - Soils

Pesticides detected in soil to a depth of 1.2m: Endrin, DDT, DDE, DDD, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

Organochlorine pesticides in soil under irrigated cotton farming systems in Vertisols of the Namoi Valley, north-western New South Wales,Australia

Author: Weaver, Timothy B, Ghadiri, Hossein, Hulugalle, Nilantha R, Harden, Stephen

https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/48782/82240_1.pdf?sequence=1

2000-2003 Australian Cotton Research Institute – Soils

Pesticides detected in soil to a depth of 1.2m: Endrin, DDT, DDE, DDD, Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate

Organochlorine pesticides in soil under irrigated cotton farming systems in Vertisols of the Namoi Valley, north-western New South Wales,Australia

Author: Weaver, Timothy B, Ghadiri, Hossein, Hulugalle, Nilantha R, Harden, Stephen

https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/48782/82240_1.pdf?sequence=1

2002: Namoi Valley (NSW) DDE residues remaining in Soil

2002 - Namoi Valley (NSW) Levels of DDE remaining in soil

Fig. 1.  GIS distribution of DDE residues in Namoi Valley topsoil (0.10 cm). Reproduced with permission from the American Chemical Society (Shivaramaiah et al. 2002). Unwanted legacies such as this justified the transition to chemicals with shorter half-lives, including endosulfan.

https://www.publish.csiro.au/CP/fulltext/CP13091

2002 – Namoi Valley (NSW) Levels of DDE remaining in soil

Fig. 1.  GIS distribution of DDE residues in Namoi Valley topsoil (0.10 cm). Reproduced with permission from the American Chemical Society (Shivaramaiah et al. 2002). Unwanted legacies such as this justified the transition to chemicals with shorter half-lives, including endosulfan.

https://www.publish.csiro.au/CP/fulltext/CP13091

1997: Wagga Wagga (NSW). Shearers Awarded $613,000 Exposure to OP Pesticide Applied to Sheep

1997 Wagga Wagga (NSW) Health impacts of OP Pesticide on Sheep

p41 "...Statistics for pesticide poisonings do not represent a large percentage of the overall number of injuries that occur in the agricultural industry; however, the cost of some of these claims can be significant. For example, three shearers in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, were awarded $613,144.00 in October 1997 for health effects associated with exposure to OP pesticide applied to sheep (Dips, 2000). There are also growing health and safety concerns, in the industry and the general community regarding the use of pesticides.

Source: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16345/1/Kelly_Johnstone_Thesis.pdf

Organophosphate Exposure in Australian Agricultural Workers: Human Exposure and Risk Assessment. Kelly Johnstone Bachelor of Applied Science (Occupational Health and Safety) Bachelor of Health Sciences (Honours)

1997 Wagga Wagga (NSW) Health impacts of OP Pesticide on Sheep

p41 “…Statistics for pesticide poisonings do not represent a large percentage of the overall number of injuries that occur in the agricultural industry; however, the cost of some of these claims can be significant. For example, three shearers in Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, were awarded $613,144.00 in October 1997 for health effects associated with exposure to OP pesticide applied to sheep (Dips, 2000). There are also growing health and safety concerns, in the industry and the general community regarding the use of pesticides.

Source: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16345/1/Kelly_Johnstone_Thesis.pdf

Organophosphate Exposure in Australian Agricultural Workers: Human Exposure and Risk Assessment. Kelly Johnstone Bachelor of Applied Science (Occupational Health and Safety) Bachelor of Health Sciences (Honours)

2020 July: Darlington Point (NSW) Spray Drift

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state's cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was "definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather".

"It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected ... Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas."

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were "unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures". The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

 

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

"The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we're being exposed to something on an annual basis and it's across all our areas and towns," Mr Maynard said. "In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control."

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

 

"But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof," Mr Hamilton said. "There's the potential for human health impacts."

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor's contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

"I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots," Professor Weston said. "If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby."

 

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

"The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying," an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was "most likely a result of large area spraying".

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

"We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA)," he said.

"This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report."

 

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

"[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day," said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. "We've got to get to the bottom of these reports."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

"The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment," Ms Immig said. "All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil."

 

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state’s cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was “definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather”.

“It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected … Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas.”

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were “unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures”. The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

“The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we’re being exposed to something on an annual basis and it’s across all our areas and towns,” Mr Maynard said. “In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control.”

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

“But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof,” Mr Hamilton said. “There’s the potential for human health impacts.”

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor’s contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

“I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots,” Professor Weston said. “If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby.”

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

“The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying,” an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was “most likely a result of large area spraying”.

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

“We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA),” he said.

“This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report.”

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

“[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day,” said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. “We’ve got to get to the bottom of these reports.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

“The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment,” Ms Immig said. “All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil.”

 

2020 July: Bourke (NSW). Spray Drift

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state's cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was "definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather".

"It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected ... Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas."

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were "unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures". The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

 

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

"The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we're being exposed to something on an annual basis and it's across all our areas and towns," Mr Maynard said. "In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control."

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

 

"But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof," Mr Hamilton said. "There's the potential for human health impacts."

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor's contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

"I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots," Professor Weston said. "If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby."

 

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

"The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying," an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was "most likely a result of large area spraying".

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

"We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA)," he said.

"This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report."

 

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

"[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day," said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. "We've got to get to the bottom of these reports."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

"The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment," Ms Immig said. "All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil."

 

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state’s cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was “definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather”.

“It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected … Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas.”

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were “unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures”. The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

“The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we’re being exposed to something on an annual basis and it’s across all our areas and towns,” Mr Maynard said. “In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control.”

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

“But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof,” Mr Hamilton said. “There’s the potential for human health impacts.”

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor’s contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

“I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots,” Professor Weston said. “If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby.”

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

“The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying,” an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was “most likely a result of large area spraying”.

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

“We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA),” he said.

“This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report.”

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

“[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day,” said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. “We’ve got to get to the bottom of these reports.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

“The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment,” Ms Immig said. “All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil.”

 

2020 July: Narrowmine (NSW). Spray Drift Impacting Peppercorns

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state's cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was "definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather".

"It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected ... Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas."

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were "unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures". The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

 

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

"The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we're being exposed to something on an annual basis and it's across all our areas and towns," Mr Maynard said. "In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control."

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

 

"But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof," Mr Hamilton said. "There's the potential for human health impacts."

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor's contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

"I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots," Professor Weston said. "If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby."

 

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

"The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying," an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was "most likely a result of large area spraying".

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

"We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA)," he said.

"This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report."

 

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

"[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day," said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. "We've got to get to the bottom of these reports."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

"The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment," Ms Immig said. "All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil."

 

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state’s cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was “definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather”.

“It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected … Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas.”

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were “unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures”. The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

“The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we’re being exposed to something on an annual basis and it’s across all our areas and towns,” Mr Maynard said. “In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control.”

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

“But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof,” Mr Hamilton said. “There’s the potential for human health impacts.”

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor’s contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

“I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots,” Professor Weston said. “If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby.”

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

“The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying,” an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was “most likely a result of large area spraying”.

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

“We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA),” he said.

“This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report.”

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

“[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day,” said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. “We’ve got to get to the bottom of these reports.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

“The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment,” Ms Immig said. “All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil.”

 

2020 July: Warren (NSW). Spray Drift Impacting Peppercorns

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state's cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was "definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather".

"It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected ... Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas."

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were "unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures". The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

 

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

"The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we're being exposed to something on an annual basis and it's across all our areas and towns," Mr Maynard said. "In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control."

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

 

"But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof," Mr Hamilton said. "There's the potential for human health impacts."

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor's contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

"I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots," Professor Weston said. "If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby."

 

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

"The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying," an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was "most likely a result of large area spraying".

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

"We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA)," he said.

"This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report."

 

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

"[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day," said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. "We've got to get to the bottom of these reports."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

"The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment," Ms Immig said. "All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil."

 

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state’s cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was “definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather”.

“It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected … Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas.”

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were “unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures”. The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

“The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we’re being exposed to something on an annual basis and it’s across all our areas and towns,” Mr Maynard said. “In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control.”

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

“But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof,” Mr Hamilton said. “There’s the potential for human health impacts.”

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor’s contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

“I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots,” Professor Weston said. “If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby.”

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

“The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying,” an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was “most likely a result of large area spraying”.

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

“We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA),” he said.

“This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report.”

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

“[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day,” said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. “We’ve got to get to the bottom of these reports.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

“The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment,” Ms Immig said. “All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil.”

 

2020 July: Trangie (NSW). Spray Drift Impacting Peppercorns

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state's cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was "definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather".

"It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected ... Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas."

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were "unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures". The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

 

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

"The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we're being exposed to something on an annual basis and it's across all our areas and towns," Mr Maynard said. "In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control."

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

 

"But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof," Mr Hamilton said. "There's the potential for human health impacts."

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor's contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

"I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots," Professor Weston said. "If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby."

 

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

"The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying," an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was "most likely a result of large area spraying".

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained "zero evidence" that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

"We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA)," he said.

"This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report."

 

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

"[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day," said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. "We've got to get to the bottom of these reports."

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

"The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment," Ms Immig said. "All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil."

 

Chemicals the most likely cause of mystery leaf loss in cotton towns, secret report finds

July 28 2020

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/chemicals-the-most-likely-cause-of-mystery-leaf-loss-in-cotton-towns-secret-report-finds-20200726-p55fjk.html

Chemicals used in cotton farming are the most likely cause of trees losing their leaves in parts of central western NSW and may pose a threat to human health, according to a government report that has been blocked from the public since it was circulated internally two years ago.

The report by a technical specialist within the NSW Department of Industry is the first official analysis of a phenomenon that has mystified and troubled graziers around Narromine, Trangie and Warren, as far south as Darlington Point near Hay and as far north as Bourke.

The peppercorn, which is an exotic evergreen, and certain species of eucalyptus drop their leaves annually at a time that coincides with cotton farmers using aerial spray to defoliate their crop, raising concerns about other potential harms caused by exposure to the chemicals.

But the notion that spray drift might be responsible for denuding the trees is contentious in the state’s cotton belt. Narromine mayor Craig Davies, a former spray contractor, says leaf drop is caused by the drought.

The NSW Environment Protection Agency has repeatedly told complainants that the only way to prove spray drift is the cause of non-target species losing their leaves is to conduct tests within two days of the spray activity, which may be before the symptoms have appeared.

However, the NSW Department of Industry report, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws, concluded in May 2018 that the leaf loss was “definitely not a result of environmental conditions such as prolonged dry weather”.

“It was most likely the result of a large area spraying with temperature inversions moving fine particles of chemicals further than would be expected … Symptoms of peppercorn trees were not apparent in other non-cotton growing areas.”

The risks of spray drift included: conflict between farmer groups, the prospect of legal action, the potential for people to be selling produce with trace residue, and human health impacts as there were “unknown effects of chemical especially with low dose longer time exposures”. The report recommended a community mediation chaired by an independent person to minimise community unrest and reduce spray drift the next season.

But Bruce Maynard, a spokesman for the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, said this had not occurred.

“The peppercorn trees are showing clear evidence that we’re being exposed to something on an annual basis and it’s across all our areas and towns,” Mr Maynard said. “In the long run, this is about two things: health and also our businesses, because we are at risk for things outside our control.”

The report did not name the chemicals that might have drifted off target. Cotton defoliants include the chemicals Thidiazuron, Dimethipin and Diuron, which has been linked to damage in the Great Barrier Reef and is proposed to be deregistered in the European Union from September.

Grazier Colin Hamilton said the leaf drop put beef producers in a difficult position when they had to declare their pasture free from contaminants because there was no confirmation that chemicals were present but the evidence suggested otherwise.

“But closer to home, the majority of people in our area drink the rainwater that runs off their roof,” Mr Hamilton said. “There’s the potential for human health impacts.”

However, Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said there was “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were responsible for the leaf drop. Preventing off-target spray drift was a priority across agriculture to ensure the safety of communities and environments.

“The use of biotechnology and integrated pest management in cotton has reduced pesticide use by 95 per cent since 1993,” Mr Kay said.

The mayor’s contention that the drought was more likely to blame was also supported by Leslie Weston, a professor of plant biology at Charles Sturt University. Some of the affected trees were 10 kilometres from the nearest cotton farm.

“I don’t personally think that this particular herbicide would be killing trees unless they bordered the field and off-site spray was occurring, allowing root uptake or translocation from shoots,” Professor Weston said. “If herbicide damage was prevalent, one would typically also see damage on citrus or other perennials growing nearby.”

The NSW Environment Protection Agency said it had conducted three vegetation and water tests in the Narromine and Trangie areas in the past two years and no pesticides had been detected, but it was important for overspray complaints to be made within two days because the residue dissipated quickly.

“The EPA has committed to undertake pre- and post-spray inspections coming into the next spray season, to check the condition of vegetation and to collect vegetation samples for testing immediately after spraying,” an EPA spokesman said.

The chemical report Cotton Australia will not release

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-chemical-report-cotton-australia-will-not-release-20200728-p55gak.html

July 29 2020

The peak cotton industry body is refusing to release a report into the cause of trees losing their leaves in the central west of NSW, despite saying there was no evidence chemical sprays were to blame.

Graziers around the towns of Trangie, Warren and Narromine are concerned that some of the chemicals used in cotton farming are drifting off target, affecting other plant species and potentially compromising their health in an area reliant on rainwater for drinking.

A technical specialist from the NSW Department of Industry inspected the area in May 2018 and noted moderate to major leaf drop among peppercorn trees and lesser damage to cadaghi and lemon-scented eucalyptus, which was “most likely a result of large area spraying”.

The report was kept secret until obtained by the Herald under freedom of information laws. Cotton Australia chief executive Adam Kay said it contained “zero evidence” that agricultural chemicals were involved.

Cotton Australia did its own investigations around the same time in response to community concerns, commissioning a researcher from the University of New England to inspect.

But it has declined to release the report, despite numerous requests from the Lower Macquarie Overspray Group, which represents concerned locals.

Mr Kay said the inspection was not a formal investigation.

“We were provided some advice, but no samples were taken for chemical testing because it was too far after the alleged event and this is the job of the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA),” he said.

“This work by the researcher was in no means a formal report.”

However, a farmer whose property the researcher visited said samples were taken from his premises and several others.

“[The researcher] took three samples from my property and I phoned three times but the report has never seen the light of day,” said the farmer, who asked not to be named because he feared retribution in the close-knit cotton community. “We’ve got to get to the bottom of these reports.”

National Toxics Network co-ordinator Jo Immig said spray could drift up to 20 kilometres in inversion levels. The EPA should have obtained spray application records to find out what chemicals were being applied, she said.

“The idea that pesticides can be applied safely to paddocks and not move ‘off target’ is perhaps one of the greatest cons perpetrated by the chemical industry and regulators on the Australian public and environment,” Ms Immig said. “All ecological systems are inter-connected via the atmosphere, water and soil.”

 

2020 June: Holey Plains State Park Spray Drift from Pine Plantation. Pesticides: Glyphosate?, Metsulfuron Methyl?

Thousands of Trees in Reserve Threatened by Herbicide Spray Drift

https://www.foe.org.au/thousands_of_trees_in_reserve_threatened_by_herbicide_spray_drift

Friends of the Earth has uncovered a disturbing incident in the Holey Plains State Reserve, in Central Gippsland, Victoria. FoE has found an area of several hundred hectares, in the Reserve which appears to have been impacted by spray drift from an adjacent pine plantation which was recently aerially sprayed. Thousands of trees appear to have been impacted. The trees were slowly recovering after being severely burnt by bushfires which ravaged Holey Plains in early 2019.

The area was recently being visited by Friends of the Earth during koala surveys. The impact of the sprays can be seen mainly on a 2km front on the eastern side of the plantation indicating that herbicides are likely to have wafted in when a 500ha pine plantation, managed by Hancock Victorian Plantations was recently sprayed. This plantation is certified by Forest Stewardship Council.

Pine plantations of this size are usually aerially sprayed with herbicides including Glyphosate, Metsulfuron Methyl and Clopyralid. Another herbicide Glufosinate Ammonium is also sometimes used. After the pines have been established for a year or two, aerial application of pellitised Hexazinone then occurs. Hexazinone will then leach into the soil for a many months.

Friends of the Earth believes that the likely culprit of the spray drift is Glyphosate. A similar incident occurred in the King Lake National Park about 10 years ago. It was determined that coppicing eucalypts are highly susceptible to minute levels of Glyphosate. It is unclear whether the trees impacted at Holey Plains will survive the incident.

The incident also raises concerns about the use of herbicides near recently burnt areas along the eastern seaboard of the Australian continent after the massive bushfire disaster which occurred in late 2019/2020. FoE believes that there should be label changes made to the herbicide Glyphosate listing concerns about its use in areas where Eucalypts are recovering from fire.

Chemical Standards Officers from Biosecurity and Agricultural Services (Victorian State Government) are now investigating the incident.

Thousands of Trees in Reserve Threatened by Herbicide Spray Drift

https://www.foe.org.au/thousands_of_trees_in_reserve_threatened_by_herbicide_spray_drift

Friends of the Earth has uncovered a disturbing incident in the Holey Plains State Reserve, in Central Gippsland, Victoria. FoE has found an area of several hundred hectares, in the Reserve which appears to have been impacted by spray drift from an adjacent pine plantation which was recently aerially sprayed. Thousands of trees appear to have been impacted. The trees were slowly recovering after being severely burnt by bushfires which ravaged Holey Plains in early 2019.

The area was recently being visited by Friends of the Earth during koala surveys. The impact of the sprays can be seen mainly on a 2km front on the eastern side of the plantation indicating that herbicides are likely to have wafted in when a 500ha pine plantation, managed by Hancock Victorian Plantations was recently sprayed. This plantation is certified by Forest Stewardship Council.

Pine plantations of this size are usually aerially sprayed with herbicides including Glyphosate, Metsulfuron Methyl and Clopyralid. Another herbicide Glufosinate Ammonium is also sometimes used. After the pines have been established for a year or two, aerial application of pellitised Hexazinone then occurs. Hexazinone will then leach into the soil for a many months.

Friends of the Earth believes that the likely culprit of the spray drift is Glyphosate. A similar incident occurred in the King Lake National Park about 10 years ago. It was determined that coppicing eucalypts are highly susceptible to minute levels of Glyphosate. It is unclear whether the trees impacted at Holey Plains will survive the incident.

The incident also raises concerns about the use of herbicides near recently burnt areas along the eastern seaboard of the Australian continent after the massive bushfire disaster which occurred in late 2019/2020. FoE believes that there should be label changes made to the herbicide Glyphosate listing concerns about its use in areas where Eucalypts are recovering from fire.

Chemical Standards Officers from Biosecurity and Agricultural Services (Victorian State Government) are now investigating the incident.

2018: Tully River (Queensland). Pesticide Shirtan (contains Mercury)

2018 Tully River Queensland. Mercury from use of Shirtan Fungicide

Evaluation of mercury in a freshwater environment impacted by an organomercury fungicide using diffusive gradient in thin films

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.081

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717327845

"...Mercury was surveyed in soils close to the Tully River at 3 different depths (100, 200 and 300 mm). Additionally, total Hg (THg) and the labile fraction of Hg in water (measured by the diffusive gradient in thin film technique) were determined in the Tully River. A pristine site, the Tully Gorge National Park upstream of sugarcane fields, was selected for background Hg concentration estimation. In soils, Hg levels ranged from 18 to 264 μg kg− 1, with one of the soil samples being almost 10 times higher than at other sites at the surface level (199 μg kg− 1). Total and labile concentrations of Hg in water increased from the Hg-elevated soil sampling sites (0.085 μg L− 1 and 0.061 μg L− 1) to downstream sites (0.082 μg L− 1 and 0.066 μg L− 1), which is likely due to agricultural runoff. Indeed, except for the upstream control site, the THg concentration in water is over the limit permitted by the Australian freshwater quality guideline for protection of 99% species (0.06 μg L− 1). These findings point to the need to perform further research to reveal the mechanisms for release of Hg from soil and whether this might be causing important adverse effects to the Great Barrier Reef located in front of this river catchment..."

 

2018 Tully River Queensland. Mercury from use of Shirtan Fungicide

Evaluation of mercury in a freshwater environment impacted by an organomercury fungicide using diffusive gradient in thin films

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.081

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717327845

“…Mercury was surveyed in soils close to the Tully River at 3 different depths (100, 200 and 300 mm). Additionally, total Hg (THg) and the labile fraction of Hg in water (measured by the diffusive gradient in thin film technique) were determined in the Tully River. A pristine site, the Tully Gorge National Park upstream of sugarcane fields, was selected for background Hg concentration estimation. In soils, Hg levels ranged from 18 to 264 μg kg− 1, with one of the soil samples being almost 10 times higher than at other sites at the surface level (199 μg kg− 1). Total and labile concentrations of Hg in water increased from the Hg-elevated soil sampling sites (0.085 μg L− 1 and 0.061 μg L− 1) to downstream sites (0.082 μg L− 1 and 0.066 μg L− 1), which is likely due to agricultural runoff. Indeed, except for the upstream control site, the THg concentration in water is over the limit permitted by the Australian freshwater quality guideline for protection of 99% species (0.06 μg L− 1). These findings point to the need to perform further research to reveal the mechanisms for release of Hg from soil and whether this might be causing important adverse effects to the Great Barrier Reef located in front of this river catchment…”

 

 

June 6 2020: TasNetworks (Hydro Electric Commission) Pay Pesticide Compensation. Pesticide: 2,4,5-T

TasNetworks to pay compensation over use of cancer-linked herbicide

June 6 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-05/tasnetworks-hydro-worker-payout-herbicide-cancer/12324788

A man in his 60s and the family of another who died in the 1980s will receive compensation over historical exposure to a herbicide contaminant while they were employees of Tasmania's Hydro Electric Commission (HEC).

The two men worked for the HEC, now TasNetworks, on vegetation teams using the herbicide 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) in the 1970s and 80s.

The dioxin TCDD, which is found in some batches of 2,4,5-T, has been linked to Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and soft-cell sarcoma, TasNetworks said in a statement.

TasNetworks said the man aged in his 60s was a current employee, while the other man had already left the HEC before his death.

Both men had contracted one of the linked illnesses, the statement said.

"We deeply regret that a current and former employee contracted a cancer linked to this herbicide," TasNetworks CEO Lance Balcombe said.

"Our current team member affected will be compensated, and TasNetworks will take a strong, supportive role in his ongoing treatment," he said, adding the employee would keep working at the company

The State Government last year confirmed WorkSafe Tasmania was working with TasNetworks to examine the claims of multiple former Hydro workers who said chemical exposure had left them with chronic illnesses.

TasNetworks on Friday said it had completed a "comprehensive search and screening process over 18 month, supported by independent toxicology and medical advice".

Mr Balcombe said that of 400 past and present employees contacted, 70 had chosen to be tested and that all but the one current employee was clear of the three conditions.

"We're confident we've reached the vast majority of people who could've been affected," he said.

TasNetworks said compensation would be determined by a legal framework and would remain confidential.

Former boss told employees 'you can drink it'

David Vince was one of hundreds of government workers who used the herbicide while working for Hydro Electric Commission's vegetation teams — without wearing any protective gear.

"None whatsoever," he said. "We just used to go out, mix it down at the depot, and what run on the ground went down the drains.

"We were breathing it in eight hours a day plus we were taking our clothes home and washing them in our machines … it was with us 24/7 really."

He said workers raised concerns with management but they were laughed off.

"One of the bosses, he said: 'No, there's nothing wrong with that, you can drink it!'

"One said to us: 'Oh well, if you don't like it you haven't got a job'."

Mr Vince said he believed his kidney problems were linked to using the herbicide.

"What I'd like to have seen is medical bills paid," he said.

"I go to the specialist every couple of months … if they covered medical expenses, that would be good."

In a statement, TasNetworks said: "[We] recognises that some people involved in the screening process are suffering from other medical conditions not linked to historical TCDD exposure.

"These are still our people, valued employees past and present. We intend to keep in contact, and explore other options for supporting those people into the future.

"The options we're considering include funded health checks every two years, a 1300 phone number to a dedicated support officer, and making pro-active contact about any fresh medical or scientific information on TCDD and associated illnesses."

Former hydro workers in Tasmania to launch compensation claims over chemical exposure

May 17 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-17/hydro-workers-claim-chemical-damages/11123070

At least 19 former hydro workers in Tasmania are seeking compensation, saying they were exposed to dangerous chemicals which has left them with chronic health conditions.

The workers were all employed by the Hydro Electric Commission (HEC), known today as TasNetworks.

The chemicals were sprayed by workers in groups of three or four to cut undergrowth and trees underneath transmission lines.

The spraying occurred primarily between the 1950s and the 1970s, but in some cases up until the 1990s.

The State Government has confirmed WorkSafe Tasmania was working with TasNetworks to examine the claims.

Geoff Pratt, who lives in Latrobe on Tasmania's north-west coast, is one of the workers affected.

He suffers from severe asthma, which he believes is linked to chemical exposure during work at the Hydro in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

"I was a young, fit healthy man, played footy, but my life has been shattered," he said.

Dave Vince, another former worker who believes chemical exposure has led to his ill health, said his kidneys now work at 38 per cent.

"I remember just being covered in the chemical spray after working with the Hydro in the 1960s," Mr Vince said.

"The worst part was you weren't given any protective equipment and the chemicals would just flow down your back after spilling over the lip of the container."

He and others want an apology.

"A lot of them have lost their husbands or partner a lot earlier than they probably should have done," he said.

Graham Smith sprayed the chemicals from the start of the 1960s until 1974.

"It was hard, heavy work," he said.

"We would work at least eight hours a day and would be just covered in the spray. It would make you feel dizzy.

"You would just be covered in the stuff, it would be flowing down your back."

Mr Smith, Mr Vince and Mr Pratt are all taking TasNetworks to court over their exposure to the chemicals and have engaged a lawyer.

TasNetworks confirmed it was in discussions with 12 employees and seven former HEC workers about the chemical exposure.

But the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union (CEPU) of Australia said more than 40 former workers could be affected.

The union confirmed some of the former workers would be meeting TasNetworks toxicologist next week for tests.

TasNetworks to pay compensation over use of cancer-linked herbicide

June 6 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-05/tasnetworks-hydro-worker-payout-herbicide-cancer/12324788

A man in his 60s and the family of another who died in the 1980s will receive compensation over historical exposure to a herbicide contaminant while they were employees of Tasmania’s Hydro Electric Commission (HEC).

The two men worked for the HEC, now TasNetworks, on vegetation teams using the herbicide 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) in the 1970s and 80s.

The dioxin TCDD, which is found in some batches of 2,4,5-T, has been linked to Hodgkin’s lymphoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and soft-cell sarcoma, TasNetworks said in a statement.

TasNetworks said the man aged in his 60s was a current employee, while the other man had already left the HEC before his death.

Both men had contracted one of the linked illnesses, the statement said.

“We deeply regret that a current and former employee contracted a cancer linked to this herbicide,” TasNetworks CEO Lance Balcombe said.

“Our current team member affected will be compensated, and TasNetworks will take a strong, supportive role in his ongoing treatment,” he said, adding the employee would keep working at the company

The State Government last year confirmed WorkSafe Tasmania was working with TasNetworks to examine the claims of multiple former Hydro workers who said chemical exposure had left them with chronic illnesses.

TasNetworks on Friday said it had completed a “comprehensive search and screening process over 18 month, supported by independent toxicology and medical advice”.

Mr Balcombe said that of 400 past and present employees contacted, 70 had chosen to be tested and that all but the one current employee was clear of the three conditions.

“We’re confident we’ve reached the vast majority of people who could’ve been affected,” he said.

TasNetworks said compensation would be determined by a legal framework and would remain confidential.

Former boss told employees ‘you can drink it’

David Vince was one of hundreds of government workers who used the herbicide while working for Hydro Electric Commission’s vegetation teams — without wearing any protective gear.

“None whatsoever,” he said. “We just used to go out, mix it down at the depot, and what run on the ground went down the drains.

“We were breathing it in eight hours a day plus we were taking our clothes home and washing them in our machines … it was with us 24/7 really.”

He said workers raised concerns with management but they were laughed off.

“One of the bosses, he said: ‘No, there’s nothing wrong with that, you can drink it!’

“One said to us: ‘Oh well, if you don’t like it you haven’t got a job’.”

Mr Vince said he believed his kidney problems were linked to using the herbicide.

“What I’d like to have seen is medical bills paid,” he said.

“I go to the specialist every couple of months … if they covered medical expenses, that would be good.”

In a statement, TasNetworks said: “[We] recognises that some people involved in the screening process are suffering from other medical conditions not linked to historical TCDD exposure.

“These are still our people, valued employees past and present. We intend to keep in contact, and explore other options for supporting those people into the future.

“The options we’re considering include funded health checks every two years, a 1300 phone number to a dedicated support officer, and making pro-active contact about any fresh medical or scientific information on TCDD and associated illnesses.”

Former hydro workers in Tasmania to launch compensation claims over chemical exposure

May 17 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-17/hydro-workers-claim-chemical-damages/11123070

At least 19 former hydro workers in Tasmania are seeking compensation, saying they were exposed to dangerous chemicals which has left them with chronic health conditions.

The workers were all employed by the Hydro Electric Commission (HEC), known today as TasNetworks.

The chemicals were sprayed by workers in groups of three or four to cut undergrowth and trees underneath transmission lines.

The spraying occurred primarily between the 1950s and the 1970s, but in some cases up until the 1990s.

The State Government has confirmed WorkSafe Tasmania was working with TasNetworks to examine the claims.

Geoff Pratt, who lives in Latrobe on Tasmania’s north-west coast, is one of the workers affected.

He suffers from severe asthma, which he believes is linked to chemical exposure during work at the Hydro in the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

“I was a young, fit healthy man, played footy, but my life has been shattered,” he said.

Dave Vince, another former worker who believes chemical exposure has led to his ill health, said his kidneys now work at 38 per cent.

“I remember just being covered in the chemical spray after working with the Hydro in the 1960s,” Mr Vince said.

“The worst part was you weren’t given any protective equipment and the chemicals would just flow down your back after spilling over the lip of the container.”

He and others want an apology.

“A lot of them have lost their husbands or partner a lot earlier than they probably should have done,” he said.

Graham Smith sprayed the chemicals from the start of the 1960s until 1974.

“It was hard, heavy work,” he said.

“We would work at least eight hours a day and would be just covered in the spray. It would make you feel dizzy.

“You would just be covered in the stuff, it would be flowing down your back.”

Mr Smith, Mr Vince and Mr Pratt are all taking TasNetworks to court over their exposure to the chemicals and have engaged a lawyer.

TasNetworks confirmed it was in discussions with 12 employees and seven former HEC workers about the chemical exposure.

But the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union (CEPU) of Australia said more than 40 former workers could be affected.

The union confirmed some of the former workers would be meeting TasNetworks toxicologist next week for tests.

1987-1998: King Lake (Victoria). Depletion of Dieldrin and DDT in soils

The depletion of dieldrin and DDT concentrations in Kinglake soils

H. J. Grainger, G. Roberts and L. Callinan

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40(1) 53 - 56
Published: 2000

Abstract

Twenty-two sites on 14 former potato growing properties at Kinglake, Victoria, with similar soil type, topography and history of chemical use, were soil tested for organochlorine chemicals during 1987–88 and again during 1997–98. The 95% confidence limits for the decline in concentrations of dieldrin and DDT in the soil were 5.5–41.5% and 29.1–48.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences between farms in the rate of depletion of either organochlorine. Reductions in both to 1997–98 were not significantly associated with the concentration in 1987–88.

https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99034

The depletion of dieldrin and DDT concentrations in Kinglake soils

H. J. Grainger, G. Roberts and L. Callinan

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40(1) 53 – 56
Published: 2000

Abstract

Twenty-two sites on 14 former potato growing properties at Kinglake, Victoria, with similar soil type, topography and history of chemical use, were soil tested for organochlorine chemicals during 1987–88 and again during 1997–98. The 95% confidence limits for the decline in concentrations of dieldrin and DDT in the soil were 5.5–41.5% and 29.1–48.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences between farms in the rate of depletion of either organochlorine. Reductions in both to 1997–98 were not significantly associated with the concentration in 1987–88.

https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99034

1/5/20: Senate Inquiry Cancer Cluster Bellarine Peninsula. Pesticide: Dieldrin?

Senate inquiry investigates possible cancer cluster on Victoria's Bellarine Peninsula

1 May 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-01/senate-inquiry-into-possible-cancer-cluster-bellarine-peninsula/12202094

A Drysdale secondary school likely had "harmful levels" of insecticides in the soil when it first opened in 1997, a Senate inquiry into a possible cancer cluster on Victoria's Bellarine Peninsula has heard.

Gordon Legal senior partner Peter Gordon told the inquiry he was acting for the spouses of three former Bellarine Secondary College students who died from cancer.

He said Scott Beyer, Mitch Trickey and Tyanne Riddle all attended the school during its initial years of operation and all three died as young adults from different forms of cancer.

Mr Gordon told the inquiry that dangerous levels of carcinogens would likely have been present when the school first opened.

"It's very likely to have been unsafe in the years 1997, 1998, 1999 when school children were first put in harm's way," he said.

Concerns about possible soil contamination from dieldrin — a pesticide previously used on farms which can contaminate the soil for decades — prompted the Department of Education and WorkSafe to conduct soil tests at Bellarine Secondary College, in 2018.

The report found pesticides, including dieldrin, were found in the soil, but in levels below what is considered harmful to human health.

Mr Gordon told the inquiry that while soil testing conducted in recent years found "negligible levels" of dieldrin and other organo-chlorine pesticides, levels would have been higher in previous decades.

"Based on our investigation there's evidence of a disturbing number of cancer cases occurring in the Bellarine Secondary College cohort — that is, teachers and students — who were present at the Drysdale campus when it first opened in 1997 and the years that followed," he told the inquiry.

"There's clear evidence that the school population in that period was exposed to certain levels of organo-chlorine pesticides, of which dieldrin was one.

"It's probable that exposure caused the cancer and death of at least some people in the Bellarine Secondary College cohort."

Mr Gordon also argued previous studies which found no evidence of a cancer cluster on the Bellarine Peninsula had "serious limitations" because they focused on statistical data across a wide geographical area.

Mr Gordon told the inquiry he planned to negotiate with the Victorian Government on behalf of his clients, but if those negotiations broke down he expected to launch legal proceedings.

But he made it clear he did not believe there was any ongoing risk to students at the school today.

"I don't think there is a hard and fast year where one can say the risk became an acceptable risk," he said.

"The risk and the exposure levels, in my view, diminished over the years."

'Unusual' investigation arose from media reports

The Senate inquiry is the result of a promise from both major parties made during the tightly-fought 2019 federal election campaign in the marginal seat of Corangamite.

Both candidates picked up on community concerns about a perceived higher rate of cancer on the Bellarine Peninsula.

Victoria's Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton told the inquiry that while the community was originally worried about the level of dieldrin in the soil at Bellarine Secondary College, concerns had changed over time to include a widespread mosquito-spraying program around Barwon Heads.

He said claims of a possible cancer cluster on the Bellarine Peninsula were "quite unusual" because the department had not been approached by individuals — as is usually the case with cancer cluster claims — but had instead responded to multiple community concerns raised in the media.

"We were trying to piece together where the concerns were focused," he said.

"That did change over time. Over the past 16 months there's been a shift in concerns or there's been multiple concerns expressed by different groups."

Senator labels report an 'embarrassment'

Victorian Senator Sarah Henderson, who promised the inquiry when she was recontesting the seat of Corangamite before taking up a role in the Senate, questioned the credibility of a Cancer Council study which found no higher incidence of cancer in Barwon Heads.

The study was commissioned by the state's Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and identified 315 new cancer cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2016, including six cases in people aged 10 to 34 years, in the town with a population of fewer than 4,000 people.

Senator Henderson said the Barwon Heads community's biggest concern related to the mosquito-spraying program conducted by the local council, which ran from the 1980s to the mid-2000s.

"Most of the cancers that are of concern in the Barwon Heads community predominantly occurred prior to 2001 when this spraying program was underway," Senator Henderson told the inquiry.

"This is such a poorly framed epidemiological study that it appears, and it's almost designed to ensure, there's no assessment at all of allegations of a potential cancer cluster in the period of the 1980 and 90s."

The report's author, Professor Roger Milne, told the inquiry DHHS had originally asked him to consider data from 1991 onwards.

But Professor Milne said there was a change in the way data was collated after 2001, making it more time-consuming and potentially problematic to compare cancer data before that date.

He told the inquiry he advised department that he could provide a more timely report if he only looked at data from 2001 onwards, a proposal the department accepted.

Senator Henderson said it was "extremely disappointing" the department had not taken into account many of the concerns raised by local residents.

"I would say that this is just an absolute embarrassment," she told the inquiry.

Questions raised over 'no cancer cluster' findings

The inquiry also heard from Professor David Hill, a member of the expert advisory group which provides advice on potential cancer clusters to DHHS.

He said Professor Milne's report was appropriate and "the conclusions are valid".

Senator Henderson said it was shocking two decades of cancer data was not considered.

"Given that exposure [to chemicals used in mosquito spraying] first occurred from the early 1980s isn't it the case that the Victorian Government has misled the community?" she asked.

"How can the community be assured there's no cancer cluster?"

Professor Hill said the investigations were in line with the "standard response".

"I can't agree with the proposition that the department have misled the community about the absence of a cancer cluster," he said.

Professor Hill said one of the biggest issues was a lack of clarity around exactly what the community was concerned about

"Our group has never seen the age distribution of the cluster that people in the community perceived ... so it's very difficult to plan an analysis," he said.

"It would be extremely helpful to know what the community's evidence of a cluster is. And that evidence really needs to be based on the number of patients, the type of cancers they had, the date of diagnosis and their age."

A local community group headed by Ross Harrison has been collating evidence of cancer and auto-immune disease diagnoses in Barwon Heads.

He told the inquiry the figures were alarming and there was a need for a more in-depth analysis.

Promise of further investigations

City of Greater Geelong planning, design and development director Gareth Smith told the inquiry all the products used in mosquito-spraying program were approved by the relevant Commonwealth Government agencies.

He said the council had provided all the information it had, including prior to council amalgamations in 1993, but many of the historic documents has not been preserved.

"We want to be transparent. We have an obligation to our community," he said.

Under questioning, Professor Sutton told the inquiry he would agree to commission a report that considered data going back to the 1980s, provided there was a community desire for the information and it was "methodologically feasible".

A second public hearing will be held once coronavirus restrictions are relaxed and the Senate committee is able to travel to the Bellarine Peninsula.

The Senate committee is due to hand down its report in November.

Senate inquiry investigates possible cancer cluster on Victoria’s Bellarine Peninsula

1 May 2020

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-01/senate-inquiry-into-possible-cancer-cluster-bellarine-peninsula/12202094

A Drysdale secondary school likely had “harmful levels” of insecticides in the soil when it first opened in 1997, a Senate inquiry into a possible cancer cluster on Victoria’s Bellarine Peninsula has heard.

Gordon Legal senior partner Peter Gordon told the inquiry he was acting for the spouses of three former Bellarine Secondary College students who died from cancer.

He said Scott Beyer, Mitch Trickey and Tyanne Riddle all attended the school during its initial years of operation and all three died as young adults from different forms of cancer.

Mr Gordon told the inquiry that dangerous levels of carcinogens would likely have been present when the school first opened.

“It’s very likely to have been unsafe in the years 1997, 1998, 1999 when school children were first put in harm’s way,” he said.

Concerns about possible soil contamination from dieldrin — a pesticide previously used on farms which can contaminate the soil for decades — prompted the Department of Education and WorkSafe to conduct soil tests at Bellarine Secondary College, in 2018.

The report found pesticides, including dieldrin, were found in the soil, but in levels below what is considered harmful to human health.

Mr Gordon told the inquiry that while soil testing conducted in recent years found “negligible levels” of dieldrin and other organo-chlorine pesticides, levels would have been higher in previous decades.

“Based on our investigation there’s evidence of a disturbing number of cancer cases occurring in the Bellarine Secondary College cohort — that is, teachers and students — who were present at the Drysdale campus when it first opened in 1997 and the years that followed,” he told the inquiry.

“There’s clear evidence that the school population in that period was exposed to certain levels of organo-chlorine pesticides, of which dieldrin was one.

“It’s probable that exposure caused the cancer and death of at least some people in the Bellarine Secondary College cohort.”

Mr Gordon also argued previous studies which found no evidence of a cancer cluster on the Bellarine Peninsula had “serious limitations” because they focused on statistical data across a wide geographical area.

Mr Gordon told the inquiry he planned to negotiate with the Victorian Government on behalf of his clients, but if those negotiations broke down he expected to launch legal proceedings.

But he made it clear he did not believe there was any ongoing risk to students at the school today.

“I don’t think there is a hard and fast year where one can say the risk became an acceptable risk,” he said.

“The risk and the exposure levels, in my view, diminished over the years.”

‘Unusual’ investigation arose from media reports

The Senate inquiry is the result of a promise from both major parties made during the tightly-fought 2019 federal election campaign in the marginal seat of Corangamite.

Both candidates picked up on community concerns about a perceived higher rate of cancer on the Bellarine Peninsula.

Victoria’s Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton told the inquiry that while the community was originally worried about the level of dieldrin in the soil at Bellarine Secondary College, concerns had changed over time to include a widespread mosquito-spraying program around Barwon Heads.

He said claims of a possible cancer cluster on the Bellarine Peninsula were “quite unusual” because the department had not been approached by individuals — as is usually the case with cancer cluster claims — but had instead responded to multiple community concerns raised in the media.

“We were trying to piece together where the concerns were focused,” he said.

“That did change over time. Over the past 16 months there’s been a shift in concerns or there’s been multiple concerns expressed by different groups.”

Senator labels report an ’embarrassment’

Victorian Senator Sarah Henderson, who promised the inquiry when she was recontesting the seat of Corangamite before taking up a role in the Senate, questioned the credibility of a Cancer Council study which found no higher incidence of cancer in Barwon Heads.

The study was commissioned by the state’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and identified 315 new cancer cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2016, including six cases in people aged 10 to 34 years, in the town with a population of fewer than 4,000 people.

Senator Henderson said the Barwon Heads community’s biggest concern related to the mosquito-spraying program conducted by the local council, which ran from the 1980s to the mid-2000s.

“Most of the cancers that are of concern in the Barwon Heads community predominantly occurred prior to 2001 when this spraying program was underway,” Senator Henderson told the inquiry.

“This is such a poorly framed epidemiological study that it appears, and it’s almost designed to ensure, there’s no assessment at all of allegations of a potential cancer cluster in the period of the 1980 and 90s.”

The report’s author, Professor Roger Milne, told the inquiry DHHS had originally asked him to consider data from 1991 onwards.

But Professor Milne said there was a change in the way data was collated after 2001, making it more time-consuming and potentially problematic to compare cancer data before that date.

He told the inquiry he advised department that he could provide a more timely report if he only looked at data from 2001 onwards, a proposal the department accepted.

Senator Henderson said it was “extremely disappointing” the department had not taken into account many of the concerns raised by local residents.

“I would say that this is just an absolute embarrassment,” she told the inquiry.

Questions raised over ‘no cancer cluster’ findings

The inquiry also heard from Professor David Hill, a member of the expert advisory group which provides advice on potential cancer clusters to DHHS.

He said Professor Milne’s report was appropriate and “the conclusions are valid”.

Senator Henderson said it was shocking two decades of cancer data was not considered.

“Given that exposure [to chemicals used in mosquito spraying] first occurred from the early 1980s isn’t it the case that the Victorian Government has misled the community?” she asked.

“How can the community be assured there’s no cancer cluster?”

Professor Hill said the investigations were in line with the “standard response”.

I can’t agree with the proposition that the department have misled the community about the absence of a cancer cluster,” he said.

Professor Hill said one of the biggest issues was a lack of clarity around exactly what the community was concerned about

“Our group has never seen the age distribution of the cluster that people in the community perceived … so it’s very difficult to plan an analysis,” he said.

“It would be extremely helpful to know what the community’s evidence of a cluster is. And that evidence really needs to be based on the number of patients, the type of cancers they had, the date of diagnosis and their age.”

A local community group headed by Ross Harrison has been collating evidence of cancer and auto-immune disease diagnoses in Barwon Heads.

He told the inquiry the figures were alarming and there was a need for a more in-depth analysis.

Promise of further investigations

City of Greater Geelong planning, design and development director Gareth Smith told the inquiry all the products used in mosquito-spraying program were approved by the relevant Commonwealth Government agencies.

He said the council had provided all the information it had, including prior to council amalgamations in 1993, but many of the historic documents has not been preserved.

“We want to be transparent. We have an obligation to our community,” he said.

Under questioning, Professor Sutton told the inquiry he would agree to commission a report that considered data going back to the 1980s, provided there was a community desire for the information and it was “methodologically feasible”.

A second public hearing will be held once coronavirus restrictions are relaxed and the Senate committee is able to travel to the Bellarine Peninsula.

The Senate committee is due to hand down its report in November.

2017: Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Longan. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Thiamethoxam

Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Thiamethoxam

15/6/17: Dried Longan - Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg

28/6/17: Dried Longan - Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China): Thiamethoxam 0.04mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Thiamethoxam

15/6/17: Dried Longan – Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg

28/6/17: Dried Longan – Zhucheng Lukang Food Co Ltd (China): Thiamethoxam 0.04mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

1/7/19: Zhongshan Yuncheng Trading Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Longan. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Zhongshan Yuncheng Trading Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

1/7/19: Dried Longan - Zhongshan Yuncheng Trading Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhongshan Yuncheng Trading Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

1/7/19: Dried Longan – Zhongshan Yuncheng Trading Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

20/1/17: Zhongshan Kun Bo Foodstuff Import and Export (China). Breached Australian MRL for Red Dates. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Zhongshan Kun Bo Foodstuff Import & Export Corp Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

20/1/17: Dried Red Dates - Zhongshan Kun Bo Foodstuff Import & Export Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhongshan Kun Bo Foodstuff Import & Export Corp Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

20/1/17: Dried Red Dates – Zhongshan Kun Bo Foodstuff Import & Export Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

3/6/19: Zhongshan Best Honest Trading. (China). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Red Dates. Pesticide: Propargite

Zhongshan Best Honest Trading Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Propargite

3/6/19: Dried Seedless Red Dates - Zhongshan Best Honest Trading Co Ltd (China): Propargite 0.07mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhongshan Best Honest Trading Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Propargite

3/6/19: Dried Seedless Red Dates – Zhongshan Best Honest Trading Co Ltd (China): Propargite 0.07mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/21: Zhanhua Kingman Food (China). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Red Dates/Jujube. Pesticides: Multiple

Zhanhua Kingman Food Co. Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Dichlorvos, Propargite

8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdCarbendazim0.061
8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdCarbendazim0.83
8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdChlorothalonil0.092
8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdDifenconazole0.067
8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdPropiconazole0.15
8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdTebuconazole0.17
8/02/2018Dried red jujube slicesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdTebuconazole0.36
1/12/2017Seedless red datesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdCarbendazim0.47
1/12/2017Seedless red datesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdDifenoconazole0.14
1/12/2017Seedless red datesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food Co.LtdTebuconazole0.32
23/10/2019Red datesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food LtdDichlorovos0.06
23/10/2019Red datesChinaZhanhua Kingman Food LtdDifenconazole0.28

3/9/21: Jujube (with seeds). Zhanhua Kingman Food Ltd (China). Propargite 0.09mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhanhua Kingman Food Co. Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Dichlorvos, Propargite

8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Carbendazim 0.061
8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Carbendazim 0.83
8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Chlorothalonil 0.092
8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Difenconazole 0.067
8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Propiconazole 0.15
8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Tebuconazole 0.17
8/02/2018 Dried red jujube slices China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Tebuconazole 0.36
1/12/2017 Seedless red dates China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Carbendazim 0.47
1/12/2017 Seedless red dates China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Difenoconazole 0.14
1/12/2017 Seedless red dates China Zhanhua Kingman Food Co.Ltd Tebuconazole 0.32
23/10/2019 Red dates China Zhanhua Kingman Food Ltd Dichlorovos 0.06
23/10/2019 Red dates China Zhanhua Kingman Food Ltd Difenconazole 0.28

3/9/21: Jujube (with seeds). Zhanhua Kingman Food Ltd (China). Propargite 0.09mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/19: Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRLs for Lychees. Pesticides: Multiple

Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Azoxystrobin, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Dimethomorph, Indoxacarb, Cyhalothrin, Thiabendazole, Carbendazim, Iprodione

19/06/2017Princess green LycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdChlorpyrifos1
19/06/2017Princess green LycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdCypermethrin0.4
19/06/2017Princess green LycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDifenoconazole0.2
19/06/2017Princess green LycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdIprodione10
19/06/2017Princess green LycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdThiabendazole0.03
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdAzoxystrobin0.55
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdChlorpyrifos0.33
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdCypermethrin0.43
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDifenoconazole0.84
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDifenoconazole0.73
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDimethomorph0.73
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDimethomorph0.096
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdIndoxacarb0.068
11/06/2019Fresh lycheeChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdIndoxacarb0.12
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdAzoxystrobin0.16
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdAzoxystrobin0.22
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdCyhalothrin0.06
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdCyhalothrin0.07
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDifenconazole0.088
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDifenconazole0.095
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdThiabendazole2.2
8/07/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdThiabendazole1.9
13/08/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdCarbendazim1.8
13/08/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdChlorpyrifos0.09
13/08/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdCypermethrin0.39
13/08/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdDimethomorph0.43
13/08/2019Fresh lycheesChinaZhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co LtdThiabendazole0.04

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Azoxystrobin, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Dimethomorph, Indoxacarb, Cyhalothrin, Thiabendazole, Carbendazim, Iprodione

19/06/2017 Princess green Lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Chlorpyrifos 1
19/06/2017 Princess green Lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Cypermethrin 0.4
19/06/2017 Princess green Lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Difenoconazole 0.2
19/06/2017 Princess green Lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Iprodione 10
19/06/2017 Princess green Lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Thiabendazole 0.03
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Azoxystrobin 0.55
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Chlorpyrifos 0.33
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Cypermethrin 0.43
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Difenoconazole 0.84
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Difenoconazole 0.73
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Dimethomorph 0.73
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Dimethomorph 0.096
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Indoxacarb 0.068
11/06/2019 Fresh lychee China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Indoxacarb 0.12
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Azoxystrobin 0.16
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Azoxystrobin 0.22
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Cyhalothrin 0.06
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Cyhalothrin 0.07
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Difenconazole 0.088
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Difenconazole 0.095
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Thiabendazole 2.2
8/07/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Thiabendazole 1.9
13/08/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Carbendazim 1.8
13/08/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Chlorpyrifos 0.09
13/08/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Cypermethrin 0.39
13/08/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Dimethomorph 0.43
13/08/2019 Fresh lychees China Zhangzhou Xinmingxing Trading Co Ltd Thiabendazole 0.04

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

20/7/18: Zhangzhou Dexing Development Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Lychees. Pesticide: Thiabendazole

Zhangzhou Dexing Development Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiabendazole

20/7/18: Fresh Lychees - Zhangzhou Dexing Development Co Ltd (China): Thiabendazole 0.032mg/kg & 0.18mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Zhangzhou Dexing Development Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiabendazole

20/7/18: Fresh Lychees – Zhangzhou Dexing Development Co Ltd (China): Thiabendazole 0.032mg/kg & 0.18mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

5/9/19: Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Dried Haw. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

5/9/19: Dried Haw - Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China): Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg

5/9/19: Dried Haw - Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China): Cyhalothrin 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

5/9/19: Dried Haw – Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China): Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg

5/9/19: Dried Haw – Yongxiang Food Processing Plant (China): Cyhalothrin 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

11/4/19: Yicheng Dashanhe Modern Agriculture (China). Breached Australian MRL for Red Dates. Pesticide: Tebuconazole

Yicheng Dashanhe Modern Agriculture Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Tebuconazole

11/4/19: Dried Red Dates - Yicheng Dashanhe Modern Agriculture Co Ltd(China): Tebuconazole 0.17mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

 

Yicheng Dashanhe Modern Agriculture Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Tebuconazole

11/4/19: Dried Red Dates – Yicheng Dashanhe Modern Agriculture Co Ltd(China): Tebuconazole 0.17mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

 

2018/21: Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China). Breach to Australian MRL. Pesticide: Profenofos, Procymidone, Cyhalothrin

Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Profenofos, Procymidone

9/8/18: Diced Red Pepper - Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Profenofos 0.72mg/kg

15/1/21: Celery Diced - Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Procymidone Detected. Not permitted in this food.

2/3/21: Celery  - Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin Detected. Not permitted in this food.

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Profenofos, Procymidone, Cyhalothrin

9/8/18: Diced Red Pepper – Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Profenofos 0.72mg/kg

15/1/21: Celery Diced – Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Procymidone Detected. Not permitted in this food.

2/3/21: Celery  – Yantai Aofeng Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin Detected. Not permitted in this food.

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018/19: Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd (China). Breaching MRL’s for Red Dates. Pesticides: Difenconazole, Thiamethoxam

Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole, Thiamethoxam

17/10/18: Dried Red Dates - Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.06mg/kg

28/2/19: Dried Red Dates - Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd (China): (China): Thiamethoxam 0.05mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole, Thiamethoxam

17/10/18: Dried Red Dates – Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.06mg/kg

28/2/19: Dried Red Dates – Xinzheng Xinxing Dates Co Ltd (China): (China): Thiamethoxam 0.05mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

8/2/19: Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China). Breaches to Australian MRL for Red Dates. Pesticides: Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Tebuconazole

Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Tebuconazole

8/2/19: Instant Red Date Slice - Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China): Cypermethrin 0.13mg/kg

8/2/19: Instant Red Date Slice - Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.12mg/kg

8/2/19: Instant Red Date Slice - Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China): Tebuconazole 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Tebuconazole

8/2/19: Instant Red Date Slice – Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China): Cypermethrin 0.13mg/kg

8/2/19: Instant Red Date Slice – Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.12mg/kg

8/2/19: Instant Red Date Slice – Xin Zheng City Xin Xing Jujube Co Ltd (China): Tebuconazole 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

4/10/19: Xiangyang Heli Agriculture Development Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Snap Peas. Pesticide: Thiamethoxam

Xiangyang Heli Agriculture Development Co Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiamethoxam

4/10/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - Xiangyang Heli Agriculture Development Co Ltd  (China): Thiamethoxam 0.1mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Xiangyang Heli Agriculture Development Co Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiamethoxam

4/10/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – Xiangyang Heli Agriculture Development Co Ltd  (China): Thiamethoxam 0.1mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

28/3/19: Xiamen Sinocharm Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Strawberries. Pesticide: Procymidone

Xiamen Sinocharm Co Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

28/3/19: Frozen Strawberries - Xiamen Sinocharm Co Ltd  (China): Procymidone 0.047mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Xiamen Sinocharm Co Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

28/3/19: Frozen Strawberries – Xiamen Sinocharm Co Ltd  (China): Procymidone 0.047mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

4/10/17: Weihai Ptc International Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Capsicum. Pesticide: Profenofos

Weihai Ptc International Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Profenofos

4/10/17: Dried Capsicum - Weihai Ptc International Co Ltd (China): Profenofos 0.16mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Weihai Ptc International Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Profenofos

4/10/17: Dried Capsicum – Weihai Ptc International Co Ltd (China): Profenofos 0.16mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

1/5/19: Wan Chen Science and Technology Agriculture (Taiwan). Breached Australian MRL for Mushrooms. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Wan Chen Science and Technology Agriculture Co Ltd (Taiwan) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

1/5/19: Shitake Mushrooms - Wan Chen Science and Technology Agriculture Co Ltd (Taiwan): Chlorpyrifos 0.022mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Wan Chen Science and Technology Agriculture Co Ltd (Taiwan) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

1/5/19: Shitake Mushrooms – Wan Chen Science and Technology Agriculture Co Ltd (Taiwan): Chlorpyrifos 0.022mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

5/7/17: Virat Global Exim Exp Corp (India). Breached Australian MRL for Apple. Pesticide: Tebuconazole

Virat Global Exim Exp Corp (India) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Tebuconazole

5/7/17: Dried Chilled Apple - Virat Global Exim Exp Corp (India): Tebuconazole 0.061mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Virat Global Exim Exp Corp (India) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Tebuconazole

5/7/17: Dried Chilled Apple – Virat Global Exim Exp Corp (India): Tebuconazole 0.061mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

10/12/19: Vignesh Super Stores (India). Breached Australian MRL for Toor Dal. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Vignesh Super Stores Ltd  (India) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

10/12/19: Toor Dal - Vignesh Super Stores Ltd  (India): Chlorpyrifos 0.074mg/kg & Chlorpyrifos 0.13mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Vignesh Super Stores Ltd  (India) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

10/12/19: Toor Dal – Vignesh Super Stores Ltd  (India): Chlorpyrifos 0.074mg/kg & Chlorpyrifos 0.13mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018/20: Vadilal Industries Limited (India). Breaches to Australian MRLs for Fenugreek leaves, Spinach Leaves, Hyacinth Bean, Chilli, Gourd, Hyacinth Leaves. Pesticides: Multiple

Vadilal Industries Limited (India) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos, Acephate, Tebuconazole, Dimethoate

9/03/2018Fenugreek leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.22mg/kg
10/05/2018Fenugreek leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.016mg/kg
10/05/2018Fenugreek leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.145mg/kg
11/05/2018Fenugreek leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.29mg/kg
26/07/2018Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedAcephate0.083mg/kg
27/07/2018Hyacinth BeanIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.176mg/kg
5/11/2018Frozen fenugreek leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.032mg/kg
3/12/2018Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.02mg/kg
11/12/2018Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.36mg/kg
24/12/2018Frozen spinach leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.085mg/kg
24/12/2018Frozen spinach leavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.12mg/kg
28/12/2018Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.04mg/kg
28/12/2018Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.024mg/kg
22/01/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedAcephate0.13mg/kg
30/01/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedAcephate0.08mg/kg
30/01/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.02mg/kg
30/01/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.024mg/kg
6/02/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.03mg/kg
8/05/2019Green chilliIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedTebuconazole0.059mg/kg
19/06/2019Fresh chilliIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedTebuconazole0.07mg/kg
28/06/2019Cut hyacinth beansIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedProfenofos0.09mg/kg
19/08/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.23mg/kg
6/09/2019Spinach LeavesIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedChlorpyrifos0.09mg/kg
27/11/2019Vegetable Ivy GourdIndiaVadilal Industries LimitedDimethoate0.027mg/kg

10/2/20: Frozen Spinach Leaves - India - Vadilal Industries Limited, Acephate 0.21mg/kg

10/2/20: Frozen Spinach Leaves - India - Vadilal Industries Limited, Profenofos 0.59mg/kg

9/11/20: Frozen Cut Hyacinth Leaves - India - Vadilal Industries Limited, Profenofos 0.035mg/kg

9/12/20: Frozen cut Hyacinth beans - India - Vadilal Industries Limited, Profenofos 0.035mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Vadilal Industries Limited (India) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos, Acephate, Tebuconazole, Dimethoate

9/03/2018 Fenugreek leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.22mg/kg
10/05/2018 Fenugreek leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.016mg/kg
10/05/2018 Fenugreek leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.145mg/kg
11/05/2018 Fenugreek leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.29mg/kg
26/07/2018 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Acephate 0.083mg/kg
27/07/2018 Hyacinth Bean India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.176mg/kg
5/11/2018 Frozen fenugreek leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.032mg/kg
3/12/2018 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg
11/12/2018 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.36mg/kg
24/12/2018 Frozen spinach leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.085mg/kg
24/12/2018 Frozen spinach leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.12mg/kg
28/12/2018 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg
28/12/2018 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.024mg/kg
22/01/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Acephate 0.13mg/kg
30/01/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Acephate 0.08mg/kg
30/01/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg
30/01/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.024mg/kg
6/02/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.03mg/kg
8/05/2019 Green chilli India Vadilal Industries Limited Tebuconazole 0.059mg/kg
19/06/2019 Fresh chilli India Vadilal Industries Limited Tebuconazole 0.07mg/kg
28/06/2019 Cut hyacinth beans India Vadilal Industries Limited Profenofos 0.09mg/kg
19/08/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.23mg/kg
6/09/2019 Spinach Leaves India Vadilal Industries Limited Chlorpyrifos 0.09mg/kg
27/11/2019 Vegetable Ivy Gourd India Vadilal Industries Limited Dimethoate 0.027mg/kg

10/2/20: Frozen Spinach Leaves – India – Vadilal Industries Limited, Acephate 0.21mg/kg

10/2/20: Frozen Spinach Leaves – India – Vadilal Industries Limited, Profenofos 0.59mg/kg

9/11/20: Frozen Cut Hyacinth Leaves – India – Vadilal Industries Limited, Profenofos 0.035mg/kg

9/12/20: Frozen cut Hyacinth beans – India – Vadilal Industries Limited, Profenofos 0.035mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

28/3/17: Titan Industrial (Changshu) Foods Co Ltd  (China). Breached Australian MRL for Cauliflower. Pesticide: Procymidone

Titan Industrial (Changshu) Foods Co Ltd  (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

28/3/17: Cauliflower - Titan Industrial (Changshu) Foods Co Ltd  (China): Procymidone 0.15mg/kg & Procymidone 0.22mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Titan Industrial (Changshu) Foods Co Ltd  (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

28/3/17: Cauliflower – Titan Industrial (Changshu) Foods Co Ltd  (China): Procymidone 0.15mg/kg & Procymidone 0.22mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

5/3/19: Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry and Trade (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Red Dates. Pesticides: Multiple

Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry and Trade Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Propiconazole, Pyrimethanil, Thiabendazole, Triadimefon, Triadimenol

5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdCarbendazim0.78mg/kg
5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdCyhalothrin0.011mg/kg
5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdPropiconazole0.37mg/kg
5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdPyrimethanil0.12mg/kg
5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdThiabendazole1mg/kg
5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdTriadimefon0.2mg/kg
5/03/2019Dried red datesChinaTianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co LtdTriadimenol0.08mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry and Trade Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Propiconazole, Pyrimethanil, Thiabendazole, Triadimefon, Triadimenol

5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Carbendazim 0.78mg/kg
5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Cyhalothrin 0.011mg/kg
5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Propiconazole 0.37mg/kg
5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Pyrimethanil 0.12mg/kg
5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Thiabendazole 1mg/kg
5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Triadimefon 0.2mg/kg
5/03/2019 Dried red dates China Tianjin Jinghai Huixin Industry And Trade Co Ltd Triadimenol 0.08mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

3/12/19: The Fruit Republic Can Tho One Member (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL for Dragon Fruit. Pesticide: Carbendazim

The Fruit Republic Can Tho One Member Co Ltd (Vietnam) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

3/12/19: Dragon Fruit - The Fruit Republic Can Tho One Member Co Ltd (Vietnam): Carbendazim 0.19mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

The Fruit Republic Can Tho One Member Co Ltd (Vietnam) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

3/12/19: Dragon Fruit – The Fruit Republic Can Tho One Member Co Ltd (Vietnam): Carbendazim 0.19mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019: The Fresh Connection (United States). Breached Australian MRL for Grapefruit. Pesticide: Carbaryl

The Fresh Connection (United States) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbaryl

6/3/19: Red Grapefruit - The Fresh Connection (United States): Carbaryl 0.67mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

The Fresh Connection (United States) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbaryl

6/3/19: Red Grapefruit – The Fresh Connection (United States): Carbaryl 0.67mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

31/3/17: Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand). Breach to Australian MRL for Longan. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

31/3/17: Dried Seedless Longan - Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.08mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

31/3/17: Dried Seedless Longan - Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.08mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

31/3/17: Dried Seedless Longan – Thai World Import and Export Co (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.08mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019/20: Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Chillies. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Metalaxyl

2019: Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd (Vietnam) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Metalaxyl

13/06/2019Green chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdChlorpyrifos0.2mg/kg
13/06/2019Green chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdDifenconazole0.23mg/kg
13/06/2019Green chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdPropiconazole0.16mg/kg
13/06/2019Green chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdTebuconazole0.095mg/kg
13/06/2019Red chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdChlorpyrifos0.1mg/kg
13/06/2019Red chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdDifenconazole0.22mg/kg
13/06/2019Red chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdMetalaxyl0.14mg/kg
13/06/2019Red chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdPropiconazole0.17mg/kg
13/06/2019Red chilliVietnamThai Thuan Binh Co.LtdTebuconazole0.15mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Chlorpyrifos 0.042mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Difenconazole 0.071mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Difenconazole 0.059mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Propiconazole 0.11mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019: Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd (Vietnam) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Metalaxyl

13/06/2019 Green chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Chlorpyrifos 0.2mg/kg
13/06/2019 Green chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Difenconazole 0.23mg/kg
13/06/2019 Green chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Propiconazole 0.16mg/kg
13/06/2019 Green chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Tebuconazole 0.095mg/kg
13/06/2019 Red chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Chlorpyrifos 0.1mg/kg
13/06/2019 Red chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Difenconazole 0.22mg/kg
13/06/2019 Red chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Metalaxyl 0.14mg/kg
13/06/2019 Red chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Propiconazole 0.17mg/kg
13/06/2019 Red chilli Vietnam Thai Thuan Binh Co.Ltd Tebuconazole 0.15mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Chlorpyrifos 0.042mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Difenconazole 0.071mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Difenconazole 0.059mg/kg

17/1/20: Frozen Hot Thai Red Chillies, Vietnam. Thai Thuan Binh Co Ltd Propiconazole 0.11mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018/20: Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL for Longan. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

19/12/18: Frozen Dried Longan - Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

4/6/19: Frozen Dried Longan - Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.053mg/kg

29/7/19: Frozen Dried Longan - Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.073mg/kg

2/3/20: Frozen Dried Longan - Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.055mg/kg

2/3/20: Frozen Dried Longan - Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.019mg/kg

28/4/20: Frozen Dried Longan - Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.011mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

19/12/18: Frozen Dried Longan – Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

4/6/19: Frozen Dried Longan – Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.053mg/kg

29/7/19: Frozen Dried Longan – Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.073mg/kg

2/3/20: Frozen Dried Longan – Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.055mg/kg

2/3/20: Frozen Dried Longan – Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.019mg/kg

28/4/20: Frozen Dried Longan – Tanaya International Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.011mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018/19: Tan Dong Trade Production Co Ltd (Vietnam). Breaches to MRL for Chillies. Pesticides: Multiple

Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Permethrin, Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Metalaxyl, Profenofos, Propiconazole

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Carbendazim 0.64mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Cyhalothrin 0.01mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Diefnconazole 0.2mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Metalaxyl 0.11mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Profenofos 0.33mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Propiconazole 0.16mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Red Chillies without tails - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.091mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Red Chillies without tails - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Difenconazole 0.16mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Red Chillies without tails - Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Permethrin 0.11mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Permethrin, Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Metalaxyl, Profenofos, Propiconazole

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Carbendazim 0.64mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Cyhalothrin 0.01mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Diefnconazole 0.2mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Metalaxyl 0.11mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Profenofos 0.33mg/kg

20/2/18: Frozen Red Chilli  – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Propiconazole 0.16mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Red Chillies without tails – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.091mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Red Chillies without tails – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Difenconazole 0.16mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Red Chillies without tails – Tan Dong Trade Production Company Limited  (Vietnam): Permethrin 0.11mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

21/11/18: Synergy Lanka Trading Company (Sri Lanka). Breaching Australian MRL on Gourd. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Synergy Lanka Trading Company A.I (Sri Lanka) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

21/11/18: Dehydrated Bitter Gourd - Synergy Lanka Trading Company (Sri Lanka): Carbendazim 0.91mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Synergy Lanka Trading Company A.I (Sri Lanka) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

21/11/18: Dehydrated Bitter Gourd – Synergy Lanka Trading Company (Sri Lanka): Carbendazim 0.91mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019/21: Sunshine International (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL for Durian. Pesticide: Procymidone, Chlorpyrifos

Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

13/11/19: Frozen Durian - Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.99mg/kg

5/12/19: Durian Monthong - Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.18mg/kg

6/2/20: Frozen Durian Monthong Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Chlorpyrifos 0.072mg/kg

6/2/20: Frozen Durian Monthong Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.071mg/kg

16/9/21: Frozen Durian  Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.83mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

13/11/19: Frozen Durian – Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.99mg/kg

5/12/19: Durian Monthong – Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.18mg/kg

6/2/20: Frozen Durian Monthong Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Chlorpyrifos 0.072mg/kg

6/2/20: Frozen Durian Monthong Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.071mg/kg

16/9/21: Frozen Durian  Sunshine International Co Ltd (Thailand): Procymidone 0.83mg/kg. Not permitted on this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

22/3/17: Siam Greenery Co Ltd (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL for Durian. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Siam Greenery Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim,

22/3/17: Frozen Whole Durian - Siam Greenery Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Siam Greenery Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim,

22/3/17: Frozen Whole Durian – Siam Greenery Co Ltd (Thailand): Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/19: Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food (China). Breaching MRL’s for Strawberries. Pesticide: Procymidone

Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

26/4/17: Frozen Strawberry Pulp - Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China): Procymidone 0.1mg/kg

3/5/17: Frozen Strawberry Puree - Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China): Procymidone 0.07mg/kg

11/1/19: Diced Strawberries - Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China): Procymidone 0.03mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

26/4/17: Frozen Strawberry Pulp – Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China): Procymidone 0.1mg/kg

3/5/17: Frozen Strawberry Puree – Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China): Procymidone 0.07mg/kg

11/1/19: Diced Strawberries – Shouguang Tiancheng Hongli Food Co Ltd (China): Procymidone 0.03mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017: Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Dried Dates, Seedless Red Dates

Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Propargite, Azoxystrobin, Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole

18/4/17: Dried Dates - Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Azoxystrobin 0.13mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates - Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.49mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates - Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.2mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates - Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Propiconazole 0.069mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates - Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Tebuconazole 0.37mg/kg

26/5/17: Seedless Red Dates - Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Propargite 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Propargite, Azoxystrobin, Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole

18/4/17: Dried Dates – Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Azoxystrobin 0.13mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates – Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.49mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates – Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.2mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates – Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Propiconazole 0.069mg/kg

18/4/17: Dried Dates – Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Tebuconazole 0.37mg/kg

26/5/17: Seedless Red Dates – Shantou Lifa Trading Co Ltd (China): Propargite 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018/20: Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China). Breach of Australian MRL for Mushrooms. Pesticide: Paclobutrazol

Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Paclobutrazol

2/7/18: Frozen Water Mushrooms - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Paclobutrazol 0.078mg/kg

21/2/20: Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Paclobutrazol 0.02mg/kg

6/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.018mg/kg

13/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.027mg/kg

13/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Chlorpyrifos 0.022mg/kg

26/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Paclobutrazol 0.013mg/kg

12/6/20: Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.08mg/kg

12/6/20: Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.22mg/kg

26/6/20: Frozen Shredded Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.28mg/kg

26/6/20: Frozen Shredded Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Paclobutrazol

2/7/18: Frozen Water Mushrooms – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Paclobutrazol 0.078mg/kg

21/2/20: Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Paclobutrazol 0.02mg/kg

6/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.018mg/kg

13/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.027mg/kg

13/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Chlorpyrifos 0.022mg/kg

26/5/20: Frozen Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Paclobutrazol 0.013mg/kg

12/6/20: Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.08mg/kg

12/6/20: Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.22mg/kg

26/6/20: Frozen Shredded Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.28mg/kg

26/6/20: Frozen Shredded Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Xushun Foodstuff Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

4/2/19: Shanghai Sunqiao Minshen Mushroom Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Snap Peas. Pesticide: Difenconazole

Shanghai Sunqiao Minshen Mushroom Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole

4/2/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - Shanghai Sunqiao Minshen Mushroom Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.05mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shanghai Sunqiao Minshen Mushroom Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole

4/2/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – Shanghai Sunqiao Minshen Mushroom Co Ltd (China): Difenconazole 0.05mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/18: Shanghai Jx International Trading (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Spinach. Pesticides: Cyhalothrin, Carbendazim

Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin, Carbendazim

8/5/17: Frozen Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.01mg/kg

8/5/17: Frozen Chinese Spinach - Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

5/11/18: Frozen Spinach - Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.072mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin, Carbendazim

8/5/17: Frozen Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.01mg/kg

8/5/17: Frozen Chinese Spinach – Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China): Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

5/11/18: Frozen Spinach – Shanghai Jx International Trading Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.072mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/20: Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL’s on Fresh Garlic Shoots. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Thiabendazole

Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiabendazole, Carbendazim

30/1/17: Fresh Garlic Shoots - Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Garlic Shoots - Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China): Thiabendazole 0.34mg/kg

10/11/20: Garlic Shoots - Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiabendazole, Carbendazim

30/1/17: Fresh Garlic Shoots – Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.12mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Garlic Shoots – Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China): Thiabendazole 0.34mg/kg

10/11/20: Garlic Shoots – Shandong Sinofarm Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

31/10/17: Shandong Jinsi Food Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL’s on Seedless Red Dates. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Tebuconazole

Shandong Jinsi Food Co Ltd (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Tebuconazole,

31/10/17: Seedless Red Dates - Shandong Jinsi Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.43mg/kg, Difenconazole 0.35mg/kg, Tebuconazole 0.5mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Shandong Jinsi Food Co Ltd (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Tebuconazole,

31/10/17: Seedless Red Dates – Shandong Jinsi Food Co Ltd (China): Carbendazim 0.43mg/kg, Difenconazole 0.35mg/kg, Tebuconazole 0.5mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

23/3/18: Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL’s on Rosella Leaves. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Dimethoate

Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Dimeothate

23/3/18: Rosella Leaves - Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand): Chlorpyrifos 0.083mg/kg

23/3/18: Rosella Leaves - Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand): Dimethoate 1.5mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Dimeothate

23/3/18: Rosella Leaves – Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand): Chlorpyrifos 0.083mg/kg

23/3/18: Rosella Leaves – Sethachon Co Ltd (Thailand): Dimethoate 1.5mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/21: Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam). Breached Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Permethrin, Acephate, Carbendazim, Difenocol,

Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Permethrin, Acephate, Carbendazim, Difenocol

27/9/17: Frozen Tiny Red Chilli - Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Difenconazole 0.16mg/kg

27/9/17: Frozen Tiny Red Chilli - Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Permethrin 0.11mg/kg

31/10/19: Frozen Purple Corn - Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.12mg/kg

3/6/20: Frozen Sesbania Flowers - Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.066mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli - line 7a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.039mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli - line 7a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Acephate Detected. Not permitted in this food

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli - line 7a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Carbendazim 0.11mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli - line 8a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Difenocol 0.041mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli - line 8a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Permethrin 0.1mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Permethrin, Acephate, Carbendazim, Difenocol

27/9/17: Frozen Tiny Red Chilli – Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Difenconazole 0.16mg/kg

27/9/17: Frozen Tiny Red Chilli – Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Permethrin 0.11mg/kg

31/10/19: Frozen Purple Corn – Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.12mg/kg

3/6/20: Frozen Sesbania Flowers – Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.066mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli – line 7a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Chlorpyrifos 0.039mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli – line 7a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Acephate Detected. Not permitted in this food

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli – line 7a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Carbendazim 0.11mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli – line 8a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Difenocol 0.041mg/kg

29/1/21: Frozen red chilli – line 8a Saka Saka Company Limited (Vietnam): Permethrin 0.1mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

7/6/18: Sabjiana Limited (Bangladesh). Breaching Australian MRL for Beans. Pesticide: Cypermethrin

Sabjiana Limited (Bangladesh) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cypermethrin

7/6/18: Field Beans - Sabjiana Limited (Bangladesh): Cypermethrin 0.062mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Sabjiana Limited (Bangladesh) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cypermethrin

7/6/18: Field Beans – Sabjiana Limited (Bangladesh): Cypermethrin 0.062mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

30/8/18: Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada). Breached Australian MRL’s on Ginseng Fibre: Pesticides: DDT, Fludioxonil

Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: DDT, Fludioxonil

30/8/18: Ginseng Fibre - Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada): DDT 1mg/kg

30/8/18: Ginseng Fibre - Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada): Fludioxonil 0.41mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: DDT, Fludioxonil

30/8/18: Ginseng Fibre – Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada): DDT 1mg/kg

30/8/18: Ginseng Fibre – Royal Jubilee Ginseng Farm Inc (Canada): Fludioxonil 0.41mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

29/11/19: Rongze Food Manufacturing Co (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Strawberries. Pesticide: Acephate

Rongze Food Manufacturing Co (China) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate

29/11/19: Strawberries IFQ Whole - Rongze Food Manufacturing Co (China): Acephate 0.073mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Rongze Food Manufacturing Co (China) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate

29/11/19: Strawberries IFQ Whole – Rongze Food Manufacturing Co (China): Acephate 0.073mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018: Reddy’s Export (Fiji). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Bael and Rosella Leaves. Pesticides: Deltamethrin, Acephate, Methamidophos

Reddy's Export (Fiji) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Deltamethrin, Acephate, Methamidophos

21/9/18: Bael Leaves - Reddy's Export (Fiji): Deltamethrin 0.72mg/kg

21/9/18: Bael Leaves - Reddy's Export (Fiji): Deltamethrin 0.39mg/kg

21/9/18: Rosella Leaves - Reddy's Export (Fiji): Acephate 7.8mg/kg

21/9/18: Rosella Leaves - Reddy's Export (Fiji): Methamidophos 0.82mg/kg

26/11/18: Rosella Leaves - Reddy's Export (Fiji): Deltamethrin 0.14mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Reddy’s Export (Fiji) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Deltamethrin, Acephate, Methamidophos

21/9/18: Bael Leaves – Reddy’s Export (Fiji): Deltamethrin 0.72mg/kg

21/9/18: Bael Leaves – Reddy’s Export (Fiji): Deltamethrin 0.39mg/kg

21/9/18: Rosella Leaves – Reddy’s Export (Fiji): Acephate 7.8mg/kg

21/9/18: Rosella Leaves – Reddy’s Export (Fiji): Methamidophos 0.82mg/kg

26/11/18: Rosella Leaves – Reddy’s Export (Fiji): Deltamethrin 0.14mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/18: Rabeena Food (Sri Lanka). Breaching Australian MRL’s Tamarind, Goraka Fruit, Brindleberry. Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol

Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: 2-Phenylphenol

27/6/17: Tamarind - Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka): 2-Phenylphenol 0.18mg/kg

30/1/18: Dried Goraka Fruit - Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka): 2-Phenylphenol 0.18mg/kg

28/2/18: Brindleberry Fruit - Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka): 2-Phenylphenol 0.13mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: 2-Phenylphenol

27/6/17: Tamarind – Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka): 2-Phenylphenol 0.18mg/kg

30/1/18: Dried Goraka Fruit – Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka): 2-Phenylphenol 0.18mg/kg

28/2/18: Brindleberry Fruit – Rabeena Food (Pvt) Ltd (Sri Lanka): 2-Phenylphenol 0.13mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

9/5/19: Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL for Mangosteen. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

9/5/19: Mangosteen - Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) - Chlorpyrifos 0.026mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

9/5/19: Mangosteen – Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) – Chlorpyrifos 0.026mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

9/10/19: Pioneer Foods (South Africa). Breached Australian MRL for Dried Apricot. Pesticide: Thiabendazole

Pioneer Foods (South Africa) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiabendazole

9/10/19: Dried Apricot Fruit Pack -Pioneer Foods (South Africa) - Thiabendazole 0.031mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Pioneer Foods (South Africa) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiabendazole

9/10/19: Dried Apricot Fruit Pack –Pioneer Foods (South Africa) – Thiabendazole 0.031mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

4/10/17: Parayil Exports (India). Breached Australian MRL for Aviyal mix (vegetables). Pesticide: Acephate

Parayil Exports (India) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate

4/10/17: Aviyal mix (cut vegetables) - Parayil Exports (India) - Acephate 0.094mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Parayil Exports (India) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate

4/10/17: Aviyal mix (cut vegetables) – Parayil Exports (India) – Acephate 0.094mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

4/5/17: Orouba Agrifoods Processing Co (Egypt). Breached Australia MRL for Green Okra. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Orouba Agrifoods Processing Co (Egypt) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

4/5/17: Green Okra - Orouba Agrifoods Processing Co (Egypt) - Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Orouba Agrifoods Processing Co (Egypt) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

4/5/17: Green Okra – Orouba Agrifoods Processing Co (Egypt) – Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/21: O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand). Multiple Australian pesticide breaches on Red Chilli, Dried Longan, Pandan Leaves. Pesticides: Multiple

O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Chlorpyrifos, Myclobutanil, Propiconazole, Carbaryl, Profenofos

8/6/17: Red Chilli Whole Without Stem - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Difenconazole 0.25mg/kg

8/6/17: Red Chilli Whole Without Stem - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Profenofos 0.094mg/kg

22/12/17: Dried Longan Seedless - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Carbendazim 0.077mg/kg

22/12/17: Red Chilli - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Difenconazole 0.088mg/kg

22/12/17: Red Chilli - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Myclobutanil 0.061mg/kg

22/12/17: Red Chilli - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Propicinazole 0.082mg/kg

29/1/18: Pandan Leaves - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Chlorpyrifos 0.043mg/kg

29/1/18: Pandan Leaves - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Difenconazole 0.078mg/kg

29/1/18: Pandan Leaves - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Difenconazole 0.39mg/kg

12/2/18: Red Chilli - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Carbaryl 0.068mg/kg

1/2/19: Red Chilli - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Difenconazole 0.26mg/kg

1/2/19: Red Chilli - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Propiconazole 0.26mg/kg

10/10/19: Frozen Pandan Leaf - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Difenconazole 0.054mg/kg

5/12/19: Dried Longan Seedless - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

7/1/20: Frozen Pandan Leaves - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Fludioxinil 0.03mg/kg

6/5/21: Dried seedless longan - O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) - Carbendazim Detected - not permitted in this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Difenconazole, Chlorpyrifos, Myclobutanil, Propiconazole, Carbaryl, Profenofos

8/6/17: Red Chilli Whole Without Stem – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Difenconazole 0.25mg/kg

8/6/17: Red Chilli Whole Without Stem – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Profenofos 0.094mg/kg

22/12/17: Dried Longan Seedless – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Carbendazim 0.077mg/kg

22/12/17: Red Chilli – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Difenconazole 0.088mg/kg

22/12/17: Red Chilli – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Myclobutanil 0.061mg/kg

22/12/17: Red Chilli – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Propicinazole 0.082mg/kg

29/1/18: Pandan Leaves – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Chlorpyrifos 0.043mg/kg

29/1/18: Pandan Leaves – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Difenconazole 0.078mg/kg

29/1/18: Pandan Leaves – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Difenconazole 0.39mg/kg

12/2/18: Red Chilli – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Carbaryl 0.068mg/kg

1/2/19: Red Chilli – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Difenconazole 0.26mg/kg

1/2/19: Red Chilli – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Propiconazole 0.26mg/kg

10/10/19: Frozen Pandan Leaf – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Difenconazole 0.054mg/kg

5/12/19: Dried Longan Seedless – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

7/1/20: Frozen Pandan Leaves – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Fludioxinil 0.03mg/kg

6/5/21: Dried seedless longan – O-Cha Food Pack Co Ltd (Thailand) – Carbendazim Detected – not permitted in this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

28/2/17: Noble Marketing Co Ltd (Thailand). Breached Australian MRL durian fruit. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Noble Marketing Co Ltd (Thailand) -  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

28/2/17: Thai Durian Fruit - Noble Marketing Co Ltd (Thailand) - Carbendazim 0.11mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Noble Marketing Co Ltd (Thailand) –  Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

28/2/17: Thai Durian Fruit – Noble Marketing Co Ltd (Thailand) – Carbendazim 0.11mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/19: New Lamthong Food Industries (Thailand). Breaches to Australian MRLs. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Metalaxyl

New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Metalaxyl

18/7/17: Dried Longan - New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.096mg/kg

5/3/19: Rosella Leaves - New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.2mg/kg

5/3/19: Rosella Leaves - New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.8mg/kg

5/3/19: Rosella Leaves - New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.2mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Metalaxyl

18/7/17: Dried Longan – New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.096mg/kg

5/3/19: Rosella Leaves – New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.2mg/kg

5/3/19: Rosella Leaves – New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.8mg/kg

5/3/19: Rosella Leaves – New Lamthong Food Industries Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.2mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/18: Nam Hai Company (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL chilli. Pesticides: Profenofos, Difenconazole

Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole, Profenofos

28/2/17: Frozen small red chilli - Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.14mg/kg

16/5/17: Frozen small red chilli - Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.077mg/kg

16/5/17: Frozen small red chilli - Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.1mg/kg

7/6/17: Frozen small red chilli without stem - Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.098mg/kg

7/6/17: Frozen small red chilli without stem - Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.34mg/kg

17/5/18: Frozen small red chilli - Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole, Profenofos

28/2/17: Frozen small red chilli – Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.14mg/kg

16/5/17: Frozen small red chilli – Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.077mg/kg

16/5/17: Frozen small red chilli – Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.1mg/kg

7/6/17: Frozen small red chilli without stem – Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.098mg/kg

7/6/17: Frozen small red chilli without stem – Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.34mg/kg

17/5/18: Frozen small red chilli – Nam Hai Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.06mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017: Nagy Foods (Egypt). Breaches to Australian MRL’s citrus. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Nagy Foods (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

27/1/17: Fresh Lemons - Nagy Foods (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg

6/4/17: Oranges - Nagy Foods (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Nagy Foods (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

27/1/17: Fresh Lemons – Nagy Foods (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg

6/4/17: Oranges – Nagy Foods (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

23/10/17: Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam). Breached Australian MRL red chilli. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Propiconazole

Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Propiconazole

23/10/17: Frozen red chilli - Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.01mg/kg

23/10/17: Frozen red chilli - Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.34mg/kg

23/10/17: Frozen red chilli - Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Propiconazole 0.58mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Propiconazole

23/10/17: Frozen red chilli – Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.01mg/kg

23/10/17: Frozen red chilli – Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.34mg/kg

23/10/17: Frozen red chilli – Mt Company Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Propiconazole 0.58mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018: Minh Anh International (Vietnam). Breached Australian MRL for Chilli. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Acephate

Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Acephate,

26/4/18: Frozen small mixed chilli - Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.11mg/kg

26/4/18: Frozen small mixed chilli - Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.047mg/kg

26/4/18: Frozen small mixed chilli - Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.076mg/kg

4/6/18: Frozen red chilli - Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.015mg/kg

4/6/18: Frozen red chilli - Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.083mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Difenconazole, Acephate,

26/4/18: Frozen small mixed chilli – Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.11mg/kg

26/4/18: Frozen small mixed chilli – Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.047mg/kg

26/4/18: Frozen small mixed chilli – Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.076mg/kg

4/6/18: Frozen red chilli – Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.015mg/kg

4/6/18: Frozen red chilli – Minh Anh International Co Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.083mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

8/7/19: Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand). Breaching Australian MRL on Mangosteens. Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos

8/7/19: Mangosteens - Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.3mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos

8/7/19: Mangosteens – Ptn Exotic Produce Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.3mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019: Manafez International (Saudi Arabia). Breaching Australian MRL on dates. Pesticides: Cypermethrin, Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Cyhalothrin

3/5/19: Premium Dates - Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.17mg/kg

12/11/19: Fresh Dates - Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

12/11/19: Sukkary Fresh Dates - Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.03mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cypermethrin, Cyhalothrin

3/5/19: Premium Dates – Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.17mg/kg

12/11/19: Fresh Dates – Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.06mg/kg

12/11/19: Sukkary Fresh Dates – Manafez International (Saudi Arabia) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.03mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

10/1/17: Man A Frozen Foods (Thailand). Breached Australian MRL for Longan. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Man A Frozen Foods Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

10/1/17: Dried Longan - Man A Frozen Foods Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.09mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Man A Frozen Foods Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

10/1/17: Dried Longan – Man A Frozen Foods Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.09mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

18/4/17: Mahdavieh Export Co. (Iran). Breached Australian MRL on dates. Pesticide: Propargite

Mahdavieh Export Co. (Iran) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Propargite

18/4/17: Sayer Dates - Mahdavieh Export Co. (Iran) - Pesticide: Propargite 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Mahdavieh Export Co. (Iran) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Propargite

18/4/17: Sayer Dates – Mahdavieh Export Co. (Iran) – Pesticide: Propargite 0.12mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

7/9/18: Liang Pin Pu Zi Industry Food Co Ltd (China), Breaches to Australian MRL’s on Instant Dates. Pesticides Multiple

Liang Pin Pu Zi Industry Food Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Pyraclostrobin, Tebuconazole

7/9/18: Instant Dates - Liang Pin Pu Zi Industry Food Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.34mg/kg, Cyhalothrin 0.05mg/kg, Cypermethrin 0.25mg/kg, Difenconazole 0.18mg/kg, Pyraclostrobin 0.16mg/kg, Tebuconazole 0.19mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Liang Pin Pu Zi Industry Food Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Pyraclostrobin, Tebuconazole

7/9/18: Instant Dates – Liang Pin Pu Zi Industry Food Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.34mg/kg, Cyhalothrin 0.05mg/kg, Cypermethrin 0.25mg/kg, Difenconazole 0.18mg/kg, Pyraclostrobin 0.16mg/kg, Tebuconazole 0.19mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

26/7/18: Laiyang Shenzhouyiwei Foodstuff Co Ltd (China). Breach Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Procymidone

Laiyang Shenzhouyiwei Foodstuff Co Ltd  (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

26/7/18: Strawberries -Laiyang Shenzhouyiwei Foodstuff Co Ltd  (China) - Pesticide: Procymidone 0.005mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Laiyang Shenzhouyiwei Foodstuff Co Ltd  (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

26/7/18: Strawberries –Laiyang Shenzhouyiwei Foodstuff Co Ltd  (China) – Pesticide: Procymidone 0.005mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017: Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Cyhalothrin, Thiamethoxam

Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyholathrin, Thiamethoxam

9/3/17: Asian Pear - Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.021mg/kg

1/9/17: Peeled Onions - Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.031mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyholathrin, Thiamethoxam

9/3/17: Asian Pear – Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.021mg/kg

1/9/17: Peeled Onions – Laiwu Taifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.031mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019/21: Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji). Breached Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Acephate, Methamidophos

Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate, Methamidophos

25/6/19: Frozen Cowpeas - Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.31mg/kg

25/6/19: Frozen Cowpeas - Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) - Pesticide: Methamidophos 0.098mg/kg

17/4/20: Long Beans - Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.81mg/kg

17/4/20: Long Beans - Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) - Pesticide: Methamidophos 0.15mg/kg

17/3/21: Long Beans - Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) - Pesticide: Acephate Detected - not permitted in this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate, Methamidophos

25/6/19: Frozen Cowpeas – Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.31mg/kg

25/6/19: Frozen Cowpeas – Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) – Pesticide: Methamidophos 0.098mg/kg

17/4/20: Long Beans – Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.81mg/kg

17/4/20: Long Beans – Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) – Pesticide: Methamidophos 0.15mg/kg

17/3/21: Long Beans – Labasa Farm Fresh (Fiji) – Pesticide: Acephate Detected – not permitted in this food

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2017/18: Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India). Breaching Australian MRL/Basmati Rice. Pesticide: Buprofezin

Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Buprofezin

23/3/17: Basmati Rice - Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Buprofezin 0.066mg/kg

1/2/18: Basmati Rice -  Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Buprofezin 0.024mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Buprofezin

23/3/17: Basmati Rice – Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Buprofezin 0.066mg/kg

1/2/18: Basmati Rice –  Kohinoor Foods Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Buprofezin 0.024mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2019: Kkr Agro Mills (India). Breaching Australian MRL Tamarind. Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol

Kkr Agro Mills (P) Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: 2-Phenylphenol

6/2/19: Tamarind -  Kkr Agro Mills (P) Ltd (India) - Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol 0.14mg/kg

26/8/19: Cambodge Dried Tamarind -  Kkr Agro Mills (P) Ltd (India) - Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol 0.25mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Kkr Agro Mills (P) Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: 2-Phenylphenol

6/2/19: Tamarind –  Kkr Agro Mills (P) Ltd (India) – Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol 0.14mg/kg

26/8/19: Cambodge Dried Tamarind –  Kkr Agro Mills (P) Ltd (India) – Pesticide: 2-Phenylphenol 0.25mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

26/7/18: Kashan Enterprises (Pakistan). Breaches to Australian MRL. Pesticide: Indoxacarb

Kashan Enterprises (Pakistan) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Indoxacarb

26/7/18: Mangoes -  Kashan Enterprises (Pakistan) - Pesticide: Indoxacarb

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Kashan Enterprises (Pakistan) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Indoxacarb

26/7/18: Mangoes –  Kashan Enterprises (Pakistan) – Pesticide: Indoxacarb

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

2018/20: Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines). Breaching Australian MRL. Pesticides: Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos

Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos

20/2/18: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.96mg/kg

20/2/18: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.089mg/kg

20/2/18: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.28mg/kg

11/8/20: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.084mg/kg

11/8/20: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.68mg/kg

15/10/20: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.031mg/kg

15/10/20: Jute Leaves -  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.18mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos

20/2/18: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.96mg/kg

20/2/18: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.089mg/kg

20/2/18: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.28mg/kg

11/8/20: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.084mg/kg

11/8/20: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.68mg/kg

15/10/20: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.031mg/kg

15/10/20: Jute Leaves –  Kaelen Phils Inc (Philippines) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.18mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

10/5/18: Jinxiang Hongyu Freezing and Storage Ltd (China). Breach to Australian MRL for Garlic Shoots. Pesticide: Iprodione

Jinxiang Hongyu Freezing and Storage Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Iprodione

10/5/18: Garlic Shoots -  Jinxiang Hongyu Freezing and Storage Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Iprodione 0.85mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

Jinxiang Hongyu Freezing and Storage Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Iprodione

10/5/18: Garlic Shoots –  Jinxiang Hongyu Freezing and Storage Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Iprodione 0.85mg/kg

Source: AQIS Failing Food Surveys. Department of Agriculture Australia

22/1/19: Jining Pengkie Trading Co Ltd (China). Breach Australian MRL’s for Sugar Snap Peas. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Propiconazole, Thiamethoxam

Jining Pengjie Trading Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Propiconazole, Thiamethoxam

22/1/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

22/1/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Propiconazole 0.085mg/kg

22/1/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.035mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Jining Pengjie Trading Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Propiconazole, Thiamethoxam

22/1/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

22/1/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Propiconazole 0.085mg/kg

22/1/19: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.035mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

25/7/19: Jiangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Longan. Pesticide: Tebuconazole

Jiangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Tebuconazole

25/7/19: Dried Longan - JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.06mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Jiangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Tebuconazole

25/7/19: Dried Longan – JIangmen Junying Food Co., Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.06mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

10/3/17: JIang Hua Yao Automonous County Hongu Park Huafa Agricultural Products (China). Breached Australian MRL for Sugar Snap Peas. Pesticide: Carbendazim

JIang Hua Yao Automonous County Hongu Park Huafa Agricultural Products (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

10/3/17: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas - JIang Hua Yao Automonous County Hongu Park Huafa Agricultural Products (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

JIang Hua Yao Automonous County Hongu Park Huafa Agricultural Products (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

10/3/17: Fresh Sugar Snap Peas – JIang Hua Yao Automonous County Hongu Park Huafa Agricultural Products (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

17/10/19: Jasmine Vineyards Incorporated (United States). Breaches Australian MRL for Grapes. Pesticide: Propargite

Jasmine Vineyards Incorporated (United States) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Propargite

17/10/19: Fresh Grapes - Jasmine Vineyards Inorporated (United States) - Pesticide: Propargite 2.7mg/kg

17/10/19: Fresh Grapes - Jasmine Vineyards Inorporated (United States) - Pesticide: Propargite 1.4mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Jasmine Vineyards Incorporated (United States) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Propargite

17/10/19: Fresh Grapes – Jasmine Vineyards Inorporated (United States) – Pesticide: Propargite 2.7mg/kg

17/10/19: Fresh Grapes – Jasmine Vineyards Inorporated (United States) – Pesticide: Propargite 1.4mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2019/21: Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) Breached Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Fludioxonil, Tebuconazole, Carbendazim

Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Fludioxonil, Tebuconazole, Carbendazim

23/12/19: Elderberry Concentrate - Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) - Pesticide: Fludioxonil 0.024mg/kg

23/12/19: Elderberry Concentrate - Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.12mg/kg

15/1/21: Frozen Blackberry concentrate - Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Fludioxonil, Tebuconazole, Carbendazim

23/12/19: Elderberry Concentrate – Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) – Pesticide: Fludioxonil 0.024mg/kg

23/12/19: Elderberry Concentrate – Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.12mg/kg

15/1/21: Frozen Blackberry concentrate – Iprona Ag-Spa (Italy) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.14mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/21: Innovative Cuisine (India). Multiple Australian pesticide MRL breaches on Guar Beans, Fenugreek Leaves, Green Chillies, Indian Flat Beans, Spinach, Gourd, Surti Beans

Innovative Cuisine (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate, Azinphos-Methyl, Chlorpyrifos, Fenvalerate, Monocrotophos, Hexaconazole, Cyhalothrin, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Phosmet, Cypermethrin, Carbendazim, Profenofos, Dimethoate

20/4/18: Cut Guar Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Azinphos Methyl 0.095mg/kg & 0.08mg/kg

20/4/18: Fenugreek leaves - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.173mg/kg & 0.08mg/kg

20/4/18: Hot Green Chllies - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Phosmet 0.191mg/kg

29/8/18: Green Chllies - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.058mg/kg

5/10/18: Green Chllies - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.175mg/kg

5/10/18: Green Chllies - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Propiconazole 0.352mg/kg

19/12/18: Green Chllies - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.15mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.11mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.53mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.26mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.26mg/kg

10/4/19: Frozen Spinach - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.28mg/kg

16/4/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.14mg/kg

16/4/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.58mg/kg

23/5/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.08mg/kg

12/6/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.05mg/kg

2/7/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.58mg/kg

2/7/19: Indian Flat Beans - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.1mg/kg

23/10/19: Parval (pointed gourd)- Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.022mg/kg

25/11/19: Indian Flat Beans (surti papdi)- Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.09mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Surti Beans Whole - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Surti Beans Whole - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.56mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Surti Beans Whole - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.07mg/kg

11/2/21: Parval - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos Detected, not permitted in this food

23/4/21: Gourd Slices - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos Detected, not permitted in this food

23/4/21: Gourd Slices - Innovative Cuisine (India) - Pesticide: Acephate Detected, not permitted in this food

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Innovative Cuisine (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate, Azinphos-Methyl, Chlorpyrifos, Fenvalerate, Monocrotophos, Hexaconazole, Cyhalothrin, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole, Phosmet, Cypermethrin, Carbendazim, Profenofos, Dimethoate

20/4/18: Cut Guar Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Azinphos Methyl 0.095mg/kg & 0.08mg/kg

20/4/18: Fenugreek leaves – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.173mg/kg & 0.08mg/kg

20/4/18: Hot Green Chllies – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Phosmet 0.191mg/kg

29/8/18: Green Chllies – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.058mg/kg

5/10/18: Green Chllies – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.175mg/kg

5/10/18: Green Chllies – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Propiconazole 0.352mg/kg

19/12/18: Green Chllies – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.15mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.11mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.53mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.26mg/kg

1/3/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.26mg/kg

10/4/19: Frozen Spinach – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.28mg/kg

16/4/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.14mg/kg

16/4/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.58mg/kg

23/5/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.08mg/kg

12/6/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.05mg/kg

2/7/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.58mg/kg

2/7/19: Indian Flat Beans – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.1mg/kg

23/10/19: Parval (pointed gourd)- Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.022mg/kg

25/11/19: Indian Flat Beans (surti papdi)- Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.09mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Surti Beans Whole – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Surti Beans Whole – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.56mg/kg

24/12/19: Frozen Surti Beans Whole – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.07mg/kg

11/2/21: Parval – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos Detected, not permitted in this food

23/4/21: Gourd Slices – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos Detected, not permitted in this food

23/4/21: Gourd Slices – Innovative Cuisine (India) – Pesticide: Acephate Detected, not permitted in this food

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

18/4/17: Hyper Fresh International (Egypt). Breaches to Australian MRL’s for Mandarins. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Hyper Fresh International for Export (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

18/4/17: Fresh Mandarins - Hyper Fresh International for Export (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg & 0.08mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Hyper Fresh International for Export (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

18/4/17: Fresh Mandarins – Hyper Fresh International for Export (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg & 0.08mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

26/2/18: Hoang Phat Fruit Company (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Dragon Fruit. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Hoang Phat Fruit Company (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

26/2/18: Dragon Fruit - Hoang Phat Fruit Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.37mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Hoang Phat Fruit Company (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

26/2/18: Dragon Fruit – Hoang Phat Fruit Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.37mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018: H-Htet Company Ltd (Myanmar). Breaches to Australian MRL for Betel Leaves. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Metalaxyl

H-Htet Company Ltd (Myanmar) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Metalaxyl, Chlorpyrifos

23/1/18: Fresh Betel Leaves - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.23mg/kg

23/1/18: Fresh Betel Leaves - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.3mg/kg

29/3/18: Fresh Betel Leaf - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.13mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

H-Htet Company Ltd (Myanmar) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Metalaxyl, Chlorpyrifos

23/1/18: Fresh Betel Leaves – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.23mg/kg

23/1/18: Fresh Betel Leaves – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.3mg/kg

29/3/18: Fresh Betel Leaf – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.13mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/21: Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India). Breaching Australian MRL’s for Grapes and Raisins. Pesticide: Carbendazim, Propargite

Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Propargite

4/6/18: Dried Grapes - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.7mg/kg

30/8/19: Golden Raisins - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.36mg/kg

18/6/21: Raisins - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.95mg/kg

18/6/21: Raisins - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Propargite. Not permitted in this food

15/9/21: Raisins - Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Carbendazim. 1.05mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Propargite

4/6/18: Dried Grapes – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 1.7mg/kg

30/8/19: Golden Raisins – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.36mg/kg

18/6/21: Raisins – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.95mg/kg

18/6/21: Raisins – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Propargite. Not permitted in this food

15/9/21: Raisins – Harihar Foods Pvt. Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Carbendazim. 1.05mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

25/7/17: Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Dates. Pesticide: Bifenthrin, Propargite, Tebuconazole

Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Bifenthrin

25/7/17: Dates - Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Bifenthrin 0.041mg/kg

25/7/17: Dates - Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Propargite 0.678mg/kg

25/7/17: Dates - Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.052mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Bifenthrin, Propargite, Tebuconazole

25/7/17: Dates – Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Bifenthrin 0.041mg/kg

25/7/17: Dates – Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Propargite 0.678mg/kg

25/7/17: Dates – Haoxiangni Dates Enterprise Co. Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.052mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

10/12/18: Guzel Can Gida Tarim Urunleri (Turkey). Breaching Australian MRL for Apricot. Pesticide: Fenvalerate

Guzel Can Gida Tarim Urunleri Ins. San Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti (Turkey) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Fenvalerate

10/12/18: Dried Apricot - Guzel Can Gida Tarim Urunleri Ins. San Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti (Turkey) - Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.113mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Guzel Can Gida Tarim Urunleri Ins. San Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti (Turkey) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Fenvalerate

10/12/18: Dried Apricot – Guzel Can Gida Tarim Urunleri Ins. San Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti (Turkey) – Pesticide: Fenvalerate 0.113mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

17/5/18: Guangzhou Lu Ken Produce Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Fresh Onion Flowers. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Guangzhou Lu Ken Produce Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

17/5/18: Fresh Onion Flowers - Guangzhou Lu Ken Produce Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.12mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Guangzhou Lu Ken Produce Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

17/5/18: Fresh Onion Flowers – Guangzhou Lu Ken Produce Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.12mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2017/20: Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Farming Byproduct Factory (China). Breached Australian MRL for Exported Longan. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Cyhalothrin

Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Farming Byproduct Factory (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

18/5/17: Dried Longan Fruit - Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Farming Byproduct Factory (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Same company below?

Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Nong Fu Factory (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

13/5/20: Dried Hawthorn Fruit - Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Nong Fu Factory (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.1mg/kg

13/5/20: Dried Hawthorn Fruit - Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Nong Fu Factory (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Farming Byproduct Factory (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

18/5/17: Dried Longan Fruit – Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Farming Byproduct Factory (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Same company below?

Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Nong Fu Factory (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

13/5/20: Dried Hawthorn Fruit – Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Nong Fu Factory (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.1mg/kg

13/5/20: Dried Hawthorn Fruit – Guangdong Zhongshan Guzhen Lihua Nong Fu Factory (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

27/9/19: Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China). Breaches to Australian MRL’s for Dried Hawthorn Fruit. Pesticide: Carbendazim, Tebuconazole

Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Tebuconazole

27/9/19: Dried Hawthorn Fruit - Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.65mg/kg

27/9/19: Dried Hawthorn Fruit - Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.12mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Tebuconazole

27/9/19: Dried Hawthorn Fruit – Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.65mg/kg

27/9/19: Dried Hawthorn Fruit – Guang Dong Jiexi Maolin Food Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.12mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/5/19: Greenroof Design Co Ltd (Thailand) Breach of Australian MRL for Mangosteens. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Greenroof Design Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

1/5/19: Green Mangosteens - Greenroof Design Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.092mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Greenroof Design Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

1/5/19: Green Mangosteens – Greenroof Design Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.092mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2017/21: Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India). Multiple breaches Australian MRL’s for Okra and Spinach. Pesticides: Acephate, Chlorpyrifos, Monocrotophos, Cyhalothrin

Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Acephate, Monocrotophos, Chlorpyrifos

1/6/17: Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.088mg/kg

1/6/17: Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.091mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.13mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.2mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.053mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.056mg/kg

16/11/17: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.03mg/kg

6/12/17: Cut Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.06mg/kg

6/12/17: Cut Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.075mg/kg

9/1/18: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.03mg/kg

9/1/18: Cut Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.07mg/kg

12/4/18: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.17mg/kg

12/4/18: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.11mg/kg

18/12/19: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.56mg/kg

15/10/19: Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.068mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.33mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.9mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.28mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.36mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.36mg/kg

24/3/20: Bhindi (Baby Okra) - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.073mg/kg

24/3/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.67mg/kg

24/3/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.034mg/kg

24/3/20: Frozen Surti Papdi (whole indian beans) - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.047mg/kg

3/4/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.31mg/kg

16/4/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.38mg/kg

29/4/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.76mg/kg

13/5/20: Baby Okra - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.012mg/kg

18/5/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.76mg/kg

18/5/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.07mg/kg

18/5/20: Frozen Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.056mg/kg

2/3/21: Spinach - Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.013mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Acephate, Monocrotophos, Chlorpyrifos

1/6/17: Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.088mg/kg

1/6/17: Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.091mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.13mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.2mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.053mg/kg

18/7/17: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.056mg/kg

16/11/17: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.03mg/kg

6/12/17: Cut Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.06mg/kg

6/12/17: Cut Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.075mg/kg

9/1/18: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.03mg/kg

9/1/18: Cut Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.07mg/kg

12/4/18: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.17mg/kg

12/4/18: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.11mg/kg

18/12/19: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.56mg/kg

15/10/19: Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.068mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.33mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.9mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.28mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.36mg/kg

26/2/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.36mg/kg

24/3/20: Bhindi (Baby Okra) – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.073mg/kg

24/3/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.67mg/kg

24/3/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.034mg/kg

24/3/20: Frozen Surti Papdi (whole indian beans) – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.047mg/kg

3/4/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.31mg/kg

16/4/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.38mg/kg

29/4/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.76mg/kg

13/5/20: Baby Okra – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.012mg/kg

18/5/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.76mg/kg

18/5/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.07mg/kg

18/5/20: Frozen Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.056mg/kg

2/3/21: Spinach – Global Gourmet Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.013mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2017/20: Givrex (Egypt). Exporting Cut Green Beans in Breach of Australian MRL. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

Givrex (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Chlorpyrifos, Carbendazim

20/9/17: Frozen Cut Green Beans - Givrex (Egypt) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.063mg/kg

11/4/18: Cut Green Beans - Givrex (Egypt) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.015mg/kg

24/8/20: Okra small - Givrex Robert Mansour & Co (Egypt) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Givrex (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Chlorpyrifos, Carbendazim

20/9/17: Frozen Cut Green Beans – Givrex (Egypt) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.063mg/kg

11/4/18: Cut Green Beans – Givrex (Egypt) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.015mg/kg

24/8/20: Okra small – Givrex Robert Mansour & Co (Egypt) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.02mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2017/21: Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam). Breaching Australian MRL for Red Chilli. Pesticides: Difenconazole, Hexaconazole, Profenofos, Difenconazole, Metalaxyl

Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Difenconazole, Hexaconazole, Profenofos, Metalaxyl

28/3/17: Frozen small red chilli - Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.092mg/kg, Hexaconazole 0.057mg/kg, Profenofos 0.41mg/kg

31/5/21: Frozen red chilli whole - Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.12mg/kg, Metalaxyl 0.48mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Difenconazole, Hexaconazole, Profenofos, Metalaxyl

28/3/17: Frozen small red chilli – Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.092mg/kg, Hexaconazole 0.057mg/kg, Profenofos 0.41mg/kg

31/5/21: Frozen red chilli whole – Gia Minh Company Limited (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.12mg/kg, Metalaxyl 0.48mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

7/6/17: Gaozhou City Mingzhu Fruit and Vegetable Company (China). Breach of Australian MRL for Lychee. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Iprodione

Gaozhou City Mingzhu Fruit and Vegetable Co., Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Iprodione

7/6/17: Fresh Chinese Lychee - Gaozhou City Mingzhu Fruit and Vegetable Co.,Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.2mg/kg, Cypermethrin 0.08mg/kg, Iprodione 3mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Gaozhou City Mingzhu Fruit and Vegetable Co., Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin, Iprodione

7/6/17: Fresh Chinese Lychee – Gaozhou City Mingzhu Fruit and Vegetable Co.,Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.2mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.2mg/kg, Cypermethrin 0.08mg/kg, Iprodione 3mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

3/5/17: Gaoming Hui Sheng Feng Foods (China). Breach of Australian MRL for Dried Red Dates. Pesticides: Tebuconazole

Gaoming Hui Sheng Feng Foods Trading Company of Foshan City (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Tebuconazole

3/5/17: Dried Red Dates - Gaoming Hui Sheng Feng Foods Trading Company of Foshan City (China) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.14mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Gaoming Hui Sheng Feng Foods Trading Company of Foshan City (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Tebuconazole

3/5/17: Dried Red Dates – Gaoming Hui Sheng Feng Foods Trading Company of Foshan City (China) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.14mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/21: Gaomi Ruifeng Co Ltd (China). Breaching Australian MRL for Exported Spinach. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin, Carbendazim

Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

23/3/18: Frozen Chopped Spinach - Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.068mg/kg

30/1/19: Chopped Spinach - Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.052mg/kg

7/4/21: Spinach - Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

7/4/21: Spinach - Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos. 0.022mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin

23/3/18: Frozen Chopped Spinach – Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.068mg/kg

30/1/19: Chopped Spinach – Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.052mg/kg

7/4/21: Spinach – Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

7/4/21: Spinach – Gaomi Ruifeng Foods Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos. 0.022mg/kg.

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

13/3/18: Future Agrico for Investment (Egypt) Breaching Australian MRL for Oranges. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Future Agrico for Investment (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

13/3/18: Fresh Oranges - Future Agrico for Investment  (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Future Agrico for Investment (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

13/3/18: Fresh Oranges – Future Agrico for Investment  (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/2/18: Fu Hong Enterprise (Taiwan), Exporting Soya Beans above Australian MRL. Pesticide: Bifenthrin

Fu Hong Food Enterprise Co Ltd (Taiwan) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Bifenthrin

1/2/18: Boiled Soya Beans - Fu Hong Food Enterprise Co. Ltd  (Taiwan) - Pesticide: Bifenthrin 0.032mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Fu Hong Food Enterprise Co Ltd (Taiwan) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Bifenthrin

1/2/18: Boiled Soya Beans – Fu Hong Food Enterprise Co. Ltd  (Taiwan) – Pesticide: Bifenthrin 0.032mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018: Frutisma (Colombia) Exported Blackberry Pulp to Australia breaching MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Frutisma (Colombia) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

20/7/18: Blackberry Pulp - Frutisima  (Colombia) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.49mg/kg

4/10/18: Blackberry Pulp - Frutisima  (Colombia) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.28mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Frutisma (Colombia) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

20/7/18: Blackberry Pulp – Frutisima  (Colombia) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.49mg/kg

4/10/18: Blackberry Pulp – Frutisima  (Colombia) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.28mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2019 October: Fresh Jasmines Export and Import (India). Australian MRL breaches on Betel Leaves. Pesticides: Triadimefon, Chlorpyrifos, Hexaconazole, Metalaxyl

Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Triadimefon, Chlorpyrifos, Hexaconazole, Metalaxyl

2/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves - Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) - Pesticide: Triadimefon 0.058mg/kg

2/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves - Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) - Pesticide: Triadimefon 0.058mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves - Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.043mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves - Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) - Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.12mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves - Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) - Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.41mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Triadimefon, Chlorpyrifos, Hexaconazole, Metalaxyl

2/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves – Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) – Pesticide: Triadimefon 0.058mg/kg

2/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves – Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) – Pesticide: Triadimefon 0.058mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves – Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.043mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves – Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) – Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.12mg/kg

25/10/19: Fresh Betel Leaves – Fresh Jasmines Export and Import Pvt Ltd  (India) – Pesticide: Metalaxyl 0.41mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

26/11/18: Four Seasons Food Co Ltd (China). Breached Australian MRL for Strawberries. Pesticide: Procymidone

Four Seasons Food Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Procymidone

26/11/18: Strawberries - Four Seasons Food Co Ltd  (China) - Pesticide: Procymidone 0.045mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Four Seasons Food Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Procymidone

26/11/18: Strawberries – Four Seasons Food Co Ltd  (China) – Pesticide: Procymidone 0.045mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

28/3/18: Food Alliance for Exporting Agricultural Crops (Egypt). Breach of Australian MRL for Oranges. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Food Alliance for Exporting Agricultural Crops (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

28/3/18: Naval Oranges - Food Alliance for Exporting Agricultural Crops (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.23mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Food Alliance for Exporting Agricultural Crops (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

28/3/18: Naval Oranges – Food Alliance for Exporting Agricultural Crops (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.23mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/19: Finns Frozen Food (India). Breaches to Australian MRL’s for Spinach, Gourd and Indian Beans. Pesticides: Dimethoate, Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin

Finns Frozen Foods (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Dimethoate, Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin

23/5/18: Chopped Spinach - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.086mg/kg

24/9/18: Chopped Spinach - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.075mg/kg

20/11/18: Chopped Spinach - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.025mg/kg

20/11/18: Chopped Spinach - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Profenofos 0.08mg/kg

21/12/18: Chopped Spinach - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.28mg/kg

16/7/19: Bitter Gourd - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.026mg/kg

16/7/19: Indian Beans (val papadi) - Finns Frozen Foods (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.21mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Finns Frozen Foods (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Dimethoate, Profenofos, Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin

23/5/18: Chopped Spinach – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.086mg/kg

24/9/18: Chopped Spinach – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.075mg/kg

20/11/18: Chopped Spinach – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.025mg/kg

20/11/18: Chopped Spinach – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Profenofos 0.08mg/kg

21/12/18: Chopped Spinach – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.28mg/kg

16/7/19: Bitter Gourd – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Dimethoate 0.026mg/kg

16/7/19: Indian Beans (val papadi) – Finns Frozen Foods (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.21mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

11/9/17: Ernteband Fruchaft (Germany). Breached Australian MRL for Strawberry Juice Concentrate. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Ernteband Fruchtsaft Gmbh (Germany) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

11/9/17: Strawberry Juice Concentrate - Ernteband Fruchtsaft (Germany) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.23mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Ernteband Fruchtsaft Gmbh (Germany) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

11/9/17: Strawberry Juice Concentrate – Ernteband Fruchtsaft (Germany) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.23mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

1/3/18: Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt). Breaches of Australian MRL’s for Fresh Naval Oranges

Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin

1/3/18: Fresh Naval Oranges - Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.03mg/kg

1/3/18: Fresh Naval Oranges - Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.38mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin

1/3/18: Fresh Naval Oranges – Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.03mg/kg

1/3/18: Fresh Naval Oranges – Elbaraka Fruit for Import and Export (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.38mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

17/4/18: El Waha Co for Export and Supply Agriculture Products (Egypt). Breached Australian MRL for Mandarins. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

El Waha Co for Export and Supply Agriculture Products (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalotrin

17/4/18: Mandarins - El Waha Co For Export and Supply Agriculture Products (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.059mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

El Waha Co for Export and Supply Agriculture Products (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalotrin

17/4/18: Mandarins – El Waha Co For Export and Supply Agriculture Products (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.059mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2019/20: El Rawan Co for Import and Export (Egypt). Breached MRL for Oranges. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

El Rawan Co for Import and Export (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalotrin

1/3/19: Fresh Oranges - El Rawan Co For Import and Export (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.15mg/kg

5/3/20: Fresh Naval Oranges - El Rawan Co For Import and Export (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.071mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

El Rawan Co for Import and Export (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalotrin

1/3/19: Fresh Oranges – El Rawan Co For Import and Export (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.15mg/kg

5/3/20: Fresh Naval Oranges – El Rawan Co For Import and Export (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.071mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/21: Dt-Pro Co Ltd (Vietnam) Breaching Australian MRL for Lychees. Pesticide: Carbendazim, Cypermethrin

Dt-Pro Co.,Ltd (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim

3/7/18: Fresh Lychees - Dt-Pro Co., Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.075mg/kg

5/5/20: Fresh Chilled Mango - Dt-Pro Co., Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.093mg/kg

9/6/21: Mango - Dt-Pro Co., Ltd (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.05mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Dt-Pro Co.,Ltd (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim

3/7/18: Fresh Lychees – Dt-Pro Co., Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.075mg/kg

5/5/20: Fresh Chilled Mango – Dt-Pro Co., Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.093mg/kg

9/6/21: Mango – Dt-Pro Co., Ltd (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.05mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

8/4/19: Desert Valley Dates (United States) Breach Australian MRL for Dates. Pesticide: Hexythiazox

Desert Valley Dates Inc (United States) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Hexythiazox

8/4/19: Dates - Desert Valley Dates Inc (United States) - Pesticide: Hexythiazox 0.87mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Desert Valley Dates Inc (United States) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Hexythiazox

8/4/19: Dates – Desert Valley Dates Inc (United States) – Pesticide: Hexythiazox 0.87mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

4/3/19: Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) breached Australian MRL for Dried Long Beans. Pesticide: Thiamethoxam

Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiamethoxam

4/3/19: Dried Long Beans - Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.3mg/kg

4/3/19: Dried Long Beans - Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.3mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiamethoxam

4/3/19: Dried Long Beans – Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.3mg/kg

4/3/19: Dried Long Beans – Chuanzhen Industry Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.3mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018 May: Chengdu Qilihong Food Co Ltd (China). Breaches to Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Cyhalothrin, Myclobutanil

Chengdu Qilihong Food Co. Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Cyhalothrin, Myclobutanil

23/5/18: Red Jujube (Chinese Red Dates) - Chengdu Qilihong Food Co. Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.06mg/kg

23/5/18: Red Jujube (Chinese Red Dates) - Chengdu Qilihong Food Co. Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Myclobutanil 0.41mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Chengdu Qilihong Food Co. Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Cyhalothrin, Myclobutanil

23/5/18: Red Jujube (Chinese Red Dates) – Chengdu Qilihong Food Co. Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.06mg/kg

23/5/18: Red Jujube (Chinese Red Dates) – Chengdu Qilihong Food Co. Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Myclobutanil 0.41mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

11/11/19: Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam). Breaches to Australian MRL’s. Pesticides: Azoxystrobin, Difenconazole

Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Azoxystrobin, Difenconazole

11/11/19: Fresh Longans - Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Azoxystrobin 0.18mg/kg

11/11/19: Fresh Longans - Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.11mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Azoxystrobin, Difenconazole

11/11/19: Fresh Longans – Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Azoxystrobin 0.18mg/kg

11/11/19: Fresh Longans – Chanh Thu Export and Import Fruit Company (Vietnam) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.11mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2017/18: Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa). Exporting Dried Apricots exceeding Australian MRL’s. Pesticide: Thiabendazole

Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Thiabendazole

8/6/17: Dried Apricots - Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) - Pesticide: Thiabendazole 0.076mg/kg

3/4/18: Dried Apricots - Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) - Pesticide: Thiabendazole 0.11mg/kg

4/4/18: Dried Apricots - Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) - Pesticide: Thiabendazole 0.076mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Thiabendazole

8/6/17: Dried Apricots – Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) – Pesticide: Thiabendazole 0.076mg/kg

3/4/18: Dried Apricots – Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) – Pesticide: Thiabendazole 0.11mg/kg

4/4/18: Dried Apricots – Cape Dried Fruit Packers (South Africa) – Pesticide: Thiabendazole 0.076mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/19: Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) Red Dates above Australian Pesticide MRL. Pesticides: Multiple

Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Myclobutanil, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole,

28/8/18: Red Pitted Dates - Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.49mg/kg, Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg, Cypermethrin 0.26mg/kg, Difenconazole 0.34mg/kg, Myclobutanil 0.21mg/kg, Propiconazole 0.06mg/kg, Tebuconazole 0.71mg/kg

11/10/19: Red Pitted Dates - Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) - Carbendazim 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for: Carbendazim, Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Difenconazole, Myclobutanil, Propiconazole, Tebuconazole,

28/8/18: Red Pitted Dates – Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.49mg/kg, Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg, Cypermethrin 0.26mg/kg, Difenconazole 0.34mg/kg, Myclobutanil 0.21mg/kg, Propiconazole 0.06mg/kg, Tebuconazole 0.71mg/kg

11/10/19: Red Pitted Dates – Cangzhou Ruifeng Date Product Co Ltd (China) – Carbendazim 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

19/9/19: Bozhou Haomen Chinese Medicine Co Ltd exporting Chinese Dates above MRL’s. Pesticide: Cypermethrin

Bozhou Haomen Chinese Medicine Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Cypermethrin

19/9/19: Dried Chinese Dates - Bozhou Haomen Chinese Medicine Co Ltd (China) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.11mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Bozhou Haomen Chinese Medicine Co Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Cypermethrin

19/9/19: Dried Chinese Dates – Bozhou Haomen Chinese Medicine Co Ltd (China) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.11mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

11/12/18: Bethany Food Korea. Export of Jujube – Multiple pesticides breaching Australian MRL

Bethany Food (Korea) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Bifenthrin, Cyhalothrin, Hexaconazole, Iprodione, Paclobutrazol, Tebuconazole, Tebufenozide, Triadimefon, Triadimenol

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Bifenthrin 0.07mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.026mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.5mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Iprodione 0.11mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Paclobutrazol 0.05mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.18mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Tebufenozide 0.12mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Triadimefon 0.35mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube - Bethany Food (Korea) - Pesticide: Triadimenol 0.3mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

 

Bethany Food (Korea) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Bifenthrin, Cyhalothrin, Hexaconazole, Iprodione, Paclobutrazol, Tebuconazole, Tebufenozide, Triadimefon, Triadimenol

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Bifenthrin 0.07mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.026mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Hexaconazole 0.5mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Iprodione 0.11mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Paclobutrazol 0.05mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.18mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Tebufenozide 0.12mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Triadimefon 0.35mg/kg

11/12/18: Dried Jujube – Bethany Food (Korea) – Pesticide: Triadimenol 0.3mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

26/10/17: Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) Breaching MRL’s on Longan Exported into Australia. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Chlorpyrifos

Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Chlorpyrifos, Carbendazim

26/10/17: Fresh Longan - Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.064mg/kg

26/10/17: Fresh Longan - Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.042mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Chlorpyrifos, Carbendazim

26/10/17: Fresh Longan – Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.064mg/kg

26/10/17: Fresh Longan – Best Fruit Co Ltd (Thailand) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.042mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

31/8/18: Berrynice Limitada (Chile) Exports raspberries above MRL’s into Australia. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos

Berrynice Limitada (Chile) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Chlorpyrifos

31/8/18: Frozen raspberries - Baoding City Just Foods (China) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.016mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Berrynice Limitada (Chile) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Chlorpyrifos

31/8/18: Frozen raspberries – Baoding City Just Foods (China) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.016mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018 July: Baoding City Just Foods (China) Exporting Strawberries to Australia breaching MRL. Pesticide: Paclobutrazol

Baoding City Just Foods Co. Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Paclobutrazol

19/7/18: Strawberries - Baoding City Just Foods (China) - Pesticide: Paclobutrazol 0.03mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Baoding City Just Foods Co. Ltd (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Paclobutrazol

19/7/18: Strawberries – Baoding City Just Foods (China) – Pesticide: Paclobutrazol 0.03mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2019/21: Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) exporting food to Australia breaching MRL’s. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin

Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin,

29/3/19: Mung dal - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.27mg/kg

29/3/19: Mung dhal - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.13mg/kg

5/6/19: Mung Chilka Split - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.19mg/kg

5/6/19: Mung Chilka Split - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.03mg/kg

9/7/19: Split Mung Beans - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.33mg/kg

9/7/19: Split Mung Beans - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.06mg/kg

22/8/19: Toor dal (pigeon peas) - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.12mg/kg

7/1/20: Toor Dal - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.038mg/kg

20/5/20: Toor Dal - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.027mg/kg

20/5/20: Toor Dal - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.042mg/kg

12/6/20: Ural Dal (black lentils) - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.033mg/kg

5/11/20: Toor Dal (pea) - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.013mg/kg

18/3/21: Lentils - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.025mg/kg

18/3/21: Yellow Lentils - Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.015mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Chlorpyrifos, Cypermethrin,

29/3/19: Mung dal – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.27mg/kg

29/3/19: Mung dhal – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.13mg/kg

5/6/19: Mung Chilka Split – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.19mg/kg

5/6/19: Mung Chilka Split – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.03mg/kg

9/7/19: Split Mung Beans – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.33mg/kg

9/7/19: Split Mung Beans – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin 0.06mg/kg

22/8/19: Toor dal (pigeon peas) – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.12mg/kg

7/1/20: Toor Dal – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.038mg/kg

20/5/20: Toor Dal – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.027mg/kg

20/5/20: Toor Dal – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.042mg/kg

12/6/20: Ural Dal (black lentils) – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.033mg/kg

5/11/20: Toor Dal (pea) – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.013mg/kg

18/3/21: Lentils – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.025mg/kg

18/3/21: Yellow Lentils – Ays Mfg Co Ltd (Myanmar) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.015mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018 March: Asia Foods Nanjing Co Ld (China) Exporting food to Australia breaching MRL’s. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Thiamethoxam

Asia Foods Nanjing Co Ld (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Carbendazim, Thiamethoxam

13/3/18: Frozen Baby Seasoned Baby Soybean - Edamame (China) - Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.092mg/kg

13/3/18: Frozen Baby Seasoned Baby Soybean - Edamame (China) - Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.082mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Asia Foods Nanjing Co Ld (China) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Carbendazim, Thiamethoxam

13/3/18: Frozen Baby Seasoned Baby Soybean – Edamame (China) – Pesticide: Carbendazim 0.092mg/kg

13/3/18: Frozen Baby Seasoned Baby Soybean – Edamame (China) – Pesticide: Thiamethoxam 0.082mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2019/20: Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) Exporting Chill’s breaching MRL’s into Australia. Pesticides: Monocrotophos, Tebuconazole, Difenconazole, Cyhalothrin

Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Monocrotophos, Tebuconazole, Difenconazole

15/8/19: Frozen Green Chilli  Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.07mg/kg

15/8/19: Frozen Green Chilli Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.13mg/kg

3/12/19: Frozen Green Chilli's Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.17mg/kg

28/2/20: Frozen Green Chilli's Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.08mg/kg

18/3/20: Frozen Green Chilli's Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

18/3/20: Frozen Green Chilli's Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.03mg/kg

18/3/20: Frozen Green Chilli's Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) - Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Monocrotophos, Tebuconazole, Difenconazole

15/8/19: Frozen Green Chilli  Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Monocrotophos 0.07mg/kg

15/8/19: Frozen Green Chilli Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.13mg/kg

3/12/19: Frozen Green Chilli’s Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Difenconazole 0.17mg/kg

28/2/20: Frozen Green Chilli’s Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.08mg/kg

18/3/20: Frozen Green Chilli’s Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.02mg/kg

18/3/20: Frozen Green Chilli’s Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.03mg/kg

18/3/20: Frozen Green Chilli’s Arctic Agro Foods Pvt Ltd (India) – Pesticide: Tebuconazole 0.07mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

22/2/18: Agro Egypt Agricultural Products (Egypt) exporting food breaching MRL’s into Australia. Pesticide: Cyhalothrin

Agro Egypt for Agricultural Products (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Cyhalothrin

22/2/18: Fresh Naval Oranges. Agro Egypt for Agricultural Products (Egypt) - Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Agro Egypt for Agricultural Products (Egypt) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Cyhalothrin

22/2/18: Fresh Naval Oranges. Agro Egypt for Agricultural Products (Egypt) – Pesticide: Cyhalothrin 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

5/1/18: Agricola Los Batros Sa (Chile) Exporting Mixed Berries to Australia breaching MRL’s. Pesticides: Procymidone

Agricola Los Batros Sa (Chile) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Procymidone

5/1/18: Mixed Berries. Agricola Los Batros Sa (Chile) - Pesticide: Procymidone 0.045mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Agricola Los Batros Sa (Chile) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Procymidone

5/1/18: Mixed Berries. Agricola Los Batros Sa (Chile) – Pesticide: Procymidone 0.045mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

26/5/17: Fresh Asparagus Export breaching MRL from Agricola La Venta (Peru). Pesticide: Methomyl

Agricola La Venta (Peru) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Methomyl

26/5/17: Fresh Asparagus. Agricola La Venta (Peru) - Pesticide: Methomyl 0.66mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Agricola La Venta (Peru) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Methomyl

26/5/17: Fresh Asparagus. Agricola La Venta (Peru) – Pesticide: Methomyl 0.66mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/21: Aerath Business Corporation (India). Breaching MRL’s on Food Exports to Australia. Pesticides: Acephate, Methamidophos, Cypermethrin

Aerath Business Corporation (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Acephate

14/9/18: Okra Cut. Aerath Business Corporation (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 3.9mg/kg

26/7/19: Frozen Cut Okra. Aerath Business Corporation (India) - Pesticide: Acephate 0.087mg/kg

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) - Pesticide: Acephate. Lines 5a and 5b. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) - Pesticide: Methamidophos. Lines 5a and 5b. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin. Line 5a. 0.48mg/kg

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) - Pesticide: Cypermethrin. Line 5b. 0.043mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Aerath Business Corporation (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Acephate

14/9/18: Okra Cut. Aerath Business Corporation (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 3.9mg/kg

26/7/19: Frozen Cut Okra. Aerath Business Corporation (India) – Pesticide: Acephate 0.087mg/kg

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) – Pesticide: Acephate. Lines 5a and 5b. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) – Pesticide: Methamidophos. Lines 5a and 5b. Detected. Not permitted in this food.

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin. Line 5a. 0.48mg/kg

11/3/21: Frozen vegetables. Aerath Business Corporation (India) – Pesticide: Cypermethrin. Line 5b. 0.043mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018/19: Adf Foods India. Food breaching MRL’s Imported into Australia. Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Parathion Ethyl

Adf Foods (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL's for Chlorpyrifos, Parathion Ethyl

22/2/18: Cut Okra. Adf Foods (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.19mg/kg

3/1/19: Whole Green Chilli's. Adf Foods (India) - Pesticide: Parathion Ethyl 0.04mg/kg

15/4/19: Indian Flat Beans. Adf Foods (India) - Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

Adf Foods (India) Exported Food breaching Australian MRL’s for Chlorpyrifos, Parathion Ethyl

22/2/18: Cut Okra. Adf Foods (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.19mg/kg

3/1/19: Whole Green Chilli’s. Adf Foods (India) – Pesticide: Parathion Ethyl 0.04mg/kg

15/4/19: Indian Flat Beans. Adf Foods (India) – Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos 0.04mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2018 April: Araththi Exports (India) – Exports of Dried Raisins breaching Australian MRL. Pesticide: Carbendazim

Araththi Exports Exported Raisins breaching Australian MRL's for Carbendazim

26/4/18: Dried Raisins. Aarththi Exports India - Pesticide Carbendazim 0.83mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report - Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

 

 

Araththi Exports Exported Raisins breaching Australian MRL’s for Carbendazim

26/4/18: Dried Raisins. Aarththi Exports India – Pesticide Carbendazim 0.83mg/kg

Source Failing Food Report – Australian Department of Agriculture (AQIS)

2019 July: Farmer fined stored Barley – North Star (New South Wales). Pesticide: Phosphine

Australian farmers warned the misuse of pesticides will see overseas markets turn away

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2019-07-26/chemicals-on-crops-jeopardise-export-markets/11270722

An industry group is warning farmers that they are jeopardising overseas markets by breaching maximum residue levels, resulting in too much chemical found on the end product.

The European Commission describes a maximum residue level (MRL) "as the highest level of a pesticide residue that is legally tolerated in or on food or feed when pesticides are applied correctly".

It is not just grain crops that have MRLs.

All products from fruit and vegetable crops to meat can have traces of pesticides.

Paul McIntosh from Pulse Australia and the Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative said while Australia had a 98.5 per cent to 99 per cent compliance rate, it was the 1 per cent that were causing disruptions.

"It's a big issue and it's really starting to impact on some of our export markets, particularly for our pulse crops overseas," Mr McIntosh said.

"The issue is we are getting picked up on [being over] our MRLs … particularly with our chickpeas and our mung beans.

"We can't afford that 1 or 1.5 per cent, we need to get it perfect, we need to be 100 per cent now.

"If we don't change and the crops go overseas — our clean and green image is going to be severely damaged and we are going to restrict markets.

Farmer fined for alleged misuse of pesticides

The New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) recently fined a farmer for the alleged incorrect use of pesticides on stored barley grain.

Doolin Farming at North Star was fined $3,500 after the EPA was alerted to elevated phosphine residues in a delivery to Graincorp in Queensland.

In a written statement the EPA said "it is alleged the barley grower had not complied with several requirements relating to the use of pesticides — including that the farmer was not following the directions for use on the pesticide labels, did not hold a current accreditation to use pesticide and did not make a record of the application of the pesticide."

Srinivas Boyapalli is the Trading and Export Manager for Olam Australia, a company which exports pulses, chickpeas, fava beans, mung beans and lentils.

Mr Boyapalli said the current attention on glyphosate meant countries were taking extra notice of maximum residue levels.

"We have seen one particular issue last year with lentils, which went to India," he said.

"The importer tested the product and it came out with a glyphosate residue limit [breach] and it was reported to the government, and then the government said the cargo had to be returned or dumped.

"It costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to take back [or dump] rejected cargo."

Calls for standardised maximum residue levels to make trade easier

However, Mr Boyapalli explained this incident was particularly difficult because India did not have a clear MRL set for glyphosate.

"When they don't have a maximum residue level it defaults to zero," he said.

"If it reverts back to zero tolerance it cuts out the trade … when our growers are using glyphosate here to control the weeds."

Most countries set their own MRL, making it difficult for marketers with the levels constantly changing.

Mr Boyapalli said there is a push for each country to set a standard MRL to make it clear for agricultural marketers.

"Global Pulse Confederation (GPC) is the peak global body and it is working with all countries to have a standardised MRL," he said.

"GPC [is also] lobbying governments and the United Nations body to accept the minimum residue level limits for all pulse commodities.

"It would be much easier for the trade because if we are sending lentils to India, Pakistan and Bangladesh — it should be the same and it would be easy to follow and easy to explain to growers what the limits are.

Australian farmers warned the misuse of pesticides will see overseas markets turn away

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2019-07-26/chemicals-on-crops-jeopardise-export-markets/11270722

An industry group is warning farmers that they are jeopardising overseas markets by breaching maximum residue levels, resulting in too much chemical found on the end product.

The European Commission describes a maximum residue level (MRL) “as the highest level of a pesticide residue that is legally tolerated in or on food or feed when pesticides are applied correctly”.

It is not just grain crops that have MRLs.

All products from fruit and vegetable crops to meat can have traces of pesticides.

Paul McIntosh from Pulse Australia and the Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative said while Australia had a 98.5 per cent to 99 per cent compliance rate, it was the 1 per cent that were causing disruptions.

“It’s a big issue and it’s really starting to impact on some of our export markets, particularly for our pulse crops overseas,” Mr McIntosh said.

“The issue is we are getting picked up on [being over] our MRLs … particularly with our chickpeas and our mung beans.

“We can’t afford that 1 or 1.5 per cent, we need to get it perfect, we need to be 100 per cent now.

“If we don’t change and the crops go overseas — our clean and green image is going to be severely damaged and we are going to restrict markets.

Farmer fined for alleged misuse of pesticides

The New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) recently fined a farmer for the alleged incorrect use of pesticides on stored barley grain.

Doolin Farming at North Star was fined $3,500 after the EPA was alerted to elevated phosphine residues in a delivery to Graincorp in Queensland.

In a written statement the EPA said “it is alleged the barley grower had not complied with several requirements relating to the use of pesticides — including that the farmer was not following the directions for use on the pesticide labels, did not hold a current accreditation to use pesticide and did not make a record of the application of the pesticide.”

Srinivas Boyapalli is the Trading and Export Manager for Olam Australia, a company which exports pulses, chickpeas, fava beans, mung beans and lentils.

Mr Boyapalli said the current attention on glyphosate meant countries were taking extra notice of maximum residue levels.

“We have seen one particular issue last year with lentils, which went to India,” he said.

“The importer tested the product and it came out with a glyphosate residue limit [breach] and it was reported to the government, and then the government said the cargo had to be returned or dumped.

“It costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to take back [or dump] rejected cargo.”

Calls for standardised maximum residue levels to make trade easier

However, Mr Boyapalli explained this incident was particularly difficult because India did not have a clear MRL set for glyphosate.

“When they don’t have a maximum residue level it defaults to zero,” he said.

“If it reverts back to zero tolerance it cuts out the trade … when our growers are using glyphosate here to control the weeds.”

Most countries set their own MRL, making it difficult for marketers with the levels constantly changing.

Mr Boyapalli said there is a push for each country to set a standard MRL to make it clear for agricultural marketers.

“Global Pulse Confederation (GPC) is the peak global body and it is working with all countries to have a standardised MRL,” he said.

“GPC [is also] lobbying governments and the United Nations body to accept the minimum residue level limits for all pulse commodities.

“It would be much easier for the trade because if we are sending lentils to India, Pakistan and Bangladesh — it should be the same and it would be easy to follow and easy to explain to growers what the limits are.

2020 February: Senate Inquiry into Possible Bellarine Peninsula Cancer Cluster – Mosquito spraying?

Senate inquiry into possible Bellarine Peninsula cancer cluster now open

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-09/bellarine-peninsula-cancer-cluster-senate-inquiry-begins/11931164

Illness has been a major part of Danielle Livingstone's life.

The palliative care nurse spends her working hours caring for the terminally ill, her adult daughter has Crohn's disease, her son had ulcerative colitis and three years ago Ms Livingstone was diagnosed with breast cancer.

The idyllic riverside court where she lived in Barwon Heads, on Victoria's Bellarine Peninsula, had 10 houses and multiple cases of cancer and auto-immune disease.

And after a number of young Barwon Heads locals died from cancer in the space of just a few years, she, like many others in the small coastal community, became concerned the region's farming history or mosquito spraying programs could have contributed to an increased level of illness.

Amid the community angst, both candidates for a tightly-fought election campaign in the ultra-marginal seat of Corangamite promised a Senate inquiry to investigate the issue.

Ms Livingstone said the inquiry was needed.

"There's been a lot of community talk," she said.

"There's been conversations, many conversations, over the years like 'is this healthy?'"

Council slams 'irresponsible' claims

Mangroves behind Ms Livingstone's yard were routinely treated with chemicals by the Bellarine Shire and later the City of Greater Geelong — often at the request of the community, who wanted to keep the mosquitoes at bay and minimise the risk of mosquito-borne diseases.

It included aerial treatment, where pellets were dropped from helicopters.

"Where we were was a very heavily sprayed area," she said.

"You would see the helicopters dropping the pellets.

"You would wake up in the morning and there'd be this low, sort of fog around Barwon Heads."

Ms Livingstone became particularly concerned when she saw the reported cases of cancer and auto-immune disease plotted out on a map of Barwon Heads.

"It blew my mind. I was shocked, really, really shocked," she said.

It's a community fear that authorities have been trying hard to placate in recent years.

The City of Greater Geelong has repeatedly said there was "no scientific basis" to claims linking mosquito treatment to human health impacts, even hosting community meetings to answer questions from frightened residents.

Planning and development director Gareth Smith said any suggestions of a link were "irresponsible" and had the potential to hurt those who had suffered from the impact of serious disease.

"All of the chemicals used in our mosquito treatment programs have been approved as safe products by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority," he said.

"These products only affect mosquito larvae and do not harm people, pets or the general environment."

But he also said council could "empathise" with the community, which was still hurting.

"Sadly, the occurrence of cancer and immunological diseases is not uncommon in any community," he said.

"The devastating impacts can be widespread and long-lasting."

A long list of investigations

The Senate inquiry is now open and will investigate the possibility of a cancer cluster on the Bellarine Peninsula.

Submissions close at the end of this month, public hearings will follow and a report is due in August.

But this will not be the first time a government agency has investigated claims of a cancer cluster in the popular holiday spot, located about 90 minutes south of Melbourne.

In January 2019, Victoria's chief health officer initiated a review of cancer incidence rates for total cancers; breast and liver cancer; and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, brain cancers and leukaemia.

It used data from the Australian Cancer Atlas and found "no evidence of a higher rate of cancer overall" and "no high number of the specific cancers of interest" on the Bellarine Peninsula than expected based on the average cancer rate in Australia.

A Cancer Council Victoria report from October 2019 also found "no substantive evidence of increased [cancer] incidence" across the peninsula.

This finding was endorsed by an expert advisory group established by the state's Health Department.

Concerns about possible soil contamination from dieldrin — a pesticide previously used on farms which can contaminate the soil for decades — also prompted the Education Department and WorkSafe to conduct soil tests at Bellarine Secondary College, in the nearby town of Drysdale, in 2018, in a bid to allay community concerns stemming from the fact that a number of the young people who became sick had attended the school.

The report found pesticides, including dieldrin, were found in the soil, but in levels below what is considered harmful to human health.

What will the inquiry achieve?

The Senate inquiry will be chaired by Greens senator Rachel Siewert and will look at residents' concerns, the incidence of cancer in the area, possible environmental factors and the Victorian chief health officer's investigation.

Local surf shop owner Ross Harrison, who has led the public campaign for answers, said previous data analyses have not taken into account the holiday town's transient population.

"We've had a mass migration in, and a mass migration out of the township so those people that are presented with disease end up with a different postcode," he said.

"Also, in coastal townships we have many holiday-makers with houses who have holidayed here for 40 and 50 years, so when they present with disease they present with that disease in their hometown."

He hopes the bipartisan inquiry will provide the community with some answers.

"We just look forward to a forensic examination of the issues … this can't be a desktop review," he said.

"What we are arguing is that there has been a chemical exposure and the epidemiology figures show that so a diligent forensic investigation would be the minimum, I'd imagine."

Ms Livingstone also hopes this inquiry will put an end to some of the uncertainty.

"I'm just hoping that the truth will be revealed really and that people can tell their story," she said.

"There's just so many people down here who've been affected by it, who've lost loved ones, young people dying unnecessarily and young kids and everyone being sick.

"It's too much to not be strange."

Senate inquiry into possible Bellarine Peninsula cancer cluster now open

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-09/bellarine-peninsula-cancer-cluster-senate-inquiry-begins/11931164

Illness has been a major part of Danielle Livingstone’s life.

The palliative care nurse spends her working hours caring for the terminally ill, her adult daughter has Crohn’s disease, her son had ulcerative colitis and three years ago Ms Livingstone was diagnosed with breast cancer.

The idyllic riverside court where she lived in Barwon Heads, on Victoria’s Bellarine Peninsula, had 10 houses and multiple cases of cancer and auto-immune disease.

And after a number of young Barwon Heads locals died from cancer in the space of just a few years, she, like many others in the small coastal community, became concerned the region’s farming history or mosquito spraying programs could have contributed to an increased level of illness.

Amid the community angst, both candidates for a tightly-fought election campaign in the ultra-marginal seat of Corangamite promised a Senate inquiry to investigate the issue.

Ms Livingstone said the inquiry was needed.

“There’s been a lot of community talk,” she said.

“There’s been conversations, many conversations, over the years like ‘is this healthy?'”

Council slams ‘irresponsible’ claims

Mangroves behind Ms Livingstone’s yard were routinely treated with chemicals by the Bellarine Shire and later the City of Greater Geelong — often at the request of the community, who wanted to keep the mosquitoes at bay and minimise the risk of mosquito-borne diseases.

It included aerial treatment, where pellets were dropped from helicopters.

“Where we were was a very heavily sprayed area,” she said.

“You would see the helicopters dropping the pellets.

“You would wake up in the morning and there’d be this low, sort of fog around Barwon Heads.”

Ms Livingstone became particularly concerned when she saw the reported cases of cancer and auto-immune disease plotted out on a map of Barwon Heads.

“It blew my mind. I was shocked, really, really shocked,” she said.

It’s a community fear that authorities have been trying hard to placate in recent years.

The City of Greater Geelong has repeatedly said there was “no scientific basis” to claims linking mosquito treatment to human health impacts, even hosting community meetings to answer questions from frightened residents.

Planning and development director Gareth Smith said any suggestions of a link were “irresponsible” and had the potential to hurt those who had suffered from the impact of serious disease.

“All of the chemicals used in our mosquito treatment programs have been approved as safe products by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority,” he said.

“These products only affect mosquito larvae and do not harm people, pets or the general environment.”

But he also said council could “empathise” with the community, which was still hurting.

“Sadly, the occurrence of cancer and immunological diseases is not uncommon in any community,” he said.

“The devastating impacts can be widespread and long-lasting.”

A long list of investigations

The Senate inquiry is now open and will investigate the possibility of a cancer cluster on the Bellarine Peninsula.

Submissions close at the end of this month, public hearings will follow and a report is due in August.

But this will not be the first time a government agency has investigated claims of a cancer cluster in the popular holiday spot, located about 90 minutes south of Melbourne.

In January 2019, Victoria’s chief health officer initiated a review of cancer incidence rates for total cancers; breast and liver cancer; and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, brain cancers and leukaemia.

It used data from the Australian Cancer Atlas and found “no evidence of a higher rate of cancer overall” and “no high number of the specific cancers of interest” on the Bellarine Peninsula than expected based on the average cancer rate in Australia.

A Cancer Council Victoria report from October 2019 also found “no substantive evidence of increased [cancer] incidence” across the peninsula.

This finding was endorsed by an expert advisory group established by the state’s Health Department.

Concerns about possible soil contamination from dieldrin — a pesticide previously used on farms which can contaminate the soil for decades — also prompted the Education Department and WorkSafe to conduct soil tests at Bellarine Secondary College, in the nearby town of Drysdale, in 2018, in a bid to allay community concerns stemming from the fact that a number of the young people who became sick had attended the school.

The report found pesticides, including dieldrin, were found in the soil, but in levels below what is considered harmful to human health.

What will the inquiry achieve?

The Senate inquiry will be chaired by Greens senator Rachel Siewert and will look at residents’ concerns, the incidence of cancer in the area, possible environmental factors and the Victorian chief health officer’s investigation.

Local surf shop owner Ross Harrison, who has led the public campaign for answers, said previous data analyses have not taken into account the holiday town’s transient population.

“We’ve had a mass migration in, and a mass migration out of the township so those people that are presented with disease end up with a different postcode,” he said.

“Also, in coastal townships we have many holiday-makers with houses who have holidayed here for 40 and 50 years, so when they present with disease they present with that disease in their hometown.”

He hopes the bipartisan inquiry will provide the community with some answers.

“We just look forward to a forensic examination of the issues … this can’t be a desktop review,” he said.

“What we are arguing is that there has been a chemical exposure and the epidemiology figures show that so a diligent forensic investigation would be the minimum, I’d imagine.”

Ms Livingstone also hopes this inquiry will put an end to some of the uncertainty.

“I’m just hoping that the truth will be revealed really and that people can tell their story,” she said.

“There’s just so many people down here who’ve been affected by it, who’ve lost loved ones, young people dying unnecessarily and young kids and everyone being sick.

“It’s too much to not be strange.”

2012/19: Warra Weir (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy, DEET, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Fluroxypyr, Hexazinone, Imidacloprid, Metolachlor, Metolachlor-OXA, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbuthylazine

Warra Weir (Queensland)

23/4/12:  Nothing

31/7/12: Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.17ug/L. [Total 0.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

24/10/12: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.13ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/1/13: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L [Total 0.13ug/L 3 pesticides]

10/4/13: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.16ug/L]

23/7/13: Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L, Terbuthylazine 2.7ug/L [Total 2.88ug/L 5 pesticides]

23/10/13: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.09ug/L [Total 0.21 4 pesticides]

22/1/14: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.17ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/4/14: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.93ug/L [Total 1.38ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/7/14: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.42ug/L [Total 0.7ug/L 4 pesticides]

22/10/14: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L [Total 0.48ug/L 4 pesticides]

14/1/15: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 3.8ug/L [Total 4.25ug/L 4 pesticides]

21/4/15: Atrazine 0.34ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.38ug/L [Total 1.15ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/7/15: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.24ug/L, Simazine 0.07ug/L [Total 0.42ug/L 5 pesticides]

14/10/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/12/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, DEET 0.2ug/L [Total 0.44ug/L 5 pesticides]

27/4/16: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.39ug/L 5 pesticides]

12/7/16: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.33ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/10/16: Atrazine 0.51ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 1.5ug/L [Total 2.08ug/L 4 pesticides]

4/1/17: Atrazine 0.32ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.61ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.02ug/L [Total 1.02ug/L, 4 pesticides]

11/4/17: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.29ug/L, Metolachlor 0.62ug/L [Total 1.23ug/L 4 pesticides]

25/7/17: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.2ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 3 pesticides]

17/10/17: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L [Total 0.26ug/L 3 pesticides]

17/10/17: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 3 pesticides]

9/1/18: Atrazine 0.7ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.34ug/L [Total 1.19ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/4/18: Atrazine 0.52ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.8ug/L [1.62ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/7/18: Atrazine 0.43ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.39ug/L, DEET 1.2ug/L [Total 2.25ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/10/18: Atrazine 4.8ugL, Desethyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Metolachlor 9.7ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.2ug/L, DEET 2.8ug/L [Total 17.83ug/L 6 pesticides]

8/1/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.7ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Diuron 0.31ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 6.4ug/L [Total 7.74ug/L 5 pesticides]

9/7/19: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Metolachlor 0.27ug/L, DEET 0.7ug/L, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.7ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Fluroxypyr 0.25ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 1.6ug/L [Total 4.17ug/L 8 pesticides]

Warra Weir (Queensland)

23/4/12:  Nothing

31/7/12: Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.17ug/L. [Total 0.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

24/10/12: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.13ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/1/13: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L [Total 0.13ug/L 3 pesticides]

10/4/13: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.16ug/L]

23/7/13: Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L, Terbuthylazine 2.7ug/L [Total 2.88ug/L 5 pesticides]

23/10/13: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.09ug/L [Total 0.21 4 pesticides]

22/1/14: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.17ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/4/14: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.93ug/L [Total 1.38ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/7/14: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.42ug/L [Total 0.7ug/L 4 pesticides]

22/10/14: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L [Total 0.48ug/L 4 pesticides]

14/1/15: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 3.8ug/L [Total 4.25ug/L 4 pesticides]

21/4/15: Atrazine 0.34ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.38ug/L [Total 1.15ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/7/15: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.24ug/L, Simazine 0.07ug/L [Total 0.42ug/L 5 pesticides]

14/10/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/12/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, DEET 0.2ug/L [Total 0.44ug/L 5 pesticides]

27/4/16: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.39ug/L 5 pesticides]

12/7/16: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.33ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/10/16: Atrazine 0.51ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 1.5ug/L [Total 2.08ug/L 4 pesticides]

4/1/17: Atrazine 0.32ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.61ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.02ug/L [Total 1.02ug/L, 4 pesticides]

11/4/17: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.29ug/L, Metolachlor 0.62ug/L [Total 1.23ug/L 4 pesticides]

25/7/17: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.2ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 3 pesticides]

17/10/17: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L [Total 0.26ug/L 3 pesticides]

17/10/17: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 3 pesticides]

9/1/18: Atrazine 0.7ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.34ug/L [Total 1.19ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/4/18: Atrazine 0.52ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.8ug/L [1.62ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/7/18: Atrazine 0.43ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.39ug/L, DEET 1.2ug/L [Total 2.25ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/10/18: Atrazine 4.8ugL, Desethyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Metolachlor 9.7ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.2ug/L, DEET 2.8ug/L [Total 17.83ug/L 6 pesticides]

8/1/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.7ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Diuron 0.31ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 6.4ug/L [Total 7.74ug/L 5 pesticides]

9/7/19: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Metolachlor 0.27ug/L, DEET 0.7ug/L, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.7ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Fluroxypyr 0.25ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 1.6ug/L [Total 4.17ug/L 8 pesticides]

2012/19: Gil Weir, Miles (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, DEET,Desethyl Atrazine , Hexazinone, Imidacloprid, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron, Tris (chloropropyl) Phosphate Isomers

Miles, Gil Weir

27/2/12: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L, DEET 0.2ug/L [Total: 0.73ug/L  6 pesticides]

29/5/12: Nothing

25/7/12: Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L

28/8/12: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

30/10/12: Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L

26/3/13: Hexazinone 0.11ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L  [Total 0.18ug/L 2 pesticides]

16/7/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total: 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/9/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

28/10/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.11ug/L  2 pesticides]

22/4/14: Nothing

29/7/14: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

29/11/14: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, Tris (chloropropyl) Phosphate Isomers 0.3ug/L [Total 0.33ug/L, 2 pesticides]

25/3/15: Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

29/4/15: Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L

22/7/15: Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

28/10/15: Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L

27/1/16: Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L

27/4/16: Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.09ug/L 2 pesticides]

27/7/16: Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L (Total 0.08ug/L, 2 pesticides]

26/10/16: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.18ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 3 pesticides]

24/1/17: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.2ug/L 3 pesticides]

3/5/17: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.16ug/L 3 pesticides]

26/7/17: Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.09ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/10/17: Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.07ug/L 2 pesticides]

30/1/18: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L {Total 0.15ug/L 3 pesticides]

26/4/18: Tebuthiuron 0.02ug/L

25/7/18: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

30/10/18: Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.08ug/L 2 pesticides]

30/1/19 (Miles Weir): Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.14ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/4/19: (Miles Weir): Diuron 0.12ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L [Total 0.22ug/L 2 pesticides]

23/7/19: (Miles Weir): Diuron 0.09ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 3 pesticides]

Miles, Gil Weir

27/2/12: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L, DEET 0.2ug/L [Total: 0.73ug/L  6 pesticides]

29/5/12: Nothing

25/7/12: Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L

28/8/12: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

30/10/12: Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L

26/3/13: Hexazinone 0.11ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L  [Total 0.18ug/L 2 pesticides]

16/7/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total: 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/9/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

28/10/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.11ug/L  2 pesticides]

22/4/14: Nothing

29/7/14: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

29/11/14: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, Tris (chloropropyl) Phosphate Isomers 0.3ug/L [Total 0.33ug/L, 2 pesticides]

25/3/15: Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

29/4/15: Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L

22/7/15: Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

28/10/15: Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L

27/1/16: Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L

27/4/16: Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.09ug/L 2 pesticides]

27/7/16: Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L (Total 0.08ug/L, 2 pesticides]

26/10/16: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.18ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 3 pesticides]

24/1/17: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.2ug/L 3 pesticides]

3/5/17: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.16ug/L 3 pesticides]

26/7/17: Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.09ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/10/17: Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.07ug/L 2 pesticides]

30/1/18: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L {Total 0.15ug/L 3 pesticides]

26/4/18: Tebuthiuron 0.02ug/L

25/7/18: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

30/10/18: Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.08ug/L 2 pesticides]

30/1/19 (Miles Weir): Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.14ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/4/19: (Miles Weir): Diuron 0.12ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L [Total 0.22ug/L 2 pesticides]

23/7/19: (Miles Weir): Diuron 0.09ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 3 pesticides]

2015/16: Jandowae Apex Park Reticulation (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Metolachlor, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide, Tebuthiuron

Jandowae Apex Park Reticulation

9/9/15: Metolachlor 0.2ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.7ug/L [Total 0.9ug/L 2 pesticides]

27/9/16: Atrazine 0.42ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L

Jandowae Apex Park Reticulation

9/9/15: Metolachlor 0.2ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.7ug/L [Total 0.9ug/L 2 pesticides]

27/9/16: Atrazine 0.42ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L

2014/18: Jandowae Rotary Park Reticulated Drinking Water (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Metolachlor, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide, Simazine, Tebuthiuron,

Jandowae Rotary Park Reticulation

9/4/14: Atrazine 0.25ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.48ug/L 4 pesticides]

4/11/15:  Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.6ug/L [Total 0.8ug/L 3 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.3ug/L [Total 0.24ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.27ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 2.31ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.77ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 1.02ug/L 5 pesticides]

18/10/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.21ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.27ug/L 3 pesticides]

15/10/18: Metolachlor 0.34ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 3 pesticides]

Jandowae Rotary Park Reticulation

9/4/14: Atrazine 0.25ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.48ug/L 4 pesticides]

4/11/15:  Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.6ug/L [Total 0.8ug/L 3 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.3ug/L [Total 0.24ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.27ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 2.31ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.77ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 1.02ug/L 5 pesticides]

18/10/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.21ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.27ug/L 3 pesticides]

15/10/18: Metolachlor 0.34ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 3 pesticides]

2013-18: Jandowae Bores (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Dieldrin, Imidacloprid, Metolachlor, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide, Tebuthiuron

Jandowae Combined Bores

3/4/13: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 3 pesticides]

Jandowae Bore 1

9/7/13: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 6.1ug/L

25/2/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.5ug/L

9/4/14:  N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.6ug/L

31/7/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4ug/L

28/1/15: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 3 pesticides]

24/3/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.8ug/L

29/7/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.3ug/L

9/9/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.2ug/L

4/11/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.9ug/L

16/3/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.4ug/L

25/7/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.2ug/L

27/9/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.9ug/L

26/10/16: Acetone 3.7ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 5.2ug/L [Total 8.9ug/L 2 pesticides]

11/1/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.3ug/L

18/10/17: Nothing

15/10/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.7g/L

 

Jandowae Bore 2

9/7/13: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.4ug/L

25/2/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.1ug/L

9/4/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.5ug/L

31/7/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.7ug/L

28/1/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 5.7ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 5.9ug/L 2 “pesticides”]

24/3/15: Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Dieldrin 0.05ug/L N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.3ug/L[Total 2.37ug/L 3 pesticides]

29/7/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 6.1ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 6.3ug/L 2 pesticides]

9/9/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.7ug/L, Dieldrin 0.1ug/L [Total 2.8ug/L 2 pesticides]

4/11/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 3.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

8/12/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2ug/L

16/3/16:  Nothing

25/7/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.6ug/L

27/9/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.8ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 4ug/L 2 pesticides]

26/10/16: Acetone 3.3ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.9ug/L [Total 6.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

11/1/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.4ug/L

 

Jandowae Bore 6

25/2/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.6ug/L

9/4/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.4ug/L

31/7/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.9ug/L

11/1/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.1ug/L

18/10/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4ug/L

15/10/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2ug/L

Jandowae WTP Bore

3/4/13: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L [Total 0.22ug/L, 2 pesticides]

9/7/13: Nothing

25/2/14: Nothing

31/7/14: Nothing

28/1/15: Nothing

29/7/15: Nothing

4/11/15: Nothing

8/12/15: Nothing

16/3/16:  Nothing

25/7/16: Nothing

26/10/16: Acetone 2.6ug/L

11/1/17: Nothing

18/10/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.22ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.29ug/L 3 pesticides]

15/10/18: Nothing

Jandowae Combined Bores

3/4/13: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 3 pesticides]

Jandowae Bore 1

9/7/13: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 6.1ug/L

25/2/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.5ug/L

9/4/14:  N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.6ug/L

31/7/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4ug/L

28/1/15: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 3 pesticides]

24/3/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.8ug/L

29/7/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.3ug/L

9/9/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.2ug/L

4/11/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.9ug/L

16/3/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.4ug/L

25/7/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.2ug/L

27/9/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.9ug/L

26/10/16: Acetone 3.7ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 5.2ug/L [Total 8.9ug/L 2 pesticides]

11/1/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.3ug/L

18/10/17: Nothing

15/10/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.7g/L

 

Jandowae Bore 2

9/7/13: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.4ug/L

25/2/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.1ug/L

9/4/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.5ug/L

31/7/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.7ug/L

28/1/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 5.7ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 5.9ug/L 2 “pesticides”]

24/3/15: Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Dieldrin 0.05ug/L N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.3ug/L[Total 2.37ug/L 3 pesticides]

29/7/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 6.1ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 6.3ug/L 2 pesticides]

9/9/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.7ug/L, Dieldrin 0.1ug/L [Total 2.8ug/L 2 pesticides]

4/11/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 3.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

8/12/15: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2ug/L

16/3/16:  Nothing

25/7/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.6ug/L

27/9/16: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.8ug/L, Dieldrin 0.2ug/L [Total 4ug/L 2 pesticides]

26/10/16: Acetone 3.3ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.9ug/L [Total 6.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

11/1/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.4ug/L

 

Jandowae Bore 6

25/2/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 3.6ug/L

9/4/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.4ug/L

31/7/14: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2.9ug/L

11/1/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.1ug/L

18/10/17: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4ug/L

15/10/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 2ug/L

Jandowae WTP Bore

3/4/13: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L [Total 0.22ug/L, 2 pesticides]

9/7/13: Nothing

25/2/14: Nothing

31/7/14: Nothing

28/1/15: Nothing

29/7/15: Nothing

4/11/15: Nothing

8/12/15: Nothing

16/3/16:  Nothing

25/7/16: Nothing

26/10/16: Acetone 2.6ug/L

11/1/17: Nothing

18/10/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.22ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.29ug/L 3 pesticides]

15/10/18: Nothing

2012-2019: Jandowae Dam (Queensland). Pesticides: 2,4-D, Atrazine, Atrazine, 2-hydroxy, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Dimethoate, Diuron, Fluroxypur, Imazethapyr, Metolachlor, Metolachlor-OXA, Simazine, 2,4-Di-t-butylphenol, Terbuthylazine,

Jandowae Dam

3/4/12:  Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L [Total: 1.78ug/L  4 pesticides]

24/7/12: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.33ug/L, Diuron 0.61ug/L, Metolachlor 0.47ug/L, Simazine 1.93ug/L [Total: 3.59ug/L 6 pesticides]

10/10/12: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Diuron 0.31ug/L, Metolachlor 0.31ug/L, Simazine 0.37ug/L [Total: 1.42ug/L 6 pesticides].

23/1/13: Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Diuron 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 0.7ug/L, Simazine 0.34ug/L [Total 2.1ug/L 6 pesticides].

3/4/13: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L  [Total 0.31ug/L 3 pesticides]

9/7/13: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L [Total 0.38ug/L 4 pesticides]

8/10/13: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 3 pesticides]

25/2/14: Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L 4 pesticides]

9/4/14: Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.14ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.53ug/L 5 pesticides]

30/7/14: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.37ug/L 4 pesticides]

15/10/14: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metalochlor 0.09ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [0.4ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/1/15: Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 4 pesticides]

24/3/15: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.38ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/4/15: Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/7/15: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 4 pesticides]

9/9/15: Metolachor 0.2ug/L, 2,4-Di-t-butylphenol 0.2ug/L [Total 0.4ug/L, 2 pesticides]

4/11/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.2ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 2 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L pesticides 4]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 4 pesticides]

25/7/16: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/9/16: Atrazine 12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.82ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.44ug/L, Metolachlor 7.6ug/L, Simazine 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 20.98ug/L 6 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 2.13ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.24ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Metolachlor 1.6ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 2.08ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/7/17: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.39ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.57ug/L 4 pesticides]

18/10/17: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.88ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L  [Total 1.22ug/L 4 pesticides]

10/1/18: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.37ug/L 5 pesticides]

5/3/18: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L, Dimethoate 0.2ug/L, 2,4-D 0.04ug/L, Atrazine, 2-hydroxy 0.45ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Fluroxypur 0.11ug/L, Imazethapyr 0.02ug/L, Isoxaflutole Metabolite (DKN) 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 1ug/L [Total: 2.91ug/L 13 pesticides]

5/3/18: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, Dimethoate 0.2ug/L, Tebuconazole 0.2ug/L [Total 2ug/L 6 pesticides]

30/4/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachor 0.69ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, DEET 0.3ug/L [Total 1.18ug/L 5 pesticides]

15/10/18: Metolachor 0.42ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.49ug/L 3 pesticides]

22/1/19: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.5ug/L, 2,4-D 0.15ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 0.34ug/L [Total 1.09ug/L 4 pesticides]

9/7/19: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Metolachlor 0.37ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L,Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.36ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Fluroxypur 0.07ug/L, Isoxaflutole Metabolite (DKN) 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 0.4ug/L, [Total 1.5ug/L 9 pesticides]

Jandowae Dam

3/4/12:  Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L [Total: 1.78ug/L  4 pesticides]

24/7/12: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.33ug/L, Diuron 0.61ug/L, Metolachlor 0.47ug/L, Simazine 1.93ug/L [Total: 3.59ug/L 6 pesticides]

10/10/12: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Diuron 0.31ug/L, Metolachlor 0.31ug/L, Simazine 0.37ug/L [Total: 1.42ug/L 6 pesticides].

23/1/13: Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Diuron 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 0.7ug/L, Simazine 0.34ug/L [Total 2.1ug/L 6 pesticides].

3/4/13: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L  [Total 0.31ug/L 3 pesticides]

9/7/13: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L [Total 0.38ug/L 4 pesticides]

8/10/13: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 3 pesticides]

25/2/14: Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L 4 pesticides]

9/4/14: Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.14ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.53ug/L 5 pesticides]

30/7/14: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.37ug/L 4 pesticides]

15/10/14: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metalochlor 0.09ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [0.4ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/1/15: Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 4 pesticides]

24/3/15: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.38ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/4/15: Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/7/15: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 4 pesticides]

9/9/15: Metolachor 0.2ug/L, 2,4-Di-t-butylphenol 0.2ug/L [Total 0.4ug/L, 2 pesticides]

4/11/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.2ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 2 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L pesticides 4]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 4 pesticides]

25/7/16: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/9/16: Atrazine 12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.82ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.44ug/L, Metolachlor 7.6ug/L, Simazine 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 20.98ug/L 6 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 2.13ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.24ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Metolachlor 1.6ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 2.08ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/7/17: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.39ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.57ug/L 4 pesticides]

18/10/17: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.88ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L  [Total 1.22ug/L 4 pesticides]

10/1/18: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.37ug/L 5 pesticides]

5/3/18: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L, Dimethoate 0.2ug/L, 2,4-D 0.04ug/L, Atrazine, 2-hydroxy 0.45ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Fluroxypur 0.11ug/L, Imazethapyr 0.02ug/L, Isoxaflutole Metabolite (DKN) 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 1ug/L [Total: 2.91ug/L 13 pesticides]

5/3/18: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, Dimethoate 0.2ug/L, Tebuconazole 0.2ug/L [Total 2ug/L 6 pesticides]

30/4/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachor 0.69ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, DEET 0.3ug/L [Total 1.18ug/L 5 pesticides]

15/10/18: Metolachor 0.42ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.49ug/L 3 pesticides]

22/1/19: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.5ug/L, 2,4-D 0.15ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 0.34ug/L [Total 1.09ug/L 4 pesticides]

9/7/19: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Metolachlor 0.37ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L,Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.36ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Fluroxypur 0.07ug/L, Isoxaflutole Metabolite (DKN) 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 0.4ug/L, [Total 1.5ug/L 9 pesticides]

2012/19: Condamine Weir (Queensland). Pesticides: Ametryn, Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, DEET, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy, Diuron, Fluroxypur, Hexazinone, Imidacloprid, Metolachlor, Metolachlor-OXA,Tebuthiuron,

Condamine Condamine Weir

27/2/12: Ametryn 0.01ug/L, Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.01ug/L, Metolachlor 0.25ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.49ug/L, DEET 0.2ug/L [Total: 1.42ug/L  9 pesticides]

29/5/12: Nothing

26/4/13: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Imidacloprid 1.7ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, DEET 0.5ug/L [Total 2.5ug/L 6 pesticides]

28/5/13: Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.05ug/L 2 pesticides]

29/10/13: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

22/4/14: Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.62ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 1ug/L 5 pesticides]

30/7/14: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.28ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.54ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/10/14: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.45ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/1/15: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.17ug/L [Total 0.53ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/4/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/7/15: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.36ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.65ug/L 5 pesticides]

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.39ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/1/16: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.27ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.49ug/L 5 pesticides]

27/4/16: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.11ug/L [Total 0.54ug/L pesticides 5]

26/7/16: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.4ug/L 5 pesticides].

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 1.46ug/L 5 pesticides]

24/1/17: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 1.38ug/L 5 pesticides]

3/5/17: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.38ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.76ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/7/17: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.27ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.1ug/L [Total 0.56ug/l 5 pesticides]

24/10/17: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/1/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.96ug/L [1.15ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/4/18: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.2ug/L 3 pesticides]

30/7/18: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.17ug/L 3 pesticides]

29/1/19: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.57ug/L, Diuron 0.23ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 7.6ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 9.09ug/L 7 pesticides]

16/4/19: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.2ug/L, Metolachlor 0.49ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.17ug/L [Total 1.06ug/L 5 pesticides]

23/7/19: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.46ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.2ug/L, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Fluroxypyr 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 0.5ug/L, [Total 1.82ug/L 9 pesticides]

Condamine Condamine Weir

27/2/12: Ametryn 0.01ug/L, Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.01ug/L, Metolachlor 0.25ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.49ug/L, DEET 0.2ug/L [Total: 1.42ug/L  9 pesticides]

29/5/12: Nothing

26/4/13: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Imidacloprid 1.7ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L, DEET 0.5ug/L [Total 2.5ug/L 6 pesticides]

28/5/13: Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.05ug/L 2 pesticides]

29/10/13: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

22/4/14: Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.62ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 1ug/L 5 pesticides]

30/7/14: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.28ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.54ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/10/14: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.45ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/1/15: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.17ug/L [Total 0.53ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/4/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.3ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/7/15: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.36ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.65ug/L 5 pesticides]

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.39ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/1/16: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.27ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.49ug/L 5 pesticides]

27/4/16: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.11ug/L [Total 0.54ug/L pesticides 5]

26/7/16: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.4ug/L 5 pesticides].

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 1.46ug/L 5 pesticides]

24/1/17: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 1.38ug/L 5 pesticides]

3/5/17: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.38ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.76ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/7/17: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.27ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.1ug/L [Total 0.56ug/l 5 pesticides]

24/10/17: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/1/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.96ug/L [1.15ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/4/18: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.2ug/L 3 pesticides]

30/7/18: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.17ug/L 3 pesticides]

29/1/19: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.57ug/L, Diuron 0.23ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 7.6ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 9.09ug/L 7 pesticides]

16/4/19: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.2ug/L, Metolachlor 0.49ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.17ug/L [Total 1.06ug/L 5 pesticides]

23/7/19: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.46ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.2ug/L, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Fluroxypyr 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 0.5ug/L, [Total 1.82ug/L 9 pesticides]

2015/16: Charleys Creek, Chinchilla (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron

Charleys Creek, Chinchilla

21/1/15: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L [Total 0.47ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/10/16: Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.11ug/L [Total 0.19ug/L 2 pesticides]

Charleys Creek, Chinchilla

21/1/15: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.19ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L [Total 0.47ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/10/16: Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.11ug/L [Total 0.19ug/L 2 pesticides]

2012-2017 – Condamine River, Chinchilla. Pesticides: Multiple

Chinchilla Condamine River

17/4/12: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L  [Total: 0.11ug/L  3 pesticides]

25/7/12: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.25ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.34ug/L [Total: 0.91ug/L 8 pesticides]

18/10/12: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.18ug/L. [Total 0.4ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/2/13: Atrazine 0.58ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.87ug/L [Total 1.62ug/L 5 pesticides]

2/4/13: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L

31/7/13: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.3ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/10/13: Atrazine 0.43ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Simazine 0.25ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.5ug/L [Total 1.34ug/L 7 pesticides]

29/1/14: Atrazine 0.37ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.19ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.3ug/L [Total 0.89ug/L 6 pesticides]

30/4/14: Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 1.87ug/L 6 pesticides]

22/7/14: Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.66ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 1.2ug/L 6 pesticides]

28/10/14: Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.32ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.63ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/1/15: Atrazine 0.24ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.25ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.64ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/4/15: Atrazine 0.62ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 2.37ug/L 6 pesticides]

22/7/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.28ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L pesticides 5]

26/7/17: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.15ug/L, Metolachlor 0.5ug/L [Total 0.44ug/L 4 pesticides]

Chinchilla Condamine River

17/4/12: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L  [Total: 0.11ug/L  3 pesticides]

25/7/12: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.25ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L, Simazine 0.34ug/L [Total: 0.91ug/L 8 pesticides]

18/10/12: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.18ug/L. [Total 0.4ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/2/13: Atrazine 0.58ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.87ug/L [Total 1.62ug/L 5 pesticides]

2/4/13: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L

31/7/13: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.3ug/L [Total 0.41ug/L 4 pesticides]

29/10/13: Atrazine 0.43ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Simazine 0.25ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.5ug/L [Total 1.34ug/L 7 pesticides]

29/1/14: Atrazine 0.37ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Simazine 0.19ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.3ug/L [Total 0.89ug/L 6 pesticides]

30/4/14: Atrazine 0.35ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 1.87ug/L 6 pesticides]

22/7/14: Atrazine 0.29ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.66ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 1.2ug/L 6 pesticides]

28/10/14: Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.32ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.63ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/1/15: Atrazine 0.24ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.25ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.64ug/L 5 pesticides]

21/4/15: Atrazine 0.62ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.23ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 2.37ug/L 6 pesticides]

22/7/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.28ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L pesticides 5]

26/7/17: Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.15ug/L, Metolachlor 0.5ug/L [Total 0.44ug/L 4 pesticides]

2012-2019: Bell (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide

Bell Queensland

Koondaii Dam, Bell

23/4/12: Nothing

24/7/12: Atrazine 0.02ug/L [Total: 0.02ug/L 1 pesticide]

16/10/12: Atrazine 0.02ug/L [Total 0.02ug/L 1 pesticide]

19/3/13: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.23ug/L, Tebuthiruon 0.03ug/L [Total: 0.5ug/L 4 pesticides]

15/4/13: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.18ug/L, [Total 0.38ug/L 3 pesticides]

31/7/13: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 3 pesticides]

23/10/13: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/1/14: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.22ug/L 3 pesticides]

30/4/14: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.19ug/L 3 pesticides]

23/7/14: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.07ug/L 2 pesticides]

22/10/14: Ametryn 0.02ug/L, Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.1ug/L 3 pesticides]

14/1/19: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachor 0.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.4ug/L [Total 0.7ug/L 3 pesticides]

Bell Bore

15/4/13: Nothing

23/10/13: Nothing

22/10/14: Nothing

20/10/15: Nothing

27/4/16: Nothing

13/7/16: Nothing

5/10/16: Nothing

17/10/17: Nothing

Bell WTP

15/4/13: Nothing

23/10/13: Nothing

22/10/14: Nothing

20/10/15: Nothing

27/4/16: Nothing

5/10/16: Nothing

17/10/17: Nothing

Bell Racecourse Bore

15/4/15: Nothing

16/10/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 7.2ug/L

Bell - Warmga Bore

21/2/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L

16/10/18:  N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.1ug/L

Bell - Cattle Creek Bore

21/2/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.9ug/L

Bell – Koondaii Bore 1

21/2/18:  N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.9ug/L

Bell – Koondaii Bore 2

21/2/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 15ug/L

Bell Queensland

Koondaii Dam, Bell

23/4/12: Nothing

24/7/12: Atrazine 0.02ug/L [Total: 0.02ug/L 1 pesticide]

16/10/12: Atrazine 0.02ug/L [Total 0.02ug/L 1 pesticide]

19/3/13: Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.23ug/L, Tebuthiruon 0.03ug/L [Total: 0.5ug/L 4 pesticides]

15/4/13: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.18ug/L, [Total 0.38ug/L 3 pesticides]

31/7/13: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 3 pesticides]

23/10/13: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/1/14: Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.22ug/L 3 pesticides]

30/4/14: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.19ug/L 3 pesticides]

23/7/14: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.07ug/L 2 pesticides]

22/10/14: Ametryn 0.02ug/L, Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.1ug/L 3 pesticides]

14/1/19: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachor 0.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.4ug/L [Total 0.7ug/L 3 pesticides]

Bell Bore

15/4/13: Nothing

23/10/13: Nothing

22/10/14: Nothing

20/10/15: Nothing

27/4/16: Nothing

13/7/16: Nothing

5/10/16: Nothing

17/10/17: Nothing

Bell WTP

15/4/13: Nothing

23/10/13: Nothing

22/10/14: Nothing

20/10/15: Nothing

27/4/16: Nothing

5/10/16: Nothing

17/10/17: Nothing

Bell Racecourse Bore

15/4/15: Nothing

16/10/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 7.2ug/L

Bell – Warmga Bore

21/2/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L

16/10/18:  N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.1ug/L

Bell – Cattle Creek Bore

21/2/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.9ug/L

Bell – Koondaii Bore 1

21/2/18:  N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 4.9ug/L

Bell – Koondaii Bore 2

21/2/18: N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 15ug/L

2019 December: Spray Drift Fine (Bellata, NSW)

Bellata farmer fined for pesticide spray drift

https://www.northerndailyleader.com.au/story/6552591/environmental-watchdog-fines-farmer-for-pesticide-drift/

Dec 19 2019

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has reminded farmers not to damage neighbouring crops or the environment while spraying pesticides after the Belatta incident

EPA regional director Adam Gilligan said spraying crops in the wrong conditions could cause damage to other crops on nearby farms.

The fine followed complaints from another farmer about a neighbour applying pesticides using a spray boom in windy conditions on September 10.

The farmer reported the spray crossed onto his property, impacting a native vegetation corridor.

The EPA's investigation found the pesticide in the native vegetation corridor over 50 metres away and that while the spraying was taking place, the wind conditions were gusty and variable and at times blowing toward the vegetation corridor.

"Safe pesticide use relies on users spraying in appropriate weather conditions and following the label instructions," Mr Gilligan said.

"The proper use of pesticides helps to ensure the safety of the operators, the environment and the local community."

Mr Gilligan said the $750 fine was a reminder of the importance of being a good neighbour when applying or using pesticides.

Penalty notices are one of several tools the EPA can use to achieve environmental compliance.

If you are concerned about illegal pesticide use, or you have knowledge of an incident, please call the 24/7 Environment Line on 131 555.

Bellata farmer fined for pesticide spray drift

https://www.northerndailyleader.com.au/story/6552591/environmental-watchdog-fines-farmer-for-pesticide-drift/

Dec 19 2019

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has reminded farmers not to damage neighbouring crops or the environment while spraying pesticides after the Belatta incident

EPA regional director Adam Gilligan said spraying crops in the wrong conditions could cause damage to other crops on nearby farms.

The fine followed complaints from another farmer about a neighbour applying pesticides using a spray boom in windy conditions on September 10.

The farmer reported the spray crossed onto his property, impacting a native vegetation corridor.

The EPA’s investigation found the pesticide in the native vegetation corridor over 50 metres away and that while the spraying was taking place, the wind conditions were gusty and variable and at times blowing toward the vegetation corridor.

“Safe pesticide use relies on users spraying in appropriate weather conditions and following the label instructions,” Mr Gilligan said.

“The proper use of pesticides helps to ensure the safety of the operators, the environment and the local community.”

Mr Gilligan said the $750 fine was a reminder of the importance of being a good neighbour when applying or using pesticides.

Penalty notices are one of several tools the EPA can use to achieve environmental compliance.

If you are concerned about illegal pesticide use, or you have knowledge of an incident, please call the 24/7 Environment Line on 131 555.

2018/21 – Hearnes Lake, Coffs Harbour (New South Wales) – Chlorpyrifos

Community discusses pesticide risk in Hearnes Lake catchment

 
https://www.newsofthearea.com.au/community-discusses-pesticide-risk-in-hearnes-lake-catchment
 

MAXINE Rowley from the Sandy Beach Action Group Inc (SANDBAG) presented the main outcomes of a study conducted throughout 2021 which was undertaken by members of the local Sandy Beach community who have ongoing concerns about the health of Hearnes Lake catchment.

The study explored the type and extent of agricultural chemical contamination in tributaries feeding into Hearnes Lake during rain events.

With the report released late last year, Ms Rowley, an environmental scientist, presented the facts and figures to interested individuals on Thursday 23 February at the Woolgoolga Community Gardens, with the meeting facilitated by Sarah Maclagan.

“The next step is the implementation of methods such as on-farm water recycling systems, designed to prevent contaminated water from reaching the waterways,” Ms Rowley told News Of The Area.

“After this the restoration of a clean and healthy Hearnes Lake can begin.”

For the study a community-based sampling methodology was produced and implemented by local residents, and water samples were collected during rainfall-induced flows at five sites in the catchment, three times throughout the year.

The study found twelve different pesticides in the Hearnes Lake catchment waterways over three sampling events.

“Most are highly toxic to a variety of aquatic organisms, and some are highly toxic to humans and other mammals,” Ms Rowley said.

“Two are suspected of causing cancer.

“Seven are listed as most dangerous by the National Toxics Network.

“Six are under review or proposed to be reviewed by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority.

“Eight are banned by the European Union, and one has been illegal in Australia since 2006,” she said.

The SANDBAG report states that the most obvious and alarming pattern was the repeated detection of multiple (at least six) pesticides at one site.

“It took just an estimated 20mm of rainfall to induce runoff at this site, and over the year of the study alone, adequate rainfall to produce this pesticide laden runoff occurred eighteen times.”

Aerial photos show significant agricultural development upstream of this site, most of which has been identified as blueberry farms.

The land slopes steeply and there appears to be minimal vegetation around the creeks.

The report suggests it is possible that this type of landscape is not suitable for intensive agricultural practices.

The pesticide Imidacloprid was repeatedly detected indicating widespread and possibly frequent contamination of the waterways.

Residues of this insecticide above safe limits have previously been found in prawn flesh and in the water of Hearnes.

It is known to have damaging impacts on prawns and oysters even at low concentrations.

“The pattern of detections indicates the main source of Imidacloprid may have been discharges from hothouses (tunnels) growing cucumbers or tomatoes.

“Current accepted methods for management of this chemical appear inadequate to prevent continued pollution to downstream environments,” noted Ms Rowley.

The most significant damaging effects of these pesticides, the study suggests, are likely to be on the aquatic life that provides a vital food source for this ecosystem.

The report states that this will reduce the health of Hearnes Lake, which is a part of the Solitary Islands Marine Park (SIMP), and threatens to impact on Flat Top Point, the site of the most biodiverse Rocky Shore habitat in the SIMP.

Pesticide pollution of Hearnes Lake also presents a potential Public Health risk to people who use the lake for swimming, fishing and boating, and to anyone eating seafood sourced from the lake.

One local researcher was recently quoted as stating, “Hearnes Lake isn’t dead but it’s nearly dead.”

The researchers say in the report that significant loads of pollution entering Hearnes Lake waterways is damning evidence of a failure of will or capacity by the responsible authorities, and the relevant agricultural industries, to act decisively to protect this section of the SIMP and its irreplaceable environmental and community values.

This paper was prepared on behalf of Sandy Beach Action Group Inc. (SANDBAG) for the City of Coffs Harbour.

This project was funded via the Coffs Harbour City Council’s Environmental Levy program.

To access the final report, scroll down to ‘Identifying pesticides in Hearnes Lake catchment waterways’ at https://www.coffsharbour.nsw.gov.au/Environment/Compliance-and-reporting/Monitoring-our-waterways.

Pesticide use at Hearnes Lake non-compliant

September 5 2019

An investigation into a fish kill at Hearnes Lake, north of Coffs Harbour, has found 25 instances of alleged non-compliance with pesticide use.

Investigations were carried out by the EPA, following the fish kill in March last year, but found no evidence to directly link the alleged non-compliances with the dead fish.

The EPA says they were unable to identify the cause or sources of the high levels of chlorpyrifos found in the fish samples – however the pesticide is used in horticulture and for residential termite treatments – both of which occur in the area.

https://coffscoastoutlook.com.au/pesticide-use-at-hearnes-lake-non-compliant/

Community discusses pesticide risk in Hearnes Lake catchment

https://www.newsofthearea.com.au/community-discusses-pesticide-risk-in-hearnes-lake-catchment

MAXINE Rowley from the Sandy Beach Action Group Inc (SANDBAG) presented the main outcomes of a study conducted throughout 2021 which was undertaken by members of the local Sandy Beach community who have ongoing concerns about the health of Hearnes Lake catchment.

The study explored the type and extent of agricultural chemical contamination in tributaries feeding into Hearnes Lake during rain events.

With the report released late last year, Ms Rowley, an environmental scientist, presented the facts and figures to interested individuals on Thursday 23 February at the Woolgoolga Community Gardens, with the meeting facilitated by Sarah Maclagan.

“The next step is the implementation of methods such as on-farm water recycling systems, designed to prevent contaminated water from reaching the waterways,” Ms Rowley told News Of The Area.

“After this the restoration of a clean and healthy Hearnes Lake can begin.”

For the study a community-based sampling methodology was produced and implemented by local residents, and water samples were collected during rainfall-induced flows at five sites in the catchment, three times throughout the year.

The study found twelve different pesticides in the Hearnes Lake catchment waterways over three sampling events.

“Most are highly toxic to a variety of aquatic organisms, and some are highly toxic to humans and other mammals,” Ms Rowley said.

“Two are suspected of causing cancer.

“Seven are listed as most dangerous by the National Toxics Network.

“Six are under review or proposed to be reviewed by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority.

“Eight are banned by the European Union, and one has been illegal in Australia since 2006,” she said.

The SANDBAG report states that the most obvious and alarming pattern was the repeated detection of multiple (at least six) pesticides at one site.

“It took just an estimated 20mm of rainfall to induce runoff at this site, and over the year of the study alone, adequate rainfall to produce this pesticide laden runoff occurred eighteen times.”

Aerial photos show significant agricultural development upstream of this site, most of which has been identified as blueberry farms.

The land slopes steeply and there appears to be minimal vegetation around the creeks.

The report suggests it is possible that this type of landscape is not suitable for intensive agricultural practices.

The pesticide Imidacloprid was repeatedly detected indicating widespread and possibly frequent contamination of the waterways.

Residues of this insecticide above safe limits have previously been found in prawn flesh and in the water of Hearnes.

It is known to have damaging impacts on prawns and oysters even at low concentrations.

“The pattern of detections indicates the main source of Imidacloprid may have been discharges from hothouses (tunnels) growing cucumbers or tomatoes.

“Current accepted methods for management of this chemical appear inadequate to prevent continued pollution to downstream environments,” noted Ms Rowley.

The most significant damaging effects of these pesticides, the study suggests, are likely to be on the aquatic life that provides a vital food source for this ecosystem.

The report states that this will reduce the health of Hearnes Lake, which is a part of the Solitary Islands Marine Park (SIMP), and threatens to impact on Flat Top Point, the site of the most biodiverse Rocky Shore habitat in the SIMP.

Pesticide pollution of Hearnes Lake also presents a potential Public Health risk to people who use the lake for swimming, fishing and boating, and to anyone eating seafood sourced from the lake.

One local researcher was recently quoted as stating, “Hearnes Lake isn’t dead but it’s nearly dead.”

The researchers say in the report that significant loads of pollution entering Hearnes Lake waterways is damning evidence of a failure of will or capacity by the responsible authorities, and the relevant agricultural industries, to act decisively to protect this section of the SIMP and its irreplaceable environmental and community values.

This paper was prepared on behalf of Sandy Beach Action Group Inc. (SANDBAG) for the City of Coffs Harbour.

This project was funded via the Coffs Harbour City Council’s Environmental Levy program.

To access the final report, scroll down to ‘Identifying pesticides in Hearnes Lake catchment waterways’ at https://www.coffsharbour.nsw.gov.au/Environment/Compliance-and-reporting/Monitoring-our-waterways.

Pesticide use at Hearnes Lake non-compliant

September 5 2019

An investigation into a fish kill at Hearnes Lake, north of Coffs Harbour, has found 25 instances of alleged non-compliance with pesticide use.

Investigations were carried out by the EPA, following the fish kill in March last year, but found no evidence to directly link the alleged non-compliances with the dead fish.

The EPA says they were unable to identify the cause or sources of the high levels of chlorpyrifos found in the fish samples – however the pesticide is used in horticulture and for residential termite treatments – both of which occur in the area.

https://coffscoastoutlook.com.au/pesticide-use-at-hearnes-lake-non-compliant/

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland)

Biloela Bore Water

Chlordene-1-hydroxy (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?):  4.1ug/L (max), 0.66ug/L (av.)

Chlordene-1-hydroxy epoxide (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?): 0.4ug/L (max), 0.22ug/L (av.)

Dicofol: 3.2ug/L (max), 2.98ug/L (av.)

Endosulfan (Total): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole S-Methyl (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1ug/L (max), 0.47ug/L (av.)

Moclobemide (anti depressant drug): 2.1ug/L (max), 1.98ug/L (av.)

Oxadiazon: 0.4ug/L (max), 0.21ug/L (av.)

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland)

Biloela Raw Dam

Chlordene-1-hydroxy (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?):  1.9ug/L (max), 1.05ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole S-Methyl: 1.9ug/L (max), 1.15ug/L (av.)

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland)

Biloela Potable

Chlordene-1-hydroxy (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?):  1.9ug/L (max), 0.54ug/L (av.)

Dicofol: 3.2ug/L (max), 2.98ug/L (av.)

Endosulfan (Total): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole S-Methyl (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1.9ug/L (max), 0.7ug/L (av.)

Moclobemide (anti depressant drug): 2.1ug/L (max), 1.98ug/L (av.)

Oxadiazon: 0.4ug/L (max), 0.24ug/L (av.)

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland)

Biloela Bore Water

Chlordene-1-hydroxy (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?):  4.1ug/L (max), 0.66ug/L (av.)

Chlordene-1-hydroxy epoxide (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?): 0.4ug/L (max), 0.22ug/L (av.)

Dicofol: 3.2ug/L (max), 2.98ug/L (av.)

Endosulfan (Total): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole S-Methyl (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1ug/L (max), 0.47ug/L (av.)

Moclobemide (anti depressant drug): 2.1ug/L (max), 1.98ug/L (av.)

Oxadiazon: 0.4ug/L (max), 0.21ug/L (av.)

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland)

Biloela Raw Dam

Chlordene-1-hydroxy (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?):  1.9ug/L (max), 1.05ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole S-Methyl: 1.9ug/L (max), 1.15ug/L (av.)

2017/18: Biloela (Queensland)

Biloela Potable

Chlordene-1-hydroxy (metabolite of Chlordane or Heptachlor?):  1.9ug/L (max), 0.54ug/L (av.)

Dicofol: 3.2ug/L (max), 2.98ug/L (av.)

Endosulfan (Total): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1.5ug/L (max), 1.41ug/L (av.)

1-H-Benzotriazole S-Methyl (anti-corrosive/aircraft de-icer/pesticide precursor): 1.9ug/L (max), 0.7ug/L (av.)

Moclobemide (anti depressant drug): 2.1ug/L (max), 1.98ug/L (av.)

Oxadiazon: 0.4ug/L (max), 0.24ug/L (av.)

 

2017/19: Coffs Harbour Local Government Area (New South Wales). Pesticides: Diuron, Carbendazim, Boscalid, Propiconazole, Terbutryn, Metolachlor

Assessment of Drinking Water Tanks in Close Proximity to Intensive Plant Agriculture in the Coffs Harbour Local Government Area 2017-2019

Coffs Harbour City Council

Rainwater Tank 001: Distance from Maize 40m, Blueberries 111m, Macadamias 570m. Metolachlor 0.03ug/L (13/11/17) and 0.04ug/L (4/12/17).

Rainwater Tank 005: Distance from Blueberries 25m. Terbutryn 0.19ug/L (22/1/19).

Rainwater Tank 011: Distance from Blueberries 225m. Propiconazole 0.04ug/L (3/6/19).

Rainwater Tank 012: Distance from Blueberries 170m. Boscalid 0.03ug/L (12/9/18).

Rainwater Tank 017: Distance from Berries  and Bananas 40m. Diuron 0.14ug/L (26/2/19), Diuron 0.12ug/L (5/6/19).

Rainwater Tank 020: Distance from Berries  and Bananas 110m. Carbendazim 0.25ug/L (26/2/19), Diuron 2.88ug/L (26/2/19), Diuron 2.6ug/L (3/6/19), Diuron 1.24ug/L (25/6/19)

Assessment of Drinking Water Tanks in Close Proximity to Intensive Plant Agriculture in the Coffs Harbour Local Government Area 2017-2019

Coffs Harbour City Council

Rainwater Tank 001: Distance from Maize 40m, Blueberries 111m, Macadamias 570m. Metolachlor 0.03ug/L (13/11/17) and 0.04ug/L (4/12/17).

Rainwater Tank 005: Distance from Blueberries 25m. Terbutryn 0.19ug/L (22/1/19).

Rainwater Tank 011: Distance from Blueberries 225m. Propiconazole 0.04ug/L (3/6/19).

Rainwater Tank 012: Distance from Blueberries 170m. Boscalid 0.03ug/L (12/9/18).

Rainwater Tank 017: Distance from Berries  and Bananas 40m. Diuron 0.14ug/L (26/2/19), Diuron 0.12ug/L (5/6/19).

Rainwater Tank 020: Distance from Berries  and Bananas 110m. Carbendazim 0.25ug/L (26/2/19), Diuron 2.88ug/L (26/2/19), Diuron 2.6ug/L (3/6/19), Diuron 1.24ug/L (25/6/19)

 

2018/19 – Barmah (Victoria) – DBCP (1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane)

2018/19 - Barmah Victoria (Pesticide - Soil Fumigant, Nematocide)

"Single detection of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane in the raw water. At the time of the detection powdered activated carbon was operational in the treatment plant. The risk of WTP breakthrough was low, and all subsequent samples were below the limit of reporting. DBCP Is not listed in the ADWG but the WHO standard was used instead."  https://www.gvwater.vic.gov.au/Portals/0/GV-Water/Documents/Reports/Water%20Quality%20Annual%20Report%20201819%20Goulburn%20Valley%20Water%20-%20Final%20PDF.pdf?ver=2019-10-30-085222-843

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) was used in the past as a soil fumigant and nematocide on crops; it is no longer used except as an intermediate in chemical synthesis. Acute (short-term) exposure to DBCP in humans results in moderate depression of the central nervous system (CNS) and pulmonary congestion from inhalation, and gastrointestinal distress and pulmonary edema from oral exposure. Chronic (long-term) exposure to DBCP in humans causes male reproductive effects, such as decreased sperm counts. Testicular effects and decreased sperm counts were observed in animals chronically exposed to DBCP by inhalation. Available human data on DBCP and cancer are inadequate. High incidences of tumors of the nasal tract, tongue, adrenal cortex, and lungs of rodents were reported in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) inhalation study. EPA has classified DBCP as a Group B2, probable human carcinogen.

2018/19 – Barmah Victoria (Pesticide – Soil Fumigant, Nematocide)

“Single detection of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane in the raw water. At the time of the detection powdered activated carbon was operational in the treatment plant. The risk of WTP breakthrough was low, and all subsequent samples were below the limit of reporting. DBCP Is not listed in the ADWG but the WHO standard was used instead.”  https://www.gvwater.vic.gov.au/Portals/0/GV-Water/Documents/Reports/Water%20Quality%20Annual%20Report%20201819%20Goulburn%20Valley%20Water%20-%20Final%20PDF.pdf?ver=2019-10-30-085222-843

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) was used in the past as a soil fumigant and nematocide on crops; it is no longer used except as an intermediate in chemical synthesis. Acute (short-term) exposure to DBCP in humans results in moderate depression of the central nervous system (CNS) and pulmonary congestion from inhalation, and gastrointestinal distress and pulmonary edema from oral exposure. Chronic (long-term) exposure to DBCP in humans causes male reproductive effects, such as decreased sperm counts. Testicular effects and decreased sperm counts were observed in animals chronically exposed to DBCP by inhalation. Available human data on DBCP and cancer are inadequate. High incidences of tumors of the nasal tract, tongue, adrenal cortex, and lungs of rodents were reported in a National Toxicology Program (NTP) inhalation study. EPA has classified DBCP as a Group B2, probable human carcinogen.

2018/19: Goulburn River, Alexandra (Victoria) – Glyphosate

2018/19: Goulburn River, Alexandra (Victoria) - Glyphosate

All the pesticides tested in the source water were reported by the NATA laboratory at values below the level of reporting with the exception of a single detection of glyphosate below the health limit in the source water at Alexandra. A subsequent resample was below the limit of reporting.

https://www.gvwater.vic.gov.au/Portals/0/GV-Water/Documents/Reports/Water%20Quality%20Annual%20Report%20201819%20Goulburn%20Valley%20Water%20-%20Final%20PDF.pdf?ver=2019-10-30-085222-843

2018/19: Goulburn River, Alexandra (Victoria) – Glyphosate

All the pesticides tested in the source water were reported by the NATA laboratory at values below the level of reporting with the exception of a single detection of glyphosate below the health limit in the source water at Alexandra. A subsequent resample was below the limit of reporting.

https://www.gvwater.vic.gov.au/Portals/0/GV-Water/Documents/Reports/Water%20Quality%20Annual%20Report%20201819%20Goulburn%20Valley%20Water%20-%20Final%20PDF.pdf?ver=2019-10-30-085222-843

2013/22: Nebo Road Water Treatment Plant (Mackay, Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Dinoseb, Diuron, Hexazinone, Metolachlor

Australian Record for Diuron in drinking water

Date of Non-Compliance: February & March 2013

Date of Notification: 5 November 2013

Scheme: Mackay - Nebo Rd Treated Water - Diuron and Atrazine (pesticides)

390 μg/L & 350 μg/L. These levels are 19.5 and 17.5 times over guidelines levels.

Guideline levels for both pesticides are 20 μg/L.

Routine monitoring of drinking water detected Diuron and Atrazine in the treated water at Nebo Rd WTP at elevated levels which exceed the ADWG 2011 Health guideline value of 20 μg/L and 20 μg/L respectively. High levels of chemicals were also detected in the sample of the incoming raw water to the WTP collected on the same day as the treated water. Analysis of rainfall data for Mackay indicates that prior to the detections a significant rainfall event occurred which is likely to have washed sediments and chemicals into the Pioneer River which is the raw water source for Nebo Rd WTP.

A failure of the mass spectrometer at the Mackay Water and Waste Services Scientific and Analytical Services Laboratory (SAS) resulted in samples collected from August 2012 to April 2013 to not be analysed by SAS and instead sent to QLD Health laboratory for analysis. This resulted in a delay in obtaining results and analysing the results to identify non-compliances.

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013-14

Nebo Road Water Treatment Plant (Raw Water)

November 2017: Atrazine 0.2468ug/L

December 2017: Atrazine 0.8155ug/L, Diuron 0.6916ug/L

January 2018: Atrazine 0.394ug/L, Diuron 0.6148ug/L, Hexazinone 0.2612ug/L

February 2018: Atrazine 0.0755ug/L, Diuron 0.4473ug/L

March 2018: Atrazine 0.3342ug/L, Diuron 0.7559ug/L, Hexazinone 0.4089ug/L

April 2018: Atrazine 0.2038ug/L, Diuron 0.4794ug/L

May 2018: Dinoseb 0.001ug/L

2019/20: Atrazine 0.16ug/L (mean?), Diuron 0.08ug/L (mean?), Hexazinone 0.25ug/L (mean?) (all totals are listed in the mean column, with min and max columns stating <0.0001ug/L)

2020/21: Atrazine 0.16ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (mean)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.24ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (mean)

2020/21: Metolachlor 0.14ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (mean)

Nov 2021: Atrazine <0.0001ug/L – 0.6935ug/L, Diuron <0.0001-0.714ug/L

Dec 2021: Atrazine 0.4083-2.5967ug/L, Diuron 0.5183-2.1498ug/L, Hexazinone <0.0001-0.9031ug/L

Jan 2022: Atrazine <0.0001-2.6078ug/L, Diuron 0.3262-1.8943ug/L

Feb 2022: Atrazine 0.1349ug/L

Nebo Road Water Treatment Plant

2015/16: Atrazine 3.33ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2015/16: Diuron 0.96ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2015/16: Hexazinone 0.41ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2015/16: Metolachlor 0.12ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2016/17: Atrazine 0.63ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min.) WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2016/17: Diuron 1.06ug/L (max), 0.09ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2016/17: Hexazinone 0.24ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min).WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

2016/17: Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary - Treated Water

Nov 2021: Atrazine <0.0001ug/L – 0.2606ug/L

Dec 2021: Atrazine <0.0001ug/L-0.7729ug/L

Jan 2022: Atrazine <0.0001-0.2832ug/L

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2021/22

Australian Record for Diuron in drinking water

Date of Non-Compliance: February & March 2013

Date of Notification: 5 November 2013

Scheme: Mackay – Nebo Rd Treated Water – Diuron and Atrazine (pesticides)

390 μg/L & 350 μg/L. These levels are 19.5 and 17.5 times over guidelines levels.

Guideline levels for both pesticides are 20 μg/L.

Routine monitoring of drinking water detected Diuron and Atrazine in the treated water at Nebo Rd WTP at elevated levels which exceed the ADWG 2011 Health guideline value of 20 μg/L and 20 μg/L respectively. High levels of chemicals were also detected in the sample of the incoming raw water to the WTP collected on the same day as the treated water. Analysis of rainfall data for Mackay indicates that prior to the detections a significant rainfall event occurred which is likely to have washed sediments and chemicals into the Pioneer River which is the raw water source for Nebo Rd WTP.

A failure of the mass spectrometer at the Mackay Water and Waste Services Scientific and Analytical Services Laboratory (SAS) resulted in samples collected from August 2012 to April 2013 to not be analysed by SAS and instead sent to QLD Health laboratory for analysis. This resulted in a delay in obtaining results and analysing the results to identify non-compliances.

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013-14

Nebo Road Water Treatment Plant (Raw Water)

November 2017: Atrazine 0.2468ug/L

December 2017: Atrazine 0.8155ug/L, Diuron 0.6916ug/L

January 2018: Atrazine 0.394ug/L, Diuron 0.6148ug/L, Hexazinone 0.2612ug/L

February 2018: Atrazine 0.0755ug/L, Diuron 0.4473ug/L

March 2018: Atrazine 0.3342ug/L, Diuron 0.7559ug/L, Hexazinone 0.4089ug/L

April 2018: Atrazine 0.2038ug/L, Diuron 0.4794ug/L

May 2018: Dinoseb 0.001ug/L

2019/20: Atrazine 0.16ug/L (mean?), Diuron 0.08ug/L (mean?), Hexazinone 0.25ug/L (mean?) (all totals are listed in the mean column, with min and max columns stating <0.0001ug/L)

2020/21: Atrazine 0.16ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (mean)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.24ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (mean)

2020/21: Metolachlor 0.14ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (mean)

Nov 2021: Atrazine <0.0001ug/L – 0.6935ug/L, Diuron <0.0001-0.714ug/L

Dec 2021: Atrazine 0.4083-2.5967ug/L, Diuron 0.5183-2.1498ug/L, Hexazinone <0.0001-0.9031ug/L

Jan 2022: Atrazine <0.0001-2.6078ug/L, Diuron 0.3262-1.8943ug/L

Feb 2022: Atrazine 0.1349ug/L

Nebo Road Water Treatment Plant

2015/16: Atrazine 3.33ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2015/16: Diuron 0.96ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2015/16: Hexazinone 0.41ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2015/16: Metolachlor 0.12ug/L (max), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2016/17: Atrazine 0.63ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min.) WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2016/17: Diuron 1.06ug/L (max), 0.09ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2016/17: Hexazinone 0.24ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min).WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

2016/17: Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.0001ug/L (min). WTP Final Water Quality Data Summary – Treated Water

Nov 2021: Atrazine <0.0001ug/L – 0.2606ug/L

Dec 2021: Atrazine <0.0001ug/L-0.7729ug/L

Jan 2022: Atrazine <0.0001-0.2832ug/L

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2021/22

2017/22: Marian Water Treatment Plant (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Dinoseb, Diuron, Hexazinone, Metolachlor

Marian Water Treatment Plant (Raw Water)

November 2017: Atrazine 0.4478ug/L, Diuron 0.5744ug/L, Hexazinone 0.1073ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1248ug/L

December 2017: Atrazine 0.8298ug/L, Diuron 1.4509ug/L

January 2018: Atrazine 0.4404ug/L, Diuron 0.3382ug/L

February 2018: Atrazine 1.1076ug/L, Diuron 1.5455ug/L, Hexazinone 0.4357ug/L

March 2018: Atrazine 0.1891ug/L, Diuron 0.8048ug/L, Hexazinone 0.4098ug/L

April 2018: Diuron 0.1434ug/L

May 2018: Dinoseb 0.001ug/L

Jan 2020: Atrazine 0.1688ug/L, Diuron 0.6946ug/L, 0.2664ug/L (raw water)

Feb 2020: Atrazine 0.5803ug/L, Diuron 0.8689ug/L, 0.3430ug/L (raw water)

Jan 2022: Atrazine 0.3579-0.5685ug/L, Diuron <0.0001-0.2038ug/L

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2017-18 + 2021/22

Marian Water Treatment Plant (Final Water Quality Data Summary - WTP Treated

2015/16: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Atrazine <0.0001ug/L

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2015/16

Marian Water Treatment Plant (Raw Water)

November 2017: Atrazine 0.4478ug/L, Diuron 0.5744ug/L, Hexazinone 0.1073ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1248ug/L

December 2017: Atrazine 0.8298ug/L, Diuron 1.4509ug/L

January 2018: Atrazine 0.4404ug/L, Diuron 0.3382ug/L

February 2018: Atrazine 1.1076ug/L, Diuron 1.5455ug/L, Hexazinone 0.4357ug/L

March 2018: Atrazine 0.1891ug/L, Diuron 0.8048ug/L, Hexazinone 0.4098ug/L

April 2018: Diuron 0.1434ug/L

May 2018: Dinoseb 0.001ug/L

Jan 2020: Atrazine 0.1688ug/L, Diuron 0.6946ug/L, 0.2664ug/L (raw water)

Feb 2020: Atrazine 0.5803ug/L, Diuron 0.8689ug/L, 0.3430ug/L (raw water)

Jan 2022: Atrazine 0.3579-0.5685ug/L, Diuron <0.0001-0.2038ug/L

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2017-18 + 2021/22

Marian Water Treatment Plant (Final Water Quality Data Summary – WTP Treated

2015/16: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Atrazine <0.0001ug/L

Source: Mackay Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2015/16

2018: Surat Reticulation (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron

Surat (Queensland) Reticulated Drinking Water

9/5/18

Atrazine: 0.14ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine: 0.05ug/L

Diuron: 0.02ug/L

Metolachlor: 0.24ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 0.18ug/L

Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2017/18
Maranoa Regional Council

Surat (Queensland) Reticulated Drinking Water

9/5/18

Atrazine: 0.14ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine: 0.05ug/L

Diuron: 0.02ug/L

Metolachlor: 0.24ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 0.18ug/L

Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2017/18
Maranoa Regional Council

2015: Terrace Hill, Waterstone Hill (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Myclobutanil, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Terrace Way @ Waterstone Hill

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 330ug/kg, Myclobutanil 15.2ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Terrace Way @ Waterstone Hill

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 330ug/kg, Myclobutanil 15.2ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Eaststone Avenue, Wollert (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Edgars ck GGF wetland, ds Eaststone Ave, Wollert

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 34.4ug/kg, DEET 4ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 10.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Edgars ck GGF wetland, ds Eaststone Ave, Wollert

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 34.4ug/kg, DEET 4ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 10.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Rix Rd, Officer (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Rix Rd GGF wetland pond, Cyan Cr; Officer

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 5.6ug/kg, DEET 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Rix Rd GGF wetland pond, Cyan Cr; Officer

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 5.6ug/kg, DEET 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Flanagan Avenue, Officer (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Iprodione

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Gum scrub ck (lwr) GGF pond 1, Flanagan Ave; Officer

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 2ug/kg, DEET 8.8ug/kg, Iprodione 84.5ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Gum scrub ck (lwr) GGF pond 1, Flanagan Ave; Officer

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 2ug/kg, DEET 8.8ug/kg, Iprodione 84.5ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Edgars Road, Epping (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Melbourne Wholesale Market GGF pond, near Edgars Rd, Epping

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin Trace, DEET 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Melbourne Wholesale Market GGF pond, near Edgars Rd, Epping

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin Trace, DEET 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Rippleside Terrace, Tarneit (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Dimethoate, Prometryn, Simazine

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Sayers Drain wetland; cnr Rippleside Terrace and Mirror Ave, Tarneit

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 4ug/kg, DEET 11ug/kg, Dimethoate 69.1ug/kg, Prometryn 26ug/kg, Simazine 14ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent, Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Sayers Drain wetland; cnr Rippleside Terrace and Mirror Ave, Tarneit

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 4ug/kg, DEET 11ug/kg, Dimethoate 69.1ug/kg, Prometryn 26ug/kg, Simazine 14ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Riversdale Drive, Hoppers Crossing (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Riversdale Drive opp Lindrum Outlook at Hoppers Crossing

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 3ug/kg, DEET 11ug/kg, Prometryn 28ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Riversdale Drive opp Lindrum Outlook at Hoppers Crossing

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 3ug/kg, DEET 11ug/kg, Prometryn 28ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Woodlands Industrial Estate, Braeside (Victoria). Pesticide: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Woodlands Industrial Estate; Braeside

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 17.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Woodlands Industrial Estate; Braeside

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 17.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Winter Way, Point Cook (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Permethrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Winter Way; Point Cook

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 41.9ug/kg, DEET 9.6ug/kg, Diuron 32ug/kg, Permethrin 13.85ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Winter Way; Point Cook

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 41.9ug/kg, DEET 9.6ug/kg, Diuron 32ug/kg, Permethrin 13.85ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Watervale Boulevard, Taylors Hill (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Watervale Blvd; Taylors Hill

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 22.4ug/kg, DEET 3.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Watervale Blvd; Taylors Hill

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 22.4ug/kg, DEET 3.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Watergardens Shopping Centre, Taylors Lakes (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Watergardens Shopping Centre, Taylors Lakes

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 24.8ug/kg, DEET 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Watergardens Shopping Centre, Taylors Lakes

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 24.8ug/kg, DEET 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Valda Avenue, Mont Albert North (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Valda Ave, Mont Albert North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 18.7ug/kg, DEET 9.9ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Valda Ave, Mont Albert North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 18.7ug/kg, DEET 9.9ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: St Muirs Drive, Warrandyte (Victoria). Pesticides: Multiple

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

St Muirs Drive, Warrandyte

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 171ug/kg, Chlorpyrifos 25.2ug/kg, DEET 3ug/kg, Diuron 56ug/kg, Permethrin 38ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 16.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

St Muirs Drive, Warrandyte

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 171ug/kg, Chlorpyrifos 25.2ug/kg, DEET 3ug/kg, Diuron 56ug/kg, Permethrin 38ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 16.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Old Joes Creek, Bayswater North (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Old Joes Creek Rb, Bayswater North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 70.4ug/kg, Diuron 11ug/kg, Permethrin 38ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 12ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Old Joes Creek Rb, Bayswater North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 70.4ug/kg, Diuron 11ug/kg, Permethrin 38ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 12ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Brushy Creek Trail Wetlands, Chirnside Park (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Brushy Creek Trail Wetlands at Ramset Drive, Chirnside Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 22.3ug/kg, DEET 8.8ug/kg, Diuron 103ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Brushy Creek Trail Wetlands at Ramset Drive, Chirnside Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 22.3ug/kg, DEET 8.8ug/kg, Diuron 103ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Victor Crescent, Narre Warren (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Narre Warren Township Rb at Victor Cres, Narre Warren

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 19.2ug/kg, Diuron 7ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Narre Warren Township Rb at Victor Cres, Narre Warren

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 19.2ug/kg, Diuron 7ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Lysterfield West, Lysterfield (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Permethrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lysterfield West Rb, Lysterfield

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 132ug/kg, DEET 10ug/kg, Diuron 53ug/kg, Permethrin 13.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lysterfield West Rb, Lysterfield

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 132ug/kg, DEET 10ug/kg, Diuron 53ug/kg, Permethrin 13.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Caroline Springs at Rockbank Middle Road (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Caroline Springs at Rockbank Middle Rd, Caroline Springs

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 14.4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Caroline Springs at Rockbank Middle Rd, Caroline Springs

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 14.4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: River Gum Creek Wetland, Hampton Park (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

River Gum Creek wetland, opp Drysdale Ct; Hampton Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 42.8ug/kg, DEET 4ug/kg, Diuron 26ug/kg, Prometryn 30.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

River Gum Creek wetland, opp Drysdale Ct; Hampton Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 42.8ug/kg, DEET 4ug/kg, Diuron 26ug/kg, Prometryn 30.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Hallam Road, Dandenong South (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Hallam Valley Rb (Aust Post), Dandenong South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23.2ug/kg, DEET 3.6ug/kg, Diuron 12ug/kg, Prometryn 28.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Hallam Valley Rb (Aust Post), Dandenong South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23.2ug/kg, DEET 3.6ug/kg, Diuron 12ug/kg, Prometryn 28.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Taylors Lakes at Watergardens (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Taylors Lakes at Watergardens

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 8.4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Taylors Lakes at Watergardens

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 8.4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Cascade Wetlands, Linsell Boulevard, Clyde North (Victoria). Pesticide: Bifenthrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Cascade wetlands, Linsell Boulevard at Clyde North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 7.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Cascade wetlands, Linsell Boulevard at Clyde North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 7.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Yarrunga Reserve, Croydon Hills (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Yarrunga Reserve, Croydon Hills

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 36ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Yarrunga Reserve, Croydon Hills

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 36ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Yarrabing Wetlands, Wantirna (Victoria). Pesticide: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Yarrabing Wetlands, Wantirna

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 20ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Yarrabing Wetlands, Wantirna

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 20ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Woodlands Park, Essendon (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Woodlands Park, Winifred St; Essendon

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23.5ug/kg, DEET 9.6ug/kg, Diuron 10ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Woodlands Park, Winifred St; Essendon

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23.5ug/kg, DEET 9.6ug/kg, Diuron 10ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Wattle Park, Burwood (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Wattle Park, Burwood

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 4.8ug/kg, DEET 4.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Wattle Park, Burwood

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 4.8ug/kg, DEET 4.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Village Green Reserve, Nayook Lane, Maribyrnong (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Permethrin, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Village Green Reserve, Nayook Lane, Maribyrnong

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 25ug/kg, DEET 13ug/kg, Diuron 141ug/kg, Permethrin 34ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 9.1ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Village Green Reserve, Nayook Lane, Maribyrnong

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 25ug/kg, DEET 13ug/kg, Diuron 141ug/kg, Permethrin 34ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 9.1ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Freshfields Drive, Cranbourne North (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Freshfields Drive; Cranbourne North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 6.4ug/kg, DEET 5.2ug/kg, Prometryn 34.7ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Freshfields Drive; Cranbourne North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 6.4ug/kg, DEET 5.2ug/kg, Prometryn 34.7ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: The Esplanade, Narre Warren South (Victoria), Pesticides: Multiple

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

The Esplanade, Narrewarren South; Narre Warren South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 20ug/kg, Boscalid 13.6ug/kg, DEET 8.8ug/kg, Diuron 9ug/kg, Fenamiphos 11ug/kg, Metolachlor 22.4ug/kg, Prometryn 24.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

The Esplanade, Narrewarren South; Narre Warren South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 20ug/kg, Boscalid 13.6ug/kg, DEET 8.8ug/kg, Diuron 9ug/kg, Fenamiphos 11ug/kg, Metolachlor 22.4ug/kg, Prometryn 24.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Equator Road, Thomastown (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

RB at end Equator Rd, Thomastown

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 5ug/kg, DEET 8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

RB at end Equator Rd, Thomastown

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 5ug/kg, DEET 8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Chocolate Lilly St at North Epping (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Chocolate Lilly St at North Epping

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 17ug/kg, DEET 25ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Chocolate Lilly St at North Epping

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 17ug/kg, DEET 25ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Settlers Orchard Greygum Terrace, Croydon Hills (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Settlers Orchard at end of Greygum Tce; Croydon Hills

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 71.6ug/kg, Diuron 116ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Settlers Orchard at end of Greygum Tce; Croydon Hills

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 71.6ug/kg, Diuron 116ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Rowville Lakes, Rowville (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Rowville Lakes - Hill Lake; Rowville

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 27.5ug/kg, Diuron 55.25ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 68ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Rowville Lakes – Hill Lake; Rowville

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 27.5ug/kg, Diuron 55.25ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 68ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Ringwood Lake, Ringwood (Victoria). Pesticides: Multiple

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Ringwood Lake, Ringwood

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 13ug/kg, DEET 15ug/kg, Diuron 91ug/kg, Permethrin 32.8ug/kg, Prometryn 27ug/kg, Simazine 14ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Ringwood Lake, Ringwood

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 13ug/kg, DEET 15ug/kg, Diuron 91ug/kg, Permethrin 32.8ug/kg, Prometryn 27ug/kg, Simazine 14ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: National Business Park, Link Drive, Campbellfield (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

National Business Park at Link Drive; Campbellfield

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 36.8ug/kg, Diuron 10ug/kg, Permethrin 930.5ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

National Business Park at Link Drive; Campbellfield

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 36.8ug/kg, Diuron 10ug/kg, Permethrin 930.5ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: St. Clair Boulevard, Roxborough Park (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Metolachlor

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

St Clair Blvd, Roxborough Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 29.7ug/kg, DEET 12.5ug/kg, Diuron 8ug/kg, Metolachlor  22.3ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

St Clair Blvd, Roxborough Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 29.7ug/kg, DEET 12.5ug/kg, Diuron 8ug/kg, Metolachlor  22.3ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Paroo Avenue, Roxborough Park (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Paroo Ave, Roxborough Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 74ug/kg, DEET 2.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Paroo Ave, Roxborough Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 74ug/kg, DEET 2.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Roxborough Park @ McIntyre Ave (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Roxborough Park at Mc Intyre Ave

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 31.7ug/kg, DEET 11.9ug/kg, Diuron 9ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Roxborough Park at Mc Intyre Ave

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 31.7ug/kg, DEET 11.9ug/kg, Diuron 9ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Orchard Grove Reserve, Blackburn South (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Prometryn, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Orchard Grove Reserve at Fulton Rd, Blackburn South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 25.85ug/kg, DEET 5.95ug/kg, Diuron 13.5ug/kg, Prometryn 13.05ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Orchard Grove Reserve at Fulton Rd, Blackburn South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 25.85ug/kg, DEET 5.95ug/kg, Diuron 13.5ug/kg, Prometryn 13.05ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Newells Paddock Wetlands, Footscray (Victoria). Pesticides: DEET, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Newells Paddock Wetlands, Jamieson Ave; Footscray

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 14ug/kg, Prometryn 28ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Newells Paddock Wetlands, Jamieson Ave; Footscray

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 14ug/kg, Prometryn 28ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Naganthan Way Pond, Croydon North (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Prometryn, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Naganthan Way Pond; Croydon North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 22ug/kg, DEET 13ug/kg, Diuron 80ug/kg, Prometryn 26ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Naganthan Way Pond; Croydon North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 22ug/kg, DEET 13ug/kg, Diuron 80ug/kg, Prometryn 26ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Mt St. Joseph Wetlands, Altona (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Mt St Joseph Wetlands, Civic Parade; Altona

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 56.5ug/kg, DEET 2.3ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Mt St Joseph Wetlands, Civic Parade; Altona

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 56.5ug/kg, DEET 2.3ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Monterey Bush Park, Ringwood (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Monterey Bush Park, Ringwood

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 78.8ug/kg, DEET 25.2ug/kg, Diuron 50ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Monterey Bush Park, Ringwood

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 78.8ug/kg, DEET 25.2ug/kg, Diuron 50ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Kingscote Way, North Epping (Victoria). Pesticides: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Kingscote Way, North Epping

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 21.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

 

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Kingscote Way, North Epping

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 21.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Millard Street, North Croydon (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Wetland at Millard St North Croydon

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 48ug/kg, DEET 14.7ug/kg, Diuron 9ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Wetland at Millard St North Croydon

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 48ug/kg, DEET 14.7ug/kg, Diuron 9ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Larnoo Drive Upper, Doncaster East (Victoria). Pesticide: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Larnoo Drive Upper; Doncaster East

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 7.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Larnoo Drive Upper; Doncaster East

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 7.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Landcox Park, Brighton East (Victoria). Pesticides: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Landcox Park, Keys Ave; Brighton East

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Landcox Park, Keys Ave; Brighton East

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 8.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Lakewood Nature Reserve, Knoxfield (Victoria). Pesticide: Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lakewood Nature Reserve; Knoxfield

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lakewood Nature Reserve; Knoxfield

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Lakeview Grove, Wyndham Vale (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lakeview Grove; Wyndham Vale

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 14.8ug/kg, DEET 10.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lakeview Grove; Wyndham Vale

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 14.8ug/kg, DEET 10.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Kinterbury Drive Wetland, Kings Park (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Kinterbury Drive wetland; Kings Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 97ug/kg, Diuron 162ug/kg, Permethrin  46.5ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 49ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Kinterbury Drive wetland; Kings Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 97ug/kg, Diuron 162ug/kg, Permethrin  46.5ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 49ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Kalparrin Gardens, Greensborough (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Permethrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Kalparrin Gardens at Yando St; Greensborough

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 70ug/kg, DEET 10ug/kg, Diuron 101ug/kg, Permethrin  27ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Kalparrin Gardens at Yando St; Greensborough

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 70ug/kg, DEET 10ug/kg, Diuron 101ug/kg, Permethrin  27ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Mandalay Circuit, Beveridge (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Mandalay Circuit, Beveridge

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23ug/kg, DEET 10.3ug/kg, Prometryn  21.1ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Mandalay Circuit, Beveridge

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23ug/kg, DEET 10.3ug/kg, Prometryn  21.1ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Watson Street, Wallan (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Watson St at Wallan

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 8.8ug/kg, DEET 8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Watson St at Wallan

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 8.8ug/kg, DEET 8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Heritage Hills, Berwick Waters (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Heritage Hills; Berwick Waters

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 24ug/kg, Diuron 10ug/kg, Prometryn 29.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Heritage Hills; Berwick Waters

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 24ug/kg, Diuron 10ug/kg, Prometryn 29.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Saltwater Coast Wetlands, Point Cook (Victoria). Pesticide: Bifenthrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Saltwater Coast Wetlands at Point Cook

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 132ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Saltwater Coast Wetlands at Point Cook

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 132ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Greenslopes Reserve, Mooroolbark (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Permethrin, Trifloxystrobin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Greenslopes Reserve Rb; Mooroolbark

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 144ug/kg, DEET 11ug/kg, Diuron 175ug/kg, Permethrin 13.85ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 49ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Greenslopes Reserve Rb; Mooroolbark

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 144ug/kg, DEET 11ug/kg, Diuron 175ug/kg, Permethrin 13.85ug/kg, Trifloxystrobin 49ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Green Street Wetland Mooroolbark (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Green St wetland off Taylor Rd; Mooroolbark

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 21ug/kg, DEET 10ug/kg,

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Green St wetland off Taylor Rd; Mooroolbark

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 21ug/kg, DEET 10ug/kg,

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Gilmour Park, Upper Ferntree Gully (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Gilmour Park Rb, Ferndale Rd; Upper Ferntree Gully

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 3.2ug/kg, DEET 9.6ug/kg,

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Gilmour Park Rb, Ferndale Rd; Upper Ferntree Gully

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 3.2ug/kg, DEET 9.6ug/kg,

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Epsom Estate, Hutchins Close, Mordialloc (Victoria). Pesticide: Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Epsom Estate, Hutchins Close; Mordialloc

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Diuron 126.25ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Epsom Estate, Hutchins Close; Mordialloc

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Diuron 126.25ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Elizabeth Bridge Reserve, Durham Road, Kilsyth (Victoria). Pesticides: DEET, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Elizabeth Bridge Reserve, Durham Rd; Kilsyth

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 2ug/kg, Prometryn 29.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Elizabeth Bridge Reserve, Durham Rd; Kilsyth

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 2ug/kg, Prometryn 29.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Dundas Street Wetlands (Victoria). Pesticide: Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Darebin Crk Forest Park Wetlands (Dundas St Wetlands), Thornbury

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Prometryn 26ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Darebin Crk Forest Park Wetlands (Dundas St Wetlands), Thornbury

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Prometryn 26ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Sierra Avenue, Derrimut (Victoria). Pesticide: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Sierra Ave at Derrimut; Sunshine West

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 5.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Sierra Ave at Derrimut; Sunshine West

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 5.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Cheltenham Road, Dandenong South (Victoria). Pesticide: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Cheltenham Rd Rb, U/S Chelt Rd; Dandenong South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 37.2ug/kg, Diuron 22ug/kg, Permethrin 39.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Cheltenham Rd Rb, U/S Chelt Rd; Dandenong South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 37.2ug/kg, Diuron 22ug/kg, Permethrin 39.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Chandler Road, Keysborough (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Chandler Rd Rb, Chandler Rd; Keysborough

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 68.4ug/kg, Diuron 20ug/kg, Permethrin 209ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 7.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Chandler Rd Rb, Chandler Rd; Keysborough

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 68.4ug/kg, Diuron 20ug/kg, Permethrin 209ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 7.6ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Caroline Springs Estate (Victoria). Pesticide: Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Caroline Springs Estate at King Circuit; Caroline Springs

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Caroline Springs Estate at King Circuit; Caroline Springs

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Botanica Boulevard Bundoora (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Botanica Blvd opp Pride Ave (North Pond), Bundoora

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 111ug/kg, DEET 33ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Botanica Blvd opp Pride Ave (North Pond), Bundoora

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 111ug/kg, DEET 33ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015 April: Bonview Wetlands, Doncaster (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Bonview Wetlands opp Martin Ct; Doncaster (above Ruffey Lake)

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 37.4ug/kg, Diuron 343ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 6.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Bonview Wetlands opp Martin Ct; Doncaster (above Ruffey Lake)

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 37.4ug/kg, Diuron 343ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 6.8ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Cyril Molyneux Reserve, Berwick (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Berwick West Rb at Cyril Molyneux Reserve; Berwick

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 47.6ug/kg, Prometryn 29.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Berwick West Rb at Cyril Molyneux Reserve; Berwick

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 47.6ug/kg, Prometryn 29.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Tim Neville Arboretum, Ferntree Gully (Victoria). Pesticide: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Tim Neville Arboretum, Dorset Road; Ferntree Gully

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 9.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Tim Neville Arboretum, Dorset Road; Ferntree Gully

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 9.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Bellbird Dell Reserve , Vermont South (Victoria). Pesticide: Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Bellbird Dell Reserve, South Edge Pk, Vermont South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Diuron 31ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Bellbird Dell Reserve, South Edge Pk, Vermont South

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Diuron 31ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Belgrave Lake (Victoria). Pesticides: DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Belgrave Lake at Judkins Ave ;Belgrave

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 42ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Belgrave Lake at Judkins Ave ;Belgrave

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 42ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Albert Park Lake (Victoria). Pesticides: DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Albert Park Lake

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 7.6ug/kg, Diuron 70ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Albert Park Lake

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: DEET 7.6ug/kg, Diuron 70ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Amber Place Wetland, Wyndham Vale (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Amber Place wetland; Wyndham Vale

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 6.4ug/kg, DEET 6.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Amber Place wetland; Wyndham Vale

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 6.4ug/kg, DEET 6.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Alan Morton Reserve Park Orchards (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Prometryn

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Alan Morton Reserve at Park Rd, Park Orchards

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23ug/kg, DEET 23.4ug/kg,  Diuron 5316ug/kg, Prometryn 21.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Alan Morton Reserve at Park Rd, Park Orchards

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 23ug/kg, DEET 23.4ug/kg,  Diuron 5316ug/kg, Prometryn 21.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Craigmore Avenue Mentone (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Southern Road retarding basin at Craigmore Ave; Mentone

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 126ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg, Permethrin 84.5ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Southern Road retarding basin at Craigmore Ave; Mentone

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 126ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg, Permethrin 84.5ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2018 February: Concerns over Mosquito Spraying with Twilight ULV on Karumba Fishery (Queensland). Pesticide: Phenothrin, Piperonyl Butoxide

Mosquito-control spraying questioned after Gulf barramundi fail to spawn for two years

Feb 5 2018

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-05/mosquito-control-spraying-questioned-after-fish-fail-to-spawn/9390214

Note Active Ingredients Twilight ULV: Phenothrin + Piperonyl Butoxide

A remote Queensland Gulf community is concerned their local council's mosquito control program could destroy the local barramundi industry after the hatchery failed to produce spawn for almost two years.

Spraying to stem mosquito numbers and mosquito-borne viruses such as dengue and zika are carried-out worldwide, and recently in Townsville, Rockhampton and Torres Strait islands.

According to the Carpentaria Shire Council, the barramundi hatchery at Karumba had not produced successful spawn since at least April 2016 until recently, when mosquito spraying was halted for two months.

Local fisherman Mathew Donald is among those concerned about the impacts of mosquito spraying on the fishing and tourism industries across north Queensland.

"If the hatcheries stopped stocking the rivers and the fisherman kept fishing the way they were, then the barramundi stocks would obviously just decline," he said.

"The professional fishermen would have to move on, the tourists would stop coming to Karumba because of the lack of barramundi there. It would just destroy the place."

Environmental concerns

Carpentaria Shire Mayor Jack Bawden told the ABC there were two successful spawns around the time the spraying was stopped, which prompted council to further investigate the effects of mosquito spraying.

"Whether that is a 100 per cent reason for it we still don't know for sure. That's why there's more investigations happening," he said.

Mr Bawden said the Council suspended mosquito spraying two weeks ago and have called in an environmental health officer for advice.

He said he only became aware of the issues just recently and it was an issue the present council inherited from the previous administration.

"I've decided looking into it myself. You're actually told not to use it [spray] around aquaculture and environments like that because it's detrimental to marine life," he said.

Despite the council's efforts, local fishermen are worried the impact goes beyond the local hatchery.

The chair of the Gulf of Carpentaria Commercial Fishermen's Association, Shane Ward, said he was concerned about the impact on the hatchery and environment.

"Their suspicion why the last couple of spawns haven't worked is because of the mosquito spraying and they can't prove otherwise, so we're a bit concerned that spraying could also impact the habitat around Karumba," Mr Ward said.

"The local environment is what we're concerned about because Karumba is built right on the wetlands, with mangroves almost right up to the back of some of the houses."

The Council used a chemical called Twilight ULV Mosquito Adulticide Concentrate to manage mosquitos, which according to the material safety data sheet published on their website poses many ecological risks.

"This product is toxic to bees. Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects to the aquatic environment," the document said.

While fishermen were comforted by the recent spraying suspension, some believed the council did not act quickly enough.

"That's quite disgusting that they would keep spraying something like that around Karumba when fishing is the only reason for Karumba," Mr Donald said.

"They should've been on to that a hell of a lot earlier."

Mayor Bawden said he assured the community the Council was working to resolve the issue.

"Be patient. We're trying to do the right thing by everyone, and at the same time get a sustainable fishery going in Karumba," he said.

Mosquito-control spraying questioned after Gulf barramundi fail to spawn for two years

Feb 5 2018

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-05/mosquito-control-spraying-questioned-after-fish-fail-to-spawn/9390214

A remote Queensland Gulf community is concerned their local council’s mosquito control program could destroy the local barramundi industry after the hatchery failed to produce spawn for almost two years.

Spraying to stem mosquito numbers and mosquito-borne viruses such as dengue and zika are carried-out worldwide, and recently in Townsville, Rockhampton and Torres Strait islands.

According to the Carpentaria Shire Council, the barramundi hatchery at Karumba had not produced successful spawn since at least April 2016 until recently, when mosquito spraying was halted for two months.

Local fisherman Mathew Donald is among those concerned about the impacts of mosquito spraying on the fishing and tourism industries across north Queensland.

“If the hatcheries stopped stocking the rivers and the fisherman kept fishing the way they were, then the barramundi stocks would obviously just decline,” he said.

“The professional fishermen would have to move on, the tourists would stop coming to Karumba because of the lack of barramundi there. It would just destroy the place.”

Environmental concerns

Carpentaria Shire Mayor Jack Bawden told the ABC there were two successful spawns around the time the spraying was stopped, which prompted council to further investigate the effects of mosquito spraying.

“Whether that is a 100 per cent reason for it we still don’t know for sure. That’s why there’s more investigations happening,” he said.

Mr Bawden said the Council suspended mosquito spraying two weeks ago and have called in an environmental health officer for advice.

He said he only became aware of the issues just recently and it was an issue the present council inherited from the previous administration.

“I’ve decided looking into it myself. You’re actually told not to use it [spray] around aquaculture and environments like that because it’s detrimental to marine life,” he said.

Despite the council’s efforts, local fishermen are worried the impact goes beyond the local hatchery.

The chair of the Gulf of Carpentaria Commercial Fishermen’s Association, Shane Ward, said he was concerned about the impact on the hatchery and environment.

“Their suspicion why the last couple of spawns haven’t worked is because of the mosquito spraying and they can’t prove otherwise, so we’re a bit concerned that spraying could also impact the habitat around Karumba,” Mr Ward said.

“The local environment is what we’re concerned about because Karumba is built right on the wetlands, with mangroves almost right up to the back of some of the houses.”

The Council used a chemical called Twilight ULV Mosquito Adulticide Concentrate to manage mosquitos, which according to the material safety data sheet published on their website poses many ecological risks.

“This product is toxic to bees. Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects to the aquatic environment,” the document said.

While fishermen were comforted by the recent spraying suspension, some believed the council did not act quickly enough.

“That’s quite disgusting that they would keep spraying something like that around Karumba when fishing is the only reason for Karumba,” Mr Donald said.

“They should’ve been on to that a hell of a lot earlier.”

Mayor Bawden said he assured the community the Council was working to resolve the issue.

“Be patient. We’re trying to do the right thing by everyone, and at the same time get a sustainable fishery going in Karumba,” he said.

2015: Lake Legana, Patterson Lakes (Victoria). Pesticides: Permethrin, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lake Legana at Iluka Island; Patterson Lakes

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Permethrin 13.7ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Lake Legana at Iluka Island; Patterson Lakes

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Permethrin 13.7ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Hendersons Creek Wetland, South Morang (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Hendersons Creek Wetland at cnr of Findon Rd and the Lakes Blvd; South Morang

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin Trace, DEET 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Hendersons Creek Wetland at cnr of Findon Rd and the Lakes Blvd; South Morang

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin Trace, DEET 8.4ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Austrak RB at Regional Drive, Somerton (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Austrak RB at Regional Drv, Somerton

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 8.4ug/kg, DEET 9.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Austrak RB at Regional Drv, Somerton

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 8.4ug/kg, DEET 9.2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Bungalook Creek Bayswater North (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Fenamiphos, Pyrimethanil

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Bungalook Creek RB at Canterbury Rd; Bayswater North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 42.4ug/kg, DEET 4ug/kg, Diuron 59ug/kg, Fenamiphos 50.4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Bungalook Creek RB at Canterbury Rd; Bayswater North

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 42.4ug/kg, DEET 4ug/kg, Diuron 59ug/kg, Fenamiphos 50.4ug/kg, Pyrimethanil 2ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Avoca Street Highett (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Diuron, Permethrin, Simazine

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Avoca St Retarding Basin at Avoca St; Highett

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 32.4ug/kg, Diuron 7ug/kg, Permethrin 41.65ug/kg, Simazine 16ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Avoca St Retarding Basin at Avoca St; Highett

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 32.4ug/kg, Diuron 7ug/kg, Permethrin 41.65ug/kg, Simazine 16ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Pezzimenti Place Wonga Park (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Pezzimenti Place at Wonga Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 10ug/kg, DEET 13ug/kg, Diuron 69ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Pezzimenti Place at Wonga Park

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 10ug/kg, DEET 13ug/kg, Diuron 69ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2015: Croydon Main Drain (Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, DEET, Diuron, Fenamiphos, Permethrin

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Croydon Main Drain at footbridge near 4 Jesmond Rd; Croydon

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 65.2ug/kg, DEET 6ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg, Fenamiphos 47.2ug/kg, Permethrin 16ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

Potentially toxic concentrations of synthetic pyrethroids associated with low density residential land use

Supplementary Material

Stephen Marshall*, David Sharley, Katherine Jeppe, Simon Sharp, Gavin Rose, Vincent Pettigrove

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00075/full

Croydon Main Drain at footbridge near 4 Jesmond Rd; Croydon

Sediment

Feb/April 2015: Bifenthrin 65.2ug/kg, DEET 6ug/kg, Diuron 17ug/kg, Fenamiphos 47.2ug/kg, Permethrin 16ug/kg

also see: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-common-insecticide-poisoning-our-rivers-and-wetlands

2019/2010: 128 dead Wedge Tailed Eagles (Violet Town (Victoria)). Suspected Pesticide Luci-Jet (Fenthion)

Charges laid over Violet Town eagle deaths

17 December 2020
 
https://www.delwp.vic.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/charges-laid-over-violet-town-eagle-deaths

A Violet Town woman has been charged over the unlawful possession of more than 140 protected native bird carcasses, 128 of them Wedge-tailed Eagles, which were found across paddocks north of Violet Town.

The Violet Town woman, faces 291 charges under the Wildlife Act 1975 and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986, includingthe poisoning of Wedge-tailed Eagles and the possession of other wildlife.

In August 2019, authorised officers from the Conservation Regulator, Forest Fire Management Victoria, with the support of Victoria Police and Agriculture Victoria, executed a search warrant at the woman’s property, after a number of deceased Wedge-tailed Eagles were found in the area.

The Benalla Magistrates’ Court is due to hear the matter early in the new year.

Native birds are protected under the Wildlife Act 1975. Killing native birds or being in possession of them without the appropriate licence or authority carries a maximum penalty ranging from $8,261 to $39,652 and/or six to 24 months imprisonment.To report wildlife crime contact CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000.

Quotes attributable to Chief Conservation Regulator, Kate Gavens:

“We understand the value the community places on Victoria’s native wildlife, and we are taking these matters very seriously.”

“Wedge-tailed Eagles are Victoria’s largest bird of prey and an important part of our environment. This investigation shows the Conservation Regulators commitment to combating wildlife crime and protecting the iconic Wedge-tailed Eagle.”

Eagle death toll hits 89: Investigators test for poison at Violet Town

https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/victoria/eagle-death-toll-hits-89-investigators-test-for-poison-at-violet-town/news-story/550e7afbd251b748b92221b5fc9a3533

Sep 3 2019

THE death toll from the suspected poisoning of Wedge-tailed eagles on a property north of Violet Town has risen to 89, following the discovery of 13 more carcasses.

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning officers are investigating if the deaths are deliberate, including the possible use of poison.

A warrant was issued early last week, allowing Victoria Police and DELWP investigators to search the sheep and cattle property’s home and buildings for further evidence.

Samples of the dead eagles have been sent off for testing.

The deaths follow last year’s discovery of the carcasses of more than 400 Wedge-tailed eagles on an East Gippsland property at Tubbut, which were poisoned during the previous two-and-a-half years.

The suspected poison in the Gippsland case was the now banned sheep dip Luci-Jet.

Luci-jet is highly toxic to birds, with CSIRO research from 1985 stating “seven species of birds in Australia are highly sensitive to the organophosphorous insecticide”, including Wedge-tailed eagles.

Poisoned birds lose their ability to stand or fly, before convulsing and dying.

Native birds are protected under the Wildlife Act 1975 and the penalty for deliberately injuring or killing wildlife ranges from $8,261 to $39,652 and/or six to 24 months’ imprisonment.

If you have any information regarding this incident contact DELWP on 136 186 or Crime Stoppers Victoria: 1800 333 000 or crimestoppersvic.com.au/report-a-crime

Vic bird deaths blamed on insecticide

Oct 7 2019

https://www.theleader.com.au/story/6424261/vic-bird-deaths-blamed-on-insecticide/?cs=9397

An insecticide is believed to have killed almost 200 native birds in northeast Victoria.

Dead wedge-tailed eagles found near Violet Town in August, led the state's environment department to find more, along with hawks and falcons, on a nearby property.

They have since found up to 200 dead native birds in the area, including 25 wedge-tailed eagles.

Tests of six eagles have detected an insecticide used to control mites.

The same agricultural chemical has been found in the carcasses of animals suspected of being used as bait, with the department believing it may have caused all of the bird deaths.

But they aren't sure whether the poisoning was an accident.

"It remains unclear if these birds were deliberately poisoned, however given the large number of birds found nearby, it's a possibility," environment department compliance manager Andrew Dean said.

Raids have also taken place in recent weeks at properties in Shepparton East and Goomalibee.

"All evidence collected will be forensically analysed, including the carcasses and chemicals seized, which may take some time."

Charges laid over Violet Town eagle deaths

https://www.delwp.vic.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/charges-laid-over-violet-town-eagle-deaths

A Violet Town woman has been charged over the unlawful possession of more than 140 protected native bird carcasses, 128 of them Wedge-tailed Eagles, which were found across paddocks north of Violet Town.

The Violet Town woman, faces 291 charges under the Wildlife Act 1975 and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986, includingthe poisoning of Wedge-tailed Eagles and the possession of other wildlife.

In August 2019, authorised officers from the Conservation Regulator, Forest Fire Management Victoria, with the support of Victoria Police and Agriculture Victoria, executed a search warrant at the woman’s property, after a number of deceased Wedge-tailed Eagles were found in the area.

The Benalla Magistrates’ Court is due to hear the matter early in the new year.

Native birds are protected under the Wildlife Act 1975. Killing native birds or being in possession of them without the appropriate licence or authority carries a maximum penalty ranging from $8,261 to $39,652 and/or six to 24 months imprisonment.To report wildlife crime contact CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000.

Quotes attributable to Chief Conservation Regulator, Kate Gavens:

“We understand the value the community places on Victoria’s native wildlife, and we are taking these matters very seriously.”

“Wedge-tailed Eagles are Victoria’s largest bird of prey and an important part of our environment. This investigation shows the Conservation Regulators commitment to combating wildlife crime and protecting the iconic Wedge-tailed Eagle.”

Eagle death toll hits 89: Investigators test for poison at Violet Town

https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/victoria/eagle-death-toll-hits-89-investigators-test-for-poison-at-violet-town/news-story/550e7afbd251b748b92221b5fc9a3533

Sep 3 2019

THE death toll from the suspected poisoning of Wedge-tailed eagles on a property north of Violet Town has risen to 89, following the discovery of 13 more carcasses.

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning officers are investigating if the deaths are deliberate, including the possible use of poison.

A warrant was issued early last week, allowing Victoria Police and DELWP investigators to search the sheep and cattle property’s home and buildings for further evidence.

Samples of the dead eagles have been sent off for testing.

The deaths follow last year’s discovery of the carcasses of more than 400 Wedge-tailed eagles on an East Gippsland property at Tubbut, which were poisoned during the previous two-and-a-half years.

The suspected poison in the Gippsland case was the now banned sheep dip Luci-Jet.

Luci-jet is highly toxic to birds, with CSIRO research from 1985 stating “seven species of birds in Australia are highly sensitive to the organophosphorous insecticide”, including Wedge-tailed eagles.

Poisoned birds lose their ability to stand or fly, before convulsing and dying.

Native birds are protected under the Wildlife Act 1975 and the penalty for deliberately injuring or killing wildlife ranges from $8,261 to $39,652 and/or six to 24 months’ imprisonment.

If you have any information regarding this incident contact DELWP on 136 186 or Crime Stoppers Victoria: 1800 333 000 or crimestoppersvic.com.au/report-a-crime

Vic bird deaths blamed on insecticide

Oct 7 2019

https://www.theleader.com.au/story/6424261/vic-bird-deaths-blamed-on-insecticide/?cs=9397

An insecticide is believed to have killed almost 200 native birds in northeast Victoria.

Dead wedge-tailed eagles found near Violet Town in August, led the state’s environment department to find more, along with hawks and falcons, on a nearby property.

They have since found up to 200 dead native birds in the area, including 25 wedge-tailed eagles.

Tests of six eagles have detected an insecticide used to control mites.

The same agricultural chemical has been found in the carcasses of animals suspected of being used as bait, with the department believing it may have caused all of the bird deaths.

But they aren’t sure whether the poisoning was an accident.

“It remains unclear if these birds were deliberately poisoned, however given the large number of birds found nearby, it’s a possibility,” environment department compliance manager Andrew Dean said.

Raids have also taken place in recent weeks at properties in Shepparton East and Goomalibee.

“All evidence collected will be forensically analysed, including the carcasses and chemicals seized, which may take some time.”

2019 April: Port of Portland Log Fumigation (Victoria) – Methyl Bromide

Port moves to allay fumigation fears

PORT of Portland chief executive officer Jim Cooper has moved to allay public concerns about the use of the chemical methyl bromide to fumigate a log ship bound for China.
The public concerns were made to the Glenelg Shire Council.
A spokesperson for the council said that “the concerns related to the use of methyl bromide, and the prevailing wind direction on Wednesday morning”.
“The council did receive calls from members of the public last year and earlier this year about the chemical,” the spokesperson said.
“We will make enquiries as to what the regulatory uses of the chemical are.”

Port moves to allay fumigation fears

PORT of Portland chief executive officer Jim Cooper has moved to allay public concerns about the use of the chemical methyl bromide to fumigate a log ship bound for China.
The public concerns were made to the Glenelg Shire Council.
A spokesperson for the council said that “the concerns related to the use of methyl bromide, and the prevailing wind direction on Wednesday morning”.
“The council did receive calls from members of the public last year and earlier this year about the chemical,” the spokesperson said.
“We will make enquiries as to what the regulatory uses of the chemical are.”

2019 August: Epping Market (Victoria) – Methyl Bromide

Ozone, uh oh: Fumigator roasted for spraying pesticide at fruit market

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/ozone-uh-oh-fumigator-roasted-for-spraying-pesticide-at-fruit-market-20190802-p52dan.html

August 3 2019

A fumigation company at Melbourne's fruit and vegetable wholesale market has been ordered to stop releasing a gas it sprays to deter pests because it depletes the ozone layer.

It's the first time the Environment Protection Authority has issued a pollution abatement notice for methyl bromide, a colourless and odourless gas often used to control insects, spiders, mites, snails and rodents.

Madiklumi Pty Ltd – the company whacked with the clean-up edict at the Epping markets – challenged the decision. However, it was recently upheld in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

The environment watchdog used powers that stem from the United Nations Montreal Protocol, an international agreement first signed in 1989 to prevent the hole in the ozone layer from getting bigger.

Methyl bromide has been banned in Australia for all but certified quarantine and feedstock uses since 2005.

Sitting in the stratosphere between 15 and 35 kilometres above earth, the ozone layer filters out harmful ultraviolet light that causes skin cancer, agricultural disasters and other damage. The Montreal Protocol is credited with reversing its degradation.

After receiving a tip-off, the EPA discovered in late 2017 that Robinson's Unloading, a logistics company connected to Madiklumi, was releasing diluted methyl bromide into the atmosphere after it had finished fumigating.

Under the VCAT order, Madiklumi was given until next February to stop. The company will also be required to provide regular reports on its compliance.

The tribunal heard that the most effective way to prevent the release of methyl bromide was to recapture it and then bury it in landfill.

Lawyers for Madiklumi argued that this would have a significant financial impact on the fumigation company, starting with a capital outlay of between $70,000-$100,000.

However, VCAT senior member Geoffrey Code and member Catherine Wilson rejected the argument, pointing out that other fumigators were able to continue operating while capturing methyl bromide.

The EPA's CEO, Dr Cathy Wilkinson, praised the tribunal for sending "a clear message" to businesses that protection of the environment was more important than financial considerations.

"Methyl bromide is a necessary evil for many fresh produce operators, but that doesn’t mean we should abandon all environmental considerations, especially when there are viable options available for reducing its impact," she said.

Russell Kennedy principal Stefan Fiedler said Madiklumi was disappointed with the tribunal’s decision.

"Madiklumi estimates the requirement will increase the cost of fumigation for consignment of fresh produce for distribution predominantly to the interstate domestic market and also overseas," he said.

Mr Fiedler said the company would work to comply with the decision. It was important that other fumigators had the same standard imposed on them to prevent "market distortion", he said.

"Madiklumi will continue its work alongside leading industry partners in pursuit of alternative technology avoiding the future use of methyl bromide," he said.

EPA senior air quality scientist Dr Paul Torre said methyl bromide was a popular method of pest control because it was fast-acting and could be applied across large surfaces.

"But there's the other side," he said.

"There are these environmental impacts and that's why they have been trying to phase this out for a number of years. It's about finding an alternative."

Ozone, uh oh: Fumigator roasted for spraying pesticide at fruit market

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/ozone-uh-oh-fumigator-roasted-for-spraying-pesticide-at-fruit-market-20190802-p52dan.html

August 3 2019

A fumigation company at Melbourne’s fruit and vegetable wholesale market has been ordered to stop releasing a gas it sprays to deter pests because it depletes the ozone layer.

It’s the first time the Environment Protection Authority has issued a pollution abatement notice for methyl bromide, a colourless and odourless gas often used to control insects, spiders, mites, snails and rodents.

Madiklumi Pty Ltd – the company whacked with the clean-up edict at the Epping markets – challenged the decision. However, it was recently upheld in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

The environment watchdog used powers that stem from the United Nations Montreal Protocol, an international agreement first signed in 1989 to prevent the hole in the ozone layer from getting bigger.

Methyl bromide has been banned in Australia for all but certified quarantine and feedstock uses since 2005.

Sitting in the stratosphere between 15 and 35 kilometres above earth, the ozone layer filters out harmful ultraviolet light that causes skin cancer, agricultural disasters and other damage. The Montreal Protocol is credited with reversing its degradation.

After receiving a tip-off, the EPA discovered in late 2017 that Robinson’s Unloading, a logistics company connected to Madiklumi, was releasing diluted methyl bromide into the atmosphere after it had finished fumigating.

Under the VCAT order, Madiklumi was given until next February to stop. The company will also be required to provide regular reports on its compliance.

The tribunal heard that the most effective way to prevent the release of methyl bromide was to recapture it and then bury it in landfill.

Lawyers for Madiklumi argued that this would have a significant financial impact on the fumigation company, starting with a capital outlay of between $70,000-$100,000.

However, VCAT senior member Geoffrey Code and member Catherine Wilson rejected the argument, pointing out that other fumigators were able to continue operating while capturing methyl bromide.

The EPA’s CEO, Dr Cathy Wilkinson, praised the tribunal for sending “a clear message” to businesses that protection of the environment was more important than financial considerations.

“Methyl bromide is a necessary evil for many fresh produce operators, but that doesn’t mean we should abandon all environmental considerations, especially when there are viable options available for reducing its impact,” she said.

Russell Kennedy principal Stefan Fiedler said Madiklumi was disappointed with the tribunal’s decision.

“Madiklumi estimates the requirement will increase the cost of fumigation for consignment of fresh produce for distribution predominantly to the interstate domestic market and also overseas,” he said.

Mr Fiedler said the company would work to comply with the decision. It was important that other fumigators had the same standard imposed on them to prevent “market distortion”, he said.

“Madiklumi will continue its work alongside leading industry partners in pursuit of alternative technology avoiding the future use of methyl bromide,” he said.

EPA senior air quality scientist Dr Paul Torre said methyl bromide was a popular method of pest control because it was fast-acting and could be applied across large surfaces.

“But there’s the other side,” he said.

“There are these environmental impacts and that’s why they have been trying to phase this out for a number of years. It’s about finding an alternative.”

2019 March: Mosquito Spraying Burili Ulcer (Goyarra Street, Rye). Pesticides: Bifenthrin?, S Methoprene?

Goyarra Street Rye

Department Health and Human Services Letter to Residents

Mosquito Control Activities Scheduled March 19 - No 'Opt-out' offered to residents

Spraying can be conducted in several ways but is most commonly applied by hand using a hose that is connected to either a backpack or a container in a vehicle.

Information from Friends of the Earth

Bifenthrin Insecticide – Used against a variety of insects including termites. Most likely enters waterways as a result of termite treatment.

Pesticide Movement Rating: Extremely Low. Soil Half Life: 26 days. Water Solubility: 0.1. Koc: 240000. (The lower the Koc, the less sorption potential and the higher risk of it washing off a site).

Human Health: Possible carcinogen, developmental/reproductive toxin, suspected
endocrine disruptor.

Ecological Information: Very highly toxic to fish, insects and zooplankton.

Beating Burili Project in Victoria Project

https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/public-health/infectious-diseases/beating-buruli

  • Cases of Buruli ulcer have increased significantly in Victoria in recent years and the disease is spreading into new geographical areas.
  • Although it's understood that the infection is picked up from the environment, it's not yet known exactly how humans become infected with the bacteria, or where in the environment the bacteria prefer to live. It is not spread person-to-person.
  • Research has shown that possums and mosquitoes may be involved in spreading the disease, however there may be other or multiple ways the disease is spread.
  • A two-year research project is currently underway through a collaborative partnership between DHHS, the Doherty Institute, Barwon Health, Austin Health, CSIRO, Agriculture Victoria, the University of Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula Shire, to better understand how Buruli ulcer is transmitted and determine effective ways to prevent infections and reduce infections.
  • The 'Beating Buruli in Victoria' project hopes to actively disrupt disease transmission for the first time and lead to the development of evidence-based policies and guidelines that can help stop the spread of Buruli ulcer around Victoria and even globally.

Goyarra Street Rye

Department Health and Human Services Letter to Residents

Mosquito Control Activities Scheduled March 19 – No ‘Opt-out’ offered to residents

Spraying can be conducted in several ways but is most commonly applied by hand using a hose that is connected to either a backpack or a container in a vehicle.

Information from Friends of the Earth

Bifenthrin Insecticide – Used against a variety of insects including termites. Most likely enters waterways as a result of termite treatment.

Pesticide Movement Rating: Extremely Low. Soil Half Life: 26 days. Water Solubility: 0.1. Koc: 240000. (The lower the Koc, the less sorption potential and the higher risk of it washing off a site).

Human Health: Possible carcinogen, developmental/reproductive toxin, suspected
endocrine disruptor.

Ecological Information: Very highly toxic to fish, insects and zooplankton.

Beating Burili Project in Victoria Project

https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/public-health/infectious-diseases/beating-buruli

  • Cases of Buruli ulcer have increased significantly in Victoria in recent years and the disease is spreading into new geographical areas.
  • Although it’s understood that the infection is picked up from the environment, it’s not yet known exactly how humans become infected with the bacteria, or where in the environment the bacteria prefer to live. It is not spread person-to-person.
  • Research has shown that possums and mosquitoes may be involved in spreading the disease, however there may be other or multiple ways the disease is spread.
  • A two-year research project is currently underway through a collaborative partnership between DHHS, the Doherty Institute, Barwon Health, Austin Health, CSIRO, Agriculture Victoria, the University of Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula Shire, to better understand how Buruli ulcer is transmitted and determine effective ways to prevent infections and reduce infections.
  • The ‘Beating Buruli in Victoria’ project hopes to actively disrupt disease transmission for the first time and lead to the development of evidence-based policies and guidelines that can help stop the spread of Buruli ulcer around Victoria and even globally.

2019 March: Mosquito Spraying Burili Ulcer (French Street, Rye, Victoria). Pesticide: Bifenthrin?, S Methoprene?

French Street Rye

Department Health and Human Services Letter to Residents

Mosquito Control Activities Scheduled March 19 2019 - No 'Opt-out' offered to residents

Spraying can be conducted in several ways but is most commonly applied by hand using a hose that is connected to either a backpack or a container in a vehicle.

Information from Friends of the Earth

Bifenthrin Insecticide – Used against a variety of insects including termites. Most likely enters waterways as a result of termite treatment.

Pesticide Movement Rating: Extremely Low. Soil Half Life: 26 days. Water Solubility: 0.1. Koc: 240000. (The lower the Koc, the less sorption potential and the higher risk of it washing off a site).

Human Health: Possible carcinogen, developmental/reproductive toxin, suspected
endocrine disruptor.

Ecological Information: Very highly toxic to fish, insects and zooplankton.

Beating Burili Project in Victoria Project

https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/public-health/infectious-diseases/beating-buruli

  • Cases of Buruli ulcer have increased significantly in Victoria in recent years and the disease is spreading into new geographical areas.
  • Although it's understood that the infection is picked up from the environment, it's not yet known exactly how humans become infected with the bacteria, or where in the environment the bacteria prefer to live. It is not spread person-to-person.
  • Research has shown that possums and mosquitoes may be involved in spreading the disease, however there may be other or multiple ways the disease is spread.
  • A two-year research project is currently underway through a collaborative partnership between DHHS, the Doherty Institute, Barwon Health, Austin Health, CSIRO, Agriculture Victoria, the University of Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula Shire, to better understand how Buruli ulcer is transmitted and determine effective ways to prevent infections and reduce infections.
  • The 'Beating Buruli in Victoria' project hopes to actively disrupt disease transmission for the first time and lead to the development of evidence-based policies and guidelines that can help stop the spread of Buruli ulcer around Victoria and even globally.

French Street Rye

Department Health and Human Services Letter to Residents

Mosquito Control Activities Scheduled March 2019 – No ‘Opt-out’ offered to residents

Spraying can be conducted in several ways but is most commonly applied by hand using a hose that is connected to either a backpack or a container in a vehicle.

Information from Friends of the Earth

Bifenthrin Insecticide – Used against a variety of insects including termites. Most likely enters waterways as a result of termite treatment.

Pesticide Movement Rating: Extremely Low. Soil Half Life: 26 days. Water Solubility: 0.1. Koc: 240000. (The lower the Koc, the less sorption potential and the higher risk of it washing off a site).

Human Health: Possible carcinogen, developmental/reproductive toxin, suspected
endocrine disruptor.

Ecological Information: Very highly toxic to fish, insects and zooplankton.

Beating Burili Project in Victoria Project

https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/public-health/infectious-diseases/beating-buruli

  • Cases of Buruli ulcer have increased significantly in Victoria in recent years and the disease is spreading into new geographical areas.
  • Although it’s understood that the infection is picked up from the environment, it’s not yet known exactly how humans become infected with the bacteria, or where in the environment the bacteria prefer to live. It is not spread person-to-person.
  • Research has shown that possums and mosquitoes may be involved in spreading the disease, however there may be other or multiple ways the disease is spread.
  • A two-year research project is currently underway through a collaborative partnership between DHHS, the Doherty Institute, Barwon Health, Austin Health, CSIRO, Agriculture Victoria, the University of Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula Shire, to better understand how Buruli ulcer is transmitted and determine effective ways to prevent infections and reduce infections.
  • The ‘Beating Buruli in Victoria’ project hopes to actively disrupt disease transmission for the first time and lead to the development of evidence-based policies and guidelines that can help stop the spread of Buruli ulcer around Victoria and even globally.

2019 March: Mosquito Spraying Burili Ulcer (Dawn Street, Rye, Victoria). Pesticides: Bifenthrin?, S Methoprene?

Dawn Street Rye

Department Health and Human Services Letter to Residents

Mosquito Control Activities Scheduled March 19 - - No 'Opt-out' offered to residents

Spraying can be conducted in several ways but is most commonly applied by hand using a hose that is connected to either a backpack or a container in a vehicle.

Information from Friends of the Earth

Bifenthrin Insecticide – Used against a variety of insects including termites. Most likely enters waterways as a result of termite treatment.

Pesticide Movement Rating: Extremely Low. Soil Half Life: 26 days. Water Solubility: 0.1. Koc: 240000. (The lower the Koc, the less sorption potential and the higher risk of it washing off a site).

Human Health: Possible carcinogen, developmental/reproductive toxin, suspected
endocrine disruptor.

Ecological Information: Very highly toxic to fish, insects and zooplankton.

Beating Burili Project in Victoria Project

https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/public-health/infectious-diseases/beating-buruli

  • Cases of Buruli ulcer have increased significantly in Victoria in recent years and the disease is spreading into new geographical areas.
  • Although it's understood that the infection is picked up from the environment, it's not yet known exactly how humans become infected with the bacteria, or where in the environment the bacteria prefer to live. It is not spread person-to-person.
  • Research has shown that possums and mosquitoes may be involved in spreading the disease, however there may be other or multiple ways the disease is spread.
  • A two-year research project is currently underway through a collaborative partnership between DHHS, the Doherty Institute, Barwon Health, Austin Health, CSIRO, Agriculture Victoria, the University of Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula Shire, to better understand how Buruli ulcer is transmitted and determine effective ways to prevent infections and reduce infections.
  • The 'Beating Buruli in Victoria' project hopes to actively disrupt disease transmission for the first time and lead to the development of evidence-based policies and guidelines that can help stop the spread of Buruli ulcer around Victoria and even globally.

Dawn Street Rye

Department Health and Human Services Letter to Residents

Mosquito Control Activities Scheduled March 19 – No ‘Opt-out’ offered to residents

Spraying can be conducted in several ways but is most commonly applied by hand using a hose that is connected to either a backpack or a container in a vehicle.

Information from Friends of the Earth

Bifenthrin Insecticide – Used against a variety of insects including termites. Most likely enters waterways as a result of termite treatment.

Pesticide Movement Rating: Extremely Low. Soil Half Life: 26 days. Water Solubility: 0.1. Koc: 240000. (The lower the Koc, the less sorption potential and the higher risk of it washing off a site).

Human Health: Possible carcinogen, developmental/reproductive toxin, suspected
endocrine disruptor.

Ecological Information: Very highly toxic to fish, insects and zooplankton.

Beating Burili Project in Victoria Project

https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/public-health/infectious-diseases/beating-buruli

  • Cases of Buruli ulcer have increased significantly in Victoria in recent years and the disease is spreading into new geographical areas.
  • Although it’s understood that the infection is picked up from the environment, it’s not yet known exactly how humans become infected with the bacteria, or where in the environment the bacteria prefer to live. It is not spread person-to-person.
  • Research has shown that possums and mosquitoes may be involved in spreading the disease, however there may be other or multiple ways the disease is spread.
  • A two-year research project is currently underway through a collaborative partnership between DHHS, the Doherty Institute, Barwon Health, Austin Health, CSIRO, Agriculture Victoria, the University of Melbourne and Mornington Peninsula Shire, to better understand how Buruli ulcer is transmitted and determine effective ways to prevent infections and reduce infections.
  • The ‘Beating Buruli in Victoria’ project hopes to actively disrupt disease transmission for the first time and lead to the development of evidence-based policies and guidelines that can help stop the spread of Buruli ulcer around Victoria and even globally.

 

2019 August: Mosquito Spray Trial Halted (Mornington Peninsula, Victoria). Pesticide: Bifenthrin

Buruli ulcer mosquito spray trial halted amid pesticide, bee concerns

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/buruli-ulcer-mosquito-spray-trial-halted-amid-pesticide-bee-concerns-20190814-p52h59.html

August 14 2019

A controversial plan to spray pesticide over parts of the Mornington Peninsula to fight the spread of the flesh-eating Buruli ulcer has been halted amid concerns about its effect on bees.

The pesticide trial, which was planned for October, was designed to reduce mosquito numbers in the hope that would stop the spread of the mysterious ulcer, which has mainly affected the Mornington and Bellarine peninsulas.

But the trial has been paused by the Mornington Shire Council after local residents expressed concerns about the use of synthetic pyrethroid pesticide spray.

In a petition, the founder of Save the Bees Australia, Simon Mulvany, dubbed the proposed spraying an "insect massacre".

"The stuff they are using will kill every insect," Mr Mulvany said. "There is also health warnings about using it near waterways because it will also kill aqua creatures including dragonfly larvae and tadpoles."

Mr Mulvany started the petition opposing the mosquito cull after reading about the proposed spraying in The Good Weekend. The petition has been signed by 16,000 people.

"What danger does this poisoning program pose to pollinators, fauna and public health?" the petition says.

Mornington Peninsula Shire mayor David Gill said the community does not want the spraying "and have made that clear".

"We are not going to have spraying on the Mornington Peninsula in October - they can come back to us and have another discussion," he said.

There have been 135 cases of the flesh-eating Buruli ulcer recorded in Victoria this year, slightly down on the 165 cases at the same time last year.

Leading Buruli expert Professor Tim Stinear said research led by Melbourne scientists over the last 15 years indicated mosquitoes and possums were involved in the spread of the disease.

 

"When we have a disease outbreak we have an obligation to the human population to control that disease," said Professor Stinear, a professor in microbiology at Melbourne University’s Doherty Institute.

"What we are trying to do is balance the need to control a devastating disease with minimising environmental impacts."

He said those involved in the study were very sensitive to the environmental impacts and would continue with the consultation process.

"We are in a close partnership with Mornington Shire Council and we are certainly going to listen  to their wishes and advice," Professor Stinear said.

He said there were alternatives to pesticide spraying, but the effectiveness of other interventions might be varied.

"It is too early to say what the alternatives might look like but they are certainly being investigated. We need to control this disease."

The council voted to undertake extensive community consultation on the use of spraying and ask for expert advice on alternative approaches that alleviated harm to the ecosystem and biodiversity.

It would not take a position on the spraying trials - which are part of the Beating Buruli in Victoria project - until this was completed.

The council has asked for a report stipulating that fogging, where pesticide is misted from a blower, is not a viable option and that targeted spraying in yards should be a last resort.

 

It says safer, non-chemical pesticides should be explored.

It also says anyone affected by the mosquito cull program should be required to opt in, rather than opt out.

Cr Gill said there was an outpouring of concern at a public meeting attended by hundreds of people last Saturday.

"To a person, there was nobody supporting spraying," said Cr Gill, who is a native bee enthusiast.

 

The Beating Buruli study is being funded by the Australian government, which has provided $3.9 million for Buruli research.

It is a joint initiative between the Department of Health and Human Services, Mornington Peninsula Shire Council, Austin Health, Agriculture Victoria and Melbourne University’s Doherty Institute.

Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt, who attended the public meeting on Saturday, said the Shire maintained full authority over the project and actions undertaken in its municipality.

"My advice to the meeting and the council is that they may want to consider moving to an opt-in program," Mr Hunt said.

"It was also good to speak to locals about how to better educate physicians and diagnosticians on the ulcer."

Buruli ulcer mosquito spray trial halted amid pesticide, bee concerns

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/buruli-ulcer-mosquito-spray-trial-halted-amid-pesticide-bee-concerns-20190814-p52h59.html

August 14 2019

A controversial plan to spray pesticide over parts of the Mornington Peninsula to fight the spread of the flesh-eating Buruli ulcer has been halted amid concerns about its effect on bees.

The pesticide trial, which was planned for October, was designed to reduce mosquito numbers in the hope that would stop the spread of the mysterious ulcer, which has mainly affected the Mornington and Bellarine peninsulas.

But the trial has been paused by the Mornington Shire Council after local residents expressed concerns about the use of synthetic pyrethroid pesticide spray.

In a petition, the founder of Save the Bees Australia, Simon Mulvany, dubbed the proposed spraying an “insect massacre”.

“The stuff they are using will kill every insect,” Mr Mulvany said. “There is also health warnings about using it near waterways because it will also kill aqua creatures including dragonfly larvae and tadpoles.”

Mr Mulvany started the petition opposing the mosquito cull after reading about the proposed spraying in The Good Weekend. The petition has been signed by 16,000 people.

“What danger does this poisoning program pose to pollinators, fauna and public health?” the petition says.

Mornington Peninsula Shire mayor David Gill said the community does not want the spraying “and have made that clear”.

“We are not going to have spraying on the Mornington Peninsula in October – they can come back to us and have another discussion,” he said.

There have been 135 cases of the flesh-eating Buruli ulcer recorded in Victoria this year, slightly down on the 165 cases at the same time last year.

Leading Buruli expert Professor Tim Stinear said research led by Melbourne scientists over the last 15 years indicated mosquitoes and possums were involved in the spread of the disease.

“When we have a disease outbreak we have an obligation to the human population to control that disease,” said Professor Stinear, a professor in microbiology at Melbourne University’s Doherty Institute.

“What we are trying to do is balance the need to control a devastating disease with minimising environmental impacts.”

He said those involved in the study were very sensitive to the environmental impacts and would continue with the consultation process.

“We are in a close partnership with Mornington Shire Council and we are certainly going to listen  to their wishes and advice,” Professor Stinear said.

He said there were alternatives to pesticide spraying, but the effectiveness of other interventions might be varied.

“It is too early to say what the alternatives might look like but they are certainly being investigated. We need to control this disease.”

The council voted to undertake extensive community consultation on the use of spraying and ask for expert advice on alternative approaches that alleviated harm to the ecosystem and biodiversity.

It would not take a position on the spraying trials – which are part of the Beating Buruli in Victoria project – until this was completed.

The council has asked for a report stipulating that fogging, where pesticide is misted from a blower, is not a viable option and that targeted spraying in yards should be a last resort.

It says safer, non-chemical pesticides should be explored.

It also says anyone affected by the mosquito cull program should be required to opt in, rather than opt out.

Cr Gill said there was an outpouring of concern at a public meeting attended by hundreds of people last Saturday.

“To a person, there was nobody supporting spraying,” said Cr Gill, who is a native bee enthusiast.

The Beating Buruli study is being funded by the Australian government, which has provided $3.9 million for Buruli research.

It is a joint initiative between the Department of Health and Human Services, Mornington Peninsula Shire Council, Austin Health, Agriculture Victoria and Melbourne University’s Doherty Institute.

Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt, who attended the public meeting on Saturday, said the Shire maintained full authority over the project and actions undertaken in its municipality.

“My advice to the meeting and the council is that they may want to consider moving to an opt-in program,” Mr Hunt said.

“It was also good to speak to locals about how to better educate physicians and diagnosticians on the ulcer.”

2016 March: Tens of Thousands of Dead Bees (Killarney Victoria). Pesticide: Fipronil

Insecticide devastates beehives

March 14 2016

Warrnambool Standard

CHELSEA Fox and her family love honey and have four beehives on their Killarney property.

She knows that local farmers need to control crickets and locusts but wishes they could use alternatives to the insecticide that recently killed tens of thousands of bees from her hives.

Ms Fox said she first noticed hundreds of dead bees on March 3 around a hive they had commandeered in a shed behind her home.

She later found thousands more mortalities around three other hives she keeps along the fenceline of the family’s rural property and thousands more died in the ensuing days.

“I was devastated to find out that the cause of the death of my bees was due to agricultural spray that is used to control locust and crickets.

“The key ingredient is fipronil and it is highly toxic to bees and a range of other insects and fish.

“A lot of farmers I know choose not to use it and make responsible choices with their chemical use,” Ms Fox said.

“The death caused by this chemical is very slow.

“Each day I have been sweeping up thousands of new dead bees and it's quite heartbreaking for our whole family to see all our hives slowly dying,” she said.

Ms Fox said it was difficult to determine where the chemical was sprayed because bees foraged for up to a 10 kilometre radius. She said she did not want to assign blame to anyone over the deaths.

However she had gone public with the incident in the hope it would raise awareness about the harmful non-target effects of the insecticide. She is also sending a letter to farmers near her property alerting them to the effects of fipronil on bees.

Government specialists in agricultural chemicals have told her there were a range of options available to farmers to control locusts and crickets that did not affect bees.

“If this type of devastation has happened to my four hives, imagine what it's doing to bees on a wider scale,” Ms Fox said.

“We all know that bees are essential for pollinating agricultural crops as well as most of out fruits and vegetables that we eat,” she said.

Insecticide devastates beehives

March 14 2016

https://www.standard.net.au/story/3790222/bees-buzz-no-more-after-chemical-hit/

CHELSEA Fox and her family love honey and have four beehives on their Killarney property.

She knows that local farmers need to control crickets and locusts but wishes they could use alternatives to the insecticide that recently killed tens of thousands of bees from her hives.

Ms Fox said she first noticed hundreds of dead bees on March 3 around a hive they had commandeered in a shed behind her home.

She later found thousands more mortalities around three other hives she keeps along the fenceline of the family’s rural property and thousands more died in the ensuing days.

“I was devastated to find out that the cause of the death of my bees was due to agricultural spray that is used to control locust and crickets.

“The key ingredient is fipronil and it is highly toxic to bees and a range of other insects and fish.

“A lot of farmers I know choose not to use it and make responsible choices with their chemical use,” Ms Fox said.

“The death caused by this chemical is very slow.

“Each day I have been sweeping up thousands of new dead bees and it’s quite heartbreaking for our whole family to see all our hives slowly dying,” she said.

Ms Fox said it was difficult to determine where the chemical was sprayed because bees foraged for up to a 10 kilometre radius. She said she did not want to assign blame to anyone over the deaths.

However she had gone public with the incident in the hope it would raise awareness about the harmful non-target effects of the insecticide. She is also sending a letter to farmers near her property alerting them to the effects of fipronil on bees.

Government specialists in agricultural chemicals have told her there were a range of options available to farmers to control locusts and crickets that did not affect bees.

“If this type of devastation has happened to my four hives, imagine what it’s doing to bees on a wider scale,” Ms Fox said.

“We all know that bees are essential for pollinating agricultural crops as well as most of out fruits and vegetables that we eat,” she said.

2018 April: Busselton Bee Deaths (Western Australia)

Bee deaths investigated

https://thewest.com.au/news/busselton-dunsborough-times/bee-deaths-investigated-ng-b88796601z

5 April 2019

Bee colonies in Busselton and Vasse have been dying and while experts have not yet confirmed the cause and extent, apiarists are pointing to insecticide.

Beekeepers first noticed colonies dying about a month ago and the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development confirmed it has since received several reports.

The issue appears to be concentrated in West Busselton and Vasse but beekeeper Catherine Talbot conceded it was difficult to track given bees’ foraging habits.

“One of my hives is next door and they’re all dead but the two in my backyard are fine,” she said.

“I know of another in Vasse whose hives are fine and a friend of mine ... knows of six (that aren’t).

“It all depends on where the bees are going.”

The Times understands bee deaths from insecticides are not uncommon but Ms Talbot and fellow beekeeper Andrew Weinert said it was the first time they had experienced it locally.

Mr Weinert lost two not-well-established hives and said the remaining bees were still dying.

“There is no easy way to pin point the source of the insecticide as bees will fly up to 5km in any direction,” he said.

Some apiarists queried whether routine spraying by the City of Busselton could be responsible but acting chief executive Paul Needham said the same products had now been used for several years.

“Minor spraying on an ongoing basis is undertaken across the broad area by our parks and gardening crew,” he said.

“The product has been used for many years across the municipality in generally mild doses and we do not believe it would adversely impact bee populations.”

DPIRB is making further inquiries into the reports and said if apiarists suspected insecticide as the cause of bee deaths, they could organise laboratory testing of honey or wax and unusual behaviour or death should be reported.

Renee Hall, who recently started keeping bees with the help of Ms Talbot, said it was distressing to watch the bees die and believed it to be indicative of “the bigger picture”.

“My husband’s been out there sweeping up the poor, disoriented bees — it’s really sad,” she said.

“And it’s got me thinking about what we put onto our food. I make strawberry jam and I think about all the pesticides that go onto strawberries — we eat that stuff.”

Ms Talbot likened the situation to “the canary in the coal mine”.

“It raises awareness about how many toxic elements are in the environment,” she said.

“If bees in your backyard are dying ... it makes you wonder what else is going on out there.”

Bee deaths investigated

https://thewest.com.au/news/busselton-dunsborough-times/bee-deaths-investigated-ng-b88796601z

5 April 2019

Bee colonies in Busselton and Vasse have been dying and while experts have not yet confirmed the cause and extent, apiarists are pointing to insecticide.

Beekeepers first noticed colonies dying about a month ago and the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development confirmed it has since received several reports.

The issue appears to be concentrated in West Busselton and Vasse but beekeeper Catherine Talbot conceded it was difficult to track given bees’ foraging habits.

“One of my hives is next door and they’re all dead but the two in my backyard are fine,” she said.

“I know of another in Vasse whose hives are fine and a friend of mine … knows of six (that aren’t).

“It all depends on where the bees are going.”

The Times understands bee deaths from insecticides are not uncommon but Ms Talbot and fellow beekeeper Andrew Weinert said it was the first time they had experienced it locally.

Mr Weinert lost two not-well-established hives and said the remaining bees were still dying.

“There is no easy way to pin point the source of the insecticide as bees will fly up to 5km in any direction,” he said.

Some apiarists queried whether routine spraying by the City of Busselton could be responsible but acting chief executive Paul Needham said the same products had now been used for several years.

“Minor spraying on an ongoing basis is undertaken across the broad area by our parks and gardening crew,” he said.

“The product has been used for many years across the municipality in generally mild doses and we do not believe it would adversely impact bee populations.”

DPIRB is making further inquiries into the reports and said if apiarists suspected insecticide as the cause of bee deaths, they could organise laboratory testing of honey or wax and unusual behaviour or death should be reported.

Renee Hall, who recently started keeping bees with the help of Ms Talbot, said it was distressing to watch the bees die and believed it to be indicative of “the bigger picture”.

“My husband’s been out there sweeping up the poor, disoriented bees — it’s really sad,” she said.

“And it’s got me thinking about what we put onto our food. I make strawberry jam and I think about all the pesticides that go onto strawberries — we eat that stuff.”

Ms Talbot likened the situation to “the canary in the coal mine”.

“It raises awareness about how many toxic elements are in the environment,” she said.

“If bees in your backyard are dying … it makes you wonder what else is going on out there.”

2012 June: Thousands of Bees Killed – Batemans Bay region (NSW)

Thousands of bees killed as 750 hives poisoned

https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/thousands-of-bees-killed-as-750-hives-poisoned-20120619-20l4z.html

June 19 2012

Hundreds of beehives on the NSW south coast have been sprayed with poison, with a major honey producer left devastated and a harvest ruined.

Police said about 750 beehives were poisoned on properties near Batemans Bay causing about $150,000 worth of damage.

Wendy Roberts from Australian Rainforest Honey at Sunshine Bay, which provides honey to Woolworths around the country, said about 240 of their 5000 hives had been sprayed, killing all the bees inside.

Mrs Roberts said her husband Pat discovered the poisoned hives at two of their sites yesterday morning.

The honey on some of the hives was ready to be harvested this week, but is now contaminated.

Thousands of bees killed as 750 hives poisoned

https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/thousands-of-bees-killed-as-750-hives-poisoned-20120619-20l4z.html

June 19 2012

Hundreds of beehives on the NSW south coast have been sprayed with poison, with a major honey producer left devastated and a harvest ruined.

Police said about 750 beehives were poisoned on properties near Batemans Bay causing about $150,000 worth of damage.

Wendy Roberts from Australian Rainforest Honey at Sunshine Bay, which provides honey to Woolworths around the country, said about 240 of their 5000 hives had been sprayed, killing all the bees inside.

Mrs Roberts said her husband Pat discovered the poisoned hives at two of their sites yesterday morning.

The honey on some of the hives was ready to be harvested this week, but is now contaminated.

2019 June: 10 million bees killed – Griffith (NSW). Pesticide: Fipronil

No more buzz: Griffith apiarists want to see chemical banned from use in Australia after major bee poisoning

https://www.beaudeserttimes.com.au/story/6218101/insecticide-blamed-for-death-of-10-million-bees/

June 14 2019:

The use of a toxic chemical has left 10 million bees in Griffith dead.

Five local apiarists have seen around 340 hives between them destroyed by the use of Fipronil, and they're now calling for the insecticide to be banned in Australia.

The chemical is banned in around 49 countries including most of Europe.

Apiarist Les Ellis lost 75 hives alone to Fipronil contamination.

"It's overkill, it's too toxic," Mr Ellis said.

The chemical has a 120 day half-life which means a drop on a flower can be brought back to a bee hive and can have devastating consequences

Mr Ellis said the inside of hives including wax and honey would either have to be burned or buried and cannot be re-used without endangering new bees.

Mr Ellis said the loss of his 75 hives effectively means he will retire for the second time in his life.

"It would take two years to replace 75 hives, that's two years without income," he said.

Fipronil is often used to combat termites or ants and only needs a few drops to be brought back to a hive or nest to be effective.

What's not clear to the apiarists however, is how 340 hives were contaminated.

One theory is a wild bee hive was sprayed and the then unprotected honey was taken back to the apiarists hives.

While the chemical has been used to protect crops, the apiarists believed when the hives were moved to 'safer' locations closer to Griffith they would have been protected from contamination.

"Twenty years ago people wouldn't care less about bees, now there's a real buzz about bees because people understand the role they play," Ian Carter said.

"We don't know why this chemical is being used in town."

Mr Carter had his bees in two locations to shield them from insecticides however many of those hives have since been destroyed.

Laboratory testing revealed the bees which had died were poisoned by fipronil which is toxic to humans if ingested in large amounts.

Apiarist Tom Doubleday said he believed the use fipronil around Griffith was contrary to the directions.

"There's other chemicals which will do the job, they're less toxic but more costly," Mr Doubleday said.

No more buzz: Griffith apiarists want to see chemical banned from use in Australia after major bee poisoning

https://www.beaudeserttimes.com.au/story/6218101/insecticide-blamed-for-death-of-10-million-bees/

June 14 2019:

The use of a toxic chemical has left 10 million bees in Griffith dead.

Five local apiarists have seen around 340 hives between them destroyed by the use of Fipronil, and they’re now calling for the insecticide to be banned in Australia.

The chemical is banned in around 49 countries including most of Europe.

Apiarist Les Ellis lost 75 hives alone to Fipronil contamination.

“It’s overkill, it’s too toxic,” Mr Ellis said.

The chemical has a 120 day half-life which means a drop on a flower can be brought back to a bee hive and can have devastating consequences

Mr Ellis said the inside of hives including wax and honey would either have to be burned or buried and cannot be re-used without endangering new bees.

Mr Ellis said the loss of his 75 hives effectively means he will retire for the second time in his life.

“It would take two years to replace 75 hives, that’s two years without income,” he said.

Fipronil is often used to combat termites or ants and only needs a few drops to be brought back to a hive or nest to be effective.

What’s not clear to the apiarists however, is how 340 hives were contaminated.

One theory is a wild bee hive was sprayed and the then unprotected honey was taken back to the apiarists hives.

While the chemical has been used to protect crops, the apiarists believed when the hives were moved to ‘safer’ locations closer to Griffith they would have been protected from contamination.

“Twenty years ago people wouldn’t care less about bees, now there’s a real buzz about bees because people understand the role they play,” Ian Carter said.

“We don’t know why this chemical is being used in town.”

Mr Carter had his bees in two locations to shield them from insecticides however many of those hives have since been destroyed.

Laboratory testing revealed the bees which had died were poisoned by fipronil which is toxic to humans if ingested in large amounts.

Apiarist Tom Doubleday said he believed the use fipronil around Griffith was contrary to the directions.

“There’s other chemicals which will do the job, they’re less toxic but more costly,” Mr Doubleday said.

2017 March: Coffs Harbour Blueberry Spraying (NSW). Bees and Methomyl

'Nothing untoward' with chemical spraying on blueberry farms

https://www.coffscoastadvocate.com.au/news/nothing-untoward-with-chemical-spraying-on-blueber/3154125/

13 March 2017

DISCUSSION on radio this morning posed questions whether Coffs Coast blueberry farmers are spraying their crops at night due to public safety issues and the concoction of poisonous chemicals they are spraying?

After hearing the discussion on radio this morning, Southern Cross Honey and Pollination, which supplies 400 bee hives to local blueberry farmers supplying the Oz Berries Group, contacted The Advocate to shed light on the situation.

A company spokesman said blueberry farmers are spraying their crops between dusk and midnight so insecticide residue has dried by morning when bees from the supplied hives are active pollinating the crops.

"The farmers are spraying of a night-time to look after our bees really," a company spokesman said.

"Farmers cannot spray in the middle of the day because it burns the leaves of the blueberry plants.

"The days of spraying nasty chemicals around are gone.

"There is nothing untoward going on at the blueberry farms I supply my bees too, just because they are seen to be spraying their crops of a night-time.

The company spokesman said most local blueberry farmers are rotating the insecticides known as 'Prodigy', which controls moths, caterpillars, heliothis, and bug varieties, and 'Success', which controls moths, butterflies, caterpillars, grubs, slugs and thrips, to ensure problem insects don't build up resistance to one particular brand of spray.

"These chemicals clear within a day or so, I believe, but if the farmers are using another insecticide known as Lannate than that's a worry," the beekeeper said.

"It's like letting off a nuclear bomb for all insects including bees."

Another concern raised by neighbours living near local blueberry farms is spray drift onto their properties.

The local beekeeper said given the cost of the chemicals blueberry farmers aren't going to waste their chemicals by spraying in windy conditions.

"They want the best coverage they can get. A chemical like Prodigy retails for $1500 a litre, they sure aren't going to be wasting it over their neighbours' fences."

"After hearing the discussion on radio I just thought I would ring in and clear up a bit of information for the general public as to why farmers are spraying of a night-time.

"If a farmer is spraying between 3am and 9am personally they won't be having my bees on their property. There's no way the chemical will have cleared by the time the bees are active of a morning.

"Put it this way without bees there are no blueberries, no fruit and there's no profit."

Southern Cross Honey and Pollination supplies two species of bees to local farms for crop pollination, Italian bees (yellow banded bees) and caucasian bees (known for their black appearance).

 

‘Nothing untoward’ with chemical spraying on blueberry farms

https://www.coffscoastadvocate.com.au/news/nothing-untoward-with-chemical-spraying-on-blueber/3154125/

13 March 2017

DISCUSSION on radio this morning posed questions whether Coffs Coast blueberry farmers are spraying their crops at night due to public safety issues and the concoction of poisonous chemicals they are spraying?

After hearing the discussion on radio this morning, Southern Cross Honey and Pollination, which supplies 400 bee hives to local blueberry farmers supplying the Oz Berries Group, contacted The Advocate to shed light on the situation.

A company spokesman said blueberry farmers are spraying their crops between dusk and midnight so insecticide residue has dried by morning when bees from the supplied hives are active pollinating the crops.

“The farmers are spraying of a night-time to look after our bees really,” a company spokesman said.

“Farmers cannot spray in the middle of the day because it burns the leaves of the blueberry plants.

“The days of spraying nasty chemicals around are gone.

“There is nothing untoward going on at the blueberry farms I supply my bees too, just because they are seen to be spraying their crops of a night-time.

The company spokesman said most local blueberry farmers are rotating the insecticides known as ‘Prodigy’, which controls moths, caterpillars, heliothis, and bug varieties, and ‘Success’, which controls moths, butterflies, caterpillars, grubs, slugs and thrips, to ensure problem insects don’t build up resistance to one particular brand of spray.

“These chemicals clear within a day or so, I believe, but if the farmers are using another insecticide known as Lannate than that’s a worry,” the beekeeper said.

“It’s like letting off a nuclear bomb for all insects including bees.”

Another concern raised by neighbours living near local blueberry farms is spray drift onto their properties.

The local beekeeper said given the cost of the chemicals blueberry farmers aren’t going to waste their chemicals by spraying in windy conditions.

“They want the best coverage they can get. A chemical like Prodigy retails for $1500 a litre, they sure aren’t going to be wasting it over their neighbours’ fences.”

“After hearing the discussion on radio I just thought I would ring in and clear up a bit of information for the general public as to why farmers are spraying of a night-time.

“If a farmer is spraying between 3am and 9am personally they won’t be having my bees on their property. There’s no way the chemical will have cleared by the time the bees are active of a morning.

“Put it this way without bees there are no blueberries, no fruit and there’s no profit.”

Southern Cross Honey and Pollination supplies two species of bees to local farms for crop pollination, Italian bees (yellow banded bees) and caucasian bees (known for their black appearance).

 

2018 Feb/Apr: Wappa Dam (Queensland) – Glyphosate, AMPA

Wappa Dam (Queensland) - 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.104ug/L

AMPA: ~0.125ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

Wappa Dam (Queensland) – 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.104ug/L

AMPA: ~0.125ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

2018 Feb/Apr: Cedar Grove Weir (Queensland) – Glyphosate

Cedar Grove Weir (Queensland) - 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.005ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

Cedar Grove Weir (Queensland) – 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.005ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

2018 Feb/Apr: Downstream Fernvale STP (Queensland) – Glyphosate

Downstream Fernvale STP @ Savages CRC (Queensland) - 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.003ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

Downstream Fernvale STP @ Savages CRC (Queensland) – 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.003ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

2018 Feb/Apr: Leslie Harrison Dam (Queensland) – Glyphosate + more

Leslie Harrison Dam (Queensland) - 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.006ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

Leslie Harrison Dam (Queensland) – 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.006ug/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

2018 Feb/Apr – Lake Macdonald (Queensland) – Glyphosate, AMPA

Lake MacDonald (Queensland) - 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.024ug/L

AMPA: ~0.05ng/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

Lake MacDonald (Queensland) – 2018 Feb/Apr

Glyphosate: ~0.024ug/L

AMPA: ~0.05ng/L

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling
Report 8 – Summer 2018 (University of Queensland)

 

2016: Western Treatment Plant Biosolids (Victoria). Pesticides: Aldrin, Chlordane (trans), DDD, DDE, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, Hexachlorobenzene

March 2016 – Biosolids/ Sludge Data Summary (Melbourne Water)

The following data was collected from Melbourne Water’s Eastern and Western Treatments Plants over many years. Various compounds and parameters were tested over this time but those of most interest to the EPA and the public are shown here. This data should be used to give an indication of the average concentrations of pollutants in biosolids and sludge and how these may change as the material changes from fresh to old. Old biosolids are classified as being older than 3 years at the time of testing. All tests were conducted on dried biosolids by NATA accredited laboratories.

Western Treatment Plant Biosolids (Maximum Detections)

Aldrin: 0.3mg/kg

Chlordane (trans): 0.02mg/kg

DDD: 0.29mg/kg

DDE: 0.1mg/kg

Dieldrin: 0.21mg/kg

Heptachlor: 0.03mg/kg

Hexachlorobenzene: 0.012mg/kg

PCB's: 5.98mg/kg

March 2016 – Biosolids/ Sludge Data Summary (Melbourne Water)

The following data was collected from Melbourne Water’s Eastern and Western Treatments Plants over many years. Various compounds and parameters were tested over this time but those of most interest to the EPA and the public are shown here. This data should be used to give an indication of the average concentrations of pollutants in biosolids and sludge and how these may change as the material changes from fresh to old. Old biosolids are classified as being older than 3 years at the time of testing. All tests were conducted on dried biosolids by NATA accredited laboratories.

Western Treatment Plant Biosolids (Maximum Detections)

Aldrin: 0.3mg/kg

Chlordane (trans): 0.02mg/kg

DDD: 0.29mg/kg

DDE: 0.1mg/kg

Dieldrin: 0.21mg/kg

Heptachlor: 0.03mg/kg

Hexachlorobenzene: 0.012mg/kg

PCB’s: 5.98mg/kg

2016: Eastern Treatment Plant Biosolids (Victoria). Pesticides: Aldrin, Chlordane (cis), Chlordane (trans), DDT, DDE, DDD, Dieldrin, Hexachlorobenzene

March 2016 – Biosolids/ Sludge Data Summary (Melbourne Water)

The following data was collected from Melbourne Water’s Eastern and Western Treatments Plants over many years. Various compounds and parameters were tested over this time but those of most interest to the EPA and the public are shown here. This data should be used to give an indication of the average concentrations of pollutants in biosolids and sludge and how these may change as the material changes from fresh to old. Old biosolids are classified as being older than 3 years at the time of testing. All tests were conducted on dried biosolids by NATA accredited laboratories.

Eastern Treatment Plant Biosolids (Maximum Detections)

Aldrin: 0.24mg/kg

Chlordane (cis): 0.031mg/kg

Chlordane (trans): 0.1mg/kg

DDD: 0.089mg/kg

DDE: 0.066mg/kg

DDT: 0.76mg/kg

Dieldrin: 0.12mg/kg

Hexachlorobenzene: 0.049mg/kg

PCB's: 0.18mg/kg

March 2016 – Biosolids/ Sludge Data Summary (Melbourne Water)

The following data was collected from Melbourne Water’s Eastern and Western Treatments Plants over many years. Various compounds and parameters were tested over this time but those of most interest to the EPA and the public are shown here. This data should be used to give an indication of the average concentrations of pollutants in biosolids and sludge and how these may change as the material changes from fresh to old. Old biosolids are classified as being older than 3 years at the time of testing. All tests were conducted on dried biosolids by NATA accredited laboratories.

Eastern Treatment Plant Biosolids (Maximum Detections)

Aldrin: 0.24mg/kg

Chlordane (cis): 0.031mg/kg

Chlordane (trans): 0.1mg/kg

DDD: 0.089mg/kg

DDE: 0.066mg/kg

DDT: 0.76mg/kg

Dieldrin: 0.12mg/kg

Hexachlorobenzene: 0.049mg/kg

PCB’s: 0.18mg/kg

2019 April: St George community forum addresses issue of spray drift (Queensland)

St George community forum addresses issue of spray drift

19 April 2019

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/story/6080070/st-george-landholders-tackling-spray-drift/?cs=4717

Continued incidents of spray drift nation-wide and an estimated damage bill of $1 million to local vineyards have seen St George landholders come together to tackle the issue at a local level.

A group of almost 50 cotton, horticulture and grain growers, as well as industry and regulatory representatives, gathered earlier this month to discuss regulations, education and how best to tackle the issue.

CottonInfo extension officer Andrew McKay said other than discussions around regulations with representatives from APVMA, EPA NSW, and Biosecurity Queensland, the other significant presentation was from Brett Mawbey of SOS Macquarie.

"SOS Macquarie is a group that is already established in the Macquarie Valley in NSW, and they're doing what we're hoping to achieve which is basically educating spray applicators and chemical users, raising their awareness of the issues and perhaps trying to go about how to do it better," he said.

Mr McKay said they hoped to establish a working group in the local area.

"Hopefully the group can get involved in helping to deliver an education piece around how to set up sprayers properly, and get expert input into doing that and working collaboratively with the regulators," he said.

Spray drift, which hit most vineyards in the St George region in mid- to late-September, left an estimated damage bill of $1 million as a result of yield losses and extra picking costs.

Riversands Vineyards owner David Blacket said he had hoped vines would grow out of early leaf damage but losses became apparent in early November.

Growers say it is unclear yet if the vines will also be affected next season.

St George community forum addresses issue of spray drift

19 April 2019

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/story/6080070/st-george-landholders-tackling-spray-drift/?cs=4717

Continued incidents of spray drift nation-wide and an estimated damage bill of $1 million to local vineyards have seen St George landholders come together to tackle the issue at a local level.

A group of almost 50 cotton, horticulture and grain growers, as well as industry and regulatory representatives, gathered earlier this month to discuss regulations, education and how best to tackle the issue.

CottonInfo extension officer Andrew McKay said other than discussions around regulations with representatives from APVMA, EPA NSW, and Biosecurity Queensland, the other significant presentation was from Brett Mawbey of SOS Macquarie.

“SOS Macquarie is a group that is already established in the Macquarie Valley in NSW, and they’re doing what we’re hoping to achieve which is basically educating spray applicators and chemical users, raising their awareness of the issues and perhaps trying to go about how to do it better,” he said.

Mr McKay said they hoped to establish a working group in the local area.

“Hopefully the group can get involved in helping to deliver an education piece around how to set up sprayers properly, and get expert input into doing that and working collaboratively with the regulators,” he said.

Spray drift, which hit most vineyards in the St George region in mid- to late-September, left an estimated damage bill of $1 million as a result of yield losses and extra picking costs.

Riversands Vineyards owner David Blacket said he had hoped vines would grow out of early leaf damage but losses became apparent in early November.

Growers say it is unclear yet if the vines will also be affected next season.

2009/10: Broome (Western Australia) Pesticide: ?

2009/10 Broome (Western Australia)

Pesticides above Australian Drinking Water Guidelines detected in Broome Water Supply.

Pesticide: ?

Amount: ?

Source: Water Corporation 2009/10

2009/10 Broome (Western Australia)

Pesticides above Australian Drinking Water Guidelines detected in Broome Water Supply.

Pesticide: ?

Amount: ?

Source: Water Corporation 2009/10

2019 March. Coffs Harbour NSW. Blueberry Spray Drift Protest

March 19 2019

BLUEBERRY PROTEST IN COFFS HARBOUR

More than 150 Coffs Harbour locals have hit the streets to demand stronger regulation of the region’s rapidly expanding blueberry industry.

Protesters expressed concerns about spray drift and possible contamination of waterways.

March 19 2019

BLUEBERRY PROTEST IN COFFS HARBOUR

More than 150 Coffs Harbour locals have hit the streets to demand stronger regulation of the region’s rapidly expanding blueberry industry.

Protesters expressed concerns about spray drift and possible contamination of waterways.

2018 Jan: Coonamble (NSW). Spray Drift. Paraquat mentioned

16 Jan 2018

Coonamble farmer John Single speaks out on spray drift

https://www.farmonline.com.au/story/5169349/farmer-says-current-spray-drift-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/

Following the spate of news regarding the alleged spray drift in the Walgett shire and beyond, Coonamble farmer, John Single says growers need to step up when it comes to spray drift. 

The recent publicity surrounding herbicide damage to cotton crops is just the tip of the iceberg.

Phenoxy damage to cotton is dramatic in that it is highly visible and can be hugely detrimental to yield.

Hence cotton receives the publicity, and unfortunately, in the eyes of some farmers, cotton growers are seen as the bad guys, as they restrict the use of herbicides in cotton growing areas.

What rubbish.

We all have a very clear obligation to contain all pesticides to their intended target, legally, morally and most importantly environmentally.

We all have a very clear obligation to contain all pesticides to their intended target, legally, morally and most importantly environmentally. - John Single

All too frequently we are seeing herbicide damage to all types of crops and from the various chemical groups, not as obvious as cotton, but it is occurring.

We see it in leaf discolouration, irregular plant growth, reduced or lost tillers and in worst instances plant death.

How often do we drive through cropping areas and witness the obvious damage to the trees, or drift onto pasture country.

In isolated instances traces of paraquat has been detected in grain.

That is frightening.

And what is that distortion in my garden plant and why did that garden plant die?

As a grower who helped develop our current zero tillage cropping systems in the 1980’s and proudly promoted “maximum sustainable economic yield” through zero tillage in the early 1990’s, it is way past time to speak out about pesticide damage that is occurring in this great industry of ours.

We own the industry, we are causing the problem and we must fix it.

If we choose to do nothing, there is no doubt that in time the problem will be fixed for us.  

Take for example the European Union (EU), where the purchase and use of some pesticides is monitored and controlled. 

The EU recently reviewed the use of glyphosate, where it’s use has been approved for a further five years in a close vote.

The implications of Australian farmers loosing glyphosate would be horrendous for farmers and the environment.

Won’t happen you say? remember Helix.

There is no debating that the current situation is unacceptable, it simply must change.

The choices are simple, do nothing and watch government cover the agricultural industry with red tape, and or have certain pesticides banned because of irresponsible use, or we self  regulate.

Self regulation could take many forms, education is the obvious starting point.

Self regulation could take many forms, education is the obvious starting point - John Single

But let’s make certain that the information we put out there is complete.

Drift occurs in many different situations and all needs to be contained, however the primary focus is inversion layer drift.

The industry has itself to blame for inadvertently promoting night and early morning spraying, when inversion conditions are most likely to exist.

This has occurred through the promotion of Delta T conditions under which to operate, ideally of no more than a Delta T eight, which in the summer months principally occurs at night and early morning.

Delta T is the difference between wet and dry bulb thermometer or a measurement of evaporation.

This has promoted better herbicide efficacy.

However no one said where to measure Delta T, so we rely on various weather stations that record well above ground level. 

Unfortunately it is at ground level in the spraying environment that we are interested in.

Frequently Delta T is less at lower heights, so spraying can continue further into the day reducing the need to apply at night.

Weed stress and size have a huge effect on herbicide efficacy, and small rapidly growing weeds are far easier to control than large stressed weeds.

Frequently in a fallow spray program it is better to extend spray hours past Delta T of eight  in order to apply to small actively growing weeds, again reducing the need to spray at night.

The information as to how to contain drift is available, but it is an age old industry problem as to how to beat that information into growers heads.

Habits are hard to break, particularly when dollars are involved.

Chemical card training should be ramped up to include detailed information on drift control, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicine Association (APVMA) need to look at labelling to include inversion layer restrictions, a minimum of a 3 km per hour wind does not mean that there is not an inversion layer.

If growers suffer drift from neighbours, let them know, they may not realise that they or their operators have caused a problem.

The industry used to have the slogan of “conservation farming, good farmers manage it”, it could now be “minimise drift, good farmers manage it”.

Let’s hope that we don’t need to resort to “it’s cool to dob in a drifter” and need to bring in a further drum levy similar to drum muster in order to fund policing of our great and proud industry.

16 Jan 2018

Coonamble farmer John Single speaks out on spray drift

https://www.farmonline.com.au/story/5169349/farmer-says-current-spray-drift-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/

Following the spate of news regarding the alleged spray drift in the Walgett shire and beyond, Coonamble farmer, John Single says growers need to step up when it comes to spray drift. 

The recent publicity surrounding herbicide damage to cotton crops is just the tip of the iceberg.

Phenoxy damage to cotton is dramatic in that it is highly visible and can be hugely detrimental to yield.

Hence cotton receives the publicity, and unfortunately, in the eyes of some farmers, cotton growers are seen as the bad guys, as they restrict the use of herbicides in cotton growing areas.

What rubbish.

We all have a very clear obligation to contain all pesticides to their intended target, legally, morally and most importantly environmentally.

We all have a very clear obligation to contain all pesticides to their intended target, legally, morally and most importantly environmentally. – John Single

All too frequently we are seeing herbicide damage to all types of crops and from the various chemical groups, not as obvious as cotton, but it is occurring.

We see it in leaf discolouration, irregular plant growth, reduced or lost tillers and in worst instances plant death.

How often do we drive through cropping areas and witness the obvious damage to the trees, or drift onto pasture country.

In isolated instances traces of paraquat has been detected in grain.

That is frightening.

And what is that distortion in my garden plant and why did that garden plant die?

As a grower who helped develop our current zero tillage cropping systems in the 1980’s and proudly promoted “maximum sustainable economic yield” through zero tillage in the early 1990’s, it is way past time to speak out about pesticide damage that is occurring in this great industry of ours.

We own the industry, we are causing the problem and we must fix it.

If we choose to do nothing, there is no doubt that in time the problem will be fixed for us.

Take for example the European Union (EU), where the purchase and use of some pesticides is monitored and controlled.

The EU recently reviewed the use of glyphosate, where it’s use has been approved for a further five years in a close vote.

The implications of Australian farmers loosing glyphosate would be horrendous for farmers and the environment.

Won’t happen you say? remember Helix.

There is no debating that the current situation is unacceptable, it simply must change.

The choices are simple, do nothing and watch government cover the agricultural industry with red tape, and or have certain pesticides banned because of irresponsible use, or we self  regulate.

Self regulation could take many forms, education is the obvious starting point.

Self regulation could take many forms, education is the obvious starting point – John Single

But let’s make certain that the information we put out there is complete.

Drift occurs in many different situations and all needs to be contained, however the primary focus is inversion layer drift.

The industry has itself to blame for inadvertently promoting night and early morning spraying, when inversion conditions are most likely to exist.

This has occurred through the promotion of Delta T conditions under which to operate, ideally of no more than a Delta T eight, which in the summer months principally occurs at night and early morning.

Delta T is the difference between wet and dry bulb thermometer or a measurement of evaporation.

This has promoted better herbicide efficacy.

However no one said where to measure Delta T, so we rely on various weather stations that record well above ground level.

Unfortunately it is at ground level in the spraying environment that we are interested in.

Frequently Delta T is less at lower heights, so spraying can continue further into the day reducing the need to apply at night.

Weed stress and size have a huge effect on herbicide efficacy, and small rapidly growing weeds are far easier to control than large stressed weeds.

Frequently in a fallow spray program it is better to extend spray hours past Delta T of eight  in order to apply to small actively growing weeds, again reducing the need to spray at night.

The information as to how to contain drift is available, but it is an age old industry problem as to how to beat that information into growers heads.

Habits are hard to break, particularly when dollars are involved.

Chemical card training should be ramped up to include detailed information on drift control, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicine Association (APVMA) need to look at labelling to include inversion layer restrictions, a minimum of a 3 km per hour wind does not mean that there is not an inversion layer.

If growers suffer drift from neighbours, let them know, they may not realise that they or their operators have caused a problem.

The industry used to have the slogan of “conservation farming, good farmers manage it”, it could now be “minimise drift, good farmers manage it”.

Let’s hope that we don’t need to resort to “it’s cool to dob in a drifter” and need to bring in a further drum levy similar to drum muster in order to fund policing of our great and proud industry.

2019 March – Helicopter Crash Bool Lagoon (South Australia)

Helicopter crashes into power lines at Bool Lagoon in the South East

 
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/helicopter-crashes-into-power-lines-at-bool-lagoon-in-the-south-east/news-story/1acd704906bb441cdcf1761e99e2c15e
 

A pilot has been injured after crashing his helicopter into power lines in the state’s South East.

Just after 2.30pm emergency services were called to the Bool Lagoon, just south of Naracoorte, after the helicopter clipped powerlines.

The pilot, a 31-year-old male from the South-East, suffered minor cuts and bruises in the crash and was taken to the Naracoorte Hospital for treatment.

Despite knocking down powerlines there have been no reports of power outages in the South-East.

Helicopter crashes into power lines at Bool Lagoon in the South East

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/helicopter-crashes-into-power-lines-at-bool-lagoon-in-the-south-east/news-story/1acd704906bb441cdcf1761e99e2c15e

A pilot has been injured after crashing his helicopter into power lines in the state’s South East.

Just after 2.30pm emergency services were called to the Bool Lagoon, just south of Naracoorte, after the helicopter clipped powerlines.

The pilot, a 31-year-old male from the South-East, suffered minor cuts and bruises in the crash and was taken to the Naracoorte Hospital for treatment.

Despite knocking down powerlines there have been no reports of power outages in the South-East.

2019 February: Growers lose $1 million from suspected toxic spray. Pesticide: 2,4-D suspected

DISASTER: Growers lose $1 million from suspected toxic spray

https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/regional/disaster-growers-lose-1-million-from-suspected-toxic-spray/news-story/ee3f97eca06663040bab83dd4f5e38e0

A SUSPECTED spray drift disaster has created a "nightmare harvest” for St George grape grower David Blacket and other farmers who now face an estimated $1 million loss in crops.

The first signs the toxic weed killer had drifted on to Riversands Vineyards and other crops started to show in September 2018 - that's when Mr Blacket and other growers raised their concerns with Biosecurity Queensland. Growers were hoping their vines would grow out of the early leaf damage, however their harvest yielded small, unmarketable berries.

This resulted in a loss estimated to be in the seven figures.

The Riversands Vineyards owner said he and two other grape growers in the region were feeling the loss.

"It was a nightmare harvest, with approximately half of our Menindee crop unmarketable, due to below spec berry size,” Mr Blacket said.

"Bunch weights were lighter, picking costs were also doubled, due to higher piece rates required to compensate the slow picking.

"Aggregated losses across all the vineyards in St George is around one million dollars.”

The Balonne Beacon understands Biosecurity Queensland has launched an investigation into whether spray drift from 2,4-D affected crops.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority introduced new 2,4-D label instructions in October 2018 in an attempt to curtail spray drift cases.

Users of 2,4-D now must comply with the new label instructions, even if they are using products with the old labels - which includes a requirement not to spray in inversion conditions and additional information on recognising inversion conditions.

These label changes came in less than a month after Mr Blacket and other growers reported their case to Biosecurity Queensland.

Mr Blacket previously told the Balonne Beacon he didn't know the source of the 2,4-D spraying.

However he believes it has drifted from fallow weed spraying in the early weeks of September.

"This is money that won't be circulating through the town, all because of careless spray application in unsuitable conditions,” he said.

"We (the horticultural industry) already cop enough risks growing these crops without additional risks from herbicide drift.

"It is so insidious and difficult to manage for.”

George Faessler, a nearby table grape grower, said his crops were also severely affected.

"My Flame Seedless crop was particularly hard hit, with most of the fruit unmarketable,” he said.

David Moon, an onion and cotton grower from Moonrocks, said he felt 2,4-D should be banned completely in horticultural and cotton regions.

"There are better, more cost effective options to use, which have far less risk attached,” he said.

 

DISASTER: Growers lose $1 million from suspected toxic spray

https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/regional/disaster-growers-lose-1-million-from-suspected-toxic-spray/news-story/ee3f97eca06663040bab83dd4f5e38e0

A SUSPECTED spray drift disaster has created a “nightmare harvest” for St George grape grower David Blacket and other farmers who now face an estimated $1 million loss in crops.

The first signs the toxic weed killer had drifted on to Riversands Vineyards and other crops started to show in September 2018 – that’s when Mr Blacket and other growers raised their concerns with Biosecurity Queensland. Growers were hoping their vines would grow out of the early leaf damage, however their harvest yielded small, unmarketable berries.

This resulted in a loss estimated to be in the seven figures.

The Riversands Vineyards owner said he and two other grape growers in the region were feeling the loss.

“It was a nightmare harvest, with approximately half of our Menindee crop unmarketable, due to below spec berry size,” Mr Blacket said.

“Bunch weights were lighter, picking costs were also doubled, due to higher piece rates required to compensate the slow picking.

“Aggregated losses across all the vineyards in St George is around one million dollars.”

The Balonne Beacon understands Biosecurity Queensland has launched an investigation into whether spray drift from 2,4-D affected crops.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority introduced new 2,4-D label instructions in October 2018 in an attempt to curtail spray drift cases.

Users of 2,4-D now must comply with the new label instructions, even if they are using products with the old labels – which includes a requirement not to spray in inversion conditions and additional information on recognising inversion conditions.

These label changes came in less than a month after Mr Blacket and other growers reported their case to Biosecurity Queensland.

Mr Blacket previously told the Balonne Beacon he didn’t know the source of the 2,4-D spraying.

However he believes it has drifted from fallow weed spraying in the early weeks of September.

“This is money that won’t be circulating through the town, all because of careless spray application in unsuitable conditions,” he said.

“We (the horticultural industry) already cop enough risks growing these crops without additional risks from herbicide drift.

“It is so insidious and difficult to manage for.”

George Faessler, a nearby table grape grower, said his crops were also severely affected.

“My Flame Seedless crop was particularly hard hit, with most of the fruit unmarketable,” he said.

David Moon, an onion and cotton grower from Moonrocks, said he felt 2,4-D should be banned completely in horticultural and cotton regions.

“There are better, more cost effective options to use, which have far less risk attached,” he said.

 

2018 December: Spray Drift Costs Lucerne Grower $1.3m (Victoria)

Spray drift costs lucerne grower $1.3 million in damages

A LUCERNE grower has been ordered to pay more than $1.3 million in damages for herbicide spray drift that damaged a neighbouring spring onion crop.

Supreme Court Justice Melinda Richards ruled last week GG & PM Burrell — a family-owned company at Beverford, north of Swan Hill — was liable for drift from herbicide spraying of a lucerne crop in July 2014.

The spray drift damaged 12.14ha of commercial spring onions grown by Butler Market Gardens, another family-owned vegetable business.

Justice Richards found drift from the spraying of Burrell’s lucerne crop on July 28, 2014, damaged BMG’s spring onions crop.

Gavan Wilson, an independent contractor, was hired by Craig Burrell to spray and harvest the lucerne crop.

It is alleged Mr Burrell asked Mr Wilson to do the winter clean-up of a lucerne crop on the Burrell farm, ­including the lucerne crop to the north and northwest of the Swan Hill block.

Mr Burrell allegedly did not give Mr Wilson specific instructions beyond asking him to get it done and to be mindful of the spring onions.

“Before that day, the spring onions were in ‘fantastic’ condition and were ready to harvest exactly on target,” Justice Richards said.

“There was no sign of damage before the spraying and the first of the spring onions were in fact harvested on July 28, 2014.

“After Gavan Wilson spray­ed the lucerne to the north and west of the spring onions with herbicide, in weather conditions that were conducive to spray drift, many people ­observed the damage to the spring onions.

“The nature and pattern of the damage was consistent with herbicide spray drift.”

Justice Richards found neither Mr Burrell or Mr Wilson held an agricultural chemical user permit or a commercial operator licence.

BMG subsequently spent about $665,000 buying spring onions from a Queensland grower and transporting them to Victoria following the damage to their crop from the spray drift, in an effort to meet a supply commitment for ­supermarkets.

Justice Richards ordered Burrell to pay BMG $1,346,570 in damages for the lost crop.

Victorian Farmers Federation grains president Ross Johns said all farmers should take care when spraying crops or risk being held liable for damage.

“It’s our responsibility not to damage neighbouring property or anyone else’s property,” Mr Johns said.

“Farmers almost every year spray during the summer period — this year is very similar, in some areas there’s been higher rainfall and stronger weed growth.

“Weather conditions play a huge role in sprayer performance (and) the operator needs to be very aware of weather conditions.

“It’s just important to adhere to these guidelines.”

The Weekly Times had contacted the Butler family for comment.

Spray drift costs lucerne grower $1.3 million in damages

A LUCERNE grower has been ordered to pay more than $1.3 million in damages for herbicide spray drift that damaged a neighbouring spring onion crop.

Supreme Court Justice Melinda Richards ruled last week GG & PM Burrell — a family-owned company at Beverford, north of Swan Hill — was liable for drift from herbicide spraying of a lucerne crop in July 2014.

The spray drift damaged 12.14ha of commercial spring onions grown by Butler Market Gardens, another family-owned vegetable business.

Justice Richards found drift from the spraying of Burrell’s lucerne crop on July 28, 2014, damaged BMG’s spring onions crop.

Gavan Wilson, an independent contractor, was hired by Craig Burrell to spray and harvest the lucerne crop.

It is alleged Mr Burrell asked Mr Wilson to do the winter clean-up of a lucerne crop on the Burrell farm, ­including the lucerne crop to the north and northwest of the Swan Hill block.

Mr Burrell allegedly did not give Mr Wilson specific instructions beyond asking him to get it done and to be mindful of the spring onions.

“Before that day, the spring onions were in ‘fantastic’ condition and were ready to harvest exactly on target,” Justice Richards said.

“There was no sign of damage before the spraying and the first of the spring onions were in fact harvested on July 28, 2014.

“After Gavan Wilson spray­ed the lucerne to the north and west of the spring onions with herbicide, in weather conditions that were conducive to spray drift, many people ­observed the damage to the spring onions.

“The nature and pattern of the damage was consistent with herbicide spray drift.”

Justice Richards found neither Mr Burrell or Mr Wilson held an agricultural chemical user permit or a commercial operator licence.

BMG subsequently spent about $665,000 buying spring onions from a Queensland grower and transporting them to Victoria following the damage to their crop from the spray drift, in an effort to meet a supply commitment for ­supermarkets.

Justice Richards ordered Burrell to pay BMG $1,346,570 in damages for the lost crop.

Victorian Farmers Federation grains president Ross Johns said all farmers should take care when spraying crops or risk being held liable for damage.

“It’s our responsibility not to damage neighbouring property or anyone else’s property,” Mr Johns said.

“Farmers almost every year spray during the summer period — this year is very similar, in some areas there’s been higher rainfall and stronger weed growth.

“Weather conditions play a huge role in sprayer performance (and) the operator needs to be very aware of weather conditions.

“It’s just important to adhere to these guidelines.”

The Weekly Times had contacted the Butler family for comment.

2018 December – Farmers seek compensation over claims chemical contamination of herbicides wiped out vegetable crops (Victoria) – Pesticides:

Farmers seek compensation over claims chemical contamination of herbicides wiped out vegetable crops

Dec 17, 2018: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-17/australian-vegetable-farmers-legal-action-tainted-herbicides/10568578?fbclid=IwAR2_LGCa6eQ01AYVzeEE2a_V0cqzkF25rAerniqOoC6mUo8H7jccMAEWxI0

ome of Australia's biggest vegetable farmers are fighting for compensation, claiming their food crops were decimated by contaminated herbicides.

Multinational chemical companies Syngenta and Nufarm recalled tens of thousands of litres of tainted herbicide in late 2016 and early 2017.

The products are commonly used on a range of vegetable crops including spring onions, leeks, carrots, celery and corn to control weeds.

They contained impurities from different herbicides, which have been traced back to the manufacturer.

But not before many farmers unwittingly sprayed the polluted products on their farms.

The national agrochemical regulator says the contaminants don't pose a risk to human health, if used according to instructions.

But some growers claim the toxic mix-up wiped out many tonnes of valuable produce.

'Huge financial stress'

One farmer, who doesn't want to be named, says his business and his family have been devastated by the contamination.

"The crops just weren't performing, they weren't growing as they should, they were just slow or stunted, pale."

He says agricultural experts have ruled out other potential causes, and tests suggest chemicals are to blame.

"The herbicide is doing the damage. I'm very confident of that," the farmer said.

"We lost crops, we've lost income from that, we're under huge financial stress.

"It hurt our family and our partnerships and it's hurt relationships with other farmers and other people in the industry.

"It's something that I wish had never happened."

He is seeking compensation for the losses and says he is afraid to be identified for fear of a consumer backlash and punitive action by the chemical companies.

Do you know more about this story? Email NatRegional@abc.net.au.

A family struggle

The Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) is concerned for the farmer's welfare.

President of the VFF's horticulture group Emma Germano says it's taking a toll on his whole family.

Contaminants in Syngenta's recalled Gesagard and Primextra Gold products and Nufarm's recalled Ramrod product:

  • Diflufenican
  • Prometryn/Turbutryn
  • Propachlor
  • Simazine
  • Thidiazuron
  • Atrazine
  • MCPA
  • Propyzamide

*Not all the affected herbicides contained all the contaminants listed above
Source: The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicine Authority (APVMA) and Nufarm

*Syngenta declined to provide the list of contaminants its analysis of the contaminated herbicides found.
Syngenta said it provided the information to the APVMA.

"Farming businesses are generally family businesses, and to see an entire family struggle with this has been very difficult," she said.

"The amount of stress that he's under and his family is under, and his extended family is under, is incredible.

"Watching this farmer go through such an incredible amount of financial and psychological stress has been the thing that we've been most concerned about for him," she said.

He's not the only farmer in dispute with the chemical companies over the allegations of crop damage.

Contamination in court

A major Victorian vegetable grower has taken his claim that contaminated herbicides wiped out his crops to the Supreme Court of Victoria.

Court documents show Riviera Farms is claiming contaminated batches of Syngenta's Gesagard and Primextra Gold products spoiled carrot and corn crops.

The farm business is suing Syngenta and manufacturing company Accensi.

The contamination stemmed from a manufacturing fault at the Accensi factory where the herbicides were made and the company has been fined $100,000.

Defence documents show Syngenta and Accensi deny the allegations.

They're blaming the crop failures on improper herbicide application and other farm-management failures.

Recall process slammed

One of the allegations in Riviera Farms' statement of claim is that the farm was never notified of the herbicide recall.

A number of farmers and agricultural experts have criticised the recall process as inadequate and secretive.

The companies didn't advertise the withdrawal but instead asked their chemical retailers to contact growers

The VFF's Ms Germano says attempts to let farmers know did not go far enough.

"When this recall happened, it was a very piecemeal approach," she said.

"It wasn't reported widely enough. We're concerned about the fact that the recall just essentially didn't have farmers at its core.

"The Victorian Farmers Federation was not told about this recall."

Ms Germano says some producers may still be unaware of the recall.

"We think that there needs to be a very clear recall process. If you want everyone to know about something that's a problem, you make sure that everybody knows about it," she said.

'In severe distress'

US-based agricultural consultant and herbicide expert Chuck Kupatt says he's seen crop damage on one of the affected farms.

"I saw plants that were in severe distress, were not growing in many instances, that would never form a crop," he said.

Mr Kupatt says the testing suggests chemical contaminants are the cause.

"What I've seen would support that there's damaging levels of residual compounds in that soil," he said.

It's now almost two years since the recall and Mr Kupatt says the issue should have been resolved by now.

"Everything is done in good faith, both when the companies develop the products, and when the farmers purchase them and use them," he said.

"But if there's a mistake, we have to put our big-boy pants on and say, 'Yeah, OK, we had a problem and we'll take care of the situation'."

'Unpredictable brew'

Mr Kupatt says the contaminants are chemicals that can be found in other herbicides for different crops.

But he said most of them would not normally be applied to the vegetable crops they were used on.

"Some of the contaminants that are on that list would generally not be used in vegetable culture because there is no tolerance to the crop," he said.

"Which means if you spray them on the crop, you can get damage."

Mr Kupatt says there is little or no independent science on how the contaminants might act in combination with each other, or with the active ingredients in the herbicide.

"Now that's probably the biggest questions here … nobody would have ever thought to research those combinations," he said.

"There's several different types of chemistry here with many different modes of action.

"If you had any combination of these, you're probably going to have a pretty unpredictable brew when you have them all put together into a product. So putting five or six of them together is a really, really difficult situation."

'Cocktail of herbicides'

Agricultural consultant David Bell has been employed by a number of farmers concerned about chemical contamination to provide expert advice.

He says farmers are afraid to speak out about the problem.

"These are very, very large multinational chemical companies, who wield big sticks in the industry," he said.

He says the mix of chemicals means there could be a multiplication effect going on.

"What we've got is a cocktail of herbicides in the drums," he said.

"We've got a poor plant trying to outgrow one herbicide, then being whacked by a second or third or even fourth or fifth herbicide."

He too says he's seen the personal toll the dispute is taking.

"I see farmers stand in paddocks with tears running down their face, looking at crops that these farmers take pride in growing," he said.

"Their crops are literally dying before their eyes … These are very, very good vegetable farmers that are struggling to have people understand that it's the herbicides that have caused the damage to their farms."

Call for inquiry

Independent agricultural and herbicide expert John Seidel said it would be very difficult to prove the combination of chemical contaminants was totally safe for crops.

"When you put it in different soil types … the amount of breakdown depends on microbial action, on amount of rainfall, and a lot of factors come into play," he said.

"I think it needs a bit more due diligence, a bit more stewardship from the companies to find out exactly what is going on here."

"They could get an independent umpire to look into it, and that would satisfy both parties," he said.

"If you had someone independent gathering the information, and the company has got nothing to hide, that would be wonderful for them as well."

Companies say they acted swiftly

In a statement to the ABC, Syngenta defended the way it carried out the recall.

It said the company, "does not have access to the contact details of every farmer" in Australia and that it went through herbicide retailers because of their direct access to farmers.

Syngenta said this course of action was in accordance with the voluntary recall guidelines of the national agrochemical regulator, the APVMA.

The company also said it carried out its own scientific risk assessments, which confirmed the contamination posed an extremely low risk to the environment, crops or animals.

And that this information was provided to the APVMA as part of the voluntary recall process.

Syngenta said it was dealing with two claims from vegetable growers.

The company also said it had appointed an independent research agronomist to help address potential concerns from growers about the withdrawn batches of contaminated herbicide, and that those discussions would be confidential.

Nufarm said it was alerted to the problem by a grower's report of crop damage and that it swiftly notified the APVMA and conducted a thorough voluntary recall.

Nufarm said in its recall notice that use of the affected herbicides might result in crop damage, and offered free testing of produce and soil.

The company said it used a range of methods to reach growers who might have used the contaminated product, including contacting chemical retailers, peak horticultural bodies and, in some cases, farmers directly.

Nufarm said it had worked with growers who made claims on a case-by-case basis, and that only one claim remained outstanding.

Accensi declined to comment, as did the Federal Agriculture Minister, David Littleproud.

Process needs to be 'robust'

Since the recall, the APVMA has made changes to recall processes and now publishes voluntary recalls on its website.

But critics say it's not enough, and that advertising of all recalls should be compulsory.

While this contamination didn't spark human health concerns from authorities, affected farmers say it has raised questions about the adequacy of agrochemical regulation in Australia.

Ms Germano says there are rules in place to protect farmers and food safety, but its important to make sure those rules are working.

"We saw that there was an improvement in the process, through the APVMA when this incident occurred," she said.

"But we just want to make sure that this process is really robust.

"Mistakes happen, but we need to be able to deal with that when it happens."

It's too late for farmers who say they've suffered as a result of this contamination.

One farmer, who wanted to remain anonymous, told the ABC it was not up to growers to take on the chemical giants when things like this go wrong.

He said the APVMA should be protecting farmers from damaging incidents like this and the companies involved should be more helpful.

"I speak to a number of growers around Victoria and Australia," he said.

"It certainly hurt a lot of businesses, and some can't afford to fight it, and some just can't win the battle … They knew there was damage, they should've helped growers a lot more.

"It was handled badly and we've got to learn from this … The next time it happens, and it will happen again, it's got to be handled better."

Farmers seek compensation over claims chemical contamination of herbicides wiped out vegetable crops

Dec 17, 2018: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-17/australian-vegetable-farmers-legal-action-tainted-herbicides/10568578?fbclid=IwAR2_LGCa6eQ01AYVzeEE2a_V0cqzkF25rAerniqOoC6mUo8H7jccMAEWxI0

ome of Australia’s biggest vegetable farmers are fighting for compensation, claiming their food crops were decimated by contaminated herbicides.

Multinational chemical companies Syngenta and Nufarm recalled tens of thousands of litres of tainted herbicide in late 2016 and early 2017.

The products are commonly used on a range of vegetable crops including spring onions, leeks, carrots, celery and corn to control weeds.

They contained impurities from different herbicides, which have been traced back to the manufacturer.

But not before many farmers unwittingly sprayed the polluted products on their farms.

The national agrochemical regulator says the contaminants don’t pose a risk to human health, if used according to instructions.

But some growers claim the toxic mix-up wiped out many tonnes of valuable produce.

‘Huge financial stress’

One farmer, who doesn’t want to be named, says his business and his family have been devastated by the contamination.

“The crops just weren’t performing, they weren’t growing as they should, they were just slow or stunted, pale.”

He says agricultural experts have ruled out other potential causes, and tests suggest chemicals are to blame.

“The herbicide is doing the damage. I’m very confident of that,” the farmer said.

“We lost crops, we’ve lost income from that, we’re under huge financial stress.

“It hurt our family and our partnerships and it’s hurt relationships with other farmers and other people in the industry.

“It’s something that I wish had never happened.”

He is seeking compensation for the losses and says he is afraid to be identified for fear of a consumer backlash and punitive action by the chemical companies.

Do you know more about this story? Email NatRegional@abc.net.au.

A family struggle

The Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) is concerned for the farmer’s welfare.

President of the VFF’s horticulture group Emma Germano says it’s taking a toll on his whole family.

Contaminants in Syngenta’s recalled Gesagard and Primextra Gold products and Nufarm’s recalled Ramrod product:

  • Diflufenican
  • Prometryn/Turbutryn
  • Propachlor
  • Simazine
  • Thidiazuron
  • Atrazine
  • MCPA
  • Propyzamide

*Not all the affected herbicides contained all the contaminants listed above
Source: The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicine Authority (APVMA) and Nufarm

*Syngenta declined to provide the list of contaminants its analysis of the contaminated herbicides found.
Syngenta said it provided the information to the APVMA.

“Farming businesses are generally family businesses, and to see an entire family struggle with this has been very difficult,” she said.

“The amount of stress that he’s under and his family is under, and his extended family is under, is incredible.

“Watching this farmer go through such an incredible amount of financial and psychological stress has been the thing that we’ve been most concerned about for him,” she said.

He’s not the only farmer in dispute with the chemical companies over the allegations of crop damage.

Contamination in court

A major Victorian vegetable grower has taken his claim that contaminated herbicides wiped out his crops to the Supreme Court of Victoria.

Court documents show Riviera Farms is claiming contaminated batches of Syngenta’s Gesagard and Primextra Gold products spoiled carrot and corn crops.

The farm business is suing Syngenta and manufacturing company Accensi.

The contamination stemmed from a manufacturing fault at the Accensi factory where the herbicides were made and the company has been fined $100,000.

Defence documents show Syngenta and Accensi deny the allegations.

They’re blaming the crop failures on improper herbicide application and other farm-management failures.

Recall process slammed

One of the allegations in Riviera Farms’ statement of claim is that the farm was never notified of the herbicide recall.

A number of farmers and agricultural experts have criticised the recall process as inadequate and secretive.

The companies didn’t advertise the withdrawal but instead asked their chemical retailers to contact growers

The VFF’s Ms Germano says attempts to let farmers know did not go far enough.

“When this recall happened, it was a very piecemeal approach,” she said.

“It wasn’t reported widely enough. We’re concerned about the fact that the recall just essentially didn’t have farmers at its core.

“The Victorian Farmers Federation was not told about this recall.”

Ms Germano says some producers may still be unaware of the recall.

“We think that there needs to be a very clear recall process. If you want everyone to know about something that’s a problem, you make sure that everybody knows about it,” she said.

‘In severe distress’

US-based agricultural consultant and herbicide expert Chuck Kupatt says he’s seen crop damage on one of the affected farms.

“I saw plants that were in severe distress, were not growing in many instances, that would never form a crop,” he said.

Mr Kupatt says the testing suggests chemical contaminants are the cause.

“What I’ve seen would support that there’s damaging levels of residual compounds in that soil,” he said.

It’s now almost two years since the recall and Mr Kupatt says the issue should have been resolved by now.

“Everything is done in good faith, both when the companies develop the products, and when the farmers purchase them and use them,” he said.

“But if there’s a mistake, we have to put our big-boy pants on and say, ‘Yeah, OK, we had a problem and we’ll take care of the situation’.”

‘Unpredictable brew’

Mr Kupatt says the contaminants are chemicals that can be found in other herbicides for different crops.

But he said most of them would not normally be applied to the vegetable crops they were used on.

“Some of the contaminants that are on that list would generally not be used in vegetable culture because there is no tolerance to the crop,” he said.

“Which means if you spray them on the crop, you can get damage.”

Mr Kupatt says there is little or no independent science on how the contaminants might act in combination with each other, or with the active ingredients in the herbicide.

“Now that’s probably the biggest questions here … nobody would have ever thought to research those combinations,” he said.

“There’s several different types of chemistry here with many different modes of action.

“If you had any combination of these, you’re probably going to have a pretty unpredictable brew when you have them all put together into a product. So putting five or six of them together is a really, really difficult situation.”

‘Cocktail of herbicides’

Agricultural consultant David Bell has been employed by a number of farmers concerned about chemical contamination to provide expert advice.

He says farmers are afraid to speak out about the problem.

“These are very, very large multinational chemical companies, who wield big sticks in the industry,” he said.

He says the mix of chemicals means there could be a multiplication effect going on.

“What we’ve got is a cocktail of herbicides in the drums,” he said.

“We’ve got a poor plant trying to outgrow one herbicide, then being whacked by a second or third or even fourth or fifth herbicide.”

He too says he’s seen the personal toll the dispute is taking.

“I see farmers stand in paddocks with tears running down their face, looking at crops that these farmers take pride in growing,” he said.

“Their crops are literally dying before their eyes … These are very, very good vegetable farmers that are struggling to have people understand that it’s the herbicides that have caused the damage to their farms.”

Call for inquiry

Independent agricultural and herbicide expert John Seidel said it would be very difficult to prove the combination of chemical contaminants was totally safe for crops.

“When you put it in different soil types … the amount of breakdown depends on microbial action, on amount of rainfall, and a lot of factors come into play,” he said.

“I think it needs a bit more due diligence, a bit more stewardship from the companies to find out exactly what is going on here.”

“They could get an independent umpire to look into it, and that would satisfy both parties,” he said.

“If you had someone independent gathering the information, and the company has got nothing to hide, that would be wonderful for them as well.”

Companies say they acted swiftly

In a statement to the ABC, Syngenta defended the way it carried out the recall.

It said the company, “does not have access to the contact details of every farmer” in Australia and that it went through herbicide retailers because of their direct access to farmers.

Syngenta said this course of action was in accordance with the voluntary recall guidelines of the national agrochemical regulator, the APVMA.

The company also said it carried out its own scientific risk assessments, which confirmed the contamination posed an extremely low risk to the environment, crops or animals.

And that this information was provided to the APVMA as part of the voluntary recall process.

Syngenta said it was dealing with two claims from vegetable growers.

The company also said it had appointed an independent research agronomist to help address potential concerns from growers about the withdrawn batches of contaminated herbicide, and that those discussions would be confidential.

Nufarm said it was alerted to the problem by a grower’s report of crop damage and that it swiftly notified the APVMA and conducted a thorough voluntary recall.

Nufarm said in its recall notice that use of the affected herbicides might result in crop damage, and offered free testing of produce and soil.

The company said it used a range of methods to reach growers who might have used the contaminated product, including contacting chemical retailers, peak horticultural bodies and, in some cases, farmers directly.

Nufarm said it had worked with growers who made claims on a case-by-case basis, and that only one claim remained outstanding.

Accensi declined to comment, as did the Federal Agriculture Minister, David Littleproud.

Process needs to be ‘robust’

Since the recall, the APVMA has made changes to recall processes and now publishes voluntary recalls on its website.

But critics say it’s not enough, and that advertising of all recalls should be compulsory.

While this contamination didn’t spark human health concerns from authorities, affected farmers say it has raised questions about the adequacy of agrochemical regulation in Australia.

Ms Germano says there are rules in place to protect farmers and food safety, but its important to make sure those rules are working.

“We saw that there was an improvement in the process, through the APVMA when this incident occurred,” she said.

“But we just want to make sure that this process is really robust.

“Mistakes happen, but we need to be able to deal with that when it happens.”

It’s too late for farmers who say they’ve suffered as a result of this contamination.

One farmer, who wanted to remain anonymous, told the ABC it was not up to growers to take on the chemical giants when things like this go wrong.

He said the APVMA should be protecting farmers from damaging incidents like this and the companies involved should be more helpful.

“I speak to a number of growers around Victoria and Australia,” he said.

“It certainly hurt a lot of businesses, and some can’t afford to fight it, and some just can’t win the battle … They knew there was damage, they should’ve helped growers a lot more.

“It was handled badly and we’ve got to learn from this … The next time it happens, and it will happen again, it’s got to be handled better.”

2018 November: Griffith Spraydrift (New South Wales). Pesticide: 2,4-D

Further drift incidents cause concern

Gregor Heard@grheard

14 Nov 2018, 11:47 a.m.

 
https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5757590/further-drift-incidents-cause-concern/?cs=4751

Australian sprayers are being cautioned they risk losing critical chemistry if they continue to cause damage through spray drift.

 

JUST weeks after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) issued new regulations to do with usage of 2,4-D herbicides to reduce the risk of drift there have been reports down the east coast of summer crop damaged by chemical drift.

Spray application expert Mary O’Brien said she had been contacted about drift events in locations ranging from central Queensland to as far south as Griffith in the Riverina.

“It’s a real concern, I’ve been a strong advocate of making sure you do everything right to minimise the risk of inversion but it does not appear the message is getting through.

“If we’re not careful there’s the real risk this chemistry will be taken off us, and I imagine the people farming in areas where there is not a summer cropping industry will not be pleased to lose a valuable chemistry because of incidents like these,” Ms O’Brien said.

Her comments on drift incidents were backed up by an agronomist in the Moree district who declined to be named.

He said a client had lost 150 hectares of cotton due to drift damage from an unknown chemical.

“We don’t know what it chemical it was exactly but the damage has certainly been done.”

“It is still early enough to replant, but the cost of sourcing new seed and replanting is going to be around $100/ha, so it is a substantial cost.”

Further to this, Ms O’Brien said she had heard of issues with cotton in CQ, grape vines that suffered from chemical damage in the St George area and 34ha of cotton damaged at Griffith.

Ms O’Brien has previously spoken out about the risks of night spraying.

“For me, in order to manage risk properly, I would not be spraying at night because the risk of inversion is just too great,” she said.

“In virtually all instances in Australian conditions over virtually all year, the risk of inversion grows at night so it is something you have to weigh up very carefully.”

Grain Producers South Australia chairman Wade Dabinett said grain growers in SA, which a strong viticulture sector, have long understood the need for minimising drift.

“People who farm around grape areas know they have to be super careful not to jeopardise other people’s livelihoods,” Mr Dabinett said.

“I think we are doing the right thing and showing we are good stewards of products such as 2,4-D, which is in our interest as we want to retain the chemistry.”

The story Further drift incidents cause concern first appeared on Farm Online.

Further drift incidents cause concern

Gregor Heard@grheard

https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5757590/further-drift-incidents-cause-concern/?cs=4751

Australian sprayers are being cautioned they risk losing critical chemistry if they continue to cause damage through spray drift.

JUST weeks after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) issued new regulations to do with usage of 2,4-D herbicides to reduce the risk of drift there have been reports down the east coast of summer crop damaged by chemical drift.

Spray application expert Mary O’Brien said she had been contacted about drift events in locations ranging from central Queensland to as far south as Griffith in the Riverina.

“It’s a real concern, I’ve been a strong advocate of making sure you do everything right to minimise the risk of inversion but it does not appear the message is getting through.

“If we’re not careful there’s the real risk this chemistry will be taken off us, and I imagine the people farming in areas where there is not a summer cropping industry will not be pleased to lose a valuable chemistry because of incidents like these,” Ms O’Brien said.

Her comments on drift incidents were backed up by an agronomist in the Moree district who declined to be named.

He said a client had lost 150 hectares of cotton due to drift damage from an unknown chemical.

“We don’t know what it chemical it was exactly but the damage has certainly been done.”

“It is still early enough to replant, but the cost of sourcing new seed and replanting is going to be around $100/ha, so it is a substantial cost.”

Further to this, Ms O’Brien said she had heard of issues with cotton in CQ, grape vines that suffered from chemical damage in the St George area and 34ha of cotton damaged at Griffith.

Ms O’Brien has previously spoken out about the risks of night spraying.

“For me, in order to manage risk properly, I would not be spraying at night because the risk of inversion is just too great,” she said.

“In virtually all instances in Australian conditions over virtually all year, the risk of inversion grows at night so it is something you have to weigh up very carefully.”

Grain Producers South Australia chairman Wade Dabinett said grain growers in SA, which a strong viticulture sector, have long understood the need for minimising drift.

“People who farm around grape areas know they have to be super careful not to jeopardise other people’s livelihoods,” Mr Dabinett said.

“I think we are doing the right thing and showing we are good stewards of products such as 2,4-D, which is in our interest as we want to retain the chemistry.”

The story Further drift incidents cause concern first appeared on Farm Online.

2018 November: St. George Grapevine Damage (NSW). Pesticide: 2,4-D

Further drift incidents cause concern

Gregor Heard@grheard

14 Nov 2018, 11:47 a.m.

 
https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5757590/further-drift-incidents-cause-concern/?cs=4751
 

Australian sprayers are being cautioned they risk losing critical chemistry if they continue to cause damage through spray drift.

 

JUST weeks after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) issued new regulations to do with usage of 2,4-D herbicides to reduce the risk of drift there have been reports down the east coast of summer crop damaged by chemical drift.

Spray application expert Mary O’Brien said she had been contacted about drift events in locations ranging from central Queensland to as far south as Griffith in the Riverina.

“It’s a real concern, I’ve been a strong advocate of making sure you do everything right to minimise the risk of inversion but it does not appear the message is getting through.

“If we’re not careful there’s the real risk this chemistry will be taken off us, and I imagine the people farming in areas where there is not a summer cropping industry will not be pleased to lose a valuable chemistry because of incidents like these,” Ms O’Brien said.

Her comments on drift incidents were backed up by an agronomist in the Moree district who declined to be named.

He said a client had lost 150 hectares of cotton due to drift damage from an unknown chemical.

“We don’t know what it chemical it was exactly but the damage has certainly been done.”

“It is still early enough to replant, but the cost of sourcing new seed and replanting is going to be around $100/ha, so it is a substantial cost.”

Further to this, Ms O’Brien said she had heard of issues with cotton in CQ, grape vines that suffered from chemical damage in the St George area and 34ha of cotton damaged at Griffith.

Ms O’Brien has previously spoken out about the risks of night spraying.

“For me, in order to manage risk properly, I would not be spraying at night because the risk of inversion is just too great,” she said.

“In virtually all instances in Australian conditions over virtually all year, the risk of inversion grows at night so it is something you have to weigh up very carefully.”

Grain Producers South Australia chairman Wade Dabinett said grain growers in SA, which a strong viticulture sector, have long understood the need for minimising drift.

“People who farm around grape areas know they have to be super careful not to jeopardise other people’s livelihoods,” Mr Dabinett said.

“I think we are doing the right thing and showing we are good stewards of products such as 2,4-D, which is in our interest as we want to retain the chemistry.”

The story Further drift incidents cause concern first appeared on Farm Online.

Further drift incidents cause concern

Gregor Heard@grheard

https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5757590/further-drift-incidents-cause-concern/?cs=4751

Australian sprayers are being cautioned they risk losing critical chemistry if they continue to cause damage through spray drift.

JUST weeks after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) issued new regulations to do with usage of 2,4-D herbicides to reduce the risk of drift there have been reports down the east coast of summer crop damaged by chemical drift.

Spray application expert Mary O’Brien said she had been contacted about drift events in locations ranging from central Queensland to as far south as Griffith in the Riverina.

“It’s a real concern, I’ve been a strong advocate of making sure you do everything right to minimise the risk of inversion but it does not appear the message is getting through.

“If we’re not careful there’s the real risk this chemistry will be taken off us, and I imagine the people farming in areas where there is not a summer cropping industry will not be pleased to lose a valuable chemistry because of incidents like these,” Ms O’Brien said.

Her comments on drift incidents were backed up by an agronomist in the Moree district who declined to be named.

He said a client had lost 150 hectares of cotton due to drift damage from an unknown chemical.

“We don’t know what it chemical it was exactly but the damage has certainly been done.”

“It is still early enough to replant, but the cost of sourcing new seed and replanting is going to be around $100/ha, so it is a substantial cost.”

Further to this, Ms O’Brien said she had heard of issues with cotton in CQ, grape vines that suffered from chemical damage in the St George area and 34ha of cotton damaged at Griffith.

Ms O’Brien has previously spoken out about the risks of night spraying.

“For me, in order to manage risk properly, I would not be spraying at night because the risk of inversion is just too great,” she said.

“In virtually all instances in Australian conditions over virtually all year, the risk of inversion grows at night so it is something you have to weigh up very carefully.”

Grain Producers South Australia chairman Wade Dabinett said grain growers in SA, which a strong viticulture sector, have long understood the need for minimising drift.

“People who farm around grape areas know they have to be super careful not to jeopardise other people’s livelihoods,” Mr Dabinett said.

“I think we are doing the right thing and showing we are good stewards of products such as 2,4-D, which is in our interest as we want to retain the chemistry.”

The story Further drift incidents cause concern first appeared on Farm Online.

2018 November: Spraydrift (Central Queensland). Pesticide: 2,4-D

Further drift incidents cause concern

Gregor Heard@grheard

14 Nov 2018, 11:47 a.m.

 
https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5757590/further-drift-incidents-cause-concern/?cs=4751

Australian sprayers are being cautioned they risk losing critical chemistry if they continue to cause damage through spray drift.

JUST weeks after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) issued new regulations to do with usage of 2,4-D herbicides to reduce the risk of drift there have been reports down the east coast of summer crop damaged by chemical drift.

Spray application expert Mary O’Brien said she had been contacted about drift events in locations ranging from central Queensland to as far south as Griffith in the Riverina.

“It’s a real concern, I’ve been a strong advocate of making sure you do everything right to minimise the risk of inversion but it does not appear the message is getting through.

“If we’re not careful there’s the real risk this chemistry will be taken off us, and I imagine the people farming in areas where there is not a summer cropping industry will not be pleased to lose a valuable chemistry because of incidents like these,” Ms O’Brien said.

Her comments on drift incidents were backed up by an agronomist in the Moree district who declined to be named.

He said a client had lost 150 hectares of cotton due to drift damage from an unknown chemical.

“We don’t know what it chemical it was exactly but the damage has certainly been done.”

“It is still early enough to replant, but the cost of sourcing new seed and replanting is going to be around $100/ha, so it is a substantial cost.”

Further to this, Ms O’Brien said she had heard of issues with cotton in CQ, grape vines that suffered from chemical damage in the St George area and 34ha of cotton damaged at Griffith.

Ms O’Brien has previously spoken out about the risks of night spraying.

“For me, in order to manage risk properly, I would not be spraying at night because the risk of inversion is just too great,” she said.

“In virtually all instances in Australian conditions over virtually all year, the risk of inversion grows at night so it is something you have to weigh up very carefully.”

Grain Producers South Australia chairman Wade Dabinett said grain growers in SA, which a strong viticulture sector, have long understood the need for minimising drift.

“People who farm around grape areas know they have to be super careful not to jeopardise other people’s livelihoods,” Mr Dabinett said.

“I think we are doing the right thing and showing we are good stewards of products such as 2,4-D, which is in our interest as we want to retain the chemistry.”

 

The story Further drift incidents cause concern first appeared on Farm Online.

Further drift incidents cause concern

Gregor Heard@grheard

https://www.northqueenslandregister.com.au/story/5757590/further-drift-incidents-cause-concern/?cs=4751

Australian sprayers are being cautioned they risk losing critical chemistry if they continue to cause damage through spray drift.

JUST weeks after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) issued new regulations to do with usage of 2,4-D herbicides to reduce the risk of drift there have been reports down the east coast of summer crop damaged by chemical drift.

Spray application expert Mary O’Brien said she had been contacted about drift events in locations ranging from central Queensland to as far south as Griffith in the Riverina.

“It’s a real concern, I’ve been a strong advocate of making sure you do everything right to minimise the risk of inversion but it does not appear the message is getting through.

“If we’re not careful there’s the real risk this chemistry will be taken off us, and I imagine the people farming in areas where there is not a summer cropping industry will not be pleased to lose a valuable chemistry because of incidents like these,” Ms O’Brien said.

Her comments on drift incidents were backed up by an agronomist in the Moree district who declined to be named.

He said a client had lost 150 hectares of cotton due to drift damage from an unknown chemical.

“We don’t know what it chemical it was exactly but the damage has certainly been done.”

“It is still early enough to replant, but the cost of sourcing new seed and replanting is going to be around $100/ha, so it is a substantial cost.”

Further to this, Ms O’Brien said she had heard of issues with cotton in CQ, grape vines that suffered from chemical damage in the St George area and 34ha of cotton damaged at Griffith.

Ms O’Brien has previously spoken out about the risks of night spraying.

“For me, in order to manage risk properly, I would not be spraying at night because the risk of inversion is just too great,” she said.

“In virtually all instances in Australian conditions over virtually all year, the risk of inversion grows at night so it is something you have to weigh up very carefully.”

Grain Producers South Australia chairman Wade Dabinett said grain growers in SA, which a strong viticulture sector, have long understood the need for minimising drift.

“People who farm around grape areas know they have to be super careful not to jeopardise other people’s livelihoods,” Mr Dabinett said.

“I think we are doing the right thing and showing we are good stewards of products such as 2,4-D, which is in our interest as we want to retain the chemistry.”

The story Further drift incidents cause concern first appeared on Farm Online.

2018 September: Alstonville Bee Deaths (New South Wales). Pesticide: Fipronil

Independent Testing found Fipronil in these bees at 0.005ug/bee (sep/oct 2018)

Cause of mass bee death a mystery

EARLIER this month, Alstonville amateur beekeeper Mark Fleming managed to find a break in the rain, and went out to check on his beehives. What he found horrified him.

There were hundreds of dead and dying bees blanketing ground at the foot of his hives, with more appearing out of the hive with every passing second.

"They were just coming out of the hive and falling and dying,” Mr Fleming said.

"I didn't even think that it could be poison at first.”

After studying some of the dead bees, Mr Fleming started to notice recurring characteristics.

"Dying bees have been showing jerky movements, and have been falling on to their sides and back,” he said.

"Their proboscises have also been protruding, which is something that usually only happens while foraging.”

Following research online, Mr Fleming believes the bees had all been poisoned by chemical sprays or pesticides.

Mark soon discovered that his hives weren't the only ones affected.

Sandy Jeudwine and Michael Koenen live one kilometre away from Mark, and are fellow amateur beekeepers, and discovered their bees were dying too.

He believed that it may have been happening from a few days before, due to the amount of dead bees, but can't be sure.

The largest hives have been the ones hit most severely.

It is impossible to calculate just how many bees have been lost, however the numbers are in the thousands.

Even dead larvae have been spotted being thrown out of Michael and Sandy's hives, impacting the next generation of bees as well.

"It's an agonising death. It's not sudden, but slow and painful,” Mr Fleming said.

Honey bees can forage for anywhere up to a two- kilometre radius from their hives, so trying to figure out where the poisoning happened would be practically impossible.

Mrs Jeudwine hopes that the poisoning was an accidental mistake.

Northern Rivers Amateur Beekeepers Association's biosecurity officer Stephen Fowler said they were not trying to point the finger or place blame on someone.

"We just want people to understand,” Mrs Jeudwine said.

"We love our bees, so we're just devastated,” Mrs Jeudwine said.

"We're natural beekeepers, so we got into beekeeping to care for the welfare of the bees.”

Testing the dead bees for cause of death is very expensive, and even so, it would be difficult to pinpoint the exact poison or chemical.

What makes the whole situation worse is with every single hive affected, there is the possibility that the keepers have lost queens out of one or more of their hives, and it would be difficult to replace them.

"We're just hoping that the hives can hold out and survive so that we can introduce a new queen if necessary,” Mr Fleming said.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority received two reports of bee deaths last week, and is investigating.

EPA Director North Adam Gilligan said the EPA took all reports of bee deaths very seriously and would consider all avenues, including impact from pesticides as part of its investigation.

"Bees play an important role in any healthy ecosystem and are essential for the survival of many plant species and food crops,” Mr Gilligan said.

"To help reduce risks to bees from pesticide spraying, we encourage beekeepers to let farmers know specifically when and where they are going to put their hives.”

Any pesticide spraying should be undertaken at night when bees are not foraging.

Farmers have a responsibility to ensure they are using herbicides and pesticides safely, including following product instructions carefully, monitoring local weather conditions and connecting with any local bee keepers, other farmers and surrounding neighbours ahead of time.

The EPA contacted the Australian Macadamia Society last week to remind growers that

We encourage people to report any suspected pesticide misuse to the EPA's Environment Line 131555, providing as much information about the incident as possible.

For further information about pesticide misuse, please refer to the EPA's website https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse.

It is an offence under the EPA's legislation to use pesticides in a manner that harms non-target animals with hefty penalties.

The maximum penalties for this are $120,000 for an individual, and $250,000 for a corporation.

Independent Testing found Fipronil in these bees at 0.005ug/bee (sep/oct 2018)

Cause of mass bee death a mystery

EARLIER this month, Alstonville amateur beekeeper Mark Fleming managed to find a break in the rain, and went out to check on his beehives. What he found horrified him.

There were hundreds of dead and dying bees blanketing ground at the foot of his hives, with more appearing out of the hive with every passing second.

“They were just coming out of the hive and falling and dying,” Mr Fleming said.

“I didn’t even think that it could be poison at first.”

After studying some of the dead bees, Mr Fleming started to notice recurring characteristics.

“Dying bees have been showing jerky movements, and have been falling on to their sides and back,” he said.

“Their proboscises have also been protruding, which is something that usually only happens while foraging.”

Following research online, Mr Fleming believes the bees had all been poisoned by chemical sprays or pesticides.

Mark soon discovered that his hives weren’t the only ones affected.

Sandy Jeudwine and Michael Koenen live one kilometre away from Mark, and are fellow amateur beekeepers, and discovered their bees were dying too.

He believed that it may have been happening from a few days before, due to the amount of dead bees, but can’t be sure.

The largest hives have been the ones hit most severely.

It is impossible to calculate just how many bees have been lost, however the numbers are in the thousands.

Even dead larvae have been spotted being thrown out of Michael and Sandy’s hives, impacting the next generation of bees as well.

“It’s an agonising death. It’s not sudden, but slow and painful,” Mr Fleming said.

Honey bees can forage for anywhere up to a two- kilometre radius from their hives, so trying to figure out where the poisoning happened would be practically impossible.

Mrs Jeudwine hopes that the poisoning was an accidental mistake.

Northern Rivers Amateur Beekeepers Association’s biosecurity officer Stephen Fowler said they were not trying to point the finger or place blame on someone.

“We just want people to understand,” Mrs Jeudwine said.

“We love our bees, so we’re just devastated,” Mrs Jeudwine said.

“We’re natural beekeepers, so we got into beekeeping to care for the welfare of the bees.”

Testing the dead bees for cause of death is very expensive, and even so, it would be difficult to pinpoint the exact poison or chemical.

What makes the whole situation worse is with every single hive affected, there is the possibility that the keepers have lost queens out of one or more of their hives, and it would be difficult to replace them.

“We’re just hoping that the hives can hold out and survive so that we can introduce a new queen if necessary,” Mr Fleming said.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority received two reports of bee deaths last week, and is investigating.

EPA Director North Adam Gilligan said the EPA took all reports of bee deaths very seriously and would consider all avenues, including impact from pesticides as part of its investigation.

“Bees play an important role in any healthy ecosystem and are essential for the survival of many plant species and food crops,” Mr Gilligan said.

“To help reduce risks to bees from pesticide spraying, we encourage beekeepers to let farmers know specifically when and where they are going to put their hives.”

Any pesticide spraying should be undertaken at night when bees are not foraging.

Farmers have a responsibility to ensure they are using herbicides and pesticides safely, including following product instructions carefully, monitoring local weather conditions and connecting with any local bee keepers, other farmers and surrounding neighbours ahead of time.

The EPA contacted the Australian Macadamia Society last week to remind growers that

We encourage people to report any suspected pesticide misuse to the EPA’s Environment Line 131555, providing as much information about the incident as possible.

For further information about pesticide misuse, please refer to the EPA’s website https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/your-environment/pesticides/preventing-pesticide-misuse.

It is an offence under the EPA’s legislation to use pesticides in a manner that harms non-target animals with hefty penalties.

The maximum penalties for this are $120,000 for an individual, and $250,000 for a corporation.

2018 October: Indian Government Warns About Glyphosate on Dals. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Modi govt says imported Moong and Masoor dals  likely to be poisonous

Oct 23 2018: https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/india/modi-govt-says-imported-moong-and-masoor-dals-likely-to-be-poisonous

FSSAI has issued warning to people to halt the consumption of Moong and Masoor dal. These lentils contain residues of the highly toxic herbicide Glyphosate, used by farmers to clear weeds

The Food Safety and Standards of India (FSSAI) has issued warning to people to halt the consumption of Moong and Masoor dal. These lentils contain residues of the highly toxic herbicide Glyphosate, used by farmers to clear weeds. It is being imported from Canada and Australia.

India does not have its own regulations on toxic herbicide Glyphosate. Therefore, FSSAI has adopted the international standards in order to ensure that the lentils being sold are safe for consumption.

According to report in The Pioneer, "There is a possibility of higher levels of residues of the herbicide Glyphosate in pulses which could adversely affect the health of consumers here. Since the maximum residual limits (MRL) for Glyphosate in pulses has not been specified in the FSSAI regulations, we have asked the concerned officials to follow the MRL for the herbicide as specified in the Codex standards,” said Food Safety and Standards of India official.

FSSAI has also directed laboratories to test the pulses for ‘Glyphosate” along with other parameters.

The apex food regulation authority came into action after Canadian food security activist Santanu Mitra alleged that imported lentils from Australia moong dal and Canadian masoor dal contain high level of Glyphosate. Food safety and agricultural scientists too are issuing warning that the use of glyphosate may prove dangerous as in Sri Lanka, where many sugarcane farmers died due to renal failure after being overexposed to the herbicide.

“Mitra thinks that the Indian diet might have become overly contaminated from imported pulses. The pulses need to be tested for glyphosate residue at every entry point which is not being carried out presently,” said an FSSAI official.

Till 2015, the herbicide Glyphosate was considered to be safe but then the WHO’s IARC classified it as a probable human carcinogen. In India, it seems that Glyphosate is being used as a pre-harvest desiccant in several crops resulting in high residues in food.

Dr GV Ramanjaneyulu, agricultural scientist and founder of Centre for Sustainable Agriculture said in a report that while it is mandatory to label organic products, imported pulses are not labelled. “It's very difficult to find out if we are consuming Canadian pulses or locally grown ones, if they are sold in loose,” he warned.

Modi govt says imported Moong and Masoor dals  likely to be poisonous

Oct 23 2018: https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/india/modi-govt-says-imported-moong-and-masoor-dals-likely-to-be-poisonous

FSSAI has issued warning to people to halt the consumption of Moong and Masoor dal. These lentils contain residues of the highly toxic herbicide Glyphosate, used by farmers to clear weeds

The Food Safety and Standards of India (FSSAI) has issued warning to people to halt the consumption of Moong and Masoor dal. These lentils contain residues of the highly toxic herbicide Glyphosate, used by farmers to clear weeds. It is being imported from Canada and Australia.

India does not have its own regulations on toxic herbicide Glyphosate. Therefore, FSSAI has adopted the international standards in order to ensure that the lentils being sold are safe for consumption.

According to report in The Pioneer, “There is a possibility of higher levels of residues of the herbicide Glyphosate in pulses which could adversely affect the health of consumers here. Since the maximum residual limits (MRL) for Glyphosate in pulses has not been specified in the FSSAI regulations, we have asked the concerned officials to follow the MRL for the herbicide as specified in the Codex standards,” said Food Safety and Standards of India official.

FSSAI has also directed laboratories to test the pulses for ‘Glyphosate” along with other parameters.

The apex food regulation authority came into action after Canadian food security activist Santanu Mitra alleged that imported lentils from Australia moong dal and Canadian masoor dal contain high level of Glyphosate. Food safety and agricultural scientists too are issuing warning that the use of glyphosate may prove dangerous as in Sri Lanka, where many sugarcane farmers died due to renal failure after being overexposed to the herbicide.

“Mitra thinks that the Indian diet might have become overly contaminated from imported pulses. The pulses need to be tested for glyphosate residue at every entry point which is not being carried out presently,” said an FSSAI official.

Till 2015, the herbicide Glyphosate was considered to be safe but then the WHO’s IARC classified it as a probable human carcinogen. In India, it seems that Glyphosate is being used as a pre-harvest desiccant in several crops resulting in high residues in food.

Dr GV Ramanjaneyulu, agricultural scientist and founder of Centre for Sustainable Agriculture said in a report that while it is mandatory to label organic products, imported pulses are not labelled. “It’s very difficult to find out if we are consuming Canadian pulses or locally grown ones, if they are sold in loose,” he warned.

2018 October – 4 Spray Drift Incidents (Central Highlands Queensland ). Pesticide:2,4-D

Cotton looks promising

19 October 2018 - Central Highlands Queensland

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/story/5712465/spray-drift-strikes-central-highlands-cotton/

"... It’s not all positive in the region though, with four incidents of spray drift causing damage to crops already. 

Cotton Australia chief executive officer, Adam Kay, said it was incredibly disappointing and frustrating to see that many reports already this season.

“It will take a little bit of time to see whether it's actually just been a light dusting and it might grow through, or if it's been quite heavy and affects the plant,” he said.

“The next couple of weeks will tell if the crops can recover from it.” 

Mr Kay said he encouraged all farmers who use 2,4-D to look at the new guidelines and label changes, and act accordingly. 

“In talking to the APVMA, if these changes they've made don't result in a reduction in spray drift, or an elimination of spray drift, they've got to move to much more severe restrictions,” he said.

Cotton looks promising

19 October 2018 – Central Highlands Queensland

https://www.queenslandcountrylife.com.au/story/5712465/spray-drift-strikes-central-highlands-cotton/

“… It’s not all positive in the region though, with four incidents of spray drift causing damage to crops already.

Cotton Australia chief executive officer, Adam Kay, said it was incredibly disappointing and frustrating to see that many reports already this season.

“It will take a little bit of time to see whether it’s actually just been a light dusting and it might grow through, or if it’s been quite heavy and affects the plant,” he said.

“The next couple of weeks will tell if the crops can recover from it.”

Mr Kay said he encouraged all farmers who use 2,4-D to look at the new guidelines and label changes, and act accordingly.

“In talking to the APVMA, if these changes they’ve made don’t result in a reduction in spray drift, or an elimination of spray drift, they’ve got to move to much more severe restrictions,” he said.

2017 December. Mackay Catchment (Queensland). Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, DEET, Imidacloprid, 2,4-D, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, MCPA, Metolachlor, 4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate, 4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate

Mackay Catchment Qld - December 2017

Chlorpyrifos: 0.0057ug/L (highest detection)

DEET: 0.0116ug/L (highest detection)

Imidacloprid: 0.415ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.045ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.0206ug/L (highest detection)

Diuron: 0.0274ug/L (highest detection)

Hexazinone: 0.0516ug/L (highest detection)

MCPA: 0.0226ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.0067ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0154ug/L (highest detection)

4-tert-Octylphenol (adjuvant): 0.0067ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0097ug/L (highest detection)

Metalaxyl: 0.0064ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

Mackay Catchment Qld – December 2017

Chlorpyrifos: 0.0057ug/L (highest detection)

DEET: 0.0116ug/L (highest detection)

Imidacloprid: 0.415ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.045ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.0206ug/L (highest detection)

Diuron: 0.0274ug/L (highest detection)

Hexazinone: 0.0516ug/L (highest detection)

MCPA: 0.0226ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.0067ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0154ug/L (highest detection)

4-tert-Octylphenol (adjuvant): 0.0067ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0097ug/L (highest detection)

Metalaxyl: 0.0064ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

2017 April: Burnett-Mary Catchment (Queensland. Pesticides: Imidacloprid, 2,4-D, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, 4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate, 4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate, Metalaxyl

Burnett-Mary Catchment Qld - April 2017

Imidacloprid: 0.0173ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.0311ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.136ug/L (highest detection)

Diuron: 0.0153ug/L (highest detection)

Hexazinone: 0.036ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.155ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0101ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.006ug/L (highest detection)

Metalaxyl: 0.0064ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

Burnett-Mary Catchment Qld – April 2017

Imidacloprid: 0.0173ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.0311ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.136ug/L (highest detection)

Diuron: 0.0153ug/L (highest detection)

Hexazinone: 0.036ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.155ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0101ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.006ug/L (highest detection)

Metalaxyl: 0.0064ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

2017 March: Logan Catchment (Queensland). Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Chlorpyrifos, Clothianidin, Fipronil, Imidacloprid, 2,4-D, Atrazine, MCPA, Metolachlor, 4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate, 4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate, Bentrotriazole

Logan Catchment Qld - March 2017

Bifenthrin: 0.0206ug/L (highest detection)

Chlorpyrifos: 0.043ug/L (highest detection)

Clothianidin: 0.0049ug/L (highest detection)

Fipronil: 0.0738ug/L (highest detection)

Imidacloprid: 0.0297ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.0644ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.0042ug/L (highest detection)

MCPA: 0.0145ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.211ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0211ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0142ug/L (highest detection)

Benzotriazole (corrosion inhibitor): 0.0142ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

Logan Catchment Qld – March 2017

Bifenthrin: 0.0206ug/L (highest detection)

Chlorpyrifos: 0.043ug/L (highest detection)

Clothianidin: 0.0049ug/L (highest detection)

Fipronil: 0.0738ug/L (highest detection)

Imidacloprid: 0.0297ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.0644ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.0042ug/L (highest detection)

MCPA: 0.0145ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.211ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-mono-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0211ug/L (highest detection)

4-Nonylphenol-di-ethoxylate (adjuvant): 0.0142ug/L (highest detection)

Benzotriazole (corrosion inhibitor): 0.0142ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

2017 March: Clarence Catchment (New South Wales). Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, 2,4-D, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron,

Clarence Catchment NSW

Chlorpyrifos: 0.0179ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.01450ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.011ug/L (highest detection)

Diuron: 0.0187ug/L (highest detection)

Hexazinone: 0.0038ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.0098ug/L (highest detection)

Tebuthiuron: 0.0023ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

Clarence Catchment NSW

Chlorpyrifos: 0.0179ug/L (highest detection)

2,4-D: 0.01450ug/L (highest detection)

Atrazine: 0.011ug/L (highest detection)

Diuron: 0.0187ug/L (highest detection)

Hexazinone: 0.0038ug/L (highest detection)

Metolachlor: 0.0098ug/L (highest detection)

Tebuthiuron: 0.0023ug/L (highest detection)

Source: The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp agriculture: An assessment for north eastern Australia. Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: February 2018 (Hook, Sellars, Kookana, Kumar)

2018 September: Katherine (Northern Territory). 1 Million Bees Poisoned. Pesticide: Fipronil

About 1 million bees dead in NT after second suspected deliberate poisoning incident in a year

NT Country Hour

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-09-25/million-bees-dead-in-second-suspected-deliberate-poisoning-nt/10297858

A Northern Territory beekeeper says about 1 million of his bees have been deliberately killed with an insecticide, in the second suspected poisoning of commercial bee boxes near Katherine in a year.

Sam Curtis found the dead bees inside and near their boxes on a track outside Katherine, a few kilometres off the Victoria Highway, in July.

Last week he received confirmation from a laboratory that the bees had died from Fipronil poisoning — an insecticide commonly used to kill termites.

The hives were about 5 kilometres from where another beekeeper had about 120 hives of bees die from the same insecticide in November.

Mr Curtis said the loss of bees would set his business back about $20,000.

"We had 100 breeding colonies that were completely decimated and we had probably 20 full-strength hives that were totally destroyed," he said.

"The rest were severely weakened, so we had to clean out the comb in the boxes so there was no [insecticide] residue affecting the brood rearing, so the bees can recover.

Mr Curtis has ruled out the bees being accidentally poisoned by insecticide use on a nearby mango farm because it was spraying a different chemical.

He suspected the person responsible for the poisoning was someone who "doesn't like bees".

"Some people reckon it could be greenies because they think that [European] bees attack the native bee colonies, so they would try and kill the European species," Mr Curtis said.

"Or it could be anyone related to the agriculture sector because Fipronil is a rather difficult chemical to come across."

Two mass bee poisonings may be linked

More than 10 months on from the mass poisoning of Nathan Woods's bees near Katherine, no-one has been held responsible and NT Police have closed their investigation.

Mr Curtis said it was possible the two cases were linked because they both occurred in the same area.

"Both of us like to put bees out that way for various trees, but our beehives aren't very noticeable from the road," he said.

"So this person obviously goes up and down [that track] regularly, if it is the same person."

In addition to the loss of the bees, Mr Curtis said he was reluctant to return his bees to what was one of his best locations to place his hives.

"We were trying to breed queen bees to replace some of the hives that were dying over the years for pollination; this has really screwed that up because that was our queening site," he said.

Mr Curtis said he had asked NT Police to investigate the deaths of his bees.

About 1 million bees dead in NT after second suspected deliberate poisoning incident in a year

NT Country Hour

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-09-25/million-bees-dead-in-second-suspected-deliberate-poisoning-nt/10297858

A Northern Territory beekeeper says about 1 million of his bees have been deliberately killed with an insecticide, in the second suspected poisoning of commercial bee boxes near Katherine in a year.

Sam Curtis found the dead bees inside and near their boxes on a track outside Katherine, a few kilometres off the Victoria Highway, in July.

Last week he received confirmation from a laboratory that the bees had died from Fipronil poisoning — an insecticide commonly used to kill termites.

The hives were about 5 kilometres from where another beekeeper had about 120 hives of bees die from the same insecticide in November.

Mr Curtis said the loss of bees would set his business back about $20,000.

“We had 100 breeding colonies that were completely decimated and we had probably 20 full-strength hives that were totally destroyed,” he said.

“The rest were severely weakened, so we had to clean out the comb in the boxes so there was no [insecticide] residue affecting the brood rearing, so the bees can recover.

Mr Curtis has ruled out the bees being accidentally poisoned by insecticide use on a nearby mango farm because it was spraying a different chemical.

He suspected the person responsible for the poisoning was someone who “doesn’t like bees”.

“Some people reckon it could be greenies because they think that [European] bees attack the native bee colonies, so they would try and kill the European species,” Mr Curtis said.

“Or it could be anyone related to the agriculture sector because Fipronil is a rather difficult chemical to come across.”

Two mass bee poisonings may be linked

More than 10 months on from the mass poisoning of Nathan Woods’s bees near Katherine, no-one has been held responsible and NT Police have closed their investigation.

Mr Curtis said it was possible the two cases were linked because they both occurred in the same area.

“Both of us like to put bees out that way for various trees, but our beehives aren’t very noticeable from the road,” he said.

“So this person obviously goes up and down [that track] regularly, if it is the same person.”

In addition to the loss of the bees, Mr Curtis said he was reluctant to return his bees to what was one of his best locations to place his hives.

“We were trying to breed queen bees to replace some of the hives that were dying over the years for pollination; this has really screwed that up because that was our queening site,” he said.

Mr Curtis said he had asked NT Police to investigate the deaths of his bees.

2016 September – Broken Hill Area 60 Dead Eagles (New South Wales) – Methomyl

https://markpearson.org.au/question-without-notice-lannate-l-insecticide/

Question Without Notice-Lannate L Insecticide

On our recent visit to Broken Hill where I hosted a community forum, some alarming reports of animal cruelty and abuse were conveyed to myself and my staff. One of the more distressing issues was that of farmers and landholders using Lannate L insecticide, a highly dangerous schedule seven chemical, to poison wild animals, including wild dogs, foxes and wedge tail eagles. Reports of even insect eating animals such as birds and echidnas dying from consuming ants that have landed on Lannate L baited carcassess has sparked serious community concern.

I questioned the Minister on this issue and it seems he has forgotten that he is the person responsible for animal welfare in this state. Whether an animal is native or not is irrelevant, the issue here is the unauthorised use of a highly dangerous poison on wild animals which causes immense suffering and a slow lingering death.

Question

Mark Pearson MLC

My question is directed to the Minister for Primary Industries. At my recent community forum in Broken Hill I was told that it was common practice for landholders to purchase Lannate L, a schedule 7 insecticide, known colloquially as “Magic” because if used undiluted on a carcass it will kill anything. I was told of a sheep farmer who killed 60 wedge-tailed eagles in one week.

Will the Minister advise whether the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority has approved the use of Lannate L for wild animal control?

If not, will the Minister direct his department to investigate this unauthorised and cruel use of a schedule 7 poison?

https://markpearson.org.au/question-without-notice-lannate-l-insecticide/

Question Without Notice-Lannate L Insecticide

On our recent visit to Broken Hill where I hosted a community forum, some alarming reports of animal cruelty and abuse were conveyed to myself and my staff. One of the more distressing issues was that of farmers and landholders using Lannate L insecticide, a highly dangerous schedule seven chemical, to poison wild animals, including wild dogs, foxes and wedge tail eagles. Reports of even insect eating animals such as birds and echidnas dying from consuming ants that have landed on Lannate L baited carcassess has sparked serious community concern.

I questioned the Minister on this issue and it seems he has forgotten that he is the person responsible for animal welfare in this state. Whether an animal is native or not is irrelevant, the issue here is the unauthorised use of a highly dangerous poison on wild animals which causes immense suffering and a slow lingering death.

Question

Mark Pearson MLC

My question is directed to the Minister for Primary Industries. At my recent community forum in Broken Hill I was told that it was common practice for landholders to purchase Lannate L, a schedule 7 insecticide, known colloquially as “Magic” because if used undiluted on a carcass it will kill anything. I was told of a sheep farmer who killed 60 wedge-tailed eagles in one week.

Will the Minister advise whether the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority has approved the use of Lannate L for wild animal control?

If not, will the Minister direct his department to investigate this unauthorised and cruel use of a schedule 7 poison?

2018 September: Tubbut (East Gippsland) – Farm Worker Jailed for Poisoning 406 Wedge-Tail Eagles. Pesticide: Methomyl

Farm worker who poisoned 406 wedge-tailed eagles in east Gippsland jailed and fined

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-24/man-poisoned-wedge-tailed-eagles-in-gippsland-jailed/10298426

A New Zealand man has been jailed for 14 days and fined $2,500 for poisoning 406 wedge-tailed eagles at three remote properties in Victoria's east.

Key points:

  • It's the first time in Victorian history a person has been jailed for wildlife destruction
  • The farm worker said he poisoned the birds under the direction of his employer
  • A retired wildlife officer says such culling of eagles is common on farms

Farm worker Murray James Silvester, 59, pleaded guilty to killing the protected birds at Tubbut in east Gippsland between October 2016 and April 2018.

The eagle carcasses were found hidden in bush and scrub on three separate farms spanning 2,000 hectares.

Other protected species including a kookaburra, ravens and a raptor were also found dead

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) prosecutor Chrisanthi Paganis told the Sale Magistrates' Court Silvester first alerted authorities to his actions in May 2018 after an argument with his boss, landowner John Auer.

Silvester provided investigators with two diaries detailing the methods used and a hand-drawn map showing where the eagle carcasses were hidden and where the chemicals were stored.

Silvester also named others involved.

The prosecutor told the court other people were being investigated over the killings but had not been charged.

Chemicals injected into necks of sheep to lure eagles

Ms Paganis told the court three different chemicals were used to kill the eagles, but most of the eagle deaths were caused by the chemical Lannate (Methomyl).

"John Auer showed him how to do it by injecting the substances into the necks of lambs," Ms Paganis told the court.

Lannate caused the eagles to die within 30 minutes of feeding on the sheep and lamb carcasses, the court heard.

Over the 18-month period, Silvester experimented with other chemicals, including a blue phosphorous which made the eagles severely sick but did not kill them straight away.

Sale Magistrates' Court heard Silvester admitted to killing 366 eagles during 2017 and another 40 in early 2018 at the properties at 2742, 2744 and 2789 McKillops Road, Tubbut.

Orders, court hears

A report for DELWP estimated it would take two and a half years before breeding recovered to its pre-kill levels.

"This is our first custodial sentence for the destruction of wildlife in Victoria, so it's a significant statement to make by the courts, that this is a very, very serious matter and this is how it will be dealt with," said Iain Bruce, the manager of DELWP's investigations and intelligence unit.

Defence lawyer Keith Borthwick told the court Silvester's employer played a role in the eagle deaths.

"It was under the instruction of his employer," Mr Borthwick said.

He said Silvester was under pressure to increase lamb survival rates.

The court was told the maximum penalty for killing that many eagles was more than $350,000 or six months' jail.

"You brought this to the attention of authorities because you had an argument with your boss," Magistrate Rodney Higgins told Mr Silvester.

Silvester pleaded guilty to two charges under the Wildlife Act and was sentenced to 14 days in prison and fined $2,500.

"You'll be back home in New Zealand in a month," Magistrate Higgins told Silvester.

The magistrate told the court he would have sentenced Silvester to three months in prison, had he not pleaded guilty to the charges at the first opportunity. 

Eagle culls 'widespread' on farms

Retired wildlife officer Roger Bilney said the illegal killing of wedge-tailed eagles was not isolated to the Tubbut case.

"It's a multiple state issue, a national issue, which needs further research," Mr Bilney said.

"This is threatening the whole species and it's an iconic bird. People will stop and watch as they soar past. The wedge-tailed eagle is an iconic bird, a part of the Australian landscape," he said.

He said eagles were also targeted as predators to lambs in New South Wales and Queensland.

"Especially with the value of wool and lambs increasing, a lot of farmers see the wedge-tailed eagles as a threat to their profitability," Mr Bilney said.

"They're certainly capable of killing newborn lambs, and we know that they do that at times and they will team up and do it, but in terms of the overall losses on a sheep farm, research shows it's irrelevant to the overall property," Mr Bilney said.

"Especially with the drought, and so many lambs dying due to the ewes being in poor condition, there'd be a higher mortality due to poor farming practices, or things like drought that are beyond their control," Mr Bilney said.

'Bloody well done': Texts and emails reveal scheme to poison eagles

November 14 2019

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/bloody-well-done-texts-and-emails-reveal-scheme-to-poison-eagles-20190917-p52s0z.html

The messages from a Gippsland land owner congratulating his employee for killing dozens of wedge-tailed eagles have been revealed after the businessman admitted to his part in the scheme.

John Franz Auer's farm manager Murray Silvester injected the carcasses of lambs, sheep and kangaroos with insecticide to use as bait to kill eagles over about two years.

Environment Department officers discovered at least 134 dead wedge-tailed eagles, along with the carcasses of four other protected bird species on Auer's properties in May and June last year.

"I just wouldn't have dreamed of those numbers. Bloody well done," Auer said in messages to his farm manager.

The emails and text messages, in which the pair secretly referred to eagles as "foxes", were revealed at Bairnsdale Magistrates Court on Wednesday as Auer, 57, pleaded guilty to the misuse of agricultural chemicals.

Auer also admitted to his involvement in offences carried out by Silvester, who was last year found guilty of injecting animal carcasses with insecticide to use as bait.

On October 5, 2016, Auer messaged Silvester asking: "Seen any eagles?"

"6 more = 24 in 2 days," Silvester replied.

"Gee that's amazing, they just keep coming? I just wouldn't have dreamed of those numbers. Bloody well done," Auer replied a few days later.

 

In late October of 2016, Auer messaged Silvester saying he had picked up a "different chem to try", later adding he had "looked up that poison and it is deadly to birds apparently so should work".

At some stage, Auer told Silvester to refer to eagles within email communication as "foxes", court documents show.

In January 2017, Silvester wrote to Auer: "3 more foxs [sic] = 52, crazy".

In August that year, after Silvester said he had "got" five foxes, Auer replied: "Well done on foxes, I wonder where a group of 7 come from hey. Gee your [sic] good at getting straight onto them now."

 

Then, in November 2017, Auer wrote: "The eagles just keep coming, it continues to astound me, but your [sic] doing a good job on them".

Court documents show Auer hired Silvester as a farm manager in 2016 in Tubbut, near the Snowy River National Park, where he operates a sheep grazing business on several thousand acres of land.

Silvester, a New Zealand national, was charged by the Environment Department and found guilty in September last year of killing 420 wedge-tailed eagles in East Gippsland over a two-year period and sentenced to 14 days in jail and fined $2500.

Auer was then charged by the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions in June for the misuse and incorrect storage of agricultural chemicals, including poisons and pesticides.

 

In March 2017, the court documents show, Auer supplied Silvester with a quantity of Lannate, an insecticide that contains a substance toxic to humans and animals called methomyl.

Eagles have historically been blamed by farmers for the deaths of lambs.

Auer was also convicted on Wednesday of failing to comply with the conditions of an Agricultural Chemical User Permit by storing and using Lannate incorrectly and for failing to comply with storage instructions relating to 1080 wild dog bait.

On two charges, Auer was convicted, given a 12-month good behaviour bond and ordered to pay $25,000 to a court fund to be distributed among wildlife groups in Gippsland. He was also ordered to pay department costs of $3870.

 

On four remaining charges, Auer was convicted and sentenced to a community corrections order for a period of 12 months, under which he must perform 100 hours of community service.

 

Farm worker who poisoned 406 wedge-tailed eagles in east Gippsland jailed and fined

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-24/man-poisoned-wedge-tailed-eagles-in-gippsland-jailed/10298426

A New Zealand man has been jailed for 14 days and fined $2,500 for poisoning 406 wedge-tailed eagles at three remote properties in Victoria’s east.

Key points:

  • It’s the first time in Victorian history a person has been jailed for wildlife destruction
  • The farm worker said he poisoned the birds under the direction of his employer
  • A retired wildlife officer says such culling of eagles is common on farms

Farm worker Murray James Silvester, 59, pleaded guilty to killing the protected birds at Tubbut in east Gippsland between October 2016 and April 2018.

The eagle carcasses were found hidden in bush and scrub on three separate farms spanning 2,000 hectares.

Other protected species including a kookaburra, ravens and a raptor were also found dead

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) prosecutor Chrisanthi Paganis told the Sale Magistrates’ Court Silvester first alerted authorities to his actions in May 2018 after an argument with his boss, landowner John Auer.

Silvester provided investigators with two diaries detailing the methods used and a hand-drawn map showing where the eagle carcasses were hidden and where the chemicals were stored.

Silvester also named others involved.

The prosecutor told the court other people were being investigated over the killings but had not been charged.

Chemicals injected into necks of sheep to lure eagles

Ms Paganis told the court three different chemicals were used to kill the eagles, but most of the eagle deaths were caused by the chemical Lannate (Methomyl).

“John Auer showed him how to do it by injecting the substances into the necks of lambs,” Ms Paganis told the court.

Lannate caused the eagles to die within 30 minutes of feeding on the sheep and lamb carcasses, the court heard.

Over the 18-month period, Silvester experimented with other chemicals, including a blue phosphorous which made the eagles severely sick but did not kill them straight away.

Sale Magistrates’ Court heard Silvester admitted to killing 366 eagles during 2017 and another 40 in early 2018 at the properties at 2742, 2744 and 2789 McKillops Road, Tubbut.

Orders, court hears

A report for DELWP estimated it would take two and a half years before breeding recovered to its pre-kill levels.

“This is our first custodial sentence for the destruction of wildlife in Victoria, so it’s a significant statement to make by the courts, that this is a very, very serious matter and this is how it will be dealt with,” said Iain Bruce, the manager of DELWP’s investigations and intelligence unit.

Defence lawyer Keith Borthwick told the court Silvester’s employer played a role in the eagle deaths.

“It was under the instruction of his employer,” Mr Borthwick said.

He said Silvester was under pressure to increase lamb survival rates.

The court was told the maximum penalty for killing that many eagles was more than $350,000 or six months’ jail.

“You brought this to the attention of authorities because you had an argument with your boss,” Magistrate Rodney Higgins told Mr Silvester.

Silvester pleaded guilty to two charges under the Wildlife Act and was sentenced to 14 days in prison and fined $2,500.

“You’ll be back home in New Zealand in a month,” Magistrate Higgins told Silvester.

The magistrate told the court he would have sentenced Silvester to three months in prison, had he not pleaded guilty to the charges at the first opportunity. 

Eagle culls ‘widespread’ on farms

Retired wildlife officer Roger Bilney said the illegal killing of wedge-tailed eagles was not isolated to the Tubbut case.

“It’s a multiple state issue, a national issue, which needs further research,” Mr Bilney said.

“This is threatening the whole species and it’s an iconic bird. People will stop and watch as they soar past. The wedge-tailed eagle is an iconic bird, a part of the Australian landscape,” he said.

He said eagles were also targeted as predators to lambs in New South Wales and Queensland.

“Especially with the value of wool and lambs increasing, a lot of farmers see the wedge-tailed eagles as a threat to their profitability,” Mr Bilney said.

“They’re certainly capable of killing newborn lambs, and we know that they do that at times and they will team up and do it, but in terms of the overall losses on a sheep farm, research shows it’s irrelevant to the overall property,” Mr Bilney said.

“Especially with the drought, and so many lambs dying due to the ewes being in poor condition, there’d be a higher mortality due to poor farming practices, or things like drought that are beyond their control,” Mr Bilney said.

‘Bloody well done’: Texts and emails reveal scheme to poison eagles

November 14 2019

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/bloody-well-done-texts-and-emails-reveal-scheme-to-poison-eagles-20190917-p52s0z.html

The messages from a Gippsland land owner congratulating his employee for killing dozens of wedge-tailed eagles have been revealed after the businessman admitted to his part in the scheme.

John Franz Auer’s farm manager Murray Silvester injected the carcasses of lambs, sheep and kangaroos with insecticide to use as bait to kill eagles over about two years.

Environment Department officers discovered at least 134 dead wedge-tailed eagles, along with the carcasses of four other protected bird species on Auer’s properties in May and June last year.

“I just wouldn’t have dreamed of those numbers. Bloody well done,” Auer said in messages to his farm manager.

The emails and text messages, in which the pair secretly referred to eagles as “foxes”, were revealed at Bairnsdale Magistrates Court on Wednesday as Auer, 57, pleaded guilty to the misuse of agricultural chemicals.

Auer also admitted to his involvement in offences carried out by Silvester, who was last year found guilty of injecting animal carcasses with insecticide to use as bait.

On October 5, 2016, Auer messaged Silvester asking: “Seen any eagles?”

“6 more = 24 in 2 days,” Silvester replied.

“Gee that’s amazing, they just keep coming? I just wouldn’t have dreamed of those numbers. Bloody well done,” Auer replied a few days later.

In late October of 2016, Auer messaged Silvester saying he had picked up a “different chem to try”, later adding he had “looked up that poison and it is deadly to birds apparently so should work”.

At some stage, Auer told Silvester to refer to eagles within email communication as “foxes”, court documents show.

In January 2017, Silvester wrote to Auer: “3 more foxs [sic] = 52, crazy”.

In August that year, after Silvester said he had “got” five foxes, Auer replied: “Well done on foxes, I wonder where a group of 7 come from hey. Gee your [sic] good at getting straight onto them now.”

Then, in November 2017, Auer wrote: “The eagles just keep coming, it continues to astound me, but your [sic] doing a good job on them”.

Court documents show Auer hired Silvester as a farm manager in 2016 in Tubbut, near the Snowy River National Park, where he operates a sheep grazing business on several thousand acres of land.

Silvester, a New Zealand national, was charged by the Environment Department and found guilty in September last year of killing 420 wedge-tailed eagles in East Gippsland over a two-year period and sentenced to 14 days in jail and fined $2500.

Auer was then charged by the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions in June for the misuse and incorrect storage of agricultural chemicals, including poisons and pesticides.

In March 2017, the court documents show, Auer supplied Silvester with a quantity of Lannate, an insecticide that contains a substance toxic to humans and animals called methomyl.

Eagles have historically been blamed by farmers for the deaths of lambs.

Auer was also convicted on Wednesday of failing to comply with the conditions of an Agricultural Chemical User Permit by storing and using Lannate incorrectly and for failing to comply with storage instructions relating to 1080 wild dog bait.

On two charges, Auer was convicted, given a 12-month good behaviour bond and ordered to pay $25,000 to a court fund to be distributed among wildlife groups in Gippsland. He was also ordered to pay department costs of $3870.

On four remaining charges, Auer was convicted and sentenced to a community corrections order for a period of 12 months, under which he must perform 100 hours of community service.

 

2016/18: Ringarooma (Dunns Dam/Ringarooma). Pesticide: Hexazinone

Ringarooma (Tasmania)

30/3/16: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (Dunns Dam)*

30/4/16: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (Dunns Dam)*

12/4/17: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (Dunns Dam)

21/6/17: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (Dunns Dam)

3/8/18: Hexazinone 5ug/L (Dunns Dam)*

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v 4

*RTI Request

 

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v 4

Ringarooma (Tasmania)

30/3/16: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (Dunns Dam)*

30/4/16: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (Dunns Dam)*

12/4/17: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (Dunns Dam)

21/6/17: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (Dunns Dam)

3/8/18: Hexazinone 5ug/L (Dunns Dam)*

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v 4

*RTI Request

2016/18: Gladstone (Tasmania). Pesticides: 2,4-D, MCPA, Dicamba, Metsulfuron Methyl, Sulfometuron Methyl

Gladstone (Tasmania)

13/7/16: 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

26/7/16: 2,4-D 0.17ug/L

26/7/16: MCPA 0.04ug/L

30/8/16: 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

8/5/18: 2,4-D 0.14ug/L

8/5/18: Dicamba 0.3ug/L

8/5/18: MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/5/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

8/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 33ug/L

3/8/18: Hexazinone 1ug/L

Right to Information Application

 

30/8/16: 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

Gladstone (Tasmania)

13/7/16: 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

26/7/16: 2,4-D 0.17ug/L

26/7/16: MCPA 0.04ug/L

30/8/16: 2,4-D 0.04ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

8/5/18: 2,4-D 0.14ug/L

8/5/18: Dicamba 0.3ug/L

8/5/18: MCPA 0.07ug/L

8/5/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

8/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 33ug/L

3/8/18: Hexazinone 1ug/L

Right to Information Application

 

2016/2018: Bracknell (Tasmania). Pesticide: MCPA, Simazine, Sulfometuron Methyl

Bracknell - Liffey River

24/11/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

Bracknell - Liffey River

24/11/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

31/5/18: Simazine 1ug/L

31/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 20ug/L

Right to Information Request

Bracknell – Liffey River

24/11/16: MCPA 0.05ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

31/5/18: Simazine 1ug/L

31/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 20ug/L

Right to Information Request

2018 May: Mechanics of Pesticide-Parkinsons Link Revealed. Pesticides: Paraquat, Maneb

Mechanics of pesticide-Parkinson’s link revealed

A genetic mutation massively increases risk for agrochemical exposure.

Andrew Masterton (Cosmos Magazine) May 25 2018

https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/mechanics-of-pesticide-parkinson-s-link-revealed

Even very low levels of exposure to some common agricultural chemicals can boost the risk of Parkinson’s disease, according to new research.

A paper published in the journal Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology reveals that exposure to pesticides known as paraquat and maneb dramatically affects the function of dopamine-producing neurons – the cells primarily targeted by Parkinson’s – in people carrying a particular genetic mutation.

Separate lines of research kicked off two decades ago identified the chemicals and the mutation – in a gene known as alpha-synuclein, located on chromosome four – as risk factors for developing Parkinson’s, but the latest study is the first to uncover what happens on a cellular level when the two combine.

“People exposed to these chemicals are at about a 250% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease than the rest of the population,” says Scott Ryan from the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, lead author of the new study.

“We wanted to investigate what is happening in this susceptible population that results in some people developing the disease.”

The role of chemical exposure in influencing risk for Parkinson’s was first identified in epidemiological studies, starting in 1998.

A separate line of investigation around the same time focussed on a large Italian family group prone to developing the disease, many members of which carried the alpha-synuclein mutation.

Ryan and his colleagues set out to determine what happens to human cell function when both risk factors are combined.

To do so researchers established two cohorts of stem cells. The first used cells derived from Parkinson’s patients known to be carrying the mutation. The second derived from standard embryonic stem cells into which the mutation was edited.

Both sets were induced to form the target neurons, which were then exposed to varying levels of paraquat and maneb.

In cells containing the mutation even very low levels of exposure prevented the mitochondria from functioning correctly, depriving the neurons of essential energy and causing them to fail.

Cells that did not carry the mutation needed higher doses before function was impaired.

“Until now, the link between pesticides and Parkinson’s disease was based primarily on animal studies as well as epidemiological research that demonstrated an increased risk among farmers and others exposed to agricultural chemicals,” explains Ryan.

“We are one of the first to investigate what is happening inside human cells.”

Critical exposure levels for the mutation-carrying cells were lower than the maximum safe levels contained in Canadian Environmental Protection Authority regulations.

Ryan says that the results indicate that current one-level-fits-all advice for chemical exposure needs to be ditched.

“This study shows that everyone is not equal, and these safety standards need to be updated in order to protect those who are more susceptible and may not even know it,” he says.

2016/21: Glenelg Waste Water Treatment Plant (South Australia). Pesticide: MCPA, 2,4-D, Triclopyr

Glenelg WWTP

# 40555 Glenelg WWTP B Plant Final Effluent A/C         

3/12/2016 MCPA    0.11 ug/l

25/2/2017   MCPA    0.06 ug/l

20/5/2017   MCPA    0.42 ug/l

20/5/2017     2 4-D    0.05 ug/l

23/8/2016    MCPA   0.13 ug/l

23/10/2017 MCPA 0.26 ug/L

30/10/18: MCPA 0.15ug/L

31/10/19: MCPA 0.12ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

31/10/20: MCPA 0.06ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

26/10/21: MCPA 0.42ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

#40556 Glenelg WWTP C&D Plant Final Effluent A/C    

23/8/2016    MCPA    0.16 ug/l

3/12/2016   MCPA     0.17 ug/l

25/2/2017 MCPA     0.10 ug/l

20/5/2017    MCPA   0.43ug/l

29/10/2017 MCPA    0.11ug/l

30/10/18: MCPA

31/10/19: MCPA 0.1ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

31/10/20: MCPA 0.07ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

26/10/21: MCPA 0.46ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

Glenelg Waste Water Treatment Plant

23/10/17: MCPA 0.26ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

23/10/17: MCPA 0.11ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

Source SA Water FoI

Glenelg WWTP

# 40555 Glenelg WWTP B Plant Final Effluent A/C         

3/12/2016 MCPA    0.11 ug/l

25/2/2017   MCPA    0.06 ug/l

20/5/2017   MCPA    0.42 ug/l

20/5/2017     2 4-D    0.05 ug/l

23/8/2016    MCPA   0.13 ug/l

23/10/2017 MCPA 0.26 ug/L

30/10/18: MCPA 0.15ug/L

31/10/19: MCPA 0.12ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

31/10/20: MCPA 0.06ug/L, Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

26/10/21: MCPA 0.42ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

#40556 Glenelg WWTP C&D Plant Final Effluent A/C    

23/8/2016    MCPA    0.16 ug/l

3/12/2016   MCPA     0.17 ug/l

25/2/2017 MCPA     0.10 ug/l

20/5/2017    MCPA   0.43ug/l

29/10/2017 MCPA    0.11ug/l

30/10/18: MCPA

31/10/19: MCPA 0.1ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

31/10/20: MCPA 0.07ug/L, Triclopyr 0.3ug/L

26/10/21: MCPA 0.46ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

Glenelg Waste Water Treatment Plant

23/10/17: MCPA 0.26ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

23/10/17: MCPA 0.11ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

Source SA Water FoI

2016/22: Christies Beach Waste Water Treatment Plant (South Australia). Pesticide: MCPA, Triclopyr, 2,4-D

Christies Beach Waste Water Treatment Plant

#4101 Christies Beach WWTP Final effluent AC 

23/6/2016 MCPA 0.25 ug/l

3/12/2016 MCPA 0.24 ug/l

25/2/2017   2 4-D  0.05 ug/l

25/2/2017 MCPA 0.09 ug/l

20/5/2017 MCPA 0.15 ug/l

23/10/2017 MCPA 0.33 ug/l

31/10/19: MCPA 0.38ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

31/10/20: MCPA 0.11ug/L MCPA 0.14ug/L

 

13/5/22:

Christies Beach Waste Water Treatment Plant

23/01/17: MCPA 0.41ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

23/01/17: MCPA 0.33ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

30/10/18: MCPA 0.13ug/L (Final Effluent)

30/10/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L (Final Effluent)

30/10/18: MCPA 0.16ug/L (WWTP B Plant Final Effluent)

30/10/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L (WWTP C & D Plant Final Effluent)

31/10/19: MCPA 0.23ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

31/10/20: MCPA 0.13ug/L (C Final Effulent after UV)

13/5/22: MCPA 0.2ug/L (C Final Effluent after UV) 

 

 

Christies Beach Waste Water Treatment Plant

#4101 Christies Beach WWTP Final effluent AC 

23/6/2016 MCPA 0.25 ug/l

3/12/2016 MCPA 0.24 ug/l

25/2/2017   2 4-D  0.05 ug/l

25/2/2017 MCPA 0.09 ug/l

20/5/2017 MCPA 0.15 ug/l

23/10/2017 MCPA 0.33 ug/l

31/10/19: MCPA 0.38ug/L, Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

31/10/20: MCPA 0.11ug/L MCPA 0.14ug/L

 

13/5/22:

Christies Beach Waste Water Treatment Plant

23/01/17: MCPA 0.41ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

23/01/17: MCPA 0.33ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

30/10/18: MCPA 0.13ug/L (Final Effluent)

30/10/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L (Final Effluent)

30/10/18: MCPA 0.16ug/L (WWTP B Plant Final Effluent)

30/10/18: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L (WWTP C & D Plant Final Effluent)

31/10/19: MCPA 0.23ug/L (Final effluent after UV)

31/10/20: MCPA 0.13ug/L (C Final Effulent after UV)

13/5/22: MCPA 0.2ug/L (C Final Effluent after UV)

2018 August: Potential Legal Action (Western Australia). Pesticide: Glyphosate

Councils urged to suspend use of Roundup or face risk of legal action

https://www.communitynews.com.au/hills-gazette/news/councils-urged-to-suspend-use-of-roundup-or-face-risk-of-legal-action
 
 

COUNCILS should ban the use of Roundup or risk being sued by employees and residents if their health is affected, say action groups.

The call comes in the wake of a landmark lawsuit in the United States in which a jury found chemical giant Monsanto liable for causing a school groundsman’s cancer from his exposure to the weedkiller.

The active chemical in Roundup – glyphosate –is classified as probably carcinogenic by the World Health Organisation but is still approved for use in Australia.

Alliance for a Clean Environment convenor Jane Bremmer said councils should immediately suspend the use of glyphosate in public places, particularly children’s playgrounds.

“Local government authorities are now compelled by this legal precedent to protect their constituents and worker’s health and their own legal liability by suspending the use of glyphosate in public places and invest in safer, alternative weed control practices,” she said.

“It is simply absurd to suggest that allowing children to play on freshly sprayed grass within minutes of a pesticide application is safe.

“It’s a tragic case of the Emperor’s new clothes with potentially deadly consequences.”

The Shire of Mundaring and City of Kalamunda said they would continue to use glyphosate in line with the advice from the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) recommendation that products containing the pesticide were safe to use as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

City of Swan CEO Mike Foley acknowledged several European countries had banned the use of glyphosate and said the council would monitor developments nationally and internationally.

Councils urged to suspend use of Roundup or face risk of legal action

https://www.communitynews.com.au/hills-gazette/news/councils-urged-to-suspend-use-of-roundup-or-face-risk-of-legal-action

COUNCILS should ban the use of Roundup or risk being sued by employees and residents if their health is affected, say action groups.

The call comes in the wake of a landmark lawsuit in the United States in which a jury found chemical giant Monsanto liable for causing a school groundsman’s cancer from his exposure to the weedkiller.

The active chemical in Roundup – glyphosate –is classified as probably carcinogenic by the World Health Organisation but is still approved for use in Australia.

Alliance for a Clean Environment convenor Jane Bremmer said councils should immediately suspend the use of glyphosate in public places, particularly children’s playgrounds.

“Local government authorities are now compelled by this legal precedent to protect their constituents and worker’s health and their own legal liability by suspending the use of glyphosate in public places and invest in safer, alternative weed control practices,” she said.

“It is simply absurd to suggest that allowing children to play on freshly sprayed grass within minutes of a pesticide application is safe.

“It’s a tragic case of the Emperor’s new clothes with potentially deadly consequences.”

The Shire of Mundaring and City of Kalamunda said they would continue to use glyphosate in line with the advice from the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) recommendation that products containing the pesticide were safe to use as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

City of Swan CEO Mike Foley acknowledged several European countries had banned the use of glyphosate and said the council would monitor developments nationally and internationally.

Director of Australian anti-GM group Gene Ethics Bob Phelps said the court ruling raised thorny questions for the industry.

“These organisations should now cease their weedkiller use or risk being sued for breach of care to workers and citizens,” he said.

“Roundup is available from most hardware shops and supermarkets and retailers should review their liability for selling an unsafe product and take it off their shelves.”

APVMA chief executive officer Dr Chris Parker said they would continue to track and consider any new scientific information associated with the safety and effectiveness of glyphosate.

“In 2016, the APVMA found no grounds to place glyphosate under formal reconsideration,” he said.

“Glyphosate is registered for use in Australia and APVMA approved products containing glyphosate can continue to be used safely according to label directions.”

Mr Phelps called for an urgent review of Roundup in light of the new evidence discovered during the US trial.

Monsanto has denied the link between glyphosate and cancer and will appeal the decision.

2018 June: Derby Region (Western Australia). Pesticides: 2,4,5-T, 2,4-D

Agent Orange survivor Carl Drysdale slams government inaction

PerthNow June 3, 2018

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/agent-orange-survivor-carl-drysdale-slams-government-inaction-ng-b88850940z

"... The 72-year-old Pinjarra grandfather is “still fighting the machine” over the appalling ill-health and the suspicious deaths of dozens of once-healthy men who sprayed the banned 2,4,5-T during government weed eradication programs across WA’s North West in the 1970s and ’80s. It is a scandal that refuses to die, unlike the many men it affected, fuelled by decades-long government inaction and a mean-spirited bureaucracy.

“I look through the old photos and they’re mostly all dead, generally with cancer,” he tells The Sunday Times. “Dying in their 30s and 40s. Most of them are gone.”

But not all of them.

This Tuesday, yet another chapter of the long-running saga opens, with four other Agriculture Protection Board workers from the Kimberley taking their compensation claims back to the courts.

Their lawyers want WorkCover to finally acknowledge the appalling hardships that have befallen them and the wider Kimberley communities, especially in small, close-knit outback towns such as Derby..."

 

Agent Orange survivor Carl Drysdale slams government inaction

PerthNow

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wa/agent-orange-survivor-carl-drysdale-slams-government-inaction-ng-b88850940z

WHILE the colour photographs of his Kimberley days may be dog-eared and fading, the years do not extinguish the fire in Carl Drysdale’s belly.

The 72-year-old Pinjarra grandfather is “still fighting the machine” over the appalling ill-health and the suspicious deaths of dozens of once-healthy men who sprayed the banned 2,4,5-T during government weed eradication programs across WA’s North West in the 1970s and ’80s. It is a scandal that refuses to die, unlike the many men it affected, fuelled by decades-long government inaction and a mean-spirited bureaucracy.

“I look through the old photos and they’re mostly all dead, generally with cancer,” he tells The Sunday Times. “Dying in their 30s and 40s. Most of them are gone.”

But not all of them.

This Tuesday, yet another chapter of the long-running saga opens, with four other Agriculture Protection Board workers from the Kimberley taking their compensation claims back to the courts.

Their lawyers want WorkCover to finally acknowledge the appalling hardships that have befallen them and the wider Kimberley communities, especially in small, close-knit outback towns such as Derby.

“The weed-spraying program has haunted families in the West Kimberley as the preponderance of graves of workers, their children and grandchildren testify,” Chapman’s Lawyers’ Tony Mullen said.

It has been more than 40 years since the young butcher from Perth headed north after getting a job as the West Kimberley district officer for the Agricultural Protection Board.

He was in charge of teams of 15 men — many of them indigenous — who would go bush for up to 10 days, sleeping in swags, cooking their own tucker and enjoying the occasional bath in waterholes.

Armed with spray packs, their job was to eradicate the dreaded Parkinsonian tree, one of the many weeds threatening the burgeoning Kimberley pastoral industry.

What they didn’t know was that they were spraying the dangerous herbicide 2,4,5-T, a hazardous chemical that when mixed with equal parts of 2,4-D was better known as Agent Orange, dropped by US forces during the Vietnam war to defoliate jungles, kill crops and flush out the Viet Cong.

Years before occupational health and safety was a workplace reality and rarely wearing any protective clothing in the searing heat of the Kimberley, the APB workers literally covered themselves with the stuff, day in, day out.

It wasn’t long before the headaches began, and the rashes and sores that never healed. Then they started dying. Young men. Strong men. Men who didn’t know what sickness was.

One death in particular hit Mr Drysdale hard.

Cyril Hunter was just 33 when he died. A big, robust and proud indigenous man, he worked as a sprayer for the APB for seven years under Mr Drysdale.

“I remember talking to him once while he was sitting at the bottom of some stairs where we used to go to get paid,” he said. “He told me that a couple of mates had gone upstairs to pick up his wages.

“It then dawned on me that he couldn’t even get up the stairs. He was so buggered. He died of ventricle failure, a well-known symptom of heavy exposure to the chemical. He was a young man … there were so many of them.”

Appalled by clear anecdotal evidence of a spiralling death rate among APB employees and pushed into action by media, then-premier Geoff Gallop launched the Armstrong Report, led by world-renowned cancer epidemiologist Bruce Armstrong.

While he stopped short of concluding “beyond reasonable doubt” that the spraying program was directly linked to the alarming cancer rate, Dr Armstrong did find that APB workers might have suffered an increased risk of cancer because of their work.

The Gallop government then urged all APB workers and their dependants to file compensation claims. It said they would receive preferential treatment and be expedited through the system.

That was 14 years ago. Some claims have been settled over the years, but many have not.

Mr Drysdale refuses to let the matter die. He is determined to see it through to the end.

“It’s not just one government that pushes back, it’s been all of them,” he says on the seemingly never-ending drama. “They have been stuffing us around again and again. Then all of a sudden, a new government comes in and it starts all over from scratch.

“I know what their strategy is, ‘Let’s just wait, we’ll outlast them’. They are waiting for us to die. Well, I’m not going to give them that pleasure.”

Agriculture Minister Alannah MacTiernan would not be drawn on whether successive State governments had dragged their feet over the issue, only saying that she hoped the matters “can be brought to a conclusion soon”.

She said eight former APB workers had received payments for cancer claims that had been facilitated through the State-based worker’s compensation system.

Those confidential settlements took into account future medical expenses.

Ms MacTiernan said applications for non-cancer claims could still be submitted for assessment.

2014 – Grain Contamination (Victoria) – Flutriafol

Cross-contamination of grain from fungicide-treated fertiliser

 
https://www.smithandgeorg.com.au/articles/agchemnews/autumn2014/crosscontamination.html
 

The Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) has reported two cases of grain contaminated with the fungicide flutriafol, where flutriafol-treated fertiliser had previously been used in equipment used to handle or store the grain.

In one case a farmer treated fertiliser with flutriafol as it was transferring via an auger to a truck. The truck was swept but the auger was not cleaned or decontaminated. Canola grain was later transferred via the auger to the truck, and when tested showed levels of flutriafol that was 17 times higher than the legal limit.

In the other case a farmer temporarily stored flutriafol-treated fertiliser in a silo, which was not cleaned before later being used to store wheat. The wheat was found to contain levels of flutriafol that are 42 times higher than the legal limit.

These cases illustrate how important it is to thoroughly clean and decontaminate equipment and facilities that are used to handle or store potentially contaminating materials. This does not only apply to grain, but to any food or feed that is handled or transported. Other examples include fresh fruit and vegetables carried in contaminated bins; and processing waste (eg citrus peel, brewers grain, etc) that is carried in trucks or bins and fed to animals.

Cross-contamination of grain from fungicide-treated fertiliser

https://www.smithandgeorg.com.au/articles/agchemnews/autumn2014/crosscontamination.html

The Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) has reported two cases of grain contaminated with the fungicide flutriafol, where flutriafol-treated fertiliser had previously been used in equipment used to handle or store the grain.

In one case a farmer treated fertiliser with flutriafol as it was transferring via an auger to a truck. The truck was swept but the auger was not cleaned or decontaminated. Canola grain was later transferred via the auger to the truck, and when tested showed levels of flutriafol that was 17 times higher than the legal limit.

In the other case a farmer temporarily stored flutriafol-treated fertiliser in a silo, which was not cleaned before later being used to store wheat. The wheat was found to contain levels of flutriafol that are 42 times higher than the legal limit.

These cases illustrate how important it is to thoroughly clean and decontaminate equipment and facilities that are used to handle or store potentially contaminating materials. This does not only apply to grain, but to any food or feed that is handled or transported. Other examples include fresh fruit and vegetables carried in contaminated bins; and processing waste (eg citrus peel, brewers grain, etc) that is carried in trucks or bins and fed to animals.

2016 August: Pesticide Residues (Western Australia). Pesticides: Glyphosate, Imidacloprid, Haloxyfop, Flutriafol, Imazapic, Imazapyr

Vigilance urged on residue levels to protect markets

August 27 2016

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/news/agriculture/cropping/grains/vigilance-urged-on-residue-levels-to-protect-markets/2753581.aspx?storypage=1

"...But he warned that single events can damage a market and a grower making the decision to use off-label mixes could have serious ramifications for the industry.

Mr Reichstein said an increased food safety focus in the Asian market meant that growers and those in the supply chain had to be aware of the market requirements and MRLs where the grain was destined...

For WA growers, the off label use of glyphosate in barley remains a serious issue...

Of those, 56 had detectable levels of glyphosate.

Aside from the glyphosate levels in barley samples, Mr Reichstein said there were four MRL violations in WA last year - a canola sample with an imidacloprid reading of 0.086 milligrams per kilogram (Australian MRL of 0.05mg/kg), a second canola sample with haloxyfop 0.63mg/kg (MRL of 0.1mg/kg), an oat sample with a 0.12mg/kg glyphosate reading (MRL of 0.1mg/kg) and a lupin sample with a 0.083mg/kg of flutriafol (no MRL set)...

"However, if you compare some of these results with the MRLs set by our markets, it would appear only 50pc of those samples with residues would be compliant.

 

"The flow-on effect from a detection is increased sampling and cargo testing which impacts on all exporters and then the whole market can become restricted," he said.

Mr Reichstein outlined several cases of other MRL violations in Australia, including the 2014 case of a grower who created a imidazoline herbicide mix of imazapic and imazapyr rather than using the approved Intervix herbicide in a barley crop, which was detected in samples heading to Japan.

As a result, Japan increased its surveillance of Australian barley over the next five years.

Flutriafol also remains an issue, with inadequate cleaning of trucks in between loads of fungicide-treated fertilisers and grain, leading to contamination, with one sample recording levels 254 times the limit of 0.02mg/kg...

 

Vigilance urged on residue levels to protect markets

August 27 2016

https://www.farmweekly.com.au/news/agriculture/cropping/grains/vigilance-urged-on-residue-levels-to-protect-markets/2753581.aspx?storypage=1

WHILE Australia continues to receive a top report card for its compliance with maximum residue levels (MRL), the unregistered use of glyphosate in barley still remains a hot issue for both growers and exporters.

Speaking at the Grain Industry Association of WA (GIWA) barley council spring forum at Lake Grace and the Farmanco client conference in Perth last week, National Residue Survey (NRS) director Ian Reichstein said Australia and WA continued to have 99 per cent compliance when it came to MRL.

“Over the past 15 years, Australia has achieved 99.9pc compliance with Australian MRL in bulk samples and 99pc in containers,” he said.

“This is a very good record and shows to our overseas trading partners we have integrity in grain industry.”

But he warned that single events can damage a market and a grower making the decision to use off-label mixes could have serious ramifications for the industry.

Mr Reichstein said an increased food safety focus in the Asian market meant that growers and those in the supply chain had to be aware of the market requirements and MRLs where the grain was destined.

The NRS received $1.5 million in funding from the Australian grain producer levy to undertake the collection and analysis of 6000 samples of all Australian grain each year. Of this, 2000 samples were of WA grains.

The samples were subjected to multi-residue screening for a range of pesticides, contaminants, heavy metals and fumigants.

“There are still too many people in the industry who believe compliance with Australian MRL is equal to market access, which is completely incorrect,” he said.

For WA growers, the off label use of glyphosate in barley remains a serious issue.

Of the 2000 samples collected in WA last year, 87 barley samples were subjected to the “special” herbicide screen.

Of those, 56 had detectable levels of glyphosate.

While Weedmaster DST (470 grams per litre glyphosate) is registered as a pre-harvest application in wheat, canola, hay and some pulse crops, the in-crop or pre-harvest application of glyphosate in barley is not registered.

Aside from the glyphosate levels in barley samples, Mr Reichstein said there were four MRL violations in WA last year – a canola sample with an imidacloprid reading of 0.086 milligrams per kilogram (Australian MRL of 0.05mg/kg), a second canola sample with haloxyfop 0.63mg/kg (MRL of 0.1mg/kg), an oat sample with a 0.12mg/kg glyphosate reading (MRL of 0.1mg/kg) and a lupin sample with a 0.083mg/kg of flutriafol (no MRL set).

“Some might say that out of 2000 samples, only four incidences is an excellent track record, but there are others that will say four is still too high,” he said.

“However, if you compare some of these results with the MRLs set by our markets, it would appear only 50pc of those samples with residues would be compliant.

“It is a highly risky situation if exporters are not fully aware of the trading requirements for that market.”

Mr Reichstein said non-compliance could become very expensive for the exporter, with cargo rejected or held at port, demurrage, disposal of contaminated grain, on-forwarding or return costs.

“The flow-on effect from a detection is increased sampling and cargo testing which impacts on all exporters and then the whole market can become restricted,” he said.

“Exporters may restrict future exports to avoid higher risks from increased testing and this can impact on the sale of Australian grain.”

Mr Reichstein outlined several cases of other MRL violations in Australia, including the 2014 case of a grower who created a imidazoline herbicide mix of imazapic and imazapyr rather than using the approved Intervix herbicide in a barley crop, which was detected in samples heading to Japan.

As a result, Japan increased its surveillance of Australian barley over the next five years.

“Japan has a high level of trust in Australian grain and while we were able to rectify the issue, we cannot afford to have markets lose confidence in Australia,” he said.

Flutriafol also remains an issue, with inadequate cleaning of trucks in between loads of fungicide-treated fertilisers and grain, leading to contamination, with one sample recording levels 254 times the limit of 0.02mg/kg.

“Since it was identified five years ago, the issue with flutriafol still hasn’t been resolved and we are still finding levels in samples,” Mr Reichstein said.

“Of the 21 samples last year that were more than the Australian MRL, we believe 50pc came from incorrect in-crop use and the other half from trucks or augers.”

Canola which has been treated with Verdict (haloxyfop) was still an issue, as Mr Reichstein said there were 17 violations of the 0.1mg/kg MRL set by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA).

“After providing data to APVMA, the label was reviewed and the application timings were changed in 2014,” he said.

“But the old label is still out there and the product appears to be being applied too late in the season and contaminating the crop.

“Growers need to be aware of these issues and how they can affect market access overseas.”

It was also important for exporters to be aware of market MRL.

If countries want to change their MRL, an application is made to the World Trade Organisation through its Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) notification system.

“As 80pc of Australia’s grain is exported, the NRS monitors this very closely in consultation with the grain industry and if a country notifies of a MRL change which might impact on our market access, a submission is prepared which seeks reconsideration of the change to ensure we retain on-going market access,” Mr Reichstein said.

“If we are very mindful of requirements from our markets and there is better communication between growers and handler and marketer on the application of chemicals, we can lower the risk and prevent violations in overseas markets.”

2018 July : Vijayawada (India) – Glyphosate

Imported lentils laced with weed killer

DECCAN CHRONICLE Jul 19, 2018

 
 
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/190718/imported-lentils-laced-with-weed-killer.html
 
Food safety activists said every imported agriculture commodity needed to be tested for chemical residues but this was being ignored here.
 Some lentils that were imported from India by some Canadian restaurants showed 25 parts per billion of glyphosate.

 

Vijayawada: Indians are consuming highly toxic lentils (masoor dal) and moong dal that are imported from Canada and Australia respectively. The lentils and moong dal are induced with the herbicide Glyphosate, that is being used by Canadian and Australian farmers indiscriminately to clear weeds.

Tests conducted by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) on thousands of samples of these lentils and moong dal grown by farmers in Canada and Australia found an average 282 parts per billion (PPB) and 1,000 parts per billion of glyphosate respectively, which is extremely high on any standards.

Some lentils that were imported from India by some Canadian restaurants showed 25 parts per billion of glyphosate. India has been traditionally the biggest producer and consumer of pulses. Recently, it has also become a huge importer of pulses.
 

On an average, India has been importing 5 to 7 million tonnes of pulses annually. Almost half this quantity is imported from Canada and Australia and the rest from Myanmar, Ukraine, Russia and some African countries.

 

Glyphosate is known to be highly toxic and harmful to health. It can adversely affect immunity to serious diseases and the absorption of mineral and vitamin nutrients, apart from disrupting protein-related functions.

 

“India appears to import a lot of pulses from Canada, Australia and Myanmar. I have seen test records of Canadian grown pulses which are all desiccated by glyphosate. I also have seen results of test on Australian moong dal (known as moong beans in Canada) as tested by the CFIA which also had over 1,000 parts per billion of glyphosate,” Indian-born Canadian food security activist Tony Mitra, who made the CFIA test on these pulses for Glyphosate told this newspaper.

Imported lentils laced with weed killer

DECCAN CHRONICLE Jul 19, 2018

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/190718/imported-lentils-laced-with-weed-killer.html
Food safety activists said every imported agriculture commodity needed to be tested for chemical residues but this was being ignored here.
 Some lentils that were imported from India by some Canadian restaurants showed 25 parts per billion of glyphosate.

 

Vijayawada: Indians are consuming highly toxic lentils (masoor dal) and moong dal that are imported from Canada and Australia respectively. The lentils and moong dal are induced with the herbicide Glyphosate, that is being used by Canadian and Australian farmers indiscriminately to clear weeds.

Tests conducted by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) on thousands of samples of these lentils and moong dal grown by farmers in Canada and Australia found an average 282 parts per billion (PPB) and 1,000 parts per billion of glyphosate respectively, which is extremely high on any standards.

Some lentils that were imported from India by some Canadian restaurants showed 25 parts per billion of glyphosate. India has been traditionally the biggest producer and consumer of pulses. Recently, it has also become a huge importer of pulses.

On an average, India has been importing 5 to 7 million tonnes of pulses annually. Almost half this quantity is imported from Canada and Australia and the rest from Myanmar, Ukraine, Russia and some African countries.

Glyphosate is known to be highly toxic and harmful to health. It can adversely affect immunity to serious diseases and the absorption of mineral and vitamin nutrients, apart from disrupting protein-related functions.

“India appears to import a lot of pulses from Canada, Australia and Myanmar. I have seen test records of Canadian grown pulses which are all desiccated by glyphosate. I also have seen results of test on Australian moong dal (known as moong beans in Canada) as tested by the CFIA which also had over 1,000 parts per billion of glyphosate,” Indian-born Canadian food security activist Tony Mitra, who made the CFIA test on these pulses for Glyphosate told this newspaper.

“India is also importing these pulses. Consumers do not seem to know if or when they are buying Canadian lentils or lentils mixed with local produce, and how much glyphosate is in their dal. Canadians do not consume these pulses which are grown to be exported  to other countries, especially India. In Canada, in one of the provinces, some millions of acres of land is being used to grow pulses only to be exported to India,” Mr Mitra said.

He added that 87 per cent of Canadian lentils were contaminated and the average level of contamination was 282 parts per billion. Only 40 per cent of Indian samples were contaminated while the average was 25 parts per billion.

Food safety activists said every imported agriculture commodity needed to be tested for chemical residues but this was being ignored here.

“While it is mandatory to label organic products, imported pulses are not labelled. It’s very difficult to find out if we are consuming Canadian pulses or locally grown ones, if they are sold in loose. In some supermarkets, they label the country of origin where we will have a choice whether to buy the packet or not,” said Dr G.V. Ramanjaneyulu, agricultural scientist and founder of Centre for Sustainable Agriculture.

“ At the entry points, these imported pulses are not being checked for glyphosate residue due to which pulses induced the highly toxic chemical from other countries are making their way into India and ultimately into the stomachs of Indians,” he said.

Farmers warned against using glyphosate without proper gear

Food safety and agricultural scientists are warning that the use of glyphosate may prove lethal. They are citing the example of Sri Lanka, where many sugarcane farmers died due to renal failure after being overexposed to the herbicide.

Glyphosate is a popular herbicide among farmers in the Telugu speaking states. Glyphosate is officially allowed to be used in only tea gardens, but is available across the country under various names and brands.“While farmers have to wear astronaut suit kind of gear while using glyphosate, it’s not the case in countries such as India and Sri Lanka, said Mr Tony Mitra, Indian born Canadian food security activist.

2017 August – Accensi Pty Ltd Chemical Company Fined $100,000

Chemical Company Fined $100,000

 

 

August 9, 2017 - South Burnett News

Agricultural chemical manufacturer Accensi Pty Ltd has been fined $100,000 for supplying herbicides containing chemical ingredients not listed in the registered formulation.

In March this year, APVMA admitted it had been notified in December 2016 by Nufarm Australia and Syngenta Australia that they were recalling several products, made by Accensi, which had been found to contain chemicals not listed in the registered formulation.

The news that APVMA knew about the contamination and voluntary recalls but had published nothing on its website caused concern among some growers.

One West Australian farmer claimed he had lost up to 90 per cent of his celery crop.

However, after media criticism, APVMA backed down and agreed to publish information about voluntary recalls of agvet chemicals.

However, APVMA Chief Executive Officer Dr Chris Parker said there was no legislative requirement for APVMA to publish information about a voluntary recall by manufacturers.

Dr Parker said on Tuesday that Accensi had settled the payment of four separate infringement notices each totalling $25,000, under section 83(1)(a) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994.

“These are the largest fines ever issued by the APVMA under the Agvet Code. The fines reflect that the APVMA treats issues affecting the quality of agricultural and veterinary chemicals seriously,” Dr Parker said.

“Crop protection is a multi-billion dollar industry in Australia and farmers rely on agvet chemical manufacturers and registrants to supply registered products that are safe and will work as directed to eliminate pests and weeds and improve agricultural productivity.

“So when we discovered that a manufacturer had supplied chemicals that didn’t meet the registered formulation, we investigated with the full force of the law.”

In addition to settling the infringement notice amounts, Accensi has been invited to provide an Enforceable Undertaking, regarding contamination control of all SC Herbicide products produced in the future.

Dr Parker said APVMA was continuing to work with registrants on the voluntary recall of affected agricultural products.

Chemical Company Fined $100,000

August 9, 2017 – South Burnett News

Agricultural chemical manufacturer Accensi Pty Ltd has been fined $100,000 for supplying herbicides containing chemical ingredients not listed in the registered formulation.

In March this year, APVMA admitted it had been notified in December 2016 by Nufarm Australia and Syngenta Australia that they were recalling several products, made by Accensi, which had been found to contain chemicals not listed in the registered formulation.

The news that APVMA knew about the contamination and voluntary recalls but had published nothing on its website caused concern among some growers.

One West Australian farmer claimed he had lost up to 90 per cent of his celery crop.

However, after media criticism, APVMA backed down and agreed to publish information about voluntary recalls of agvet chemicals.

However, APVMA Chief Executive Officer Dr Chris Parker said there was no legislative requirement for APVMA to publish information about a voluntary recall by manufacturers.

Dr Parker said on Tuesday that Accensi had settled the payment of four separate infringement notices each totalling $25,000, under section 83(1)(a) of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994.

“These are the largest fines ever issued by the APVMA under the Agvet Code. The fines reflect that the APVMA treats issues affecting the quality of agricultural and veterinary chemicals seriously,” Dr Parker said.

“Crop protection is a multi-billion dollar industry in Australia and farmers rely on agvet chemical manufacturers and registrants to supply registered products that are safe and will work as directed to eliminate pests and weeds and improve agricultural productivity.

“So when we discovered that a manufacturer had supplied chemicals that didn’t meet the registered formulation, we investigated with the full force of the law.”

In addition to settling the infringement notice amounts, Accensi has been invited to provide an Enforceable Undertaking, regarding contamination control of all SC Herbicide products produced in the future.

Dr Parker said APVMA was continuing to work with registrants on the voluntary recall of affected agricultural products.

2017 January: Crop Duster Crash – Mareeba (Queensland)

Pilot escapes unharmed after crop duster crashes into field near Mareeba

A MAN has escaped unharmed after his crop duster crashed into a field on the Atherton Tableland this morning.

Emergency services were called to the light plane crash near Mareeba about 7am.

The 25-year-old pilot is believed to have only sustained a minor finger injury.

He declined to be taken to hospital.

The plane is understood to have been significantly damaged.

Pilot escapes unharmed after crop duster crashes into field near Mareeba

A MAN has escaped unharmed after his crop duster crashed into a field on the Atherton Tableland this morning.

Emergency services were called to the light plane crash near Mareeba about 7am.

The 25-year-old pilot is believed to have only sustained a minor finger injury.

He declined to be taken to hospital.

The plane is understood to have been significantly damaged.

2016 September: Crop Duster Crash, north of Esperance (Western Australia)

Pilot injured in plane crash in WA's south

 10 Sep 2016

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-10/pilot-injured-in-plane-crash-in-wa-south/7833390

A pilot has been injured in a crash involving a crop-dusting plane in Western Australia's south-east.

The crash occurred around 10:00am on a property 105 kilometres north of Esperance.

The pilot, a 29-year-old man from Victoria, was able to exit the plane after suffering non-life threatening injuries.

He is being flown to Perth for treatment and is in a critical condition.

The incident comes just five days after a light plane crash near the Great Southern town of Mount Barker.

Both people aboard that plane survived the crash.

Pilot injured in plane crash in WA’s south

A pilot has been injured in a crash involving a crop-dusting plane in Western Australia’s south-east.

The crash occurred around 10:00am on a property 105 kilometres north of Esperance.

The pilot, a 29-year-old man from Victoria, was able to exit the plane after suffering non-life threatening injuries.

He is being flown to Perth for treatment and is in a critical condition.

The incident comes just five days after a light plane crash near the Great Southern town of Mount Barker.

Both people aboard that plane survived the crash.

2016 December: Crop Duster Crash Callandoon (Queensland)

Pilot critically injured in crop duster crash near Goondiwindi

28 Dec 2016

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-28/crop-duster-crash-near-goondiwindi-leaves-man-critically-injured/8151048

A man in his 40s is in a critical condition after crashing his single-engine crop duster plane in a paddock in Queensland's southern border region.

The pilot was airlifted to the Princess Alexander Hospital in Brisbane with major internal and facial injuries.

The man was pulled from the wreckage by witnesses, after his crop duster clipped power lines and crashed in a field near Goondiwindi about 7:30am this morning.

Paramedics at the scene said he suffered multiple injuries.

He was initially taken to Goondiwindi Hospital before being flown to Brisbane.

Crop-duster hit ground 'nose-first and flipped over'

https://www.thechronicle.com.au/news/pilot-injured-after-plane-crash-rural-property/3126690/

UPDATE: An agricultural pilot is fighting for life after a harrowing plane crash on a cotton plantation near Goondiwindi.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau and police are investigating the cause of the crash which left the male pilot, 43, in hospital with serious injuries.

The pilot, from Goondiwindi, had taken off at 6.15am for a scheduled 25-minute chemical spray on the rural property off the Barwon Hwy at Callandoon, about 30km south-west of Goondiwindi.

But when he failed to stop and refuel by 6.45am, the ground crew did a radio check.

After no contact was made with the pilot, a ground search was conducted.

A Goondiwindi farmer from the neighbouring property, Macintyre Downs, found the wreckage of the yellow air-tractor aircraft and pulled the pilot to safety about 7.10am.

He rushed the injured man in his own vehicle and met waiting Queensland Ambulance crews who then transported him by road to Goondiwindi Hospital.

The was later airlifted to the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane where he was last night in a critical but stable condition.

A police spokesman said initial investigation suggested the single-engine aircraft clipped overhead power lines, snapping two, which downed the craft.

He said the plane hit the ground "nose-first and flipped over", causing major damage.

The ATSB and police are investigating and will compile an incident report.

10.30AM: A pilot is in a critical condition after a plane crash landed on a rural property in the Goondiwindi region this morning.

The pilot, aged in his 40s, was taken by Queensland Ambulance to Goondiwindi Airport from where RACQ LifeFlight airlifted him to Brisbane.

The man suffered major internal and facial injuries in the landing.

The single pilot agricultural aircraft was flying at a low level when it crashed, clipping a powerline in the process.

He was pulled from the aircraft and taken to a nearby residence before meeting with QAS paramedics.

The man was airlifted to Princess Alexandra Hospital in a critical condition.

8.45AM: Paramedics are treating a male pilot after a crash landing on a rural property this morning.

Queensland Ambulance were called to a private property off the Barwon Hwy at Callandoon near Goondiwindi about 7.30am with reports an agricultural plane had crash landed, injuring the pilot.

The pilot, a man aged in his 40s, had been removed from the plane and taken to a nearby homestead where he was met with paramedics a short time later.

His injuries are as yet unknown.

Queensland Fire and Emergency Services remain at the scene of the fixed-wing aircraft crash which clipped and brought down powerlines.

A spokesman said crews were securing the area.

Pilot critically injured in crop duster crash near Goondiwindi

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-28/crop-duster-crash-near-goondiwindi-leaves-man-critically-injured/8151048

A man in his 40s is in a critical condition after crashing his single-engine crop duster plane in a paddock in Queensland’s southern border region.

The pilot was airlifted to the Princess Alexander Hospital in Brisbane with major internal and facial injuries.

The man was pulled from the wreckage by witnesses, after his crop duster clipped power lines and crashed in a field near Goondiwindi about 7:30am this morning.

Paramedics at the scene said he suffered multiple injuries.

He was initially taken to Goondiwindi Hospital before being flown to Brisbane.

Crop-duster hit ground ‘nose-first and flipped over’

https://www.thechronicle.com.au/news/pilot-injured-after-plane-crash-rural-property/3126690/

UPDATE: An agricultural pilot is fighting for life after a harrowing plane crash on a cotton plantation near Goondiwindi.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau and police are investigating the cause of the crash which left the male pilot, 43, in hospital with serious injuries.

The pilot, from Goondiwindi, had taken off at 6.15am for a scheduled 25-minute chemical spray on the rural property off the Barwon Hwy at Callandoon, about 30km south-west of Goondiwindi.

But when he failed to stop and refuel by 6.45am, the ground crew did a radio check.

After no contact was made with the pilot, a ground search was conducted.

A Goondiwindi farmer from the neighbouring property, Macintyre Downs, found the wreckage of the yellow air-tractor aircraft and pulled the pilot to safety about 7.10am.

He rushed the injured man in his own vehicle and met waiting Queensland Ambulance crews who then transported him by road to Goondiwindi Hospital.

The was later airlifted to the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane where he was last night in a critical but stable condition.

A police spokesman said initial investigation suggested the single-engine aircraft clipped overhead power lines, snapping two, which downed the craft.

He said the plane hit the ground “nose-first and flipped over”, causing major damage.

The ATSB and police are investigating and will compile an incident report.

10.30AM: A pilot is in a critical condition after a plane crash landed on a rural property in the Goondiwindi region this morning.

The pilot, aged in his 40s, was taken by Queensland Ambulance to Goondiwindi Airport from where RACQ LifeFlight airlifted him to Brisbane.

The man suffered major internal and facial injuries in the landing.

The single pilot agricultural aircraft was flying at a low level when it crashed, clipping a powerline in the process.

He was pulled from the aircraft and taken to a nearby residence before meeting with QAS paramedics.

The man was airlifted to Princess Alexandra Hospital in a critical condition.

8.45AM: Paramedics are treating a male pilot after a crash landing on a rural property this morning.

Queensland Ambulance were called to a private property off the Barwon Hwy at Callandoon near Goondiwindi about 7.30am with reports an agricultural plane had crash landed, injuring the pilot.

The pilot, a man aged in his 40s, had been removed from the plane and taken to a nearby homestead where he was met with paramedics a short time later.

His injuries are as yet unknown.

Queensland Fire and Emergency Services remain at the scene of the fixed-wing aircraft crash which clipped and brought down powerlines.

A spokesman said crews were securing the area.

2017 December: Emerald (Queensland) – Crop Duster Crash

Safety bureau informed of CQ crop duster crash

SUNDAY: THE Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) have been advised of a crop duster crash which happened near an Emerald property on Friday.

A Queensland Police Spokesperson said a 37-year-old male pilot was taken to Emerald Hospital with head and chest injuries after the crash.

Initial investigations suggest the crop duster nosedived into the ground on Munro Rd between 6am and 6.30am on Friday.

Police have now passed information from the scene to ATSB who will determine if further investigation is needed.

FRIDAY: ONE man has been injured in a major aircraft accident on a farm near Emerald this morning.

Queensland Police Service were notified at about 6.20am this morning of reports a crop-dusting plane had crashed on Munro Rd, Emerald.

The man is suffering from head injuries and is being taken to Emerald Hospital by Queensland Ambulance Service in a stable condition.

Safety bureau informed of CQ crop duster crash

SUNDAY: THE Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) have been advised of a crop duster crash which happened near an Emerald property on Friday.

A Queensland Police Spokesperson said a 37-year-old male pilot was taken to Emerald Hospital with head and chest injuries after the crash.

Initial investigations suggest the crop duster nosedived into the ground on Munro Rd between 6am and 6.30am on Friday.

Police have now passed information from the scene to ATSB who will determine if further investigation is needed.

FRIDAY: ONE man has been injured in a major aircraft accident on a farm near Emerald this morning.

Queensland Police Service were notified at about 6.20am this morning of reports a crop-dusting plane had crashed on Munro Rd, Emerald.

The man is suffering from head injuries and is being taken to Emerald Hospital by Queensland Ambulance Service in a stable condition.

2018 June: Tamworth (NSW) – Fines for Spray Drift

 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has issued fines totaling $2250 to pesticide contractors after spray drift incidents in Moree and Tamworth.

The fines came after the EPA investigated complaints from a Moree grazier and a Tamworth olive grower.

Northern director Adam Gilligan said that in both incidents, the EPA had found evidence that the neighbouring properties had been affected by the spray drift.

Mr Gilligan said that, with winter spraying now under way, pesticide users must take all necessary precautions to ensure they were using pesticide products safely.

Spray drift can impact the agricultural operations of neighbouring properties and pose a serious threat to the health of the operators, community and the environment if spraying is not carried out appropriately,” he said.

The EPA said the Moree landholder had lodged a complaint after his grazing land was subject to spray drift when an aerial operator applied pesticides to a cotton crop on the adjoining farm.

The EPA fined the aerial pesticide operator $1500.

In the other incident, the EPA issued a fine of $750 to a Tamworth-based pesticides contractor after receiving a complaint that pesticides had drifted onto an established olive grove while spraying was occurring on the adjoining farm.

Mr Gilligan said anyone using pesticides was legally required to read the product’s label instructions, follow directions, “and where appropriate, apply suitable buffer distances to ensure pesticides do not drift”.

“Other than people using small amounts of pesticides by hand in non-commercial circumstances, most operators must have received appropriate training and hold current certification in order to apply pesticides,” he said.

“Equally important, they must keep appropriate records.”

 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has issued fines totaling $2250 to pesticide contractors after spray drift incidents in Moree and Tamworth.

The fines came after the EPA investigated complaints from a Moree grazier and a Tamworth olive grower.

Northern director Adam Gilligan said that in both incidents, the EPA had found evidence that the neighbouring properties had been affected by the spray drift.

Mr Gilligan said that, with winter spraying now under way, pesticide users must take all necessary precautions to ensure they were using pesticide products safely.

Spray drift can impact the agricultural operations of neighbouring properties and pose a serious threat to the health of the operators, community and the environment if spraying is not carried out appropriately,” he said.

The EPA said the Moree landholder had lodged a complaint after his grazing land was subject to spray drift when an aerial operator applied pesticides to a cotton crop on the adjoining farm.

The EPA fined the aerial pesticide operator $1500.

In the other incident, the EPA issued a fine of $750 to a Tamworth-based pesticides contractor after receiving a complaint that pesticides had drifted onto an established olive grove while spraying was occurring on the adjoining farm.

Mr Gilligan said anyone using pesticides was legally required to read the product’s label instructions, follow directions, “and where appropriate, apply suitable buffer distances to ensure pesticides do not drift”.

“Other than people using small amounts of pesticides by hand in non-commercial circumstances, most operators must have received appropriate training and hold current certification in order to apply pesticides,” he said.

“Equally important, they must keep appropriate records.”

2018 June: Moree (NSW) – Fines for Spraydrift

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has issued fines totaling $2250 to pesticide contractors after spray drift incidents in Moree and Tamworth.

The fines came after the EPA investigated complaints from a Moree grazier and a Tamworth olive grower.

Northern director Adam Gilligan said that in both incidents, the EPA had found evidence that the neighbouring properties had been affected by the spray drift.

Mr Gilligan said that, with winter spraying now under way, pesticide users must take all necessary precautions to ensure they were using pesticide products safely. 

Spray drift can impact the agricultural operations of neighbouring properties and pose a serious threat to the health of the operators, community and the environment if spraying is not carried out appropriately,” he said.

The EPA said the Moree landholder had lodged a complaint after his grazing land was subject to spray drift when an aerial operator applied pesticides to a cotton crop on the adjoining farm. 

The EPA fined the aerial pesticide operator $1500.

In the other incident, the EPA issued a fine of $750 to a Tamworth-based pesticides contractor after receiving a complaint that pesticides had drifted onto an established olive grove while spraying was occurring on the adjoining farm.

Mr Gilligan said anyone using pesticides was legally required to read the product’s label instructions, follow directions, “and where appropriate, apply suitable buffer distances to ensure pesticides do not drift”.

“Other than people using small amounts of pesticides by hand in non-commercial circumstances, most operators must have received appropriate training and hold current certification in order to apply pesticides,” he said.

“Equally important, they must keep appropriate records.”

 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) has issued fines totaling $2250 to pesticide contractors after spray drift incidents in Moree and Tamworth.

The fines came after the EPA investigated complaints from a Moree grazier and a Tamworth olive grower.

Northern director Adam Gilligan said that in both incidents, the EPA had found evidence that the neighbouring properties had been affected by the spray drift.

Mr Gilligan said that, with winter spraying now under way, pesticide users must take all necessary precautions to ensure they were using pesticide products safely.

Spray drift can impact the agricultural operations of neighbouring properties and pose a serious threat to the health of the operators, community and the environment if spraying is not carried out appropriately,” he said.

The EPA said the Moree landholder had lodged a complaint after his grazing land was subject to spray drift when an aerial operator applied pesticides to a cotton crop on the adjoining farm.

The EPA fined the aerial pesticide operator $1500.

In the other incident, the EPA issued a fine of $750 to a Tamworth-based pesticides contractor after receiving a complaint that pesticides had drifted onto an established olive grove while spraying was occurring on the adjoining farm.

Mr Gilligan said anyone using pesticides was legally required to read the product’s label instructions, follow directions, “and where appropriate, apply suitable buffer distances to ensure pesticides do not drift”.

“Other than people using small amounts of pesticides by hand in non-commercial circumstances, most operators must have received appropriate training and hold current certification in order to apply pesticides,” he said.

“Equally important, they must keep appropriate records.”

1995-2021: Innisfail Water Supply (Queensland). Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Fenthion Methyl, Fenthion, Diuron, Simazine, Imidacloprid

Raw Water Innisfail (Queensland)

Raw Water Source Results Summary 1995-2011

Chlorpyrifos (1 detection) 0.33ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Fenthion Methyl (1 detection) 1.3ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.) <0.01ug/L (min)

Diuron (4 detections) 0.1ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Simazine (1 detection) 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Imidacloprid (26 detections) 0.1ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Water Treatment Plant (raw) 2013-16

Imidacloprid 0.23ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.), 0.02ug/L (min)

Table 3.7A Innisfail Scheme – SWA Johnstone River 1/2016 to 1/2021
Notes:1. Imidacloprid continues to be detected in the river water. Of 30 samples the min of this pesticide was 0.02ug/L, average of 0.065ug/L and max of 0.23ug/L

Innisfail Treatment Plant 2009-11

Imidacloprid 0.1ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Treatment Plant 2013-16

Imidacloprid 0.19ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Scheme Treated Water Quality - Jan 2016 - Jan 2021 - (WTP and Stoters Res) - SWA and Pesticide Results

Johnstone: Number of samples 41 Imidacloprid 0.19ug/L (max) 0.02ug/L (min), 0.07ug/L (av.). Pesticides Various 0.0ug/L

Source: Cassowary Coast Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan May 2021

Innisfail Scheme Treated Water Quality

Sth Johnstone, Mena Ck, Wrights Park, Flying Fish Pt, Eubenangee, Garradunga and Castor Park 2012-2016

Imidacloprid 0.2ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Scheme Treated Water Quality

South Johnstone, Mena Creek, Wrights park, Flying Fish Point, Eubenangee, Garradunga and Castor Park Mourilylan Harbour 2016 -2021

Imidacloprid 0.11ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), 0.02ug/L (min)

Raw Water Innisfail (Queensland)

Raw Water Source Results Summary 1995-2011

Chlorpyrifos (1 detection) 0.33ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Fenthion Methyl (1 detection) 1.3ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.) <0.01ug/L (min)

Diuron (4 detections) 0.1ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Simazine (1 detection) 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Imidacloprid (26 detections) 0.1ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Water Treatment Plant (raw) 2013-16

Imidacloprid 0.23ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.), 0.02ug/L (min)

Table 3.7A Innisfail Scheme – SWA Johnstone River 1/2016 to 1/2021
Notes:1. Imidacloprid continues to be detected in the river water. Of 30 samples the min of this pesticide was 0.02ug/L, average of 0.065ug/L and max of 0.23ug/L

Innisfail Treatment Plant 2009-11

Imidacloprid 0.1ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Treatment Plant 2013-16

Imidacloprid 0.19ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), <0.01ug/L (min)

Innisfail Scheme Treated Water Quality – Jan 2016 – Jan 2021 – (WTP and Stoters Res) – SWA and Pesticide Results

Johnstone: Number of samples 41 Imidacloprid 0.19ug/L (max) 0.02ug/L (min), 0.07ug/L (av.). Pesticides Various 0.0ug/L

Source: Cassowary Coast Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan May 2021

Innisfail Scheme Treated Water Quality

Sth Johnstone, Mena Ck, Wrights Park, Flying Fish Pt, Eubenangee, Garradunga and Castor Park 2012-2016

Imidacloprid 0.2ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), 0.00ug/L (min)

Innisfail Scheme Treated Water Quality

South Johnstone, Mena Creek, Wrights park, Flying Fish Point, Eubenangee, Garradunga and Castor Park Mourilylan Harbour 2016 -2021

Imidacloprid 0.11ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), 0.02ug/L (min)

 

2016/22: Branyan Water Treatment Plant (Bundaberg-Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Branyan Water Treatment Plant Bundaberg (Bundaberg WSA)

2016/17: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.02ug/L (max)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.03ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av), 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

2021/22: 2,2-DPA (Dalapon) 1.4ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (min). Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max). Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (min).

Bundaberg Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22

Branyan Water Treatment Plant Bundaberg (Bundaberg WSA)

2016/17: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.02ug/L (max)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.03ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av), 2,4-D 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

2021/22: 2,2-DPA (Dalapon) 1.4ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (min). Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max). Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (min).

Bundaberg Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2016/17, 2017/18, 2018/19, 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22

2014/22: River Park Reservoir (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

River Park Reservoir (Queensland)

2014/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Hexazinone 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.22ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean). Hexazinone 0.08ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean), Metolachlor 0.12ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (mean)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.09ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.06ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Fipronil 0.55ug/L (max), 0.15ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min)

2021/22: Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.03ug/L (max), Tebuthiuron 0.3ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min). Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.06ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.09ug/L (max), Dalapon 2.7ug/L (max), 0.3ug/L (min).

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/22

River Park Reservoir (Queensland)

2014/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.03ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Hexazinone 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.22ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean). Hexazinone 0.08ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean), Metolachlor 0.12ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (mean)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.09ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.06ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Fipronil 0.55ug/L (max), 0.15ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min)

2021/22: Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.03ug/L (max), Tebuthiuron 0.3ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min). Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.06ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.09ug/L (max), Dalapon 2.7ug/L (max), 0.3ug/L (min).

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/22

2014/22: Wallaville Reservoir (Wallaville, Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

Wallaville Reservoir (Wallaville Queensland)

2014/15: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Diuron 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.28ug/L, Hexazinone 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.14ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.13ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean). Hexazinone 0.07ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (mean). Metolachlor 0.1ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (mean)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.21ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (min). Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max). 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (max)

2021/22: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 4.1ug/L (max), 0.6ug/L (min). Atrazine-2-hydroxy 0.02ug/L (max). Dicamba 0.1ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), MCPA 0.1ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.08ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (min). Tebuthiuron 0.26ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min). 2,4-D 0.03ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/22

Wallaville Reservoir (Wallaville Queensland)

2014/15: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.06ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.15ug/L, Diuron 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.28ug/L, Hexazinone 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.14ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.13ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (mean). Hexazinone 0.07ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (mean). Metolachlor 0.1ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (mean)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.21ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (min). Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max). 2,4-D 0.02ug/L (max)

2021/22: Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 4.1ug/L (max), 0.6ug/L (min). Atrazine-2-hydroxy 0.02ug/L (max). Dicamba 0.1ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.02ug/L (max), MCPA 0.1ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.08ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (min). Tebuthiuron 0.26ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min). 2,4-D 0.03ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/22

2013/22: Gregory River Reservoir (Childers/Woodgate, Qld). Pesticides: Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Hexazinone

Gregory River Reservoir (Childers/Woodgate Queensland) - Gregory WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Diuron 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2014/15: Atrazine 0.56ug/L, Diuron 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 0.26ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.33ug/L

2016/17: Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.33ug/L (max), 0.12ug/L (av). Hexazinone 0.02ug/L. Metolachlor 0.26ug/L (max), 0.09ug/L (av). Diuron 0.06ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av).

2018/19: Atrazine 0.32ug/L (max), 0.14ug/L (av.), Diuron 0.03ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.15ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Atrazine 0.08ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (max)

2021/22: Imidacloprid 0.12ug/L (max), Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.11ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 4.1ug/L (max) 1ug/L (min), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

Gregory River Reservoir (Childers/Woodgate Queensland) – Gregory WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Diuron 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2014/15: Atrazine 0.56ug/L, Diuron 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 0.26ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.33ug/L

2016/17: Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.33ug/L (max), 0.12ug/L (av). Hexazinone 0.02ug/L. Metolachlor 0.26ug/L (max), 0.09ug/L (av). Diuron 0.06ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av).

2018/19: Atrazine 0.32ug/L (max), 0.14ug/L (av.), Diuron 0.03ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.15ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Atrazine 0.08ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Hexazinone 0.03ug/L (max)

2021/22: Imidacloprid 0.12ug/L (max), Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.11ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 4.1ug/L (max) 1ug/L (min), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

2013/22: Kalkie Reservoir (Kalkie, Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

Kalkie Reservoir (Kalkie Queensland) Kalkie WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2014/15: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.14ug/L (max) 0.07ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.06ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, 0.02ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (min)

2021/22: Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.04ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.08ug/L (max), Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.02ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 2.1ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

Kalkie Reservoir (Kalkie Queensland) Kalkie WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.02ug/L

2014/15: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 0.14ug/L (max) 0.07ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.06ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2018/19: Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, 0.02ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Hexazinone 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (min)

2021/22: Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.04ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.08ug/L (max), Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.02ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 2.1ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

2013/22: Vecellios Road Reservoir (Moore Park, Queensland). Pesticide: Multiple

Vecellios Road Reservoir (Moore Park Queensland) - Moore Park WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.34ug/L

2014/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.08ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Diuron 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 1.3ug/L (max), 0.39ug/L (av.)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.05ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: MCPA 0.03ug/L (max)

2021/22: Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.16ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.44ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 2.1ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (min). Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max). Fluroxypur 0.05ug/L (max), Haloxyfop 0.02ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.1ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.06ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (min).

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

Vecellios Road Reservoir (Moore Park Queensland) – Moore Park WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.34ug/L

2014/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L

2015/16: Atrazine 0.08ug/L

2016/17: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Diuron 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 0.02ug/L

2017/18: Atrazine 1.3ug/L (max), 0.39ug/L (av.)

2018/19: Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.), Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.02ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.), Metolachlor 0.05ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: MCPA 0.03ug/L (max)

2021/22: Atrazine-2-Hydroxy 0.16ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.44ug/L (max), Dalapon (2,2-DPA) 2.1ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (min). Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max). Fluroxypur 0.05ug/L (max), Haloxyfop 0.02ug/L (max), Metolachlor OXA 0.1ug/L (max), Metolachlor 0.06ug/L (max), Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (min).

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

2013/14 + 2021/22: Murdochs Road Reservoir (Moore Park, Qld). Pesticide: Atrazine, Imidacloprid

Murdochs Road Reservoir (Bundaberg Queensland) - Moore Park WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Imidacloprid 0.07ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013/14 + 2021/22

Murdochs Road Reservoir (Bundaberg Queensland) – Moore Park WSA

2013/14: Atrazine 0.03ug/L

2021/22: Imidacloprid 0.07ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (min)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013/14 + 2021/22

2013/22: Power Street WTP Reservoir (Bundaberg Qld). Pesticide: Bromacil, Metolachlor

Powers Street WTP Reservoir (Bundaberg Queensland) Bundaberg WSA

2013/14: Bromacil 0.11ug/L (max)

2014/15: Bromacil 0.09ug/L (max)

2015/16: Bromacil 0.1ug/L (max)

2016/17: Bromacil 0.08ug/L (max)

2017/18: Bromacil 0.07ug/L (max)

2018/19: Bromacil 0.08ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Bromacil 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2021/21: Bromacil 0.16ug/L (max)

2021/22: Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max). Bromacil 0.02ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

Powers Street WTP Reservoir (Bundaberg Queensland) Bundaberg WSA

2013/14: Bromacil 0.11ug/L (max)

2014/15: Bromacil 0.09ug/L (max)

2015/16: Bromacil 0.1ug/L (max)

2016/17: Bromacil 0.08ug/L (max)

2017/18: Bromacil 0.07ug/L (max)

2018/19: Bromacil 0.08ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

2019/20: Bromacil 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2021/21: Bromacil 0.16ug/L (max)

2021/22: Metolachlor 0.01ug/L (max). Bromacil 0.02ug/L (max)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2013/22

2013/14 + 2020/22: Heaps Street Reservoir Bundaberg (Qld). Pesticide: Bromacil

Heaps Street Reservoir (Bundaberg Qld) - Bundaberg WSA

2013/14: Bromacil 0.02ug/L

2020/21: Bromacil 0.04ug/L (max)

2021/22: Bromacil 0.12ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (min)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013/14 + 2020/22

Heaps Street Reservoir (Bundaberg Qld) – Bundaberg WSA

2013/14: Bromacil 0.02ug/L

2020/21: Bromacil 0.04ug/L (max)

2021/22: Bromacil 0.12ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (min)

Bundaberg Shire Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2013/14 + 2020/22

2016/17: Walkamin (Queensland) – Pesticide: Thiometon, Dichlorvos, Bromophos-ethyl

2016/17: Walkamin (Queensland)

Thiometon: 2.3ug/L (source water), 1.4ug/L (average)

Australian Drinking Water Guideline Thiometon: 4ug/L

Dichlorvos: 0.2ug/L (source water), 0.1525ug/L (average)

Australian Drinking Water Guideline Dichlorvos: 5ug/L

Bromophos-ethyl: 0.1ug/L (source water)

Tablelands Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Annual Report 2016/17

2016/17: Walkamin (Queensland)

Thiometon: 2.3ug/L (source water), 1.4ug/L (average)

Australian Drinking Water Guideline Thiometon: 4ug/L

Dichlorvos: 0.2ug/L (source water), 0.1525ug/L (average)

Australian Drinking Water Guideline Dichlorvos: 5ug/L

Bromophos-ethyl: 0.1ug/L (source water)

Tablelands Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Annual Report 2016/17

2016/17: Tinaroo Park (Queensland) – Thiometon, Dichlorvos

2016/17: Tinaroo Park (Queensland)

Dichlorvos: 0.2ug/L (reticulation)

Thiometon: 4.3ug/L (source water), 1.45ug/L (average)

Australian Drinking Water Guideline Thiometon: 4ug/L

Tablelands Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Annual Report 2016/17

2016/17: Tinaroo Park (Queensland)

Dichlorvos: 0.2ug/L (reticulation)

Thiometon: 4.3ug/L (source water), 1.45ug/L (average)

Australian Drinking Water Guideline Thiometon: 4ug/L

Tablelands Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Annual Report 2016/17

2016/17: Atherton (Queensland) – Pesticides: Bromophos Ethyl, Dichlorvos, Endrin Ketone, Heptachlor

2016-17 Atherton Queensland

Dichlorvos 0.2ug/L (reticulation)

Heptachlor 0.01ug/L (reticulation)

Bromphos-Ethyl 0.1ug/L (source water)

Dichlorvos 0.2ug/L (source water)

Endrin Ketone 0.01ug/L (source water)

Heptachlor 0.01ug/L (source water)

Tablelands Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Annual Report 2016-17

2016-17 Atherton Queensland

Dichlorvos 0.2ug/L (reticulation)

Heptachlor 0.01ug/L (reticulation)

Bromphos-Ethyl 0.1ug/L (source water)

Dichlorvos 0.2ug/L (source water)

Endrin Ketone 0.01ug/L (source water)

Heptachlor 0.01ug/L (source water)

Tablelands Regional Council Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Annual Report 2016-17

2015/16: Tieri (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desthylatrazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor

2015/16: Tieri (Queensland) Pesticides

Tieri Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.21ug/L(max), 0.18ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.09ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tieri Raw:

Atrazine: 0.37ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.08ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.12ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2015/16: Tieri (Queensland) Pesticides

Tieri Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.21ug/L(max), 0.18ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.09ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tieri Raw:

Atrazine: 0.37ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.08ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.12ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2015/20: Rolleston (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

2015/16: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides

Rolleston Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.23ug/L(max), 0.18ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.4ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.4ug/L(max), 0.2ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 1.1ug/L(max), 0.4ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides (Note reticulated samples not provided 2017/18)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.09ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Simazine: 0.15ug/L (max), 0.11ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.48ug/L(max), 0.34ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.19ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides (Note reticulated samples not provided 2018/19)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

N-Butylbenzene sulfonamide: 0.2ug/L(max), 0.2ug/L(av)

Simazine: 0.1ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 1.4ug/L(max), 1.4ug/L(av)

Metolachlor OXA: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Tris (chloropropyl) phosphate: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides (Note reticulated samples not provided 2019/20)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.01ug/L(max), 0.01ug/L(av)

N-Butylbenzene Sulfonamide: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (min)

Simazine: 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 1.4ug/L(max), 1.4ug/L(av)

Metolachlor - OXA: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Tris (chloropropyl) phosphate: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides

Rolleston Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.23ug/L(max), 0.18ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.4ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.4ug/L(max), 0.2ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 1.1ug/L(max), 0.4ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides (Note reticulated samples not provided 2017/18)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.09ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Simazine: 0.15ug/L (max), 0.11ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.48ug/L(max), 0.34ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.19ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides (Note reticulated samples not provided 2018/19)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

N-Butylbenzene sulfonamide: 0.2ug/L(max), 0.2ug/L(av)

Simazine: 0.1ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 1.4ug/L(max), 1.4ug/L(av)

Metolachlor OXA: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Tris (chloropropyl) phosphate: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Rolleston (Queensland) Pesticides (Note reticulated samples not provided 2019/20)

Rolleston Raw:

Atrazine: 0.01ug/L(max), 0.01ug/L(av)

N-Butylbenzene Sulfonamide: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (min)

Simazine: 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 1.4ug/L(max), 1.4ug/L(av)

Metolachlor – OXA: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Tris (chloropropyl) phosphate: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/20: Emerald (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

2015/16: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides

Emerald Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.08ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.15ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Emerald Raw:

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max)

Tebuthiuron: 0.2ug/L(max)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides (Please not reticulated samples not provided 2017/18)

Emerald Raw:

Atrazine: 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Desethylatrazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 0.12ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.38ug/L (max), 0.37ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides

Emerald Reticulation:

Atrazine 2-Hydroxy: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

2,4-D: 0.3ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.34ug/L(max), 0.18ug/L(av)

Dalapon (2,2 DPA): 1.9ug/L (max), 1.6ug/L (av.)

Emerald Raw:

Atrazine 2 Hydroxy: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L (av)

2,4-D: 0.8ug/L (max), 0.65ug/L (av)

Diuron: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.31ug/L(max), 0.31ug/L (av)

Fluroxypur: 0.09ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides (Please not reticulated samples not provided 2019/20)

Emerald Raw:

Atrazine, 2-hydroxy: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 0.8ug/L (max), 0.65ug/L (av.)

Diuron: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av.)

Desethylatrazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.31ug/L (max), 0.31ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 0.09ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides

Emerald Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.08ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.15ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Emerald Raw:

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max)

Tebuthiuron: 0.2ug/L(max)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides (Please not reticulated samples not provided 2017/18)

Emerald Raw:

Atrazine: 0.05ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Desethylatrazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 0.12ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.38ug/L (max), 0.37ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides

Emerald Reticulation:

Atrazine 2-Hydroxy: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

2,4-D: 0.3ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.34ug/L(max), 0.18ug/L(av)

Dalapon (2,2 DPA): 1.9ug/L (max), 1.6ug/L (av.)

Emerald Raw:

Atrazine 2 Hydroxy: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L (av)

2,4-D: 0.8ug/L (max), 0.65ug/L (av)

Diuron: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.31ug/L(max), 0.31ug/L (av)

Fluroxypur: 0.09ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Emerald (Queensland) Pesticides (Please not reticulated samples not provided 2019/20)

Emerald Raw:

Atrazine, 2-hydroxy: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 0.8ug/L (max), 0.65ug/L (av.)

Diuron: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av.)

Desethylatrazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.31ug/L (max), 0.31ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur: 0.09ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/20: Duaringa (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

2015/16: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides

Duaringa Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.17ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.09ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.19ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Simazine: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.4ug/L(av) ??

Tebuthiuron: 0.39ug/L(max), 0.36ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides (Please note, reticulated samples not provided 2017/18).

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.65ug/L(max), 0.52ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides (Please note, reticulated samples not provided 2018/19).

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.3ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L(av)

Hexazinone: 0.03ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.5ug/L(max), 0.5ug/L(av)

Propazin - 2 hydroxy: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.06ug/L(av)

Metolachlor OXA: 0.08ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides (Please note, reticulated samples not provided 2019/20).

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.3ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L(av)

Hexazinone: 0.03ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.5ug/L(max), 0.5ug/L(av)

Propazin 2-hydroxy: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.06ug/L(av)

Metolachlor - OXA 0.08ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides

Duaringa Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.17ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.09ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.19ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Simazine: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.4ug/L(av) ??

Tebuthiuron: 0.39ug/L(max), 0.36ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides (Please note, reticulated samples not provided 2017/18).

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.65ug/L(max), 0.52ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides (Please note, reticulated samples not provided 2018/19).

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.3ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L(av)

Hexazinone: 0.03ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.5ug/L(max), 0.5ug/L(av)

Propazin – 2 hydroxy: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.06ug/L(av)

Metolachlor OXA: 0.08ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Duaringa (Queensland) Pesticides (Please note, reticulated samples not provided 2019/20).

Duaringa Raw:

Atrazine: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.3ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L(av)

Hexazinone: 0.03ug/L (max), 0.03ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.5ug/L(max), 0.5ug/L(av)

Propazin 2-hydroxy: 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.06ug/L(av)

Metolachlor – OXA 0.08ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/20: Dingo (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Tebuthiuron

2015/16: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Atrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Tebuthiuron: 0.14ug/L(max), 0.14ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/18

2018/19: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Tebuthiuron: 0.66ug/L(max), 0.66ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Tebuthiuron: 0.66ug/L(max), 0.66ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Atrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Tebuthiuron: 0.14ug/L(max), 0.14ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/18

2018/19: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Tebuthiuron: 0.66ug/L(max), 0.66ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Dingo (Queensland) Pesticides

Dingo Raw:

Tebuthiuron: 0.66ug/L(max), 0.66ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/20: Comet (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

2015/16: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides

Comet Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.46ug/L(max), 0.32ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.08ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Comet Raw:

Atrazine: 1ug/L(max)

Desethylatrazine: 0.2ug/L(max)

Tebuthiuron: 0.4ug/L(max)

Metolachlor: 1.7ug/L(max)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated water not provided 2017/18)

Comet Raw:

Atrazine: 0.17ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.13ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated water not provided 2018/19)

Comet Raw:

Desethyl Atrazine: 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Atrazine 2 Hydroxy: 0.09ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.46ug/L(max), 0.29ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated water not provided 2019/20)

Comet Raw:

Desethyl Atrazine 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 0.01ug/L(max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Atrazine, 2-hydroxy 0.09ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.46ug/L(max), 0.29ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides

Comet Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.46ug/L(max), 0.32ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.08ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.04ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Comet Raw:

Atrazine: 1ug/L(max)

Desethylatrazine: 0.2ug/L(max)

Tebuthiuron: 0.4ug/L(max)

Metolachlor: 1.7ug/L(max)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated water not provided 2017/18)

Comet Raw:

Atrazine: 0.17ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.13ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated water not provided 2018/19)

Comet Raw:

Desethyl Atrazine: 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Atrazine 2 Hydroxy: 0.09ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.46ug/L(max), 0.29ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Comet (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated water not provided 2019/20)

Comet Raw:

Desethyl Atrazine 0.01ug/L (max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 0.01ug/L(max), 0.01ug/L (av.)

Atrazine, 2-hydroxy 0.09ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 0.46ug/L(max), 0.29ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 0.02ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L av.)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Capella (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor

2015/16: Capella (Queensland) Pesticides

Capella Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.39ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.13ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Capella Raw:

Atrazine: 0.53ug/L(max), 0.48ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.28ug/L(max), 0.21ug/L (av)

Metolachlor: 0.33ug/L(max), 0.22ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2015/16: Capella (Queensland) Pesticides

Capella Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.39ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.06ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.04ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.13ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Capella Raw:

Atrazine: 0.53ug/L(max), 0.48ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.28ug/L(max), 0.21ug/L (av)

Metolachlor: 0.33ug/L(max), 0.22ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2015/20: Blackwater (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Tebuthiuron, Metolachlor

2015/16: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides

Blackwater Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.47ug/L(max), 0.42ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.11ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.19ug/L(max), 0.14ug/L(av)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.5ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.2ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.2ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated samples not provided 2017/18)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.21ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 1.2ug/L(max), 0.8ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.25ug/L(max), 0.19ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated samples not provided 2018/19)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Atrazine 2-Hydroxy: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.26ug/L(max), 0.26ug/L(av)

Metsulfuron: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated samples not provided 2019/20)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.26ug/L(max), 0.26ug/L(av)

Metsulfuron: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2015/16: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides

Blackwater Reticulation:

Atrazine: 0.47ug/L(max), 0.42ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.07ug/L(max), 0.07ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.11ug/L(max), 0.11ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.19ug/L(max), 0.14ug/L(av)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.5ug/L(max), 0.3ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.2ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.2ug/L(max), 0.1ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2015/16

2017/18: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated samples not provided 2017/18)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.21ug/L(max), 0.12ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Simazine: 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 1.2ug/L(max), 0.8ug/L(av)

Metolachlor: 0.25ug/L(max), 0.19ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2017/18

2018/19: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated samples not provided 2018/19)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Atrazine 2-Hydroxy: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.26ug/L(max), 0.26ug/L(av)

Metsulfuron: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2018/19

2019/20: Blackwater (Queensland) Pesticides (Note: Reticulated samples not provided 2019/20)

Blackwater Raw:

Atrazine: 0.05ug/L(max), 0.05ug/L (av)

Desethylatrazine: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L (av)

Tebuthiuron: 0.26ug/L(max), 0.26ug/L(av)

Metsulfuron: 0.03ug/L(max), 0.03ug/L(av)

Source: Central Highlands Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (DWQMP) Annual Report 2019/20

2016/17 – Surat River (2) (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron

Surat (River) Site: 17KE6870

Atrazine: 0.15ug/L

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L

Metolachlor: 0.38ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 0.06ug/L

Source: Maranoa Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2016/17

Surat (River) Site: 17KE6870

Atrazine: 0.15ug/L

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L

Metolachlor: 0.38ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 0.06ug/L

Source: Maranoa Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2016/17

2016/17: Surat River (1) (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron

Surat (River) Site: 17KE6869

Atrazine: 0.15ug/L

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L

Diuron: 0.06ug/L

Metolachlor: 0.37ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 0.06ug/L

Source: Maranoa Regional Council - Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2016/17

Surat (River) Site: 17KE6869

Atrazine: 0.15ug/L

Desethylatrazine: 0.04ug/L

Diuron: 0.06ug/L

Metolachlor: 0.37ug/L

Tebuthiuron: 0.06ug/L

Source: Maranoa Regional Council – Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Report 2016/17

2018 April: Tatong (Victoria) – Victorian Protected Cockatoos Killed By Chemical. Pesticide: Omethoate

Victorian protected cockatoos killed by chemical

A COMMON farm chemical possibly made into baits is behind the mass deaths of protected sulphur-crested cockatoos in Victoria’s northeast, authorities say.

More than 250 of the birds died at Tatong, near Benalla, in January and February, prompting calls to wildlife officers from the Department of Environment.

Greg Chant from the department said testing of samples from the dead birds indicated they had died from omethoate poisoning.

“Omethoate is a common farm chemical used to protect crops from red-legged earth mites,” he said.

“It’s possible omethoate was illegally used to create a homemade bait, which the birds ate.” The cockatoos are protected under the Wildlife Act and there are significant penalties — including imprisonment — for hunting, taking or destroying protected species.

It is also illegal to make bait products without appropriate authorisation, Mr Chant said.

“The incident highlights that using chemical products in an illegal way poses an unacceptable risk to wildlife,” he added.

“It is unclear if the birds were deliberately poisoned or not, but illegally destroying protected native wildlife is a serious environmental crime.”

The department is now looking for the person responsible and anyone with information can make anonymous calls to the department on 136 186 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 300 000.

Victorian protected cockatoos killed by chemical

A COMMON farm chemical possibly made into baits is behind the mass deaths of protected sulphur-crested cockatoos in Victoria’s northeast, authorities say.

More than 250 of the birds died at Tatong, near Benalla, in January and February, prompting calls to wildlife officers from the Department of Environment.

Greg Chant from the department said testing of samples from the dead birds indicated they had died from omethoate poisoning.

“Omethoate is a common farm chemical used to protect crops from red-legged earth mites,” he said.

“It’s possible omethoate was illegally used to create a homemade bait, which the birds ate.” The cockatoos are protected under the Wildlife Act and there are significant penalties — including imprisonment — for hunting, taking or destroying protected species.

It is also illegal to make bait products without appropriate authorisation, Mr Chant said.

“The incident highlights that using chemical products in an illegal way poses an unacceptable risk to wildlife,” he added.

“It is unclear if the birds were deliberately poisoned or not, but illegally destroying protected native wildlife is a serious environmental crime.”

The department is now looking for the person responsible and anyone with information can make anonymous calls to the department on 136 186 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 300 000.

1994 July: Pyengana (Tasmania). Pesticide: Simazine

Pyengana - Tasmania

22/7/94: Simazine 14ug/L (Hardwood Plantation)

The sample was taken at Pyengana in the upper parts of the George River catchment (Site called Water Forest Lodge 2 Sample No: V94/12579)

Testing done by Australian Government Analytical Laboratories

Pyengana – Tasmania

22/7/94: Simazine 14ug/L (Hardwood Plantation)

The sample was taken at Pyengana in the upper parts of the George River catchment (Site called Water Forest Lodge 2 Sample No: V94/12579)

Testing done by Australian Government Analytical Laboratories

2017 May: Murrabit (Victoria) – Biker Spray and Wiped

Biker spray and wiped

10 May 2017: https://www.theguardian.com.au/story/4646367/biker-spray-and-wiped/

 

AN angry motorcyclist who was sprayed with chemicals from a crop duster has voiced his frustration at the lack of accountability from multiple government bodies.

Adrian McVeigh was riding with a group of seven people travelling along Benjeroop-Tresco Road on his way to the Murrabit Country Market when he noticed a low flying crop duster.

"He was very low, I actually thought he was going to try and land on the road," Mr McVeigh said.

"I was approaching a bend and just before I entered it my visor was obscured by the chemicals the crop duster released.

"Of the seven in our riding group, four of us were covered from head to toe."

While Mr McVeigh was concerned enough about the incident to report it and visit a GP, it was actually the follow-up responses he received that left him frustrated and concerned.

"I really wasn't too sure who the right reporting body would be but I felt it should be reported," he said.

"Not just for the fact we were covered in chemicals while travelling on a public road, but because it could have caused me to have an accident as I entered the bend.

"I rang multiple places and each seemed to keep passing the buck and nobody seemed to believe it was their responsibility.

"What I did learn is there is more protection for crops and livestock in the event of this occurring than there is for people."

Mr McVeigh said he contacted Gannawarra Shire Council, who advised it was not within local council power and recommended he contact the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) who then advised it was not an issue for them. Mr McVeigh now states the council is following up on the issue.

He also contacted the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) who put him in contact with the chemical standards officer.

He contacted VicRoads, who claimed no jurisdiction and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), who said their role was in relation to the plane only, not the chemical aspect. 

Mr McVeigh also contacted WorkSafe Victoria as he felt the pilot may have been operating outside safe procedures and they informed him they could only investigate a matter that was happening now, not an incident that had already happened and was not continuing. He claims WorkSafe staff were rude and dismissive.

DEDJTR provided a list of chemicals sprayed and according to their safety data sheets they should not cause health effects but he suffered a headache for two days after the incident and is unsure if it was connected. 

His motorcycle and helmet were both covered with the chemicals and he is concerned this could void warranty.

"I just don't understand why there seems to be no duty of care," Mr McVeigh said.

"I don't know why he dropped the chemicals so close to the road knowing we were there."

A spokesperson for DEDJTR responded to the claims saying aerial spraying of agricultural chemicals in Victoria is regulated by both the DEDJTR and CASA.

"Under the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Act 1992 administered by DEDJTR, there are various restrictions in place regarding which chemicals can be applied by air and in which locations and circumstances," the spokesperson said. 

"These restrictions vary based on what individual chemical was used and how it was used. 

"The Act also contains notification requirements when applying agricultural chemicals by air or mister within 200 metres of a school, hospital, aged care service or children's service.

DEDJTR also said there were various offences that may apply (to breaches of the act) depending on what individual chemical was used and how it was used.

The penalties may range from $310 to $63,500.

According to DEDJTR it is not currently a requirement for sprayers to post a warning to alert passing civilians that spraying is taking place.

"The potential health impacts from spraydrift depends on the amount of drift, the toxicity of the chemical, the nature of exposure (inhalation or skin) and duration," the spokesperson said.

Mr McVeigh said regardless of the circumstances he should never have been covered in chemicals from a plane.

"I was just enjoying a relaxing ride with friends to the local market, this should never happen," he said. 

DEDJTR can provide information to the public regarding chemicals used in spraying and their health risks. 

More information on what to do if spraydrift has occurred can be accessed by visiting Agricultural Victoria website.

DEDJTR are continuing to assist Mr McVeigh in the matter.

Biker spray and wiped

AN angry motorcyclist who was sprayed with chemicals from a crop duster has voiced his frustration at the lack of accountability from multiple government bodies.

Adrian McVeigh was riding with a group of seven people travelling along Benjeroop-Tresco Road on his way to the Murrabit Country Market when he noticed a low flying crop duster.

“He was very low, I actually thought he was going to try and land on the road,” Mr McVeigh said.

“I was approaching a bend and just before I entered it my visor was obscured by the chemicals the crop duster released.

“Of the seven in our riding group, four of us were covered from head to toe.”

While Mr McVeigh was concerned enough about the incident to report it and visit a GP, it was actually the follow-up responses he received that left him frustrated and concerned.

“I really wasn’t too sure who the right reporting body would be but I felt it should be reported,” he said.

“Not just for the fact we were covered in chemicals while travelling on a public road, but because it could have caused me to have an accident as I entered the bend.

“I rang multiple places and each seemed to keep passing the buck and nobody seemed to believe it was their responsibility.

“What I did learn is there is more protection for crops and livestock in the event of this occurring than there is for people.”

Mr McVeigh said he contacted Gannawarra Shire Council, who advised it was not within local council power and recommended he contact the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) who then advised it was not an issue for them. Mr McVeigh now states the council is following up on the issue.

He also contacted the Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) who put him in contact with the chemical standards officer.

He contacted VicRoads, who claimed no jurisdiction and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), who said their role was in relation to the plane only, not the chemical aspect.

Mr McVeigh also contacted WorkSafe Victoria as he felt the pilot may have been operating outside safe procedures and they informed him they could only investigate a matter that was happening now, not an incident that had already happened and was not continuing. He claims WorkSafe staff were rude and dismissive.

DEDJTR provided a list of chemicals sprayed and according to their safety data sheets they should not cause health effects but he suffered a headache for two days after the incident and is unsure if it was connected.

His motorcycle and helmet were both covered with the chemicals and he is concerned this could void warranty.

“I just don’t understand why there seems to be no duty of care,” Mr McVeigh said.

“I don’t know why he dropped the chemicals so close to the road knowing we were there.”

A spokesperson for DEDJTR responded to the claims saying aerial spraying of agricultural chemicals in Victoria is regulated by both the DEDJTR and CASA.

“Under the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Act 1992 administered by DEDJTR, there are various restrictions in place regarding which chemicals can be applied by air and in which locations and circumstances,” the spokesperson said.

“These restrictions vary based on what individual chemical was used and how it was used.

“The Act also contains notification requirements when applying agricultural chemicals by air or mister within 200 metres of a school, hospital, aged care service or children’s service.

DEDJTR also said there were various offences that may apply (to breaches of the act) depending on what individual chemical was used and how it was used.

The penalties may range from $310 to $63,500.

According to DEDJTR it is not currently a requirement for sprayers to post a warning to alert passing civilians that spraying is taking place.

“The potential health impacts from spraydrift depends on the amount of drift, the toxicity of the chemical, the nature of exposure (inhalation or skin) and duration,” the spokesperson said.

Mr McVeigh said regardless of the circumstances he should never have been covered in chemicals from a plane.

“I was just enjoying a relaxing ride with friends to the local market, this should never happen,” he said.

DEDJTR can provide information to the public regarding chemicals used in spraying and their health risks.

More information on what to do if spraydrift has occurred can be accessed by visiting Agricultural Victoria website.

DEDJTR are continuing to assist Mr McVeigh in the matter.

2016 March – Spray Drift Pilot Found Guilty (Piangil Victoria)

Spray drift pilot found guilty

7 March 2016

A licenced aerial spraying pilot has been found guilty in the Swan Hill Magistrates' Court of causing chemical spray to drift onto a neighbouring crop.

In June 2014 the pilot sprayed a selective herbicide onto a canola crop at Piangil, which subsequently drifted onto a neighbour's wheat crop.

Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) Leading Chemical Standards Officer Alex Perera said the damage caused by the spray drift was significant.

"About 40 hectares (100 acres) of the wheat crop was affected by the pilot's actions," Mr Perera said.

"It's important that all chemical users, whether they're using ground based or aerial equipment, take appropriate steps to minimise the risk of spray drift," he said.

"Pilots should make every effort to ensure maps provided by their clients include the location of any sensitive crops or sites in the surrounding area."

Causing spray drift damage to plants of economic value is an offence under the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Control of Use) Act 1992.

The pilot received a 12-month good behaviour bond, and was ordered to donate $3,000 to the Swan Hill CFA.

For more information on spray drift management, including DEDJTR's Top 10 Spraying please contact the Customer Service Centre on 136186 or go to www.agriculture.vic.gov.au/chemicaluse.

Spray drift pilot found guilty

7 March 2016

A licenced aerial spraying pilot has been found guilty in the Swan Hill Magistrates’ Court of causing chemical spray to drift onto a neighbouring crop.

In June 2014 the pilot sprayed a selective herbicide onto a canola crop at Piangil, which subsequently drifted onto a neighbour’s wheat crop.

Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) Leading Chemical Standards Officer Alex Perera said the damage caused by the spray drift was significant.

“About 40 hectares (100 acres) of the wheat crop was affected by the pilot’s actions,” Mr Perera said.

“It’s important that all chemical users, whether they’re using ground based or aerial equipment, take appropriate steps to minimise the risk of spray drift,” he said.

“Pilots should make every effort to ensure maps provided by their clients include the location of any sensitive crops or sites in the surrounding area.”

Causing spray drift damage to plants of economic value is an offence under the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals (Control of Use) Act 1992.

The pilot received a 12-month good behaviour bond, and was ordered to donate $3,000 to the Swan Hill CFA.

For more information on spray drift management, including DEDJTR’s Top 10 Spraying please contact the Customer Service Centre on 136186 or go to www.agriculture.vic.gov.au/chemicaluse.

2018 April: Australian Barley Banned in Japan. Pesticide: Azoxystrobin

Japan partially bans Australian barley over excessive pesticide levels (April 3 2018)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-03/japan-partially-bans-australian-barley-over-pesticide-levels/9614952

The Japanese Government has banned some imports of Australian barley after pesticides five times the normal limit were detected.

Key points:

  • High levels of the pesticide azoxystrobin were detected
  • The shipment came from ITOCHU Corporation
  • Authorities said azoxystrobin had been used as a fungicide for grains, fruit and vegetables around the world and was safe

Hundreds of thousands of cereal products containing the barley are now being recalled.

The pesticide azoxystrobin was detected in a shipment of Australian barley from ITOCHU Corporation that arrived in August.

The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food is now investigating and analysing all shipments of Australian barley.

Almost half of the 85 tonne export has already been used in food products and most likely already eaten, but ITOCHU said the quantity and concentration of pesticides detected did not pose a health risk.

Nevertheless, food company Nissin Cisco has voluntarily recalled 315,000 of its cereal products.

The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food has banned future shipments of barley from ITOCHU, but this will not impact exports which already have approval.

"ITOCHU says something possibly happened between harvesting and shipping, perhaps during the cleaning process, but they are still investigating," the ministry's Tetsuo Ushikusa told the ABC.

"It's very unlikely that it suddenly appeared in the fields."

"In the last 14-15 years, azoxystrobin has never been detected from Australian imports — not even a tiny amount."

The Japanese Government has given ITOCHU until April 27 to provide the results of its investigation.

The ministry said azoxystrobin had been used as a fungicide for grains, fruit and vegetables around the world and was safe.

In a statement, ITOCHU apologised and said it was working hard to make sure it never happened again.

Australian barley scare widens as Japanese company recalls 132,000 yoghurt bowls

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-04/australian-barley-pesticide-scare-widens-across-japan/9618544

Kyoto-based Japan Luna has announced the voluntary recall of 132,000 yoghurt bowls containing cereal from the suspect batch.

On Tuesday, Nissin Cisco recalled 315,000 of its cereal products.

A shipment of Australian barley from ITOCHU Corporation in August last year was found to have residue of the pesticide azoxystrobin well above normal levels.

The Japanese Government has banned imports of barley from ITOCHU, and all shipments of the Australian grain are now being closely inspected and analysed.

The import ban will not impact exports which already have approval.

ITOCHU to conduct thorough investigation

Almost half of the 85 tonne export with pesticide traces has already been used in food products and most likely already eaten, but ITOCHU said the quantity and concentration of the susbstance detected did not pose a health risk.

The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food said it had given ITOCHU until April 27 to conduct a thorough investigation to find out what happened and how the batch had become tainted.

"ITOCHU says something possibly happened between harvesting and shipping, perhaps during the cleaning process, but they are still investigating," the ministry's Tetsuo Ushikusa told the ABC.

"It's very unlikely that it suddenly appeared in the fields.

"In the last 14-15 years, azoxystrobin has never been detected from Australian imports — not even a tiny amount."

In a statement, ITOCHU apologised and said it was working hard to make sure it never happened again.

Japan partially bans Australian barley over excessive pesticide levels (April 3 2018)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-03/japan-partially-bans-australian-barley-over-pesticide-levels/9614952

The Japanese Government has banned some imports of Australian barley after pesticides five times the normal limit were detected.

Key points:

  • High levels of the pesticide azoxystrobin were detected
  • The shipment came from ITOCHU Corporation
  • Authorities said azoxystrobin had been used as a fungicide for grains, fruit and vegetables around the world and was safe

Hundreds of thousands of cereal products containing the barley are now being recalled.

The pesticide azoxystrobin was detected in a shipment of Australian barley from ITOCHU Corporation that arrived in August.

The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food is now investigating and analysing all shipments of Australian barley.

Almost half of the 85 tonne export has already been used in food products and most likely already eaten, but ITOCHU said the quantity and concentration of pesticides detected did not pose a health risk.

Nevertheless, food company Nissin Cisco has voluntarily recalled 315,000 of its cereal products.

The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food has banned future shipments of barley from ITOCHU, but this will not impact exports which already have approval.

“ITOCHU says something possibly happened between harvesting and shipping, perhaps during the cleaning process, but they are still investigating,” the ministry’s Tetsuo Ushikusa told the ABC.

“It’s very unlikely that it suddenly appeared in the fields.”

“In the last 14-15 years, azoxystrobin has never been detected from Australian imports — not even a tiny amount.”

The Japanese Government has given ITOCHU until April 27 to provide the results of its investigation.

The ministry said azoxystrobin had been used as a fungicide for grains, fruit and vegetables around the world and was safe.

In a statement, ITOCHU apologised and said it was working hard to make sure it never happened again.

Australian barley scare widens as Japanese company recalls 132,000 yoghurt bowls

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-04/australian-barley-pesticide-scare-widens-across-japan/9618544

Kyoto-based Japan Luna has announced the voluntary recall of 132,000 yoghurt bowls containing cereal from the suspect batch.

On Tuesday, Nissin Cisco recalled 315,000 of its cereal products.

A shipment of Australian barley from ITOCHU Corporation in August last year was found to have residue of the pesticide azoxystrobin well above normal levels.

The Japanese Government has banned imports of barley from ITOCHU, and all shipments of the Australian grain are now being closely inspected and analysed.

The import ban will not impact exports which already have approval.

ITOCHU to conduct thorough investigation

Almost half of the 85 tonne export with pesticide traces has already been used in food products and most likely already eaten, but ITOCHU said the quantity and concentration of the susbstance detected did not pose a health risk.

The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food said it had given ITOCHU until April 27 to conduct a thorough investigation to find out what happened and how the batch had become tainted.

“ITOCHU says something possibly happened between harvesting and shipping, perhaps during the cleaning process, but they are still investigating,” the ministry’s Tetsuo Ushikusa told the ABC.

“It’s very unlikely that it suddenly appeared in the fields.

“In the last 14-15 years, azoxystrobin has never been detected from Australian imports — not even a tiny amount.”

In a statement, ITOCHU apologised and said it was working hard to make sure it never happened again.

2015: Callide Dam (Queensland) – Dicofol and unidentified pesticides

Callide Dam - Water Treatment Plant

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

 

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Dicofol 1.5ug/L, other unidentifed pesticides

Callide Dam – Water Treatment Plant

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

 

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Dicofol 1.5ug/L, other unidentifed pesticides

2014-18: Moura Water Treatment Plant (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Dicofol, Endosulfan (Total), Endosulfan (Lactose), Endrin, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Azinphos Methyl

Moura - Water Treatment Plant

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.27ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.3ug/L, Dicofol 1.5ug/L, Endosulfan (Total) 0.6ug/L, Endosulfan (Lactose) 0.5ug/L, Endrin 0.2ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.2ug/L [also detected 1H-Benzotriazole 0.7ug/L a heterocyclic compound].

Moura - Water Treatment Plant + Raw Water

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2017/18

Azinphos Ethyl 0.4ug/L (max), 0.27ug/L (av.)

Moura – Water Treatment Plant

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.05ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Hexazinone 0.04ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.27ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.3ug/L, Dicofol 1.5ug/L, Endosulfan (Total) 0.6ug/L, Endosulfan (Lactose) 0.5ug/L, Endrin 0.2ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.2ug/L [also detected 1H-Benzotriazole 0.7ug/L a heterocyclic compound].

Moura – Water Treatment Plant + Raw Water

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2017/18

Azinphos Ethyl 0.4ug/L (max), 0.27ug/L (av.)

2014-15: Moura – Dawson River (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Endosulfan (Total), Endosulfan (Lactose), Hexazinone, Metoloachlor, Tebuthiuron, Terbuthylazine

Moura - Dawson River

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.06ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

 

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Endosulfan (Total) 1.2ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.49ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.3ug/L, Endosulfan (Total) 0.6ug/L, Endosulfan (Lactose) 0.5ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.2ug/L

Moura – Dawson River

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.06ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.04ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Endosulfan (Total) 1.2ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.49ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.3ug/L, Endosulfan (Total) 0.6ug/L, Endosulfan (Lactose) 0.5ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.2ug/L

2014-15: Dawson River (SW) (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Chlordane, DEET, Desethyl Atrazine, Dicofol, Diuron, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron

Dawson River SW

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.1ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Oct-Dec 2014

Atrazine, 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Chlordane, 0.4ug/L, DEET 1.7ug/L, Dicofol 2.9ug/L [also detected Moclobemide  1.9ug/L a mental health drug]

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.32ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.89ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

Dawson River SW

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.1ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Oct-Dec 2014

Atrazine, 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Chlordane, 0.4ug/L, DEET 1.7ug/L, Dicofol 2.9ug/L [also detected Moclobemide  1.9ug/L a mental health drug]

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.32ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Metolachlor 0.89ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

2014-15: Baralaba WTP (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Dicofol, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron,

Baralaba WTP

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.11ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Oct-Dec 2014

Atrazine, 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Atrazine, 0.34ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Dicofol 2.9ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.37ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.37ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.91ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

Baralaba WTP

Banana Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014/15

Quarterly Regulator Report Jul-Sep 2014

Atrazine, 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.11ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Oct-Dec 2014

Atrazine, 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Jan-Mar 2015

Atrazine, 0.34ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Dicofol 2.9ug/L, Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.37ug/L

Quarterly Regulator Report Apr-Jun 2015

Atrazine, 0.37ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.91ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L

2018 April: Tests Reveal Poison Risk in Backyard Chook Pens. Pesticides: Dieldrin, DDT, Aldrin

Tests reveal poison risk in backyard chook pens

PerthNow April 2, 2018
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/health/tests-reveal-poison-risk-in-backyard-chook-pens-ng-b88774339z

URBAN chook owners are being warned of the risk of eating their pets’ eggs after tests revealed toxic pesticides banned in the 1980s are still lurking in backyard soils.

A Perth laboratory that does soil and egg tests for residents said dieldrin and other banned pesticides were still found in dangerously high levels throughout the metropolitan area.

ARL Group tested soil from the Hilton home of Frank Mofflin and his wife and three young daughters, who keep six chickens. It showed dieldrin levels of 0.14 parts per million (ppm), which was 2.33 times the safe level recommended by Department of Agriculture and Food WA.

Dieldrin is an organochlorine pesticide (OCP) which takes decades to degrade and has been linked to diseases including breast cancer and early onset Parkinson’s disease.

OCP chemicals accumulate in fatty tissues in humans and animals such as chooks, which transfer the toxins to their eggs. Dieldrin and other OCPs started to be banned in Australia in the 1980s.

ARL laboratory manager Douglas Todd said up to 40 per cent of eggs tested at the laboratory recorded “above allowable levels” of dieldrin and other banned pesticides such as DDT and aldrin.

“If I had backyard chickens I would definitely be getting tests done because I’ve seen enough tests with above-allowable levels that I would be cautious about eating any (backyard) eggs,” Mr Todd said.

DAFWA’s website highlights health risks from banned pesticides. It recommends “poultry do not have access to soils with OC levels of 0.06 ppm or above as chickens can easily consume soil when feeding”.

A map showing where OCPs were used during the Argentine ant eradication program in the 1970s covers a big swathe of Perth, stretching north to Balcatta, east to Midland, west to Fremantle and as far south as Armadale.

Pockets of regional towns, including Albany, Busselton, Bunbury, Harvey, Mandurah and Two Rocks are also listed.

“There may be areas (in Perth) that were treated by private contractors and these are not listed,” the website states.

“The map is only a guide to whether poultry may have a higher residue risk via soil ingestion in treated areas.

“If you run free-range chickens for either commercial or domestic consumption, you should be aware of the possibility of OC contamination.

“Anyone who runs or intends to run free range chickens in any area of WA that was developed before 1987 when OCs were banned should arrange testing of the soil where the chicken coop is sited and where the chickens will be allowed to roam.”

Mr Mofflin, 40, said when his family moved in last August they “adopted” the chooks from the former owner.

“We thought it was great to have the chooks and we were getting about five eggs a day,” Mr Mofflin said.

But after friends warned them, the couple organised getting the soil tested.

“As soon we got the test results, I said, ‘Right, that’s it, we’re not eating any more eggs’. So now we just smash them and we’ll leave the chooks to live out their days in our yard,” he said.

Agriculture Minister Alannah MacTiernan said while it was encouraging to see an increasing number of people becoming urban chook owners, they needed to be aware of the risks.

“We want to encourage as many urban people as possible to be engaged with their food and food source,” Ms MacTiernan said.

“I think there’s incredible benefits for people growing their own food and being connected to where your food is from.

“But there’s no doubt there was a lot of these pesticides spread around previously.”

“I wouldn’t say to people to give up their chooks but we encourage people to have tests done,” she said.

“There is some risk that areas have higher than acceptable residual pesticide levels, but we believe this is a vast minority of properties.

“Residual pesticides in backyard soils are not often above recommended levels, but if landholders are concerned, the ChemCentre and private labs can provide soil testing services and Local Government Environmental Health Officers or WA Health’s Environmental Health Directorate can assist with interpretation of results.

“We want to encourage people to be better informed about both the benefits and potential risks of growing their own food.”

“I have discussed this matter with Perth NRM (Natural Resource Management) who have agreed to develop a project as part of their Food Future initiative to ensure generations to come have access to safe, healthy and local fresh food.”

Tests reveal poison risk in backyard chook pens

PerthNow

URBAN chook owners are being warned of the risk of eating their pets’ eggs after tests revealed toxic pesticides banned in the 1980s are still lurking in backyard soils.

A Perth laboratory that does soil and egg tests for residents said dieldrin and other banned pesticides were still found in dangerously high levels throughout the metropolitan area.

ARL Group tested soil from the Hilton home of Frank Mofflin and his wife and three young daughters, who keep six chickens. It showed dieldrin levels of 0.14 parts per million (ppm), which was 2.33 times the safe level recommended by Department of Agriculture and Food WA.

Dieldrin is an organochlorine pesticide (OCP) which takes decades to degrade and has been linked to diseases including breast cancer and early onset Parkinson’s disease.

OCP chemicals accumulate in fatty tissues in humans and animals such as chooks, which transfer the toxins to their eggs. Dieldrin and other OCPs started to be banned in Australia in the 1980s.

ARL laboratory manager Douglas Todd said up to 40 per cent of eggs tested at the laboratory recorded “above allowable levels” of dieldrin and other banned pesticides such as DDT and aldrin.

“If I had backyard chickens I would definitely be getting tests done because I’ve seen enough tests with above-allowable levels that I would be cautious about eating any (backyard) eggs,” Mr Todd said.

DAFWA’s website highlights health risks from banned pesticides. It recommends “poultry do not have access to soils with OC levels of 0.06 ppm or above as chickens can easily consume soil when feeding”.

A map showing where OCPs were used during the Argentine ant eradication program in the 1970s covers a big swathe of Perth, stretching north to Balcatta, east to Midland, west to Fremantle and as far south as Armadale.

Pockets of regional towns, including Albany, Busselton, Bunbury, Harvey, Mandurah and Two Rocks are also listed.

“There may be areas (in Perth) that were treated by private contractors and these are not listed,” the website states.

“The map is only a guide to whether poultry may have a higher residue risk via soil ingestion in treated areas.

“If you run free-range chickens for either commercial or domestic consumption, you should be aware of the possibility of OC contamination.

“Anyone who runs or intends to run free range chickens in any area of WA that was developed before 1987 when OCs were banned should arrange testing of the soil where the chicken coop is sited and where the chickens will be allowed to roam.”

Mr Mofflin, 40, said when his family moved in last August they “adopted” the chooks from the former owner.

“We thought it was great to have the chooks and we were getting about five eggs a day,” Mr Mofflin said.

But after friends warned them, the couple organised getting the soil tested.

“As soon we got the test results, I said, ‘Right, that’s it, we’re not eating any more eggs’. So now we just smash them and we’ll leave the chooks to live out their days in our yard,” he said.

Agriculture Minister Alannah MacTiernan said while it was encouraging to see an increasing number of people becoming urban chook owners, they needed to be aware of the risks.

“We want to encourage as many urban people as possible to be engaged with their food and food source,” Ms MacTiernan said.

“I think there’s incredible benefits for people growing their own food and being connected to where your food is from.

“But there’s no doubt there was a lot of these pesticides spread around previously.”

“I wouldn’t say to people to give up their chooks but we encourage people to have tests done,” she said.

“There is some risk that areas have higher than acceptable residual pesticide levels, but we believe this is a vast minority of properties.

“Residual pesticides in backyard soils are not often above recommended levels, but if landholders are concerned, the ChemCentre and private labs can provide soil testing services and Local Government Environmental Health Officers or WA Health’s Environmental Health Directorate can assist with interpretation of results.

“We want to encourage people to be better informed about both the benefits and potential risks of growing their own food.”

“I have discussed this matter with Perth NRM (Natural Resource Management) who have agreed to develop a project as part of their Food Future initiative to ensure generations to come have access to safe, healthy and local fresh food.”

2012/18: Miles Water Treatment Plant (Queensland) – Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Tebuthiuron

Miles Water Treatment Plant

27/2/12: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total: 0.25ug/L  5 pesticides]

29/5/12: Nothing

25/7/12: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

28/8/12: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.08ug/L 2 pesticides]

30/10/12: Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.04ug/L 1 pesticide]

26/3/13: Hexazinone 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total: 0.19ug/L 2 pesticides]

16/7/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/9/13: Hexazinone 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.12ug/L  2 pesticides ]

28/10/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L  [Total 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

29/11/14: Tebuthiuron 0.02ug/L

28/10/15: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

26/10/16: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.26ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 3 pesticides]

25/10/17: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

30/10/18: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.06ug/L 2 pesticides]

 

Miles Water Treatment Plant

27/2/12: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total: 0.25ug/L  5 pesticides]

29/5/12: Nothing

25/7/12: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

28/8/12: Hexazinone 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.08ug/L 2 pesticides]

30/10/12: Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.04ug/L 1 pesticide]

26/3/13: Hexazinone 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total: 0.19ug/L 2 pesticides]

16/7/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/9/13: Hexazinone 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.12ug/L  2 pesticides ]

28/10/13: Hexazinone 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L  [Total 0.11ug/L 2 pesticides]

29/11/14: Tebuthiuron 0.02ug/L

28/10/15: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

26/10/16: Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.26ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 3 pesticides]

25/10/17: Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L

30/10/18: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L [Total 0.06ug/L 2 pesticides]

 

2015/17: Warra Water Treatment Plant (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Deisosopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbuthylazine

Warra WTP

10/4/13: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L [Total: 0.36ug/L 3 pesticides]

23/10/13: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Simazine 0.04ug/L [Total 0.29ug/L 4 pesticides]

22/10/14: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L [Total 0.33ug/L 3 pesticides]

14/10/15: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.28ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.79ug/L 7 pesticides]

19/10/16: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/10/18: Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L, Simazine 0.01ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.01ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L 5 pesticides]

Warra WTP

10/4/13: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L [Total: 0.36ug/L 3 pesticides]

23/10/13: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Simazine 0.04ug/L [Total 0.29ug/L 4 pesticides]

22/10/14: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L [Total 0.33ug/L 3 pesticides]

14/10/15: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.28ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 0.79ug/L 7 pesticides]

19/10/16: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.34ug/L 4 pesticides]

16/10/18: Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L, Simazine 0.01ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.01ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.02ug/L [Total 0.5ug/L 5 pesticides]

2013/18: Jandowae Water Treatment Plant (Queensland) – Pesticides: Atrazine, Bromacil, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Imidacloprid, Metolachlor, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide, Tebuthiuron

2015-18: Jandowae Water Treatment Plant (Jandowae)

Jandowae WTP

9/7/13:  Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L [Total 0.19ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/2/14: Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L [Total 0.39ug/L 3 pesticides]

4/8/14: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.36ug/L 4 pesticides

28/1/15: Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.46ug/L 4 pesticides]

24/3/15: Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L

29/7/15: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.5ug/L [Total 0.84ug/L 5 pesticides]

9/9/15: Metolachlor 0.2ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.5ug/L [Total 0.7ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/7/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.29ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/9/16: Atrazine 1.5ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.86ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 2.58ug/L 5 pesticides].

15/10/18: Metolachlor 0.41ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.48ug/L 3 pesticides]

Jandowae WTP Settled

4/11/15: Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.1ug/L [Total 1.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L [Total 0.54ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.35ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 2.1ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total: 1.72ug/L 5 pesticides]

Jandowae WTP Filtered

4/11/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 12ug/L [Total 12.2ug/L 3 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 10ug/L [Total 10.34ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L [Total 0.51ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.8ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.6ug/L [Total 2.84ug/L 6 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 1.83ug/L 5 pesticides]

Jandowae WTP Final Treated

4/11/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.7ug/L [Total 1.9ug/L 3 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.31ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 2.1ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.63ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.82ug/L 4 pesticides].

 

2015-18: Jandowae Water Treatment Plant (Jandowae)

Jandowae WTP

9/7/13:  Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L [Total 0.19ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/2/14: Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L [Total 0.39ug/L 3 pesticides]

4/8/14: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.36ug/L 4 pesticides

28/1/15: Atrazine 0.26ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.03ug/L [Total 0.46ug/L 4 pesticides]

24/3/15: Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L

29/7/15: Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.5ug/L [Total 0.84ug/L 5 pesticides]

9/9/15: Metolachlor 0.2ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.5ug/L [Total 0.7ug/L 2 pesticides]

25/7/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.07ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.29ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/9/16: Atrazine 1.5ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.86ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 2.58ug/L 5 pesticides].

15/10/18: Metolachlor 0.41ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.48ug/L 3 pesticides]

Jandowae WTP Settled

4/11/15: Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.1ug/L [Total 1.2ug/L 2 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L [Total 0.54ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 0.35ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 2.1ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total: 1.72ug/L 5 pesticides]

Jandowae WTP Filtered

4/11/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 12ug/L [Total 12.2ug/L 3 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 10ug/L [Total 10.34ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L [Total 0.51ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.21ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.8ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.6ug/L [Total 2.84ug/L 6 pesticides]

11/1/17: Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.22ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 1.4ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 1.83ug/L 5 pesticides]

Jandowae WTP Final Treated

4/11/15: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.1ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 1.7ug/L [Total 1.9ug/L 3 pesticides]

8/12/15: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.12ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L, N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide 0.2ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/3/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.09ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.31ug/L 4 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 1.7ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 2.1ug/L 5 pesticides]

11/1/17: Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 0.63ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.82ug/L 4 pesticides].

 

2015/18: Condamine Water Treatment Plant (Qld). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, DEET, Hexazinone, Imidacloprid, Metoloachlor, Simazine, Tebuthiuron

Condamine Water Treatment Plant

26/2/13: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L [Total: 0.34ug/L Pesticides 4]

29/10/13: Hexazinone 0.2ug/L

29/10/14: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.38ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, DEET 0.3ug/L [Total 0.6ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 1.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 1.5ug/L 3 pesticides]

24/10/17: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/10/18: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.15ug/L {Total 0.21ug/L 3 pesticides]

 

 

Condamine Water Treatment Plant

26/2/13: Atrazine 0.12ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.15ug/L [Total: 0.34ug/L Pesticides 4]

29/10/13: Hexazinone 0.2ug/L

29/10/14: Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.17ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.38ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.16ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, DEET 0.3ug/L [Total 0.6ug/L 5 pesticides]

26/10/16: Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 1.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.09ug/L [Total 1.5ug/L 3 pesticides]

24/10/17: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.13ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.07ug/L [Total 0.32ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/10/18: Hexazinone 0.01ug/L, Metolachlor 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.15ug/L {Total 0.21ug/L 3 pesticides]

 

 

2013/18: Chinchilla Water Treatment Plant (Qld). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbuthylazine

2015-17: Chinchilla Water Treatment Plant (Chinchilla)

29/10/13: Atrazine 0.39ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.04ug/L, Simazine 0.22ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.4ug/L [Total 0.8ug/L 7 pesticides]

28/10/14: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.32ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.64ug/L 5 pesticides]

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/10/16: Atrazine 1.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 3.9ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.2ug/L [Total 5.6ug/L 8 pesticides]

17/10/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.57ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L [Total 0.81ug/L 4 pesticides]

 

2015-17: Chinchilla Water Treatment Plant (Chinchilla)

29/10/13: Atrazine 0.39ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Hexazinone 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 0.04ug/L, Simazine 0.22ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.4ug/L [Total 0.8ug/L 7 pesticides]

28/10/14: Atrazine 0.19ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.32ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L [Total 0.64ug/L 5 pesticides]

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.11ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L [Total 0.23ug/L 4 pesticides]

19/10/16: Atrazine 1.2ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.13ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.06ug/L, Diuron 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 3.9ug/L, Simazine 0.05ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.04ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.2ug/L [Total 5.6ug/L 8 pesticides]

17/10/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.57ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.13ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L [Total 0.81ug/L 4 pesticides]

 

2013/21: Mount Kelly Bores – Drinking Water (Queensland). Pesticide: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Imazapic

Mount Kelly Reticulation  2013-2020

Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Mt Kelly Bores

2014/15: Desethyl Atrazine: 0.05ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av)

2018/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av)

2020/21: Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Source: Burdekin Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014-15 + 2018/19 + 2020/21

Mount Kelly Bore Water Data 2013-2020

Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max) 0.02ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L (max) 0.051ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.032ug/L (av.)

Imazapic 0.02ug/L (max), 0.012 (av.)

Mount Kelly Reticulation  2013-2020

Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Mt Kelly Bores

2014/15: Desethyl Atrazine: 0.05ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av)

2018/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L (max), 0.08ug/L (av), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av)

2020/21: Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av)

Source: Burdekin Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plan 2014-15 + 2018/19 + 2020/21

Mount Kelly Bore Water Data 2013-2020

Atrazine 0.02ug/L (max) 0.02ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L (max) 0.051ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.032ug/L (av.)

Imazapic 0.02ug/L (max), 0.012 (av.)

2013/21: Home Hill Water Tower Drinking Water (Queensland). Pesticide: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine

Home Hill Water Tower - Queensland

2014/15: Desethyl Atrazine 0.15ug/L (max), 0.076ug/L (av)

2015/16: Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av)

2016/17: Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.043ug/L (av)

2018/19: Reticulation: Desethyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.) Raw: Desethyl Atrazine 0.16ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.025ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Reticulation: Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), Desethyl Atrazine 0.18ug/L (max), 0.09ug/L (mean/average). Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av./mean)

Source: Burdekin Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, 2018/19, 2020/21

Home Hill Full Service Area 2013-2020

Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.13ug/L (max), 0.055ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av.)

Home Hill Water Tower – Queensland

2014/15: Desethyl Atrazine 0.15ug/L (max), 0.076ug/L (av)

2015/16: Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.035ug/L (av)

2016/17: Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.043ug/L (av)

2018/19: Reticulation: Desethyl Atrazine 0.12ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av.), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.) Raw: Desethyl Atrazine 0.16ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.025ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Reticulation: Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), Desethyl Atrazine 0.18ug/L (max), 0.09ug/L (mean/average). Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av./mean)

Source: Burdekin Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, 2018/19, 2020/21

Home Hill Full Service Area 2013-2020

Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.13ug/L (max), 0.055ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av.)

2013/20: Giru/Cungulla Drinking Water (Queensland). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Hexazinone, Metolachlor, Diuron, Imidacloprid, Desisopropyl Atrazine

Giru Full Service Area 2013-2020 Reticulation

The water supply for the Giru township is treated surface water sourced from the Haughton River.  Burdekin Shire Council considers that the source is unprotected. The Haughton River catchment is  approximately 220km² and similarly to the Burdekin catchment, land use is dominated by grazing with  85% coverage and cropping with almost 7%. At times of low flow in the Haughton River, flows are  supplemented with Burdekin River water via the Haughton Main Channel.
Townsville Water draws surface water from the Giru weir to treat at the Cungulla Water Treatment  Plant and provides drinking water to the Giru and Cungulla communities. The Cungulla treatment plant  is operated by Townsville Water under Townsville City Council’s DWQMP.
For the purposes of the DWQMP, the water supply that Burdekin Shire Council uses for the Giru
scheme is treated water from Townsville.
This scheme operates under an agreement with Townsville that includes a commitment to provide  safe water and identifies the typical chlorine levels that are delivered to Burdekin Shire Council  Infrastructure.

Townsville Water sources raw water from the Giru Weir on the Haughton River and provides treatment  at the Cungulla water treatment plant located at the northern end of the township. The Giru weir is  located on the Haughton River approximately 300 metres downstream of the Queensland Rail bridge  at Giru and is owned and operated by SunWater. A supply agreement exists between Townsville  Water and SunWater. The intake pumps for the Giru water treatment plant is located on the  Queensland Rail Bridge. The weir is supplied by runoff from the Haughton River catchment and is  supplemented by Burdekin River water via the SunWater operated Haughton Main Channel.

Amicarbazone 0.07ug/L (max), 0.068ug/L (av.)

Atrazine 1.3ug/L (max), 0.39ug/L (av.)

Dalapon 0.6ug/L (max), 0.41ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.21ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.34ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur 0.08ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L (max), 0.027ug/L (av.)

Giru Full Service Area January 2019-2020 – post treatment improvements - Reticulation

Amicarbazone 0.07ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Atrazine 0.29 ug/L (max), 0.17ug/L (av.)

Dalapon 0.5ug/L (max), 0.35ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L (max), 0.036ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur 0.08ug/L (max), 0.063ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L (max), 0.042ug/L (av.)

Giru/Cungulla (Queensland) Drinking Water 2014/21

2014/15:

Atrazine: 1.1ug/L (max), 0.4ug/L (av), Desethylatrazine: 0.12ug/L (max), 0.063ug/L (av.), Hexazinone: 0.07ug/L (max), 0.055ug/L (av), Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av)

2015/16:

Atrazine: 1.3ug/L (max), 0.463ug/L (av), Desethylatrazine: 0.06ug/L (max), 0.055ug/L (av), Diuron: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av)

2016/17

Desethylatrazine: 0.15ug/L (max), 0.125ug/L (av), Imidacloprid: 0.12ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av)

2018/19

Atrazine 0.91ug/L (max), 0.039ug/L (av.), Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L (max), 0.054ug/L (av.), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.028ug/L (av.)

2020/21

Atrazine Reticulation 0.24ug/L (max), 0.085ug/L (av./mean), Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.023ug/L (av./mean)

Source: Burdekin Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, 2018/19, 2020/21

 

 

Giru Full Service Area 2013-2020 Reticulation

The water supply for the Giru township is treated surface water sourced from the Haughton River.  Burdekin Shire Council considers that the source is unprotected. The Haughton River catchment is  approximately 220km² and similarly to the Burdekin catchment, land use is dominated by grazing with  85% coverage and cropping with almost 7%. At times of low flow in the Haughton River, flows are  supplemented with Burdekin River water via the Haughton Main Channel.
Townsville Water draws surface water from the Giru weir to treat at the Cungulla Water Treatment  Plant and provides drinking water to the Giru and Cungulla communities. The Cungulla treatment plant  is operated by Townsville Water under Townsville City Council’s DWQMP.
For the purposes of the DWQMP, the water supply that Burdekin Shire Council uses for the Giru
scheme is treated water from Townsville.
This scheme operates under an agreement with Townsville that includes a commitment to provide  safe water and identifies the typical chlorine levels that are delivered to Burdekin Shire Council  Infrastructure.

Townsville Water sources raw water from the Giru Weir on the Haughton River and provides treatment  at the Cungulla water treatment plant located at the northern end of the township. The Giru weir is  located on the Haughton River approximately 300 metres downstream of the Queensland Rail bridge  at Giru and is owned and operated by SunWater. A supply agreement exists between Townsville  Water and SunWater. The intake pumps for the Giru water treatment plant is located on the  Queensland Rail Bridge. The weir is supplied by runoff from the Haughton River catchment and is  supplemented by Burdekin River water via the SunWater operated Haughton Main Channel.

Amicarbazone 0.07ug/L (max), 0.068ug/L (av.)

Atrazine 1.3ug/L (max), 0.39ug/L (av.)

Dalapon 0.6ug/L (max), 0.41ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.21ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.34ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur 0.08ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L (max), 0.027ug/L (av.)

Giru Full Service Area January 2019-2020 – post treatment improvements – Reticulation

Amicarbazone 0.07ug/L (max), 0.06ug/L (av.)

Atrazine 0.29 ug/L (max), 0.17ug/L (av.)

Dalapon 0.5ug/L (max), 0.35ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L (max), 0.036ug/L (av.)

Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L (max), 0.025ug/L (av.)

Fluroxypur 0.08ug/L (max), 0.063ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L (max), 0.042ug/L (av.)

Giru/Cungulla (Queensland) Drinking Water 2014/21

2014/15:

Atrazine: 1.1ug/L (max), 0.4ug/L (av), Desethylatrazine: 0.12ug/L (max), 0.063ug/L (av.), Hexazinone: 0.07ug/L (max), 0.055ug/L (av), Metolachlor: 0.06ug/L (max), 0.05ug/L (av)

2015/16:

Atrazine: 1.3ug/L (max), 0.463ug/L (av), Desethylatrazine: 0.06ug/L (max), 0.055ug/L (av), Diuron: 0.04ug/L (max), 0.04ug/L (av), Metolachlor 0.07ug/L (max), 0.07ug/L (av)

2016/17

Desethylatrazine: 0.15ug/L (max), 0.125ug/L (av), Imidacloprid: 0.12ug/L (max), 0.1ug/L (av)

2018/19

Atrazine 0.91ug/L (max), 0.039ug/L (av.), Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L (max), 0.054ug/L (av.), Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L (max), 0.028ug/L (av.)

2020/21

Atrazine Reticulation 0.24ug/L (max), 0.085ug/L (av./mean), Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.023ug/L (av./mean)

Source: Burdekin Shire Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, 2018/19, 2020/21

 

 

2009/21: Ayr/Brandon Drinking Water (Queensland): Atrazine, Metolachlor, DEET, Desethyl Atrazine, Imidacloprid

Ayr/Brandon Drinking Water

Reticulation

Ayr/Brandon 2013-2020

Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.017ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

For PFAS contamination in Ayr water supply follow this link

2014/15: Ayr/Brandon Metolachlor: 0.4ug/L (max), 0.4ug/L (average)

2015/16: Ayr/Brandon DEET: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (average)

2018/19: Ayr/Brandon Reticulation: Desethyl Atrazine 0.03(max), 0.013ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Ayr/Brandon: Desethyl Atrazine 0.02(max)

2020/21: Ayr/Brandon (Conlan): Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02(av./mean)

Source: Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014-15, 2015-16, 2018-19, 2020/21

Herbicide in drinking water 'safe'

22 Apr 2009

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-04-22/herbicide-in-drinking-water-safe/1658810?site=farnorth

The Burdekin Shire Council says it does have traces of the farm chemical Atrazine in its town water supply, but well below safe drinking guidelines.

The Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research (ACTFR) says Atrazine has been found in large quantities in north Queensland rivers and poses a public health risk because it has polluted town water supplies.

The chemical is used by cane farmers to control weeds and is also a known carcinogen.

Burdekin Mayor Lyn McLaughlin says the town water supply is tested at least once a year and the levels are a fraction of those set down under the Australian guidelines for drinking water.

She says one of the main roles of local government is to provide a safe water supply.

"Not only are we below the drinking water guidelines, we're also well below the Australian health guidelines for chemical in the water," she said.

"I think people in the district can feel very safe about what they're drinking.

"This is only one of the chemicals that we check for - there's a long list of things that are checked under the health services."

'Significant threat'

ACTFR scientist Jon Brodie says he believes Atrazine in drinking water poses a significant threat to human health, while Tasmanian Greens' MP Tim Morris says the campaign against Atrazine has been going on for many years in that state.

Mr Morris says no-one has successfully stopped that category of chemicals from finding their way into water supplies.

"Given the evidence that's in against triazine chemicals, we're continuing to call for a ban on the use of triazines in Tasmania," he said.

"There are other alternatives that are less toxic."

'No trace'

Meanwhile, Cassowary Coast Mayor Bill Shannon says residents can rest assured there is no trace of Atrazine in the region's water supply.

He says the council tests Innisfail's water supply every month and no Atrazine has been detected in recent years.

"Of course it only would be an issue in intakes that are in the middle of agricultural areas and that does include Innisfail," councillor Shannon said.

"The inputs for water elsewhere in the Cassowary coast region - for example Tully and the beaches - those intakes are in the world heritage area where there's no chance of any agricultural run-off."

Ayr/Brandon Drinking Water

Reticulation

Ayr/Brandon 2013-2020

Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

Desethyl Atrazine 0.2ug/L (max), 0.017ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L (max), 0.02ug/L (av.)

For PFAS contamination in Ayr water supply follow this link

2014/15: Ayr/Brandon Metolachlor: 0.4ug/L (max), 0.4ug/L (average)

2015/16: Ayr/Brandon DEET: 0.2ug/L (max), 0.2ug/L (average)

2018/19: Ayr/Brandon Reticulation: Desethyl Atrazine 0.03(max), 0.013ug/L (av.)

2020/21: Ayr/Brandon: Desethyl Atrazine 0.02ug/L(max)

2020/21: Ayr/Brandon (Conlan): Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L (max), 0.02(av./mean)

Source: Drinking Water Quality Management Plans 2014-15, 2015-16, 2018-19, 2020/21

Herbicide in drinking water ‘safe’

The Burdekin Shire Council says it does have traces of the farm chemical Atrazine in its town water supply, but well below safe drinking guidelines.

The Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research (ACTFR) says Atrazine has been found in large quantities in north Queensland rivers and poses a public health risk because it has polluted town water supplies.

The chemical is used by cane farmers to control weeds and is also a known carcinogen.

Burdekin Mayor Lyn McLaughlin says the town water supply is tested at least once a year and the levels are a fraction of those set down under the Australian guidelines for drinking water.

She says one of the main roles of local government is to provide a safe water supply.

“Not only are we below the drinking water guidelines, we’re also well below the Australian health guidelines for chemical in the water,” she said.

“I think people in the district can feel very safe about what they’re drinking.

“This is only one of the chemicals that we check for – there’s a long list of things that are checked under the health services.”

‘Significant threat’

ACTFR scientist Jon Brodie says he believes Atrazine in drinking water poses a significant threat to human health, while Tasmanian Greens’ MP Tim Morris says the campaign against Atrazine has been going on for many years in that state.

Mr Morris says no-one has successfully stopped that category of chemicals from finding their way into water supplies.

“Given the evidence that’s in against triazine chemicals, we’re continuing to call for a ban on the use of triazines in Tasmania,” he said.

“There are other alternatives that are less toxic.”

‘No trace’

Meanwhile, Cassowary Coast Mayor Bill Shannon says residents can rest assured there is no trace of Atrazine in the region’s water supply.

He says the council tests Innisfail’s water supply every month and no Atrazine has been detected in recent years.

“Of course it only would be an issue in intakes that are in the middle of agricultural areas and that does include Innisfail,” councillor Shannon said.

“The inputs for water elsewhere in the Cassowary coast region – for example Tully and the beaches – those intakes are in the world heritage area where there’s no chance of any agricultural run-off.”

2018 March (Queensland) Pesticides Killing Prawn Larvae in Early Warning for $80m Industry. Pesticides: Bifenthrin, Fipronil, Imidacloprid,

Pesticides killing prawn larvae in early warning for $80m industry

 

Pesticides from farms and cane fields washing into Queensland’s six main river systems could severely damage the state's $80 million prawn industry, according to CSIRO research.

Pesticide run-off from farms was affecting crustaceans' nervous systems and, in Bribie Island laboratory tests from 2017, tiger prawn larvae exposed to the level of pesticides found in the waterways would die.

Adult prawns, subjected to rigorous testing, showed no evidence of pesticide contamination.

The research also found that if subsequent field tests backed up the CSIRO's findings, there could be a major impact on Queensland’s multimillion-dollar prawn industry and Australia’s $1 billion aquaculture industry.

The report, The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp aquaculture; an assessment for north eastern Australia, was published in the February 2018 edition of the journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

CSIRO lead researcher Dr Sharon Hook said there was "one piece of evidence" that pesticides  from farms were affecting crustaceans.

Dr Hook said the 2017 research must now be tested on larvae in the rivers where pesticide levels varied with stream flow.

“It seems to be preventing them from eating,” Dr Hook said.

“[Pesticides] are near the concentrations where they are just not able to catch live prey.

“But these lab studies were done in a beaker and we haven’t yet had the opportunity to test this in the real world.

“Scientists are a cautious breed. This is one piece of evidence and we would like to have a weight of evidence before we can say we have a cause and effect.”

Professor Jon Brodie, the chief scientist from James Cook University's Catchment to Reef Processes research group, said the preliminary research was valuable.

“It again shows that we have pesticides above guideline levels in Queensland streams and particularly near the Great Barrier Reef where I work,” he said.

“That in itself is not news.

“But what this shows is that these sorts of levels can hurt prawns."

More than 95 per cent of Australia's prawn industry is in Queensland as prawns prefer water temperatures above 25 degrees.

Australian Prawn Farmers Association president Matt West said the CSIRO research showed pesticides were killing prawn larvae.

“I guess it’s the early stages of alarm bells, if you like, based on the results they have done in a lab,” Mr West said.

"What we are talking about is pesticides in estuaries in run-off from agricultural farms, which appears to be elevating.

“So we are getting mortality with our larvae stages.”

Mr West insisted rigorous annual tests with Queensland's Department of Agriculture showed no pesticides at all in adult prawns.

“So there is no effect on human health in consuming these animals," Mr West said.

Fisheries expert Dr Matt Landos said the situation was a “canary in the coal mine situation” for Australia’s prawn and crustacean industry.

“What they found was that at the low levels of these chemicals, in fact at staggering low levels, the prawns stopped eating,” he said.

“We now have the science."

The CSIRO scientists investigated the impact of three common pesticides – bifenthrin, fipronil and imidacloprid - that they discovered in rivers near Mackay and Logan.

The scientists said all pesticide levels in Queensland's coastal rivers were increasing as farms shifted from older-style organophosphate pesticides to modern neonicotinoid pesticides, following world trends.

CSIRO research shows increasing proportions of pesticides in Queensland streams, though not all to dangerous levels.

CSIRO research shows increasing proportions of pesticides in Queensland streams, though not all to dangerous levels.

Photo: CSIRO

Neonicotinoid pesticides influence receptors in the brains of sucking and chewing insects.

They make up more than 24 per cent of the world’s pesticides and were linked to honey-bee deaths in the United States in the early 2000s.

They are now widely used on Queensland’s cane farms and fruit and vegetable farms, and to control pests.

The CSIRO report found the pesticides had low toxicity to birds and mammals, but higher toxicity to fish and arthropods.

The team of scientists tested the “lethal toxicity” of the pesticides on baby black tiger prawns and found that: "Each of these insecticides was among pesticides detected in some samples collected from shrimp farm intake waters, and at concentrations approaching those that would either impact survival (fipronil) or their feeding rates (bifenthrin and imidacloprid)."

Dr Hook said Queensland’s Department of Environment and Science had decided recently to upgrade water quality guidelines on pesticides, however that could not be confirmed.

A spokesman for Queensland’s Department of Agriculture and Fisheries said the CSIRO research had yet to be evaluated.

“As yet we cannot confirm the accuracy of CSIRO’s conclusions,” the spokesman said.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority described the CSIRO study as an “initial limited study” only.

“The APVMA will continue to monitor and consider any further scientific work on this issue,” a spokesman said.

The APVMA said a review of fipronil began in 2011 because of environmental concerns, while a review of bifenthrin was completed 10 years ago and imidacloprid had never been reviewed.

Pesticides killing prawn larvae in early warning for $80m industry

Pesticides from farms and cane fields washing into Queensland’s six main river systems could severely damage the state’s $80 million prawn industry, according to CSIRO research.

Pesticide run-off from farms was affecting crustaceans’ nervous systems and, in Bribie Island laboratory tests from 2017, tiger prawn larvae exposed to the level of pesticides found in the waterways would die.

Adult prawns, subjected to rigorous testing, showed no evidence of pesticide contamination.

The research also found that if subsequent field tests backed up the CSIRO’s findings, there could be a major impact on Queensland’s multimillion-dollar prawn industry and Australia’s $1 billion aquaculture industry.

The report, The impacts of modern-use pesticides on shrimp aquaculture; an assessment for north eastern Australia, was published in the February 2018 edition of the journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

CSIRO lead researcher Dr Sharon Hook said there was “one piece of evidence” that pesticides  from farms were affecting crustaceans.

Dr Hook said the 2017 research must now be tested on larvae in the rivers where pesticide levels varied with stream flow.

“It seems to be preventing them from eating,” Dr Hook said.

“[Pesticides] are near the concentrations where they are just not able to catch live prey.

“But these lab studies were done in a beaker and we haven’t yet had the opportunity to test this in the real world.

“Scientists are a cautious breed. This is one piece of evidence and we would like to have a weight of evidence before we can say we have a cause and effect.”

Professor Jon Brodie, the chief scientist from James Cook University’s Catchment to Reef Processes research group, said the preliminary research was valuable.

“It again shows that we have pesticides above guideline levels in Queensland streams and particularly near the Great Barrier Reef where I work,” he said.

“That in itself is not news.

“But what this shows is that these sorts of levels can hurt prawns.”

More than 95 per cent of Australia’s prawn industry is in Queensland as prawns prefer water temperatures above 25 degrees.

Australian Prawn Farmers Association president Matt West said the CSIRO research showed pesticides were killing prawn larvae.

“I guess it’s the early stages of alarm bells, if you like, based on the results they have done in a lab,” Mr West said.

“What we are talking about is pesticides in estuaries in run-off from agricultural farms, which appears to be elevating.

“So we are getting mortality with our larvae stages.”

Mr West insisted rigorous annual tests with Queensland’s Department of Agriculture showed no pesticides at all in adult prawns.

“So there is no effect on human health in consuming these animals,” Mr West said.

Fisheries expert Dr Matt Landos said the situation was a “canary in the coal mine situation” for Australia’s prawn and crustacean industry.

“What they found was that at the low levels of these chemicals, in fact at staggering low levels, the prawns stopped eating,” he said.

“We now have the science.”

The CSIRO scientists investigated the impact of three common pesticides – bifenthrin, fipronil and imidacloprid – that they discovered in rivers near Mackay and Logan.

The scientists said all pesticide levels in Queensland’s coastal rivers were increasing as farms shifted from older-style organophosphate pesticides to modern neonicotinoid pesticides, following world trends.

CSIRO research shows increasing proportions of pesticides in Queensland streams, though not all to dangerous levels.

CSIRO research shows increasing proportions of pesticides in Queensland streams, though not all to dangerous levels.

Photo: CSIRO

Neonicotinoid pesticides influence receptors in the brains of sucking and chewing insects.

They make up more than 24 per cent of the world’s pesticides and were linked to honey-bee deaths in the United States in the early 2000s.

They are now widely used on Queensland’s cane farms and fruit and vegetable farms, and to control pests.

The CSIRO report found the pesticides had low toxicity to birds and mammals, but higher toxicity to fish and arthropods.

The team of scientists tested the “lethal toxicity” of the pesticides on baby black tiger prawns and found that: “Each of these insecticides was among pesticides detected in some samples collected from shrimp farm intake waters, and at concentrations approaching those that would either impact survival (fipronil) or their feeding rates (bifenthrin and imidacloprid).”

Dr Hook said Queensland’s Department of Environment and Science had decided recently to upgrade water quality guidelines on pesticides, however that could not be confirmed.

A spokesman for Queensland’s Department of Agriculture and Fisheries said the CSIRO research had yet to be evaluated.

“As yet we cannot confirm the accuracy of CSIRO’s conclusions,” the spokesman said.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority described the CSIRO study as an “initial limited study” only.

“The APVMA will continue to monitor and consider any further scientific work on this issue,” a spokesman said.

The APVMA said a review of fipronil began in 2011 because of environmental concerns, while a review of bifenthrin was completed 10 years ago and imidacloprid had never been reviewed.

2018 February: Riverland (South Australia) – Spray Drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Spray drift towards SA vineyards prompts calls for crackdown on crop spraying 'recklessness' 

Feb 28 2018

A regional South Australian wine body is calling for officials to crack down on weed spraying "recklessness", or banning products, amid a spike in reports of chemical damage due to spray drift.

Biosecurity SA has confirmed a number of cases of spray drift in two of the state's most prominent wine regions, with five reported cases in the Riverland between mid-January to mid-February, and eight in the Clare Valley.

Spray drift can see chemical particles travel away from its intended target site in certain weather, with some conditions, such as inversions, pushing spray drift up to 70 kilometres.

Such herbicide drift has recently caused headaches for farmers across the country, including damage to cotton crops worth tens of millions of dollars in New South Wales last Christmas.

Executive chairman of Riverland Wine, Chris Byrne, said it was frustrating to see the actions of few impacting upon so many.

"What has been occurring this year seems to have been the result of some carelessness or maybe even just some recklessness," Mr Byrne said.

"I guess our view here at Riverland Wine is that probably 95 per cent of all users or more are being very careful, diligent or using an alternative product.

"But there are some who do not seem to understand that what they are doing … is causing harm and damage."

A Riverland wine grape grower, who requested to remain anonymous, told the ABC their patch of young vines was subject to chemical damage from off-target spray drift last year.

"We just noticed all of a sudden that the vines just stopped growing and all the leaves were deformed," they said.

"We got a few people out to look at it, and they said it was 2,4-D."

They said with the significant risks posed to wine grape crops, the chemical in question needed to be taken off shelves.

"You go get hail or frost or anything like that and it's mother nature, that's part of being on the land," they said.

"When it is actually caused by someone else and could have been avoided, it gets really annoying.

"If the farmers or whoever is doing it does the right thing then it should not be an issue, but I do not know if there is any way of policing that or stopping that.

A call for more to be done

South Australia's primary industries body said offences carried a maximum penalty of $35,000, with Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuting an SA farmer of three offences last year.

Riverland Wine's Chris Byrne said he had written to the state minister in a call for more direct action, with suggestions including a greater focus on auditing spray diaries.

However, he said if no improvements were seen, restricting access to certain sprays and herbicides, like 2,4-D, may be the final avenue left.

"It's time for a little bit more policing of the situation and, if that does not work, it is probably time to say 'Look, these products need to be withdrawn from sale or use for certain times of the year," Mr Byrne said.

"That is a fairly harsh move … we are hopeful we can avoid it because of the fact there are lots of good producers who are compliant."

In a statement made to the ABC, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) said it was "aware of incidents involving drift of 2,4-D and will continue to consider information regarding industry uses and the continued safety and effectiveness of 2,4-D, with state authorities and industry, as part of the chemical review process".

Biosecurity SA has been contacted by the ABC for a response.

Education, not chemical bans, the key

Grain growers in South Australia have voiced similar frustration at the small percentage of farmers not abiding by regulations, but said restrictions or bans on sprays was not the answer.

Chairman of Grain Producers SA, Wade Dabinett, said continual education was a vital cog in the process.

"I think there has been plenty of research done out there, so it's just matter of educating and extending that to our existing members," Mr Dabinett said.

"This is something the industry has to self-regulate; I would not want to see chemicals banned or further regulation.

Mr Dabinett also welcomed government funding to improve real-time weather data for combatting spray drift, with a pilot network of 40 weather stations across South Australia set to kick-off.

"While we need to have a focus on education, providing our members with far greater information in terms of weather and an alerts system is going to allow us to make better decisions," he said.

"I think it is a fantastic initiative, and hopefully we will see it rolled out across the state."

Spray drift towards SA vineyards prompts calls for crackdown on crop spraying ‘recklessness’

Feb 28 2018

A regional South Australian wine body is calling for officials to crack down on weed spraying “recklessness”, or banning products, amid a spike in reports of chemical damage due to spray drift.

Biosecurity SA has confirmed a number of cases of spray drift in two of the state’s most prominent wine regions, with five reported cases in the Riverland between mid-January to mid-February, and eight in the Clare Valley.

Spray drift can see chemical particles travel away from its intended target site in certain weather, with some conditions, such as inversions, pushing spray drift up to 70 kilometres.

Such herbicide drift has recently caused headaches for farmers across the country, including damage to cotton crops worth tens of millions of dollars in New South Wales last Christmas.

Executive chairman of Riverland Wine, Chris Byrne, said it was frustrating to see the actions of few impacting upon so many.

“What has been occurring this year seems to have been the result of some carelessness or maybe even just some recklessness,” Mr Byrne said.

“I guess our view here at Riverland Wine is that probably 95 per cent of all users or more are being very careful, diligent or using an alternative product.

“But there are some who do not seem to understand that what they are doing … is causing harm and damage.”

A Riverland wine grape grower, who requested to remain anonymous, told the ABC their patch of young vines was subject to chemical damage from off-target spray drift last year.

“We just noticed all of a sudden that the vines just stopped growing and all the leaves were deformed,” they said.

“We got a few people out to look at it, and they said it was 2,4-D.”

They said with the significant risks posed to wine grape crops, the chemical in question needed to be taken off shelves.

“You go get hail or frost or anything like that and it’s mother nature, that’s part of being on the land,” they said.

“When it is actually caused by someone else and could have been avoided, it gets really annoying.

“If the farmers or whoever is doing it does the right thing then it should not be an issue, but I do not know if there is any way of policing that or stopping that.

A call for more to be done

South Australia’s primary industries body said offences carried a maximum penalty of $35,000, with Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuting an SA farmer of three offences last year.

Riverland Wine’s Chris Byrne said he had written to the state minister in a call for more direct action, with suggestions including a greater focus on auditing spray diaries.

However, he said if no improvements were seen, restricting access to certain sprays and herbicides, like 2,4-D, may be the final avenue left.

“It’s time for a little bit more policing of the situation and, if that does not work, it is probably time to say ‘Look, these products need to be withdrawn from sale or use for certain times of the year,” Mr Byrne said.

“That is a fairly harsh move … we are hopeful we can avoid it because of the fact there are lots of good producers who are compliant.”

In a statement made to the ABC, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) said it was “aware of incidents involving drift of 2,4-D and will continue to consider information regarding industry uses and the continued safety and effectiveness of 2,4-D, with state authorities and industry, as part of the chemical review process”.

Biosecurity SA has been contacted by the ABC for a response.

Education, not chemical bans, the key

Grain growers in South Australia have voiced similar frustration at the small percentage of farmers not abiding by regulations, but said restrictions or bans on sprays was not the answer.

Chairman of Grain Producers SA, Wade Dabinett, said continual education was a vital cog in the process.

“I think there has been plenty of research done out there, so it’s just matter of educating and extending that to our existing members,” Mr Dabinett said.

“This is something the industry has to self-regulate; I would not want to see chemicals banned or further regulation.

Mr Dabinett also welcomed government funding to improve real-time weather data for combatting spray drift, with a pilot network of 40 weather stations across South Australia set to kick-off.

“While we need to have a focus on education, providing our members with far greater information in terms of weather and an alerts system is going to allow us to make better decisions,” he said.

“I think it is a fantastic initiative, and hopefully we will see it rolled out across the state.”

2018 February: Spray Drift Clare Valley (South Australia) – Pesticide: 2,4-D

Spray drift towards SA vineyards prompts calls for crackdown on crop spraying 'recklessness'

Feb 28 2018

A regional South Australian wine body is calling for officials to crack down on weed spraying "recklessness", or banning products, amid a spike in reports of chemical damage due to spray drift.

Biosecurity SA has confirmed a number of cases of spray drift in two of the state's most prominent wine regions, with five reported cases in the Riverland between mid-January to mid-February, and eight in the Clare Valley.

Spray drift can see chemical particles travel away from its intended target site in certain weather, with some conditions, such as inversions, pushing spray drift up to 70 kilometres.

Such herbicide drift has recently caused headaches for farmers across the country, including damage to cotton crops worth tens of millions of dollars in New South Wales last Christmas.

Executive chairman of Riverland Wine, Chris Byrne, said it was frustrating to see the actions of few impacting upon so many.

"What has been occurring this year seems to have been the result of some carelessness or maybe even just some recklessness," Mr Byrne said.

"I guess our view here at Riverland Wine is that probably 95 per cent of all users or more are being very careful, diligent or using an alternative product.

"But there are some who do not seem to understand that what they are doing … is causing harm and damage."

A Riverland wine grape grower, who requested to remain anonymous, told the ABC their patch of young vines was subject to chemical damage from off-target spray drift last year.

"We just noticed all of a sudden that the vines just stopped growing and all the leaves were deformed," they said.

"We got a few people out to look at it, and they said it was 2,4-D."

They said with the significant risks posed to wine grape crops, the chemical in question needed to be taken off shelves.

"You go get hail or frost or anything like that and it's mother nature, that's part of being on the land," they said.

"When it is actually caused by someone else and could have been avoided, it gets really annoying.

"If the farmers or whoever is doing it does the right thing then it should not be an issue, but I do not know if there is any way of policing that or stopping that.

A call for more to be done

South Australia's primary industries body said offences carried a maximum penalty of $35,000, with Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuting an SA farmer of three offences last year.

Riverland Wine's Chris Byrne said he had written to the state minister in a call for more direct action, with suggestions including a greater focus on auditing spray diaries.

However, he said if no improvements were seen, restricting access to certain sprays and herbicides, like 2,4-D, may be the final avenue left.

"It's time for a little bit more policing of the situation and, if that does not work, it is probably time to say 'Look, these products need to be withdrawn from sale or use for certain times of the year," Mr Byrne said.

"That is a fairly harsh move … we are hopeful we can avoid it because of the fact there are lots of good producers who are compliant."

In a statement made to the ABC, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) said it was "aware of incidents involving drift of 2,4-D and will continue to consider information regarding industry uses and the continued safety and effectiveness of 2,4-D, with state authorities and industry, as part of the chemical review process".

Biosecurity SA has been contacted by the ABC for a response.

Education, not chemical bans, the key

Grain growers in South Australia have voiced similar frustration at the small percentage of farmers not abiding by regulations, but said restrictions or bans on sprays was not the answer.

Chairman of Grain Producers SA, Wade Dabinett, said continual education was a vital cog in the process.

"I think there has been plenty of research done out there, so it's just matter of educating and extending that to our existing members," Mr Dabinett said.

"This is something the industry has to self-regulate; I would not want to see chemicals banned or further regulation.

Mr Dabinett also welcomed government funding to improve real-time weather data for combatting spray drift, with a pilot network of 40 weather stations across South Australia set to kick-off.

"While we need to have a focus on education, providing our members with far greater information in terms of weather and an alerts system is going to allow us to make better decisions," he said.

"I think it is a fantastic initiative, and hopefully we will see it rolled out across the state."

Spray drift towards SA vineyards prompts calls for crackdown on crop spraying ‘recklessness’

Feb 28 2018

A regional South Australian wine body is calling for officials to crack down on weed spraying “recklessness”, or banning products, amid a spike in reports of chemical damage due to spray drift.

Biosecurity SA has confirmed a number of cases of spray drift in two of the state’s most prominent wine regions, with five reported cases in the Riverland between mid-January to mid-February, and eight in the Clare Valley.

Spray drift can see chemical particles travel away from its intended target site in certain weather, with some conditions, such as inversions, pushing spray drift up to 70 kilometres.

Such herbicide drift has recently caused headaches for farmers across the country, including damage to cotton crops worth tens of millions of dollars in New South Wales last Christmas.

Executive chairman of Riverland Wine, Chris Byrne, said it was frustrating to see the actions of few impacting upon so many.

“What has been occurring this year seems to have been the result of some carelessness or maybe even just some recklessness,” Mr Byrne said.

“I guess our view here at Riverland Wine is that probably 95 per cent of all users or more are being very careful, diligent or using an alternative product.

“But there are some who do not seem to understand that what they are doing … is causing harm and damage.”

A Riverland wine grape grower, who requested to remain anonymous, told the ABC their patch of young vines was subject to chemical damage from off-target spray drift last year.

“We just noticed all of a sudden that the vines just stopped growing and all the leaves were deformed,” they said.

“We got a few people out to look at it, and they said it was 2,4-D.”

They said with the significant risks posed to wine grape crops, the chemical in question needed to be taken off shelves.

“You go get hail or frost or anything like that and it’s mother nature, that’s part of being on the land,” they said.

“When it is actually caused by someone else and could have been avoided, it gets really annoying.

“If the farmers or whoever is doing it does the right thing then it should not be an issue, but I do not know if there is any way of policing that or stopping that.

A call for more to be done

South Australia’s primary industries body said offences carried a maximum penalty of $35,000, with Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuting an SA farmer of three offences last year.

Riverland Wine’s Chris Byrne said he had written to the state minister in a call for more direct action, with suggestions including a greater focus on auditing spray diaries.

However, he said if no improvements were seen, restricting access to certain sprays and herbicides, like 2,4-D, may be the final avenue left.

“It’s time for a little bit more policing of the situation and, if that does not work, it is probably time to say ‘Look, these products need to be withdrawn from sale or use for certain times of the year,” Mr Byrne said.

“That is a fairly harsh move … we are hopeful we can avoid it because of the fact there are lots of good producers who are compliant.”

In a statement made to the ABC, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) said it was “aware of incidents involving drift of 2,4-D and will continue to consider information regarding industry uses and the continued safety and effectiveness of 2,4-D, with state authorities and industry, as part of the chemical review process”.

Biosecurity SA has been contacted by the ABC for a response.

Education, not chemical bans, the key

Grain growers in South Australia have voiced similar frustration at the small percentage of farmers not abiding by regulations, but said restrictions or bans on sprays was not the answer.

Chairman of Grain Producers SA, Wade Dabinett, said continual education was a vital cog in the process.

“I think there has been plenty of research done out there, so it’s just matter of educating and extending that to our existing members,” Mr Dabinett said.

“This is something the industry has to self-regulate; I would not want to see chemicals banned or further regulation.

Mr Dabinett also welcomed government funding to improve real-time weather data for combatting spray drift, with a pilot network of 40 weather stations across South Australia set to kick-off.

“While we need to have a focus on education, providing our members with far greater information in terms of weather and an alerts system is going to allow us to make better decisions,” he said.

“I think it is a fantastic initiative, and hopefully we will see it rolled out across the state.”

2017 April: Naaracoorte (South Australia) – Spray Drift

Biosecurity SA investigating spray drift damage in the Riverland and Mid North

Wednesday 14 February 2018

Reports of chemical damage to grape vines caused by spray drift are being investigated by PIRSA Biosecurity SA in both the Clare Valley and Riverland.

Off-target damage to grapevines has been an ongoing issue in viticultural and horticultural areas adjacent to broad acre cropping across Australia over the last decade with the move away from cultivation and towards herbicides for summer weed control,

Certain weather conditions, such as inversions, can result in spray drift damage tens of kilometres from the application site, so producers must consider that sensitive crops may be located some distance away when planning a spray operation.

PIRSA through Biosecurity SA takes this issue very seriously. While investigations can be time consuming and spray drift origins difficult to trace due to rapidly changing weather conditions, Biosecurity SA will pursue all reports of anyone who has either deliberately or negligently caused damage to others by not following regulatory requirements. If caught offences can carry a maximum penalty of $35,000.

In April 2017 Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuted a Naracoorte farmer, who was found guilty of three charges in relation to the spray drift of herbicides and fined $15,000.

Biosecurity SA investigating spray drift damage in the Riverland and Mid North

Wednesday 14 February 2018

Reports of chemical damage to grape vines caused by spray drift are being investigated by PIRSA Biosecurity SA in both the Clare Valley and Riverland.

Off-target damage to grapevines has been an ongoing issue in viticultural and horticultural areas adjacent to broad acre cropping across Australia over the last decade with the move away from cultivation and towards herbicides for summer weed control,

Certain weather conditions, such as inversions, can result in spray drift damage tens of kilometres from the application site, so producers must consider that sensitive crops may be located some distance away when planning a spray operation.

PIRSA through Biosecurity SA takes this issue very seriously. While investigations can be time consuming and spray drift origins difficult to trace due to rapidly changing weather conditions, Biosecurity SA will pursue all reports of anyone who has either deliberately or negligently caused damage to others by not following regulatory requirements. If caught offences can carry a maximum penalty of $35,000.

In April 2017 Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuted a Naracoorte farmer, who was found guilty of three charges in relation to the spray drift of herbicides and fined $15,000.

February 2018: Riverlands (South Australia) – Spray Drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Biosecurity SA investigating spray drift damage in the Riverland and Mid North

Wednesday 14 February 2018

Reports of chemical damage to grape vines caused by spray drift are being investigated by PIRSA Biosecurity SA in both the Clare Valley and Riverland.

Off-target damage to grapevines has been an ongoing issue in viticultural and horticultural areas adjacent to broad acre cropping across Australia over the last decade with the move away from cultivation and towards herbicides for summer weed control,

Certain weather conditions, such as inversions, can result in spray drift damage tens of kilometres from the application site, so producers must consider that sensitive crops may be located some distance away when planning a spray operation.

PIRSA through Biosecurity SA takes this issue very seriously. While investigations can be time consuming and spray drift origins difficult to trace due to rapidly changing weather conditions, Biosecurity SA will pursue all reports of anyone who has either deliberately or negligently caused damage to others by not following regulatory requirements. If caught offences can carry a maximum penalty of $35,000.

In April 2017 Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuted a Naracoorte farmer, who was found guilty of three charges in relation to the spray drift of herbicides and fined $15,000.

Biosecurity SA investigating spray drift damage in the Riverland and Mid North

Wednesday 14 February 2018

Reports of chemical damage to grape vines caused by spray drift are being investigated by PIRSA Biosecurity SA in both the Clare Valley and Riverland.

Off-target damage to grapevines has been an ongoing issue in viticultural and horticultural areas adjacent to broad acre cropping across Australia over the last decade with the move away from cultivation and towards herbicides for summer weed control,

Certain weather conditions, such as inversions, can result in spray drift damage tens of kilometres from the application site, so producers must consider that sensitive crops may be located some distance away when planning a spray operation.

PIRSA through Biosecurity SA takes this issue very seriously. While investigations can be time consuming and spray drift origins difficult to trace due to rapidly changing weather conditions, Biosecurity SA will pursue all reports of anyone who has either deliberately or negligently caused damage to others by not following regulatory requirements. If caught offences can carry a maximum penalty of $35,000.

In April 2017 Biosecurity SA successfully prosecuted a Naracoorte farmer, who was found guilty of three charges in relation to the spray drift of herbicides and fined $15,000.

Anyone who suspects spray drift damage is encouraged to call the Chemical Trespass Hotline on 1300 799 684 to report it.

2018 February: 50,000 Bees Poisoned (Paddington NSW)

Australia

Beekeepers and residents frustrated after council poisons up to 50,000 bees (Feb 9 2018)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-09/beehive-poisoned.-by-council-paddington-sydney-residents-fuming/9411092?sf181677529=1

Residents and beekeeping authorities are frustrated after a local council sprayed an urban nest with poison, killing tens of thousands of bees, in the Sydney suburb of Paddington.

Key points:

  • Local resident found dead bees beneath nest, across road
  • Council says it called pest control after a resident complained about the nest
  • Council says it was focused on minimising harm and responding to residents’ requests

Doug Purdie from The Urban Beehive said the nest — which is commonly referred to as a hive — was substantial and up to 50,000 European honey bees would have been killed in the process.

“There’s plenty of people who remove beehives so I’m not sure why the council felt the need to spray it,” he said.

Mr Purdie said local beekeeping authorities will often remove nests and relocate them for free.

“It’s just frustrating that they chose to poison it instead.” he said.

He said nests are usually removed if they are situated in problematic areas, such as near preschools.

However, Mr Purdie said poisoning a nest should be a last resort if it cannot be relocated.

The nest was situated on Glen Street, along a walkway near residential properties.

Local resident Heather Simington was shocked to find thousands of dead bees beneath the nest and across the road.

“I couldn’t believe it. I was speechless,” Ms Simington said.

“The coverage was probably a metre long and half a metre wide and 3 centimetres deep. And that’s just counting the ones under the tree.”

A spokesperson from Woollahra Municipal Council said they called pest control after a resident complained about the nest.

“We had a request to attend the hive from residents who were concerned about the bees,” the spokesperson said.

2015 August – 2016 November: Fingal/Miners Park (Tasmania). Pesticide: Picloram, MCPA

Fingal (Tasmania)

20/8/15: Picloram 0.68ug/L (Fingal/Miners Park (Tasmania)

15/11/16: MCPA 0.02ug/L*

Source: TasWater ADWQR 2015-16 Supporting Data Part A

*TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

Fingal (Tasmania)

20/8/15: Picloram 0.68ug/L (Fingal/Miners Park (Tasmania)

15/11/16: MCPA 0.02ug/L*

Source: TasWater ADWQR 2015-16 Supporting Data Part A

*TasWater Raw Pesticide Data by system v4

2018 January: Spray Drift Kills Cotton. Pesticide: 2,4-D

The Courier 11/1/18 (Narrabri)

Bid to prevent spray drift in future

“We had a good discussion about how to manage the crop from now and more so how we can try and prevent it happening again.”

The late spring and summer rain might have been a blessing to cotton growers counting the cost of a lack of it earlier this year, but it has also turned out to be a curse for some.

About 6000 hectares of cotton in an area from Burren Junction to Rowena and across to Walgett has been lost due to damage from off-target spray drift around Christmas Day.

Most of the major damage has occurred on 12 properties, with some growers facing complete crop loss. Other growers have areas of cotton showing the symptoms of spray damage.

It is a devastating blow following the failure of the winter harvest and a cotton season that promised so much with rain falling at the right time.

But it is a problem that rears its head in those conditions, as the rain is also an opportunity for other farmers to use 2,4-D herbicide to control fallow weeds.

To that end, about 50 local farmers and agronomists attended an emergency meeting called by the Walgett Cotton Growers’ Association in Walgett last Thursday night.

Association vice chairman Bernie Bierhoff said nearly every dryland farmer was represented, either in person or by their agronomist.

“We had a good discussion about how to manage the crop from now and more so how we can try and prevent it happening again,” he said.

The Courier 11/1/18 (Narrabri)

Bid to prevent spray drift in future

“We had a good discussion about how to manage the crop from now and more so how we can try and prevent it happening again.”

The late spring and summer rain might have been a blessing to cotton growers counting the cost of a lack of it earlier this year, but it has also turned out to be a curse for some.

About 6000 hectares of cotton in an area from Burren Junction to Rowena and across to Walgett has been lost due to damage from off-target spray drift around Christmas Day.

Most of the major damage has occurred on 12 properties, with some growers facing complete crop loss. Other growers have areas of cotton showing the symptoms of spray damage.

It is a devastating blow following the failure of the winter harvest and a cotton season that promised so much with rain falling at the right time.

But it is a problem that rears its head in those conditions, as the rain is also an opportunity for other farmers to use 2,4-D herbicide to control fallow weeds.

To that end, about 50 local farmers and agronomists attended an emergency meeting called by the Walgett Cotton Growers’ Association in Walgett last Thursday night.

Association vice chairman Bernie Bierhoff said nearly every dryland farmer was represented, either in person or by their agronomist.

“We had a good discussion about how to manage the crop from now and more so how we can try and prevent it happening again,” he said.

2017 December: Spray Drift Damages 6000 hectares of NSW cotton on Christmas Day. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Spray drift damages 6,000 hectares of NSW cotton on Christmas Day

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-01-04/spray-drift-damages-6,000-hectares-of-cotton-northern-nsw/9303354
NSW Country Hour
 

Cotton crops worth tens of millions of dollars in north-west New South Wales have been damaged by spray drift.

Growers have called an emergency meeting to discuss the impact and how to deal with it.

Vice chair of the Walgett Cotton Growers' Association, Bernie Bierhoff, said about 6,000 hectares on more than a dozen farms are showing signs of damage from an incident on Christmas Day.

The affected area covers about 100 square kilometres around Burren Junction, Rowena and Walgett.

Mr Bierhoff said he was also getting reports of damage in other cotton regions further east and closer to Moree, such as Wee Waa and Bellata.

Spray drift is caused by chemicals being applied in windy conditions and in this case it is thought they may have drifted as far as 70 kilometres away.

Drift from the Phenoxy herbicide (using the active ingredient 2,4-D) has been an ongoing concern for cotton growers dating back to the 1970s.

The rising cost of alternative weed controls such as glyphosate has meant more farmers used phenoxy herbicides, which can devastate a cotton crop even in tiny amounts.

Adam Kay from Cotton Australia is frustrated by this latest incident.

"It is disappointing that a couple of broadacre farmers have not followed the proper advice or attention to detail when spraying out weeds and it has devastated quite a number of cotton crops," he said.

Bernie Bierhoff said the situation was made more difficult because cotton farmers in the region have been dealing with dry conditions and some will have locked in contracts to deliver at the end of the season.

"Spray drift damage is a terrible blow for the affected cotton growers, who are already struggling with limited access to water for irrigation this season," Mr Bierhoff said.

"Although the drift has caused varying degrees of severity, some growers believe they are facing complete crop loss, which would simply be devastating for them."

Insurance is not common for cotton growers, but some may be able to plough in the damaged cotton and plant something else while others may find their crops recover from the damage.

Mr Kay said the industry had spent a lot of money to educate other farmers about being careful when spraying to kill weeds in fallow fields.

He said he was disappointed that some people were not listening.

"We've spent a lot of money over the years with advertising, newspaper articles and running workshops on spray application but we still see incidents like this with the phenoxy herbicide."

Spray drift damages 6,000 hectares of NSW cotton on Christmas Day

https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-01-04/spray-drift-damages-6,000-hectares-of-cotton-northern-nsw/9303354
NSW Country Hour

Cotton crops worth tens of millions of dollars in north-west New South Wales have been damaged by spray drift.

Growers have called an emergency meeting to discuss the impact and how to deal with it.

Vice chair of the Walgett Cotton Growers’ Association, Bernie Bierhoff, said about 6,000 hectares on more than a dozen farms are showing signs of damage from an incident on Christmas Day.

The affected area covers about 100 square kilometres around Burren Junction, Rowena and Walgett.

Mr Bierhoff said he was also getting reports of damage in other cotton regions further east and closer to Moree, such as Wee Waa and Bellata.

Spray drift is caused by chemicals being applied in windy conditions and in this case it is thought they may have drifted as far as 70 kilometres away.

Drift from the Phenoxy herbicide (using the active ingredient 2,4-D) has been an ongoing concern for cotton growers dating back to the 1970s.

The rising cost of alternative weed controls such as glyphosate has meant more farmers used phenoxy herbicides, which can devastate a cotton crop even in tiny amounts.

Adam Kay from Cotton Australia is frustrated by this latest incident.

“It is disappointing that a couple of broadacre farmers have not followed the proper advice or attention to detail when spraying out weeds and it has devastated quite a number of cotton crops,” he said.

Bernie Bierhoff said the situation was made more difficult because cotton farmers in the region have been dealing with dry conditions and some will have locked in contracts to deliver at the end of the season.

“Spray drift damage is a terrible blow for the affected cotton growers, who are already struggling with limited access to water for irrigation this season,” Mr Bierhoff said.

“Although the drift has caused varying degrees of severity, some growers believe they are facing complete crop loss, which would simply be devastating for them.”

Insurance is not common for cotton growers, but some may be able to plough in the damaged cotton and plant something else while others may find their crops recover from the damage.

Mr Kay said the industry had spent a lot of money to educate other farmers about being careful when spraying to kill weeds in fallow fields.

He said he was disappointed that some people were not listening.

“We’ve spent a lot of money over the years with advertising, newspaper articles and running workshops on spray application but we still see incidents like this with the phenoxy herbicide.”

2017/2020: Paraquat Poisoning (Mangrove Mountain NSW) Pesticide: Paraquat

$48,000 fine imposed in near fatal poisoning case

30 October 2020
 
https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2020/epamedia201030-$48000-fine-imposed-in-near-fatal-poisoning-case
 

The NSW Land and Environment Court has convicted and fined a Central Coast man $48,000 after another man almost died after consuming a pesticide stored incorrectly.

Mr Warwick Ronald McInnes was prosecuted by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) after a 22-year-old autistic man accidentally drank the highly toxic weedkiller Paraquat which Mr McInnes had illegally stored in a Coca-Cola bottle and left in a disabled toilet at a sports field at Mangrove Mountain, in August 2017.

The 22 year old man spent 18 days in hospital critically ill.

Her Honour Justice Duggan said the manner of storage of the poison in a drink bottle was a “gravely serious breach” of the Pesticides Act undertaken “without any real regard for the obligations” of safe poison storage, and that the injury to the victim was significant.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Adam Gilligan said the case highlighted the vital importance of vigilance and care, when dealing with dangerous chemicals.

“A young man very nearly died. Rules for the safe storage and use of pesticides and other poisons are in place to protect the community and the environment. Any disregard for the regulations can have very serious consequences, as we saw in this terrible case.

“It is absolutely vital that dangerous chemicals are stored safely and securely, well out of harm’s way.”

Mr McInnes has been fined $48,000 (out of a maximum available penalty of $60,000) and ordered to pay the EPA’s legal costs and the Victim’s Support Levy.

Accidental poisoning of NSW Central Coast man leads to calls for ban on toxic herbicide

December 11 2017. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-11/near-fatal-poisoning-central-coast-man-paraquat-ban/9242454

The near-fatal poisoning of a NSW Central Coast man with severe autism who drank a cocktail of highly toxic herbicides left in an unmarked drink bottle has sparked fresh calls for a nationwide ban on Paraquat.

Damien Terry's survival, after accidentally drinking a combination of the commercial weed killers Paraquat and Diquat, has been described as nothing less than "miraculous".

The 21-year-old and his carer were visiting a sports oval on Mangrove Mountain in August, when he suddenly started vomiting uncontrollably shortly after returning from the disabled toilet.

He had been poisoned after accidentally sipping the chemicals, which he found in an abandoned soft drink bottle.

Safety warnings displayed on all Paraquat products include that it must be labelled clearly and not placed in drinking containers.

Doctors at Gosford Hospital told his family to prepare for the worst.

"The doctors basically said to us that Damien probably had 12 hours to live," said Mr Terry's mother, Julie Terry.

"Their words were 'nobody' survives from ingesting Paraquat.

"Obviously you go into a state of shock. Damien looked quite well, although he was vomiting quite significantly, he looked well so it was hard to comprehend that he was as ill as he was.

"At that point ... they just said he would have massive organ failure and I just asked them to keep him as comfortable as possible."

Family speaking out after ordeal

After two agonising weeks in hospital not knowing whether Mr Terry would pull through, he is now on the road to recovery and his family wants to speak out about the dangers of Paraquat.

It is a highly effective weed killer commonly used by farmers across Australia but is also extremely toxic: it only takes a few sips to kill a person and has no antidote.

In 2015, a Queensland farmer died after the deadly herbicide accidentally sprayed into his mouth when he was filling a pressure back-pack pump spray.

Paraquat has caused thousands of deaths worldwide and is banned in more than 30 countries including China, Cambodia and across the European Union.

There is also a debate about its links to Parkinson's disease.

The poison has been under review by regulator, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, since 1997 due to health and environmental concerns, with a final determination due next year.

The Terrys want a major crackdown on its use and availability but are ultimately seeking a nationwide ban.

"It defies logic in my mind that this is available over the counter for anybody to purchase," Ms Terry said.

"Everybody knows these days that health and safety is a very common agenda for all of us in the workplace so I feel a bit disillusioned that the authorities didn't keep an eye on that."

Support for the campaign

The Terrys call is one that is strongly supported by the National Toxics Network.

"It beggars belief a pesticide of this toxicity would ever be used in a public facility, let alone decanted into a drinking bottle," said environmental campaigner Jo Immig.

"What it really illustrates is the failure of risk management when it comes to highly dangerous pesticides.

"It's been banned by 32 other countries and it's high time the regulator put the needs of people and the planet first ... it's just a very highly toxic chemical that has no place in common use in Australia today."

Newcastle University environmental contamination expert Professor Ravi Naidu has also questioned why the herbicide was anywhere near the sports ground.

"When Paraquat is applied, that time and at least for 20 days children should not be exposed at all. If they're exposed then it poses risk," Professor Naidu said.

He said a national ban on Paraquat would hurt the agriculture industry but agrees it should be more tightly regulated.

"I think the best way forward would be restrictive availability and therefore farmers must demonstrate they have a farm and a need for that and only the amount they need should be available."

Investigation could take up to three years

A New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) investigation is underway into the poisoning, which could take up to three years.

An EPA spokeswoman said any pesticide misuse resulting in harm to human health is extremely serious.

She said the authority was looking at a range of offences under the pesticides legislation, with a maximum penalty of $60,000 for an individual and up to $120,000 for a corporation for each offence.

Central Coast Council has declined to comment while the incident is being investigated.

Four months on, the Terrys' lives are returning to normal but they are determined make sure other families are spared the same trauma.

"[Damien's] recovery has been miraculous — there's no other word for it. He should be gone," Ms Terry said.

$48,000 fine imposed in near fatal poisoning case

https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-releases/2020/epamedia201030-$48000-fine-imposed-in-near-fatal-poisoning-case

The NSW Land and Environment Court has convicted and fined a Central Coast man $48,000 after another man almost died after consuming a pesticide stored incorrectly.

Mr Warwick Ronald McInnes was prosecuted by the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) after a 22-year-old autistic man accidentally drank the highly toxic weedkiller Paraquat which Mr McInnes had illegally stored in a Coca-Cola bottle and left in a disabled toilet at a sports field at Mangrove Mountain, in August 2017.

The 22 year old man spent 18 days in hospital critically ill.

Her Honour Justice Duggan said the manner of storage of the poison in a drink bottle was a “gravely serious breach” of the Pesticides Act undertaken “without any real regard for the obligations” of safe poison storage, and that the injury to the victim was significant.

EPA Director Regulatory Operations Adam Gilligan said the case highlighted the vital importance of vigilance and care, when dealing with dangerous chemicals.

“A young man very nearly died. Rules for the safe storage and use of pesticides and other poisons are in place to protect the community and the environment. Any disregard for the regulations can have very serious consequences, as we saw in this terrible case.

“It is absolutely vital that dangerous chemicals are stored safely and securely, well out of harm’s way.”

Mr McInnes has been fined $48,000 (out of a maximum available penalty of $60,000) and ordered to pay the EPA’s legal costs and the Victim’s Support Levy.

Accidental poisoning of NSW Central Coast man leads to calls for ban on toxic herbicide

December 11 2017. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-11/near-fatal-poisoning-central-coast-man-paraquat-ban/9242454

The near-fatal poisoning of a NSW Central Coast man with severe autism who drank a cocktail of highly toxic herbicides left in an unmarked drink bottle has sparked fresh calls for a nationwide ban on Paraquat.

Damien Terry’s survival, after accidentally drinking a combination of the commercial weed killers Paraquat and Diquat, has been described as nothing less than “miraculous”.

The 21-year-old and his carer were visiting a sports oval on Mangrove Mountain in August, when he suddenly started vomiting uncontrollably shortly after returning from the disabled toilet.

He had been poisoned after accidentally sipping the chemicals, which he found in an abandoned soft drink bottle.

Safety warnings displayed on all Paraquat products include that it must be labelled clearly and not placed in drinking containers.

Doctors at Gosford Hospital told his family to prepare for the worst.

“The doctors basically said to us that Damien probably had 12 hours to live,” said Mr Terry’s mother, Julie Terry.

“Their words were ‘nobody’ survives from ingesting Paraquat.

“Obviously you go into a state of shock. Damien looked quite well, although he was vomiting quite significantly, he looked well so it was hard to comprehend that he was as ill as he was.

“At that point … they just said he would have massive organ failure and I just asked them to keep him as comfortable as possible.”

Family speaking out after ordeal

After two agonising weeks in hospital not knowing whether Mr Terry would pull through, he is now on the road to recovery and his family wants to speak out about the dangers of Paraquat.

It is a highly effective weed killer commonly used by farmers across Australia but is also extremely toxic: it only takes a few sips to kill a person and has no antidote.

In 2015, a Queensland farmer died after the deadly herbicide accidentally sprayed into his mouth when he was filling a pressure back-pack pump spray.

Paraquat has caused thousands of deaths worldwide and is banned in more than 30 countries including China, Cambodia and across the European Union.

There is also a debate about its links to Parkinson’s disease.

The poison has been under review by regulator, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, since 1997 due to health and environmental concerns, with a final determination due next year.

The Terrys want a major crackdown on its use and availability but are ultimately seeking a nationwide ban.

“It defies logic in my mind that this is available over the counter for anybody to purchase,” Ms Terry said.

“Everybody knows these days that health and safety is a very common agenda for all of us in the workplace so I feel a bit disillusioned that the authorities didn’t keep an eye on that.”

Support for the campaign

The Terrys call is one that is strongly supported by the National Toxics Network.

“It beggars belief a pesticide of this toxicity would ever be used in a public facility, let alone decanted into a drinking bottle,” said environmental campaigner Jo Immig.

“What it really illustrates is the failure of risk management when it comes to highly dangerous pesticides.

“It’s been banned by 32 other countries and it’s high time the regulator put the needs of people and the planet first … it’s just a very highly toxic chemical that has no place in common use in Australia today.”

Newcastle University environmental contamination expert Professor Ravi Naidu has also questioned why the herbicide was anywhere near the sports ground.

“When Paraquat is applied, that time and at least for 20 days children should not be exposed at all. If they’re exposed then it poses risk,” Professor Naidu said.

He said a national ban on Paraquat would hurt the agriculture industry but agrees it should be more tightly regulated.

“I think the best way forward would be restrictive availability and therefore farmers must demonstrate they have a farm and a need for that and only the amount they need should be available.”

Investigation could take up to three years

A New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (EPA) investigation is underway into the poisoning, which could take up to three years.

An EPA spokeswoman said any pesticide misuse resulting in harm to human health is extremely serious.

She said the authority was looking at a range of offences under the pesticides legislation, with a maximum penalty of $60,000 for an individual and up to $120,000 for a corporation for each offence.

Central Coast Council has declined to comment while the incident is being investigated.

Four months on, the Terrys’ lives are returning to normal but they are determined make sure other families are spared the same trauma.

“[Damien’s] recovery has been miraculous — there’s no other word for it. He should be gone,” Ms Terry said.

 

2017 November: Magpies Poisoned (Coal Point NSW). Pesticides: Fenamiphos, Fenthion

Coal Point consortium offers $5000 reward for information that leads to conviction of magpie poisoner 

https://www.lakesmail.com.au/story/5037240/reward-offered-in-hunt-for-coal-point-magpie-killer/
 

A $5000 reward has been offered by a Coal Point “consortium” for information leading to a conviction of those responsible for killing 21 magpies at Coal Point with pesticide.

Coal Point Progress Association said the magpies were found dead on October 9 “around the perimeter of Coal Point School and Rofe Street”.

“The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is asking for the community’s help to catch a suspected bird killer,” a spokesperson for the association said.

“A local consortium is putting up a $5000 reward for information leading to a conviction.”

Laboratory analysis of one of the dead birds by the EPA revealed high concentrations of pesticides including fenamiphos and fenthion, both of which are not readily available to the public.

The EPA is also investigating the recent poisoning of birds at Budgewoi.

 

The EPA’s director for the Hunter region, Karen Marler, said community information could be the missing piece that helps solve the puzzle.

“Residents in Budgewoi and Warnervale will remember that this time last year, we had similar cases involving corella and magpie deaths. What’s worrying is that our lab analysis is telling us it’s the same pesticide, in the same location, along with a new location only 20km away.

“If you see anyone disposing of food or chemicals near open spaces such as ovals or parks, please call our 24/7 Environment Line on 131 555.”

Ms Marler also reminded locals to be vigilant with their pets.

“Residents of Budgewoi, Coal Point and Warnervale should keep a close eye on their pets,” she said.

“We know people have used food in the past to lure and kill birds. Please make sure your pets do not eat anything foreign when on their daily walks.”

It is an offence under the EPA’s legislation to use pesticides in a manner that harms non-target animals.

The maximum penalties for this are $120,000 for an individual.

It is also an offence to cause danger or harm to an animal by littering and maximum penalties are $3,300.

Coal Point consortium offers $5000 reward for information that leads to conviction of magpie poisoner

https://www.lakesmail.com.au/story/5037240/reward-offered-in-hunt-for-coal-point-magpie-killer/

A $5000 reward has been offered by a Coal Point “consortium” for information leading to a conviction of those responsible for killing 21 magpies at Coal Point with pesticide.

Coal Point Progress Association said the magpies were found dead on October 9 “around the perimeter of Coal Point School and Rofe Street”.

“The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is asking for the community’s help to catch a suspected bird killer,” a spokesperson for the association said.

“A local consortium is putting up a $5000 reward for information leading to a conviction.”

Laboratory analysis of one of the dead birds by the EPA revealed high concentrations of pesticides including fenamiphos and fenthion, both of which are not readily available to the public.

The EPA is also investigating the recent poisoning of birds at Budgewoi.

The EPA’s director for the Hunter region, Karen Marler, said community information could be the missing piece that helps solve the puzzle.

“Residents in Budgewoi and Warnervale will remember that this time last year, we had similar cases involving corella and magpie deaths. What’s worrying is that our lab analysis is telling us it’s the same pesticide, in the same location, along with a new location only 20km away.

“If you see anyone disposing of food or chemicals near open spaces such as ovals or parks, please call our 24/7 Environment Line on 131 555.”

Ms Marler also reminded locals to be vigilant with their pets.

“Residents of Budgewoi, Coal Point and Warnervale should keep a close eye on their pets,” she said.

“We know people have used food in the past to lure and kill birds. Please make sure your pets do not eat anything foreign when on their daily walks.”

It is an offence under the EPA’s legislation to use pesticides in a manner that harms non-target animals.

The maximum penalties for this are $120,000 for an individual.

It is also an offence to cause danger or harm to an animal by littering and maximum penalties are $3,300.

2011-2016? Darwin River Reservoir (NT). Pesticide: Dicamba

"From 2011 until July 2016, only one sample tested for pesticides has returned a result above the level of detection of the test method. The measured value, 0.0015 mg/L for Dicamba at Darwin is still well below the 2011 ADWG limit of 0.1 mg/L.
 
Occasionally weed problems in reservoirs and catchments can only be managed effectively through the use of herbicides. Dicamba (Banvel, 3, 6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) is a moderate to low toxicity herbicide used to control weeds and mimosa in the catchment of Darwin River Reservoir.
 
Dicamba is moderately persistent in soil and breaks down to very simple substances such as carbon dioxide and water. The reported half life of Dicamba in soil ranges from one to six weeks. This herbicide is applied two to three times a year as part of the mimosa control program.
 
Although monitored for several years, pesticides have rarely been detected in the Northern Territory water supplies despite limited use in some areas. In consideration of these results,
pesticide monitoring during 2011-16 was restricted to Darwin and Katherine water supplies. These supplies are considered potentially vulnerable to pesticide contamination due to agricultural activities close to production bores and surface water sources."
 
Power and Water Corporation - Water Quality Report 2016
https://www.powerwater.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/146237/Water_Quality_Report_2016.PDF
“From 2011 until July 2016, only one sample tested for pesticides has returned a result above the level of detection of the test method. The measured value, 0.0015 mg/L for Dicamba at Darwin is still well below the 2011 ADWG limit of 0.1 mg/L.
Occasionally weed problems in reservoirs and catchments can only be managed effectively through the use of herbicides. Dicamba (Banvel, 3, 6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) is a moderate to low toxicity herbicide used to control weeds and mimosa in the catchment of Darwin River Reservoir.
Dicamba is moderately persistent in soil and breaks down to very simple substances such as carbon dioxide and water. The reported half life of Dicamba in soil ranges from one to six weeks. This herbicide is applied two to three times a year as part of the mimosa control program.
Although monitored for several years, pesticides have rarely been detected in the Northern Territory water supplies despite limited use in some areas. In consideration of these results,
pesticide monitoring during 2011-16 was restricted to Darwin and Katherine water supplies. These supplies are considered potentially vulnerable to pesticide contamination due to agricultural activities close to production bores and surface water sources.”
Power and Water Corporation – Water Quality Report 2016
https://www.powerwater.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/146237/Water_Quality_Report_2016.PDF

1982 March – Marysville (Vic). Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March – Mansfield/Bright (Vic) – Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March – Corryong (Vic) – Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March – Orbost – Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March – Omeo (Vic) Chlordane Treated Eucalypt Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March – Nowa Nowa Vic – Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March – Bruthen (Vic) Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

1982 March: Cann River (Vic) – Chlordane Treated Eucalyptus Seed

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). "The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

30 March 1982: Chlordane (an organochlorine) coated eucalyptus seed spread over 3000ha of native forest to regenerate forests by killing ants. Chlordane (2% Chlrodane 18g-36g per ha). 3396ha throughout the east of the state. 2253ha East Gippsland (comprising Cann River, Bruthen, Nowa Nowa, Omeo, Orbost and Corryong Forest Districts), 350ha North East Victoria (comprising Bright and Mansfield Forest Districts), 336ha Heyfield (comprising Heyfield, Maffra and Erica Forest Districts), 457ha Marysville (comprising Alexandra and Marysville Forest Districts). “The Forest Commission Victoria proposes to conduct a program of aerial seeding during autumn 1982 using coated eucalypts seed to regenerate forests utilised in 1980-82. The seed coating technique involves the addition of the insecticide Chlordane to control the activities of seed harvesting insects. Seed harvesting insects (mostly ants) may remove large quantities of eucalpyt seed from the site prior to germination, thus seriously affecting the amont of regeneration achieved on an area.

2017 October: Friends of the Earth releases Report into Pesticide Pollution of Victorian Drinking Water Supplies.

***PRESS RELEASE***

October 24 2017

Friends of the Earth Releases Report into Pesticide Pollution of  Victorian Drinking Water Supplies

Environmental organisation Friends of the Earth today published results of a statewide survey of pesticide pollution in the State’s drinking water supplies.

The results were sourced from Freedom of Information (FoI) Requests from all of the State’s drinking water authorities. The multiple FOI .requests covered the years 2007 through to 2016.

“This is the first time such a survey has apparently been conducted” said FoE spokesperson Anthony Amis.  “Improved monitoring by some water authorities since 2012, has allowed a more accurate understanding about what pesticides are being washed into water supplies.”

“Over 600 pesticide incidents were detected by Victorian water authorities throughout Victoria during the decade. The incident list would even be higher if all water authorities were more pro-active in coming to terms with these pollution events” .

The most frequent amount of detections (52) were detected in the Yarra River at the offtake to Sugarloaf Reservoir. “Many people presume that all of Melbourne’s drinking water comes from closed forested water catchments. This belief is not correct” Mr Amis said.

The highest level recorded was a detection of the banned insecticide Monocrotophos which was detected in Candowie Reservoir in 2011 at levels 20 times higher than the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines.  “The source of this incident, possibly the most significant in a Victorian drinking water supply in 40 years was never investigated” said Mr Amis.

The small community of Girgarre recorded multiple detections for the herbicide 2,4-D for a period of three months in 2010. “FOE is unsure if residents were informed about the pollution .

The most commonly detected pesticides throughout Victoria were the herbicides 2,4-D, Atrazine, Triclopyr, MCPA and Simazine.  FoE is calling for the restriction of these herbicides in water supply catchments.

A total of 46 different pesticides were detected in drinking water supplies over the ten year period. “This is probably a fraction of what is actually out there, but no one is testing for everything that is used. Water authorities need to be informed by pesticide users about what is actually being sprayed in their water supply catchment. At the moment this is not the case”added Mr Amis.

Pesticides were also detected in tap water the greater Melbourne area for the first time. “This is of concern, as FoE is of the view that no pesticides should be detected in water supplies, let alone consumer taps, at any level” Mr Amis concluded.

A copy of the report can be found here: https://www.foe.org.au/vicwaterpesticide

2016/17: Little Para River Water Treatment Plant Inlet. Pesticides: 2,4-D, MCPA, Triclopyr

Little Para River Water Treatment Plant Inlet

14/11/16: 2,4-D 0.08ug/L

14/11/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L

16/1/17: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

16/1/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L

16/1/17: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

13/2/17: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

Source SA Water FoI

Little Para River Water Treatment Plant Inlet

14/11/16: 2,4-D 0.08ug/L

14/11/16: MCPA 0.07ug/L

16/1/17: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

16/1/17: MCPA 0.05ug/L

16/1/17: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

13/2/17: Triclopyr 0.1ug/L

Source SA Water FoI

2016/2018 March: Whitemark (Tas) Council Depot. Pesticide: MCPA, 2,4-D, Atrazine, Sulfometuron Methyl, Dicamba, Metsulfuron Methyl

Whitemark Council Depot

2/3/16: MCPA 2.8ug/L

Source: Annual Drinking Water Quality Report – Appendix C Supporting Data Part A (Systems M-Z)

Whitemark - Pat's River Weir*

2/3/16: MCPA 1.6ug/L

7/5/18: 2,4-D 0.8ug/L

7/5/18: Atrazine 6ug/L

7/5/18: MCPA 0.1ug/L

7/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 6ug/L

Whitemark - Cannes Hill Res 1*

2/3/16: MCPA 5.3ug/L

7/5/18: Atrazine 3ug/L

7/5/18: Dicamba 0.6ug/L

7/5/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

7/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 5ug/L

*Right to Information Request

ems M-Z)

Whitemark Council Depot

2/3/16: MCPA 2.8ug/L

Source: Annual Drinking Water Quality Report – Appendix C Supporting Data Part A (Systems M-Z)

Whitemark – Pat’s River Weir*

2/3/16: MCPA 1.6ug/L

7/5/18: 2,4-D 0.8ug/L

7/5/18: Atrazine 6ug/L

7/5/18: MCPA 0.1ug/L

7/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 6ug/L

Whitemark – Cannes Hill Res 1*

2/3/16: MCPA 5.3ug/L

7/5/18: Atrazine 3ug/L

7/5/18: Dicamba 0.6ug/L

7/5/18: Metsulfuron Methyl 1ug/L

7/5/18: Sulfometuron Methyl 5ug/L

*Right to Information Request

2016 June: Prospect Vale (Tas) Casino Rising. Pesticide: MCPA, Atrazine

South Esk Prospect Vale Casino Rising

8/6/16: MCPA 0.17ug/L

8/6/16: Atrazine 0.01ug/L*

Source: Annual Drinking Water Quality Report – Appendix C Supporting Data Part A (Systems M-Z)

*RTI application

South Esk Prospect Vale Casino Rising

8/6/16: MCPA 0.17ug/L

8/6/16: Atrazine 0.01ug/L*

Source: Annual Drinking Water Quality Report – Appendix C Supporting Data Part A (Systems M-Z)

*RTI application

2015/16: Westbury (Tas) Village Green/WTP. Pesticide: MCPA

Westbury (Tas) Village Green

30/11/15: MCPA 0.02ug/L

Source: Annual Drinking Water Quality Report – Appendix C Supporting Data Part A (Systems M-Z)

Westbury (Tas) WTP

24/11/16: MCPA 0.02ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide data by system v4

Westbury (Tas) Village Green

30/11/15: MCPA 0.02ug/L

Source: Annual Drinking Water Quality Report – Appendix C Supporting Data Part A (Systems M-Z)

Westbury (Tas) WTP

24/11/16: MCPA 0.02ug/L

TasWater Raw Pesticide data by system v4

2017 September: Pesticide Contaminates Drinking Water Dam near Ballina. Pesticide: Diazinon

Pesticide contaminates drinking water dam near Ballina

THE NSW Environment Protection Authority is investigating an incident of potential spray drift near Emigrant Creek Dam north of Ballina.

EPA regional operations manager for the North Coast, Brett Nudd, said the EPA started an investigation after a complaint was made in August highlighting concerns with pesticide application during strong winds.

"The EPA is investigating potential spray drift that has impacted on Emigrant Creek Dam and surrounds as a result of a farmer using the pesticide diazinon," Mr Nudd said.

"The EPA, and Rous County Council whom operate the Emigrant Creek Dam, have taken water samples from the dam which supplies drinking water to the Ballina and Lennox Head areas.

"While these samples have detected diazinon in the dam, the levels of pesticide detected are well below the Australian Drinking Water Guideline."

Rous County Council General Manager Kyme Lavelle said the filtration system at the dam is designed to address any pesticide contamination.

"As an added precaution Rous has ceased supply of water from this source and is currently testing its treated water to confirm that the filtration is successfully removing any pesticides," Mr Lavelle said.

Director North Coast Public Health Unit, Mr Paul Corben also reminded local residents of the importance of maintaining first flush systems on rainwater tanks.

"After prolonged dry periods various contaminants can accumulate on roofs and gutters and it is important that residents prevent the build-up of contaminants from entering their rainwater tank. This can be achieved by using first flush systems or disconnecting the tank inlet," Mr Corben said.

The EPA is continuing to investigate the incident and reminds anyone using pesticides to read product labels carefully, monitor local weather conditions and communicate with neighbours ahead of time to avoid spray drift incidents.

Anyone with a concern, or knowledge of a spray drift incident or pesticide misuse in their local area, should contact the Environment Line on 131 555.

Pesticide contaminates drinking water dam near Ballina

THE NSW Environment Protection Authority is investigating an incident of potential spray drift near Emigrant Creek Dam north of Ballina.

EPA regional operations manager for the North Coast, Brett Nudd, said the EPA started an investigation after a complaint was made in August highlighting concerns with pesticide application during strong winds.

“The EPA is investigating potential spray drift that has impacted on Emigrant Creek Dam and surrounds as a result of a farmer using the pesticide diazinon,” Mr Nudd said.

“The EPA, and Rous County Council whom operate the Emigrant Creek Dam, have taken water samples from the dam which supplies drinking water to the Ballina and Lennox Head areas.

“While these samples have detected diazinon in the dam, the levels of pesticide detected are well below the Australian Drinking Water Guideline.”

Rous County Council General Manager Kyme Lavelle said the filtration system at the dam is designed to address any pesticide contamination.

“As an added precaution Rous has ceased supply of water from this source and is currently testing its treated water to confirm that the filtration is successfully removing any pesticides,” Mr Lavelle said.

Director North Coast Public Health Unit, Mr Paul Corben also reminded local residents of the importance of maintaining first flush systems on rainwater tanks.

“After prolonged dry periods various contaminants can accumulate on roofs and gutters and it is important that residents prevent the build-up of contaminants from entering their rainwater tank. This can be achieved by using first flush systems or disconnecting the tank inlet,” Mr Corben said.

The EPA is continuing to investigate the incident and reminds anyone using pesticides to read product labels carefully, monitor local weather conditions and communicate with neighbours ahead of time to avoid spray drift incidents.

Anyone with a concern, or knowledge of a spray drift incident or pesticide misuse in their local area, should contact the Environment Line on 131 555.

2017 July: Poisoned Birds Murrumbatemen (NSW). Pesticide: Omethoate

Poisoned birds in Murrumbateman prompt investigation by NSW Environment Protection Authority

 
 

The deaths of about 30 birds in Murrumbateman has prompted the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) to investigate the cause.

Nigel Sargent, EPA manager of regional operations, said results from initial tests show that the birds, primarily cockatoos and corellas, have consumed the insecticide omethoate.

“This is used on a variety of agricultural crops and fruit trees for insect pest management,” Mr Sargent said.

He said the results came from analysing a number of dead birds that were sent to Office of Environment and Heritage laboratories as part of the investigations.

Initial autopsies, which showed oat grain in the crops and signs of toxin.

 

The investigation came after residents initially reported and took a number of the dead birds to Murrumbateman Veterinary Clinic in early July.

Veterinarian Dr Iva Velevska said the clinic is continuing to work with the EPA in its investigation. Since mid July, Wildcare in Queanbeyan has been collecting the birds from the clinic for rehabilitation.

Maryanne Gates, bird coordinator at Wildcare, said she initially contacted the Yass Police Station.

“They advised me to follow it up with the EPA to investigate and confirm that poisoning was involved,” she said.

Ms Gates said the police did conduct extra patrol in Murrumbateman in mid July.

Since July 25, Wildcare has had 11 cockatoos, two corellas, one galah and one raven in its care.

“I had about 30 birds and I’d say there’s many that have died,” Ms Gates said.

“The ones that came in last weekend are now well enough to have been moved to an aviary to continue their recovery,” she said.

“We’re not convinced its stopped. There could be other bodies and people aren’t seeing them.”

At this stage, the EPA has not determined if the poisoning was deliberate. The misuse of pesticides is an offence in NSW and heavy penalties apply, including fines up to $120,000.

Poisoned birds in Murrumbateman prompt investigation by NSW Environment Protection Authority

The deaths of about 30 birds in Murrumbateman has prompted the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) to investigate the cause.

Nigel Sargent, EPA manager of regional operations, said results from initial tests show that the birds, primarily cockatoos and corellas, have consumed the insecticide omethoate.

“This is used on a variety of agricultural crops and fruit trees for insect pest management,” Mr Sargent said.

He said the results came from analysing a number of dead birds that were sent to Office of Environment and Heritage laboratories as part of the investigations.

Initial autopsies, which showed oat grain in the crops and signs of toxin.

The investigation came after residents initially reported and took a number of the dead birds to Murrumbateman Veterinary Clinic in early July.

Veterinarian Dr Iva Velevska said the clinic is continuing to work with the EPA in its investigation. Since mid July, Wildcare in Queanbeyan has been collecting the birds from the clinic for rehabilitation.

Maryanne Gates, bird coordinator at Wildcare, said she initially contacted the Yass Police Station.

“They advised me to follow it up with the EPA to investigate and confirm that poisoning was involved,” she said.

Ms Gates said the police did conduct extra patrol in Murrumbateman in mid July.

Since July 25, Wildcare has had 11 cockatoos, two corellas, one galah and one raven in its care.

“I had about 30 birds and I’d say there’s many that have died,” Ms Gates said.

“The ones that came in last weekend are now well enough to have been moved to an aviary to continue their recovery,” she said.

“We’re not convinced its stopped. There could be other bodies and people aren’t seeing them.”

At this stage, the EPA has not determined if the poisoning was deliberate. The misuse of pesticides is an offence in NSW and heavy penalties apply, including fines up to $120,000.

August 2017: Bird Deaths Linked to Common Insecticide that is Banned in Europe. Pesticide: Imidacloprid

Bird deaths linked to common insecticide that is banned in Europe

August 9 2017

 

A commonly used chemical is being blamed for the deaths of native birds in Victoria.

Lab results obtained by the ABC confirm that the chemical, which is used as an insecticide, killed at least 12 birds near Horsham last month.

The same chemical has been banned in Europe because of concerns it is behind a dramatic decline in bee populations.

Cath De Vaus, from Natimuk a small town western Victoria's cropping region, started making the grisly discoveries, finding dead birds around her house last month.

She said the deaths had not stopped and the numbers were adding up.

"It's lovely watching them in the evenings and every morning when you see new dead ones it's incredibly sad."

Ms De Vaus, along with other residents, reported the deaths and Agriculture Victoria has been investigating.

Lab results obtained by the ABC confirm traces of imidacloprid, a chemical commonly used in insecticides.

Imidacloprid is used to kill insects and termites, and can often be found in flea control for pets.

Farmers also use it to treat barley and wheat seeds.

In a statement, Agriculture Victoria has acknowledged that while the initial lab results show traces of chemicals used in crop management, there was not clear evidence that this was the single cause of death of the birds.

Associate Professor Vincent Pettigrove, a chemicals expert from the University of Melbourne said imidacloprid affected the nervous system.

"It actually mimics nicotine and it's really quite toxic to insects and it shouldn't be toxic to mammals and birds, but in certain circumstances we've found many reports of bird deaths associated with the use of this insecticide," he said.

"Some work in the European Union showed that a sparrow if it ate just one and half beet seeds would be enough to kill the bird."

European ban in place

In 2013 the European Union put a ban on these kinds of insecticides because of concerns they were behind a dramatic decline in bee populations.

Associate Professor Pettigrove said research published this year backed up the EU's concerns.

"There was a study in France where they looked at 103 wildlife mortality incidents and they found in 101 cases the birds had some concentrations of imidacloprid in them," he said.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority were unable to comment on the situation as they had not been advised on the matter.

People urged to report incidents

Associate Professor Pettigrove said he thought it was time to be ''much more vigilant about recording these deaths and trying to understand what is the reason for it''.

"Once the APVMA get a good body of information they'll have to consider reviewing how this chemical is used," he said.

Associate Professor Pettigrove said the way to do that was for more people to report incidents to the authorities.

"That will help us develop a better strategy for trying to use this chemical in a more environmentally safe way."

Bird deaths linked to common insecticide that is banned in Europe

August 9 2017

A commonly used chemical is being blamed for the deaths of native birds in Victoria.

Lab results obtained by the ABC confirm that the chemical, which is used as an insecticide, killed at least 12 birds near Horsham last month.

The same chemical has been banned in Europe because of concerns it is behind a dramatic decline in bee populations.

Cath De Vaus, from Natimuk a small town western Victoria’s cropping region, started making the grisly discoveries, finding dead birds around her house last month.

She said the deaths had not stopped and the numbers were adding up.

“It’s lovely watching them in the evenings and every morning when you see new dead ones it’s incredibly sad.”

Ms De Vaus, along with other residents, reported the deaths and Agriculture Victoria has been investigating.

Lab results obtained by the ABC confirm traces of imidacloprid, a chemical commonly used in insecticides.

Imidacloprid is used to kill insects and termites, and can often be found in flea control for pets.

Farmers also use it to treat barley and wheat seeds.

In a statement, Agriculture Victoria has acknowledged that while the initial lab results show traces of chemicals used in crop management, there was not clear evidence that this was the single cause of death of the birds.

Associate Professor Vincent Pettigrove, a chemicals expert from the University of Melbourne said imidacloprid affected the nervous system.

“It actually mimics nicotine and it’s really quite toxic to insects and it shouldn’t be toxic to mammals and birds, but in certain circumstances we’ve found many reports of bird deaths associated with the use of this insecticide,” he said.

“Some work in the European Union showed that a sparrow if it ate just one and half beet seeds would be enough to kill the bird.”

European ban in place

In 2013 the European Union put a ban on these kinds of insecticides because of concerns they were behind a dramatic decline in bee populations.

Associate Professor Pettigrove said research published this year backed up the EU’s concerns.

“There was a study in France where they looked at 103 wildlife mortality incidents and they found in 101 cases the birds had some concentrations of imidacloprid in them,” he said.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority were unable to comment on the situation as they had not been advised on the matter.

People urged to report incidents

Associate Professor Pettigrove said he thought it was time to be ”much more vigilant about recording these deaths and trying to understand what is the reason for it”.

“Once the APVMA get a good body of information they’ll have to consider reviewing how this chemical is used,” he said.

Associate Professor Pettigrove said the way to do that was for more people to report incidents to the authorities.

“That will help us develop a better strategy for trying to use this chemical in a more environmentally safe way.”

1998: Bendoc (Vic). Simazine in Soil

In 1998 organic farmers near Bendoc in East Gippsland found traces of simazine on their property and linked it to plantations established to Harris-Daishowa. In the ruling of the case the magistrate found that the council failed; i) to undertake further sampling to determine the extent of the use of Simazine . . . and the long term impact of simazine on the proposed plantation site and organic farm, ii) to consider whether the prior use and proposed use of Simazine has and will continue to jeopardise the capacity of the organic farm to obtain organic certification from the Biodynamic Farming Association or the National Association of Sustainable Agriculture Australia, iii) to consider whether the proposed use of Simazine and Roundup on the proposed plantation site is simply incompatible with the agricultural practices of the adjacent organic farm, iv) to adequately consider the potential consequences of the use of Simazine and Roundup at the proposed maximum application rates upon the organic farm and nearby watercourses; or v) to specify any requirements for monitoring the effects of the use of Simazine and Roundup and any other effects of the establishment of the timber plantation upon the organic farm and nearby watercourses.

'Prior to this application, there had been no planning permit conditions relating to the use of herbicides for plantation development. In fact, no individual nor any authority has raised the issue of herbicide use in plantations with Council even though the use there of it clearly indicated in each proposal'.

In 1998 organic farmers near Bendoc in East Gippsland found traces of simazine on their property and linked it to plantations established to Harris-Daishowa. In the ruling of the case the magistrate found that the council failed; i) to undertake further sampling to determine the extent of the use of Simazine . . . and the long term impact of simazine on the proposed plantation site and organic farm, ii) to consider whether the prior use and proposed use of Simazine has and will continue to jeopardise the capacity of the organic farm to obtain organic certification from the Biodynamic Farming Association or the National Association of Sustainable Agriculture Australia, iii) to consider whether the proposed use of Simazine and Roundup on the proposed plantation site is simply incompatible with the agricultural practices of the adjacent organic farm, iv) to adequately consider the potential consequences of the use of Simazine and Roundup at the proposed maximum application rates upon the organic farm and nearby watercourses; or v) to specify any requirements for monitoring the effects of the use of Simazine and Roundup and any other effects of the establishment of the timber plantation upon the organic farm and nearby watercourses.

‘Prior to this application, there had been no planning permit conditions relating to the use of herbicides for plantation development. In fact, no individual nor any authority has raised the issue of herbicide use in plantations with Council even though the use there of it clearly indicated in each proposal’.

2017 August: Five Sea Eagles Poisoned – Bairnsdale (Vic). Pesticide: DDE

Five threatened white-bellied sea eagles die after being poisoned in eastern Victoria

ABC Gippsland 1/8/17

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-01/threatened-sea-eagles-die-from-poison-near-bairnsdale/8762742

 

A farmer in Bairnsdale could face charges over the fatal poisoning of five white-bellied sea eagles found dead near Bairnsdale last month.

The threatened birds were poisoned after eating corellas that had been illegally baited.

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Program Manager, Craig Oldis says necropsy and toxicology tests on two of the sea eagles found traces of the chemical, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), traditionally used in the agricultural and livestock industry."We believe the eagles have fed on the corella carcasses and succumbed to the poison also."

 

DELWP has formally interviewed a Bairnsdale man after speaking with a number of people who live along the Mitchell River near Bairnsdale.

The white-bellied sea eagle is one of Australia's largest and most spectacular raptors and is common to East Gippsland.

They measure about one metre long and have a similar wing span and flight pattern to the wedge-tailed eagle.

Using poison to destroy protected wildlife attracts fines of up to $15,600 and/or six months imprisonment.

"If a person is convicted in court they may well find themselves going to jail for such a callous and hideous act of cruelty," Mr Oldis said.

Five threatened white-bellied sea eagles die after being poisoned in eastern Victoria

ABC Gippsland 1/8/17

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-01/threatened-sea-eagles-die-from-poison-near-bairnsdale/8762742

A farmer in Bairnsdale could face charges over the fatal poisoning of five white-bellied sea eagles found dead near Bairnsdale last month.

The threatened birds were poisoned after eating corellas that had been illegally baited.

Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Program Manager, Craig Oldis says necropsy and toxicology tests on two of the sea eagles found traces of the chemical, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), traditionally used in the agricultural and livestock industry.“We believe the eagles have fed on the corella carcasses and succumbed to the poison also.”

DELWP has formally interviewed a Bairnsdale man after speaking with a number of people who live along the Mitchell River near Bairnsdale.

The white-bellied sea eagle is one of Australia’s largest and most spectacular raptors and is common to East Gippsland.

They measure about one metre long and have a similar wing span and flight pattern to the wedge-tailed eagle.

Using poison to destroy protected wildlife attracts fines of up to $15,600 and/or six months imprisonment.

“If a person is convicted in court they may well find themselves going to jail for such a callous and hideous act of cruelty,” Mr Oldis said.

2011 December: Candowie Reservoir (Vic) Phillip Island Water Supply. Pesticide: Monocrotophos

6/12/11: The insecticide, Monocrotophos was detected at 20ug/L in Candowie Reservoir at inlet to Water Treatment Plant. In the 2004 Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, Monocrotophos had a guideline level of 1ug/L. It did not have a guideline level in the 2011 Guidelines. 

The level detected therefore was 20 times higher than the level determined to be "safe" in 2004. Probably the most serious pesticide incident in a domestic water supply in Victoria since the 1970's. How much was removed during the treatment process? Was the source determined?

"The herbicide/pesticide, monocrotophos exceeded the ADWG health-based
guideline value during the 2011/12 reporting period. Westernport Water were not advised of this exceedence by their consultant laboratory and were therefore unable to take any remedial actions in response to the detection. It is important to note that this result was obtained in the raw water, and the health-based guideline values apply in the treated water."
 
https://www.westernportwater.com.au/wp-content/uploads/WebFiles/Services/Water%20quality/DHS%20Water%20quality%20report%202011-12.pdf

6/12/11: The insecticide, Monocrotophos was detected at 20ug/L in Candowie Reservoir at inlet to Water Treatment Plant. In the 2004 Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, Monocrotophos had a guideline level of 1ug/L. It did not have a guideline level in the 2011 Guidelines.

The level detected therefore was 20 times higher than the level determined to be “safe” in 2004. Probably the most serious pesticide incident in a domestic water supply in Victoria since the 1970’s. How much was removed during the treatment process? Was the source determined?

“The herbicide/pesticide, monocrotophos exceeded the ADWG health-based
guideline value during the 2011/12 reporting period. Westernport Water were not advised of this exceedence by their consultant laboratory and were therefore unable to take any remedial actions in response to the detection. It is important to note that this result was obtained in the raw water, and the health-based guideline values apply in the treated water.”
https://www.westernportwater.com.au/wp-content/uploads/WebFiles/Services/Water%20quality/DHS%20Water%20quality%20report%202011-12.pdf

 

 

2017 July: Grape Grower Awarded $7million (Spray Drift Case). Pesticides: 2,4-D, Glyphosate, Metsulfuron Methyl

High price for spraying: Grower awarded more than $7million

 
 
 

A NORTH west Victorian grape grower, whose 60-hectare property was permanently damaged by chemical overspray from a neighbouring property four years ago, has been awarded more than $7 million.

Riverman Orchards, which farms land at Piangil, claimed herbicide spray drift had adversely impacted on its 61.14-hectare vineyard.

The Supreme Court of Victoria was last week told block owner Tony Caccaviello, who had farmed in the Piangil area for his entire life, initially thought the vines had been affected by frost before tests confirmed the damage was the result of chemicals toxic to grapevines and which were not used within a vineyard.

The court heard vetch block owner Rodney James Hayden confirmed his property had been sprayed just days earlier with a mixture containing 2,4-D, glyphosate and metsulfuron-methyl and which included a wetting agent based on ammonium sulphate.

Riverman sought damages for the October, 2013, overspray event for nuisance and negligence.

It asserted that subjecting its vines to the overspray was an unreasonable and substantial interference with its use and enjoyment of the Mallee Block vineyard.

It also asserted the vetch spraying was negligently carried out, principally in the manner in which it was done in the prevailing weather conditions and in the mixture of chemicals chosen.

At the time of the overspray, local winemaker Andrew Peace Wines was purchasing all of the produce from 54.25 hectares of the Mallee Block at annual prices to be agreed each year before harvest.

Riverman claimed its vineyard did not yield the same quantity of fruit and the quality of the fruit produced was poor and that after three seasons it was clear that the vineyard would not recover.

The plaintiff claimed that 8000 vines needed to be removed and replanted to re-establish the vineyard to the standard that it was before October, 2013.

Hayden’s principal submission was that there was in fact no interference by him through spraying activities with the Riverman property, but if there was a spray drift event, the plaintiff’s damage was not caused by exposure to the herbicides used.

He claimed the damage to Mallee Block vines was caused by water stress arising from inadequate irrigation, excessive pruning and general inadequate management, including inappropriate fertilisation.

Hayden submitted that in any event the alleged interference was neither substantial nor unreasonable. 

However, Judge John Dixon said he was satisfied that when the defendant sprayed the vetch, multiple spray drifts were created in sufficient concentrations to cause very serious damage to the vines.

Judge Dixon ordered Hayden to pay Riverman $6,543,626.10 in damages and a further $704,587.66 in interest.

High price for spraying: Grower awarded more than $7million

A NORTH west Victorian grape grower, whose 60-hectare property was permanently damaged by chemical overspray from a neighbouring property four years ago, has been awarded more than $7 million.

Riverman Orchards, which farms land at Piangil, claimed herbicide spray drift had adversely impacted on its 61.14-hectare vineyard.

The Supreme Court of Victoria was last week told block owner Tony Caccaviello, who had farmed in the Piangil area for his entire life, initially thought the vines had been affected by frost before tests confirmed the damage was the result of chemicals toxic to grapevines and which were not used within a vineyard.

The court heard vetch block owner Rodney James Hayden confirmed his property had been sprayed just days earlier with a mixture containing 2,4-D, glyphosate and metsulfuron-methyl and which included a wetting agent based on ammonium sulphate.

Riverman sought damages for the October, 2013, overspray event for nuisance and negligence.

It asserted that subjecting its vines to the overspray was an unreasonable and substantial interference with its use and enjoyment of the Mallee Block vineyard.

It also asserted the vetch spraying was negligently carried out, principally in the manner in which it was done in the prevailing weather conditions and in the mixture of chemicals chosen.

At the time of the overspray, local winemaker Andrew Peace Wines was purchasing all of the produce from 54.25 hectares of the Mallee Block at annual prices to be agreed each year before harvest.

Riverman claimed its vineyard did not yield the same quantity of fruit and the quality of the fruit produced was poor and that after three seasons it was clear that the vineyard would not recover.

The plaintiff claimed that 8000 vines needed to be removed and replanted to re-establish the vineyard to the standard that it was before October, 2013.

Hayden’s principal submission was that there was in fact no interference by him through spraying activities with the Riverman property, but if there was a spray drift event, the plaintiff’s damage was not caused by exposure to the herbicides used.

He claimed the damage to Mallee Block vines was caused by water stress arising from inadequate irrigation, excessive pruning and general inadequate management, including inappropriate fertilisation.

Hayden submitted that in any event the alleged interference was neither substantial nor unreasonable.

However, Judge John Dixon said he was satisfied that when the defendant sprayed the vetch, multiple spray drifts were created in sufficient concentrations to cause very serious damage to the vines.

Judge Dixon ordered Hayden to pay Riverman $6,543,626.10 in damages and a further $704,587.66 in interest.

2013 September: Wannamai to Geraldton Sick Trees (Western Australia). Pesticide: Metribuzin

Railway bush reserves are highly important both as ecological corridors and as community assets. With the recent extensive tree decline noticed along the railway between Wannamal to Geraldton involving York Gums, Salmon Gums and Wandoo, investigations led by MCC have followed. Rachel Walmsley, MCC’s NRM Officer said “MCC has organised two stakeholder meetings in the past few months. The initial meeting with Brookfield Rail in January discussed the issue and the community’s concerns on why thousands of trees along the railway suddenly becoming sick in Spring 2013. Outcomes included leaf/soil sampling of affected areas and further investigation by Brookfield Rail.”
 
A follow up meeting was held in March in Moora between Brookfield Rail and even more concerned stakeholders than the first meeting. Rachel said “Leaf/soil samples results concluded that the residual herbicide chemical Metribuzin is to blame for the tree decline. This has been used by Brookfield Rail with Glyphosate to control weeds including resistant rye grass, and had been used for the previous two years prior to 2013 without ill effects. It is thought the rain events/wet spring may have unfortunately allowed the chemical to infiltrate the soil and reach the tree roots.
 
The long dry summer has also not helped with tree recovery. “Lengthy discussions were held on Brookfield Rail’s weed spraying protocol including chemicals used, technique and timing. Brookfield Rail said they are reviewing their procedures and that Metribuzin would not be used again on the line. Chemical selection is made in conjunction with the Australian Glyphosate
Sustainability Working Group to avoid weed species developing glyphosate resistance.
 
Rachel said “Actions to be taken by Brookfield Rail include using a proven nutrient injection technique to bring back a number of prominent sick trees including those through Moora and Coomberdale.” This happened in April with 180 trees being injected. Monitoring by Brookfield Rail will be long term to gauge success. Recovery of a large number of trees is expected
over the autumn/winter but this will be reviewed in the spring. Brookfield Rail will also commit to a wide scale planting program if necessary. This will be discussed at the next meeting in the spring.
 
https://www.moorecatchment.org.au/Newsletters/Issue%2032%20MCC%20newsletterspring_autumn%202014email.pdf
Railway bush reserves are highly important both as ecological corridors and as community assets. With the recent extensive tree decline noticed along the railway between Wannamal to Geraldton involving York Gums, Salmon Gums and Wandoo, investigations led by MCC have followed. Rachel Walmsley, MCC’s NRM Officer said “MCC has organised two stakeholder meetings in the past few months. The initial meeting with Brookfield Rail in January discussed the issue and the community’s concerns on why thousands of trees along the railway suddenly becoming sick in Spring 2013. Outcomes included leaf/soil sampling of affected areas and further investigation by Brookfield Rail.”
A follow up meeting was held in March in Moora between Brookfield Rail and even more concerned stakeholders than the first meeting. Rachel said “Leaf/soil samples results concluded that the residual herbicide chemical Metribuzin is to blame for the tree decline. This has been used by Brookfield Rail with Glyphosate to control weeds including resistant rye grass, and had been used for the previous two years prior to 2013 without ill effects. It is thought the rain events/wet spring may have unfortunately allowed the chemical to infiltrate the soil and reach the tree roots.
The long dry summer has also not helped with tree recovery. “Lengthy discussions were held on Brookfield Rail’s weed spraying protocol including chemicals used, technique and timing. Brookfield Rail said they are reviewing their procedures and that Metribuzin would not be used again on the line. Chemical selection is made in conjunction with the Australian Glyphosate
Sustainability Working Group to avoid weed species developing glyphosate resistance.
Rachel said “Actions to be taken by Brookfield Rail include using a proven nutrient injection technique to bring back a number of prominent sick trees including those through Moora and Coomberdale.” This happened in April with 180 trees being injected. Monitoring by Brookfield Rail will be long term to gauge success. Recovery of a large number of trees is expected
over the autumn/winter but this will be reviewed in the spring. Brookfield Rail will also commit to a wide scale planting program if necessary. This will be discussed at the next meeting in the spring.
https://www.moorecatchment.org.au/Newsletters/Issue%2032%20MCC%20newsletterspring_autumn%202014email.pdf

2017 June: Fish and Eel Kill. Ipswich Qld. Pesticide: Bifenthrin

Mass pesticide dose killed fish, eels tests confirm

Queensland Times June 29 2017

https://www.qt.com.au/news/lab-tests-confirm-mass-pesticide-dose-killed-fish-/3194755/

FISH and eels found dead in an Ipswich waterway were killed by exposure to pesticides, lab tests have confirmed.

The discovery was made after residents sent samples of the dead animals found at Walloon near the Waterlea development to a government lab for testing.

Those tests showed high levels of the chemical Bifenthrin, commonly used in Queensland to treat timber for termites.

While the mystery of the animals' cause of death last month has now been solved, the source of the chemical remains unknown.

Waterlea developer said its own investigation pointed to a "localised source", meaning the chemical was likely dumped directly into the waterway, as opposed to run-off from the nearby development site.

Owen Wesner, who discovered the dead fish and eels, wants answers and assurances the surrounding ground and waterways are not contaminated. He also wants to know there will be no long-term environmental consequences.

"It's an environmental disaster as far as I am concerned," Mr Wesner said.

"If pesticides have been dumped there, then it's an environmental issue that needs to be addressed.

"Who's to say children don't swim in that water hole? What if the cattle downstream drink the water? Are the local kangaroos drinking from the water hole? Has the local koala population been affected? People need to understand they can't dump these chemicals down the drain, if that's what has happened here. Chemicals like pesticides must be disposed of properly at a council facility."

The State Government's Biosecurity Department confirmed the chemical detected Bifenthrin, is an agricultural insecticide used for the control of borers and termites in timber, insect pests in agricultural crops and turf, as well as general pest control.

The State Environment Department was aware of the waterway contamination and said Ipswich City Council had investigated.

Ipswich City Council said its officers attended the area following the fish kill report from residents, but is still awaiting the results of a preliminary investigation.

A spokesperson for Waterlea at Walloon said it worked closely with authorities to determine the origin of the chemicals.

"By examining rain fall logs and other data we determined no water had left our site in the days leading up to the event," the spokesperson said.

Mass pesticide dose killed fish, eels tests confirm

Queensland Times June 29 2017

https://www.qt.com.au/news/lab-tests-confirm-mass-pesticide-dose-killed-fish-/3194755/

FISH and eels found dead in an Ipswich waterway were killed by exposure to pesticides, lab tests have confirmed.

The discovery was made after residents sent samples of the dead animals found at Walloon near the Waterlea development to a government lab for testing.

Those tests showed high levels of the chemical Bifenthrin, commonly used in Queensland to treat timber for termites.

While the mystery of the animals’ cause of death last month has now been solved, the source of the chemical remains unknown.

Waterlea developer said its own investigation pointed to a “localised source”, meaning the chemical was likely dumped directly into the waterway, as opposed to run-off from the nearby development site.

Owen Wesner, who discovered the dead fish and eels, wants answers and assurances the surrounding ground and waterways are not contaminated. He also wants to know there will be no long-term environmental consequences.

“It’s an environmental disaster as far as I am concerned,” Mr Wesner said.

“If pesticides have been dumped there, then it’s an environmental issue that needs to be addressed.

“Who’s to say children don’t swim in that water hole? What if the cattle downstream drink the water? Are the local kangaroos drinking from the water hole? Has the local koala population been affected? People need to understand they can’t dump these chemicals down the drain, if that’s what has happened here. Chemicals like pesticides must be disposed of properly at a council facility.”

The State Government’s Biosecurity Department confirmed the chemical detected Bifenthrin, is an agricultural insecticide used for the control of borers and termites in timber, insect pests in agricultural crops and turf, as well as general pest control.

The State Environment Department was aware of the waterway contamination and said Ipswich City Council had investigated.

Ipswich City Council said its officers attended the area following the fish kill report from residents, but is still awaiting the results of a preliminary investigation.

A spokesperson for Waterlea at Walloon said it worked closely with authorities to determine the origin of the chemicals.

“By examining rain fall logs and other data we determined no water had left our site in the days leading up to the event,” the spokesperson said.

2012 February-March: Buchan (Vic). Pesticide: Triclopyr

10 Feb 2012: Buchan River Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

13 Feb 2012: Buchan River Entry Triclopyr 0.09ug/L

7 March 2012: Buchan River Entry Triclopyr 0.09ug/L

Source: Freedom of Information Application East Gippsland Water June 2017

10 Feb 2012: Buchan River Triclopyr 0.2ug/L

13 Feb 2012: Buchan River Entry Triclopyr 0.09ug/L

7 March 2012: Buchan River Entry Triclopyr 0.09ug/L

Source: Freedom of Information Application East Gippsland Water June 2017

2016 April: Merryn Grove Wantirna. Pesticide: Dicamba

Dicamba detected at 0.01ug/L Merryn Grove Wantirna April 2016. Source: South East Water FoI

"This is the second instance I've seen of a pesticide being detected through consumer taps in Melbourne's drinking water network. This detection was 10000 times less that safe drinking water guideline. But it is evidence that the treatment process was compromised. Source for water for Wantirna is Silvan Dam, so most likely source of Dicamba could have been spray drift (open aquaducts) from Upper Yarra, O'Shannassy"

Dicamba detected at 0.01ug/L Merryn Grove Wantirna April 2016. Source: South East Water FoI

“This is the second instance I’ve seen of a pesticide being detected through consumer taps in Melbourne’s drinking water network. This detection was 10000 times less that safe drinking water guideline. But it is evidence that the treatment process was compromised. Source for water for Wantirna is Silvan Dam, so most likely source of Dicamba could have been spray drift (open aquaducts) from Upper Yarra, O’Shannassy”

2003 February: Letter to Age Vietnam Vets drinking 2,4,5-T. Pesticides: 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T

How safe are anthrax shots?

Can Defence Minister Hill please explain why those on board HMAS Kanimbla were required to sign a consent form if anthrax vaccinations were as safe as he claims? If years down the track those personnel over in the Gulf start to suffer previously unknown side effects, will that consent form indemnify the Government from any guilt? And will this consequently make those personnel ineligible for medical treatment?

During the Vietnam War, Agent Orange was sprayed to defoliate the jungle, and subsequently the ground troops suffered side effects that not only affected them and their children, but could also continue affecting them for generations to come. Those ground troops are 13 per cent more likely to contract cancer than the general population.

I was on HMAS Sydney during that war, and we apparently drank contaminated desalinated water drawn from the harbour at Vung Tau. The desalination method increased the toxicity of the contaminants to such an extent that I am 58 per cent more likely to contract cancer than the general population. These facts came to light late last year, more than 30 years after the war, and after a lot of sailors had contracted cancer and died mysteriously.

If Robert Hill is so sure the anthrax vaccine is safe, then I'm sure he won't mind he and his family having the inoculation - and signing a consent form, of course.
J. King, Musgrave Hill, Qld

How safe are anthrax shots?

Can Defence Minister Hill please explain why those on board HMAS Kanimbla were required to sign a consent form if anthrax vaccinations were as safe as he claims? If years down the track those personnel over in the Gulf start to suffer previously unknown side effects, will that consent form indemnify the Government from any guilt? And will this consequently make those personnel ineligible for medical treatment?

During the Vietnam War, Agent Orange was sprayed to defoliate the jungle, and subsequently the ground troops suffered side effects that not only affected them and their children, but could also continue affecting them for generations to come. Those ground troops are 13 per cent more likely to contract cancer than the general population.

I was on HMAS Sydney during that war, and we apparently drank contaminated desalinated water drawn from the harbour at Vung Tau. The desalination method increased the toxicity of the contaminants to such an extent that I am 58 per cent more likely to contract cancer than the general population. These facts came to light late last year, more than 30 years after the war, and after a lot of sailors had contracted cancer and died mysteriously.

If Robert Hill is so sure the anthrax vaccine is safe, then I’m sure he won’t mind he and his family having the inoculation – and signing a consent form, of course.
J. King, Musgrave Hill, Qld

2012 Oct-Nov: Adjungbilly Creek (NSW). Pesticides: Atrazine, Hexazinone, Simazine

Forestry NSW Samples from various locations near headwaters of Adjungbilly Creek

11/10/12 8*-Sample N12/027457

Atrazine 0.56µg/L, Hexazinone 0.45µg/L

11/10/12 9A*-Sample N12/027458

Atrazine 1.8µg/L, Hexazinone 0.94µg/L

11/10/12 A CGAGO1 N12/027453

Atrazine 78ug/L, Hexazinone 22µg/L, Simazine 0.26µg/L

11/10/12 C CGAGO N12/027455

Atrazine 0.4ug/L, Hexazinone 0.11µg/L

Office of Environment & Heritage Report 201200381

Wee Jasper State Forest Courajago 

201202974 2 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 0.6µg/L

201202976 4 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Atrazine 8.3µg/L Hexazinone 4.8µg/L

201202977 5 Courajago 19/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Atrazine 130µg/kg Hexazinone 43µg/kg

201202978 6 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 1µg/L

201202980 8 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 0.5201202978 6 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 1µg/L

Australian Government NM1 samples 13/11/12

N12/030147: Atrazine 0.3µg/L, Hexazinone 0.16µg/L

N12/030148: Atrazine 0.28µg/L, Hexazinone 0.2µg/L

N12/030149: Atrazine 0.44µg/L, Hexazinone 0.21µg/L

Water C Gago D 

11/10/12 D-CGAG01-Sample N12/027456

Atrazine 31µg/L, Hexazinone 15µg/L, Simazine 0.11µg/L

Atrazine 78µg/L, Hexazinone 22µg/L, Simazine 0.26µg/L

Sample N12/030153 13/11/12: Atrazine 0.91µg/L, Hexazinone 0.85µg/L

Sample N12/031947 21/11/12 Atrazine 0.69µg/L, Hexazinone 0.68µg/L

Sample N12/032831 30/11/12: Hexazinone 0.54µg/L

Water C Gago B

N12/030951 13/11/12 Hexazinone 1.6µg/L

N12/030152 13/11/12 Atrazine 0.19 µg/L, Hexazinone 1.2µg/L

N12/031948 21/11/12 Atrazine 0.2µg/L, Hexazinone 0.49µg/L

N12/032832 30/11/12: Hexazinone 0.49µg/L

Water C Gago C 

N12/031949 13/11/12: Atrazine 0.44µg/L, Hexazinone 0.21µg/L

N12/031949 21/11/12: Atrazine 0.18µg/L, Hexazinone 0.99µg/L

N12/03285 30/11/12: Hexazinone 0.19µg/L

Water C Gago A 

N12/030150 13/11/12 Atrazine 0.12µg/L Hexazinone 0.16µg/L

N12/031950 21/11/2012 Hexazinone 1.1µg/L

N12/032828 30/11/12: Atrazine 0.15µg/L Hexazinone 0.12µg/L

Water G2 

N12/031951 21/11/12 Atrazine 0.12 µg/L, Hexazinone 0.22µg/L

Water C Gag C 

N12/031953: 21/11/2012 Atrazine 0.24 µg/L, Hexazinone 0.16µg/L

Water 20 

N12/030154: 13/11/2012 Atrazine 1.3µg/L, Hexazinone 0.33µg/L

Forestry NSW Samples from various locations near headwaters of Adjungbilly Creek

11/10/12 8*-Sample N12/027457

Atrazine 0.56µg/L, Hexazinone 0.45µg/L

11/10/12 9A*-Sample N12/027458

Atrazine 1.8µg/L, Hexazinone 0.94µg/L

11/10/12 A CGAGO1 N12/027453

Atrazine 78ug/L, Hexazinone 22µg/L, Simazine 0.26µg/L

11/10/12 C CGAGO N12/027455

Atrazine 0.4ug/L, Hexazinone 0.11µg/L

Office of Environment & Heritage Report 201200381

Wee Jasper State Forest Courajago 

201202974 2 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 0.6µg/L

201202976 4 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Atrazine 8.3µg/L Hexazinone 4.8µg/L

201202977 5 Courajago 19/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Atrazine 130µg/kg Hexazinone 43µg/kg

201202978 6 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 1µg/L

201202980 8 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 0.5201202978 6 Courajago 15/11/12 OMSSVQ1

Hexazinone 1µg/L

Australian Government NM1 samples 13/11/12

N12/030147: Atrazine 0.3µg/L, Hexazinone 0.16µg/L

N12/030148: Atrazine 0.28µg/L, Hexazinone 0.2µg/L

N12/030149: Atrazine 0.44µg/L, Hexazinone 0.21µg/L

Water C Gago D 

11/10/12 D-CGAG01-Sample N12/027456

Atrazine 31µg/L, Hexazinone 15µg/L, Simazine 0.11µg/L

Atrazine 78µg/L, Hexazinone 22µg/L, Simazine 0.26µg/L

Sample N12/030153 13/11/12: Atrazine 0.91µg/L, Hexazinone 0.85µg/L

Sample N12/031947 21/11/12 Atrazine 0.69µg/L, Hexazinone 0.68µg/L

Sample N12/032831 30/11/12: Hexazinone 0.54µg/L

Water C Gago B

N12/030951 13/11/12 Hexazinone 1.6µg/L

N12/030152 13/11/12 Atrazine 0.19 µg/L, Hexazinone 1.2µg/L

N12/031948 21/11/12 Atrazine 0.2µg/L, Hexazinone 0.49µg/L

N12/032832 30/11/12: Hexazinone 0.49µg/L

Water C Gago C 

N12/031949 13/11/12: Atrazine 0.44µg/L, Hexazinone 0.21µg/L

N12/031949 21/11/12: Atrazine 0.18µg/L, Hexazinone 0.99µg/L

N12/03285 30/11/12: Hexazinone 0.19µg/L

Water C Gago A 

N12/030150 13/11/12 Atrazine 0.12µg/L Hexazinone 0.16µg/L

N12/031950 21/11/2012 Hexazinone 1.1µg/L

N12/032828 30/11/12: Atrazine 0.15µg/L Hexazinone 0.12µg/L

Water G2 

N12/031951 21/11/12 Atrazine 0.12 µg/L, Hexazinone 0.22µg/L

Water C Gag C 

N12/031953: 21/11/2012 Atrazine 0.24 µg/L, Hexazinone 0.16µg/L

Water 20 

N12/030154: 13/11/2012 Atrazine 1.3µg/L, Hexazinone 0.33µg/L

2017 April: ‘Agent Orange’ chemicals at old Nufarm site in Fawkner spark fears over health risks. Pesticides: 2,4,5-T, 2,4-D

Agent Orange’ chemicals at old Nufarm site in Fawkner spark fears over health risks

THE Environment Protection Authority will be asked to inspect a former pesticide factory site in Fawkner that is contaminated with chemicals found in Agent Orange.

Land at 100 and 102 McBryde St was formerly owned by Nufarm Ltd, which produced dioxins and herbicides using chemicals that are the chief ingredients in the substance first used by US troops to defoliate the jungle during the Vietnam War.

The council has referred a planning application for two warehouses on the site to the EPA, which has until Thursday to comment.

Moreland Council has also called on the EPA to examine a clay cap, placed over the soil in the mid 1990s to entrap the contaminants, to determine its condition.

A council report revealed high traces of the carcinogenic chemicals were found at the site after the Nufarm factory closed in 1990.

The report also showed a cancer cluster is believed to have existed in the area of McBryde, Percy and Bruce streets during operation of the factory.

The Herald Sun reported in June 1990 that 20 cancer deaths were recorded at 18 nearby homes.

Brian Snowden, who lives near the property, said he hoped planning permits for construction at the site would be rejected due to health risks.

“What the residents are saying is ‘It’s not on’,” Mr Snowden said.

“Nobody knows the status of this property and nobody has done anything on it since it was capped and sold off.”

An earlier permit application to build warehouses on the lot was denied in 2015, while three similar permits lapsed.

An EPA audit conducted in 1995 led to restrictions for the site, including the clay cap being maintained and a requirement that any soil excavated from deeper than half a metre be tested and disposed of within the authority’s guidelines.

EPA metro manager Daniel Hunt said the authority was yet to receive a request to inspect the clay cap, but was in discussions with the council and a resident.

Anger from Fawkner locals over toxic site poised for redevelopment

 Sunday Age 15/10/17 
https://www.theage.com.au/victoria/anger-from-fawkner-locals-over-exagent-orange-site-poised-for-redevelopment-20171013-gz0nv1.html

A plan to redevelop a former Fawkner manufacturing site where the component parts of Agent Orange were once made and stored is heading to the state planning tribunal, despite attempts by residents and a local council to stop it.

Proposed for the site are two warehouses on land once owned by agricultural chemical maker Nufarm.

Nufarm sold the property four decades ago, but from 1957 to 1971 manufactured a range of chemicals, including two components of the weapon Agent Orange.

A Nufarm spokeswoman said that the company had never manufactured Agent Orange. The company also made DDT and arsenic there.

The plant was not connected to the sewerage system until 1968.

For over a decade when there was spillage of the many deadly chemicals manufactured there, they were simply washed via a stormwater drain into the nearby Merri Creek, an environmental report done on the site for Nufarm in 1995 shows.

A residents’ group has been set up to fight the warehouse plan and, with between 50 and 100 members on board, has succeeded in convincing Moreland councillors to reject the plan – despite council officers having recommended it proceed.

The proposed warehouses are to be used for the storage of concrete equipment, trucks and tools, and the need to dig deep across all of the contaminated land may not be necessary.

But the proposal involves digging into a clay cap previously put over the entire site to protect people from chemicals that had leached into the soils. The planned warehouse’s drainage would see a new sewer dug that would need twin 25-metre-long, two-metre deep trenches dug.

The residents’ group, Toxic Free Fawkner, has voiced concerns that remnant chemicals may be disturbed and dispersed when construction is underway.

One resident, Brian Snowden, said the site was “a weeping sore” that had to be fixed rather than redeveloped. Mr Snowden’s mother, Elsie Snowden led the fight to close the factory – which locals said put a stench over the entire suburb when it was open.

The Environment Protection Authority in 1995 ordered Nufarm to test the site after a Greenpeace campaign focused attention on the seriousness of its contamination.

Special Minister of State Gavin Jennings told the Victorian parliament in June that a test done earlier this year by the EPA had found chemicals in the soil around the former factory had not leaked off the site or into the Merri Creek.

But residents were furious the tests were done only off the site – not on some of the contaminated areas that will be excavated if it is redeveloped.

“New and comprehensive testing is needed,” said Moreland councillor Sue Bolton, who has led the charge within Moreland Council to stop the plan.

A cluster of historical cancers in the area were reported in the area in the 1980s, and some residents believe it has never been fully explored properly.

Former nurse and local resident Roma Mawby, aged in her 80s, said many children in the area used to play in Merri Creek directly at the back of the Nufarm factory.

Among those to present to Moreland Council when it voted to oppose the proposal late last month was Roger Pell, principal of Fawkner Primary School. He said his school’s council believed residents in the area had been neglected for too long.

The school council had directed him to make the point to Moreland councillors that, if the development proceeds, “are children going to be safe when they go to school?” Mr Pell said.

“How do we explain to our school community if we have odours and smells coming across our school during the drilling and construction period. What do we say to [parents and children]: ‘Oh it’s safe, there’s nothing wrong with it’?”

A Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hearing on whether the plan should proceed is scheduled for March next year.

A resident protest outside the proposed warehouse site recently.A resident protest outside the proposed warehouse site recently. Photo: Chris Hopkins

2006 April/May: Warmies Melbourne. Pesticides: p,p,DDE, p,p,DDD

Technical Report
 
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
 
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
 
Warmies
 
 
p34 Bream (sample no.37):
 
p,p,DDE 0.019mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.024mg/kg
 
Bream (sample no.38):
 
p,p,DDE 0.001mg/kg, p,p.DDD 0.011mg/kg
 
Bream (sample no. 39):
 
p,p,DDD 0.011mg/kg
 
Mullet (sample no. 47):
 
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg
Technical Report
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
Warmies
p34 Bream (sample no.37):
p,p,DDE 0.019mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.024mg/kg
Bream (sample no.38):
p,p,DDE 0.001mg/kg, p,p.DDD 0.011mg/kg
Bream (sample no. 39):
p,p,DDD 0.011mg/kg
Mullet (sample no. 47):
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg

2006 April/May: South Wharf Dockland. Pesticides p,p,DDE, p,p,DDD, Dieldrin

Technical Report
 
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
 
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
 
South Wharf Dockland
 
 
p34 Bream (sample no.28):
 
p,p,DDE 0.013mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.017mg/kg
 
Bream (sample no.29):
 
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg, p,p.DDD 0.014mg/kg
 
Mulloway (sample no. 31):
 
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.016mg/kg
 
Mullet (sample no. 36):
 
Dieldrin 0.021mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.019mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.022mg/kg
Technical Report
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
South Wharf Dockland
p34 Bream (sample no.28):
p,p,DDE 0.013mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.017mg/kg
Bream (sample no.29):
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg, p,p.DDD 0.014mg/kg
Mulloway (sample no. 31):
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.016mg/kg
Mullet (sample no. 36):
Dieldrin 0.021mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.019mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.022mg/kg

2006 April/May: Maribyrnong River Whitehall Impacts of Fauna. Pesticides:

Technical Report
 
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
 
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
 
Maribyrnong River Whitehall
 
 
p34 Bream (sample no.19):
 
p,p,DDE 0.018mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.025mg/kg
 
Bream (sample no.20):
 
p,p,DDE 0.014mg/kg
 
Bream (sample no. 21):
 
p,p,DDE 0.011mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.017mg/kg
Technical Report
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
Maribyrnong River Whitehall
p34 Bream (sample no.19):
p,p,DDE 0.018mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.025mg/kg
Bream (sample no.20):
p,p,DDE 0.014mg/kg
Bream (sample no. 21):
p,p,DDE 0.011mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.017mg/kg

 

2006 April/May: Pesticides in Fish etc Yarra River Herring Island. Pesticides: Multiple

Technical Report
 
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
 
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
 
Herring Island
 
 
p34 Bream (sample no.11):
 
p,p,DDD 0.011mg/kg
 
Mulloway (sample no.13):
 
p,p,DDE 0.023mg/kg
 
Mulloway (sample no. 14):
 
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg
 
Eel (sample no. 16):
 
Dieldrin 0.036mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.035mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.013mg/kg, p,p,DDT 0.012mg/kg
 
Eel (sample no. 17)
 
Dieldrin 0.071mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.056mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.013mg/kg
 
Eel (sample no. 18)
 
Heptachlor Epoxide 0.022mg/kg, Dieldrin 0.075mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.08mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.031mg/kg, Endrin 0.012mg/kg
Technical Report
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
Herring Island Yarra River
p34 Bream (sample no.11):
p,p,DDD 0.011mg/kg
Mulloway (sample no.13):
p,p,DDE 0.023mg/kg
Mulloway (sample no. 14):
p,p,DDE 0.016mg/kg
Eel (sample no. 16):
Dieldrin 0.036mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.035mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.013mg/kg, p,p,DDT 0.012mg/kg
Eel (sample no. 17)
Dieldrin 0.071mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.056mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.013mg/kg
Eel (sample no. 18)
Heptachlor Epoxide 0.022mg/kg, Dieldrin 0.075mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.08mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.031mg/kg, Endrin 0.012mg/kg

2006 April/May: Pesticides in Fish etc Maribyrnong River (Armourments). Pesticides: Dieldrin, p,p,DDD, p,p,DDE, p,p,DDT, Endrin

Technical Report
 
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
 
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
 
 
p34 Eel (sample no.7):
 
Dieldrin 0.059mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.05mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.011mg/kg, p,p,DDT 0.01mg/kg, Endrin 0.01mg/kg
 
Technical Report
Yarra and Maribyrnong estuaries: Investigation of contaminants in fish
EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA
Publication 1094 January 2007
ISBN 0 7306 7659 5 © EPA Victoria 2007
p34 Eel (sample no.7):
Dieldrin 0.059mg/kg, p,p,DDD 0.05mg/kg, p,p,DDE 0.011mg/kg, p,p,DDT 0.01mg/kg, Endrin 0.01mg/kg

2014/15: Shoalhaven System. Pesticide: Triclopyr

Shoalhaven System: Triclopyr (0.1ug/L max, 0.04ug/L med) site HW11

https://www.waternsw.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/70829/WaterNSW-Annual-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-2014-15-Appendices.pdf

Shoalhaven System: Triclopyr (0.1ug/L max, 0.04ug/L med) site HW11

https://www.waternsw.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/70829/WaterNSW-Annual-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-2014-15-Appendices.pdf

2015/16: Upper Nepean System (Site HNED+Site HMAC1 80-125). Pesticide: 2,4-D, Atrazine

Upper Nepean System Site: HNED

2,4-D: 0.01ug/L

Source: https://www.waternsw.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/123949/Annual-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-Appendices.pdf

Upper Nepean System Site: HMAC1 80-125

2014/15: Atrazine: 0.007ug/L

https://www.waternsw.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/70829/WaterNSW-Annual-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-2014-15-Appendices.pdf

Upper Nepean System Site: HNED

2015/16: 2,4-D: 0.01ug/L

Source: https://www.waternsw.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/123949/Annual-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-Appendices.pdf

Upper Nepean System Site: HMAC1 80-125

2014/15: Atrazine: 0.007ug/L

https://www.waternsw.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/70829/WaterNSW-Annual-Water-Quality-Monitoring-Report-2014-15-Appendices.pdf

 

2002 November: Central Gippsland Drain. Pesticide: DEET

Evaluating and controlling pharmaceutical emissions from dairy farms: a critical first step in developing a preventative management approach Peter M.J. Fisher,*, Ross Scott.

Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (2008) 1437 - 1446

Location B: Central Gippsland Drain No.6 Sale-Heyfield Rd DEET 50.8ng/L (0.0508ug/L)

Evaluating and controlling pharmaceutical emissions from dairy farms: a critical first step in developing a preventative management approach Peter M.J. Fisher,*, Ross Scott.

Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (2008) 1437 – 1446

Location B: Central Gippsland Drain No.6 Sale-Heyfield Rd DEET 50.8ng/L (0.0508ug/L)

2002 November: Newry Creek. Pesticide: DEET

Evaluating and controlling pharmaceutical emissions from dairy farms: a critical first step in developing a preventative management approach Peter M.J. Fisher,*, Ross Scott.

Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (2008) 1437 - 1446

Location B: Newry Creek in Newry DEET 20ng/L (0.02ug/L)

Evaluating and controlling pharmaceutical emissions from dairy farms: a critical first step in developing a preventative management approach Peter M.J. Fisher,*, Ross Scott.

Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (2008) 1437 – 1446

Location B: Newry Creek in Newry DEET 20ng/L (0.02ug/L)

2002 November: Snowy River, near Orbost. Pesticide: DEET

Evaluating and controlling pharmaceutical emissions from dairy farms: a critical first step in developing a preventative management approach Peter M.J. Fisher,*, Ross Scott.

Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (2008) 1437 - 1446

Location A: Snowy River in egress drain, very close to Orbost DEET 69ng/L (0.069ug/L)

Evaluating and controlling pharmaceutical emissions from dairy farms: a critical first step in developing a preventative management approach Peter M.J. Fisher,*, Ross Scott.

Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (2008) 1437 – 1446

Location A: Snowy River in egress drain, very close to Orbost DEET 69ng/L (0.069ug/L)

2016 November: Barnaby Joyce says new ANZECC Guidelines will be published in 2017

2 9 NOV 2016 (Letter forwarded from Friends of the Earth)

Dear ***
Thank you for your email of 24 October 2016 to the Hon. Josh Frydenberg MP, Minister for
the Environment and Energy, about the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and
Marine Water Quality (the Guidelines) and their review. Your email was forwarded to me as I
am the minister responsible for the matters you raised.
I am advised the Guidelines are being reviewed by the Australian, New Zealand and
Australian State and Territory governments. A revised version is expected to be released in
2017. A major component of the review is the development of new default guideline values
which determine the conservative levels at which chemicals can be used safely to maintain the
ecological health of various aquatic environments. Default guideline values are included for
simazine and glyphosate in both fresh and marine waters, and for atrazine in fresh water.
Pesticides such as diuron and imidacloprid have also been assigned default guideline values.

It is important to note that the Guidelines are not mandatory and while most states and
territories use them to inform their policies on chemical product regulation, they are not
required to do so. Each state and territory is responsible for communicating how they will
apply the revised Guidelines prior to release. I encourage you to contact your relevant state
authority regarding this information.
Responsibility for the regulation of agricultural chemical products is shared between the
Australian and state and territory governments. The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary
Medicines Authority (APVMA) is the independent national regulator for all agricultural
chemical products up to and including the point of sale. It conducts thorough scientific
assessments and chemical reviews, of the potential risks chemical products pose to human
health, the environment and trade.
APVMA’s processes also allow it to respond to new research findings and challenges. For
example, following a review of diuron approvals in 2012, the APVMA cancelled the
registration of some products and amended permitted use patterns for others to reduce risks
related to runoff. I refer you to the APVMA website if you would like to access further
information on its chemical reviews (apvma.gov.au/node/10916).

State and territory governments are responsible for the control of use of agricultural chemical
products. It is their responsibility to ensure that users comply with the APVMA-approved
product instructions, and to take action against breaches of agvet chemical regulations. If you
are aware of agvet chemicals being misused, I encourage you to contact the relevant state
authority.

Thank you for bringing your concerns to the government’s attention. I trust this information is
of assistance.

Yours sincerely
Barnaby Joyce MP

1996: Armstrong Creek Reefton Vic. Pesticides: Total BHC, Lindane, Heptachlor, Heptachlor Epoxide, Dieldrin

UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data 1996

Downstream Armstrong Creek Reefton Vic

Pesticides

Total BHC 0.005mg/kg, Lindane 0.005mg/kg, Heptachlor 0.007mg/kg, Heptachlor Epoxide 0.02mg/kg, Dieldrin 0.01mg/kg

UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data 1996

Downstream Armstrong Creek Reefton Vic

Pesticides

Total BHC 0.005mg/kg, Lindane 0.005mg/kg, Heptachlor 0.007mg/kg, Heptachlor Epoxide 0.02mg/kg, Dieldrin 0.01mg/kg

1996: Merri Creek Roseneath Street. Pesticide: Total BHC, Heptachlor, Chlorpyrifos, Total Chlordane, Dieldrin, o,p-DDT

UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data 1996

Merri Creek Roseneath Street Vic

Pesticides

Total BHC 0.005mg/kg, Heptachlor 0.007mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.01mg/kg, Total Chlordane 0.013mg/kg, Dieldrin 0.005mg/kg

UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data 1996

Merri Creek Roseneath Street Vic

Pesticides

Total BHC 0.005mg/kg, Heptachlor 0.007mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.01mg/kg, Total Chlordane 0.013mg/kg, Dieldrin 0.005mg/kg

1996: Ennimor Crescent Drain, Park Orchards Vic. Pesticides: BHC, Chlorpyrifos, Chlordane, o,p,DDE

UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data 1996

Ennismor Drain Park Orchards Vic

Pesticides

Total BHC 0.008mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.011mg/kg, Total Chlordane 0.006mg/kg, o,p,DDE 0.008mg/kg

UWRAA Sediment Chemistry Data 1996

Ennismor Drain Park Orchards Vic

Pesticides

Total BHC 0.008mg/kg, Chlorpyrifos 0.011mg/kg, Total Chlordane 0.006mg/kg, o,p,DDE 0.008mg/kg

2017 March: Chemical Crop Contamination – Peak Body Ausveg Silent: Propachlor, Prometryn, Metolachlor, Atrazine

Chemical crop contamination: Peak body AusVeg silent

VEGETABLE growers who have lost millions of dollars after using contaminated herbicides have been left without a voice, with the peak industry body, AusVeg, not prepared to comment on the recalls.

A combined 200,000 litres of Ramrod Flowable, Gesagard and Primextra Gold were recalled by agrochemical companies Nufarm, Crop Care and Syngenta on December 8, 2016 and January 20, 2017.

Ramrod Flowable is used on onions, broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbages, cauliflower, beetroot and grain crops maize, sorghum and sweet corn.

Gesagard is used on carrots, celery, leeks, potatoes, chickpeas, peas, cotton and perennial grass and ryegrass seed crops while Primextra Gold is used on maize, sorghum and sweet corn.

The Weekly Times questioned AusVeg about the recalled herbicides and asked if Nufarm, Crop Care and Syngenta had done enough to inform farmers about the contamination, given the herbicides had caused severe crop losses and soil contamination.

But AusVeg would not comment.

EDITORIAL: COVER-UP DAMAGES OUR IMAGE

AusVeg, which receives levies from Australian vegetable growers to advocate on their behalf, is in a “strategic partnership” with Nufarm and Syngenta.

The AusVeg website says AusVeg is “proud” to partner with Nufarm to “help Australian farmers grow a better tomorrow” and AusVeg’s partnership with Syngenta will have “many positive benefits for growers”.

A Nufarm and Crop Care spokesman said AusVeg and Horticulture Innovation Australia had been informed about the recalled Ramrod, and an AusVeg spokesman confirmed the peak body was aware of the recall and sent two emails to growers informing them about the contamination.

READ MORE: CHEMICALS MAY POSE SERIOUS RISK TO PLANTS

The Weekly Times was unable to find any vegetable growers who had received these emails from AusVeg.

Despite knowing about the recall, AusVeg has not published any information about it on its website nor any media releases with the details.

Horticulture Innovation Australia published a short not­ice about the recall on its website, but did not publish any media releases about the recall.

Horticulture Innovation Australia’s annual national conference, which is run in conjunction with AusVeg, has featured Syngenta as its leading sponsor for the past eight years.

2017 March + 2017 May: Chemical Contamination: Tainted Herbicide Shock. Pesticides: Propachlor, Prometryn, Metolachlor, Atrazine

Chemical crop contamination: Tainted herbicide shock

EXCLUSIVE: HUNDREDS of farmers across Australia have unwittingly contaminated their crops with tainted herbicides.

The Weekly Times can reveal 200,000 litres of contaminated herbicides had been in supply stores for up to two years, with little effort made by agrochemical companies to inform farmers about the tainted products.

The Weekly Times understands the herbicides were contaminated at manufacturer Accensi’s Brisbane plant, when equipment was allegedly not properly cleaned and a cocktail of chemicals contaminated the product.

Investigations reveal major agrochemical companies Nufarm, Crop Care — which is owned by Nufarm — and Syngenta recalled the contaminated herbicides on December 8, 2016 and January 20 this year, but chose not to publicise the recalls.

The three companies did not advertise the recalls in media outlets or publish media releases about the recalls, which are all recommendations in recall guidelines of the Federal Government’s chemical watchdog, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority.

The Weekly Times can reveal the APVMA also made little or no effort to inform farmers about the recall.

The AVPMA chose not to publish the recalls on its website and did not make contact with farmers, despite knowing the companies had recalled the tainted herbicide. Instead, suppliers and distributors were left with the responsibility of informing growers.

READ MORE: VEGETATIVE STATE ON RECALL

Farmers who bought the herbicides told The Weekly Times they had not been contacted and had been using them months after recalls were made.

There are fears farmers are still spraying the contaminated herbicides — Ramrod Flowable (Propachlor), Gesagard (Prometryn) and Primextra Gold (Metolachlor/Atrazine) — which are used to control weeds on vegetable and grain crops, pasture and perennial grasses.

 

With many farmers unaware of the problem, residual testing cannot take place, meaning the contamination’s impact on produce and consumers is unknown.

But The Weekly Times can reveal the contaminated herbicides have costs farmers millions of dollars in crop losses and soil damage and at least five farmers are taking legal action against the chemical companies.

Farmers who have been using the contaminated herbicides but did not want to be named, said it was the worst thing to happen to their businesses. They said they had spent months, and in some cases years, trying to figure out why their crops were dying or not performing.

“A contaminated herbicide is the very last thing I would think of,” one farmer said.

“Every crop we had applied it on, crop after crop, has been affected and in many cases we lost 100 per cent of crops.

“It has caused us so much pain and stress … we are farmers, you know, and don’t deserve this.”

Shepparton agricultural consultant David Bell has been working with some growers to assess the herbicide contamination’s damage to crops and the residual effect on future crops, and to calculate financial losses.

EDITORIAL: COVER-UP DAMAGES OUR IMAGE

Documents seen by The Weekly Times show Nufarm and Crop Care recalled 120,000 litres of Ramrod Flowable herbicide on December 8, 2016, while Syngenta recalled 40,000 litres of Gesagard herbicide and 40,000 litres of Primextra Gold herbicide on January 20, 2017.

Twelve batches of Ramrod Flowable were contaminated, with the first contaminated batch manufactured in February 2015, while four batches of Gesagard were contaminated, with the first contaminated batch manufactured in March 2016.

Primextra Gold was contaminated in four batches, with the first contaminated batch manufactured in August 2015.

The three contaminated herbicides were in supply stores for three to 24 months.

An agronomist who has seen the damage caused by the contaminated herbicides, but did not want to be named, said he couldn’t understand why Nufarm, Crop Care and Syngenta hadn’t done more to contact farmers about the recalls.

“It seems like they’ve tried to cover it up in a bid to avoid compensation … it’s just not right,” he said.

“Farmers don’t have time to be checking the internet for this kind of information, it needs to be communicated in public formats, and phone calls from the companies should be made.”

A Syngenta spokeswoman said contaminated batches of Gesagard and Primextra Gold were voluntarily withdrawn and therefore did not require media advertising. “Given the extremely low levels of contaminants, in consultation with the APVMA, it was decided the most appropriate course of action was to voluntarily withdraw identified batches through distributors,” the spokeswoman said.

“Syngenta has worked closely with the APVMA, distributors, growers and other parties to promptly work towards finding a solution to any issue that has arisen.”

A Nufarm and Crop Care spokesman said the companies became aware of low-level contamination in its Ramrod herbicide in November 2016 after conducting testing.

 

He said the companies worked with rural merchandise stores to remove affected product and identify farmers that had used the product.

“Crop Care worked with AUSVEG and Horticulture Innovation Australia to directly inform growers of the issue,” the spokesman said.

“A web page was created on the Crop Care website.”

READ MORE: CHEMICALS MAY POSE SERIOUS RISK TO PLANTS

The spokesman was confident all farmers were aware of the recall and said the company had not received any new reports of crop damage since January but confirmed an independent loss adjuster had been appointed to manage compensation cases.

The agrochemical companies would not answer questions about the manufacturer, Accensi, and would not say if they continue to have herbicides manufactured at the Brisbane plant. Accensi did not return calls for comment.

The APVMA, despite being the regulatory body, handballed most questions about the recalls to the agrochemical companies. A spokeswoman said the APVMA does not publish details of voluntary recalls on its website and had not made contact with farmers about the recalls, because it was not its role.

Charles Hart of Shepparton lawyers Dawes and Vary Riordan said if a farmer suffered a loss as a result of crop damage caused by contaminated herbicide then, generally speaking, the farmer will be entitled to recover any financial damages.

“Determining the quantum of any damage can be complex and farmers should seek advice,” a firm spokesman said.

A MAJOR herbicide recall is under way, sparking concerns Australia’s clean and green vegetable industry could be in jeopardy. 

The Weekly Times can reveal agrochemical giant Syngenta is recalling 60,000 litres of Gesagard, one of the most common herbicides sprayed on Australian vegetables — including carrots, celery, leaks and peas — to control weeds.

This comes just months after Syngenta recalled 80,000 litres of contaminated herbicides and assured farmers the contamination was an “isolated incident”, and that further herbicides, including Gesagard, had been “rigorously” tested and met “stringent quality standards”.

Documents seen by The Weekly Times show the 60,000 litres of Gesagard were allegedly contaminated during the manufacturing process at Accensi in Brisbane and contained chemicals such as atrazine.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority website says atrazine is “toxic to many vegetables”.

The tainted Gesagard has been on retail shelves and unwittingly sprayed by Australian farmers for up to 3½ years.

The Weekly Times can also reveal Syngenta continued to sell batches of Gesagard despite knowing they were contaminated.

RELATED COVERAGE: WRONGED GROWERS HIT HARD

Documents seen by The Weekly Times show that on April 24 Syngenta received test results from Agrisolutions, an independent chemical testing company, that found at least 10,000 litres of Gesagard were contaminated.

But on May 8, Syngenta told The Weekly Times Gesagard batches that had been tested were not contaminated.

On the same day The Weekly Times questioned the APVMA about the Gesagard contamination, but the government chemical regulator would not comment.

The Weekly Times informed Syngenta last Friday it intended to publish a story about the contamination. Only then did Syngenta confirm 60,000 litres of Gesagard was contaminated. A Syngenta spokeswoman said the Gesagard had been “recently” recalled, but would not provide the exact date.

The spokeswoman said the recall had been communicated to Syngenta’s customers but a major outlet said it was not aware of the recall.

One retailer, who did not want to be named, said Syngenta told him a month ago Gesagard was not contaminated.

Neither APVMA nor Syngenta’s websites contain any information about the Gesagard recall. Gesagard is sold in 20-litre drums and was still for sale in a retail store in Victoria on Saturday.

This is the second major herbicide contamination recall in Australia this year.

Chemical crop contamination: Tainted herbicide shock

EXCLUSIVE: HUNDREDS of farmers across Australia have unwittingly contaminated their crops with tainted herbicides.

The Weekly Times can reveal 200,000 litres of contaminated herbicides had been in supply stores for up to two years, with little effort made by agrochemical companies to inform farmers about the tainted products.

The Weekly Times understands the herbicides were contaminated at manufacturer Accensi’s Brisbane plant, when equipment was allegedly not properly cleaned and a cocktail of chemicals contaminated the product.

Investigations reveal major agrochemical companies Nufarm, Crop Care — which is owned by Nufarm — and Syngenta recalled the contaminated herbicides on December 8, 2016 and January 20 this year, but chose not to publicise the recalls.

The three companies did not advertise the recalls in media outlets or publish media releases about the recalls, which are all recommendations in recall guidelines of the Federal Government’s chemical watchdog, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority.

The Weekly Times can reveal the APVMA also made little or no effort to inform farmers about the recall.

The AVPMA chose not to publish the recalls on its website and did not make contact with farmers, despite knowing the companies had recalled the tainted herbicide. Instead, suppliers and distributors were left with the responsibility of informing growers.

READ MORE: VEGETATIVE STATE ON RECALL

Farmers who bought the herbicides told The Weekly Times they had not been contacted and had been using them months after recalls were made.

There are fears farmers are still spraying the contaminated herbicides — Ramrod Flowable (Propachlor), Gesagard (Prometryn) and Primextra Gold (Metolachlor/Atrazine) — which are used to control weeds on vegetable and grain crops, pasture and perennial grasses.

With many farmers unaware of the problem, residual testing cannot take place, meaning the contamination’s impact on produce and consumers is unknown.

But The Weekly Times can reveal the contaminated herbicides have costs farmers millions of dollars in crop losses and soil damage and at least five farmers are taking legal action against the chemical companies.

Farmers who have been using the contaminated herbicides but did not want to be named, said it was the worst thing to happen to their businesses. They said they had spent months, and in some cases years, trying to figure out why their crops were dying or not performing.

“A contaminated herbicide is the very last thing I would think of,” one farmer said.

“Every crop we had applied it on, crop after crop, has been affected and in many cases we lost 100 per cent of crops.

“It has caused us so much pain and stress … we are farmers, you know, and don’t deserve this.”

Shepparton agricultural consultant David Bell has been working with some growers to assess the herbicide contamination’s damage to crops and the residual effect on future crops, and to calculate financial losses.

EDITORIAL: COVER-UP DAMAGES OUR IMAGE

Documents seen by The Weekly Times show Nufarm and Crop Care recalled 120,000 litres of Ramrod Flowable herbicide on December 8, 2016, while Syngenta recalled 40,000 litres of Gesagard herbicide and 40,000 litres of Primextra Gold herbicide on January 20, 2017.

Twelve batches of Ramrod Flowable were contaminated, with the first contaminated batch manufactured in February 2015, while four batches of Gesagard were contaminated, with the first contaminated batch manufactured in March 2016.

Primextra Gold was contaminated in four batches, with the first contaminated batch manufactured in August 2015.

The three contaminated herbicides were in supply stores for three to 24 months.

An agronomist who has seen the damage caused by the contaminated herbicides, but did not want to be named, said he couldn’t understand why Nufarm, Crop Care and Syngenta hadn’t done more to contact farmers about the recalls.

“It seems like they’ve tried to cover it up in a bid to avoid compensation … it’s just not right,” he said.

“Farmers don’t have time to be checking the internet for this kind of information, it needs to be communicated in public formats, and phone calls from the companies should be made.”

A Syngenta spokeswoman said contaminated batches of Gesagard and Primextra Gold were voluntarily withdrawn and therefore did not require media advertising. “Given the extremely low levels of contaminants, in consultation with the APVMA, it was decided the most appropriate course of action was to voluntarily withdraw identified batches through distributors,” the spokeswoman said.

“Syngenta has worked closely with the APVMA, distributors, growers and other parties to promptly work towards finding a solution to any issue that has arisen.”

A Nufarm and Crop Care spokesman said the companies became aware of low-level contamination in its Ramrod herbicide in November 2016 after conducting testing.

He said the companies worked with rural merchandise stores to remove affected product and identify farmers that had used the product.

“Crop Care worked with AUSVEG and Horticulture Innovation Australia to directly inform growers of the issue,” the spokesman said.

“A web page was created on the Crop Care website.”

READ MORE: CHEMICALS MAY POSE SERIOUS RISK TO PLANTS

The spokesman was confident all farmers were aware of the recall and said the company had not received any new reports of crop damage since January but confirmed an independent loss adjuster had been appointed to manage compensation cases.

The agrochemical companies would not answer questions about the manufacturer, Accensi, and would not say if they continue to have herbicides manufactured at the Brisbane plant. Accensi did not return calls for comment.

The APVMA, despite being the regulatory body, handballed most questions about the recalls to the agrochemical companies. A spokeswoman said the APVMA does not publish details of voluntary recalls on its website and had not made contact with farmers about the recalls, because it was not its role.

Charles Hart of Shepparton lawyers Dawes and Vary Riordan said if a farmer suffered a loss as a result of crop damage caused by contaminated herbicide then, generally speaking, the farmer will be entitled to recover any financial damages.

“Determining the quantum of any damage can be complex and farmers should seek advice,” a firm spokesman said.

A MAJOR herbicide recall is under way, sparking concerns Australia’s clean and green vegetable industry could be in jeopardy.

The Weekly Times can reveal agrochemical giant Syngenta is recalling 60,000 litres of Gesagard, one of the most common herbicides sprayed on Australian vegetables — including carrots, celery, leaks and peas — to control weeds.

This comes just months after Syngenta recalled 80,000 litres of contaminated herbicides and assured farmers the contamination was an “isolated incident”, and that further herbicides, including Gesagard, had been “rigorously” tested and met “stringent quality standards”.

Documents seen by The Weekly Times show the 60,000 litres of Gesagard were allegedly contaminated during the manufacturing process at Accensi in Brisbane and contained chemicals such as atrazine.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority website says atrazine is “toxic to many vegetables”.

The tainted Gesagard has been on retail shelves and unwittingly sprayed by Australian farmers for up to 3½ years.

The Weekly Times can also reveal Syngenta continued to sell batches of Gesagard despite knowing they were contaminated.

RELATED COVERAGE: WRONGED GROWERS HIT HARD

Documents seen by The Weekly Times show that on April 24 Syngenta received test results from Agrisolutions, an independent chemical testing company, that found at least 10,000 litres of Gesagard were contaminated.

But on May 8, Syngenta told The Weekly Times Gesagard batches that had been tested were not contaminated.

On the same day The Weekly Times questioned the APVMA about the Gesagard contamination, but the government chemical regulator would not comment.

The Weekly Times informed Syngenta last Friday it intended to publish a story about the contamination. Only then did Syngenta confirm 60,000 litres of Gesagard was contaminated. A Syngenta spokeswoman said the Gesagard had been “recently” recalled, but would not provide the exact date.

The spokeswoman said the recall had been communicated to Syngenta’s customers but a major outlet said it was not aware of the recall.

One retailer, who did not want to be named, said Syngenta told him a month ago Gesagard was not contaminated.

Neither APVMA nor Syngenta’s websites contain any information about the Gesagard recall. Gesagard is sold in 20-litre drums and was still for sale in a retail store in Victoria on Saturday.

This is the second major herbicide contamination recall in Australia this year.

2016 December: Spray Drift causes Widespread Damage to CSIRO cotton plots. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Severe spray drift damage serves as a warning to prevent off-target spray drift

Media release: 23 December 2016

Local farmers have been warned to be vigilant of off-target spray drift, following widespread damage to CSIRO experimental cotton plots at the Australian Cotton Research Institute (ACRI) near Narrabri.

CSIRO Lead Cotton Breeder Dr Warwick Stiller, who leads the breeding program, reported severe damage to all of CSIRO’s experimental conventional cotton plots in November after a Group M herbicide drifted from its intended target.

The damage to the crop is so severe, it will impact the industry’s cotton breeding program.

“These plots underpin the Australian cotton industry’s entire breeding program and pipeline for the release of future varieties. The impact on these plants is so severe that I am not confident we will see these experiments through to the end of the season,” Dr Stiller says.

“I have been part of the CSIRO cotton breeding team for more than 20 years, and this is the worst spray drift damage I have witnessed on site. CSIRO’s conventional cotton breeding lines do not contain resistance genes for glyphosate, which makes our plots susceptible to damage.”

The NSW Environment Protection Authority’s (EPA) Adam Gilligan, Regional Director North, says spray drift often travels a considerable distance because of changes in wind strength or direction.

“Our message to all users is a simple one – read product labels carefully, monitor local weather conditions and tell your neighbours ahead of time if you are spraying,” Mr Gilligan says.

“If you are impacted, report it to the EPA’s 24/7 Environment Line on 131 555.”

“Herbicides and pesticides are important in agricultural operations, but it is vital these products are handled and used with care.”

Cotton Australia Regional Manager Paul Sloman says all farmers, regardless of what chemical is applied, are encouraged to use best practice guides and tools to prevent damage to nearby farms.

"Unfortunately, this event serves as a timely reminder about the potential dangers of spraying,” Mr Sloman says.

Severe spray drift damage serves as a warning to prevent off-target spray drift

Media release: 23 December 2016

Local farmers have been warned to be vigilant of off-target spray drift, following widespread damage to CSIRO experimental cotton plots at the Australian Cotton Research Institute (ACRI) near Narrabri.

CSIRO Lead Cotton Breeder Dr Warwick Stiller, who leads the breeding program, reported severe damage to all of CSIRO’s experimental conventional cotton plots in November after a Group M herbicide drifted from its intended target.

The damage to the crop is so severe, it will impact the industry’s cotton breeding program.

“These plots underpin the Australian cotton industry’s entire breeding program and pipeline for the release of future varieties. The impact on these plants is so severe that I am not confident we will see these experiments through to the end of the season,” Dr Stiller says.

“I have been part of the CSIRO cotton breeding team for more than 20 years, and this is the worst spray drift damage I have witnessed on site. CSIRO’s conventional cotton breeding lines do not contain resistance genes for glyphosate, which makes our plots susceptible to damage.”

The NSW Environment Protection Authority’s (EPA) Adam Gilligan, Regional Director North, says spray drift often travels a considerable distance because of changes in wind strength or direction.

“Our message to all users is a simple one – read product labels carefully, monitor local weather conditions and tell your neighbours ahead of time if you are spraying,” Mr Gilligan says.

“If you are impacted, report it to the EPA’s 24/7 Environment Line on 131 555.”

“Herbicides and pesticides are important in agricultural operations, but it is vital these products are handled and used with care.”

Cotton Australia Regional Manager Paul Sloman says all farmers, regardless of what chemical is applied, are encouraged to use best practice guides and tools to prevent damage to nearby farms.

“Unfortunately, this event serves as a timely reminder about the potential dangers of spraying,” Mr Sloman says.

1960’s: Warriewood Valley (NSW). Death Valley/Poisoned Paddocks. Pesticides: DDT, Dieldrin

By the 1960s, however, the glasshouses began to disappear because of the loss of traditional markets and competition from growers in Queensland, along with increasing residential development.

At the same time, the “glass city” and “crystal valley” monikers came to be replaced by more unpleasant ones, including “death valley” and “poisoned paddocks” as growers became aware of the deadly effects of the chemicals including DDT and dieldrin that had been used in the valley for years.

There were claims that between 10 and 20 growers had died as the result of chemical poisoning, although the Health Department denied there had been any increase in deaths related to the use of chemicals in the valley.

The valley was also known for its numerous stables and a riding school called Boots and Saddles but today there are thought to be no more than 15 horses left in the area.

Today the rural atmosphere of Warriewood and some of the most fertile soil on the peninsula has largely disappeared under the concrete and bitumen of suburban development.

Source: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/manly-daily/valleys-rich-soil-once-made-it-the-beaches-market-garden-mecca/news-story/6447560c11efa5c69060bcd608325378

By the 1960s, however, the glasshouses began to disappear because of the loss of traditional markets and competition from growers in Queensland, along with increasing residential development.

At the same time, the “glass city” and “crystal valley” monikers came to be replaced by more unpleasant ones, including “death valley” and “poisoned paddocks” as growers became aware of the deadly effects of the chemicals including DDT and dieldrin that had been used in the valley for years.

There were claims that between 10 and 20 growers had died as the result of chemical poisoning, although the Health Department denied there had been any increase in deaths related to the use of chemicals in the valley.

The valley was also known for its numerous stables and a riding school called Boots and Saddles but today there are thought to be no more than 15 horses left in the area.

Today the rural atmosphere of Warriewood and some of the most fertile soil on the peninsula has largely disappeared under the concrete and bitumen of suburban development.

Source: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/manly-daily/valleys-rich-soil-once-made-it-the-beaches-market-garden-mecca/news-story/6447560c11efa5c69060bcd608325378

2012-2016: Walkers Saddle Yackandandah. Pesticides: Hexazinone, Triclopyr

DateLocationPesticideValue µg/L
7/11/2012Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.02
4/06/2013Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.03
30/07/2013Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.02
21/01/2014Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.04
29/07/2014Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.02
28/01/2015Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.04
29/07/2015Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.03
26/01/2016Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahHexazinone0.04
29/07/2014Walker's Saddle Basin at outlet - YackandandahTriclopyr0.02
Date Location Pesticide Value µg/L
7/11/2012 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.02
4/06/2013 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.03
30/07/2013 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.02
21/01/2014 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.04
29/07/2014 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.02
28/01/2015 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.04
29/07/2015 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.03
26/01/2016 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Hexazinone 0.04
29/07/2014 Walker’s Saddle Basin at outlet – Yackandandah Triclopyr 0.02

2012-2013: Nariel Creek Corryong. Pesticides: Diazinon, MCPA, Triclopyr

DateLocationPesticideValue µg/L
12/11/2012Nariel Creek tap at pump station CorryongDiazinon0.01
24/09/2012Nariel Creek tap at pump station CorryongMCPA0.01
11/06/2013Nariel Creek tap at pump station CorryongTriclopyr0.02
Date Location Pesticide Value µg/L
12/11/2012 Nariel Creek tap at pump station Corryong Diazinon 0.01
24/09/2012 Nariel Creek tap at pump station Corryong MCPA 0.01
11/06/2013 Nariel Creek tap at pump station Corryong Triclopyr 0.02

2010-2016: Thorpdale (Vic). Pesticides: Triclopyr

DateLocationPesticideValue µg/L
12/05/2010ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.01
15/03/2011ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.01
8/11/2011Thorpdale2,4-D0.05
8/11/2011Thorpdale4CPA0.03
8/11/2011ThorpdaleDicamba0.11
8/11/2011ThorpdaleMCPA0.42
8/11/2011ThorpdaleMecoprop0.04
8/11/2011ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.04
21/02/2012ThorpdalePicloram0.14
21/02/2012ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.25
8/05/2012ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.01
15/11/2012ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.02
11/02/2016ThorpdaleTriclopyr0.02
Date Location Pesticide Value µg/L
12/05/2010 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.01
15/03/2011 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.01
8/11/2011 Thorpdale 2,4-D 0.05
8/11/2011 Thorpdale 4CPA 0.03
8/11/2011 Thorpdale Dicamba 0.11
8/11/2011 Thorpdale MCPA 0.42
8/11/2011 Thorpdale Mecoprop 0.04
8/11/2011 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.04
21/02/2012 Thorpdale Picloram 0.14
21/02/2012 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.25
8/05/2012 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.01
15/11/2012 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.02
11/02/2016 Thorpdale Triclopyr 0.02

2009-2016: Seaspray: Pesticides: Dinoseb, Triclopyr, Picloram

DateLocationPesticideValue µg/L
12/11/2009SeasprayDinoseb1
9/11/2010SeasprayDinoseb1
28/02/2012SeasprayTriclopyr0.09
8/05/2012SeasprayTriclopyr0.08
15/11/2012SeasprayPicloram0.51
15/11/2012SeasprayTriclopyr1.5
10/05/2016SeasprayTriclopyr0.02
Date Location Pesticide Value µg/L
12/11/2009 Seaspray Dinoseb 1
9/11/2010 Seaspray Dinoseb 1
28/02/2012 Seaspray Triclopyr 0.09
8/05/2012 Seaspray Triclopyr 0.08
15/11/2012 Seaspray Picloram 0.51
15/11/2012 Seaspray Triclopyr 1.5
10/05/2016 Seaspray Triclopyr 0.02

2009-2016: Moe. Pesticides: Dinoseb, Triclopyr, MCPA, 2,4-D, Mecoprop

DateLocationPesticideValue µg/L
11/11/2009MoeDinoseb1
12/05/2010MoeTriclopyr0.01
11/11/2010MoeDinoseb1
10/02/2011MoeMCPA0.11
10/02/2011MoeTriclopyr0.03
10/02/2011Moe2,4-D0.01
10/02/2011MoeTriclopyr0.02
15/02/2012MoeTriclopyr0.05
12/11/2012Moe2,4-D0.06
10/02/2016MoeTriclopyr0.22
10/02/2016MoeMCPA0.39
10/02/2016MoeMecoprop0.02
10/02/2016MoeTriclopyr0.01
12/05/2016MoeTriclopyr0.12
Date Location Pesticide Value µg/L
11/11/2009 Moe Dinoseb 1
12/05/2010 Moe Triclopyr 0.01
11/11/2010 Moe Dinoseb 1
10/02/2011 Moe MCPA 0.11
10/02/2011 Moe Triclopyr 0.03
10/02/2011 Moe 2,4-D 0.01
10/02/2011 Moe Triclopyr 0.02
15/02/2012 Moe Triclopyr 0.05
12/11/2012 Moe 2,4-D 0.06
10/02/2016 Moe Triclopyr 0.22
10/02/2016 Moe MCPA 0.39
10/02/2016 Moe Mecoprop 0.02
10/02/2016 Moe Triclopyr 0.01
12/05/2016 Moe Triclopyr 0.12

2011-2016: Maffra. Pesticide: Triclopyr

DateLocationPesticideValue µg/L
22/02/2011MaffraTriclopyr0.02
1/03/2012MaffraTriclopyr0.06
9/02/2016MaffraTriclopyr0.21
10/05/2016MaffraTriclopyr0.01

 

Date Location Pesticide Value µg/L
22/02/2011 Maffra Triclopyr 0.02
1/03/2012 Maffra Triclopyr 0.06
9/02/2016 Maffra Triclopyr 0.21
10/05/2016 Maffra Triclopyr 0.01

2015: Roper River (NT) Mt McMinn Station. Pesticides: Diuron, Tebuthiuron

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 6 Roper River Mt McMinn Station

TDCPP Isomers: 0.71ng/L (flame retardant used in plastic foams)

Diuron: 0.07ng/L

Tebuthiuron 0.12ng/L

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 6 Roper River Mt McMinn Station

TDCPP Isomers: 0.71ng/L (flame retardant used in plastic foams)

Diuron: 0.07ng/L

Tebuthiuron 0.12ng/L

2015: Roper River (NT). Pesticides: DEET, Tebuthiuron

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 5 Roper River

DEET: 20ng/L

Tonalid: 0.02ng/L (musk fragrance)

TDCPP Isomers: 3ng/L (flame retardant used in plastic foams)

Tebuthiuron 0.12ng/L

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 5 Roper River

DEET: 20ng/L

Tonalid: 0.02ng/L (musk fragrance)

TDCPP Isomers: 3ng/L (flame retardant used in plastic foams)

Tebuthiuron 0.12ng/L

 

2015: Fig Tree Springs (NT). Pesticide: Simazine

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 3 Fig Tree Springs

Tonalid: 0.02ng/L (musk fragrance)

Simazine: 0.01ng/L

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 3 Fig Tree Springs

Tonalid: 0.02ng/L (musk fragrance)

Simazine: 0.01ng/L

 

2015: Rainbow Springs (NT). Pesticides: DEET, Diuron, Tebuthiuron.

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 2 Rainbow Springs

DEET: 8.7ng/L

Tonalid: 0.02ng/L (musk fragrance)

Diuron: 0.06ng/L

Tebuthiuron 0.02ng/L

Carbamazepine: 0.01ng/L (anti-convulsant drug)

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 2 Rainbow Springs

DEET: 8.7ng/L

Tonalid: 0.02ng/L (musk fragrance)

Diuron: 0.06ng/L

Tebuthiuron 0.02ng/L

Carbamazepine: 0.01ng/L (anti-convulsant drug)

2015 Bitter Springs (NT). Pesticides: DEET, Piperonyl Butoxide, Imidacloprid, Tebuthiuron

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 1 Bitter Springs

DEET: 110ng/L

Galoxolide: 0.39ng/L (musk fragrance)

Tonalid: 0.07ng/L (musk fragrance)

Piperonyl Butoxide: 2.4ng/L

Imidacloprid: 0.04ng/L

Tebuthiuron 0.22ng/L

Carbamazepine: 0.02ng/L (anti-convulsant drug)

Schult, J. 2016. Pesticide and nutrient monitoring in the Roper River region during the 2015 dry season. Northern Territory Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Report No. 20/2016D. Palmerston. (passive samplers)

Site 1 Bitter Springs

DEET: 110ng/L

Galoxolide: 0.39ng/L (musk fragrance)

Tonalid: 0.07ng/L (musk fragrance)

Piperonyl Butoxide: 2.4ng/L

Imidacloprid: 0.04ng/L

Tebuthiuron 0.22ng/L

Carbamazepine: 0.02ng/L (anti-convulsant drug)

2014 May – October: Palm Creek (NT) Groundwater. Pesticides: Atrazine, Diuron, Imidacloprid, Tebuthiuron

Source: Department of Land Resource Management

Pesticide and Nutrient Monitoring in Five Springs of the Darwin Region in the 2014 Dry Season. Report 10/2014D Julia Schult December 2014

Palm Creek

Atrazine: 0.07ng/L

Diuron: 0.13ng/L

Imidacloprid: 0.21ng/L

Tebuthiuron: 1.1ng/L

Source: Department of Land Resource Management

Pesticide and Nutrient Monitoring in Five Springs of the Darwin Region in the 2014 Dry Season. Report 10/2014D Julia Schult December 2014

Palm Creek

Atrazine: 0.07ng/L

Diuron: 0.13ng/L

Imidacloprid: 0.21ng/L

Tebuthiuron: 1.1ng/L

2014: Berry Springs (NT). Pesticide: Chlorpyrifos

Source: Department of Land Resource Management

Pesticide and Nutrient Monitoring in Five Springs of the Darwin Region in the 2014 Dry Season. Report 10/2014D Julia Schult December 2014

Berry Springs

Chlorpyrifos: 0.7ng/L

Source: Department of Land Resource Management

Pesticide and Nutrient Monitoring in Five Springs of the Darwin Region in the 2014 Dry Season. Report 10/2014D Julia Schult December 2014

Berry Springs

Chlorpyrifos: 0.7ng/L

2016 October: Motor Neurone Disease: Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (NSW)

Motor Neurone Disease is killing too many people in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area. SBS travelled to Australia's fruit bowl with a leading neurologist who is attempting to solve a tragic medical mystery. The answer, or part of it, lies in what humans are doing to the environment.
By

Rick Feneley, Will Reid

Source: The Feed

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/health/thefeed/article/2016/10/03/bastard-disease-mia-0
 
5 Oct 2016   UPDATED 7 Oct 2016

The oranges in Joe Pasin’s orchard are glowing orbs on their branches, radiant against the heavy grey sky as we roll down his long driveway.

“Joe grew the most magnificent oranges that you’ve ever tasted,” says the man behind the wheel, Dominic Rowe, a neurology professor from Sydney’s Macquarie University.

We pull up at the farm house Joe built with his own hands, a monument to a post-war immigration success story, an Italian family’s labour of love lasting 66 years.

Rowe climbs out of the driver’s seat. He’s immediately greeted by the wide-open arms of Joe’s wife, Mim. He’s become accustomed to visiting this Riverina town of Griffith to investigate a cruel and fatal disease, and to these prolonged hugs with Mim Pasin.

“You’ve lost weight,” he chides her gently. “You need to eat.”

Only a week before this meeting, Mim and her three adult children held a memorial mass to commemorate the first anniversary of Joe’s death. He died of motor neurone disease in September last year, less than 10 months after he was diagnosed.

Mim recalls that day in Sydney: “He just listened and he said, ‘Well, Doctor, I've got my death sentence.’”

MND, a disease of the central nervous system, is indeed a death sentence. It will kill as many as 800 Australians this year. Another 800 will be diagnosed, from which point they will have on average – with the best of care – a few years to live.

In those long months, the disease will attack the nerve cells controlling the muscles that allow people to move, speak, swallow, breathe and, ultimately, stay alive.

“His speech began to slur and he started having cramps on his hands,” says Mim. “And then, gradually, food [became difficult]. Breathing wasn’t as quick [to go].”

At 70, Joe wasn’t one for quitting. Even now his work boots remain on the shoe rack by the back door, where he left them when he came inside from his beloved tractor for the last time. And his equally beloved blanket is still on the couch where, that night, his breathing began to fail and he finally relented, agreeing it was time for hospital. He died a week later.

“Just a few months before our 50th wedding anniversary,” Mim says. “So we didn't make it.”

Inheriting a faulty gene is the cause of MND in 10 per cent of the affected population. 

“But the 900-pound gorilla,” says Dom Rowe, “is the 90 per cent of patients who have sporadic motor neurone disease. Why do people develop this disease out of the blue?”

People like Joe Pasin. His MND was sporadic, not inherited.

And why have so many more of them been developing sporadic MND over the past 30 years?

In Australia, Rowe says: “It’s gone, as a cause of death, from one in 500 in 1985 to about one in 200 in 2013. This is not a statistical aberration. This is a fact. Motor neurone disease kills 250 per cent more Australians than it did in 1986. This cannot be genetic. It has to be environmental.”

A disproportionate number of them are dying here in the MIA, the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area.

 

Mim Pasin has heard some of the scientific conjecture about the possible triggers for the disease. Might it be linked to toxic blue-green algae, a regular blight on the waterways in these parts? Might it be herbicides or pesticides? Joe was exposed to them all.

“They were mixing chemicals with no mask,” Mim says, “and they would be spraying … you get drenched sometimes. And I did it too.

“Now,” she wonders, “has that got anything to do with it?”

That’s why Dom Rowe is here and why he keeps coming back: to look for the answers. At his clinic at Macquarie University, he cares for more than 200 MND sufferers, about 10 per cent of all Australians currently living - and dying - with the disease.

But he also collaborates with scientists at Macquarie’s Motor Neurone Disease Research Centre, the largest facility of its kind in Australia and among the biggest in the world. The science, at last, appears to be zeroing in on one of the great mysteries of modern medicine. And the people of the Riverina are pitching in to help.

MND in the MIA

“This is a bastard of a disease. It attacks you mercilessly. It’s relentless.”

Five minutes down the road from the Pasin farm, on the shores of Lake Wayangan, Professor Rowe gives us a crash course in the theories. But sometimes it is hard to separate the science from the emotion.

“This is personal,” he agrees. “You know, yesterday one of my patients died – a 26-year-old mother. This is awful … I hate this disease with a passion … I would give my eye teeth to make this disease go away.”

Rowe realised that too many of his patients were harking from the Riverina – from towns such as Leeton, Narrandera, Hay, Lake Cargelligo, Barellan and Wagga Wagga as well as Griffith.

MND has a prevalence of one in 14,000 in Australia. The “incidence” of the disease – that is, new cases each year – is one in 42,000.

Griffith has a population of just 25,000 and yet 12 of its residents have MND. That doesn’t account for the cases in surrounding towns.

Does this amount to a cluster? The observations require epidemiological investigation and proof, Rowe cautions, but his team has no doubt the region is a hot spot, experiencing at least a two to threefold higher incidence of the disease. 

But why?

Rowe gestures to the lake behind him. “This here represents perhaps several of the factors that may be involved in the increased incidence of motor neurone disease. We have agriculture, with fertilization and nutrients into the water table. We have a lake that didn’t exist before it was dammed. We have water that has introduced species such as European carp and increased turbidity in the water. All of these factors lead to cyanobacterial blooms. In fact, last summer this lake was closed because of blue-green algal blooms.”

In that mouthful, Rowe has summarized a slab of his team’s investigations.

So-called “blue-green algae” is not algae at all. It is a bacteria. Specifically, it is cyanobacteria, and this produces one of the main suspected culprits behind MND, a false amino acid called BMAA – or beta-methylamino-alanine. It is a neurotoxin that can cause cellular dysfunction and death.

After World War II, an alarming rate of the disease was observed in the Chamorro people in the US protectorate of Guam. Their diet included flour from nuts taken from cycad plants, which contained BMAA. They also consumed fruit bats that fed on these cycads.

“This has been observed in many places around the world, including southern Florida, in the lakes of north-eastern America and some in France,” Rowe says. “In southern France, around the Thau Lagoon, if you live downwind of the lagoon, within a five-kilometre distance of the edge of the lagoon, your risk of motor neurone disease goes up fivefold.

"If it’s unfit for recreation, is it fit for irrigation?"

“This is not just a theory. There is a lot of science in how BMAA is a dangerous toxin in our food chain.”

He gestures again to Lake Wayangan: “The cyanobacterial or algal blooms that we see in this lake have led to it being closed for recreational water sports; indeed, even last summer.

“If we think about Murrumbidgee irrigation, there are megalitres of water that sit in canals with high turbidity and cyanobacteria and increased nutrients. So in comparison to Lake Wayangan, the amount of water in here is miniscule compared to the water in the Riverina that may indeed have identical factors that make this water unfit for recreation.

“If it’s unfit for recreation, is it fit for irrigation?”

Then there are the herbicides and pesticides. While farming run-off contributes to blue-green algae, the chemicals themselves are under investigation at the Macquarie research centre. So is lead.

One of Rowe’s colleagues at Macquarie is Frenchman Gilles Guillemin, an internationally renowned expert in neuro-inflammation and neuro-toxicity. Guillemin has previously collaborated in the identification of a biomarker for people prone to commit suicide, and he helped develop biomarkers for the sub-types of multiple sclerosis. Now he is attempting to find a biomarker for sporadic MND.

Like Rowe, Guillemin suspects the answer will be not one environmental culprit but several. And like Rowe, his investigations have made him a regular visitor to Griffith, to the extent that he has joined locals in fishing competitions. Not only does he collect samples from residents to take back to the lab – their skin, blood, plasma, hair – but he takes home the carp they land. He sends the fish to France for testing.

“I've lost a few of these people already ... It's really becoming personal for me."

Guillemin points to other apparent MND hotspots in agricultural areas around Coffs Harbour, Port Macquarie, Ballina and Tamworth, but the focus for now is on the Riverina. It's a good region to study because its population is very stable. Relatively few people move in or move out, so any changes in the incidence of the disease can be analysed more accurately.

In the process, the friendships Guillemin makes are powerful motivation to find answers.

“I've lost a few of these people already,” he tells SBS at the Macquarie laboratory. “And it's – it’s really hard. I can't tell you. They become, you have this relationship. You know them, they ask you questions and after a time they cannot speak to you anymore. So they just send you emails or texts to ask you questions, and then you find out they're gone. It's really becoming personal for me.”

Rowe puts it this way: “Joe's motor neurone disease was sporadic, out of the blue, a one-in-42,000 chance of developing a disease that we think was triggered by the environment – the environment on the shores of which he farmed and lived for 60 years.”

A family’s burden

Sisters Tania Magoci and Michelle Vearing spent much of their childhood swimming in Lake Wayangan and in Barrenbox Swamp on their family’s rice farm near Griffith. Tania is 37, Michelle 41. They can still make each other laugh like little girls, and they’re doing it now while perched on stools at Michelle’s kitchen bench in Griffith, leafing through old photo albums.

Tania is a cackler, but Michelle confides, “We still have moments where we cry a lot.”

Their grandfather was diagnosed with MND in 1995. His symptoms started in his arms and legs. He died two and a half years later.

The family had never heard of the disease. They had no idea it might be genetic until 2007.

“I noticed slurring in Mum’s speech,” Michelle recalls. “And I said to her, ‘Mum, have you been to the dentist to see why you're talking like that … and she burst into tears. And I said, ‘You know what this is, don't you?’”

Their mother Karen’s motor neurone disease, having started in her mouth, progressed more rapidly than if it had begun in her limbs. She lost her speech. She was dead in a year.

Michelle remembers that first conversation: “We cried and we hugged, and that's when the reality hit that, you know, this is a disease that's going to affect all of us. And it's something that has frightened us ever since.”

By the time of their mother’s diagnosis, Michelle and Tania already had their own families. Both had two children.

Michelle and Tania also have another sister and a brother. They came to understand the statistical realities. Each had a 50 per cent chance of inheriting the disease. Two of the four siblings could expect bad news at some point.

It came too soon for Tania Magoci. She was diagnosed on February 11, 2011, when she was 32.

“I was a hairdresser and I was dropping my scissors and I was dropping my comb,” Tania says. “I had a lot of twitching everywhere."

She made an appointment to see Professor Dominic Rowe in Sydney. She has been forever grateful for his forthright brand of compassion.

“He swore. He said, ‘I'm sorry, Tania, but you've got this beeping MND disease … You've got this f---ing disease, this bastard of a disease. And then just he grabbed my hands and then he cuddled me. He said, ‘But we're going to beat this. You're going to break the record, aren't ya?’ I said, 'Yep, don't worry, Dom, I'm going to break the record.'”

"I want to find the gene for my children"

The record in Australia, Tania adds, is to live 18 years beyond diagnosis. There are very rare exceptions, such as theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, who has lived with MND for more than 50 years. Tania will take whatever time she can get with husband Jason and their kids, 15-year-old Jordan and 13-year-old Lovinia.

Rowe tells SBS: “Tania, fortunately, thus far has a slow and indolent progression of this bastard.”

As yet, the Macquarie team has not found the faulty gene affecting her family. Rowe believes they are close, but they cannot yet test for it among her siblings and children.

“I want to find the gene for my children,” Tania says, “because I know one of them's going to get it.”

The statistics are almost that brutal, though not quite. There is a 25 per cent chance that neither child will get MND. However, there is also a 25 per cent chance that both will get the disease.

 

For now, there is one way to break the chain of inherited motor neurone disease: in vitro fertilisation for the next generation of child bearers.

“To know that albatross hanging around their neck is cut loose, so that their children will never have MND, is an enormous relief,” Rowe says.

The IVF defence alone could save 80 lives a year in Australia – the 10 per cent of MND deaths that result from a faulty familial gene.

“Unfortunately,” Rowe adds, “as is often the case in health funding, Medicare doesn’t yet support identifying these faulty genes, and only partially helps in funding in vitro fertilisation for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. This will catch up, but at the moment we have to fund that testing out of donations.”

Rowe’s team raises more than $1 million a year to help keep its research ticking over and to run a multi-disciplinary clinic to at Macquarie for MND sufferers so they can see speech pathologists, physiotherapists, dieticians, counsellors and more specialists under the one roof – and under a heavily subsidised rate. It is the kind of care that Medicare does not afford them.

Tania and Michelle are among the MND fundraising army. Tania established the local MND support group, and Michelle has taken on its presidency.

It is possible, say Rowe and Guillemin, that the environmental culprits – when they are identified – may not only hold answers for sporadic MND. They may also be triggers for people who inherit a predisposition to the disease. “The science,” says Rowe, “will have to do the talking.”

A cure would be great, but Tania would settle for a treatment that allows patients to live a long life with the disease.

“I don't want anyone to be diagnosed anymore and told, ‘See you later. Go home, you're going to die.’” she says. This is effectively what her mother was told. “I just don't want that anymore. I just want to have some bit of hope.”

Now there is a little hope. As a direct result of the fundraising efforts, the research centre at Macquarie is about to launch separate drug trials for people with sporadic and familial MND. Early days, says Rowe, but these and further drugs in development hold some promise of slowing or even stopping the disease.

 A town like Lake Cargelligo

Ninety minutes’ drive north of Griffith we come to Lake Cargelligo. The sign says “Population 1300”. Locals say it’s down to about 1000. And yet this little town has four residents with motor neurone disease, and another two with symptoms who are yet to be diagnosed.

Around a picnic table by the lake in Liberty Park, three of the MND patients and the son of the fourth are meeting as a group for the first time.

They include Suzie Fisher, a 66-year-old nurse who works in Aboriginal health care. She is the ninth member of her family over four generations to suffer MND, but she is animated as she tells the group: “At Macquarie University, they’ve got the fish down in the lab, and they’ve got lights that light up. And they are 70 per cent to a cure …

“So while it’s not going to help us sitting around this table, well, [it could help] this little grandperson and the next generation.”

 

She points to the baby grandson of Tim Trembath, who spent 30 years working for State Water, a career on the local lakes and rivers, before he was diagnosed with sporadic MND in early 2013.

“I drink through a straw,” says Tim, 59. “I can’t lift a cup of coffee or anything like that. Y’know, can’t pull my own trousers up.

“There’s the blue-green algae theory that would fit me fairly well,” he says. “I’ve been in and out of the water a lot of the times, dealt with the blue-green algae. I’ve seen really poisonous blooms where it looks like someone’s tipped blue or silver paint on the water.

“I’ve also been exposed to chemicals. When I was on the farm, as a teenager, I recall actually mixing the chemicals with my hands. There was no OH&S stuff or that. Put my arm in a drum and stir it around.”

Suzie Fisher says: “The nurse in me made me aware that I had motor neurone disease a very long time ago.”

"The muscles eventually die. A little bit of us dies every day."

But having watched her aunt die of MND 38 years ago, she did not want to know. The formal diagnosis came only three and a half years ago. She she counts herself “lucky” that her disease has had a slow progression.

“People think it’s a disease of the muscles but it’s not. Motor neurone comes from your head, and it’s a failure of the nerves going down and sending reflexes out to get the muscles to work. And the muscles eventually die. A little bit of us dies every day.

“I look after my 89-year-old mum. She was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer three Christmases ago, but I honestly believe that she’s living to look after me.

“Some nights I can’t get out of the chair, and this 89-year-old lady has a walker in front of her and helps me. We don’t talk about motor neurone disease in the house because it makes her cry. And I really hope that Mum goes before me because it would be terrible for her.”

Don Ridley is here by the lake to represent his father, Col, who ran a sheep and cereal farm for close to 50 years. Col’s in hospital and too ill to make it today. The Ridleys hadn't heard of MND until they saw the news that AFL legend Neale Daniher had the disease.

Daniher gained fame with Essondon but he was raised down the road from Lake Cargelligo, at Ungarie. Another son of the Riverina with the bastard disease, Daniher has become patron of the Cure for MND Foundation. Its ice bucket challenge, for which AFL stars and others volunteer to be dunked in big pools of ice, has brought headlines, awareness and donations to the cause.

We take a short drive out of town with another farmer, 79-year-old Albert Brown – the fourth member of this group – to the wheat and sheep property he ran for 60 years until he was diagnosed with sporadic MND last November.

In Albert's words

“Someone from a newspaper called me up last year and asked me why I was still working,” says Albert Brown. “I told ’em, ‘I’ve got a government to keep.’”

In a good year on this farm, he’ll have us know, the taxman could take $250,000 from him. And he hefted most of the crop on his shoulders – in bags heavier than a big man.

“I never drank in my life and I never smoked in my life. Maybe I should have. Years ago I’d lump 180-pound bags of wheat, y’know, sort of thing.

"I couldn’t lift an empty bag now. No strength at all left in me.

 

“I was layin’ on the bed one night and the wife looks at me back and says it was like water flowin’ across me back, you know, the way it was twitchin’ all the time.

“It’s started on me speech and swallowing, too, it has. I gotta blend me meat … I gotta keep me food pretty sloppy, with gravies and all that sort of thing, to get it down.”

Albert wonders about the cause of his illness. He remembers his days in the fields, holding up a flag for the crop dusters, “and you were covered in chemical all day long, you were”.

And the sheep troughs. “When the sun shines on ’em they get blue-green algae and you gotta clean ’em out every now and then. Sometimes, if you didn’t have a shovel, you’d just get your hands in and rake it out. No gloves on, sort of thing.

“They’re doin’ a lot of research in it, but we won’t find out. Probably someone else will, later on.”

He laughs.

“But that’s about all I know about that motor neurone. Well, I’d never heard about it until Tim [Trembath] – the bloke you met in town the other day – he wrote a bit in the local news and I said, ‘Geeze, I hope I haven’t got that bloody disease’. But that’s what it was. Most farmers diagnose themselves. They say, ‘I’ll be right. She’ll be right, mate.’ That’s the saying, isn’t it? ‘She’ll be right.’ But it’s not right.”

When it came to his diagnosis, Albert - like Tania Magoci in Griffith - appreciated the straight-shooting of his neurologist, Dom Rowe.

“He told me it was a f---wit of a disease.

“I had weight comin’ off me. Bones, and skinny all the time.

“It’s a bastard of a thing, yeah.”

Ghost fish

Thousands of fish swim in Dr Nicholas Cole’s tanks at the Motor Neurone Disease Research Centre at Macquarie University. They’re not carp but tiny, transparent zebra fish.

The biomedical researcher injects fish eggs with the human gene that causes MND. He also injects them with environmental toxins that are among suspected causes the disease.

This species grows from egg to fully fledged fish within days. “And because they are transparent,” Cole says, “we can see the nerves grow in real time in the living animal.”

 

With fluorescent proteins, Cole and his team can colour-code cells, tissue, nerves and muscle. They can watch nerves grow from the spinal chord and anchor into muscle. They track the rapid death of motor neurones. As they die they glow yellow in the see-through “ghost fish”.

“The ultimate aim,” says Cole, “is is to make a fish which develops MND quite rapidly and we can then treat lots and lots of fish with different compounds from drug libraries to try to find one that may give us a cure.”

“It’s breathtaking to watch,” says Dom Rowe, “as a neurologist fascinated with the human nervous system. The fact that you can see through these fish to watch their nervous system develop – to how genetic abnormalities perturb normal development and damage motor neurones.”

Joe Pasin’s legacy

Giuseppe ‘Joe’ Pasin was five years old when his family immigrated from Italy and settled in Griffith. His father worked as a labourer before he bought his own patch just out of town and planted a “fruit salad” orchard.

Joe started his working life as a bricklayer. He met newly arrived Miriam Visentin, from another Italian immigrant family, and the two married when he was 21, she 19. While they raised three children, they expanded the farm. Joe decided to specialise in oranges. Among his proudest achievements was inventing the Pasin early navel, which they pick each May, ahead of the competition.

The family still collects royalties from other growers of Joe’s legacy orange.

“That will be in history,” Mim says. “That's got Joe stamped on it.”

 

Dom Rowe has tasted all the Pasin varieties. Walking through the groves, arm in arm with Mim, he picks himself a blood orange, peels it, quarters it and shares it around.

“I knew that if I didn't honour my promise to come and visit Joe at his orchid, he would have had my guts for garters.”

In any case, “For us to understand the environmental factors that are involved in motor neurone disease, we can’t just sit in the office, the clinic or the laboratory seven hours away. You have to come down, see people in their environment, actually take samples from people who can’t get to us in Sydney. And those samples are part of our biobank at Macquarie, which is a tremendous biological resource.”

“The most important thing,” Mim says, “is that they find a cure for this disease. It won't save Joe. It won't bring him back.”

But that is her prayer.

She shows us Joe’s blanket.

“It's a comfort because, to me, Joe is still there. Even though I don't see him, he's still there and that's his blanket. His shoes, his boots that he had on when he was on the farm that morning, they're still on the verandah where he left them. And the heavy jacket, it's hooked on there. Haven't washed it. And it's still there with his beanie ... The wallet is still on the bench in our bedroom with his glasses. So that's that.”

Except for the Pasin early navel.

“Pasin navels will stay forever. Yes, yes.”

Motor Neurone Disease is killing too many people in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area. SBS travelled to Australia’s fruit bowl with a leading neurologist who is attempting to solve a tragic medical mystery. The answer, or part of it, lies in what humans are doing to the environment.
By

Rick Feneley, Will Reid

Source: The Feed

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/health/thefeed/article/2016/10/03/bastard-disease-mia-0
5 Oct 2016   UPDATED 7 Oct 2016

The oranges in Joe Pasin’s orchard are glowing orbs on their branches, radiant against the heavy grey sky as we roll down his long driveway.

“Joe grew the most magnificent oranges that you’ve ever tasted,” says the man behind the wheel, Dominic Rowe, a neurology professor from Sydney’s Macquarie University.

We pull up at the farm house Joe built with his own hands, a monument to a post-war immigration success story, an Italian family’s labour of love lasting 66 years.

Rowe climbs out of the driver’s seat. He’s immediately greeted by the wide-open arms of Joe’s wife, Mim. He’s become accustomed to visiting this Riverina town of Griffith to investigate a cruel and fatal disease, and to these prolonged hugs with Mim Pasin.

“You’ve lost weight,” he chides her gently. “You need to eat.”

Only a week before this meeting, Mim and her three adult children held a memorial mass to commemorate the first anniversary of Joe’s death. He died of motor neurone disease in September last year, less than 10 months after he was diagnosed.

Mim recalls that day in Sydney: “He just listened and he said, ‘Well, Doctor, I’ve got my death sentence.’”

MND, a disease of the central nervous system, is indeed a death sentence. It will kill as many as 800 Australians this year. Another 800 will be diagnosed, from which point they will have on average – with the best of care – a few years to live.

In those long months, the disease will attack the nerve cells controlling the muscles that allow people to move, speak, swallow, breathe and, ultimately, stay alive.

“His speech began to slur and he started having cramps on his hands,” says Mim. “And then, gradually, food [became difficult]. Breathing wasn’t as quick [to go].”

At 70, Joe wasn’t one for quitting. Even now his work boots remain on the shoe rack by the back door, where he left them when he came inside from his beloved tractor for the last time. And his equally beloved blanket is still on the couch where, that night, his breathing began to fail and he finally relented, agreeing it was time for hospital. He died a week later.

“Just a few months before our 50th wedding anniversary,” Mim says. “So we didn’t make it.”

Inheriting a faulty gene is the cause of MND in 10 per cent of the affected population.

“But the 900-pound gorilla,” says Dom Rowe, “is the 90 per cent of patients who have sporadic motor neurone disease. Why do people develop this disease out of the blue?”

People like Joe Pasin. His MND was sporadic, not inherited.

And why have so many more of them been developing sporadic MND over the past 30 years?

In Australia, Rowe says: “It’s gone, as a cause of death, from one in 500 in 1985 to about one in 200 in 2013. This is not a statistical aberration. This is a fact. Motor neurone disease kills 250 per cent more Australians than it did in 1986. This cannot be genetic. It has to be environmental.”

A disproportionate number of them are dying here in the MIA, the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area.

Mim Pasin has heard some of the scientific conjecture about the possible triggers for the disease. Might it be linked to toxic blue-green algae, a regular blight on the waterways in these parts? Might it be herbicides or pesticides? Joe was exposed to them all.

“They were mixing chemicals with no mask,” Mim says, “and they would be spraying … you get drenched sometimes. And I did it too.

“Now,” she wonders, “has that got anything to do with it?”

That’s why Dom Rowe is here and why he keeps coming back: to look for the answers. At his clinic at Macquarie University, he cares for more than 200 MND sufferers, about 10 per cent of all Australians currently living – and dying – with the disease.

But he also collaborates with scientists at Macquarie’s Motor Neurone Disease Research Centre, the largest facility of its kind in Australia and among the biggest in the world. The science, at last, appears to be zeroing in on one of the great mysteries of modern medicine. And the people of the Riverina are pitching in to help.

MND in the MIA

“This is a bastard of a disease. It attacks you mercilessly. It’s relentless.”

Five minutes down the road from the Pasin farm, on the shores of Lake Wayangan, Professor Rowe gives us a crash course in the theories. But sometimes it is hard to separate the science from the emotion.

“This is personal,” he agrees. “You know, yesterday one of my patients died – a 26-year-old mother. This is awful … I hate this disease with a passion … I would give my eye teeth to make this disease go away.”

Rowe realised that too many of his patients were harking from the Riverina – from towns such as Leeton, Narrandera, Hay, Lake Cargelligo, Barellan and Wagga Wagga as well as Griffith.

MND has a prevalence of one in 14,000 in Australia. The “incidence” of the disease – that is, new cases each year – is one in 42,000.

Griffith has a population of just 25,000 and yet 12 of its residents have MND. That doesn’t account for the cases in surrounding towns.

Does this amount to a cluster? The observations require epidemiological investigation and proof, Rowe cautions, but his team has no doubt the region is a hot spot, experiencing at least a two to threefold higher incidence of the disease.

But why?

Rowe gestures to the lake behind him. “This here represents perhaps several of the factors that may be involved in the increased incidence of motor neurone disease. We have agriculture, with fertilization and nutrients into the water table. We have a lake that didn’t exist before it was dammed. We have water that has introduced species such as European carp and increased turbidity in the water. All of these factors lead to cyanobacterial blooms. In fact, last summer this lake was closed because of blue-green algal blooms.”

In that mouthful, Rowe has summarized a slab of his team’s investigations.

So-called “blue-green algae” is not algae at all. It is a bacteria. Specifically, it is cyanobacteria, and this produces one of the main suspected culprits behind MND, a false amino acid called BMAA – or beta-methylamino-alanine. It is a neurotoxin that can cause cellular dysfunction and death.

After World War II, an alarming rate of the disease was observed in the Chamorro people in the US protectorate of Guam. Their diet included flour from nuts taken from cycad plants, which contained BMAA. They also consumed fruit bats that fed on these cycads.

“This has been observed in many places around the world, including southern Florida, in the lakes of north-eastern America and some in France,” Rowe says. “In southern France, around the Thau Lagoon, if you live downwind of the lagoon, within a five-kilometre distance of the edge of the lagoon, your risk of motor neurone disease goes up fivefold.

“If it’s unfit for recreation, is it fit for irrigation?”

“This is not just a theory. There is a lot of science in how BMAA is a dangerous toxin in our food chain.”

He gestures again to Lake Wayangan: “The cyanobacterial or algal blooms that we see in this lake have led to it being closed for recreational water sports; indeed, even last summer.

“If we think about Murrumbidgee irrigation, there are megalitres of water that sit in canals with high turbidity and cyanobacteria and increased nutrients. So in comparison to Lake Wayangan, the amount of water in here is miniscule compared to the water in the Riverina that may indeed have identical factors that make this water unfit for recreation.

“If it’s unfit for recreation, is it fit for irrigation?”

Then there are the herbicides and pesticides. While farming run-off contributes to blue-green algae, the chemicals themselves are under investigation at the Macquarie research centre. So is lead.

One of Rowe’s colleagues at Macquarie is Frenchman Gilles Guillemin, an internationally renowned expert in neuro-inflammation and neuro-toxicity. Guillemin has previously collaborated in the identification of a biomarker for people prone to commit suicide, and he helped develop biomarkers for the sub-types of multiple sclerosis. Now he is attempting to find a biomarker for sporadic MND.

Like Rowe, Guillemin suspects the answer will be not one environmental culprit but several. And like Rowe, his investigations have made him a regular visitor to Griffith, to the extent that he has joined locals in fishing competitions. Not only does he collect samples from residents to take back to the lab – their skin, blood, plasma, hair – but he takes home the carp they land. He sends the fish to France for testing.

“I’ve lost a few of these people already … It’s really becoming personal for me.”

Guillemin points to other apparent MND hotspots in agricultural areas around Coffs Harbour, Port Macquarie, Ballina and Tamworth, but the focus for now is on the Riverina. It’s a good region to study because its population is very stable. Relatively few people move in or move out, so any changes in the incidence of the disease can be analysed more accurately.

In the process, the friendships Guillemin makes are powerful motivation to find answers.

“I’ve lost a few of these people already,” he tells SBS at the Macquarie laboratory. “And it’s – it’s really hard. I can’t tell you. They become, you have this relationship. You know them, they ask you questions and after a time they cannot speak to you anymore. So they just send you emails or texts to ask you questions, and then you find out they’re gone. It’s really becoming personal for me.”

Rowe puts it this way: “Joe’s motor neurone disease was sporadic, out of the blue, a one-in-42,000 chance of developing a disease that we think was triggered by the environment – the environment on the shores of which he farmed and lived for 60 years.”

A family’s burden

Sisters Tania Magoci and Michelle Vearing spent much of their childhood swimming in Lake Wayangan and in Barrenbox Swamp on their family’s rice farm near Griffith. Tania is 37, Michelle 41. They can still make each other laugh like little girls, and they’re doing it now while perched on stools at Michelle’s kitchen bench in Griffith, leafing through old photo albums.

Tania is a cackler, but Michelle confides, “We still have moments where we cry a lot.”

Their grandfather was diagnosed with MND in 1995. His symptoms started in his arms and legs. He died two and a half years later.

The family had never heard of the disease. They had no idea it might be genetic until 2007.

“I noticed slurring in Mum’s speech,” Michelle recalls. “And I said to her, ‘Mum, have you been to the dentist to see why you’re talking like that … and she burst into tears. And I said, ‘You know what this is, don’t you?’”

Their mother Karen’s motor neurone disease, having started in her mouth, progressed more rapidly than if it had begun in her limbs. She lost her speech. She was dead in a year.

Michelle remembers that first conversation: “We cried and we hugged, and that’s when the reality hit that, you know, this is a disease that’s going to affect all of us. And it’s something that has frightened us ever since.”

By the time of their mother’s diagnosis, Michelle and Tania already had their own families. Both had two children.

Michelle and Tania also have another sister and a brother. They came to understand the statistical realities. Each had a 50 per cent chance of inheriting the disease. Two of the four siblings could expect bad news at some point.

It came too soon for Tania Magoci. She was diagnosed on February 11, 2011, when she was 32.

“I was a hairdresser and I was dropping my scissors and I was dropping my comb,” Tania says. “I had a lot of twitching everywhere.”

She made an appointment to see Professor Dominic Rowe in Sydney. She has been forever grateful for his forthright brand of compassion.

“He swore. He said, ‘I’m sorry, Tania, but you’ve got this beeping MND disease … You’ve got this f—ing disease, this bastard of a disease. And then just he grabbed my hands and then he cuddled me. He said, ‘But we’re going to beat this. You’re going to break the record, aren’t ya?’ I said, ‘Yep, don’t worry, Dom, I’m going to break the record.’”

“I want to find the gene for my children”

The record in Australia, Tania adds, is to live 18 years beyond diagnosis. There are very rare exceptions, such as theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, who has lived with MND for more than 50 years. Tania will take whatever time she can get with husband Jason and their kids, 15-year-old Jordan and 13-year-old Lovinia.

Rowe tells SBS: “Tania, fortunately, thus far has a slow and indolent progression of this bastard.”

As yet, the Macquarie team has not found the faulty gene affecting her family. Rowe believes they are close, but they cannot yet test for it among her siblings and children.

“I want to find the gene for my children,” Tania says, “because I know one of them’s going to get it.”

The statistics are almost that brutal, though not quite. There is a 25 per cent chance that neither child will get MND. However, there is also a 25 per cent chance that both will get the disease.

For now, there is one way to break the chain of inherited motor neurone disease: in vitro fertilisation for the next generation of child bearers.

“To know that albatross hanging around their neck is cut loose, so that their children will never have MND, is an enormous relief,” Rowe says.

The IVF defence alone could save 80 lives a year in Australia – the 10 per cent of MND deaths that result from a faulty familial gene.

“Unfortunately,” Rowe adds, “as is often the case in health funding, Medicare doesn’t yet support identifying these faulty genes, and only partially helps in funding in vitro fertilisation for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. This will catch up, but at the moment we have to fund that testing out of donations.”

Rowe’s team raises more than $1 million a year to help keep its research ticking over and to run a multi-disciplinary clinic to at Macquarie for MND sufferers so they can see speech pathologists, physiotherapists, dieticians, counsellors and more specialists under the one roof – and under a heavily subsidised rate. It is the kind of care that Medicare does not afford them.

Tania and Michelle are among the MND fundraising army. Tania established the local MND support group, and Michelle has taken on its presidency.

It is possible, say Rowe and Guillemin, that the environmental culprits – when they are identified – may not only hold answers for sporadic MND. They may also be triggers for people who inherit a predisposition to the disease. “The science,” says Rowe, “will have to do the talking.”

A cure would be great, but Tania would settle for a treatment that allows patients to live a long life with the disease.

“I don’t want anyone to be diagnosed anymore and told, ‘See you later. Go home, you’re going to die.’” she says. This is effectively what her mother was told. “I just don’t want that anymore. I just want to have some bit of hope.”

Now there is a little hope. As a direct result of the fundraising efforts, the research centre at Macquarie is about to launch separate drug trials for people with sporadic and familial MND. Early days, says Rowe, but these and further drugs in development hold some promise of slowing or even stopping the disease.

 A town like Lake Cargelligo

Ninety minutes’ drive north of Griffith we come to Lake Cargelligo. The sign says “Population 1300”. Locals say it’s down to about 1000. And yet this little town has four residents with motor neurone disease, and another two with symptoms who are yet to be diagnosed.

Around a picnic table by the lake in Liberty Park, three of the MND patients and the son of the fourth are meeting as a group for the first time.

They include Suzie Fisher, a 66-year-old nurse who works in Aboriginal health care. She is the ninth member of her family over four generations to suffer MND, but she is animated as she tells the group: “At Macquarie University, they’ve got the fish down in the lab, and they’ve got lights that light up. And they are 70 per cent to a cure …

“So while it’s not going to help us sitting around this table, well, [it could help] this little grandperson and the next generation.”

She points to the baby grandson of Tim Trembath, who spent 30 years working for State Water, a career on the local lakes and rivers, before he was diagnosed with sporadic MND in early 2013.

“I drink through a straw,” says Tim, 59. “I can’t lift a cup of coffee or anything like that. Y’know, can’t pull my own trousers up.

“There’s the blue-green algae theory that would fit me fairly well,” he says. “I’ve been in and out of the water a lot of the times, dealt with the blue-green algae. I’ve seen really poisonous blooms where it looks like someone’s tipped blue or silver paint on the water.

“I’ve also been exposed to chemicals. When I was on the farm, as a teenager, I recall actually mixing the chemicals with my hands. There was no OH&S stuff or that. Put my arm in a drum and stir it around.”

Suzie Fisher says: “The nurse in me made me aware that I had motor neurone disease a very long time ago.”

“The muscles eventually die. A little bit of us dies every day.”

But having watched her aunt die of MND 38 years ago, she did not want to know. The formal diagnosis came only three and a half years ago. She she counts herself “lucky” that her disease has had a slow progression.

“People think it’s a disease of the muscles but it’s not. Motor neurone comes from your head, and it’s a failure of the nerves going down and sending reflexes out to get the muscles to work. And the muscles eventually die. A little bit of us dies every day.

“I look after my 89-year-old mum. She was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer three Christmases ago, but I honestly believe that she’s living to look after me.

“Some nights I can’t get out of the chair, and this 89-year-old lady has a walker in front of her and helps me. We don’t talk about motor neurone disease in the house because it makes her cry. And I really hope that Mum goes before me because it would be terrible for her.”

Don Ridley is here by the lake to represent his father, Col, who ran a sheep and cereal farm for close to 50 years. Col’s in hospital and too ill to make it today. The Ridleys hadn’t heard of MND until they saw the news that AFL legend Neale Daniher had the disease.

Daniher gained fame with Essondon but he was raised down the road from Lake Cargelligo, at Ungarie. Another son of the Riverina with the bastard disease, Daniher has become patron of the Cure for MND Foundation. Its ice bucket challenge, for which AFL stars and others volunteer to be dunked in big pools of ice, has brought headlines, awareness and donations to the cause.

We take a short drive out of town with another farmer, 79-year-old Albert Brown – the fourth member of this group – to the wheat and sheep property he ran for 60 years until he was diagnosed with sporadic MND last November.

In Albert’s words

“Someone from a newspaper called me up last year and asked me why I was still working,” says Albert Brown. “I told ’em, ‘I’ve got a government to keep.’”

In a good year on this farm, he’ll have us know, the taxman could take $250,000 from him. And he hefted most of the crop on his shoulders – in bags heavier than a big man.

“I never drank in my life and I never smoked in my life. Maybe I should have. Years ago I’d lump 180-pound bags of wheat, y’know, sort of thing.

“I couldn’t lift an empty bag now. No strength at all left in me.

“I was layin’ on the bed one night and the wife looks at me back and says it was like water flowin’ across me back, you know, the way it was twitchin’ all the time.

“It’s started on me speech and swallowing, too, it has. I gotta blend me meat … I gotta keep me food pretty sloppy, with gravies and all that sort of thing, to get it down.”

Albert wonders about the cause of his illness. He remembers his days in the fields, holding up a flag for the crop dusters, “and you were covered in chemical all day long, you were”.

And the sheep troughs. “When the sun shines on ’em they get blue-green algae and you gotta clean ’em out every now and then. Sometimes, if you didn’t have a shovel, you’d just get your hands in and rake it out. No gloves on, sort of thing.

“They’re doin’ a lot of research in it, but we won’t find out. Probably someone else will, later on.”

He laughs.

“But that’s about all I know about that motor neurone. Well, I’d never heard about it until Tim [Trembath] – the bloke you met in town the other day – he wrote a bit in the local news and I said, ‘Geeze, I hope I haven’t got that bloody disease’. But that’s what it was. Most farmers diagnose themselves. They say, ‘I’ll be right. She’ll be right, mate.’ That’s the saying, isn’t it? ‘She’ll be right.’ But it’s not right.”

When it came to his diagnosis, Albert – like Tania Magoci in Griffith – appreciated the straight-shooting of his neurologist, Dom Rowe.

“He told me it was a f—wit of a disease.

“I had weight comin’ off me. Bones, and skinny all the time.

“It’s a bastard of a thing, yeah.”

Ghost fish

Thousands of fish swim in Dr Nicholas Cole’s tanks at the Motor Neurone Disease Research Centre at Macquarie University. They’re not carp but tiny, transparent zebra fish.

The biomedical researcher injects fish eggs with the human gene that causes MND. He also injects them with environmental toxins that are among suspected causes the disease.

This species grows from egg to fully fledged fish within days. “And because they are transparent,” Cole says, “we can see the nerves grow in real time in the living animal.”

With fluorescent proteins, Cole and his team can colour-code cells, tissue, nerves and muscle. They can watch nerves grow from the spinal chord and anchor into muscle. They track the rapid death of motor neurones. As they die they glow yellow in the see-through “ghost fish”.

“The ultimate aim,” says Cole, “is is to make a fish which develops MND quite rapidly and we can then treat lots and lots of fish with different compounds from drug libraries to try to find one that may give us a cure.”

“It’s breathtaking to watch,” says Dom Rowe, “as a neurologist fascinated with the human nervous system. The fact that you can see through these fish to watch their nervous system develop – to how genetic abnormalities perturb normal development and damage motor neurones.”

Joe Pasin’s legacy

Giuseppe ‘Joe’ Pasin was five years old when his family immigrated from Italy and settled in Griffith. His father worked as a labourer before he bought his own patch just out of town and planted a “fruit salad” orchard.

Joe started his working life as a bricklayer. He met newly arrived Miriam Visentin, from another Italian immigrant family, and the two married when he was 21, she 19. While they raised three children, they expanded the farm. Joe decided to specialise in oranges. Among his proudest achievements was inventing the Pasin early navel, which they pick each May, ahead of the competition.

The family still collects royalties from other growers of Joe’s legacy orange.

“That will be in history,” Mim says. “That’s got Joe stamped on it.”

Dom Rowe has tasted all the Pasin varieties. Walking through the groves, arm in arm with Mim, he picks himself a blood orange, peels it, quarters it and shares it around.

“I knew that if I didn’t honour my promise to come and visit Joe at his orchid, he would have had my guts for garters.”

In any case, “For us to understand the environmental factors that are involved in motor neurone disease, we can’t just sit in the office, the clinic or the laboratory seven hours away. You have to come down, see people in their environment, actually take samples from people who can’t get to us in Sydney. And those samples are part of our biobank at Macquarie, which is a tremendous biological resource.”

“The most important thing,” Mim says, “is that they find a cure for this disease. It won’t save Joe. It won’t bring him back.”

But that is her prayer.

She shows us Joe’s blanket.

“It’s a comfort because, to me, Joe is still there. Even though I don’t see him, he’s still there and that’s his blanket. His shoes, his boots that he had on when he was on the farm that morning, they’re still on the verandah where he left them. And the heavy jacket, it’s hooked on there. Haven’t washed it. And it’s still there with his beanie … The wallet is still on the bench in our bedroom with his glasses. So that’s that.”

Except for the Pasin early navel.

“Pasin navels will stay forever. Yes, yes.”

2009: Mildura (Lake Hawthorn etc). Pesticides: Methidathion, Chlorothalonil, Simazine, Chlorpyrifos

Source: GHD Lower Murray Water Report for Monitoring of Irrigation Drainage Water

Stage 1 Report October 2009

p24 Table 2 Contaminants Posing A Potential High Risk To Aquatic Ecosystems in the Mallee

Methidathion: 0.98ug/L Lake Hawthorn, Catchment 8, Murray River, Cardross Lakes

Chlorothalonil: 7.9ug/L Lake Hawthorn and Bruces Bend

Simazine: 38ug/L Cardross Lakes, Lake Hawthorn, Murray River

Chlorpyrifos: 1.46ug/L Nangiloc-Colignan, river drainage outfalls, Bruces Bend, Lake Hawthorn

https://malleecma.vic.gov.au/jobs-tenders/tenders/Monitoring%20of%20Irrigation%20Drainage%20Water%20Stage%201%20Report%20October%202009.pdf

Source: GHD Lower Murray Water Report for Monitoring of Irrigation Drainage Water

Stage 1 Report October 2009

p24 Table 2 Contaminants Posing A Potential High Risk To Aquatic Ecosystems in the Mallee

Methidathion: 0.98ug/L Lake Hawthorn, Catchment 8, Murray River, Cardross Lakes

Chlorothalonil: 7.9ug/L Lake Hawthorn and Bruces Bend

Simazine: 38ug/L Cardross Lakes, Lake Hawthorn, Murray River

Chlorpyrifos: 1.46ug/L Nangiloc-Colignan, river drainage outfalls, Bruces Bend, Lake Hawthorn

https://malleecma.vic.gov.au/jobs-tenders/tenders/Monitoring%20of%20Irrigation%20Drainage%20Water%20Stage%201%20Report%20October%202009.pdf

2008 February: (Toowong) Soils Tests Fail to Solve ABC Cancer Mystery. Pesticides: DDT, Dieldrin

Soil tests fail to solve ABC cancer mystery

Georgina Robinson | February 26, 2008 - 3:16PM

Soil testing at the ABC's abandoned Brisbane studios has found staff there were not exposed to excessive levels of pesticides and other chemicals.

A report released yesterday found levels of pesticides and metals including arsenic, cadmium, nickel and lead at the Toowong site, in the city's inner-west, were well below national contamination guidelines.

It was the latest probe into the Toowong studios, which were abandoned in December 2006 after an investigation found breast cancer rates in workers at the site were six times the national average.

At least 17 women who worked there have been diagnosed with the disease, with the most recent known case confirmed less than three months ago.

The study took samples from two locations, a production desk most of the diagnosed women worked at and a substation on the site.

Testing showed chemical concentrations at the production desk were "generally higher" than at the substation, but still much lower than recommended levels.

The sampling also looked at concentrations of PCBs, a group of banned organic compounds, but found no evidence of any major leaks at the substation.

And levels of the banned pesticide dieldrin, which is similar to DDT, were found to be very low at both locations.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/soil-tests-fail-to-solve-abc-cancer-mystery/2008/02/26/1203788321532.html

Soil tests fail to solve ABC cancer mystery

Georgina Robinson | February 26, 2008 – 3:16PM

Soil testing at the ABC’s abandoned Brisbane studios has found staff there were not exposed to excessive levels of pesticides and other chemicals.

A report released yesterday found levels of pesticides and metals including arsenic, cadmium, nickel and lead at the Toowong site, in the city’s inner-west, were well below national contamination guidelines.

It was the latest probe into the Toowong studios, which were abandoned in December 2006 after an investigation found breast cancer rates in workers at the site were six times the national average.

At least 17 women who worked there have been diagnosed with the disease, with the most recent known case confirmed less than three months ago.

The study took samples from two locations, a production desk most of the diagnosed women worked at and a substation on the site.

Testing showed chemical concentrations at the production desk were “generally higher” than at the substation, but still much lower than recommended levels.

The sampling also looked at concentrations of PCBs, a group of banned organic compounds, but found no evidence of any major leaks at the substation.

And levels of the banned pesticide dieldrin, which is similar to DDT, were found to be very low at both locations.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/soil-tests-fail-to-solve-abc-cancer-mystery/2008/02/26/1203788321532.html

2013 June: Dieldrin Concerns in Telstra Communication Pits

Union raises fears that Telstra communication pits contain deadly banned pesticide dieldrin

5 June 2013

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/beta/2013-06-05/fears-workers-exposed-to-pesticide-dieldrin-in-telstra-pits/4735762

A new threat has emerged for contract workers digging up communication pits owned by Telstra, with the pits found to possibly contain the deadly banned pesticide dieldrin.

The Communications Workers Union in Victoria has raised concerns workers could have been exposed to dieldrin that Telstra sprayed on its cables to stop termites.

The dieldrin link was flagged after recent reports about the disturbance of asbestos in the pits caused widespread concern about the rollout of the National Broadband Network (NBN).

Dieldrin is banned in most countries and was phased out in Australia in the early 1990s.

After once being widely used in agriculture and timber products, the toxic chemical has been linked with Parkinson’s disease and can trigger comas.

The union says it raised concerns about both asbestos and dieldrin with NBN Co at a meeting in August 2010.

A spokeswoman for Telstra confirmed dieldrin had been used but says it had stopped using the chemical well before the 1990s.

“We do not believe it is an issue however we will seek advice from chemical experts and relevant government authorities on the issue,” Telstra later said in a statement.

Experts say dieldrin exposure in telecommunications pits is unlikely to be as harmful as asbestos but they still urge action.

Professor Malcolm Sim said there could still be a concern about insecticides in the soil.

“They’re very persistent and as I said they can accumulate in the body and that was the main reason they were phased out,” he said.

A spokesman for NBN Co referred the ABC back to Telstra and was trying to track down more information.

2017 February: Darlington Point NSW – Beehive Loss due to Insecticide Drift from Cotton Farms

'Devastating' beehive losses due to insecticide drift from cotton farms, keeper says

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-18/bee-loses-due-to-chemical-use-by-cotton-industry-keeper-says/8276130

The pollinator in one of Australia's key food bowls claims he can no longer base his 2,000 hive operation in the region because of chemical use by the emerging cotton industry.

Harold Saxvik's family has been keeping bees at Darlington Point in the New South Wales Riverina for more than 80 years.

In 2013, he lost 500 hives to insecticide spray drift which he believes came from nearby cotton farms.

Since then he has been moving his bees to avoid any risk but he said it had become unworkable.

"To go out and see all your hives or your bees dead on the ground is really devastating," he said.

"You think, 'Do I keep going, and what's the future in bee keeping if this is going to keep happening?' So we made the decision to move all our hives away from the area."

This year Mr Saxvik contracted 15,000 beehives from around Australia for the booming almond industry, which is expected to triple production in the next few years.

According to the Almond Board of Australia, the crop earned $1 billion in 2015.

Prices have fallen since then but the nut was still Australia's third largest horticulture export.

Mr Saxvik's company helps pollinate more than a dozen other crops in the Riverina, including crucial vegetable seed for growers around Australia.

"We produced tens of millions of dollars worth of seed ... 80 per cent of our production of bees was for seed pollination and now it's come to the stage where we're going to have to move all our plant and all our hives," he said.

Cotton is thriving in the Southern Rivers region with a $250 million harvest expected from the Murrumbidgee, Murray and Lachlan Rivers this season.

Ironically it is the development of a genetically modified cotton variety which uses far less insecticide that has led to the growth of the industry in a region previously considered too temperate for the crop.

Bolgard cotton needs to be sprayed as few as three times a growing season compared to up to 20 times for conventional cotton.

Cotton Australia's chief executive officer Adam Kay said the industry had made huge reductions in chemical use and was recognised internationally for its environmental stewardship.

"It's a fantastic story," Mr Kay said.

"For the last 15 years we've been able to, through concerted research and development effort, reduce the amount of pesticide that the industry uses by over 90 per cent.

"That reduction has really been recognised globally to the extent that it's starting to pull through Australian cotton with some of the major retailers and brand owners."

He said the industry contributed to about $60 million a year in research into new softer chemicals that were safe for bees and other beneficial insects.

"Look it's certainly right through everything we do in our pesticide guides and our best practise management program," Mr Kay said.

"Bees feature there to make sure growers are aware and do due diligence to make sure if there are any hives in the area around their crop."

'A light drift will kill thousands of hives'

The president of the New South Wales Apiarist's Association, Neil Bingley, said the cotton industry needed to do more.

"The cotton industry thinks that we're a small industry but when you take the pollination of all the other horticultural crops, we're a major player and Cotton Australia does not have the right to drive us out," Mr Bingley said.

He believes some cotton growers along the Murrumbidgee are still spraying up to nine times a season.

"Our biggest concern is the Fipronil. It doesn't take much of that spray at all, a light drift will kill thousands of hives," Mr Bingley said.

Fipronil and a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids have been restricted by the European Union because of their potential harm to pollinators, but the science is controversial and the EU's Food Safety Authority is currently reviewing these restrictions.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority said the chemicals were all safe to use as recommended by their manufacturers.

Crop Life Australia, which represents the plant science industry, said the EU restrictions had done nothing but harm farmers.

Crop Life Australia CEO Matthew Cossey said Australia had one of the world's healthiest bee colonies despite the use of these insecticides.

"We've seen in Europe, where neonics got blamed for a range of things, banning them took about 600 million pounds Sterling out of production, it didn't have an impact," Mr Cossey said.

"There's multiple threats to bees and to other pollinators, but bees specifically and they are varroa mite, the small hive beetle, over work, a whole range of issues.

"They [bees] are critical to farming and that's why working together I think we get the best outcomes."...

Watch Sean Murphy's report on Landline this Sunday at noon.

‘Devastating’ beehive losses due to insecticide drift from cotton farms, keeper says

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-18/bee-loses-due-to-chemical-use-by-cotton-industry-keeper-says/8276130

The pollinator in one of Australia’s key food bowls claims he can no longer base his 2,000 hive operation in the region because of chemical use by the emerging cotton industry.

Harold Saxvik’s family has been keeping bees at Darlington Point in the New South Wales Riverina for more than 80 years.

In 2013, he lost 500 hives to insecticide spray drift which he believes came from nearby cotton farms.

Since then he has been moving his bees to avoid any risk but he said it had become unworkable.

“To go out and see all your hives or your bees dead on the ground is really devastating,” he said.

“You think, ‘Do I keep going, and what’s the future in bee keeping if this is going to keep happening?’ So we made the decision to move all our hives away from the area.”

This year Mr Saxvik contracted 15,000 beehives from around Australia for the booming almond industry, which is expected to triple production in the next few years.

According to the Almond Board of Australia, the crop earned $1 billion in 2015.

Prices have fallen since then but the nut was still Australia’s third largest horticulture export.

Mr Saxvik’s company helps pollinate more than a dozen other crops in the Riverina, including crucial vegetable seed for growers around Australia.

“We produced tens of millions of dollars worth of seed … 80 per cent of our production of bees was for seed pollination and now it’s come to the stage where we’re going to have to move all our plant and all our hives,” he said.

Cotton is thriving in the Southern Rivers region with a $250 million harvest expected from the Murrumbidgee, Murray and Lachlan Rivers this season.

Ironically it is the development of a genetically modified cotton variety which uses far less insecticide that has led to the growth of the industry in a region previously considered too temperate for the crop.

Bolgard cotton needs to be sprayed as few as three times a growing season compared to up to 20 times for conventional cotton.

Cotton Australia’s chief executive officer Adam Kay said the industry had made huge reductions in chemical use and was recognised internationally for its environmental stewardship.

“It’s a fantastic story,” Mr Kay said.

“For the last 15 years we’ve been able to, through concerted research and development effort, reduce the amount of pesticide that the industry uses by over 90 per cent.

“That reduction has really been recognised globally to the extent that it’s starting to pull through Australian cotton with some of the major retailers and brand owners.”

He said the industry contributed to about $60 million a year in research into new softer chemicals that were safe for bees and other beneficial insects.

“Look it’s certainly right through everything we do in our pesticide guides and our best practise management program,” Mr Kay said.

“Bees feature there to make sure growers are aware and do due diligence to make sure if there are any hives in the area around their crop.”

‘A light drift will kill thousands of hives’

The president of the New South Wales Apiarist’s Association, Neil Bingley, said the cotton industry needed to do more.

“The cotton industry thinks that we’re a small industry but when you take the pollination of all the other horticultural crops, we’re a major player and Cotton Australia does not have the right to drive us out,” Mr Bingley said.

He believes some cotton growers along the Murrumbidgee are still spraying up to nine times a season.

“Our biggest concern is the Fipronil. It doesn’t take much of that spray at all, a light drift will kill thousands of hives,” Mr Bingley said.

Fipronil and a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids have been restricted by the European Union because of their potential harm to pollinators, but the science is controversial and the EU’s Food Safety Authority is currently reviewing these restrictions.

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority said the chemicals were all safe to use as recommended by their manufacturers.

Crop Life Australia, which represents the plant science industry, said the EU restrictions had done nothing but harm farmers.

Crop Life Australia CEO Matthew Cossey said Australia had one of the world’s healthiest bee colonies despite the use of these insecticides.

“We’ve seen in Europe, where neonics got blamed for a range of things, banning them took about 600 million pounds Sterling out of production, it didn’t have an impact,” Mr Cossey said.

“There’s multiple threats to bees and to other pollinators, but bees specifically and they are varroa mite, the small hive beetle, over work, a whole range of issues.

“They [bees] are critical to farming and that’s why working together I think we get the best outcomes.”…

Watch Sean Murphy’s report on Landline this Sunday at noon.

2014/15: Cattle Creek (Qld). Pesticide: Atrazine

Agricultural chemical levels compared to water quality guidelines for 95% ecosystem protection: In 2011, no Diuron, Atrazine or Endosulfan sulphates were measured at any of the water sampling sites. In 2014, only Atrazine was detected, and only near the exit point of Cattle Creek before the Walsh. The amount of Atrazine measured was 0.011 mg/L, only
just below the Australian and New Zealand fresh water quality guideline trigger value of 0.013 mg/L.
 
Northern Gulf Regional Management Group Annual Report 2014-15 (p32)
Agricultural chemical levels compared to water quality guidelines for 95% ecosystem protection: In 2011, no Diuron, Atrazine or Endosulfan sulphates were measured at any of the water sampling sites. In 2014, only Atrazine was detected, and only near the exit point of Cattle Creek before the Walsh. The amount of Atrazine measured was 0.011 mg/L, only
just below the Australian and New Zealand fresh water quality guideline trigger value of 0.013 mg/L.
Northern Gulf Regional Management Group Annual Report 2014-15 (p32)

2017 February: Benerembah NSW. Spray drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Off-target weed herbicide spray drift damages more than half of NSW's cotton crops

More than half the cotton crops planted across southern NSW have been damaged by off-target weed herbicide spray drift, according to Cotton Australia.

About 30,000 hectares of the 57,000 hectares of cotton growing across the Murrumbidgee and Lachlan areas had been affected.

Cotton Australia's regional manager in Griffith, Honi Anderson, said drift from Group I herbicides such as 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) being used to control summer weeds in fallow paddocks was harming cotton crops.

"In the crops that I've looked at it's definitely Group I damage, but it's very difficult to pinpoint what crops or what fallow situations it's coming from," Ms Anderson said.

"The weather conditions have not been helping keep those sprays effectively stay on the property they are intended for."

Ms Anderson said the damage was extremely widespread this season and very few crops had not been impacted.

"In some crops the damage is low to moderate, some would be quite severe and in others it's quite patchy," she said.

Ms Anderson said she had been flooded with calls over the past six weeks from growers and agronomists identifying damage.

"Depending on the severity, it looks quite ugly and it's quite distinctive," she said.

"It's like a witches hand effect on the leaf, the leaf shrivels up and cups over.

"Low level damage can just be a slight cupping and bubbling of the leaf."

Ms Anderson called for growers, agronomists and contractors to utilise the online Cotton Map tool which identified the location of cotton crops.

"It's important growers are communicating with their neighbours that they are growing cotton as it's a very sensitive crop," she said.

The full impact of the off-target spray drift would not be known until picking.

"Some of the plants I have seen with severe damage are throwing squares off and that is definitely going to have an impact on yield," Ms Anderson said.

"Other crops, where damage is quite light, it shouldn't have an impact.

"But the compounding issue is crops were generally planted late due to it being wet, so that coupled with spray drift issues isn't helping yield potential."

Cotton crop cops it

Murrumbidgee grower Ben Dal Broi reported moderate damage occurred in the 100 hectares of cotton growing on his Benerembah property.

"We're hoping that we might be able to get away with very light damage at picking, but the thing that concerns me is that should we have another event it could be much more damaging and that would really affect our profitability," Mr Dal Brio said.

He said the impact of off-target spray drift was much worse on his property this season due to the wet summer and croppers spraying weeds.

"People need to be very careful about the conditions they spray under, they need to very careful when they spray at night — particularly when there is a temperature inversion as the chemical can drift a long way and affect crops a distance away," Mr Dal Broi said.

He said it had been a harder season for cotton than the two prior seasons, but still hopes to average 10 bales a hectare.

"We had a slower start with the wet winter and it was very difficult to get on the paddocks and get beds up and prepared for sowing," he said.

"So the cotton was planted later, and then we had some insect damage so we lost some of the fruit.

"But since then it has been much warmer and the crop had lifted its head and is powering away."

Off-target weed herbicide spray drift damages more than half of NSW’s cotton crops

More than half the cotton crops planted across southern NSW have been damaged by off-target weed herbicide spray drift, according to Cotton Australia.

About 30,000 hectares of the 57,000 hectares of cotton growing across the Murrumbidgee and Lachlan areas had been affected.

Cotton Australia’s regional manager in Griffith, Honi Anderson, said drift from Group I herbicides such as 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) being used to control summer weeds in fallow paddocks was harming cotton crops.

“In the crops that I’ve looked at it’s definitely Group I damage, but it’s very difficult to pinpoint what crops or what fallow situations it’s coming from,” Ms Anderson said.

“The weather conditions have not been helping keep those sprays effectively stay on the property they are intended for.”

Ms Anderson said the damage was extremely widespread this season and very few crops had not been impacted.

“In some crops the damage is low to moderate, some would be quite severe and in others it’s quite patchy,” she said.

Ms Anderson said she had been flooded with calls over the past six weeks from growers and agronomists identifying damage.

“Depending on the severity, it looks quite ugly and it’s quite distinctive,” she said.

“It’s like a witches hand effect on the leaf, the leaf shrivels up and cups over.

“Low level damage can just be a slight cupping and bubbling of the leaf.”

Ms Anderson called for growers, agronomists and contractors to utilise the online Cotton Map tool which identified the location of cotton crops.

“It’s important growers are communicating with their neighbours that they are growing cotton as it’s a very sensitive crop,” she said.

The full impact of the off-target spray drift would not be known until picking.

“Some of the plants I have seen with severe damage are throwing squares off and that is definitely going to have an impact on yield,” Ms Anderson said.

“Other crops, where damage is quite light, it shouldn’t have an impact.

“But the compounding issue is crops were generally planted late due to it being wet, so that coupled with spray drift issues isn’t helping yield potential.”

Cotton crop cops it

Murrumbidgee grower Ben Dal Broi reported moderate damage occurred in the 100 hectares of cotton growing on his Benerembah property.

“We’re hoping that we might be able to get away with very light damage at picking, but the thing that concerns me is that should we have another event it could be much more damaging and that would really affect our profitability,” Mr Dal Brio said.

He said the impact of off-target spray drift was much worse on his property this season due to the wet summer and croppers spraying weeds.

“People need to be very careful about the conditions they spray under, they need to very careful when they spray at night — particularly when there is a temperature inversion as the chemical can drift a long way and affect crops a distance away,” Mr Dal Broi said.

He said it had been a harder season for cotton than the two prior seasons, but still hopes to average 10 bales a hectare.

“We had a slower start with the wet winter and it was very difficult to get on the paddocks and get beds up and prepared for sowing,” he said.

“So the cotton was planted later, and then we had some insect damage so we lost some of the fruit.

“But since then it has been much warmer and the crop had lifted its head and is powering away.”

2017 February: Half of NSW’s cotton crop impacted by spray drift. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Off-target weed herbicide spray drift damages more than half of NSW's cotton crops

More than half the cotton crops planted across southern NSW have been damaged by off-target weed herbicide spray drift, according to Cotton Australia.

About 30,000 hectares of the 57,000 hectares of cotton growing across the Murrumbidgee and Lachlan areas had been affected.

Cotton Australia's regional manager in Griffith, Honi Anderson, said drift from Group I herbicides such as 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) being used to control summer weeds in fallow paddocks was harming cotton crops.

"In the crops that I've looked at it's definitely Group I damage, but it's very difficult to pinpoint what crops or what fallow situations it's coming from," Ms Anderson said.

"The weather conditions have not been helping keep those sprays effectively stay on the property they are intended for."

Ms Anderson said the damage was extremely widespread this season and very few crops had not been impacted.

"In some crops the damage is low to moderate, some would be quite severe and in others it's quite patchy," she said.

Ms Anderson said she had been flooded with calls over the past six weeks from growers and agronomists identifying damage.

"Depending on the severity, it looks quite ugly and it's quite distinctive," she said.

"It's like a witches hand effect on the leaf, the leaf shrivels up and cups over.

"Low level damage can just be a slight cupping and bubbling of the leaf."

Ms Anderson called for growers, agronomists and contractors to utilise the online Cotton Map tool which identified the location of cotton crops.

"It's important growers are communicating with their neighbours that they are growing cotton as it's a very sensitive crop," she said.

The full impact of the off-target spray drift would not be known until picking.

"Some of the plants I have seen with severe damage are throwing squares off and that is definitely going to have an impact on yield," Ms Anderson said.

"Other crops, where damage is quite light, it shouldn't have an impact.

"But the compounding issue is crops were generally planted late due to it being wet, so that coupled with spray drift issues isn't helping yield potential."

Cotton crop cops it

Murrumbidgee grower Ben Dal Broi reported moderate damage occurred in the 100 hectares of cotton growing on his Benerembah property.

"We're hoping that we might be able to get away with very light damage at picking, but the thing that concerns me is that should we have another event it could be much more damaging and that would really affect our profitability," Mr Dal Brio said.

He said the impact of off-target spray drift was much worse on his property this season due to the wet summer and croppers spraying weeds.

"People need to be very careful about the conditions they spray under, they need to very careful when they spray at night — particularly when there is a temperature inversion as the chemical can drift a long way and affect crops a distance away," Mr Dal Broi said.

He said it had been a harder season for cotton than the two prior seasons, but still hopes to average 10 bales a hectare.

"We had a slower start with the wet winter and it was very difficult to get on the paddocks and get beds up and prepared for sowing," he said.

"So the cotton was planted later, and then we had some insect damage so we lost some of the fruit.

"But since then it has been much warmer and the crop had lifted its head and is powering away."

Off-target weed herbicide spray drift damages more than half of NSW’s cotton crops

More than half the cotton crops planted across southern NSW have been damaged by off-target weed herbicide spray drift, according to Cotton Australia.

About 30,000 hectares of the 57,000 hectares of cotton growing across the Murrumbidgee and Lachlan areas had been affected.

Cotton Australia’s regional manager in Griffith, Honi Anderson, said drift from Group I herbicides such as 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) being used to control summer weeds in fallow paddocks was harming cotton crops.

“In the crops that I’ve looked at it’s definitely Group I damage, but it’s very difficult to pinpoint what crops or what fallow situations it’s coming from,” Ms Anderson said.

“The weather conditions have not been helping keep those sprays effectively stay on the property they are intended for.”

Ms Anderson said the damage was extremely widespread this season and very few crops had not been impacted.

“In some crops the damage is low to moderate, some would be quite severe and in others it’s quite patchy,” she said.

Ms Anderson said she had been flooded with calls over the past six weeks from growers and agronomists identifying damage.

“Depending on the severity, it looks quite ugly and it’s quite distinctive,” she said.

“It’s like a witches hand effect on the leaf, the leaf shrivels up and cups over.

“Low level damage can just be a slight cupping and bubbling of the leaf.”

Ms Anderson called for growers, agronomists and contractors to utilise the online Cotton Map tool which identified the location of cotton crops.

“It’s important growers are communicating with their neighbours that they are growing cotton as it’s a very sensitive crop,” she said.

The full impact of the off-target spray drift would not be known until picking.

“Some of the plants I have seen with severe damage are throwing squares off and that is definitely going to have an impact on yield,” Ms Anderson said.

“Other crops, where damage is quite light, it shouldn’t have an impact.

“But the compounding issue is crops were generally planted late due to it being wet, so that coupled with spray drift issues isn’t helping yield potential.”

Cotton crop cops it

Murrumbidgee grower Ben Dal Broi reported moderate damage occurred in the 100 hectares of cotton growing on his Benerembah property.

“We’re hoping that we might be able to get away with very light damage at picking, but the thing that concerns me is that should we have another event it could be much more damaging and that would really affect our profitability,” Mr Dal Brio said.

He said the impact of off-target spray drift was much worse on his property this season due to the wet summer and croppers spraying weeds.

“People need to be very careful about the conditions they spray under, they need to very careful when they spray at night — particularly when there is a temperature inversion as the chemical can drift a long way and affect crops a distance away,” Mr Dal Broi said.

He said it had been a harder season for cotton than the two prior seasons, but still hopes to average 10 bales a hectare.

“We had a slower start with the wet winter and it was very difficult to get on the paddocks and get beds up and prepared for sowing,” he said.

“So the cotton was planted later, and then we had some insect damage so we lost some of the fruit.

“But since then it has been much warmer and the crop had lifted its head and is powering away.”

1999: Port of Newcastle Phosphine Gas Fumigant

REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE

STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT

INQUIRY INTO THE USE AND MANAGEMENT

OF PESTICIDES IN NEW SOUTH WALES

At Dubbo on Monday 26 July 1999

https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/DBAssets/InquiryReport/ReportAcrobat/6009/transcript%20002.pdf

Mr YEO:

Not really, not on that. I think Sam has covered it pretty well. I am following a different line. I would like to deal with a problem that we have with fumigants in our community. I have worked within this industry for 33 years, and I would like to follow the subject of fumigants phosphene, phostoxin and those sorts of gases that are used on the farm. They are a very toxic sort of a gas, and if you run through the first page of the submission you will see what the boiling point of this gas is. It is 87.4 at room temperature. It is highly poisonous.

If we go to the next page, you will see – and this is very important – the safe working is 0.03 parts per million in any one 8-hour working period. This phosphine gas is in pelletised form, or it is in liquid gases. It is very highly used in the grain industry. The trucks have been detected at our storages at up to 380 parts per million, which is 380-odd times the safe working of this gas. Now, these trucks are passing through the city, townships and other small towns.

In the submission you can see the effects of the gas. It severely irritates the nose, throat, respiratory passages, and causing coughs and shortage of breath, et cetera. It causes deep lung damage. It irritates the eyes, the nose and the throat and the nervous system. It causes headaches, nausea, vomiting. People become confused, have double vision, have an unsteady walk, and suffer tremors and stutters. It can be fatal. It affects the liver and kidneys, the heart, and causes a drop in blood pressure.

So, if you could take those matters on board. If a person is following these trucks for long distances and the truck has a contamination at those parts per million and it is escaping when that transport operator is travelling to the seaboard or to the end user of that product, the driver or passengers in the following vehicle could become drowsy and sleepy, and that could cause some major problems. Severe single exposure can cause any of the above. It is a lethal gas.

We in the industry certainly are having our problems with it. About 14 months ago we had a site opened. There were seven semitrailers turned up to deliver their grain. The first truck got past the inspection point; that grain was delivered into rail trucks; we then tested the second truck and got 100 parts per million of phosphine gas. We then checked the rail truck that that grain had gone into, and it was at 298 parts per million. Those trucks left our site and returned to the farm, a distance of 120 kilometres. So the enormity of that danger to the community or anyone travelling in the event that that truck tipped over, for the rescue workers, et cetera, is obvious. It is a major issue. There should be some means of convicting these people who are wilfullyand deliberating doing this.

The other day a truck was detected at the Port of Newcastle. A truck was detected there with phosphine at a rate of more than 100 parts per million. That truck had travelled from the Central West of New South Wales all the way to that port, a distance of 400 or 500 kilometres. I am very concerned about that, and so should this Committee be very concerned about the prospect of death or serious risk, in case of accidents, to people who are following these vehicles. There were six trucks returned to the farm, and again those drivers complained of exactly what this meeting was saying: nausea, double vision and whatever. These vehicles are grossing 42 tonnes.

The document is regarding the proper use of fumigants. These fumigants can be readily obtained off the shelf at any of the farm suppliers around town. There should be some regulation to control this problem. It was only 14 months ago that a child ate one of these tablets and was killed immediately. What the truck operators are doing now is loading the trucks with grain that is infested with live insects. The quickest way to activate the fumigants is to place them in a tin with a few holes and add water. As you can see, it is very combustible.

NSW, Australia

REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE

STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT

INQUIRY INTO THE USE AND MANAGEMENT

OF PESTICIDES IN NEW SOUTH WALES

At Dubbo on Monday 26 July 1999

https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/DBAssets/InquiryReport/ReportAcrobat/6009/transcript%20002.pdf

Mr YEO:

Not really, not on that. I think Sam has covered it pretty well. I am following a different line. I would like to deal with a problem that we have with fumigants in our community. I have worked within this industry for 33 years, and I would like to follow the subject of fumigants phosphene, phostoxin and those sorts of gases that are used on the farm. They are a very toxic sort of a gas, and if you run through the first page of the submission you will see what the boiling point of this gas is. It is 87.4 at room temperature. It is highly poisonous.

If we go to the next page, you will see – and this is very important – the safe working is 0.03 parts per million in any one 8-hour working period. This phosphine gas is in pelletised form, or it is in liquid gases. It is very highly used in the grain industry. The trucks have been detected at our storages at up to 380 parts per million, which is 380-odd times the safe working of this gas. Now, these trucks are passing through the city, townships and other small towns.

In the submission you can see the effects of the gas. It severely irritates the nose, throat, respiratory passages, and causing coughs and shortage of breath, et cetera. It causes deep lung damage. It irritates the eyes, the nose and the throat and the nervous system. It causes headaches, nausea, vomiting. People become confused, have double vision, have an unsteady walk, and suffer tremors and stutters. It can be fatal. It affects the liver and kidneys, the heart, and causes a drop in blood pressure.

So, if you could take those matters on board. If a person is following these trucks for long distances and the truck has a contamination at those parts per million and it is escaping when that transport operator is travelling to the seaboard or to the end user of that product, the driver or passengers in the following vehicle could become drowsy and sleepy, and that could cause some major problems. Severe single exposure can cause any of the above. It is a lethal gas.

We in the industry certainly are having our problems with it. About 14 months ago we had a site opened. There were seven semitrailers turned up to deliver their grain. The first truck got past the inspection point; that grain was delivered into rail trucks; we then tested the second truck and got 100 parts per million of phosphine gas. We then checked the rail truck that that grain had gone into, and it was at 298 parts per million. Those trucks left our site and returned to the farm, a distance of 120 kilometres. So the enormity of that danger to the community or anyone travelling in the event that that truck tipped over, for the rescue workers, et cetera, is obvious. It is a major issue. There should be some means of convicting these people who are wilfullyand deliberating doing this.

The other day a truck was detected at the Port of Newcastle. A truck was detected there with phosphine at a rate of more than 100 parts per million. That truck had travelled from the Central West of New South Wales all the way to that port, a distance of 400 or 500 kilometres. I am very concerned about that, and so should this Committee be very concerned about the prospect of death or serious risk, in case of accidents, to people who are following these vehicles. There were six trucks returned to the farm, and again those drivers complained of exactly what this meeting was saying: nausea, double vision and whatever. These vehicles are grossing 42 tonnes.

The document is regarding the proper use of fumigants. These fumigants can be readily obtained off the shelf at any of the farm suppliers around town. There should be some regulation to control this problem. It was only 14 months ago that a child ate one of these tablets and was killed immediately. What the truck operators are doing now is loading the trucks with grain that is infested with live insects. The quickest way to activate the fumigants is to place them in a tin with a few holes and add water. As you can see, it is very combustible.

2012 July: Pesticide Linked to Parkinsons Disease. Pesticide: Paraquat

Pesticide linked to Parkinson’s disease

Flash version 9 or above required to view video: Get flash.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation h

ttp://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2012/s3545855.htm

Broadcast: 13/07/2012

Reporter: Kirrin McKechnie

Scientists have called for a ban on a pesticide with links to Parkinson’s disease and have warned more people may get sick.

Transcript

STEVE CANNANE, PRESENTER: There are calls to ban a pesticide with links to Parkinson’s disease. Paraquat is under review by the pesticides authority but scientists warn many more people could get sick while’s decision is being made.

Kirrin McKechnie has the story.

KIRRIN MCKECHNIE, REPORTER: It is a herbicide used extensively in agriculture. But the move is on to try to ban Paraquat.

DARYL SMEATON, PARKINSON’S AUSTRALIA: The use of chemicals is important in agriculture, we know that. But we’ve got to make sure those that have a bad reputation aren’t used.

KIRRIN MCKECHNIE: Paraquat has such a bad reputation it is banned in 32 countries, including across Europe and parts of south-east Asia. Scientists say the chemical has known links to Parkinson’s disease.

JOHN POWER, FLINDERS UNIVERSITY: Once you’ve got Parkinson’s you’ve lost a certain number of brain cells in the particular area of the brain related to movement. A number of chemicals, Paraquat, Maneb, Rotonome, all target those cells. And destroy them.

KIRRIN MCKECHNIE: Parkinson’s Australia is now planning a national campaign to force the Commonwealth to act. It is warning the Federal Government it could face compensation claims if it doesn’t.

DARYL SMEATON: That’s certainly part of the questions that we have to raise with government. Where there’s smoke there’s fire.

KIRRIN MCKECHNIE: The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority admits Paraquat has been under review since 1997, but visit investigations are still ongoing. As it makes up its mind, scientists are urging better education about the dangers.

JOHN POWER: Lots of farmers have huge sheds full of drums of this and it has to be… if it was me I would be gowned and gloves and goggles and masks, because all these chemicals are toxic of

DARYL SMEATON: The evidence is growing day by day.

KIRRIN MCKECHNIE: So, he says, is the incidence of Parkinson’s in farming communities.

Do you have a comment or a story idea? Get in touch with the Lateline team by clicking here.

2016 April: Parkinsons Cluster in Victoria’s North West: Horsham, Northern Grampians

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/video/video-news/video-national-news/parkinsons-disease-cluster-discovered-in-states-northwest-20160411-4daao.html

Parkinson's disease cluster discovered in state's north-west

Associate Professor David Finkelstein talks to 3AW about the link between the disease and pesticides used in the Victorian region for barley, chickpea and lentil farming.

Study finds Parkinsons cluster in regional Victoria

Tom Nightingale reported this story on Monday, April 11, 2016

MICHAEL BRISSENDON: New research has found a cluster of Parkinson's disease cases in rural northwest Victoria, raising concerns of a possible link with pesticides used in farming.

Tom Nightingale reports.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: They knew the rule; now they've found the exception.

Numerous studies had found Parkinson's disease was equally as prevalent in the city and the bush.

Then researchers looked at rates around Victoria's Wimmera area.

ASHLEY BUSH: There is a cluster of higher incidence of Parkinson's disease that would be expected for the average age of the population. And it's about double what would be expected.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: Professor Ashley Bush was one the researchers.

He says pesticides used to produce chickpeas, beans and lentils could be responsible.

ASHLEY BUSH: Pesticides, various kinds of pesticides can cause the type of brain damage that leads to Parkinson's disease.

That exposure would have occurred decades earlier, probably so it's possible that things have changed indeed, so there's quite a bit of investigation to go on to try to work this out.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: Associate Professor David Finkelstein is with Parkinson's Victoria.

He says the findings from Monash University and the Florey Institute are the first in Australia.

DAVID FINKELSTEIN: Other rural farming communities, especially in the States, have done a lot of research and they've found that pesticides have been linked with an increased incidence of Parkinson's.

If you give these pesticides to animals in the laboratory they get Parkinsonism.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: He wants Parkinson's disease to be a research priority so it gets a short term boost in funding.

DAVID FINKELSTEIN: Parkinson's slips through the cracks for funding. It doesn't fit in the national health disability scheme because people get it generally after the age of 60, it's a chronic disease, and it, so it slips through the cracks.

What we're saying is if you put it, give it the appropriate attention it deserves, it will actually save the money for people because it will keep people in the workforce for longer.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: The report's executive summary is being released today to coincide with World Parkinson's Day.

The full study will be released later this year.

MICHAEL BRISSENDED: Tom Nightingale with that report.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/video/video-news/video-national-news/parkinsons-disease-cluster-discovered-in-states-northwest-20160411-4daao.html

Parkinson’s disease cluster discovered in state’s north-west

Associate Professor David Finkelstein talks to 3AW about the link between the disease and pesticides used in the Victorian region for barley, chickpea and lentil farming.

Study finds Parkinsons cluster in regional Victoria

Tom Nightingale reported this story on Monday, April 11, 2016

MICHAEL BRISSENDON: New research has found a cluster of Parkinson’s disease cases in rural northwest Victoria, raising concerns of a possible link with pesticides used in farming.

Tom Nightingale reports.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: They knew the rule; now they’ve found the exception.

Numerous studies had found Parkinson’s disease was equally as prevalent in the city and the bush.

Then researchers looked at rates around Victoria’s Wimmera area.

ASHLEY BUSH: There is a cluster of higher incidence of Parkinson’s disease that would be expected for the average age of the population. And it’s about double what would be expected.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: Professor Ashley Bush was one the researchers.

He says pesticides used to produce chickpeas, beans and lentils could be responsible.

ASHLEY BUSH: Pesticides, various kinds of pesticides can cause the type of brain damage that leads to Parkinson’s disease.

That exposure would have occurred decades earlier, probably so it’s possible that things have changed indeed, so there’s quite a bit of investigation to go on to try to work this out.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: Associate Professor David Finkelstein is with Parkinson’s Victoria.

He says the findings from Monash University and the Florey Institute are the first in Australia.

DAVID FINKELSTEIN: Other rural farming communities, especially in the States, have done a lot of research and they’ve found that pesticides have been linked with an increased incidence of Parkinson’s.

If you give these pesticides to animals in the laboratory they get Parkinsonism.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: He wants Parkinson’s disease to be a research priority so it gets a short term boost in funding.

DAVID FINKELSTEIN: Parkinson’s slips through the cracks for funding. It doesn’t fit in the national health disability scheme because people get it generally after the age of 60, it’s a chronic disease, and it, so it slips through the cracks.

What we’re saying is if you put it, give it the appropriate attention it deserves, it will actually save the money for people because it will keep people in the workforce for longer.

TOM NIGHTINGALE: The report’s executive summary is being released today to coincide with World Parkinson’s Day.

The full study will be released later this year.

MICHAEL BRISSENDED: Tom Nightingale with that report.

2012 November: Adjungbilly Creek NSW. Pesticide: Atrazine

ADJUNGBILLY CREEK CONTAMINATION
Page: 17170

The Hon. DUNCAN GAY: I provide the following response to a question asked of me today by the Hon. Mick Veitch concerning the herbicide atrazine:

        Following recent routine stream water sampling in the Tumut region, Forests NSW detected a concentration of atrazine in two samples that exceeded the Australian Drinking Water Standards [ADWS]. Forests NSW use atrazine in combination with other chemicals to control weeds in newly established pine plantations. This is an authorised use of this herbicide and atrazine is a widely used herbicide. Atrazine is highly mobile in water and as such Forests NSW is careful to ensure that it does not enter waterways but also tests after application so it is aware if it has been carried into minor streams and waterways by unforseen rainfall events.
      In accordance with Forests NSW herbicide policy and the Environment Protection Authority [EPA] protocol, Forests NSW notified the Environment Protection Authority, WorkCover, the Greater Southern Area Health Service and the Gundagai Shire Council of the event. Forests NSW also notified as many downstream neighbours as possible as soon as possible. Sampling of water at the neighbours' pumping points is being undertaken for atrazine so that these neighbours can resume using the water as soon as clearance can be given. The atrazine will be carried downstream and, as it does so, it will be diluted to below hazardous concentrations. A heightened sampling regime is being instituted to monitor the concentrations of atrazine in watercourses. Contingency plans are in place in the event measured concentrations exceed the standards. Forests NSW is continuing to investigate the cause of these incidents and to monitor for the presence of atrazine in the affected streams.

Source: Parliament of NSW Hansard 21/11/2012

https://23.101.218.132/Prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LC20121121066?open&refNavID=HA8_1

ADJUNGBILLY CREEK CONTAMINATION
Page: 17170

The Hon. DUNCAN GAY: I provide the following response to a question asked of me today by the Hon. Mick Veitch concerning the herbicide atrazine:

        Following recent routine stream water sampling in the Tumut region, Forests NSW detected a concentration of atrazine in two samples that exceeded the Australian Drinking Water Standards [ADWS]. Forests NSW use atrazine in combination with other chemicals to control weeds in newly established pine plantations. This is an authorised use of this herbicide and atrazine is a widely used herbicide. Atrazine is highly mobile in water and as such Forests NSW is careful to ensure that it does not enter waterways but also tests after application so it is aware if it has been carried into minor streams and waterways by unforseen rainfall events.
      In accordance with Forests NSW herbicide policy and the Environment Protection Authority [EPA] protocol, Forests NSW notified the Environment Protection Authority, WorkCover, the Greater Southern Area Health Service and the Gundagai Shire Council of the event. Forests NSW also notified as many downstream neighbours as possible as soon as possible. Sampling of water at the neighbours’ pumping points is being undertaken for atrazine so that these neighbours can resume using the water as soon as clearance can be given. The atrazine will be carried downstream and, as it does so, it will be diluted to below hazardous concentrations. A heightened sampling regime is being instituted to monitor the concentrations of atrazine in watercourses. Contingency plans are in place in the event measured concentrations exceed the standards. Forests NSW is continuing to investigate the cause of these incidents and to monitor for the presence of atrazine in the affected streams.

Source: Parliament of NSW Hansard 21/11/2012

https://23.101.218.132/Prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LC20121121066?open&refNavID=HA8_1

2010 December: Urgent Action Needed on Dioxins: Pesticides: Multiple

6 December 2010

 

Source: https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2010/12/urgent-action-needed-dioxins-says-toxicologist

The environmental scientist whose work on dioxins last year prompted governments around the world to suspend the use of some pesticides says there is more to the problem and authorities need to act urgently.

Although dioxins have been banned from the ingredients of pesticides in Australia for more than a decade, many dioxins emerged in the manufacturing process and there was no end-stage monitoring to protect consumers and the public, said University of Queensland scientist Dr Caroline Gaus.

Numerous environmental and health issues were associated with undeclared dioxin impurities, said Dr Gaus, an environmental toxicologist with the National Research Institute for Environmental Toxicology (ENTOX).

Little information was available about the impurities because they were created during the production process so were not original ingredients.

“We estimate that the amount of these impurities is relatively high compared to other current dioxin sources, but this cannot be adequately quantified due to the commercial protection of data on pesticides use in Australia and internationally,” Dr Gaus said.

She said pesticides with impurities used in high volumes represented a previously neglected but significant and concerning source of dioxins in the environment. They also posed a risk to the health of people handling pesticides, and to consumers.

“Some of these pesticides contained high concentrations of dioxins, comparable to those known from pesticides which are banned or restricted for use in most countries since the 1980s and 90s,” she said.

Dioxins are linked to a range of cancers and are considered one of the most toxic man-made chemicals. They can cause adverse health effects in humans and wildlife including cancer, and act on development, reproduction and the endocrine system.

Research by Dr Gaus and PhD student Eva Holt last year showed that a wide range of currently used and globally marketed pesticides contained dioxin impurities, despite the widespread belief that modern pesticides were no longer a significant dioxin source.

As a result of their work, a new wave of suspensions, recalls, restrictions and government reviews on pesticide formulations is under way worldwide, including in the United States, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

The study analysed 23 different pesticide formulations, containing 15 different active ingredients currently used in Australia (plus four formulations that are no longer registered for use in Australia), including insecticides, herbicides and fungicides. Dioxins were detected in all samples, including some commonly used products. Researchers estimate approximately 200 pesticides have the potential to contain dioxins.

The pesticides are used on crops including cotton, potatoes, lettuce, tomatoes, beans and peanuts, as well as in parks and recreation areas, at turf farms and plant nurseries.

“In view of the global manufacturing, distribution and use of pesticides, international regulation and monitoring strategies should be developed and implemented to identify, evaluate, and target pesticide dioxin sources at the manufacturing stage,” Dr Gaus said.

Some Recent Restrictions

The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) suspended all formulations containing quintozene (pentachloronitrobenzene) from use in April this year due to risk to workers applying the pesticide, which was commonly used on golf courses. The fungicide is under review in New Zealand where it is used on bulbs and turf. The manufacturer recently initiated a voluntary recall of product containing quintozene. The APVMA has recently suspended the pesticide PCNB from sale and a stop sale order has been issued by the US Environmental Protection Agency.

About Dioxins

• Dioxins are toxic compounds which have adverse health effects in humans and wildlife. They can elicit adverse health effects at low levels (cancer, immunotoxicity, reproduction, endocrine function, development).

• These toxicants are managed under the international Stockholm Convention treaty which aims to protect human health and the environment by reducing and eliminating dioxin release to the environment. More than 150 countries, including Australia, have ratified the Stockholm Convention treaty since 2004.

• Most chlorinated pesticides have the potential to contain dioxins if manufactured under certain conditions and processes (e.g. > 150 ºC, alkaline conditions, process including chlorine) – the US EPA lists 161 chemicals (but it is not complete – PCNB for example is not listed). Thus, pesticides were considered historical sources of dioxins and contemporary monitoring data in most current-use pesticides are lacking.

• Dioxin impurities can vary between manufacturing facility, batch, year and country due to variations in production processes and conditions.

About the Research

• 23 different formulations containing 15 different active ingredients currently used in Australia (plus 4 formulations that are no longer registered for use in Australia), including insecticides, herbicides and fungicides, were analysed. Dioxins were detected in all samples. These include commonly used pesticides, such as PCNB, MCPA, 2,4-D, chlorothalonil and triclopyr/picloram. Others are Fluroxypyr, Mecoprop, Flumetsulam, Imazamox, Prochloraz, Fenamisphos, Chlorpyrifos, Lindane; 2,4-D; 2,4-DB; Chlorthal amd Quintozene.

• Some of these pesticide formulations contained high concentrations of dioxins, comparable to those known from pesticides which are banned or restricted for use in most countries since the 1980/90s.

•Highest dioxin (1,100-2,000 mg/tonne AI) and TEQ (2,400-5,700 µg/tonne AI) concentrations were found in the fungicide quintozene (also known as pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)).

• Dioxin concentrations in PCNB are comparable to those known from the banned pesticides 2,4,5-T (trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; the key ingredient of Agent Orange). Note: TEQ concentrations in PCNB are at the lower end for those known for 2,4,5-T (approaching the 7,000 µg/tonne used under the Stockholm Convention to estimate historical dioxin releases via past use of 2,4,5-T).

• There are about 6000 pesticide products on the market in Australia (containing ~2000 different active ingredients) – the UQ/ENTOX scientists analysed only a small proportion (0.4 per cent) of these.

• Dioxin concentrations in other pesticides analysed ranged from 61-190 ug TEQ/tonne AI. Impurity concentrations may vary considerably depending on the conditions employed during pesticide production and should therefore be monitored regularly.

• As many pesticides are used in high volumes, they can represent previously neglected but important sources of dioxins to the environment and pose a risk to the health of people handling pesticides.

• Based on these findings, the APVMA have recently suspended the pesticide PCNB, due to dioxin contamination and the associated risks to pesticide applicators. Similarly, the US EPA have issued a stop sale order for PCNB.

• The estimated release of dioxins from the use of PCNB is 27 g TEQ/year (10-90th percentile range: 14-110 g TEQ/year). The dioxin release from this pesticide alone ranks among the top 5 dioxin sources to land in Australia (range 28-110 g TEQ/year).

• The greatest source of uncertainty with these estimates is the lack of information on pesticide use volumes in Australia, which is commercial in confidence and thus not publicly available. This is why the dioxin release associated with many of the pesticides analysed by the UQ/ENTOX scientists could not be estimated to date (has to be modelled)

• The cumulative dioxin release associated with high volume-use of different pesticides may be an important source of dioxins, even if pesticides contain lower dioxin levels than PCNB, e.g. if all pesticide products were contaminated at levels ranging from 100-10,000 µg TEQ/tonne AI and used at a total of 200,000 tonnes per year, then the annual dioxin release would be between 20 and 2000 g TEQ/year.

Note: data on the amount of pesticides used in Australia is not publicly available (commercial in confidence), total pesticide use may be considerably higher than 200,000 tonnes (approximately 2.25 million tonnes of pesticides a year are used in the USA, including 1.18 million tonnes per year of chlorine and hypochlorite pesticides).

The study was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and undertaken by the National Research Institute for Environmental Toxicology, University of Queensland (Eva Holt, Caroline Gaus) in collaboration with the National Measurement Institute in Sydney (Gavin Stevenson) and collaborators from Germany (Roland Weber).

The United Nations Environmental Protection Agency has used the data from the study to develop a burden of toxicology measure for use worldwide. It helps identify and prioritise dioxin sources.

Media inquiries: Marlene McKendry – 0401 99 6847

2015 July: Brisbane ‘Pest Bomb’ Explosion.

'Large volume' of pest bombs cause explosion at Brisbane restaurant, buckling front wall and blowing off rear door

Brisbane restaurant owners have inadvertently caused an explosion at their shop after overusing pest bombs.

Authorities were called to the Glamorous Wok at Sunnybank just after 10pm and found the bottom section of the front wall buckled out and rear door blown off.

The owners had planted 24 cans of pest repellent inside the store.

Acacia Ridge Fire and Emergency Services station officer Michael Yates said they were originally told the owners had laid "some 12 pest bombs inside the premises".

"I sent a couple fire-fighters in with atmospheric test equipment and a thermal imaging camera to make sure there was no residue vapours; there wasn't any signs of fire. Police then did a secondary sweep of the building and found 24 pest bombs," Mr Yates said.

"There is structural damage to the restaurant ... the front door was buckled out and the rear door was blown out."

He said pest bomb explosions were not very common.

"This [kind of explosion] usually happens with a gas leak. I haven't in my 20-year career seen a pest bomb explosion," Mr Yates said.

"What happens with these they have hydrocarbon propellant within the aerosol and they go up into the air and kill the bugs but they're extremely flammable and may present an explosion hazard.

Obviously if you're going to set off 24 that's a large volume of propellant so it obviously found an ignition source and caused an vapour explosion which expands out with a sudden rush, which is why the front of the restaurant buckled out."

‘Large volume’ of pest bombs cause explosion at Brisbane restaurant, buckling front wall and blowing off rear door

 

Brisbane restaurant owners have inadvertently caused an explosion at their shop after overusing pest bombs.

Authorities were called to the Glamorous Wok at Sunnybank just after 10pm and found the bottom section of the front wall buckled out and rear door blown off.

The owners had planted 24 cans of pest repellent inside the store.

Acacia Ridge Fire and Emergency Services station officer Michael Yates said they were originally told the owners had laid “some 12 pest bombs inside the premises”.

“I sent a couple fire-fighters in with atmospheric test equipment and a thermal imaging camera to make sure there was no residue vapours; there wasn’t any signs of fire. Police then did a secondary sweep of the building and found 24 pest bombs,” Mr Yates said.

“There is structural damage to the restaurant … the front door was buckled out and the rear door was blown out.”

He said pest bomb explosions were not very common.

“This [kind of explosion] usually happens with a gas leak. I haven’t in my 20-year career seen a pest bomb explosion,” Mr Yates said.

“What happens with these they have hydrocarbon propellant within the aerosol and they go up into the air and kill the bugs but they’re extremely flammable and may present an explosion hazard.

Obviously if you’re going to set off 24 that’s a large volume of propellant so it obviously found an ignition source and caused an vapour explosion which expands out with a sudden rush, which is why the front of the restaurant buckled out.”

2012-2016: Toora (Vic) Water Supply. Pesticides: Triclopyr, 2,4,6-T, Picloram

Clear Water Storage Water27/03/2012Triclopyr0.15ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water29/04/2013Triclopyr0.02ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water18/03/2014Triclopyr0.04ug/L
Untreated Source Water21/04/20152,4,6-T0.1ug/L
Untreated Source Water21/04/2015Picloram0.27ug/L
Untreated Source Water21/04/2015Triclopyr2.6ug/L
WTP Filtered Water12/05/2015Picloram0.07ug/L
WTP Filtered Water12/05/2015Triclopyr0.53ug/L
Untreated Source Water12/05/2015Triclopyr0.27ug/L
Untreated Source Water19/04/2016Triclopyr0.12ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 27/03/2012 Triclopyr 0.15ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 29/04/2013 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 18/03/2014 Triclopyr 0.04ug/L
Untreated Source Water 21/04/2015 2,4,6-T 0.1ug/L
Untreated Source Water 21/04/2015 Picloram 0.27ug/L
Untreated Source Water 21/04/2015 Triclopyr 2.6ug/L
WTP Filtered Water 12/05/2015 Picloram 0.07ug/L
WTP Filtered Water 12/05/2015 Triclopyr 0.53ug/L
Untreated Source Water 12/05/2015 Triclopyr 0.27ug/L
Untreated Source Water 19/04/2016 Triclopyr 0.12ug/L

2012-2016: Meeniyan Water Supply (Vic). Pesticides: Triclopyr, 2,4-D

Clear Water Storage Water27/03/2012Triclopyr0.06ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water29/04/2013Triclopyr0.06ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water18/03/2014Triclopyr0.06ug/L
Untreated Source Water17/11/2014Triclopyr0.01ug/L
Untreated Source Water21/04/2015Triclopyr0.07ug/L
Untreated Source Water16/11/20152,4-D0.02ug/L
Untreated Source Water16/11/2015Triclopyr0.02ug/L
Untreated Source Water19/04/20162,4-D0.06ug/L
Untreated Source Water19/04/2016Triclopyr0.09ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 27/03/2012 Triclopyr 0.06ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 29/04/2013 Triclopyr 0.06ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 18/03/2014 Triclopyr 0.06ug/L
Untreated Source Water 17/11/2014 Triclopyr 0.01ug/L
Untreated Source Water 21/04/2015 Triclopyr 0.07ug/L
Untreated Source Water 16/11/2015 2,4-D 0.02ug/L
Untreated Source Water 16/11/2015 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L
Untreated Source Water 19/04/2016 2,4-D 0.06ug/L
Untreated Source Water 19/04/2016 Triclopyr 0.09ug/L

2012-2016: Korumburra (Vic) Water Supply. Pesticides: Triclopyr, MCPA, 2-4-D

Clear Water Storage Water28/03/2012Triclopyr0.05ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water17/03/2014Triclopyr0.02ug/L
Untreated Source Water16/11/2015MCPA0.03ug/L
Untreated Source Water18/04/20162,4-D0.04ug/L
Untreated Source Water18/04/2016Triclopyr0.02ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 28/03/2012 Triclopyr 0.05ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 17/03/2014 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L
Untreated Source Water 16/11/2015 MCPA 0.03ug/L
Untreated Source Water 18/04/2016 2,4-D 0.04ug/L
Untreated Source Water 18/04/2016 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

2011-2015: Foster (Vic). Pesticide: Triclopyr

Clear Water Storage Water28/06/2011Triclopyr0.02
Clear Water Storage Water27/03/2012Triclopyr0.04
Clear Water Storage Water18/03/2014Triclopyr0.07
Untreated Source Water18/11/2014Triclopyr0.26
Untreated Source Water21/04/2015Triclopyr0.04
Untreated Source Water17/11/2015Triclopyr0.03
Clear Water Storage Water 28/06/2011 Triclopyr 0.02
Clear Water Storage Water 27/03/2012 Triclopyr 0.04
Clear Water Storage Water 18/03/2014 Triclopyr 0.07
Untreated Source Water 18/11/2014 Triclopyr 0.26
Untreated Source Water 21/04/2015 Triclopyr 0.04
Untreated Source Water 17/11/2015 Triclopyr 0.03

2011-2014: Fish Creek (Victoria). Pesticides: Triclopyr

Clear Water Storage Water28/06/2011Triclopyr0.01ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water27/03/2012Triclopyr0.24ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water29/04/2013Triclopyr0.02ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water18/03/2014Triclopyr0.02ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 28/06/2011 Triclopyr 0.01ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 27/03/2012 Triclopyr 0.24ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 29/04/2013 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L
Clear Water Storage Water 18/03/2014 Triclopyr 0.02ug/L

1992: Wandin (Vic) Dieldrin “Control Area”

2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
 
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
 
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.
 

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

1992: Koo Wee Rup (Vic) Dieldrin “Control Area”

2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
 
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
 
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.
 

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

1992: Thorpdale (Vic) Dieldrin “Control Area”

2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
 
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
 
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.
 

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

2.2 Potato growing
Potato growing in the Gembrook area has historically been the main form of agriculture in theNorthern Ranges Green Wedge, with an excellent reputation for high quality produce based onstrong consumer demand for brushed potatoes from the red soil country. In 1995 Gembrook accounted for around 4 per cent of Victoria’s potato growing area, producing around 10,000 tonnes and occupying around 400 hectares.
Unfortunately the area has been faced with majordifficulties over the last 30 years. Dieldrin is present in the red soils and much of the area is also affected by an organism called the potato cyst nematode (PCN). These two separate problems have combined to create an immensely difficult situation for many growers, some of whom are concerned about their future in the industry and their future options for retirement.
Potato cyst nematode is common in Europe while Australia has generally remained free of the problem. It consists of a microscopic organism which lives in the soil and attacks the roots of potatoes and some other plants. It is not a human health issue except it reduces crop yields, increases production costs and reduces the value of potatoes grown in the area. It was discovered in Western Australia in 1983, in Wandin (1991) and then in Gembrook in 1992. Since 1992 the Department of Primary Industries has declared four “Control Areas” in Victoria – at Thorpdale, Koo Wee Rup, Wandin and Gembrook – and movement into and out of these areas is restricted and export to interstate markets has been banned. The effects on the Gembrook potato industry have been devastating as Gembrook’s main market was interstate and as a consequence half the growers left theindustry and the production of potatoes declined in the study area by half.

At present only 12 potato growers now remain in the study area. Another problem in the study area is dieldrin, as a result of widespread use of the pesticide between1950 and 1980. At the time dieldrin was hailed as an effective pesticide which could   replace Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and it was used widely across the world. It was subsequently found to build up to toxic levels in animals and humans and was withdrawn from use in 1987. The level of dieldrin soil contamination does drop over time – reportedly 30-50 years before it is graded at a safe level – although the levels re main at unacceptable levels in the Gembrook area.Whilst soil contamination does not directly affect the growing of potatoes and other vegetables, itlimits options for cattle, ducks and free range chickens (but not for horses and sheep). Cattle whichgraze on contaminated dieldrin soils must be agisted on “clean” soils for six months before they can obtain a clean bill of health and be sold at market.

Source: Northern Ranges Green Wedge Management Plan Issues Paper June 2010https://www.cardinia.vic.gov.au/files/Strategic_planning/SP_GWMP_NorthernRanges_IssuesPaper_2010-06.pdf

2016 September: Study Confirms Widespread Pesticide Pollution of Australian Waterways

Study Confirms Widepsread Pesticide Pollution of Australian Waterways

2016 September: https://www.archive.foe.org.au/sites/default/files/Pesticides%20Detections%20in%20Australian%20Waterways.pdf

Environmental organisation Friends of the Earth (FoE) today called on increased restrictions and bans on pesticides which continue to pollute Australian waterways. FoE also called for significant increases in the number of pesticide guideline levels published in ecological and drinking water guidelines in Australia.

These calls are based on a review of data revealing widespread pesticide pollution across Australia.

“Our research revealed almost 200 pesticides have been detected in over 3,500 locations in Australian waterways over the years” Friends of the Earth spokesperson Anthony Amis said. “This information was gained from published scientific reports and Freedom of Information applications from a variety of water authorities”.

“It is worrying that almost all of these pesticides have no ecological guidelines, and 40% don’t have drinking water guidelines” Mr Amis added.”FoE wants the most commonly detected pesticides to be banned from use within Australia”.

“95% of pesticides used in Australia and detected in waterways do not have ecological guidelines, meaning that if traces of the pesticide leach off land and into waterways there are limited mechanisms, including legal means, available to determine ecological effect of the pesticide on the waterway and the legal consequences of such pollution”. Mr Amis said. “Essentially many pesticide users are allowed to pollute waterways without due consequences and this has been the state of play for decades. Many waterways are treated as nothing more than agricultural drains” he added.

“Over 40% of pesticides that have been detected in Australian waterways do not have guideline limits under the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, making it difficult to determine possible health impacts associated with people who are exposed to that particular pesticide. Because there is no Australian Government authority that monitors biocide use, water authorities often do not know what is being used within their water supplies and what to test for. This further complicates the issue”.

Friends of the Earth is recommending that the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), who publish the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, should contact every water authority across the country to get access to their water pollution data. In this way, the NHMRC can then better determine which pesticides require guidelines based on actual pesticide pollution events.

FoE is also calling on the National Environment Protection Council and the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand to urgently update ANZECC Ecological Guidelines, some of which have not been updated in almost two decades. ”A mountain of scientific research on pesticides and other pollutants has been published since the ANZECC Guidelines were last produced” Mr Amis added.

FoE is also recommending bans and label changes for pesticides commonly detected in waterways, particularly the herbicides Atrazine and Simazine, which represent 20% of pesticides entering waterways.

A copy of the report can be found here:

https://www.archive.foe.org.au/sites/default/files/Pesticides%20Detections%20in%20Australian%20Waterways.pdf

2016 September: Birds poisoned at Budgewoi and Warnerville NSW. Pesticide: Fenitrothion

EPA, council seeking information to catch bird killer at Budgewoi and Warnervale

September 28, 2016
 
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/central-coast/epa-council-seeking-information-to-catch-bird-killer-at-budgewoi-and-warnervale/news-story/e26742cd07cf2813b0734ad38bf9888a
 

The NSW Environment Protection Authority has received reports of dozens of bird deaths at Warnervale and Budgewoi.

EPA acting director Hunter Karen Marler said the bird deaths were disturbing and the EPA was investigating with Central Coast Council.

“The EPA received reports of dead corellas at Warnervale and dead magpies at Budgewoi over the past two weeks,” Ms Marler said.

“Officers from the EPA and council inspected the areas and collected dead birds of different species for analysis at the EPA’s laboratories in Sydney.

“Preliminary results indicate the birds have been poisoned with the same pesticide, fenamiphos. This pesticide is not readily available to the public.

“The EPA conducted a letterbox drop to local residents in both areas seeking any information that may assist the EPA’s investigation.”

Ms Marler said the EPA received video evidence of the birds being poisoned by a member of the public on Monday.

“The EPA has reviewed the footage which appears to show a dark-coloured Ford Ranger with the driver appearing to throw an object out of the moving vehicle.

“The video footage is distressing — it shows magpies and other birds flying to the meat and then becoming severely affected within minutes of ingesting the poison. Dead magpies are visible on the road verge and birds can be seen falling out of trees as they succumb to the poison.

“An EPA officer attended the scene on Monday and found numerous pieces of meat, which smelt strongly of pesticide, in the area seen in the footage.”

Central Coast Council’s noxious weeds and pest species officer Paul Marynissen said it was distressing to see so many native birds being attacked.

“We’ve received a number of reports of many dead birds who have eaten this poisoned meat.

“Residents living in the Budgewoi, Warnervale and Woongarrah areas, also need to keep an eye on their pets and make sure they don’t eat anything foreign when on their daily walks. This poisoned meat is not only harmful to our local birds but also our pets and children,” Mr Marynissen said.

The EPA has provided information taken from the video footage to both the NSW Police and the RSPCA and is conducting its own investigations.

It is an offence under the EPA’s legislation to use pesticides in a manner that harms non-target animals. The maximum penalties for this are $120,000 for an individual. It is also an offence to cause danger or harm to an animal by littering and maximum penalties are $3300.

The EPA and Central Coast Council is appealing for people to come forward with information which may assist. They are particularly interested in hearing from the owner of the dark coloured Ford Ranger seen in the vicinity of Highberry St, Woongarrah, on Saturday, September 24.

Details: EPA Environment Line on 131 555.

EPA, council seeking information to catch bird killer at Budgewoi and Warnervale

September 28, 2016
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/central-coast/epa-council-seeking-information-to-catch-bird-killer-at-budgewoi-and-warnervale/news-story/e26742cd07cf2813b0734ad38bf9888a

The NSW Environment Protection Authority has received reports of dozens of bird deaths at Warnervale and Budgewoi.

EPA acting director Hunter Karen Marler said the bird deaths were disturbing and the EPA was investigating with Central Coast Council.

“The EPA received reports of dead corellas at Warnervale and dead magpies at Budgewoi over the past two weeks,” Ms Marler said.

“Officers from the EPA and council inspected the areas and collected dead birds of different species for analysis at the EPA’s laboratories in Sydney.

“Preliminary results indicate the birds have been poisoned with the same pesticide, fenamiphos. This pesticide is not readily available to the public.

“The EPA conducted a letterbox drop to local residents in both areas seeking any information that may assist the EPA’s investigation.”

Ms Marler said the EPA received video evidence of the birds being poisoned by a member of the public on Monday.

“The EPA has reviewed the footage which appears to show a dark-coloured Ford Ranger with the driver appearing to throw an object out of the moving vehicle.

“The video footage is distressing — it shows magpies and other birds flying to the meat and then becoming severely affected within minutes of ingesting the poison. Dead magpies are visible on the road verge and birds can be seen falling out of trees as they succumb to the poison.

“An EPA officer attended the scene on Monday and found numerous pieces of meat, which smelt strongly of pesticide, in the area seen in the footage.”

Central Coast Council’s noxious weeds and pest species officer Paul Marynissen said it was distressing to see so many native birds being attacked.

“We’ve received a number of reports of many dead birds who have eaten this poisoned meat.

“Residents living in the Budgewoi, Warnervale and Woongarrah areas, also need to keep an eye on their pets and make sure they don’t eat anything foreign when on their daily walks. This poisoned meat is not only harmful to our local birds but also our pets and children,” Mr Marynissen said.

The EPA has provided information taken from the video footage to both the NSW Police and the RSPCA and is conducting its own investigations.

It is an offence under the EPA’s legislation to use pesticides in a manner that harms non-target animals. The maximum penalties for this are $120,000 for an individual. It is also an offence to cause danger or harm to an animal by littering and maximum penalties are $3300.

The EPA and Central Coast Council is appealing for people to come forward with information which may assist. They are particularly interested in hearing from the owner of the dark coloured Ford Ranger seen in the vicinity of Highberry St, Woongarrah, on Saturday, September 24.

Details: EPA Environment Line on 131 555.

2012: 50 bird killed near Mudgee NSW. Pesticide: Mevinphos

Pesticide kills nearly 50 birds
22 Jul 2013, Mudgee Guardian

Source: https://www.mudgeeguardian.com.au/story/1651647/pesticide-kills-nearly-50-birds/

A 66-year-old man was sentenced in Mudgee Local Court for misusing a pesticide that killed 46 birds including natives.

A man who killed 46 birds, the majority of which were native, by misusing a pesticide when attempting to control problem pigeons was convicted and ordered to pay nearly $10,000 in Mudgee Local Court last Wednesday.

Clark Lennard Bell, 66, pleaded guilty to the charges of ‘Use pesticide as to harm non-target animal/plant’, ‘Not understand label before using registered pesticide’, and ‘Possess/use restricted pesticide without authority’.

He was fined $3500, ordered to pay professional costs of $3500 and a further $2500 to the Environment Protection Authority (EPA).

Since 2009 the Mudgee mill where Bell was general manager has had trouble with pigeons entering, roosting and defecating in the building.

Bell tried a range of methods to rid the mill of the birds without success.

In July last year he found a 20 to 30 year old insecticide in the shed on the site of the mill which he used to bait the pigeons.

The substance was Phosdrin Insecticide, a restricted pesticide which Bell didn’t have the authority to use, which didn’t have the full label, and which has never been approved for use on birds.

Around this time, members and players of the nearby Mudgee Golf Club started to notice dead cockatoos and galahs on the course, along with several more dead birds and pigeons around the adjacent railway tracks.

In total 46 birds were found dead, 25 cockatoos, 12 galahs and nine pigeons.

Bell’s solicitor, Stephen Flynn, told the court that his client’s actions were “reckless as oppose to deliberate” and that he was “amateurishly attempting to solve a problem to the business”.

Ms Junor of the EPA said that Phosdrin Insecticide is a particularly dangerous pesticide and that there must have been “an awareness in the mind of the defendant that his actions were unlawful”.

Magistrate Michael Allen said the incident was “reckless conduct” and “unsophisticated” but “accepts there was no intention to harm anything beyond pest pigeons”.

However he went on to say there needs to be “a significant deterrent” to breaching regulations aimed at protecting native animals.

“There needs to be greater care given to the land that these people derive their living from,” he said.

Pesticide kills nearly 50 birds

A man who killed 46 birds, the majority of which were native, by misusing a pesticide when attempting to control problem pigeons was convicted and ordered to pay nearly $10,000 in Mudgee Local Court last Wednesday.

Clark Lennard Bell, 66, pleaded guilty to the charges of ‘Use pesticide as to harm non-target animal/plant’, ‘Not understand label before using registered pesticide’, and ‘Possess/use restricted pesticide without authority’.

He was fined $3500, ordered to pay professional costs of $3500 and a further $2500 to the Environment Protection Authority (EPA).

Since 2009 the Mudgee mill where Bell was general manager has had trouble with pigeons entering, roosting and defecating in the building.

Bell tried a range of methods to rid the mill of the birds without success.

In July last year he found a 20 to 30 year old insecticide in the shed on the site of the mill which he used to bait the pigeons.

The substance was Phosdrin Insecticide, a restricted pesticide which Bell didn’t have the authority to use, which didn’t have the full label, and which has never been approved for use on birds.

Around this time, members and players of the nearby Mudgee Golf Club started to notice dead cockatoos and galahs on the course, along with several more dead birds and pigeons around the adjacent railway tracks.

In total 46 birds were found dead, 25 cockatoos, 12 galahs and nine pigeons.

Bell’s solicitor, Stephen Flynn, told the court that his client’s actions were “reckless as oppose to deliberate” and that he was “amateurishly attempting to solve a problem to the business”.

Ms Junor of the EPA said that Phosdrin Insecticide is a particularly dangerous pesticide and that there must have been “an awareness in the mind of the defendant that his actions were unlawful”.

Magistrate Michael Allen said the incident was “reckless conduct” and “unsophisticated” but “accepts there was no intention to harm anything beyond pest pigeons”.

However he went on to say there needs to be “a significant deterrent” to breaching regulations aimed at protecting native animals.

“There needs to be greater care given to the land that these people derive their living from,” he said.

2011: 52 Brolgas Poisoned in North Queensland

Queensland farmer fined $18,000 for poisoning 52 brolgas

Updated 15 Aug 2013, 1:07pm

A far north Queensland farmer has been fined $18,000 over the poisoning deaths of 52 protected brolgas on a southern Tablelands property.

The birds died from eating corn laced with organophosphate pesticide at Mandalee station at Innot Hot Springs in 2011.

Cairns magistrate Suzette Coates found 72-year-old Richard Thiele, the director of the company that operates the station, Osprey Australia, responsible for the deaths.

She rejected Thiele's plea of not guilty for breaching the Nature Conservation Act, along with his defence that anyone could have baited the birds because the public had easy access to the 2,300-hectare property.

Photos of the dead birds in various stages of decomposition were shown in court.

A chemist gave evidence describing the toxicity of a pesticide in the stomach contents of the birds as being exceedingly high.

Queensland farmer fined $18,000 for poisoning 52 brolgas

Updated

A far north Queensland farmer has been fined $18,000 over the poisoning deaths of 52 protected brolgas on a southern Tablelands property.

The birds died from eating corn laced with organophosphate pesticide at Mandalee station at Innot Hot Springs in 2011.

Cairns magistrate Suzette Coates found 72-year-old Richard Thiele, the director of the company that operates the station, Osprey Australia, responsible for the deaths.

She rejected Thiele’s plea of not guilty for breaching the Nature Conservation Act, along with his defence that anyone could have baited the birds because the public had easy access to the 2,300-hectare property.

Photos of the dead birds in various stages of decomposition were shown in court.

A chemist gave evidence describing the toxicity of a pesticide in the stomach contents of the birds as being exceedingly high.

2014 May: Residents Fight Plans for $100m Pesticide Plant at Lara. Pesticide: Paraquat

29 May 2014.

 
By NOEL MURPHY

Source: https://geelongindy.com.au/indy/2014-05-29/residents-fight-plans-for-100m-pesticide-plant-at-lara/

TWO hundred anxious Lara residents have petitioned City Hall over a new pesticide plant expected to generate 45 jobs and $100 million a year for the local economy.
The Accensi plant, with separate sites on McManus and Broderick Rds, is set to open by November in City Hall’s Geelong Ring Road Employment Precinct.
But Lara Resident Action Group has lashed out at a lack of notification about the chemical plant to 50 households within a kilometre of the site.
The group also voiced fears about safety and environment regulations for the project.
Spokesman Rob Leonard said residents in the dark about the pesticides to be manufactured feared they might include Paraquat, banned in 32 other countries.
“Residents are more than disturbed, they’re up in arms,” Mr Leonard said.
“They’re worrying about property values, about their kids’ health, everyone’s health. A chemical plant like this is making Lara feel unsafe to live in.
“If it leaks it will go into the water drainage system next door. If it’s airborne it will go over schools.”
Mr Leonard released a letter to City Hall from WorkSafe major hazards manager Geoff Cooke, explaning WorkSafe’s opinion that Paraquatm“should be classified as very toxic”.
However, the letter said Accensi believed Paraquat should be classified as toxic, meaning the proposed facility “would be beblow the major hazard threshold”.
The petion said the signatories understood they lived next to Industrial 2-zoned land, so they had “an expectation of industrial-type development”..
“But it is of deep concern to us that there has been an approval of a chemical plant within 200 to 1000 metres of our properties without any notification.
“Some of our dwellings/properties are within 200 metres of the proposed development site and still no notification was/has been received.”
City Hall planning and tourism general manager Peter Bettess said zoning made Accensi’s site exempt from objection and appeal rights.
The Independent was unable to obtain comment from Accensi.

.

By NOEL MURPHYSource: https://geelongindy.com.au/indy/2014-05-29/residents-fight-plans-for-100m-pesticide-plant-at-lara/TWO hundred anxious Lara residents have petitioned City Hall over a new pesticide plant expected to generate 45 jobs and $100 million a year for the local economy.
The Accensi plant, with separate sites on McManus and Broderick Rds, is set to open by November in City Hall’s Geelong Ring Road Employment Precinct.
But Lara Resident Action Group has lashed out at a lack of notification about the chemical plant to 50 households within a kilometre of the site.
The group also voiced fears about safety and environment regulations for the project.
Spokesman Rob Leonard said residents in the dark about the pesticides to be manufactured feared they might include Paraquat, banned in 32 other countries.
“Residents are more than disturbed, they’re up in arms,” Mr Leonard said.
“They’re worrying about property values, about their kids’ health, everyone’s health. A chemical plant like this is making Lara feel unsafe to live in.
“If it leaks it will go into the water drainage system next door. If it’s airborne it will go over schools.”
Mr Leonard released a letter to City Hall from WorkSafe major hazards manager Geoff Cooke, explaning WorkSafe’s opinion that Paraquatm“should be classified as very toxic”.
However, the letter said Accensi believed Paraquat should be classified as toxic, meaning the proposed facility “would be beblow the major hazard threshold”.
The petion said the signatories understood they lived next to Industrial 2-zoned land, so they had “an expectation of industrial-type development”..
“But it is of deep concern to us that there has been an approval of a chemical plant within 200 to 1000 metres of our properties without any notification.
“Some of our dwellings/properties are within 200 metres of the proposed development site and still no notification was/has been received.”
City Hall planning and tourism general manager Peter Bettess said zoning made Accensi’s site exempt from objection and appeal rights.
The Independent was unable to obtain comment from Accensi.

2015 April: Yarra Valley Strawberries. Pesticide: Methyl Bromide

Australian growers say strawberries are safe to eat after revelations of pesticide use in the industry

Source: https://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/outer-east/australian-growers-say-strawberries-are-safe-to-eat-after-revelations-of-pesticide-use-in-the-industry/news-story/b8fef5bd3bf690babbc2f690724039a4

YARRA Valley strawberry farmers have reassured consumers their produce is safe to eat after reports that Australian strawberry plants were being treated with a restricted chemical.

On Monday, theABC reported the Toolangi Certified Strawberry Runner Growers Co-op was using methyl bromide as a pesticide for its runner plants.

The co-op produces nursery plants which are supplied to commercial strawberry growers across Australia.

In 1989, the United Nations agreed to phase out some uses of methyl bromide because of its damaging effects to the ozone layer.

Under a UN exemption, runner growers are allowed to use the chemical in small amounts to control soil-borne diseases and pests. But commercial strawberry growers stopped using methyl bromide more than 10 years ago.

HAVE YOUR SAY: Are you worried about pesticide use on fresh produce? Tell us below

Australian Strawberry Growers Association president Sam Violi said he was highly concerned the report painted commercial growers with the same brush as runner growers.

Mr Violi, who owns Coldstream’s Golden Vale strawberry farm, said he was worried sales of Yarra Valley strawberries would fall just weeks after the industry experienced a spike after the Nanna’s imported frozen berries hepatitis scare.

“So many of our growers are concerned about the public getting the wrong information,” Mr Violi said.

“Our message is that our strawberries are safe to eat.

“Methyl bromide is not sprayed on the fruit. It is only used as a soil fumigant in production and we only get the plants 12 months after that.”

Co-op managing director George Weda said methyl bromide was still being used by runner growers because there were “no effective alternatives”.

Mr Weda said growers were making considerable efforts to reduce the use of the chemical but warned against a total ban until an alternative was found.

He said if methyl bromide was banned, runner growers would not be able to supply commercial growers with healthy plants, which would lead to a decline in yields and encourage imports.

But Environmental Justice Australia chief executive Brendan Sydes said it was a “real failure” that the runner industry had not come up with an alternative.

“We believe that if people knew more about this issue they’d be very concerned that the strawberries they’re consuming are contributing to this significant environmental issue,” Mr Sydes said.

Australian growers say strawberries are safe to eat after revelations of pesticide use in the industry

Source: https://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/outer-east/australian-growers-say-strawberries-are-safe-to-eat-after-revelations-of-pesticide-use-in-the-industry/news-story/b8fef5bd3bf690babbc2f690724039a4

YARRA Valley strawberry farmers have reassured consumers their produce is safe to eat after reports that Australian strawberry plants were being treated with a restricted chemical.

On Monday, theABC reported the Toolangi Certified Strawberry Runner Growers Co-op was using methyl bromide as a pesticide for its runner plants.

The co-op produces nursery plants which are supplied to commercial strawberry growers across Australia.

In 1989, the United Nations agreed to phase out some uses of methyl bromide because of its damaging effects to the ozone layer.

Under a UN exemption, runner growers are allowed to use the chemical in small amounts to control soil-borne diseases and pests. But commercial strawberry growers stopped using methyl bromide more than 10 years ago.

HAVE YOUR SAY: Are you worried about pesticide use on fresh produce? Tell us below

Australian Strawberry Growers Association president Sam Violi said he was highly concerned the report painted commercial growers with the same brush as runner growers.

Mr Violi, who owns Coldstream’s Golden Vale strawberry farm, said he was worried sales of Yarra Valley strawberries would fall just weeks after the industry experienced a spike after the Nanna’s imported frozen berries hepatitis scare.

“So many of our growers are concerned about the public getting the wrong information,” Mr Violi said.

“Our message is that our strawberries are safe to eat.

“Methyl bromide is not sprayed on the fruit. It is only used as a soil fumigant in production and we only get the plants 12 months after that.”

Co-op managing director George Weda said methyl bromide was still being used by runner growers because there were “no effective alternatives”.

Mr Weda said growers were making considerable efforts to reduce the use of the chemical but warned against a total ban until an alternative was found.

He said if methyl bromide was banned, runner growers would not be able to supply commercial growers with healthy plants, which would lead to a decline in yields and encourage imports.

But Environmental Justice Australia chief executive Brendan Sydes said it was a “real failure” that the runner industry had not come up with an alternative.

“We believe that if people knew more about this issue they’d be very concerned that the strawberries they’re consuming are contributing to this significant environmental issue,” Mr Sydes said.

2016 February: National Study into Pesticides and Parkinsons Disease

Research to examine links between most common pesticides and conditions such as Parkinson’s and cancer

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-17/chemicals-pesticide-organophosphates-research-farmer-health/7175340?pfmredir=sm

Updated

Chemical drums for recycling Scientists are examining links between exposure to the most widely used pesticides in Australia and degenerative conditions such as Parkinson’s disease

The National Centre for Farmer Health (NCFH) will test farmers’ exposure to organophosphate pesticides over 12 months and document the effect on the farmers’ nervous systems.

Flinders University toxicologist Associate Professor John Edwards said aggressive cancers, neurological and psychotic conditions had been linked to long-term exposure, but very little research had been done.

What we’re trying to show to farmers is that the level of exposure they may have had today will have an impact on them.

Associate Professor John Edwards, toxicologist

“What we do know is that farmers and pesticide sprayers are at risk of some cancers,” he said.

“We don’t know which pesticides are the contributors to that disease and we don’t know whether it’s the mixture of chemicals or other lifestyle factors that might contribute.

“It’s still quite a speculative argument to say that farmers are more at risk of Parkinson’s due to their exposure to insecticides, and one of the problems there is that the design of the studies that have been done to look for this link are relatively poor.”

The 12-month program is only a first step towards answering these bigger questions but Professor Edwards hopes it will prompt funding and interest for further research.

Attacking the nervous system

Organophosphates attack an insect’s nervous system, causing instant death.

The question is whether they are doing something similar to humans over time.

“We find that it is relatively safe, provided exposure is limited,” Associate Professor Edwards said.

“However, the problem for humans is that it’s an accumulated toxin; that is, the effect accumulates over time with repeated exposure.

“What we’re trying to show to farmers is that the level of exposure they may have had today will have an impact on them.

“Even if they don’t have any symptoms now, they may then accumulate an effect with a subsequent exposure in a week or two or a month later.”

Pesticides banned overseas, but ‘vital’ to Australian agriculture

Organophosphates have been banned in the United States and restricted in the United Kingdom and Europe.

But in Australia the chemicals are regularly used in a list of industries including sheep, beef, grain and dairy.

Associate Professor Edwards said it was hard to imagine agricultural production without them.

“Remember that Australia is very, very buggy,” he said.

“We have probably a greater need for effective insecticides in Australia and especially in agriculture.

“The benefits in this case could outweigh the risk … the trick here is to be able to use them safely.”

Associate Professor Edwards said education was more important than regulation, stressing restrictions or bans could prompt a dangerous black market.

“When chemicals are banned and farmers still want to use them for economic reasons, because it helps their crop, they will find ways around the ban,” he said.

Years after organochloride pesticide DDT [dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane] was banned in Australia, Associate Professor Edwards was called out to a number of chemical spills.

“I remember someone had bought a 44-gallon drum of DDT even though it was banned,” he said.

“It was so old, the drum was rusty and when he got it home it burst open and spilled all over their yard.

“The next day we got a second call because another drum was found, which had done the same thing.”

Research to empower farmers, encourage safe management

Farmers who participate in the research will be tested every month over 12 months, and will receive instant feedback on their exposure levels.

The test involves measuring the level of cholinesterase enzymes, which are needed for the proper functioning of the nervous system.

Organophosphates inhibit cholinesterase, and regular tests will detail the impact of chemical use on a farmers’ enzyme levels.

Associate Professor Edwards said information about the invisible impacts would empower farmers to improve safety standards.

“What it becomes is a matter of farmers recognising the practices that they undertake, which increases their risk,” he said.

“So a part of what we’re doing is also an estimate of their exposure by talking to them about what they’ve been doing during each interval.”

The NCFH is calling on farmers in western Victoria to participate in the research and will set up three localities of interest in the Wimmera and south-west.

2010 June – 2011 March: Wunghnu: Pesticides detected: 2,4-D, Atrazine, Simazine

DateTownLevelPesticide
24/06/2010Wunghnu2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.8 μg/L
9/09/2010Wunghnu Atrazine 1.2 μg/L
9/09/2010Wunghnu Simazine 1 μg/L
16/09/2010WunghnuSimazine0.8 μg/L
16/09/2010Wunghnu Atrazine 0.8 μg/L
24/02/2011Wunghnu 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.8 μg/L
7/03/2011Wunghnu2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.7 μg/L
7/03/2011Wunghnu WTP2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.6 μg/L
10/03/2011Wunghnu 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.5 μg/L
10/03/2011Wunghnu WTP2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.5 μg/L
Date Town Level Pesticide
24/06/2010 Wunghnu 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.8 μg/L
9/09/2010 Wunghnu Atrazine 1.2 μg/L
9/09/2010 Wunghnu Simazine 1 μg/L
16/09/2010 Wunghnu Simazine 0.8 μg/L
16/09/2010 Wunghnu Atrazine 0.8 μg/L
24/02/2011 Wunghnu 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.8 μg/L
7/03/2011 Wunghnu 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.7 μg/L
7/03/2011 Wunghnu WTP 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.6 μg/L
10/03/2011 Wunghnu 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.5 μg/L
10/03/2011 Wunghnu WTP 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.5 μg/L

2011/2016: Nathalia. Pesticides detected: Atrazine, 2,4-D

DateTownLevelPesticide
8/09/2011Nathalia RAW Atrazine0.3 μg/L
22/09/2011Nathalia Atrazine 0.1 μg/L
22/09/2011Nathalia RAW Atrazine0.1 μg/L
22/09/2011Nathalia WTP Atrazine 0.1 μg/L
4/10/2016Nathalia RAW 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.1 μg/L
4/10/2016Nathalia RAW Atrazine 0.1 μg/L
Date Town Level Pesticide
8/09/2011 Nathalia RAW Atrazine 0.3 μg/L
22/09/2011 Nathalia Atrazine 0.1 μg/L
22/09/2011 Nathalia RAW Atrazine 0.1 μg/L
22/09/2011 Nathalia WTP Atrazine 0.1 μg/L
4/10/2016 Nathalia RAW 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 0.1 μg/L
4/10/2016 Nathalia RAW Atrazine 0.1 μg/L

2011 September-December: Bonnie Doon (Vic). Pesticide: Atrazine

DateTownLevelPesticide
20/09/2011Bonnie Doon RAW 0.1 μg/LAtrazine 
4/10/2011Bonnie Doon 0.2 μg/LAtrazine 
4/10/2011Bonnie Doon RAW 0.2 μg/LAtrazine 
4/10/2011Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/LAtrazine
11/10/2011Bonnie Doon 0.3 μg/LAtrazine
11/10/2011Bonnie Doon RAW 0.3 μg/LAtrazine
11/10/2011Bonnie Doon WTP0.3 μg/LAtrazine 
25/10/2011Bonnie Doon0.2 μg/LAtrazine
25/10/2011Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/LAtrazine
25/10/2011Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/LAtrazine
22/11/2011Bonnie Doon RAW0.1 μg/LAtrazine 
6/12/2011Bonnie Doon0.2 μg/LAtrazine 
6/12/2011Bonnie Doon RAW 0.2 μg/LAtrazine 
6/12/2011Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/LAtrazine 
20/12/2011Bonnie Doon RAW 0.1 μg/LAtrazine
Date Town Level Pesticide
20/09/2011 Bonnie Doon RAW 0.1 μg/L Atrazine
4/10/2011 Bonnie Doon 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
4/10/2011 Bonnie Doon RAW 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
4/10/2011 Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
11/10/2011 Bonnie Doon 0.3 μg/L Atrazine
11/10/2011 Bonnie Doon RAW 0.3 μg/L Atrazine
11/10/2011 Bonnie Doon WTP 0.3 μg/L Atrazine
25/10/2011 Bonnie Doon 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
25/10/2011 Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
25/10/2011 Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
22/11/2011 Bonnie Doon RAW 0.1 μg/L Atrazine
6/12/2011 Bonnie Doon 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
6/12/2011 Bonnie Doon RAW 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
6/12/2011 Bonnie Doon WTP 0.2 μg/L Atrazine
20/12/2011 Bonnie Doon RAW 0.1 μg/L Atrazine

2010 June – October: Gigarre Drinking Water – CG 7/12/9 Channel (Vic). Pesticide: 2,4-D

 2,4-D Detections Girgarre Water Supply

μg/L
10/06/20104
10/06/20101.9
17/06/20103.2
17/06/20103.3
17/06/20103.4
17/06/20103
8/07/20103.6
8/07/20103.7
8/07/20103.4
15/07/20102.3
15/07/20102.6
15/07/20102.3
19/07/20102.9
22/07/20102.9
5/08/20100.6
5/08/20102.2
5/08/20100.7
12/08/20102.3
12/08/20100.7
19/08/20100.6
19/08/20101.6
26/08/20101.2
2/09/20100.6
2/09/20101.4
9/09/20100.6
9/09/20100.6
9/09/20101.3
16/09/20101
23/09/20100.8
30/09/20100.9
7/10/20100.7
 average1.945161

 2,4-D Detections Girgarre Water Supply

μg/L
10/06/2010 4
10/06/2010 1.9
17/06/2010 3.2
17/06/2010 3.3
17/06/2010 3.4
17/06/2010 3
8/07/2010 3.6
8/07/2010 3.7
8/07/2010 3.4
15/07/2010 2.3
15/07/2010 2.6
15/07/2010 2.3
19/07/2010 2.9
22/07/2010 2.9
5/08/2010 0.6
5/08/2010 2.2
5/08/2010 0.7
12/08/2010 2.3
12/08/2010 0.7
19/08/2010 0.6
19/08/2010 1.6
26/08/2010 1.2
2/09/2010 0.6
2/09/2010 1.4
9/09/2010 0.6
9/09/2010 0.6
9/09/2010 1.3
16/09/2010 1
23/09/2010 0.8
30/09/2010 0.9
7/10/2010 0.7
 average 1.945161

2016 November: Crop Duster Accident Narrowmine NSW.

Pilot killed in crash five years after brother died in similar accident

23 Nov 2016,

https://www.theland.com.au/story/4311802/pilot-killed-in-crash-five-years-after-brother-died-in-similar-accident/

The family of a pilot killed in a plane crash in western NSW on Monday lost his younger brother in a similar accident just five years ago.

Don Blanch, aged in his 50s, died when his crop dusting airplane crashed at 8.20am on a rural property on Dandaloo Road, west of Narromine. In 2011 Don's younger brother, Ben Blanch, died in a similar accident.

In a Facebook tribute to her son, Mary Blanch wrote, "My first born, my beloved son Don. Killed today at the exact same time as his little brother Ben, nearly six years ago."

The Blanch family have a long history in the aviation industry. They run BlanchAir, a professional aerial spraying company based in Queensland. Mr Blanch had been flying for over 35 years, and was well regarded in the Australian aviation industry.

"We don't know any details at this stage other than that Don was killed doing what he loved, flying a high performance aerial, spraying pests," said his son, Chris Blanch.

Chris Blanch said of his father, "He was a strong advocate for both agriculture and the aviation industry and had the same pioneering spirit that his ag-pilot father had, constantly pushing the technological barriers."

He said that aviation pilots provided a valuable service to Australia often despite grave risks involved.

"We would also like to remind people that aviation is inherently dangerous and we're very proud of Don for the role he has played in aviation," he said.

"He leaves behind a loving family and friends around the world, and a legacy of professionalism and integrity."

Pilot killed in crash five years after brother died in similar accident

https://www.theland.com.au/story/4311802/pilot-killed-in-crash-five-years-after-brother-died-in-similar-accident/

The family of a pilot killed in a plane crash in western NSW on Monday lost his younger brother in a similar accident just five years ago.

Don Blanch, aged in his 50s, died when his crop dusting airplane crashed at 8.20am on a rural property on Dandaloo Road, west of Narromine. In 2011 Don’s younger brother, Ben Blanch, died in a similar accident.

In a Facebook tribute to her son, Mary Blanch wrote, “My first born, my beloved son Don. Killed today at the exact same time as his little brother Ben, nearly six years ago.”

The Blanch family have a long history in the aviation industry. They run BlanchAir, a professional aerial spraying company based in Queensland. Mr Blanch had been flying for over 35 years, and was well regarded in the Australian aviation industry.

“We don’t know any details at this stage other than that Don was killed doing what he loved, flying a high performance aerial, spraying pests,” said his son, Chris Blanch.

Chris Blanch said of his father, “He was a strong advocate for both agriculture and the aviation industry and had the same pioneering spirit that his ag-pilot father had, constantly pushing the technological barriers.”

He said that aviation pilots provided a valuable service to Australia often despite grave risks involved.

“We would also like to remind people that aviation is inherently dangerous and we’re very proud of Don for the role he has played in aviation,” he said.

“He leaves behind a loving family and friends around the world, and a legacy of professionalism and integrity.”

December 12 2016: Murrumbateman Region Spray Drift Impact on Vineyards: Pesticides: 2,4-D, MCPA

A blow to the health and income of Canberra Region vintners

Murrumbateman winemaker Ken Helm says he fears massive crop loss after reports of illegal weedicide spraying.  Photo: Jeffrey Chan

Murrumbateman winemaker Ken Helm says he fears massive crop loss after reports of illegal weedicide spraying. Photo: Jeffrey Chan

Canberra Region wineries are fearful of massive crop and income loss after reports of illegal weedicide spraying in November this year.

Reports of vine damage from the vineyards has come to light in the last two weeks, from the deforming weedicides 24D and MCPA.

The chemicals, which have links to Agent Orange used in the Vietnamese war, can cause major loss of crop and deformities in the growth of the vines which can continue in the plant for two years.

According to pioneer winemaker and ex CSIRO biologist, Ken Helm of Murrumbateman, it’s not just the Yass Valley’s biggest tourism driver that is at risk, but also the health of the broader community.

“People have to by law control their weeds, for things such as serrated tussock and thistles, but this all has to be done before October 1,” he said. “This is before the vines start to form and no damage can be done.”

“Reports of a helicopter spraying in the Hall district and vine damage is particularly worrying as the spray can drift for kilometres. On November 14 there were also reports on Dog Trap Road of aerial spraying.”

By law, persons spraying herbicides are liable for damage, should the herbicides drift and damage neighbouring crops.

“There have been a number of cases where persons and authorities had to pay compensation to neighbours for crop damage caused by herbicide drift from weed spraying machines,” he said. 

This year the late and illegal spraying has caused deformities in the leaves of the vines spreading from Hall in the ACT, to around the Murrumbateman area. The weedicide spray drift can threaten crops, vine health, and the farmers livelihood, as well as the farmers health and the health of their neighbours.

“Aside from harming our crops, the other issue which should be addressed is the health issues of the community who have the spray drift settle on them and on the roofs of their houses and then is washed into their rainwater tanks,” he said.

The leaf deformities due to weedicide spraying means the grapes won’t grow on the vines. Although the extent of the damage won’t be known for another two weeks, Mr Helm says he believes the damage is extensive. 

Damage: A vine taken from Mr Helm's vineyard showing 24D damage in December, next to one of his healthy vines. Photo: Supplied.

Damage: A vine taken from Mr Helm's vineyard showing 24D damage in December, next to one of his healthy vines. Photo: Supplied.

While he assured the chemicals in the weedicides cannot contaminate the grape or the wine, the loss of crops will result in thousands of dollars of income loss.

“Out of a tonne of grapes we can expect around 60 cases of wines, which you would expect around $300 for. In a season we will pick around 80 tonnes of grapes,” he said. “We can put up with the weather but we can’t put up with irresponsible attitudes.”

Mr Helm, who has been growing grapes for 40 years in the Canberra district, says it is frustrating that people are illegally spraying weeds and allowing the spray to escape their property, causing damage to other people’s income.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority spoke with Mr Helm last week and is investigating the incidents. The EPA says herbicides must be used responsibly to avoid environmental damage and costs to farmers.

“The misuse or mishandling of these chemicals can pose a danger to the community and impact on the surrounding environment, including damaging native vegetation and non-target crops, such as cotton, grapes and tomatoes,” a spokesperson said. “Failing to meet any of the requirements on use can result in regulatory action.” 

Anyone with information should contact the Environment Line on 131 555. Mr Helm says he is making representations to identify the people responsible, so legal action can be taken.

A blow to the health and income of Canberra Region vintners

Murrumbateman winemaker Ken Helm says he fears massive crop loss after reports of illegal weedicide spraying. Photo: Jeffrey Chan

Murrumbateman winemaker Ken Helm says he fears massive crop loss after reports of illegal weedicide spraying. Photo: Jeffrey Chan

Canberra Region wineries are fearful of massive crop and income loss after reports of illegal weedicide spraying in November this year.

Reports of vine damage from the vineyards has come to light in the last two weeks, from the deforming weedicides 24D and MCPA.

The chemicals, which have links to Agent Orange used in the Vietnamese war, can cause major loss of crop and deformities in the growth of the vines which can continue in the plant for two years.

According to pioneer winemaker and ex CSIRO biologist, Ken Helm of Murrumbateman, it’s not just the Yass Valley’s biggest tourism driver that is at risk, but also the health of the broader community.

“People have to by law control their weeds, for things such as serrated tussock and thistles, but this all has to be done before October 1,” he said. “This is before the vines start to form and no damage can be done.”

“Reports of a helicopter spraying in the Hall district and vine damage is particularly worrying as the spray can drift for kilometres. On November 14 there were also reports on Dog Trap Road of aerial spraying.”

By law, persons spraying herbicides are liable for damage, should the herbicides drift and damage neighbouring crops.

“There have been a number of cases where persons and authorities had to pay compensation to neighbours for crop damage caused by herbicide drift from weed spraying machines,” he said.

This year the late and illegal spraying has caused deformities in the leaves of the vines spreading from Hall in the ACT, to around the Murrumbateman area. The weedicide spray drift can threaten crops, vine health, and the farmers livelihood, as well as the farmers health and the health of their neighbours.

“Aside from harming our crops, the other issue which should be addressed is the health issues of the community who have the spray drift settle on them and on the roofs of their houses and then is washed into their rainwater tanks,” he said.

The leaf deformities due to weedicide spraying means the grapes won’t grow on the vines. Although the extent of the damage won’t be known for another two weeks, Mr Helm says he believes the damage is extensive.

Damage: A vine taken from Mr Helm's vineyard showing 24D damage in December, next to one of his healthy vines. Photo: Supplied.

Damage: A vine taken from Mr Helm’s vineyard showing 24D damage in December, next to one of his healthy vines. Photo: Supplied.

While he assured the chemicals in the weedicides cannot contaminate the grape or the wine, the loss of crops will result in thousands of dollars of income loss.

“Out of a tonne of grapes we can expect around 60 cases of wines, which you would expect around $300 for. In a season we will pick around 80 tonnes of grapes,” he said. “We can put up with the weather but we can’t put up with irresponsible attitudes.”

Mr Helm, who has been growing grapes for 40 years in the Canberra district, says it is frustrating that people are illegally spraying weeds and allowing the spray to escape their property, causing damage to other people’s income.

The NSW Environment Protection Authority spoke with Mr Helm last week and is investigating the incidents. The EPA says herbicides must be used responsibly to avoid environmental damage and costs to farmers.

“The misuse or mishandling of these chemicals can pose a danger to the community and impact on the surrounding environment, including damaging native vegetation and non-target crops, such as cotton, grapes and tomatoes,” a spokesperson said. “Failing to meet any of the requirements on use can result in regulatory action.”

Anyone with information should contact the Environment Line on 131 555. Mr Helm says he is making representations to identify the people responsible, so legal action can be taken.

2016 October: Pesticides detected in imported Spices, Rice and Ghee. Pesticides: Carbendazim, Imidacloprid, Buprufezin, Chlorpyrifos, DDT

Worrying and in some cases illegal levels of heavy metals, carcinogenic insecticide and arsenic has been found in multiple foods being imported into Australia as revealed by independent testing commissioned by SBS Punjabi Radio as part of a special investigation into the safety of Australia’s food import industry
 
Shamsher Kainth, Manpreet K Singh
27 Oct 2016 - 7:00 AM  UPDATED 2 Nov 2016 - 5:29 PM
 

After receiving reports from listeners complaining of problems with foods they had purchased at South Asian grocery stores around Australia, SBS Punjabi Radio team were prompted to investigate further. They sent 18 products purchased at Indian Specialty stores across greater Melbourne to the National Measurement Institute, a food testing lab accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities.

The tests revealed two instances of products which failed Australian food safety standards:

 - Kohinoor brand basmati rice found to contain Buprofezin - an insecticide banned in Australia.
 - Popular Indian spice brand MDH found to contain pesticides above the accepted Australian limit.

Apart from the two foods that failed to meet FSANZ standards, the National Measurement Institute also tested many samples of popular foods. 

Results from three other products concerned Food Safety experts due to levels of lead, copper and insecticide residues.

The three concerning products are:
- Complan - a powdered milk drink for growing children manufactured by Heinz in India.
- Indus basmati - a rice from Pakistan.
- Verka Ghee - a clarified butter widely used by South Asians in their daily cooking

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/punjabi/en/article/2016/10/26/exclusive-sbs-testing-reveals-worrying-levels-chemicals-foods-available-sale

Worrying and in some cases illegal levels of heavy metals, carcinogenic insecticide and arsenic has been found in multiple foods being imported into Australia as revealed by independent testing commissioned by SBS Punjabi Radio as part of a special investigation into the safety of Australia’s food import industry
Shamsher Kainth, Manpreet K Singh
27 Oct 2016 – 7:00 AM  UPDATED 2 Nov 2016 – 5:29 PM

After receiving reports from listeners complaining of problems with foods they had purchased at South Asian grocery stores around Australia, SBS Punjabi Radio team were prompted to investigate further. They sent 18 products purchased at Indian Specialty stores across greater Melbourne to the National Measurement Institute, a food testing lab accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities.

The tests revealed two instances of products which failed Australian food safety standards:

 – Kohinoor brand basmati rice found to contain Buprofezin – an insecticide banned in Australia.
 – Popular Indian spice brand MDH found to contain pesticides above the accepted Australian limit.

Apart from the two foods that failed to meet FSANZ standards, the National Measurement Institute also tested many samples of popular foods.

Results from three other products concerned Food Safety experts due to levels of lead, copper and insecticide residues.

The three concerning products are:
– Complan – a powdered milk drink for growing children manufactured by Heinz in India.
– Indus basmati – a rice from Pakistan.
– Verka Ghee – a clarified butter widely used by South Asians in their daily cooking

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/punjabi/en/article/2016/10/26/exclusive-sbs-testing-reveals-worrying-levels-chemicals-foods-available-sale

2016 November: Imported Rice Residues: Pesticides: Chlorpyrifos, Propiconazole, Buprofezin

Two out of four samples of rice tested by SBS fail to comply with Australian regulations. Imported from Pakistan and from India, these basmati rice samples were found to be in breach of levels accepted  by Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ).

The tests commissioned by SBS were carried out by Australia’s National Measurement Institute, a food-testing lab accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities

Worrying and in some cases illegal levels of heavy metals, carcinogenic insecticide and arsenic has been found in multiple foods being imported into Australia as revealed by independent testing commissioned by SBS Punjabi Radio as part of a special investigation into the safety of Australia’s food import industry.

SBS journalists chose samples produced in different nations to explore if the country of origin made a difference in the quality of the product. The samples were bought in Australia but only one was produced in this country; the other three came from Pakistan, India and Thailand.

The SBS investigation discovered the Indian produced Kohinoor Basmati rice contained Buprofezin, an insecticide that is not permitted in rice in Australia.

It also revealed that Pakistani produced Indus Basmati Rice contained Chlorpyrifos. Its presence in rice constitutes an apparent breach of the Australian and New Zealand food code.

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/punjabi/en/article/2016/11/24/imported-rice-australia-pesticides-and-chemicals-found-be-above-safe-standards

Two out of four samples of rice tested by SBS fail to comply with Australian regulations. Imported from Pakistan and from India, these basmati rice samples were found to be in breach of levels accepted  by Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ).

The tests commissioned by SBS were carried out by Australia’s National Measurement Institute, a food-testing lab accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities

Worrying and in some cases illegal levels of heavy metals, carcinogenic insecticide and arsenic has been found in multiple foods being imported into Australia as revealed by independent testing commissioned by SBS Punjabi Radio as part of a special investigation into the safety of Australia’s food import industry.

SBS journalists chose samples produced in different nations to explore if the country of origin made a difference in the quality of the product. The samples were bought in Australia but only one was produced in this country; the other three came from Pakistan, India and Thailand.

The SBS investigation discovered the Indian produced Kohinoor Basmati rice contained Buprofezin, an insecticide that is not permitted in rice in Australia.

It also revealed that Pakistani produced Indus Basmati Rice contained Chlorpyrifos. Its presence in rice constitutes an apparent breach of the Australian and New Zealand food code.

https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/punjabi/en/article/2016/11/24/imported-rice-australia-pesticides-and-chemicals-found-be-above-safe-standards

2008: Western Creek

spray-drift-tusons

2008: Western Creek on a Gunns plantation. Those of us watching the spraying from the road could also feel the spray drift hitting us as the wind was from the South and blew the spray drift onto my friends Organic farmland. We actually had the representative from the Department of Primary Industries overspray unit there watching with us. He did not think it was a problem or think that spray drift was leaving the plantation. The cleared land in the foreground is the organic farm property.

spray-drift-tusons

2008: Western Creek on a Gunns plantation. Those of us watching the spraying from the road could also feel the spray drift hitting us as the wind was from the South and blew the spray drift onto my friends Organic farmland. We actually had the representative from the Department of Primary Industries overspray unit there watching with us. He did not think it was a problem or think that spray drift was leaving the plantation. The cleared land in the foreground is the organic farm property.

2009 January: Weegena Tasmania Spray Drift

weegena

Weegena Tasmania 20th Jan 2009. Spraying Gunns plantations. During this event spray drift filled the river valley causing 5 people who were at a meeting at a house on the river to be affected by the spray. Spray used was Alphacypermethrin with a surfactant called Bond. Physical effects were burning eyes, nausea, headaches and confusion. For the three of us who live in Tasmania the effects lasted for at least 4 days

weegena

Weegena Tasmania 20th Jan 2009. Spraying Gunns plantations. During this event spray drift filled the river valley causing 5 people who were at a meeting at a house on the river to be affected by the spray. Spray used was Alphacypermethrin with a surfactant called Bond. Physical effects were burning eyes, nausea, headaches and confusion. For the three of us who live in Tasmania the effects lasted for at least 4 days

2008 December: Meander Tasmania Spraying Drainage Ditch

tassymeander2

tassymeander

Drainage ditch in Meander Village, the council sprayed the ditches next to the footpath ,  photos taken on 18th Dec 2008.
The bridge in the photo crosses the Meander River, when approached the council over the fact that their sprays would be washing into the river their response was. "but we have always sprayed the ditches"

The Meander river supplies water to Deloraine, Exton, Westbury, Carrick, Hagley and West Launceston,

tassymeander2

tassymeander

Drainage ditch in Meander Village, the council sprayed the ditches next to the footpath ,  photos taken on 18th Dec 2008.
The bridge in the photo crosses the Meander River, when approached the council over the fact that their sprays would be washing into the river their response was. “but we have always sprayed the ditches”

The Meander river supplies water to Deloraine, Exton, Westbury, Carrick, Hagley and West Launceston,

2008 February: Meander Tasmania Aerial Spraying

tassymaenderspraydrift

Cloud of spray drift, photo taken 15 feb 2008 Meander Tas. Plane spraying crops. Adjacent to the Meander River, 13 kilometres approx from Deloraine town water intake.

tassymaenderspraydrift

Cloud of spray drift, photo taken 15 feb 2008 Meander Tas. Plane spraying crops. Adjacent to the Meander River, 13 kilometres approx from Deloraine town water intake.

2008 February 25: Stockers Plains Meander Tasmania

tassy7104

25th Feb 2008, Stockers Plains, Meander Tas. Gunns plantation with heaps of waterways draining it, including Stockers Creek and Muddy creek that both flow into the Meander River within 10 kilometres of the uptake of the Deloraine Water Supply

tassy7104

25th Feb 2008, Stockers Plains, Meander Tas. Gunns plantation with heaps of waterways draining it, including Stockers Creek and Muddy creek that both flow into the Meander River within 10 kilometres of the uptake of the Deloraine Water Supply

2010: Aerial Spraying Plantations Kilmore East

sep11broadford

2010: Aerial spraying of Midway Plantation near Kilmore East 2010. Farmers downstream recorded simazine in their farm dam at 20 parts per billion in August 2010

sep11broadford

2010: Aerial spraying of Midway Plantation near Kilmore East 2010. Farmers downstream recorded simazine in their farm dam at 20 parts per billion in August 2010

2016 November: Pesticide agency relocation from Canberra to Armidale

Pesticides agency relocation from Canberra to Armidale approved

UPDATE: PEAK plant science body CropLife Australia has slammed the Federal Government’s decision to forge ahead with moving the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority from Canberra to Armidale.

CropLife chief executive Matthew Cossey said today’s announcement lacked any initiatives that would make the move to University of New England “a genuine Centre of Excellence”.

“Simply relocating an agency from one building in Canberra to one in Armidale does not make a Centre of Excellence,” Mr Cossey said.

“While we recognise the Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce is acting with good intentions, just relocation in itself doesn’t achieve anything except interrupting the efforts being made by the APVMA to improve regulatory efficiency.”

While CropLife believed the relocation would have negative consequences, Mr Cossey said his organisation was keen to work with the Government to try minimise the impact.

“There is opportunity to deliver structural changes and initiatives that would leverage technology to streamline APVMA and associated regulatory operations,” he said.

“It’s imperative that the Government now works with key stakeholders including, CropLife Australia, the National Farmers’ Federation and other industry stakeholders to ensure the delivery of outcomes that enhance Australian farmers’ productivity.”

Barnaby Joyce is forging ahead with the forced relocation of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority from Canberra to his home electorate.

Mr Joyce confirmed this morning that the long-touted relocation to the University of New England would go ahead — via an extraordinary government order forcing the regulator to move — at a cost of $25.6 million.

That’s more than the original proposed cost of $24.1 million.

 

In addition to the move, UNE will offer a regulatory science course from next year and a new “digital strategy” for the APVMA will be developed.

Plans to relocate APVMA — and its 175 staff — were first flagged more than a year ago.

Mr Joyce has been steadfast in his desire for the agency to move to Armidale, where it would be located at UNE alongside the school’s existing agricultural research centres to create a “centre of excellence in agriculture”.

The move has been strongly opposed by the sector — including plant science peak body CropLife and the National Farmers’ Federation — who fear it would lead to the loss of expert staff reluctant to move, and delays in approvals of vital ag-vet chemicals.

Labor has slammed the move as blatant pork-barrelling.

A cost-benefit analysis — expected to be released today — is also understood that the move did not stack up economically.

But this week, Finance Minister Mathias Cormann invoked a government policy order — that does not need to go through Parliament — that forces the relocation of “corporate Commonwealth entities with agricultural policy or regulatory responsibilities” to a regional community.

That community must be at least 150 kilometres away from Canberra or a state capital city, and the agency must be within 10 kilometres of the main campus of a regional university “recognised for research and teaching in the field of agricultural science”.

Mr Joyce said the move “puts APVMA regulators at the heart of where the boots hit the dirt in country Australia”.

“Not only will the move modernise the APVMA, with a fresh digital strategy essential to its success, but it will also provide unprecedented opportunity to young scientists on the Northern Tablelands,” Mr Joyce said.

“Relocating the APVMA is an important next step to bring more quality jobs and expertise to Armidale and the surrounding region — an area with a strong history in agriculture, now has an even stronger future in agriculture here.”

Mr Joyce said Canberra-based staff concerned about moving would be supported by a transition team and an advisory committee to oversee the relocation.

The move is part of the Coalition’s decentralisation policy, which will see the Murray Darling Basin Authority have a stronger regional presence, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation move to Wagga Wagga, and Grains Research and Development Corporation office set-up in Toowoomba and Dubbo.

Pesticides agency relocation from Canberra to Armidale approved

UPDATE: PEAK plant science body CropLife Australia has slammed the Federal Government’s decision to forge ahead with moving the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority from Canberra to Armidale.

CropLife chief executive Matthew Cossey said today’s announcement lacked any initiatives that would make the move to University of New England “a genuine Centre of Excellence”.

“Simply relocating an agency from one building in Canberra to one in Armidale does not make a Centre of Excellence,” Mr Cossey said.

“While we recognise the Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce is acting with good intentions, just relocation in itself doesn’t achieve anything except interrupting the efforts being made by the APVMA to improve regulatory efficiency.”

While CropLife believed the relocation would have negative consequences, Mr Cossey said his organisation was keen to work with the Government to try minimise the impact.

“There is opportunity to deliver structural changes and initiatives that would leverage technology to streamline APVMA and associated regulatory operations,” he said.

“It’s imperative that the Government now works with key stakeholders including, CropLife Australia, the National Farmers’ Federation and other industry stakeholders to ensure the delivery of outcomes that enhance Australian farmers’ productivity.”

Barnaby Joyce is forging ahead with the forced relocation of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority from Canberra to his home electorate.

Mr Joyce confirmed this morning that the long-touted relocation to the University of New England would go ahead — via an extraordinary government order forcing the regulator to move — at a cost of $25.6 million.

That’s more than the original proposed cost of $24.1 million.

In addition to the move, UNE will offer a regulatory science course from next year and a new “digital strategy” for the APVMA will be developed.

Plans to relocate APVMA — and its 175 staff — were first flagged more than a year ago.

Mr Joyce has been steadfast in his desire for the agency to move to Armidale, where it would be located at UNE alongside the school’s existing agricultural research centres to create a “centre of excellence in agriculture”.

The move has been strongly opposed by the sector — including plant science peak body CropLife and the National Farmers’ Federation — who fear it would lead to the loss of expert staff reluctant to move, and delays in approvals of vital ag-vet chemicals.

Labor has slammed the move as blatant pork-barrelling.

A cost-benefit analysis — expected to be released today — is also understood that the move did not stack up economically.

But this week, Finance Minister Mathias Cormann invoked a government policy order — that does not need to go through Parliament — that forces the relocation of “corporate Commonwealth entities with agricultural policy or regulatory responsibilities” to a regional community.

That community must be at least 150 kilometres away from Canberra or a state capital city, and the agency must be within 10 kilometres of the main campus of a regional university “recognised for research and teaching in the field of agricultural science”.

Mr Joyce said the move “puts APVMA regulators at the heart of where the boots hit the dirt in country Australia”.

“Not only will the move modernise the APVMA, with a fresh digital strategy essential to its success, but it will also provide unprecedented opportunity to young scientists on the Northern Tablelands,” Mr Joyce said.

“Relocating the APVMA is an important next step to bring more quality jobs and expertise to Armidale and the surrounding region — an area with a strong history in agriculture, now has an even stronger future in agriculture here.”

Mr Joyce said Canberra-based staff concerned about moving would be supported by a transition team and an advisory committee to oversee the relocation.

The move is part of the Coalition’s decentralisation policy, which will see the Murray Darling Basin Authority have a stronger regional presence, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation move to Wagga Wagga, and Grains Research and Development Corporation office set-up in Toowoomba and Dubbo.

2014 August: Birds Deliberately Poisoned in Bingara

Birds 'deliberately' poisoned in Bingara

 1 Aug 2014,

Tests are back from some of the dead native birds found around the Bingara Showground recently and results suggest the animals had been intentionally poisoned with insecticide.

Acting Northern Branch Director of the EPA Brett Nudd is appealing for community assistance, after it was determined the native birds appear to have eaten bread soaked in Fenthion.

The same poison was found to be the cause of death of hundreds of birds near Dubbo around March this year.

Mr Nudd says the department will re-visit the area on Tuesday.

"We're going to conduct a sweep of that entire area on Tuesday, and what we're trying to do through that sweep is to locate any contaminated bread and any more dead birds and make sure that we're cleaning up all that material," he said.

The dead birds included ravens and currawongs.

"Fenthion is the likely cause of death, [as] this insecticide has been found both in the birds and it's also been found in bread at the scene," Mr Nudd said.

"The fact that it's been found in bread at the scene suggests to us that there's people or persons deliberately seeking to poison the birds in that area."

The Bingara community is being encouraged to assist in Tuesday's sweep.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-01/birds-27deliberately27-poisoned-in-bingara/5642328

Birds ‘deliberately’ poisoned in Bingara

 

Tests are back from some of the dead native birds found around the Bingara Showground recently and results suggest the animals had been intentionally poisoned with insecticide.

Acting Northern Branch Director of the EPA Brett Nudd is appealing for community assistance, after it was determined the native birds appear to have eaten bread soaked in Fenthion.

The same poison was found to be the cause of death of hundreds of birds near Dubbo around March this year.

Mr Nudd says the department will re-visit the area on Tuesday.

“We’re going to conduct a sweep of that entire area on Tuesday, and what we’re trying to do through that sweep is to locate any contaminated bread and any more dead birds and make sure that we’re cleaning up all that material,” he said.

The dead birds included ravens and currawongs.

“Fenthion is the likely cause of death, [as] this insecticide has been found both in the birds and it’s also been found in bread at the scene,” Mr Nudd said.

“The fact that it’s been found in bread at the scene suggests to us that there’s people or persons deliberately seeking to poison the birds in that area.”

The Bingara community is being encouraged to assist in Tuesday’s sweep.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-01/birds-27deliberately27-poisoned-in-bingara/5642328

2016 November: Native Birds Poisoned at Bundaberg’s Botanic Garden: Pesticide: Fenthion

Native birds poisoned at Bundaberg's botanic gardens

The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection is investigating the deliberate poisoning of birds at Bundaberg's botanic gardens.

Wildlife officers began investigations in September, after several magpie geese were found dead in the gardens.

The department said moorhens, water dragons and eels were also found dead, possibly from ingesting the droppings from poisoned birds.

A department spokesman said toxicity testing has found the animals' had eaten food laced with the pesticide Fenthion.

"Fenthion was widely used by fruit growers to control fruit fly until it was banned from further use from October 2015 by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines

Authority," he said.

"From October 2015, it has been illegal to possess, use or supply Fenthion products in Australia."

The department said it was treating the incident as a serious and deliberate act.

It is continuing investigations and working with the Bundaberg Regional Council and Biosecurity Queensland.

"Fenthion was widely used by fruit growers to control fruit fly until it was banned from further use from October 2015 by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines

Poisoned birds die 'in agony': RSPCA

The RSPCA said, unfortunately, it sees several cases each year throughout Queensland where it appears birds have been deliberately poisoned.

Spokesman Michael Beatty said it was a disturbing act.

"In most cases those birds die in agony, you know it's a very painful death," he said.

He said people caught poisoning animals could be prosecuted under both the Nature Conservation Act, or the Animal Care and Protection Act which the RSPCA looks after.

"It's hard to comprehend somebody's mindset who would deliberately set out to do that," Mr Beatty said.

"I mean it's just a very sad reflection on us as a whole I guess."

Queensland's native wildlife is protected by the Nature Conservation Act 1992 and associated regulations.

Penalties, depending on the conservation status and the number of birds killed, can be as high as $365,700.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-02/birds-poisoned-at-botanic-gardens/7987140?WT.tsrc=Facebook

 

Native birds poisoned at Bundaberg’s botanic gardens

The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection is investigating the deliberate poisoning of birds at Bundaberg’s botanic gardens.

Wildlife officers began investigations in September, after several magpie geese were found dead in the gardens.

The department said moorhens, water dragons and eels were also found dead, possibly from ingesting the droppings from poisoned birds.

A department spokesman said toxicity testing has found the animals’ had eaten food laced with the pesticide Fenthion.

“Fenthion was widely used by fruit growers to control fruit fly until it was banned from further use from October 2015 by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority,” he said.

“From October 2015, it has been illegal to possess, use or supply Fenthion products in Australia.”

The department said it was treating the incident as a serious and deliberate act.

It is continuing investigations and working with the Bundaberg Regional Council and Biosecurity Queensland.

“Fenthion was widely used by fruit growers to control fruit fly until it was banned from further use from October 2015 by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines

Poisoned birds die ‘in agony’: RSPCA

The RSPCA said, unfortunately, it sees several cases each year throughout Queensland where it appears birds have been deliberately poisoned.

Spokesman Michael Beatty said it was a disturbing act.

“In most cases those birds die in agony, you know it’s a very painful death,” he said.

He said people caught poisoning animals could be prosecuted under both the Nature Conservation Act, or the Animal Care and Protection Act which the RSPCA looks after.

“It’s hard to comprehend somebody’s mindset who would deliberately set out to do that,” Mr Beatty said.

“I mean it’s just a very sad reflection on us as a whole I guess.”

Queensland’s native wildlife is protected by the Nature Conservation Act 1992 and associated regulations.

Penalties, depending on the conservation status and the number of birds killed, can be as high as $365,700.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-02/birds-poisoned-at-botanic-gardens/7987140?WT.tsrc=Facebook

2014 June: Pesticides Suspected in NT Bee Deaths

NT growers warned to 'bee' careful when spraying

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-12/spraying-tips-to-protect-bees/5518514

12 Jun 2014

The Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry (DPI) is warning Top End growers to be careful of bee populations when spraying crops.

Last year there was a sudden loss of bees in the Top End, and while no one's figured out exactly what caused it, the DPI has an inkling it may have been caused by people misusing certain pesticides.

"We have basically no disease or pest that affects our bees... [but] it's the spraying of pesticides, herbicides and weedicide, that can affect the health of our bees up here." said DPI apiary officer Vicki Simlesa.

"Pesticides, like anything, will basically decline the population and kill off your bees."

She says people using sprays, need to check they are using them correctly, in accordance with the label and the DPI.

The warning is extended to gardeners and roadside sprayers who spray chemicals in the path of pollinating bee populations.

"We had a loss of bees occur during last year.

"We're not sure if that is related to pesticide poisoning, or some other disease or pest.

"[The issue] is currently under investigation, to see what that problem is, so it's hard to line up actual bee deaths with any one specific problem."

Ms Simlesa says a loss of bees would have a direct impact on the Territory's growing melon industry, which the DPI recently estimated is worth $80-90 million per year.

NT growers warned to ‘bee’ careful when spraying

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-12/spraying-tips-to-protect-bees/5518514

The Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry (DPI) is warning Top End growers to be careful of bee populations when spraying crops.

Last year there was a sudden loss of bees in the Top End, and while no one’s figured out exactly what caused it, the DPI has an inkling it may have been caused by people misusing certain pesticides.

“We have basically no disease or pest that affects our bees… [but] it’s the spraying of pesticides, herbicides and weedicide, that can affect the health of our bees up here.” said DPI apiary officer Vicki Simlesa.

“Pesticides, like anything, will basically decline the population and kill off your bees.”

She says people using sprays, need to check they are using them correctly, in accordance with the label and the DPI.

The warning is extended to gardeners and roadside sprayers who spray chemicals in the path of pollinating bee populations.

“We had a loss of bees occur during last year.

“We’re not sure if that is related to pesticide poisoning, or some other disease or pest.

“[The issue] is currently under investigation, to see what that problem is, so it’s hard to line up actual bee deaths with any one specific problem.”

Ms Simlesa says a loss of bees would have a direct impact on the Territory’s growing melon industry, which the DPI recently estimated is worth $80-90 million per year.

2016 July: Brunswick Heads Beach. Pesticide: Metsulfuron Methyl

Something in the air – and not in a good way

Anthea Amore, Byron Bay. (Letter Aug 2 2016)

On Thursday July 28 my husband and I were walking on Brunswick Heads beach around 8.30am at low tide from the surf life saving club. The beach was busy with many beach walkers and dogs on such a beautiful sunny winter’s morning.

About 20 minutes into our walk, going south towards Byron, my we detected a chemical smell in the air. It was quite strong and distinctive. My husband (who happens to be a chemical free bush regenerator) said that it smelled like glyphosate.

We continued to walk for 15 minutes and eventually turned around and, as we reached the same spot, the smell returned.  We got back to our car and took a sip of our filtered water and my husband said, ‘what’s wrong with the water?’ It was bitter and tasted like chemicals.

As we drove home the penny dropped and we realised we’d been poisoned by the large plume of chemical spray drift. I began to notice my lips were burnt, like I’d been wind burnt (I hadn’t been in the bright sun or wind for weeks). This burnt lips sensation and redness lasted all day. My eyes were sore and itchy and my breathing felt slightly laboured and heavy. Our skin tasted like a very bitter, acrid, chemical and it was all over our face, feet, hair and clothes.

A very pregnant woman and school children were on the beach in the time the spraying occurred. There must have been close to 100 people using the beach in the 1hour 15 minutes we were there.

I rang council when I got home and they suggested that National Parks and Wildlife Service(NPWS) were currently spraying the Tyagrah reserve. I rang the local NPWS to find out if they were spraying and of course they were. I spoke to them of my experience and lodged a complaint and I wanted to warn them how far their spraying was drifting.

There were no signs of warning on the Brunswick beach but I was told by Nigel Stewart (one of the local rangers I spoke to) that they would now start to use signs on Brunswick beach. I do hope this happens as I was informed that this spraying would last months! I wanted to let the community know about this so people could avoid the beach for the next couple of months (or hopefully when the signs are put out on display).

Today they were spraying Metsulfuon. (Metsulfuron-methyl is an organic compound classified as a sulfonylurea herbicide, which kills broadleaf weeds and some annual grasses. It is a systemic compound with foliar and soil activity, that inhibits cell division in shoots and roots).

To find out more and when the National Parks and Wildlife are spraying call 02 66 20 93 00. I suggest all who are interested call them.

https://www.echo.net.au/2016/08/something-air-not-good-way/

Something in the air – and not in a good way

Anthea Amore, Byron Bay. (Letter Aug 2 2016)

On Thursday July 28 my husband and I were walking on Brunswick Heads beach around 8.30am at low tide from the surf life saving club. The beach was busy with many beach walkers and dogs on such a beautiful sunny winter’s morning.

About 20 minutes into our walk, going south towards Byron, my we detected a chemical smell in the air. It was quite strong and distinctive. My husband (who happens to be a chemical free bush regenerator) said that it smelled like glyphosate.

We continued to walk for 15 minutes and eventually turned around and, as we reached the same spot, the smell returned.  We got back to our car and took a sip of our filtered water and my husband said, ‘what’s wrong with the water?’ It was bitter and tasted like chemicals.

As we drove home the penny dropped and we realised we’d been poisoned by the large plume of chemical spray drift. I began to notice my lips were burnt, like I’d been wind burnt (I hadn’t been in the bright sun or wind for weeks). This burnt lips sensation and redness lasted all day. My eyes were sore and itchy and my breathing felt slightly laboured and heavy. Our skin tasted like a very bitter, acrid, chemical and it was all over our face, feet, hair and clothes.

A very pregnant woman and school children were on the beach in the time the spraying occurred. There must have been close to 100 people using the beach in the 1hour 15 minutes we were there.

I rang council when I got home and they suggested that National Parks and Wildlife Service(NPWS) were currently spraying the Tyagrah reserve. I rang the local NPWS to find out if they were spraying and of course they were. I spoke to them of my experience and lodged a complaint and I wanted to warn them how far their spraying was drifting.

There were no signs of warning on the Brunswick beach but I was told by Nigel Stewart (one of the local rangers I spoke to) that they would now start to use signs on Brunswick beach. I do hope this happens as I was informed that this spraying would last months! I wanted to let the community know about this so people could avoid the beach for the next couple of months (or hopefully when the signs are put out on display).

Today they were spraying Metsulfuon. (Metsulfuron-methyl is an organic compound classified as a sulfonylurea herbicide, which kills broadleaf weeds and some annual grasses. It is a systemic compound with foliar and soil activity, that inhibits cell division in shoots and roots).

To find out more and when the National Parks and Wildlife are spraying call 02 66 20 93 00. I suggest all who are interested call them.

https://www.echo.net.au/2016/08/something-air-not-good-way/

2016 October: BASF Expands NSW Chemical Plant

BASF expands NSW chemical plant to produce Velifer biological insect killer

The Weekly Times

UPDATE: GERMAN chemical manufacturer BASF will open a new $1 million extension of its production plant at Somersby, near Gosford, NSW, by June next year.

Upgrade of the Somersby plant will begin by the end of this year.

The extension will allow BASF to produce the biological insecticide Velifer, which has been marketed in South Africa for a number of years as Broadband.

The insecticide has been used to counter thrips, whitefly, aphids and mites in a range of fruit, nut and vegetable crops, plus canola plantings.

Velifer is currently being evaluated by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority for release in Australia next year.

BASF said Velifer was a biological insecticide containing the spores of the naturally occurring soil-borne fungus Beauveria bassiana.

The company’s Australian and New Zealand head of agriculture Gavin Jackson said the $1 million investment showed the company’s commitment to delivering the latest innovations in crop protection to Australia.

BASF has about 25 new products in the pipeline for release in Australia over the next five years and the new manufacturing plant will also allow the company to produce other biological products in the future.

Biological crop protection products accounted for just 2 per cent of the $75 billion global market in 2015.

BASF expects that to grow at a rate of about 11 per cent a year.

https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/cropping/basf-expands-nsw-chemical-plant-to-produce-velifer-biological-insect-killer/news-story/8bc9d4e3cf4574f98aba48738c6efddb

BASF expands NSW chemical plant to produce Velifer biological insect killer

The Weekly Times

UPDATE: GERMAN chemical manufacturer BASF will open a new $1 million extension of its production plant at Somersby, near Gosford, NSW, by June next year.

Upgrade of the Somersby plant will begin by the end of this year.

The extension will allow BASF to produce the biological insecticide Velifer, which has been marketed in South Africa for a number of years as Broadband.

The insecticide has been used to counter thrips, whitefly, aphids and mites in a range of fruit, nut and vegetable crops, plus canola plantings.

Velifer is currently being evaluated by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority for release in Australia next year.

BASF said Velifer was a biological insecticide containing the spores of the naturally occurring soil-borne fungus Beauveria bassiana.

The company’s Australian and New Zealand head of agriculture Gavin Jackson said the $1 million investment showed the company’s commitment to delivering the latest innovations in crop protection to Australia.

BASF has about 25 new products in the pipeline for release in Australia over the next five years and the new manufacturing plant will also allow the company to produce other biological products in the future.

Biological crop protection products accounted for just 2 per cent of the $75 billion global market in 2015.

BASF expects that to grow at a rate of about 11 per cent a year.

https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/agribusiness/cropping/basf-expands-nsw-chemical-plant-to-produce-velifer-biological-insect-killer/news-story/8bc9d4e3cf4574f98aba48738c6efddb

2016 October: Pesticide Contamination of Breast Milk, down 42 fold since 1970. Pesticides: Persistent Organic Pollutants

Breastfeeding: Pesticide contamination among WA mums down 42-fold since 1970, study suggests

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-19/pesticide-contamination-in-breast-milk-lowest-levels-since-70s/7944672

The levels of pesticides in breast milk have dropped significantly in Western Australia in the past 40 years and are now among the lowest in the world, research had found.

The study by the University of Western Australia and Murdoch University found the level of pesticides in breast milk has dropped 42-fold from 1970 to 2010.

The daily intake of pesticides by infants is now at least 59-fold below the amount that is considered safe, indicating that WA infants were not at risk from pesticides in their mother’s milk.

UWA Emeritus Professor Peter Hartmann said breastfeeding mothers should be reassured that they were not passing on pesticides to their child.

“It’s really very good news,” he said.

“They should feel very secure in the fact that there is not going to be any of these compounds in sufficient quantities to worry them at all.”

He said the research showed legislation to ban pesticides in WA in the 1970s had been effective.

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) include organochlorine pesticides, organophosphate pesticides, pyrethroids and carbamate pesticides, were widely used in agricultural practice to kill pests.

“The restriction of sale of these pesticides has had an enormous effect in bringing the levels down to very good levels,” he said.

According to Professor Hartmann, studies indicated the presence of pesticides could affect the growth and development of babies.

“Some of these compounds do mimic some of the bodies hormones, particularly oestrogen … so it is a bit of a problem if they are in high levels,” he said.

Professor Hartmann said the study measured 88 different compounds, and recruited 40 West Australian breastfeeding mothers who had an average age of 33 years.

2014-2015: Stone River (North Queensland) Pesticides: Multiple

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie - James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Stone River

Maximum Levels

Diuron 1.6ug/L

Hexazinone 0.42ug/L

2,4-D 1ug/L

Atrazine 0.28ug/L

Fluroxypur 0.36ug/L

Imidacloprid 0.15ug/L

Metolachlor 0.01ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L

Metsulfuron Methyl 0.01ug/L

Desisopropylatrazine 0.01ug/L

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie – James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Stone River

Maximum Levels

Diuron 1.6ug/L

Hexazinone 0.42ug/L

2,4-D 1ug/L

Atrazine 0.28ug/L

Fluroxypur 0.36ug/L

Imidacloprid 0.15ug/L

Metolachlor 0.01ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L

Metsulfuron Methyl 0.01ug/L

Desisopropylatrazine 0.01ug/L

 

2014-2015: Gangami Rd (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie - James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Gangami Road

Maximum Levels

Diuron 8.6ug/L

Hexazinone 1.7ug/L

2,4-D 21ug/L

Atrazine 0.06ug/L

Fluroxypur 3.4ug/L

Imidacloprid 0.7ug/L

Metolachlor 0.04ug/L

Metribuzin 0.22ug/L

Total Isoxaflutole 0.1ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L

Metsulfuron Methyl 0.48ug/L

Ametryn 0.07ug/L

Desisopropylatrazine 0.02ug/L

Triclopyr 0.15ug/L

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie – James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Gangami Road

Maximum Levels

Diuron 8.6ug/L

Hexazinone 1.7ug/L

2,4-D 21ug/L

Atrazine 0.06ug/L

Fluroxypur 3.4ug/L

Imidacloprid 0.7ug/L

Metolachlor 0.04ug/L

Metribuzin 0.22ug/L

Total Isoxaflutole 0.1ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L

Metsulfuron Methyl 0.48ug/L

Ametryn 0.07ug/L

Desisopropylatrazine 0.02ug/L

Triclopyr 0.15ug/L

 

2014-2015: Boundary Creek Qld. Pesticides: Multiple

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie - James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Boundary Creek

Maximum Levels

Diuron 15ug/L

Hexazinone 2.9ug/L

2,4-D 18ug/L

Atrazine 0.68ug/L

Fluroxypur 20ug/L

Imidacloprid 1.9ug/L

Metolachlor 0.55ug/L

Metribuzin 0.29ug/L

Total Isoxaflutole 0.35ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L

Metsulfuron Methyl 0.45ug/L

Ametryn 0.02ug/L

Desisopropylatrazine 0.06ug/L

Imidacloprid Metabolites 0.03ug/L

Triclopyr 0.67ug/L

Imazapic 0.02ug/L

Propazine 2-Hydroxy 0.02ug/L

Haloxyfop 0.02ug/L

MCPA 0.1ug/L

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie – James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Boundary Creek

Maximum Levels

Diuron 15ug/L

Hexazinone 2.9ug/L

2,4-D 18ug/L

Atrazine 0.68ug/L

Fluroxypur 20ug/L

Imidacloprid 1.9ug/L

Metolachlor 0.55ug/L

Metribuzin 0.29ug/L

Total Isoxaflutole 0.35ug/L

Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L

Metsulfuron Methyl 0.45ug/L

Ametryn 0.02ug/L

Desisopropylatrazine 0.06ug/L

Imidacloprid Metabolites 0.03ug/L

Triclopyr 0.67ug/L

Imazapic 0.02ug/L

Propazine 2-Hydroxy 0.02ug/L

Haloxyfop 0.02ug/L

MCPA 0.1ug/L

2014-5: Nash’s Crossing (Herbert River Qld). Pesticide: Atrazine

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) October 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie - James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Nash's Crossing

Atrazine 0.15ug/L (Max)

Herbert Water Quality Monitoring Program (HWQMP) 2015
Sugarcane specific monitoring 2014-2016 (Project NEMO)
Progress report 2014-2015
Dominique O’Brien, Michael Nash, Lawrence Di Bella, Adam Royle and Jon Brodie – James Cook University Queensland.HCPSL

Nash’s Crossing

Atrazine 0.15ug/L (Max)

2013 February: Darlington Point (NSW) Bee Deaths. Pesticides: Fipronil, Clothiandin

Two large bee poisoning incidents in NSW in 2013 came to the attention of the APVMA.
 
In the first incident, more than 400 hives situated in three apiaries south of Darlington Point on the Murrumbidgee River in southern NSW were killed in early February 2013. The bee kills followed shortly after aerial pesticide application on nearby cotton crops.
 
The NSW Environment Protection Agency (NSW EPA) advised the APVMA that bees from all six sites where dead/dying bees were found had fipronil detections while clothianidin, a neonicotinoid, was only detected in bees from three of the six sites. Taking into account spraying dates, which chemicals were sprayed, and wind direction at the time of spraying, it appears that the bees were more likely to have been poisoned by foraging in the sprayed crops rather than the hives being directly impacted by spray drift. [Note that a clothianidin product is approved as a foliar spray in cotton in Australia but there are currently no clothianidin-based seed treatments in this country, so the detection of clothianidin, if it came from foraging on cotton, was from a foliarly-applied spray, not a systemic residue arising from cotton seed treatment.]
 
https://archive.apvma.gov.au/news_media/docs/neonicotinoids_overview_report_february_2014.pdf
Two large bee poisoning incidents in NSW in 2013 came to the attention of the APVMA.
In the first incident, more than 400 hives situated in three apiaries south of Darlington Point on the Murrumbidgee River in southern NSW were killed in early February 2013. The bee kills followed shortly after aerial pesticide application on nearby cotton crops.
The NSW Environment Protection Agency (NSW EPA) advised the APVMA that bees from all six sites where dead/dying bees were found had fipronil detections while clothianidin, a neonicotinoid, was only detected in bees from three of the six sites. Taking into account spraying dates, which chemicals were sprayed, and wind direction at the time of spraying, it appears that the bees were more likely to have been poisoned by foraging in the sprayed crops rather than the hives being directly impacted by spray drift. [Note that a clothianidin product is approved as a foliar spray in cotton in Australia but there are currently no clothianidin-based seed treatments in this country, so the detection of clothianidin, if it came from foraging on cotton, was from a foliarly-applied spray, not a systemic residue arising from cotton seed treatment.]
https://archive.apvma.gov.au/news_media/docs/neonicotinoids_overview_report_february_2014.pdf

August 2016: Household Pesticides Pose Biggest Exposure Risk to Children Under Five

Household pesticides pose biggest exposure risk to children under five

ABC: 15/8/16

Cockroach and ant baits pose the biggest poison exposure risk to small children, a new study has found.

The University of Queensland made the discovery after analysing calls made to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre in 2014.

The research found cockroach and ant baits accounted for 39 per cent of the calls from parents with children under five.

Bug sprays, containing pyrethroids, pyrethrins, piperonyl butoxide – and the more harmful organophosphate diazinon – accounted for almost 26 per cent of calls.

The research, published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health on Monday, showed exposure to bug sprays via direct application, typically by the child or an older sibling, peaked in children aged two.

It also found of the 743 insecticide-related calls received, 49 per cent were for children under five, with calls peaking for children aged one.

“They’re at that stage where they spend a lot of the time on the floor and put things in their mouth,” researcher Karin English said.

“We tried to calculate some comparative rates, so in children aged one, there were about 223 calls per 1,000 children.”

Ms English said the findings showed how prevalent insecticides were in homes.

She said she was surprised to find that one bug killer, sold in a spray bottle, contained organophosphate, which can make children quite ill, even in small volumes.

“It shows we really need to track how insecticides are used once they’re sold,” she said.

“This highlights the need for more comprehensive regulation of insecticides in Australia, and for improvements in child-proof packaging of pest control products.”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-15/household-pesticides-pose-exposure-risk-for-small-children/7734754

2010 Goulburn Weir: Pesticide: Glyphosate

Residue testing of water following treatment of Nympheae mexicana (within Goulburn Weir Pool) with Weedmaster Duo (glyphosate, with an aquatic registration). October 2011 Goulburn Murray Water

The results from River Channel Site 1, show that glyphosate was detected with in the spray zone at 1,2, 4 and 6 h after spray treatment. At 1 h, glyphosate was only detect in surface sample, while at 2, 4 and 6 h glyphosate was detected at the surface of 0.5m depth. Concentration ranged from 0.05 - 0.15 mg/L which was less than half that of the ANZECC water quality for protection of 99% of aquatic life (0.37mg/L). Recreational (boating) and the subsequent wave action probably washed glyphosate off the treated Yellow Waterlily leaves and into the surrounding water...

In Backwater Site 1, glyphosate was detected in the spray zone at the surface of 0.5, 1 and 2 h after spray treatment. At the 2 h interval glyphosate was also detected at 0.5 m depth. The surface residue sample collected at 0.5 h exceeded the ANZECC 99% level of protection water quality guideline by 0.03mg/L...

Residue testing of water following treatment of Nympheae mexicana (within Goulburn Weir Pool) with Weedmaster Duo (glyphosate, with an aquatic registration). October 2011 Goulburn Murray Water

The results from River Channel Site 1, show that glyphosate was detected with in the spray zone at 1,2, 4 and 6 h after spray treatment. At 1 h, glyphosate was only detect in surface sample, while at 2, 4 and 6 h glyphosate was detected at the surface of 0.5m depth. Concentration ranged from 0.05 – 0.15 mg/L which was less than half that of the ANZECC water quality for protection of 99% of aquatic life (0.37mg/L). Recreational (boating) and the subsequent wave action probably washed glyphosate off the treated Yellow Waterlily leaves and into the surrounding water…

In Backwater Site 1, glyphosate was detected in the spray zone at the surface of 0.5, 1 and 2 h after spray treatment. At the 2 h interval glyphosate was also detected at 0.5 m depth. The surface residue sample collected at 0.5 h exceeded the ANZECC 99% level of protection water quality guideline by 0.03mg/L…

2009 June: Goulburn Weir. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Collection of water samples for residue analysis of glyphosate following spray application to yellow water lily at Goulburn Weir

Spray Zone, Surface, Post Treatment, 4 June 11.35am - 210ug/L

Collection of water samples for residue analysis of glyphosate following spray application to yellow water lily at Goulburn Weir

Spray Zone, Surface, Post Treatment, 4 June 11.35am – 210ug/L

2007 January: Goulburn Murray Water. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Miscellaneous Analysis Goulburn Murray Water January 2007

Site 42: 18/1/07 - Glyphosate 42ug/L

Site 21: 18/1/07 - Glyphosate 180ug/L

Site 22: 18/1/07 - Glyphosate 220ug/L

Site 25: 18/1/07 - Glyphosate 410ug/L

Miscellaneous Analysis Goulburn Murray Water January 2007

Site 42: 18/1/07 – Glyphosate 42ug/L

Site 21: 18/1/07 – Glyphosate 180ug/L

Site 22: 18/1/07 – Glyphosate 220ug/L

Site 25: 18/1/07 – Glyphosate 410ug/L

2014 May: Goulburn Murray Water Various. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Goulburn Murray Water

Miscellaneous samples for Goulburn Murray Water

8/5/14: Site 8 GR SZ surface skim +0.5h: 40ug/L

8/5/14: Site 8 GR SZ surface skim +2h: 70ug/L

8/5/14: Site 32 GR BW 3 - 1hr: 310ug/L

8/5/14: Site 68 GR Glyphos. 2: 6700ug/L

12/5/14: Site 66 BW 4: 240ug/L

12/5/14: Site 67 GR Glyphos. 2: 5600ug/L

Source: FoI 2015/6

Goulburn Murray Water

Miscellaneous samples for Goulburn Murray Water

8/5/14: Site 8 GR SZ surface skim +0.5h: 40ug/L

8/5/14: Site 8 GR SZ surface skim +2h: 70ug/L

8/5/14: Site 32 GR BW 3 – 1hr: 310ug/L

8/5/14: Site 68 GR Glyphos. 2: 6700ug/L

12/5/14: Site 66 BW 4: 240ug/L

12/5/14: Site 67 GR Glyphos. 2: 5600ug/L

Source: FoI 2015/6

2011: Shepparton Drain. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Concentrations of Glyphosate and TSS in water samples collected from Shepparton  Drain.

Glyphosate Levels recorded as high as 11420ug/L, immediately after spraying, dropping to 190ug/L after 6 hours.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers - Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

Concentrations of Glyphosate and TSS in water samples collected from Shepparton  Drain.

Glyphosate Levels recorded as high as 11420ug/L, immediately after spraying, dropping to 190ug/L after 6 hours.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers – Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

2011: Waaia Channel Vic. Pesticide: Glyphosate

Concentrations of Glyphosate and TSS in water samples collected from the Waaia Channel.

Glyphosate Levels recorded as high as 3252ug/L, immediately after spraying.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers - Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

Concentrations of Glyphosate and TSS in water samples collected from the Waaia Channel.

Glyphosate Levels recorded as high as 3252ug/L, immediately after spraying.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers – Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

2011: Numurkah channel. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Concentrations of 2,4-D and TSS in water samples collected from channels at Katunga and Numurkah.

2,4-D Levels recorded as high as 1012ug/L.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers - Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

Concentrations of 2,4-D and TSS in water samples collected from channels at Katunga and Numurkah.

2,4-D Levels recorded as high as 1012ug/L.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers – Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

 

2011: Katunga Channel Weed Control. Pesticide: 2,4-D

Concentrations of 2,4-D and TSS in water samples collected from channels at Katunga and Numurkah.

2,4-D Levels recorded as high as 929ug/L on day 2 after spray.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers - Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

Concentrations of 2,4-D and TSS in water samples collected from channels at Katunga and Numurkah.

2,4-D Levels recorded as high as 929ug/L on day 2 after spray.

Final Report Environmental risk assessment of herbicides used in channels, drains and natural carriers – Stage II. Goulburn Murray Water/CSIRO 2012

2015 Jul/Aug: Larissa Rd Channel Yarroweyah. Pesticide: Imazapyr

MVIA Ch3 - reg MV 192 - Larissa Rd

30 Jul 2015 1.35am 156ug/L

6 Aug 2015 1.25am 38.7ug/L

10 Aug 2015 9.45am 40.4ug/L

15 Aug 2015 12.15pm 20ug/L

17 Aug 2015 9.37am 15ug/L

20 Aug 2015 11.30am 16ug/L

24 Aug 2015 9.47am 3.4ug/L

26 Aug 2015 11.41am 1.1ug/L

30 Aug 2015 11.41am 0.62ug/L

MVIA Ch3 – reg MV 192 – Larissa Rd

30 Jul 2015 1.35am 156ug/L

6 Aug 2015 1.25am 38.7ug/L

10 Aug 2015 9.45am 40.4ug/L

15 Aug 2015 12.15pm 20ug/L

17 Aug 2015 9.37am 15ug/L

20 Aug 2015 11.30am 16ug/L

24 Aug 2015 9.47am 3.4ug/L

26 Aug 2015 11.41am 1.1ug/L

30 Aug 2015 11.41am 0.62ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

2015 August: Bourke Rd Channel Katamatite. Pesticide: Imazapyr

MVIA Ch3 - reg MV 172 - Bourke Rd

17 Aug 2015 11.45am 2.2ug/L

20 Aug 2015 10.46am 1.5ug/L

24 Aug 2015 10.36am 0.98ug/L

26 Aug 2015 12.54pm 0.4ug/L

26 Aug 2015 1.22pm 0.029ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

MVIA Ch3 – reg MV 172 – Bourke Rd

17 Aug 2015 11.45am 2.2ug/L

20 Aug 2015 10.46am 1.5ug/L

24 Aug 2015 10.36am 0.98ug/L

26 Aug 2015 12.54pm 0.4ug/L

26 Aug 2015 1.22pm 0.029ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

2015 July/Aug: Larissa Rd Strathmerton. Pesticide: Imazapyr

MVIA Ch2 - reg MV 350 - Larissa Rd

29 July 2015 12.35pm <10ug/L

17 Aug 2015 9.48am 0.76ug/L

20 Aug 2015 11.30am <0.001ug/L

24 Aug 2015 11.42am 0.12ug/L

26 Aug 2015 1.22pm 0.029ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

MVIA Ch2 – reg MV 350 – Larissa Rd

29 July 2015 12.35pm <10ug/L

17 Aug 2015 9.48am 0.76ug/L

20 Aug 2015 11.30am <0.001ug/L

24 Aug 2015 11.42am 0.12ug/L

26 Aug 2015 1.22pm 0.029ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

2015 Jul/Aug: Cottons Rd Channel. Pesticide: Imazapyr

MVIA Ch3 - reg MV 174 - Cottons Rd

30 July 2015 11.20am 15.1ug/L

10 Aug 2015 10.20am 14ug/L

17 Aug 2015 11.40am 4.1ug/L

20 Aug 2015 10.50am 3.3ug/L

23 Aug 2015 12.25pm 0.74ug/L

24 Aug 2015 12.15pm 1.4ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

MVIA Ch3 – reg MV 174 – Cottons Rd

30 July 2015 11.20am 15.1ug/L

10 Aug 2015 10.20am 14ug/L

17 Aug 2015 11.40am 4.1ug/L

20 Aug 2015 10.50am 3.3ug/L

23 Aug 2015 12.25pm 0.74ug/L

24 Aug 2015 12.15pm 1.4ug/L

GMW FoI 2015/6

2015 Jul/Aug: Channel 29 Katandra. Pesticide: Imazapyr

Shep Ch29 Reg SP1041

28 July 2015, 10.30am: 45ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 11.58am: 12ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 11.52am: 0.38ug/L

28 Aug 2015, 10.45am: 49.2ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 12.01pm: 14ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 11.55am: 0.46ug/L

Goulburn Valley Water FoI Application 2016

Shep Ch29 Reg SP1041

28 July 2015, 10.30am: 45ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 11.58am: 12ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 11.52am: 0.38ug/L

28 Aug 2015, 10.45am: 49.2ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 12.01pm: 14ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 11.55am: 0.46ug/L

Goulburn Valley Water FoI Application 2016

2015 Jul/Aug: Chapel Road Murray Valley. Pesticide: Imazapyr

MVIA CH1 - Reg 24 - Chapel Road

20 July 2015, 1.20pm: 18.9ug/L

23 July 2015, 12.20pm: 18.2ug/L

28 Aug 2015, 10.55am: 12.9ug/L

10 Aug 2015, 10.50am: 4ug/L

15 Aug 2015, 1.00pm: 2.4ug/L

17 Aug 2015, 10.46am: 3.1ug/L

20 Aug 2015, 10.52am: 1.3ug/L

23 Aug 2015, 11.40am: 0.51ug/L

24 Aug 2015, 11.00am: 0.79ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

MVIA CH1 – Reg 24 – Chapel Road

20 July 2015, 1.20pm: 18.9ug/L

23 July 2015, 12.20pm: 18.2ug/L

28 Aug 2015, 10.55am: 12.9ug/L

10 Aug 2015, 10.50am: 4ug/L

15 Aug 2015, 1.00pm: 2.4ug/L

17 Aug 2015, 10.46am: 3.1ug/L

20 Aug 2015, 10.52am: 1.3ug/L

23 Aug 2015, 11.40am: 0.51ug/L

24 Aug 2015, 11.00am: 0.79ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

2015 Jul/Aug: Murray Valley Highway Channel (Vic). Pesticide: Imazapyr

MVIA CH1 - Reg MV11 - Murray Valley Highway

20 July 2015, 1.00pm: <10ug/L

23 July 2015, 12.35pm: <10ug/L

17 Aug 2015, 10.57am: 0.77ug/L

20 Aug 2015, 11.02am: 0.2ug/L

24 Aug 2015, 11.12am: 0.26ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

MVIA CH1 – Reg MV11 – Murray Valley Highway

20 July 2015, 1.00pm: <10ug/L

23 July 2015, 12.35pm: <10ug/L

17 Aug 2015, 10.57am: 0.77ug/L

20 Aug 2015, 11.02am: 0.2ug/L

24 Aug 2015, 11.12am: 0.26ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

2015 Jul/Aug: Channel 29 Katandra. Pesticide: Imazapyr

Shep Ch 29 - Reg SP1045 - Union Road

13 July 2015, 9.20am: 51.7ug/L

13 July 2015, 2.40pm: 53.5ug/L

14 July 2015, 9.30am: 54.6ug/L

14 July 2015, 1.55pm: 56.6ug/L

15 July 2015, 9.10am: 55.5ug/L

16 July 2015, 8.05am: 59.4ug/L

20 July 2015, 10.40am: 58.3ug/L

23 July 2015, 1.40pm: 57.4ug/L

28 July 2015, 12.40pm: 53.2ug/L

6 Aug 2015, 1.48pm: 42.7ug/L

10 Aug 2015, 9.51am: 22ug/L

11 Aug 2015, 4.05pm: 12ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 11.43am: 12ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 11.36am: 0.84ug/L

23 Aug 2015, 10.36am: 0.24ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

Shep Ch 29 – Reg SP1045 – Union Road

13 July 2015, 9.20am: 51.7ug/L

13 July 2015, 2.40pm: 53.5ug/L

14 July 2015, 9.30am: 54.6ug/L

14 July 2015, 1.55pm: 56.6ug/L

15 July 2015, 9.10am: 55.5ug/L

16 July 2015, 8.05am: 59.4ug/L

20 July 2015, 10.40am: 58.3ug/L

23 July 2015, 1.40pm: 57.4ug/L

28 July 2015, 12.40pm: 53.2ug/L

6 Aug 2015, 1.48pm: 42.7ug/L

10 Aug 2015, 9.51am: 22ug/L

11 Aug 2015, 4.05pm: 12ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 11.43am: 12ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 11.36am: 0.84ug/L

23 Aug 2015, 10.36am: 0.24ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

2015 July: Inverness Road Channel 29. Pesticide: Imazapyr

Shep Ch 29 - Reg SP1034 - Inverness Road

13 July 2015, 9.05am: 14.3ug/L

13 July 2015, 1.45pm: 14.4ug/L

14 July 2015, 9.20am: 14.2ug/L

14 July 2015, 1.00pm: 13.6ug/L

16 July 2015, 8.50am: 13.8ug/L

16 July 2015, 8.20am: 13.8ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 12.10pm: 2.2ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 12.01am: 0.19ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

Shep Ch 29 – Reg SP1034 – Inverness Road

13 July 2015, 9.05am: 14.3ug/L

13 July 2015, 1.45pm: 14.4ug/L

14 July 2015, 9.20am: 14.2ug/L

14 July 2015, 1.00pm: 13.6ug/L

16 July 2015, 8.50am: 13.8ug/L

16 July 2015, 8.20am: 13.8ug/L

16 Aug 2015, 12.10pm: 2.2ug/L

19 Aug 2015, 12.01am: 0.19ug/L

Source: Goulburn Murray Water FoI 2016

2012-2021: Myponga Reservoir WTP Inlet + Research. Pesticide: MCPA, 2,4-D, AMPA, Chlorpyrifos, Clopyralid, Glyphosate, Malathion, Metsulfuron Methyl, Omethoate

Myponga Reservoir Water Treatment Plant Inlet

13/8/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

8/10/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L,

31/12/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

17/6/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

15/7/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/8/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

9/9/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

9/10/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

4/11/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

14/7/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

11/8/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

8/9/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

8/10/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

15/6/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/7/15: MCPA 0.08ug/L

10/8/15 MCPA 0.07ug/L

7/9/15 MCPA 0.08ug/L

7/10/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/11/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

30/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

11/7/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

15/8/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

12/9/16: MCPA 0.11ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

14/11/16: MCPA 0.08ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.08ug/L

16/1/17: MCPA 0.06ug/L

14/9/20: MCPA 0.11ug/L

17/8/20: MCPA 0.2ug/L

13/7/20: MCPA 0.2ug/L

19/10/20 MCPA 0.06ug/L

16/8/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/9/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

11/10/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.05ug/L

Myponga Southern Inlet Station Catchment Research

8/8/19: MCPA 0.12ug/L

27/4/20: 2,4-D 0.1ug/L

9/5/20: 2,4-D 1.17ug/L, Clopyralid 1.3ug/L, MCPA 22.4ug/L

16/6/20: MCPA 4.24ug/L

Myponga Northern Inlet Station Catchment Research

27/4/20: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L, AMPA 20ug/L, Glyphosate 85ug/L, MCPA 0.22ug/L, Omethoate 0.07ug/L

Myponga Location 3 Grab Sample Research

27/4/20: 2,4-D 0.5ug/L

9/5/20: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

Myponga Reservoir Loc 5

16/6/20: Chlorpyrifos 0.34ug/L, MCPA 2.64ug/L

Myponga Location 2 Grab Sample Research

8/8/19: MCPA 0.08ug/L

4/2/20: MCPA 0.27ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.21ug/L

9/5/20: Glyphosate 34ug/L, Malathion 0.03ug/L

16/6/20: MCPA 0.14ug/L

Myponga Location 1 Grab Sample Research

4/2/20: MCPA 2.95ug/L

9/5/20: MCPA 0.13ug/L

Myponga Location 4 Grab Sample Research

13/8/20: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.07ug/L

Myponga Reservoir Water Treatment Plant Inlet

13/8/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

8/10/12: MCPA 0.07ug/L,

31/12/12: MCPA 0.06ug/L

17/6/13: MCPA 0.05ug/L

15/7/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

19/8/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

9/9/13: MCPA 0.08ug/L

9/10/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

4/11/13: MCPA 0.06ug/L

14/7/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

11/8/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

8/9/14: MCPA 0.06ug/L

8/10/14: MCPA 0.05ug/L

15/6/15: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/7/15: MCPA 0.08ug/L

10/8/15 MCPA 0.07ug/L

7/9/15 MCPA 0.08ug/L

7/10/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

2/11/15: MCPA 0.06ug/L

30/11/15: MCPA 0.05ug/L

11/7/16: MCPA 0.06ug/L

15/8/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

12/9/16: MCPA 0.11ug/L

17/10/16: MCPA 0.1ug/L

14/11/16: MCPA 0.08ug/L

12/12/16: MCPA 0.08ug/L

16/1/17: MCPA 0.06ug/L

14/9/20: MCPA 0.11ug/L

17/8/20: MCPA 0.2ug/L

13/7/20: MCPA 0.2ug/L

19/10/20 MCPA 0.06ug/L

16/8/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

13/9/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

11/10/21: MCPA 0.07ug/L

6/12/21: MCPA 0.05ug/L

Myponga Southern Inlet Station Catchment Research

8/8/19: MCPA 0.12ug/L

27/4/20: 2,4-D 0.1ug/L

9/5/20: 2,4-D 1.17ug/L, Clopyralid 1.3ug/L, MCPA 22.4ug/L

16/6/20: MCPA 4.24ug/L

Myponga Northern Inlet Station Catchment Research

27/4/20: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L, AMPA 20ug/L, Glyphosate 85ug/L, MCPA 0.22ug/L, Omethoate 0.07ug/L

Myponga Location 3 Grab Sample Research

27/4/20: 2,4-D 0.5ug/L

9/5/20: 2,4-D 0.06ug/L

Myponga Reservoir Loc 5

16/6/20: Chlorpyrifos 0.34ug/L, MCPA 2.64ug/L

Myponga Location 2 Grab Sample Research

8/8/19: MCPA 0.08ug/L

4/2/20: MCPA 0.27ug/L, Metsulfuron Methyl 0.21ug/L

9/5/20: Glyphosate 34ug/L, Malathion 0.03ug/L

16/6/20: MCPA 0.14ug/L

Myponga Location 1 Grab Sample Research

4/2/20: MCPA 2.95ug/L

9/5/20: MCPA 0.13ug/L

Myponga Location 4 Grab Sample Research

13/8/20: Metsulfuron Methyl 0.07ug/L

1997: Gunnedah Area Rainwater Tanks. Pesticide: Endosulfan

Ms Christine Robertson, Director, New England Public Health Unit tabled two
documents with the Standing Committee pertaining to tests on water quality in rainwater tanks in the Gunnedah area conducted by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and the New England Public Health Unit. A pilot test was prepared in 1996, followed by a more intensive survey during the 1997 summer cropping season. Water samples from selected rainwater tanks were tested against maximum residue limits (MRLs) as set out in the National Health and Medical Research Council’s 1987 “Drinking Water Quality in Australia” guidelines.
Findings from the surveys were as follows:
•Pesticides were detected in 36 of the 54 (64%) rainwater tanks sampled in the1997 program;
•The highest endosulfan concentrations were recorded as 0.27 ppb in the 1996 program and0.12 ppb in the 1997 program, these figures were well below the MRL level of 40 ppb; and
•Endosulfan residues were detected in raintanks up to 3600 metres from thenearest possible source.
 
https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/DBAssets/InquiryReport/ReportAcrobat/6009/Chapter02-Report%20on%20Use%20and%20Management%20of%20Pesticid.PDF
Ms Christine Robertson, Director, New England Public Health Unit tabled two
documents with the Standing Committee pertaining to tests on water quality in
rainwater tanks in the Gunnedah area conducted by the NSW Environment
Protection Authority and the New England Public Health Unit. A pilot test
was prepared in 1996, followed by a more intensive survey during the 1997
summer cropping season. Water samples from selected rainwater tanks were
tested against maximum residue limits (MRLs) as set out in the National Health
and Medical Research Council’s 1987 “Drinking Water Quality in Australia”
guidelines.
Findings from the surveys were as follows:
•Pesticides were detected in 36 of the 54 (64%) rainwater tanks sampled in the
1997 program;
•The highest endosulfan concentrations were recorded as 0.27 ppb in the 1996
program and0.12 ppb in the 1997 program, these figures were well below the MRL level
of 40 ppb; and
•Endosulfan residues were detected in raintanks up to 3600 metres from the
nearest possible source.
https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/DBAssets/InquiryReport/ReportAcrobat/6009/Chapter02-Report%20on%20Use%20and%20Management%20of%20Pesticid.PDF

2015: Tindall Aquifer Katherine (NT). Pesticides: Multiple.

Herbicides, pesticides and nutrients in the Tindall aquifer, Katherine Region.
Julia Schult Report No. 13/2016D June 2016
Department Land Resource Management
 
Maximum Levels
 
Atrazine 0.007ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.059ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.024ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.002ug/L, Simazine 0.002ug/L, Haloxyfop 0.001ug/L, Total Imidacloprid (sum of Imidacloprid and its metabolites)  0.8ug/L, 2,4-D 1.3ug/L
Herbicides, pesticides and nutrients in the Tindall aquifer, Katherine Region.
Julia Schult Report No. 13/2016D June 2016
Department Land Resource Management
Maximum Levels
Atrazine 0.007ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.059ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.024ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.002ug/L, Simazine 0.002ug/L, Haloxyfop 0.001ug/L, Total Imidacloprid (sum of Imidacloprid and its metabolites)  0.8ug/L, 2,4-D 1.3ug/L

1995 May: Jandalot Mound (WA). Pesticides: Glyphosate, Metribuzin, Metoxuron

Glyphosate: 380ug/L

Metribuzin: 0.3ug/L

Metoxuron: 0.5ug/L

"Glyphosate, a phosphonic acid herbicide commonly used in home gardens, industrial sites and non-selectively in agriculture, was detected in Bore JE6A from the Water Supply Treatment Plant at 38014L. This is a significant concentration of herbicide in groundwater...The occurrence of glyphosate in the deep, but not th eshallow, groundwater at this site suggests rapid direct transport to the deeper aquifer, with little opportunity to bind to soil minerals. This may be possible through soil fissures, or damaged bore construction.

The tritium activity of this groundwater (0.9TU) suggests it is older than 25 years and the depth to water table is 9.7m. This information, combined with the presence of glyphosate, suggests that recently contaminated water is mixing with older water in this aquifer.Groundwater is rarely analysed for the presence of glyphosate due to the compound's immobility through the vadose zone. This is possibly the first occasion glyphosate has been reported in Australian groundwater..."

Source: A Groundwater Quality Assessment of the Jandakot Mound, Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia. R.M. LARSEN, K.L. WATKINS, N.A. STEEL,S.J. APPLEYARD AND J. BAULD. RECORD 1998/18. Australian Geological Survey Association

Glyphosate: 380ug/L

Metribuzin: 0.3ug/L

Metoxuron: 0.5ug/L

“Glyphosate, a phosphonic acid herbicide commonly used in home gardens, industrial sites and non-selectively in agriculture, was detected in Bore JE6A from the Water Supply Treatment Plant at 38014L. This is a significant concentration of herbicide in groundwater…The occurrence of glyphosate in the deep, but not th eshallow, groundwater at this site suggests rapid direct transport to the deeper aquifer, with little opportunity to bind to soil minerals. This may be possible through soil fissures, or damaged bore construction.

The tritium activity of this groundwater (0.9TU) suggests it is older than 25 years and the depth to water table is 9.7m. This information, combined with the presence of glyphosate, suggests that recently contaminated water is mixing with older water in this aquifer.Groundwater is rarely analysed for the presence of glyphosate due to the compound’s immobility through the vadose zone. This is possibly the first occasion glyphosate has been reported in Australian groundwater…”

Source: A Groundwater Quality Assessment of the Jandakot Mound, Swan Coastal Plain,
Western Australia. R.M. LARSEN, K.L. WATKINS, N.A. STEEL,S.J. APPLEYARD AND J. BAULD. RECORD 1998/18. Australian Geological Survey Association

2005 November: Main Southern Channel Heyfield. Pesticide: Acrolein

Main Southern Channel

Heyfield intermittent Town Supply

(upstream of Clynes Rd - 1st Treatment Zone, central section)

9 November 2005

10.55am: 3ug/L

11.20am: 2978ug/L

11.40am: 2825ug/L

12.00pm: 2334ug/L

4.00pm: 427ug/L

9 November 2005 (Swimming Pool Check)

10.40am: 128ug/L

1.45pm: 4148ug/L

2.20pm: 2399ug/L

4.35pm: 66ug/L

 

Main Southern Channel

Heyfield intermittent Town Supply

(upstream of Clynes Rd – 1st Treatment Zone, central section)

9 November 2005

10.55am: 3ug/L

11.20am: 2978ug/L

11.40am: 2825ug/L

12.00pm: 2334ug/L

4.00pm: 427ug/L

9 November 2005 (Swimming Pool Check)

10.40am: 128ug/L

1.45pm: 4148ug/L

2.20pm: 2399ug/L

4.35pm: 66ug/L

2005: Main Northern Channel Gippsland. Pesticide: Acrolein

Main Northern Channel (near Boisdale)

80 Foot Drop (Upstream of Sellings Road)

3rd Treatment Zone

18 January 2005

10.35am: 5908.9ug/L

12.00pm: 2408.4ug/L

3.00pm: 2982.1ug/L

3.48pm: 2928.1ug/L

8 November 2005

11.06am: 29ug/L

4.15pm: 57ug/L

6.00pm: 108ug/L

7.00pm: 24ug/L

7.50pm: 497ug/L

9 November 2005

1.00pm: 510ug/L

6.53ug/L: 124ug/L

10 November 2005

9.45am: 754ug/L

4.00pm: 286ug/L

11November 2005

11.10am: 66ug/L

 

 

Main Northern Channel (near Boisdale)

80 Foot Drop (Upstream of Sellings Road)

3rd Treatment Zone

18 January 2005

10.35am: 5908.9ug/L

12.00pm: 2408.4ug/L

3.00pm: 2982.1ug/L

3.48pm: 2928.1ug/L

8 November 2005

11.06am: 29ug/L

4.15pm: 57ug/L

6.00pm: 108ug/L

7.00pm: 24ug/L

7.50pm: 497ug/L

9 November 2005

1.00pm: 510ug/L

6.53ug/L: 124ug/L

10 November 2005

9.45am: 754ug/L

4.00pm: 286ug/L

11November 2005

11.10am: 66ug/L

2005: Main Northern Channel Gippsland. Pesticide: Acrolein

Magnacide H Herbicide Monitoring

Southern Rural Water

Main Northern

Below 919 off-take Second Injection Site

18/1/05: 3pm Acrolein 562ug/L

Football Lane

(upstream of drop) 3rd Treatment Zone

8/11/05

11.58am:  0ug/L

1.08pm: 395ug/L

1.22pm: 450ug/L

1.25pm: 473ug/L

1.45pm: 564ug/L

2.10pm: 518ug/L

2.30pm: 461ug/L

2.45pm: 381ug/L

3.30pm: 1900ug/L

3.35pm: 4424ug/L

3.57pm: 5144ug/L

4.15pm: 5029ug/L

4.40pm: 5201ug/L

5pm: 5235ug/L

5.20pm: 6560ug/L

6.30pm: 792ug/L

7.20pm: 96ug/L

7.30pm: 96ug/L

 

Magnacide H Herbicide Monitoring

Southern Rural Water

Main Northern

Below 919 off-take Second Injection Site

18/1/05: 3pm Acrolein 562ug/L

Football Lane

(upstream of drop) 3rd Treatment Zone

8/11/05

11.58am:  0ug/L

1.08pm: 395ug/L

1.22pm: 450ug/L

1.25pm: 473ug/L

1.45pm: 564ug/L

2.10pm: 518ug/L

2.30pm: 461ug/L

2.45pm: 381ug/L

3.30pm: 1900ug/L

3.35pm: 4424ug/L

3.57pm: 5144ug/L

4.15pm: 5029ug/L

4.40pm: 5201ug/L

5pm: 5235ug/L

5.20pm: 6560ug/L

6.30pm: 792ug/L

7.20pm: 96ug/L

7.30pm: 96ug/L

 

2005 November: Northern Channel Gippsland. Pesticide: Acrolein

Main Northern @ Coloe's Road

Acrolein Weed Control - Southern Rural Water

8/11/05: 2.38pm 97ug/L

8/11/05: 6.45pm 27ug/L

9/11/05: 9.50am 1200ug/L

9/11/05: 10.30am 2308ug/L

9/11/05: 10.50am 2929ug/L

9/11/05: 11.14am 3275ug/L

9/11/05: 11.50am 3384ug/L

9/11/05: 12.35pm 4127ug/L

9/11/05: 1.45pm 5052ug/L

9/11/05: 2.50pm 3967ug/L

9/11/05: 4.40pm 2185ug/L

9/11/05: 6.05pm 2185ug/L

10/11/05: 11.40pm 1194ug/L

 

Main Northern @ Coloe’s Road

Acrolein Weed Control – Southern Rural Water

8/11/05: 2.38pm 97ug/L

8/11/05: 6.45pm 27ug/L

9/11/05: 9.50am 1200ug/L

9/11/05: 10.30am 2308ug/L

9/11/05: 10.50am 2929ug/L

9/11/05: 11.14am 3275ug/L

9/11/05: 11.50am 3384ug/L

9/11/05: 12.35pm 4127ug/L

9/11/05: 1.45pm 5052ug/L

9/11/05: 2.50pm 3967ug/L

9/11/05: 4.40pm 2185ug/L

9/11/05: 6.05pm 2185ug/L

10/11/05: 11.40pm 1194ug/L

2005: Main Northern Channel Gippsland. Pesticide: Acrolein

Main Northern @ Slaughterhouse Road

Acrolein Weed Control - Southern Rural Water

8/11/05: 1.45pm 250ug/L

8/11/05: 2.10pm 10ug/L

8/11/05: 2.40pm 200ug/L

8/11/05: 5.30pm 3540ug/L

8/11/05: 5.55pm 280ug/L

18/1/05: 12.56pm 79ug/L

18/1/05: 1.55pm 226ug/L

Main Northern @ Slaughterhouse Road

Acrolein Weed Control – Southern Rural Water

8/11/05: 1.45pm 250ug/L

8/11/05: 2.10pm 10ug/L

8/11/05: 2.40pm 200ug/L

8/11/05: 5.30pm 3540ug/L

8/11/05: 5.55pm 280ug/L

18/1/05: 12.56pm 79ug/L

18/1/05: 1.55pm 226ug/L

 

2005: Newry North Channel. Pesticide: Acrolein

Main Northern @ Kentucky Road

Acrolein Weed Control - Southern Rural Water

18/1/05: 10.05am 100ug/L

18/1/05: 11.36am 163ug/L

18/11/05: 12.37pm 163ug/L

Hanratty's Injection Point

8/11/05: 9.00am 3.8ug/L

8/11/05: 11.01am 4610ug/L

8/11/05: 11.30am 541ug/L

8/11/05: 11.50am 38ug/L

8/11/05: 5.20pm 15ug/L

9/11/05: 5.20pm 6ug/L

10/11/05: 1.45pm 40ug/L

Main Northern @ Kentucky Road

Acrolein Weed Control – Southern Rural Water

18/1/05: 10.05am 100ug/L

18/1/05: 11.36am 163ug/L

18/11/05: 12.37pm 163ug/L

Hanratty’s Injection Point

8/11/05: 9.00am 3.8ug/L

8/11/05: 11.01am 4610ug/L

8/11/05: 11.30am 541ug/L

8/11/05: 11.50am 38ug/L

8/11/05: 5.20pm 15ug/L

9/11/05: 5.20pm 6ug/L

10/11/05: 1.45pm 40ug/L

 

2005: Carters Creek (Vic). Pesticide: Acrolein

Carters Creek at Sellings Road

Acrolein Weed Control - Southern Rural Water

18/1/05: 11.35am 312.61ug/L

18/1/05: 5.30pm 209.821ug/L

8/11/05: 9.50am 3.6ug/L

8/11/05: 4.40pm 150ug/L

9/11/05: 3.50pm 7ug/L

Carters Creek at Sellings Road

Acrolein Weed Control – Southern Rural Water

18/1/05: 11.35am 312.61ug/L

18/1/05: 5.30pm 209.821ug/L

8/11/05: 9.50am 3.6ug/L

8/11/05: 4.40pm 150ug/L

9/11/05: 3.50pm 7ug/L

2005: Kentucky Creek (Vic). Pesticide: Acrolein

Kentucky Creek at Wrights Road

Acrolein Weed Control - Southern Rural Water

9/11/05: 3.30pm Acrolein 93.7ug/L

10/11/05: 1pm Acrolein 20ug/L

11/11/05: 10.20am Acrolein 10ug/L

Kentucky Creek at Wrights Road

Acrolein Weed Control – Southern Rural Water

9/11/05: 3.30pm Acrolein 93.7ug/L

10/11/05: 1pm Acrolein 20ug/L

11/11/05: 10.20am Acrolein 10ug/L

2005/6 Baratta/Sheep Station Creek Estuary. Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Ametryn, Diuron

Three different herbicide residues were detected in the estuarine waters of the Barratta/Sheep Station Creek estuary including atrazine (0.05 μg/L) and its decay product desethylatrazine (0.03 μg/L), ametryn (0.02 μg/L) and diuron (0.01 μg/L). These concentrations all fall well below any ecological ANZECC guideline. No herbicide residues were detected in the three sediment samples.

p43 Pesticides in the lower Burdekin and Don River catchments (Edition 1) Stephen Lewis, Aaron Davis, Jon Brodie, Zoë Bainbridge, Vivian McConnell, Mirjam Maughan

Australian Centre for Freshwater Research 2006

Three different herbicide residues were detected in the estuarine waters of the Barratta/Sheep Station Creek estuary including atrazine (0.05 μg/L) and its decay product desethylatrazine (0.03 μg/L), ametryn (0.02 μg/L) and diuron (0.01 μg/L). These concentrations all fall well below any ecological ANZECC guideline. No herbicide residues were detected in the three sediment samples.

p43 Pesticides in the lower Burdekin and Don River catchments (Edition 1) Stephen Lewis, Aaron Davis, Jon Brodie, Zoë Bainbridge, Vivian McConnell, Mirjam Maughan

Australian Centre for Freshwater Research 2006

2005/6: Plantation Creek Estuary (Qld). Pesticide: Diuron

No herbicide residues were detected in the estuarine waters of Yellow Gin
Creek which supports the sub-catchment data while diuron (0.02 μg/L) was detected in the water sample from the Plantation Creek estuary. This diuron concentration is well below any ANZECC ecological guideline....

Pesticides in the lower Burdekin and Don River catchments (Edition 1) Stephen Lewis, Aaron Davis, Jon Brodie, Zoë Bainbridge, Vivian McConnell, Mirjam Maughan

Australian Centre for Freshwater Research 2006

No herbicide residues were detected in the estuarine waters of Yellow Gin
Creek which supports the sub-catchment data while diuron (0.02 μg/L) was detected
in the water sample from the Plantation Creek estuary. This diuron concentration is
well below any ANZECC ecological guideline….

Pesticides in the lower Burdekin and Don River catchments (Edition 1) Stephen Lewis, Aaron Davis, Jon Brodie, Zoë Bainbridge, Vivian McConnell, Mirjam Maughan

Australian Centre for Freshwater Research 2006

1998: Lower Burdekin (Qld) Sediments. Pesticides: Atrazine, 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T

Atrazine (ranged from 11.3 to 48 μg/kg in 3 sampling sites), 2,4-D (ranged from 4.2 to 5.6 μg/kg in 2 sampling sites) and 2,4,5-T (ranged from 2.4 to 15.1 μg/kg at 4 of 18 sampling sites) were also detected in sediments of the lower Burdekin waterways (Hunter et al., 1998).

p12 Pesticides in the lower Burdekin and Don River catchments

(Edition 1) Stephen Lewis, Aaron Davis, Jon Brodie, Zoë Bainbridge, Vivian McConnell, Mirjam Maughan, ACTFR REPORT NUMBER 07/05

Atrazine (ranged from 11.3 to 48 μg/kg in 3 sampling sites), 2,4-D (ranged from 4.2 to 5.6 μg/kg in 2 sampling sites) and 2,4,5-T (ranged from 2.4 to 15.1 μg/kg at 4 of 18 sampling sites) were also detected in sediments of the lower Burdekin waterways (Hunter et al., 1998).

p12 Pesticides in the lower Burdekin and Don River catchments

(Edition 1) Stephen Lewis, Aaron Davis, Jon Brodie, Zoë Bainbridge, Vivian McConnell, Mirjam Maughan, ACTFR REPORT NUMBER 07/05

2008: Noosa Heads Spray Drift.

Another high profile case of alleged spray drift in QLD occurred near Noosa where a fish hatchery attracted national media attention with stories of fish deformities following alleged spray drift from an adjacent macadamia farm. Investigations by a government task force and APVMA were inconclusive but did not show that spray drift was the source of the alleged deformities. As with some other states/ territories, QLD did not have a central single reporting or investigation centre for drift issues. Rather, issues were directed to different groups for attention (Biosecurity QLD, Workplace health and Safety, local Department of Environment and Resource Management office, local government authority, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, APVMA, health officials etc) depending on the nature of the complaint. State-level statistics and information are therefore not available in QLD. It is therefore recommended that a single data source be established in QLD.

Horticulture Risk Survey
Dr Andrew Hewitt
The University of Queensland
Project Number: AH11033

2014

Another high profile case of alleged spray drift in QLD occurred near Noosa where a fish hatchery attracted national media attention with stories of fish deformities following alleged spray drift from an adjacent macadamia farm. Investigations by a government task force and APVMA were inconclusive but did not show that spray drift was the source of the alleged deformities. As with some other states/ territories, QLD did not have a central single reporting or investigation centre for drift issues. Rather, issues were directed to different groups for attention (Biosecurity QLD, Workplace health and Safety, local Department of Environment and Resource Management office, local government authority, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, APVMA, health officials etc) depending on the nature of the complaint. State-level statistics and information are therefore not available in QLD. It is therefore recommended that a single data source be established in QLD.

Horticulture Risk Survey
Dr Andrew Hewitt
The University of Queensland
Project Number: AH11033

2014

1996-7: Brownhill Creek (SA). Pesticides: Simazine, Atrazine

Technical Report - Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 - 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme - SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare - SA EPA 2005

Brownhill Creek Adelaide Airport

p26: Simazine: 4.9ug/L, 3.7ug/L, 1.9ug/L, 0.59ug/L

Atrazine 0.6ug/L

Technical Report – Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 – 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme – SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare – SA EPA 2005

Brownhill Creek Adelaide Airport

p26: Simazine: 4.9ug/L, 3.7ug/L, 1.9ug/L, 0.59ug/L

Atrazine 0.6ug/L

1996-7: Torrens River (SA). Pesticides: Dieldrin, Simazine

Technical Report - Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 - 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme - SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare - SA EPA 2005

Torrens River (Tapleys Hill Road Bridge)

p26: Dieldrin 0.03ug/L, Simazine 3.6ug/L, Simazine 2.9ug/L

Technical Report – Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 – 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme – SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare – SA EPA 2005

Torrens River (Tapleys Hill Road Bridge)

p26: Dieldrin 0.03ug/L, Simazine 3.6ug/L, Simazine 2.9ug/L

1978-1983: Torrens River (SA). Pesticides: Lindane, Dachtal

Technical Report - Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 - 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme - SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare - SA EPA 2005

Torrens River (Holbrooks Road)

p26: Lindane 0.02ug/L, 0.16ug/L, Dachtal 0.08ug/L, 0.08ug/L, 0.08ug/L, 0.06ug/L

Technical Report – Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 – 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme – SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare – SA EPA 2005

Torrens River (Holbrooks Road)

p26: Lindane 0.02ug/L, 0.16ug/L, Dachtal 0.08ug/L, 0.08ug/L, 0.08ug/L, 0.06ug/L

1978-1983: Gawler River (SA). Pesticide: Lindane, Dachtal

Technical Report - Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 - 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme - SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare - SA EPA 2005

p26: Lindane 0.01ug/L, Dachtal 0.01ug/L Gawler River (Virginia Park)

Technical Report – Adelaide Coastal Waters Study

Stage 2 Research Program 2003 – 2005
Technical Report No. 3 July 2005

Audit of contemporary and historical quality and quantity data of stormwater discharging into the marine environment, and field work programme – SA Govt/CSIRO/Watercare – SA EPA 2005

p26: Lindane 0.01ug/L, Dachtal 0.01ug/L Gawler River (Virginia Park)

1997-1999: Emerald (Qld) 21 Spray Drift Incidents. Pesticide: 2,4-D

...A number of incidents of alleged 2,4-D herbicide damage to grapes,
horticultural tree crops and cotton have occurred in the Emerald district over
the past 2 years. A number of these incidents may have been caused by the
volatility of the chemical formulations used....

The Emerald Chemical Liaison Group met in Emerald on 2 November 1998 to consider restrictions on the use of 2,4-D (amine and ester
formulations). The meeting reached consensus that the declaration of Emerald Shire as a hazardous area2 under the Agricultural Chemicals Distribution Control Act 1966 was the preferred option....

The meeting resolved to request the DPI to consider declaration of a hazardous area in the Emerald district, broadly consisting of a 100 km radius from the centre of Emerald. A local committee was formed to develop a submission detailing the desired scope of the proposed regulation including geographic coverage, extent of chemical restrictions and any
exemptions considered necessary. ..

5.2.1 The Emerald Chemical Liaison Group has been concerned with alleged damage from volatile 2,4-D over the 1997/98 and 1998/99 seasons. There have been a total of 21 incidents of alleged 2,4-D damage to cotton, table grapes, chick peas, mangoes and tomatoes over the 1997-99 period. As a consequence, the Emerald Chemical Liaison Group met at Emerald on 2 November 1998 to consider restrictions on the distribution of 2,4-D (ester and amine) formulations. This meeting was attended by DPI Animal and
Plant Health Service staff. The meeting resolved to request the declaration of a hazardous area near Emerald with restrictions on the aerial and ground distribution of volatile 2,4-D ester formulations.

Agricultural Chemicals Distribution Control Amendment (No. 1) No. 283, 2000 Queensland Hansard

…A number of incidents of alleged 2,4-D herbicide damage to grapes,
horticultural tree crops and cotton have occurred in the Emerald district over
the past 2 years. A number of these incidents may have been caused by the
volatility of the chemical formulations used….

The Emerald Chemical Liaison Group met in Emerald on 2 November 1998 to consider restrictions on the use of 2,4-D (amine and ester
formulations). The meeting reached consensus that the declaration of Emerald Shire as a hazardous area2 under the Agricultural Chemicals Distribution Control Act 1966 was the preferred option….

The meeting resolved to request the DPI to consider declaration of a hazardous area in the Emerald district, broadly consisting of a 100 km radius from the centre of Emerald. A local committee was formed to develop a submission detailing the desired scope of the proposed regulation including geographic coverage, extent of chemical restrictions and any
exemptions considered necessary. ..

5.2.1 The Emerald Chemical Liaison Group has been concerned with alleged damage from volatile 2,4-D over the 1997/98 and 1998/99 seasons. There have been a total of 21 incidents of alleged 2,4-D damage to cotton, table grapes, chick peas, mangoes and tomatoes over the 1997-99 period. As a consequence, the Emerald Chemical Liaison Group met at Emerald on 2 November 1998 to consider restrictions on the distribution of 2,4-D (ester and amine) formulations. This meeting was attended by DPI Animal and
Plant Health Service staff. The meeting resolved to request the declaration of a hazardous area near Emerald with restrictions on the aerial and ground distribution of volatile 2,4-D ester formulations.

Agricultural Chemicals Distribution Control Amendment (No. 1) No. 283, 2000 Queensland Hansard

2011/2023: Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump. Pesticides: Multiple

Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump (Mackay Drinking Water Supply)

July 7 2023: https://www.foe.org.au/are_queenslanders_microdosing_on_weedkillers_in_their_drinking_water

5646 pesticide detections between Sep 2011 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 779 detections of Diuron between Nov 2011 and Jan 2023. 6.5ug/L (max 11/1/14). 0.5076ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 493 detections of 2,4-D between Jul 2012 and Jan 2023. 3.7ug/L (max 11/1/14). 0.1512ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 265 detections of Ametryn between Dec 2011 and Jan 2023. 0.6ug/L (max 24/1/13). 0.0409ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 732 detections of Atrazine between Sep 2011 and Jan 2023. 5.1ug/L (max 29/1/20). 0.5265ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 98 detections of Bromacil between Sep 2011 and Jan 2023. 0.71ug/L (max 6/7/22). 0.0316ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 6 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between May 2022 to July 2022.

Diazinon: 8 trace detections of Diazinon between Jan 2017 to July 2022.

Fluroxypur: 308 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2014 to Jan 2023. 0.6ug/L (max 4/1/21). 0.1235ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 4 detections of Haloxyfop between Nov 2016 and Mar 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 662 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2011 and Jan 2023. 1ug/L (max 1/1/13). 0.1529ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 412 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.58ug/L (max 5/1/17). 0.0762ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 562 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2012 and Jan 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 4/1/21). 0.151ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 277 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jul 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.19ug/L (max 6/2/22). 0.0453ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 360 detections of MCPA between July 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.87ug/L (max 9/1/19). 0.0651ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 406 detections of Metolachlor between Nov 2011 and Jan 2023. 0.37ug/L (max 29/1/20). 0.0497ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 26 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2015 and Feb 2020. 0.04ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.0141ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 169 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 0.9ug/L (max 7/1/13). 0.0742ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 13 detections of Simazine between Feb 2012 and Jan 2020. 0.02ug/L (max 1/2/17). 0.011ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 10 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2021 and Mar 2021. 0.12ug/L (max 2/4/18). 0.03ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 35 detections of Terbuthylazine between Dec 2020 and Mar 2021. 0.22ug/L (max 15/1/23). 0.0383ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 20 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2012 and Jul 2022. 0.28ug/L (max 31/12/21). 0.0506ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

PIONEER RIVER CATCHMENT EVENT BASED WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

Ian White1, Jon Brodie2 and Carl Mitchell3
1. NRM, Mackay, 2. ACTFR, James Cook University, Townsville, 3. Healthy Waterways Program, Mackay
 
"Residues of five herbicides were found at Dumblet on Weir during the event. Pesticides found were diuron, ametryn, atrazine, hexazinone and 2,4-D. Deset
hylatrazine, a degradation product of atrazine, was also recorded on the rising stage of the hydrograph. Concentrations of all of these pesticides were highest during the initial runoff and became diluted as the event progressed. No filtered samples were collected for the analysis of pesticides, therefore it is unknown what proportion of these chemical residues were carried on the sediment and how much was in solution ..."
 
Dumbleton Weir detections (Ranges)
 
Diuron: 8.5ug/L - 0.9ug/L
Atrazine: 1.3ug/L - 0.29ug/L
Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L - 0.05ug/L
Hexazinone: 0.3ug/L - 0.11ug/L
Ametryn: 0.3ug/L - 0.1ug/L
2,4-D: 0.4ug/L - 0.2ug/L
 
https://www-public.jcu.edu.au/events/idc/groups/public/documents/journal_article/jcudev_015631~4.pdf
 

2012-2013

Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump Station

Ametryn 28kg, Total Atrazine 460kg, Diuron 440kg, Hexazinone 93kg

Land Use Yield

Ametryn (Sugarcane) 0.091 kg/km2

Atrazine (Cropping, Forestry & Sugarcane) 0.68kg/km2

Diuron (Cropping, Horticulture & Sugarcane) 1.4kg/km2

Hexazinone (Cropping, Forestry  and Sugarcane) 0.079kg/km2

Source: Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Total Suspended Solids, Nutrients & Pesticide Loads (2012-2013) for Rivers that Discharge to the Great Barrier Reef - Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2012-2013

https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/measuring-success/paddock-to-reef/assets/2012-2013-gbr-catchment-loads-technical-report.pdf

An evaluation of the prevalence of alternate pesticides of environmental concern in Great Barrier Reef catchments: RP57C 2014
Rachael A Smith, Ryan Turner, Susi Vardy, Rae Huggins, Rohan Wallace, Michael St.J. Warne
Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences, Science Division, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts.

Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump

Pesticides: Ametryn, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, 2,4-D, MCPA, Triclopyr, Isoxaflutole, Fluometuron, Metribuzin, Simazine, Metolachlor

Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump (Mackay Drinking Water Supply)

July 7 2023: https://www.foe.org.au/are_queenslanders_microdosing_on_weedkillers_in_their_drinking_water

5646 pesticide detections between Sep 2011 and Jan 2023

Diuron: 779 detections of Diuron between Nov 2011 and Jan 2023. 6.5ug/L (max 11/1/14). 0.5076ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 493 detections of 2,4-D between Jul 2012 and Jan 2023. 3.7ug/L (max 11/1/14). 0.1512ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 265 detections of Ametryn between Dec 2011 and Jan 2023. 0.6ug/L (max 24/1/13). 0.0409ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 732 detections of Atrazine between Sep 2011 and Jan 2023. 5.1ug/L (max 29/1/20). 0.5265ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 98 detections of Bromacil between Sep 2011 and Jan 2023. 0.71ug/L (max 6/7/22). 0.0316ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 6 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between May 2022 to July 2022.

Diazinon: 8 trace detections of Diazinon between Jan 2017 to July 2022.

Fluroxypur: 308 detections of Fluroxypur between Feb 2014 to Jan 2023. 0.6ug/L (max 4/1/21). 0.1235ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 4 detections of Haloxyfop between Nov 2016 and Mar 2023. 0.06ug/L (max 23/2/20). 0.023ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 662 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2011 and Jan 2023. 1ug/L (max 1/1/13). 0.1529ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 412 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Jan 2023. 0.58ug/L (max 5/1/17). 0.0762ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 562 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2012 and Jan 2023. 1.4ug/L (max 4/1/21). 0.151ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 277 detections of Isoxaflutole between Jul 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.19ug/L (max 6/2/22). 0.0453ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 360 detections of MCPA between July 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.87ug/L (max 9/1/19). 0.0651ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 406 detections of Metolachlor between Nov 2011 and Jan 2023. 0.37ug/L (max 29/1/20). 0.0497ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 26 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl between Jan 2015 and Feb 2020. 0.04ug/L (max 31/1/17). 0.0141ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 169 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 0.9ug/L (max 7/1/13). 0.0742ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 13 detections of Simazine between Feb 2012 and Jan 2020. 0.02ug/L (max 1/2/17). 0.011ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 10 detections of Tebuthiuron between Jan 2021 and Mar 2021. 0.12ug/L (max 2/4/18). 0.03ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 35 detections of Terbuthylazine between Dec 2020 and Mar 2021. 0.22ug/L (max 15/1/23). 0.0383ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 20 detections of Triclopyr between Dec 2012 and Jul 2022. 0.28ug/L (max 31/12/21). 0.0506ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

PIONEER RIVER CATCHMENT EVENT BASED WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

Ian White1, Jon Brodie2 and Carl Mitchell3
1. NRM, Mackay, 2. ACTFR, James Cook University, Townsville, 3. Healthy Waterways Program, Mackay
“Residues of five herbicides were found at Dumblet on Weir during the event. Pesticides found were diuron, ametryn, atrazine, hexazinone and 2,4-D. Deset
hylatrazine, a degradation product of atrazine, was also recorded on the rising stage of the hydrograph. Concentrations of all of these pesticides were highest during the initial runoff and became diluted as the event progressed. No filtered samples were collected for the analysis of pesticides, therefore it is unknown what proportion of these chemical residues were carried on the sediment and how much was in solution …”
Dumbleton Weir detections (Ranges)
Diuron: 8.5ug/L – 0.9ug/L
Atrazine: 1.3ug/L – 0.29ug/L
Desethylatrazine: 0.1ug/L – 0.05ug/L
Hexazinone: 0.3ug/L – 0.11ug/L
Ametryn: 0.3ug/L – 0.1ug/L
2,4-D: 0.4ug/L – 0.2ug/L
https://www-public.jcu.edu.au/events/idc/groups/public/documents/journal_article/jcudev_015631~4.pdf

2012-2013

Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump Station

Ametryn 28kg, Total Atrazine 460kg, Diuron 440kg, Hexazinone 93kg

Land Use Yield

Ametryn (Sugarcane) 0.091 kg/km2

Atrazine (Cropping, Forestry & Sugarcane) 0.68kg/km2

Diuron (Cropping, Horticulture & Sugarcane) 1.4kg/km2

Hexazinone (Cropping, Forestry  and Sugarcane) 0.079kg/km2

Source: Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Total Suspended Solids, Nutrients & Pesticide Loads (2012-2013) for Rivers that Discharge to the Great Barrier Reef – Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2012-2013

https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/measuring-success/paddock-to-reef/assets/2012-2013-gbr-catchment-loads-technical-report.pdf

An evaluation of the prevalence of alternate pesticides of environmental concern in Great Barrier Reef catchments: RP57C 2014
Rachael A Smith, Ryan Turner, Susi Vardy, Rae Huggins, Rohan Wallace, Michael St.J. Warne
Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences, Science Division, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts.

Pioneer River at Dumbleton Pump

Pesticides: Ametryn, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, 2,4-D, MCPA, Triclopyr, Isoxaflutole, Fluometuron, Metribuzin, Simazine, Metolachlor

2011/2023: Baratta Creek at Northcote (Queensland). Pesticides: Multiple

Barratta Creek at Northcote (Queensland)

7313 pesticide detections between Aug 2011 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 736 detections of Diuron between Aug 2011 and Feb 2023. 8.9ug/L (max 18/10/17). 0.698ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 579 detections of 2,4-D between July 2012 and Feb 2023. 20ug/L (max 10/11/15 & 18/12/16). 0.637ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 425 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2011 and Jan 2023. 5.8ug/L (max 20/11/17). 0.0839ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 734 detections of Atrazine between Aug 2011 and Feb 2023. 99.3% of all samples positive. 59ug/L (max 20/10/21). 3.084ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 285 detections of Bromacil between Dec 2014 and Feb 2023. 10ug/L (max 24/4/21). 0.206ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Nov 2021 and Jul 2022.

Diazinon: 9 detections (7 trace) of Diazinon between Apr 2017 and Jan 2019. 0.02ug/L (max 22/10/18). 0.0023ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 25 detections of Fipronil between Dec 2016 and Jul 2020. 0.21ug/L (max 24/7/20). 0.0152ug/L av.)

Fluroxypur: 530 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2012 and Feb 2023. 16ug/L (max 27/10/20). 0.611ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 246 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 0.65ug/L (max 30/9/16). 0.068ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 207 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2011 and Dec 2022. 1.2ug/L (max 1.2ug/L 25/8/15). 0.0522ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 352 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.46ug/L (max 31/8/21). 0.0482ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 310 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2012 and Oct 2022. 1.3ug/L (max 23/9/14). 0.063ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 439 detections of Isoxaflutole between Nov 2011 and Jan 2023. 6.8ug/L (max 27/10/20). 0.288ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 489 detections of MCPA between Jul 2012 and Feb 2023. 34ug/L (max 27/10/20). 0.314ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 490 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2011 and Feb 2023. 19ug/L (max 27/6/15). 0.247ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 101 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl Oct 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.29ug/L (max 23/4/18). 0.0359ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 444 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 8.6ug/L (max 13/11/18). 0.418ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 17 detections of Pendimethalin between Jan 2017 and May 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 23/5/20). 0.0635ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 19 detections of Prometryn between Jul 2012 and Nov 2017. 0.02ug/L (max 24/12/15). 0.0058ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 183 detections of Simazine between Aug 2011 and Nov 2022. 0.22ug/L (max 13/12/14). 0.0222ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 443 detections of Tebuthiuron between Mar 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.32ug/L (max 8/1/23). 0.0458ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 134 detections of Terbuthylazine between Nov 2015 and Feb 2023. 12ug/L (max 9/11/20). 0.317ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 114 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2013 and Jul 2022. 0.76ug/L (max 3/3/20). 0.0841ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal - Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Baratta Creek at Northcote

Ametryn 13kg, Total Atrazine 520kg, Diuron 80kg, Hexazinone 1.1kg, Tebuthiuron 0.049kg

Land Use Yield

Ametryn (Sugarcane) 0.098 kg/km2

Atrazine (Cropping, Forestry & Sugarcane) 3.4kg/km2

Diuron (Cropping, Horticulture & Sugarcane) 0.52kg/km2

Hexazinone (Forestry, Grazing & Sugarcane) 0.0015kg/km2

Tebuthiuron (Grazing) 0.000082kg/km2

Source: Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Total Suspended Solids, Nutrients & Pesticide Loads (2012-2013) for Rivers that Discharge to the Great Barrier Reef - Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2012-2013

https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/measuring-success/paddock-to-reef/assets/2012-2013-gbr-catchment-loads-technical-report.pdf

Baratta Creek at Northcote

Pesticides: Ametryn, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Tebuthiuron, Metsulfuron Methyl, 2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, MCPA, Triclopyr, Metolachlor, Acifluorfen, Haloxyfop, Isoxaflutole, Bromacil, Fluometuron, Metribuzin, Prometryn, Simazine, Propazine-2-hydroxy, Metolachlor

An evaluation of the prevalence of alternate pesticides of environmental concern in Great Barrier Reef catchments: RP57C 2014
Rachael A Smith, Ryan Turner, Susi Vardy, Rae Huggins, Rohan Wallace, Michael St.J. Warne
Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences, Science Division, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts.

 

Barratta Creek at Northcote (Queensland)

7313 pesticide detections between Aug 2011 and Feb 2023

Diuron: 736 detections of Diuron between Aug 2011 and Feb 2023. 8.9ug/L (max 18/10/17). 0.698ug/L (av.)

2,4-D: 579 detections of 2,4-D between July 2012 and Feb 2023. 20ug/L (max 10/11/15 & 18/12/16). 0.637ug/L (av.)

Ametryn: 425 detections of Ametryn between Oct 2011 and Jan 2023. 5.8ug/L (max 20/11/17). 0.0839ug/L (av.)

Atrazine: 734 detections of Atrazine between Aug 2011 and Feb 2023. 99.3% of all samples positive. 59ug/L (max 20/10/21). 3.084ug/L (av.)

Bromacil: 285 detections of Bromacil between Dec 2014 and Feb 2023. 10ug/L (max 24/4/21). 0.206ug/L (av.)

Chlorpyrifos: 2 trace detections of Chlorpyrifos between Nov 2021 and Jul 2022.

Diazinon: 9 detections (7 trace) of Diazinon between Apr 2017 and Jan 2019. 0.02ug/L (max 22/10/18). 0.0023ug/L (av.)

Fipronil: 25 detections of Fipronil between Dec 2016 and Jul 2020. 0.21ug/L (max 24/7/20). 0.0152ug/L av.)

Fluroxypur: 530 detections of Fluroxypur between Oct 2012 and Feb 2023. 16ug/L (max 27/10/20). 0.611ug/L (av.)

Haloxyfop: 246 detections of Haloxyfop between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 0.65ug/L (max 30/9/16). 0.068ug/L (av.)

Hexazinone: 207 detections of Hexazinone between Dec 2011 and Dec 2022. 1.2ug/L (max 1.2ug/L 25/8/15). 0.0522ug/L (av.)

Imazapic: 352 detections of Imazapic between Feb 2015 and Feb 2023. 0.46ug/L (max 31/8/21). 0.0482ug/L (av.)

Imidacloprid: 310 detections of Imidacloprid between Feb 2012 and Oct 2022. 1.3ug/L (max 23/9/14). 0.063ug/L (av.)

Isoxaflutole: 439 detections of Isoxaflutole between Nov 2011 and Jan 2023. 6.8ug/L (max 27/10/20). 0.288ug/L (av.)

MCPA: 489 detections of MCPA between Jul 2012 and Feb 2023. 34ug/L (max 27/10/20). 0.314ug/L (av.)

Metolachlor: 490 detections of Metolachlor between Oct 2011 and Feb 2023. 19ug/L (max 27/6/15). 0.247ug/L (av.)

Metsulfuron Methyl: 101 detections of Metsulfuron Methyl Oct 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.29ug/L (max 23/4/18). 0.0359ug/L (av.)

Metribuzin: 444 detections of Metribuzin between Jan 2013 and Jan 2023. 8.6ug/L (max 13/11/18). 0.418ug/L (av.)

Pendimethalin: 17 detections of Pendimethalin between Jan 2017 and May 2022. 0.23ug/L (max 23/5/20). 0.0635ug/L (av.)

Prometryn: 19 detections of Prometryn between Jul 2012 and Nov 2017. 0.02ug/L (max 24/12/15). 0.0058ug/L (av.)

Simazine: 183 detections of Simazine between Aug 2011 and Nov 2022. 0.22ug/L (max 13/12/14). 0.0222ug/L (av.)

Tebuthiuron: 443 detections of Tebuthiuron between Mar 2012 and Jan 2023. 0.32ug/L (max 8/1/23). 0.0458ug/L (av.)

Terbuthylazine: 134 detections of Terbuthylazine between Nov 2015 and Feb 2023. 12ug/L (max 9/11/20). 0.317ug/L (av.)

Triclopyr: 114 detections of Triclopyr between Jan 2013 and Jul 2022. 0.76ug/L (max 3/3/20). 0.0841ug/L (av.)

Source: Pesticide Reporting Portal – Queensland Government. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/c0f0c6d7d88a4fd3a5541fe59f41ff75

Baratta Creek at Northcote

Ametryn 13kg, Total Atrazine 520kg, Diuron 80kg, Hexazinone 1.1kg, Tebuthiuron 0.049kg

Land Use Yield

Ametryn (Sugarcane) 0.098 kg/km2

Atrazine (Cropping, Forestry & Sugarcane) 3.4kg/km2

Diuron (Cropping, Horticulture & Sugarcane) 0.52kg/km2

Hexazinone (Forestry, Grazing & Sugarcane) 0.0015kg/km2

Tebuthiuron (Grazing) 0.000082kg/km2

Source: Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Total Suspended Solids, Nutrients & Pesticide Loads (2012-2013) for Rivers that Discharge to the Great Barrier Reef – Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2012-2013

https://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/measuring-success/paddock-to-reef/assets/2012-2013-gbr-catchment-loads-technical-report.pdf

Baratta Creek at Northcote

Pesticides: Ametryn, Atrazine, Diuron, Hexazinone, Tebuthiuron, Metsulfuron Methyl, 2,4-D, Fluroxypyr, MCPA, Triclopyr, Metolachlor, Acifluorfen, Haloxyfop, Isoxaflutole, Bromacil, Fluometuron, Metribuzin, Prometryn, Simazine, Propazine-2-hydroxy, Metolachlor

An evaluation of the prevalence of alternate pesticides of environmental concern in Great Barrier Reef catchments: RP57C 2014
Rachael A Smith, Ryan Turner, Susi Vardy, Rae Huggins, Rohan Wallace, Michael St.J. Warne
Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences, Science Division, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts.

2012 July – 2013 June: North Johnstone River @ Tung Oil. Pesticides: Diuron, 2,4-D

An evaluation of the prevalence of alternate pesticides of environmental concern in Great Barrier Reef catchments: RP57C 2014
Rachael A Smith, Ryan Turner, Susi Vardy, Rae Huggins, Rohan Wallace, Michael St.J. Warne
Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences, Science Division, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts.

North Johnston River at Tung Oil

Pesticides: Diuron, 2,4-D

An evaluation of the prevalence of alternate pesticides of environmental concern in Great Barrier Reef catchments: RP57C 2014
Rachael A Smith, Ryan Turner, Susi Vardy, Rae Huggins, Rohan Wallace, Michael St.J. Warne
Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences, Science Division, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts.

North Johnstone River at Tung Oil

Pesticides: Diuron, 2,4-D

 

2001: Dalby (groundwater). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

Groundwater bores were sampled at Millmerran, Dalby, Chinchilla and St George every 6 months in 1998 and 1999 to determine if there was any leaching of pesticides into the groundwater system (CBWC 2001). No pesticides were detected in any of the monitored bores. An additional
bore tested on two occasions in 2001 in a cropping area close to Dalby had traces of a number of chemicals including endosulfan, metolachlor, trifluralin, atrazine, chlorpyrifos and prometryn. This is the first agriculturalbore sample in the Condamine Balonne Catchment to show a positive
detection to date.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

Groundwater bores were sampled at Millmerran, Dalby, Chinchilla and St George every 6 months in 1998 and 1999 to determine if there was any leaching of pesticides into the groundwater system (CBWC 2001). No pesticides were detected in any of the monitored bores. An additional
bore tested on two occasions in 2001 in a cropping area close to Dalby had traces of a number of chemicals including endosulfan, metolachlor, trifluralin, atrazine, chlorpyrifos and prometryn. This is the first agriculturalbore sample in the Condamine Balonne Catchment to show a positive
detection to date.

1999-2000: Dirranbandi Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1999-2000: St.George Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1999-2000: Surat Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1999/2000 + 2015/19: Chinchilla Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Atrazine, Desethyl Atrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diuron, Metolachlor, Simazine, Tebuthiuron

Chinchilla Weir, Chinchilla

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.14ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.27ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/1/16: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.21ug/L [Total 0.49ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/4/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/7/16: Atrazine 0.04ug/L

19/10/16: Atrazine 1.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 3.7ug/L, Simazine 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.2ug/L [Total 5.36ug/L 8 pesticides]

24/1/17: Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 1ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 1.73ug/L 6 pesticides]

26/4/17: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.25ug/L, Metolachlor 0.75ug/L [Total 1.32ug/L 4 pesticides]

25/10/17: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.34ug/L [Total 0.63ug/L 4 pesticides]

23/1/18: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.31ug/L [Total 0.63ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/1/18: Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 1.31ug/L [Total 1.64ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/4/18: Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.18ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.12ug/L [Total 1.94ug/L 6 pesticides]

25/7/18: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.53ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.93ug/L 5 pesticides]

17/10/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.64ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.14ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L  [Total 0.97ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/1/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.8ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Diuron 0.87ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 9.8ug/L [Total 11.79ug/L 5 pesticides]

10/4/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Diuron 0.51ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 7.9ug/L [Total 9.13ug/L 5 pesticides]

24/7/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.45ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.28ug/L, Diuron 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 3.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L, Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.08ug/L, Fluroxypyr 0.71ug/L, Isoxaflutole Metabolite (DKN) 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 1.8ug/L [Total 6.95ug/L 10 pesticides]

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Chinchilla Weir, Chinchilla

28/10/15: Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 0.14ug/L, Simazine 0.03ug/L [Total 0.27ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/1/16: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.21ug/L [Total 0.49ug/L 4 pesticides]

28/4/16: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.03ug/L, Diuron 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor 0.08ug/L [Total 0.25ug/L 4 pesticides]

27/7/16: Atrazine 0.04ug/L

19/10/16: Atrazine 1.1ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.14ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.03ug/L, Metolachlor 3.7ug/L, Simazine 0.06ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.2ug/L [Total 5.36ug/L 8 pesticides]

24/1/17: Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Metolachlor 1ug/L, Simazine 0.02ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.06ug/L [Total 1.73ug/L 6 pesticides]

26/4/17: Atrazine 0.27ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.25ug/L, Metolachlor 0.75ug/L [Total 1.32ug/L 4 pesticides]

25/10/17: Atrazine 0.16ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.09ug/L, Metolachlor 0.34ug/L [Total 0.63ug/L 4 pesticides]

23/1/18: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.1ug/L, Metolachlor 0.31ug/L [Total 0.63ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/1/18: Atrazine 0.18ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.04ug/L, Diuron 0.11ug/L, Metolachlor 1.31ug/L [Total 1.64ug/L 4 pesticides]

30/4/18: Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.09ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.05ug/L, Diuron 0.18ug/L, Metolachlor 1.2ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.12ug/L [Total 1.94ug/L 6 pesticides]

25/7/18: Atrazine 0.17ug/L, Desethyl Atrazine 0.07ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.53ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.08ug/L [Total 0.93ug/L 5 pesticides]

17/10/18: Atrazine 0.1ug/L, Diuron 0.08ug/L, Metolachlor 0.64ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.14ug/L, Terbuthylazine 0.01ug/L  [Total 0.97ug/L 5 pesticides]

16/1/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.8ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.3ug/L, Diuron 0.87ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 9.8ug/L [Total 11.79ug/L 5 pesticides]

10/4/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.5ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.2ug/L, Diuron 0.51ug/L, Imidacloprid 0.02ug/L, Metolachlor 7.9ug/L [Total 9.13ug/L 5 pesticides]

24/7/19: Desethyl Atrazine 0.45ug/L, Desisopropyl Atrazine 0.28ug/L, Diuron 0.13ug/L, Metolachlor 3.3ug/L, Tebuthiuron 0.05ug/L, Atrazine 0.11ug/L, Atrazine, 2-Hydroxy 0.08ug/L, Fluroxypyr 0.71ug/L, Isoxaflutole Metabolite (DKN) 0.04ug/L, Metolachlor-OXA 1.8ug/L [Total 6.95ug/L 10 pesticides]

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1999-2000: Dalby Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1999-2000: Cecil Plains (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1999-2000: Millmerran Weir (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs - Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine - desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

Water quality in Queensland catchments and the cotton industry
Dave Waters Cotton CRC, Qld NRME, Toowoomba 2001

In 1999-2000 sampling, 29 sites across the region of NSW and Queensland were monitored for 34 agricultural chemicals. Endosulfan, atrazine, diuron, fluometuron, metolachlor and prometryn were detected. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide, with the second most
frequently detected chemical being endosulfan.

The CBWC pesticide-monitoring program was conducted at the following town weirs – Millmerran,
Cecil Plains, Dalby, Chinchilla, Surat, St George and Dirranbandi in the Condamine Balonne River system. This work was continued in the later years through funding provided by the chemical company Syngenta. Cotton is grown upstream of all sampling locations and would therefore
have the potential to contribute to contamination of the water bodies sampled.

Water samples were analysed for 52 pesticides. These chemicals included the alpha and beta isomers of endosulfan, as well as endosulfan sulfate and the breakdown products of atrazine – desethyl atrazine and hydroxy atrazine. Eight chemicals were detected in all five weirs:
metolachlor, dieldrin, simazine, atrazine, atrazine desethyl, atrazine desisopropyl, prometryn. A byproduct of DDT (p,p-DDE) was detected on one occasion.

1996 March – 2006?: Burwood Beach WWTW (NSW). Pesticides: Multiple

Environmental Monitoring and Performance Review of Burwood Beach WWTW
Biosolids to Ocean Discharge

Hunter Water Corporation
Update Report July 2007

Appendix Three - Biosolids Quality Summary

Burwood Beach Biosolids

HCB, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, DDD, DDE, DDT, Chlordane, Endrin, Chlorpyrifos, Malathion, Diazinon

Environmental Monitoring and Performance Review of Burwood Beach WWTW
Biosolids to Ocean Discharge

Hunter Water Corporation
Update Report July 2007

Appendix Three – Biosolids Quality Summary

Burwood Beach Biosolids

HCB, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, DDD, DDE, DDT, Chlordane, Endrin, Chlorpyrifos, Malathion, Diazinon

2013 Dec – 2014 Mar: Edmonton WWTP Qld. Pesticides: Multiple

Pesticides detected at Edmonton WWTP (Waste Water Treatment Plant)

2,4-D, 3,4-DiCl Aniline, Atrazine, DEET, Desethylatrazine, Diazinon, Diuron, Haloxyfop, MCPA, Mecoprop, Propoxur, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbutryn, Triclopyr

Source: TropWATER/James Cook University. Barron River Pesticide Monitoring and Cairns WWTP WQ Assessment. A Report for Terrain NRM. Report No. 14/40 June 2014

Pesticides detected at Edmonton WWTP (Waste Water Treatment Plant)

2,4-D, 3,4-DiCl Aniline, Atrazine, DEET, Desethylatrazine, Diazinon, Diuron, Haloxyfop, MCPA, Mecoprop, Propoxur, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbutryn, Triclopyr

Source: TropWATER/James Cook University. Barron River Pesticide Monitoring and Cairns WWTP WQ Assessment. A Report for Terrain NRM. Report No. 14/40 June 2014

2013 Dec – 2014 Mar: Southern WWTP Warep Qld. Pesticides: Multiple

Pesticides detected at Southern WWTP (Waste Water Treatment Plant)

2,4-D, 2,4DP, 3,4DiCl Aniline, Atrazine, Bromacil, Carbaryl, DEET, Desethylatrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diazinon, Diuron, Haloxyfop, MCPA, Mecoprop, Propoxur, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbutryn, Triclopyr

Source: TropWATER/James Cook University. Barron River Pesticide Monitoring and Cairns WWTP WQ Assessment. A Report for Terrain NRM. Report No. 14/40 June 2014

Pesticides detected at Southern WWTP (Waste Water Treatment Plant)

2,4-D, 2,4DP, 3,4DiCl Aniline, Atrazine, Bromacil, Carbaryl, DEET, Desethylatrazine, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diazinon, Diuron, Haloxyfop, MCPA, Mecoprop, Propoxur, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Terbutryn, Triclopyr

Source: TropWATER/James Cook University. Barron River Pesticide Monitoring and Cairns WWTP WQ Assessment. A Report for Terrain NRM. Report No. 14/40 June 2014

2009 Nov – 2010 Apr: Corner Inlet Marine National Park. Pesticides: Multiple

Pesticides detected from 17 different locations:

Dichlorvos, Metalaxyl, Prometryn, Tetraconazole, Carbaryl, Hexazinone, Simazine, Prochloraz, Myclobutanil, Propiconazole, Tebufenozide, Trifloxystrobin, Azoxystrobin, Atrazine, Metribuzin, Penconazole (sediment), Pyraclostribin (sediment)

Source: Pesticide and Trace Metals in Surface Waters and Sediments of Rivers Entering the Corner Inlet Marine National Park Victoria Australia. Supplementary Information March 2016

Pesticides detected from 17 different locations:

Dichlorvos, Metalaxyl, Prometryn, Tetraconazole, Carbaryl, Hexazinone, Simazine, Prochloraz, Myclobutanil, Propiconazole, Tebufenozide, Trifloxystrobin, Azoxystrobin, Atrazine, Metribuzin, Penconazole (sediment), Pyraclostribin (sediment)

Source: Pesticide and Trace Metals in Surface Waters and Sediments of Rivers Entering the Corner Inlet Marine National Park Victoria Australia. Supplementary Information March 2016

2002-2007: Coxs Creek Boggabri. Pesticide: Metolachlor

Metolachlor 0.05-18.6ug/L detected in the Namoi River catchment - Majority of detections at Coxs Creek Boggabri and Mooki River at Ruvigne

Source: Mawhinney W (2011) Namoi Water Quality Project 2002-2007 Office of Water NSW

Metolachlor 0.05-18.6ug/L detected in the Namoi River catchment – Majority of detections at Coxs Creek Boggabri and Mooki River at Ruvigne

Source: Mawhinney W (2011) Namoi Water Quality Project 2002-2007 Office of Water NSW

2002-2007: Namoi River. Pesticides: Endosulfan

Endosulfan residues were detected in the Namoi River between Wee Waa and Walgett and in Pian Creek in January and February 2005...

Source: Mawhinney W (2011) Namoi Water Quality Project 2002-2007 Office of Water NSW

Endosulfan residues were detected in the Namoi River between Wee Waa and Walgett and in Pian Creek in January and February 2005…

Source: Mawhinney W (2011) Namoi Water Quality Project 2002-2007 Office of Water NSW

2002-2007: Mooki River at Ruvigne (NSW). Pesticides: Multiple

Dimethoate 0.05ug/L Mooki River at Ruvigne April 2005

Fluometuron most commonly detected Mooki River Ruvigne 0.1-1.6ug/L.

Prometyrn - 8 detections in the Mooki River at Ruvigne between 0.05-0.95ug/L

Metolachlor, 2,4-D, MCPA, Simazine and Pendimethalin also detected.

Source: Mawhinney W (2011) Namoi Water Quality Project 2002-2007 Office of Water NSW

Dimethoate 0.05ug/L Mooki River at Ruvigne April 2005

Fluometuron most commonly detected Mooki River Ruvigne 0.1-1.6ug/L.

Prometyrn – 8 detections in the Mooki River at Ruvigne between 0.05-0.95ug/L

Metolachlor, 2,4-D, MCPA, Simazine and Pendimethalin also detected.

Source: Mawhinney W (2011) Namoi Water Quality Project 2002-2007 Office of Water NSW

2014 July – August: Lockyer Creek at Patrick’s Estate Bridge. Pesticides: Multiple

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July - August 2014

Simazine, Metolachlor, Atrazine, Imidacloprid, Metsulfuron Methyl, pp-DDE, pp-DDD, Endrin, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July – August 2014

Simazine, Metolachlor, Atrazine, Imidacloprid, Metsulfuron Methyl, pp-DDE, pp-DDD, Endrin, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos

2014 July – August. Lockyer Lake (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July - August 2014 Lockyer Lake

DEET, Simazine, Metolachlor, Hexazinone, Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Imidacloprid, Metsulfuron Methyl, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diazinon, pp-DDE, pp-DDD, Lindane, Endrin, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July – August 2014 Lockyer Lake

DEET, Simazine, Metolachlor, Hexazinone, Atrazine, Desethylatrazine, Imidacloprid, Metsulfuron Methyl, Desisopropyl Atrazine, Diazinon, pp-DDE, pp-DDD, Lindane, Endrin, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos

2014 Jul – 2015 Feb: Hinze Dam Offtake. Pesticides: Multiple

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling

Elissa O’Malley and Sarit Kaserzon
10 July 2015
UniQuest Project No: C01604

SEQ Water.

Pesticides detected at Hinze Dam Offtae include:  Atrazine, Simazine, Diuron, Endosulfan Sulphate, Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July - August 2014

DEET, ppDDE, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling

Elissa O’Malley and Sarit Kaserzon
10 July 2015
UniQuest Project No: C01604

SEQ Water.

Pesticides detected at Hinze Dam Offtae include:  Atrazine, Simazine, Diuron, Endosulfan Sulphate, Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July – August 2014

DEET, ppDDE, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane

2014 Jul – 2015 Feb: Hinze Dam Intake. Pesticides: Multiple

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling

Elissa O’Malley and Sarit Kaserzon
10 July 2015
UniQuest Project No: C01604

SEQ Water.

Pesticides detected at Hinze Dam intake include:  Atrazine, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Diuron, Endosulfan Sulphate, Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July - August 2014

DEET, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling

Elissa O’Malley and Sarit Kaserzon
10 July 2015
UniQuest Project No: C01604

SEQ Water.

Pesticides detected at HinzeDam Intake include:  Atrazine, Simazine, Tebuthiuron, Diuron, Endosulfan Sulphate, Chlorpyrifos, Dieldrin

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July – August 2014

DEET, Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane

2014 Jul – 2015 Feb: Little Nering Dam (Qld). Pesticides: Multiple

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling

Elissa O’Malley and Sarit Kaserzon
10 July 2015
UniQuest Project No: C01604

SEQ Water.

Pesticides detected at Little Nering Dam include:  Triclopyr, 2,4-D, Atrazine, Simazine, Diuron, a-Endosulfan, Endosulfan Phosphate, Dieldrin, pp-DDE

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July - August 2014

Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane, Chlorp

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling

Elissa O’Malley and Sarit Kaserzon
10 July 2015
UniQuest Project No: C01604

SEQ Water.

Pesticides detected at Little Nering Dam include:  Triclopyr, 2,4-D, Atrazine, Simazine, Diuron, a-Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulphate, Dieldrin, pp-DDE

Catchment and Drinking Water Quality Micro Pollutant
Monitoring Program – Passive Sampling Report No 1 2014

National research centre for environmental toxicology
Entox is a joint venture between The University of Queensland and Queensland Health

July – August 2014

Dieldrin, Endosulfan Sulphate, Heptachlor Epoxide, cis Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos